1: %\documentclass[11pt]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}
3: \documentclass[prd,aps,floats,showpacs,twocolumn,twoside,preprintnumbers,
4: superscriptaddress,floatfix]{revtex4}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
7: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
8: \usepackage{amsmath}
9: \usepackage{amssymb}
10: \usepackage{mathrsfs}
11: \usepackage{epsfig}
12: %\usepackage[dvips,colorlinks=true,citecolor=blue,linkcolor=blue]{hyperref}
13:
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15:
16: \newcommand{\figurewidth}{\linewidth}
17:
18: \newcommand{\pslash}{{p\!\!\!/}}
19: \newcommand{\dslash}{{\partial\!\!\!/}}
20:
21: \newcommand\expect[1]{\langle\!\langle#1\rangle\!\rangle}
22: \newcommand\eqn[1]{(\ref{#1})}
23: \newcommand\eqns[2]{(\ref{#1}-\ref{#2})}
24: \newcommand\fig[1]{Fig.~\ref{#1}}
25: \newcommand\figs[2]{Figs.~\ref{#1}-\ref{#2}}
26: \newcommand\twofigs[2]{Figs.~\ref{#1}~and~\ref{#2}}
27:
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: %\preprint{\vbox{\hbox{Preprint no.}}}
33: %\bigskip
34:
35: %\bigskip
36:
37: \title{The phase diagram of three-flavor quark matter under compact star
38: constraints}
39:
40: \author{D. Blaschke}
41: \email{Blaschke@theory.gsi.de}
42: \affiliation{Gesellschaft f\"ur Schwerionenforschung mbH (GSI),
43: %Planckstr. 1,
44: D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany, and\\
45: Bogoliubov Laboratory for Theoretical Physics, JINR Dubna, 141980 Dubna,
46: Russia}
47: \author{S. Fredriksson}
48: \email{Sverker.Fredriksson@ltu.se}
49: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Lule{\aa} University of Technology,
50: SE-97187 Lule\aa , Sweden}
51: \author{H. Grigorian}
52: \email{Hovik.Grigorian@uni-rostock.de}
53: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Physik, Universit\"at Rostock,
54: D-18051 Rostock, Germany, and\\
55: Department of Physics, Yerevan State University,375025 Yerevan, Armenia}
56: \author{A.M. \"Ozta\c{s}}
57: \email{oztas@hacettepe.edu.tr}
58: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Hacettepe University,
59: TR-06532 Ankara, Turkey}
60: \author{F. Sandin}
61: \email{Fredrik.Sandin@ltu.se}
62: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Lule{\aa} University of Technology,
63: SE-97187 Lule\aa , Sweden}
64:
65: %\date{March 18, 2005}
66:
67: \begin{abstract}
68: The phase diagram of three-flavor quark matter under compact star
69: constraints is investigated within a Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model.
70: Local color and electric charge neutrality is imposed for
71: $\beta$-equilibrated superconducting quark matter. The constituent
72: quark masses and the diquark condensates are determined selfconsistently
73: %at the global minima of the thermodynamic potential, by variation of
74: %these order parameters
75: in the plane of temperature and quark chemical potential.
76: Both strong and intermediate diquark coupling strengths are considered.
77: We show that in both cases, gapless superconducting phases
78: do not occur at temperatures relevant for compact star evolution, {i.e.},
79: below $T \sim 50$ MeV. The stability and structure of isothermal quark
80: star configurations are evaluated.
81: For intermediate coupling, quark stars are composed of a mixed phase of
82: normal (NQ) and two-flavor superconducting (2SC) quark matter up to a
83: maximum mass of $1.21~M_\odot$.
84: At higher central densities, a phase transition to the three-flavor
85: color flavor locked (CFL) phase occurs and the configurations become unstable.
86: For the strong diquark coupling we find stable stars in the 2SC phase, with
87: masses up to $1.326~M_\odot$. A second family of more compact
88: configurations (twins) with a CFL quark matter core and a 2SC shell is also
89: found to be stable. The twins have masses in the range $1.301 ... 1.326$
90: $M_\odot$. We consider also hot isothermal configurations at temperature
91: $T=40$ MeV. When the hot maximum mass configuration cools down, due to
92: emission of photons and neutrinos, a mass defect of $0.1~M_\odot$ occurs
93: and two final state configurations are possible.
94: \end{abstract}
95:
96: \pacs{12.38.Mh, 24.85.+p, 26.60.+c, 97.60.-s}
97:
98: \maketitle
99:
100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
101:
102: \section{Introduction}
103:
104: Theoretical investigations of the QCD phase diagram at high densities
105: have recently gained momentum due to results of non-perturbative
106: low-energy QCD models~\cite{rapp98,alford99,Blaschke:1998md} of
107: color superconductivity in quark matter~\cite{barrois77,bailin84}.
108: These models predict that the diquark pairing condensates are of the
109: order of 100 MeV and a remarkably rich phase structure has been
110: identified~\cite{Rajagopal:2000wf,Alford:2001dt,Buballa:2003qv,Schmitt:2004et}.
111: The main motivation for studying the low-temperature domain of the
112: QCD phase diagram is its possible relevance for the physics of
113: compact stars~\cite{NSI,CS,SQCDM}. Observable effects of color superconducting
114: phases in compact stars is expected, {e.g.}, in the
115: cooling behaviour~\cite{Horvath:1991ms,Blaschke:1999qx,Page:2000wt,Blaschke:2000dy,Grigorian:2004jq},
116: magnetic field evolution~\cite{Blaschke:1999fy,Alford:1999pb,Iida:2002ev,Sedrakian:2002ff},
117: and in burst-type phenomena~\cite{Hong:2001gt,Ouyed:2001cg,Aguilera:2002dh,Ouyed:2005tm}.
118:
119: The most prominent color superconducting phases with large diquark
120: pairing gaps are the two-flavor scalar diquark condensate (2SC) and
121: the color-flavor locking (CFL) condensate. The latter requires
122: approximate SU(3) flavor symmetry and occurs therefore only at rather
123: large quark chemical potentials, $\mu_q>430-500$ MeV, of the order of the
124: dynamically generated strange quark mass $M_s$, whereas the 2SC phase can
125: appear already at the chiral restoration transition for $\mu_q>330-350$ MeV
126: \cite{Neumann:2002jm,Oertel:2002pj,Gocke:2001ri}.
127: Note that the quark chemical potential in the center of a typical compact
128: star is expected to not exceed a value of $\sim 500$ MeV so
129: the volume fraction of a strange quark matter phase will be insufficient
130: to entail observable consequences.
131: However, when the strange quark mass is considered not dynamically, but
132: as a free parameter independent of the thermodynamical conditions, it has been
133: shown that for not too large $M_s$ the CFL phase dominates over the 2SC phase
134: \cite{Alford:2002kj,Steiner:2002gx}.
135: Studies of the QCD phase diagram with fixed strange quark mass have recently
136: been extended to the discussion of gapless CFL (gCFL) phases
137: \cite{Alford:2004akr,Alford:2004akr2,Ruster:2004}.
138: The gapless phases occur when the asymmetry between Fermi levels of different
139: flavors is large enough to allow for zero energy excitations while a finite
140: pairing gap exists. They have been found first for the 2SC phase (g2SC)
141: within a dynamical chiral quark model \cite{Shovkovy:2003uu,Huang:2003}.
142:
143: Any scenario for compact star evolution
144: %and for the explanation of astrophysical observations
145: that is based on the occurence of quark matter relies
146: on the assumptions about the properties of this phase.
147: It is therefore of prior importance to obtain a phase diagram of three-flavor
148: quark matter under compact star constraints with selfconsistently
149: determined dynamical quark masses.
150: In the present paper we will employ the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model
151: to delineate the different quark matter phases in the plane of temperature
152: and chemical potential. We also address the question whether CFL quark matter
153: and gapless phases are likely to play a role in compact star interiors.
154:
155: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
156:
157: \section{Model}
158: In this paper, we consider an NJL model with quark-antiquark interactions in
159: the color singlet scalar/pseudoscalar channel, and quark-quark interactions in
160: the scalar color antitriplet channel.
161: We neglect the less attractive interaction channels, {e.g.}, the
162: isospin-singlet channel, which could allow for weak spin-1 condensates.
163: Such condensates allow for gapless excitations at low temperatures and could
164: be important for the cooling behaviour of compact stars.
165: However, the coupling strengths in these channels are poorly known and we
166: therefore neglect them here.
167: The Lagrangian density is is given by
168: \begin{eqnarray}
169: \label{lagrangian}
170: {\cal L} &=& \bar{q}_{i\alpha}(i\dslash\delta_{ij}\delta_{\alpha\beta}
171: - M^0_{ij}\delta_{\alpha\beta}
172: + \mu_{ij,\alpha\beta}\gamma^0)q_{j\beta} \nonumber \\
173: &+& G_S \sum^8_{a=0}\left[(\bar{q}\tau^a_f q)^2 +
174: (\bar{q}i\gamma_5\tau^a_f q)^2\right] \nonumber \\
175: &+&\,G_{D} \sum_{k, \gamma} \left[(\bar{q}_{i\alpha}\epsilon_{ijk}
176: \epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}q^C_{j\beta})
177: (\bar{q}^C_{i'\alpha'}\epsilon_{i'j'k}\epsilon_{\alpha'\beta'\gamma}
178: q_{j'\beta'}) \right. \nonumber \\
179: &+& \left. (\bar{q}_{i\alpha}i\gamma_5\epsilon_{ijk}
180: \epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}q^C_{j\beta})
181: (\bar{q}^C_{i'\alpha'}i\gamma_5\epsilon_{i'j'k}
182: \epsilon_{\alpha'\beta'\gamma}q_{j'\beta'}) \right],
183: \end{eqnarray}
184: where $M^0_{ij}=$~diag$(m^0_u, m^0_d, m^0_s)$ is the current quark mass
185: matrix in flavor space and $\mu_{ij,\alpha\beta}$ is the chemical
186: potential matrix in color and flavor space. Due to strong and weak
187: interactions, the various chemical potentials are not independent. In the
188: superconducting phases a $U(1)$ gauge symmetry remains unbroken~
189: \cite{Alford:1999arw}, and the associated charge is a linear combination of
190: the electric charge, $Q$, and two orthogonal generators of the unbroken
191: $SU(2)_c$ symmetry. Hence, there are in total four independent chemical
192: potentials
193: \begin{equation}
194: \label{chempot}
195: \mu_{ij,\alpha\beta} = (\mu\delta_{ij} + Q\mu_Q)\delta_{\alpha\beta} +
196: (T_3\mu_3 + T_8\mu_8)\delta_{ij},
197: \end{equation}
198: where $Q={\rm diag}(2/3,-1/3,-1/3)$ is the electric charge in flavor space,
199: and $T_3={\rm diag}(1,-1,0)$ and $T_8={\rm diag}(1/\sqrt{3},1/\sqrt{3},
200: -2/\sqrt{3})$
201: are the generators in color space. The quark number chemical
202: potential, $\mu$, is related to the baryon chemical potential by
203: $\mu = \mu_B/3$.
204: The quark fields in color, flavor and Dirac spaces are denoted by
205: $q_{i\alpha}$ and $\bar{q}_{i\alpha}=q^\dagger_{i\alpha}\gamma^0$.
206: $\tau^a_f$ are Gell-Mann matrices acting in
207: flavor space. Charge conjugated quark fields are denoted by
208: $q^C = C \bar{q}^T$ and $\bar{q}^C=q^T C$, where $C=i\gamma^2\gamma^0$
209: is the Dirac charge conjugation matrix.
210: The indices $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ represent colors
211: ($r=1$, $g=2$ and $b=3$),
212: while $i$, $j$ and $k$ represent flavors ($u=1$, $d=2$ and $s=3$).
213: $G_S$ and $G_D$ are dimensionful coupling constants that must be determined
214: by experiments.
215: %The units used in this paper are $\hbar=c=k_B=1$.
216:
217: Typically, three-flavor NJL models use a 't Hooft determinant interaction
218: that induces a U$_A$(1) symmetry breaking in the pseudoscalar isoscalar
219: meson sector which can be adjusted such that the $\eta$-$\eta'$ mass
220: difference is described.
221: This realization of the U$_A$(1) breaking leads to the important consequence
222: that the quark condensates of different flavor sectors get coupled.
223: The dynamically generated strange quark mass contains a contribution from the
224: chiral condensates of the light flavors.
225: There is, however, another possible realization of the U$_A$(1) symmetry
226: breaking that does not arise on the mean field level, but only for the mesonic
227: fluctuations in the pseudoscalar isoscalar channel. This is due to the
228: coupling to the nonperturbative gluon sector via the the triangle anomaly,
229: see e.g. \cite{Blaschke:1996dp,vonSmekal:1997dq,Nielsen:1992va}.
230: This realization of the $\eta$-$\eta'$ mass difference gives no contribution
231: to the quark thermodynamics at the mean field level, which we
232: will follow in this paper.
233: Up to now it is not known, which of the two U$_A$(1) breaking mechanisms is the
234: dominant one in nature.
235: In the present exploratory study of the mean field thermodynamics
236: of three-flavor quark matter, we will take the point of view that the 't Hooft
237: term might be subdominant and can be disregarded.
238: One possible way to disentangle both mechanisms is due to their different
239: response to chiral symmetry restoration at finite temperatures and densities.
240: While in heavy-ion collisions only the finite temperature aspect can be
241: systematically studied \cite{AAR}, the state of matter in neutron star
242: interiors may be suitable to probe the U$_A$(1) symmetry restoration and
243: its possible implications for the quark matter phase diagram at high
244: densities and low temperatures.
245: A comparison of the results presented in this work with
246: the alternative treatment of the phase diagram of three-flavor quark
247: matter including the 't Hooft determinant term, see \cite{RWBSR}, may
248: therefore be very instructive.
249:
250: The mean-field Lagrangian is
251: \begin{widetext}
252: \begin{eqnarray}
253: {\cal L}^{MF} &=& \bar{q}_{i\alpha}\left[i\dslash\delta_{ij}\delta_{\alpha\beta}
254: - (M^0_{ij} - 4 G_S \expect{\bar{q}_{i\alpha}q_{j\beta}}\delta_{ij})\delta_{\alpha\beta}
255: + \mu_{ij,\alpha\beta}\gamma^0 \right]q_{j\beta} \nonumber \\
256: &-& 2 G_S \sum_i \expect{\bar{q}_i q_i}^2
257: - \sum_{k, \gamma} \frac{|\Delta_{k\gamma}|^2}{4 G_D} + \bar{q}_{i\alpha}\frac{\widetilde{\Delta}_{k\gamma}}{2}
258: q^C_{j\beta} + \bar{q}^C_{i\alpha}\frac{\widetilde{\Delta}^\dagger_{k\gamma}}{2} q_{j\beta},
259: \label{mflagrangian} \\
260: \widetilde{\Delta}_{k\gamma} &=& 2 G_D i \gamma_5\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}\epsilon_{ijk}
261: \expect{\bar{q}_{i'\alpha'}i\gamma_5\epsilon_{\alpha'\beta'\gamma}\epsilon_{i'j'k} q^C_{j'\beta'}}
262: = i\gamma_5\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}\epsilon_{ijk} \Delta_{k\gamma}.
263: \label{digap}
264: \end{eqnarray}
265: \end{widetext}
266: We define the chiral gaps
267: \begin{equation}
268: \label{chiralcond}
269: \phi_i = -4G_S\expect{\bar{q_i}q_i},
270: \end{equation}
271: and the diquark gaps
272: \begin{equation}
273: \label{diqcond}
274: \Delta_{k\gamma} = 2G_D\expect{\bar{q}_{i\alpha}i\gamma_5\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma}\epsilon_{ijk} q^C_{j\beta}}.
275: \end{equation}
276:
277: The chiral condensates contribute to the dynamical mass of the quarks, the constituent quark
278: mass matrix in flavor space is $M = \text{diag}(m^0_u+\phi_u, m^0_d+\phi_d, m^0_s+\phi_s)$,
279: where $m^0_i$ are the current quark masses.
280: For finite current quark masses the $U(3)_L \times U(3)_R$ symmetry of the Lagrangian is
281: spontaneously broken and only approximately restored at high densities.
282:
283: The diquark gaps, $\Delta_{k\gamma}$, are antisymmetric in flavor and color,
284: { e.g.}, the condensate corresponding to $\Delta_{ur}$ is created by green
285: and blue down and strange quarks. Due to
286: this property, the diquark gaps can be denoted with the flavor indices of the
287: interacting quarks
288: \begin{equation}
289: \Delta_{ur}=\Delta_{ds}, \quad \Delta_{dg}=\Delta_{us},
290: \quad \Delta_{sb}=\Delta_{ud}.
291: \label{digapidents}
292: \end{equation}
293:
294: After reformulating the mean-field lagrangian in 8-component Nambu-Gorkov
295: spinors~\cite{Gorkov:1959,Nambu:1960} and performing the functional integrals
296: over Grassman variables~\cite{Kapusta:1989} we obtain the thermodynamic
297: potential
298: \begin{eqnarray}
299: \label{matsubpotential}
300: \Omega(T,\mu) &=& \frac{\phi^2_u+\phi^2_d+\phi^2_s}{8 G_S}
301: +\frac{|\Delta_{ud}|^2+|\Delta_{us}|^2+|\Delta_{ds}|^2}{4 G_D}
302: \nonumber \\
303: &-&T \sum_n \int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{2}{\rm Tr}
304: \ln\left(\frac{1}{T}S^{-1}(i\omega_n,\vec{p})\right)
305: \nonumber \\
306: &+& \Omega_e - \Omega_0.
307: \end{eqnarray}
308: Here $S^{-1}(p)$ is the inverse propagator of the quark fields at four momentum
309: $p=(i\omega_n,\vec{p})$,
310: \begin{equation}
311: S^{-1}(i\omega_n,\vec{p}) = \left[
312: \begin{array}{cc}
313: \pslash-M+\mu\gamma^0&\widetilde{\Delta}_{k\gamma} \\
314: \widetilde{\Delta}_{k\gamma}^\dagger&\pslash-M-\mu\gamma^0
315: \end{array}
316: \right],
317: \label{invprop}
318: \end{equation}
319: and $\omega_n = (2n+1)\pi T$ are the Matsubara frequencies for fermions.
320: The thermodynamic potential of ultrarelativistic electrons,
321: \begin{equation}
322: \label{omegae}
323: \Omega_e = -\frac{1}{12\pi^2}\mu^4_Q -\frac{1}{6}\mu^2_QT^2 -
324: \frac{7}{180}\pi^2T^4,
325: \end{equation}
326: has been added to the potential, and the vacuum contribution,
327: \begin{eqnarray}
328: \label{omega0}
329: \Omega_0 = \Omega(0,0) &=&
330: \frac{\phi^2_{0u}+\phi^2_{0d}+\phi^2_{0s}}{8 G_S}
331: \nonumber \\
332: && - 2 N_c\sum_i\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\sqrt{M^2_i + p^2},
333: \end{eqnarray}
334: has been subtracted in order to get zero pressure in vacuum.
335: Using the identity $\text{Tr}(\text{ln}(D))=\text{ln}(\text{det}(D))$
336: and evaluating the determinant (see Appendix A), we obtain
337: \begin{equation}
338: \text{ln}\;\text{det}\left(\frac{1}{T}S^{-1}(i\omega_n,\vec{p})\right)=
339: 2\sum_{a=1}^{18}\text{ln}\left(\frac{\omega^2_n + \lambda_a(\vec{p})^2}{T^2}\right).
340: \end{equation}
341: The quasiparticle dispersion relations, $\lambda_a(\vec{p})$, are the eigenvalues
342: of the Hermitian matrix,
343: \begin{equation}
344: {\cal M} = \left[
345: \setlength\arraycolsep{-0.01cm}
346: \begin{array}{cc}
347: -\gamma^0\vec{\gamma}\cdot\vec{p}-\gamma^0 M+\mu & \gamma^0\widetilde{\Delta}_{k\gamma}C \\
348: \gamma^0 C\widetilde{\Delta}_{k\gamma}^\dagger & -\gamma^0 \vec{\gamma}^T\cdot\vec{p}+\gamma^0 M-\mu
349: \end{array}
350: \right],
351: \label{eigmatrix}
352: \end{equation}
353: in color, flavor, and Nambu-Gorkov space. This result is in agreement with~
354: \cite{Steiner:2002gx,RWBSR}.
355: Finally, the Matsubara sum can be evaluated on closed form~\cite{Kapusta:1989},
356: \begin{equation}
357: \label{matsubarasum}
358: T\sum_n\ln\left(\frac{\omega^2_n + \lambda^2_a}{T^2}\right)
359: =\lambda_a + 2 T\ln(1+e^{-\lambda_a/T}),
360: \end{equation}
361: leading to an expression for the thermodynamic potential on the form
362: \begin{eqnarray}
363: \Omega(T,\mu) &=& \frac{\phi^2_u+\phi^2_d+\phi^2_s}{8 G_S}
364: +\frac{|\Delta_{ud}|^2+|\Delta_{us}|^2+|\Delta_{ds}|^2}{4 G_D}
365: \nonumber \\
366: &-&\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\sum_{a=1}^{18}
367: \left(\lambda_a+2T\ln\left(1+e^{-\lambda_a/T}\right)\right)
368: \nonumber \\
369: &+& \Omega_e - \Omega_0.
370: \label{potential}
371: \end{eqnarray}
372: It should be noted that (14) is an even function
373: of $\lambda_a$, so the signs of the quasiparticle
374: dispersion relations are arbitrary. In this paper,
375: we assume that there are no trapped neutrinos. This
376: approximation is valid for quark matter in neutron
377: stars, after the short period of deleptonization
378: is over.
379:
380: Equations~\eqn{omegae},~\eqn{omega0},~\eqn{eigmatrix}, and~\eqn{potential}
381: form a
382: consistent thermodynamic model of superconducting quark matter. The independent
383: variables are $\mu$ and $T$. The gaps, $\phi_i$, and $\Delta_{ij}$, are
384: variational order parameters that should be determined by minimization of the
385: grand canonical thermodynamical potential, $\Omega$. Also, quark matter should
386: be locally color and electric charge neutral, so at the physical minima of the
387: thermodynamic potential the corresponding number densities should be zero
388: \begin{eqnarray}
389: n_Q &=& -\frac{\partial\Omega}{\partial\mu_Q} = 0, \\
390: n_8 &=& -\frac{\partial\Omega}{\partial\mu_3} = 0, \\
391: n_3 &=& -\frac{\partial\Omega}{\partial\mu_8} = 0.
392: \end{eqnarray}
393: The pressure, $P$, is related to the thermodynamic potential by $P = -\Omega$
394: at the global minima of $\Omega$.
395: The quark density, entropy and energy density are then obtained
396: as derivatives of the thermodynamical potential with respect to $\mu$, $T$ and
397: $1/T$, respectively.
398:
399: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
400:
401: \section{Results}
402: The numerical solutions to be reported in this Section are obtained with
403: the following set of model parameters, taken from Table 5.2 of Ref.
404: \cite{Buballa:2003qv} for vanishing 't Hooft interaction,
405: \begin{eqnarray}
406: m^0_{u,d}&=& 5.5~{\mathrm MeV}~,\\
407: m^0_s &=& 112.0~ {\mathrm MeV}~,\\
408: G_S \Lambda^2 &=& 2.319~,\\
409: \Lambda^2 &=& 602.3~ {\mathrm MeV}~.
410: \end{eqnarray}
411: With these parameters, the following low-energy QCD observables can be
412: reproduced: $m_\pi=135$ MeV, $m_K=497.7$ MeV, $f_\pi=92.4$ MeV.
413: The value of the diquark coupling strength $G_D=\eta G_S$ is considered as
414: a free parameter of the model. Here we present results for $\eta=0.75$
415: (intermediate coupling) and $\eta=1.0$ (strong coupling).
416:
417: \begin{figure}[thb]
418: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{gaps_T0_eta075n.ps}
419: \caption{Gaps and dynamical quark masses as a function of $\mu$ at T=0 for
420: intermediate diquark coupling, $\eta=0.75$.
421: \label{gaps075}
422: }
423: \end{figure}
424: \begin{figure}[thb]
425: \label{gaps1}
426: \vspace{-5mm}
427: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{gaps_T0_eta1.ps}
428: \caption{Gaps and dynamical quark masses as a function of $\mu$ at T=0 for
429: strong diquark coupling, $\eta=1$.}
430: \end{figure}
431:
432: \subsection{Quark masses and pairing gaps at zero temperature}
433: The dynamically
434: generated quark masses and the diquark pairing gaps are determined
435: selfconsistently at the absolute minima of the thermodynamic potential,
436: % with respect to a variation of these order parameters
437: in the plane of temperature and quark chemical potential.
438: This is done for both the strong and the intermediate diquark coupling
439: strength.
440: In Figs. 1 and 2 we show the dependence of
441: masses and gaps on the quark chemical potential at $T=0$ for $\eta=0.75$ and
442: $\eta=1.0$, resp.
443: \begin{figure}[hbt]
444: \vspace{-5mm}
445: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{mu_T0_eta075_and_eta1.ps}
446: \caption{Chemical potentials $\mu_Q$ and $\mu_8$ at T=0 for
447: both values of the diquark coupling $\eta=0.75$ and $\eta=1$.
448: All phases considered in this work have zero
449: $n_3$ color charge for $\mu_3=0$, hence $\mu_3$
450: is omitted in the plot.}
451: \end{figure}
452: A characteristic feature of this dynamical quark model is that the
453: critical quark chemical potentials where light and strange quark masses
454: jump from their constituent mass values down to almost their current mass
455: values do not coincide. With increasing chemical potential the system
456: undergoes a sequence of two transitions: (1) vacuum $\to$ two-flavor quark
457: matter, (2) two-flavor $\to$ three-flavor quark matter.
458: The intermediate two-flavor quark matter phase occurs within an interval of
459: chemical potentials typical for compact star interiors.
460: While at intermediate
461: coupling the asymmetry between of up and down quark chemical potentials
462: leads to a mixed NQ-2SC phase below temperatures of 20-30 MeV, at strong
463: coupling the pure 2SC phase extends down to T=0.
464: Simultaneously, the limiting chemical potentials of the two-flavor
465: quark matter region are lowered by about 40 MeV.
466: Three-flavor quark matter
467: is always in the CFL phase where all quarks are paired.
468: The robustness of the 2SC condensate under compact star constraints, with
469: respect to changes of the coupling strength, as well as to a softening of the
470: momentum cutoff by a formfactor, has been recently investigated within a
471: different parametrization \cite{Aguilera:2004ag} with similar trend:
472: for $\eta=0.75$ and NJL formfactor the 2SC condensate does not occur for
473: moderate chemical potentials while for $\eta=1.0$ it occurs simultaneously
474: with chiral symmetry restoration.
475: Fig. 3 shows the corresponding dependences of the chemical potentials
476: conjugate to electric ($\mu_Q$) and color ($\mu_8$) charges.
477: All phases considered
478: in this work have zero $n_3$ color charge for $\mu_3=0$.
479: \begin{figure}[htb]
480: \vspace{-5mm}
481: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{energyspectra2.ps}
482: \caption{Quark-quark quasiparticle dispersion relations.
483: For $\eta=0.75$, $T=0$, and $\mu=480$~MeV (left panel)
484: there is a forbidden energy band above the Fermi surface.
485: All dispersion relations are gapped at this point in the
486: $\mu-T$ plane, see Fig.~5.
487: There is no forbidden energy band for the $ub-sr$,
488: $db-sq$, and $ur-dg-sb$ quasiparticles at $\eta=1$,
489: $T=84$~MeV, and $\mu=500$~MeV (right panel). This point
490: in the $\mu-T$ plane constitute a part of the gapless
491: CFL phase of Fig.~6.
492: %$M_u=11.3$~MeV, $M_d=11.2$~MeV,
493: %$M_s=256$~MeV, $\Delta_{ud}=163$~MeV, $\Delta_{us}=8.6$~MeV,
494: %$\Delta_{ds}=3.7$~MeV, $\mu_Q=-23.7$~MeV, and $\mu_8=$1.8~MeV.}
495: }
496: \end{figure}
497: \subsection{Dispersion relations and gapless phases}
498: In Fig. 4 we show the quasiparticle dispersion relations
499: of different excitations at two points in the phase diagram:
500: (I) the CFL phase (left panel), where there is a finite
501: energy gap for all dispersion relations. (II) the gCFL
502: phase (right panel), where the energy spectrum is shifted
503: due to the assymetry in the chemical potentials, such that
504: the CFL gap is zero and (gapless) excitations with zero
505: energy are possible. In the present model, this phenomenon
506: occurs only at rather high temperatures, where the condensates
507: are diminished by thermal fluctuations.
508: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
509: \begin{figure}[htb]
510: \vspace{-5mm}
511: \label{PHASEDIAG_FOR_ETA075}
512: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{phasediag_eta075_v6.ps}
513: \caption{Phase diagram of neutral three-flavor quark matter for
514: intermediate diquark coupling $\eta=0.75$.
515: First-order phase transition boundaries are indicated by bold solid lines,
516: while thin solid lines correspond to second-order phase boundaries.
517: The dashed lines indicate gapless phase boundaries.
518: The volume fraction, $\chi_{2SC}$, of the 2SC component
519: of the mixed NQ-2SC phase is denoted with thin dotted
520: lines, while the constituent strange quark mass is
521: denoted with bold dotted lines.
522: }
523: \end{figure}
524: \subsection{Phase diagram}
525: The thermodynamical state of the system is characterized by the values
526: of the order parameters and their dependence on T and $\mu$.
527: Here we illustrate this dependency in a phase diagram.
528: We identify the following phases:
529: \begin{enumerate}
530: \item NQ: $\Delta_{ud}=\Delta_{us}=\Delta_{ds}=0$;
531: \item NQ-2SC: $\Delta_{ud}\neq 0$, $\Delta_{us}=\Delta_{ds}=0$,
532: 0<$\chi_{\rm 2SC}$<1;
533: \item 2SC: $\Delta_{ud}\neq 0$, $\Delta_{us}=\Delta_{ds}=0$;
534: \item uSC: $\Delta_{ud}\neq 0$, $\Delta_{us}\neq 0$, $\Delta_{ds}=0$;
535: %\item dSC: $\Delta_{ud}\neq 0$, $\Delta_{ds}\neq 0$, $\Delta_{us}=0$;
536: \item CFL: $\Delta_{ud}\neq 0$, $\Delta_{ds}\neq 0$, $\Delta_{us}\neq 0$;
537: \end{enumerate}
538: and their gapless versions.
539: \begin{figure}[htb]
540: \vspace{-5mm}
541: \label{PHASEDIAG_FOR_ETA1}
542: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{phasediag_eta1_v4.ps}
543: \caption{Phase diagram of neutral three-flavor quark matter for
544: strong diquark coupling $\eta=1$. Line styles as in Fig. 3}
545: \end{figure}
546: The resulting phase diagrams for intermediate
547: and strong coupling are given in Figs. 5 and 6, resp. and constitute the main
548: result of this work, which is summarized in the following statements:
549: \begin{enumerate}
550: \item Gapless phases occur only at high temperatures,
551: above 50 MeV (intermediate coupling) or 60 MeV (strong coupling).
552: \item CFL phases occur only at rather high chemical potential, well above
553: the chiral restoration transition, i.e. above 464 MeV
554: (intermediate coupling) or 426 MeV (strong coupling).
555: \item Two-flavor quark matter for intermediate coupling is at low temperatures
556: (T<20-30 MeV) in a mixed NQ-2SC phase, at high temperatures in the pure 2SC
557: phase.
558: \item Two-flavor quark matter for strong coupling is in the 2SC phase with
559: rather high critical temperatures of $\sim 100$ MeV.
560: \item The critical endpoint of first order chiral phase transitions is at
561: (T,$\mu$)=(44 MeV, 347 MeV) for intermediate coupling and at (92 MeV, 305 MeV)
562: for strong coupling.
563: \end{enumerate}
564:
565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
566: \subsection{Quark matter equation of state}
567: The various phases of quark matter presented in the previous
568: section have been identified by minimizing the thermodynamic
569: potential, $\Omega$, in the order parameters, $\Delta_{ij}$
570: and $\phi_i$. For a homogenous system, the pressure is
571: $P=-\Omega_{min}$, see Fig. 7, where the $\mu$-dependence
572: of $\Omega_{min}$ is shown at $T=0$ for the different
573: competing phases. The lowest value of $\Omega_{min}$
574: corresponds to the negative value of the physical pressure.
575: The intersection of two curves corresponds to a first
576: order phase transition. All other thermodynamic quantities
577: can be obtained from the thermodynamic potential by
578: derivatives. At intermediate coupling, we have a first order
579: transition from the NQ-2SC phase to the CFL phase, whereas
580: at strong coupling the first order transition is from
581: the 2SC phase to the CFL phase, with a lower critical
582: energy density. In Fig. 8 the equation of state for cold
583: three-flavor quark matter is given on a form suitable for
584: the investigation of hydrodynamic stability of gravitating
585: compact object, so-called quark stars. This is the topic
586: for the next Subsection.
587: \begin{figure}[th]
588: \vspace{-5mm}
589: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{omega_T0.ps}
590: \caption{Minima of the thermodynamical potential for neutral three-flavor
591: quark matter at T=0 as a function of the quark chemical potential.
592: Note that at a given coupling $\eta$ the state with the lowest
593: $\Omega_{\rm min}$
594: is attained and the physical pressure is $P=-\Omega_{\rm min}$.}
595: \end{figure}
596: \begin{figure}[h]
597: \vspace{-3mm}
598: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{eos2.ps}
599: \vspace{-1mm}
600: \caption{Equation of state for three-flavor quark matter at T=0 with first
601: order phase transitions. For intermediate diquark coupling ($\eta=0.75$):
602: from the mixed NQ-2SC phase to the CFL phase,
603: for strong diquark coupling ($\eta=1$):
604: from the 2SC phase to the CFL phase.}
605: \end{figure}
606: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
607: \subsection{Quark star configurations}
608: The properties of spherically symmetric, static
609: configurations of dense matter can be calculated
610: with the well-known Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff
611: equations for hydrostatic equilibrium of self-
612: gravitating matter, see also \cite{glendenning00},
613: \begin{equation}
614: \frac{dP(r)}{dr}= -\frac{[\varepsilon(r)+P(r)][m(r)+4\pi
615: r^{3}P(r)]}{r[r-2m(r)]}~.
616: \end{equation}
617:
618: Here $\varepsilon(r)$ is the energy density and $P(r)$ the pressure at
619: distance $r$ from the center of the star. The mass enclosed in a sphere with
620: radius $r$ is defined by
621: \begin{equation}
622: m(r)=4\pi \int_{0}^{r}\varepsilon(r')r'^{2}dr'~.
623: \end{equation}
624:
625: These equations are solved for given central baryon
626: number densities, $n_B(r=0)$, thereby defining a
627: sequence of quark star configurations.
628: For the generalization to finite temperature configurations, see
629: \cite{ST}. Hot quark stars have been discussed, e.g., in
630: \cite{Kettner:1994zs,Blaschke:1998hy,Blaschke:2003yn}.
631: \begin{figure}[ht]
632: \label{stab}
633: \vspace{-3mm}
634: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{3D3f_Stab9.ps}
635: \vspace{-2mm}
636: \caption{Sequences of cold quark stars for the three-flavor quark matter
637: equation of state described in the text.
638: The rising branches in the mass-central density relation (left panel)
639: indicate stable compact object configurations.
640: The mass-radius relations (right panel) show that the three-flavor
641: quark matter described in this paper leads to very compact selfbound objects.
642: For intermediate diquark coupling, $\eta=0.75$, stable stars
643: consist of a mixed phase of NQ-2SC matter with a maximum mass of
644: $1.21$ M$_\odot$ (dashed line).
645: %configuration with a central density of $5.62$ n$_0$.
646: At higher densities a phase transition to CFL quark matter occurs which
647: entails a collapse of the star.
648: For strong coupling, $\eta=1$, the low density quark matter is in
649: the 2SC phase and corresponding quark stars are stable up to a
650: maximum mass of
651: $1.326~M_\odot$ (solid line).
652: %with a central density of $4.27$ n$_0$.
653: The phase transition to CFL quark matter entails an instability which
654: at T=0 leads to a third family of stable stars for central densities above
655: 9 n$_0$ and a mass twin window of 1.301 - 1.326 $M_\odot$.}
656: \end{figure}
657: In Fig. 9 we show the stable configurations of
658: quark stars for the three-flavor quark matter
659: equation of state described above. The obtained
660: mass radius relations allow for very compact
661: selfbound objects, with a maximum radius that
662: is less than 10~km. For intermediate diquark
663: coupling, $\eta=0.75$, stable stars consist of
664: a NQ-2SC mixed phase with a maximum mass of
665: $1.21~M_\odot$. With incrasing density, a phase
666: transition to the CFL phase renders the sequence
667: unstable. For the strong diquark coupling,
668: $\eta=1$, quark matter is in the 2SC phase at
669: low densities and the corresponding sequence
670: of quark stars is stable up to a maximum
671: mass of 1.33~$M_\odot$. The phase transition
672: to CFL quark matter entails an instability
673: that leads to a third family of stable stars,
674: with masses in-between 1.30 and $1.33~M_\odot$.
675: \begin{figure}[ht]
676: \vspace{-5mm}
677: \label{mdef1}
678: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{3D3f_mdef2.ps}
679: \caption{Cooling an isothermal quark star configuration with initial
680: mass $M=1.41~M_\odot$ at temperature $T=40$ MeV under conservation of
681: the given baryon number $N=1.46~N_\odot$ down to $T=0$ leads to a mass defect
682: $\Delta M=0.1~M_\odot$ for the strong coupling case ($\eta=1.0$).
683: Due to the twin structure at $T=0$, two alternatives for the final state can
684: be attained, a homogeneous 2SC quark star or a dense 2SC-CFL quark hybrid star.
685: }
686: \end{figure}
687: \begin{figure}[ht]
688: \vspace{-5mm}
689: \label{struc}
690: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=-90]{3D3f_str.ps}
691: \caption{Structure of two quark star (QS) configurations with
692: $M=1.314~M_\odot$ (mass twins) for the three-flavor quark matter
693: equation of state described in the text in the case of strong coupling
694: ($\eta=1$).
695: The low-density twin has a radius of 9 km and is a homogeneous 2SC quark star,
696: the high-density twin is more compact with a radius of 8 km and consists of
697: a CFL quark matter core with 4.65 km radius and a 2SC quark matter shell.}
698: \end{figure}
699: For non-accreting compact stars the baryon number
700: is an invariant during the cooling evolution. By
701: comparing the masses of cold and hot isothermal
702: configurations of quark stars of equal baryon
703: number, the maximum mass defect (energy release
704: due to cooling) can be calculated. The result for
705: the strong diquark coupling, $\eta=1$, is shown
706: if Fig. 10. For an initial temperature of 40~MeV
707: and a given baryon number of $N=1.46~N_\odot$, the
708: initial mass is $M=1.41~M_\odot$.
709: By cooling this object down to $T=0$, a mass defect of
710: $\Delta M = 0.1~M_\odot$ occurs.
711: For the chosen baryon number, $N=1.46~N_\odot$,
712: there are two possible $T=0$ configurations (twins).
713: A hot star could thus evolve into the more compact
714: mass-equivalent (twin) final state, if a fluctuation
715: triggers the transition to a CFL phase in the core
716: of the star. The structures of these two twin
717: configurations are given in Fig. 11. The energy
718: release of 0.1~$M_\odot$ is of the same order of
719: magnitude as the energy release in supernova
720: explosions and gamma-ray bursts. Disregarding
721: the possible influence of a hadronic shell and
722: the details regarding the heat transport, the
723: cooling induced first order phase transition
724: to the CFL phase
725: could serve as a candidate process for the
726: puzzling engine of these energetic phenomena
727: \cite{Aguilera:2004ag,Blaschke:2003yn}.
728:
729:
730: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
731:
732: \section{Conclusions}
733: We have investigated the phase diagram of three-flavor
734: quark matter within an NJL model under compact star
735: constraints. Local color and electric charge neutrality
736: is imposed for $\beta-$equilibrated superconducting
737: quark matter. The constituent quark masses are
738: selfconsistently determined. The model refrains from
739: adopting the 't Hooft determinant interaction in the
740: mean field Lagrangian as a realization of the U$_A$(1)
741: symmetry breaking.
742: Instead, it is assumed that the $\eta-\eta'$ mass difference
743: originates from an anomalous coupling of the pseudoscalar
744: isosinglet fluctuation to the nonperturbative gluon sector,
745: which gives no contribution to the quark thermodynamics at
746: the mean field level. The resulting parametrization of this
747: SU$_f$(3) NJL model results in a stronger coupling than NJL
748: models with a 't Hooft term and thus in different phase
749: diagrams, cf. Ref. \cite{RWBSR}. The diquark condensates are
750: determined selfconsistently by minimization of the grand canonical
751: thermodynamic potential.
752: The various condensates are order parameters that
753: characterize the different phases in the plane of temperature
754: and quark chemical potential. These phases are in particular
755: the NQ-2SC mixed phase, the 2SC, uSC, and CFL phases, as well
756: as the corresponding gapless phases.
757: We have investigated strong and intermediate diquark coupling
758: strengths. It is shown that in both cases gapless superconducting
759: phases does not occur at temperatures relevant for compact star
760: evolution, i.e., below $\sim 50$~MeV. Three-flavor quark matter
761: phases, e.g., the CFL phase, occur only at rather large
762: chemical potential, so the existence of such phases in stable
763: compact stars is questionable. The stability and stucture of
764: isothermal quark star configurations are evaluated. For the
765: strong diquark coupling, 2SC stars are stable up to a maximum
766: mass of $1.33~M_\odot$. A second family of more compact
767: stars (twins) with a CFL quark matter core and masses in-between
768: $1.30$ and $1.33~M_\odot$ are found to be stable. For intermediate
769: coupling, the quark stars are composed of a mixed NQ-2SC phase up
770: to a maximum mass of $1.21~M_\odot$, where a phase transition
771: to the CFL phase occurs and the configurations become unstable.
772: When isothermal star configurations with an initial temperature
773: of 40~MeV cools under conservation of baryon number, the mass defect
774: is $0.1~M_\odot$ for the strong diquark coupling.
775: It is important to investigate the robustness of these statements,
776: in particular by inlcuding nonlocal formfactors and by going beyond
777: the mean-field level by including the effects of a hadronic
778: medium on the quark condensates. Finally, any statement concerning
779: the occurence and stability of quark matter in compact stars shall
780: include an investigation of the influence of a hadronic shell
781: \cite{Baldo:2002ju,Shovkovy:2003ce,Grigorian:2003vi}
782: on the solutions of the equations of compact star structure.
783:
784:
785: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
786:
787: \section{Acknowledgements}
788:
789: F.S. acknowledges support from the Swedish National Graduate School of
790: Space Technology. A.M.\"O. received support from Hacettepe University
791: Research Fund, grant No. 02 02 602 001. D.B. thanks for partial support
792: of the Department of Energy during the program INT-04-1 on {\it QCD and
793: Dense Matter: From Lattices to Stars} at the University of Washington,
794: where this work has been started.
795: This work has been supported in part by the Virtual Institute of the Helmholtz
796: Association under grant No. VH-VI-041.
797: We are grateful to our colleagues in Darmstadt and Frankfurt who made the
798: results of their study in Ref. \cite{RWBSR} available to us prior to
799: submission.
800:
801: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
802:
803: \appendix
804: \section{Dispersion Relations}
805: The dispersion relations of the quasiparticles that appear in the expression
806: for the thermodynamic potential~\eqn{potential} is the eigenvalues of the
807: Nambu-Gorkov matrix~\eqn{eigmatrix}. For each color and flavor combination of
808: the eight component Nambu-Gorkov spinors, there is a corresponding 8x8 entry in
809: this matrix; for three flavors and three colors~\eqn{eigmatrix} is a
810: 72x72 matrix.
811: The explicit form of this matrix can be represented by a table, where the rows
812: and columns denote the flavor and color degrees of freedom
813: \begin{widetext}
814: \begin{equation}
815: \label{matrix72}
816: \setlength\arraycolsep{-0.03cm}
817: \begin{array}{c|cccccccccccccccccc}
818: &q_{ur}& q_{ug}&q_{ub}&q_{dr}& q_{dg}&q_{db}&q_{sr}& q_{sg}&q_{sb}&q_{ur}^\dagger& q_{ug}^\dagger&q_{ub}^\dagger&q_{dr}^\dagger& q_{dg}^\dagger&q_{db}^\dagger&q_{sr}^\dagger& q_{sg}^\dagger&q_{sb}^\dagger \\
819: \hline
820: q_{ur}^\dagger\; &\;\;A_{ur}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&D_{ud}&0&0&0&D_{us} \\
821: q_{ug}^\dagger\; &0&A_{ug}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D_{ud}&0&0&0&0&0 \\
822: q_{ub}^\dagger\; &0&0&A_{ub}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D_{us}&0&0 \\
823: q_{dr}^\dagger\; &0&0&0&A_{dr}&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D_{ud}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
824: q_{dg}^\dagger\; &0&0&0&0&A_{dg}&0&0&0&0&D_{ud}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&D_{ds} \\
825: q_{db}^\dagger\; &0&0&0&0&0&A_{db}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D_{ds}&0 \\
826: q_{sr}^\dagger\; &0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{sr}&0&0&0&0&-D_{us}&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
827: q_{sg}^\dagger\; &0&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{sg}&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D_{ds}&0&0&0 \\
828: q_{sb}^\dagger\; &0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{sb}&\,D_{us}&0&0&0&D_{ds}&0&0&0&0\\
829: q_{ur}\; &0&0&0&0&D^\dagger_{ud}&0&0&0&D^\dagger_{us}\,&B_{ur}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
830: q_{ug}\; &0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{ud}&0&0&0&0&0&0&B_{ug}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
831: q_{ub}\; &0&0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{us}&0&0&0&0&B_{ub}&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
832: q_{dr}\; &0&-D^\dagger_{ud}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&B_{dr}&0&0&0&0&0 \\
833: q_{dg}\; &\;\;D^\dagger_{ud}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&D^\dagger_{ds}&0&0&0&0&B_{dg}&0&0&0&0 \\
834: q_{db}\; &0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{ds}&0&0&0&0&0&0&B_{db}&0&0&0 \\
835: q_{sr}\; &0&0&-D^\dagger_{us}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&B_{sr}&0&0 \\
836: q_{sg}\; &0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{ds}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&B_{sg}&0 \\
837: q_{sb}\; &\;\;D^\dagger_{us}&0&0&0&D^\dagger_{ds}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&B_{sb}
838: \end{array}.
839: \end{equation}
840: \end{widetext}
841: Each entry is a 4x4 Hermitean matrix in Dirac space.
842: The diagonal submatrices are
843: \begin{equation}
844: \label{Ablock}
845: A_{i,\alpha} = \left[
846: \setlength\arraycolsep{-0.01cm}
847: \begin {array}{cccc}
848: p+\mu_{i,\alpha}&0&-M_{{i}}&0 \\
849: 0&-p+\mu_{i,\alpha}&0&-M_{{i}} \\
850: -M_{{i}}&0&-p+\mu_{i,\alpha}&0 \\
851: 0&-M_{{i}}&0&p+\mu_{i,\alpha}
852: \end {array}
853: \right],
854: \end{equation}
855: %
856: \begin{equation}
857: \label{Bblock}
858: B_{j,\beta} = \left[
859: \setlength\arraycolsep{-0.01cm}
860: \begin {array}{cccc}
861: -p-\mu_{j,\beta}&0&M_{{j}}&0 \\
862: 0&p-\mu_{j,\beta}&0&M_{{j}}\\
863: M_{{j}}&0&p-\mu_{j,\beta}&0\\
864: 0&M_{{j}}&0&-p-\mu_{j,\beta}
865: \end{array}
866: \right],
867: \end{equation}
868: %
869: whereas the off-diagonal blocks are given by
870: \begin{equation}
871: \label{Dblock}
872: D_{i,j} = \left[
873: \setlength\arraycolsep{-0.01cm}
874: \begin {array}{cccc}
875: 0&0&0&i\Delta_{i,j}\\
876: 0&0&-i\Delta_{i,j}&0\\
877: 0&i\Delta_{i,j}&0&0\\
878: -i\Delta_{i,j}&0&0&0
879: \end{array}
880: \right].
881: \end{equation}
882:
883: The eigenvalues of~\eqn{matrix72} are the quasiparticle energies, $\lambda_a$, that
884: enter the thermodynamic potential~\eqn{potential}, {\it i.e.}, the 72
885: dispersion relations of the various quark-quark and antiquark-antiquark excitations.
886: These eigenvalues can be calculated using a standard numerical library.
887: However, in order to reduce the computational cost, the matrix can be
888: decomposed into a block-diagonal matrix by elementary row and column
889: operations.
890: \begin{widetext}
891: \begin{equation}
892: \label{blockmatrix72}
893: \setlength\arraycolsep{-0.03cm}
894: \begin{array}{c|cccccccccccccccccc}
895: &q_{ur}&q_{dg}&q_{sb}&q^\dagger_{ur}&q^\dagger_{dg}&q^\dagger_{sb}
896: &q_{ug}&q_{dr}^\dagger&q_{dr}&q_{ug}^\dagger&q_{ub}&q_{sr}^\dagger
897: &q_{sr} &q_{ub}^\dagger&q_{db}&q_{sg}^\dagger&q_{sg}&q_{db}^\dagger \\
898: \hline
899: q_{ur}^\dagger\;&\;\;A_{ur}&0&0&0&D_{ud}&\;D_{us}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
900: q_{dg}^\dagger\;&0&A_{dg}&0&D_{ud}&0&D_{ds}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
901: q_{sb}^\dagger\;&0&0&A_{sb}&D_{us}&\;D_{ds}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
902: q_{ur}&0&D^\dagger_{ud}&\;D^\dagger_{us}&\;B_{ur}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
903: q_{dg}&D^\dagger_{ud}&0&D^\dagger_{ds}&0&B_{dg}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
904: q_{sb}&\;D^\dagger_{us}&\;D^\dagger_{ds}&0&0&0&B_{sb}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
905: q_{ug}^\dagger\;&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{ug}&-D_{ud}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
906: q_{dr}&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{ud}&B_{dr}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
907: q_{dr}^\dagger\;&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{dr}&-D_{ud}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
908: q_{ug}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{ud}&B_{ug}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
909: q_{ub}^\dagger\;&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{ub}&-D_{us}&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
910: q_{sr}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{us}&B_{sr}&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\
911: q_{sr}^\dagger\;&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{sr}&-D_{us}&0&0&0&0 \\
912: q_{ub}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{us}&B_{ub}&0&0&0&0 \\
913: q_{db}^\dagger\;&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{db}&-D_{ds}&0&0 \\
914: q_{sg}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{ds}&B_{sg}&0&0 \\
915: q_{sg}^\dagger\;&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&A_{sg}&-D_{ds} \\
916: q_{db}&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-D^\dagger_{ds}&B_{db} \\
917: \end{array}
918: \end{equation}
919: \end{widetext}
920:
921: This matrix has one 24x24 and six 8x8 independent submatrices. Expressing these
922: submatrices explicitely, using~\eqns{Ablock}{Dblock}, the 24x24 matrix can
923: be decomposed into two independent 12x12 submatrices by elementary row and
924: column operations. Similarly, the six 8x8 matrices can be transformed into
925: twelve independent 4x4 submatrices. There is a two-fold degeneracy due to the
926: Nambu-Gorkov basis, each matrix appears both as ${\cal M}$ and ${\cal M}^\dagger$,
927: so there are only one independent 12x12 matrix and six 4x4 matrices. The 12x12 matrix is
928: \begin{widetext}
929: \begin{equation}
930: \label{matrix12}
931: \setlength\arraycolsep{-0.12cm}
932: {\cal M}_{12} = \left[ \begin {array}{cccccccccccc}
933: \; p+\mu_{ur}&0&0&-M_{u}&0&0&0&i\Delta_{ud}&i\Delta_{us}&0&0&0\\
934: 0&p+\mu_{dg}&0&0&-M_{d}&0&i\Delta_{ud}&0&i\Delta_{ds}&0&0&0\\
935: 0&0&p+\mu_{sb}&0&0&-M_{s}&i\Delta_{us}&i\Delta_{ds}&0&0&0&0\\
936: -M_{u}&0&0&-p+\mu_{ur}&0&0&0&0&0&0&i\Delta_{ud}&i\Delta_{us}\\
937: 0&-M_{d}&0&0&-p+\mu_{dg}&0&0&0&0&i\Delta_{ud}&0&i\Delta_{ds}\\
938: 0&0&-M_{s}&0&0&-p+\mu_{sb}&0&0&0&i\Delta_{us}&i\Delta_{ds}&0\\
939: 0&\;\;-i\Delta_{ud}&\;\;\;-i\Delta_{us}&0&0&0&-p-\mu_{ur}&0&0&M_{u}&0&0\\
940: -i\Delta_{ud}&0&-i\Delta_{ds}&0&0&0&0&-p-\mu_{dg}&0&0&M_{d}&0\\
941: -i\Delta_{us}&-i\Delta_{ds}&0&0&0&0&0&0&-p-\mu_{sb}&0&0&M_{s}\\
942: 0&0&0&0&-i\Delta_{ud}&-i\Delta_{us}&M_{u}&0&0&p-\mu_{ur}&0&0\\
943: 0&0&0&-i\Delta_{ud}&0&-i\Delta_{ds}&0&M_{d}&0&0&p-\mu_{dg}&0\\
944: 0&0&0&-i\Delta_{us}&-i\Delta_{ds}&0&0&0&M_{s}&0&0&p-\mu_{sb}\;
945: \end{array}\right],
946: \end{equation}
947: \end{widetext}
948: and the 4x4 matrices are
949: \begin{equation}
950: \label{matrix4}
951: {\cal M}_4 = \left[
952: \setlength\arraycolsep{-0.01cm}
953: \begin {array}{cccc}
954: p+\mu_{i,\alpha}&-i\Delta_{i,j}&-M_{i}&0\\
955: i\Delta_{i,j}&-p-\mu_{j,\beta}&0&M_{j}\\
956: -M_{i}&0&-p+\mu_{i,\alpha}&-i\Delta_{i,j}\\
957: 0&M_{j}&i\Delta_{i,j}&p-\mu_{j,\beta}
958: \end {array}
959: \right],
960: \end{equation}
961: for spinor products $ug-dr$, $ub-sr$, $db-sg$, $dr-ug$, $sr-ub$, and $sg-db$,
962: respectively.
963:
964: Since these matrices are Hermitean, the eigenvalues appear
965: in $\pm$ pairs. Thus, in general, there are nine independent dispersion
966: relations for quark-quark excitations and nine for antiquark-antiquark
967: excitations. The eigenvalues of~\eqn{matrix12} must be calculated
968: numerically. The eigenvalues of~\eqn{matrix4} can be obtained
969: analytically by solving for the roots of the quartic characteristic
970: polynomial,
971: \begin{equation}
972: \label{quartic}
973: \lambda^4 + a_3 \lambda^3 + a_2 \lambda^2 + a_1 \lambda + a_0=0,
974: \end{equation}
975: where
976: %\begin{widetext}
977: \begin{eqnarray}
978: a_0 &=& P^4+\left(M^2_i+M^2_j+2\Delta^2_{i,j}-\mu^2_{i,\alpha}-\mu^2_{j,\beta}\right)P^2 \nonumber \\
979: &+&\left(\mu_{i,\alpha}\mu_{j,\beta}+M_iM_j+\Delta^2_{i,j}+\mu_{i,\alpha}M_j+\mu_{j,\beta}M_i\right) \nonumber \\
980: &&\left(\mu_{i,\alpha}\mu_{j,\beta}+M_iM_j+\Delta^2_{i,j}-\mu_{i,\alpha}M_j-\mu_{j,\beta}M_i\right), \nonumber \\
981: a_1 &=& 2\left(\mu_{i,\alpha}-\mu_{j,\beta}\right)P^2
982: +2\Delta^2_{i,j}\left(\mu_{i,\alpha}-\mu_{j,\beta}\right) \nonumber \\
983: &+&\,2\left(\mu_{i,\alpha}M^2_j-\mu_{j,\beta}M^2_i
984: +\mu^2_{i,\alpha}\mu_{j,\beta}-\mu^2_{j,\beta}\mu_{i,\alpha}\right), \nonumber \\
985: a_2 &=& \mu^2_{i,\alpha}+\mu^2_{j,\beta}-2P^2-M^2_i-M^2_j-2\Delta^2_{i,j}
986: -4\mu_{i,\alpha}\mu_{j,\beta}, \nonumber \\
987: a_3 &=& -2\left(\mu_{i,\alpha}-\mu_{j,\beta}\right). \nonumber
988: \end{eqnarray}
989: %\end{widetext}
990:
991: In the limit when $M_i=M_j=M$, which is approximately valid for the $ug-dr$ and $dr-ug$
992: quasiparticles, the four solutions are
993: \begin{equation}
994: \lambda = \frac{\mu_{i,\alpha}-\mu_{j,\beta}}{2}
995: \pm \sqrt{\left(\frac{\mu_{i,\alpha}+\mu_{j,\beta}}{2} \pm E\right)^2+\Delta^2_{i,j}},
996: \end{equation}
997: where $E=\sqrt{p^2+M^2}$. This result is in agreement with~\cite{RWBSR}. More generally,
998: the solutions of the quartic equation can be found in textbooks, see,
999: { e.g.},~\cite{Abramowitz:1972}. In this work the eigenvalues of the 4x4 matrices
1000: were calculated with the exact solutions of the quartic equation and the eigenvalues of
1001: the 12x12 matrix were calculated with LAPACK. The momentum integral in~\eqn{potential}
1002: was calculated with a Gaussian quadrature. The minimization of the thermodynamic
1003: potential was performed with conjugate gradient methods, choosing the initial values
1004: of the variational parameters carefully, and then comparing the free energies of the
1005: various minima. The color and electric charges were neutralized with a globally
1006: convergent Newton-Raphson method in multidimensions.
1007:
1008: Gapless excitations/dispersion relations are characterized by a non-zero condensate,
1009: $\Delta_{i,j}$, and a corresponding dispersion relation that is zero for at least one
1010: value of the quasiparticle momentum, {\it i.e.}, the dispersion relation reaches the
1011: Fermi surface and there is no forbidden energy band.
1012:
1013: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1014:
1015: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
1016:
1017: \bibitem{rapp98}
1018: R. Rapp {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81} (1998) 53.
1019:
1020: \bibitem{alford99}
1021: M. Alford, K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. {\bf B450} (1999) 325.
1022:
1023: %\cite{Blaschke:1998md}
1024: \bibitem{Blaschke:1998md}
1025: D.~Blaschke and C.~D.~Roberts,
1026: %``Deconfinement and hadron properties at extremes of temperature and
1027: %density,''
1028: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 642} (1998) 197.
1029: %[arXiv:nucl-th/9807008].
1030: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9807008;%%
1031:
1032: \bibitem{barrois77}
1033: B.C. Barrois, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B129} (1977) 390.
1034:
1035: \bibitem{bailin84}
1036: D. Bailin and A. Love, Phys. Rep. {\bf 107} (1984) 325.
1037:
1038:
1039: %\cite{Rajagopal:2000wf}
1040: \bibitem{Rajagopal:2000wf}
1041: K.~Rajagopal and F.~Wilczek,
1042: %``The condensed matter physics of QCD,''
1043: arXiv:hep-ph/0011333.
1044: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011333;%%
1045:
1046: %\cite{Alford:2001dt}
1047: \bibitem{Alford:2001dt}
1048: M.~G.~Alford,
1049: %``Color superconducting quark matter,''
1050: Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ {\bf 51} (2001) 131.
1051: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0102047].
1052: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102047;%%
1053:
1054: %\cite{Buballa:2003qv}
1055: \bibitem{Buballa:2003qv}
1056: M.~Buballa,
1057: %``NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density,''
1058: Phys. Rep. {\bf 407} (2005) 205.
1059: %arXiv:hep-ph/0402234.
1060: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402234;%%
1061:
1062: %\cite{Schmitt:2004et}
1063: \bibitem{Schmitt:2004et}
1064: A.~Schmitt,
1065: %``The ground state in a spin-one color superconductor,''
1066: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 054016 (2005)
1067: % [arXiv:nucl-th/0412033].
1068: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0412033;%%
1069:
1070: \bibitem{NSI}
1071: D. Blaschke, N.K. Glendenning, A. Sedrakian (Eds.),
1072: {\it Physics of Neutron Star Interiors}
1073: (Springer, Heidelberg, 2001).
1074:
1075: \bibitem{CS}
1076: D.K. Hong et al. (Eds.),
1077: {\it Compact Stars: The quest for new states of matter}
1078: (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).
1079:
1080: \bibitem{SQCDM}
1081: D. Blaschke, D. Sedrakian (Eds.),
1082: {\it Superdense QCD Matter in Compact Stars}
1083: (Springer, Heidelberg, 2005).
1084:
1085: %\cite{Horvath:1991ms}
1086: \bibitem{Horvath:1991ms}
1087: J.~E.~Horvath, O.~G.~Benvenuto and H.~Vucetich,
1088: %``Quark matter superconductivity and the cooling of compact stars,''
1089: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44}, 3797 (1991).
1090: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,3797;%%
1091:
1092: %\cite{Blaschke:1999qx}
1093: \bibitem{Blaschke:1999qx}
1094: D.~Blaschke, T.~Kl\"ahn and D.~N.~Voskresensky,
1095: %``Diquark condensates and compact star cooling,''
1096: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 533} (2000) 406.
1097: % [arXiv:astro-ph/9908334].
1098: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9908334;%%
1099:
1100: %\cite{Page:2000wt}
1101: \bibitem{Page:2000wt}
1102: D.~Page, M.~Prakash, J.~M.~Lattimer and A.~Steiner,
1103: %``Prospects of detecting baryon and quark superfluidity from
1104: %cooling neutron stars,''
1105: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 85} (2000) 2048.
1106: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0005094].
1107: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005094;%%
1108:
1109: %\cite{Blaschke:2000dy}
1110: \bibitem{Blaschke:2000dy}
1111: D.~Blaschke, H.~Grigorian and D.~N.~Voskresensky,
1112: %``Cooling of hybrid neutron stars and hypothetical self-bound objects with
1113: %superconducting quark cores,''
1114: Astron.\ Astrophys.\ {\bf 368} (2001) 561.
1115: % [arXiv:astro-ph/0009120].
1116: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0009120;%%
1117:
1118: %\cite{Grigorian:2004jq}
1119: \bibitem{Grigorian:2004jq}
1120: H.~Grigorian, D.~Blaschke and D.~Voskresensky,
1121: %``Cooling of neutron stars with color superconducting quark cores,''
1122: Phys. Rev. {\bf C} (2005) in press; [arXiv:astro-ph/0411619].
1123: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0411619;%%
1124:
1125: %\cite{Blaschke:1999fy}
1126: \bibitem{Blaschke:1999fy}
1127: D.~Blaschke, D.~M.~Sedrakian and K.~M.~Shahabasian,
1128: %``Diquark condensates and the magnetic field of pulsars,''
1129: Astron.\ Astrophys.\ {\bf 350} (1999) L47.
1130: % [arXiv:astro-ph/9904395].
1131: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9904395;%%
1132:
1133: %\cite{Alford:1999pb}
1134: \bibitem{Alford:1999pb}
1135: M.~G.~Alford, J.~Berges and K.~Rajagopal,
1136: %``Magnetic fields within color superconducting neutron star cores,''
1137: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 571} (2000) 269.
1138: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9910254].
1139: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910254;%%
1140:
1141: %\cite{Iida:2002ev}
1142: \bibitem{Iida:2002ev}
1143: K.~Iida and G.~Baym,
1144: %``Superfluid phases of quark matter. III: Supercurrents and vortices,''
1145: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 014015.
1146: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0204124].
1147: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204124;%%
1148:
1149: %\cite{Sedrakian:2002ff}
1150: \bibitem{Sedrakian:2002ff}
1151: D.~M.~Sedrakian, D.~Blaschke, K.~M.~Shahabasian and D.~N.~Voskresensky,
1152: %``Meissner effect for color superconducting quark matter,''
1153: Phys.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ {\bf 33} (2002) S100.
1154: %%CITATION = PPNUE,33,S100;%%
1155:
1156: %\cite{Hong:2001gt}
1157: \bibitem{Hong:2001gt}
1158: D.~K.~Hong, S.~D.~H.~Hsu and F.~Sannino,
1159: %``Supernovae, hypernovae and color superconductivity,''
1160: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 516} (2001) 362.
1161: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0107017].
1162: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107017;%%
1163:
1164: %\cite{Ouyed:2001cg}
1165: \bibitem{Ouyed:2001cg}
1166: R.~Ouyed and F.~Sannino,
1167: %``Color superconductivity in quark stars: Powering gamma ray bursts,''
1168: Astron.\ Astrophys.\ {\bf 387} (2002) 725.
1169: % [arXiv:astro-ph/0103022].
1170: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0103022;%%
1171:
1172: %\cite{Aguilera:2002dh}
1173: \bibitem{Aguilera:2002dh}
1174: D.~N.~Aguilera, D.~Blaschke and H.~Grigorian,
1175: %``Energy release due to antineutrino untrapping and diquark condensation in
1176: %hot quark star evolution,''
1177: Astron.\ Astrophys.\ {\bf 416} (2004) 991.
1178: % [arXiv:astro-ph/0212237].
1179: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0212237;%%
1180:
1181: %\cite{Ouyed:2005tm}
1182: \bibitem{Ouyed:2005tm}
1183: R.~Ouyed, R.~Rapp and C.~Vogt,
1184: %``Fireballs from quark stars in the CFL phase: Application to gamma ray
1185: %bursters,''
1186: arXiv:astro-ph/0503357.
1187: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0503357;%%
1188:
1189: %\cite{Neumann:2002jm}
1190: \bibitem{Neumann:2002jm}
1191: F.~Neumann, M.~Buballa and M.~Oertel,
1192: %``Mixed phases of color superconducting quark matter,''
1193: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 714} (2003) 481.
1194: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0210078].
1195: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210078;%%
1196:
1197: %\cite{Oertel:2002pj}
1198: \bibitem{Oertel:2002pj}
1199: M.~Oertel and M.~Buballa,
1200: %``Color-flavor (un-)locking,''
1201: arXiv:hep-ph/0202098.
1202: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202098;%%
1203:
1204: %\cite{Gocke:2001ri}
1205: \bibitem{Gocke:2001ri}
1206: C.~Gocke, D.~Blaschke, A.~Khalatyan and H.~Grigorian,
1207: %``Equation of state for strange quark matter in a separable model,''
1208: arXiv:hep-ph/0104183.
1209: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104183;%%
1210:
1211: %\cite{Alford:2002kj}
1212: \bibitem{Alford:2002kj}
1213: M.~Alford and K.~Rajagopal,
1214: %``Absence of two-flavor color superconductivity in compact stars,''
1215: JHEP {\bf 0206} (2002) 031.
1216: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0204001].
1217: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204001;%%
1218:
1219: %\cite{Steiner:2002gx}
1220: \bibitem{Steiner:2002gx}
1221: A.~W.~Steiner, S.~Reddy and M.~Prakash,
1222: %``Color-neutral superconducting quark matter,''
1223: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 094007.
1224: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0205201].
1225: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205201;%%
1226:
1227: % Gapless color superconductivity
1228: %3 flavor
1229: \bibitem{Alford:2004akr}
1230: M. G. Alford, C. Kouvaris and K. Rajagopal,
1231: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92} (2004) 222001.
1232: %, hep-ph/0311286.
1233:
1234: \bibitem{Alford:2004akr2}
1235: M.~Alford, C.~Kouvaris and K.~Rajagopal,
1236: %``Evaluating the gapless color-flavor locked phase,''
1237: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 054009 (2005).
1238: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0406137].
1239: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406137;%%
1240:
1241: \bibitem{Ruster:2004}
1242: %\cite{Ruster:2004eg}
1243: %\bibitem{Ruster:2004eg}
1244: S.~B.~Ruster, I.~A.~Shovkovy and D.~H.~Rischke,
1245: %``Phase diagram of dense neutral three-flavor quark matter,''
1246: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 743}, 127 (2004).
1247: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0405170].
1248: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405170;%%
1249:
1250: %2 flavor
1251: %\cite{Shovkovy:2003uu}
1252: \bibitem{Shovkovy:2003uu}
1253: I.~Shovkovy and M.~Huang,
1254: %``Gapless two-flavor color superconductor,''
1255: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 564} (2003) 205.
1256: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0302142].
1257: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302142;%%
1258:
1259: \bibitem{Huang:2003}
1260: M. Huang \& I. Shovkovy,
1261: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A729} (2003) 835.
1262: %, hep-ph/0307273.
1263: %%%%%%%
1264: \bibitem{Alford:1999arw}
1265: M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek,
1266: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B537}, 443 (1999).
1267: %, hep-ph/9804403.
1268:
1269: %\cite{Blaschke:1996dp}
1270: \bibitem{Blaschke:1996dp}
1271: D.~Blaschke, H.~P.~Pavel, V.~N.~Pervushin, G.~Ropke and M.~K.~Volkov,
1272: %``Squeezed condensate of gluons and eta eta' mass difference,''
1273: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 397} (1997) 129.
1274: % [arXiv:nucl-th/9609059].
1275: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9609059;%%
1276:
1277: %\cite{vonSmekal:1997dq}
1278: \bibitem{vonSmekal:1997dq}
1279: L.~von Smekal, A.~Mecke and R.~Alkofer,
1280: %``A dynamical eta' mass from an infrared enhanced gluon exchange,''
1281: arXiv:hep-ph/9707210.
1282: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707210;%%
1283:
1284: %\cite{Nielsen:1992va}
1285: \bibitem{Nielsen:1992va}
1286: H.~B.~Nielsen, M.~Rho, A.~Wirzba and I.~Zahed,
1287: %``The tale of the $\eta'$ from the cheshire cat principle,''
1288: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 281} (1992) 345.
1289: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B281,345;%%
1290:
1291: \bibitem{AAR}
1292: R.~Alkofer, P.~A.~Amundsen and H.~Reinhardt,
1293: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 218} (1989) 75.
1294:
1295: \bibitem{RWBSR}
1296: %\cite{Ruster:2005jc}
1297: %\bibitem{Ruster:2005jc}
1298: S.~B.~Ruster, V.~Werth, M.~Buballa, I.~A.~Shovkovy and D.~H.~Rischke,
1299: %``The phase diagram of neutral quark matter: Self-consistent treatment of
1300: %quark masses,''
1301: arXiv:hep-ph/0503184.
1302: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503184;%%
1303:
1304: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1305: \bibitem{Gorkov:1959}
1306: L. P. Gor'kov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 36} (1959) 1918.
1307:
1308: \bibitem{Nambu:1960}
1309: Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. {\bf 117} (1960) 648.
1310:
1311: \bibitem{Kapusta:1989}
1312: J. I. Kapusta,
1313: {\it Finite-temperature field theory}
1314: (University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
1315:
1316: %\cite{Aguilera:2004ag}
1317: \bibitem{Aguilera:2004ag}
1318: D.~N.~Aguilera, D.~Blaschke and H.~Grigorian,
1319: %``How robust is a 2SC quark matter phase under compact star constraints?,''
1320: arXiv:hep-ph/0412266.
1321: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412266;%%
1322:
1323: \bibitem{glendenning00}
1324: N.~K.~Glendenning, {\it Compact Stars} (Springer, New York, 2000)
1325:
1326: \bibitem{ST}
1327: S.~L.~Shapiro and S.~A.~Teukolsky,
1328: {\it Black Holes, White Dwarfs, And Neutron Stars}
1329: %: The Physics Of Compact
1330: %Objects,''
1331: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=4545559}
1332: (Wiley, New York, 1983).
1333:
1334: %\cite{Kettner:1994zs}
1335: \bibitem{Kettner:1994zs}
1336: C.~Kettner, F.~Weber, M.~K.~Weigel and N.~K.~Glendenning,
1337: %``Structure and stability of strange and charm stars at finite
1338: %temperatures,''
1339: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51} (1995) 1440.
1340: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D51,1440;%%
1341:
1342: %\cite{Blaschke:1998hy}
1343: \bibitem{Blaschke:1998hy}
1344: D.~Blaschke, H.~Grigorian, G.~S.~Poghosyan, C.~D.~Roberts and S.~M.~Schmidt,
1345: %``A dynamical, confining model and hot quark stars,''
1346: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 450} (1999) 207.
1347: % [arXiv:nucl-th/9801060].
1348: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9801060;%%
1349:
1350: %\cite{Blaschke:2003yn}
1351: \bibitem{Blaschke:2003yn}
1352: D.~Blaschke, S.~Fredriksson, H.~Grigorian and A.~M.~Oztas,
1353: %``Diquark condensation effects on hot quark star configurations,''
1354: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 736} (2004) 203.
1355: % [arXiv:nucl-th/0301002].
1356: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0301002;%%
1357:
1358: \bibitem{Abramowitz:1972} M. Abramowitz \& I. A. Stegun,
1359: {\it Handbook of Mathematical Functions
1360: with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables}
1361: (Dover, New York, 1972), pp. 17-18.
1362:
1363: %\cite{Baldo:2002ju}
1364: \bibitem{Baldo:2002ju}
1365: M.~Baldo, M.~Buballa, F.~Burgio, F.~Neumann, M.~Oertel and H.~J.~Schulze,
1366: %``Neutron stars and the transition to color-superconducting quark matter,''
1367: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 562} (2003) 153.
1368: % [arXiv:nucl-th/0212096].
1369: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0212096;%%
1370:
1371: %\cite{Shovkovy:2003ce}
1372: \bibitem{Shovkovy:2003ce}
1373: I.~Shovkovy, M.~Hanauske and M.~Huang,
1374: %``Nonstrange hybrid compact stars with color superconducting matter,''
1375: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003) 103004.
1376: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0303027].
1377: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303027;%%
1378:
1379: %\cite{Grigorian:2003vi}
1380: \bibitem{Grigorian:2003vi}
1381: H.~Grigorian, D.~Blaschke and D.~N.~Aguilera,
1382: %``Hybrid stars with color superconductivity within a non local chiral quark
1383: %model,''
1384: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 69} (2004) 065802.
1385: % [arXiv:astro-ph/0303518].
1386: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0303518;%%
1387:
1388: \end{thebibliography}
1389:
1390: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1391: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1392:
1393: \end{document}
1394:
1395: