1: \chapter{Nambu-Jona-Lasino Approach for the EWSB: the Minimal Scheme}
2: \label{chapter:min}
3:
4: \section{The Lagrangian}
5:
6: Before the discovery of the top quark a new type of model of EWSB was proposed.
7: Experiments had indicated that the top quark is very heavy,
8: $(m_t)_\text{exp} > 80 \: GeV$ at that time.
9: This motivated the possibility of
10: a quark-antiquark (mainly from the third generation) bound state
11: playing the r\^ole of the Higgs boson,
12: being in this case a composite Higgs boson \cite{NAMBU89,Miransky:1988xi,Miransky:1989ds,Bardeen:1989ds}
13: (for reviews, see \cite{Cvetic:1997eb,Hill:2002ap}).
14:
15: In this chapter we consider the simplest model of this type.
16: Its Lagrangian consists of the usual SM-Lagrangian but
17: without the elementary Higgs field.
18: In its place, a four-fermion interaction term is considered.
19: The Lagrangian is of the form
20:
21: \begin{equation}\label{min1}
22: \mathcal{L}= \sum_k \;\bar{\Psi}_k \:i \gamma^\mu D_\mu \,\Psi_k
23: -\frac{1}{4} \sum_i \;(F_{\mu\nu}^{(i)\,a})^2
24: +\mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}},
25: \end{equation}
26: where the first sum is over all left- and right-handed fermions of the theory and
27: the second contains the 3 Yang-Mills terms of the SM-symmetry group,
28: $SU(3)_c\times SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$.
29: The Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}$ is locally invariant under this symmetry group.
30: In the simplest model \cite{Bardeen:1989ds}
31: the four-fermion interaction term $\mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}}$,
32: is given by
33:
34:
35: \begin{equation}\label{min2}
36: \mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}} =
37: G_t\, (\bar{\psi}_L t_R) (\bar{t}_R\psi_L),
38: \end{equation}
39: where $\psi_L=(t_L,\, b_L)^T$, and
40: $t$ and $b$ are the top and bottom quark fields.
41: The $SU(3)_c$ and $SU(2)_L$ indices are suppressed.
42: A color-index contraction in each parenthesis and a $SU(2)_L$-index
43: contraction between $\bar{\psi}_L$ and $\psi_L$ are understood.
44: The term $\mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}}$ should be considered
45: as an effective interaction
46: produced by some underlying physics.
47: In this Section we use $\mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}}$ as a given starting point and do not postulate any possible origin.
48: The whole theory is defined for energies $E \lesssim\Lambda$.
49: The scale $\Lambda$ is a parameter of the theory identified with the scale of
50: the four-fermion term $\mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}}$
51: (remember that $G_t$ has mass dimension $m^{-2}$).
52: All momentum integrals of the theory
53: are regularized using $\Lambda$ as a spherical cutoff.
54:
55:
56: \section{The Gap Equation}
57:
58: In the following we investigate the consequences of the
59: four-fermion interaction Eq. (\ref{min2}) for EWSB.
60: We make several approximations which, however,
61: are assumed to preserve those features of the full model, Eq. (\ref{min1}),
62: which are relevant to EWSB.
63:
64: The calculation is made at first order in the $1/N$ expansion,
65: where $N=3$ is the number of colors.
66: Besides, the $SU(3)_c\times SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$ gauge interactions are neglected.
67: With these approximations only the quarks of the third family interact.
68: The relevant part of the Lagrangian Eq. (\ref{min1}) is given by
69:
70: \begin{equation}\label{min3}
71: \mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_0 + \mathcal{L}_{\text{I}},
72: \end{equation}
73: where $\mathcal{L}_0$ is the free Lagrangian and
74: $\mathcal{L}_{\text{I}}$ the interaction term
75:
76: \begin{eqnarray}
77: \mathcal{L}_0 &=& \bar{t}\:i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \,t \label{min4}
78: + \bar{b}\:i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \,b, \\
79: \mathcal{L}_{\text{I}}&=& \mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}}\;
80: =\; G_t\, (\bar{\psi}_L t_R) (\bar{t}_R\psi_L). \label{min5}
81: \end{eqnarray}
82: The Lagrangian Eq. (\ref{min3}) is a version of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model
83: \cite{Nambu:tp}.
84:
85: There are no fermion mass terms in Eqs. (\ref{min4}), (\ref{min5}),
86: which would violate the $SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$ gauge symmetry.
87: Below we see how this symmetry is broken by the vacuum.
88: The top quark acquires a dynamical mass
89: (the right-handed component of the bottom quark field
90: does not interact and in consequence the bottom field cannot get a Dirac mass term).
91: Let us start redefining conventionally the free and interaction terms
92:
93: \begin{equation}\label{min6}
94: \mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_0^{'} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{I}}^{'},
95: \end{equation}
96: with
97:
98:
99:
100: \begin{figure}[tbp]
101: \begin{center}
102: \psfig{file=fig_gap_eq1.ps,width = 12.0cm}
103: \end{center}
104: %
105: \caption{Feynman diagrams contributing to the top quark self-energy.
106: The crosses represent $im_t$ insertions.}
107: \label{fig:gap_eq1}
108: \end{figure}
109:
110:
111:
112: \begin{eqnarray}
113: \mathcal{L}_0^{'} &=& \bar{t}\:i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \,t \label{min7}
114: + \bar{b}\:i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \,b
115: -\: m_t \:\bar{t}t,\\
116: \mathcal{L}_{\text{I}}^{'}&=& m_t \:\bar{t}t +
117: G_t\, (\bar{\psi}_L t_R) (\bar{t}_R\psi_L), \nonumber \\
118: &=& m_t\: \bar{t}t + \frac{G_t}{4} \left[
119: (\bar{t}t)(\bar{t}t)+(\bar{t}\: i\gamma_5 t)(\bar{t}\: i\gamma_5 t)+
120: (\bar{b}(1+\gamma_5) t)(\bar{t}(1-\gamma_5) b) \right]. \label{min8}
121: \end{eqnarray}
122: Using the convention given by Eqs. (\ref{min4}) and (\ref{min5})
123: one would obtain the same result we arrive below.
124: In Eqs. (\ref{min7}) and (\ref{min8}) $m_t$ denotes the physical top mass of the interacting theory.
125: Thus, the top self-energy $\Sigma_t$ must vanish for $p^2=m_t^2$:
126:
127: \begin{equation}\label{min10}
128: \Sigma_t\big|_{p^2=m_t^2} =0,
129: \end{equation}
130: where the diagrams contributing to $-i\Sigma_t$ are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:gap_eq1}.
131: Remember that we perform calculations to leading order in the $1/N$ expansion.
132: The limit $N\longrightarrow \infty$ is taken keeping $G N$ fixed.
133: In this approximation the top self-energy $\Sigma_t$ is momentum independent.
134: The condition Eq. (\ref{min10}) can be expressed in a simplified manner: If the sum of the two first diagrams of Fig. \ref{fig:gap_eq1}
135: is zero, then Eq. (\ref{min10}) is fulfilled\footnote{This can be shown by introducing an auxiliary field and demanding that the associated 1PI one-point function of the shifted theory vanishes.}.
136: Eq. (\ref{min10}) is therefore equivalent to
137:
138: \begin{equation}\label{min11}
139: i m_t+\frac{i\, G_t}{4}(-1)\, 2N\int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}
140: \tr\left(\frac{i}{l\contract -m_t}\right) =0.
141: \end{equation}
142: This equation is expressed diagrammatically in Fig. \ref{fig:gap_eq2}.
143: Taking the trace one obtains
144:
145: \begin{equation}\label{min11a}
146: m_t \left[ 1-2i N G_t \int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}
147: \;\frac{1}{l^2 -m_t^2}\right] =0 .
148: \end{equation}
149: After doing the Wick rotation and performing the momentum integral using $\Lambda$ as spherical cutoff, we obtain
150:
151:
152:
153: \begin{figure}[tbp]
154: \begin{center}
155: \psfig{file=fig_gap_eq2.ps,width = 10.0cm}
156: \end{center}
157: \caption{Diagrammatic representation of the gap equation. The crosses represent $im_t$ insertions.}
158: \label{fig:gap_eq2}
159: \end{figure}
160:
161:
162:
163: \begin{equation}\label{min12}
164: m_t = m_t\,G_t \:\frac{N\Lambda^2}{8\pi^2}
165: \left( 1-\frac{m_t^2}{\Lambda^2} \, \log(\Lambda^2/m_t^2 -1)\right).
166: \end{equation}
167: This is the gap equation for the top mass.
168: We shall derive this equation again using auxiliary fields in Chapter \ref{chapter:eff_potential}.
169: Note that the factor inside the outer parenthesis is smaller than 1.
170: For $G_t$ smaller than a critical coupling,
171: $G_t < 8\pi^2/(N\Lambda^2) \equiv G_{\text{crit}}$,
172: only $m_t=0$ is a solution of Eq. (\ref{min12}).
173: If $G_t$ is bigger than $G_{\text{crit}}$,
174: the gap equation possesses 2 solutions,
175: the symmetrical one $m_t=0$ and a non-symmetrical solution $m_t\neq 0$.
176: In Chapter \ref{chapter:eff_potential} we shall see that for $G_t > G_{\text{crit}}$
177: the solution $m_t\neq 0$ corresponds to the state of lowest energy of the model, the vacuum.
178: The top mass is given in this case by the equation
179:
180: \begin{equation}\label{min13}
181: 1 = G_t \:\frac{N\Lambda^2}{8\pi^2}
182: \left( 1-\frac{m_t^2}{\Lambda^2} \, \log(\Lambda^2/m_t^2 -1)\right).
183: \end{equation}
184: Eq. (\ref{min13}) reveals that in order to obtain a top mass much smaller than the cutoff, $m_t\ll\Lambda$, a fine-tuning is needed.
185: The parameters of the theory, $G_t$ and $\Lambda$, must be chosen
186: in such a way that $G_t/G_{\text{crit}}=1+\delta$, with $\delta\ll 1$.
187:
188:
189: The dynamically created top mass breaks the $SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$ symmetry
190: of the Lagrangian Eq. (\ref{min1}).
191: The theory remains, however, invariant under a subgroup of the original symmetry,
192: namely under electromagnetic $U(1)_{\text{em}}$ transformations.
193: Due to the Goldstone theorem we expect, as in the SM, 3 Goldstone bosons.
194: In the next Section we find these massless modes and, in addition,
195: a neutral scalar boson explicitly.
196: All of them are fermion-antifermion bound states. \\
197:
198:
199: In order to motivate extensions of this minimal scheme,
200: we give some comments about the possible mass terms which can be dynamically generated.
201: The term $m_t \:(\bar{t}_L t_R+\bar{t}_R t_L)$ is the only mass term that can be generated by the interaction Eq. (\ref{min5}).\footnote{
202: One could say that more general terms are in this case also possible,
203: e.g. $\bar{b}_L t_R + \text{h.c.}$ or $\bar{t}\, i\gamma_5\,t$.
204: However these terms are related to the term $\bar{t}_L t_R+\bar{t}_R t_L$ by $SU(2)_L$ or $t_R$-$U(1)$-chiral transformations, respectively.
205: The Lagrangian Eq. (\ref{min1}) is invariant under these transformations.}
206: If instead of Eq. (\ref{min2}) we consider gauge invariant four-quark interaction terms involving all quarks,
207: other dynamical mass terms could also be induced.
208: In particular, it could happen that the electroweak symmetry gets broken completely
209: if in addition to the usual electrically neutral mass terms a term such as $\bar{b}t+\bar{t}b$ appears
210: (this term violates the $U(1)_{\text{em}}$ symmetry).
211: We refer to this possibility as the vacuum alignment problem.
212: Furthermore complex mass terms which mix quarks of the same electric charge could also appear.
213: They can lead to a non-trivial CKM-matrix and,
214: if the Lagrangian of the model is $CP$-invariant,
215: to spontaneous $CP$-breaking.
216: We study this possibility in Chapter \ref{chapter:3fam}.
217:
218:
219: \section{Scalar and Goldstone Modes}\label{section:min_poles}
220:
221:
222: Quark-antiquark bound states show up as poles
223: in two-point correlation functions of quark-antiquark composite fields
224:
225: \begin{equation}\label{min16a}
226: i\mathrm{G}(p^2)= \int d^4x \: e^{ipx}
227: <\Omega|T\{ \mathcal{O}(x)\,\mathcal{O}^\dagger(0)\}|\Omega>_{\text{amputated}},
228: \end{equation}
229: where the field $\mathcal{O}(x)$ is a Lorentz scalar, quark-bilinear composite field
230: and $\mathcal{O}^\dagger(x)$ its hermitian adjoint.
231:
232: In this Section we calculate such correlation functions in the
233: scalar, pseudoscalar, and charged channels.
234: We shall find 3 massless modes corresponding to the 3 Goldstone bosons,
235: and a fourth pole in the scalar channel corresponding to a composite Higgs boson.
236: In order to obtain the poles, it is necessary to use
237: the gap equation (Eq. (\ref{min13})) in the calculations.
238:
239: The composite fields we deal with are
240:
241: \begin{equation}\label{min16b}
242: \begin{split}
243: \mathcal{O}_s (x) &=\bar{t}(x)t(x), \\
244: \mathcal{O}_p (x) &=\bar{t}(x) \,i\gamma_5\, t(x), \\
245: \mathcal{O}_c^- (x)&=\bar{t}(x)(1- \gamma_5)b(x), \\
246: \mathcal{O}_c^+ (x)&=\bar{b}(x)(1+ \gamma_5)t(x),
247: \end{split}
248: \end{equation}
249: where the indices $s$, $p$, and $c$ stand for scalar, pseudoscalar, and charged, respectively.
250:
251:
252:
253: \begin{figure}[tbp]
254: %
255: \begin{center}
256: \psfig{file=fig_four_point.ps,width = 13.8cm}
257: \end{center}
258: %
259: \caption{Feynman diagrams contributing to two-point correlation functions
260: of fermion-antifermion composite fields.}
261: \label{fig:four-point}
262: \end{figure}
263:
264:
265:
266: The Feynman diagrams contributing to the two-point correlation functions
267: are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:four-point}.
268: In the scalar channel the amplitude is given by
269:
270: \begin{eqnarray}
271: i\mathrm{G}_s(p^2) &=&
272: \frac{i G_t}{4}\,2+\left(\frac{iG_t}{4}\right)^2 4(-1) N
273: \int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\tr\left( \frac{i}{l\contract -m_t}
274: \;\;\frac{i}{p\contract +l\contract -m_t}\right) +\dots \nonumber \\
275: &=& \frac{i G_t}{2} \left( \label{min15}
276: 1-\frac{i G_t N I_s}{2}+\left( -\frac{i G_t N I_s}{2}\right)^2+\dots\right),
277: \end{eqnarray}
278: where $I_s$ is given by
279:
280: \begin{equation}\label{min16}
281: I_s=\int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\tr\left( \frac{i}{l\contract -m_t}
282: \;\;\frac{i}{l\contract +p\contract -m_t}\right).
283: \end{equation}
284:
285: If one uses, as we do, a spherical cutoff as regulator,
286: the Feynman integrals are
287: in general not invariant under a shift of the integration variables.
288: Convergent or logarithmically divergent integrals are invariant under this operation,
289: while linearly or more than linearly divergent integrals are not.
290: In the last case additional surface terms appear \cite{JAUCH-ROHRLICH55}.
291: A consequence of the appearance of surface terms is that ambiguities show up in some
292: correlation functions.
293: In particular, the mass of the Higgs particle becomes ambiguous.
294: On the other hand the position of the Goldstone boson poles is not affected
295: \cite{Willey:1993cp}.
296: These surface terms are treated in more detail in Appendix \ref{appendix:surface_terms}.
297: In what follows we neglect surface terms,
298: assuming that their ambiguous contributions are not physically relevant.
299:
300: It is convenient to write $I_s$ as a quadratically divergent plus
301: a logarithmically divergent contribution.
302: Neglecting surface terms we obtain for $I_s$:
303:
304: \begin{equation}\label{min17}
305: I_s= -4 \int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4} \;\frac{1}{l^2 -m_t^2}
306: +2(p^2-4m_t^2)\int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4} \;
307: \frac{1}{(l^2 -m_t^2)((l+p)^2 -m_t^2)}.
308: \end{equation}
309: Summing the geometric series in Eq. (\ref{min15}) we get
310:
311: \begin{equation}\label{min18}
312: i\mathrm{G}_s(p^2)= \frac{i G_t}{2} \left(1+\frac{i G_t N I_s}{2}\right)^{-1}.
313: \end{equation}
314: Using Eq. (\ref{min17}) and the gap equation we finally obtain
315:
316: \begin{equation}\label{min19}
317: i\mathrm{G}_s(p^2)= \frac{1}{2N(p^2-4m_t^2)} \left(
318: \int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\;\frac{1}{(l^2 -m_t^2)((l+p)^2 -m_t^2)}
319: \right)^{-1} .
320: \end{equation}
321: Thus the amplitude of the scalar channel has a pole at $p^2=4m_t^2$.
322: That means that there is a composite scalar particle, a composite Higgs boson, with mass equal to $2 m_t$.
323: This quantitative prediction of the model for the mass of the composite Higgs particle should not be considered as an exact one, mainly because of the crude approximation we are doing.
324: For example in a renormalization group analysis including gauge interactions this result receives important corrections (see Chapter \ref{chapter:composite_condition}).
325: Concerning the regularization procedure and its possible influence on this result, some comments are made in the next Section.
326:
327: In a similar way one finds the amplitudes in the pseudoscalar and charged channels.
328: One gets
329:
330: \begin{eqnarray}
331: i\mathrm{G}_p(p^2) &=& \frac{1}{2N p^2} \left( \label{min20}
332: \int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\;\frac{1}{(l^2 -m_t^2)((l+p)^2 -m_t^2)}\right)^{-1}, \\
333: i\mathrm{G}_c(p^2) &=& \frac{1}{8N} \left( \label{min21}
334: \int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\;\frac{p(l+p)}{(l^2 -m_t^2)(l+p)^2}\right)^{-1}.
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: Note that none of the three four-point correlation functions depends directly
337: on the coupling constant $G_t$.
338: From Eqs. (\ref{min20}) and (\ref{min21}) one can see that
339: the pseudoscalar and charged amplitudes have a pole at $p^2=0$.
340: These massless modes are the Goldstone bosons.
341: In the next Section we see how these modes manifest themselves.
342:
343:
344: \section{Gauge boson masses}\label{section:gauge_boson_masses}
345:
346:
347: Finally we study in this minimal scheme the masses of the gauge bosons,
348: which appear in the theory according to the Higgs mechanism.
349: Recall that this denotes the mechanism where Goldstone bosons related to local symmetries are eaten by the corresponding gauge fields which, in turn, get massive.
350: Let us remark that the Higgs mechanism does not require {\it elementary} scalar bosons \cite{Jackiw:1973tr,Cornwall:1973ts}.
351:
352: As a consequence of the gauge invariance, the gauge-boson self-energies
353: $\Pi^{\mu \nu}_A$, with $A=\gamma$, $Z^0$, $W^{\pm}$, must fulfill the Ward identity $p_\mu\Pi^{\mu \nu}_A=0$
354: (where $p_\mu$ is the external momentum).
355: The self-energies can then be written as
356:
357:
358:
359:
360: \begin{table}[tbp]
361: \begin{equation*}\Large
362: \begin{array}{|!{\;}c!{\;}|!{\;}c!{\;}|!{\;}c!{\;}|}
363: \hline
364: & & \\
365: \int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\;\frac{1}{(l^2-M)^2} &
366: \frac{i}{(4\pi)^2}\int_0^{\Lambda^2} \frac{dq^2\, q^2}{(q^2+M)^2} &
367: \frac{i}{(4\pi)^{d/2}}\frac{\Gamma(2-d/2)}{M^{2-d/2}} \\
368: & & \\
369: \hline \hline
370: & & \\
371: \int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\;\frac{l^2}{(l^2-M)^2} &
372: \frac{-i}{(4\pi)^2}\int_0^{\Lambda^2} \frac{dq^2\, q^4}{(q^2+M)^2} &
373: \frac{-i}{(4\pi)^{d/2}}\frac{d}{2}\,\frac{\Gamma(1-d/2)}{M^{1-d/2}} \\
374: & & \\
375: \hline
376: \end{array}
377: \end{equation*}
378: \caption{Table showing momentum integrals using different regularizations.
379: In the first column the generic integrals are shown.
380: In the second column these integrals are regularized using a cutoff $\Lambda$.
381: In the third column the same integrals are shown using dimensional regularization,
382: where $d=4-\epsilon$, the space-time dimension, is used as regulator.
383: The first and second rows show logarithmically and quadratically divergent integrals, respectively.}
384: \label{table:regularizations}
385: \end{table}
386:
387:
388:
389:
390:
391: \begin{equation}\label{min22}
392: \Pi^{\mu \nu}_A=(g^{\mu \nu}p^2-p^\mu p^\nu)\,\Pi_A(p^2).
393: \end{equation}
394: It is known that a momentum cutoff is not a good regulator,
395: in the sense that it does not respect the Ward identities.
396: In order to obtain self-energies of the form given in Eq. (\ref{min22})
397: we use as an intermediate stage dimensional regularization.
398: We proceed as follows:
399: first we calculate the self-energies using dimensional regularization
400: (which is a good regulator).
401: Then we express the results as a function of the cutoff $\Lambda$ using Table \ref{table:regularizations}.
402:
403:
404:
405: By using dispersion relations \cite{Gherghetta:1994cr}
406: it is possible to obtain directly transverse gauge bosons self-energies.
407: In this approach one imposes the appearance of the Goldstone bosons
408: related to the $SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y\longrightarrow U(1)_{em}$
409: symmetry breaking.
410: As a consequence, one obtains the gap equation and the mass pole at $p^2=4m_t^2$
411: in the scalar channel (the same we obtained using a spherical cutoff as regulator).
412: Still another possibility is to use proper time regularization.
413: For a comparison between these different schemes
414: and the spherical cutoff regularization
415: in the context of a next-to-leading order calculation in $1/N$, see \cite{Cvetic:1996uq}.
416: For simplicity we stick to the spherical cutoff regularization.
417:
418:
419: We calculate the self-energies to all orders in $G_t$ in the $N\longrightarrow\infty$ limit.
420: In this approximation the contribution of gauge boson loops is suppressed by a factor $N^{-1}$ as compared with the quark-loop contribution shown in Fig. \ref{fig:self_energy1} and are therefore omitted.
421: Consequently a gauge fixing is not required.
422: Let us first calculate the self-energy of the $W^\pm$ boson.
423: We consider two types of contributions
424:
425: \begin{equation}\label{min24}
426: i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W=\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_1+\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_2,
427: \end{equation}
428: where $\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_1$ is the contribution we obtain without considering
429: the four-fermion interaction $\mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}}$ (Fig. \ref{fig:self_energy1}),
430: and $\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_2$ contains all diagrams with $G_t$ insertions
431: (Fig. \ref{fig:self_energy2}).
432: The first term is given by
433:
434:
435:
436: \begin{figure}[tbp]
437: %
438: \begin{center}
439: \psfig{file=fig_self_energy1.ps,width = 4.0cm}
440: \end{center}
441: %
442: \caption{Feynman diagram associated with
443: the self-energy contribution $\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_1$.}
444: \label{fig:self_energy1}
445: \end{figure}
446:
447:
448:
449: \begin{equation}\label{min25}
450: \left[i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_1=
451: \left( \frac{i g_2}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2
452: \int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4} (-1)N \tr\left(
453: \projectorl \, \frac{i}{l\contract +p\contract} \,\gamma^\mu\,
454: \projectorl \, \frac{i}{l\contract - m_t } \,\gamma^\nu \right) ,
455: \end{equation}
456: where $\projectorl=(1-\gamma_5)/2$ and $g_2$ denotes the $SU(2)_L$ gauge coupling.
457: After integration we obtain
458:
459:
460: \begin{equation}\label{min26}
461: \begin{split}
462: \left[i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_1 &= (g^{\mu\nu}p^2-p^\mu p^\nu)
463: \left( \frac{i g_2}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 2N
464: \int_0^1 dx \: 2x(1-x) \:\int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\;\frac{1}{(l^2-D)^2} \\
465: &\qquad\quad -m_t^2 \,g^{\mu\nu}\left( \frac{i g_2}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 2N
466: \int_0^1 dx \: (1-x) \:\int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\;\frac{1}{(l^2-D)^2} ,
467: \end{split}
468: \end{equation}
469: with $D=-x(1-x)p^2+(1-x)m_t^2$.
470: For $m_t=0$, $\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_1$ fulfills the Ward identity.
471: In order to obtain a transversal self-energy for $m_t \neq 0$
472: one must also consider the contributions coming from the interaction $\mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}}$ which is responsible for
473: the generation of $m_t$.
474: Because of the tensor structure of $\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_2$
475: (see Fig. \ref{fig:self_energy2})
476: this term must be proportional to $p^\mu p^\nu$.
477: Therefore, the only way for $i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W$ to respect the Ward identity is
478: that the second term of Eq. (\ref{min24}) is given by
479:
480: \begin{equation}\label{min27}
481: \left[i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_2=
482: m_t^2 \,\frac{p^\mu p^\nu}{p^2}\left( \frac{i g_2}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 2N
483: \int_0^1 dx \: (1-x) \:\int\frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\;\frac{1}{(l^2-D)^2}.
484: \end{equation}
485: Note that this expression does not depend on $G_t$.
486: Now we show that this is indeed what one obtains for $\left[i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_2$ from direct calculation.
487: We use the fact that the sum of the diagrams of Fig. \ref{fig:self_energy2}
488: is proportional to the sum of the diagrams given in Fig. \ref{fig:four-point}
489: (which are calculated in Eq. (\ref{min21})).
490: The contribution is given by
491:
492:
493: \begin{equation}\label{min28}
494: \left[i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_2=
495: \left( \frac{i g_2}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2 N^2
496: \left[\int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}
497: \frac{m_t \tr(\gamma^\mu(l\contract+p\contract))}{(l^2-m_t^2)^2 (l+p)^2}
498: \right]
499: i\mathrm{G}_c(p^2)
500: \left[\int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}
501: \frac{m_t \tr(\gamma^\nu(l\contract+p\contract))}{(l^2-m_t^2)^2 (l+p)^2}
502: \right] .
503: \end{equation}
504: Using Eq. (\ref{min21}) one obtains Eq. (\ref{min27}). The self-energy
505: fulfills the Ward identity as it should.
506: Extracting the tensor structure from $\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W$ (using Eq. (\ref{min22}))
507: one obtains finally
508:
509: \begin{equation}\label{min29}
510: \Pi_W(p^2)=
511: \left( \frac{i g_2}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2
512: \frac{2N}{(4\pi)^2}
513: \int_0^1 dx
514: \left( 2x(1-x) -(1-x)\frac{m_t^2}{p^2} \right)
515: \left[ \log(\Lambda^2/D) -1 \right],
516: \end{equation}
517: with $D=-x(1-x)p^2+(1-x)m_t^2$.
518: The Goldstone boson contribution makes $\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W(p^2)$ singular at $p^2=0$.
519: This shifts the $W^\pm$ mass away from zero.
520: The dressed propagator is then given by
521:
522: \begin{equation}\label{min30}
523: \int d^4x \: e^{ipx} <\Omega| \text{T}\:\{ W_\mu^+(x) W_\nu^-(0)\} |\Omega>\:=
524: \frac{-i (g_{\mu\nu}-p_\mu p_\nu/p^2)}{p^2}
525: \left( \frac{1}{1-\Pi_W(p^2)} \right) ,
526: \end{equation}
527: where $W_\mu^\pm (x)$ are the $W^\pm$ fields.
528: We define $\bar{g}_2(p^2)$ and $\bar{f}(p^2)$ as
529:
530:
531:
532: \begin{figure}[tbp]
533: \begin{center}
534: \psfig{file=fig_self_energy2.ps,width = 15.8cm}
535: \end{center}
536: \caption{Feynman diagrams contributing to
537: the self-energy $\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_W\right]_2$,
538: which contain four-fermion interaction insertions.}
539: \label{fig:self_energy2}
540: \end{figure}
541:
542:
543:
544: \begin{eqnarray}
545: \frac{1}{\bar{g}_2^2(p^2)} &=& \frac{1}{g_2^2}
546: +\frac{N}{(4\pi)^2}
547: \int_0^1 dx\: 2x(1-x)
548: \left[ \log(\Lambda^2/D) -1 \right], \label{min31} \\
549: \bar{f}^2(p^2) &=&
550: m_t^2\,\frac{ N}{(4\pi)^2}
551: \int_0^1 dx\: (1-x)
552: \left[ \log(\Lambda^2/D) -1 \right], \label{min32}
553: \end{eqnarray}
554: such that
555:
556: \begin{equation}\label{min33}
557: \frac{1-\Pi_W(p^2)}{g_2^2} \:=\:
558: \frac{1}{\bar{g}_2^2(p^2)}
559: -\frac{\bar{f}^2(p^2)}{p^2}.
560: \end{equation}
561: The $W^\pm$ mass is given by the pole of its dressed propagator (Eq. (\ref{min30}))
562: through the condition
563:
564: \begin{equation}\label{min34}
565: \begin{split}
566: M_W^2 &= \bar{f}^2(M_W^2)\:\bar{g}_2^2(M_W^2) \\
567: &= m_t^2\:\:
568: \frac{ g_2^2 N/(4\pi)^2 \int_0^1 dx\, (1-x)[\log(\Lambda^2/D) -1]}
569: {1+g_2^2 N/(4\pi)^2 \int_0^1 dx\,2x(1-x)[\log(\Lambda^2/D) -1]},
570: \end{split}
571: \end{equation}
572: with $D$ evaluated at $p^2=M_W^2$.\\
573: On the other hand the Fermi constant is given by
574:
575: \begin{equation}\label{min35}
576: G_F=\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2} \:\bar{f}^2(0)}.
577: \end{equation}
578: The experimental value of the Fermi constant is
579: $(\sqrt{2}\,G_F)^{-1/2}=246\:GeV$.
580: Using the experimental value of the top mass $m_t=178\: GeV$ and
581: the number of colors $N=3$ Eq. (\ref{min35}) gives the condition
582:
583:
584: \begin{equation}\label{min36}
585: \left( \frac{246}{178}\right)^2 \approx
586: \frac{12}{(4\pi)^2}\int_0^1 dx\,(1-x)
587: \left[ \log(\Lambda^2/((1-x)m_t^2))-1\right].
588: \end{equation}
589: The last equation demands a value of $\Lambda\approx 3\times 10^{13} GeV$.
590:
591:
592: Next we perform a similar calculation for the neutral gauge bosons.
593: We consider the fields $A_3^\mu(x)$ and $B^\mu(x)$ from the $SU(2)_L$ and $U(1)_Y$ gauge groups, respectively.
594: The difference in this case is that the gauge bosons mix.
595: Instead of calculating a single self-energy we have to calculate a $2\times 2$
596: matrix.
597: As in the case of the charged-boson self-energy
598: we distinguish two contributions
599:
600: \begin{equation}\label{min37}
601: i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_{jk} = \left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_{jk} \right]_1
602: + \left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_{jk} \right]_2,
603: \end{equation}
604: where $j,k=1,2$ refers to the fields $B^\mu(x)$ ($j,k=1$) and $A_3^\mu(x)$ ($j,k=2$).
605: Similar as in Eq. (\ref{min22}) we define
606:
607: \begin{equation}\label{min38}
608: \Pi^{\mu \nu}_{ij}=(g^{\mu \nu}p^2-p^\mu p^\nu)\,\Pi_{ij}(p^2).
609: \end{equation}
610: The dressed propagator is given in this case by
611:
612: \begin{equation}\label{min39}
613: \int dx\: e^{ipx}
614: \begin{pmatrix}
615: < B^\mu(x)\, B^\nu(0)> & < B^\mu(x)\, A_3^\nu(0)> \\
616: < A_3^\mu(x)\, B^\nu(0)> & < A_3^\mu(x)\, A_3^\nu(0)>
617: \end{pmatrix}
618: = \frac{-i (g^{\mu\nu}-p^\mu p^\nu/p^2)}{p^2}
619: \left( 1-\Pi(p^2) \right)^{-1},
620: \end{equation}
621: where $< A^\mu(x)\, B^\nu(0)>$ stands for
622: $<\Omega|T\{ A^\mu(x)\, B^\nu(0)\}|\Omega>$
623: and $( 1-\Pi(p^2))$ is a $2\times 2$ matrix.
624: The first contribution to the self-energy,
625: $\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_{jk}\right]_1$, is given by
626:
627: \begin{equation}\label{min40}
628: \begin{split}
629: \left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_{jk}\right]_1 =
630: -2N\sum_{q=t,b}\: &\int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4}\int dx\,\frac{1}{(l^2-D_q)^2}\times \\
631: & \Big[ \, (g^{\mu \nu}p^2-p^\mu p^\nu) \,2x(1-x)
632: \begin{pmatrix}
633: g_1^2\,(Y_{q\text{L}}^2 + Y_{q\text{R}}^2) & g_1 g_2 \,T_q^3 Y_{q\text{L}} \\
634: g_1 g_2\, T_q^3 Y_{q\text{L}} & g_2^2 \,(T_q^3)^2
635: \end{pmatrix} \\
636: & \qquad -m_q^2 \,g^{\mu \nu}
637: \begin{pmatrix}
638: g_1^2\, (Y_{q\text{L}}-Y_{q\text{R}})^2 & g_1 g_2\, T_q^3(Y_{q\text{L}}-Y_{q\text{R}})\\
639: g_1 g_2\,T_q^3(Y_{q\text{L}}-Y_{q\text{R}}) & g_2^2 \, (T_q^3)^2
640: \end{pmatrix}
641: \Bigg] ,
642: \end{split}
643: \end{equation}
644: with $D_q=-x(1-x)p^2+m_q^2$.
645: The weak hypercharges are $Y_{t\text{L}}=Y_{b\text{L}}=-1/6$, $Y_{t\text{R}}=-2/3$,
646: $Y_{b\text{R}}=1/3$ and the weak isospin charges are
647: $T_t^3=-T_b^3=1/2$.
648: The $U(1)_Y$ and $SU(2)_L$ gauge couplings are denoted by $g_1$ and $g_2$, respectively.
649: Again $\left[ i\Pi^{\mu \nu}_{jk}\right]_1$ is not transversal for non-vanishing quark masses.
650: Adding the contributions with $G_t$ insertions
651: (only the pseudoscalar channel, i.e. the Goldstone boson, contributes)
652: one obtains
653:
654: \begin{equation}\label{min41}
655: \begin{split}
656: \Pi(p^2) &=
657: -\frac{2N}{(4\pi)^2}\int_0^1 dx\,2x(1-x) \left[\log(\Lambda^2/D_t) -1\right]
658: \begin{pmatrix}
659: 17/36 \:g_1^2 & -1/12\: g_1 g_2 \\
660: -1/12\: g_1 g_2 & 1/4 \: g_2^2
661: \end{pmatrix} \\
662: %
663: &\quad-\frac{2N}{(4\pi)^2}\int_0^1 dx\,2x(1-x) \left[\log(\Lambda^2/D_b) -1\right]
664: \begin{pmatrix}
665: 5/36\: g_1^2 & 1/12\: g_1 g_2 \\
666: 1/12\: g_1 g_2 & 1/4\: g_2^2
667: \end{pmatrix} \\
668: %
669: &\quad+\frac{2m_t^2 N}{p^2(4\pi)^2}\int_0^1 dx \left[\log(\Lambda^2/D_t) -1\right]
670: \frac{1}{4}
671: \begin{pmatrix}
672: g_1^2 & g_1 g_2 \\
673: g_1 g_2 & g_2^2
674: \end{pmatrix} ,
675: \end{split}
676: \end{equation}
677: where Eq. (\ref{min38}) was used.
678: After a rearrangement we obtain
679:
680: \begin{equation}\label{min42}
681: \begin{pmatrix}
682: 1/g_1 & 0 \\
683: 0 & 1/g_2
684: \end{pmatrix}
685: \Big( 1-\Pi(p^2) \Big)
686: \begin{pmatrix}
687: 1/g_1 & 0 \\
688: 0 & 1/g_2
689: \end{pmatrix}
690: =
691: \begin{pmatrix}
692: 1/g_1^2(p^2) & 0 \\
693: 0 & 1/g_2^2(p^2)
694: \end{pmatrix}
695: -\frac{f^2(p^2)}{p^2}
696: \begin{pmatrix}
697: 1 & 1 \\
698: 1 & 1
699: \end{pmatrix} ,
700: \end{equation}
701: with $g_1(p^2)$, $g_2(p^2)$, and $f(p^2)$ given by
702:
703: \begin{equation}\label{min43}
704: \frac{1}{g_1^2(p^2)} = \frac{1}{g_1^2} + \frac{2N}{(4\pi)^2}\int_0^1 dx\,2x(1-x)
705: \left( \frac{5}{9} \left[\log(\Lambda^2/D_t) -1\right]
706: +\frac{1}{18} \left[\log(\Lambda^2/D_b) -1\right] \right),
707: \end{equation}
708:
709: \begin{equation}\label{min44}
710: \frac{1}{g_2^2(p^2)} = \frac{1}{g_2^2} + \frac{2N}{(4\pi)^2}\int_0^1 dx\,2x(1-x)
711: \left( \frac{1}{3} \left[\log(\Lambda^2/D_t) -1\right]
712: +\frac{1}{6} \left[\log(\Lambda^2/D_b) -1\right] \right),
713: \end{equation}
714:
715: \begin{equation}\label{min45}
716: f^2(p^2)= \frac{p^2}{6}\frac{N}{(4\pi)^2}\int_0^1 dx\,2x(1-x)\,\log(D_b/D_t)
717: +\frac{m_t^2}{2}\frac{N}{(4\pi)^2}
718: \int_0^1 dx\left[\log(\Lambda^2/D_t) -1\right].
719: \end{equation}
720: The masses of the $\gamma$ and $Z^0$ particles are given by the poles of
721: the propagator Eq. (\ref{min39})
722: (the values of $p^2$ for which $1-\Pi(p^2)$ has vanishing eigenvalues).
723: For $p^2\longrightarrow 0$ one can see in Eq. (\ref{min42}) that the last term dominates the sum. This matrix has all entries equal and hence possesses a vanishing eigenvalue.
724: As expected, a pole in the propagator located at $p^2=0$ is found.
725: The second pole related to the $Z^0$ particle is located at $p^2=M_Z^2$,
726: with $M_Z^2$ given by the condition
727:
728: \begin{equation}\label{min46}
729: M_Z^2= f^2(M_Z^2)\left[ g_1^2(M_Z^2)+g_2^2(M_Z^2)\right].
730: \end{equation}
731: From Eqs. (\ref{min34}) and (\ref{min46}) one obtains
732:
733: \begin{equation}
734: \frac{M_W^2}{M_Z^2} \left(
735: \frac{g_1^2(M_Z^2)+g_2^2(M_Z^2)}{\bar{g}_2^2(M_W^2)} \right)
736: =\frac{\bar{f}^2(M_W^2)}{f^2(M_Z^2)}.
737: \end{equation}
738: The difference between $f^2$ and $\bar{f}^2$ is essentially the usual correction
739: to the $\rho$ parameter due to the weak isospin breaking effects.\\
740:
741:
742: %{\it Comment about the g's as running couplings}\\
743:
744:
745: We can in general say that the self-energies $\Pi^{\mu\nu}$
746: do not depend on the details of the four-fermion interactions we consider,
747: as long as each of these interactions is a product of two Lorentz (pseudo)scalar bilinears.
748: By separating the self-energies in the contributions $[\Pi^{\mu\nu}]_1$ and $[\Pi^{\mu\nu}]_2$ we saw that the part containing four-fermion interaction insertions $[\Pi^{\mu\nu}]_2$ is completely determined by its Lorentz structure and the requirement that $\Pi^{\mu\nu}$ must satisfy $p_\mu\Pi^{\mu\nu}=0$.
749: For this reason the gauge boson propagators,
750: and in consequence the gauge boson masses,
751: do not change if we consider more a general four-fermion interaction $\mathcal{L}_{\text{4f}}$,
752: as we do in Chapters \ref{chapter:1fam} and \ref{chapter:3fam}.
753:
754:
755:
756:
757: