1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
4: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
11: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
12: %
13: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
14: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
15: %
16: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
17: % 2) bibtex apssamp
18: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
19: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
20: %
21: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
22: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
23: \renewcommand\ln{\log}
24: \newcommand\ba{\begin{eqnarray}}
25: \newcommand\ea{\end{eqnarray}}
26:
27: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
28: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
29: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
30: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
31:
32: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
33: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
34: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
35:
36: %\nofiles
37:
38: \begin{document}
39:
40: %\preprint{APS/123-QED}
41:
42: \title{
43: Lowest order QED radiative corrections \\
44: to longitudinally polarized
45: M{\o}ller scattering}
46:
47: \author{A. Ilyichev}
48: %\altaffiliation[Also at ]{Physics Department, XYZ University.}%Lines break automatically or can be forced with \\
49: \email{ily@hep.by}
50: \affiliation{%
51: National Scientific
52: and Educational Centre of Particle and High Energy Physics of the Belarusian State University,
53: 220040 Minsk, Belarus
54: %Authors' institution and/or address\\
55: %This line break forced with \textbackslash\textbackslash
56: }%
57:
58: \author{V. Zykunov}
59: % \homepage{http://www.Second.institution.edu/~Charlie.Author}
60: \email{zykunov@gstu.gomel.by}
61: \affiliation{
62: Gomel State Technical University, 246746 Gomel, Belarus
63: %Second institution and/or address\\
64: %This line break forced% with \\
65: }%
66:
67: %\date{ffff}% It is always \today, today,
68: % but any date may be explicitly specified
69:
70: \begin{abstract}
71: The total lowest-order electromagnetic radiative corrections to the
72: observables in M{\o}ller scattering of longitudinally polarized electrons
73: have been calculated.
74: The final expressions obtained by the covariant method for the
75: infrared divergency cancellation are free from
76: any unphysical cut-off parameters.
77: Since the calculation is carried out within the
78: ultrarelativistic approximation our result has a compact form
79: that is convenient for computing. Basing on these expressions the FORTRAN code
80: MERA has been developed. Using this code the detailed numerical analysis
81: performed under SLAC (E-158) and JLab kinematic conditions has shown
82: that the radiative corrections are significant and
83: rather sensitive to the value
84: of the missing mass (inelasticity) cuts.
85: \end{abstract}
86:
87: \pacs{12.15.Lk, 13.88.+e, 25.30.Bf}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
88: % Classification Scheme.
89: %\keywords{M{\o}ller scattering}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
90: % %display desired
91: \maketitle
92:
93: %\section{\label{sec:level1}First-level heading:\protect\\ The line
94: %break was forced \lowercase{via} \textbackslash\textbackslash}
95: \section{Introduction}
96: The present intense interest of physicists in polarized M{\o}ller scattering
97: is stimulated by several reasons.
98: Today the measurement of the parity-violating asymmetry $A_{PV}$
99: in the recent experiment E158 \cite{E1581,E1582} at SLAC gives the
100: $\sin{\theta_W}$ with the best precision at low enegries.
101: Further, experimentally M{\o}ller scattering is actively used
102: in polarimetry to measure the polarization of the electron
103: beams \cite{polarimetry} as well as monitoring of luminosity
104: (for example, at DESY \cite{DESY}).
105: Yet another reason stimulating an interest in
106: M{\o }ller scattering consists in possibility to test the
107: Standard Model and to reveal traces of new physics.
108: In the intensively
109: discussed projects of the ILC, $e^-e^-$
110: and $\mu^-\mu^-$ colliders \cite{heush}, high hopes for the discovery of
111: Higgs bosons, manifestations of contact interactions,
112: the compositeness of the electron, new gauge bosons,
113: etc., are pinned on the scattering of identical polarized
114: fermions ($e,\mu$).
115:
116: A precise comparison of the experimental results with the
117: theoretical predictions requires to take into account
118: the radiative effects correctly on both QED and electroweak
119: levels.
120:
121: Generally within the polarimetry measurements by the M{\o}ller scattering,
122: the value of the transferred momentum is rather low, and therefore
123: electroweak effects can usually be neglected.
124: But otherwise in the
125: projects of ILC where the energies are characterized by the TeV region,
126: the value of the weak and electromagnetic effects will have the same order.
127: Similarly, due to specific character of
128: observables (singly polarized parity-violating asymmetry),
129: such experiments as E-158 is sensitive to both
130: electromagnetic and electroweak radiative corrections (and new physics
131: phenomena at the TeV scales).
132:
133: The exact calculation of the lowest-order electromagnetic radiative
134: corrections to polarized M{\o}ller scattering was performed by Shumeiko and Suarez
135: \cite{suarez}.
136: The electroweak radiative corrections to polarized M{\o}ller
137: scattering at high energies were computed in \cite{denn} (without
138: hard bremsstrahlung contribution), and at low energies corresponding
139: to conditions of E-158 were computed in papers \cite{cz-marc}
140: (without hard bremsstrahlung) and \cite{petr,zyk} (including hard
141: bremsstrahlung).
142: The detailed calculation presented there demonstrates the significant value
143: of the radiative effects that have to be explicitly included both in QED and
144: the Electroweak theory predictions.
145:
146: In the given paper we considered the lowest order electromagnetic radiative
147: corrections
148: both to the longitudinally polarized cross sections and
149: the doubly-polarized parity conserving asymmetry
150: \begin{equation}
151: A_{LR} =
152: \frac{\sigma_{LR}-\sigma_{LL}}
153: {\sigma_{LR}+\sigma_{LL}},
154: \label{A}
155: \end{equation}
156: where the first (second) cross section subscripts $L$ and $R$
157: correspond left and right degree of beam (target) polarization respectivelly.
158: Similarly to \cite{suarez}, we perform our calculations
159: within the covariant Bardin--Shumeiko approach \cite{covar,shum1}, that allows to
160: cancel out the infrared divergences in such a way that the final result does
161: not depend on any unphysical parameters (such as a frame-dependent cutoff
162: $\Delta E$ that separates the soft photon contribution region from the hard
163: one). Using the ultrarelativistic approximation allows us to obtain the
164: compact form for radiative correction expression
165: that is convenient (and sometimes necessary) for fast and more
166: precise computer treatment. Moreover during the numerical estimations it was found that
167: the numerical result strictly depends on missing mass cuts.
168: At the same time it should be stress that
169: the first correct application of the some kinematical cuts
170: within the covariant Bardin--Shumeiko approach was presented in \cite{diff,ex}.
171: Unfortunately Ref. \cite{suarez}
172: did not investigate the effects of experimentally-motivated
173: kinematical cuts.
174:
175: The paper is organized as follows. In the Section II the kinematics of
176: M{\o}ller scattering as well as the cross section and asymmetry
177: at the lowest order are introduced.
178: In the Section III the structure of the
179: lowest order radiative corrections (virtual and real photon
180: contributions) is explained. The Section IV presents numerical
181: results applied to the kinematics of E-158 (SLAC) and JLab experiments.
182: The Section V contains some conclusions. The explicit expressions
183: for finite part of the real photon emission could be find in Appendix.
184:
185:
186: \section{The lowest order contribution}
187: %
188: The lowest order Feynman graphs giving the contribution to M{\o}ller scattering
189: \ba
190: e(k_1,\xi_L)+e(p_1,\eta_L)\to
191: e(k_2)+e(p_2)
192: \ea
193: are presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:born}. Here
194: $k_1$, $p_1$ ($k_2$, $p_2$) are
195: the 4-momenta of the incoming (outgoing) electrons ($k_1^2=k_2^2=p_1^2=p_2^2=m$)
196: while the beam ($\xi_L$) and target ($\eta_L$)
197: polarization vectors read:
198: \ba
199: \xi_L=
200: \frac 1{\sqrt{s(s-4 m^2)}}
201: \left (\frac{s-2 m^2}mk_1-2 mp_1\right ),
202: \nonumber \\
203: \eta_L=
204: \frac 1{\sqrt{s(s-4 m^2)}}
205: \left (2 mk_1-\frac{s-2 m^2}mp_1\right ).
206: \ea
207: Then $s$ and other Mandelstam variables can be introduce in the
208: standard way:
209: \ba
210: &&s=(k_1+p_1)^2,\ t=(k_1-k_2)^2,\ u=(k_2-p_1)^2,
211: \nonumber \\
212: &&s+t+u=4 m^2.
213: \label{m1}
214: \ea
215: Notice that for the Born kinematics (strictly speaking for
216: the non radiative process)
217: \begin{equation}
218: u = u_0 \equiv 4m^2-s-t.
219: \end{equation}
220: %Correlation $u = u_0$ takes place in first sections:
221: %to the (\ref{can}) formula inclusive.
222:
223: \begin{figure}
224: \vspace*{-10mm}
225: \hspace*{-12mm}
226: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{bot}}
227: \hspace*{-13mm}
228: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{bou}}
229: \vspace*{-1cm}
230: \caption{\label{fig:born}
231: The lowest order graphs giving contribution
232: to the M{\o }ller scattering:
233: a) $t$-channel; b) $u$-channel.
234: }
235: \end{figure}
236:
237:
238: Neglecting the electron mass,
239: the Born cross section for the M{\o}ller scattering
240: of longitudinal electrons
241: can be written as follows
242: \begin{equation}
243: \sigma^0=\frac{2\pi \alpha^2}{t^2}
244: \left[ (1+P)\frac{u^2}{s} - (1-P)\frac{s^2}{u}\right ]
245: + (t \leftrightarrow u).
246: \label{cs0}
247: \end{equation}
248: Here and later each $\sigma $ denotes the differential cross
249: section over the kinematic variable $y$
250: ($\sigma \equiv d\sigma /dy $) that is defined as
251: \begin{equation}
252: y=-\frac{t}{s},
253: \end{equation}
254: $P=P_BP_T$, where
255: $P_B, P_T$ are the polarizations of the beam and target electrons.
256:
257: The form of the Born cross section (\ref{cs0}) with factorized combinations
258: $ 1 \pm P_BP_T $ is very convenient for construction of
259: the polarization asymmetry (\ref{A}) that
260: does not depend on any energies:
261: \begin{equation}
262: A_{LR}^0 =
263: \frac{y(1-y)(y^2-y+2)}
264: {(1+y(y-1))^2}=
265: \frac{\sin^2 \theta ( 7+\cos^2 \theta )}{ (3 +\cos^2 \theta )^2},
266: \label{A0}
267: \end{equation}
268: where $\theta$ is a scattering angle of the detected electron with
269: 4-momentum $k_2$ in the center mass system of the initial particles
270: $\vec{k}_1+\vec{p}_1=0$. The cosine of this angle can be express
271: via invariants in the standard way:
272: \ba
273: \cos \theta^0=1+2t/s=1-2y,
274: \label{ctborn}
275: \ea
276: while the energy of the scattering lepton in Lab. system reads:
277: \ba
278: E_{k_{2}}^0=\frac{s+t-2m^2}{2m}.
279: \label{en0}
280: \ea
281:
282: \section{Electromagnetic radiative corrections}
283: The lowest order radiative corrections to M{\o}ller scattering
284: appears from the graphs with the additional virtual particle
285: (V-contribution, see Fig.~\ref{fig:V} for the $t$-channel) and from the
286: real photon bremsstrahlung (R-contribution, see Fig.~\ref{fig:R} for the $t$-channel).
287: It should be noted that both these parts include the infrared divergency but their
288: sum must be infrared free. In this section the explicit expression
289: for V- and R- contributions as well as their
290: infrared free sum are presented.
291:
292:
293: \subsection{Virtual contribution}
294:
295: For the calculation of one-loop electromagnetic radiative corrections
296: we apply the on-shell renormalization scheme of electroweak standard model.
297: The building blocks needed for explicit calculations according this
298: scheme have been worked out in paper of
299: B\"ohm et al. \cite{BSH86}, where we take the results for gauge boson self-energies
300: and vertex functions.
301:
302: The virtual contributions to M{\o}ller scattering
303: can be separated into
304: three parts:
305: \begin{equation}
306: \sigma^{V}=
307: \sigma^S+\sigma^{Ver}+\sigma^{Box},
308: \label{G}
309: \end{equation}
310: where
311: \begin{enumerate}
312: \item
313: $\sigma^S$ is a virtual photon self-energy contribution [Fig.~\ref{fig:V} (a)];
314: \item
315: $\sigma^{Ver}$ is a vertex function contribution [Fig.~\ref{fig:V} (b,c)];
316: \item
317: $\sigma^{Box}$ is a box contribution [Fig.~\ref{fig:V} (d,e)].
318: \end{enumerate}
319: %In renormalization on-mass shell scheme
320: %there is no contribution from the self energy of electrons.
321:
322:
323: \begin{figure}
324: \vspace*{-10mm}
325: \hspace*{-12mm}
326: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{self-g}}
327: \vspace*{-20mm}
328: \hspace*{-13mm}
329: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{ver1}}
330: \hspace*{-12mm}
331: \vspace*{-20mm}
332: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{ver2}}
333: \hspace*{-13mm}
334: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{box1}}
335: \hspace*{-12mm}
336: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{box2}}
337: \vspace*{-1cm}
338: \caption{\label{fig:V}
339: The virtual one-loop graphs giving contribution
340: to the corrected M{\o }ller scattering
341: within $t$-channel.
342: }
343: \end{figure}
344: Now we consider each of them.
345: \begin{enumerate}
346: \item
347: The contribution of the virtual photon self energies
348: (including the photon vacuum polarization by hadrons)
349: to the cross section looks like
350: \begin{eqnarray}
351: \sigma^S&=& \frac{4\pi \alpha^2}{t^2}
352: \mbox{Re} \Bigl( -\frac{1}{t} \hat{\Sigma}^{\gamma}_T(t)
353: + \Pi_h(-t) \Bigr )
354: \times
355: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
356: &&
357: \times
358: \Bigl[
359: (1+P)\frac{u^2}{s}
360: -(1-P)\frac{s^2}{u} \Bigr ]
361: + (t \leftrightarrow u).
362: \label{self-en}
363: \end{eqnarray}
364: Here $\hat{\Sigma}^{\gamma}_T(-t)$ is the renormalized transverse
365: part of the $\gamma$--self-energy \cite{BSH86}
366: (this part includes
367: vacuum polarization by $e$, $\mu$ and $\tau$ charged leptons:
368: in corresponding formula of \cite{BSH86} we should take a
369: summing index $f=e,\mu,\tau$).
370: Hadronic part of the photonic vacuum polarization associated with
371: light quarks can be directly obtained from the data on
372: process $e^+e^- \rightarrow \mbox{hadrons}$ via dispersion relations.
373: Here we use parameterization of \cite{Bur-Piet}
374: \begin{equation}
375: \mbox{Re} \Pi_h(-t) \cong A+B \ln (1+C|t|),
376: \end{equation}
377: with updated parameters A,B,C in different energy regions.
378:
379: %
380: \item
381: For the contribution of electron vertices we used the
382: results of the paper \cite{BSH86} (see also references therein).
383: We can obtain the vertex part as
384: \begin{eqnarray}
385: \sigma^{Ver}&=&\frac{2 \alpha^3}{t^2}
386: \Bigl[ (1+P)\frac{u^2}{s}
387: \nonumber \\ &&
388: -(1-P)\frac{s^2}{u} \Bigr] \Lambda_1(t,m^2)
389: + (t \leftrightarrow u),
390: \label{csv}
391: \end{eqnarray}
392: where
393: \begin{eqnarray}
394: \Lambda_1(t,m^2) &=& -2\ln\frac{|t|}{\lambda^2}
395: \Bigl(\ln\frac{|t|}{m^2}-1\Bigr)+
396: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
397: &&+ \ln\frac{|t|}{m^2} + \ln^2\frac{|t|}{m^2} + 4(\frac{\pi^2}{12}-1).
398: \end{eqnarray}
399: %
400: \item
401: Our calculation for the box cross section gives compact formula:
402: \begin{eqnarray}
403: \sigma^{Box}&=&
404: \frac{2 \alpha^3}{t}
405: \Bigl[ \frac{1+P}{s}
406: \Bigl( \frac{2u^2}{t}\ln\frac{s}{|u|}\ln\frac{|su|}{\lambda^2m^2}
407: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
408: && -\delta^1_{(\gamma\gamma)} \Bigr)- \frac{1-P}{u}
409: \Bigl( \frac{2s^2}{t}\ln\frac{s}{|u|}\ln\frac{|su|}{\lambda^2m^2}
410: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] &&
411: -\delta^2_{(\gamma\gamma)} \Bigr ) \Bigr ]
412: + (t \leftrightarrow u),
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: The expressions $\delta_{(\gamma\gamma)}^{1,2}$ have the form:
415: \begin{eqnarray}
416: \delta^1_{(\gamma \gamma)} & = &
417: l_s^2\frac{ s^2+u^2}{2t} - l_su -(l_x^2+\pi^2)\frac{u^2}{t},
418: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
419: \delta^2_{(\gamma \gamma)} &=&
420: l_s^2\frac{s^2}{t} + l_x s - (l_x^2 + \pi^2 )\frac{s^2+u^2}{2t},
421: \end{eqnarray}
422: and logarithms look like
423: \begin{equation}
424: l_s=\ln\frac{s}{|t|},\ l_x=\ln\frac{u}{t}.
425: \end{equation}
426: \end{enumerate}
427: It should be noted that vertex and box parts contain the infrared divergence
428: through the appearance of the fictitious photon mass $\lambda$.
429: The infrared part from virtual cross section
430: can be extracted in a simple way:
431: \begin{eqnarray}
432: \sigma^{V}_{IR} &&=
433: \sigma^{V} - \sigma^{V}(\lambda^2 \rightarrow s)
434: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
435: &&= -\frac{2\alpha}{\pi} \ln\frac{s}{\lambda^2}
436: \left( \ln\frac{tu}{m^2s}-1 \right) \sigma^{0}.
437: \end{eqnarray}
438:
439:
440: \subsection{Real bremsstrahlung contribution}
441:
442: The full set of Feynman graphs contributed to
443: the real photon bremsstrahlung are presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:R}.
444: For extraction of the infrared divergency
445: we use the prescription of Bardin and Shumeiko \cite{covar}:
446: \ba
447: \sigma^R\equiv
448: \sigma^R-\sigma^R_{IR}+\sigma^R_{IR}=
449: \sigma^R_{F}+\sigma^R_{IR},
450: \ea
451: where the infrared free part can be presented in the following way
452: \begin{equation}
453: \sigma^R_F
454: = - \frac{\alpha^3}{\pi s}
455: \int\limits_0^{v_{max}}dv
456: \sum_{i=1}^{10} S_i.
457: \label{srf}
458: \end{equation}
459: The explicit expressions for $S_i$ are presented in the Appendix.
460: The integration in (\ref{srf}) is performed over variable
461: $v$ that is a so-called inelasticity.
462: The reason of this term can be explain by the fact
463: that for the radiative process
464: the last relation in (\ref{m1}) transforms into
465: \ba
466: &&s+t+u=v+4 m^2.
467: \label{m2}
468: \ea
469: The explicit expression for $v$ can be defined as
470: $v=\Lambda^2-m^2$, where $\Lambda=k_1-k_2+p_1$ and $\Lambda^2$ is
471: a so-called missing mass squared.
472:
473:
474: \begin{figure}
475: \vspace*{-10mm}
476: \hspace*{-12mm}
477: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{br1}}
478: \vspace*{-20mm}
479: \hspace*{-13mm}
480: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{br2}}
481: \hspace*{-12mm}
482: \vspace*{-1.5cm}
483: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{br3}}
484: \hspace*{-13mm}
485: \scalebox{0.27}{\includegraphics{br4}}
486: \vspace*{5mm}
487: \caption{\label{fig:R}
488: The real one photon emission graphs giving contribution
489: to the corrected M{\o }ller scattering
490: within $t$-channel.
491: }
492: \end{figure}
493:
494: It should be noted that due to kinematical restrictions
495: the upper limit of the integration in (\ref{srf}) is defined as
496: \ba
497: v_{max}=\frac{st+\sqrt{s(s-4m^2)t(t-4m^2)}}{2m^2}\sim s+t.
498: \ea
499: On the other hand, the energy of the scattering lepton in Lab. system
500: (\ref{en0}) for the radiative process transforms into
501: \ba
502: E_{k_{2}}^R=\frac{s+t-v-2m^2}{2m},
503: \label{enr}
504: \ea
505: \\and reaches its minimum value for $v=v_{max}$
506: \ba
507: E_{k_{2}}^R|_{v=v_{max}}=\frac{s+t-v_{max}-2m^2}{2m}\sim -m\frac{s^2+t^2}{2st}.
508: \label{enrm}
509: \ea
510: Obviously the electron with the energy (\ref{enrm}) cannot be detected.
511: Moreover, as it was point out first in \cite{diff}, the variable $v$ can be
512: directly reconstructed from the measured momenta. However
513: not all events with non-zero $v<v_{cut}$ can be rejected
514: from the experimental data due to finite resolution of the experimental equipment.
515: Therefore during the radiative corrections calculation for the given
516: experimental setup it is necessary to take into account this fact.
517:
518: Notice that for the radiative events the cosine of the scattering angle
519: in the centre mass system of the initial particles also depends
520: on integration variable $v$:
521: \ba
522: \cos \theta^R=1+2t/(s-v).
523: \label{ctrad}
524: %\label{ctborn}
525: \ea
526:
527:
528: The infrared-divergent part of brems\-strah\-lung cross section
529: integrated over the real photon phase space is given in terms of a finite
530: (and infinitesimal) photon mass $\lambda$ in
531: \begin{equation}
532: \sigma_{IR}^R=
533: \frac{\alpha}{\pi}
534: \left[ 4 \ln \frac{v_{{max}}}{m\lambda}
535: \left (\ln \frac{tu}{m^2s}-1\right) + \delta_1^S + \delta_1^H
536: \right ] \sigma^0,
537: \label{ir}
538: \end{equation}
539: where (see \cite{covar} for details)
540: \ba
541: \delta_1^S &=& -\frac 1 2l_m^2+(3-2 l_r)l_m
542: -(l_m-1)\ln \frac{s(s+t)}{t^2}-\frac 12l_r
543: \nonumber \\[0.3cm]
544: &&-\frac{\pi ^2}{3}+1
545: \ea
546: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
547: and
548: \begin{figure*}
549: \vspace*{-10mm}
550: \hspace*{-5mm}
551: \scalebox{0.45}{\includegraphics{deu}}
552: \scalebox{0.45}{\includegraphics{dep}}
553: \vspace*{-5mm}
554: \caption{\label{fig:1}
555: The relative corrections to the unpolarized ($\delta ^u$) and polarized
556: ($\delta ^p$) parts of the cross section as a functions of the scattering
557: angle (defined according to eq. (\ref{ctapp})) for JLab
558: ($E_{beam}=1$ GeV, solid lines) and SLAC
559: ($E_{beam}=45$ GeV, dashed lines) kinematic conditions
560: with different inelasticity cuts:
561: 1) $v_{cut}=0.5v_{max}$; 2) $0.9v_{max}$; 3) $0.99v_{max}$.
562: }
563: \end{figure*}
564: \vspace*{-15mm}
565: \begin{widetext}
566: \ba
567: \delta_1^H & = &-\frac 5 2l_m^2+
568: \Bigl (\ln \frac{t^2(s+t)^2(s-v_{max})}{s(s+t-v_{max})^2v_{max}(v_{max}-t)}
569: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
570: +1\Bigr )l_m-\frac 1 2 \ln ^2\frac{v_{max}}{|t|}
571: -\ln ^2\bigl(1-\frac{v_{max}}{t}\bigr)
572: \nonumber \\[0.2cm]&&
573: +\ln \frac {s+t}{s+t-v_{max}}
574: \ln \frac {(s+t)(s+t-v_{max})}{t^2}
575: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm]&&
576: +\ln \frac {s-v_{max}}{|t|}
577: \ln \frac {s-v_{max}}{s}
578: +\ln \frac {v_{max}}{|t|}
579: \nonumber
580: \ea
581: \ba
582: \nonumber\\[-0.6cm]
583: \;\;\;\;\;\;
584: \;\;\;\;\;\;
585: \;\;\;\;\;\;
586: \;\;
587: +2\Bigl[
588: {\rm Li}_2\left(\frac{v_{max}}s\right)
589: -{\rm Li}_2\left(\frac{v_{max}}t\right)
590: -{\rm Li}_2\left(\frac{v_{max}}{s+t}\right)\Bigl]
591: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm]&&
592: +{\rm Li}_2\left(\frac{s-v_{max}}s\right)
593: -{\rm Li}_2\left(\frac{t-v_{max}}t\right)
594: -\frac{\pi^2}6.
595: \label{dh1}
596: \ea
597: \end{widetext}
598: Here ${\rm Li}_2(x)$ is the Spence function and
599: \ba
600: && l_m=\ln\frac{-t}{m^2},\ l_r=\ln\frac{s+t}{s}.
601: \ea
602:
603: Summing up (\ref{G}) and (\ref{ir})
604: %%
605: \begin{eqnarray}
606: \sigma^{RV} &=&
607: \sigma^{R}_{IR}+
608: \sigma^{V}=
609: \frac{\alpha}{\pi}
610: ( 4 \ln \frac{v_{{max}}}{m\sqrt{s}}
611: (\ln \frac{tu}{m^2s}-1) + \delta_1^S
612: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
613: &&
614: + \delta_1^H)
615: \sigma^0+
616: \sigma^{V}(\lambda^2 \rightarrow s),
617: \label{can}
618: \end{eqnarray}
619: we obtain a cancellation of infrared divergencies
620: from R- and V- contribution.
621:
622:
623: Finally, the total infrared free radiative corrected cross
624: section reads:
625: \ba
626: \sigma^{obs}=
627: \sigma^{0}+
628: \sigma^{RV}+
629: \sigma^{R}_F.
630: \label{obs}
631: \ea
632:
633: \section{Numerical estimations}
634:
635: Basing on the equations presented above the FORTRAN code
636: MERA\footnote{FORTRAN code MERA is available from
637: http:/www.hep.by/RC}
638: (M{\o}ller scattering: Electromagnetic RAdiative corrections) has
639: been developed.
640: In this section using MERA the
641: numerical estimation of radiative effects to the
642: M{\o}ller scattering of longitudinally polarized electrons
643: is presented.
644:
645: There are two basic differences between the numerical analysis
646: that are performed in this and previous
647: \cite{suarez,zyk} papers: we show the dependence
648: of radiative corrections on the scattering angle in the center mass
649: system of the initial electrons, we investigate
650: the dependence of radiative corrections on the value of the missing mass cut.
651:
652: As it was mentioned above for the radiative events the cosine of
653: the scattering angle has to be expressed not only via $t$ and $s$ as for
654: non-radiative events (\ref{ctborn}) but and via inelasticity
655: $v$ too (see (\ref{ctrad})).
656: Taking into account that we calculate the cross section as a function of $y$
657: or $t=-ys$ (because $s$ is fixed) and inelasticity is the inegration variable
658: we has some uncertanties in the definition of
659: the scattering angle for the observable cross section (\ref{obs}).
660: In order to escape it we use the standard non-radiative
661: approximation (\ref{ctborn}), i.e. we assume that
662: \ba
663: \cos \theta^R\sim
664: \cos \theta^0
665: =1+2t/s.
666: \label{ctapp}
667: \ea
668: \begin{figure*}
669: \vspace*{-10mm}
670: \hspace*{-5mm}
671: \scalebox{0.45}{\includegraphics{aj}}
672: \scalebox{0.45}{\includegraphics{as}}
673: \vspace*{-5mm}
674: \caption{\label{fig:2}
675: $\theta$-dependence ($\theta$ is defined according to eq. (\ref{ctapp}))
676: of the Born (solid line)
677: and observable (dashed lines) asymmetries
678: for JLab ($E_{beam}=1$ GeV) and SLAC
679: ($E_{beam}=45$ GeV) kinematic conditions
680: with different inelasticity cuts:
681: 1) $v_{cut}=0.5v_{max}$; 2) $0.9v_{max}$; 3) $0.99v_{max}$.
682: }
683: \end{figure*}
684: \begin{figure}
685: \vspace*{-10mm}
686: \hspace*{-5mm}
687: \scalebox{0.45}{\includegraphics{dar}}
688: \vspace*{-1cm}
689: \caption{\label{fig:1qq}
690: The relative corrections to the asymmetry (\ref{da}) as a functions of the scattering
691: angle (defined according to eq. (\ref{ctapp})) for JLab ($E_{beam}=1$ GeV,
692: solid lines) and SLAC
693: ($E_{beam}=45$ GeV, dashed lines) kinematic conditions
694: with different inelasticity cuts:
695: 1) $v_{cut}=0.5v_{max}$; 2) $0.9v_{max}$; 3) $0.99v_{max}$.
696: }
697: \end{figure}
698:
699: The cross section for polarized M{\o}ller scattering can be
700: presented as a difference of the unpolarized and polarized parts
701: \ba
702: \sigma^{0,obs}=
703: \sigma^{0,obs}_u-P
704: \sigma^{0,obs}_p.
705: \ea
706: In the Fig.~\ref{fig:1} the $\theta$-dependence of the relative
707: radiative correction for the unpolarized and polarized parts
708: of the cross section
709: \ba
710: \delta ^{u,p}=\sigma^{obs}_{u,p}/\sigma^{0}_{u,p}
711: \label{das}
712: \ea
713: for three
714: different inelasticity cuts $v_{cut}$
715: (and, therefore $\Lambda ^2$ cuts):
716: $v_{cut}=0.5v_{max}$, $0.9v_{max}$ and $0.99v_{max}$ is presented.
717: One can see the following features of their behavior:
718: the presence of maximum values at $\theta \geq 90^0$; sizable
719: increasing when $v_{cut}$ tending to its maximum value. For the
720: $v_{cut}=0.5v_{max}$ the corrections $\delta ^u$ ($\delta ^p$)
721: for $\theta=90^0$ equal to 1.075 (1.064) for SLAC and 1.054 (1.045) for JLab.
722:
723:
724: The $\theta $-dependence of the Born and observable asymmetries
725: with the same inelasticity cuts is presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:2}.
726: In this figure it can be seen that in the most region of $\theta $
727: the corrected asymmetries are less then the Born ones and essentially
728: decrease with the increasing $v_{cut}$.
729: The Fig.~\ref{fig:1qq}, where $\theta $-dependence of
730: the relative corrections to the asymmetries
731: \ba
732: \delta_A=\frac{A^{obs}_{LR}-A^{0}_{LR}}{A^{0}_{LR}}
733: \label{da}
734: \ea
735: is presented, reflects this fact clear. Particularly, it could be seen
736: that for the realistic $v_{cut}=0.5v_{max}$
737: we have $\delta_A=-0.008 (-0.01)$
738: for JLab (SLAC) at $\theta=90^0$ while for $v_{cut}=0.99v_{max}$
739: the relative corrections to the asymmetries reach
740: $\delta_A=-0.4 (-0.55)$ for JLab (SLAC) at the same angle.
741:
742: Let us consider the situation with more realistic
743: small $v_{cut}$. As it could be
744: seen from (\ref{dh1}) and (\ref{can}) the radiative corrected cross section
745: (\ref{obs}) diverge when $v_{cut}$ tends to zero. Such cross section
746: behavior can be explain in a simple way. Naturally that
747: there is no any real photon emission in the limit $v_{cut}\rightarrow 0$. Therefore we need
748: to say about the infrared divergency that appear from V-contribution and can not be
749: canceled due to any real photon emission absent.
750:
751: The other very interesting feature consists in the deviation
752: of the observable asymmetry from the Born one at the small $v_{cut}$
753: where asymmetry reach its maximum value. Due to rather small
754: effects once again in Fig.~\ref{fig:1qq2} the quantity (\ref{da}) as a function of the ratio
755: $v_{cut}/v_{max}$ is presented for JLab and SLAC kinematic conditions. From this picture it
756: can be seen that for $0.001v_{max}<v_{cut}<0.1v_{max}$
757: the relative correction to the asymmetry is flat
758: and consists some dozen of percent while starting with $v_{cut}>0.1v_{max}$ it
759: rapidly falls.
760:
761: %In the end of this section it is necessary to say, that
762: %according to agreement between us, Shumeiko and Suarez
763: %the comparison of our code MERA [19] with
764: %FORTRAN code M{\O}LLERAD \cite{suarez} is
765: %in the progress.
766:
767: \begin{figure}
768: \vspace*{-10mm}
769: \hspace*{-5mm}
770: \scalebox{0.45}{\includegraphics{dvar}}
771: \vspace*{-1cm}
772: \caption{\label{fig:1qq2}
773: The relative corrections to the asymmetry (\ref{da}) as a functions
774: of $v_{cut}/v_{max}$ at the scattering
775: angle (defined according to eq. (\ref{ctapp})) in CM system 1) $\theta =90^0$; 2) $100^0$
776: for JLab ($E_{beam}=1$ GeV, solid lines) and SLAC
777: ($E_{beam}=45$ GeV, dashed lines) kinematic conditions.
778: }
779: \end{figure}
780:
781: \section{Conclusions}
782:
783: The explicit expressions for the lowest order electromagnetic
784: radiative corrections to M{\o}ller scattering of
785: longitudinally polarized
786: electrons in ultrarelativistic approximation have been obtained.
787: Basing on these expressions the FORTRAN code MERA has been developed.
788:
789: The numerical analysis performed for different values of
790: missing mass (inelasticity) cut has shown that
791: the radiative corrections are strongly depended on this
792: parameter.
793: So when this cut tends to its maximum
794: value two tendencies should be observed:
795: the radiatively corrected cross sections increase while
796: the radiatively corrected asymmetries decrease. At the same
797: time $\theta $-dependence has shown some common features:
798: the relative corrections to the cross sections (asymmetries)
799: has a maximum (minimum) at $\theta \geq 90^0$.
800: For more realistic small cuts the relative corrections to the asymmetry are
801: rather flat and amounts some dozen percent.
802:
803: Taking into consideration a large scale of obtained
804: radiative effects we proof the necessity of radiative
805: correction procedure for JLab and SLAC experiments.
806: Particularly to perform data processing correctly
807: it is necessary to construct Monte Carlo generator
808: for simulation of radiative events within M{\o }ller
809: scattering.
810:
811:
812: \begin{acknowledgments}
813: The authors would like to thank Andrei Afanasev,
814: Igor Akushevich, Eugene Chudakov,
815: Yury Kolomensky, Nikolai Shumeiko and Juan Suarez
816: for stimulating discussions. We also thank
817: Nikolai Shumeiko and Juan Suarez for agreement to compare
818: the numerical results from FORTRAN codes M{\O}LLERAD and MERA.
819: V.Z. (A.I.) would like to thank SLAC (JLab) staff for their generous hospitality
820: during their visits.
821: \end{acknowledgments}
822:
823: \appendix*
824:
825: \section{}
826: $S_1$ is the $t$-channel contribution of the emission from
827: the upper electron leg:
828: %
829: %
830: %
831: \widetext
832: %\begin{widetext}
833: \begin{eqnarray}
834: S_1 &=& S_1^u+PS_1^p + S_1^{a},\
835: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
836: S_1^u &=& - L_A - \hat L_A
837: + L_s(2s^2t^{-2} + 2t^{-1}u + 2t^{-2}u^2 + 1)
838: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
839: + L_x( - 2s^2t^{-2} - 2st^{-1} - 2t^{-2}u^2 - 1)
840: - 2L_t + 4L_m
841: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] &&
842: - 2t^{-2}( v(s^2+u^2)s^{-1}u^{-1}-2t ),
843: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
844: S_1^p &=&
845: - L_A + \hat L_A
846: + L_s( - 2t^{-1}u - 1)
847: + L_x( - 2st^{-1} - 1)
848: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] &&
849: + 4L_mt^{-1}(s - u) + 4t^{-2}(s + t - u)
850: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
851: &&
852: -2(4s^2+2st-t^2)s^{-1}t^{-1}(s+t)^{-1}
853: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
854: -2(3s+2t)t^{-1}u^{-1}+2us^{-1}t^{-1},
855: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
856: S_1^{a} &=& 4(1+P)t^{-2}(u+u_0)(1+tL_m);
857: \end{eqnarray}
858: %\end{widetext}
859: %
860: %
861: %
862: $S_2$ is the $t$-channel contribution of the interference from
863: the upper and lower electron legs:
864: %\begin{widetext}
865: \begin{eqnarray}
866: S_2 &=& (S_2^u+PS_2^p)/t + S_2^{a},\
867: \nonumber
868: \end{eqnarray}
869: \begin{eqnarray}
870: S_2^u &=&
871: L_s (8 s^3 t^{-1} - 8 s^2 t^{-1} v + 8 s^2 + 4 s t + 4 s t^{-1} v^2
872: - 6 s v
873: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
874: - t^2 + 2 t v - v^2)/(t - v)
875: + L_x ( - 8 s^3 t^{-1} + 16 s^2 t^{-1} v
876: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
877: &&
878: - 16 s^2 - 12 s t
879: - 12 s t^{-1} v^2 + 22 s v - 5 t^2 + 12 t v
880: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
881: + 4 t^{-1} v^3 - 11 v^2)/(t - v)
882: + 2 L_u (2 s + t - v)
883: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
884: &&
885: + L_1 (4 s^3 t^{-1} - 4 s^2 t^{-1} v + 2 s^2 + s t + 2 s t^{-1}
886: v^2 - s v
887: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
888: + t v - v^2)
889: + L_2 ( - 4 s^3 t^{-1} + 8 s^2 t^{-1} v - 10 s^2 - 9 s t
890: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
891: &&
892: - 6 s t^{-1} v^2 + 13 s v - 3 t^2 + 7 t v
893: + 2 t^{-1} v^3 - 6 v^2)
894: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
895: + 2 L_3 t ( - 2 s - t + v)
896: + 2 t ((v-s)^{-1}-(s+t)^{-1}
897: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
898: &&
899: + 2 (2 s+t-v)/(t-v)^2),
900: \nonumber
901: %\\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
902: \end{eqnarray}
903: \begin{eqnarray}
904: S_2^p &=&
905: L_s (12 s^2 t + 8 s^2 t^{-1} v^2 - 20 s^2 v + 4 s t^2 - 12 s t v
906: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
907: - 4 s t^{-1} v^3 + 12 s v^2 - t^3 + 3 t^2 v - 3 t v^2 + v^3)
908: %/(t^2 - 2 t v + v^2)
909: /(t-v)^2
910: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
911: &&
912: + L_x ( - 12 s^2 t - 8 s^2 t^{-1} v^2 + 20 s^2 v - 20 s t^2+ 52 s t v
913: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
914: + 12 s t^{-1} v^3
915: - 44 s v^2 - 7 t^3 + 25 t^2 v - 33 t v^2
916: - 4 t^{-1} v^4
917: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
918: &&
919: + 19 v^3)
920: %/(t^2 - 2 t v +v^2)
921: /(t-v)^2
922: + 2 L_u t
923: + L_1 (2 s^2 t^2 - 8 s^2 t v
924: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
925: - 4 s^2 t^{-1} v^3 +10 s^2 v^2 + s t^3
926: - 3 s t^2 v + 5 s t v^2 + 2 s t^{-1} v^4
927: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
928: &&
929: - 5 s v^3
930: + t^3 v - 3 t^2 v^2
931: + 3 t v^3 - v^4)
932: %/(t^2 - 2 t v + v^2)
933: /(t-v)^2
934: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
935: + L_2 ( - 2 s^2 t^2 + 8 s^2 t v + 4 s^2 t^{-1} v^3
936: - 10 s^2 v^2
937: - 3 s t^3
938: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
939: &&
940: + 17 s t^2 v
941: - 31 s t v^2 - 6 s t^{-1} v^4 + 23 s v^3 -
942: t^4 + 7 t^3 v
943: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
944: - 17 t^2 v^2
945: + 19 t v^3
946: + 2 t^{-1} v^5 - 10 v^4)
947: %/(t^2 - 2 t v + v^2)
948: /(t-v)^2
949: - 2 L_3 t v
950: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
951: &&
952: -2 t (t+v)(s+t)^{-1}(s-v)^{-1},
953: \nonumber
954: %\\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
955: \end{eqnarray}
956: \begin{eqnarray}
957: S_2^{a} &=& 2t^{-2}\{ (L_x-\hat L_A)(s^2(1-P)+(u^2+uu_0+u_0^2)(1+P))
958: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
959: + s(L_A+L_s)(1+P)(u+u_0) \};
960: \end{eqnarray}
961: %\end{widetext}
962: %
963: %
964: %
965: $S_3$ is the $t$-channel contribution of the emission from the lower electron leg:
966: %\begin{widetext}
967: \begin{eqnarray}
968: S_3 &=& (S_3^u+PS_3^p)/t^2 + S_3^{a},\
969: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
970: S_3^u &=& -L_u t(s^2+u^2)(v-2t)(t-v)^{-2}
971: + (3 s^2 t^3 {\tau}^{-1}
972: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
973: + 12 s^2 t^2 - 13 s^2 t v + 4 s^2 v^2
974: + 3 s t^4 {\tau}^{-1}
975: + 9 s t^3
976: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
977: - 25 s t^2 v + 17 s t v^2
978: - 4 s v^3+ \frac{3}{2} t^5 {\tau}^{-1} + t^4 - 13 t^3 v
979: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
980: + 19 t^2 v^2
981: - \frac{21}{2} t v^3
982: + 2 v^4)/(t-v)^3,
983: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
984: S_3^p &=& L_u t (s-u)(2t-v)(t-v)^{-1}
985: + \frac{(s-u)}{2\tau}(st^3+8t^2v
986: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
987: -7tv^2+4v^3)(t-v)^{-2},
988: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
989: S_3^a &=& 2(1+P)t^{-2}(u+u_0)(1+tL_u);
990: \end{eqnarray}
991: %\end{widetext}
992: %
993: %
994: %
995: $S_{4,5,6,7}$ are the contributions of the interference between the $t$- and $u$-channel
996: graphs:
997: %\begin{widetext}
998: \begin{eqnarray}
999: S_4 &=& ((1-P)S_4^c+PS_4^p)/u + S_4^a,\
1000: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1001: S_4^c &=&
1002: - 2 L_1 s^3 t^{-1} + L_2 (2 s^3 t^{-1} + 4 s^2 + 3 s t + t^2)
1003: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
1004: + 2 \hat L_A ( - 3 s^3 - 7 s^2 t + 2 s^2 v - 5 s t^2
1005: + 3 s t v - t^3
1006: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1007: &&
1008: + t^2 v)
1009: %/(s^2 + 2 s t + t^2)
1010: (s + t)^{-2}
1011: + 2 L_m (2 s - v) + L_s s t^{-1} (2 s - v)
1012: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
1013: + L_x ( - 4 s^2 t^{-1}
1014: + 3 s t^{-1} v - 6 s - 3 t - t^{-1} v^2 + 3 v)
1015: %+ L_t (2 s t v^{-1} - 2 s + t^2 v^{-1} - 3 t + 2 v)
1016: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1017: &&
1018: + L_t ( - 2 s - 3 t + 2 v)
1019: + L_3 t (2 s + t )
1020: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle&&
1021: + 2 ( - 2 s^3 t^{-1} v
1022: + s^3 - 2 s^2 t - 3 s t^2 + 3 s t v - s v^2
1023: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1024: &&
1025: - t^2 v + t v^2)
1026: %/(s^2 t - s^2 v + 2 s t^2 - 2 s t v + t^3 - t^2 v)
1027: (s+t)^{-2}(t-v)^{-1},
1028: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1029: S_4^p &=&
1030: 4 s^2 t^{-1} v(s + t)^{-2},
1031: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1032: S_4^a &=& 2s^2(1-P)( 2-u_0\hat L_A+2tL_m+sL_A )/(tuu_0);
1033: \end{eqnarray}
1034: %
1035: %
1036: %
1037: \begin{eqnarray}
1038: S_5 &=& (1-P)S_5^c + S_5^a,\
1039: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1040: S_5^c &=&
1041: L_5 v
1042: + 2 L_6 ( - s^3 - s^2 u + s^2 v - s v^2 - u v^2 + v^3)
1043: %/(s^2 u - s^2 v + 2 s u^2 - 3 s u v + s v^2 + u^3 - 2 u^2 v + u v^2)
1044: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1045: %&&
1046: (s+u)^{-1}(v-u)^{-1}t^{-1}
1047: - \hat L_A
1048: + 2 L_m ( - 2 s^4 u^{-1}
1049: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1050: &&
1051: + 5 s^3 u^{-1} v - 4 s^3 - 3 s^2 u
1052: - 6 s^2 u^{-1} v^2 + 10 s^2 v - 2 s u^2
1053: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1054: %&&
1055: + 9 s u v
1056: + 4 s u^{-1} v^3
1057: - 11 s v^2 - u^3 + 4 u^2 v - 6 u v^2 - u^{-1} v^4
1058: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1059: &&
1060: + 4 v^3)
1061: %/(s^2 u - s^2 v + 2 s u^2 - 3 s u v + s v^2 + u^3 - 2 u^2 v + u v^2)
1062: (s+u)^{-1}(v-u)^{-1}t^{-1}
1063: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1064: %&&
1065: + L_r ( - 2 s^3 - 2 s^2 u + s^2 v - u^2 v)
1066: %/(s^2 u - s^2 v + 2 s u^2 - 3 s u v + s v^2 + u^3 - 2 u^2 v + u v^2)
1067: (s+u)^{-1}(v-u)^{-1}t^{-1}
1068: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1069: &&
1070: + L_s (4 s^4 u^{-1} - 4 s^3 u^{-1} v
1071: + 4 s^3 + 4 s^2 u
1072: + 3 s^2 u^{-1} v^2
1073: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1074: %&&
1075: - 8 s^2 v - 4 s u v
1076: - s u^{-1} v^3 + 6 s v^2
1077: + 2 u v^2 - 2 v^3)
1078: %/(s^2 u - s^2 v + 2 s u^2 - 3 s u v + s v^2 + u^3 - 2 u^2 v + u v^2)
1079: (s+u)^{-1}
1080: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1081: &&
1082: (v-u)^{-1}t^{-1}
1083: - L_t + L_u
1084: - L_x (4 s^3 u + 2 s^3 u^{-1} v^2 - 6 s^3 v
1085: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1086: %&&
1087: - s^2 u^2 + 2 s^2 u v
1088: - s^2 v^2 - 2 s u^3 + 7 s u^2 v - 8 s u v^2
1089: + 3 s v^3
1090: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1091: &&
1092: - u^4
1093: + 3 u^3 v - 4 u^2 v^2 + 3 u v^3 - v^4)
1094: %/(s^2 u^2 - 2 s^2 u v + s^2 v^2 + 2 s u^3 - 5 s u^2 v + 4 s u v^2
1095: %- s v^3 + u^4 - 3 u^3 v + 3 u^2 v^2 - u v^3)
1096: (s+u)^{-1}(u-v)^{-2}t^{-1}
1097: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1098: %&&
1099: + 4
1100: %( - 2 s^2 u^{-1} + s u^{-1} v - 2 s + v)
1101: %/(s^2 + 2 s u - s v + u^2 - u v)
1102: (2s-v)u^{-1}t^{-1},
1103: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1104: S_5^a &=& 2s^2(1-P)( 2+s L_s+2tL_m+u_0L_x )
1105: t^{-1}u^{-1}u_0^{-1};
1106: \end{eqnarray}
1107: %
1108: %
1109: %
1110: \begin{eqnarray}
1111: S_6 &=& (1-P)S_6^c/(tu) + S_6^a,\
1112: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1113: S_6^c &=&
1114: 2 L_u s^2
1115: - 3 {\tau}^{-1} s^2 t^3
1116: %/(t^3 - 3 t^2 v + 3 t v^2 - v^3)
1117: (t-v)^{-3}
1118: + t (5 s^4 t - 2 s^4 v + 10 s^3 t^2
1119: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1120: %&&
1121: - 4 s^3 t v + s^2 t^3
1122: + 10 s^2 t^2 v
1123: - 12 s^2 t v^2 + 4 s^2 v^3 - 4 s t^4
1124: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1125: &&
1126: + 14 s t^3 v - 18 s t^2 v^2 + 10 s t v^3 - 2 s v^4 + t^4 v
1127: - 3 t^3 v^2
1128: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1129: %&&
1130: + 3 t^2 v^3 - t v^4)
1131: %/(s^2 t^3 - 3 s^2 t^2 v + 3 s^2 t v^2 - s^2 v^3
1132: %+ 2 s t^4 - 6 s t^3 v + 6 s t^2 v^2 - 2 s t v^3 + t^5
1133: %- 3 t^4 v + 3 t^3 v^2 - t^2 v^3)
1134: (s+t)^{-2}(t-v)^{-3}
1135: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1136: S_6^a &=& 2s^2(1-P)( s L_s-u_0\hat L_A+tL_u )
1137: t^{-1}u^{-1}u_0^{-1};
1138: \end{eqnarray}
1139: %
1140: %
1141: %
1142: \begin{eqnarray}
1143: S_7 &=& ((1-P)S_7^c+PS_7^p)/(tu) + S_7^a,\
1144: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1145: S_7^c &=&
1146: - 2 L_1 s^3 + L_4 t (s^2 + t^2)
1147: + L_5
1148: %( - s^3 - s^2 t + 2 s^2 v + s t^2 + 2 s t v - s v^2 + t^3 - t v^2)
1149: (s+t)(s-t-v)u
1150: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1151: %&&
1152: + L_s s (2 s - v) + L_x ( - 4 s^2 - 2 s t
1153: + 3 s v + t v - v^2)
1154: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1155: &&
1156: + L_u ( - 3 s^2 t^2 + 4 s^2 t v - s^2 v^2 - 2 s t^3 + 6 s t^2 v
1157: - 6 s t v^2
1158: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1159: %&&
1160: + 2 s v^3 - t^4
1161: + 3 t^3 v - 4 t^2 v^2 + 3 t v^3
1162: - v^4)
1163: %/(t^2 - 2 t v + v^2)
1164: (t-v)^{-2}
1165: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1166: &&
1167: + 2 ( - 4 s^3 t + 2 s^3 v - 7 s^2 t^2 + 5 s^2 t v - 3 s t^3
1168: + 3 s t^2 v
1169: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1170: %&&
1171: - t^3 v + 2 t^2 v^2 - t v^3)
1172: %/(s t^2 - 2 s t v + s v^2 + t^3 - 2 t^2 v + t v^2)
1173: (s+t)^{-1}(t-v)^{-2},
1174: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1175: S_7^p &=&
1176: 4 s^{-1} v (s^3 + 2 t^2 v - 4 t v^2 + 2 v^3)(t-v)^{-2},
1177: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1178: S_7^a &=& 2s^2(1-P)( 2+u_0L_x+tL_u+sL_A )
1179: t^{-1}u^{-1}u_0^{-1};
1180: \end{eqnarray}
1181: %
1182: %
1183: %
1184: $S_{8,9,10}$ are the pure u-channel contributions:
1185: \begin{eqnarray}
1186: S_8 = (S_3^u+PS_3^p)|_{t \leftrightarrow u}/u^2 + S_8^{a},\
1187: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1188: S_8^a = -2(s^2+t^2-(s^2-t^2)P)((u+u_0)u^{-2}u_0^{-2}
1189: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1190: %&&
1191: -\hat L_A u^{-1}u_0^{-1});
1192: \end{eqnarray}
1193: %
1194: %
1195: %
1196: \begin{eqnarray}
1197: S_9 = (S_2^u+PS_2^p)|_{t \leftrightarrow u}/u + S_9^{a},\
1198: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1199: S_9^a = -2(s^2+t^2-(s^2-t^2)P) (2tL_m+sL_A+sL_s
1200: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1201: %&&
1202: + tL_u ) (u+u_0)u^{-2}u_0^{-2};
1203: \end{eqnarray}
1204: %
1205: %
1206: %
1207: \begin{eqnarray}
1208: S_{10} = (S_1^u+PS_1^p)|_{t \leftrightarrow u} + S_{10}^{a},\
1209: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1210: S_{10}^a = -2(s^2+t^2-(s^2-t^2)P)(2(u+u_0)u^{-2}u_0^{-2}
1211: %\nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1212: %&&
1213: + L_xu^{-1}u_0^{-1});
1214: \end{eqnarray}
1215:
1216:
1217: Evidently, the contributions $S_1,\ S_2,\ S_3$
1218: are in agreement with the corresponding terms of calculations
1219: \cite{old-bard-shum} (unpolarized fermion scattering)
1220: and \cite{my1} (longitudinally polarized fermion scattering),
1221: if we suppose that masses of the initial fermions being equal.
1222:
1223:
1224: Here we present the logarithms (and their combinations) which
1225: were used in hard brems\-strah\-lung calculation (notice that
1226: all of them do not lead to infrared singularity):
1227: \ba
1228: && L_m = -\frac{1}{t} \log\frac{|t|}{m^2},\
1229: L_A = -\frac{1}{v-s} \log\frac{(v-s)^2}{m^2\tau},
1230: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1231: &&
1232: \hat L_A = -\frac{1}{v-u} \log\frac{(v-u)^2}{m^2\tau},
1233: L_t = \frac{1}{v-t} \log\frac{\tau(v-t)^2}{m^2t^2},\
1234: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1235: &&
1236: L_s = \frac{1}{s} \log\frac{s^2}{m^4},\
1237: L_x = -\frac{1}{u} \log\frac{u^2}{m^4},\
1238: \nonumber % \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1239: \ea
1240: \ba
1241: &&
1242: L_u = \frac{1}{v-t} \log\frac{(v-t)^2}{m^2\tau},\
1243: L_1 = \frac{1}{v} (L_s-L_A),\
1244: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1245: &&
1246: L_2 = \frac{1}{v} (L_x+\hat L_A),\
1247: L_3 = \frac{1}{v} L_t,\
1248: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1249: &&
1250: L_4 = \frac{1}{v} (L_u-2L_m),\
1251: L_5 = \frac{1}{v(s+t)} \log\frac{u^2m^2}{(v-u)^2\tau},\
1252: \nonumber \\[0.3cm] \displaystyle
1253: &&
1254: L_6 = \frac{1}{s} \log\frac{s\tau^2}{m^2ut},\
1255: L_r = \frac{1}{u} \log\frac{t^2}{u^2},\; \tau=v+m^2.
1256: \ea
1257: %\end{widetext}
1258: \twocolumngrid
1259: \bibliography{ura}% Produces the bibliography via BibTeX.
1260: \end{document}
1261: %
1262: % ****** End of file apssamp.tex ******
1263:
1264:
1265: