1: 

2: 

3: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

4: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}

5: \topmargin 0cm

6: \textwidth 154mm

7: \textheight 230mm

8: \hoffset -1.2cm

9: \voffset -.5cm

10: \topskip 0mm

11: 

12: 

13: \newcommand{\nc}{\newcommand}

14: \nc{\renc}{\renewcommand}

15: 

16: 

17: 

18: % needed packages

19: \usepackage{calc}

20: \usepackage{ifthen}

21: \usepackage{graphicx}

22: \usepackage{epsfig}

23: \usepackage{miniplot}

24: 

25: % supplementary packages

26: \usepackage{wrapfig}

27: \usepackage{subfigure}

28: \usepackage{rotfloat}

29: 

30: %\usepackage{showkeys}

31: 

32: 

33: \usepackage{epsfig}

34: \usepackage{graphicx}

35: \usepackage{epsf}

36: %\usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}

37: 

38: 

39: 

40: 

41: % ***********************************************************

42: % ********************** latexcom.tex ***********************

43: % ***********************************************************

44: %

45: % ============================ Definitions ===================

46: %

47: 

48: 

49: \nc{\half}{{\textstyle{1\over2}}}

50: \nc{\etal}{\mbox{\it et al. }}

51: \nc{\ie}{{\it i.e.}}

52: \nc{\eg}{{\it e.g.}}

53: 

54: \renc{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}

55: \nc{\capt}[1]{{\bf Figure.} {\small\sl #1}}

56: 

57: % --- For equation numbering like (sec.eq) ---

58: %\nc{\seqnoll}{\setcounter{equation}{0}}

59: %\renc{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

60: %\renc{\Section}[2]{\bc\section{\sc #2}\label{#1}\seqnoll\ec}

61: 

62: 

63: 

64: 

65: %-- Appendix Equation Numbering -- 

66: 

67: 

68: 

69: % \renewcommand{\theequation}{A-\arabic{equation}}

70:  % redefine the command that creates the equation no.

71:  % \setcounter{equation}{0} 

72: % reset counter 

73: 

74: 

75: 

76: \nc{\eqs}[2]{\mbox{Eqs.~(\ref{#1},\,\ref{#2})}}

77: \nc{\eq}[1]{\mbox{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}}

78: 

79: 

80: \nc{\figs}[2]{\mbox{Figs.~(\ref{#1},\,\ref{#2})}}

81: \nc{\fig}[1]{\mbox{Fig~.(\ref{#1})}}

82: 

83: \def\jump{\vskip 1truecm}

84: 

85: %

86: \nc{\tag}[1]{\label{#1} \marginpar{{\footnotesize #1}}}

87: \nc{\mtag}[1]{\label{#1} \mbox{\marginpar{{\footnotesize #1}}}}

88: %............................................................

89: %Macros for draft version/final version

90: \renc{\baselinestretch}{1.5}

91: %\pagestyle{headings}

92: \jot 1ex

93: %

94: \newlength{\overeqskip}

95: \newlength{\undereqskip}

96: \setlength{\overeqskip}{\jot}

97: \setlength{\undereqskip}{\jot}

98: %

99: %DRAFT MODE: Undo % on the following lines

100: %\nc{\be}[1]{{\marginpar{{\footnotesize #1}}}

101: %       \vspace{\overeqskip}\begin{equation} \mbox{$\label{#1}$}}

102: %\nc{\bea}[1]{{\marginpar{{\footnotesize #1}}}

103: %       \vspace{\overeqskip}\begin{eqnarray} \mbox{$\label{#1}$}}

104: %\nc{\Section}[2]{{\marginpar{{\footnotesize #1}}}

105: %       \section{#2}\label{#1}}

106: %\nc{\Bibitem}[1]{\bibitem{#1}{\marginpar{{\footnotesize #1}}}}

107: %\nc{\Label}[1]{\label{#1}{\marginpar{{\footnotesize #1}}}}

108: %FINAL MODE: Undo % on the following lines

109: \nc{\be}[1]{\begin{equation} \mbox{$\label{#1}$}}

110: \nc{\bea}[1]{\begin{eqnarray} \mbox{$\label{#1}$}}

111: \nc{\Section}[2]{\section{#2}\label{#1}}

112: \nc{\Bibitem}[1]{\bibitem{#1}}

113: \nc{\Label}[1]{\label{#1}}

114: 

115: \nc{\bep}[1]{\begin{equation} \mbox{$A.\label{#1}$}}

116: 

117: 

118: %..............................................................

119: 

120: \nc{\eea}{\vspace{\undereqskip}\end{eqnarray}}

121: \nc{\ee}{\vspace{\undereqskip}\end{equation}}

122: \nc{\bdm}{\begin{displaymath}}

123: \nc{\edm}{\end{displaymath}}

124: \nc{\dpsty}{\displaystyle}

125: \nc{\bc}{\begin{center}}

126: \nc{\ec}{\end{center}}

127: \nc{\ba}{\begin{array}}

128: \nc{\ea}{\end{array}}

129: \nc{\bab}{\begin{abstract}}

130: \nc{\eab}{\end{abstract}}

131: \nc{\btab}{\begin{tabular}}

132: \nc{\etab}{\end{tabular}}

133: \nc{\bit}{\begin{itemize}}

134: \nc{\eit}{\end{itemize}}

135: \nc{\ben}{\begin{enumerate}}

136: \nc{\een}{\end{enumerate}}

137: \nc{\bfig}{\begin{figure}}

138: \nc{\efig}{\end{figure}}

139: %

140: %------------------- Math commands, general --------------------

141: %

142: \nc{\arreq}{&\!=\!&}

143: \nc{\arrmi}{&\!-\!&}

144: \nc{\arrpl}{&\!+\!&}

145: \nc{\arrap}{&\!\!\!\approx\!\!\!&}

146: \nc{\non}{\nonumber\\*}

147: \nc{\align}{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!&&}

148: 

149: 

150: \def\lsim{\; \raise0.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-0.75em

151:       \raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\; }

152: \def\gsim{\; \raise0.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-0.75em

153:       \raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\; }

154: \nc{\DOT}{\hspace{-0.08in}{\bf .}\hspace{0.1in}}

155: \nc{\Laada}{\hbox {$\sqcap$ \kern -1em $\sqcup$}}

156: \nc\loota{{\scriptstyle\sqcap\kern-0.55em\hbox{$\scriptstyle\sqcup$}}}

157: \nc\Loota{{\sqcap\kern-0.65em\hbox{$\sqcup$}}}

158: \nc\laada{\Loota}

159: \nc{\qed}{\hskip 3em \hbox{\BOX} \vskip 2ex}

160: \def\Re{{\rm Re}\hskip2pt}

161: \def\Im{{\rm Im}\hskip2pt}

162: \nc{\real}{{\rm I \! R}}

163: \nc{\Z}{{\sf Z \!\!\! Z}}

164: \nc{\complex}{{\rm C\!\!\! {\sf I}\,\,}}

165: \def\bigid{\leavevmode\hbox{\small1\kern-3.8pt\normalsize1}}

166: \def\id{\leavevmode\hbox{\small1\kern-3.3pt\normalsize1}}

167: %\nc{\id}{{\bf 1}}

168: %\nc{\id}{{1\!\!1}}

169: \nc{\slask}{\!\!\!/}

170: \nc{\bis}{{\prime\prime}}

171: \nc{\pa}{\partial}

172: \nc{\na}{\nabla}

173: \nc{\ra}{\rangle}

174: \nc{\la}{\langle}

175: \nc{\goto}{\rightarrow}

176: \nc{\swap}{\leftrightarrow}

177: 

178: \nc{\EE}[1]{ \mbox{$\cdot10^{#1}$} }

179: \nc{\abs}[1]{\left|#1\right|}

180: \nc{\at}[2]{\left.#1\right|_{#2}}

181: \nc{\norm}[1]{\|#1\|}

182: \nc{\abscut}[2]{\Abs{#1}_{\scriptscriptstyle#2}}

183: \nc{\vek}[1]{{\rm\bf #1}}

184: \nc{\integral}[2]{\int\limits_{#1}^{#2}}

185: \nc{\inv}[1]{\frac{1}{#1}}

186: \nc{\dd}[2]{{{\partial #1}\over{\partial #2}}}

187: \nc{\ddd}[2]{{{{\partial}^2 #1}\over{\partial {#2}^2}}}

188: \nc{\dddd}[3]{{{{\partial}^2 #1}\over

189:         {\partial #2 \partial #3}}}

190: \nc{\dder}[2]{{{d #1}\over{d #2}}}

191: \nc{\ddder}[2]{{{d^2 #1}\over{d {#2}^2}}}

192: \nc{\dddder}[3]{{d^2 #1}\over

193:         {d #2 d #3}}

194: \nc{\dx}[1]{d\,^{#1}x}

195: \nc{\dy}[1]{d\,^{#1}y}

196: \nc{\dz}[1]{d\,^{#1}z}

197: \nc{\dl}[1]{\frac{d\,^{#1}l}{(2\pi)^{#1}}}

198: \nc{\dk}[1]{\frac{d\,^{#1}k}{(2\pi)^{#1}}}

199: \nc{\dq}[1]{\frac{d\,^{#1}q}{(2\pi)^{#1}}}

200: 

201: %

202: \nc{\cc}{\mbox{$c.c.$ }}

203: \nc{\hc}{\mbox{$h.c.$ }}

204: \nc{\cf}{cf.\ }

205: \nc{\erfc}{{\rm erfc}}

206: \nc{\Tr}{{\rm Tr\,}}

207: \nc{\tr}{{\rm tr\,}}

208: \nc{\pol}{{\rm pol}}

209: \nc{\sign}{{\rm sign}}

210: \nc{\bfT}{{\bf T }}

211: \def\eV{{\rm\ eV}}

212: \def\GeV{{\rm\ GeV}}

213: \def\MeV{{\rm\ MeV}}

214: \def\keV{{\rm\ keV}}

215: \def\TeV{{\rm\ TeV}}

216: 

217: \nc{\cA}{{\cal A}}

218: \nc{\cB}{{\cal B}}

219: \nc{\cD}{{\cal D}}

220: \nc{\cE}{{\cal E}}

221: \nc{\cG}{{\cal G}}

222: \nc{\cH}{{\cal H}}

223: \nc{\cL}{{\cal L}}

224: \nc{\cO}{{\cal O}}

225: \nc{\cT}{{\cal T}}

226: \nc{\cN}{{\cal N}}

227: %

228: %----------------------Math commands, almost general -------------

229: \nc{\rvac}[1]{|{\cal O}#1\rangle}

230: \nc{\lvac}[1]{\langle{\cal O}#1|}

231: \nc{\rvacb}[1]{|{\cal O}_\beta #1\rangle}

232: \nc{\lvacb}[1]{\langle{\cal O}_\beta #1 |}

233: \nc{\bb}{\bar{\beta}}

234: \nc{\bt}{\tilde{\beta}}

235: \nc{\ctH}{\tilde{\cal H}}

236: \nc{\chH}{\hat{\cal H}}

237: %

238: %---------------------- swedish characters ---------------------------

239: \nc{\1}{\aa}

240: \nc{\2}{\"{a}}

241: \nc{\3}{\"{o}}

242: \nc{\4}{\AA}

243: \nc{\5}{\"{A}}

244: \nc{\6}{\"{O}}

245: %

246: %---------------------- greek characters ---------------------------

247: \nc{\al}{\alpha}

248: \nc{\g}{\gamma}

249: \nc{\Del}{\Delta}

250: \nc{\e}{\epsilon}

251: \nc{\eps}{\epsilon}

252: \nc{\lam}{\lambda}

253: \nc{\om}{\omega}

254: \nc{\Om}{\Omega}

255: \nc{\ve}{\varepsilon}

256: \nc{\mn}{{\mu\nu}}

257: \nc{\kap}{\kappa}

258: \nc{\vp}{\varphi}

259: 

260: %

261: %---------------------------- Journals -------------------------

262: %

263: \nc{\advp}[3]{{\it  Adv.\ in\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

264: \nc{\annp}[3]{{\it  Ann.\ Phys.\ (N.Y.)\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

265: \nc{\apl}[3]{{\it  Appl. Phys. Lett. }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

266: \nc{\apj}[3]{{\it  Ap.\ J.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

267: \nc{\apjl}[3]{{\it  Ap.\ J.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

268: \nc{\app}[3]{{\it Astropart.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

269: \nc{\cmp}[3]{{\it  Comm.\ Math.\ Phys.\ }{{ \bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

270: \nc{\cqg}[3]{{\it  Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

271: \nc{\epl}[3]{{\it  Europhys.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

272: \nc{\ijmp}[3]{{\it Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

273: \nc{\ijtp}[3]{{\it Int.\ J.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

274: \nc{\jcap}[3]{{\it JCAP }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

275: \nc{\jhep}[3]{{\it JHEP }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

276: \nc{\jmp}[3]{{\it  J.\ Math.\ Phys.\ }{{ \bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

277: \nc{\jpa}[3]{{\it  J.\ Phys.\ A\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

278: \nc{\jpc}[3]{{\it  J.\ Phys.\ C\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

279: \nc{\jap}[3]{{\it J.\ Appl.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

280: \nc{\jpsj}[3]{{\it J.\ Phys.\ Soc.\ Japan\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

281: \nc{\lmp}[3]{{\it Lett.\ Math.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

282: \nc{\mpl}[3]{{\it  Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

283: \nc{\ncim}[3]{{\it  Nuov.\ Cim.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

284: \nc{\np}[3]{{\it  Nucl.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

285: \nc{\npps}[3]{{\it  Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

286: \nc{\pr}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Rev.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

287: \nc{\pra}[3]{{\it  Phys.\ Rev.\ A\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

288: \nc{\prb}[3]{{\it  Phys.\ Rev.\ B\ }{{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}}

289: \nc{\prc}[3]{{\it  Phys.\ Rev.\ C\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

290: \nc{\prd}[3]{{\it  Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

291: \nc{\prl}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

292: \nc{\pl}[3]{{\it  Phys.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

293: \nc{\prep}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Rep.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

294: \nc{\prsl}[3]{{\it Proc.\ R.\ Soc.\ London\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

295: \nc{\ptp}[3]{{\it  Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

296: \nc{\ptps}[3]{{\it  Prog\ Theor.\ Phys.\ suppl.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

297: \nc{\physa}[3]{{\it  Physica\ A\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

298: \nc{\physb}[3]{{\it  Physica\ B\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

299: \nc{\phys}[3]{{\it Physica\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

300: \nc{\rmp}[3]{{\it  Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

301: \nc{\rpp}[3]{{\it Rep.\ Prog.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

302: \nc{\sjnp}[3]{{\it Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

303: \nc{\spjetp}[3]{{\it Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

304: \nc{\yf}[3]{{\it Yad.\ Fiz.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

305: \nc{\zetp}[3]{{\it Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\  }{{\bf #1}  {(#2)} {#3}}}

306: \nc{\zp}[3]{{\it Z.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}

307: \nc{\ibid}[3]{{\sl ibid.\ }{{\bf #1} {#2} {#3}}}

308: %

309: %

310: % *****************************************************************

311: % ****************** end of latexcom.tex **************************

312: % *****************************************************************

313: %

314: % ------------------------  local commands  -----------------------

315: \nc{\rf}[1]{(\ref{#1})}

316: \nc{\nn}{\nonumber \\*}

317: \nc{\bfB}{\bf{B}}

318: \nc{\bfv}{\bf{v}}

319: \nc{\bfx}{\bf{x}}

320: \nc{\bfy}{\bf{y}}

321: \nc{\vx}{\vec{x}}

322: \nc{\vy}{\vec{y}}

323: \nc{\oB}{\overline{B}}

324: \nc{\oI}{\overline{I}}

325: \nc{\oR}{\overline{R}}

326: \nc{\rar}{\rightarrow}

327: \nc{\ti}{\times}

328: \nc{\slsh}{\hskip-5pt/}

329: \nc{\sm}{Standard~Model~}

330: \nc{\MP}{M_{\rm Pl}}

331: \nc{\tp}{t_{\rm Pl}}

332: \nc{\ave}{\bar{E}}

333: \def\mes#1{{d^3{#1}\over (2\pi )^3}}

334: %\renc{\dk}{{d^3k\over (2\pi)^3 2\omega_k}}

335: \def\sepand{\rule{14cm}{0pt}\and}

336: \nc{\eff}{{\rm eff}}

337: \nc{\kk}{\vek{k}}

338: \nc{\pp}{{\rm p}}

339: \nc{\ga}{g_{a\gamma}}

340: \nc{\vv}{\\}

341: \nc{\eee}{{\bf E}}

342: \nc{\bbb}{{\bf B}}

343: \nc{\qcd}{T_{\rm QCD}}

344: \nc{\G}{\rm \ G}

345: \def\vec#1{{\bf #1}}

346: %\batchmode

347: 

348: 

349: %\newcounter{eqnn} \newcounter{eqs} \newcounter{secn}

350: %\newcounter{subn}

351: %\def\sec{\addtocounter{secn}{1}\setcounter{subn}{0}

352: %\setcounter{eqs}{0}$\bf \thesecn $}

353: %\def\sub{\addtocounter{subn}{1}  $\bf \thesecn.\thesubn $}

354: %\def\eqn{\addtocounter{eqs}{1}\;\;\;(\thesecn.\theeqs)}

355: %\def\eq{\addtocounter{eqnn}{1}\;\;\;(\theeqnn)} 

356: \def\lae{\;^{<}_{\sim} \;} \def\gae{\; ^{>}_{\sim} \;} 

357: %\def\udd{u^{c}d^{c}d^{c}}  \def\ffr{\phi_{R}}

358: %\def\sr{\psi_{R}} \def\ffi{\phi_{I}} \def\si{\psi_{I}}

359: %\def\dfr{\dot{\phi}_{R}} \def\dsr{\dot{\psi}_{R}}

360: %\def\dfi{\dot{\phi}_{I}} \def\dsi{\dot{\psi}_{I}}

361: %\def\ddfr{\ddot{\phi}_{R}} \def\ddsr{\ddot{\psi}_{R}}

362: %\def\ddfi{\ddot{\phi}_{I}} \def\ddsi{\ddot{\psi}_{I}}

363: %\def\tt{\tilde{\theta}}

364: \def\tu{\tilde{\mu}}

365: \def\te{\tilde{\epsilon}}

366: \def\rd{\dot{R}}

367: \def\tee{\tilde{E}}

368: 

369: \def\udd{u^{c}d^{c}d^{c}}

370: 

371: \def\hl{H_{u}L}

372: \def\uude{u^{c}u^{c}d^{c}e^{c}}

373: \def\ell{e^{c}LL}

374: %\def\om{\omega}

375: \def\snu{\tilde{\nu}}

376: \begin{document}

377: 

378: {\title{\vskip-2truecm{\hfill {{\small \\

379: 	\hfill \\

380: 	}}\vskip 1truecm}

381: {\LARGE Simulations of the End of Supersymmetric Hybrid Inflation

382:  and Non-Topological Soliton Formation}}

383: \vspace{1cm}

384: {\author{

385: {\sc  Matt Broadhead$^{1}$ and John McDonald$^{2}$ \vspace{0.5cm}}\\

386: {\sl\small Theoretical Physics Division,}\\

387: {\sl\small Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool,

388: Liverpool L69 3BX, England $^{1}$}

389: \vspace{0.5cm} 

390: \\ {\sl\small Dept. of Physics, University of Lancaster,

391: Lancaster LA1 4YB, England $^{2}$} \vspace{0.5cm}

392: }

393: 

394: 

395: 

396: \maketitle

397: %\vspace{1cm}

398: %\newpage

399: \begin{abstract}

400: \noindent

401:         

402:           We present two- and three-dimensional

403: simulations of the growth of quantum

404: fluctuations of the scalar fields in supersymmetric hybrid inflation

405: models. For a natural range of couplings, sub-horizon quantum fluctuations undergo rapid

406: growth due to scalar field dynamics, resulting in the

407: formation of quasi-stable non-topological solitons (inflaton condensate lumps)

408: which dominate the post-inflation era.

409: 

410: 

411: \end{abstract}

412: \vfil

413: \footnoterule

414: {\small $^1$mattb@amtp.liv.ac.uk}

415: {\small $^2$j.mcdonald@lancaster.ac.uk}

416: 

417: 

418: %

419: \thispagestyle{empty}

420: \newpage

421: \setcounter{page}{1}

422: 

423: 

424: 

425: \section{Introduction}

426: 

427:           Hybrid inflation models \cite{hi} are a promising class of model,   

428: having a classically flat inflaton potential without requiring fine-tuning of

429: coupling constants. 

430: In order to control radiative corrections to the inflaton potential, supersymmetric (SUSY) 

431: hybrid inflation models are favoured \cite{dti,fti,lr}. D-term hybrid inflation

432: models are of particular interest, since they naturally account for the absence of order $H^2$

433: corrections to the inflaton mass squared term coming from non-renormalisable 

434: interactions with non-zero F-terms. 

435: However, in spite of requiring fine-tuning to eliminate order $H^2$ corrections, 

436: several F-term hybrid inflation models have also been 

437: proposed. In light of recent reconsideration of the issue of fine-tuning 

438: in SUSY models and the idea of 'split supersymmetry' \cite{ss}, such models may 

439: still play an important role. 

440: 

441:       An important issue is the process by which inflation ends and the 

442: Universe reheats. It is known that the end of inflation and reheating in hybrid inflation 

443: is dominated by the non-linear dynamics of the scalar fields responsible for inflation 

444: \cite{tp1,tp2,icf}. Sub-horizon 

445: quantum fluctuations are rapidly amplified by scalar field dynamics once the symmetry

446: breaking transition ending inflation occurs, becoming effectively classical modes \cite{tp1,tp2}.

447: The energy density at the end of inflation 

448: rapidly becomes dominated by spatial fluctuations of the inflaton.  

449: For the case of D-term hybrid inflation, the rapid growth of the perturbations

450: is expected to dominate the energy density for $\lambda \gae 0.1g$ 

451: \cite{mb1}.  Similar dynamics may be observed in models of tachyonic inflation \cite{tachy}.

452: \footnote{For related analyses of tachyonic preheating see \cite{add}.}

453: 

454:        What is the subsequent evolution of this inhomogeneous

455: scalar field? There are two possible outcomes. The growth 

456: of the spatial perturbations of the inflaton 

457: could result in scalar field waves which scatter from each

458: other, dispersing the energy of the initially highly inhomogeneous state \cite{tp1,tp2}. 

459: Alternatively, the growth of the spatial perturbations might continue, resulting

460: in the formation of non-topological solitons corresponding to

461: inflaton breathers \cite{icf} (also known as oscillons \cite{osc}). 

462: This was first suggested in an alternative view of the end of

463:  hybrid inflation, inflaton condensate fragmentation \cite{icf}, which 

464: was based upon perturbing a homogeneous inflaton condensate assumed

465:  to form immediately after the end of hybrid inflation.  In \cite{icf} the 

466: non-topological solitons were called

467: inflaton condensate lumps. Their existence can be understood as the result of 

468: an effective attractive interaction between the inflaton scalars due to 

469: the symmetry breaking field \cite{icf}. 

470: Although the assumption of a homogeneous inflaton condensate is violated

471: by the rapid growth of quantum fluctuations within a few coherent oscillation periods,

472: the possibility that spatial perturbations could form non-topological solitons remains.

473: Such objects were subsequently observed in a

474: numerical simulation of the phase transition in hybrid inflation \cite{cpr}.

475: Oscillons such as inflaton condensate lumps are known to be quasi-stable,

476: having a lifetime much longer than the 

477: period of the inflaton coherent oscillations \cite{osc}. They decay by a slow 

478: radiation of scalar field waves. For the case of the effective theory associated with 

479: SUSY hybrid inflation models, the lifetime of the inflaton condensate lumps 

480: is $10^{3}-10^{4}$ times the oscillation period \cite{iball}. 

481: 

482: 

483:               The possibility of non-topological soliton formation at the end of 

484: SUSY hybrid inflation is strengthened by the existence of stable Q-ball solutions of the

485: scalar field equations of D- and F-term inflation \cite{qballs}.

486: These are two-field Q-ball solutions, composed of a complex inflaton

487: field and a real symmetry breaking field. They carry a 

488: conserved global charge associated with the inflaton.  As a result, it is possible that

489: SUSY hybrid inflation could end by initially forming neutral non-topological solitons 

490: which subsequently decay to pairs of stable Q-balls of opposite global charge.

491: The formation of neutral condensate lumps

492: which decay to Q-ball pairs has been observed numerically 

493: in the context of Affleck-Dine condensates along MSSM flat directions \cite{kk}. 

494: (See also \cite{enq}.) It occurs because the initially neutral condensate lumps

495: are unstable with respect to growth of perturbations of the phase of the complex

496: scalar field, resulting in the formation of an energetically preferred state consisting of 

497: a stable Q-ball, anti-Q-ball pair. This is likely to

498: be a generic feature of the evolution of quasi-stable neutral

499: condensate lumps whenever a related stable Q-ball solution exists. 

500: 

501: 

502:        Thus there exists the possibility that the post-inflation era of SUSY hybrid inflation 

503: models will be dominated by Q-balls containing most of the energy of the Universe.

504: Whether this happens depends upon whether the inhomogeneous state of the Universe 

505: immediately following inflation evolves into quasi-stable neutral condensate lumps or

506: simply disperses as scalar field waves. In this paper we report the results of   

507: a numerical simulation of the growth and evolution of quantum 

508: fluctuations of the scalar fields in SUSY hybrid inflation models. 

509: The growth of quantum fluctuations into classical fluctuations is studied using the

510: equivalent classical stochastic field method \cite{ps}, which replaces

511: the quantum field theory by an equivalent classical field theory with a classical 

512: probability distribution for the initial conditions. We focus on the case of D-term 

513: inflation. The results for F-term inflation are likely to be similar to those of

514: D-term inflation for a particular choice of the D-term inflation model couplings. 

515: 

516: 

517:       The paper is organised as follows. In Section 2 we review SUSY hybrid inflation models

518: and the scalar field equations. In Section 3 we discuss the initial conditions and details of the 

519: numerical simulation. In Section 4 we present the results of 2-D and 3-D simulations of the

520: evolution of the scalar fields. 

521: In Section 5 we discuss a scaling property of the D-term inflation field equations

522: and the dependence of our numerical results on the coupling constants. 

523: In Section 6 we compare our results with earlier numerical simulations. 

524: In Section 7 we present our conclusions. 

525: In the Appendix we review the equivalent classical stochastic field method.  

526: 

527: 

528: \section{SUSY Hybrid Inflation Models}

529: 

530: 

531: 

532:      The minimal D-term inflation model is described by the superpotential \cite{dti}

533: \be{w1} W = \lambda S \Phi_{+} \Phi_{-}    ~,\ee

534: where $S$ is the inflaton, $\Phi_{\pm}$ are fields with charges $\pm 1$ with respect to a Fayet-Iliopoulos 

535: $U(1)_{FI}$ gauge symmetry, $\xi > 0$ is the Fayet-Iliopoulos term ($\xi^{1/2} = 8.5 \times 10^{15} \GeV$ \cite{lr}) 

536: and $g$ is the $U(1)_{FI}$ gauge coupling. 

537: The scalar potential is given by 

538: \be{w2} V = \lambda^{2}|S|^{2}\left(|\Phi_{+}|^{2} + |\Phi_{-}|^{2}\right) 

539: + \lambda^{2} |\Phi_{+}|^{2} |\Phi_{-}|^{2} + \frac{g^{2}}{2} \left(|\Phi_{+}|^{2}

540: - |\Phi_{-}|^{2} + \xi\right)^{2}    ~.\ee

541: Once $|S| < s_{c}/\sqrt{2} = g \xi^{1/2}/\lambda$, $\Phi_{-}$ develops a non-zero expectation value,

542: breaking the $U(1)_{FI}$ symmetry and ending inflation.      

543: 

544:     The simplest F-term inflation model is described by the superpotential \cite{fti}

545: \be{w3} W = \frac{\eta}{2}S \left(\Phi^{2} - \mu^{2}\right)       ~,\ee

546: where $S$ is the inflaton and $\Phi$ is the field 

547: which terminates inflation. $\mu^{2}$ and $\eta$ may be chosen 

548: real and positive. The scalar potential is then 

549: \be{w4} V = \eta^{2} |S|^{2} |\Phi|^{2} + \frac{\eta^{2}}{4} |\Phi^{2} - \mu^{2}|^{2}

550: ~.\ee

551: For the case of real scalar fields, the F-term scalar field equations become equivalent to the

552: D-term equations in the limit where $\Phi_{+} = 0$ and $\lambda = \sqrt{2} g$. 

553: 

554: 

555:     The superpotentials \eq{w1} and \eq{w3} are invariant with respect to an

556: R-symmetry under which only $S$ transforms, 

557: which manifests itself as a global $U(1)$ symmetry of the scalar potential, $S \rightarrow e^{i \alpha}S$. 

558: It is this symmetry which is responsible for the conserved global charge of the 

559: hybrid inflation Q-balls \cite{qballs}.

560: 

561:        In the following we will focus on the minimal D-term inflation model. We expect the end of inflation 

562: in F-term inflation models to be similar to D-term inflation in the case $\lambda = \sqrt{2}g$,

563: up to the effect of $U(1)_{FI}$ symmetry breaking and cosmic string formation, which our results indicate are

564: of secondary importance to the evolution of the energy density.  

565: During inflation, the inflaton evolves due to the 1-loop effective potential, 

566: $\Delta V(|S|,|\Phi_{-}|)$ \footnote{

567: $\Delta V(|S|,|\Phi_{-}|)$, has been calculated in \cite{mb1}, where $\Delta V$ 

568: is given for $s \equiv \sqrt{2} Re(S)$ and $\phi_{-} \equiv \sqrt{2} Re{\Phi_{-}}$. The complex version

569: is given by replacing $s$, $\phi_{-}$ by $\sqrt{2}|S|$, $\sqrt{2}|\Phi_{-}|$ in $\Delta V(s,\phi_{-})$.}.    

570: This determines its rate of rolling at the end of inflation, an important initial condition 

571: for the subsequent non-linear growth of the field perturbations. 

572: We assume throughout that $\Phi_{+} = 0$. This is justified since the 

573: $\Phi_{+}$ field has a large positive mass squared both during and after inflation. 

574: The equations of motion are then 

575: \be{e7} \ddot{S} + 3 H \dot{S} - \frac{\vec{\nabla}^{2}}{a^{2}}S    

576: = -\lambda^{2} |\Phi_{-}|^{2}S

577: - \frac{\partial \Delta V}{\partial S^{\dagger}}      ~,\ee

578: and

579: \be{e8} \ddot{\Phi}_{-} + 3 H \dot{\Phi}_{-} - \frac{\vec{\nabla}^{2}}{a^{2}}\Phi_{-}    

580: = -\lambda^{2} |S|^{2}\Phi_{-} + g^{2}\left(\xi - |\Phi_{-}|^{2} \right)

581: \Phi_{-} - \frac{\partial \Delta V}{\partial \Phi_{-}^{\dagger}}      ~.\ee

582: 

583: 

584: \section{Initial Conditions and Numerical Methods}

585: 

586: 

587:           The mechanism behind the formation of spatial inhomogeneities of the 

588: inflaton field at the end of D-term hybrid inflation is the 

589: dynamical amplification of sub-horizon quantum fluctuations of the scalar fields. In

590: the Appendix we review the formation of classical scalar field perturbations from  

591: dynamical amplification of quantum fluctuations. 

592: The process can be summarised as follows. At the end of hybrid inflation, the symmetry breaking

593: transition results in the formation of an effectively tachyonic scalar potential for the inflaton. 

594: Rapid growth of the quantum modes in this potential results in semi-classical quantum fluctuations. 

595: If the quantum fluctuations grow to become semi-classical whilst the field equations are

596: linear in the inflaton, then the quantum field theory becomes equivalent to solving the 

597: classical field equations with a classical probability distribution for the initial conditions, 

598: given by the Wigner function of the field modes

599: and their conjugate momenta in the semi-classical limit. The subsequent 

600: evolution of the scalar field fluctuations can then be studied by 

601: solving the {\it classical} scalar field equations with stochastic initial conditions 

602: (equivalent classical stochastic field).  In this way

603:  we can simulate the growth of sub-horizon quantum fluctuations

604:  at the end of hybrid inflation. 

605: 

606: 

607: \subsection{Initial Conditions}

608: 

609: 

610:       The initial conditions for the simulation are obtained from

611: the values of $\phi(t)$ and $\dot{\phi}(t)$

612: for the homogeneous zero modes and values of the equivalent  classical

613: momentum modes $q(\vec{k},t)$

614: and $p(\vec{k},t)$. (Here $\phi$ represents any real scalar field.)  

615: The classical initial conditions are applied at the end of hybrid inflation, 

616: $|S|  =  s_{c}/\sqrt{2}$, at which time the $S$ and $\Phi_{-}$ fields are massless. 

617: 

618:          

619: The fields are studied in a comoving box of volume $V = L^3$ with periodic boundary conditions, 

620: with the classical field $\phi$ and its derivative, $\dot{\phi} $, being expanded in terms of modes as  

621: \be{fe3}  \phi(\vec{x}, t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}} \sum q(\vec{k},t) e^{i \vec{k}.\vec{x}}   ~\ee

622: and

623: \be{fe4}  \dot{\phi}(\vec{x}, t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}} \sum p(\vec{k},t) e^{i \vec{k}.\vec{x}}   ~,\ee

624: where $\vec{k} = \Delta k (\alpha,\beta,\gamma)$ with integer $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$  

625: and $\Delta k = 2 \pi/L$.  

626: 

627:     For a massless scalar field in de Sitter space, the initial condition for non-zero modes $q(\vec{k},t)$

628: at $t=0$ corresponds to a complex Gaussian distribution for $|q(\vec{k},0)|$ with root mean

629: squared (r.m.s.) value given by (Appendix) \cite{ps}   

630: \be{fe5} |q(\vec{k}, 0)|_{rms} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 k}}\left(1 + \frac{1}{k^{2} \eta^{2}}\right)^{1/2}     ~,\ee

631: and a random phase factor $e^{i \delta_{\vec{k}}}$ for each $\vec{k}$. 

632: Here $\eta$ is the conformal time at the end of inflation ($\eta = -H^{-1}$) and $k = |\vec{k}|$. 

633: Since $\phi(\vec{x}, t)$ is a real scalar field, the modes and phase satisfy 

634: $q(-\vec{k}, t) = q^{\dagger}(\vec{k}, t)$

635: and $\delta_{-\vec{k}} = - \delta_{\vec{k}}$. The 

636: initial value of the mode function $p(\vec{k},t)$ has an r.m.s. magnitude 

637: \be{fe6} |p(\vec{k}, 0)|_{rms} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 k}|\eta|}\left(1 + \frac{1}{k^{2} 

638: \eta^{2}}\right)^{-1/2}       ~.\ee

639: For the sub-horizon modes of interest, $|k\eta| \equiv |k/H| \gg 1$.

640: In this case, from \eq{fe5} and \eq{fe6}, 

641: initially $|p(\vec{k}, 0)| \equiv |\dot{q}(\vec{k},0)|  \approx H |q(\vec{k},0)|$. 

642: Since the mode $q(\vec{k},t)$, corresponding to a wavefunction of wavenumber $\vec{k}$, 

643: will satisfy $\dot{q}(\vec{k},t) \approx k q(\vec{k},t) \gg H |q(\vec{k},0)|$

644:  at subsequent times, 

645: the initial value of $\dot{q}(\vec{k},t)$ from \eq{fe6} will have a negligible effect. 

646: 

647:         In our simulations we modelled the initial mode function $q(\vec{k},0)$ by

648: the r.m.s. value of $|q(\vec{k},0)|$ multiplied by a random complex phase for each $\vec{k}$.

649: To simulate the evolution of the 

650: scalar field we considered a spatial lattice with $\vec{x} = \Delta x (i,j,k)$ for 

651: integer $i,j,k$.  The sum over non-zero modes in \eq{fe3} then gives the 

652: initial spatial perturbation on the lattice,  

653: \be{fe7}  \delta \phi(\vec{x}, 0)  = 

654: \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}} \sum \frac{8}{\sqrt{2 k_{\alpha \beta \gamma}}} 

655: \cos\left( \Delta k \Delta x \alpha i + \theta_{\alpha} \right) 

656: \cos\left( \Delta k \Delta x \beta j + \theta_{\beta} \right)

657: \cos\left( \Delta k \Delta x \gamma k + \theta_{\gamma} \right)   ~,\ee

658: where $k_{\alpha\beta\gamma} = \Delta k(\alpha^{2}+\beta^{2}+\gamma^{2})^{1/2}$ and 

659: we have substituted $\delta_{\vec{k}} \rightarrow \theta_{\alpha}

660:  + \theta_{\beta} + \theta_{\gamma}$, 

661: where $\theta_{\alpha,\beta,\gamma}$ are random phases. 

662: We then solved the scalar field equations numerically on the lattice using

663: \eq{fe7} and $\delta \dot{\phi}(\vec{x},0) = 0$ for each of the real scalar fields.

664:  

665: 

666:      Only those modes which are amplified,

667: such that their occupation number becomes large, can be considered classical.  

668: Modes which are not amplified remain 

669: as quantum fluctuations. In simulations the quantum fluctuations

670: must be regularised, since summing over large $k$ modes will result in 

671: a large initial amplitude for the spatial perturbations, 

672: causing the assumption of linearity of the field equations 

673: to break down. We introduce a cut-off $\Lambda$ at a value  

674: given by the mass of the inflaton field in vacuum, $\Lambda = m_{S} = \lambda \xi^{1/2}$. 

675: This should be close to the largest value of $k$ 

676: for which modes can grow dynamically, $k_{max}$, although the exact

677: value of $k_{max}$ cannot be known a priori since it is determined by the full scalar field dynamics. 

678:  

679: 

680: 

681: 

682: 

683: 

684: 

685: \section{Results of Numerical Simulations} 

686: 

687: 

688:      In order to investigate the formation of neutral inflaton

689: condensate lumps, we have studied a model with a real inflaton field, $s \equiv \sqrt{2}Re(S)$. 

690: We considered numerical simulations in two- and three-dimensions, 

691: using a staggered leapfrog routine and the initial conditions for quantum

692: fluctuations  \eq{fe7}  applied to $s$, $\phi_{-\;1}$ and $\phi_{-\;2}$ at $s = s_{c}$, 

693: where $\Phi_{-} = (\phi_{-\;1} + i \phi_{-\;2})/\sqrt{2}$. 

694: 

695: 

696:       In Figure 1, we show the results for the growth of the energy density in 

697: a 2-D simulation using a $200 \times 200$ lattice, for the case $\lambda = 0.14$ and $g=1$, for four

698: different times. We compare the energy density $\rho$ with the mean energy density averaged

699:  over the lattice, $\overline{\rho}$. 

700: The time from the first to last figure 

701: corresponds to five $S$ coherent oscillation periods, $\tau_{S}$,

702: where $\tau_{S} = 2 \pi m_{S}^{-1}$. 

703: The growth of the energy density perturbations to

704: non-linearity occurs within the first two coherent oscillation periods. We find that roughly circular 

705: lumps of energy density form, which are stable over the duration of the simulation.   

706: Essentially all of the energy density becomes concentrated in the 

707: lumps. We also observe some condensate lumps coalescing into 

708: larger lumps, in particular by comparing Figures 1c and 1d. 

709: The lattice spatial dimension is given by $L = 20 \pi m_{S}^{-1}$, which is 

710: small compared with the horizon $H^{-1} \approx (3/4 \pi)^{1/2} 

711: \lambda^{2} M_{Pl}/(g m_{S}^{2})$.  

712: 

713: 

714: 

715: 

716: \begin{arrangedFigure}{1}{2}{arrangedO521}

717: {\footnotesize{

718: 2D growth of energy density perturbations for $\lambda = 0.14$ and $g = 1$

719: on a 200 $\times$ 200 lattice. Black areas correspond to $\rho > 4 \overline{\rho}$.   

720: }}

721:    \subFig[$t = \tau_{S}$]{1oscx.eps}%

722:     \subFig[$t= 3 \tau_{S}$]{3oscx.eps}%

723:     \subFig[$t = 4 \tau_{S}$]{4oscx.eps}%

724:     \subFig[$t = 5 \tau_{S}$]{5oscx.eps}%

725: \setlength{\subFigureAboveCaptionSpace}{7mm} 

726: \end{arrangedFigure} 

727: \setlength{\subFigureAboveCaptionSpace}{0mm} 

728: 

729: 

730: 

731:               In Figure 2, we show the amplitude of the $S$ field at the

732: centre of one of the energy density lumps in Figure 1. The oscillations of an 

733: unperturbed homogeneous inflaton field are shown for comparison. 

734: The field inside the lump is oscillating

735: in time, showing that the inflaton condensate lump is indeed a quasi-stable oscillon. 

736: This is important, as it is not obvious that the energy density lumps in Figure 1

737: are not simply concentrations

738: of the energy density with no coherent structure. If this were true, it would be possible for 

739: such concentrations to have a short lifetime due to a large amount of

740: kinetic energy associated with their constituent scalar particles. The fact the energy density lumps are 

741: oscillons suggests that they will have a very long 

742: lifetime compared with the coherent oscillation period, 

743: as observed in numerical and analytical studies of single-field oscillons \cite{osc,iball}. 

744: 

745: 

746: \begin{figure}[htbp]

747: \begin{center}

748: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{osclumpx.eps}

749: \caption{\footnotesize{Coherent oscillations of an energy density lump.}}

750: \label{fig:fig1}

751: \end{center}

752: \end{figure}

753: 

754: 

755:               In Figure 3 we show the results of a 3-D simulation on a $50^{3}$

756: lattice. The regions where the energy density is greater than $4 \overline{\rho}$ are shown. 

757: This clearly demonstrates the formation of inflaton condensate lumps in the 3-D case,

758: confirming the results of the higher resolution 2-D simulations.  

759: 

760: \begin{figure}[htbp]

761: \begin{center}

762: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{3d2x.eps}

763: \caption{\footnotesize{ $50^{3}$ lattice 3D simulation. 

764: The plot shows regions of energy $\rho > 4 \overline{\rho}$

765: at $t = 5 \tau_{S}$. }}

766: \label{fig:fig1}

767: \end{center}

768: \end{figure}

769: 

770: 

771: 

772:     We find no evidence of cosmic strings forming within the volume

773: of our our lattice. This is consistent with our previous semi-analytical 

774: analysis, which indicated that the typical seperation of $U(1)_{FI}$ cosmic strings formed 

775: at the end of hybrid inflation would be not very much smaller than the horizon, corresponding to the 

776: wavelength of the first $\Phi_{-}$ fluctuations to be able to 

777: grow classically and break the $U(1)_{FI}$ symmetry \cite{mb1}. 

778:   

779: 

780: 

781: \section{A Scaling Property of the D-term Inflation Field Equations.} 

782: 

783: 

784:     Throughout we have considered the case $g = 1$. However,  

785: by rescaling the spacetime coordinates, 

786: the D-term inflation field equations can be written in a form 

787: that depends only upon the ratio $\lambda/g$. As a result, 

788: the condition for the formation of inflaton condensate lumps is likely to depend 

789: primarily upon the ratio $\lambda/g$, with only a 

790: weak logarithmic dependence on $g$ due to the initial value of the 

791: perturbations. 

792: 

793:        Under the rescaling of the coordinates

794: $t = \tilde{t}/g$, $x = \tilde{x}/g$, the tree-level scalar field equations become 

795: \be{at1} \ddot{S} + 3 \tilde{H} \dot{S} - \frac{\vec{\nabla}^{2}}{a^{2}}S    

796: = -\frac{\lambda^{2}}{g^{2}}|\Phi_{-}|^{2}S      ~,\ee

797: and

798: \be{at2} \ddot{\Phi}_{-} + 3 \tilde{H} \dot{\Phi}_{-} - \frac{\vec{\nabla}^{2}}{a^{2}}\Phi_{-}    

799: = -\frac{\lambda^{2}}{g^{2}} |S|^{2}\Phi_{-} + \left(\xi - |\Phi_{-}|^{2} \right)

800: \Phi_{-}     ~,\ee

801: where derivatives are now with respect to $\tilde{x}$ and $\tilde{t}$. We have defined 

802: $\tilde{H} = a^{-1}da/d\tilde{t} = H/g$. $\tilde{H}$ is a function purely of 

803: $\lambda/g$. This follows since $H^{2} \propto \rho$ where, in terms of derivatives with respect to 

804: rescaled spacetime coordinates,

805: \be{at3} \rho = g^{2}\left(|\dot{S}|^{2} + |\dot{\Phi}_{-}|^{2} + \left|\frac{\nabla S}{a}\right|^{2} 

806: + \left|\frac{\nabla \Phi_{-}}{a}\right|^{2} + V(S, \Phi_{-})/g^{2}   \right)  \equiv g^{2} \tilde{\rho}  ~.\ee 

807: $V(S, \Phi_{-})/g^{2}$ is purely a function of $\lambda/g$, therefore $\tilde{\rho}$ depends only on 

808: $\lambda/g$. Thus $H \propto \rho^{1/2} = g \tilde{\rho}^{1/2}$ and so $\tilde{H} = H/g \propto \tilde{\rho}^{1/2}$. 

809: Therefore $\tilde{H} = \tilde{H}(\lambda/g)$. 

810: 

811: 

812:     The dependence of the rescaled field equations only on $\lambda/g$ does not extend to the 

813: quantum fluctuation initial conditions, \eq{fe7}. In terms of rescaled coordiantes and 

814: the rescaled wavenumber, $\tilde{k} = k/g$, the initial fluctuation becomes 

815: \be{at3a}  \delta \phi(\tilde{\vec{x}}, 0)  = 

816: \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}} \sum \frac{8g^{-1/2}}{\sqrt{2 \tilde{k}_{\alpha \beta \gamma}}} 

817: \cos\left( \Delta \tilde{k} \Delta \tilde{x} \alpha i + \theta_{\alpha} \right) 

818: \cos\left( \Delta \tilde{k} \Delta \tilde{x} \beta j + \theta_{\beta} \right)

819: \cos\left( \Delta \tilde{k} \Delta \tilde{x} \gamma k + \theta_{\gamma} \right)   ~.\ee

820: The upper limit of the sum, corresponding to the largest value of $\tilde{k}$ for which the modes can grow,  

821: is determined from the rescaled field equations and is therefore purely a function of $\lambda/g$. Thus the 

822: initial conditions for the rescaled field equations are proportional to $g^{-1/2}$.  

823: However, the growth of perturbations in a tachyonic potential 

824: is typically rapid (exponential), in which case the condition for

825: perturbations to become non-linear will depend only weakly (logarithmically) on the initial perturbation. 

826: As a result, if inflaton condensate lumps form for 

827: one value of $g$ (we considered $g = 1$ in our simulations) then they will form for any value of $g$  

828: for the same value of $\lambda/g$, up to a weak dependence on the initial conditions.  

829: The effect of reducing $g$ will be to increase the time for the lumps to form 

830: ($t = \tilde{t}/g$) and to increase the size of the resulting lumps ($x = \tilde{x}/g$).

831: 

832: 

833: 

834: 

835: \section{Comparison with Previous Simulations} 

836: 

837: 

838:     In \cite{tp1} a simulation of SUSY hybrid inflation was reported for the case equivalent to

839: D-term inflation couplings $\lambda = 0.014$ and $g = 0.14$, such that $\lambda/g = 0.1$. 

840: It was concluded that the 

841: energy density would be transferred to inhomogeneous classical scalar field waves. Although no 

842: non-topological soliton formation was observed, this value of $\lambda/g$ is on the borderline of values

843: for which we would expect to find non-topological soliton formation \cite{mb1}. 

844: Therefore the results of \cite{tp1} are not in any obvious way inconsistent with the results we have obtained here.   

845: 

846: In \cite{cpr} a simulation of the end of D-term 

847: was performed, again for the case equivalent to $\lambda = 0.014$, $g=0.14$ in D-term inflation. 

848: The formation of non-topological solitons

849: was observed along the length of cosmic strings. 

850: However, only quantum fluctuations of the symmetry-breaking field were 

851: considered in \cite{cpr}, with no inflaton fluctuations, which cannot be considered fully realistic. 

852: As discussed above, we expect that fluctuations of the symmetry-breaking field will only play a 

853: minor role in the evolution of the total energy density, being primarily associated with 

854: cosmic-string formation on scales not very much smaller than the horizon \cite{mb1}. 

855: Nevertheless, the results in \cite{cpr} confirm the possibility of non-topological soliton

856: formation at the end of SUSY hybrid inflation. 

857: 

858: 

859: \section{Conclusions and Discussion} 

860: 

861: 

862:       Our numerical simulations have shown that growth of quantum fluctuations

863: of the scalar fields in SUSY hybrid inflation models results in the

864: formation of inflaton condensate lumps corresponding to 

865: spherical lumps of coherently oscillating scalar field, also known as oscillons. 

866: The energy density of the Universe becomes almost

867: entirely concentrated in these condensate lumps. 

868: We have focused on the case of D-term hybrid inflation,

869: in which case the inflaton condensate lumps form if $\lambda \gae 0.1 g$. 

870: Although a full analysis remain to be done, similar

871: results may be expected in the case of F-term inflation, whose classical 

872: field equations are similar to those of D-term inflation for the case $\lambda = \sqrt{2} g$.

873: 

874:         We have performed simulations for the case of a real inflaton field. 

875: The fact that the objects which form in this case are oscillons is significant,

876: since from numerical and analytical studies of single-field oscillons such objects are known

877: to be quasi-stable, with very long lifetimes compared to the scalar field coherent oscillation period.

878: Therefore we expect that the post-inflation era will consist entirely of long-lived

879: inflaton condensate lumps, even though our present numerical simulations are unable to resolve

880: the evolution over more than about 10 coherent oscillation periods. 

881: 

882:         In the case of a complex inflaton field, oscillons are expected

883: to be a precursor to stable Q-ball formation via decay to Q-ball pairs.

884: Decay to Q-ball pairs is likely to occur long before the  

885: neutral inflaton condensate lumps decay via radiation of scalar field waves.

886: Thus if inflaton condensate lumps form in the case of a

887: real inflaton field, it is very likely that decay to Q-ball pairs and 

888: a Q-ball dominated post-inflation era will occur once a complex inflaton is considered. 

889: Since the Q-balls are classically stable, this era will only end once the 

890: scalar particles forming the Q-ball decay perturbatively to MSSM

891: particles, reheating the Universe. A highly inhomogeneous inflaton condensate lump or Q-ball

892: dominated era would have significant consequences for post-inflation SUSY cosmology.

893: For example, it has been shown that the dynamics of scalar fields in the post-inflation era

894: will not be subject to order $H$ mass corrections \cite{fdd}, with important consequences for

895: Affleck-Dine baryogenesis, SUSY curvatons and moduli dynamics. Reheating

896: will also be inhomogeneous, via Q-ball decay.

897:           

898:      We plan to develop  

899: the capabilities of our numerical simulations in the future, 

900: with the ultimate goal of achieving a complete understanding of the post-inflation era of 

901: SUSY hybrid inflation models. 

902:  

903: 

904: 

905: \section*{Acknowledgements}   The work of MB was supported by EPSRC.  

906: 

907: 

908: \renewcommand{\theequation}{A-\arabic{equation}}

909:  % redefine the command that creates the equation no.

910:  \setcounter{equation}{0} 

911: % reset counter 

912: 

913: 

914: 

915: \section*{Appendix.  Non-linear Growth of Quantum Fluctuations

916:  and the Equivalent Classical Stochastic Field} 

917: 

918: 

919:             In this Appendix we review the growth of quantum fluctuations in

920: the presence of a time-dependent tachyonic mass squared term. 

921: We first consider a real scalar field in Minkowski space with 

922: a positive or negative mass squared term. We

923: then generalise to the case of a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker

924: background, in particular de Sitter space. 

925: 

926:                In order to derive the classical initial conditions used

927: in the lattice simulations, we quantize the theory in a box of side $L$. 

928: We consider an initial state corresponding to a Minkowski or Bunch-Davies vacuum state

929: for a massive scalar field. The scalar field theory is exactly quantized in terms of

930: creation and annihilation operators for momentum modes, which is valid so long as interaction

931: terms can be neglected in the Hamiltonian, or equivalently the scalar field equations are linear.

932: To follow the evolution of the quantum fluctuations into the non-linear regime, the

933: quantum field theory is replaced by an equivalent classical field theory with a classical probability

934: distribution for the initial conditions \cite{guth,ps}, equivalent in the sense that the

935: results of quantum field theory for the expectation values of products of fields are equal to the values

936: obtained by solving the classical field equations with the classical probability distribution

937: for the initial field values.  This can be done if the occupation numbers of

938: the quantum modes become large compared with one during the linear regime. 

939: The classical probability distribution is then given by the Wigner

940: function of the field modes in the semi-classical limit. Although the classical

941: probability distribution must become

942: valid at some time during the period when the theory can be considered linear,

943: once it becomes established it can be applied at any earlier time during the linear regime. 

944: 

945: 

946:         The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for the scalar field in Minkowski space are

947: \be{a0} {\cal L} = \frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial^{\mu} \phi  - \frac{m^{2}}{2} \phi^{2}    ~,\ee

948: and

949: \be{a1} {\cal H} = \pi \dot{\phi} - {\cal L}

950:  = \frac{1}{2} \left[ \pi^{2} + ( \vec{\nabla} \phi)^{2} + m^{2} \phi^{2} \right]     ~,\ee

951: where the canonical momentum is $ \pi 

952: \equiv \partial {\cal L}/ \partial \dot{\phi} = \dot{\phi}$. We consider

953: the scalar field in a cube of volume $L^3$ with periodic boundary conditions.

954: The field and canonical momentum are expanded in terms of momentum modes as 

955: \be{a2}  \phi(\vec{x}, t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}} \sum_{\vec{k}} q(\vec{k}, t) e^{i \vec{k}. \vec{x}}    ~\ee

956: and

957: \be{a3}  \pi(\vec{x},t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}} \sum_{\vec{k}} p(\vec{k}, t) e^{i \vec{k}.\vec{x}}   ~,\ee

958: where the components of $\vec{k}$ satisfy $k_{i} = 2 \pi n_{i}/L$ with $n_{i}$ an integer. 

959: $\pi(\vec{x},t) = \dot{\phi}(\vec{x},t)$ implies that $p(\vec{k}, t)

960:  = \dot{q}\left(\vec{k},t\right) $.

961: The non-zero equal-time canonical commutation relations for the field operators are 

962: \be{a3a}  [\pi(\vec{x},t), \phi(\vec{x}^{'},t)] = -i \delta^{3}\left(\vec{x} - \vec{x}^{'}\right) 

963: ~.\ee    

964: The field and conjugate momentum mode operators must then satisfy 

965: \be{a4} \left[p(-\vec{k},t), q(\vec{l},t)\right] = -i \delta_{\vec{k},\vec{l}}    ~.\ee  

966: In terms of mode operators the Hamiltonian becomes  

967: \be{a5}  H = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{\vec{k}} p^{\dagger}(\vec{k},t) p(\vec{k},t) + \omega_{\vec{k}}^{2} 

968: q^{\dagger}(\vec{k},t) q(\vec{k},t) \;\;,\;\;\; \omega_{\vec{k}}^{2} = \vec{k}^{2} + m^{2}  

969: ~,\ee

970: where the mode operators satisfy the classical Hamiltonian equations of motion.   

971: In general, a Hamiltonian which is quadratic in the mode operators may be exactly quantized by expanding the 

972:  operators in terms of time-independent creation and annihilation operators 

973: \be{a6}    q(\vec{k},t) = f_{\vec{k}} a_{\vec{k}}

974:  + f_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger} a_{-\vec{k}}^{\dagger}      ~\ee

975: and 

976: \be{a6a}    p(\vec{k},t) = - i g_{\vec{k}} a_{\vec{k}}

977:  + i g_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger} a_{-\vec{k}}^{\dagger}      ~\ee

978: where $[a_{\vec{k}}, a_{\vec{l}}^{\dagger}] = \delta_{\vec{k},\vec{l}}  $. 

979: $p(\vec{k},t) = \dot{q}(\vec{k},t)$ implies that $g_{\vec{k}} = i \dot{f}_{\vec{k}}$. 

980: The mode functions $f_{\vec{k}}$ and $g_{\vec{k}}$ satisfy the classical field equations for the

981:  momentum modes (which are, by assumption, linear in $f_{\vec{k}}$) and the canonical commutation relations.

982:  The latter implies that the mode functions satisfy the condition

983:  $g_{\vec{k}} f_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger} + g_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger} f_{\vec{k}} = 1$. 

984:  For the case of a constant positive mass squared term, the mode functions $f_{\vec{k}}$ must

985:  also satisfy the condition that the 

986: Hamiltonian is correctly quantized, such that the energy eigenstates correspond to numbers

987:  of quanta of energy $\omega_{\vec{k}}$. 

988: The unique solution for $f_{\vec{k}}$ which satisfies both of these conditions is 

989: \be{a7}   f_{\vec{k}}  = \frac{i}{ \sqrt{2 \omega_{\vec{k}} }} e^{-i \omega_{\vec{k}}t}  ~.\ee

990:  To study the evolution of the mode functions from an initial time $t=0$ at which $m^2 \geq 0$,

991:  we use \eq{a7} as the initial condition for the mode functions. The subsequent evolution

992:  may then be studied by solving the classical equation of motion for $f_{\vec{k}}$ so long as we are

993:  in the linear regime, since in this case the 

994:  field equations may be satisfied by field operators expanded in terms of time-independent

995:  creation and annihilation operators.  

996: 

997: 

998:      As an example, we consider the evolution for a model where a field

999: is massless at $t \leq 0$ and gains a constant negative mass squared term once $t > 0$. 

1000: The field operator at $t > 0$ satisfies the equation, for modes with $k^2 < |m|^2$, 

1001: \be{a8}  \ddot{q}\left(\vec{k},t\right) = \tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}}^{2} q\left(\vec{k},t\right) 

1002:  \;,\;\;\; \tilde{\omega}^{2}_{\vec{k}} = |m|^{2} - \vec{k}^{2}    ~,\ee

1003: with general solution

1004: \be{a9}  q(\vec{k},t) = \alpha_{\vec{k}} e^{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t}

1005:  + \beta_{\vec{k}} e^{-\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t}        ~\ee

1006: and

1007: \be{a9a}  p(\vec{k},t)\equiv \dot{q}(\vec{k},t) = \tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}}\left( 

1008: \alpha_{\vec{k}} e^{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t}

1009:  - \beta_{\vec{k}}  e^{-\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t} \right)        ~,\ee

1010: where $\alpha_{\vec{k}}$ and $\beta_{\vec{k}}$ are time-independent operators corresponding

1011: to linear combinations of $a_{\vec{k}}$ and $a_{-\vec{k}}^{\dagger}$. Matching these with the 

1012: vacuum ($m = 0$) solution at $t = 0$ implies that

1013: \be{a10} \alpha_{\vec{k}} =

1014: \frac{i}{2 \sqrt{2 \omega_{\vec{k}}  }} \left[ \left(1 - \frac{ i\omega_{\vec{k}} }{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}}}

1015: \right) a_{\vec{k}} - 

1016: \left(1 +  \frac{i \omega_{\vec{k}}}{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}}}

1017: \right) a_{-\vec{k}}^{\dagger} \right]       ~\ee

1018: and 

1019: \be{a11} \beta_{\vec{k}} =

1020:  \frac{i}{2 \sqrt{2 \omega_{\vec{k}}  } }\left[ \left(1 +  \frac{i\omega_{\vec{k}}}{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}}}

1021: \right) a_{\vec{k}}

1022:  - \left(1 - \frac{i \omega_{\vec{k}}}{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}}}

1023: \right) a_{-\vec{k}}^{\dagger} \right]       ~,\ee

1024: where $\omega_{\vec{k}} = |\vec{k}|$. 

1025: Therefore $q(\vec{k},t)$ for $t > 0$ can be written in the form of \eq{a6} with 

1026: \be{a11a} f_{\vec{k}} =  \frac{i}{2 \sqrt{2 \omega_{\vec{k}} 

1027:  } }\left[ \left(1 - \frac{i \omega_{\vec{k}}}{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}}}

1028: \right) e^{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t}

1029:  + \left(1 + \frac{i \omega_{\vec{k}}}{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}}}

1030: \right)e^{-\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t}  \right]    ~.\ee

1031: For $\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t \gg 1$, 

1032: $q(\vec{k},t) \approx \alpha_{\vec{k}}e^{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t}$ and 

1033: $p(\vec{k},t) \approx \omega_{\vec{k}} \alpha_{\vec{k}}e^{\tilde{\omega}_{\vec{k}} t}$, 

1034: so that to a good approximation $q(\vec{k},t)$ and $p(\vec{k},t)$ commute, corresponding to the limit

1035: of classical physics.

1036: 

1037:                  

1038:     In order to study the growth of quantum fluctuations beyond the linear regime, we need

1039: the classical stochastic initial conditions which reproduce the 

1040: field theory expectation values in the semi-classical limit. The classical probability

1041: distribution is obtained from the Wigner function, 

1042: \be{a15}    W(q,p,t) = \int \frac{dx_{1} dx_{2}}{\left( 2 \pi \right)^{2}} 

1043: e^{ -i \left( p_{1} x_{1} + p_{2} x_{2} \right)} < q-\frac{x}{2}, t| \rho |q + \frac{x}{2}, t> 

1044: ~,\ee 

1045: where $p =p_{1} + i p_{2}$, $q =q_{1} + i q_{2}$ and $x =x_{1} + i x_{2}$. The $q$ and $p$ represent

1046: complex generalised coordinates and conjugate momenta, which in our case correspond to 

1047: $q(\vec{k},t)$ and $p(\vec{k},t)$. $\rho = |\psi_{o}(t)><\psi_{o}(t)|$

1048: is the density matrix of the Schrodinger picture state, 

1049: $|\psi_{o}(t)>$, which evolves from the initial vacuum state. 

1050: In general the Wigner function gives 

1051: the probability distribution of the observable $q$ at $t$

1052: after integrating over $p$ and vice-versa. 

1053: In the classical limit the Wigner function tends towards a classical probability distribution, 

1054: $f(q,p,t)$, which reproduces the quantum field theory results for expectation values of the

1055: field operators. Although $f(q,p,t)$ should be calculated

1056: in the semi-classical limit, it can be applied at any time during the linear evolution

1057: of the field, in particular at earlier times, since it satisfies the

1058: classical equations of motion \cite{guth}. 

1059: In the case of hybrid inflation we can therefore apply the classical

1060: initial conditions at the end of inflation ($s = s_{c}$), 

1061: corresponding to massless scalar fields.

1062: 

1063:       The annihilation operators can be expressed as 

1064: \be{a14} a_{\vec{k}} = \frac{g_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}}{2 Re(f_{\vec{k}} g_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger})}

1065: \left(q(\vec{k},t) - \frac{f_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}}{i g_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}} p(\vec{k},t) 

1066: \right)      ~.\ee

1067: By definition $a_{\vec{k}} |0> = 0$,  where the Heisenberg picture initial vacuum state, $|0>$,

1068: is equivalent to the Schrodinger picture vacuum state at $t=0$. 

1069: In order to obtain the Schrodinger wavefunction $\psi(q,t) \equiv <q|\psi_{o}(t)>$ corresponding 

1070: to the state evolving from the initial vacuum state, we express the equation $a_{\vec{k}} |0>$

1071: as a wave equation in the position representation \cite{ps}. In terms of the time evolution 

1072: operator $U(t)$, $a_{\vec{k}} |0> = 0$ can be expressed as 

1073: \be{a18} U^{\dagger} [q(\vec{k},0) + \frac{i f_{k}^{\dagger}}{g_{k}^{\dagger}} p(\vec{k},0) ] U |0>  = 0      ~,\ee

1074: where $q(\vec{k},t) = U^{\dagger} q(\vec{k},0) U$. Since $U|0>  \equiv |\psi_{o}(t)>$ is the time-dependent

1075: Schrodinger state vector and $q(\vec{k},0) \equiv q_{\vec{k}}$ , $p(\vec{k},0) \equiv p_{\vec{k}}$ are the 

1076: Schrodinger representation generalised coordinate and momentum operators, with $p_{\vec{k}}$ 

1077:  conjugate to $q_{-\vec{k}} \equiv q^{\dagger}_{\vec{k}}$ ($[p_{\vec{k}}, q_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}] = -i$), 

1078: the momentum operator in the position representation becomes 

1079: $p_{\vec{k}} = -i \partial / \partial q_{\vec{k}}^{*}$. The wave equation can then be written as 

1080: \be{a17} \left(q_{\vec{k}} 

1081: + \frac{f_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}}{g_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}} \frac{\partial}{\partial q_{\vec{k}}^{*}} \right) 

1082: \psi_{o}\left(q_{\vec{k}}, q_{\vec{k}}^{*}, t \right)  = 0    ~.\ee 

1083: This has the solution \cite{ps}

1084: \be{a18a}  \psi_{o}(q_{\vec{k}}, q_{\vec{k}}^{*}, t) = N_{o} \exp\left( - \frac{g_{k}^{\dagger}}{f_{k}^{\dagger}} 

1085: |q_{\vec{k}}|^{2}\right) ~,\ee

1086: where $N_{o} = (\sqrt{\pi} |f_{\vec{k}}|)^{-1}$. The normalized probability distribution is then 

1087: \be{a19} P(q_{\vec{k}}, q_{\vec{k}}^{*}, t) = \frac{1}{ \pi |f_{\vec{k}}|^{2}}

1088:  exp\left( - \frac{|q_{\vec{k}}|^{2}}{|f_{\vec{k}}(t)|^{2}} \right)     ~.\ee

1089: This gives the probability that the magnitude of the {\it classical} mode amplitude 

1090: $q(\vec{k}, t)$ at $t$ is $|q_{\vec{k}}|$. This is a complex Gaussian distribution, 

1091: with r.m.s. value for $|q_{\vec{k}}|$ equal to $|f_{\vec{k}}|$. Then 

1092: $q(\vec{k}, t) = |q(\vec{k}, t)| e^{i \delta_{\vec{k}}}$, with $\delta_{\vec{k}}$ 

1093: a random phase.

1094: 

1095:                      The Wigner function is then given by    

1096: \be{a20} W(q_{\vec{k}}, p_{\vec{k}}, t) = \int \int \frac{ dx_{1} dx_{2}}{\left( 2 \pi\right)^{2}} 

1097: e^{-i \left(p_{\vec{k} \;1} x_{1} + p_{\vec{k}\;2} x_{2}\right)} \psi_{o}^{*}(q_{\vec{k}}-x/2, t)

1098:  \psi_{o}(q_{\vec{k}} + x/2, t) 

1099: ~.\ee

1100: Integrating gives 

1101:   \be{a21} W(q_{\vec{k}},p_{\vec{k}},t) = \frac{1}{\pi^{2}} \exp\left[ -\frac{|q_{\vec{k}}|^{2}}{|f_{\vec{k}}|^{2}} - 

1102: |f_{\vec{k}}|^{2} \left|p_{\vec{k}} - \frac{F_{\vec{k}}}{|f_{\vec{k}}|^{2}} q_{\vec{k}}\right|^2 \right]          ~,\ee

1103: where $F_{\vec{k}} = Im(f_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}g_{\vec{k}})$.  In the limit  $|f_{\vec{k}}|^{2} \gg 1$, where the Wigner

1104:  function tends towards the classical probability distribution, the Wigner function is

1105:  vanishing except if 

1106: \be{a22} p_{\vec{k}} = \frac{F_{\vec{k}}}{|f_{\vec{k}}|^{2}} q_{\vec{k}}   ~.\ee

1107: Since the classical probability distribution can be applied at any time during the linear regime,

1108: we can choose to apply the initial conditions at the end of hybrid inflation, such that

1109: the fields are massless. For the case of flat space, 

1110: the mode functions with $m = 0$ are given by

1111: \be{a23}   f_{\vec{k}} = \frac{i}{\sqrt{2k}} e^{-i kt} 

1112: \;,\;\;\; g_{\vec{k}} = i \sqrt{\frac{k}{2}} e^{-i kt}

1113:    ~,\ee

1114: where $k = |\vec{k}|$. 

1115: Thus $F_{\vec{k}} = Im(f_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}g_{\vec{k}}) = 0$. 

1116: Therefore the flat space classical initial condition for $p(\vec{k},t)$

1117: is $p(\vec{k},0) = 0$, whilst the

1118: flat space classical initial conditions for $q(\vec{k},t)$

1119: at $t=0$ corresponds to  

1120: a complex Gaussian distribution for $|q(\vec{k},0)|$,

1121: with r.m.s. value   

1122: \be{a24} |q(\vec{k},0)|_{rms} =  \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 k}}   ~\ee

1123: and with a random phase factor $e^{i \delta_{\vec{k}}}$ for each $\vec{k}$. 

1124: 

1125: 

1126:        These results can easily be generalised to a scalar field in  

1127: Friedman-Robertson-Walker spacetime. In this case the action is  

1128: \be{a23a} S = \int d^{4} x \sqrt{-g} \left[\frac{1}{2} \partial_{\mu}\phi \partial^{\mu}\phi 

1129:  - \frac{m^{2}}{2} \phi^{2} \right]    ~.\ee

1130: In terms of $y = a(t) \phi$ and conformal time $\eta$ ($dt = a(t)d \eta$), where $a(t)$ is 

1131: the scale factor, this becomes

1132: \be{a24a} S = \int d^{4} x \left[ \frac{1}{2} \left(y^{'} - \frac{a^{'}}{a} y \right)^{2} 

1133: - \frac{\left(\nabla y\right)^{2}}{2} - \frac{m^2 a^2}{2} y^2      \right]      ~,\ee

1134: where $'$ denotes differentiation with respect to conformal time and $d^{4} x$ is now understood 

1135: as an integral over comoving coordinates and conformal time. 

1136: The conjugate momentum is 

1137: \be{a25}   \pi = \frac{\partial {\cal L}}{\partial y^{'}} = y^{'} - \frac{a^{'}}{a}y  ~\ee

1138: and the Hamiltonian is  

1139: \be{a26} H = \int d^{3}x \left[ \frac{\pi^{2}}{2} + \frac{\left(\nabla y\right)^{2}}{2}

1140:  + \frac{m^2 a^2}{2} y^2   + \frac{a^{'}}{a}\pi y \right]  ~.\ee

1141: Expanding $y(\vec{x},\eta)$ and $\pi(\vec{x},\eta)$ in terms of 

1142: modes as before (but now with $\eta$ in place of $t$ and $y$ in place of $\phi$) 

1143: implies that

1144: \be{a27} H = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{\vec{k}} \left[p(\vec{k},\eta)^{\dagger}p(\vec{k},\eta) 

1145: + \omega_{\vec{k}}^{2}  q(\vec{k},\eta)^{\dagger}q(\vec{k},\eta) + \frac{a^{'}}{a} 

1146: \left(p(\vec{k},\eta)q^{\dagger}(\vec{k},\eta) + p^{\dagger}(\vec{k},\eta)q(\vec{k},\eta) \right) \right] 

1147: ~,\ee

1148: where $\omega_{\vec{k}}^{2} = \vec{k}^2 + m^2 a^2$ and

1149: \be{a28a} p(\vec{k},\eta) = q^{'}(\vec{k},\eta) - \frac{a^{'}}{a}q(\vec{k},\eta)    ~.\ee  

1150: This is quantized by expanding $q$ and $p$ in terms of creation and annihilation operators 

1151: according to \eq{a6} and \eq{a6a}. 

1152: The mode functions satisfy the classical equation of motion 

1153: \be{a29} f_{\vec{k}}^{''} - \frac{a^{''}}{a} f_{\vec{k}} = -\left( \vec{k}^{2} +m^2 a^2\right) f_{\vec{k}}    ~,\ee

1154: with the requirement that the initial $f_{\vec{k}}$ reduces to the Minkowski modes in the limit  

1155: $k \gg H$ (Bunch-Davies vacuum).    

1156: 

1157:          For the case of de Sitter space, $H = constant$, the mode equation becomes 

1158: \be{a29a} f_{\vec{k}}^{''}  + \left[k^{2} - \frac{ \left(2 - \frac{m^{2}}{H^{2}} \right)}{

1159: \eta^{2}  } \right]  f_{\vec{k}} = 0     ~,\ee

1160: where $\eta = -1/aH$.  

1161: For a constant $m^2$, the solution which tends to the Minkowski vacuum in the limit $k \gg H$ is

1162: \be{a30}    f_{\vec{k}}(\eta) = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} e^{i \left( \frac{\pi}{2}\nu + \frac{\pi}{4}\right)}

1163: \sqrt{-\eta} H_{\nu}^{(1)}\left(-k\eta\right) \;,\;\;\; \nu^{2} = \frac{9}{4} - \frac{m^{2}}{H^{2}}      ~,\ee

1164: where $H^{(1)}_{\nu}$ is a spherical Hankel function of the first kind. 

1165: 

1166:        The Wigner function analysis is as before except with $\eta$

1167: in place of $t$. $f_{\vec{k}}$ is now given by \eq{a30}, whilst 

1168: $g_{\vec{k}}$ follows from $p(\vec{k},\eta) = q^{'}(\vec{k},\eta) - (a^{'}/a) q(\vec{k},\eta)$, which 

1169: implies that $g_{\vec{k}} = i (f_{\vec{k}}^{'} - (a^{'}/a)

1170:  f_{\vec{k}})$.  The initial 

1171: conditions we impose correspond to de Sitter space with a massless field, in which case $\nu = 3/2$ and so

1172: \be{a31} f_{\vec{k}} = \frac{i \sqrt{\pi}}{2} \sqrt{-\eta} H_{\frac{3}{2}}^{(1)} \left( -k \eta\right) 

1173:  = \frac{e^{-i k \eta}}{\sqrt{2k}} \left[1 - \frac{i}{k \eta} \right]      ~\ee 

1174: \be{a32} g_{\vec{k}} = \sqrt{\frac{k}{2}}  e^{-i k\eta}        ~,\ee

1175: where we have used the expression for the Hankel function, 

1176: \be{a32a} H_{3/2}^{\left(1\right)}(x) = -\left(\frac{2}{\pi x}\right)^{1/2} e^{i x}

1177: \left[1 + \frac{i}{x} \right]     ~.\ee

1178: Thus $F_{\vec{k}} = Im(f_{\vec{k}}^{\dagger}g_{\vec{k}}) = 1/(2 k \eta)$. 

1179: The classical r.m.s. values for the magnitudes of the mode functions are then 

1180: \be{a34} |q(\vec{k},\eta)|_{rms}  = |f_{\vec{k}}| = 

1181: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 k}} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{k^{2} \eta^{2}} \right)^{1/2}    ~\ee

1182: and

1183: \be{a35} |p(\vec{k},\eta)|_{rms} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 k} |\eta|} \left(1 

1184: + \frac{1}{k^{2} \eta^{2}} \right)^{-1/2}     ~.\ee

1185: These may be used to model the initial conditions for the massless scalar fields at the

1186: end of hybrid inflation. 

1187: 

1188:            In practice, we numerically solve the classical 

1189: scalar field equations for $\phi(\vec{x},t)$ rather than $y(\vec{x},\eta)$.

1190: In general, $y(\vec{x},\eta) = a \phi(\vec{x},t)$ and 

1191: $\pi(\vec{x},\eta) = a^{2} \dot{\phi}(\vec{x},t)$. 

1192: Choosing $a = 1$ at the end of inflation (corresponding to choosing $\eta = -H^{-1}$ at $t=0$)  

1193: implies that $\phi(\vec{x},0) = y(\vec{x},\eta)$ and $\dot{\phi}(\vec{x},0) = 

1194: \pi(\vec{x},\eta)$ at the end of inflation.  In this case the

1195: mode functions in \eq{a34} and \eq{a35} will provide the initial conditions for the 

1196: mode expansions of $\phi(\vec{x},t)$ and $\dot{\phi}(\vec{x},t)$ in de Sitter space. 

1197: 

1198: 

1199: 

1200: 

1201: \begin{thebibliography}{50}

1202: 

1203: \Bibitem{hi} A.Linde, \pr{D49}{1994}{748}. 

1204: 

1205: \Bibitem{dti} E.Halyo, \pl{B387}{1996}{43}; P.Binetruy and G.Dvali, 

1206: \pl{B388}{1996}{241}.

1207: 

1208: \Bibitem{fti} G.Dvali, Q.Shafi and R.Schafer, \prl{73}{1994}{1886};

1209:  E.J.Copeland, A.R.Liddle, D.H.Lyth, E.D.Stewart and D.Wands, \pr{D49}{1994}{6410}. 

1210: 

1211: \Bibitem{lr} D.Lyth and A.Riotto, \prep{314}{1999}{1}.

1212: 

1213: \Bibitem{ss} N.Arkani-Hamed and S.Dimopoulos, {\it hep-th/0405159}; 

1214: G.F.Giudice and A.Romanino, \np{B699}{2004}{65}; 

1215: N.Arkani-Hamed, S.Dimopoulos, G.F.Giudice and A.Romanino, \np{B709}{2005}{3}.

1216: 

1217: \Bibitem{tp1}  G.Felder, J.Garcia-Bellido, P.B.Greene, L.Kofman,

1218:  A.Linde and I.Tkachev, \prl{87}{2001}{011601}.  

1219: 

1220: \Bibitem{tp2} G.Felder, L.Kofman and A.Linde, \pr{D64}{2001}{123517}.

1221: 

1222: \Bibitem{icf} J.McDonald, \pr{D66}{2002}{043525}.

1223: 

1224: \Bibitem{mb1} M.Broadhead and J.McDonald, \pr{D68}{2003}{083502}.

1225: 

1226: \Bibitem{tachy} G.Felder and L.Kofman, \pr{D70}{2004}{046004}.

1227: 

1228: 

1229: \Bibitem{add} A.Arrizabalaga, J.Smit and A.Tranberg, \jhep{0410}{2004}{017};

1230: A.Tranberg and J.Smit, \jhep{0311}{2003}{016}; 

1231: J.Garcia-Bellido, M.G.Perez and A.Gonzalez-Arroyo, \pr{D67}{2003}{103501};

1232: J.Smit and A.Tranberg, \jhep{0212}{2002}{020}. 

1233: 

1234: 

1235: \Bibitem{osc} M.Gleiser and A.Sornborger, \pr{E62}{2000}{1368}; 

1236: E.J.Copeland, M.Gleiser and H.R.Muller, \pr{D52}{1995}{1920}; 

1237: M. Gleiser, \pr{D49}{1994}{2978}.

1238: 

1239: \Bibitem{cpr} E.J.Copeland, S.Pascoli and A.Rajantie, \pr{D65}{2002}{103517}. 

1240: 

1241: \Bibitem{iball} S.Kasuya, M.Kawasaki and F.Takahashi, \pl{B559}{2003}{99}. 

1242: 

1243: 

1244: \Bibitem{qballs} M.Broadhead and J.McDonald, \pr{D69}{2004}{063510}.

1245: 

1246: \Bibitem{kk} S.Kasuya and M.Kawasaki, \pr{D61}{2000}{041301}; \pr{D62}{2000}{023512}.

1247: 

1248: \Bibitem{enq} K.Enqvist, S.Kasuya and A.Mazumdar, \pr{D66}{2002}{043505}.

1249: 

1250: \Bibitem{ps} D.Polarski and A.Starobinsky, \cqg{13}{1996}{377}.

1251: 

1252: \Bibitem{fdd} J.McDonald, \jcap{0408}{2004}{002}.

1253: 

1254: \Bibitem{guth} A.Guth and S.Y.Pi, \pr{D32}{1985}{1899}. 

1255: 

1256: 

1257: 

1258: 

1259: 

1260: \end{thebibliography}

1261: 

1262: 

1263: 

1264: 

1265: 

1266: \end{document}

1267: ********************************************************************

1268: ********************************************************************

1269: 

1270: