1: %% ****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12:
13: \documentclass[prc,preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
14:
15: % You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
16: % Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS
17: % BibTeX style file (bast file), so only uncommented the line
18: % below if necessary.
19: %\bibliographystyle{apsrev}
20: \usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
21: \usepackage{graphicx}
22: \def\slr#1{\setbox0=\hbox{$#1$} % set a box for #1
23: \dimen0=\wd0 % and get its size
24: \setbox1=\hbox{/} \dimen1=\wd1 % get size of /
25: \ifdim\dimen0>\dimen1 % #1 is bigger
26: \rlap{\hbox to \dimen0{\hfil/\hfil}} % so center / in box
27: #1 % and print #1
28: \else % / is bigger
29: \rlap{\hbox to \dimen1{\hfil$#1$\hfil}} % so center #1
30: / % and print /
31: \fi}
32:
33: \def\kp{k^{\,\prime}}
34: \def\kpsq{k^{\,\prime\,2}}
35: \def\ksq{k^2}
36: \def\kdp{k^{\,\prime\prime}}
37: \def\myint#1{\!\int\!\!\frac{d^4\!{#1}}{(2\pi)^4}\,}
38: \def\mytint#1{\!\int\!\!\frac{d^3{#1}}{(2\pi)^3}\,}
39: \def\myvecint#1{\!\int\!\!\frac{d{#1}}{(2\pi)^3}\,}
40: \def\gev#1{ GeV${}^{#1}$}
41: \def\be{\begin{eqnarray}}
42: \def\ee{\end{eqnarray}}
43: \def\qmm{$m^0=\mbox{diag}\,(m_u^0,
44: m_d^0, m_s^0)$}
45: \def\cond#1{\langle\bar #1\rangle}
46: \def\etal{\emph{et al.}}
47:
48:
49: \renewcommand{\theequation}%
50: {\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
51: \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{section} \makeatother
52:
53: \begin{document}
54:
55: % Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
56: % number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.
57: % Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
58: % Use the 'proprietresses' class option to override journal defaults
59: % to display numbers if necessary
60: \preprint{BCCNT: 05/314/333}
61:
62: %Title of paper
63: \title{Relativistic Calculation of the Width of the $\Theta^+(1540)$ Pentaquark}
64:
65: \author{Hu Li}
66: \author{C. M. Shakin}
67: \email[email:]{cshakin@brooklyn.cuny.edu}
68:
69:
70: \affiliation{%
71: Department of Physics\\
72: Brooklyn College of the City University of New York\\
73: Brooklyn, New York 11210
74: }%
75:
76: \author{Xiangdong Li}
77: \affiliation{%
78: Department of Computer System Technology\\
79: New York City College of Technology of the City University of New
80: York\\
81: Brooklyn, New York 11201 }%
82:
83:
84:
85: \date{\today}
86:
87: \begin{abstract}
88: We calculate the width of the $\Theta^+(1540)$ pentaquark in a
89: relativistic model in which the pentaquark is considered to be
90: composed of a scalar diquark and a spin 1/2 triquark. We consider
91: both positive and negative parity for the pentaquark. There is a
92: single parameter in our model which we vary and which describes
93: the size of the pentaquark. If the pentaquark size is somewhat
94: smaller than that of the nucleon, we find quite small widths for
95: the pentaquark of about 1 MeV or less. Our model of confinement
96: plays an important role in our analysis and makes it possible to
97: use Feynman diagrams to describe the decay of the pentaquark.
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \pacs{12.39.Ki, 13.30.Eg, 12.38.Lg}
101:
102: \maketitle
103:
104: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
105: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
106: \section{INTRODUCTION}
107:
108: There has been a great deal of interest in the recent observation of
109: a quite narrow resonance which decays to a nucleon and a kaon
110: \cite{Na03,Ba03a,Al04,Ak04,Ku04,St03,Ba03b,Ab04,ch03}. These states
111: have been interpreted as pentaquarks which are likely to have a
112: $udud\bar s$ structure \cite{Ja03}. (The extremely narrow width of
113: the state, the $\Theta^+(1540)$, has led some to question whether
114: the state exists in nature.) In the present work we will describe
115: the calculation of the width of the $\Theta^+(1540)$ in a
116: relativistic quark model which includes a model of confinement that
117: we have introduced previously in our study of meson and nucleon
118: structure.
119:
120: A number of reviews have appeared. In Ref. \cite{Ca04} the
121: experimental evidence for the pentaquark is reviewed. Theoretical
122: and experimental developments are reviewed in Refs.
123: \cite{Zh04,St04,Cl03,Na04a}. A number of theoretical papers have
124: also appeared \cite{Ja03,Sh04,Se05,Na04b,Ma04,Ka04,Ka03}. We are
125: particularly interested in the work of Ref. \cite{Ka03} in which a
126: diquark-triquark model is introduced to describe the pentaquark. We
127: will make use of a variant of that model in the present work, since
128: that model lends itself to the analysis of the pentaquark decay
129: using Feynman diagrams. The diagram we consider is presented in Fig.
130: \ref{f333.1}. There the pentaquark is represented by the heavy line
131: with momentum $P$. The pentaquark is composed of a diquark of
132: momentum $-k+P_N$ and a triquark of momentum $P+k-P_N$. The triquark
133: emits a quark ($u$ or $d$) which combines with the diquark to form a
134: nucleon of momentum $P_N$. The final-state kaon of momentum $P-P_N$
135: is emitted along with the quark at the triquark vertex.
136:
137: We have studied the structure of the nucleon in a quark-diquark
138: model in Ref. \cite{Sz96}. In that work we considered both scalar
139: and axialvector diquarks, however, in this work we will limit our
140: considerations to a nucleon composed of a quark and a scalar
141: diquark. The nucleon vertex is described in Ref. \cite{Sz96} for the
142: case in which the diquark is placed on mass shell. (We remark that
143: in Fig. \ref{f333.1} only the quark of momentum $k$ and the triquark
144: of momentum $P+k-P_N$ will be off mass shell in our analysis.) The
145: mass of the scalar diquark was taken to be 400 MeV in Ref.
146: \cite{Sz96}. We use that value here and also take the triquark to
147: have a mass of 800 MeV. Therefore, it is clear that we need to
148: introduce a model of confinement for the pentaquark which has a mass
149: of 1540 MeV. Our (covariant) confinement model which we have used
150: extensively in other works \cite{Ce99a,Ce99b,Ce99c} will be
151: discussed in the next section.
152:
153: The organization of our work is as follows. In Section II we will
154: describe our model of confinement and in Section III we will
155: calculate the width of the pentaquark, assuming it has negative
156: parity. In Section IV we consider the width in the case the
157: pentaquark has positive parity. Finally, Section V contains further
158: discussion and conclusions.
159:
160: \section{A Model of Confinement}
161:
162: As stated in the last section, our pentaquark is composed of a
163: scalar diquark of mass 400 MeV and a triquark of mass 800 MeV. Since
164: the mass of the pentaquark under consideration is 1540 MeV, the
165: pentaquark would decay into its constituents in the absence of a
166: model of confinement. Similarly, the nucleon of mass 939 MeV could
167: decay into the scalar diquark of mass 400 MeV and a quark whose mass
168: we take to be 350 MeV in this work.
169:
170: In earlier work we have introduced a confining interaction which
171: served to prevent the decay of mesons or nucleons into their
172: constituents. Our covariant confinement model is described in a
173: series of our papers \cite{Ce99a,Ce99b,Ce99c}. In that model we
174: solve a linear equation for a confining vertex function, $\Gamma$.
175: This function has the following property. Consider the decay
176: $A\rightarrow B+C$, in which the hadrons $A$ and $C$ are on mass
177: shell. If we include the confining vertex we find the amplitude
178: has a zero when particle $B$ goes on mass shell, so that the
179: amplitude for $A$ to decay into two on-mass-shell particles ($B$
180: and $C$) is zero.
181:
182: For the decay $A\rightarrow B+C$ we may introduce a wave function
183: that may be expressed in terms of the momentum of the off-shell
184: particle $B$. If $B$ is a scalar, we have \be\label{e333.2.1}
185: \Psi_B(k)=\frac1{k^2-m_B^2}\Gamma_B(k)\,.\ee Note that the ratio
186: of $\Gamma_B(k)$ to $(k^2-m_B^2)$ is an ordinary function which
187: may often be well represented by a Gaussian function. (It is not
188: necessary to include an $i\epsilon$ in the denominator of Eq.
189: (\ref{e333.2.1}).)
190:
191: In the case of the nucleon we may consider the decay into a quark
192: and a diquark. In Ref. \cite{Sz96} we considered both scalar and
193: axialvector diquarks, but for simplicity we will limit ourselves
194: to only the scalar diquark. The relevant wave function in this
195: case was given in Eq. (3.3) of Ref. \cite{Sz96}:
196: \be\Psi_S(P,k,s,t)=\widetilde\Psi_{(1)}(P,k)\frac{2m_q\Lambda^{(+)}(\vec
197: k)}{\sqrt{2E(\vec k)\left(E(\vec k)+m_q\right)}}u_N(P,s)\chi_t\ee
198: which we will simplify for the present work to read
199: \be\label{e333.2.3}\Psi_N(P_N,k,s,t)=\widetilde\Psi_N(P_N,k)\Lambda^{(+)}(\vec
200: k)u_N(P_N,s)\chi_t\,.\ee The function $\widetilde\Psi_N(P,k)$ is
201: represented in Fig. 5 of Ref. \cite{Sz96} by a dashed line. That
202: function is well approximated by a Gaussian function which we will
203: record at a latter point in our discussion. The factor of
204: $\Lambda^{(+)}(\vec k)=(\slr k_{on}+m_q)/2m_q$ arises from an
205: approximation made in Ref. \cite{Sz96}. (Here $k_{on}=(E(\vec
206: k),\,\vec k)$ with $E(\vec k)=[\vec k^{\,2}+m_q^2]^{1/2}$.) In
207: Ref. \cite{Sz96} the quark propagator was written as \be
208: -iS(k)=\frac{m_q}{E_q(k)}\left[\frac{\Lambda^{(+)}(\vec
209: k)}{k^0-E_q(\vec k)}-\frac{\Lambda^{(-)}(-\vec k)}{k^0+E_q(\vec
210: k)}\right]\,.\ee The second term was neglected in our formalism
211: when we studied the nucleon. (Thus we limited our analysis to
212: positive-energy quark spinors.) Since we wish to make use of the
213: nucleon wave function determined in Ref. \cite{Sz96}, we will
214: continue to include the projection $\Lambda^{(+)}(\vec k)$ in our
215: formalism. Here $k$ is the quark momentum.
216:
217: As stated earlier, the diquark of momentum $-k+P_N$ in Fig.
218: \ref{f333.1} will be placed on mass shell, so that $k^0=E_N(\vec
219: P_N)-E_D(\vec P_N-\vec k)$, where $E_D(\vec P_N-\vec k)=[(\vec
220: P_N-\vec k)^{\,2}+m_D^2]^{1/2}$ and $E_N(\vec P_N)=[\vec
221: P_N^{\,2}+m_N^2]^{1/2}$. That approximation is achieved by writing
222: \be \frac1{(P_N-k)^2-m_D^2+i\epsilon}\longrightarrow -2\pi
223: i\delta^{(+)}[(P_N-k)^2-m_D^2]\,,\ee as described in detail in
224: Ref. \cite{Ce86}. Note that \be
225: \delta^{(+)}[(P_N-k)^2-m_D^2]=\frac1{2E_D(\vec P_N-\vec
226: k)}\,\delta[P_N^0-k^0-E_D(\vec P_N-\vec k)]\,.\ee The
227: on-mass-shell specification used here arises when performing an
228: integral in the complex $k^0$ plane \cite{Ce86}.
229:
230: \section{Calculation of the Width of a Negative Parity Pentaquark}
231:
232: We consider the diagram shown in Fig. \ref{f333.1}. Recall that the
233: heavy line of momentum $P$ denotes the pentaquark. The line carrying
234: momentum $-k+P_N$ is the on-mass-shell scalar diquark and the line
235: with momentum $P+k-P_N$ is the triquark. The momentum $k$ is that of
236: an up or down quark, $P-P_N$ is the momentum of the nucleon. The
237: pentaquark, nucleon and kaon are on mass shell. In our analysis the
238: diquark is also on mass shell, so that only the triquark and quark
239: propagate off mass shell, as noted earlier. (As stated in the last
240: section, the on-shell characterization of the diquark arises when we
241: complete the $k^0$ integral in the complex $k^0$ plane.)
242:
243: We now make use of the formula \cite{Bj64} \be
244: d\Gamma=|\mathfrak{M}|^2\frac{d^3k_1}{(2\pi)^3}\,\frac{m_N}{E_N(\vec
245: k_1)}\,\frac{d^3k_2}{(2\pi)^3}\,\frac1{2E_K(\vec k_2)}\,
246: (2\pi)^4\delta^4(P-k_1+k_2)\ee where $\vec k_1$ and $\vec k_2$ are
247: the momenta of the outgoing particles. We may put $\vec k_1=\vec
248: P_N$ and $\vec k_2=\vec P-\vec P_N=-\vec P_N$ for a pentaquark at
249: rest. (It is convenient to take $\vec P_N$ along the $z$ axis when
250: calculating the width.)
251:
252: In writing our expression for $\Gamma$ we will represent the product
253: of the quark propagator and nucleon vertex function by the nucleon
254: wave function of Eq. (\ref{e333.2.3}). In a similar fashion we will
255: represent the product of the triquark propagator and the
256: pentaquark-triquark vertex function by a triquark wave function. (In
257: the vertex, the diquark is on mass shell.) We then have to specify
258: the vertex function of the triquark which describes the decay into
259: the quark of momentum $k$ and the kaon. That scalar part of the
260: vertex is usefully written as \be
261: \Gamma_T(k)=\Psi_T(k)(k^2-m_q^2)\,.\ee Thus, the wave functions
262: $\Psi_N(k)$, $\Psi_T(k)$ and $\Psi_\Theta(P_N-k)$ will appear in our
263: expression for $\Gamma_\Theta$. Note that \be \vec
264: P_N^2=\left(\frac{m_\Theta^2-m_N^2+m_K^2}{2m_\Theta}\right)-m_K^2\ee
265: which yields $\vec P_N^2=0.0396$ \gev2, or $|\vec P_N|=0.199$ GeV.
266:
267: We find that the width is given by
268: \be\label{e333.3.4}\Gamma_\Theta&=&\frac12\myvecint {\vec
269: k}\frac1{2E_D(\vec k-\vec P_N)}\myvecint{\vec
270: k^{\,\prime}}\frac1{2E_D(\vec k^{\,\prime}-\vec
271: P_N)}\frac1{N_\Theta N_T N_N}\frac1{(2m_N)(2m_\Theta)}\\\nonumber
272: &\times&\Psi_N(\vec k)\,\Psi_N(\vec
273: k^{\,\prime})\,\Psi_\Theta(\vec P_N-\vec k)\,\Psi_\Theta(\vec
274: P_N-\vec k^{\,\prime})\,(k^2-m_q^2)\Psi_T(\vec
275: k)\,(k^{\prime2}-m_q^2)\Psi_T(\vec k^{\,\prime})\\\nonumber
276: &\times&\mbox{Tr}\left[\left(\slr k-\slr P_N+\slr
277: P+m_T\right)\left(\slr k_{on}+m_q\right)\left(\slr
278: P_N+m_N\right)\gamma^0\right.\\\nonumber &&\left. \left(\slr
279: k_{on}^\prime+m_q\right)\left(\slr k^\prime-\slr P_N+\slr
280: P+m_T\right)\gamma^0\left(\slr P+m_\Theta\right)\right]\rho\,,\ee
281: where $\rho$ is the phase space factor. We find \be
282: \rho=\frac1{2\pi}\frac{m_N}{m_\Theta}|\vec P_N|\\=0.193
283: \,\;\mbox{GeV}\,,\ee since $|\vec P_N|\simeq0.199$ GeV.
284:
285: The factor $\slr P_N+m_N$ and $\slr P+m_\Theta$ in the trace arise
286: from the relations \be\frac{\slr P_N+m_N}{2m_N}=\sum_{s_N}u_N(\vec
287: P_N,s_N)\bar u_N(\vec P_N,s_N)\ee and \be\frac{\slr
288: P+m_\Theta}{2m_\Theta}=\sum_s u_\Theta(\vec P,s)\bar u_\Theta(\vec
289: P,s)\,.\ee The factors $(1/N_\Theta)^{1/2}$, $(1/N_T)^{1/2}$ and
290: $(1/N_N)^{1/2}$ serve to normalize the wave functions. We
291: determine that $N_N=0.316$, $N_T=0.0673$, and calculate $N_\Theta$
292: for each choice of the pentaquark wave function. We write, with
293: $k=|\vec k|$, \be\Psi_N(\vec k)=\frac1{\sqrt{N_N}}\left(y_0+\frac
294: A{w\sqrt{\dfrac\pi2}}\,\,e^{-\dfrac{2(k-k_c)^2}{w^2}}\right)\ee
295: and \be\Psi_T(\vec k)=\frac1{\sqrt{N_T}}\left(y_0+\frac
296: A{w\sqrt{\dfrac\pi2}}\,\,e^{-\dfrac{2(k-k_c)^2}{w^2}}\right)\,.\ee
297: We have determined $y_0$, $A$, $k_c$ and $w$ from a fit to the
298: wave function given in Fig. 5 of Ref. \cite{Sz96}. We find
299: $y_0=-3.66$, $k_c=-0.013$ GeV, $w=0.660$ GeV and $A=27.73$ GeV.
300: For the pentaquark we write \be\Psi_\Theta(\vec k-\vec
301: P_N)=\frac1{\sqrt{N_\Theta}}\frac
302: A{w_\Theta\sqrt{\dfrac\pi2}}\,\,e^{-\dfrac{2(\vec k-\vec
303: P_N)^2}{w_\Theta^2}}\,,\ee where $w_\Theta$ is a variable in our
304: analysis. (Note that $N_\Theta$ depends upon the choice of
305: $w_\Theta$.) Here $\vec k-\vec P_N$ is the relative momentum of
306: the diquark and triquark when $\vec P=0$.
307:
308: In Fig. \ref{f333.2} we present the results of our calculation of
309: $\Gamma_\Theta$ as a function of $w_\Theta$. Quite small values
310: are obtained in the region 0.7 GeV $<w_\Theta<$ 0.9 GeV. The
311: region 0.6 GeV to 1 GeV is shown in Fig. \ref{f333.3} where it may
312: be seen that the width has a maximum of about 15 MeV. The minimum
313: values are very small and it is quite difficult to make an
314: accurate calculation of widths significantly less than 1 MeV. (We
315: have calculated five-dimensional integrals with 40 points for each
316: variable. Thus the number of points calculated is
317: $(40)^5\sim10^8$.)
318:
319: \section{Calculation of the Width of a Positive Parity Pentaquark}
320:
321: In the case of a positive parity pentaquark we assume that the
322: pentaquark decays to a positive parity diquark and a positive
323: parity triquark. As in Section III, the triquark and diquark have
324: zero relative angular momentum. In this case we need to insert
325: factors of $i\gamma_5$ at the triquark-kaon vertex where the quark
326: of momentum $k$ is emitted. In addition the calculation of the
327: normalization factor, $N_T$, is modified. In Eq. (\ref{e333.3.4}),
328: the trace becomes \be \mbox{Trace}&=&\mbox{Tr}\left[(\slr k-\slr
329: P_N+\slr P+m_T)i\gamma_5(\slr k_{on}+m_q)(\slr
330: P_N+m_N)\gamma^0\right.\\\nonumber &&\left. (\slr
331: k_{on}^\prime+m_q)i\gamma_5(\slr k^\prime-\slr P_N+\slr
332: P+m_T)\gamma^0(\slr P+m_\Theta)\right]\,.\ee We may define
333: $\widetilde{ \slr k}=\gamma^0\slr k\gamma^0$, etc. Thus \be
334: \mbox{Trace}&=&\mbox{Tr}\left[(\slr k-\slr P_N+\slr
335: P+m_T)\gamma_5(\slr k_{on}+m_q)(\slr P_N+m_N)(\widetilde{\slr
336: k}_{on}^{\,\prime}+m_q)\right.\\\nonumber &&\left.
337: \gamma_5(\widetilde{\slr k}^{\,\prime}-\widetilde{\slr
338: P}_N+\widetilde{\slr P}+m_T)(\slr
339: P+m_\Theta)\right] \\
340: &=& \mbox{Tr}\left[(\slr k-\slr P_N+\slr P+m_T)(-\slr
341: k_{on}+m_q)(-\slr P_N+m_N)(-\widetilde{\slr
342: k}_{on}^{\,\prime}+m_q)\right.\\\nonumber &&\left.
343: (\widetilde{\slr k}^{\,\prime}-\widetilde{\slr
344: P}_N+\widetilde{\slr P}+m_T)(\slr P+m_\Theta)\right]\,.\ee
345:
346: In this case we find $N_N=0.316$ and $N_T=0.0201$, where only the
347: second value has changed relative to the values given in Section
348: III. In Fig. \ref{f333.4} we show the values obtained for the
349: width of the positive parity pentaquark, and in Fig. \ref{f333.5}
350: we show the results of our calculation using a different scale.
351:
352: \section{discussion}
353:
354: It is of interest to note that, despite extensive efforts, no
355: signal of a 1540 MeV pentaquark has been observed in lattice QCD
356: studies \cite{La05,Cs05}. (These work contain more comprehensive
357: references to the literature than given here.) In Ref. \cite{Cs05}
358: pion masses in the range 400-630 MeV are used. The authors state
359: that they cannot rule out the existence of a pentaquark at the
360: physical quark mass of $m_\pi=135$ MeV. They also suggest the
361: possibility is that the pentaquark has a more exotic wave function
362: than that considered in Ref. \cite{Cs05}.
363:
364: One feature that has led some researches to question the existence
365: of the pentaquark is its very small width \cite{Cl03}. We have
366: shown in the present work that very small widths are obtained in
367: our model if the pentaquark wave function parameter, $w_\Theta$,
368: is somewhat larger than that we have found for the nucleon
369: ($w_N=0.66$ GeV) in Ref. \cite{Sz96}. [See Fig. \ref{f333.3}.]
370:
371: \begin{figure}
372: \includegraphics[bb=0 355 519 623, angle=0, scale=0.7]{fig1.eps}%
373: \caption{\label{f333.1}In this figure the heavy line denotes the
374: pentaquark and the line of momentum $-k+P_N$ denotes an
375: on-mass-shell diquark. The line of momentum $k$ represents the quark
376: and $P+k-P_N$ is the momentum of the triquark. In the final state we
377: have a nucleon of momentum $P_N$ and a kaon of momentum $P-P_N$.}
378: \end{figure}
379: \begin{figure}
380: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 280 235, angle=0, scale=1]{fig2.eps}%
381: \caption{\label{f333.2}The figure shows the width of the
382: pentaquark as a function of the parameter, $w_\Theta$, which
383: governs the extent of the pentaquark wave function in momentum
384: space. In the case of the nucleon we found $w=0.66$ GeV for the
385: wave function calculated in Ref. \cite{Sz96}. In this calculation
386: the pentaquark had negative parity as did the triquark.}
387: \end{figure}
388: \begin{figure}
389: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 280 235, angle=0, scale=1]{fig3.eps}%
390: \caption{\label{f333.3}The width of the negative parity pentaquark
391: is shown as a function of the parameter $w_\Theta$. (See Fig.
392: \ref{f333.2}.) (The quite small values in the vicinity of the
393: minimum have rather large uncertainties because of the limitation
394: of the number of points used in our five-dimensional integral
395: which determines the width.)}
396: \end{figure}
397: \begin{figure}
398: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 280 235, angle=0, scale=1]{fig4.eps}%
399: \caption{\label{f333.4}The width of a pseudoscalar pentaquark
400: calculated in our model is shown.}
401: \end{figure}
402: \begin{figure}
403: \includegraphics[bb=0 0 280 235, angle=0, scale=1]{fig5.eps}%
404: \caption{\label{f333.5}The results of the calculation reported in
405: Fig. 4 are shown using a different scale. Widths of the pentaquark
406: less than 1 MeV are found for values of $w_\Theta$ greater than
407: 0.72 GeV. (We recall that $w$ for the nucleon was 0.66 GeV.)}
408: \end{figure}
409: %\newpage
410: \vspace{1.5cm}
411: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
412: \bibitem{Na03}T. Nakano \etal, LEPS Collaboration, Phys. Rev.
413: Lett. \textbf{91}, 012002 (2003).
414: \bibitem{Ba03a}V.V. Barmin \etal, DIANA Collaboration, Phys.
415: At. Nucl. \textbf{66}, 1715 (2003).
416: \bibitem{Al04}C. Alt \etal, NA49 Collaboration, Phys. Rev.
417: Lett. \textbf{92}, 042003 (2004).
418: \bibitem{Ak04}A. Aktas \etal, H1 Collaboration, Phys. Lett.
419: B\textbf{588}, 17 (2004).
420: \bibitem{Ku04}V. Kubarovsky \etal, CLAS Collaboration, Phys.
421: Rev. Lett. \textbf{92}, 032001 (2004).
422: \bibitem{St03}S. Stepanyan \etal, CLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev.
423: Lett. \textbf{91}, 252001 (2003).
424: \bibitem{Ba03b}J. Barth \etal, SAPHIR Collaboration, Phys. Lett.
425: B\textbf{572}, 127 (2003).
426: \bibitem{Ab04}M. Abdel-Bary \etal, COSY-TOF Collaboration, Phys.
427: Lett. B\textbf{595}, 127 (2004).
428: \bibitem{ch03}S. Chekanov \etal, ZEUS Collaboration, Phys. Lett.
429: B\textbf{591}, 7 (2004).
430: \bibitem{Ja03}R. Jaffe and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.
431: \textbf{91}, 23003 (2003); Eur. Phys. J. C\textbf{33}, S38
432: (2004).
433: \bibitem{Ca04}D.S. Carman, hep-ex/0412074.
434: \bibitem{Zh04}Shi-Lin Zhu, hep-ph/0410002.
435: \bibitem{St04}Fl. Stancu, Plenary talk, MESON2004 Conference
436: Proceedings, Crakow, June 4-8 (2004), hep-ph/0408042.
437: \bibitem{Cl03}F.E. Close, hep-ph/0311087.
438: \bibitem{Na04a}T. Nakano and K. Hicks, Mod. Phys. Lett.
439: \textbf{19}, 645 (2004).
440: \bibitem{Sh04}E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, Phys. Lett.
441: B\textbf{589}, 21 (2004).
442: \bibitem{Se05}C. Semay, F. Brau and B. Silvestre-Brac, Phys.
443: Rev. Lett. \textbf{94}, 062001 (2005).
444: \bibitem{Na04b}I.M. Narodetskii, Yu.A. Simonov, M.A. Trusov,
445: A.I. Veselov, Phys. Lett. B\textbf{578}, 318 (2004); I.M.
446: Narodetskii, C. Semay, B. Silvestre-Brac and Yu.A. Simonov,
447: hep-ph/0409304.
448: \bibitem{Ma04}Y. Maezawa, T. Maruyama, N. Itagaki and T.
449: Hatsuda, hep-ph/0408056.
450: \bibitem{Ka04}M. Karliner and H.J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett.
451: B\textbf{586}, 303 (2004).
452: \bibitem{Ka03}M. Karliner and H.J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett.
453: B\textbf{575}, 249 (2003).
454: \bibitem{Sz96}J. Szweda, L.S. Celenza, C.M. Shakin and W.-D.
455: Sun, Few-Body Systems \textbf{20}, 93 (1996).
456: \bibitem{Ce99a}L.S. Celenza, Bo Huang, Huangsheng Wang and C.M.
457: Shakin, Phys. Rev. C\textbf{60}, 025202 (1999).
458: \bibitem{Ce99b}L.S. Celenza, Bo Huang and C.M. Shakin, Phys.
459: Rev. C\textbf{59}, 1041 (1999).
460: \bibitem{Ce99c}L.S. Celenza, Bo Huang, Huangsheng Wang and C.M.
461: Shakin, Phys. Rev. C\textbf{60}, 065209 (1999).
462: \bibitem{Ce86}L.S. Celenza and C.M. Shakin, \emph{Relativistic
463: Nuclear Physics: Theories of Structure and Scattering}, (World
464: Scientific, Singapore, 1986).
465: \bibitem{Bj64}J.D. Bjorken and S.D. Drell, \emph{Relativistic
466: Quantum Mechanics}, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).
467: \bibitem{La05}B. G. Lasscock, J. Hedditch, D. B. Leinweber, W.
468: Melnitchouk, A. W. Thomas, A. G. Williams, R. D. Young and J.
469: M. Zanotti, hep-lat/0503008.
470: \bibitem{Cs05}F. Csikor, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, T. G. Kov$\acute{a}$cs
471: and B. C. T$\acute{o}$th, hep-lat/0503012.
472:
473: \end{thebibliography}
474: % Create the reference section using BibTeX:
475: %\bibliography{basename of .bib file}
476:
477: \end{document}
478: %
479: % ****** End of file template.aps ******
480: