1: \documentclass[twoside,12pt]{article}

2: \usepackage{epsfig}

3: %\usepackage{showkeys}

4: 

5: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {#2} (#4) #3 }

6: \def\NCA{{\em Nuovo Cimento} A}

7: \def\PHYS{{\em Physica}}

8: \def\NPA{{\em Nucl. Phys.} A}

9: \def\MATH{{\em J. Math. Phys.}}

10: \def\PRO{{\em Prog. Theor. Phys.}}

11: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}

12: \def\PLA{{\em Phys. Lett.} A}

13: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.} B}

14: \def\PLD{{\em Phys. Lett.} D}

15: \def\PL{{\em Phys. Lett.}}

16: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}

17: \def\PREV{\em Phys. Rev.}

18: \def\PREP{\em Phys. Rep.}

19: \def\PRA{{\em Phys. Rev.} A}

20: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}

21: \def\PRC{{\em Phys. Rev.} C}

22: \def\PRB{{\em Phys. Rev.} B}

23: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}

24: \def\ZPA{{\em Z. Phys.} A}

25: \def\ANNP{\em Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)}

26: \def\RMP{{\em Rev. Mod. Phys.}}

27: \def\CHEM{{\em J. Chem. Phys.}}

28: \def\INT{{\em Int. J. Mod. Phys.} E}

29: \def\r{\vec r}

30: \def\R{\vec R}

31: \def\p{\vec p}

32: \def\P{\vec P}

33: \def\q{\vec q}

34: \def\ss{\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}}

35: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

36: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

37: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

38: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

39: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}

40: \def\eq#1{{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}}

41: \def\fig#1{{Fig.~\ref{#1}}}

42: 

43: \newcommand{\slpartial}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\partial$}}

44: \newcommand{\slA}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.73em\hbox{$A$}}

45: \newcommand{\slp}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.57em\hbox{$p$}}

46: \newcommand{\slk}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.57em\hbox{$k$}}

47: \newcommand{\slq}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.57em\hbox{$q$}}

48: \newcommand{\slepsilon}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\epsilon$}}

49: \newcommand{\slvarepsilon}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\varepsilon$}}

50: \newcommand{\slC}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$C$}}

51: 

52: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{eqnarray*}}

53: \newcommand{\een}{\end{eqnarray*}}

54: \newcommand{\stackeven}[2]{{{}_{\displaystyle{#1}}\atop\displaystyle{#2}}}

55: \newcommand{\lsim}{\stackeven{<}{\sim}}

56: \newcommand{\gsim}{\stackeven{>}{\sim}}

57: \newcommand{\bas}{\overline{\alpha}_s}

58: \newcommand{\un}[1]{\underline{#1}}

59: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}

60: \newcommand{\as}{\alpha_s}

61: 

62: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{.85}

63: \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{.7}

64: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{.15}

65: \renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{.66}

66: \renewcommand{\dbltopfraction}{.66}

67: \renewcommand{\dblfloatpagefraction}{.66}

68: \setcounter{topnumber}{9}

69: \setcounter{bottomnumber}{9}

70: \setcounter{totalnumber}{20}

71: \setcounter{dbltopnumber}{9}

72: 

73: \topmargin-2.8cm

74: \oddsidemargin-1cm

75: \evensidemargin-1cm

76: \textwidth18.5cm

77: \textheight25.0cm

78: 

79: \begin{document}

80: 

81: \title{Saturation Physics and Deuteron--Gold Collisions at RHIC}

82: \author{Jamal Jalilian-Marian$^1$\footnote{Email: jamal@phys.washington.edu} \

83: and Yuri V. Kovchegov$^2$\footnote{Email: yuri@mps.ohio-state.edu} \\~~\\

84: $^1$ Institute for Nuclear Theory, Box 351550 \\

85: University of Washington \\

86: Seattle, WA 98195-1550, USA \\~~\\

87: $^2$ Department of Physics \\

88: The Ohio State University \\

89: 191 West Woodruff Avenue \\

90: Columbus, OH 43210, USA}

91: 

92: \maketitle

93: 

94: \begin{abstract}

95: We present a review of parton saturation/Color Glass Condensate

96: physics in the context of deuteron-gold ($d+Au$) collisions at

97: RHIC. Color Glass Condensate physics is a universal description of all

98: high energy hadronic and nuclear interactions. It comprises classical

99: (McLerran-Venugopalan model and Glauber-Mueller rescatterings) and

100: quantum evolution (JIMWLK and BK equations) effects both in small-$x$

101: hadronic and nuclear wave functions and in the high energy scattering

102: processes. Proton-nucleus (or $d+A$) collisions present a unique

103: opportunity to study Color Glass Condensate predictions, since many

104: relevant observables in proton-nucleus collisions are reasonably

105: well-understood theoretically in the Color Glass Condensate approach. In this

106: article we review the basics of saturation/Color Glass Condensate

107: physics and reproduce derivations of many important observables in proton

108: (deuteron)--nucleus collisions. We compare the predictions of Color

109: Glass physics to the data generated by $d+Au$ experiments at RHIC and

110: observe an agreement between the data and the theory, indicating that

111: Color Glass Condensate has probably been discovered at RHIC. We point

112: out further experimental measurements which need to be carried out to

113: test the discovery.

114: \end{abstract}

115: 

116: 

117: \vspace*{1cm}

118: 

119: \begin{center}

120: {\sl Prepared for publication in Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.}

121: \end{center}

122: 

123: 

124: \newpage

125: 

126: \tableofcontents

127: 

128: \newpage

129: 

130: \section{Introduction}

131: 

132: Saturation/Color Glass Condensate physics \cite{GLR}-\cite{yuri_bk} is

133: a rapidly developing field of strong interactions at high

134: energy. Color Glass Condensate (CGC) physics describes high parton

135: densities inside the hadronic and nuclear wave functions at small

136: values of Bjorken $x$ variable. It demonstrates how the gluon fields

137: in the hadronic and nuclear wave functions reach their maximum

138: allowable values in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) corresponding to

139: $A_\mu \sim 1/g$ \cite{MV,yuri1,yuri2,jkmw}. The CGC formalism is also

140: successfully applied to calculation of total, elastic and diffractive

141: cross sections of high energy hadronic and nuclear scattering. There,

142: by resumming the strong gluon field dynamics, it resolves such

143: long-standing questions as unitarity of the scattering $S$-matrix

144: \cite{froi} and infrared (IR) safety \cite{Bartels}, which are known 

145: to be violated by the Balitsky-Fadin-Kuraev-Lipatov (BFKL) evolution

146: equation \cite{BFKL} corresponding to the weak field limit of

147: CGC. Saturation/CGC approach allows one to calculate particle

148: production in hadronic and nuclear scattering

149: \cite{KMW1}-\cite{Lappi}. The resulting inclusive particle production

150: cross sections are infrared-safe, which is a significant theoretical

151: improvement over the IR-divergent perturbative QCD results

152: \cite{GB,Lipatov1} making the small coupling approach to particle

153: production self-consistent. One of the interesting application of

154: particle production in CGC framework is understanding the initial

155: conditions for the evolution of the quark-gluon system produced in

156: heavy ion collisions toward the possible thermalization leading to

157: formation of quark-gluon plasma (QGP) \cite{yuriaa,Ian04,KV,Lappi}.

158: 

159: Perturbative QCD (pQCD) has been extremely successful in describing

160: the particle production data over a large kinematic window

161: \cite{amueller}. Applications of pQCD to particle production in high

162: energy hadronic or nuclear collisions are based on the use of

163: collinear factorization theorems. The essence of a collinearly

164: factorized cross section is the idea of incoherence. In other words, a

165: hadronic cross section can be written as a convolution of parton

166: distributions and fragmentation functions, which are universal

167: non-perturbative objects that are also subject to perturbative

168: evolution (DGLAP), with a hard scattering cross section involving

169: partons, which is perturbatively calculable but is process

170: dependent. Parton distribution functions are typically measured in

171: Deep Inelastic Scattering experiments such as the ones performed at

172: HERA, where it has been observed that the gluon and sea quark

173: distributions grow very fast with decreasing Bjorken $x$. This fast

174: growth can be understood in pQCD as driven by radiation of gluons with

175: small Bjorken $x$ via DGLAP evolution equations. Collinear

176: factorization theorems are not exact and are violated by effects that

177: are typically suppressed by inverse of the hard momentum transfer but

178: can be enhanced by energy (or $\ln \, 1/x$) or $A$ dependent factors,

179: which may be large at high energy and/or for large nuclei. This

180: necessitates construction of a new formalism that does not rely on

181: collinear factorization and can include these potentially large

182: effects.  The hint for this new formalism comes from pQCD itself,

183: noticing that the rise of parton distribution functions can not

184: continue for ever since it would lead to growth of hadronic cross

185: sections at a rate which would violate unitarity. A weak coupling

186: mechanism which can tame this fast growth is gluon recombination and

187: saturation. Color Glass Condensate formalism is the natural

188: generalization of pQCD in order to make it applicable to dense

189: partonic systems.

190: 

191: The extensive theoretical progress in the field of saturation/Color

192: Glass has been summarized in several review articles, mostly

193: concentrating on the issues of non-linear small-$x$ evolution

194: \cite{ILM,IV,Heribert}. Our article here deals with saturation/Color

195: Glass Condensate physics putting more emphasis on particle production

196: in proton (deuteron)--nucleus collisions ($p(d)A$) and in deep

197: inelastic scattering (DIS). Many of the relevant particle production

198: observables in $pA$ and DIS have been well-understood theoretically in

199: the saturation/Color Glass approach, at least at the partonic level

200: \cite{KMW1}-\cite{Gelis:2002nn}. It is therefore, very important to be

201: able to verify our theoretical understanding by comparing the

202: predictions of CGC physics for particle production in $p(d)A$ to the

203: experimental data produced by deuteron-gold ($d+Au$) scattering

204: program at Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven

205: National Laboratory (BNL) \cite{phenix}-\cite{stardA}. Below we will

206: review both the CGC predictions \cite{KLM}-\cite{KLN} and experimental

207: data reported by RHIC experiments \cite{phobos_mult}-\cite{stardA}. We

208: will point out the apparent agreement between the two indicating a

209: possible discovery of Color Glass Condensate at RHIC \cite{GM}. We

210: will also review future experimental test which can be carried out to

211: test the CGC discovery both by $d+Au$ program at RHIC and by $pA$

212: scattering program at Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN.

213: 

214: The paper is structured as follows. We begin in Sect. \ref{satrev}

215: with a general review of saturation/CGC physics. This review is by no

216: means all-inclusive: we will concentrate on the material that we will

217: need later in our discussion of particle production. We refer the

218: interested reader who wants to learn more about various aspects of

219: small-$x$ evolution to the dedicated reviews in

220: \cite{ILM,IV,Heribert,genya}. In Sect. \ref{ed} we discuss the BFKL 

221: evolution equation \cite{BFKL} along with its problems, such as

222: violation of unitarity \cite{froi} and diffusion into infrared

223: \cite{Bartels}. We also review the Gribov-Levin-Ryskin--Mueller-Qiu 

224: (GLR-MQ) evolution equation \cite{GLR,MQ}. We proceed in

225: Sect. \ref{QCA} by discussing quasi-classical approximation in

226: small-$x$ physics. We review Glauber-Mueller multiple rescatterings in

227: DIS \cite{GlaMue,Glauber} and McLerran-Venugopalan model of small-$x$

228: wave functions of large nuclei

229: \cite{MV,yuri1,yuri2,jkmw,LM}. Quasi-classical regime at small-$x$ is

230: valid when $x$ is small enough, so that coherent interactions of

231: nucleons in the nucleus with the projectile are possible. This

232: translates into the requirement for parton coherence length $l_{coh}$

233: to be larger than the nuclear radius $R$ \cite{KS},

234: \be\label{clcond}

235: l_{coh} \, = \, \frac{1}{2 \, m_N \, x_{Bj}} \, > \, R,

236: \ee

237: with $m_N$ the nucleon mass and $x_{Bj}$ the Bjorken $x$ variable of a

238: parton. Defining the {\sl rapidity} variable $Y = \ln 1/x_{Bj}$ we

239: recast the condition (\ref{clcond}) as $Y \, > \, \ln A$, with $A$ the

240: atomic number of the nucleus. On the other hand, when $x_{Bj}$ becomes

241: too small, BFKL evolution effects become important, breaking down the

242: quasi-classical approximation. BFKL evolution brings in powers of $\as

243: \, \ln (1/x_{Bj}) \, \sim \, \as \, Y$. Requiring for such effects to

244: be small, $\as \, Y < 1$, we obtain an upper bound on the allowable

245: rapidity range. The applicability window for the quasi-classical

246: approximation is then

247: \be\label{clcond3}

248: \ln A \, \le \, Y \, \le \, \frac{1}{\as}. 

249: \ee

250: We also discuss in Sect. \ref{QCA} how the {\sl saturation} scale

251: $Q_s$ arises in the quasi-classical limit.

252: 

253: We continue our review of saturation/Color Glass physics by

254: re-deriving the

255: Jalilian-Marian--Iancu--McLerran--Weigert--Leonidov--Kovner (JIMWLK)

256: \cite{jklw1}-\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1998cb},

257: \cite{Iancu:2000hn}-\cite{Ferreiro:2001qy} and Balitsky-Kovchegov (BK) 

258: \cite{balitsky,yuri_bk} non-linear evolution equations in Sect. \ref{QE}. 

259: Quantum small-$x$ evolution corrections become important when $\as \,

260: Y \, \gsim \, 1$ \cite{BFKL}, such that

261: \be\label{qcond}

262: Y \, \ge \, \frac{1}{\as}.

263: \ee

264: \eq{qcond} gives a lower bound on the region of applicability of JIMWLK 

265: and BK evolution equations. 

266: 

267: We conclude the review of CGC by solving the non-linear evolution

268: equations in Sect. \ref{see}. There we discuss the solution of linear

269: (BFKL) evolution equation outside of the saturation region,

270: demonstrate an interesting property of the solution of JIMWLK and BK

271: known as {\sl geometric scaling} inside the saturation region

272: \cite{geom,LT} and reproduce the derivation of {\sl extended geometric

273: scaling} outside of that region \cite{IIM1}. We demonstrate how

274: saturation scale $Q_s$ grows with energy once the quantum evolution

275: effects are included \cite{MT,Mueller3,MP}. We explain how JIMWLK and

276: BK evolution equations resolve the problems of the BFKL evolution by

277: unitarizing the corresponding total cross sections of DIS and by

278: prohibiting diffusion into the infrared, making the small-coupling

279: approximation self-consistent \cite{Braun1}-\cite{AAMSW}.

280: 

281: We continue in Sect. \ref{pppa} by deriving expressions for a number

282: of particle production observables in $pA$ collisions in the

283: saturation/CGC framework. We start in Sect. \ref{clpa} by calculating

284: inclusive gluon production cross section in $pA$ in the

285: quasi-classical approximation \cite{KM,KTS,DM,KW2}. We show that

286: quasi-classical multiple rescatterings lead to Cronin enhancement

287: \cite{Cronin} of gluon production in $pA$ \cite{BKW,KKT,KNST}-\cite{ktbroadening3}, 

288: as can be seen from \fig{cron}. We then proceed in Sect. \ref{qepa} by

289: including the effects of quantum BK evolution in the expression for

290: gluon production cross section in $pA$ \cite{KT,Braun2,Braun3}. As one

291: can see from \fig{toy}, the effect of small-$x$ evolution is to

292: flatten the Cronin maximum introducing suppression of particle

293: production at all transverse momenta $p_T$ (see \fig{toy})

294: \cite{KLM}-\cite{BKW,AAMSW,IIT}. In Sect. \ref{clquark} we calculate

295: valence quark production cross section in $pA$ both in the

296: quasi-classical limit and including small-$x$ evolution

297: \cite{Dumitru:2002qt}-\cite{Gelis:2002nn}. We move on to

298: electromagnetic probes in Sect. \ref{ep}, where we calculate prompt

299: photon and dilepton production cross sections in $pA$ collisions

300: \cite{Gelis:2002ki}-\cite{BGD}.  Finally, in Sect.\ref{2pi}

301: we analyze two-particle correlations

302: \cite{KLM2}-\cite{Fujii:2005vj}. We rederive production cross section

303: in $pA$ for two gluons at mid-rapidity \cite{JMK}, for a quark and a

304: gluon at forward rapidity \cite{JMK} and for $q\bar q$ pair at

305: mid-rapidity \cite{Kharzeev:2003sk}-\cite{Fujii:2005vj}.

306: 

307: We review some of the data generated by $d+Au$ scattering program at

308: RHIC \cite{phenix}-\cite{stardA} in Sect.~\ref{data}. We show that the

309: data reported by BRAHMS \cite{brahms-2}, PHENIX

310: \cite{phenix}, PHOBOS \cite{phobos} and STAR \cite{star} experiments show 

311: Cronin-like enhancement of particle production at mid-rapidity. We

312: discuss how this result, combined with suppression of produced hadrons

313: in $Au+Au$ collisions \cite{brahmsaa}-\cite{starAA}, serves as a

314: control experiment for the signals of quark-gluon plasma formation in

315: heavy ion collisions at RHIC \cite{Bj}-\cite{GM1}. We then review

316: BRAHMS data at forward rapidity \cite{brahms-1,brahms-2}, indicating

317: suppression predicted by saturation/CGC approach

318: \cite{KLM,KKT,AAKSW}. This data is confirmed by preliminary results

319: from PHENIX \cite{phenixdA}, PHOBOS \cite{phobosdA} and STAR

320: \cite{stardA}, demonstrating that Color Glass Condensate has probably

321: been discovered at RHIC \cite{GM1}. We conclude Sect. \ref{data} by

322: listing future experimental tests

323: \cite{Jalilian-Marian:2004er,KKT2,JamalH} which need to be carried out

324: to verify the discovery of CGC at RHIC \cite{GM1}.

325: 

326: We conclude in Sect. \ref{conc} by discussing some of the issues which

327: we inevitably had to leave out in this review, including recent

328: progress in our understanding of pomeron loop corrections to small-$x$

329: evolution \cite{loop1}-\cite{loop5} and some exclusive processes

330: \cite{Hebecker}-\cite{yuridiff}, which can not be measured at RHIC.

331: 

332: Throughout the paper we will use the following notation for the

333: 4-vectors: for a 4-vector $v_\mu = (v_0, v_1, v_2, v_3)$ we define the

334: light cone components by $v^\pm = (v_0 \pm v_3)/\sqrt{2}$ and combine

335: the transverse components into a two-dimensional vector ${\un v} =

336: (v_1, v_2)$. The metric tensor is chosen in such a way that $v_\mu

337: v^\mu = 2 \, v^+ \, v^- - {\un v}^2$.

338: 

339: 

340: 

341: 

342: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

343: 

344: \section{Overview of Saturation/Color Glass Condensate Physics}

345: \label{satrev}

346: 

347: In this Section we will review the developments and advances of high

348: energy QCD which led to our modern understanding of the

349: saturation/Color Glass Condensate physics.

350: 

351: \subsection{Early Developments}

352: \label{ed}

353: 

354: \subsubsection{The BFKL Equation}

355: \label{BFKLeq}

356: 

357: A milestone in the development of small-$x$ physics was the

358: derivation by Balitsky, Fadin, Kuraev, and Lipatov of what has become

359: known as the BFKL equation \cite{BFKL}. The BFKL equation describes

360: the behavior of scattering amplitudes and gluon distribution functions

361: at asymptotically high energies. It does it by resumming leading

362: logarithms of energy, i.e., powers of the parameter $\as \ln s$, where

363: in the perturbative QCD regime the coupling constant is small, $\as

364: \ll 1$, and, in Regge kinematics, the center of mass energy $s$ of the

365: scattering process is much larger than any other momentum scale

366: involved.

367: 

368: Derivation of the BFKL equation is rather complicated. For derivations

369: in the transverse momentum space we refer the interested reader to

370: \cite{BFKL,Jar}, as well as to Sect. \ref{JIMWLKsect} below. Derivation in 

371: transverse coordinate space can be found in \cite{dip1,dip2,dip3,CM},

372: as well as in Sect. \ref{BKsect} below. Here we are going to present a

373: simple physical picture of the BFKL evolution following Mueller in

374: \cite{MuellerCarg}. \\

375: 

376: {\sl Physical Picture} \\

377: ~\\

378: Consider an ultrarelativistic gluon scattering on a target at

379: rest. Before scattering on the target, the gluon can emit one or more

380: extra gluons. The emissions are illustrated in \fig{bfkl_phys}. In the

381: infinite momentum frame considered here, the gluon moving in the light

382: cone ``+'' direction has a very large typical light cone ``+''

383: component of its momentum, which we denote by $p^+$. The original

384: gluon emits another gluon with a much smaller light cone momentum

385: $k_1^+ \ll p^+$. A simple calculation shows that the emission

386: probability is given by

387: \be\label{P1}

388: d P_1 \, = \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi} \, \frac{d^2 k_1}{{\un k}_1^2} \,

389: \frac{d k_1^+}{k_1^+},

390: \ee

391: where $N_c$ is the number of colors (and the $SU(N_c)$ Casimir

392: operator in the adjoint representation) and ${\un k}_1$ is the

393: two-component transverse momentum vector of the gluon $\# 1$. \eq{P1}

394: can be obtained from the usual formula for photon Bremsstrahlung by

395: multiplying it with the color Casimir $N_c$ and replacing $\alpha_{EM}

396: \rightarrow \as$. Following \cite{MuellerCarg} we assume that all 

397: emitted gluons have fixed transverse momentum of the order of some

398: scale $Q$. This allows us to simplify the problem by replacing the

399: transverse momentum integral $d^2 k_1 / {\un k}_1^2$ by a constant

400: $c$. Defining the {\it rapidity} variable

401: \be

402: y_1 \, = \, \ln \frac{p^+}{k_1^+} 

403: \ee

404: we rewrite \eq{P1} as

405: \be\label{P11}

406: d P_1 \, = \, c \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi} \, d y_1.

407: \ee

408: Using \eq{P11} we conclude that given the rapidity interval

409: \be

410: \Delta y_1 \, = \, \frac{\pi}{\as \, c \, N_c}

411: \ee

412: the original gluon would split into two gluons with probability 1. 

413: 

414: To generalize the picture to many gluon emissions, we have to

415: understand the space-time picture of the process. First we note that

416: the typical light cone coherence time of the gluon $\# 1$ is 

417: \be\label{lctime}

418: \tau_1 \, \equiv \, x^+_1 \, = \, \frac{2 \, k_1^+}{{\un k}_1^2} \, \approx

419: \, \frac{2 \, k_1^+}{Q^2}. 

420: \ee

421: Similarly, for the $i$th gluon in the gluon cascade, the light cone

422: time is of the order of 

423: \be

424: \tau_i \, \approx \, \frac{2 \, k_i^+}{Q^2}.

425: \ee

426: Thus, if the original gluon emits a cascade of gluons with their

427: longitudinal momenta being progressively smaller

428: \be\label{kord}

429: p^+ \gg k_1^+ \gg k_2^+ \gg \ldots \gg k_N^+

430: \ee

431: than their light cone times would also be ordered

432: \be

433: \tau_1 \gg \tau_2 \gg \ldots \gg \tau_N.

434: \ee

435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

436: \begin{figure}

437: \begin{center}

438: \epsfxsize=8cm

439: \leavevmode

440: \hbox{\epsffile{bfkl_phys.eps}}

441: \end{center}

442: \caption{Gluon cascade leading to the BFKL evolution. All gluon emissions 

443: are ordered in light cone ``+'' momenta, and, correspondingly, in

444: light cone time. }

445: \label{bfkl_phys}

446: \end{figure}

447: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

448: This cascade is shown in \fig{bfkl_phys}. There the gluons are ordered

449: in time, such that the typical coherence time of each emitted gluon is

450: much shorter than the coherence times of all the preexisting (harder)

451: gluons. Therefore, for the $i$th gluon, all the gluons $1, \ldots,

452: i-1$ appear frozen in time. The gluon can be emitted off any of these

453: preexisting gluons, which is shown by disconnected gluon lines in

454: \fig{bfkl_phys}. Indeed, in the transverse direction the gluons are 

455: coherent only over short distances of the order of $\Delta x_\perp

456: \sim 1/Q$, such that each gluon is emitted only by some fraction $c'$

457: of the preexisting gluons. Since the colors of all these gluons are

458: random, the $i$th gluon ``sees'' an effective color charge

459: \be

460: g_i \, = \, \sqrt{c' \, i} \, g

461: \ee

462: which results from a random walk in color space of $i$ preexisting

463: gluons. The probability of $i$th gluon emission is

464: \be\label{Pi}

465: d P_i \, = \, c \, c' \, i \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi} \, d y_i.

466: \ee

467: The rapidity interval required for $i$th gluon emission is

468: \be

469: \Delta y_i \, = \, \frac{\pi}{c \, c' \, i \, \as \, N_c}.

470: \ee

471: Thus, the rapidity needed to emit $N$ gluons is given by

472: \be

473: Y_N \, = \, \sum_{i=1}^N \Delta y_i \, = \, \frac{\pi}{c \, c' \, \as

474: \, N_c} \, \sum_{i=1}^N \, \frac{1}{i} \, \approx \, \frac{\pi}{c \, c' 

475: \, \as \, N_c} \, \ln N,

476: \ee

477: so that the total number of gluons emitted in rapidity interval $Y$ is

478: given by

479: \be\label{expglue}

480: N(Y) \, = \, e^{c \, c' \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi} \, Y}.

481: \ee

482: This simple physical picture that we borrowed from \cite{MuellerCarg}

483: gives the right qualitative behavior of the BFKL evolution. The exact

484: BFKL evolution also leads to the exponentially increasing number of

485: gluons, just like we obtained in \eq{expglue}. The successive time

486: ordered emissions discussed above and shown in \fig{bfkl_phys} resum

487: the leading logarithms of energy, just like the exact BFKL equation:

488: each power of $\as$ gets enhanced by a power of rapidity $Y$ (which is

489: equivalent to the logarithm of center of mass energy $s$), such that

490: \eq{expglue} resums powers of $\as Y$. Even the kinematics of successive 

491: emissions considered above (see \eq{kord}) is the same as in the exact

492: BFKL evolution, where extracting the leading logarithmic contribution

493: requires ordering of the gluons' longitudinal momenta.~\\

494: 

495: {\sl The BFKL Equation}~\\

496: 

497: Let us now consider a scattering of a bound heavy quark-antiquark

498: state (quarkonium, or simply onium) on another quarkonium. The

499: interaction between the onia is shown in \fig{bfkl_stand}.

500: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

501: \begin{figure}

502: \begin{center}

503: \epsfxsize=5cm

504: \leavevmode

505: \hbox{\epsffile{bfkl.eps}}

506: \end{center}

507: \caption{Scattering of two onia with the interaction mediated by the 

508: BFKL evolution.}

509: \label{bfkl_stand}

510: \end{figure}

511: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

512: In general, we can write down the total onium-onium scattering cross

513: section as a convolution of the onia light cone wave functions

514: \cite{BL,BPP} with the imaginary part of the forward scattering amplitude 

515: of two quark-antiquark pairs (the imaginary part is denoted by $F$)

516: \begin{equation}\label{onium_tot}

517: \sigma_{tot} \, = \, 2 \, \int d^2 x \, \int_0^1 dz \, \int d^2 x' 

518: \, \int_0^1 dz' \, \Phi_{q\bar q} (\underline{x}, z) \, \Phi_{q\bar q}

519:  (\underline{x}', z') \, F ({\un x}, {\un x}', Y),

520: \end{equation}

521: where $\Phi_{q\bar q} (\underline{x}, z)$ and $\Phi_{q\bar q}

522: (\underline{x}', z')$ are light cone wave functions of the onia with

523: transverse sizes ${\un x}$ and ${\un x}'$. In the center of mass

524: frame, each of the onia carries a large light cone momentum, $p^+$ and

525: $p'^-$ correspondingly. For high energy eikonal scattering considered

526: here, these two momenta ($p^+$ and $p'^-$) are much larger than any

527: transverse momentum scales in the problem. In each of the onia the

528: quark carries the fraction $z$ (or $z'$) of the light cone component

529: of the total momentum of the quark-antiquark state. $Y = \ln (s/4

530: M^2)$ is the rapidity variable, defined as a logarithm of the ratio of

531: the center of mass energy of the onium-onium scattering $s$ over some

532: typical transverse momentum scale, like the onium mass $M$ used here.

533: 

534: At the lowest order the interaction in \fig{bfkl_stand} is mediated by

535: the two-gluon exchange. The corresponding imaginary part of the

536: forward amplitude, which we denote by $F=F^{(0)}$, is given by

537: \begin{equation}\label{twogl}

538: F^{(0)} (\underline{x},\underline{x}' ) \, = \, \frac{\as^2 \, C_F}{N_c} \, 

539: \int \, \frac{d^2 l}{[\underline{l}^2]^2} \, (2 - e^{- i

540: \underline{l} \cdot \underline{x}} - e^{ i \underline{l} \cdot

541: \underline{x}} ) \, (2 - e^{- i \underline{l} \cdot \underline{x}'} - e^{

542: i \underline{l} \cdot \underline{x}'} ),

543: \end{equation}

544: where $C_F = (N_c^2 - 1)/2 N_c$ is the $SU(N_c)$ Casimir operator in

545: the fundamental representation and ${\un l}$ is the transverse

546: momentum of each of the gluons. 

547: 

548: The BFKL evolution allows one to calculate quantum corrections to

549: \eq{twogl} that bring in powers of $\as Y$. Apparently, as was shown in 

550: \cite{BFKL}, such corrections preserve the two-gluon exchange structure 

551: of the interactions and can be summarized by the blob in

552: \fig{bfkl_stand}. Corresponding generalization of the amplitude (\ref{twogl}) 

553: reads

554: \be\label{forw}

555: F ({\un x}, {\un x}', Y)  \, = \, \frac{\as^2 \, C_F}{N_c} \, 

556: \int \, \frac{d^2 l \, d^2 l'}{\underline{l}^2 \, {\un l}'^2} \, (2 - e^{- i

557: \underline{l} \cdot \underline{x}} - e^{ i \underline{l} \cdot

558: \underline{x}} ) \, (2 - e^{- i \underline{l}' \cdot \underline{x}'} - e^{

559: i \underline{l}' \cdot \underline{x}'} ) \, f ({\un l}, {\un l}', Y)

560: \ee

561: with ${\un l}$ and ${\un l}'$ the gluons' transverse momenta on both

562: sides of the blob as shown in \fig{bfkl_stand}. At the lowest

563: (two-gluon) order the amplitude $f ({\un l}, {\un l}', Y)$ is given by

564: a delta-function

565: \be\label{bfkl_init}

566: f^{(0)} ({\un l}, {\un l}') \, = \, f ({\un l}, {\un l}', Y=Y_0) \, =

567: \, \delta^2 ({\un l} - {\un l}'),

568: \ee

569: which, after substitution into \eq{forw} readily gives

570: \eq{twogl}. ($Y_0$ is some initial rapidity, corresponding to the 

571: center of mass energy where the two-gluon exchange dominates the

572: interaction.)

573: 

574: The BFKL equation for the amplitude $f ({\un l}, {\un l}', Y)$ with

575: the initial condition (\ref{bfkl_init}) reads \cite{BFKL}

576: \be\label{bfkleq}

577: \frac{\partial f ({\un l}, {\un l}', Y)}{\partial Y} \, = \, 

578: \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi^2} \int \! \frac{d^2

579: k}{(\underline{k} - \underline{l})^2} \left[ f

580: (\underline{k},\underline{l}', Y) - \frac{{\un l}^2 \, f

581: (\underline{l},\underline{l}', Y)}{{\un k}^2 + (\underline{k} -

582: \underline{l})^2} \right].

583: \ee

584: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

585: \begin{figure}

586: \begin{center}

587: \epsfxsize=18cm

588: \leavevmode

589: \hbox{\epsffile{bfkl_iter.eps}}

590: \end{center}

591: \caption{Schematic representation of a single rung of the BFKL evolution.}

592: \label{bfkl_iter}

593: \end{figure}

594: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

595: The equation is illustrated in \fig{bfkl_iter}, where the dashed

596: vertical line denotes the cut. The equation in \fig{bfkl_iter} states

597: that the blob can either consist of just a two gluon exchange without

598: any evolution (the first term on the right hand side of

599: \fig{bfkl_iter}), corresponding to the initial condition in

600: \eq{bfkl_init}, or the blob may have small-$x$ evolution corrections

601: included. The evolution corrections can be real (the second term on

602: the right in \fig{bfkl_iter}) and virtual (the third and fourth terms

603: on the right of

604: \fig{bfkl_iter}). The real term contains a gluon in the final state 

605: (crossing the cut) and corresponds to the first term on the right hand

606: side of \eq{bfkleq}. The gluon is emitted off the $t$-channel gluons

607: via the effective Lipatov vertices \cite{BFKL}, denoted by thick dots

608: in \fig{bfkl_iter}, which represent the sum of all possible

609: emissions. The virtual terms in \fig{bfkl_iter} contain no gluon in

610: the final state and correspond to the last term on the right of

611: \eq{bfkleq}.

612: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

613: \begin{figure}[hb]

614: \begin{center}

615: \epsfxsize=5cm

616: \leavevmode

617: \hbox{\epsffile{ladder.eps}}

618: \end{center}

619: \caption{BFKL evolution as a ladder diagram.}

620: \label{ladder}

621: \end{figure}

622: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

623: 

624: The solution of the BFKL equation should contain all iterations of the

625: kernel depicted in \fig{bfkl_iter}. Iterating the BFKL kernel leads

626: to the ladder diagrams, like the one shown in \fig{ladder}. It depicts

627: interaction of two onia characterized by typical transverse momentum

628: scales $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ interacting via a BFKL-evolved

629: amplitude. \fig{ladder} shows the structure of the blob in

630: \fig{bfkl_stand} in more detail. Again, the triple gluon vertices in

631: \fig{ladder} are not the usual QCD vertices: they are effective

632: Lipatov vertices responsible for the real part of the BFKL kernel

633: \cite{BFKL}. Similarly, the $t$-channel gluon lines do not correspond

634: to the usual QCD gluon propagators: they give the so-called reggeized

635: gluon propagators \cite{BFKL}.

636: 

637: 

638: The emissions resummed by a Lipatov vertex are shown in

639: \fig{lvert}. There we consider scattering of two ultrarelativistic quarks 

640: leading to production of a soft gluon with momentum $k^+ \ll p^+$ and

641: $k^- \ll p'^-$ \cite{BFKL,GB,KMW1,KMW2,KR,GM}. The correct emission

642: amplitude, which is obtained by summing diagrams A-E in \fig{lvert},

643: can be written as the first diagram in \fig{lvert} with the effective

644: vertex triple gluon given by \cite{BFKL,Lipatov1}

645: \be\label{lipa}

646: C_\mu^a (k, \underline{q}) \, = \, g \, T^a \, \left( \frac{

647: \underline{q}^2 }{k^-} - k^+ \, , \, - \frac{

648: (\underline{k} - \underline{q})^2 }{k^+} + k^- \, , \,

649: 2\underline{q} - \underline{k}

650: \right)

651: \ee

652: in the $(+,-,\perp)$ form with $T^a$ the $SU(N_c)$ color matrix in the

653: adjoint representation.

654: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

655: \begin{figure}[h]

656: \begin{center}

657: \epsfxsize=18cm

658: \leavevmode

659: \hbox{\epsffile{lipatov.eps}}

660: \end{center}

661: \caption{The diagrams contributing to effective Lipatov vertex, which is 

662: denoted by a very thick dot. }

663: \label{lvert}

664: \end{figure}

665: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

666: 

667: To construct an effective reggeized gluon propagator one has to resum

668: all leading logarithmic corrections to a single $t$-channel gluon

669: exchange keeping the exchange amplitude in a color octet state. The

670: details of this sophisticated resummation procedure can be found in

671: \cite{FR}. Here we will only give the final result: the leading logarithmic 

672: corrections to the $t$-channel gluon propagator exponentiate,

673: modifying the gluon propagator

674: \be\label{gregg}

675: \frac{D_{\mu\nu}^{ab} (q)}{q^2} \, \longrightarrow \, \frac{D_{\mu\nu}^{ab} 

676: (q)}{q^2} \, e^{- \omega ({\un q}^2) \, \Delta y}

677: \ee

678: where $\omega ({\un q}^2)$ is the gluon Regge trajectory

679: \cite{BFKL,Lipatov1}

680: \be

681: \omega ({\un q}^2) \, = \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{(2 \pi )^2} \, \int \, 

682: \frac{d^2 k  \, {\un q}^2}{{\un k}^2 ({\un k} - {\un q})^2}

683: \ee

684: and $\Delta y$ is the rapidity interval spanned by a given $t$-channel

685: gluon.

686: 

687: Eqs. (\ref{lipa}) and (\ref{gregg}) give us the rules for vertices and

688: $t$-channel propagators necessary to construct the ladder diagram in

689: \fig{ladder}. There the leading logarithmic contribution is given by 

690: the multi-Regge kinematics of the produced $s$-channel gluons

691: \be

692: p^+ \, \gg \, k_1^+ \, \gg \, k_2^+ \, \gg \, \ldots \, \gg \, k_N^+ \,

693: \gg \, p'^+,

694: \ee

695: \be

696: p^- \, \ll \, k_1^- \, \ll \, k_2^- \, \ll \, \ldots \, \ll \, k_N^-

697: \, \ll \, p'^-,

698: \ee

699: and

700: \be\label{regge3}

701: k_{1}^\perp \, \sim \, k_{2}^\perp \, \sim \, \ldots \, \sim \,

702: k_N^\perp,

703: \ee

704: where $k_i^\perp = |{\un k}_i|$. \\

705: 

706: {\sl Solution of the BFKL Equation} \\

707: 

708: To solve \eq{bfkleq} we first have to find the eigenfunctions of its

709: integral kernel. The kernel of BFKL equation is conformally

710: invariant. It is easy to verify that a complete and orthogonal set of

711: eigenfunctions of \eq{bfkleq} is formed by the functions

712: \cite{BFKL,Lipatov2}

713: \be\label{eigf}

714: ({\un l}^2)^{-\frac{1}{2} + i \nu} \, e^{i \, n \, \phi},

715: \ee

716: where $\phi$ is the angle between vector ${\un l}$ and some chosen

717: axes and $n$ is integer. The eigenvalues of the eigenfunctions in

718: \eq{eigf} are \cite{BFKL,Lipatov2}

719: \be\label{eigv}

720: \frac{2 \, \as \, N_c}{\pi} \, \chi (n, \nu)

721: \ee

722: where

723: \be\label{chi}

724: \chi (n, \nu) \, = \, \psi (1) - \frac{1}{2} \psi \left( \frac{1 + |n|}{2} 

725: + i \nu \right) - \frac{1}{2} \psi \left( \frac{1 + |n|}{2} 

726: - i \nu \right)

727: \ee

728: with $\psi (z) = d \ln \Gamma (z) / dz$.  Denoting $l \equiv |{\un

729: l}|$ and $l' \equiv |{\un l}'|$ we write the solution of \eq{bfkleq}

730: as

731: \be\label{ans1}

732: f ({\un l}, {\un l}', Y) \, = \, \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \,

733: \int_{-\infty}^\infty \, d \nu \, C_{n,\nu} (Y) \, l^{-1 + 2 i \nu} \, 

734: l'^{-1 - 2 i \nu} \, \, e^{i \, n \, (\phi - \phi')}.

735: \ee

736: Substituting \eq{ans1} into \eq{bfkleq} and using the eigenvalues from

737: \eq{eigv} we find

738: \be\label{Cnn}

739: C_{n,\nu} (Y) \, = \, C_{n,\nu}^{(0)} \ e^{\frac{2 \, \as \,

740: N_c}{\pi} \, \chi (n, \nu) \, Y},

741: \ee

742: where the coefficient $C_{n,\nu}^{(0)}$ is fixed by the initial

743: conditions (\ref{bfkl_init}) giving

744: \be\label{C0}

745: C_{n,\nu}^{(0)} \, = \, \frac{1}{2 \pi^2}.

746: \ee

747: Combining Eqs. (\ref{Cnn}), (\ref{C0}) and (\ref{ans1}) yields

748: \be\label{bfklsol} 

749: f ({\un l}, {\un l}', Y) \, = \, \frac{1}{2 \pi^2} \, \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \,

750: \int_{-\infty}^\infty \, d \nu \,  e^{\frac{2 \, \as \,

751: N_c}{\pi} \, \chi (n, \nu) \, Y} \, l^{-1 + 2 i \nu} \, l'^{-1 - 2 i

752: \nu} \, \, e^{i \, n \, (\phi - \phi')}.

753: \ee

754: \eq{bfklsol} provides us the solution of \eq{bfkleq} with the initial 

755: conditions given by \eq{bfkl_init}. As one can see already from

756: \eq{bfklsol}, the BFKL equation generates amplitudes which grow exponentially 

757: with rapidity $Y$. Remembering that $Y \sim \ln s$, this translates

758: into a power of energy growth.

759: 

760: Let us evaluate the amplitude in \eq{bfklsol} a little

761: further. Consider the case when $l \sim l'$, i.e., the two momentum

762: scales involved in the problem are not very much different from each

763: other. A simple analysis of the function $\chi (n, \nu)$ allows one to

764: conclude that the dominant contribution to the amplitude is given by

765: the $n=0$ term in the sum in \eq{bfklsol}. Expanding $\chi (n=0, \nu)$

766: around the saddle point at $\nu = 0$ we get

767: \be\label{sp}

768: \chi (0, \nu) \, \approx \, 2 \ln 2 - 7 \, \zeta (3) \, \nu^2,

769: \ee

770: where $\zeta (z)$ is the Riemann zeta-function. Using \eq{sp} in

771: \eq{bfklsol} we can perform the $\nu$-integration obtaining \cite{BFKL}

772: \be\label{spa}

773: f ({\un l}, {\un l}', Y) \, \approx \, \frac{1}{2 \, \pi^2 \, l \, l'}

774: \, \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{14 \, \zeta (3) \, \bas \, Y}} \ \exp \left[ 

775: (\alpha_P - 1) \, Y - \frac{\ln^2 l/l'}{14 \, \zeta (3) \, \bas \, Y}

776: \right],

777: \ee

778: where we have defined the {\sl intercept} of the perturbative pomeron

779: \be\label{bfkl_int}

780: \alpha_P - 1 \, = \, \frac{4 \, \as \, N_c}{\pi} \, \ln 2

781: \ee

782: and

783: \be

784: \bas \, \equiv \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi}.

785: \ee

786: The essential feature of \eq{spa} is that it shows that cross sections

787: mediated by the BFKL exchange grow as a power of energy 

788: \be\label{poe}

789: \sigma \, \sim \, e^{(\alpha_P - 1) \, Y} \, \sim \, s^{\alpha_P - 1}.

790: \ee 

791: This behavior is reminiscent of the Pomeranchuk singularity in the

792: reggeon calculus, and is, therefore, sometimes referred to as the pomeron

793: or the hard pomeron (to distinguish it from the soft non-perturbative

794: interaction phenomenon). \\

795: 

796: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

797: \begin{figure}[b]

798: \begin{center}

799: \epsfxsize=7cm

800: \leavevmode

801: \hbox{\epsffile{bartels.eps}}

802: \end{center}

803: \caption{Diffusion of the gluon transverse momentum in the BFKL ladder. 

804: Non-perturbative region is denoted by the scale $\Lambda$.}

805: \label{cone}

806: \end{figure}

807: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

808: 

809: {\sl Problems of the BFKL Evolution} \\

810: 

811: The BFKL equation poses some important questions even in the case of

812: heavy onium-onium scattering and at the leading order in $\as$ in the

813: kernel.

814: 

815: {\bf (i)} The power of energy growth of the total cross section

816: (\eq{poe}) violates Froissart unitarity bound, which states that the

817: growth of the total cross sections with energy at asymptotically high

818: energies is bounded by \cite{froi}

819: \be\label{fro}

820: \sigma \, \le \, \frac{const}{m_\pi^2} \, \ln^2 s

821: \ee

822: with $m_\pi$ the pion's mass. (For a good pedagogical derivation of

823: the Froissart bound we refer the readers to \cite{genya}.) This

824: implies that some new physical effects should modify the BFKL equation

825: at very large $s$ making the resulting amplitude unitary.

826: 

827: {\bf (ii)} The solution in \eq{bfklsol} includes a diffusion term,

828: which is the last term in its exponent. To see the potential danger of

829: this term, let us consider a half of the ladder of \fig{ladder},

830: stretching from one of the onia (the top one) to some intermediate

831: gluon in the middle of the ladder carrying transverse momentum

832: $l_\perp$ and having rapidity $Y/2$. Applying \eq{spa} to that

833: half-ladder we see that it includes a term

834: \be\label{diff}

835: \exp \left[-{\ln^2 (l/Q_1) \over 14 \, \zeta (3) \, \bas \, \, (Y/2)}\right].

836: \ee

837: This term is responsible for diffusion of the transverse momenta from

838: the initial perturbative scale $Q_1$ both to high and low momenta,

839: i.e., into infrared and ultraviolet. It implies that the distribution

840: of gluons' transverse momentum in the ladder, while still centered

841: around $Q_1$, may have significant fluctuations towards high and low

842: momenta $l$ as shown in \fig{cone}, where we plot the typical range of

843: transverse momentum $l$ in the ladder of \fig{ladder} as a function of

844: rapidity of gluons in the ladder. The width of the diffusion grows

845: with rapidity $Y$ allowing for larger fluctuations at higher

846: energies. Thus, no matter how large the starting scale $Q_1$ is, at

847: certain very high energy the momentum of some gluons in the middle of

848: the ladder would become of the order of $\Lambda_{QCD}$ leading to the

849: coupling constant $\as (\Lambda_{QCD}) \sim 1$ and thus invalidating

850: further application of perturbative QCD ($\as \ll 1$) and,

851: consequently, of the BFKL evolution \cite{Bartels}. The diffusion

852: starts from the scale $Q_1$ at one end of the ladder and from the

853: scale $Q_2$ at the other end (see

854: \fig{cone}). At high energy the allowed momentum range broadens

855: towards the middle and touches the non-perturbative region of low

856: momenta at mid-rapidity. The plot of allowed momenta as a function of

857: rapidity shown here in \fig{cone} is sometimes referred to as Bartels

858: cone \cite{Bartels}. Again it hints that the BFKL equation should be

859: modified at higher energies to avoid the problem of running into the

860: non-perturbative region. Alternatively, if such modification is not

861: found within perturbation theory, we would be forced to admit that

862: high energy asymptotics is dominated by non-perturbative

863: physics. Fortunately this is not the case, as will be shown below.

864: 

865: 

866: \subsubsection{The GLR-MQ Equation}

867: 

868: As we have seen above, the BFKL evolution leads to exponential growth

869: of total cross sections with energy, violating the Froissart bound

870: \cite{froi}. It also leads to exponential growth of the density of partons 

871: in the onium (or hadron) wave function. To see this let us define an

872: unintegrated gluon distribution of an onium by

873: \be\label{oniglue}

874: \phi (x_{Bj}, {\un k}^2) \, = \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi} \, \int \, 

875: \frac{d^2 l}{\underline{l}^2} \, (2 - e^{- i

876: \underline{l} \cdot \underline{x}} - e^{ i \underline{l} \cdot

877: \underline{x}} ) \, f ({\un l}, {\un k}, Y = \ln 1/x_{Bj}) \, d^2 x \, dz \, 

878: \Phi_{q\bar q} ({\un x}, z).

879: \ee

880: The definition (\ref{oniglue}) is illustrated in \fig{gluelo}. To

881: obtain it we have, essentially, truncated the lower onium in

882: \fig{bfkl_stand}, leaving two disconnected gluon lines. The diagram in

883: \fig{gluelo} has to be calculated in $A^+ = 0$ light cone gauge to

884: give the gluon distribution function.  The unintegrated gluon

885: distribution function in \eq{oniglue} gives us the number of gluons in

886: the onium wave function having transverse momentum ${\un k}$ and

887: carrying the fraction $x_{Bj}$ of the onium ``+'' component of the

888: momentum (Bjorken, or Feynman $x$).

889: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

890: \begin{figure}[ht]

891: \begin{center}

892: \epsfxsize=5cm

893: \leavevmode

894: \hbox{\epsffile{gluelo.eps}}

895: \end{center}

896: \caption{Unintegrated gluon distribution of an onium.}

897: \label{gluelo}

898: \end{figure}

899: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

900: 

901: Using the BFKL solution from \eq{spa} in \eq{oniglue} one can easily

902: see that the gluon distribution grows as

903: \be

904: \phi (x_{Bj}, {\un k}^2) \, \sim \, \left( \frac{1}{x_{Bj}} 

905: \right)^{\alpha_P - 1} .

906: \ee

907: Therefore, the number of gluons rises sharply at small $x$ / high

908: energy, in agreement with the semi-qualitative estimate of

909: \eq{expglue}. This feature is illustrated qualitatively by the

910: gluon cascade representation of the BFKL evolution presented in the

911: Sect. \ref{BFKLeq}. There, the gluons are produced in a multi-Regge

912: kinematics with comparable transverse momenta (see \eq{regge3}). That

913: means that the typical transverse sizes of the gluons, given by

914: $r_i^\perp \sim 1/k_i^\perp$ are also of the same order for all the

915: gluons

916: \be

917: r_1^\perp \, \sim \, r_2^\perp \, \sim \, \ldots \, \sim \, r_N^\perp.

918: \ee

919: Therefore, the BFKL cascade produces many gluons in the onium or

920: hadron wave function, with roughly the same transverse size. As energy

921: increases, more and more gluons are produced in the cascade. The

922: gluons overlap in the transverse plane, creating areas of high gluon

923: density. Thus, not only the {\it number} of gluons, but their {\it

924: density} in the transverse plane increase with energy.

925: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

926: \begin{figure}[ht]

927: \begin{center}

928: \epsfxsize=15cm

929: \leavevmode

930: \hbox{\epsffile{hdens.eps}}

931: \end{center}

932: \caption{BFKL equation as a high density machine.}

933: \label{hdens}

934: \end{figure}

935: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

936: This is illustrated in \fig{hdens} for a wave function of a proton. At

937: some initial value of Bjorken $x$, corresponding to lower energy, the

938: proton's wave function may have one parton with transverse size $\sim

939: 1/Q$ in it. As we go to smaller $x$, BFKL evolution would generate

940: many more partons of comparable size, creating a region of high gluon

941: density in the wave function

942: \cite{MuellerCarg}.

943: 

944: However, the gluon density can not rise forever. It is known that in

945: QCD the gluon fields can not be stronger than $A_\mu \sim 1/g$ for

946: small coupling $g$. Therefore, when the gluon field reaches the

947: density corresponding to field strength 

948: \be

949: \frac{F_{\mu \nu}}{Q^2} \, \sim \, \frac{1}{g} 

950: \ee

951: some new, possibly non-linear effects should become important slowing

952: down the density growth \cite{MuellerCarg}. This strong field

953: constraint may be intimately connected to the problem of unitarization

954: of cross sections at fixed impact parameter, i.e., to the black disk

955: limit (see below).

956: 

957: To understand how the growth of the gluon distribution can be tamed,

958: Gribov, Levin and Ryskin (GLR) \cite{GLR,GLR2} considered distribution

959: functions of a ``dense'' proton or a nucleus. By ``dense'' proton we

960: imply a model of a proton filled with sources of color charge --- sea

961: quarks and gluons, which were pre-created in the proton's wave

962: function by some non-perturbative mechanism (see, e.g.,

963: \cite{Chevy}). Gribov, Levin and Ryskin  \cite{GLR,GLR2} argued that 

964: for such systems multiple ladder exchanges may become important. Since

965: one is interested in gluon distribution, which is a correlation

966: function for two gluonic fields, these multiple ladders should come in

967: as the so-called ``fan'' diagrams. An example of a fan diagram is

968: shown in \fig{fan}.

969: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

970: \begin{figure}[ht]

971: \begin{center}

972: \epsfxsize=10cm

973: \leavevmode

974: \hbox{\epsffile{fan.eps}}

975: \end{center}

976: \caption{An example of fan diagram resummed by the GLR-MQ equation.}

977: \label{fan}

978: \end{figure}

979: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

980: There multiple BFKL ladders start from different quarks and gluons in

981: the proton or nucleus, shown by straight lines at the bottom of

982: \fig{fan}. Due to high density of gluon fields, the ladders 

983: can not stay independent forever. As the energy increases so does the

984: gluon density, eventually leading to {\it recombination} of the

985: ladders, as shown in \fig{fan}. Ladder recombination is described by

986: effective ladder merger vertices, denoted by blobs in \fig{fan}. These

987: vertices are sometimes called the triple pomeron vertices, since they

988: connect three different ladders (BFKL pomerons). For their calculation

989: we refer the reader to \cite{BW} and references therein.

990: 

991: Gribov, Levin and Ryskin \cite{GLR,GLR2} suggested that, before the

992: energy gets sufficiently high for all nonlinear effects to become

993: important, there could be an intermediate energy region where the

994: physics of gluon distributions is dominated by $2 \rightarrow 1$

995: ladder recombination only. This recombination brought in a quadratic

996: correction to the linear BFKL equation, leading to the GLR evolution equation

997: \cite{GLR,GLR2}

998: \be\label{glreq}

999: \frac{\partial \, \phi (x, {\un k}^2)}{\partial \ln (1/x)} \, = \, 

1000: \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi^2} \int \! \frac{d^2

1001: l}{(\underline{k} - \underline{l})^2} \left[ \phi

1002: (x, \underline{l}^2) - \frac{{\un k}^2 \, \phi

1003: (x, \underline{k}^2)}{{\un l}^2 + (\underline{k} -

1004: \underline{l})^2} \right] - \frac{\as^2 \, \pi}{S_\perp} \, \left[ \phi

1005: (x, \underline{k}^2) \right]^2,

1006: \ee

1007: where, for simplicity, we assumed that the proton or nucleus has a

1008: shape of a cylinder oriented along the beam axis with the cross

1009: sectional area $S_\perp = \pi R^2$. As expected, the linear term in

1010: \eq{glreq} is equivalent to the BFKL equation (\ref{bfkleq}), while the 

1011: quadratic term, responsible for ladder mergers, introduces damping,

1012: thus slowing down the growth of the gluon distributions with

1013: energy. The growth of gluon distributions with energy given by

1014: \eq{glreq}  should slow down and {\sl saturate} at very high 

1015: energies. This phenomenon became known as the {\sl saturation} of

1016: parton distributions.

1017: 

1018: The ansatz (\ref{glreq}) of GLR \cite{GLR} was proven by Mueller and

1019: Qiu \cite{MQ} in the double leading logarithmic approximation (DLA)

1020: for the (integrated) gluon distribution functions, which are defined

1021: as

1022: \cite{MQ}

1023: \be\label{xg}

1024: x G (x, Q^2) \, = \, \int^{Q^2} \, d k^2 \, \phi (x, k^2).

1025: \ee

1026: The double logarithmic approximation is a resummation of the powers of

1027: the parameter

1028: \be

1029: \as \ln (1/x) \ln (Q^2/\Lambda^2).

1030: \ee 

1031: The BFKL equation \cite{BFKL} was derived in the leading logarithmic

1032: approximation (LLA), corresponding to resummation of the parameter

1033: $\as \ln 1/x$, or, equivalently, $\as Y$ (see Sect. \ref{BFKLeq}). In

1034: the limiting case of large $Q^2$ in the distribution functions (or

1035: large ${\un k}^2$ in the unintegrated distribution functions) another

1036: large logarithm becomes important: $\ln Q^2/\Lambda^2$, where

1037: $\Lambda$ is the non-perturbative QCD scale. It becomes possible to

1038: define a new resummation parameter, $\as \ln (1/x) \ln

1039: (Q^2/\Lambda^2)$. In principle, the LLA is much broader than DLA: it

1040: resums powers of $\as

1041: \ln 1/x$ with {\it any} dependence of the obtained terms on $Q^2$, not 

1042: restricting it to the leading logarithmic regime. Leading powers of

1043: $\as \ln (Q^2/\Lambda^2)$ are, of course, resummed by the Dokshitzer,

1044: Gribov, Lipatov, Altarelli, Parisi (DGLAP) equation

1045: \cite{DGLAP}. Indeed, the DLA limits of the BFKL and DGLAP equations 

1046: are identical, since they are resumming the same parameter, $\as \ln

1047: (1/x) \ln (Q^2/\Lambda^2)$.

1048: 

1049: Employing the DLA and analyzing diagrams with two merging DGLAP

1050: ladders, Mueller and Qiu arrived at the following evolution equation

1051: \cite{MQ} (again written here for a cylindrical nucleus)

1052: \begin{eqnarray}\label{mq}

1053:   \frac{\partial^2 \, xG (x, Q^2) }{\partial \ln (1/x)\, \partial \ln

1054:   (Q^2 / \Lambda^2) } \, = \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi} \, xG (x, Q^2) -

1055:   \frac{\as^2 \, \pi}{S_\perp} \, \frac{1}{Q^2} \, [xG (x, Q^2)]^2,

1056: \end{eqnarray}

1057: which is known as GLR-MQ equation. \eq{mq} is in agreement with

1058: \eq{glreq}, and could be be obtained from the latter by taking the DLA 

1059: limit and using \eq{xg}. Thus Mueller and Qiu \cite{MQ} proved

1060: \eq{glreq} in the double logarithmic limit.

1061: 

1062: \eq{mq} allows one to estimate at which $Q^2$ the non-linear saturation 

1063: effects become important. To do that we have to equate the linear and

1064: quadratic terms on the right hand side of \eq{mq}. The corresponding

1065: value of $Q^2$ is called the {\sl saturation scale} and is denoted by

1066: $Q_s^2$. It is determined by

1067: \be

1068: Q_s^2 \, = \, \frac{\as \, \pi^2}{S_\perp \, N_c} \, xG (x, Q_s^2).

1069: \ee

1070: The non-linear saturation effects are important for all $Q \, \lsim \,

1071: Q_s$, which is known as the {\sl saturation region}.

1072: 

1073: The quadratic damping term in both \eq{glreq} and \eq{mq} was believed

1074: to be important only near the border of the saturation region, for $Q

1075: \sim Q_s$, where the non-linear effects were only starting to become

1076: important \cite{GLR,MQ}. It was expected that higher order non-linear

1077: corrections would show up as one goes deeper into the saturation

1078: region towards $Q < Q_s$ (see, e.g., \cite{AGL}). In the next Section

1079: we will talk about the model where all such corrections could be

1080: resummed in a particular quasi-classical approximation, where the BFKL

1081: evolution can be neglected.

1082: 

1083: 

1084: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1085: 

1086: \subsection{Quasi-Classical Approximation}

1087: \label{QCA}

1088: 

1089: As was suggested by the GLR equation, the effects of high gluonic

1090: field strengths come in as multiple exchanges. To better understand

1091: the effect of multiple rescatterings one can consider a specific model

1092: of hadronic or nuclear wave functions. In this section we will

1093: consider the case of deep inelastic scattering on a large dilute

1094: nucleus, where multiple rescatterings take place on individual

1095: nucleons and, as we will demonstrate, can be described by the

1096: Glauber-Mueller formula \cite{GlaMue}. In the infinite momentum frame

1097: this large nucleus can be thought of as a Lorentz-contracted

1098: ``pancake'' in the direction transverse to its velocity. Due to a

1099: large number of nucleons in the nucleus, the parton color charge

1100: density fluctuations in this ``pancake'' are large, described by a

1101: hard scale referred to as the {\sl saturation scale} $Q_s$. For very

1102: large nuclei, the saturation scale is large $Q_s \gg \Lambda_{QCD}$

1103: making the strong coupling constant small $\as (Q_s) \ll 1$. At weak

1104: coupling the dynamics of field theories becomes classical: therefore,

1105: as was concluded by McLerran and Venugopalan \cite{MV}, the gluon

1106: field of such a large ultrarelativistic nucleus should be given by the

1107: solution of the classical Yang-Mills equations of motion \cite{YM}

1108: with the nucleus providing the source current. The resulting small-$x$

1109: nuclear wave function systematically includes all multiple

1110: rescatterings and exhibits the effects of saturation.

1111: 

1112: 

1113: \subsubsection{Glauber-Mueller Rescatterings}

1114: \label{GM}

1115: 

1116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1117: \begin{figure}[b]

1118: \begin{center}

1119: \epsfxsize=7cm

1120: \leavevmode

1121: \hbox{\epsffile{dis.eps}}

1122: \end{center}

1123: \caption{Deep inelastic scattering in the rest frame of the target.}

1124: \label{dis}

1125: \end{figure}

1126: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1127: Let us consider deep inelastic scattering (DIS) on a large nucleus. In

1128: DIS the incoming electron emits a virtual photon, which in turn

1129: interacts with the proton or nucleus. In the rest frame of the

1130: nucleus, the interaction can be thought of as virtual photon splitting

1131: into a quark-antiquark pair, which then interacts with the nucleus

1132: (see \fig{dis}). Since the light cone lifetime of the $q\bar q$ pair

1133: is much longer than the size of the target nucleus, the total cross

1134: section for the virtual photon--nucleus scattering can be written as a

1135: convolution of the virtual photon's light cone wave function (the

1136: probability for it to split into a $q\bar q$ pair) with the forward

1137: scattering amplitude of a $q\bar q$ pair interacting with the nucleus

1138: \be\label{sigN}

1139: \sigma_{tot}^{\gamma* A} (Q^2, x_{Bj}) \, = \,  \int \frac{d^2 x \, d z }{2 \pi} \, 

1140: [\Phi_T ({\un x}, z) + \Phi_L ({\un x}, z) ] \ d^2 b \ N({\un x}, {\un

1141: b} , Y)

1142: \ee

1143: with the help of the light-cone perturbation theory \cite{BL,BPP}.

1144: Here the incoming photon with virtuality $Q$ splits into a

1145: quark--antiquark pair with the transverse separation ${\un x}$ and the

1146: impact parameter (transverse position of the center of mass of the

1147: $q\bar q$ pair) ${\un b}$. $Y$ is the rapidity variable given by $Y =

1148: \ln (s \, x_T^2) \approx \ln 1/x_{Bj}$. The square of the light cone 

1149: wave function of $q \overline{q}$ fluctuations of a virtual photon is

1150: denoted by $\Phi_T ({\un x}, z)$ and $\Phi_L ({\un x}, z)$ for

1151: transverse and longitudinal photons correspondingly, with $z$ being

1152: the fraction of the photon's longitudinal momentum carried by the

1153: quark. At the lowest order in electromagnetic coupling ($\alpha_{EM}$)

1154: $\Phi_T ({\un x}, z)$ and $\Phi_L ({\un x}, z)$ are given by

1155: \cite{NZ,KMc}

1156: \begin{equation}

1157:   \Phi_T ({\un x}, z) = \frac{2 N_c}{\pi} \, \sum_f \alpha^f_{EM} \,

1158:   \left\{ a_f^2 \ K_1^2 (x_T a_f) \ [z^2 + (1 - z)^2] + m_f^2 K_0 (x_T

1159:   a_f)^2 \right\},

1160: \end{equation}

1161: \begin{equation}

1162:   \Phi_L ({\un x}, z) = \frac{2 N_c}{\pi} \, \sum_f \alpha^f_{EM} \, \

1163:   4 \, Q^2 \, z^2 (1 - z)^2 \ K_0^2 (x_T a_f),

1164: \end{equation}

1165: with $a_f^2 = Q^2 z (1 - z) + m_f^2$, $x_T = |{\bf x}|$ and $\sum_f$

1166: denoting the sum over all relevant quark flavors with quark masses

1167: denoted by $m_f$. $\alpha^f_{EM} = e_f^2 /4 \pi$ with $e_f$ the

1168: electric charge of a quark with flavor $f$.

1169: 

1170: Our goal is to calculate the forward scattering amplitude of a

1171: quark--anti-quark dipole interacting with the nucleus, which is

1172: denoted by $N({\un x}, {\un b} , Y)$ in \eq{sigN}, including all

1173: multiple rescatterings of the dipole on the nucleons in the

1174: nucleus. To do this we need to construct a model of the target

1175: nucleus. Following Mueller \cite{GlaMue} we assume that the nucleons

1176: are dilutely distributed in the nucleus. Let us chose to perform

1177: calculations in the $\partial_\mu A^\mu =0$ covariant gauge. There we

1178: can represent the dipole-nucleus interaction as a sequence of

1179: successive dipole-nucleon interactions, as shown in \fig{qqbar}. Since

1180: each nucleon is a color singlet, the lowest order dipole-nucleon

1181: interaction in the forward amplitude from \fig{qqbar} is a two-gluon

1182: exchange. The exchanged gluon lines in \fig{qqbar} are disconnected at

1183: the top: this denotes a summation over all possible connections of

1184: these gluon lines either to the quark or to the anti-quark lines in

1185: the incoming dipole.

1186: 

1187: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1188: \begin{figure}

1189: \begin{center}

1190: \epsfxsize=12cm

1191: \leavevmode

1192: \hbox{\epsffile{qqbar.eps}}

1193: \end{center}

1194: \caption{Deep inelastic scattering in the quasi-classical 

1195: Glauber-Mueller approximation in $\partial_\mu A^\mu =0$ gauge.}

1196: \label{qqbar}

1197: \end{figure}

1198: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1199: 

1200: 

1201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1202: \begin{figure}[ht]

1203: \begin{center}

1204: \epsfxsize=5cm

1205: \leavevmode

1206: \hbox{\epsffile{cross.eps}}

1207: \end{center}

1208: \caption{An example of a diagram which does not contribute to the 

1209: total dipole-nucleus cross section due to incorrect ordering of

1210: interactions with nucleons ($x_2^+ > x_1^+$).}

1211: \label{cross}

1212: \end{figure}

1213: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1214: To demonstrate that the ordered gluon exchanges of \fig{qqbar} are

1215: indeed the only possible interactions, let us consider a diagram where

1216: such ordering is broken, as shown in \fig{cross}. There, for

1217: simplicity, we consider scattering of a single quark on a pair of

1218: nucleons, denoted as $\# 1$ and $\# 2$, with interchanged ordering of

1219: quark-nucleon rescatterings. To show that such diagrams are suppressed

1220: in the dilute nucleus case, let us consider the scattering in the

1221: center of mass frame, where the projectile quark is moving in the

1222: light cone ``$+$'' direction and the nucleus is moving in the light cone

1223: ``$-$'' direction. In a dilute nucleus all the nucleons are spatially

1224: separated. For a nucleus moving in the light cone ``$-$'' direction this

1225: translates into a separation between the nucleons along the ``$+$'' axis:

1226: specifically, let us denote $x_1^+$ and $x_2^+$ the light cone

1227: coordinates of the nucleons $\# 1$ and $\# 2$ in

1228: \fig{cross}, choosing $x_2^+ > x_1^+$ for certainty. (As we will see, 

1229: the opposite ordering will be indeed allowed.) We are interested in

1230: the integration over the $l$-momentum in the diagram of

1231: \fig{cross}. More specifically, we are interested in integrating over

1232: the ``$-$'' component of this momentum. In the high energy scattering

1233: case considered here, the incoming projectile quark carries large

1234: momentum $k^+$, and the nucleons in the nucleus carry a large ``$-$''

1235: component of momentum, e.g., $p'^-$ carried by a quark in the nucleon

1236: $\# 1$. In such eikonal approximation the quark-gluon vertices do not

1237: depend on $l$, so that all the $l$-dependence is given by the gluon

1238: propagators for the $l$ and $q-l$ lines, and by the quark propagator

1239: of the $k+q-l$ line. By requiring that the outgoing quark in the

1240: nucleon $\# 1$ is on mass-shell, $(p'-l)^2 =0$ for massless quarks, we

1241: obtain $0=(p'-l)^2 \approx -2 p'^- l^+$, such that with the eikonal

1242: accuracy $l^+ = 0$. This means that the propagator of the $l$-line,

1243: given in general by $-i/l^2$, becomes $i/{\un l}^2$ and does not

1244: depend on $l^-$ anymore. Similarly one can show that the propagator

1245: for the $q-l$-line is $i/({\un q} - {\un l})^2$ and is also

1246: independent of $l^-$. Thus all the $l^-$-dependence of the diagram in

1247: \fig{cross} is given by the denominator of the propagator of the $k+q-l$

1248: quark line, since the numerator also becomes $l^-$-independent in the

1249: eikonal limit.  The relevant $l^-$ integral can be written as

1250: \be\label{qp1}

1251: \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d l^-}{(k+q-l)^2 + i \epsilon} \, 

1252: e^{- i \, l^- \, (x_2^+ - x_1^+)}.

1253: \ee

1254: Since $k^+$ is very large, we rewrite \eq{qp1} as

1255: \be\label{qp2}

1256: \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d l^-}{2 \, k^+ \, (k^- + q^- - l^-) 

1257: - ({\un k} + {\un q} - {\un l})^2 + i \epsilon} \, 

1258: e^{- i \, l^- \, (x_2^+ - x_1^+)}.

1259: \ee

1260: Since $k^+ >0$ the integrand in \eq{qp2} has a pole in the upper half

1261: plane. However, as $x_2^+ > x_1^+$, the exponent in \eq{qp2} allows us

1262: to close the integration contour in the lower half plane

1263: only. Therefore expression in \eq{qp2} is zero, which means that the

1264: diagram in \fig{cross} can be neglected in the eikonal limit. (In

1265: fact, \eq{qp2} dictates which ordering of the nucleons is allowed: if

1266: $x_2^+ < x_1^+$ the expression in \eq{qp2} becomes non-zero, bringing

1267: us back to ordered picture of interactions shown in \fig{qqbar}.)

1268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1269: \begin{figure}

1270: \begin{center}

1271: \epsfxsize=11cm

1272: \leavevmode

1273: \hbox{\epsffile{prop.eps}}

1274: \end{center}

1275: \caption{Diagrams contributing to dipole-nucleon scattering at the two-gluon order.}

1276: \label{prop}

1277: \end{figure}

1278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1279: 

1280: 

1281: To resum the diagrams like the one shown in \fig{qqbar} we start by

1282: calculating the graphs contributing to the scattering of a dipole on a

1283: single nucleon, as shown in \fig{prop}. Remembering that we are

1284: working in the $\partial_\mu A^\mu =0$ gauge and assuming for the

1285: moment that all scattering in the nucleon happens on one of its

1286: valence quarks we write for the sum of the diagrams in \fig{prop}

1287: (similarly to \eq{twogl})

1288: \be\label{1sc1}

1289: \frac{\as^2 \, C_F}{N_c} \, \int \frac{d^2 l}{[{\un l}^2]^2} \, (2 - 

1290: e^{- i {\un l} \cdot {\un x}} - e^{i {\un l} \cdot {\un x}}),

1291: \ee

1292: where ${\un x}$ is the transverse separation between the quark and the

1293: anti-quark in the incoming dipole, as shown in \fig{prop}. Instead of

1294: performing the integration in \eq{1sc1} exactly, let us note that

1295: gluon are correct degrees of freedom responsible for the interactions

1296: only if the dipole is much smaller than the typical nucleon size,

1297: $x_\perp \ll 1/\Lambda$, with $\Lambda$ some non-perturbative infrared

1298: cutoff. Expanding the argument of the integral in

1299: \eq{1sc1} and integrating over ${\un l}$ we obtain (see also \cite{BDMPS1})

1300: \be\label{1sc2}

1301: \frac{\as^2 \, \pi \, C_F}{N_c} \, x_\perp^2 \, \int_\Lambda^{1/x_\perp} 

1302: \frac{d l_T}{l_T} \, = \, \frac{\as^2 \, \pi \, C_F}{N_c} \, x_\perp^2 \, 

1303: \ln \frac{1}{x_\perp \, \Lambda}.

1304: \ee

1305: As one can show by explicitly calculating the diagram in \fig{gluelo}

1306: without the evolution (or by using \eq{bfkl_init} in \eq{oniglue},

1307: replacing $q\bar q$ dipole by a valence quark in the latter, and using

1308: the resulting unintegrated gluon distribution in \eq{xg}), at the

1309: lowest two-gluon order the gluon distribution function of a valence

1310: quark is given by

1311: \be\label{xglo}

1312: x_{Bj} G (x_{Bj}, Q^2) \, = \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi} \, \ln

1313: \frac{Q^2}{\Lambda^2}.

1314: \ee

1315: Using \eq{xglo} in \eq{1sc2} yields

1316: \be\label{1sc3}

1317: \frac{\as \, \pi^2}{2 \, N_c} \,  x_\perp^2 \, x_{Bj} G (x_{Bj}, 1/x_\perp^2).

1318: \ee

1319: \eq{1sc3} can be easily generalized to the case of a nucleon by using the 

1320: gluon distribution of a nucleon $xG_N$ in it instead of that of a

1321: valence quark

1322: \be\label{1sc4}

1323: \frac{\sigma^{q{\bar q}N}}{2} \, = \, 

1324: \frac{\as \, \pi^2}{2 \, N_c} \,  x_\perp^2 \, x_{Bj} G_N (x_{Bj}, 1/x_\perp^2).

1325: \ee

1326: \eq{1sc4} gives us the scattering cross section of a quark dipole on 

1327: a single nucleon. The factor of $2$ is due to the definition of total

1328: cross section in terms of the forward scattering amplitude, as shown

1329: in \eq{onium_tot}.

1330: 

1331: To obtain the multiple rescattering amplitude of \fig{qqbar} we have

1332: to resum all multiple rescatterings of \fig{prop} (or, equivalently,

1333: \eq{1sc4}). Defining the $S$-matrix of a quark--anti-quark pair scattering 

1334: on a nucleus at rest by $S(z, {\un x})$, where $z$ is the longitudinal

1335: coordinate of the pair as it propagates through nuclear matter with

1336: $z=0$ at the edge of the nucleus, we can write the following equation

1337: \be\label{glaprop}

1338: \frac{\partial}{\partial z} S(z, {\un x}) \, = \, - 

1339: \frac{\rho \, \sigma^{q{\bar q}N}}{2} S(z, {\un x})

1340: \ee

1341: with $\rho$ the density of nucleons in the nucleus ($\rho = A / [(4/3)

1342: \pi R^3]$ for a spherical nucleus of radius $R$ with atomic number $A$.) 

1343: \eq{glaprop} has the following physical meaning: as the dipole propagates 

1344: through the nucleus it may encounter nucleons, with the probability of

1345: interaction per unit path length $dz$ given by the product of nucleon

1346: density $\rho$ and the interaction probability $\sigma^{q{\bar q}N}/2$

1347: from \eq{1sc4}. (In the literature devoted to jet quenching in the

1348: medium this quantity is referred to as opacity \cite{EL,EL2}.) The

1349: initial condition for \eq{glaprop} is given by a freely propagating

1350: dipole without interactions, such that $S (z=0, {\un x}) = 1$. We

1351: refer the interested reader to \cite{BDMPS1,KM,BDMPS} for a more

1352: detailed derivation of \eq{glaprop}. Solving \eq{glaprop} with $S

1353: (z=0, {\un x}) = 1$ initial condition yields

1354: \be\label{glaS}

1355: S(z, {\un x}) \, = \, \exp \left\{ - \frac{\rho \,

1356: \sigma^{q{\bar q}N}}{2} \, z \right\}.

1357: \ee

1358: To construct the forward scattering amplitude $N$ of a dipole

1359: scattering on a nucleus we need to know the $S$-matrix for the dipole

1360: which went through the whole nucleus. To obtain it we need to put $z =

1361: T({\un b})$ in \eq{glaS}, where $T({\un b})$ is the nuclear profile

1362: function equal to the length of the nuclear medium at a given impact

1363: parameter $\un b$, such that $T({\un b}) = 2 \, \sqrt{R^2 - {\un

1364: b}^2}$ for a spherical nucleus of radius $R$. Identifying $N({\un x},

1365: {\un b} , Y)$ with the scattering $T$-matrix, such that $N = 1-S$ we

1366: finally write

1367: \cite{GlaMue}

1368: \be\label{glaN}

1369: N({\un x}, {\un b} , Y=0) \, = \, 1 - \exp \left\{ - \frac{\rho \,

1370: \sigma^{q{\bar q}N}}{2} \, T({\un b}) \right\} \, = \, 1 - 

1371: \exp \left\{ - \frac{\as \, \pi^2}{2 \, N_c} \,  \rho \, T({\un b}) \,

1372: x_\perp^2 \, x_{Bj} G_N (x_{Bj}, 1/x_\perp^2) \right\}.

1373: \ee

1374: This expression is known as Glauber-Mueller formula

1375: \cite{Glauber,GlaMue}, since it presents a generalization of the

1376: Glauber model of independent multiple rescatterings in the nucleus

1377: \cite{Glauber} to the case of QCD \cite{GlaMue}.

1378: 

1379: We put $Y=0$ in the argument of $N$ in \eq{glaN} to underline that

1380: this expression does not include any small-$x$ evolution which would

1381: bring in the rapidity dependence. Indeed, \eq{glaN} was derived in the

1382: approximation where the interaction of the dipole with each of the

1383: nucleons is limited to a two-gluon exchange. At this order the gluon

1384: distribution $x_{Bj} G_N$ is given by \eq{xglo} and is, therefore,

1385: $x_{Bj}$-independent, leading to rapidity-independence of the whole

1386: expression in \eq{glaN}.

1387: 

1388: \eq{glaN} allows us to determine the parameter corresponding to the 

1389: resummation of the diagrams like the one shown in \fig{qqbar}. Using

1390: the gluon distribution from \eq{xglo} in \eq{glaN}, and noting that

1391: for large nuclei the profile function scales as $T({\un b}) \sim

1392: A^{1/3}$ and the nucleon density scales as $\rho \sim A^0$, we

1393: conclude that the resummation parameter of multiple rescatterings is

1394: \cite{yuri2}

1395: \be\label{mrp}

1396: \as^2 \, A^{1/3}.

1397: \ee

1398: The physical meaning of the parameter $\as^2 \, A^{1/3}$ is rather

1399: straightforward: at a given impact parameter the dipole interacts with

1400: $\sim A^{1/3}$ nucleons exchanging two gluons with each. Since the

1401: two-gluon exchange is parametrically of the order $\as^2$ we obtain

1402: $\as^2 \, A^{1/3}$ as the resummation parameter.

1403: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1404: \begin{figure}

1405: \begin{center}

1406: \epsfxsize=9cm

1407: \leavevmode

1408: \hbox{\epsffile{glamue.eps}}

1409: \end{center}

1410: \caption{The forward amplitude of the dipole--nucleus scattering $N$ 

1411: plotted as a function of the transverse separation between the quark

1412: and the anti-quark in a dipole $x_\perp$ using \eq{glaN2}. }

1413: \label{glamue}

1414: \end{figure}

1415: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1416: 

1417: Defining the quark {\sl saturation} scale

1418: \be\label{qsmv}

1419: Q_s^2 ({\un b}) \, \equiv \, \frac{4 \, \pi \, \as^2 \, C_F}{N_c} \, \rho \, T({\un b})

1420: \ee

1421: we rewrite \eq{glaN} as

1422: \be\label{glaN2}

1423: N({\un x}, {\un b} , Y=0) \, = \, 1 - \exp \left\{ - \frac{x_\perp^2

1424: \, Q_s^2 ({\un b}) \, \ln (1/x_T \, \Lambda)}{4} \,  \right\}.

1425: \ee

1426: The dipole amplitude $N$ from \eq{glaN2} is plotted (schematically) in

1427: \fig{glamue} as a function of $x_\perp$. One can see that, at small 

1428: $x_\perp$, $x_\perp \ll 1/Q_s$, we have $N \sim x_\perp^2$ and the

1429: amplitude is a rising function of $x_\perp$. However, at large dipole

1430: sizes $x_\perp \gsim 1/Q_s$, the growth stops and the amplitude levels

1431: off ({\sl saturates}) at $N = 1$. This regime corresponds to the black

1432: disk limit for the dipole-nucleus scattering: for large dipoles the

1433: nucleus appears as a black disk. To understand that $N = 1$ regime

1434: corresponds to the black disk limit let us note that the total

1435: dipole-nucleus scattering cross section is given by

1436: \be\label{sigtot}

1437: \sigma^{q{\bar q}A}_{tot} \, = \, 2 \, \int d^2 b \, N({\un x}, {\un b} , Y)

1438: \ee

1439: where the integration goes over the cross sectional area of the

1440: nucleus. If $N=1$ at all impact parameters $\un b$ inside the nucleus,

1441: \eq{sigtot} gives for a spherical nucleus of radius $R$

1442: \be\label{black}

1443: \sigma^{q{\bar q}A}_{tot} \, = \, 2 \, \pi \, R^2,

1444: \ee

1445: which is a well-known formula for the cross section for a particle

1446: scattering on a black sphere \cite{LL}.

1447: 

1448: The transition between the $N \sim x_\perp^2$ to $N=1$ behaviors in

1449: \fig{glamue} happens at around $x_\perp \sim 1/Q_s$. For dipole sizes 

1450: $x_\perp \gsim 1/Q_s$ the amplitude $N$ {\sl saturates} to a

1451: constant. This translates into saturation of quark distribution

1452: functions in the nucleus, as was shown in \cite{GlaMue} (as $xq +

1453: x\bar q \sim F_2 \sim \sigma_{tot}^{\gamma* A}$), and thus can be

1454: identified with parton saturation, justifying the name of the {\sl

1455: saturation scale}. We will show this connection between saturation for

1456: the amplitude $N$ and for the partonic wave functions using gluons as

1457: an example in Sect. \ref{MV} below.

1458: 

1459: Before we proceed let us finally note that, since $T({\un b}) \sim

1460: A^{1/3}$, the saturation scale in \eq{qsmv} scales as \cite{MV,GlaMue}

1461: \be\label{qsmvsc}

1462: Q_s^2 \, \sim \, A^{1/3}

1463: \ee

1464: with the nuclear atomic number. \eq{qsmvsc} implies that for a very

1465: large nucleus the saturation scale would become very large, much

1466: larger than $\Lambda_{QCD}$. If $Q_s \gg \Lambda_{QCD}$, the

1467: transition to the black disk limit in \fig{glamue} happens at the

1468: momentum scales (corresponding to inverse dipole sizes) where the

1469: physics is perturbative and gluons are correct degrees of

1470: freedom. Therefore, \eq{qsmvsc} is of paramount importance, since it

1471: justifies the approximation we made throughout this Section that

1472: dipole-nucleon interactions can be described by perturbative gluon

1473: exchanges instead of some non-perturbative mechanisms.

1474: 

1475: 

1476: \newpage

1477: 

1478: \subsubsection{The McLerran-Venugopalan Model}

1479: \label{MV}

1480: {\sl \ \ \ \ \ Point Charges Approach} \\

1481: 

1482: 

1483: Let us consider a large ultrarelativistic nucleus in the infinite

1484: momentum frame. We are interested in the small-$x$ tail of the gluon

1485: wave function in the nucleus. In the rest frame of the nucleus the

1486: small-$x$ gluons have coherence length of the order of \cite{KS}

1487: \be

1488: l_{coh} \, \sim \, \frac{1}{2 \, m_N \, x_{Bj}}

1489: \ee

1490: where $m_N$ is the mass of a nucleon. If $x_{Bj}$ is sufficiently

1491: small, the coherence length may become very long, much longer than the

1492: size of the nucleus. Such small-$x$ gluons would be produced by the

1493: whole nucleus coherently (only in the longitudinal direction). An

1494: example of such interaction is shown in \fig{rv}. There the small-$x$

1495: gluon (wavy line) interacts coherently with several Lorentz-contracted

1496: nucleons. Indeed the nucleons, and the nucleus as a whole, are

1497: color-neutral and one may worry that a coherent gluon simply would not

1498: ``see'' them. However, the gluon is coherent only in the longitudinal

1499: direction: in the transverse direction the gluon is localized on the

1500: scale $x_\perp \sim 1/k_T$ with $k_T$ the transverse momentum of the

1501: gluon. If $k_T \gg \Lambda_{QCD}$, which is a necessary condition for

1502: using gluon degrees of freedom, the transverse extent of the gluon

1503: would be much smaller than the sizes of the nucleons. Because of that

1504: the gluon would interact only with a part of each nucleon in the

1505: transverse direction, as shown in \fig{rv}. The color charge in that

1506: segment of the nucleon that a gluon is traversing does not have to be

1507: zero: the gluon may run into, say, a single valence quark there. As a

1508: result of such interactions, the gluon would ``feel'' some effective

1509: color charge of all the nucleons' segments that it would traverse

1510: through. In the spirit of Glauber approximation we may assume that all

1511: nucleons are independent of each other, so that interactions with

1512: parts of different nucleons are similar to a random walk in color

1513: space. If each individual nucleons' segment has a typical color charge

1514: $g$, than, due to the random walk nature of the process, the total

1515: color charge seen by the gluon at a fixed impact parameter would be $g

1516: \, \sqrt{n}$, where $n \sim A^{1/3}$ is the number of nucleons at this 

1517: impact parameter.

1518: 

1519: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1520: \begin{figure}[h]

1521: \begin{center}

1522: \epsfxsize=15cm

1523: \leavevmode

1524: \hbox{\epsffile{rv.eps}}

1525: \end{center}

1526: \caption{Small-$x$ gluon sees the whole nucleus coherently in the 

1527: longitudinal direction and interacts with several different nucleons

1528: in it. The effective color charge seen by the gluon is a result of a

1529: random walk in the color space (see text).  }

1530: \label{rv}

1531: \end{figure}

1532: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1533: 

1534: In the infinite momentum frame, due to Lorentz contraction, all the

1535: nucleons appear to be squeezed into a thin ``pancake'' of

1536: Lorentz-contracted nucleus, as shown on the right of \fig{rv}. One may

1537: then define an effective color charge density seen by a gluon in the

1538: transverse plane of the nucleus \cite{MV,jkmw,yuri1,LM}. The typical

1539: magnitude of these color charge density fluctuations is given by the

1540: color charge squared divided by the transverse area of the nucleus,

1541: $(g \, \sqrt{n})^2 / S_\perp \, = \, g^2 \, n / S_\perp$. The number

1542: of color charge sources in the whole nucleus is proportional to the

1543: number of nucleons in the nucleus, $n \sim A$.  The typical color

1544: charge density fluctuations are, therefore, characterized by the

1545: momentum scale

1546: \be\label{mu1}

1547: \mu^2 \, \sim \, \frac{g^2 \, A}{S_\perp} \, \sim \, A^{1/3}.

1548: \ee

1549: It is important to notice that the momentum scale in \eq{mu1} grows

1550: with $A$ as $A^{1/3}$, similar to the saturation scale in

1551: \eq{qsmvsc}. The important conclusion we can draw from \eq{mu1} is that 

1552: for sufficiently large nuclei their small-$x$ wave functions are

1553: characterized by a hard momentum scale $\mu$, which is much larger

1554: than $\Lambda_{QCD}$ allowing for a small coupling $\as$ description

1555: of the process. Field theories with small coupling are usually

1556: dominated by classical fields, with quantum corrections bringing in

1557: extra powers of the small coupling constant $\as$. Therefore the

1558: dominant small-$x$ gluon field of a large nucleus is {\sl classical}.

1559: It can be found by solving the classical Yang-Mills equations of

1560: motion \cite{YM}

1561: \be\label{YMeq}

1562: {\cal D}_\mu \, F^{\mu\nu} \, = \, J^\nu

1563: \ee

1564: with the nucleus providing the source current $J^\nu$, such that, in

1565: the infinite momentum frame 

1566: \be\label{jmv}

1567: J^\nu \, = \, \delta^{\, \nu +} \, \rho ({\un x}, x^-)

1568: \ee 

1569: with $\rho ({\un x}, x^-)$ the color charge density. This conclusion

1570: is originally due to McLerran and Venugopalan

1571: \cite{MV}. Another way of understanding why the classical field

1572: dominates is by arguing that large color charge density $\mu$ implies

1573: high occupation numbers for the color charges in the nuclei: high

1574: occupation numbers lead to classical description of the relevant

1575: physics.

1576: 

1577: We need to find the gluon field of the nucleus in order to construct

1578: its gluon distribution function. The latter is most easily related to

1579: the gluon field in the light cone gauge of the nucleus. However, the

1580: classical gluon field of a nucleus is easier to find in the covariant

1581: $\partial_\mu A^\mu =0$ gauge. To do this we will, for simplicity,

1582: assume that all the relevant color charge in the nucleus is carried by

1583: the valence quarks. Furthermore, we will specifically chose to

1584: consider a nucleus with ``mesonic'' nucleons made out of $q\bar q$

1585: pairs instead of three valence quarks \cite{yuri1}. (This latter

1586: assumption would only simplify the calculations, with the conclusions

1587: being easily generalizable to the case of real nuclei.) Considering

1588: the nucleus moving ultrarelativistically in the light cone $+$

1589: direction, we label the ``valence'' quark and anti-quark coordinates

1590: by ${\un x}_i, x^-_i$ and ${\un x'}_i, x'^-_i$. In the recoilless

1591: eikonal approximation considered here neither one of these coordinates

1592: changes due to ``emission'' of the gluon fields \cite{MV}. In

1593: covariant gauge the color charge density of such ultrarelativistic

1594: nucleus made of valence quarks is given by

1595: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rho}

1596:  {\rho}^a (\underline {x}, x^{-})= g \, \sum_{i=1}^A \, (t_i^a) \,

1597:  [\delta(x^{-}-x^-_i) \, \delta({\underline{x}}-{\underline{x}}_i ) -

1598: \delta(x^{-}-x'^-_i) \, \delta({\underline{x}}-{\underline{x}}'_i ) ]

1599: \end{eqnarray}

1600: with $(t_i^a)$ the color charge matrix of the quark and the anti-quark

1601: in the $i$th ``nucleon'' in fundamental representation. The classical

1602: electromagnetic field of an ultrarelativistic point charge $e$ at

1603: ${\un x}={\un 0}, x^-=0$ in $\partial_\mu A^\mu =0$ gauge can be

1604: easily found \cite{Muesol,yuri1}

1605: \be\label{emcl}

1606: A'^{+} (x) = - {e \over {2 \pi}} \delta (x^{-}) \ln (|\underline {x}|

1607: \Lambda)

1608: \ee

1609: with all other field components being zero and $\Lambda$ some infrared

1610: cutoff.  Since this field is localized by the delta-function along the

1611: light cone, the fields of a ensemble of charges located at different

1612: longitudinal coordinates $x^-_i$ do not overlap. Therefore, if we want

1613: to generalize \eq{emcl} to the non-Abelian case we need not worry

1614: about the non-Abelian effects due to the overlap of the fields from

1615: different charges, since those do not take place. The non-Abelian

1616: generalization can be easily accomplished by replacing the electric

1617: charge by its QCD analogue, $e \rightarrow g (t^a)$, such that the

1618: gluon field of the nucleus in covariant gauge is given by \cite{yuri1}

1619: \begin{eqnarray}

1620: A'^{+} = {-} { g \over {2 \pi }} \sum_{a=1}^{N_c^2 -1} \sum_{i=1}^A

1621:  t^a (t_i^a) \left[ \delta(x^{-}-x^-_i) \ln

1622:  (|{\underline{x}}-{\underline{x}}_i| \Lambda ) 

1623:  - \delta(x^{-}-x'^-_i) \ln

1624:  (|{\underline{x}}-{\underline{x}}'_i| \Lambda ) \right] , \underline

1625:  A' ={\un 0} , A'^{-}=0 .

1626: \label{covfd}

1627: \end{eqnarray}

1628: As one can explicitly verify, \eq{covfd} satisfies \eq{YMeq} with the

1629: source current given by \eq{jmv} with the color charge density from

1630: \eq{rho}. We now have to perform a gauge transformation of this field

1631: into the light-cone gauge. The field in a new gauge is

1632: \begin{eqnarray}

1633: A_{\mu} = S A'_{\mu} S^{-1} - { i \over g } (\partial _{\mu} S)

1634: S^{-1}.

1635: \end{eqnarray}

1636: Requiring the new gauge to be the light-cone gauge, $A^+ =0 $, we

1637: obtain

1638: \begin{eqnarray}

1639: S(\underline {x}, x^{-} ) = \mbox{P} \exp 

1640: \left( { -ig \int_{-\infty}^{x^{-}} dx'^{-} A'^{+} 

1641: (\underline {x}, x'^{-})} \right).

1642: \label{smatr}

1643: \end{eqnarray}

1644: The field in $A^+ =0$ light cone gauge is

1645: \begin{eqnarray}\label{lcfield}

1646: {\underline {A}}(\underline {x}, x^{-} ) = \int_{-\infty}^{x^{-}}

1647: dx'^{-} F^{+\perp}(\underline {x}, x'^{-} ) = \int_{-\infty}^{x^{-}}

1648: dx'^{-} S(\underline {x}, x'^{-} ) F'^{+\perp}(\underline {x}, x'^{-}

1649: ) S^{-1} (\underline {x}, x'^{-} ).

1650: \end{eqnarray}

1651: Using the explicit expression for the field in covariant gauge from

1652: \eq{covfd} in Eqs. (\ref{lcfield}) and (\ref{smatr}) we obtain \cite{yuri1}

1653: \begin{eqnarray}

1654: {\underline {A}} (\underline {x}, x^{-} ) = { g \over {2 \pi }}

1655: \sum_{a=1}^{N_c^2 -1} \sum_{i=1}^A (t_i^a) \left( S(\underline {x}, x^-_i )

1656: t^a S^{-1} (\underline {x}, x^-_i) \, {{\underline{x}}-{\underline{x}}_i

1657: \over |{\underline{x}}-{\underline{x}}_i|^2} \, \theta (x^{-} - x^-_i)

1658: \right. \nonumber

1659: \end{eqnarray}

1660: \begin{eqnarray}

1661:  - \left. S(\underline {x}, x'^-_i ) t^a S^{-1} (\underline {x},

1662: x'^-_i) \, {{\underline{x}}-{\underline{x}'}_i \over

1663: |{\underline{x}}-{\underline{x}'}_i|^2} \, \theta (x^{-} -

1664: x'^-_i) \right)

1665: \label{clsol}

1666: \end{eqnarray}

1667: with

1668: \begin{eqnarray}

1669: S(\underline {x}, x^{-} ) = \prod_{i=1}^A 

1670: \exp \left[ {i g^2 \over {2 \pi }}

1671: \sum_{a=1}^{N_c^2 -1} t^a (t_i^a) \ln \left({|\underline {x} - {\underline

1672: {x}}_i| \over { |\underline {x} - {\underline {x}}'_i|}} \right)

1673: \theta (x^{-} - x^-_i) \right].

1674: \label{cutoff}

1675: \end{eqnarray}

1676: Eqs. (\ref{clsol}) and (\ref{cutoff}) give us the classical field of a

1677: large ultrarelativistic nucleus moving in the light cone $+$ direction

1678: calculated in the light cone gauge of the nucleus $A^+ =0$. We will

1679: also refer to this field as a non-Abelian Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams

1680: field, since it is a non-Abelian analogue of the well-known

1681: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams field in electrodynamics \cite{WW}. Below we

1682: will rederive this result in the approach where the nucleus is

1683: described by a continuous color charge density $\rho ({\un x})$ and

1684: will finally calculate the correlator of two of the fields in

1685: \eq{clsol} to obtain the classical gluon distribution function of a

1686: nucleus.

1687: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1688: \begin{figure}

1689: \begin{center}

1690: \epsfxsize=10cm

1691: \leavevmode

1692: \hbox{\epsffile{ww.eps}}

1693: \end{center}

1694: \caption{Classical gluon field of an ultrarelativistic large nucleus: 

1695: the non-Abelian Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams field. }

1696: \label{ww}

1697: \end{figure}

1698: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1699: 

1700: Let us first identify which Feynman diagrams correspond to the

1701: non-Abelian Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams field of \eq{clsol}. Since a

1702: detailed analysis of the problem can be found in \cite{yuri2}, here we

1703: will only quote the answer. An example of the diagram contributing to

1704: the classical field of \eq{clsol} is shown in \fig{ww}. Classical

1705: fields are usually given by tree diagrams (graphs without loops): this

1706: is indeed the case in \fig{ww}, where the gluons from different

1707: sources (valence quarks in nucleons) keep merging with each other

1708: until they form a gluon field at the point where we ``measure'' it,

1709: which is denoted by a cross in \fig{ww}. Each nucleon can only emit

1710: one (inelastic) or two (elastic) gluons: as discussed in more detail

1711: in \cite{yuri2} emission of more than two gluons per nucleon allows

1712: for diagrams with quantum loops to be of the same order as the

1713: classical fields. Such graphs has to be discarded because the

1714: classical fields does not give the dominant contribution at that

1715: order.  The two-gluon per nucleon limit is the same as the one

1716: considered in Sect. \ref{GM} giving rise to the resummation parameter

1717: for multiple rescatterings from \eq{mrp}. As we will see below

1718: classical field from \eq{clsol} resums powers of the same parameter

1719: $\as^2 A^{1/3}$. The discarded diagrams having more than two gluons

1720: per nucleon are suppressed by extra powers of $\as$ brought in by the

1721: extra gluons, which are not enhanced by powers of $A$. \\

1722: 

1723: 

1724: 

1725: {\sl Effective Action Approach} \\

1726: 

1727: In order to investigate high gluon density effects, McLerran and

1728: Venugopalan proposed an effective action for QCD at small $x$ and/or

1729: for large nuclei (the MV model) \cite{MV}. To illustrate the approach,

1730: it is easier to consider a nucleus (this can be easily generalized to

1731: a proton) in a frame where it is traveling with the speed of light so

1732: that it has a large $P^+$ (light cone momentum). In this frame, the

1733: longitudinal size of nucleus is Lorentz contracted ($2R \rightarrow

1734: 2R/\gamma$) so that all the valence quarks are localized in a

1735: longitudinal ``pancake'' of width $2R/\gamma$. Furthermore, consider

1736: the transverse area of the nucleus as a rectangular grid of size $r

1737: \ll 1/\Lambda_{QCD}$ so that we are not sensitive to details of

1738: confinement. Since the nucleus is taken to be large, there is a large

1739: number of valence quarks (and large $x$ gluons) in this rectangular

1740: ``pancake''. As we discussed above, the small $x$ gluons have large

1741: longitudinal wavelengths and therefore can not resolve individual

1742: valence quarks in the nucleus. Rather, they couple coherently to the

1743: effective color charge generated by the valence quarks and large $x$

1744: gluons, denoted by $\rho(x^-,{\un x})$. This color charge is taken to be

1745: independent of the light cone time since the small-$x$ gluons, to

1746: which it couples, have very short life times ($\Delta x^+ \sim

1747: 1/xP^+$) and see the effective color charge as frozen in time.

1748: 

1749: Based on the above physical picture, one can write the following

1750: effective action for QCD at small $x$ and in the light cone gauge

1751: $A^+=0$ \cite{MV,jkmw} (for an alternative but equivalent form of the

1752: action see \cite{JMJV})

1753: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:mv_action}

1754: S \equiv -{1\over 4} \int d^4 x \, F_{\mu\nu}^{a \, 2} (x) + {i\over

1755: N_c} \int d^2 x dx^- \, Tr \rho (x^-,{\un x}) W_{-\infty,\infty}[A^-]

1756: (x^-,{\un x}) + i \int d^2 x \, dx^- F[\rho({\un x},x^-)]

1757: \end{eqnarray}

1758: where 

1759: \be

1760: W_{-\infty,\infty}[A^-] (x^-,{\un x}) \equiv P

1761: exp\bigg[-ig\int^{\infty}_{-\infty} dx^+ A^-_a (x^+,x^-,{\un x})\,

1762: T_a\bigg]

1763: \ee

1764: and $\exp \left[i \left\{i \int d^2 x dx^- F[\rho({\un

1765: x},x^-)]\right\}\right]$ can be thought as the statistical weight of a

1766: given color charge configuration. In the original MV model, $F$ was

1767: taken to be a Gaussian, given by

1768: \cite{MV,yuri1,LM}

1769: \be

1770: \int dx^- \, F[\rho({\un x},x^-)] \, = \, {{1\over 2 \, \mu^2} \, \rho^2({\un x})}

1771: \ee 

1772: while the interaction term was taken to be $\delta (x^-) \, \rho ({\un x})

1773: A^-$. It turns out that as long as one is interested in the evolution

1774: of observables with $x$, it is valid to take $\rho({\un x},x^-)

1775: \rightarrow \rho({\un x}) \delta(x^-)$ with logarithmic accuracy. However,

1776: if one is interested in calculating observables at the same point in

1777: $x^-$, one needs to take the structure of the color charge density

1778: $\rho$ in the longitudinal direction $x^-$ into account.

1779: 

1780: In order to calculate a physical observable, one first solves the

1781: classical equations of motion and then averages over the color charge

1782: configurations $\rho$ with the weight function $F[\rho]$.

1783: \begin{eqnarray}

1784: <O(A)> \equiv { \int [D\rho] D[A] \exp\{-F[\rho]\} \, O(A) e^{i S[\rho,A]} \over

1785:  \int [D\rho] D[A] \exp\{-F[\rho]\}  e^{i S[\rho,A]}} 

1786: \end{eqnarray}

1787: 

1788: As we have just mentioned, in the original MV model, the weight

1789: function $F$ is taken to be a Gaussian. This is a good approximation

1790: as long as the number of color sources is large and if the color

1791: sources are not correlated, such as in a large nucleus

1792: \cite{yuri1}. However, evolution in $x$ will change the weight

1793: function and it will not be a Gaussian in general.

1794: 

1795: The classical equation of motion involving the non-zero component of

1796: the current ($J^+$) is

1797: \be\label{eom1}

1798: \partial_i \partial^+ A^i + - i g [A_i, \partial^+A^i] = g J^+

1799: \ee

1800: and $F_{ij} = 0$. The solution has the form $A^i = \theta (x^-)

1801: \alpha^i ({\un x})$ where $\alpha_i ({\un x})$ satisfies $\partial_i \alpha_i

1802: ({\un x}) = g \rho ({\un x})$. In the original work of McLerran and

1803: Venugopalan \cite{MV}, it was argued that the commutator term is zero

1804: since it involves the commutator of the fields at the same point in

1805: $x^-$. This is not quite correct \cite{yuri1}, however, and leads to

1806: infrared singular solutions. The reason is that this term is very

1807: singular due to the presence of the $\delta (x^-)$ so that one needs

1808: to understand the structure of the field across this singularity,

1809: which in turn means that one needs to know the structure of the color

1810: source distribution $\rho$ in $x^-$.

1811: 

1812: In \cite{jkmw,yuri1} the structure of the color sources in $x^-$ was

1813: taken into account. Following \cite{jkmw} the equation of motion now

1814: becomes

1815: \be

1816: D_i {\partial \over \partial y} A^i ({\un x},y) = g \rho (y,{\un x})

1817: \label{eq:eom2}

1818: \ee

1819: where we have introduced the space-time rapidity variable $y \sim \ln

1820: 1/x^-$. Furthermore, the weight function is also modified in order to

1821: take the rapidity dependence of the sources into account and is given

1822: by

1823: \begin{eqnarray}

1824: \int D[\rho] \, \exp \Bigg\{ 

1825: - \int_0^{\infty} dy \int d^2x {\rho^2 (y,{\un x}) \over \mu^2 (y)}\Bigg\}.

1826: \end{eqnarray}

1827: 

1828: To find the classical solution, we introduce the path ordered Wilson

1829: line, given by

1830: \be

1831: U(y,{\un x}) \equiv \hat{P} exp \bigg [ i  \int_y^{\infty} dy^{\prime}

1832: \Lambda (y^{\prime},{\un x})\bigg].

1833: \ee

1834: Since $F_{ij} = 0$, the classical field $A_i$ must be a pure gauge in

1835: two dimensions so that it can be written as

1836: \be

1837: A^i (y,{\un x}) = {i \over g} \, U(y,{\un x}) \, \partial^i \, U^{\dagger}(y,{\un x}),

1838: \ee

1839: which, substituted into (\ref{eq:eom2}) yields the following equation for

1840: $\Lambda$: ${\un \partial}^2 \Lambda = -g^2 U^{\dagger}

1841: \rho \, U$. The classical solution can be written as

1842: \begin{eqnarray}\label{clsol2}

1843: A^i (y,{\un x}) = {1\over g} \int_y^{\infty} dy^{\prime} \, U_{\infty,y^{\prime}}({\un x}) \,

1844: [\partial^i \Lambda (y^{\prime},{\un x})] \, U_{y^{\prime},\infty}({\un x}).

1845: \end{eqnarray}

1846: Furthermore, since the transformation between $\rho$ and $\Lambda$

1847: does not depend on $\rho$, one can perform the color averaging using

1848: $\Lambda$. In other words, for any operator $O$, we have the following

1849: relation

1850: \begin{eqnarray}

1851: \int D[\rho] \, O(\rho) \, exp \Bigg[ - \int_0^{\infty} dy \int d^2x 

1852: {\rho^2(y,{\un x}) \over \mu^2(y)} \Bigg] =

1853: \int D[\Lambda] \, O(\Lambda) \, exp \Bigg[ - \int_0^{\infty} \int d^2x 

1854: {[\partial_T^2\Lambda(y,{\un x})]^2 \over g^4 \mu^2(y)}\Bigg].

1855: \end{eqnarray}

1856: Comparing \eq{clsol2} with \eq{lcfield} we can identify matrices $U$

1857: and $S$ and the function $\Lambda/x^-$ with the gluon field $A'^+$ in

1858: covariant gauge, which, in the case of point charges approach, is

1859: given by \eq{covfd}. Therefore, the solution from \eq{clsol2} is

1860: equivalent to the solution found previously in \eq{clsol}. \\

1861: 

1862: 

1863: {\sl Classical Gluon Distribution} \\

1864: 

1865: Now we can compute the correlator of two gluon fields 

1866: \begin{eqnarray}\label{gcorr}

1867: G_{ij}^{ab} (y,{\un x},{\un y}) \, \equiv \, 

1868: \langle A_i^a(y,{\un x})\, A_j^b(y,{\un y}) \rangle

1869: \end{eqnarray}

1870: which is related to the unintegrated gluon distribution via

1871: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ww1}

1872: \phi^{WW} (x_{Bj}, \un k^2) \, = \, \frac{1}{2 \, \pi^2} \, \int d^2 b \, 

1873: d^2 r \, e^{- i {\un k} \cdot {\un r}} \ \mbox{Tr} \langle {\un A}

1874: ({\un 0}) \cdot {\un A} ({\un r}) \rangle ,

1875: %\, = \, \frac{1}{(2 \, \pi)^2} \, \int d^2 b \, 

1876: %d^2 r \, e^{- i {\un k} \cdot {\un r}} \ G_{ij}^{ab} (y, {\un 0}, {\un r}),

1877: \end{eqnarray}

1878: where the index $WW$ denotes the quasi-classical

1879: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams distribution function and ${\un A} ({\un x}) =

1880: \lim_{y \rightarrow -\infty} {\un A} (y, {\un x})$.

1881: 

1882: The easiest way to compute the correlator (\ref{gcorr}) is by

1883: expanding the path ordered exponentials, performing the color

1884: averaging and exponentiating the result. The first term of the

1885: expansion gives

1886: \begin{eqnarray}

1887: G_{ij,0}^{ab} (y,{\un x};y,{\un y}) = {1 \over g^2} \,  \delta_{ab} \int^{\infty}_{y} 

1888: dy^{\prime} g^4 \, \mu^2 (y^{\prime})

1889: \partial_i\partial_j {1\over \partial_T^4} ({\un x},{\un y}).

1890: \end{eqnarray}

1891: The inverse of the operator $\partial_T^4$ is infrared singular and

1892: must be regulated. A natural cutoff is the QCD confinement scale

1893: $\Lambda_{QCD}$. A more refined treatment shows that the saturation

1894: scale $Q_s$ provides a natural infrared cutoff for the operator $1/

1895: \partial_T^4$. Nevertheless, we define

1896: \begin{eqnarray}

1897: {1\over \partial_T^4} ({\un x}) \equiv \gamma({\un x}) = {1\over 8\pi} x_T^2\,

1898: \ln [x_T^2 \Lambda^2_{QCD}] + \gamma(0)

1899: \end{eqnarray}

1900: so that  the next term in the expansion gives

1901: \begin{eqnarray}

1902: G_{ij,1}^{ab}(y,{\un x},{\un y}) = {\delta_{ab} \over g^2} {N_c\over 2} \bigg[ g^4

1903: \int_{y}^{\infty} \mu^2(y^{\prime})\bigg]^2 [\partial_i\partial_j

1904: \gamma ({\un x} - {\un y})] [\gamma({\un x} - {\un y}) - \gamma(0)].

1905: \end{eqnarray}

1906: Similarly, the $n^{th}$ term in the expansion gives

1907: \begin{eqnarray}

1908: G_{ij,n}^{ab} = {\delta_{ab} \over g^2} {N_c^n \over (n+1)!} \bigg[ g^4

1909: \int_{y}^{\infty} \mu^2(y^{\prime})\bigg]^{n+1}

1910: \partial_i\partial_j \gamma({\un x} - {\un y}) [\gamma({\un x} - {\un y}) - \gamma (0)]^n.

1911: \end{eqnarray}

1912: We can now sum the series and get the following expression for the

1913: gluon distribution function

1914: \begin{eqnarray}

1915: G_{ii}^{aa}(y,x_T) %= {dN \over dy\,d^2 x} 

1916: = {4 (N_c^2 -1) \over g^2 N_c}\,{1\over x_T^2} 

1917: \Bigg[ 1 - [x_T^2 \Lambda^2_{QCD}]^{{g^4 N_c \over 8\pi} x_T^2\,\chi(y)}\Bigg]

1918: \label{eq:G_ii}

1919: \end{eqnarray}

1920: where we have defined $\chi(y) \equiv \int_y^{\infty} dy^{\prime}

1921: \mu^2(y^{\prime})$. Using \eq{rho} to calculate a correlator of two 

1922: $\rho$'s in light cone gauge we can identify $\chi (y) = \rho \, T

1923: ({\un b}) / 4 N_c$ \cite{yuri1}. Alternatively the correlator in

1924: \eq{gcorr} can be re-calculated using the gluon field from \eq{clsol}

1925: \cite{KM}. In the end one can rewrite \eq{eq:G_ii} as

1926: \be\label{gla2}

1927: G_{ii}^{aa}(y, x_T) \, = \, \frac{2 \, C_F}{\as \, \pi} \,

1928: \frac{1}{x_T^2} \, \left[ 1 - \exp \left( - \frac{x_T^2 \, Q_s^2 \, 

1929: \ln (1/x_T \Lambda_{QCD})}{4} \right) \right],

1930: \ee

1931: which looks very similar to the Glauber-Mueller formula (\ref{glaN2}),

1932: except that the saturation scale in \eq{gla2} is now for gluons,

1933: \be\label{qsmvg}

1934: Q_s^2 ({\un b}) \, \equiv \, 4 \, \pi \, \as^2 \, \rho \, T({\un b}),

1935: \ee

1936: and is different from the quark saturation scale (\ref{qsmv}) by

1937: replacing Casimir operators, $C_F \rightarrow N_c$.

1938: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1939: \begin{figure}[t]

1940: \begin{center}

1941: \epsfxsize=8cm

1942: \leavevmode

1943: \hbox{\epsffile{mv1.eps}}

1944: \end{center}

1945: \caption{Unintegrated gluon distribution in the quasi-classical approximation 

1946: as a function of gluons' transverse momentum (see \eq{gla2}).}

1947: \label{mv1}

1948: \end{figure}

1949: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1950: 

1951: Combining Eqs. (\ref{ww1}), (\ref{gcorr}) and (\ref{gla2}) we obtain

1952: the following gluon distribution function

1953: \be\label{ww2}

1954: \phi^{WW} (x_{Bj}, {\un k}^2) \, = \, \frac{C_F}{\as \, 2 \, \pi^3} \, 

1955: \int d^2 b \, d^2 r \, e^{- i \, {\un k} \cdot {\un r}} \, \frac{1}{r_\perp^2} \, 

1956: N_G ({\un r}, {\un b}, Y= 0)

1957: \ee

1958: expressed in terms of the gluon dipole-nucleus forward scattering

1959: amplitude

1960: \be\label{NGgm}

1961: N_G ({\un r}, {\un b}, Y= 0) \, = \,  1 - \exp \left( - \frac{r_T^2 \, Q_s^2 \, 

1962: \ln (1/r_T \Lambda_{QCD})}{4} \right).

1963: \ee

1964: Note that the unintegrated gluon distribution in \eq{ww2} is

1965: proportional to $1/\as$ when $N_G \sim 1$: this corresponds to gluon

1966: fields being $A_i \sim 1/g$ characteristic of all classical solutions.

1967: 

1968: 

1969: It should be noted that (\ref{eq:G_ii}) is an all twist result for the

1970: gluon distribution function, valid in the classical regime, which

1971: resums multiple scattering of gluons from the target hadron or

1972: nucleus, in the spirit of the Glauber-Mueller formalism and can be

1973: thought of as the initial condition for an evolution equation which

1974: would take gluon emission into account, such as the JIMWLK equation

1975: which we will consider below.

1976: 

1977: It is instructive to look at the different limits of (\ref{eq:G_ii}),

1978: or, equivalently, \eq{ww2}. In the limit where $x_T \rightarrow 0$

1979: (perturbative QCD limit), we get $G(x_T) \sim \ln (x_T)$ so that in

1980: momentum space using \eq{ww1} we have $\phi (x_{Bj}, {\un k}^2) \sim

1981: 1/k_T^2$ in agreement with pQCD.  On the other hand, in the limit

1982: where $x_T$ is large (but is smaller than $1/\Lambda_{QCD}$), we get

1983: $G(x_T) \sim 1/x_T^2$ so that in momentum space we have $\phi (x_{Bj},

1984: {\un k}^2) \sim \ln (k_T)^2$. The momentum distribution of gluons is

1985: shown in Fig. \ref{mv1} where the slowing down of the infrared

1986: divergence of the gluon distribution function is evident.

1987: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1988: \begin{figure}

1989: \begin{center}

1990: \epsfxsize=11cm

1991: \leavevmode

1992: \hbox{\epsffile{mv2.eps}}

1993: \end{center}

1994: \caption{Phase space distribution of gluons in the transverse momentum space.}

1995: \label{mv2}

1996: \end{figure}

1997: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1998: 

1999: It is important to notice that the gluon distribution function (solid

2000: line in \fig{mv1}) is now only logarithmically infrared divergent, in

2001: contrast to pQCD (the first term in expansion of \eq{gla2} in powers

2002: of $Q_s$ shown by dashed line in \fig{mv1}), which would lead to power

2003: divergence. In other words, the non-linearities of the classical gluon

2004: field have (almost) regulated the infrared divergence present in

2005: leading twist pQCD, making the residual singularity integrable over

2006: ${\un k}$.  This phenomenon is usually referred to as {\it gluon

2007: saturation}: the increasing gluon distribution slows down its growth

2008: in the infrared from the power-law scaling to the logarithmic one. It

2009: is interesting to note that the saturation scale characterizing

2010: unitarization of the dipole-nucleus forward scattering amplitude $N$

2011: in Sect. \ref{GM} turns out to be the same saturation scale (modulo

2012: the Casimir factors) as the one governing the saturation of gluon

2013: distribution functions in

2014: \fig{mv1}!

2015: 

2016: 

2017: The phase space distribution of gluons is shown in Fig. \ref{mv2},

2018: where we multiplied the unintegrated gluon distribution $\phi (x_{Bj},

2019: {\un k}^2)$ from \fig{mv1} by the phase space factor $k_T$. In

2020: contrast with leading twist pQCD (dashed line), the full classical

2021: line in \fig{mv2} has a peak, which is due to the fact that the

2022: infrared divergence is now regularized. The location of the peak

2023: determines the typical momentum of the gluons in the small-$x$

2024: hadron/nucleus wavefunction and is given by the saturation momentum

2025: since it is the only scale in the problem. The fact that most gluons

2026: in the wave function of a hadron or nucleus reside in a state with a

2027: finite momentum $Q_s$ is the reason why this state is also called a

2028: {\it condensate}. It allows us to treat the gluon wave function of a

2029: high energy hadron or nucleus in the small coupling approximation.

2030: 

2031: 

2032: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2033: 

2034: \subsection{Quantum Evolution}

2035: \label{QE}

2036: 

2037: 

2038: It is known that quantum corrections to the classical results

2039: presented in the previous section are potentially large. These large

2040: corrections arise from emission of gluons, both real and virtual. If

2041: the available energy is sufficiently high, it leads to a large phase

2042: space for gluon emission which gives rise to large logs of energy (or

2043: of $1/x$) which need to be resumed. In the CGC formalism, the presence

2044: of these large corrections to the classical approximation was proved

2045: in \cite{ajmv1,ajmv2}. A Wilson renormalization group formalism was

2046: developed in \cite{jklw1,jklw2} which allows for resummation of these

2047: large logs. The resulting equation can be written as an evolution

2048: equation for correlator of any number of Wilson lines and is known as

2049: the JIMWLK equation. This (functional) equation was later shown to be

2050: equivalent to a set of coupled equations derived by Balitsky

2051: \cite{balitsky}. In the large-$N_c$ limit, these equations can be

2052: written in a closed form, as a single integral equation, independently

2053: derived by one of the authors for the correlator of two Wilson lines

2054: \cite{yuri_bk}, known as the BK equation.

2055: 

2056: \subsubsection{The JIMWLK Equation}

2057: \label{JIMWLKsect}

2058: 

2059: The starting point is the action given by (\ref{eq:mv_action}). We

2060: introduce the following decomposition of the full field $A_{\mu}$,

2061: \begin{eqnarray}

2062: A_{\mu} = b_{\mu} + \delta A_{\mu} + a_{\mu}

2063: \label{eq:decomp}

2064: \end{eqnarray}

2065: where $b_{\mu}$ is the solution to the classical equation of motion

2066: considered in the previous section, $\delta A_{\mu}$ denotes the

2067: quantum fluctuations having longitudinal momenta $q^+$ between $P^+_n$

2068: and $P^+_{n-1}$, and $a_{\mu}$ is a soft field having longitudinal

2069: momentum $k^+$ where $k^+ < P^+_n$. The effective action is calculated

2070: for field $a_{\mu}$, integrating out hard fluctuations $\delta

2071: A_{\mu}$, assuming that these fluctuations are much smaller than the

2072: classical field $b_{\mu}$.  This procedure reproduces the form of the

2073: action given in (\ref{eq:mv_action}) with a modified functional

2074: $F^{\prime}$, due to inclusion of the hard fluctuations into the color

2075: sources. The change of the functional $F$ with $log 1/x$ leads to an

2076: evolution equation for the statistical weight functional, known as the

2077: JIMWLK equation, which can then be used to derive evolution equations

2078: for any $n$ point function of the effective theory.

2079: 

2080: Expanding the action around the classical solution and keeping first

2081: and second order terms in hard fluctuations $\delta A_{\mu}$, we get

2082: \begin{eqnarray}

2083: S= -{1\over 4}G(a)^2-{{1}\over{2}} 

2084: \delta A_{\mu} [{\rm D}^{-1} (\rho)]^{\mu\nu} \delta A_{\nu} + 

2085: ga^- \rho^\prime+O((a^-)^2)

2086: + iF[\rho]

2087: \label{eq:efaction}

2088: \end{eqnarray}

2089: where

2090: \begin{eqnarray}

2091: \rho^\prime =\rho+ \delta \rho_1 + \delta \rho_2

2092: \label{eq:rhoprime}

2093: \end{eqnarray}

2094: with

2095: \begin{eqnarray}

2096: \delta \rho^a_1({\un x},x^+, x^-) &=& -2 f^{abc} \alpha^{b}_{i} ({\un x}) 

2097: \delta A^{c}_{i}({\un x}, x^+, x^-=0)

2098: \label{eq:rho1}

2099: \\ 

2100: &-& {{g}\over{2}} f^{abc} \rho^{b}

2101: ({\un x}) \int dy^+ \Bigg[\theta (y^+ - x^+) - \theta (x^+ - y^+) \Bigg] 

2102: \delta A^{-c}({\un x}, y^+, x^-=0)\nonumber

2103: \end{eqnarray}

2104: and

2105: \begin{eqnarray}

2106: \delta \rho^a_2({\un x}, x^+,x^-) &=& -f^{abc} [\partial^+ \delta 

2107: A^{b}_{i}({\un x},x^+,x^-) ]\delta A^{c}_{i}({\un x},x^+,x^-) 

2108: \nonumber\\

2109: &-& {{g^2}\over{N_c}} \rho^{b}({\un x}) \int dy^+ \delta

2110: A^{-c}({\un x},y^+, x^-=0) \int dz^+ \delta A^{-d}({\un x},y^+,x^-=0) \nonumber

2111: \\ &\times &\Bigg[\theta (z^+ -y^+) \theta (y^+ -x^+) {\rm tr} T^a T^c

2112: T^d T^b \nonumber \\ &+&\theta (x^+ -z^+) \theta (z^+ -y^+) {\rm tr}

2113: T^a T^b T^c T^d \nonumber \\ &+&\theta (z^+ -x^+) \theta (x^+ -y^+)

2114: {\rm tr} T^a T^d T^b T^c \Bigg].

2115: \label{eq:rho2}

2116: \end{eqnarray}

2117: The first term in both $\delta\rho_1^a$ and $\delta \rho^a_2$ is

2118: coming from expansion of $G^2$ in the action while the rest of the

2119: terms proportional to $\rho$ are from the expansion of the Wilson line

2120: term.  The three terms correspond to different time ordering of the

2121: fields. Since the longitudinal momentum of $a^-$ is much lower than of

2122: $\delta A$, we have only kept the eikonal coupling which gives the

2123: leading contribution in this kinematics.  The higher order terms in

2124: $a^-$ do not affect the derivation here and can be reconstructed later

2125: using the uniqueness of the action.

2126: 

2127: At first stage, we integrate over $\delta A_{\mu}$ while keeping both

2128: $\rho$ and $\delta \rho$ fixed. We note that it is sufficient to keep

2129: only the first and second order terms in correlation functions of

2130: $\delta \rho$, all higher order terms being suppressed by powers of

2131: $\alpha_s$. We therefore define

2132: \begin{eqnarray}

2133: <\delta\rho^a({\un x})>_{\delta A}& = & \alpha_s \, y\, \sigma^a({\un x})\nonumber \\

2134: <\delta\rho^a({\un x},x^+)\delta\rho^b({\un y},x^+)>_{\delta A}& = &

2135: \alpha_s \, y \,\chi^{ab}({\un x},{\un y})

2136: \label{eq:chisig}

2137: \end{eqnarray}

2138: with $y=\ln (1/x)$. Integrating out the hard fluctuations $\delta A_{\mu}$ then leads to

2139: \begin{eqnarray}

2140: \lefteqn{

2141: \int D[\rho,\rho^\prime]

2142: [ {\rm Det}(\chi)]^{-1/2}\exp\left(-F[\rho]\right) 

2143: } 

2144: \nonumber \\ && \times 

2145: \exp\left(-{1\over 2\,\alpha_s\,y\,}

2146:   \left[\rho^\prime_x-\rho_x-

2147:     \alpha_s\,y\, \sigma_x\right][\chi^{-1}_{x y}]\left[

2148:     \rho^\prime_y-\rho_y-\alpha_s\,y\,\sigma_y\right]\right)

2149: \nonumber\\ & \equiv & 

2150: \int D[\rho,\rho^\prime]\exp\{-U[\rho,\rho^\prime]\}

2151: \label{eq:intoutdA}

2152: \end{eqnarray}

2153: where an integration (summation) over repeated indices is implied. In

2154: the next step, we integrate out $\rho$ at fixed $\rho^{\prime}$. This

2155: can be done using the steepest decent method since the integrand is a

2156: steep function of $\rho$, peaked around $\rho^{\prime}$. The steepest

2157: decent equation is given by

2158: \begin{eqnarray}

2159: \rho^{\prime }_x-\rho_x-\alpha_s\,y\,\sigma_x=\alpha_s\,y\,

2160: \chi_{x u}\left[{\delta F\over \delta\rho_u}+{1\over 2}{\rm

2161:     tr}(\chi^{-1} 

2162: {\delta\chi\over\delta\rho_u})\right ].

2163: \label{eq:sd}

2164: \end{eqnarray}

2165: Substitution of this into Eq.(\ref{eq:intoutdA}) gives

2166: \begin{eqnarray}

2167: U & = & F+{1\over 2}\rm{tr}\ln(\chi)

2168: \\ &&

2169: +{\alpha_s\,y\, \over 2}\left[{\delta F\over \delta\rho_u}+{1\over 2}

2170: {\rm tr}(\chi^{-1}

2171: {\delta\chi\over\delta\rho_u})\right ]\chi_{u v}

2172: \left[{\delta F\over \delta\rho_v}+{1\over 2}{ \rm tr}(\chi^{-1}

2173: {\delta\chi\over\delta\rho_v})\right ].\nonumber

2174: \label{eq:dF}

2175: \end{eqnarray}

2176: In the above expression all the functionals are taken at $\rho^0$

2177: which is the solution of the steepest descent equation (\ref{eq:sd}).

2178: We also need the correction due to quadratic fluctuations of $\rho$

2179: around the steepest decent solution $\rho_0$. It is given by

2180: \begin{eqnarray}

2181: {\delta^2 U\over\delta\rho_x\delta\rho_y} & = &

2182: {1\over \eta}\chi^{-1}_{x y}+

2183: {\delta^2 \over\delta\rho_x\delta\rho_y}\left[F+{1\over 2}

2184: \rm{tr}\ln(\chi)\right] \\

2185: && + \chi^{-1}_{x u}{\delta \sigma_u\over\delta\rho_y}

2186: +{\delta \sigma_u\over\delta\rho_x}\chi^{-1}_{u y}\nonumber\\

2187: && + \left[\chi^{-1}_{x u}{\delta \chi_{u v}\over\delta\rho_y}

2188: +\chi^{-1}_{y u}{\delta \chi_{u v}\over\delta\rho_x} \right]

2189: \left[{\delta F\over\delta\rho_v}+{1\over 2}{\rm tr}\left(\chi^{-1}

2190: {\delta \chi\over\delta\rho_v}\right)\right].\nonumber

2191: \label{eq:deltau}

2192: \end{eqnarray}

2193: Furthermore, there are contributions from the third and the fourth

2194: derivatives of $U$, explicit expressions for which are long and can be

2195: found in \cite{jklw2}. Putting everything together, we recover the

2196: form of the action given in (\ref{eq:mv_action}) with the new

2197: functional $F^{\prime}$ given by

2198: \begin{eqnarray}

2199: F^{\prime} &\equiv& F +  

2200: {\alpha_s\, y\over 2}\left[\chi_{u v}

2201: {\delta^2 \over\delta\rho_u\delta\rho_v}F

2202: -{\delta^2\chi_{u v} \over\delta\rho_u\delta\rho_v}

2203: -{\delta F\over \delta\rho_u}

2204: \chi_{u v}

2205: {\delta F\over \delta\rho_v}

2206: \right. \nonumber \\ && \left. \hspace{1cm}

2207: +2{\delta F\over \delta\rho_u}{\delta\chi_{u v}\over

2208: \delta\rho_v}+2{\delta \sigma_u\over\delta\rho_u}

2209: -2{\delta F\over\delta\rho_u}\sigma_u\right]

2210: \label{eq:F_prime}

2211: \end{eqnarray}

2212: which can be rewritten as an evolution equation for the functional $F$ in terms

2213: of the one and two point fluctuations $\sigma$ and $\chi$  as

2214: \begin{eqnarray}

2215: {d\over d y}F

2216: & = &{\alpha_s\over 2}\left[\chi_{u v}

2217: {\delta^2 \over\delta\rho_u\delta\rho_v}F

2218: -{\delta^2\chi_{u v} \over\delta\rho_u\delta\rho_v}

2219: -{\delta F\over \delta\rho_u}

2220: \chi_{u v}

2221: {\delta F\over \delta\rho_v}

2222: \right. \nonumber\\ && \left. \hspace{1cm}

2223: +

2224: 2{\delta F\over \delta\rho_u}{\delta\chi_{u v}\over

2225: \delta\rho_v}

2226: +2{\delta \sigma_u\over\delta\rho_u}

2227: -2{\delta F\over\delta\rho_u}\sigma_u\right].

2228: \label{eq:rg_F}

2229: \end{eqnarray}

2230: If we define the statistical weight functional $Z \equiv e^{-F}$, the

2231: above equation takes a very simple form if written as an evolution

2232: equation for $Z$ known as the JIMWLK equation

2233: \begin{eqnarray}

2234: {d\over d \,y}\, Z = \alpha_s 

2235: \left\{{1\over 2}{\delta^2

2236:     \over\delta\rho_u\delta\rho_v}\left[Z\chi_{u v}

2237: \right]

2238: -{\delta \over\delta\rho_u}\left[Z\sigma_u\right]\right\}

2239: \label{eq:rg_Z}

2240: \end{eqnarray}

2241: 

2242: The equation (\ref{eq:rg_Z}) can be used to derive evolution equations

2243: for any number of correlators of the color charge density $\rho$. As

2244: an example, we consider the two point function. Multiplying both sides

2245: of (\ref{eq:rg_Z}) with $\rho_x\, \rho_y$ and integrating by parts

2246: over $\rho$ gives

2247: \begin{eqnarray}

2248: {d\over d\, y}\,<\rho_u\rho_v>=

2249: \alpha_s \, <\chi_{u v}+\rho_u\sigma_v+\rho_v\sigma_u>.

2250: \label{eq:rg_2pt}

2251: \end{eqnarray}

2252: This equation can be shown to reduce to the BFKL equation in the low density limit 

2253: which will be considered later.

2254: 

2255: To complete the derivation of the JIMWLK equation, we need to calculate the one and two

2256: point fluctuations $\chi$ and $\sigma$ in terms of the color charge density $\rho$. The

2257: details are given in \cite{Jalilian-Marian:1997dw}-\cite{Ferreiro:2001qy}.  Here we

2258: follow the derivation in  \cite{Ferreiro:2001qy} which is done in coordinate space and 

2259: is closer in spirit to the derivation of BK equation in the next section. The starting point

2260: is $\chi$ as defined in (\ref{eq:chisig}) to which only the color charge 

2261: $\rho_1$ given in (\ref{eq:rho1}) contributes. Suppressing the overall coupling constant

2262: and rapidity for the moment, $\chi$ is 

2263: \begin{eqnarray}\label{chiab}

2264: \chi_{ab}( {\un x},{\un y})\,=

2265: \left\langle \left[-2i{\cal F}^{+i}\, 

2266: \delta A^i + \,\rho {1 \over i\partial^-} \, \delta A^- \right]_x^a

2267: \left[

2268: 2i \, \delta A^i {\cal F}^{+i} + \delta A^- {1 \over 

2269: i\partial^-} \rho \right]_y^b \right\rangle

2270: \end{eqnarray}

2271: where ${\cal F}^{+i}=\delta (x^-) \alpha_i({\un x})$ (integration over

2272: $x^-$ and $y^-$ is implied above). \eq{chiab} can be rewritten in

2273: terms of the propagator of the hard fluctuations $\delta A$ as

2274: \begin{eqnarray}

2275: \chi_{ab}( {\un x},{\un y})\,&=&

2276: 2{\cal F}^{+i}_x\, \langle x|G^{ij}|y\rangle \,2{\cal F}^{+j}_y \, +\, 

2277: 2{\cal F}^{+i}_x\,\langle x|G^{i-}\,{1 \over i\partial^-}|y\rangle \, \rho_y 

2278: \nonumber\\

2279: &-&\,

2280: \rho_x \, \langle x|{1 \over i\partial^-}\, G^{-i}|y\rangle \, 

2281: 2{\cal F}^{+i}_y\,+\,i

2282: \rho_x \langle x|{1 \over i\partial^-} G^{--} {1 \over i\partial^-}

2283: |y\rangle\,\rho_y.

2284: \label{eq:chi_4}

2285: \end{eqnarray}

2286: The four terms in (\ref{eq:chi_4}) are depicted in

2287: Fig. (\ref{fig:chi}) and correspond to real corrections to the

2288: evolution equations. The dashed lines denote the propagator of the

2289: hard modes in the background field while the dash-dotted lines denote

2290: the soft modes for which the effective theory is written. The thick

2291: wavy lines attached to a circle denote the classical field while

2292: the thick wavy lines attached to the solid lines represent the color 

2293: charge density $\rho$.

2294: 

2295: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2296: \begin{figure}

2297: \begin{center}

2298: \epsfxsize=11cm

2299: \leavevmode

2300: \hbox{\epsffile{chi.eps}}

2301: \end{center}

2302: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the color charge fluctuation $\chi$.}  

2303: \label{fig:chi}

2304: \end{figure}

2305: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2306: 

2307: The hard fluctuation propagators $G^{\mu\nu}$

2308: were derived in \cite{Iancu:2000hn,ajmv1,hw}. Here we give the final result

2309: for $\chi$

2310: \begin{eqnarray}

2311: &&\chi({\un x}, {\un y})=

2312: 4 \Biggl\{

2313: {\cal F}^{+i}_x\, \delta^{ij}_{\perp}({\un x}-{\un y})\, {\cal F}^{+j}_y\, -

2314: \nonumber \\ &&

2315: \biggl[2 {\cal F}^{+i} \biggl({\cal D}^i - {\partial^i \over 2}\biggr)

2316: +\rho\biggr]_x\,\langle

2317: {\un x} | {1 \over \partial_{\perp}^2} | {\un y}

2318: \rangle\,

2319: \biggl[2\biggl({\cal D}^{\dagger j} - {\partial^{\dagger j} \over 2}\biggr)

2320: {\cal F}^{+j}+ \rho\biggr]_y\Biggr\}

2321: \label{eqn:chi_final}

2322: \end{eqnarray}

2323: with ${\cal D}^i\equiv\partial^i -ig{\cal A}^i$ and ${\cal D}^{\dagger

2324: j}=\partial^{\dagger j} +ig{\cal A}^j$ the covariant derivatives

2325: constructed with the background field ${\cal A}^i$, where the

2326: derivative $\partial^{\dagger}$ is acting on the function to its

2327: left. Furthermore, we have used the following short hand notation

2328: \begin{eqnarray}

2329: \delta^{ij}_{\perp}({\un x}-{\un y})&=&

2330: \int {d^2p_\perp \over (2 \pi)^2}\,

2331: \left[\delta^{ij}- {p^i p^j \over p_{\perp}^2}\right]\

2332: {\rm e}^{ip_{\perp}\cdot({\un x}-{\un y})}\,\\

2333: \langle

2334: {\un x} | {1 \over \partial_{\perp}^2} | {\un y}

2335: \rangle &=&-

2336: \int {d^2p_\perp \over (2 \pi)^2}\, {1 \over p_{\perp}^2}\

2337: {\rm e}^{ip_{\perp}\cdot({\un x}-{\un y})} .

2338: \label{eq:inchi_def}

2339: \end{eqnarray}

2340: 

2341: Finally, we note that the above expressions look much simpler when one 

2342: expresses the background field $A$ in terms of the covariant gauge color

2343: charge density $\tilde{\rho}$. This is allowed since both the functional measure

2344: and the weight function are gauge invariant. The classical solution is now

2345: simple and reads $\tilde{A^{\mu}_a} = \delta^{\mu +} \alpha_a$ where 

2346: $\alpha^a = - {1\over \partial_{\perp}^2} \tilde{\rho}^a$. The non-linear evolution equation

2347: (\ref{eq:rg_Z}), written in terms of the covariant fields $\alpha$ looks like

2348: \begin{eqnarray}

2349: {\partial Z[\alpha] \over \partial y}\,=\,\alpha_s

2350: \left\{ {1 \over 2} {\delta^2 \over {\delta

2351: \alpha^a({\un x}) \delta \alpha^b({\un y})}} 

2352: [Z \, \eta_{xy}^{ab}] - 

2353: {\delta \over {\delta \alpha^a({\un x})}}

2354: [Z \, \nu_{x}^a] \right\}

2355: \label{eq:rg_alpha}

2356: \end{eqnarray}

2357: where we have defined 

2358: \begin{eqnarray}

2359: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\eta^{ab}({\un x},{\un y})&\equiv&\int d^2z_\perp \int d^2u_\perp\,

2360: \langle {\un x}|\,\frac{1}{\partial^2_\perp}\,|{\un z}\rangle\,

2361: \tilde\chi^{ab}({\un z},u_\perp)\,

2362: \langle u_\perp|\,\frac{1}{\partial^2_\perp}\,|{\un y}\rangle \\

2363: \nu^a ({\un x})&\equiv&- \int d^2z_\perp\,

2364: \langle {\un x}|\,\frac{1}{\partial^2_\perp}\,|{\un z}\rangle\,

2365: \tilde\sigma^a ({\un z})

2366: \label{eq:nueta}

2367: \end{eqnarray}

2368: and $\tilde{\chi}$, $\tilde{\sigma}$ are related to $\chi$, $\sigma$ via

2369: \begin{eqnarray}

2370: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!

2371: \tilde\sigma_a ({\un x})&\equiv&

2372:  V^{\dagger}_{ab}({\un x})\,\sigma_b({\un x}) +

2373: {1\over 2}\,f^{abc}\int d^2 y_\perp \,\,

2374: \tilde\chi_{cb}({\un x},{\un y})\,

2375: \langle {\un y}|\,\frac{1}{\partial^2_\perp}\,|

2376: {\un x}\rangle \nonumber \\

2377: \tilde \chi_{ab}({\un x},{\un y})&\equiv&

2378: V^{\dagger}_{ac}({\un x})\,

2379: \chi_{cd}({\un x},{\un y})\,V_{d b}({\un y}) 

2380: \label{eq:chisig_tilde}

2381: \end{eqnarray}

2382: with  

2383: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:v_fun}

2384: V^{\dagger}_x \equiv V^\dagger({\un x})\,=\,{\rm P} \exp \left \{ ig

2385: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dz^-\,\alpha (z^-,{\un x})  \right \}.

2386: \end{eqnarray}

2387: Combining all the expressions above, the final expression for $\eta_{xy}^{ab}$ is

2388: given by

2389: \begin{eqnarray}

2390: \eta^{ab}_{xy}= {1\over \pi}

2391: \int\! \!{d^2z_\perp\over (2\pi)^2}

2392: \frac{(x^i-z^i)(y^i-z^i)}{({\un x}-{\un z})^2({\un y}-{\un z})^2 }

2393: \Bigl[1 + V^\dagger_x V_y-V^\dagger_x V_z - V^\dagger_z

2394: V_y\Bigr]^{ab}.

2395: \label{eq:eta_final}

2396: \end{eqnarray}

2397: For completeness, we also give the final expression for the virtual

2398: corrections denoted $\nu$

2399: \begin{eqnarray}

2400: \nu^a_x&=&{ig\over 2\pi}

2401: \int {d^2z_\perp\over (2\pi)^2}\,\frac{1}{({\un x}-{\un z})^2}

2402: \,{\rm Tr}\Bigl[T^a V^\dagger_x V_z\Bigr].

2403: \label{eq:nu_final}

2404: \end{eqnarray}

2405: Eq. (\ref{eq:rg_alpha}) with the coefficient functionals given by

2406: (\ref{eq:eta_final},\ref{eq:nu_final}) is known as the JIMWLK

2407: equation.  To conclude this section, we note that it is possible to

2408: rewrite the non-linear evolution equation in a more compact form,

2409: eliminating $\sigma$ in favor of $\chi$, as was done in

2410: \cite{Weigert:2000gi}. Furthermore, it is possible to recast the

2411: JIMWLK equation as a Langevin equation which lends itself easily to

2412: numerical investigation, for example, on a lattice \cite{RW}. For a

2413: review of the most recent progress in understanding the JIMWLK

2414: equation and its various forms, we refer the reader to

2415: \cite{Heribert}.

2416: 

2417: 

2418: \subsubsection{The Balitsky-Kovchegov Equation}

2419: \label{BKsect}

2420: 

2421: Let us approach the problem of resumming quantum evolution corrections

2422: from a different side: instead of including small-$x$ evolution

2423: corrections in the gluon distribution function, as was done in

2424: Sect. \ref{JIMWLKsect}, we will consider quantum corrections to the

2425: dipole-nucleus cross section from Sect. \ref{GM}. In the

2426: quasi-classical limit, the forward amplitude of the dipole-nucleus

2427: scattering is given by \eq{glaN2} \cite{GlaMue}, obtained by resumming

2428: multiple rescatterings of \fig{qqbar}. Now let us study how the

2429: quantum corrections come into this multiple rescatterings picture.

2430: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2431: \begin{figure}[ht]

2432: \begin{center}

2433: \epsfxsize=10cm

2434: \leavevmode

2435: \hbox{\epsffile{fock.eps}}

2436: \end{center}

2437: \caption{Quantum corrections to dipole-nucleus scattering. }

2438: \label{fock}

2439: \end{figure}

2440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2441: 

2442: Similar to the BFKL evolution equation \cite{BFKL} and to JIMWLK

2443: equation, we are interested in quantum evolution in the leading

2444: longitudinal logarithmic approximation resumming the powers of

2445: \be

2446: \as \, \ln \frac{1}{x_{Bj}} \, \sim \, \as \, Y

2447: \ee

2448: with $Y$ the rapidity variable. Again we will be working in the rest

2449: frame of the nucleus, but this time we choose to work in the light

2450: cone gauge of the projectile $A^+ = 0$ if the dipole is moving in the

2451: light cone $+$ direction. This gauge is equivalent to covariant gauge

2452: for the multiple rescatterings of \fig{qqbar}: therefore, all our

2453: discussion in Sect. \ref{GM} remains valid in this new gauge.

2454: 

2455: 

2456: We need to identify radiative corrections that bring in powers of $\as

2457: \, Y$.  As we have seen in Sect. \ref{GM}, instantaneous multiple

2458: rescatterings bring in only powers of $\as$ not enhanced by factors of

2459: $Y$. Therefore, additional Coulomb gluon exchanges would not generate

2460: any logarithms of $x_{Bj}$ bringing in only extra powers of $\as$. We

2461: are not interested in such corrections. Other possible corrections in

2462: the light cone gauge of the projectile dipole are modifications of the

2463: dipole wave function. The incoming dipole may have some gluons (and

2464: other quarks) present in its wave function. For instance, the

2465: dipole may emit a gluon before interacting with the target, and then

2466: the whole system of quark, anti-quark and the gluon would rescatter in

2467: the nucleus, as shown in the top diagram of \fig{fock}. The dipole may

2468: emit two gluons which would then interact with the nucleus, along with

2469: the original $q\bar q$ pair, as shown in the bottom diagram of

2470: \fig{fock}. In principle we can have as may extra gluon emissions, as 

2471: well as generation of extra $q\bar q$ pairs in the dipole's wave

2472: function. As we will shortly see, these gluonic fluctuations from

2473: \fig{fock} actually do bring in the factors of $\as$ enhanced by powers 

2474: of rapidity $Y$, i.e., they do generate leading logarithmic

2475: corrections. Fluctuations leading to formation of $q\bar q$ pairs

2476: actually enter at the subleading logarithmic level bringing in powers

2477: of $\as^2 \, Y$ \cite{FL,CC,BB} and are not important for the leading

2478: logarithmic approximation used in this Section.

2479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2480: \begin{figure}[ht]

2481: \begin{center}

2482: \epsfxsize=10cm

2483: \leavevmode

2484: \hbox{\epsffile{dip.eps}}

2485: \end{center}

2486: \caption{In the large-$N_c$ limit of the  Mueller's dipole model 

2487: \cite{dip1,dip2,dip3} the gluon cascade is represented as a color dipole 

2488: cascade. Quark colors are labeled r, b, g for red, blue and green

2489: correspondingly.}

2490: \label{dip}

2491: \end{figure}

2492: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2493: 

2494: The gluons in the dipole wave function have coherence length of the

2495: order of (see

2496: \eq{lctime})

2497: \be\label{lcoh}

2498: l_{coh} \, \approx \, \frac{2 \, k^+}{{\un k}^2}

2499: \ee

2500: if the incoming $q\bar q$ pair is moving in the light cone $+$

2501: direction. If $k^+$ is large enough, the coherence lengths of these

2502: gluons would be much larger than the nuclear radius, $l_{coh} \gg R$,

2503: so that each gluon would coherently rescatter on the nucleons in the

2504: nucleus, just like the original dipole in \fig{qqbar}. This is indeed

2505: what is also shown in \fig{fock}. Note that gluons are emitted by the

2506: incoming dipole only before the multiple rescattering interaction (or

2507: after the interaction in the forward amplitude). Emissions during the

2508: interaction are suppressed by the powers of $x_{Bj}$ (or,

2509: equivalently, by inverse powers of center of mass energy of the

2510: scattering system) \cite{KM}. This can be checked via an explicit

2511: calculation in the covariant Feynman perturbation theory or by

2512: performing the calculation in the light cone perturbation theory

2513: \cite{BL,BPP}. In the latter case, the emission of a gluon is 

2514: allowed and is equally probable at any point throughout the coherence

2515: length of the parent dipole $l_{coh}^{q\bar q} = 2 \, p^+ / {\un p}^2$

2516: with $p$ the momentum of the dipole and $p^+$ being very large. The

2517: probability of emitting the gluon inside the nucleus is given by

2518: $R/l_{coh}^{q\bar q} \sim 1/p^+ \sim 1/\sqrt{s}$, i.e., it is

2519: suppressed by powers of the center of mass energy $s$ compared to

2520: emission outside the nucleus and can be neglected in the eikonal

2521: approximation considered here.

2522: 

2523: 

2524: Therefore, our goal is to resum the cascade of long-lived gluons,

2525: which the dipole in \fig{fock} develops before interacting with the

2526: nucleus, and then convolute this cascade with the interaction

2527: amplitudes of the gluons with the nucleus. To resum the cascade we

2528: will use the dipole model developed by Mueller in

2529: \cite{dip1,dip2,dip3}. Mueller's dipole model makes use of the 't Hooft's 

2530: large-$N_c$ limit \cite{'tHooft}, taking $N_c$ to be very large while

2531: keeping $\as \, N_c$ constant. In the large-$N_c$ limit only the

2532: planar diagrams contribute, with the gluon line replaced by a double

2533: line, corresponding to replacing the gluon by a quark--anti-quark pair

2534: in the adjoint representation. The diagrams of \fig{fock} translate

2535: into the planar large-$N_c$ diagrams shown in \fig{dip}. The top

2536: diagram there represents emission of a single gluon in the original

2537: incoming dipole. After replacing the gluon by the double quark line,

2538: as shown on the top right of \fig{dip}, the original dipole splits

2539: into two new dipoles, formed by the original quark line combined

2540: with the anti-quark line in the gluon (blue--anti-blue dipole in

2541: \fig{dip}) and by the original anti-quark line combined with the

2542: quark line of the gluon (red--anti-red dipole in

2543: \fig{dip}). Successive gluon emissions would only split the dipoles 

2544: generated in the previous step into more dipoles, as depicted in the

2545: bottom diagram of \fig{dip}.

2546: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2547: \begin{figure}[h]

2548: \begin{center}

2549: \epsfxsize=10cm

2550: \leavevmode

2551: \hbox{\epsffile{dipole.eps}}

2552: \end{center}

2553: \caption{One (real) step of dipole evolution.}

2554: \label{dipole}

2555: \end{figure}

2556: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2557: 

2558: 

2559: To understand how the dipole model \cite{dip1,dip2,dip3} works let us

2560: first calculate one step of the evolution, shown in

2561: \fig{dipole}. There the original dipole consists of a quark--anti-quark 

2562: pair, with the quark (top line) having transverse coordinate ${\un

2563: x}_0$ and the anti-quark (bottom line) having transverse coordinate

2564: ${\un x}_1$. Suppose the initial dipole as a whole carries large light

2565: cone momentum $p^+$ and the anti-quark carries the momentum

2566: $k^+_1$. It will be convenient to define ratios of these momenta, such

2567: that the anti-quark would carry the fraction $z_1 = k^+_1 /p^+$ of the

2568: dipole's light cone momentum and the quark would carry the fraction

2569: $1-z_1$. Now suppose we emit a gluon with transverse coordinate ${\un

2570: x}_2$ and the light cone momentum fraction $z_2 = k^+_2/p^+$ as shown

2571: in \fig{dipole}. As can be shown by an explicit calculation, such an

2572: emission generates a logarithm of energy only if $z_2 \ll z_1,

2573: 1-z_1$. In this approximation the transverse coordinates of the

2574: initial quark and anti-quark do not change: the emission is

2575: recoilless. A straightforward calculation of the diagram in

2576: \fig{dipole} using the rules of the light cone perturbation theory 

2577: \cite{BL} yields \cite{dip1}

2578: \be\label{dip1}

2579: - \frac{i \, g \, t^a}{\pi} \, \left( \frac{{\un x}_{20}}{{\un x}_{20}^2} - 

2580: \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{{\un x}_{21}^2} \right) \cdot {\un \epsilon}^\lambda_2

2581: \ee

2582: where we added the diagram where the gluon is emitted by the

2583: anti-quark to the graph in \fig{dipole}. In \eq{dip1} ${\un

2584: \epsilon}^\lambda_2$ is the polarization of the emitted gluon,

2585: $t^a$ is the color matrix in fundamental representation and ${\un

2586: x}_{ij} = {\un x}_i - {\un x}_j$. Squaring the contribution of

2587: \eq{dip1}, summing over all polarizations and colors of the emitted

2588: gluon, we obtain the following modification of the initial dipole's

2589: wave function

2590: \be\label{dip2}

2591: \Phi^{(1)} ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_1, z_1) \, = \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \, 

2592: \int d^2 x_2 \, \int_{z_{in}}^{\mbox{min} \{z_1, 1-z_1\} } \frac{d z_2}{z_2} \, 

2593: \frac{x_{01}^2}{x_{20}^2 \, x_{21}^2} \, \Phi^{(0)} ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_1, z_1)

2594: \ee

2595: where $x_{ij} = |{\un x}_{ij}|$ and $\Phi^{(0)}$ and $\Phi^{(1)}$ are

2596: squares of the dipole light cone wave functions before and after the

2597: gluon emission correspondingly. In the spirit of the leading

2598: logarithmic approximation we cut off the $z_2$-integral from above by

2599: min$\{z_1, 1-z_1\}$ to indicate that $z_2 \ll z_1, 1-z_1$: however for

2600: the {\sl gluon} evolution the exact choice of this cutoff does not

2601: matter. (A choice of the cutoff actually does matter for formulating

2602: the evolution of the non-singlet structure functions, the so-called

2603: reggeon evolution, in the language of the dipole model

2604: \cite{IKMT}.) $z_{in}$ is some lower cutoff of the $z_2$ integration

2605: which is not important for our purposes here.

2606: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2607: \begin{figure}[h]

2608: \begin{center}

2609: \epsfxsize=10cm

2610: \leavevmode

2611: \hbox{\epsffile{dipolev.eps}}

2612: \end{center}

2613: \caption{One (virtual) step of dipole evolution.}

2614: \label{dipolev}

2615: \end{figure}

2616: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2617: 

2618: In addition to the real emission term of \fig{dipole}, we need to add

2619: virtual corrections, one of which is demonstrated in

2620: \fig{dipolev}. Other virtual diagrams involve the gluon coupling to 

2621: both the quark and the anti-quark lines, as well as only to quark

2622: line. The virtual corrections should cancel the real emission graph of

2623: \fig{dipole} in the wave function squared if there is no interaction

2624: with the target (for a more detailed analysis of real-virtual

2625: cancellations see \cite{CM}). Therefore, to calculate the corrections

2626: we just have to perform the ${\un x}_2$-integration in

2627: \eq{dip2} inserting the overall minus sign for the virtual term. This yields 

2628: the following modification of the dipole wave function

2629: \be\label{dip3}

2630: \Phi^{(1)} ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_1, z_1) \, = \, - \frac{4 \, \as \, C_F}{\pi} \, \ln  

2631: \left( \frac{x_{01}}{\rho} \right) \ \int_{z_{in}}^{\mbox{min} \{z_1, 1-z_1\} } 

2632: \frac{d z_2}{z_2} \ \Phi^{(0)} ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_1, z_1),

2633: \ee

2634: where $\rho$ is some ultraviolet cutoff needed to regulate the ${\un

2635: x}_2$-integration in \eq{dip2}: it will cancel out for physical

2636: quantities.

2637: 

2638: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2639: \begin{figure}[ht]

2640: \begin{center}

2641: \epsfxsize=15cm

2642: \leavevmode

2643: \hbox{\epsffile{dis1.eps}}

2644: \end{center}

2645: \caption{DIS as a dipole cascade interacting with the target (see text).}

2646: \label{dis1}

2647: \end{figure}

2648: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2649: 

2650: Now resummation of the gluon cascade of \fig{fock} becomes more

2651: tractable \cite{yuri_bk}. First of all, in the large-$N_c$ limit the

2652: gluon cascade translates into a dipole cascade of \fig{dip}. As we

2653: have seen in arriving at Eqs. (\ref{dip2}) and (\ref{dip3}), in the

2654: leading logarithmic approximation the gluon emissions do not change

2655: the transverse coordinates of the quark and anti-quark lines off which

2656: the gluons were emitted. Therefore, the color dipoles have the same

2657: transverse coordinates throughout the whole process: once they are

2658: created the transverse coordinates do not change. Now resummation of

2659: the dipole cascade reduces to the set of diagrams represented in

2660: \fig{dis1}, which is a generalization of \fig{qqbar} for the case of 

2661: quantum evolution corrections. (The cascade in \fig{dis1} is very

2662: similar to the one discussed in Sect. \ref{BFKLeq} shown in

2663: \fig{bfkl_phys}.) In DIS the incoming virtual photon splits into a

2664: $q\bar q$ pair, which we will refer to as the original parent

2665: dipole. The parent dipole may emit a soft gluon, like in \fig{dipole},

2666: splitting itself into a pair of dipoles. (In \fig{dis1} the sum of

2667: gluon emission from the quark and from the anti-quark lines is denoted

2668: by the gluon (double quark) line disconnected from the parent quark

2669: and anti-quark lines.) The dipole may also emit and re-absorb a gluon,

2670: generating virtual corrections of \fig{dipolev}. The produced dipoles

2671: may also evolve, generating more and more dipoles, as shown in

2672: \fig{dis1}.

2673: 

2674: In the end the evolved system of dipoles interacts with the

2675: nucleus. In the large-$N_c$ limit each dipole does not interact with

2676: other dipoles during the evolution which generates all the

2677: dipoles. For a large nucleus the dipole-nucleus interaction was

2678: calculated in Sect. \ref{GM} yielding the answer in \eq{glaN2}. That

2679: result resums powers of $\as^2 \, A^{1/3}$, as shown in

2680: \eq{mrp}. Analyzing the diagrams for the interaction of several dipoles 

2681: with the nucleus we see that interaction of, say, two dipoles with a

2682: single nucleon is suppressed by a power of $A^{1/3}$ and is therefore

2683: subleading and can be neglected. Interaction of two dipoles with two

2684: nucleons in the large-$N_c$ limit is dominated by the diagram where

2685: each of the dipoles interacts with only one of the nucleons (if we

2686: require both dipoles to interact). In general one can argue that, in

2687: the large-$N_c$ limit and at the leading order in $A$ (or,

2688: equivalently, resumming powers of $\as^2 \, A^{1/3}$), the interaction

2689: of any number of dipoles with the nucleus is dominated by {\sl

2690: independent} interactions of each of the dipoles with a different set

2691: of nucleons in the nucleus through multiple rescatterings shown in

2692: \fig{qqbar}. This is depicted in \fig{dis1}: there each of the dipoles

2693: present in the dipole wave function by the time it hits the nucleus

2694: may interact with different nucleons in the nucleus by exchanging

2695: pairs of gluons. (Only interactions of some of the dipoles are shown.) 

2696: Therefore, the dipoles are completely non-interacting with each other:

2697: they do not exchange gluons in the process of evolution, since those

2698: corrections would be suppressed by powers of $N_c$, and they interact

2699: with {\sl different} nucleons in the nucleus, which is correct at the

2700: leading order in $A$

2701: \cite{yuri_bk}.

2702: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2703: \begin{figure}[ht]

2704: \begin{center}

2705: \epsfxsize=15cm

2706: \leavevmode

2707: \hbox{\epsffile{dipeqn.eps}}

2708: \end{center}

2709: \caption{ Diagrammatic representation of the nonlinear evolution equation (\ref{eqN}).}

2710: \label{dipeqn}

2711: \end{figure}

2712: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2713: 

2714: Summation of the dipole cascade of \fig{dis1} now becomes

2715: straightforward and is illustrated in \fig{dipeqn}

2716: \cite{yuri_bk}. There the dipole cascade and its interaction with the

2717: target are denoted by a shaded oval. In one step of the evolution in

2718: energy (or rapidity) a soft gluon is emitted in the dipole. If the

2719: gluon is real (see \fig{dipole}), than the original dipole would be

2720: split into two dipoles, as shown in \fig{dipeqn}. Either one of these

2721: dipoles can interact with the nucleus with the other one not

2722: interacting, which is shown by the first term on the right hand side

2723: of \fig{dipeqn} with the factor of $2$ accounting for the fact that

2724: there are two dipoles in the wave function now. Alternatively, both

2725: dipoles may interact simultaneously, which is shown by the second term

2726: on the right hand side of \fig{dipeqn}. This term comes in with the

2727: minus sign due to the minus sign in our definition of the amplitude

2728: $N$ in terms of the $S$-matrix, $S = 1-N$. The emitted gluon in one

2729: step of evolution may be a virtual correction of \fig{dipolev}, which

2730: is not shown in \fig{dipeqn}: in that case the original dipole would

2731: not split into two, it would remain the same and would interact with

2732: the target.

2733: 

2734: 

2735: Combining the terms from \fig{dipeqn} with the virtual correction term

2736: of \fig{dipolev}, and using Eqs. (\ref{dip2}) and (\ref{dip3}) we

2737: write \cite{yuri_bk,balitsky}

2738: \ben

2739: \frac{\partial N ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y)}{\partial Y} \, = \, 

2740: \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \, 

2741: \int d^2 x_2 \, \frac{x_{01}^2}{x_{20}^2 \, x_{21}^2} \, 

2742: \left[ N ({\un x}_{02}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{21}, Y) + 

2743: N ({\un x}_{12}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{20}, Y) - N ({\un

2744: x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y) \right. 

2745: \een

2746: \be\label{eqN}

2747: - \left. N ({\un x}_{02}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un

2748: x}_{21}, Y) \, N ({\un x}_{12}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{20}, Y)

2749: \right].

2750: \ee

2751: Note that since the impact parameter of the original dipole is ${\un

2752: b} = ({\un x}_0 + {\un x}_1)/2$, the impact parameters of the produced

2753: dipoles $x_{02}$ and $x_{12}$ are different from ${\un b}$ on the

2754: right hand side of \eq{eqN}.

2755: 

2756: Equation (\ref{eqN}) is a nonlinear evolution equation, a solution of

2757: which gives us the forward amplitude of the dipole-nucleus scattering

2758: at high energy. The initial condition for \eq{eqN} at some initial

2759: rapidity which we denote $Y=0$ is given by \eq{glaN2}

2760: \cite{yuri_bk}. Therefore, \eq{eqN} resums all powers of the multiple 

2761: rescattering parameter $\as^2 \, A^{1/3}$ along with the leading

2762: logarithms of energy in the large-$N_c$ limit given by powers of $\as

2763: \, N_c \, Y$. \eq{eqN} was originally derived by Balitsky in the framework 

2764: of the effective theory of high energy interactions in \cite{balitsky}

2765: and, independently, by one of the authors in \cite{yuri_bk} using the

2766: formalism of the dipole model \cite{dip1,dip2,dip3}. It is commonly

2767: referred to as the BK equation. It was also re-derived by Braun in

2768: \cite{Braun1} using the expression for the triple pomeron vertex from

2769: \cite{BW} in resummation of fan diagrams in \fig{fan}.

2770: 

2771: \eq{eqN} has a structure similar to the GLR equation (\ref{glreq}) \cite{GLR,GLR2} 

2772: and appears to correspond to summation of the fan diagrams of

2773: \fig{fan}.  If one neglects the impact parameter dependence

2774: of the dipole amplitude $N$ and neglects the dependence of $n$ on the

2775: angle of ${\un x}_{01}$, such that $N ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y)

2776: \approx N (x_{01}, Y)$ one can perform a Fourier transform

2777: \begin{eqnarray}\label{trfm}

2778:   N(x_\perp, Y) = x_\perp^2 \int \frac{d^2 k}{2 \pi} \, e^{i {\un k}

2779:     \cdot {\un x}} \, {\tilde N} (k, Y) 

2780: \end{eqnarray}

2781: to obtain \cite{yuri_bk}

2782: \begin{eqnarray}\label{bsp}

2783:   \frac{\partial {\tilde N} (k, Y)}{ \partial Y} = \frac{2 \, \as \,

2784:   N_c}{\pi} \, \chi \left[ 0, \frac{i}{2} \left( 1 +

2785:   \frac{\partial}{\partial \ln k} \right) \right] \, {\tilde N} (k, Y)

2786:   - \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi} \, {\tilde N}^2 (k, Y),

2787: \end{eqnarray}

2788: where $\chi (n, \nu)$ was defined in \eq{chi}. One can show that

2789: \eq{bsp} is equivalent to \eq{glreq} if one identifies

2790: \be

2791: \phi (x, {\un k}^2) \, = \, \frac{N_c \, S_\perp}{\as \, \pi^2} \, 

2792: {\tilde N} (k, Y = \ln 1/x_{Bj}),

2793: \ee

2794: which, combined with \eq{trfm}, leads to

2795: \be\label{fakephi}

2796: \phi (x, {\un k}^2) \, = \, \frac{N_c \, S_\perp}{\as \, 2 \, \pi^3} \, 

2797: \int d^2 x \, e^{- i \, {\un k} \cdot {\un x}} \, \frac{1}{x_\perp^2} \, 

2798: N(x_\perp, Y= \ln 1/x_{Bj}).

2799: \ee

2800: For $N$ from \eq{glaN2} the unintegrated gluon distribution function

2801: from \eq{fakephi} looks similar to the gluon distribution from

2802: \eq{ww2}. However, the important difference is that the

2803: Glauber-Mueller dipole amplitude $N_G$ which enters \eq{ww2} is the

2804: amplitude for a {\sl gluon} (adjoint) dipole, while $N$ in

2805: \eq{fakephi} is the amplitude for a {\sl quark} (fundamental) dipole. Even 

2806: this formal difference notwithstanding, it is not at all clear whether

2807: \eq{fakephi}, or even \eq{ww2}, would still be valid for the dipole amplitude $N$

2808: from \eq{eqN} with all the evolution effects included: after all,

2809: \eq{ww2} was derived only in the quasi-classical limit. We will return

2810: to this question in Sect. \ref{clpa} where we will discuss particle

2811: production.

2812: 

2813: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2814: 

2815: \subsection{Solving the Evolution Equations}

2816: \label{see}

2817: 

2818: After the JIMWLK and the BK evolution equation were written down there

2819: has been a number of analytical \cite{LT,yuri_bk,IIM1,MT,Mueller3} and

2820: numerical \cite{Braun1,GBMS,GLLM,Misha,AAMSW,RW} attempts to solve

2821: them. While an exact analytical solution valid both inside and outside

2822: of the saturation region still does not exist, there is a number of

2823: good approximations for various kinematic regions. Here we are {\sl

2824: not} going to give an extensive review of the existing approaches

2825: referring the interested reader to the existing review articles

2826: \cite{ILM,IV,Heribert}. Instead we will outline features of the solution

2827: of the evolution equations which will be most important for our

2828: discussion of particle production below.

2829: 

2830: \subsubsection{Linear Evolution}

2831: \label{LE}

2832: 

2833: When the dipole-nucleus interactions are weak and the forward

2834: scattering amplitude is small $N \ll 1$, we can neglect the quadratic

2835: term in \eq{eqN} and write \cite{dip1,dip2}

2836: \be\label{bfkl_dip}

2837: \frac{\partial N ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y)}{\partial Y} \, = \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \, 

2838: \int d^2 x_2 \, \frac{x_{01}^2}{x_{20}^2 \, x_{21}^2} \, 

2839: \left[ N ({\un x}_{02}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{21}, Y) + 

2840: N ({\un x}_{12}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{20}, Y) - N ({\un

2841: x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y) \right].

2842: \ee

2843: This equation is equivalent to the BFKL equation \cite{BFKL}, as has

2844: been shown in the framework of the dipole model in \cite{NW}.

2845: Defining the the eigenfunctions of the Casimir operators of conformal

2846: algebra \cite{Lipatov2,Lipatov3}

2847: \be\label{enn}

2848: E^{n, \nu} (\rho_0, \rho_1) \, = \, \left( \frac{\rho_{01}}{\rho_0 \,

2849: \rho_1} \right)^{\frac{1+n}{2} + i \nu} \ \left(

2850: \frac{\rho_{01}^*}{\rho_0^* \, \rho_1^*} \right)^{\frac{1-n}{2} + i

2851: \nu}

2852: \ee

2853: with (in general) complex coordinates $\rho_i$, one can show that they

2854: are also eigenfunctions of the dipole kernel of

2855: \eq{bfkl_dip} \cite{NW,KSW}

2856: \be\label{dipeig}

2857: \int d^2 x_2 \, \frac{x_{01}^2}{x_{02}^2 \,

2858: x_{12}^2} \, \left[ E^{n, \nu} (x_0, x_2) + E^{n, \nu} (x_2, x_1) -

2859: E^{n, \nu} (x_0, x_1) \right] \, = \, 4 \, \pi \, \chi(n, \nu) \,  

2860: E^{n, \nu} (x_0, x_1)

2861: \ee

2862: with $\chi(n, \nu)$ given by \eq{chi}. \eq{dipeig} demonstrates that

2863: the BFKL equation \cite{BFKL} and \eq{bfkl_dip} have the same

2864: eigenfunctions and eigenvalues, and are, therefore, equivalent.

2865: 

2866: Let us write down explicitly the solution of \eq{bfkl_dip} for the

2867: case of a large nucleus, where we can neglect the $\un b$-dependence

2868: in $N ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y)$ along with its dependence on the

2869: azimuthal angle of ${\un x}_{01}$. Using again the Fourier transform

2870: of \eq{trfm} we rewrite \eq{bfkl_dip} as (see \eq{bsp})

2871: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ksp}

2872:   \frac{\partial {\tilde N} (k, Y)}{ \partial Y} = \frac{2 \, \as \,

2873:   N_c}{\pi} \, \chi \left[ 0, \frac{i}{2} \left( 1 +

2874:   \frac{\partial}{\partial \ln k} \right) \right] \, {\tilde N} (k, Y)

2875: \end{eqnarray}

2876: the solution of which is given by

2877: \be\label{dsol1}

2878: {\tilde N} (k, Y) \, = \, \exp \left\{ \frac{2 \, \as \,

2879:   N_c}{\pi} \, Y \, \chi \left[ 0, \frac{i}{2} \left( 1 +

2880:   \frac{\partial}{\partial \ln k} \right) \right] \right\} \, {\tilde C} (k),

2881: \ee

2882: where ${\tilde C}(k)$ is some unknown function, which could be

2883: determined by using the initial conditions (\ref{glaN2}) in

2884: \eq{trfm}. To determine the high energy asymptotics of the solution

2885: (\ref{dsol1}) we write ${\tilde C}(k)$ as a Mellin transform

2886: \be\label{CM}

2887: C (k) \, = \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \, \left( \frac{Q_{s0}}{k} 

2888: \right)^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu} \, {\tilde C}_\nu.

2889: \ee

2890: Here $Q_{s0}$ is the saturation scale in the quasi-classical

2891: approximation given by \eq{qsmv}. From here on we will use the

2892: subscript $0$ to distinguish it from the full energy-dependent

2893: saturation scale which would result from our analysis of the

2894: JIMWLK and BK evolution equations. 

2895: 

2896: Substituting \eq{CM} in \eq{dsol1} we obtain

2897: \be\label{dsol2}

2898: {\tilde N} (k, Y) \, = \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \

2899: e^{2 \, \bas \, \chi (0, \nu) \, Y } \, \left( \frac{Q_{s0}}{k} 

2900: \right)^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu} \, {\tilde C}_\nu,

2901: \ee

2902: where we have defined

2903: \be\label{bas}

2904: \bas \, \equiv \, \frac{\as \, N_c}{\pi}.

2905: \ee

2906: Substituting the result of \eq{dsol2} into \eq{trfm} and integrating

2907: over $\un k$ yields

2908: \be\label{dsol3}

2909: N (x_T, Y) \, = \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \ e^{2 \, \bas \,

2910: \chi (0, \nu) \, Y } \, (x_T Q_{s0})^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu} \, C_\nu

2911: \ee

2912: where

2913: \be

2914: C_\nu \, \equiv \, {\tilde C}_\nu \, 2^{- 2 \, i \, \nu} \, \frac{\Gamma \left( 

2915: \frac{1 - 2 \, i \, \nu}{2}\right)}{\Gamma \left( 

2916: \frac{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu}{2}\right)}.

2917: \ee

2918: 

2919: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2920: \begin{figure}

2921: \begin{center}

2922: \epsfxsize=10cm

2923: \leavevmode

2924: \hbox{\epsffile{chi.ps}}

2925: \end{center}

2926: \caption{The eigenvalue of the BFKL kernel $\chi (0, \nu)$ plotted as a function of 

2927: $-i \, \nu$ (thick line). The thin straight line is due to the linear

2928: term $2 \, i \, \nu \, \ln (x_T Q_{s0})$ in the exponent of

2929: \eq{dsol4}. The thin curve is a sum of the thick line and the thin

2930: straight line and it represents the complete expression in the

2931: exponent of \eq{dsol4}. }

2932: \label{chi_fig}

2933: \end{figure}

2934: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2935: \eq{dsol3} gives us the solution of the dipole version of the BFKL equation 

2936: (\ref{bfkl_dip}) with the coefficients $C_\nu$ to be fixed from the

2937: initial conditions of \eq{glaN2}. Now let us rewrite \eq{dsol3} as

2938: \be\label{dsol4}

2939: N (x_T, Y) \, = \, x_T Q_{s0} \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \

2940: \exp \left[ 2 \, \bas \, \chi (0, \nu) \, Y  + 2 \, i \, \nu \, 

2941: \ln (x_T Q_{s0}) \right] \, C_\nu

2942: \ee

2943: The integral in \eq{dsol4} can be approximated by the saddle point

2944: method in the following two important cases.

2945: 

2946: \begin{itemize}

2947: 

2948: \item $x_T Q_{s0} \lsim 1$ In this case the term 

2949: $2 \, i \, \nu \, \ln (x_T Q_{s0})$ in the exponent of

2950: \eq{dsol4} is small compared to $\bas \, Y$ and does not significantly 

2951: influence the position of the saddle point. The saddle point is

2952: determined mostly by the function $\chi (0, \nu)$, which is shown in

2953: \fig{chi_fig} by thick line as a function of $-i\, \nu$: there one can

2954: clearly see a saddle point near $\nu = 0$.  We use the expansion of

2955: $\chi (0, \nu)$ around $\nu =0$ (see \eq{sp}) to determine the saddle

2956: point

2957: \be\label{splla}

2958: \nu^*_{LLA} \, \approx \,  \frac{i \, \ln (x_T Q_{s0})}{14 \,

2959: \zeta (3) \, \bas \, Y},

2960: \ee

2961: where the subscript LLA stands for leading logarithmic

2962: approximation. Performing the saddle point integration we write

2963: (cf. \eq{spa})

2964: \be\label{dsol5}

2965: N (x_T, Y) \, = \, x_T Q_{s0} \, C_{\nu^*_{LLA}} \,

2966: \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{14 \, \zeta (3) \, \bas \, Y}} \ \exp \left[ (\alpha_P - 1) \, Y -

2967: \frac{\ln^2 (x_T Q_{s0})}{14 \, \zeta (3) \, \bas \, Y}

2968: \right]

2969: \ee

2970: with the BFKL pomeron intercept $\alpha_P - 1$ given by \eq{bfkl_int}.

2971: 

2972: \item $x_T Q_{s0} \ll 1$ This case is also known as the double 

2973: logarithmic approximation (DLA), since here transverse logarithms like

2974: $\ln (x_T Q_{s0})$ become important, leading to a new resummation

2975: parameter $\as \, Y \, \ln (x_T Q_{s0})$. Transverse logarithms are of

2976: course resummed by the Dokshitzer, Gribov, Lipatov, Altarelli, Parisi

2977: (DGLAP) evolution equation \cite{DGLAP}. The DLA region is where the

2978: results of DGLAP and BFKL are identical \cite{MuellerCarg}, since

2979: there both equations resum powers of the same parameter $\as \, Y \,

2980: \ln (x_T Q_{s0})$.

2981: %, one by resumming terms with $\as \, \ln (x_T

2982: %Q_{s0})$, the other one by resumming powers of $\as \, Y$. 

2983: 

2984: As shown in \fig{chi_fig} by the thin curve, when $\ln (1/x_T

2985: Q_{s0})$ becomes large, it shifts the position of saddle point towards

2986: $\nu = - i/2$ \cite{Ryskin}. In that region we approximate $\chi (0,

2987: \nu)$ by

2988: \be\label{spdla}

2989: \chi (0, \nu) \, \approx \, \frac{1}{1-2 \, i \, \nu}

2990: \ee

2991: which leads to the saddle point at 

2992: \be\label{spdla1}

2993: \nu^*_{DLA} \, \approx \, - \frac{i}{2} \, 

2994: \left( 1 - \sqrt{\frac{2 \, \bas \, Y}{\ln 1/(x_T

2995: Q_{s0})}} \right).

2996: \ee

2997: Using \eq{spdla} in \eq{dsol4} and performing the integration over

2998: $\nu$ in the saddle point approximation yields

2999: \be\label{dsol6}

3000: N (x_T, Y) \, = \, (x_T Q_{s0})^2 \, C_{\nu^*_{DLA}} \,

3001: \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} \, (2 \, \bas \, Y)^{1/4} \, \ln^{-3/4} \left( \frac{1}{x_T

3002: Q_{s0}} \right) \ \exp \left[ 2 \, \sqrt{2 \, \bas \, Y \, \ln 1/(x_T

3003: Q_{s0})} \right].

3004: \ee

3005: The coefficient $C_{\nu^*_{DLA}}$ in \eq{dsol6} is in fact important

3006: \cite{KKT}, since it may modify the prefactor: if we require, for instance, 

3007: that at $Y=0$ \eq{dsol4} reduces to the amplitude given by a two-gluon

3008: exchange from \eq{1sc3}, or, equivalently, by the first term in

3009: expansion of \eq{glaN2}, than we would get

3010: \be\label{c2g}

3011: C_{\nu } \, = \, \frac{1}{4 \, \pi \, (1 - 2 \, i \, \nu)^2}.

3012: \ee

3013: Using \eq{c2g} in \eq{dsol6} yields

3014: \be\label{dsol7}

3015: N (x_T, Y) \, = \, (x_T Q_{s0})^2 \,

3016: \frac{1}{8 \, \sqrt{\pi}} \, (2 \, \bas \, Y)^{-3/4} \, \ln^{1/4} \left( \frac{1}{x_T

3017: Q_{s0}} \right) \ \exp \left[ 2 \, \sqrt{2 \, \bas \, Y \, \ln

3018: 1/(x_T Q_{s0})} \right].

3019: \ee

3020: \end{itemize}

3021: 

3022: The general analytic linear solution found above in \eq{dsol4} allows

3023: one to estimate the boundary of the saturation region by determining

3024: the limit of applicability of the linear equation (\ref{bfkl_dip})

3025: \cite{LT,IIM1,MT}. Linear evolution is applicable only if $N \ll 1$, 

3026: and, therefore, breaks down when $N \sim 1$. To estimate when that

3027: happens, let us rewrite \eq{dsol4} as

3028: \be\label{dsol8}

3029: N (x_T, Y) \, = \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \

3030: \exp \left[ 2 \, \bas \, \chi (0, \nu) \, Y  + (2 \, i \, \nu + 1 ) \, 

3031: \ln (x_T Q_{s0}) \right] \, C_\nu.

3032: \ee

3033: Following \cite{MT} we argue that $N$ becomes of order one when the

3034: value of the exponent in \eq{dsol8} at the saddle point vanishes. This

3035: translates into the following two equations

3036: \be\label{mt1}

3037: 2 \, \bas \, \chi' (0, \nu_0) \, Y + 2 \, i \, \ln (Q_{s0}/Q_s) \, =

3038: \, 0

3039: \ee

3040: (saddle point condition) and

3041: \be\label{mt2}

3042: 2 \, \bas \, \chi (0, \nu_0) \, Y  + (2 \, i \, \nu_0 + 1 ) \, 

3043: \ln (Q_{s0}/Q_s) \, = \, 0

3044: \ee

3045: (vanishing of the power of the exponent at the saddle point). We have

3046: substituted $x_T \approx 1/Q_s$ in Eqs. (\ref{mt1}) and

3047: (\ref{mt2}), which corresponds to {\sl defining} the saturation scale

3048: $Q_s$ by requiring that $N(1/Q_s, Y) \approx 1$. One can see that this

3049: definition is consistent with the quasi-classical approach of

3050: Sect. \ref{QCA}: if we put $Y=0$ in Eqs. (\ref{mt1}) and (\ref{mt2}),

3051: which corresponds to removing the small-$x$ evolution, we obtain $Q_s

3052: = Q_{s0}$ as the solution, meaning that the full saturation scale

3053: $Q_s$ maps onto the quasi-classical saturation scale $Q_{s0}$ in the

3054: small rapidity limit.

3055: 

3056: Solving Eqs. (\ref{mt1}) and (\ref{mt2}) yields \cite{MT}

3057: \be\label{qsy0}

3058: Q_s (Y) \, = \, Q_{s0} \, \exp \left\{ 2 \, \bas \, \frac{\chi (0,

3059: \nu_0)}{2 \, i \, \nu_0 + 1} \, Y \right\}

3060: \ee

3061: with 

3062: \be\label{nu0}

3063: \frac{\chi' (0, \nu_0)}{\chi (0, \nu_0)} \, = \, \frac{2 \, i}{2 \, i \, \nu_0 + 1}

3064: \ee

3065: giving 

3066: \be\label{nu0val}

3067: \nu_0 \approx - i \, 0.1276. 

3068: \ee

3069: Using this value of $\nu_0$ in

3070: \eq{qsy0} we get

3071: \be\label{qsy1}

3072: Q_s (Y) \, \approx \, Q_{s0} \, e^{ 2.44 \, \bas \, Y }.

3073: \ee

3074: A more detailed determination of the saturation scale specifying the

3075: prefactor in \eq{qsy0} can be found in \cite{MT,IIM1}.

3076: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3077: \begin{figure}

3078: \begin{center}

3079: \epsfxsize=11.5cm

3080: \leavevmode

3081: \hbox{\epsffile{satbk.eps}}

3082: \end{center}

3083: \caption{Our understanding of high energy QCD interactions plotted in the plane 

3084: of rapidity $Y = \ln 1/x_{Bj}$ and $\ln Q^2$ (see text).  }

3085: \label{satbk}

3086: \end{figure}

3087: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3088: 

3089: \eq{qsy0}, or, equivalently, \eq{qsy1}, give us the dependence of the saturation 

3090: scale $Q_s$ on rapidity or energy. We see that as rapidity $Y$

3091: increases, so does the saturation scale. \eq{qsy0} generalizes

3092: \eq{qsmv} for $Q_{s0}$ by including the effects of small-$x$ evolution, which 

3093: bring in rapidity dependence. Combining the two equations one writes

3094: \be\label{qsy2}

3095: Q_s^2 (Y) \, = \, \frac{4 \, \pi \, \as^2 \, C_F}{N_c} \, \rho \,

3096: T({\un b}) \, \exp \left\{ 4 \, \bas \, \frac{\chi (0,

3097: \nu_0)}{2 \, i \, \nu_0 + 1} \, Y \right\}.

3098: \ee

3099: \eq{qsy2} demonstrates that for a large nucleus and at high energies the saturation 

3100: scale is proportional to

3101: \be\label{qsy3}

3102: Q_s^2 \, \sim \, A^{1/3} \, e^{c \, \bas \, Y} \, \sim \,

3103: A^{1/3} \, s^{c \, \bas}

3104: \ee

3105: with $c$ some constant, $c=4.88$ in \eq{qsy1}.  Therefore, $Q_s$ is an

3106: increasing function of both the atomic number $A$ and of center of

3107: mass energy $s$. It only gets larger as we go to higher energies,

3108: making the coupling constant $\as (Q_s)$ smaller. Thus the saturation

3109: approach is better justified as we go to progressively higher

3110: energies.

3111: 

3112: 

3113: Our understanding of high energy scattering at this point in the

3114: article is summarized in \fig{satbk}. There we depict the plane of two

3115: variables essential to the high energy scattering: the typical

3116: transverse momentum scale $Q^2$ and the rapidity $Y=\ln

3117: 1/x_{Bj}$. Right away the region of $Q < \Lambda_{QCD}$ should be

3118: excluded from our analysis here, since there the coupling is large and

3119: not much can be understood using the perturbative methods we describe

3120: here. At $Q \gg \Lambda_{QCD}$ we may distinguish two important

3121: regions. One region is given by $Q > Q_s (Y)$, where the amplitude $N$

3122: is small and the linear BFKL evolution equation (\ref{bfkl_dip})

3123: \cite{BFKL} applies, along with the DGLAP evolution \cite{DGLAP}, as

3124: shown in \fig{satbk}. In the region with $Q < Q_s (Y)$ the amplitude

3125: $N$ becomes of order $1$ and the non-linear effects of the BK and

3126: JIMWLK equations \cite{jklw1}-\cite{Weigert:2000gi},

3127: \cite{balitsky,yuri_bk} become important: this region is called the

3128: {\sl saturation region} and is given by the shaded area in

3129: \fig{satbk}. Saturation region is also called Color Glass

3130: Condensate. It is important to point out that all this non-linear

3131: dynamics takes place at $Q_s \gsim Q \gg \Lambda_{QCD}$, i.e., in the

3132: perturbative region where the strong coupling constant is small and

3133: our calculations are justified.

3134: 

3135: 

3136: 

3137: \subsubsection{Geometric Scaling}

3138: \label{GS}

3139: 

3140: Let us now analyze the behavior of the solution of \eq{eqN} deep

3141: inside the saturation region, where the non-linear effects are very

3142: important. Deep inside the saturation region, when the dipole size

3143: $x_T$ becomes large, $x_T \gg 1/Q_s$ (but still $x_T \ll

3144: 1/\Lambda_{QCD}$), the quasi-classical Glauber-Mueller amplitude from

3145: \eq{glaN2} approaches $1$. Analyzing \eq{eqN} we easily see that $N=1$ 

3146: is also a stationary solution of that equation. Therefore, we conclude

3147: that

3148: \be\label{bd}

3149: N ({\un x}, {\un b}, Y) \, = \, 1 , \hspace*{1cm} x_T \gg 1/Q_s (Y),

3150: \ee

3151: corresponding to the black disk limit of \eq{black} \cite{LL}. Now let

3152: us determine the asymptotic approach to the black disk limit of

3153: \eq{bd} following \cite{LT,IIM1}. To do that, let us write 

3154: \be\label{NS}

3155: N ({\un x}, {\un b}, Y) \, = \, 1 - S ({\un x}, {\un b}, Y)

3156: \ee

3157: where $S$ is the $S$-matrix of the dipole-nucleus collision, which is

3158: small when the system approaches the black disk limit ($N$ approaches

3159: 1). Substituting \eq{NS} in \eq{eqN} and keeping only terms linear in

3160: $S$ yields \cite{LT,IIM1,IV}

3161: \be\label{eqS1}

3162: \frac{\partial S ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y)}{\partial Y} \, = \, - \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \, 

3163: \int d^2 x_2 \, \frac{x_{01}^2}{x_{20}^2 \, x_{21}^2} \, S ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y),

3164: \ee

3165: where the integral over dipole sizes goes over $x_{02}, x_{12} > 1/Q_s

3166: (Y)$. Hence we have to replace the ultraviolet (UV) cutoff from

3167: \eq{dip3} with $1/Q_s (Y)$ obtaining

3168: \be\label{eqS2}

3169: \frac{\partial S ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y)}{\partial Y} \, = \, - 

3170: \frac{4 \, \as \, C_F}{\pi} \, 

3171: \ln \left[ x_{01} Q_s (Y) \right] \, S ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, Y).

3172: \ee

3173: Defining the {\sl scaling} variable 

3174: \be\label{xidef}

3175: \xi \, \equiv \, \ln \left[ x_{01}^2 Q_s^2 (Y) \right]

3176: \ee

3177: with (cf. \eq{qsy3})

3178: \be\label{cdef}

3179: c \, \bas \, \equiv \, \frac{\partial \xi}{\partial Y} \, = \,

3180: \frac{\partial \ln \left[ x_{01}^2 Q_s^2 (Y) \right]}{\partial Y}

3181: \ee

3182: we rewrite \eq{eqS2} as

3183: \be\label{eqS3}

3184: \frac{\partial S}{\partial \xi} \, = \, - \frac{1}{c} \, \xi \, S.

3185: \ee

3186: Solution of \eq{eqS3} can be straightforwardly written as

3187: \cite{LT,IIM1}

3188: \be\label{LTs}

3189: S (\xi) \, = \, S_0 \, e^{-\xi^2 /c} \, = \, S_0 \, e^{-\ln^2 \left[

3190: x_{01}^2 Q_s^2 (Y) \right]/c}

3191: \ee

3192: with $S_0 <1$ a constant. Corresponding dipole amplitude $N$ is given

3193: by

3194: \be\label{LTf}

3195: N (\xi)  \, = \, 1 - S_0 \, e^{-\xi^2 /c} \, = \, 1 - S_0 \, e^{-\ln^2 \left[

3196: x_{\perp}^2 Q_s^2 (Y) \right]/c}, \hspace*{1cm} x_T \gg 1/Q_s (Y).

3197: \ee

3198: \eq{LTf} is knows as Levin-Tuchin formula \cite{LT}.

3199: 

3200: Note that the $S$-matrix and the amplitude $N$ of the dipole-nucleus

3201: scattering given by Eqs. (\ref{LTs}) and (\ref{LTf}) are functions of

3202: a single variable $\xi$, or, more precisely, of the combination

3203: $x_{\perp} Q_s (Y)$. This phenomenon is known as {\sl geometric

3204: scaling}. The original argument for geometric scaling has been given

3205: by McLerran and Venugopalan in \cite{MV}, where it was suggested that

3206: small-$x$ nuclear or hadronic wave functions are described by a

3207: momentum scale $Q_s$ being the only scale in the problem and,

3208: therefore, all transverse coordinate (or momentum) dependent physical

3209: observables should depend on the combination $x_{\perp} Q_s (Y)$ (or

3210: $k_T/Q_s$). Geometric scaling has been demonstrated in an analysis of

3211: the HERA DIS data by Stasto, Golec-Biernat and Kwiecinski in

3212: \cite{geom}, presenting one of the strongest arguments for observation 

3213: of saturation phenomena at HERA. These results are shown here in

3214: \fig{gsdis} from \cite{geom}, where the authors of \cite{geom} plot combined HERA 

3215: data on the total DIS $\gamma^* p$ cross section $\sigma^{\gamma^*

3216: p}_{tot}$ for $x_{Bj} < 0.01$ as a function of the scaling variable

3217: $\tau = Q^2/Q_s^2 (x_{Bj})$. One can see that, amazingly enough, all

3218: the data falls on the same curve, indicating that $\sigma^{\gamma^*

3219: p}_{tot}$ is a function of a single variable $Q^2/Q_s^2 (x_{Bj})$! 

3220: This gives us the best to date experimental proof of geometric

3221: scaling. (For a similar analysis of DIS data on nuclear targets see

3222: \cite{FRWS} and the first reference of \cite{AAMSW}.)

3223: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3224: \begin{figure}[t]

3225: \begin{center}

3226: \epsfxsize=12cm

3227: \leavevmode

3228: \hbox{\epsffile{gsdis.eps}}

3229: \end{center}

3230: \caption{HERA data on the total DIS $\gamma^* p$ cross section plotted in 

3231: \protect\cite{geom} as a function of the scaling variable $\tau = Q^2/Q_s^2 (x_{Bj})$. }

3232: \label{gsdis}

3233: \end{figure}

3234: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3235: 

3236: The fact that geometric scaling is a property of the solution of the

3237: BK equation has been later demonstrated in \cite{LT,IIM1}. In the next

3238: Section we will also show that such scaling is also valid outside of

3239: the $Q < Q_s (Y)$ saturation region.

3240: 

3241: 

3242: \subsubsection{Extended Geometric Scaling}

3243: 

3244: In \cite{IIM1} Iancu, Itakura and McLerran noticed that the geometric

3245: scaling of \cite{LT}, which was originally derived as a solution of

3246: the BK equation inside the saturation region, also applies in an area

3247: outside of that region. To see this let us first remember that outside

3248: of saturation region ($x_T < 1/Q_s (Y)$) the nonlinear BK equation

3249: (\ref{eqN}) reduces to the linear BFKL evolution

3250: (\ref{bfkl_dip}). Therefore, the dipole-nucleus amplitude $N$ is still

3251: given by \eq{dsol8}, which we rewrite here as

3252: \be\label{dsol9}

3253: N (x_T, Y) \, = \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \, e^{P (\nu)} \,

3254: C_\nu

3255: \ee

3256: with

3257: \be

3258: P (\nu) \, = \, 2 \, \bas \, \chi (0, \nu) \, Y + (2 \, i \, \nu + 1 )

3259: \, \ln (x_T Q_{s0}).

3260: \ee

3261: In order to perform the integration in \eq{dsol9} around the saddle

3262: point from \eq{nu0} we expand $P (\nu)$ around $\nu_0$

3263: \be\label{ptay}

3264: P(\nu) \, = \, P (\nu_0) + P'(\nu_0) \, (\nu - \nu_0) + \frac{1}{2} \,

3265: P'' (\nu_0) \, (\nu - \nu_0)^2 + \ldots .

3266: \ee

3267: Following \cite{IIM1} we first assume that the integral in \eq{dsol9}

3268: is dominated by its value at the saddle point $\nu_0$. Then noticing

3269: that

3270: \be\label{p0}

3271: P (\nu_0) \, = \, (2 \, i \, \nu_0 + 1 ) \, \ln \left[ x_T Q_{s}

3272: (Y) \right] \, = \, \left( \frac{1}{2} + i \, \nu_0 \right) \, \xi

3273: \ee

3274: we obtain \cite{IIM1}

3275: \be\label{dsol10}

3276: N (x_T, Y) \, \approx \, C_{\nu_0} \, e^{P (\nu_0)} \, = \, \,

3277: C_{\nu_0} \, \left[ x_T Q_{s} (Y) \right]^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu_0} \,

3278: = \, C_{\nu_0} \, e^{\left( \frac{1}{2} + i \, \nu_0 \right) \, \xi}.

3279: \ee

3280: \eq{dsol10} obviously exhibits geometric scaling, since the amplitude 

3281: $N$ in it is a function of $\xi$ only. Therefore geometric scaling

3282: also works outside of the saturation region for $x_T < 1/Q_s (Y)$

3283: ($Q > Q_s (Y)$) \cite{IIM1}. This effect is called {\sl extended

3284: geometric scaling}.

3285: 

3286: To determine the applicability region of \eq{dsol11} we use the

3287: formula (\ref{ptay}), truncate the series in it at the quadratic

3288: order, substitute the result in \eq{dsol9} and integrate over $\nu$

3289: obtaining

3290: \be\label{dsol11}

3291: N (x_T, Y) \, = \, C_{\nu_0} \, \sqrt{\frac{2 \, \pi}{- P''

3292: (\nu_0)}} \, \exp \left\{P (\nu_0) - \frac{[P' (\nu_0)]^2}{2 \, P''

3293: (\nu_0)} \right\} .

3294: \ee

3295: Since

3296: \be\label{p1}

3297: P' (\nu_0) \, = \, 2 \, i \, \ln \left[ x_T Q_{s} (Y) \right] \, =

3298: \, i \, \xi

3299: \ee

3300: and

3301: \be\label{p2}

3302: P'' (\nu_0) \, = \, 2 \, \bas \, \chi'' (0, \nu_0) \, Y

3303: \ee

3304: the second (diffusion) term in the exponent of \eq{dsol11} along with

3305: the prefactor in \eq{dsol11} violate geometric scaling. These scaling

3306: violation corrections are small and can be neglected as long as

3307: \be\label{pcond}

3308: \frac{[P' (\nu_0)]^2}{2 \, P'' (\nu_0)} \, \ll \, P (\nu_0).

3309: \ee

3310: %(The prefactor in the exponent will be absorbed in the definition of

3311: %$Q_s (Y)$ in a more complete treatment than the one outlined here in

3312: %Sect. \ref{LE} \cite{MT}.) 

3313: Using Eqs. (\ref{p0}), (\ref{p1}) and (\ref{p2}) in \eq{pcond} yields

3314: \be

3315: x_T \, > \, \frac{1}{Q_s (Y)} \, e^{\bas \, \chi'' (0, \nu_0) \,

3316: (2 \, i \, \nu + 1 ) \, Y}.

3317: \ee

3318: Replacing $x_T$ by $1/Q$ this translates into

3319: \be\label{gs1}

3320: Q \, < \, Q_s (Y) \, e^{- \bas \, \chi'' (0, \nu_0) \, (2 \, i \,

3321: \nu_0 + 1 ) \, Y} \, = \, Q_s (Y) \, e^{30.4 \, \bas \, Y}.

3322: \ee

3323: However, the condition in \eq{gs1}, while being necessary for extended

3324: geometric scaling to apply, is not sufficient. What we learn from

3325: \eq{dsol11} is that geometric scaling is violated when the regions of 

3326: $\nu$ further away from $\nu_0$ start to contribute in the integral of

3327: \eq{dsol9}. This is also demonstrated in the DLA approximation: clearly 

3328: \eq{dsol7} can not be written as a function of a single variable $\xi$ and 

3329: thus violates geometric scaling. We may, therefore, define the border

3330: of the extended geometric scaling region by the transition point

3331: between the LLA saddle point of \eq{splla} and the DLA saddle point of

3332: \eq{spdla1} \cite{IIM1}. The point of closest approach of the two saddle 

3333: points in Eqs. (\ref{splla}) and (\ref{spdla1}) is at 

3334: \be

3335: \ln \frac{1}{x_T \, Q_{s0}} \, \approx \, 3.28 \ \bas \, Y 

3336: \ee

3337: such that the border of extended geometric scaling region is defined

3338: by the scale

3339: \be

3340: k_{\rm geom} \, \equiv \, Q_{s0} \, e^{3.28 \ \bas \, Y}  

3341: \ee

3342: which, using \eq{qsy1} can be rewritten as \cite{IIM1,KKT}

3343: \be\label{kgeom}

3344: k_{\rm geom} \, = \, Q_{s} (Y) \, \left( \frac{Q_{s} (Y)}{Q_{s0}}

3345: \right)^{0.34}.

3346: \ee

3347: Therefore, extended geometric scaling is valid up to 

3348: \be

3349: Q \, \leq \, k_{\rm geom},

3350: \ee

3351: which is a more restrictive condition than \eq{gs1}. The exact value

3352: of $k_{\rm geom}$ may still be slightly different from the one given by

3353: \eq{kgeom} \cite{IIM1,MT,Mueller3}: what is important is that at large $Y$ this 

3354: scale is much larger than the saturation scale, $Q_s (Y) \ll k_{\rm

3355: geom}$, allowing for a parametrically wide region of extended

3356: geometric scaling. 

3357: 

3358: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3359: \begin{figure}[t]

3360: \begin{center}

3361: \epsfxsize=11.5cm

3362: \leavevmode

3363: \hbox{\epsffile{satgs.eps}}

3364: \end{center}

3365: \caption{The summary of our knowledge of high energy QCD interactions 

3366: plotted again in the plane of rapidity $Y = \ln 1/x_{Bj}$ and $\ln Q^2$.}

3367: \label{satgs}

3368: \end{figure}

3369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3370: 

3371: The summary of our current knowledge of high energy interactions is

3372: shown in \fig{satgs}. One can see there that, on top of the saturation

3373: region $Q \leq Q_s (Y)$ of \fig{satbk}, one now has the extended

3374: geometric scaling region $Q_s (Y) \, < \, Q \, \leq \, k_{\rm geom}$,

3375: where the linear BFKL evolution still applies with its solution having

3376: the property of geometric scaling due to the presence of saturation

3377: region.

3378: 

3379: Indeed the property of extended geometric scaling was derived here for

3380: the case of DIS where a small projectile ($q\bar q$ dipole) scatters

3381: on a nucleus. Saturation effects were only present in the nuclear wave

3382: function. At extremely high energies gluon saturation may take place

3383: even in the projectile's wave function: to take this into account

3384: pomeron loop resummation needs to be performed

3385: \cite{loop1}-\cite{loop5}. While such resummation is still an open problem, 

3386: it has been argued in \cite{IMM,DDD} that such pomeron loop effects

3387: along with energy conservation constraints may potentially lead to a

3388: violation of geometric scaling at very high energies.

3389: 

3390: The interested reader, who would like to learn more about how to

3391: obtain the above analytical solutions in a more complete way keeping

3392: all the prefactors and on how to include the running coupling effects

3393: into the problem is referred to \cite{IIM1,MT,Mueller3} for further

3394: reading. An elegant solution of the BK equation, reducing it in the

3395: geometric scaling region to Kolmogorov-Petrovsky-Piskunov (KPP)

3396: equation, which has traveling wave solutions, was found in \cite{MP}.

3397: 

3398: 

3399: \subsubsection{Numerical Solutions}

3400: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3401: \begin{figure}[b]

3402: \begin{center}

3403: \epsfxsize=11.5cm

3404: \leavevmode

3405: \hbox{\epsffile{bkcont.eps}}

3406: \end{center}

3407: \caption{The contour plot of the numerical solutions of the BFKL and BK evolution equations 

3408: in momentum space ($k_T \, {\tilde N} ({\un k}, Y)$) as a function of

3409: transverse momentum $k$ and rapidity $Y = \ln 1/x_{Bj}$ from

3410: \protect\cite{GBMS}.}

3411: \label{bkcont}

3412: \end{figure}

3413: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3414: 

3415: As we have mentioned before, both the BK and the JIMWLK evolution

3416: equations have been studied numerically in

3417: \cite{Braun1,GBMS,GLLM,Misha,AAMSW,RW}. Here we are not going to give 

3418: a comprehensive review of these solutions, but will just show the

3419: results of one of them which summarizes all the important qualitative

3420: features of the nonlinear evolution and shows how it resolves the

3421: problems of the BFKL equation stated in the end of Sect. \ref{BFKLeq}.

3422: 

3423: As we have already seen in Sect. \ref{GS}, the solution of BK

3424: evolution equation approaches $N = 1$ at very high energy. Using

3425: \eq{sigtot} we see that this behavior corresponds to the black disk 

3426: limit for total cross sections given by \eq{black}. The total cross

3427: section in \eq{black} is constant and, therefore, does not violate the

3428: Froissart bound of \eq{fro}. Therefore the nonlinear evolution appears

3429: to resolve the unitarity problem of the BFKL equation, posed as

3430: question {\bf (i)} in Sect. \ref{BFKLeq}

3431: \cite{yuri_bk,Braun1,LT,IIM1,MT,Mueller3,GBMS,GLLM,Misha,AAMSW,RW}. 

3432: (More precisely, unitarity is restored at a given impact parameter

3433: ${\un b}$: integration over ${\un b}$ in \eq{sigtot} may still give a

3434: cross section growing with energy due to the diffusion of the boundary

3435: of the black disk which increases its radius $R$ and the area $\pi

3436: R^2$ and, hence, the total cross section $\sigma_{tot} = 2 \, \pi \,

3437: R^2$ (see \cite{KW1,FIIM} and the second reference in \cite{GBMS}).)

3438: 

3439: 

3440: To answer the question {\bf (ii)} in Sect. \ref{BFKLeq} regarding the

3441: diffusion into the infrared shown by the Bartels cone of \fig{cone} we

3442: will present one result from the numerical solution of the BK equation

3443: done in \cite{GBMS}. In \fig{bkcont} the authors of \cite{GBMS} plot

3444: the lines of constant value for the numerical solution of the BFKL and

3445: BK equations in momentum space. Namely they make a contour plot of

3446: $k_T \, {\tilde N} ({\un k}, Y)$ from \eq{trfm} scaled down by the

3447: maximum value reached by that function in the phase space region

3448: considered \cite{GBMS} as a function of transverse momentum $k$ and

3449: rapidity $Y = \ln 1/x_{Bj}$. One can see that the solution of the BFKL

3450: equation (dashed lines in \fig{bkcont}) spreads out as the rapidity

3451: increases ($x_{Bj}$ decreases). This is the diffusion discussed in

3452: Sect. \ref{BFKLeq} \cite{Bartels}, which is dangerous because it

3453: generated non-perturbative low-$k_T$ gluons, for which our small

3454: coupling treatment would not apply. \fig{bkcont} shows that the

3455: nonlinear BK evolution (shown by solid lines in \fig{bkcont}) avoids

3456: this problem. The effect of non-linear term in \eq{eqN} is to drive

3457: the constant value lines of the solution towards higher momenta, which

3458: is consistent with increase of the saturation scale in \eq{qsy0}, and

3459: to eliminate the diffusion spread of the solution: as one can see from

3460: \fig{bkcont} the width of the $k_T$-distribution of the BK solution is 

3461: roughly independent of rapidity. This solves the IR diffusion problem

3462: posed as question {\bf (ii)} in Sect. \ref{BFKLeq}. Similar results

3463: were obtained by other numerical simulations of the BK

3464: \cite{Braun1,GLLM,Misha,AAMSW} and the JIMWLK \cite{RW} evolution equations. 

3465: 

3466: 

3467: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3468: 

3469: \section{Particle Production in pA Collisions}

3470: \label{pppa}

3471: 

3472: In this Section we apply the formalism of saturation/Color Glass

3473: Condensate physics to the problem of particle production in

3474: proton-nucleus ($pA$) collisions, which is directly relevant to

3475: deuteron-gold collision experiments at RHIC advertised in our paper's

3476: title. The Section is structured in the following way: first, in

3477: Sect. \ref{clpa}, we calculate gluon production in the quasi-classical

3478: approximation (McLerran-Venugopalan model) of Sect. \ref{QCA}. We will

3479: then continue in Sect. \ref{qepa} by including the effects of BK and

3480: JIMWLK quantum evolution from Sect. \ref{QE} into the obtained

3481: expressions for gluon production cross section. We then calculate

3482: valence quark production in Sect. \ref{clquark} in the approach where

3483: inclusion of quantum evolution is straightforward. We move on to

3484: electromagnetic probes in Sect. \ref{ep} by deriving prompt photon and

3485: dilepton production cross sections. In Sect. \ref{2pi} we study

3486: two-particle correlations by calculating two-gluon, gluon-valence

3487: quark and $q\bar q$ pair production cross sections.

3488: 

3489: 

3490: 

3491: \subsection{Gluon Production in the Classical Approximation}

3492: \label{clpa}

3493: 

3494: \subsubsection{Gluon Production Cross Section}

3495: \label{clglue}

3496: 

3497: Here we are interested in calculating the inclusive single gluon

3498: production cross section in $pA$ collisions. We assume that, in the

3499: center of mass frame, the gluons light cone momentum components are

3500: much smaller than that of the proton and the nucleus. If in the center

3501: of mass frame the proton has a large $p^-$ component of its light cone

3502: momentum, we will be interested in produced gluons with $k^- \ll

3503: p^-$. Conversely, if a nucleon in the nucleus has a large $p'^+$

3504: component of its momentum, then $k^+ \ll p'^+$. 

3505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3506: \begin{figure}[ht]

3507: \begin{center}

3508: \epsfxsize=17cm

3509: \leavevmode

3510: \hbox{\epsffile{pa.eps}}

3511: \end{center}

3512: \caption{Diagrams contributing to gluon production in $pA$ collision in 

3513: $A^+ =0$ (proton) light cone gauge in the quasi-classical

3514: approximation. }

3515: \label{pa}

3516: \end{figure}

3517: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3518: 

3519: Just like for the gluon field of a single nucleus in Sect. \ref{MV},

3520: the problem of gluon production in $pA$ collisions in the

3521: quasi-classical approximation can be formulated as the problem of

3522: finding the classical gluon field from the Yang-Mills equations

3523: [\eq{YMeq}] with the source current now given by both the nucleus and

3524: the proton \cite{KMW1,KMW2,KR,GM,DM}. The outgoing gluon line of the

3525: resulting gluon field can be truncated and the gluon can be put on the

3526: mass shell, giving the production amplitude needed for constructing

3527: production cross section. The classical gluon field of the proton and

3528: the nucleus, or, equivalently, the resulting production cross section,

3529: would resum powers of the parameter $\as^2 \, A^{1/3}$ (see \eq{mrp},

3530: just like the classical gluon distribution from \eq{ww2} or the

3531: dipole-nucleus forward scattering amplitude in \eq{glaN2}. This

3532: program has been carried out in \cite{DM} and the classical gluon

3533: field produced in $pA$ has been found there. However, here we use a

3534: different strategy: instead of calculating the classical gluon field,

3535: we calculate the production cross section directly by summing

3536: diagrams, following \cite{KM} (see also \cite{KTS,yuriaa,yuridiff}).

3537: 

3538: 

3539: We begin by choosing the gauge: it turns out to be much simpler to

3540: work in the light cone gauge of the projectile (proton). Let us agree

3541: that, in the center of mass frame, the proton is moving in the light

3542: cone $-$ direction: that means we will be working in $A^- = 0$ light

3543: cone gauge. Again we will use the light cone perturbation theory

3544: (LCPT) \cite{BL,BPP}. The diagrams contributing to gluon production in

3545: $A^- = 0$ light cone gauge in the LCPT framework are shown in

3546: \fig{pa}, where one should also add (but we do not show) the complex 

3547: conjugate of the graph in \fig{pa}B, which is obtained from the graph

3548: in \fig{pa}B by mirror-reflecting it with respect to a vertical axis.

3549: 

3550:  

3551: The physical picture of the gluon production is the following: the

3552: incoming proton may already have a gluon in its light cone wave

3553: function before the collision with the nucleus and the system of the

3554: proton and gluon would multiply rescatter on the nucleons in the

3555: nucleus. Alternatively the proton can emit the gluon after the

3556: multiple rescatterings in the nucleus. Just like in derivation of the

3557: BK equation in Sect. \ref{BKsect}, the diagrams where the gluon is

3558: emitted during the proton's passing through the nucleus are suppressed

3559: by powers of its large light cone momentum $p^-$, i.e., by powers of

3560: the center of mass energy of the system (see the discussion following

3561: \eq{lcoh}), and can be neglected in the spirit of the eikonal approximation. 

3562: The graph in \fig{pa}A corresponds to the square of the amplitude

3563: given by the case when the gluon is present in proton's wave function

3564: before the collision. As one can see in \fig{pa}A, in the gluon-proton

3565: system only the gluon interacts with the nucleons in the nucleus:

3566: interactions of the proton cancel by real-virtual cancellations

3567: \cite{KM}. Moving a gluon exchanged between the nucleus and the proton 

3568: across the cut does not change the momentum of the produced gluon in

3569: \fig{pa}A, but does change the sign of the whole term, causing the

3570: cancellation. That is why we have to consider only the interactions

3571: with the {\sl gluon} in \fig{pa}A.  The diagram in \fig{pa}B gives the

3572: interference term between the amplitude from \fig{pa}A with the gluon

3573: present in the proton's wave function before the interaction and the

3574: amplitude in which the gluon is emitted by the proton after the

3575: collision. Of course a diagram complex conjugate to

3576: \fig{pa}B should also be included. Real-virtual cancellations of \fig{pa}A 

3577: do {\it not} happen in \fig{pa}B. Moving an exchanged (Coulomb) gluon

3578: across the cut would force us to move it across the gluon emission

3579: vertex for the produced gluon on the right hand side, thus changing

3580: the momentum of the produced gluon. Thus the interactions of the

3581: nucleons with both the proton and a gluon have to be included in

3582: \fig{pa}B. On the right hand side of the diagram in \fig{pa}B only

3583: the interactions with the proton are possible. It can also be shown

3584: that the square of the diagram with late gluon emission (after the

3585: proton passes through the system, as shown on the right hand side of

3586: \fig{pa}B) does not have any interactions in it and can be

3587: neglected. (The gluon exchanges between the proton and the nucleus

3588: cancel by real-virtual cancellations \cite{KM}.)

3589: 

3590: Note that in the quasi--classical approximation depicted in

3591: \fig{pa} the interaction is modeled by single and double gluon

3592: exchanges. Similar to \fig{qqbar} and Sect. \ref{QCA} we have to

3593: impose the limit of no more than two gluons per nucleon

3594: \cite{yuri2}. If a particular nucleon exchanges a gluon with the

3595: incoming proton and/or gluon in the amplitude then it has to exchange

3596: a gluon in the complex conjugate amplitude to ``remain'' color

3597: neutral. Alternatively the nucleon can exchange two gluons in the

3598: amplitude (complex conjugate amplitude), but then it would not be able

3599: to interact in the complex conjugate amplitude (amplitude). This is

3600: done in the spirit of the quasi--classical approximation resumming all

3601: powers of $\as^2 \ A^{1/3}$, as was discussed in Sect. \ref{QCA}.

3602: 

3603: The calculation is easier to perform in transverse coordinate

3604: space. We assume that the outgoing gluon has a transverse coordinate

3605: ${\un x}$ to the left of the cut in \fig{pa} and a transverse

3606: coordinate ${\un y}$ to the right of the cut. To calculate the

3607: production cross section we will first calculate the amplitude $M

3608: ({\un x})$ and its conjugate $M^* ({\un y})$ in the transverse

3609: coordinate space, Fourier-transform them into transverse momentum

3610: space and take their product, which would be the square of the

3611: amplitude in the momentum space ${\tilde M} ({\un k})$, giving the

3612: production cross section

3613: \be

3614: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ d^2 b \ dy} \ = \ \frac{1}{2 \, (2 \pi)^3} 

3615: \, | {\tilde M} ({\un k})|^2 

3616: \, =  \, \frac{1}{2 \, (2 \pi)^3} \, \int \, d^2 x \, d^2 y \,  e^{- i {\underline k} 

3617: \cdot ({\underline x} - {\underline y})} \, M ({\un x}) \, M^* ({\un y}).

3618: \ee

3619: To obtain the answer for the gluon production cross section in pA in

3620: the quasi--classical approximation we have to convolute the wave

3621: function of the proton having a soft gluon in it with the interaction

3622: amplitude of a gluon scattering in the nucleus. Below we will model

3623: the proton by a single valence quark: generalization back to the real

3624: proton case will be manifest. The soft gluon wave function of a single

3625: quark is given by the first term in the parenthesis of \eq{dip1}

3626: corresponding to the diagram in \fig{dipole}, where we should

3627: disregards the anti-quark (lower) line. The interaction amplitude

3628: between the gluon and the nucleus squared can be calculated directly

3629: following \cite{KM,BDMPS1}. However, it is easier to use crossing

3630: symmetry \cite{Mueller_cross} and ``reflect'' the gluon having

3631: transverse coordinate ${\un y}$ from the complex conjugate amplitude

3632: with respect to the cut placing it into the amplitude. One would then

3633: see that the interaction amplitude squared would reduce to the forward

3634: amplitude of a gluon dipole formed by gluons at ${\un x}$ and ${\un

3635: y}$ scattering on the nucleus. In the quasi-classical approximation

3636: such amplitude is given by \eq{NGgm}. Combining the first term in

3637: \eq{dip1} squared with the amplitude from \eq{NGgm} yields the

3638: following contribution to production cross section coming from the

3639: diagram in \fig{pa}A \cite{KM}

3640: \be\label{pasolA}

3641: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}_A}{d^2 k \ dy} \ = \ \frac{1}{\pi} \, \int \ d^2 b \, d^2 x 

3642: \, d^2 y \, \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \, \frac{\as C_F}{\pi} \frac{{\underline x} 

3643: \cdot {\underline y}}{{\underline x}^2 {\underline y}^2} \, e^{- i {\underline k} 

3644: \cdot ({\un x} - {\un y})} \, \left( e^{- ({\un x} - 

3645: {\un y})^2 \ Q_{s0}^2 \, \ln (1/|{\un x} - {\un y}| \Lambda)/4 } - 1

3646: \right)

3647: \ee

3648: with the gluon saturation scale $Q_{s0}$ given by \eq{qsmvg}, where

3649: now the subscript $0$ denotes the saturation scale of the

3650: quasi-classical McLerran-Venugopalan model without quantum

3651: evolution/rapidity dependence. In \eq{pasolA} we have also assumed

3652: that the proton's transverse coordinate is ${\un 0}$.

3653: 

3654: The diagram in \fig{pa}B is calculated in a similar way. The incoming

3655: proton wave function there is the same as in \fig{pa}A. To resum the

3656: interactions with the nucleus we can either follow direct calculations

3657: of \cite{KM,BDMPS1} or reflect the quark line from the complex

3658: conjugate amplitude with respect to the cut into the amplitude, making

3659: it an anti-quark in the amplitude. The reflected quark line would then

3660: be on top of the quark line in the amplitude, since they both have the

3661: same transverse coordinate ${\un 0}$. However the quark and the

3662: anti-quark do not cancel each other: in fact, since they emit a gluon,

3663: the pair of quarks should be in the color octet state. We again have

3664: an interaction of a color-octet dipole, formed by the gluon at $\un x$

3665: and the quark--anti-quark pair at ${\un 0}$. Adding the diagram

3666: complex conjugate to \fig{pa}B we obtain the following contribution to

3667: the cross section

3668: \be\label{pasolB}

3669: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}_{B+C}}{d^2 k \ dy} \ = \ \frac{1}{\pi} \, \int \ d^2 b \, d^2 x 

3670: \, d^2 y \, \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \, \frac{\as C_F}{\pi} \frac{{\underline x} 

3671: \cdot {\underline y}}{{\underline x}^2 {\underline y}^2} \, e^{- i {\underline k} 

3672: \cdot ({\underline x} - {\underline y})} \, \left( 1 -  e^{- {\underline x}^2 \ 

3673: Q_{s0}^2 \ln (1/|{\un x}| \Lambda)/4 } + 1 - e^{- {\underline y}^2 \

3674: Q_{s0}^2 \ln (1/|{\un y}| \Lambda)/4 } \right).

3675: \ee

3676: Combining the terms in Eqs. (\ref{pasolA}) and (\ref{pasolB}) yields \cite{KM}

3677: \ben

3678: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \ = \ \frac{1}{\pi} \, \int \ d^2 b \, d^2 x 

3679: \, d^2 y \, \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \, \frac{\as C_F}{\pi} \frac{{\underline x} 

3680: \cdot {\underline y}}{{\underline x}^2 {\underline y}^2} \, e^{- i {\underline k} 

3681: \cdot ({\underline x} - {\underline y})} 

3682: \een

3683: \be\label{paclg}

3684: \times \, \left( 1 -  e^{- {\underline x}^2 \ 

3685: Q_{s0}^2 \ln (1/|{\un x}| \Lambda)/4 } - e^{- {\underline y}^2 \ Q_{s0}^2

3686: \ln (1/|{\un y}| \Lambda)/4 }

3687: + e^{- ({\un x} - {\un y})^2 \ Q_{s0}^2 \, \ln (1/|{\un x} - {\un y}|

3688: \Lambda)/4 } \right).

3689: \ee

3690: \eq{paclg} gives us the single gluon inclusive production cross section for a 

3691: scattering of a quark on a nucleus in the quasi-classical

3692: approximation, resumming multiple rescatterings of \fig{pa}. Before we

3693: proceed to derive the properties of \eq{paclg} let us first show which

3694: diagrams it corresponds to in a different gauge, the light cone gauge

3695: of the nucleus, and demonstrate an interesting duality between

3696: multiple rescatterings of \fig{pa} and the non-Abelian

3697: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams wave function of the nucleus on the light cone

3698: from \fig{ww} first observed in \cite{KM}. \\

3699: 

3700: {\sl Initial Versus Final State Interactions} \\

3701: 

3702: Let us now consider $pA$ scattering in $A^+ = 0$ gauge, which, in our

3703: convention, is the light cone gauge of the nucleus. We also boost the

3704: system into a frame where the proton is at rest and the incoming

3705: nucleus is ultrarelativistic. The analysis of $pA$ process in the

3706: light cone gauge of the nucleus is sometimes referred to as $Ap$

3707: scattering \cite{KW2}.

3708: 

3709: The light cone gauge diagrams contributing to the gluon production

3710: cross section in proton--nucleus collisions are depicted in

3711: \fig{palc}. Again we are going to perform the calculation in the 

3712: framework of the light cone perturbation theory \cite{BL,BPP}. Similar

3713: to $A^- =0$ gauge case considered above the incoming nucleus can emit

3714: a gluon in its wave function either before or after the collision with

3715: the proton. The one gluon light cone wave function of an

3716: ultrarelativistic nucleus is given by ${\underline A}^{WW}

3717: ({\underline x}) \cdot {\underline\epsilon}$, with ${\underline

3718: A}^{WW}$ the non-Abelian Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams field of the nucleus

3719: given by \eq{clsol} of Sect. \ref{MV} with suppressed $x^-$ dependence

3720: (taking $x^- \rightarrow \infty$) and with ${\underline\epsilon}$ the

3721: gluon polarization vector in $A^+ = 0$ light cone gauge. The

3722: correspondence between the light-cone wave function and the classical

3723: gluon field was shown above to be true at the lowest order, which

3724: could be seen by comparing $x^- \rightarrow \infty$ limit of the

3725: lowest order term in \eq{clsol} with the light cone wave function in

3726: \eq{dip1}. Diagrammatically the light cone wave function corresponds

3727: to the same set of diagrams as was depicted in \fig{ww}. The

3728: fields of the nucleons in the nucleus ``gauge rotate'' the

3729: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams field of one of the nucleons

3730: \cite{yuri2}. Therefore, here we have strong reasons to assume that 

3731: this light cone wave function can be obtained from the non-Abelian

3732: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams field of \eq{clsol} by taking $x^- \rightarrow

3733: \infty$ in it and multiplying the resulting field by

3734: ${\underline\epsilon}$. The interaction of this non-Abelian

3735: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams (WW) wave function with the proton can only be

3736: by the means of single or double gluon exchanges, since having more

3737: gluons in interaction of the WW gluon field and nucleons from the wave

3738: function of \fig{ww} with the same proton would bring in extra powers

3739: of $\as$ not enhanced by $A^{1/3}$, which would be subleading in terms

3740: of resummation of the parameter $\as^2 A^{1/3}$.

3741: 

3742: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3743: \begin{figure}[ht]

3744: \begin{center}

3745: \epsfxsize=17cm

3746: \leavevmode

3747: \hbox{\epsffile{palc.eps}}

3748: \end{center}

3749: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the same process of gluon production 

3750: in $pA$ collision as in \fig{pa}, but now working in $A^+ =0$

3751: (nucleus) light cone gauge in the quasi-classical approximation. }

3752: \label{palc}

3753: \end{figure}

3754: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3755: Before colliding with the proton the nucleus can develop the

3756: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams one gluon light cone wave function which then

3757: interacts with the proton by means of one or two gluon exchanges,

3758: according to the rules of the quasi--classical approximation.  The

3759: square of the graph corresponding to this scenario is shown in

3760: \fig{palc}A. As in \fig{pa} the direct interactions of the proton with the

3761: nucleons in the nucleus cancel through the real--virtual cancellation leaving only

3762: the interactions with the gluon line. One may notice that the final

3763: state interactions, where another WW gluon merges with the outgoing

3764: gluon in \fig{palc} are left out in the diagram of

3765: \fig{palc}A, but as we will show below we do not need them to

3766: reproduce the contribution of the graph in \fig{pa}A, which implies

3767: that they cancel.

3768: 

3769: 

3770: The second possible scenario corresponds to the case when there is no

3771: gluon in the nuclear wave function by the time the collision happens

3772: and the gluon is emitted by the nucleus after the interaction with the

3773: proton. Then the nuclear wave function without an emitted gluon

3774: corresponds to the fields of the nucleons ``rotating'' the current

3775: (quark line) of one of the nucleons in the nucleus. This is shown on

3776: the right hand side of \fig{palc}B. The nucleon then interacts with

3777: the proton by exchanging one or two gluons with it. After that the

3778: nucleus can emit a gluon to be produced in the final state. Another

3779: possibility which is not shown in \fig{palc}B but which contributes to

3780: the gluon production corresponds to the case when the

3781: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams gluon is present in the nuclear wave function

3782: by the time of the collision, similar to \fig{palc}A, but after the

3783: interaction with the proton the gluon merges into the quark line of

3784: one of the nucleons, which later re-emits the gluon. We could not find

3785: an {\it a priori} argument prohibiting an emission of the whole

3786: Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams field after the interaction. However, as we

3787: will see below one needs to emit only one gluon to be able to

3788: reproduce \eq{paclg}. The square of the diagram on the right hand side

3789: of \fig{palc}B is zero since the interactions cancel due to

3790: real--virtual cancellation \cite{KM}. The only contribution we get

3791: from it is the interference term depicted in

3792: \fig{palc}B. There on the left hand side we have the same diagram as

3793: in \fig{palc}A except that now interactions of the proton with the

3794: ``last'' nucleon in the nucleus do not cancel. One can show that the

3795: diagram of \fig{palc}B provides us with the contribution equal to that

3796: of the graph in \fig{pa}B.

3797: 

3798: Let us now calculate the diagrams in \fig{palc}. The contribution of

3799: \fig{palc}A can be obtained by convoluting the correlation function of

3800: the fields on both sides of the cut with the gluon--proton

3801: interactions amplitude, which can be obtained from \eq{1sc3} by

3802: replacing $C_F \rightarrow N_c$ in the gluon distribution function

3803: from \eq{xglo}. The result yields

3804: \be\label{lc11}

3805: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}_{LC \, A}}{d^2 k \ dy} \ = \ \int \frac{d^2 x \ 

3806: d^2 y}{(2 \pi)^2} \, e^{i {\underline k} \cdot ({\underline x} -

3807: {\underline y})}\, \frac{2}{\pi} \, \mbox{Tr} \, \left< {\underline A}^{WW}

3808: ({\underline x}) \cdot {\underline A}^{WW} ({\underline y}) \right> \,

3809: \frac{- \as \pi^2 N_c}{N_c^2 - 1} \, ({\underline x} - {\underline y})^2

3810: \, xG (x, 1/({\underline x} - {\underline y})^2).

3811: \ee

3812: Employing the correlation function of two WW fields from \eq{gla2} in

3813: \eq{lc11} and defining new variables ${\underline z} = {\underline x}

3814: - {\underline y}$ and ${\underline b} = {\underline y}$ we obtain

3815: \be\label{lc12}

3816: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}_{LC \, A}}{d^2 k \ dy} \ = \ \int \, d^2 b \, d^2 z \, 

3817: e^{i {\underline k} \cdot {\underline z}} \, \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \,

3818: \frac{\as C_F}{\pi} \, \ln \frac{1}{{\underline z}^2 \Lambda^2} \, \left( 

3819: e^{ - {\underline z}^2 \, Q_s^2 \, \ln (1/|{\un z}| \, \Lambda)/ 4 } -

3820: 1 \right).

3821: \ee

3822: We will need the following mathematical formula \cite{yuriaa}

3823: \be\label{for}

3824: \ln \frac{1}{{\underline z}^2 \Lambda^2} \, = \, \frac{1}{\pi} \, \int 

3825: d^2 y \, \frac{{\underline y} \cdot ({\underline z} + {\underline

3826: y})}{{\underline y}^2 ({\underline z} + {\underline y})^2}

3827: \ee

3828: where the $y$ integration is cut off by $1/\Lambda$ in the infrared

3829: near ${\un y} = {\un 0}$ and ${\un y} = - {\un z}$. Inserting \eq{for}

3830: into \eq{lc12} and comparing the result to Eq. (\ref{pasolA}) one can

3831: see that

3832: \be

3833: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}_{LC \, A}}{d^2 k \ dy} \ = \ \frac{d \sigma^{pA}_{A}}{d^2 k \ dy}.

3834: \ee

3835: Thus we have shown that the contribution of the diagrams in

3836: \fig{palc}A is equal to the contribution of the diagrams in

3837: \fig{pa}A.

3838: 

3839: The calculation of the graphs depicted in \fig{palc}B is a little more

3840: complicated. We refer the interested reader to \cite{yuriaa}, where

3841: the estimate is done in detail. After performing the calculation one

3842: demonstrates that the contribution to the inclusive gluon production

3843: cross section from the diagram in \fig{palc}B is equal to the

3844: contribution of the diagrams in \fig{pa}B. We can now conclude that

3845: the diagrams in \fig{palc} in the $A^+ =0$ gauge reproduce the

3846: production cross section from \eq{paclg}.

3847: 

3848: Comparing \fig{pa} with \fig{palc} we see that, indeed, depending on

3849: the choice of gauge, different sets of diagrams become dominant in the

3850: production cross section. Diagrammatic representation of the process

3851: is gauge dependent. In the light cone gauge of the projectile, $A^-

3852: =0$, the gluon production in proton-nucleus interactions is dominated

3853: by multiple rescatterings, as we see from \fig{pa}. These multiple

3854: rescattering are (almost) instantaneous, happening only during the

3855: passage of the proton through nuclear matter. One can refer to them as

3856: {\sl final} state interactions.  On the other hand, the same process

3857: of gluon production looks different in the light cone gauge of the

3858: nucleus, $A^+ =0$, as shown in \fig{palc}. The multiple rescatterings

3859: of \fig{pa} become incorporated into the WW wave function of the

3860: nucleus in \fig{palc}. Therefore, {\sl final} state interactions from

3861: one gauge become {\sl initial} state interactions in another

3862: gauge. This {\sl duality} (or dichotomy) was first observed in

3863: \cite{KM}.\\

3864: 

3865: 

3866: 

3867: 

3868: {\sl $k_T$-factorization} \\

3869: 

3870: It is interesting to show that one can recast \eq{paclg} in a

3871: $k_T$-factorized form. Following \cite{KT,KKT} we first use the

3872: amplitude from

3873: \eq{NGgm} to rewrite \eq{paclg} as

3874: \be\label{paclg1}

3875: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \ = \ \frac{1}{\pi} \, \int \ d^2 b \, d^2 x 

3876: \, d^2 y \, \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \, \frac{\as C_F}{\pi} \frac{{\underline x} 

3877: \cdot {\underline y}}{{\underline x}^2 {\underline y}^2} \, e^{- i {\underline k} 

3878: \cdot ({\underline x} - {\underline y})} 

3879: \, \left[ N_G ({\underline x}, {\un b}, 0) + N_G ({\underline y}, {\un b}, 0) 

3880: - N_G ({\un x} - {\un y}, {\un b} , 0) \right],

3881: \ee

3882: where we have for simplicity assumed that $N_G$ is a slowly varying

3883: function of the impact parameter ${\un b}$. (In principle gluon

3884: dipoles $\un x$, $\un y$ and ${\un x} - {\un y}$ have slightly

3885: different impact parameters, the spread in which we neglected in

3886: \eq{paclg1} by putting them all equal to $\un b$.) Integrating over 

3887: $\un y$ in the first term in the brackets of \eq{paclg1}, over $\un x$

3888: in the second term in the brackets of \eq{paclg1}, and over, say, $\un

3889: x$ in the third term in the brackets of \eq{paclg1} (keeping ${\un x}

3890: - {\un y}$ fixed) yields \cite{KT,KKT}

3891: \be\label{paclg2}

3892: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{1}{2 \pi^2} \, 

3893: \frac{\as C_F}{\pi} \, \int d^2 b \, d^2 z \, 

3894: e^{- i {\un k} \cdot {\un z}} \, \left[ 2 \, i \, 

3895: \frac{{\un z} \cdot {\un k}}{{\un z}^2 {\un k}^2} -  

3896: \ln \frac{1}{z_T \Lambda} \right] \, N_G ({\un z}, {\un b}, 0),

3897: \ee

3898: where $\un z$ was chosen to replace $\un x$, $\un y$ and ${\un x} -

3899: {\un y}$ in each of the terms in the brackets of \eq{paclg1}

3900: correspondingly. We also use $z_T \equiv |{\un z}|$. In arriving at

3901: \eq{paclg2} we have used \eq{for} along with

3902: \be

3903: \int \frac{d^2 z}{ (2 \pi)^2} \, e^{- i \, {\un k} \cdot {\un z}} \, 

3904: \frac{\un z}{{\un z}^2} \, = \, - \frac{i}{2 \pi} \, \frac{\un k}{{\un k}^2}.

3905: \ee

3906: Using the fact that $N_G ({\un z}=0, {\un b}, 0) = 0$ we write \eq{paclg2} as

3907: \be\label{paclg3}

3908: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{1}{2 \pi^2} \, 

3909: \frac{\as C_F}{\pi} \, \frac{1}{{\un k}^2} \, \int d^2 b \, d^2 z \, 

3910: N_G ({\un z}, {\un b}, 0) \, \nabla^2_z \, \left( e^{- i {\un k}

3911: \cdot {\un z}} \, \ln \frac{1}{z_T \Lambda} \right).

3912: \ee

3913: Eqs. (\ref{1sc3}) and (\ref{xglo}) allow us to derive the forward

3914: scattering amplitude of a gluon dipole on a single quark (or proton),

3915: which we will denote $n_G$, such that

3916: \be\label{ng}

3917: \int d^2 b' \, n_G ({\un z}, {\un b}', y=0) \, = \, \pi \, \as^2 \,

3918: {\un z}^2 \, \ln \frac{1}{ z_T \, \Lambda}.

3919: \ee

3920: \eq{ng} corresponds to the two gluon exchange interaction between

3921: the dipole and the proton. With the help of \eq{ng} we rewrite

3922: \eq{paclg3} as \cite{KT}

3923: \be\label{paclkt}

3924: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{C_F}{\as \, 

3925: \pi \, (2 \pi)^3} \, 

3926: \frac{1}{{\un k}^2} \, \int d^2 B \, d^2 b \, d^2 z \, 

3927: \nabla^2_z \, n_G ({\un z}, {\un b} - {\un B}, 0) \, e^{- i {\un k}

3928: \cdot {\un z}} \, \nabla^2_z \, N_G ({\un z}, {\un b}, 0).

3929: \ee

3930: Now ${\un B}$ is the impact parameter of the proton with respect to

3931: the center of the nucleus and ${\un b}$ is the impact parameter of the

3932: gluon with respect to the center of the nucleus as shown in \fig{paimp}.

3933: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3934: \begin{figure}[ht]

3935: \begin{center}

3936: \epsfxsize=5cm

3937: \leavevmode

3938: \hbox{\epsffile{paimp.eps}}

3939: \end{center}

3940: \caption{Gluon production in pA collisions as seen in the transverse 

3941: plane. To make the picture easier to read the gluon is placed far away

3942: from the proton which is a highly improbable configuration.}

3943: \label{paimp}

3944: \end{figure}

3945: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3946: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3947: \begin{figure}[hb]

3948: \begin{center}

3949: \epsfxsize=7cm

3950: \leavevmode

3951: \hbox{\epsffile{ktfact.eps}}

3952: \end{center}

3953: \caption{$k_T$-factorization in $pA$ collisions, as implied by \eq{ktcl}. Unfortunately 

3954: in no known gauge do the contributing diagrams look as shown.}

3955: \label{ktfact}

3956: \end{figure}

3957: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3958: 

3959: Defining the unintegrated gluon distributions for the nucleus 

3960: \be\label{ktglue}

3961: \phi_A (x, \un k^2) \, = \, \frac{C_F}{\as \, (2 \pi)^3} \, \int d^2 b \, 

3962: d^2 z \, e^{- i {\un k} \cdot {\un z}} \ \nabla^2_z \, N_G ({\un z},

3963: {\un b}, y = \ln 1/x)

3964: \ee

3965: and for the proton

3966: \be\label{ktgluep}

3967: \phi_p (x, \un k^2) \, = \, \frac{C_F}{\as \, (2 \pi)^3} \, \int d^2 b \, 

3968: d^2 z \, e^{- i {\un k} \cdot {\un z}} \ \nabla^2_z \, n_G ({\un z},

3969: {\un b}, y = \ln 1/x),

3970: \ee

3971: we transform \eq{paclkt} into

3972: \be\label{ktcl}

3973: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{2 \, \as}{C_F} \, 

3974: \frac{1}{{\un k}^2} \, \int d^2 q \, \phi_p ( {\un q},  y=0) \, \phi_A ({\un k}

3975: - {\un q}, y=0  ). 

3976: \ee

3977: 

3978: \eq{ktcl} is the well-known $k_T$-factorization expression for gluon 

3979: production cross section \cite{CCH,GLR,GLR2,Ryskin,Braun2}. It has

3980: been proven in \cite{CCH} for a gluon production from a single BFKL

3981: ladder of \fig{ladder}. A graphical representation of

3982: $k_T$-factorization implied by \eq{ktcl} is shown in

3983: \fig{ktfact}. $k_T$-factorization, as shown in \eq{ktcl}, is the

3984: statement of separation of the inclusive cross section into a

3985: convolution of unintegrated gluon distribution functions of the target

3986: and of the projectile with the square of Lipatov vertex for gluon

3987: production from \eq{lipa}. This is what is shown in \fig{ktfact} for

3988: $pA$ collisions at hand. It is very surprising to obtain this

3989: factorization formula after resumming multiple rescatterings of

3990: \fig{pa}, which seem to explicitly violate factorization of \fig{ktfact}. It may 

3991: appear that the representation of gluon production in the light cone

3992: gauge of the nucleus, shown in \fig{palc}, may help cast the process

3993: in a factorized form of \fig{ktfact}. Unfortunately that is not the

3994: case: the reason is that the unintegrated distribution function used

3995: in \eq{ktcl}, given by \eq{ktglue}, is different from the unintegrated

3996: gluon distribution in \eq{ww2}, which we obtained by calculating the

3997: correlator of two WW fields. The ``factorization'' of \fig{palc}

3998: appears to require the nucleus to be described by the gluon

3999: distribution of \eq{ww2} (see \fig{glue}B), which is the correct

4000: correlator of two WW fields which provides us with the number of gluon

4001: quanta in the wave function. Unfortunately \eq{paclkt} demands that

4002: one uses the gluon distribution from \eq{ktglue} in the factorization

4003: of \eq{ktcl} instead of \eq{ww2}. Therefore, the $A^+ =0$ light cone

4004: gauge representation of the interaction in \fig{palc} does not appear

4005: to lead to \eq{ktcl} with the gluon distribution from \eq{ktglue}. In

4006: general, no gauge is known to the authors in which the dominant

4007: diagrams responsible for gluon production could be cast in the form

4008: shown in \fig{ktfact}.

4009: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4010: \begin{figure}[t]

4011: \begin{center}

4012: \begin{tabular}{cc}

4013: \epsfig{file=glue1.eps, width=7cm}

4014: & \hspace*{1cm}

4015: \epsfig{file=glue2.eps, width=6cm}\\

4016: \hspace*{1cm} {\bf A} & \hspace*{1cm} {\bf B}

4017: \end{tabular}

4018: \end{center}

4019: \caption{{\bf A.} The definition of unintegrated gluon distribution 

4020: relating it to the gluon dipole cross section from \eq{ktglue}. The

4021: exchanged gluon lines can connect to either gluon in the dipole. {\bf

4022: B.} The non-Abelian Weizs\"{a}cker-Williams gluon distribution

4023: obtained by calculating the correlator of two WW fields, given by

4024: \eq{ww2}.}

4025: \label{glue}

4026: \end{figure}

4027: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4028: 

4029: Finally, we would like to point out the difference between the two

4030: unintegrated gluon distribution functions in Eqs. (\ref{ktglue}) and

4031: (\ref{ww2}). We show the definitions of both distributions in

4032: \fig{glue}. As was mentioned above, the WW gluon distribution from 

4033: \eq{ww2} is obtained by constructing a correlator of two WW gluon 

4034: fields of \eq{clsol}. It is shown in \fig{glue}B. It is this

4035: distribution which counts the number of gluon quanta and, in that

4036: sense, is the true unintegrated gluon distribution function.  (The

4037: distribution from

4038: \eq{ww2} should not be confused with the one we defined in

4039: \eq{fakephi} to connect the BK and GLR equations: the former is 

4040: defined in terms of a gluon dipole, while the latter employs the quark

4041: dipole.)  The gluon distribution from \eq{ktglue} was required to

4042: recast the gluon production cross section (\ref{paclg}) in the

4043: $k_T$-factorization form of \eq{ktcl}.  However, its diagrammatic

4044: representation exists and is shown in \fig{glue}A. There we consider

4045: the scattering amplitude of a gluon dipole on a nucleus. To define the

4046: gluon distribution from \eq{ktglue} one has to require that the

4047: interaction happens only via a two-gluon exchange, with some

4048: complicated gluon distribution in the nuclear wave function. It is not

4049: clear whether diagrammatic representation of the dipole-nucleus

4050: interaction from \fig{glue}A is achievable in any known gauge. The

4051: bottom line is that it is rather puzzling that the $k_T$-factorization

4052: of \eq{ktcl} arises for the single gluon production cross section in

4053: $pA$, and it is also not clear why the unintegrated gluon distribution

4054: used in that formula should be given by \eq{ktglue}, which the

4055: calculations lead to, instead of the physical gluon distribution of

4056: \eq{ww2}.

4057: 

4058: 

4059: \eq{ktglue}, along with Eqs. (\ref{ktgluep}), allows one to generalize 

4060: the gluon production cross section (\ref{paclg}), which was originally

4061: derived for quark-nucleus scattering, to the case of proton-nucleus

4062: scattering. This could be done by using the gluon dipole--proton

4063: amplitude $n_G$ instead of the dipole-quark one from \eq{ng}. However,

4064: the resulting two gluon distribution functions are different only by

4065: an overall prefactor, which is not important for our discussion below.

4066: 

4067: 

4068: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4069: 

4070: \subsubsection{Nuclear Modification Factor: Low-$p_T$ Suppression}

4071: 

4072: To analyze the properties of the particle production it is convenient

4073: to construct {\sl nuclear modification factor}, which is defined

4074: experimentally as

4075: \be\label{rpaex}

4076: R^{pA} (k_T, y) \, \equiv \, \frac{\frac{d N^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy}}{N_{coll}

4077: \, \frac{d N^{pp}}{d^2 k \ dy}},

4078: \ee

4079: where $N_{coll}$ is the number of proton-nucleon collisions in the

4080: $pA$ scattering process, $d N^{pA} / d^2 k dy$ is the particle

4081: multiplicity in $pA$ scattering and $d N^{pp}/ d^2 k dy$ is the

4082: particle multiplicity in $pp$. $R^{pA}$ can be expressed in terms of

4083: particle production cross section as (for subtleties of this

4084: redefinition see \cite{Boris03})

4085: \be\label{rpa}

4086: R^{pA} (\un k, y) \, = \, \frac{\frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy}}{A \, \frac{d

4087: \sigma^{pp}}{d^2 k \ dy}}.

4088: \ee

4089: 

4090: In this and the following Sections we will study $R^{pA}$ given by the

4091: quasi-classical gluon production cross section derived above in

4092: Sect. \ref{clglue}. $R^{pA}$ for quark production, that will be

4093: derived later, can be constructed by analogy. To construct

4094: gluon $R^{pA}$ using \eq{rpa} we will need the gluon production cross

4095: section (\ref{paclg}), which we will use in the form given by

4096: \eq{paclg2}, since it is more convenient for deriving various

4097: asymptotic regimes.  \eq{rpa} also requires us to know the gluon

4098: production in $pp$ collisions, which could be obtained by expanding

4099: $N_G$ from \eq{NGgm} to the lowest non-trivial order, corresponding to

4100: rescattering on a single nucleon in the nucleus, putting $A=1$ in it

4101: and using the resulting expression in

4102: \eq{paclg2}. The result yields

4103: \be\label{pp}

4104: A \, \frac{d \sigma^{pp}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \,

4105: \int d^2 b \, \frac{Q_{s0}^2}{{\un k}^4} \, 

4106: \left( \ln \frac{{\un k}^2}{4 \, \Lambda^2} + 2 \, \gamma - 1 \right) \,

4107: \approx \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \,

4108: \int d^2 b \, \frac{Q_{s0}^2}{{\un k}^4} \, 

4109: \ln \frac{{\un k}^2}{\Lambda^2}

4110: \ee

4111: with $\Lambda$ some infrared cutoff. In \eq{pp} we have included the

4112: factor of $A$ on the left hand side to make it ready to use in

4113: \eq{rpa}.

4114: 

4115: In this Section we are interested in the behavior of $R^{pA} ({\un k},

4116: y)$ at low values of the gluon transverse momentum $k_T$, namely for

4117: $k_T \lsim Q_{s0}$. Analyzing \eq{paclg2} we note that low $k_T \lsim

4118: Q_{s0}$ corresponds to dominance of large dipole sizes $z_T \gsim

4119: 1/Q_{s0}$ in the integral. For $z_T \gsim 1/Q_{s0}$ the cross section

4120: is likely to be black, and we can approximate $N_G$ in \eq{paclg2} by

4121: $N_G (\un z, \un b, 0) \approx 1$. Integrating the resulting

4122: expression over $\un z$ we obtain

4123: \be\label{paclglkt}

4124: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, \approx \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \,

4125: \int d^2 b \, \frac{1}{{\un k}^2}, \hspace*{1cm} k_T < Q_{s0}.

4126: \ee

4127: 

4128: Before we proceed, let us point a very important property of the

4129: classical gluon production cross section (\ref{paclg}). \eq{pp} in

4130: fact reflects a high-$k_T$ asymptotics of the gluon production cross

4131: section: at high-$k_T$ it scales as $\sim 1/k_T^4$, in agreement with

4132: the lowest order perturbative calculations

4133: \cite{GB,KMW1,KMW2,KR,GM,Lipatov1}. This result is badly infrared 

4134: divergent, and demonstrates a problem of lowest order perturbative

4135: calculation of gluon production, shown in \fig{lvert}: if one wants to

4136: obtain the integral production cross section $d \sigma /dy$ from it,

4137: one would have to introduce an infrared cutoff $\Lambda$ for

4138: $k_T$-integration. The result would depend on the cutoff as $\sim

4139: 1/\Lambda^2$, making the resulting $d \sigma /dy$ very sensitive to

4140: the value of the cutoff and demonstrating that the lowest order cross

4141: section is dominated by non-perturbative infrared effects, which we do

4142: not know how to account for theoretically. On the other hand the full

4143: classical cross section of \eq{paclg} is (almost) free of such

4144: problems. \eq{paclglkt} describes the low-$k_T$ asymptotics of the

4145: cross section in \eq{paclg}. As one can see it leads to the cross

4146: section scaling as $\sim 1/k_T^2$. Thus, similar to the classical

4147: gluon distribution of Sect. \ref{MV} (see \fig{mv1}), the multiple

4148: rescattering effects regulate the infrared singularity, changing it

4149: from $\sim 1/k_T^4$ to $\sim 1/k_T^2$, and making the resulting cross

4150: section less infrared divergent. The residual infrared divergence

4151: $\sim 1/k_T^2$ is due to the fact that we have assumed that saturation

4152: behavior with multiple rescatterings takes place only in the nuclear

4153: wave function: there is no saturation in the proton wave function in

4154: the approach used here. The case of multiple rescatterings in both the

4155: target and the projectile is usually studied in the context of

4156: nucleus-nucleus ($AA$) collisions. There the residual $\sim 1/k_T^2$

4157: divergence is regulated completely \cite{KV,Lappi,yuriaa}.

4158: 

4159: Using Eqs. (\ref{paclglkt}) and (\ref{pp}) in \eq{rpa} yields

4160: \be\label{rpalkt}

4161: R^{pA} (\un k, y) \, \approx \, \frac{k_T^2}{Q_{s0}^2 \, \ln (k_T^2

4162: /\Lambda^2)}, \hspace*{1cm} k_T < Q_{s0},

4163: \ee

4164: where, for simplicity, we assumed again that the nuclei are

4165: cylindrical in the beam ($z$) direction, such that the impact

4166: parameter integration over $\un b$ in Eqs. (\ref{paclglkt}) and

4167: (\ref{pp}) would give a trivial overall factor of the nuclear

4168: transverse area $S_\perp$, which cancels in $R^{pA}$. From \eq{rpalkt}

4169: we see that

4170: \cite{KTS,BKW,KNST,KKT,KM,ktbroadening1,ktbroadening2,Vitev03,ktbroadening3}

4171: \be\label{rpaglkt}

4172: R^{pA} (\un k, y) \, < \, 1 ,  \hspace*{1cm} k_T < Q_{s0}.

4173: \ee

4174: Therefore we conclude that classical gluon production in $pA$ leads to

4175: {\sl suppression} of low-$k_T$ gluons. 

4176: 

4177: 

4178: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4179: 

4180: \subsubsection{Nuclear Modification Factor: Cronin Effect}

4181: 

4182: Our goal now is to study the nuclear modification factor $R^{pA}$ for

4183: high-$k_T$ particles with $k_T > Q_{s0}$. Starting with gluon

4184: production again we note that, in the quasi-classical case one can

4185: prove the following sum rule \cite{KKT}

4186: \be\label{sumr}

4187: \int d^2 k \, {\un k}^2 \, \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, 

4188: A \, \int d^2 k \, {\un k}^2 \, \frac{d \sigma^{pp}}{d^2 k \ dy}, 

4189: \ee

4190: which could be obtained from \eq{paclg2} using the fact that, for the

4191: quasi-classical amplitude (\ref{NGgm}) and the two-gluon exchange

4192: amplitude from \eq{ng} the following relation is true

4193: \be\label{subtr}

4194: \lim_{z_T \rightarrow 0} \left\{ 

4195: \left[ \nabla^2_z \, N_G ({\un z}, {\un b}, 0) \right] - A^{1/3} \,

4196: \left[ \nabla^2_z \, n_G ({\un z}, {\un b}, 0) \right] \right\} \, = \, 0.

4197: \ee

4198: \eq{subtr} and the sum rule of \eq{sumr} are valid in the quasi-classical 

4199: case of McLerran-Venugopalan model {\sl only}. (When quantum small-$x$

4200: evolution is included, \eq{subtr} ceases to be valid.)

4201: 

4202: The sum rule (\ref{sumr}) insures that if the quasi-classical gluon

4203: production cross section in $pA$ collisions is, in some region of

4204: $k_T$, smaller than $A$ times the gluon production cross section in

4205: $pp$ than there should be some other region of $k_T$ in which their

4206: roles are reversed. For $R^{pA}$ defined in \eq{rpa} that means that

4207: if, in some region of $k_T$, it is less than $1$ there must be some

4208: other region of $k_T$ in which it is greater than $1$. Since in the

4209: previous section we have proven that $R^{pA} < 1$ for $k_T < Q_{s0}$,

4210: the sum rule (\ref{sumr}) demands that $R^{pA} > 1$ for some region of

4211: $k_T$ in the $k_T > Q_{s0}$ interval. Enhancement of particle

4212: production in $pA$ collisions leading to $R^{pA} > 1$ was originally

4213: observed by Cronin et al in \cite{Cronin} and is usually referred to

4214: as Cronin effect. Eqs. (\ref{sumr}) and (\ref{rpaglkt}) prove that the

4215: cross section (\ref{paclg}) leads to Cronin enhancement of produced

4216: gluons in $pA$ collisions.

4217: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4218: \begin{figure}[ht]

4219: \begin{center}

4220: \epsfxsize=10cm

4221: \leavevmode

4222: \hbox{ \epsffile{cron.eps}}

4223: \end{center}

4224: \caption{ The ratio $R^{pA}$ for gluons plotted as a function of 

4225: $k_T/Q_{s0}$ in the quasi-classical McLerran-Venugopalan model as

4226: found in \protect\cite{KM,KTS,BKW,KNST,KKT}. The cutoff is $\Lambda = 0.2 \, Q_s$.}

4227: \label{cron}

4228: \end{figure}

4229: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4230: 

4231: To analyze the behavior of $R^{pA}$ for $k_T > Q_{s0}$ we follow the

4232: approach originally introduced in \cite{GJD,Gelis:2001da} and find the

4233: first correction to the high-$k_T$ asymptotics of \eq{paclg} given by

4234: \eq{pp}. Expanding $N_G$ from \eq{NGgm} to the second non-trivial order, 

4235: substituting the result in \eq{paclg2} and performing the integration

4236: over $\un z$ we obtain \cite{KKT}

4237: \ben

4238: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \,

4239: \int d^2 b \, \frac{Q_{s0}^2}{{\un k}^4} \, \left[ 

4240: \left( \ln \frac{{\un k}^2}{4 \, \Lambda^2} + 2 \, \gamma - 1 \right) + \right.

4241: \een

4242: \be\label{paas1} 

4243: + \left.  \frac{Q_{s0}^2}{4 \, {\un k}^2} \, \left( 6 \, \ln^2 

4244: \frac{{\un k}^2}{4 \, \Lambda^2} - 8 \, (4 - 3 \gamma) \,

4245: \ln \frac{{\un k}^2}{4 \, \Lambda^2} + 29 + 24 \, \gamma^2 - 64 \, \gamma \right) 

4246: + \ldots \right], \hspace*{1cm} k_T \rightarrow \infty.

4247: \ee

4248: Substituting \eq{paas1} along with \eq{pp} into \eq{rpa} and keeping

4249: only the leading logarithmic ($\ln (k_T^2 /\Lambda^2)$) terms in the

4250: parentheses of \eq{paas1} yields for a cylindrical nucleus \cite{KKT}

4251: \be\label{rpaghkt}

4252: R^{pA} (k_T) \, = \, 1 + \frac{3}{2} \, \frac{Q_{s0}^2}{{\un k}^2} \,

4253: \ln \frac{k_T^2}{\Lambda^2} + \ldots, \hspace*{1cm} k_T \rightarrow \infty.

4254: \ee

4255: \eq{rpaghkt} indicates that $R^{pA}$ approaches $1$ from above at high $k_T$, which

4256: is typical of Cronin enhancement \cite{Cronin}. We therefore conclude

4257: that in the framework of the quasi-classical approximation employed in

4258: arriving at \eq{paclg} the ratio $R^{pA}$ is less than $1$ at small

4259: $k_T \lsim Q_{s0}$ and displays Cronin {\sl enhancement} at high $k_T

4260: \gsim Q_{s0}$. This conclusion has been reached in

4261: \cite{KTS,BKW,KNST,KKT,KM,ktbroadening1,ktbroadening2,Vitev03,ktbroadening3}.

4262: 

4263: 

4264: To summarize let us note that, if one neglects the logarithms in the

4265: exponents of \eq{paclg} as a slowly varying functions of transverse

4266: separations, writing for instance $\un x^2\ln(1/x_T\Lambda)\approx \un

4267: x^2$, it would become possible to perform the $\un x$ and $\un y$

4268: integrations in \eq{paclg} exactly, obtaining \cite{KM,KKT}

4269: \be\label{paqs}

4270: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{\as \, C_F}{\pi^2} \,\int d^2 b 

4271: \, \left\{ - \frac{1}{{\un k}^2} +  \frac{2}{{\un k}^2} \, e^{- {\un k}^2 / 

4272: Q_{s0}^2} + \frac{1}{Q_{s0}^2} \, e^{- {\un k}^2 / Q_{s0}^2} \, \left[

4273: \ln \frac{Q_{s0}^4}{4 \, \Lambda^2 {\un k}^2} + \mbox{Ei} \left( 

4274: \frac{{\un k}^2}{Q_{s0}^2} \right) \right] \right\}, 

4275: \ee

4276: where $\mathrm{Ei}(x)$ is the exponential integral. Expanding

4277: \eq{paqs} would give the gluon production cross section in $pp$, which 

4278: can be obtained from \eq{pp} by dropping $\ln (k_T^2 /\Lambda^2)$ in

4279: it. The nuclear modification factor resulting from \eq{paqs} is

4280: \cite{KKT}

4281: \be\label{rpa1}

4282: R^{pA} (k_T) \, = \, \frac{{\un k}^4}{Q_{s0}^2} \, 

4283: \left\{ - \frac{1}{{\un k}^2} +  \frac{2}{{\un k}^2} \, e^{- {\un k}^2 / 

4284: Q_{s0}^2} + \frac{1}{Q_{s0}^2} \, e^{- {\un k}^2 / Q_{s0}^2} \, \left[

4285: \ln \frac{Q_{s0}^4}{4 \, \Lambda^2 {\un k}^2} + \mbox{Ei} \left( 

4286: \frac{{\un k}^2}{Q_{s0}^2} \right) \right] \right\}.

4287: \ee

4288: The ratio $R^{pA} (k_T)$ is plotted in \fig{cron} for $\Lambda = 0.2 \

4289: Q_{s0}$. It clearly exhibits an enhancement at high-$k_T$

4290: \cite{KTS,BKW,KNST,KKT,KM,ktbroadening1,ktbroadening2,Vitev03,ktbroadening3}

4291: typical of Cronin effect \cite{Cronin}. The height and position of

4292: Cronin maximum are increasing functions of $Q_s$, and, therefore, of

4293: collision centrality \cite{BKW,KKT}.

4294: 

4295: 

4296: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4297: 

4298: \subsection{Gluon Production Including Quantum Evolution}

4299: \label{qepa}

4300: 

4301: Here we are going to show how to include the effects of quantum BK

4302: evolution equation from Sect. \ref{QE} into the gluon production cross

4303: section derived in Sect. \ref{clpa}. We will then analyze the impact

4304: of small-$x$ evolution on the nuclear modification factor $R^{pA}$,

4305: demonstrating that it eliminates Cronin enhancement leading to {\sl

4306: suppression} of gluon production at all transverse momenta $k_T$.

4307: 

4308: 

4309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4310: 

4311: \subsubsection{Gluon Production Cross Section}

4312: 

4313: Starting with the gluon production cross section, let us first solve

4314: the problem of gluon production in deep inelastic scattering (DIS)

4315: instead of $pA$ collisions. The advantage of DIS is that we know

4316: explicitly how to include the non-linear small-$x$ evolution into the

4317: dipole wave function, as shown in \fig{dis1} and given by

4318: \eq{eqN}. The answer we will obtain this way would be easy to

4319: generalize to the case of $pA$ collisions.

4320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4321: \begin{figure}[ht]

4322: \begin{center}

4323: \epsfxsize=13cm

4324: \leavevmode

4325: \hbox{ \epsffile{qcdis.eps}}

4326: \end{center}

4327: \caption{Gluon production in DIS in the quasi-classical approximation. 

4328: The produced gluon may be emitted either off the quark or off the

4329: antiquark lines both in the amplitude and in the complex conjugate

4330: amplitude. Only one connection is shown. }

4331: \label{qcdis}

4332: \end{figure}

4333: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4334: 

4335: The problem of including the effects of BK evolution into the

4336: quasi-classical gluon production cross section from \eq{paclg} could

4337: be thought of as producing one of the gluons in the non-linear cascade

4338: of \fig{dis1}. However, the cascade we needed for calculation of the

4339: total DIS cross section is somewhat different from what we need now

4340: for the inclusive cross section. The difference is in the fact that

4341: the cascade of \fig{dis1} develops from early times, with light cone

4342: time $\tau \equiv x^- = -\infty$, till the interaction with the

4343: nucleus at $\tau =0$.\footnote{Remember, all the multiple

4344: rescatterings with the nucleus in \fig{qqbar} happen very fast, hence

4345: the whole multiple rescattering process can be viewed as instantaneous

4346: when compared to the time it takes to develop the cascade of

4347: gluons/dipoles in \fig{dis1}: therefore we denote the time at which

4348: all the multiple rescatterings take place as $\tau=0$.} Since

4349: \fig{dis1} represents the forward scattering amplitude, the evolution

4350: of the cascade after the interaction, during the times between $\tau

4351: =0$ and $\tau = +\infty$, is restricted to one simple case when the

4352: system returns back to the initial state and nothing is produced. This

4353: is the definition of the forward amplitude and this is all we need to

4354: calculate the total cross section. To calculate the inclusive cross

4355: section we need to square the production amplitude, as was shown in,

4356: for instance, \fig{pa}, for the quasi-classical case. There, already

4357: in the amplitude, we had to include the diagrams where the incoming

4358: proton would ``cascade'', generating a gluon both {\sl before} the

4359: interaction in the time interval $\tau = -\infty \ldots 0$ and {\sl

4360: after} the interaction, at $\tau = 0 \ldots +\infty$. Therefore, to

4361: construct a gluon cascade making sure that we always have the gluon we

4362: are trying to produce in the final state, we have to include gluon

4363: emissions bringing in logarithms of energy both at $\tau = -\infty

4364: \ldots 0$ and $\tau = 0 \ldots +\infty$ in the amplitude and in its 

4365: complex conjugate.

4366: 

4367: To do that let us first generalize the quasi-classical expression from

4368: \eq{paclg} to the case of DIS. The relevant diagrams are shown in \fig{qcdis}. 

4369: They are similar to the case of quark-nucleus scattering pictured in

4370: \fig{pa}. The major difference is that now we have an incoming $q\bar q$ 

4371: dipole instead of just a single quark. The produced gluon can,

4372: therefore, be emitted off of either quark and anti-quark lines on both

4373: sides of the cut. In \fig{qcdis} we show only one particular way of

4374: emitting the gluon. Diagrams A and B in \fig{qcdis} correspond to

4375: diagrams A and B in \fig{pa}. Another difference now is the diagram in

4376: \fig{qcdis}C, which used to cancel through real-virtual cancellations 

4377: in quark--nucleus scattering case and was not even shown in \fig{pa},

4378: is now non-zero and has to be included. This is due to the fact that

4379: moving a $t$-channel exchanged gluon across the cut in \fig{qcdis}C

4380: would change the color factor of the diagram, thus preventing the

4381: cancellation. Adding all the diagrams in \fig{qcdis}, and summing over

4382: all possible emissions of the gluon off the quark and anti-quark

4383: lines, we write for the gluon production cross section in the

4384: dipole-nucleus scattering \cite{yuridiff,KT}

4385: \begin{eqnarray}\label{qcincl}

4386: \frac{d {\hat \sigma}^{q{\bar q}A}}{d^2 k \, dy \, d^2 B}({\underline x}_{01}) 

4387: \, = \,  \frac{\as C_F}{\pi^2} \, \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \, \int \, 

4388: d^2 z_1 \, d^2 z_2 \, e^{- i {\underline k} \cdot ({\underline z}_1 -

4389: {\underline z}_2)} \, \sum_{i,j=0}^1 (-1)^{i+j}

4390: \frac{{\underline z}_1- {\underline x}_i}{|{\underline z}_1-

4391: {\underline x}_i|^2} \cdot

4392: \frac{{\underline z}_2- {\underline x}_j}{|{\underline z}_2- {\underline

4393: x}_j|^2} \nonumber \\

4394: \times \bigg[ N_G \left({\underline z}_1 - {\underline x}_j,

4395: \frac{1}{2} ({\underline z}_1 + {\underline x}_j) , 0\right) + N_G

4396: \left({\underline z}_2 - {\underline x}_i, \frac{1}{2} ({\underline

4397: z}_2 + {\underline x}_i), 0\right) - N_G

4398: \left({\underline z}_1 - {\underline z}_2, \frac{1}{2} ({\underline

4399: z}_1 + {\underline z}_2) , 0\right) \nonumber \\

4400: - N_G \left({\underline x}_i -

4401: {\underline x}_j, \frac{1}{2} ({\underline x}_i + {\underline x}_j),

4402: 0\right)\bigg],

4403: \end{eqnarray}

4404: where, just like in Sect. \ref{BKsect}, the quark and the anti-quark

4405: have transverse coordinates ${\un x}_0$ and ${\un x}_1$

4406: correspondingly. The rest of the notation of \eq{qcincl} is explained

4407: in \fig{qcdis}. $N_G$ in \eq{qcincl} is taken from \eq{NGgm}, and now

4408: we put the correct impact parameters for all the dipoles.

4409: 

4410: To include the effects of small-$x$ evolution we should add to the

4411: graphs in \fig{qcdis} the diagrams with more gluon emissions before

4412: and after the interaction. Let us denote the rapidity of the target

4413: nucleus as $0$ and the rapidity of the incoming $q\bar q$ dipole as

4414: $Y$. The produced gluon would have rapidity $y$. Following \cite{KT}

4415: we will divide all possible extra gluon emission into two categories:

4416: the gluons can have rapidities larger (harder) or smaller (softer)

4417: than $y$.

4418: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4419: \begin{figure}[ht]

4420: \begin{center}

4421: \epsfxsize=15cm

4422: \leavevmode

4423: \hbox{ \epsffile{eem.eps}}

4424: \end{center}

4425: \caption{Emission of a harder gluon in the dipole evolution, as considered in \cite{KT}. 

4426: Gluons are denoted by double lines in the large $N_c$ limit. The

4427: produced gluon is marked by a cross. Dashed lines comprise multiple

4428: rescatterings with the target from \fig{qqbar}, which are

4429: instantaneous on the time scale of the dipole evolution. }

4430: \label{eem}

4431: \end{figure}

4432: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4433: 

4434: First we analyze the emissions of {\sl harder} gluons. Some of the

4435: relevant diagrams are shown in \fig{eem}. Since we are trying to apply

4436: quantum evolution from Mueller's dipole model \cite{dip1,dip2,dip3} we

4437: are again working in the large-$N_c$ limit. Similar to \fig{dipeqn}

4438: the gluons are denoted by double lines which do not connect to any

4439: particular quark or anti-quark lines in the dipole in which a

4440: particular gluon is emitted: this denotes summation over both

4441: connections on both sides of the cut. In \fig{eem} the gluon $3$ is

4442: the one that we measure in the final state, the gluon $2$ is a harder

4443: gluon emitted before gluon $3$. Solid vertical lines in \fig{eem}

4444: denote the $\tau = +\infty$ final state, while the dashed vertical

4445: lines denote the multiple rescattering interactions with the target

4446: from \fig{qqbar} taking place at $\tau =0$ on both sides of the cut.

4447: 

4448: In Sect. \ref{BKsect} we have demonstrated that successive emissions

4449: of progressively softer gluons before the interaction (for $\tau =

4450: -\infty \ldots 0$) give the leading logarithmic contribution, in the

4451: sense of giving a factor of $Y$ for each factor of $\as$ resumming the

4452: parameter $\as Y$, as is accomplished by \eq{eqN}. Interestingly

4453: enough, this ordering has to be reversed for emissions after the

4454: interaction (for $\tau = 0 \ldots +\infty$): to obtain the leading

4455: logarithmic contribution ($\as Y$), softer gluons have to be emitted

4456: before harder ones at $\tau = 0 \ldots +\infty$ \cite{KT}. More

4457: details on how this happens could be found in \cite{KT}. Indeed, if

4458: emission of a harder gluon happened after the emission of the softer

4459: one, the harder gluon can not be emitted off the softer one: it is

4460: emitted by hard quark lines of the original dipole \cite{KT}. Since

4461: the diagrams E--I in \fig{eem} violate such inverse ordering, they can

4462: be discarded. Only the diagrams A--D in \fig{eem} contribute. Those

4463: are {\sl real} contributions to the dipole evolution leading to

4464: production of the dipole in which gluon $3$ was emitted. Note that all

4465: of these surviving diagrams have early time ($\tau = -\infty \ldots

4466: 0$) emissions only: they correspond to standard dipole evolution of

4467: \fig{dis1}. A similar analysis shows that out of the rest of the

4468: diagrams with possible emissions of gluon $2$, the ones that bring in

4469: leading logarithmic contribution are the ones which give {\sl virtual}

4470: corrections to the dipole evolution at light cone times $\tau =

4471: -\infty \ldots 0$ \cite{KT}. Emissions of other harder gluons do not

4472: change the conclusions: the surviving diagrams are the ones which

4473: contribute to dipole evolution leading to production of the dipole in

4474: which gluon $3$ was emitted. Such evolution is described by the

4475: quantity $n_1 ({\un x}_{01}, {\un x}_{0'1'}, {\un B} - {\un b}, Y-y)$,

4476: originally introduced in \cite{dip1,dip2}, which has the meaning of

4477: the number of dipoles of size ${\un x}_{0'1'}$ at rapidity $y$ and

4478: impact parameter $\un b$ generated by evolution from the original

4479: dipole ${\un x}_{01}$ having rapidity $Y$ and impact parameter $\un

4480: B$. This quantity obeys the dipole model analogue of the BFKL equation

4481: \cite{BFKL}, which is just the linear part of \eq{eqN}

4482: \cite{dip1,dip2}

4483: \ben

4484: \frac{\partial n_1 ({\un

4485: x}_{01}, {\un x}_{0'1'}, {\un b}, y)}{\partial y} \, = \, 

4486: \frac{\as \, N_c}{2 \, \pi^2} \, 

4487: \int d^2 x_2 \, \frac{x_{01}^2}{x_{20}^2 \, x_{21}^2} \, 

4488: \bigg[ n_1 ({\un x}_{02}, {\un x}_{0'1'}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{21}, y) + 

4489: n_1 ({\un x}_{12}, {\un x}_{0'1'}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{20}, y) 

4490: \een

4491: \be\label{eqn}

4492: - n_1 ({\un x}_{01}, {\un x}_{0'1'}, {\un b}, y) \bigg] 

4493: \ee

4494: with the initial condition 

4495: \be

4496: n_1 ({\un x}_{01}, {\un x}_{0'1'}, {\un b}, y=0) \, = \, \delta ({\un

4497: x}_{01} - {\un x}_{0'1'}) \, \delta ({\un b}).

4498: \ee

4499: 

4500: The inclusion of the effects of harder gluons in \eq{qcincl} is then

4501: accomplished by replacing the cross section in \eq{qcincl} by

4502: \cite{KT}

4503: \be\label{hard}

4504: \frac{d {\hat \sigma}^{q{\bar q}A}}{d^2 k \, dy \, d^2 B}({\underline x}_{01})  

4505: \rightarrow \int d^2 b \, d^2 x_{0'1'} \ 

4506: n_1 ({\un x}_{01}, {\un x}_{0'1'}, {\un B} - {\un b}, Y-y) \ \frac{d

4507: {\hat \sigma}^{q{\bar q}A}}{d^2 k \, dy \, d^2 b}({\underline

4508: x}_{0'1'}).

4509: \ee

4510: 

4511: Now we have to resum emissions of softer gluons having rapidity less

4512: than the rapidity of the produced gluon $y$.

4513: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4514: \begin{figure}[ht]

4515: \begin{center}

4516: \epsfxsize=16cm

4517: \leavevmode

4518: \hbox{ \epsffile{lem.eps}}

4519: \end{center}

4520: \caption{Diagrams including one softer gluon produced after the emission 

4521: of the measured gluon \cite{KT}.}

4522: \label{lem}

4523: \end{figure}

4524: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4525: Such emissions are demonstrated in \fig{lem}, where now the gluon $2$

4526: is softer than the gluon $3$. \fig{lem} only has emissions where gluon

4527: $2$ interacts with gluon $3$ and with either the quark or the

4528: anti-quark lines in the dipole. As was shown in \cite{KT}, such

4529: diagrams cancel pairwise via real-virtual cancellations:

4530: \be

4531: A + D =0, \hspace*{5mm} B + C =0, \hspace*{5mm} F+G=0 , \hspace*{5mm}

4532: E+H=0.

4533: \ee

4534: The diagrams where gluon $2$ connects only to the quark and the

4535: anti-quark lines cancel analogously \cite{KT}. The only remaining

4536: diagrams are where the gluon $2$ is emitted and reabsorbed by gluon

4537: $3$ only. Using the crossing symmetry \cite{Mueller_cross} we reflect

4538: the line of gluon $3$ into the complex conjugate amplitude (denoted by

4539: $3'$) with respect to the cut, obtaining a gluon dipole in the

4540: amplitude, just like we did in Sect. \ref{clglue} to obtain

4541: \eq{paclg}. Then it becomes manifest that emission of gluon $2$ can be 

4542: thought of as one iteration of dipole evolution in the gluon dipole

4543: $33'$. Successive emissions of even softer gluon would not modify this

4544: conclusion. Therefore, to include the effects of softer gluon

4545: emissions in \eq{qcincl} we have to replace \cite{KT}

4546: \be\label{soft}

4547: N_G ({\un x}, {\un b}, 0) \rightarrow N_G ({\un x}, {\un b}, y)

4548: \ee

4549: on its right hand side, where now $N_G ({\un x}, {\un b}, y)$ is the

4550: amplitude of a gluon dipole interacting with the nucleus including the

4551: small-$x$ evolution of \eq{eqN}. In the large-$N_c$ limit $N_G$ can be

4552: expressed in terms of the quark dipole amplitude $N$ from \eq{eqN} as

4553: \be\label{ggqq}

4554: N_G ({\underline x}, {\underline b}, y) \, = \, 2 \, N ({\underline

4555: x}, {\underline b}, y) - N^2 ({\underline x}, {\underline b}, y),

4556: \ee

4557: since a gluon dipole in the large-$N_c$ limit can be thought of as a

4558: pair of quark dipoles, with either one of them or both quark dipoles

4559: interacting.

4560: 

4561: Combining the prescriptions for including quantum evolution for hard

4562: (\ref{hard}) and soft (\ref{soft}) emissions we obtain the following

4563: expression for inclusive gluon production cross section in DIS

4564: \cite{KT}

4565: \ben

4566: \frac{d \sigma^{q{\bar q}A}}{d^2 k \ dy \, d^2 B} ({\un x}_{01}) \ = \ 

4567:  \int  \, d^2 x_{0'1'} \,

4568: n_1 ({\underline x}_{01}, {\underline x}_{0'1'}, {\underline B} - {\underline

4569: b}, Y - y) \,  \frac{\as

4570: C_F}{\pi^2} \, \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^2} \, d^2 b

4571: \een

4572: \ben

4573: \times \, d^2 z_1 \, d^2 z_2 \, e^{- i {\underline k} \cdot ({\underline z}_1 -

4574: {\underline z}_2 )} \, \sum_{i,j = 0'}^{1'} (-1)^{i+j} \,

4575: \frac{{\underline z}_1 - {\underline x}_i}{|{\underline z}_1 - 

4576: {\underline x}_i|^2} \cdot \frac{{\underline z}_2 - {\underline

4577: x}_j}{|{\underline z}_2 - {\underline x}_j|^2} \left[ N_G \left({\underline

4578: z}_1 - {\underline x}_j, \frac{1}{2} ({\underline z}_1 + {\underline

4579: x}_j) , y\right) + \right.

4580: \een

4581: \be\label{incl}

4582: + \left. N_G \left({\underline z}_2 - {\underline x}_i, \frac{1}{2}

4583: ({\underline z}_2 + {\underline x}_i), y\right) - N_G

4584: \left({\underline z}_1 - {\underline z}_2, \frac{1}{2} ({\underline

4585: z}_1 + {\underline z}_2) , y\right) - N_G \left({\underline x}_i -

4586: {\underline x}_j, \frac{1}{2} ({\underline x}_i + {\underline x}_j),

4587: y\right)\right].

4588: \ee

4589: \eq{incl} provides us with the single inclusive gluon production cross section 

4590: for scattering of the quark--anti-quark dipole $01$ on the target

4591: nucleus, which includes all multiple rescatterings (powers of $\as^2

4592: A^{1/3}$) and small-$x$ evolution corrections (powers of $\as Y$ and

4593: $\as y$) \cite{KT}.

4594: 

4595: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4596: \begin{figure}[ht]

4597: \begin{center}

4598: \epsfxsize=10cm

4599: \leavevmode

4600: \hbox{ \epsffile{fan1.eps}}

4601: \end{center}

4602: \caption{Interpretation of the inclusive gluon production in $pA$ collisions from 

4603: \eq{incl} in terms of fan diagrams.}

4604: \label{fan1}

4605: \end{figure}

4606: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4607: 

4608: If one associates \eq{eqN} with summation of fan diagrams from

4609: \fig{fan}, than one can represent \eq{incl} in the way shown in 

4610: \fig{fan1}. There the interaction between the quark--anti-quark 

4611: dipole and the target is mediated by exchange of fan diagrams, where

4612: we trigger on one of the produced gluons, which is denoted by the

4613: cross. The part of the diagram between the produced gluon and the

4614: projectile dipole is described in \eq{incl} by the quantity $n_1

4615: ({\underline x}_{01}, {\underline x}_{0'1'}, {\underline B} -

4616: {\underline b}, Y - y)$, which satisfies linear BFKL evolution

4617: equation (\ref{eqn}). In terms of ladder and fan diagrams, that

4618: corresponds to having just a single ladder exchange between the dipole

4619: and the produced gluon, as shown in \fig{fan1}. In principle one could

4620: draw gluon production diagrams where the ladder between the dipole and

4621: produced gluon would split into several ladders interacting with the

4622: target. However, \eq{incl} implies that such graphs cancel. The same

4623: cancellation is expected if one applies AGK cutting rules to QCD

4624: diagrams \cite{AGK,BR,Braun2}. It is intriguing to see AGK rules work

4625: in perturbative QCD in the framework of the dipole model. They have

4626: also been found to work previously for single diffractive cross

4627: sections in DIS calculated in the dipole model approach

4628: \cite{KL}. However, the AGK rules appear to break down in QCD for inclusive 

4629: two-particle production cross sections \cite{JMK,BGV,NSZZ}.

4630: 

4631: 

4632: In the limit of a very large target nucleus the momentum transfer to

4633: the nucleus is cut off by inverse nuclear radius and is very small. We

4634: can therefore take the scattering amplitudes $N_G$ in

4635: \eq{incl} at $t=0$, which in coordinate space is equivalent to

4636: neglecting (factoring out) the impact parameter dependence since the

4637: shifts in impact parameter in \eq{incl} are small compared to the

4638: nuclear radius \cite{FIIM,BKL}. We, therefore, put all the impact

4639: parameters in $N_G$'s of \eq{incl} to be equal to $\un b$. Repeating

4640: the steps outlined at the end of Sect. \ref{clglue} we arrive at \cite{KT}

4641: \be\label{ktdip}

4642: \frac{d \sigma^{q{\bar q}A}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{2 \, \as}{C_F} \, 

4643: \frac{1}{{\un k}^2} \, \int d^2 q \, \phi_{q\bar q} ({\un q}, Y-y) \, \phi_A ({\un k} 

4644: - {\un q}, y)

4645: \ee

4646: with $\phi_A ({\un k} - {\un q}, y)$ given by \eq{ktglue} and the

4647: unintegrated gluon distribution in the dipole given by \cite{KT,JMK}

4648: \be\label{dipglue}

4649: \phi_{q\bar q} ({\un q}, y) \, = \, \frac{2 \, \as \, C_F}{\pi} \, 

4650: \int d^2 b \, d^2 x_{0'1'} 

4651: \, e^{- i {\un q} \cdot {\un x}_{0'1'}} \, \frac{1}{\nabla^2_{x_{0'1'}}} \, 

4652: n_1 ({\underline x}_{01}, {\underline x}_{0'1'}, {\underline b}, y).

4653: \ee

4654: Interestingly enough, as we see from \eq{ktdip}, the small-$x$

4655: evolution does not lead to break-down of the $k_T$-factorization

4656: formula (\ref{ktcl})! In fact, \eq{ktdip}, with the gluon distribution

4657: functions given by \eq{dipglue} and by \eq{ktglue}, only with twice

4658: the quark dipole amplitude $2 \, N$ instead of $N_G$, was postulated

4659: as the answer for inclusive gluon production cross section by Braun in

4660: \cite{Braun2} using $k_T$-factorization approach. Still, \eq{ktdip},

4661: obtained in \cite{KT}, differs from the result of \cite{Braun2} by the

4662: difference in $N_G$ and $2 \, N$ (see \eq{ggqq}), which in the

4663: standard pomeron language appears to corresponds to emission of the

4664: produced gluon from the triple pomeron vertex \cite{Braun3}. This

4665: difference may become numerically significant for low transverse

4666: momenta of the produced gluon, as was shown in \cite{Braun3}.

4667: 

4668: 

4669: Now generalization to the case of $pA$ becomes manifest: we have to

4670: replace the unintegrated gluon distribution function of a dipole,

4671: $\phi_{q\bar q} ({\un q}, y)$, by the one for the proton, $\phi_p

4672: ({\un q}, y)$, given by \eq{ktgluep} with $n_G$ satisfying the linear

4673: part of \eq{eqN}

4674: \be\label{eqnG}

4675: \frac{\partial n_G ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, y)}{\partial y} \, = \, 

4676: \frac{\as \, N_c}{2 \, \pi^2} \, 

4677: \int d^2 x_2 \, \frac{x_{01}^2}{x_{20}^2 \, x_{21}^2} \, 

4678: \bigg[ n_G ({\un x}_{02}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{21}, y) + 

4679: n_G ({\un x}_{12}, {\un b} + \frac{1}{2} \, {\un x}_{20}, y) - n_G

4680: ({\un x}_{01}, {\un b}, y) \bigg]

4681: \ee

4682: with \eq{ng} as the initial condition. To summarize, the inclusive

4683: cross section from Eq. (\ref{ktdip}) becomes in the case of $pA$

4684: \be\label{ktpa}

4685: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{2 \, \as}{C_F} \, 

4686: \frac{1}{{\un k}^2} \, \int d^2 q \, \phi_p ({\un q}, Y-y) \, \phi_A ({\un k} 

4687: - {\un q}, y)

4688: \ee

4689: with the unintegrated gluon distributions given by Eqs. (\ref{ktglue})

4690: and (\ref{ktgluep}) with the dipole cross sections evolved with

4691: Eqs. (\ref{eqN}) and (\ref{eqnG}) correspondingly.

4692: 

4693: Indeed \eq{ktdip} was derived in the large-$N_c$ limit. It appear hard

4694: (though maybe not impossible) to generalize the large-$N_c$ dipole

4695: model to the case of projectile proton: therefore, we can not prove

4696: the suggested generalization to the proton case. However, this

4697: generalization is probably a good approximation of the exact answer

4698: for the following reasons.  We showed that $k_T$-factorization works

4699: in the quasi-classical case to all orders in $N_c$ (see \eq{ktcl}). We

4700: have also shown that it survives evolution corrections

4701: (\eq{ktdip}). Therefore, factorization formula (\ref{ktpa}), which

4702: expresses the production cross section in terms of gluon dipole

4703: amplitudes scattering on the projectile and on the target, is probably

4704: valid in the general case of including small-$x$ evolution beyond the

4705: large-$N_c$ limit. The results of numerical solution of the full

4706: JIMWLK evolution equation for the dipole amplitude were shown to be

4707: amazingly close to the solution of BK equation \cite{RW}. The linear

4708: BFKL evolution analogue in the dipole model \cite{dip1} gives the same

4709: value for the pomeron intercept as the exact BFKL equation

4710: \cite{BFKL}. Therefore, it is probably safe to use \eq{ktpa} for the 

4711: gluon production in $pA$, even though strictly speaking it should

4712: work only for the case when the proton is approximated by a

4713: di-quark. Both pA and DIS processes are considered here as scatterings

4714: of an unsaturated projectile (proton or $q\bar q$ pair) on a saturated

4715: target (nucleus), and, therefore, gluon production cross sections for

4716: them should be similar. Therefore, we will use \eq{ktpa} for the

4717: analysis outlined below of the gluon production in $pA$. 

4718: 

4719: 

4720: 

4721: 

4722: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4723: 

4724: \subsubsection{Nuclear Modification Factor: Double Logarithmic Region}

4725: 

4726: Let us now analyze what happens to nuclear modification factor

4727: (\ref{rpa}) when quantum evolution is included. To do that, we use

4728: Eqs. (\ref{ktglue}) and (\ref{ktgluep}) to rewrite \eq{ktpa} as

4729: \be\label{paevc1}

4730: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{C_F}{\as \, 

4731: \pi \, (2 \pi)^3} \, 

4732: \frac{1}{{\un k}^2} \, \int d^2 B \, d^2 b \, d^2 z \, 

4733: \nabla^2_z \, n_G ({\un z}, {\un B} - {\un b}, Y-y) \, e^{- i {\un k}

4734: \cdot {\un z}} \, \nabla^2_z \, N_G ({\un z}, {\un b}, y).

4735: \ee

4736: For simplicity, let us neglect the impact parameter dependence of

4737: $N_G$ throughout the nucleus and of $n_G$ over the transverse area of

4738: the proton. Suppressing the impact parameter dependence in the

4739: arguments of $N_G$ and $n_G$ in \eq{paevc1} we rewrite it as

4740: \be\label{paevc}

4741: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{C_F}{\as \, 

4742: \pi \, (2 \pi)^3} \, 

4743: \frac{S_p \, S_A}{{\un k}^2} \, \int d^2 z \, 

4744: \nabla^2_z \, n_G ({\un z}, Y-y) \, e^{- i {\un k}

4745: \cdot {\un z}} \, \nabla^2_z \, N_G ({\un z}, y),

4746: \ee

4747: with $S_A$ and $S_p$ the cross sectional areas of the nucleus and the

4748: proton correspondingly. In this Section, and in the one below, we will

4749: be interested in gluon production with large $k_T \gsim Q_s (y)$, such

4750: that nonlinear effects could be neglected in $N_G$. Outside of the

4751: saturation region we write, similar to \eq{dsol3},

4752: \be\label{NGlin}

4753: N_G (z_T, y) \, = \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \ e^{2 \, \bas \,

4754: \chi (0, \nu) \, y } \, (z_T Q_{s0})^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu} \, C_\nu^A,

4755: \ee

4756: where $C_\nu^A$ is determined by the initial condition of

4757: \eq{NGgm}. Similarly, for $n_G$ one writes the general $\un b$-independent 

4758: solution of \eq{eqnG} as

4759: \be\label{nGlin}

4760: n_G (z_T, y) \, = \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \ e^{2 \, \bas \,

4761: \chi (0, \nu) \, y } \, (z_T \Lambda_p)^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu} \, C_\nu^p,

4762: \ee

4763: where, to satisfy the initial condition given by \eq{ng}, 

4764: \be\label{Cp}

4765: C_{\nu}^p \, = \, \frac{1}{4 \, \pi \, (1 - 2 \, i \, \nu)^2}

4766: \ee

4767: and

4768: \be

4769: \Lambda^2_p \, = \, 4 \, \pi \, \as^2 \, \frac{1}{S_p}.

4770: \ee

4771: Substituting Eqs. (\ref{NGlin}) and (\ref{nGlin}) into \eq{paevc} and

4772: integrating over $\un z$ yields

4773: \ben

4774: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{C_F \, S_p \, S_A}{\as \, 

4775: (2 \pi)^3} \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \, d \nu' \, C_\nu^A \,

4776: C_{\nu'}^p \, (1+2 i \nu)^2 \, (1+2 i \nu')^2 \, 2^{2 i (\nu + \nu')}

4777: \, \frac{\Gamma [i  (\nu + \nu')]}{\Gamma [1- i  (\nu + \nu')]} 

4778: \een

4779: \be\label{dlapa1}

4780: \times \, \left( \frac{Q_{s0}}{k_T} \right)^{1+2 i \nu} \, \left( 

4781: \frac{\Lambda_p}{k_T} \right)^{1+2 i \nu'} \, e^{2 \, \bas \,

4782: \chi (0, \nu) \, y + 2 \, \bas \,

4783: \chi (0, \nu') \, (Y-y)}

4784: \ee

4785: with $\bas$ given by \eq{bas}.

4786: 

4787: In this Section we are interested in the double logarithmic region

4788: (DLA) where $k_T \gsim k_{\rm geom} \gg Q_s (y)$. Evaluating the $\nu$ and

4789: $\nu'$ integrals in \eq{dlapa1} in the stationary phase approximation

4790: around the saddle point from \eq{spdla1} with $\chi (0,\nu)$ (and

4791: $\chi (0,\nu')$) given by \eq{spdla} we obtain \cite{Ryskin}

4792: \ben

4793: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \bigg|_{DLA} \, \approx \, 

4794: \frac{C_F \, S_p \, S_A}{\as \, (2 \pi)^4} \, 

4795: \frac{Q_{s0}^{2} \, \Lambda_p^2}{{\un k}^4} \, \frac{1}{2 \, \bas} \, 

4796: \left[ \frac{\ln \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}} \, \ln \frac{k_T}{\Lambda_p}}{y^3 \, 

4797: (Y-y)^3} 

4798: \right]^{1/4} \, \left( \sqrt{\frac{y}{\ln \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}}}} + 

4799: \sqrt{\frac{Y-y}{ \ln \frac{k_T}{\Lambda_p}}} \right)

4800: \een

4801: \be\label{dla}

4802: \times \exp\left( 2 \sqrt{2 \, \bas \, y \, \ln \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}}} +

4803:  2 \sqrt{2 \, \bas \, (Y-y) \, \ln \frac{k_T}{\Lambda_p}} \ \right).

4804: \ee

4805: In arriving at \eq{dla} we made use of \eq{Cp}, and have also used the

4806: fact that near the saddle point of \eq{spdla1} $C_\nu^A$ is

4807: approximately given by \eq{Cp} as well \cite{KKT}.

4808: 

4809: To calculate $R^{pa}$ we also need the gluon production cross section

4810: in $pp$ collisions in the same kinematic DLA region, which can be

4811: obtained from \eq{dla} by replacing $S_A \rightarrow S_p$ and $Q_{s0}

4812: \rightarrow \Lambda_p$ in it \cite{KKT}

4813: \be\label{dlapp}

4814: \frac{d \sigma^{pp}}{d^2 k \ dy} \bigg|_{DLA} \, \approx \, 

4815: \frac{C_F \, S_p^2}{\as \, (2 \pi)^4} \

4816: \frac{\Lambda_p^4}{{\un k}^4} \, \frac{1}{2 \, \bas} \, 

4817: \frac{\sqrt{y} + \sqrt{Y-y}}{y^{3/4} \, (Y-y)^{3/4}} 

4818: \, \exp\left[ 2 \sqrt{2 \, \bas \, \ln \frac{k_T}{\Lambda_p}} \left( \sqrt{y} 

4819: + \sqrt{Y-y} \right) \right].

4820: \ee

4821: Substituting Eqs. (\ref{dla}) and (\ref{dlapp}) in \eq{rpa} and

4822: remembering that $S_A = A^{2/3} S_p$ and $Q_{s0}^2 = A^{1/3}

4823: \Lambda_p^2$ yields

4824: \ben

4825: R^{pA} (k_T, y) \bigg|_{k_T \gg Q_s} \, = \, \frac{\left( \ln

4826: \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}} \, \ln

4827: \frac{k_T}{\Lambda_p} \right)^{1/4}}{\sqrt{y} + \sqrt{Y-y}} \, 

4828: \left( \sqrt{\frac{y}{\ln \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}}}} + 

4829: \sqrt{\frac{Y-y}{ \ln \frac{k_T}{\Lambda_p}}} \right) 

4830: \een

4831: \be\label{dlar}

4832: \times \, \exp\left[ 2 \sqrt{2 \, \bas \, y} \left( \sqrt{\ln

4833: \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}}} - \sqrt{\ln \frac{k_T}{\Lambda_p}} \right) \right].

4834: \ee

4835: The behavior of $R^{pA} (k_T, y)$ from \eq{dlar} at high $y$ is

4836: dominated by the exponent in it \cite{KKT}

4837: \be\label{dlaexp}

4838: R^{pA} (k_T, y) \bigg|_{k_T \gg Q_s} \, \approx \, \exp\left[ 2

4839: \sqrt{2 \, \bas \, y} \left( \sqrt{\ln

4840: \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}}} - \sqrt{\ln \frac{k_T}{\Lambda_p}} \right) \right] \, < \, 1.

4841: \ee

4842: Since $Q_{s0} \gg \Lambda_p$, the exponent in \eq{dlaexp} becomes less

4843: than $1$, driving $R^{pA} (k_T, y)$ below one as well \cite{KKT}. We

4844: therefore conclude that in the DLA region with $k_T \gsim k_{\rm geom}$,

4845: the nuclear modification factor becomes smaller than $1$ due to

4846: quantum evolution. This indicates {\sl suppression} of gluon

4847: production due to quantum evolution. A suppression of $R^{pA}$ by

4848: small-$x$ evolution effects was originally suggested in \cite{KLM},

4849: though the authors of \cite{KLM} analyzed particle (gluon) production

4850: only in the geometric scaling region $k_T \lsim k_{\rm geom}$, which is

4851: what we are going to do now.

4852: 

4853: 

4854: 

4855: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4856: 

4857: \subsubsection{Nuclear Modification Factor: Extended Geometric Scaling Region}

4858: 

4859: In the extended geometric scaling region, $Q_s (Y) < k_T \lsim k_{\rm

4860: geom}$, multiple rescatterings are still unimportant and

4861: \eq{dlapa1} from the previous Section still applies. To obtain the 

4862: leading behavior of \eq{dlapa1} in the geometric scaling region we

4863: will evaluate the $\nu$-integral in it by simply replacing $\nu$ with

4864: $\nu_0$ from \eq{nu0val} in the integrand, as it was done in obtaining

4865: \eq{dsol10}. We obtain

4866: \ben

4867: \frac{d \sigma^{pA}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{C_F \, S_p \, S_A}{\as \, 

4868: (2 \pi)^3} \ C_{\nu_0}^A \, (1+2 i \nu_0)^2 \, 2^{2 i \nu_0} \, \left(

4869: \frac{Q_{s0}}{k_T} \right)^{1+2 i \nu_0} \, e^{2 \, \bas \,

4870: \chi (0, \nu_0 ) \, y} \, 

4871: \een

4872: \be\label{llapa}

4873: \times  \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu' \,  C_{\nu'}^p \, (1+2 i \nu')^2 \, 2^{2 i \nu'}

4874: \, \frac{\Gamma [i  (\nu_0 + \nu')]}{\Gamma [1- i  (\nu_0 + \nu')]} \, \left( 

4875: \frac{\Lambda_p}{k_T} \right)^{1+2 i \nu'} \, e^{2 \, \bas \,

4876: \chi (0, \nu') \, (Y-y)}.

4877: \ee

4878: The gluon production cross section in $pp$ collisions is given by

4879: \ben

4880: \frac{d \sigma^{pp}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{C_F \, S_p^2}{\as \, 

4881: (2 \pi)^3} \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \, d \nu' \, C_\nu^p \,

4882: C_{\nu'}^p \, (1+2 i \nu)^2 \, (1+2 i \nu')^2 \, 2^{2 i (\nu + \nu')}

4883: \, \frac{\Gamma [i  (\nu + \nu')]}{\Gamma [1- i  (\nu + \nu')]} 

4884: \een

4885: \be\label{pp1}

4886: \times \, \left( \frac{\Lambda_p}{k_T} \right)^{1+2 i \nu} \, \left( 

4887: \frac{\Lambda_p}{k_T} \right)^{1+2 i \nu'} \, e^{2 \, \bas \,

4888: \chi (0, \nu) \, y + 2 \, \bas \,

4889: \chi (0, \nu') \, (Y-y)}.

4890: \ee

4891: 

4892: 

4893: To evaluate the $\nu'$-integral in \eq{llapa} and both $\nu$ and

4894: $\nu'$ integrals in \eq{pp1} we need to know whether we are inside or

4895: outside of the extended geometric scaling region for the

4896: proton. Recall that, while \eq{pp1} and \eq{ktpa} are valid only

4897: outside the saturation region of the proton, such that the evolution

4898: between the produce gluon and the proton can only be linear, that

4899: evolution may still be dominated either by the double logarithmic

4900: saddle point $\nu^*_{DLA}$ from \eq{spdla1} or by the leading

4901: logarithmic saddle point $\nu_0$ from \eq{nu0val}. The dominant saddle

4902: point is determined by scale of the geometric scaling in the proton,

4903: $k_{\rm geom}^p$, which can be obtained from \eq{kgeom} by using

4904: proton saturation scale in it, which, in turn, is obtained from

4905: \eq{qsy2} by putting $A=1$. In the problem we are considering here,

4906: both the atomic number $A$ and the rapidity intervals $y$ and $Y-y$

4907: are large. Therefore, in principle, $k_{\rm geom}^p$ can be above the

4908: nuclear saturation scale $Q_s (y)$. Since we are interested in the

4909: extended geometric scaling region of the nucleus, $Q_s (Y) < k_T \lsim

4910: k_{\rm geom}$, we have to consider two cases: (a)~$k^p_{\rm geom}

4911: \lsim k_T

4912: \lsim k_{\rm geom}$ and (b)~$Q_s (Y) < k_T \lsim k^p_{\rm geom}$.

4913: 

4914: \begin{itemize}

4915: 

4916: \item[(a)] $k^p_{\rm geom} \lsim k_T \lsim k_{\rm geom}$ If $k_T$ of the 

4917: produced gluon is outside of the proton extended geometric scaling

4918: region, then $\nu'$-integral in \eq{llapa} and $\nu$ and $\nu'$

4919: integrals in \eq{pp1} have to be evaluated around the saddle point

4920: $\nu^*_{DLA}$ from \eq{spdla1}, which in momentum space for the case of

4921: the proton is given by

4922: \be

4923: \nu^*_{DLA} \, \approx \, - \frac{i}{2} \, \left( 1 - 

4924: \sqrt{\frac{2 \, \bas \, Y}{\ln (k_T/\Lambda_p)}} \right).

4925: \ee

4926: Evaluating both \eq{llapa} and \eq{pp1} using \eq{Cp}, substituting the

4927: results into \eq{rpa} and dropping the slowly varying prefactors, we

4928: obtain the nuclear modification factor \cite{KKT}

4929: \be\label{llar2}

4930: R^{pA} (k_T, y) \bigg|_{k^p_{\rm geom} \lsim k_T \lsim k_{\rm geom}} \, \approx \,

4931: \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}} \, \exp \left[{(\alpha_P - 1) \, y - 2 \, 

4932: \sqrt{2 \, \bas \, y \, \ln \frac{k_T}{\Lambda}} - \frac{\ln^2 

4933: \frac{k_T}{Q_{s0}}}{14 \, \zeta (3) \, \bas \, y}}\right].

4934: \ee

4935: To estimate the value of $R^{pA}$ in \eq{llar2} in the region

4936: $k^p_{\rm geom} \lsim k_T \lsim k_{\rm geom}$ we substitute $k_T =

4937: k_{\rm geom}$ into \eq{llar2} with $k_{\rm geom}$ from \eq{kgeom}. The

4938: result yields an asymptotically small value

4939: \be\label{rpae}

4940: R^{pA} (k_T = k_{\rm geom}, y) \, \approx \, e^{- 1.65 \, \bas \, y}

4941: \, \ll \, 1,

4942: \ee

4943: where we used $A=197$ for gold nucleus. For other values of $A$ and

4944: for other values of $k_T$ in the region $k_{\rm geom}^p \lsim k_T

4945: \lsim k_{\rm geom}$ one still gets exponential suppression for $R^{pA}

4946: (k_T, y)$.  Therefore we conclude that $R^{pA} (k_T, y) < 1$ in the

4947: region $k_{\rm geom}^p \lsim k_T \lsim k_{\rm geom}$.

4948: 

4949: \item[(b)] $Q_s (Y) < k_T \lsim k^p_{\rm geom}$ If $k_T$ of the produced 

4950: gluon is inside the geometric scaling regions of both the nucleus and

4951: the proton, we evaluate the $\nu'$-integral in \eq{llapa} and $\nu$

4952: and $\nu'$ integrals in \eq{pp1} by putting $\nu = \nu' = \nu_0$ in

4953: them with $\nu_0$ given by \eq{nu0val}. Noting that almost all the

4954: prefactors in Eqs. (\ref{llapa}) and (\ref{pp1}) would then be

4955: identical, we write for the nuclear modification factor

4956: \be\label{lla1}

4957: R^{pA} (k_T, y) \bigg|_{Q_s (y) < k_T \lsim k^p_{\rm geom}} \, \approx

4958: \, \frac{C^A_{\nu_0}}{C^p_{\nu_0}} \, A^{-\frac{1}{3}} \, \left(

4959: \frac{Q_{s0}}{\Lambda_p} \right)^{1+2 i \nu_0}.

4960: \ee

4961: As $Q_{s0}^2 = A^{1/3} \Lambda_p^2$ \eq{lla1} leads to 

4962: \be\label{lla2}

4963: R^{pA} (k_T, y) \bigg|_{Q_s (y) < k_T \lsim k^p_{\rm geom}} \, \approx

4964: \, \frac{C^A_{\nu_0}}{C^p_{\nu_0}} \ A^{- \frac{1}{6} + \frac{i \, \nu_0}{3}}.

4965: \ee

4966: Since $\nu_0$ is just a number, $C^A_{\nu_0}/C^p_{\nu_0}$ does not

4967: depend on rapidity and varies weakly with $A$. The nuclear

4968: modification factor in \eq{lla2} is, therefore, driven by the power of

4969: $A$ in it. Using the numerical value of $\nu_0$ from \eq{nu0val} we

4970: obtain \cite{KKT}

4971: \be\label{lla3}

4972: R^{pA} (k_T, y) \bigg|_{Q_s (y) < k_T \lsim k^p_{\rm geom}} \, \approx

4973: \, A^{- \frac{1}{6} + \frac{i \, \nu_0}{3}} \, = \, A^{-0.124} \, < \, 1.

4974: \ee

4975: This is the suppression of particle production which was originally

4976: predicted in \cite{KLM}. 

4977: 

4978: \end{itemize}

4979: 

4980: We conclude that small-$x$ evolution leads to suppression of $R^{pA}$

4981: in the whole extended geometric scaling region $Q_s (y) < k_T \lsim

4982: k_{\rm geom}$ \cite{KLM,KKT,BKW,AAKSW}. 

4983: 

4984: 

4985: 

4986: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4987: 

4988: \subsubsection{Nuclear Modification Factor: Saturation Region}

4989: 

4990: Above we have shown that for $k_T > Q_s (y)$ quantum evolution

4991: introduces suppression of $R^{pA}$. Here we will study the saturation

4992: region, $k_T \lsim Q_s (y)$. The important question now is to

4993: understand what happens to Cronin maximum from \fig{cron} as the

4994: effects of small-$x$ evolution become important. Since the Cronin peak

4995: is located at $k_T = Q_s (y)$, we need to find out what happens with

4996: $R^{pA} (k_T = Q_s (y), y)$ as $y$ increases. 

4997: 

4998: Inside the geometric scaling region ($z_T > 1/k_{\rm geom}$) the

4999: dipole amplitude $N_G$ depends only on the parameter $\xi$ from

5000: \eq{xidef}. Therefore one can write

5001: \be\label{NGgeom}

5002: N_G (z_T, y) \, = \, \int_{-\infty}^\infty d \nu \ [z_T Q_{s}

5003: (y) ]^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu} \, {\tilde C}_\nu^A

5004: \ee

5005: with ${\tilde C}_\nu^A$ some unknown coefficient. Substituting

5006: \eq{NGgeom} along with \eq{nGlin} into \eq{paevc} and integrating over 

5007: ${\un z}$ yields

5008: \ben

5009: \frac{d\sigma^{pA}}{d^2k \, dy}\bigg|_{k_T=Q_s (y)} \, = \,

5010:  \frac{C_F\, S_p\, S_A }{\as (2\pi)^3} \int \, d \nu \, d \nu' \,

5011:  C_{\nu'}^p \, \tilde C_\nu^A \, (1+2 i \nu)^2 \, (1+2 i \nu')^2 \,

5012:  2^{2 i (\nu + \nu')} \, \frac{\Gamma [i (\nu + \nu')]}{\Gamma [1- i

5013:  (\nu + \nu')]} 

5014: \een

5015: \be\label{fm} 

5016: \times \, \left( \frac{\Lambda_p}{Q_s (y)} \right)^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu'} \, 

5017: e^{2 \, \bas \, \chi (0, \nu') \, (Y-y)}.  

5018: \ee

5019: (In arriving at \eq{fm} we have assumed that extended geometric

5020: scaling region $z_T > 1/k_{\rm geom}$ dominates in the integral of

5021: \eq{paevc}: this is explicitly shown in the Appendix of \cite{KKT}.) 

5022: To evaluate the $\nu'$-integral in \eq{fm} we again need to know

5023: whether $k_T$ of the produced gluon is above or below the scale of

5024: extended geometric scaling in the proton $k^p_{\rm geom}$. This may be

5025: an issue when $k^p_{\rm geom} < Q_s (y)$.  Assuming for simplicity

5026: that $k^p_{\rm geom} > Q_s (y)$ we evaluate the $\nu'$-integration in

5027: \eq{fm} by putting $\nu' = \nu_0$ with $\nu_0$ given by \eq{nu0val}. 

5028: (The case when the evolution between the proton and the produced gluon

5029: is dominated by DLA saddle point is examined in \cite{KKT} with the

5030: same conclusion as we will reach below.) \eq{fm} becomes

5031: \be\label{fm1} 

5032: \frac{d\sigma^{pA}}{d^2k \, dy}\bigg|_{k_T=Q_s (y)} \, = \,

5033:  \frac{C_F\, S_p\, S_A }{\as (2\pi)^3} \ C_{\nu_0}^p \, {\cal C}_A \,

5034:  (1+2 i \nu_0)^2 \, 2^{2 i \nu_0} \, \left( \frac{\Lambda_p}{Q_s (y)}

5035:  \right)^{1 + 2 \, i \, \nu_0} \, e^{2 \, \bas \, \chi (0, \nu_0) \,

5036:  (Y-y)},

5037: \ee

5038: where we have defined

5039: \be\label{calc}

5040: {\cal C}_A \, \equiv \, \int \, d \nu \,  \tilde C_\nu^A \, (1+2 i \nu)^2 \,  

5041: 2^{2 i \nu} \, \frac{\Gamma [i (\nu + \nu_0)]}{\Gamma [1- i

5042:  (\nu + \nu_0)]}.

5043: \ee

5044: It is important to note that all the information on the solution of

5045: the non-linear evolution equation given by $N_G$ is now absorbed into

5046: a {\sl constant} from \eq{calc}, which does not depend on rapidity and

5047: on atomic number of the nucleus, and is thus not important for

5048: behavior of $R^{pA}$ at high energy/rapidity.

5049: 

5050: Similarly, evaluation the $\nu$ and $\nu'$ integrals in \eq{pp1}

5051: around $\nu_0$ yields

5052: \be\label{pp2}

5053: \frac{d \sigma^{pp}}{d^2 k \ dy} \, = \, \frac{C_F \, S_p^2}{\as \, 

5054: (2 \pi)^3} \, [C_{\nu_0}^p]^2 \, (1+2 i \nu_0)^4 \, 2^{4 i \nu_0}

5055: \, \frac{\Gamma (2 i \nu_0)}{\Gamma (1- 2 i \nu_0)} 

5056: \, \left( \frac{\Lambda_p}{k_T} \right)^{2+4 i \nu_0} \,  e^{2 \, \bas \,

5057: \chi (0, \nu_0) \, Y}.

5058: \ee

5059: Putting $k_T = Q_s (y)$ in \eq{pp2}, and using it together with

5060: \eq{fm1} in \eq{rpa} yield for the nuclear modification factor

5061: \be\label{rpacron1}

5062: R^{pA}(k_T = Q_s (y),y) \, = \, \frac{{\cal C}_A}{C_{\nu_0}^p} \, (1+2

5063: i \nu_0)^{-2} \, 2^{-2 i \nu_0} \, \frac{\Gamma (1- 2 i \nu_0)}{\Gamma

5064: (2 i \nu_0)} \, A^{- \frac{1}{3}} \, \left( \frac{Q_s (y)}{\Lambda_p}

5065: \right)^{1 + 2 i \nu_0} \, e^{- 2 \, \bas \, \chi (0, \nu_0) \, y}.

5066: \ee

5067: Remembering that $Q_s (y)$ is given by \eq{qsy0} with $Q_{s0} =

5068: A^{1/6} \Lambda_p$ we can recast \eq{rpacron1} into the following form

5069: \be\label{rpacron2}

5070: R^{pA}(k_T = Q_s (y),y) \, = \, \frac{{\cal C}_A}{C_{\nu_0}^p} \, (1+2

5071: i \nu_0)^{-2} \, 2^{-2 i \nu_0} \, \frac{\Gamma (1- 2 i \nu_0)}{\Gamma

5072: (2 i \nu_0)} \ A^{- \frac{1}{6} + \frac{i \, \nu_0}{3}}.

5073: \ee

5074: The prefactor of \eq{rpacron2} is just a number. The dynamical

5075: information is carried only by the power of $A$ in it, which, for the

5076: value of $\nu_0$ from \eq{nu0val} gives

5077: \be\label{rpacron3}

5078: R^{pA}(k_T = Q_s (y),y) \, \approx \, A^{- \frac{1}{6} + \frac{i \,

5079: \nu_0}{3}} \, = \, A^{- 0.124} \, \ll 1 \hspace*{1cm} \mbox{for} \hspace*{1cm} A \gg 1.

5080: \ee

5081: \eq{rpacron3} allows us to conclude that small-$x$ evolution tends to 

5082: reduce the Cronin peak turning enhancement into suppression. Since the

5083: suppression in \eq{rpacron3} is (parametrically) of the same order as

5084: given by \eq{lla3} for the extended geometric scaling region, we

5085: conclude that $R^{pA}$ both at $k_T = Q_s (y)$ and in the extended

5086: geometric scaling region is smaller than $1$ at all values of $k_T$ in

5087: that region, approaching the same (energy-independent) limit at very

5088: high energies/rapidities.

5089: 

5090: Deep inside the saturation region, for $k_T \ll Q_s (y)$, one can use

5091: the above techniques to show that $R^{pA}$ there is also suppressed at

5092: least at the level of \eq{rpacron3} and likely even more than that. We

5093: refer the interested reader to \cite{KKT} for details on this

5094: derivation. Here we can just argue that saturation effects with or

5095: without small-$x$ evolution, reduce the $\sim 1/k_T^4$

5096: infrared-singular scaling of the inclusive production cross section of

5097: \eq{pp} to the more infrared-regular $\sim 1/k_T^2$ scaling of \eq{paclglkt}. 

5098: Hence the suppression of $R^{pA}$ at $k_T \ll Q_s (y)$, shown in the

5099: quasi-classical limit by \eq{rpalkt}, will still be valid in the case

5100: of quantum evolution, though it will be slightly modified by the

5101: anomalous dimension $\nu_0$.

5102: 

5103: 

5104: With the help of \eq{rpacron3} we conclude that at high

5105: rapidities/energies the Cronin maximum decreases with energy and

5106: centrality, with $R^{pA} (Q_s (y),y)$ becoming less than $1$.

5107: Eventually, at very high energy, the Cronin peak flattens out and

5108: saturates to an energy independent lower limit given by \eq{rpacron3},

5109: which is parametrically suppressed by powers of $A$. The height of

5110: $R^{pA} (Q_s (y),y)$ is also a decreasing function of collision

5111: centrality/atomic number $A$.

5112: 

5113: 

5114: 

5115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5116: 

5117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5118: \begin{figure}[ht]

5119: \begin{center}

5120: \epsfxsize=10cm

5121: \leavevmode

5122: \hbox{\epsffile{toy.eps}}

5123: \end{center}

5124: \caption{The ratio $R^{pA}$ plotted as a function of $k_T/Q_s (y)$ for 

5125: (i) the quasi-classical approximation of \fig{cron}, which is valid

5126: for moderate energies/rapidities (upper solid line); (ii) the toy

5127: model for very high energies/rapidities from \protect\cite{KKT} (lower

5128: solid line); (iii) an interpolation between the two to intermediate

5129: energies (dash-dotted and dashed lines). The cutoff is $\Lambda = 0.3

5130: \, Q_s$. The figure is from \protect\cite{KKT}.}

5131: \label{toy}

5132: \end{figure}

5133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5134: 

5135: \subsubsection{Nuclear Modification Factor: Overall Picture}

5136: 

5137: 

5138: In the three above Sections we have demonstrated that small-$x$

5139: evolution leads to suppression of the nuclear modification factor

5140: $R^{pA}$ for the transverse momenta $k_T$ of the produced gluon in the

5141: double logarithmic region $k_T \gsim k_{\rm geom}$ (see

5142: \eq{dlaexp}), in the extended geometric scaling region 

5143: $Q_s (y) < k_T \lsim k_{\rm geom}$ (see \eq{lla3} and \eq{rpae}) and

5144: inside the saturation region $k_T \lsim Q_s (y)$ (see

5145: \eq{rpacron3}). To summarize the effects of quantum evolution, we 

5146: illustrate how $R^{pA} (k_T, y)$ varies with rapidity/energy in

5147: \fig{toy}, which is constructed using a toy model of \cite{KKT}, that 

5148: incorporates the correct {\sl qualitative} behavior of $R^{pA} (k_T, y)$.

5149: 

5150: 

5151: The top line in \fig{toy} is borrowed from \fig{cron} and represents

5152: the Cronin enhancement of particle production in the quasi-classical

5153: approximation. As energy (or rapidity) increases the suppression

5154: begins to set in as shown by dash-dotted and dashed lines in

5155: \fig{toy}. The asymptotic energy-independent limit of maximum 

5156: suppression to be reached at very high energies/rapidities given by

5157: Eqs. (\ref{lla3}) and (\ref{rpacron3}) is depicted by the lower solid

5158: line in \fig{toy}. We conclude that as the energy/rapidity increases

5159: the upper solid line in \fig{toy} would decrease eventually turning

5160: into the lower solid line. This result was obtained by numerical

5161: simulations in \cite{AAKSW} and by an analytical analysis similar to

5162: the one outline above in \cite{KKT} (see also \cite{BKW,IIT}).

5163: 

5164: Indeed \fig{toy} is not yet ready to be compared to data. In $d+Au$

5165: collisions at RHIC the forward rapidity high-$p_T$ particle production

5166: receives a substantial contribution from valence quark production,

5167: along with the gluon production which led to \fig{toy}. On general

5168: grounds, since the gluon suppression in \fig{toy} is driven by

5169: small-$x$ evolution, we expect valence quark production cross section

5170: to also be suppressed at high-$p_T$. To investigate this further and

5171: to be able to make quantitative predictions we will calculate forward

5172: production of valence quarks in the next Section. 

5173: 

5174: 

5175: 

5176: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5177: 

5178: \subsection{Valence Quark Production}

5179: \label{clquark}

5180: 

5181: We now consider production of valence (high $x$) quarks in

5182: proton-nucleus collisions, due to scattering of a valence quark on the

5183: nucleus \cite{Dumitru:2002qt}.  In this section, we treat the target

5184: nucleus as a Color Glass Condensate while the projectile proton is

5185: taken to be a dilute system of quarks and gluons in the spirit of

5186: standard pQCD.  This is the appropriate approach if one is probing the

5187: large $x$ components of the projectile proton wave function which is

5188: the case in the very forward proton-nucleus collisions.

5189: 

5190: The leading order diagram is shown in Fig. (\ref{fig:v_quark}).

5191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5192: \begin{figure}[htb]

5193: \begin{center}

5194: \epsfxsize=7cm

5195: \leavevmode

5196: \hbox{\epsffile{v_quark.eps}}

5197: \end{center}

5198: \caption{Scattering of a high $x$ quark from a dense target.}

5199: \label{fig:v_quark}

5200: \end{figure}

5201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5202: Using the LSZ formalism, the scattering amplitude is   

5203: \begin{eqnarray}

5204: \langle q(q)_{out}|q(p)_{in}\rangle =

5205: \langle out|b_{out}(q)b^{\dagger}_{in}(p)|in\rangle 

5206: \label{eq:amp}

5207: \end{eqnarray}

5208: which can be written as

5209: \begin{eqnarray}

5210: \langle out|b_{out}(q)b^{\dagger}_{in}(p)|in\rangle \!\!=\!\!

5211: { -1 \over Z_2} \int d^4x d^4y  e^{-i(p\cdot x - q\cdot y)}

5212: \bar{u}(q)[i \stackrel{\rightarrow}{\slpartial}_y -m]

5213: \langle out|T \psi (y) \bar{\psi}(x)|in\rangle  

5214: [-i \stackrel{\leftarrow}{\slpartial}_x -m] u(p)

5215: \label{eq:general}

5216: \end{eqnarray}

5217: where $m$ is the quark mass and $Z_2$ is the fermion wave function

5218: renormalization factor while $u(p)$ is the quark spinor with momentum $p$.

5219: The quark propagator $S_F$ in the background of the classical color 

5220: field is defined by 

5221: \begin{eqnarray}

5222: \langle out|T \psi (y) \bar{\psi}(x) |in\rangle  \equiv -i \langle  out |

5223:  in\rangle  S_F (y,x).

5224: \end{eqnarray}

5225: The amplitude then becomes (setting $Z_2 =1$ and $ \langle out |

5226: in\rangle =1$ since we are working to leading order in $\alpha_s$ and

5227: our background field is time independent)

5228: \begin{eqnarray}

5229: \langle q(q)_{out}|q(p)_{in}\rangle \!\!\!\!&=&\!\!\!\!

5230: i \!\!\int d^4x d^4y  e^{-i(p \cdot x - q\cdot  y)} 

5231: \bar{u}(q)[i \stackrel{\rightarrow}{\slpartial}_y -m] 

5232: S_F(y,x) [-i \stackrel{\leftarrow}{\slpartial}_x -m] u(p).

5233: \nonumber

5234: \end{eqnarray}

5235: In momentum space, the fermion propagator $S_F$ can be written

5236: as

5237: \begin{eqnarray}

5238: S_F(q,p)= (2\pi)^4 \delta^4 (q-p) S^0_F (p) -ig S^0_F (q)

5239: \int {d^4k \over (2\pi)^4} \, {\slA}(k) S_F (q+k,p)

5240: \label{eq:Geqmom}   

5241: \end{eqnarray}

5242: where ${\slA}=A^{\mu} \gamma_{\mu}$ is the classical background color

5243: field, and $S^0_F$ is the free fermion propagator. It is useful to

5244: define the interaction part of the fermion propagator from

5245: (\ref{eq:Geqmom}) as

5246: \begin{eqnarray}

5247: S_F(q,p)= (2\pi)^4 \delta^4 (q-p) S^0_F (p) + S^0_F (q)

5248: \tau (q,p) S^0_F (p).

5249: \label{eq:Gint}

5250: \end{eqnarray}

5251: Substituting (\ref{eq:Gint}) into the amplitude leads to

5252: \begin{eqnarray}

5253: \langle q(q)_{out}|q(p)_{in}\rangle  =  \bar{u}(q) \tau (q,p) u(p).

5254: \label{eq:finalamp}

5255: \end{eqnarray}

5256: This simple relation relates the amplitude for scattering of a quark

5257: or anti-quark from the Color Glass Condensate and the quark propagator

5258: in the background color field of the nucleus.

5259: 

5260: The explicit form of the quark propagator in the background of a

5261: classical color field was calculated in

5262: \cite{hw,Gelis:2001da}. The interaction part, as defined

5263: in (\ref{eq:Gint}) is given by \cite{Gelis:2001da}

5264: \begin{eqnarray}

5265: \tau (q,p)=(2\pi) \delta (p^- - q^-) \gamma^- 

5266: \int d^2 z \bigg [ V ({\un z}) -1 \bigg ]

5267: e^{i({\un q} - {\un p}) \cdot {\un z}}

5268: \label{eq:taures}

5269: \end{eqnarray}

5270: where $V$ is a matrix in the fundamental representation which includes

5271: the multiple scattering of the quark on the nucleus, given by

5272: (\ref{eq:v_fun})

5273: \begin{eqnarray}

5274: V({\un z}) \equiv \hat{P} \exp \bigg [-ig \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}

5275: d z^- \, A^+_a (z^-,{\un z}) \ t^a \bigg]

5276: \label{eq:udef}

5277: \end{eqnarray}

5278: and $t^a$ are in the fundamental representation. Using (\ref{eq:taures})

5279: in the scattering amplitude (\ref{eq:finalamp}) gives

5280: \begin{eqnarray}

5281: \langle q(q)_{out}|q(p)_{in}\rangle \! =\!

5282: (2\pi) \delta (p^- - q^-)

5283: \bar{u}(q) \gamma^-   u(p) \!\int d^2 z 

5284: [ V({\un z}) -1  ] e^{i({\un q} - {\un p}) \cdot {\un z}}

5285: \label{eq:expamp}

5286: \end{eqnarray}

5287: The presence of the delta function in the amplitude is due to 

5288: the target being (light-cone) time independent which leads

5289: to conservation of the ``minus'' component of momenta and 

5290: can be factored out (for a rigorous treatment of this using 

5291: wave packets, we refer the reader to \cite{Gelis:2002ki}) 

5292: \begin{eqnarray}

5293: \langle q(q)_{out}|q(p)_{in}\rangle  &=& (2\pi) \delta (p^- - q^-) M (p,q)

5294: \label{eq:mamp}

5295: \end{eqnarray}

5296: leading to 

5297: \begin{eqnarray}

5298: d\sigma = \int {d^4 q \over (2\pi)^4} (2\pi) \delta (2 q^+ q^- -q_T^2)

5299: \theta (q^+) {1 \over 2p^-} (2\pi) \delta (p^- - q^-) 

5300: |M (p,q)|^2.

5301: \label{eq:diffcs}

5302: \end{eqnarray}

5303: One can set the transverse momentum of the incoming quark $p_t$ to

5304: zero without any loss of generality. We then get the differential

5305: cross section for production of a quark with transverse momentum $q_t$

5306: per unit area

5307: \begin{eqnarray}

5308: {d\sigma^{qA\to qX} \over d^2 b \, d^2 q} ={2\over (2\pi)^2}

5309: \sigma_{dipole}^F ({\un b}, {\un q})

5310: \label{eq:cs_v_quark}

5311: \end{eqnarray}

5312: where the dipole cross section (which is, via the optical theorem, the

5313: imaginary part of the forward scattering amplitude) is defined as

5314: \begin{eqnarray}

5315: \sigma_{dipole} ^F ({\un b}, {\un q}) \equiv 

5316: \int d^2 r \, e^{i \, {\un q} \cdot {\un r}}

5317: {1 \over N_c} {\rm Tr}_c\left<

5318: V^{\dagger} ({\un b} + {\un r}/2) V({\un b} - {\un r}/2)  - 1

5319: \right>_\rho \, = \, - \int d^2 r \, e^{i \, {\un q} \cdot {\un r}} \, 

5320: N ({\un r}, {\un b},Y)

5321: \label{eq:cs_dipole_F}

5322: \end{eqnarray}

5323: and we have neglected terms which do not contribute at finite quark

5324: transverse momentum. It is trivial to extend this calculation to the

5325: case of incoming on shell gluons \cite{Dumitru:2001jn} scattering on

5326: the dense target. The only difference is the presence of adjoint

5327: matrix $U$ rather than $V$ which have different color factors in the

5328: exponent, appropriate for the given representation. It is given by

5329: \begin{eqnarray}

5330: {d\sigma^{gA\to gX} \over d^2 b \, d^2 q} ={2\over (2\pi)^2}

5331: \sigma_{dipole}^A ({\un b}, {\un q})

5332: \label{eq:cs_v_gluon}

5333: \end{eqnarray}

5334: where the adjoint dipole cross section is defined by 

5335: \begin{eqnarray}

5336: \sigma_{dipole} ^A ({\un b}, {\un q}) \equiv 

5337: \int d^2 r \, e^{i \, {\un q} \cdot {\un r}}

5338: {1 \over N_c^2 - 1} {\rm Tr}_c\left<

5339: U^{\dagger} ({\un b} + {\un r}/2) U({\un b} - {\un r}/2)  - 1

5340: \right>_\rho \, = \, - \int d^2 r \, e^{i \, {\un q} \cdot {\un r}} \, 

5341: N_G ({\un r}, {\un b},Y).

5342: \label{eq:cs_dipole_A}

5343: \end{eqnarray}

5344: Our result in (\ref{eq:cs_v_quark}, \ref{eq:cs_v_gluon}) can be

5345: understood as the generalization of the leading order quark-gluon and

5346: gluon-gluon hard scattering cross section convoluted with the target

5347: gluon distribution function in leading twist pQCD to include multiple

5348: scattering of the incoming quark on the target.  To include the

5349: effects of quantum evolution in the target at high energies, one

5350: should resum large logs of energy or $1/x$. This can be accomplished

5351: by solving the JIMWLK (or BK) equations for the (fundamental or

5352: adjoint) dipole cross section and using the result in

5353: (\ref{eq:cs_v_quark}, \ref{eq:cs_v_gluon}).

5354: 

5355: The quantum evolution of the quark-nucleus scattering cross section

5356: could have very interesting observable signatures in the forward

5357: rapidity region. At forward rapidities the nuclear saturation scale is

5358: large due to small-$x$ evolution. A typical valence quark in the

5359: incoming proton would have a transverse momentum of order $Q_s$ after

5360: scattering from the nucleus. This momentum is large and the quark will

5361: tend to fragment into hadrons independent of the other valence

5362: quarks. This would reduce the number of baryons produced in the

5363: forward rapidity region of $pA$ collisions as compared to $pp$

5364: collisions, while increasing the number of produced mesons, so that

5365: the meson to baryon ratio could increase in $pA$ compared to $pp$

5366: \cite{markstrikman}.

5367: 

5368: We note that the qualitative behavior of the nuclear modification

5369: factor $R_{pA}$ for quark production should be very similar to that of

5370: gluons. This is due to the fact that the behavior of $R_{pA}$ is

5371: determined by the properties of the of the underlying (fundamental

5372: vs. adjoint) dipole cross section. There may however be quantitative

5373: differences due to the different color factors for the fundamental and

5374: adjoint dipoles which would also affect the rate of quantum evolution

5375: for the two dipoles.  For example, one can show that in the classical

5376: approximation to quark production, the nuclear modification factor

5377: $R_{pA}$ for quarks \cite{Gelis:2002nn} exhibits an enhancement

5378: similar to that of gluons even though the magnitude of enhancement for

5379: gluon $R_{pA}$ is larger because of the larger value of the gluon

5380: saturation scale due to the color factors.  As one goes to smaller

5381: values of $x$ where quantum evolution in $\ln 1/x$ becomes important,

5382: the nuclear modification factor $R_{pA}$ becomes smaller than unity in

5383: analogy to $R_{pA}$ for gluons even though the rate of decrease of

5384: $R_{pA}$ for quarks is smaller than the rate for the decrease of

5385: $R_{pA}$ for gluons.

5386: 

5387: 

5388: To relate this to hadron production in proton-nucleus collisions, one

5389: will need to convolute these hard cross sections with the quark and

5390: gluon distribution functions in a proton and quark-hadron and

5391: gluon-hadron fragmentation functions. At this level, the distribution

5392: and fragmentation functions are delta functions of $x$ and $z$

5393: respectively, given by the parton model. One can include DGLAP

5394: evolution of the projectile parton distributions and hadron

5395: fragmentation by considering radiation of a gluon or a quark

5396: anti-quark pair and then absorbing the resultant collinear divergences

5397: into the bare distribution and fragmentation functions which lead to

5398: DGLAP evolution of the parton distribution functions in the proton and

5399: the hadron fragmentation functions. The detailed results are given in

5400: \cite{aaj}.

5401: 

5402: 

5403: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5404: 

5405: \subsection{Electromagnetic Probes}

5406: \label{ep}

5407: 

5408: In this Section we consider the production of photons and dileptons in

5409: proton-nucleus collisions \cite{Gelis:2002ki, Gelis:2002fw,

5410: Baier:2004tj, Jalilian-Marian:2005zw}. Photon and dilepton production

5411: has the advantage that there is no hadronization involved in the final

5412: state, unlike quark and gluon production. Therefore, photons and

5413: dileptons are a cleaner probe of the Color Glass

5414: Condensate. Nevertheless, they have the disadvantage of low production

5415: rate due to the smallness of the electromagnetic coupling vs. the

5416: strong coupling involved in quark and gluon production.

5417: 

5418: 

5419: \subsubsection{Photon Production}

5420: 

5421: We consider the process $q(p) A \rightarrow \gamma(k) \, q(q)\,X$

5422: where $A$ stands for a hadron or nucleus which is treated as a Color

5423: Glass Condensate and the produced quark and photon are real. The

5424: incoming quark has momentum $p$ while $q$ and $k$ denote the momenta

5425: of the outgoing on shell quark and photon respectively. To get the

5426: photon production cross section, we will integrate over the momentum

5427: of the produced quark at the end. The amplitude is given by

5428: \begin{eqnarray}

5429: \left<q( q)\gamma (k)_{\rm out}|q(p)_{\rm in}\right>=

5430: \big<0_{\rm out}\big|a_{\rm out}(k)b_{\rm out}(q)

5431: b^{\dagger}_{\rm in}(p)\big|0_{\rm in}\big>

5432: \label{eq:amp_pho}

5433: \end{eqnarray}

5434: which, using the LSZ formalism and the definition of the quark

5435: propagator, can be written as

5436: \begin{eqnarray}

5437: \big<q(q)\gamma (k)_{\rm out}\big|q(p)_{\rm in}\big> \!\!\!\!&=&\!\!\!\!

5438: e\! \int d^4x\, d^4y\, d^4z\, e^{i(k\cdot x + q\cdot z -p\cdot

5439: y)} \,\overline{u}(q)\nonumber \\

5440: &&(i \stackrel{\rightarrow}{\slpartial}_z -m) 

5441: S_{_{F}}(z,x) {\slvarepsilon} S_{_{F}}(x,y)

5442: (i \stackrel{\leftarrow}{\slpartial}_y -m) u(p)

5443: \label{eq:amplitude_pho}

5444: \end{eqnarray}

5445: where $S_F$ is the quark propagator in the background of the classical

5446: color field given in (\ref{eq:Geqmom}) and $\epsilon^{\mu} (k)$ is the

5447: polarization vector of the produced photon.  Using the decomposition

5448: of the quark propagator as a free part and an interacting part as in

5449: (\ref{eq:Gint}), the amplitude can be written as

5450: \begin{eqnarray}

5451: &&

5452: \big<q(q)\gamma (k)_{\rm out}\big|q(p)_{\rm in}\big>=

5453: -e\, \overline{u}(q) \,\Bigg[ (2\pi)^4 \delta^4 (k+q-p)    

5454: {\slvarepsilon} \nonumber\\

5455: && + \, 

5456: \tau (q,p-k) \,S_{_{F}}^{0}(p-k)\,

5457: {\slvarepsilon}

5458:  + {\slvarepsilon}\,

5459: S_{_{F}}^{0}(q+k)\,\tau (q+k,p)\nonumber \\

5460: &&

5461: +

5462: \int {{d^4l} \over {(2\pi)^4}} \tau (q,l)\,S_{_{F}}^{0}(l) 

5463: \,{\slvarepsilon}\,S_{_{F}}^{0}(k+l)\,\tau (k+l,p)

5464: \Bigg]\,u( p)

5465: \label{eq:M_pho} 

5466: \end{eqnarray}

5467: where $\tau$ is defined in (\ref{eq:taures}) and $S_F^0$ is the free

5468: quark propagator.

5469: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5470: \begin{figure}[htb]

5471: \begin{center}

5472: \epsfxsize=10cm

5473: \leavevmode

5474: \hbox{\epsffile{pho.eps}}

5475: \end{center}

5476: \caption{Real photon production in quark-nucleus scattering.}

5477: \label{fig:pho}

5478: \end{figure}

5479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5480: The various terms in (\ref{eq:M_pho}) are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:pho}

5481: where the thick wavy lines attached to the full circle signify

5482: multiple scattering of the quark from the nucleus and photon is shown

5483: by a dashed line. The first term corresponds to the case when the

5484: incoming quark does not scatter on the target and radiates a

5485: photon. This is kinematically impossible so that this term is

5486: identically zero (as can be seen by noticing that the delta function

5487: has no support). The second term corresponds to the case when the

5488: incoming quark scatters from the nucleus and then radiates a photon

5489: while the third term corresponds to the case when the incoming quark

5490: radiates a photon and then scatters from the target nucleus. The last

5491: term corresponds to the incoming quark scattering from the target,

5492: radiating a photon and then scattering from the target again. In the

5493: high energy (eikonal) limit considered here, the last term is also

5494: zero (or more precisely, suppressed by powers of center of mass

5495: energy) and is therefore dropped (for a proof of this, we refer the

5496: reader to \cite{Gelis:2002ki}). Extracting the overall delta function,

5497: the amplitude is

5498: \begin{eqnarray}

5499: {\cal M}(q,k:p) & = & -i \,e \, \overline{u}(q)\bigg[ 

5500: {\gamma^- ({\slp} - {\slk} + m) \, {\slvarepsilon} \over (p-k)^2 -m^2} +

5501: {{\slvarepsilon}\;({\slq} + {\slk} + m)\gamma^- \over (q+k)^2 -m^2}

5502: \bigg]u(p)\nonumber\\

5503: && \int d^2 x\, 

5504: e^{i({\un q} + {\un k} - {\un p})\cdot {\un x}} \, 

5505: \Big(V({\un x})- 1\Big).

5506: \label{eq:finalamp_pho}

5507: \end{eqnarray}

5508: To get the cross section, we need to square the amplitude, include the

5509: phase space and flux factors and average (sum) over the initial

5510: (final) state degrees of freedom. We also set the transverse momentum

5511: of the incoming quark and the quark mass to zero for simplicity.  We

5512: get the differential cross section for production of a photon with

5513: transverse momentum $k_T$ and a quark with transverse momentum $q_t$

5514: \begin{eqnarray}

5515: {d\sigma^{q A \to q\,\gamma \, X} \over d^2 b \, d^2 k \, d^2 q \, dz}

5516:  \!\!\!\!&=\!\!\!\!& 

5517: {{e^2} \over {(2\pi)^5} k_T^2}

5518: {[1 + (1-z)^2] \over z}  

5519: {{({\un q} + {\un k})^2 }  \sigma_{dipole}^F ({\un b}, {\un q} + {\un k})    

5520:  \over [ {\un q} + {\un k} - {\un k} /z]^2} \, 

5521: \label{eq:pho_inccs} 

5522: \end{eqnarray}

5523: where $z\equiv k^-/p^-$ and $ {[1 + (1-z)^2]/z}$ is the standard

5524: leading order photon splitting function and the dipole cross section

5525: is defined in (\ref{eq:cs_dipole_F}). To get the cross section for a

5526: hadron $+$ photon cross section, one would need to convolute the above

5527: with the quark-hadron fragmentation function which can then be used to

5528: investigate the correlation between the produced hadron and photon. It

5529: is also remarkable that the cross section is written in terms of the

5530: same degrees of freedom as in the valence quark production cross

5531: section.

5532: 

5533: To get the single inclusive photon production cross section, we

5534: integrate over the transverse momentum of the produced quark $q_T$. A

5535: quick inspection of Eq. (\ref{eq:pho_inccs}) shows that the

5536: integration over $q_T$ is divergent. This happens when the transverse

5537: momenta of the photon and the final state quark are parallel, ${\un q}

5538: = (1-z){\un k} /z$. This is nothing but the standard collinear

5539: divergence in pQCD calculation of the so called fragmentation photons

5540: (as opposed to direct photons), which occurs when the photon and

5541: produced quark are parallel.  This contribution is formally of order

5542: of $\alpha_s$ compared to direct photon contribution. However, the

5543: large collinear log can be identified as being of order $1/\alpha_s$

5544: and therefore it is customary in pQCD to include fragmentation photons

5545: at the same order of calculation as in direct photons

5546: \cite{Aurenche:1987fs}. This collinear divergence is not affected by

5547: the multiple scattering of the quark on the nucleus.

5548: 

5549: To do the $q_T$ integration \cite{Jalilian-Marian:2005zw}, we write

5550: the dipole cross section back in the coordinate space and shift the

5551: quark transverse momentum ${\un q} \rightarrow {\un q} + {\un k}

5552: (1-z)/z $ which leads to the following integral

5553: \begin{eqnarray}

5554: \int_0^{\hat{s}} {d^2 q \over q_T^2} \, e^{i {\un q} \cdot {\un r}} \simeq 

5555: \pi \, \ln \, {\hat s}/\Lambda^2_{QCD}

5556: \label{eq:col_div}

5557: \end{eqnarray}

5558: where $\hat{s}$ is the center of mass energy of the quark-nucleus

5559: system. This logarithm is typically written as sum of two pieces; $\ln

5560: \, Q^2/\Lambda^2_{QCD}$ and $\ln \,\hat{s}/Q^2$ where $Q$ is the

5561: factorization scale, usually taken to be the transverse momentum of

5562: the produced photon. With leading log accuracy, only the $\ln

5563: \,Q^2/\Lambda^2_{QCD}$ piece is kept \cite{Aurenche:1987fs} and

5564: absorbed into the quark-photon fragmentation function

5565: $D_{\gamma/q}(z,Q^2)$ which satisfies the DGLAP evolution equation,

5566: evolving with $Q^2$. Identifying the quark-photon splitting function

5567: $P_{\gamma/q} \equiv {e^2 e_q^2 \over 8\pi^2} {1 + (1-z)^2 \over z}$,

5568: we write the photon production cross section as

5569: \begin{eqnarray}

5570: {d\sigma^{q\, A \rightarrow \gamma \, X}

5571: \over d^2b \, d^2k \, dz} &=& {1\over (2\pi)^2} {1\over z^2}\, 

5572: D_{\gamma/q} (z,k_T)\, \sigma_{dipole}^F ({\un b}, {\un k}/z)

5573: \label{eq:frag_pho}

5574: \end{eqnarray}

5575: where the Leading Order (LO) photon fragmentation function is defined as

5576: \be 

5577: D_{\gamma/q} (z,Q^2) \equiv P_{\gamma/q} \, \ln Q^2/\Lambda^2.

5578: \ee 

5579: It is straightforward to include quantum evolution of the target wave

5580: function at high energies in the photon production cross section

5581: here. Again, the dipole cross section is the universal object present

5582: in all single inclusive particle production cross sections in

5583: proton-nucleus collisions. By solving the JIMWLK equations for the

5584: fundamental dipole cross section and using the solution in the above

5585: cross section, one incorporates small $x$ evolution of the target wave

5586: function with Leading Log (of $1/x$) accuracy.

5587: 

5588: We note that the process considered here is the dominant process at

5589: high energy and forward rapidity. At fixed energy, as one goes towards

5590: mid rapidity, one probes smaller $x$ in the projectile proton where

5591: gluons become as (or more) prominent as valence quarks. One then can

5592: have a gluon split into a quark anti-quark pair, one of which would

5593: then radiate the produced photon. This process is parametrically

5594: suppressed by $\alpha_s$. However, this suppression may be partially

5595: compensated by the dominance of the gluon distribution function in the

5596: proton in mid rapidity and may be numerically important.  Also, as one

5597: goes to very high $p_t$ at fixed center of mass energy, the valence

5598: degrees of freedom in the target wave function will become

5599: important. This is beyond the realm of application of CGC at its

5600: present form and would require extending CGC to high $x$ region.

5601: 

5602: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5603: 

5604: \subsubsection{Dilepton Production}

5605: 

5606: We now consider production of dileptons in proton-nucleus collisions

5607: \cite{Gelis:2002fw, Baier:2004tj, Kopeliovich:2001hf, Johnson:2001xf,BGD}. 

5608: This follows simply from our derivation of the photon cross

5609: section. We just need to allow the photon to be off shell and include

5610: the effect of the massive photon splitting into a dilepton pair. We

5611: again start with the production amplitude for this process

5612: \begin{eqnarray}

5613: q(p) + A \to q(q) + l^+ (k_1) +l^- (k_2) + X

5614: \end{eqnarray}

5615: where $k_1,k_2$ are the momenta of the two leptons. The amplitude can

5616: be written as

5617: \begin{eqnarray}

5618: &&\big<0_{\rm out}\big|b_{\rm out} (q)b^{\dagger}_{\rm in}(p)

5619: c_{\rm out}(k_2)d_{\rm out}(k_1)\big|0_{\rm in}\big>=

5620: \int d^4x\, d^4y\, d^4z_1\, d^4z_2\nonumber\\

5621: && e^{i(q\cdot x-p\cdot y)}\,

5622: e^{i(k_1\cdot z_1 + k_2\cdot z_2)}

5623: \overline{u}(q)\overline{w}(k_2)

5624: (i \stackrel{\rightarrow}{\slpartial}_x -m)

5625: (i \stackrel{\rightarrow}{\slpartial}_{z_2} -m)\nonumber\\

5626: &&

5627: \big<0_{\rm out}\big|{\rm T}\psi(x)\overline{\psi}(y)

5628: \overline{\Psi}(z_1)\Psi(z_2)

5629: \big|0_{\rm in}\big>

5630: (i\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\slpartial}_y +m)

5631: (i\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\slpartial}_{z_1} +m)

5632: v(k_1) u(p)

5633: \end{eqnarray}

5634: where $\psi$ and $\Psi$ are the quark and lepton fields while $u$ and

5635: $w$ ($v$) denote quark and lepton (anti lepton) spinors. The

5636: scattering of the quark on the target is identical to the photon

5637: production case considered earlier. The only difference with the

5638: photon production case is that we need to replace the photon

5639: polarization vectors by the virtual photon propagators which amounts

5640: to the following substitution in the squared amplitude

5641: \begin{eqnarray}

5642: \epsilon_\mu(k)\epsilon_\nu^*(k)\to

5643: {{g_{\mu\rho}}\over{k^2+i\epsilon}}

5644: {{g_{\nu\sigma}}\over{k^2-i\epsilon}}

5645: L^{\rho\sigma}(k_1,k_2)

5646: \end{eqnarray}

5647: with $k\equiv k_1 + k_2$ the virtual photon momentum and the leptonic

5648: tensor $L^{\rho\sigma}(k_1,k_2)$ is the imaginary part of the one loop

5649: leptonic contribution to the photon self energy. Furthermore, we are

5650: interested in the dilepton pair rather than the individual

5651: leptons. Therefore, the leptonic tensor can be written as

5652: \begin{eqnarray}

5653: L^{\rho\sigma}={2\over 3}\alpha_{\rm em}(g^{\rho\sigma}k^2-k^\rho

5654: k^\sigma).

5655: \end{eqnarray}

5656: Extracting the overall delta function again, the amplitude becomes  

5657: \begin{eqnarray}

5658: {\cal M} (p|qk) &=& -ie_q\,\overline{u}(q)\bigg[ 

5659: {\gamma^- ({\slp} - {\slk} + m) {\slvarepsilon}  \over (p-k)^2 -m^2} +

5660: {{\slvarepsilon} \;({\slq} + {\slk} + m)\gamma^- \over (q+k)^2 -m^2}

5661: \bigg]u( p)\nonumber\\

5662: &&\int d^2 r

5663: e^{i({\un q} + {\un k} - {\un p}) \cdot {\un r}}

5664: \Big(V({\un r}) - 1\Big).

5665: \label{eq:finalamp_dilep}

5666: \end{eqnarray}

5667: The two terms of the amplitude are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:dilep}

5668: where again, as in the real photon production case, the virtual photon

5669: can be radiated either before or after the multiple scattering from

5670: the target.

5671: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5672: \begin{figure}[htb]

5673: \begin{center}

5674: \epsfxsize=7cm

5675: \leavevmode

5676: \hbox{\epsffile{dilep.eps}}

5677: \end{center}

5678: \caption{Dilepton production in quark-nucleus scattering.}

5679: \label{fig:dilep}

5680: \end{figure}

5681: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5682: Note that this amplitude looks exactly as the amplitude for photon

5683: production in (\ref{eq:finalamp_pho}). The difference is that, here

5684: the photon $4$-momentum $k$ is off shell ($k^2 \neq 0$). Squaring the

5685: amplitude, including the flux factors and averaging (summing) over the

5686: initial (final) state degrees of freedom, the cross section is given

5687: by

5688: \begin{eqnarray}

5689: &&\!\!{d\sigma^{q\,A\rightarrow q\,l^+l^-\,X}

5690: \over d^2 b \,d^2 k \,d\ln M^2 \, dz}=

5691: {{2 e_q^2 \, \alpha^2_{\rm em}} \over{3\pi}} \int 

5692: {{d^2 q}\over{(2\pi)^4}} \sigma_{dipole}^F ({\un q} + {\un k})\nonumber\\

5693: &&

5694: \left\{

5695: \left[{{1+(1-z)^2}\over{z}}\right]

5696: {z^2 l_T^2 \over [k_T^2+M^2(1-z)] [({\un k} -z \, {\un l})^2 + M^2 (1-z)]}

5697: \right.\nonumber\\ &&\left.  - z(1-z)\,M^2\left[{1\over

5698: [k_T^2+M^2(1-z)]} - {1\over [({\un k} - z \, {\un l})^2+M^2(1-z)]}\right]^2

5699: \right\}

5700: \label{eq:cs_dilep}

5701: \end{eqnarray}

5702: where $M^2$ is the dilepton invariant mass squared, ${\un l} = {\un q}

5703: + {\un k}$ and we have ignored quark masses. As before, $z$ is the

5704: fraction of the incoming quark light cone energy carried away by the

5705: photon.

5706: 

5707: Since the dilepton production cross section is proportional to the electromagnetic

5708: coupling constant $\alpha^2_{em}$, the production rate is quite small, specially 

5709: at higher transverse momenta. One way of getting around this problem is to consider

5710: transverse momentum integrated dilepton production cross section. One can then

5711: investigate the behavior of this cross section with varying dilepton mass. To do this,

5712: we write the dipole cross section in transverse coordinate space, and 

5713: integrate over the transverse momentum of the dilepton pair $k_T$ in (\ref{eq:cs_dilep}).

5714: We get  

5715: \begin{eqnarray}

5716: z {d\sigma^{q\,A\rightarrow q\,l^+l^-\,X}

5717: \over d^2 b \,d M^2 \, dz}=&&

5718: {{\alpha^2_{em}}\over{3\pi^2}}\, 

5719:  {1-z \over z^2} \int \, dr_T^2 \, 

5720: \sigma_{dipole}^F (x_g, {\un b}, r_T)

5721: \nonumber\\

5722: &&

5723: \nonumber \\

5724: &&

5725: \Bigg[[1 + (1-z)^2] \,K_1^2[{\sqrt{1-z}\over z} M r_T] + 

5726: 2 (1-z) \, K_0^2[{\sqrt{1-z}\over z} M r_T]\Bigg]

5727: \label{eq:cs_dilep_M}

5728: \end{eqnarray}

5729: 

5730: To relate this to proton-nucleus scattering, we need to

5731: convolute (\ref{eq:cs_dilep_M}) with the quark (and anti-quark) distributions

5732: $q(x,M^2)$ in a deuteron (proton). As shown in 

5733: \cite{Kopeliovich:2001hf, Johnson:2001xf, boris}, this can be

5734: written in terms of the proton structure function $F_2$

5735: \begin{eqnarray}

5736: {d\sigma^{p\,A\rightarrow l^+l^-\,X}

5737: \over d^2b \,d M^2\, dx_F}= &&

5738: {{\alpha^2_{em}}\over{6\pi^2}}{1 \over x_q + x_g}\, 

5739: \int_{x_q}^1 \,dz \,\int dr_T^2 \, {1-z \over z^2} \, F_2^{p} (x_q/z) \, 

5740: \sigma_{dipole}^F (x_g,{\un b}, r_T)

5741: \nonumber\\

5742: &&

5743: \nonumber \\

5744: &&

5745: \Bigg[[1 + (1-z)^2] \,K_1^2[{\sqrt{1-z}\over z} M r_T] + 

5746: 2 (1-z) \, K_0^2[{\sqrt{1-z}\over z} M r_T]\Bigg]

5747: \label{eq:dpA}

5748: \end{eqnarray}

5749: where 

5750: \begin{eqnarray}

5751: x_q= {1\over 2} \bigg[\sqrt{x_F^2 + 4 {M^2 \over s}} + x_F\bigg ]\nonumber \\

5752: x_g=  {1\over 2} \bigg[\sqrt{x_F^2 + 4 {M^2 \over s}} - x_F\bigg ]

5753: \end{eqnarray}

5754: with $x_F\equiv {M\over \sqrt{s}}[e^y - e^{-y}]$ and 

5755: \[ F_2^{p}\equiv \sum_f x \, [q_f(x,M^2) + \bar{q}_f (x,M^2)]\] is the proton 

5756: structure function.

5757: 

5758: Inclusion of small $x$ evolution of the target wave function is again

5759: straightforward. As in the case of photons and elastic quark and gluon

5760: production, the dilepton production cross section depends on the

5761: dipole cross section which satisfies the JIMWLK or BK evolution

5762: equations.  Using the solution of JIMWLK or BK for the dipole cross

5763: section $\sigma_{dipole}^F$ in (\ref{eq:cs_dilep}) and

5764: (\ref{eq:cs_dilep_M}) would automatically incorporate small $x$

5765: evolution of the target nucleus wave function.  Finally, it is worth

5766: noting that there is a deep relation between dilepton production in

5767: proton-nucleus collisions and in DIS of virtual photons on a

5768: hadron/nucleus due to the approximate crossing symmetry of the

5769: amplitudes in the Color Glass Condensate \cite{Gelis:2002nn,boris}

5770: (the crossing symmetry of the amplitude is approximate due to the

5771: eikonal approximations made).

5772: 

5773: 

5774: 

5775: 

5776: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5777: 

5778: \subsection{Hadronic Two-Particle Correlations}

5779: \label{2pi}

5780: 

5781: In this Section we will discuss two-particle inclusive production in

5782: $pA$ collisions. We will review production of two gluons, of a valence

5783: quark and a gluon at forward rapidity and of a $q\bar q$ pair at

5784: mid-rapidity.

5785: 

5786: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5787: 

5788: \subsubsection{Two-Gluon Production}

5789: 

5790: Here we are interested in calculating an inclusive production cross

5791: section for two gluons with transverse momenta ${\un k}_1$, ${\un

5792: k}_2$ and rapidities $y_1$, $y_2$ in $pA$ collisions or in deep

5793: inelastic scattering. A diagram contributing to two-gluon production

5794: in DIS is shown in \fig{lodis}. Again the target nucleus has rapidity

5795: $0$ and the projectile (proton) has rapidity $Y$. The gluons are

5796: produced at central rapidities $0 \ll y_1, y_2 \ll Y$. For simplicity

5797: we assume that $y_2 \gg y_1$: generalization of the results we will

5798: present below to $y_1 \sim y_2$ appears to be conceptually

5799: straightforward but extremely cumbersome technically.

5800: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5801: \begin{figure}[ht]

5802: \begin{center}

5803: \epsfxsize=10cm

5804: \leavevmode

5805: \hbox{\epsffile{sample.eps}}

5806: \end{center}

5807: \caption{Two-gluon production in DIS on a nucleus including multiple 

5808: rescatterings. }

5809: \label{lodis}

5810: \end{figure}

5811: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5812: 

5813: Without going through details of the calculation, which was worked out

5814: in \cite{JMK}, we will just quote the answer for two-gluon production

5815: cross section at mid-rapidity for $q\bar q$--nucleus scattering

5816: including small-$x$ evolution. After a tedious calculation one obtains

5817: \cite{JMK}

5818: \ben

5819: \frac{d \sigma^{q {\bar q} \, A \ \rightarrow \ q {\bar q} \, G_1 G_2 X}}

5820: {d^2 k_1 \, dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2} ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}})

5821: \bigg|_{y_2 \gg y_1}\, = \,

5822:  \int \ d^2 B \ \bigg\{ n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un

5823:  x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_1, {\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2)

5824: \een

5825: \ben

5826: \times \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 1} \, d^2 x_2 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 2} \, s

5827:  ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, {\un k}_1, y_1) \, s ({\un x}_{2},

5828:  {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, {\un k}_2, y_2)

5829: + n_1 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un

5830: x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2) \, d^2 x_1 \, d^2 x_{\tilde 1} 

5831: \een

5832: \ben

5833: \times \, \frac{\bas}{(2 \pi)^3}

5834: \, \int \, d^2 x_2 \, d^2 x_{2'} \, 

5835: e^{- i {\underline k}_2 \cdot {\underline x}_{22'}} \,

5836: \bigg[ \left( \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} - 

5837: \frac{{\un x}_{2{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot 

5838: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} - 

5839: \frac{{\un x}_{2'{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2'{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \, 

5840: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1,

5841: y_1) \, S({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y_2) 

5842: \een

5843: \ben

5844: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} - 

5845: \frac{{\un x}_{2{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot 

5846: \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} \, 

5847: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1,

5848: y_1) \, S({\un x}_2, {\un x}_1, y_2)

5849: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2} - 

5850: \frac{{\un x}_{2'{\tilde 1}}}{x_{2'{\tilde 1}}^2} \right) \cdot 

5851: \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} 

5852: \een

5853: \be\label{2Gincl}

5854: \times \, M ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1,

5855: y_1) \, S({\un x}_1, {\un x}_{2'}, y_2) 

5856: + \frac{{\un x}_{21}}{x_{21}^2} \cdot \frac{{\un x}_{2'1}}{x_{2'1}^2}

5857: \, M ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_1, {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2; {\un k}_1, y_1) \,

5858: + \, (1 \leftrightarrow {\tilde 1}) \bigg] \bigg\}.

5859: \ee

5860: \eq{2Gincl} gives us the two-gluon inclusive production cross section for 

5861: a scattering of a $q\bar q$ dipole on a nucleus. (Generalization to

5862: $pA$ is discussed in \cite{JMK}.) The transverse coordinates of the

5863: quark and anti-quark in the dipole are ${\un x}_0$ and ${\un

5864: x}_{\tilde 0}$, with the impact parameter ${\un B} = ({\un x}_0 + {\un

5865: x}_{\tilde 0})/2$. $n_1 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 ,

5866: {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2)$ is given by \eq{eqn}: to convert it to the

5867: notations of \eq{eqn} we write 

5868: \be

5869: n_1 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y;

5870: {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_2) \, \leftrightarrow \, n_1 ({\un

5871: x}_{0\tilde 0}, {\un x}_{1\tilde 1}, {\un b} = \frac{1}{2} ({\un x}_0

5872: + {\un x}_{\tilde 0} - {\un x}_1 - {\un x}_{\tilde 1}), Y-y_2). 

5873: \ee

5874: $n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde

5875: 1}, y_1, {\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2)$ is the number of pairs

5876: of dipoles formed by quark and anti-quark at ${\un x}_1$ and ${\un

5877: x}_{\tilde 1}$ with rapidity $y_1$ and by quark and anti-quark at

5878: ${\un x}_2$ and ${\un x}_{\tilde 2}$ with rapidity $y_2$ in the

5879: original dipole ${\un x}_{0\tilde 0}$ having rapidity $Y$. $n_2$ obeys

5880: the following equation \cite{dip2,dip3}

5881: \ben

5882: n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1},

5883: y_1, {\un x}_2, {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2) \, = \, \frac{\bas}{2 \, \pi} \,

5884: \int_{\mbox{max} \{ y_1, y_2 \}}^Y d y \ e^{ - 2 \, \bas \, \ln \left(

5885:   \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}}{\rho} \right) (Y - y)} \, \int_\rho d^2 x_3

5886:   \frac{x_{0{\tilde 0}}^2}{x_{30}^2 x_{3{\tilde 0}}^2}

5887: \een

5888: \ben

5889: \times  \, \left[ n_1 ({\un

5890:   x}_0, {\un x}_3, y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_1) \, n_1

5891:   ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un x}_2 , {\un x}_{\tilde 2},

5892:   y_2) + n_1 ({\un

5893:   x}_0, {\un x}_3, y; {\un x}_2 , {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2) \, n_1

5894:   ({\un x}_3, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1},

5895:   y_1) +  \right.

5896: \een

5897: \be\label{n2}

5898: + \left. n_2 ({\un x}_0, {\un x}_3, y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1},

5899: y_1, {\un x}_2 , {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2) + n_2 ({\un x}_3, {\un

5900: x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un x}_1 , {\un x}_{\tilde 1}, y_1, {\un x}_2 ,

5901: {\un x}_{\tilde 2}, y_2)\right]

5902: \ee

5903: which is linear and can be solved after one finds $n_1$ from

5904: \eq{eqn}.

5905: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5906: \begin{figure}[ht]

5907: \begin{center}

5908: \epsfxsize=12cm

5909: \leavevmode

5910: \hbox{\epsffile{mev.eps}}

5911: \end{center}

5912: \caption{Diagrams describing one step of evolution for $M$.}

5913: \label{mev}

5914: \end{figure}

5915: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5916: 

5917: The quantity $s$ in \eq{2Gincl} is defined in terms of gluon dipole

5918: amplitudes as

5919: \ben

5920: s ({\un x}_1, {\un x}_2, {\un k}, y) \, \equiv \, \frac{\bas}{(2

5921: \pi)^3} \, \int \, d^2 z_1 \, d^2 z_2 \,

5922: e^{- i {\underline k} \cdot ({\underline z}_1 - {\underline z}_2 )} \,

5923: \sum_{i,j = 1}^2 (-1)^{i+j} \,

5924: \frac{{\underline z}_1 - {\underline x}_i}{|{\underline z}_1 - 

5925: {\underline x}_i|^2} \cdot \frac{{\underline z}_2 - {\underline

5926: x}_j}{|{\underline z}_2 - {\underline x}_j|^2} 

5927: \een

5928: \be\label{sdef}

5929: \times \, \left[ N_G \left({\underline z}_1, {\underline x}_j, y \right) 

5930: + N_G \left({\underline z}_2 , {\underline x}_i, y \right) 

5931: - N_G \left({\underline z}_1 , {\underline z}_2, y \right)

5932: - N_G \left({\underline x}_i , {\underline x}_j, y \right) \right]

5933: \ee

5934: and is an integral component of single inclusive production cross

5935: section from \eq{paclg1}. $S$ in \eq{2Gincl} is the $S$-matrix of a

5936: quark dipole scattering on the target nucleus, related to the quark

5937: dipole amplitude $N$ by

5938: \be\label{S}

5939: S ({\un x}_{0}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y) = 1 - N ({\un x}_{0}, {\un

5940: x}_{\tilde 0}, Y),

5941: \ee

5942: where $N$, in turn, can be found from the nonlinear evolution equation

5943: (\ref{eqN}). Note that the gluon dipole amplitude $N_G$ is defined by

5944: \eq{ggqq}.

5945: 

5946: Finally, the quantity $M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 1},

5947: y_2; {\un k}_1, y_1)$ in \eq{2Gincl} has the physical meaning of

5948: production amplitude of a gluon with transverse momentum ${\un k}_1$

5949: and rapidity $y_1$ in an off-forward scattering of dipole $2{\tilde

5950: 1}$ into dipole $2'{\tilde 1}$ on the target nucleus. The evolution

5951: equation for $M$ is \cite{JMK}

5952: \ben

5953: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, Y; {\un k}_1, y_1) \,

5954: = \, e^{- \bas \, \ln \left( \frac{x_{2{\tilde 0}} x_{2'{\tilde 0}}

5955: x_{22'}}{\rho^3} \right) \, (Y-y_1)} \, d({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'},

5956: {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un k}_1, y_1) +

5957: \een

5958: \ben

5959: + \frac{\bas}{2 \pi} \, \int d^2 x_4 \int_{y_1}^Y dy \, e^{- \bas \,

5960: \ln \left( \frac{x_{2{\tilde 0}} x_{2'{\tilde 0}} x_{22'}}{\rho^3}

5961: \right) \, (Y-y)} \, \bigg\{

5962: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} - 

5963: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot 

5964: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} - 

5965: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) 

5966: \een

5967: \ben

5968: \times 

5969: \bigg[ M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_4, y; {\un k}_1, y_1) 

5970: + \int d^2 x_a d^2 x_b \, n_1 ({\un x}_4, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y;

5971: {\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, y_1) \, s ({\un x}_a, {\un x}_b, {\un k}_1, y_1)

5972: \, [1 - N ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'}, y)] \bigg] - 

5973: \een

5974: \ben

5975: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} - 

5976: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \cdot 

5977: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} - 

5978: \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} \right) \, 

5979: M ({\un x}_4, {\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un k}_1, y_1) 

5980: \, [1 - N ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_4, y)] - 

5981: \een

5982: \be\label{Mev}

5983: - \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42}}{x_{42}^2} - 

5984: \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} \right) \cdot 

5985: \left( \frac{{\un x}_{42'}}{x_{42'}^2} - 

5986: \frac{{\un x}_{4{\tilde 0}}}{x_{4{\tilde 0}}^2} \right) \, 

5987: M ({\un x}_2, {\un x}_4, {\un x}_{\tilde 0}, y; {\un k}_1, y_1) 

5988: \, [1 - N ({\un x}_{2'}, {\un x}_4, y)] \bigg\} .

5989: \ee

5990: It includes the (nonlinear) evolution between the incoming dipole and

5991: the produced gluon, which is shown in \fig{mev} using the same notation

5992: as in \fig{eem}. The initial condition for the evolution in

5993: \eq{Mev} given by $d({\un x}_2, {\un x}_{2'},{\un x}_{\tilde 0}, {\un

5994: k}_1, y_1)$ has to be calculated separately by solving a linear

5995: evolution equation (see Eqs. (27) and (28) in \cite{JMK}). 

5996: 

5997: 

5998: 

5999: \eq{2Gincl} is represented graphically in \fig{fan2} in terms of 

6000: traditional Feynman diagrams.  The first term in \eq{2Gincl}

6001: corresponds to splitting of the original linear evolution in two,

6002: which is described by $n_2$. Then each of the two ladders

6003: independently produces a gluon with all the possible splittings

6004: happening afterwards. This is illustrated in \fig{fan2}A.  The second

6005: term in \eq{2Gincl} corresponds to nonlinear evolution successively

6006: producing both gluons, after which all possible splittings are

6007: allowed, as shown in Figs. \ref{fan2}B and \ref{fan2}C, where we have

6008: divided the nonlinear evolution into the linear (Fig. \ref{fan2}B) and

6009: nonlinear (Fig. \ref{fan2}C) parts. The linear evolution in this

6010: second term in \eq{2Gincl} is given by $n_1$ and by $M$ from the

6011: linear part of \eq{Mev}. This linear evolution leads to production of

6012: both gluons $\# 2$ and $\# 1$ and is illustrated in

6013: \fig{fan2}B. The initial conditions for \eq{Mev} are nonlinear. They 

6014: include ladder splittings and are pictured by the fan diagram in the

6015: lower part of \fig{fan2}B. One should note, however, that \eq{Mev},

6016: while being linear in $M$, has extra factors of $1-N$ on its right

6017: hand side. That means that evolution of $M$ includes ladder splittings

6018: between the gluons $\# 2$ and $\# 1$, one of which is shown in

6019: \fig{fan2}C. There the evolution leading to creation of gluon $\# 2$ 

6020: is still linear since it is still given by $n_1$ in the second term on

6021: the right hand side of \eq{2Gincl}. However, since the evolution in

6022: the rapidity interval between the emitted gluons (evolution of $M$) is

6023: nonlinear, splittings are allowed between the gluons $\# 2$ and $\#

6024: 1$, as depicted in \fig{fan2}C.

6025: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6026: \begin{figure}[t]

6027: \begin{center}

6028: \epsfxsize=18.5cm

6029: \leavevmode

6030: \hbox{\epsffile{fan2.eps}}

6031: \end{center}

6032: \caption{Feynman diagrams corresponding to double gluon production 

6033: cross section given by \eq{2Gincl}. Emitted gluons are denoted by

6034: crosses.  }

6035: \label{fan2}

6036: \end{figure}

6037: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6038: 

6039: The diagrams A and B in \fig{fan2} are the same as would have been

6040: expected from AGK cutting rules \cite{AGK} (see also \cite{KT} for

6041: similar correspondence between the dipole model results and AGK rules

6042: expectations). However, the diagram C in \fig{fan2}, while being

6043: included in \eq{2Gincl}, is prohibited by AGK cutting

6044: rules. Therefore, we seem to observe a direct violation of the AGK

6045: rules in QCD. Since AGK rules have never been proven for QCD, one

6046: should not be too surprised that they do not work here. It is

6047: interesting to note that AGK violation sets in at the level of the

6048: 2-gluon production: single gluon inclusive production cross section

6049: calculated in \cite{KT} adheres to AGK rules and so does the

6050: diffractive DIS cross section calculated in \cite{KL}.

6051: 

6052: The violation of AGK cutting rules in \eq{2Gincl} is due to non-linear

6053: terms in \eq{Mev}, which are in turn due to late time (after the

6054: interaction) gluon emissions at light cone times $\tau > 0$. These

6055: terms were not important for the calculation of the total cross

6056: section in the dipole model \cite{dip1,dip2}: there they were found to

6057: cancel \cite{CM}. Thus if one would try to construct an analogy

6058: between the fan diagrams \cite{GLR} and dipole calculations

6059: \cite{yuri_bk} based on the correspondence of total cross sections,

6060: one would omit such terms. Since the fan diagrams seem to adhere to

6061: AGK rules, this omission would lead to the erroneous conclusion that

6062: AGK rules should work for the two-gluon production cross

6063: section. However, as we have seen above, these late time emissions are

6064: important for single \cite{KT} and double inclusive gluon production,

6065: violating the AGK rules for the latter. What appears to fail here is

6066: the one-to-one correspondence between the fan diagrams and dipole

6067: calculations.

6068: 

6069: Another difference between the result (\ref{2Gincl}) and the direct

6070: application of AGK rules to calculating inclusive cross section done

6071: in \cite{Braun2} is that nonlinear splittings may start exactly at the

6072: point in rapidity when the softer of the produced gluons is emitted in

6073: the diagram B or exactly at the point of emission of both gluons $\#

6074: 1$ and $\# 2$ in the diagram A. Similar discrepancy was already

6075: observed when comparing the single gluon inclusive cross section

6076: calculated in \cite{KT} to the results of \cite{Braun2}.

6077: 

6078: It is interesting to note that \eq{2Gincl} can not be cast in the form

6079: adhering to $k_T$-factorization, as it was done for \eq{incl}

6080: transforming it into \eq{ktdip} \cite{JMK}. This indicated a breakdown

6081: of $k_T$-factorization for two-particle production. Below we will

6082: observe the same failure of $k_T$-factorization for the case of quark

6083: production \cite{BGV,NSZZ}.

6084: 

6085: \eq{2Gincl} gives a complete result for two-gluon production cross 

6086: section in saturation/Color Glass Condensate formalism. It can be used

6087: to describe two-particle correlations in $dAu$ collisions at RHIC and

6088: in $pA$ collisions at LHC. Unfortunately \eq{2Gincl} is rather

6089: complicated. In order to make \eq{2Gincl} easier to implement, it is

6090: highly desirable to find some way of simplifying it. At this time we

6091: are not aware of any simplification of \eq{2Gincl} in the general

6092: case. Nevertheless, in certain kinematic regimes \eq{2Gincl} may be

6093: simplified. For instance, if the center of mass energy of the

6094: collision is not too high or if the transverse momenta of the produced

6095: gluons are sufficiently large ($|{\un k}_1|, |{\un k}_2| \gsim Q_s$),

6096: the nonlinear saturation effects, such as ladder splittings, could be

6097: neglected. This implies that the diagrams in Figs. \ref{fan2} A and C

6098: are small with the linear part of the diagram B dominating the cross

6099: section. This is the well-known leading twist result

6100: \cite{lr} (see also \cite{ktflow}). 

6101: 

6102: 

6103: In \cite{KLM2}, using $k_T$-factorization formula, Kharzeev, Levin and

6104: McLerran suggested that back-to-back particle correlations would be

6105: suppressed in $p(d)A$ collisions, when the rapidity interval between

6106: the jets is large, e.g., when one of the jets ($y_2$) is going in the

6107: proton fragmentation region and the other one ($y_1$) is at

6108: mid-rapidity at RHIC (the so-called Mueller-Navelet jets

6109: \cite{MN}). This prediction will be discussed in more detail in Sect. 

6110: \ref{fet}. While preliminary data from STAR collaboration appears to

6111: confirm this prediction \cite{Ogawa}, it would be important and

6112: interesting to generalize the approach of \cite{KLM2} beyond the

6113: $k_T$-factorization formula, which is valid only at high $k_T \gg

6114: Q_s$. \eq{2Gincl} provides us with an opportunity to carry out such a

6115: generalization.

6116: 

6117: 

6118: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6119: 

6120: \subsubsection{Gluon--Valence Quark Production}

6121: 

6122: Here we consider production of a high $x$ (valence) quark and a gluon

6123: from scattering of a quark in the proton wave function on the target

6124: nucleus, treated as a Color Glass Condensate. This is expected to be

6125: the dominant process in the projectile proton fragmentation region

6126: where one probes the high $x$ degrees of the freedom in the proton and

6127: the small $x$ degrees of freedom in the target nucleus. This process

6128: is the $\alpha_s$ correction to the scattering of the high $x$ quark

6129: on the target considered in the previous sections.

6130: 

6131: Production of a valence quark and a gluon was considered in

6132: \cite{JMK}. Here we go through the main part of the derivation and

6133: refer the reader to \cite{JMK} for more detail. The starting point is

6134: the amplitude for scattering of a incoming massless on-shell quark on

6135: the target, producing an on-shell quark and gluon shown in

6136: % Fig. \ref{fig:qA-qgx}

6137:  \begin{eqnarray}

6138: q(p)\,A \rightarrow q(q)\, g(k)\, X

6139: \label{eqn:qAtoqgX}

6140: \end{eqnarray}

6141: which is given by 

6142: \begin{eqnarray}

6143: {\cal M} \!\!\!\!& = \!\!\!\!&g\! \int d^4x \,d^4y \,d^4z \,d^4r \, 

6144: d^4\bar{r} \,e^{i(q\cdot z + k\cdot r - p\cdot y)} 

6145: \bar{u}(q) [i\stackrel{\rightarrow}{\slpartial}_z ] S_F (z,x) \gamma^{\nu} 

6146: t^c S_F(x,y)  [i\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\slpartial}_y ] u(p) \nonumber \\

6147: &&G_{\nu\rho}^{cb}(x,\bar{r}) D^{\rho\mu}_{ba}(\bar{r},r) \, \epsilon_{\mu}(k)

6148: \label{eq:amp_qg}

6149: \end{eqnarray}

6150: where $S_F$, $G_{\nu\rho}$ are the quark and gluon propagators in the

6151: classical field background and $D^{\rho\mu}$ is the "inverse" propagator (which

6152: amputates the external gluon line), defined by

6153: \begin{eqnarray}

6154: \int d^4 r \,G^{0cb}_{\nu\rho} (x,r)\, D^{\rho\mu}_{ba} (r,y) \equiv 

6155: \delta^c_a \, \delta_{\nu}^{\mu} \, \delta^4 (x-y)

6156: \end{eqnarray}

6157: and 

6158: $G_{\nu\rho}^0$ is the free gluon propagator and  the quark and gluon lines 

6159: with a thick circle represent the propagators in the background field as illustrated

6160: in Fig. \ref{fig:v_quark}. The quark and gluon propagators in the classical background

6161: field are known \cite{hw,ayala}. Here we write them as an interacting part and a free

6162: part as before

6163: \begin{eqnarray}

6164: S_F(q,p)&\equiv &(2\pi)^4 \delta^4(p-q)\, S^0_F

6165: (p) + S_F^0 (q) \,\tau_f (q,p) \, S_F^0 (p) \nonumber \\ 

6166: G^{\mu\nu}(q,p)&\equiv&

6167: (2\pi)^4 \delta^4(p-q)\, G^{0\mu\nu} (p) + G^{0\mu}_{\rho}(q) \,

6168: \tau_g (q,p)\, G^{0\rho\nu}(p)

6169: \label{eq:prop_decomp}

6170: \end{eqnarray}

6171: where the free propagators are 

6172: \begin{eqnarray}

6173: S_F^0 (p) &=& i{\slp \over p^2} \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\!\!\! \mbox{and}

6174: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\!\!\!  G^0_{\mu\nu}(k) = {i\over k^2}

6175: \bigg[-g_{\mu\nu} + {\eta_\mu k_\nu + \eta_\nu k_\mu \over \eta \cdot

6176: k}\bigg]

6177: \end{eqnarray}

6178: and $\eta_\mu$ is the light cone gauge vector so that $\eta \cdot A

6179: \equiv A^- = 0$ defines the gauge we choose to use. One of the 

6180: advantages of using this gauge is that the interaction part of the gluon 

6181: propagator in \eq{eq:prop_decomp}, denoted here by $\tau_g (q,p)$, is 

6182: diagonal in Lorentz indices (proportional to $g_{\mu\nu}$)  which 

6183: is why we can write it as in \eq{eq:prop_decomp}.  The interacting parts

6184: of the quark and gluon propagator $\tau_f$ and $\tau_g$ are defined

6185: as 

6186: \begin{eqnarray}

6187: \tau_f (q,p)\equiv (2\pi)\delta(p^- - q^-) \,\gamma^-\, \int d^2x\, 

6188: e^{i ({\un q} - {\un p})\cdot {\un x}}\, [V({\un x}) - 1]\\

6189: \tau_g (q,p) \equiv 2p^- \, (2\pi)\delta(p^- - q^-) \, \int d^2x\, 

6190: e^{i ({\un q} - {\un p}) \cdot {\un x}}\, [U({\un x}) - 1]

6191: \label{eq:tau_def}

6192: \end{eqnarray}

6193: where $V$ is the multiple scattering matrix in the fundamental representation

6194: defined in (\ref{eq:v_fun}) and $U$ is the analogous matrix in the adjoint representation.

6195: The scattering amplitude then can be written as

6196: \begin{eqnarray}

6197: {\cal M}(q,\lambda ,k;p)\equiv  

6198: \epsilon_\mu^{(\lambda)} (k) \,[M_1^\mu + M_2^\mu + M_3^\mu + M_4^\mu]

6199: \label{eq:amp_mu}

6200: \end{eqnarray}

6201: where $\epsilon_\mu^{(\lambda)} (k) $ is the polarization vector of the 

6202: produced gluon and 

6203: \begin{eqnarray}

6204: \!\!\!\!M_1 \!\!\!\!&=&\!\!\!\! -g \,\bar{u}(q)\, \slepsilon \,t^a\,S_F^0(q+k)\, 

6205: \tau_f(q+k,p)\,u(p) \label{eq:amp_12341} \\

6206: M_2 \!\!\!\!&=&\!\!\!\! -g\, \bar{u}(q)\, \tau_f(q,p-k)\, S_F^0(p-k)\, \slepsilon \, 

6207: t^a\, u(p) \\

6208: M_3 \!\!\!\!&=&\!\!\!\! -g \,\bar{u}(q) \, \gamma_{\nu} t^b\,\tau_g^{ba}(k,p-q)\,u(p)\, 

6209: G_0^{\nu\mu}(p-q)\, \epsilon_\mu (k) \\

6210: M_4 \!\!\!\!&=&\!\!\!\! -g \! \int \!d^4l \,\bar{u}(q) \tau_f(q,p-l) S_F^0(p-l)\gamma_{\nu}

6211: t^b \tau_g^{ba}(k,l) u(p) G_0^{\nu\mu}(l)\epsilon_\mu (k). 

6212: \label{eq:amp_1234}

6213: \end{eqnarray}

6214: The different terms in Eqs. (\ref{eq:amp_12341})--(\ref{eq:amp_1234})

6215: are depicted in \fig{fig:qgx_1234} where the solid line denotes

6216: the incoming quark, the thick wavy line attached to a full circle

6217: denotes multiple scattering from the target and the dashed line

6218: represents the radiated gluon.

6219: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6220: \begin{figure}[htb]

6221: \begin{center}

6222: \epsfxsize=12cm

6223: \leavevmode

6224: \hbox{\epsffile{qgx_1234.eps}}

6225: \end{center}

6226: \caption{Production of a quark and a gluon in quark-nucleus scattering.}

6227: \label{fig:qgx_1234}

6228: \end{figure}

6229: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6230: 

6231: $M_1$ corresponds to radiation of a gluon before the multiple

6232: scattering before the quark and the target while $M_2$ corresponds to

6233: the incoming quark scattering on the target and then radiating a

6234: gluon. $M_3$ depicts the case when the radiated gluon multiply

6235: scatters from the target, while in $M_4$ both the radiated gluon and

6236: the final state quark multiply scatter from the target.  To get the

6237: production cross section, we need to square the amplitude. This is

6238: straightforward but tedious. First, one can do the $l^-$ integration

6239: in $M_4$ using the delta function $\delta (l^- - k^-)$ and the $l^+$

6240: integration via contour methods using the $p-l$ pole which sets $l^- =

6241: k^-$ and $l^+ = - l_\perp^2/2 q^-$.

6242: 

6243: Contribution of $M_1$ and $M_2$ terms is identical (up to color

6244: matrices) to the photon production case except for the extra

6245: contribution coming from the pieces of the gluon propagator

6246: proportional to the gauge vector $\eta_{\rho}$ which is not present in

6247: the case of the inclusive photon production. This warrants some

6248: clarification. In single photon production, photons are emitted from

6249: the incoming quark and can not be emitted from the target (CGC) which,

6250: to leading order in $\alpha_s$ is comprised of gluons only. Radiation

6251: of a photon from the target is suppressed for two reasons; first it is

6252: a higher order in $\alpha_s$ correction since one would need a gluon

6253: in the target wave function to split into a quark anti-quark pair

6254: which would then radiate a photon and second, it is suppressed in the

6255: soft photon limit (it is proportional to $z$ where $z$ is the fraction

6256: of the parent quark the radiated photon carries away). Therefore, in

6257: the case of photon production, only the $g_{\mu\nu}$ part of the

6258: propagator contributes. In case of gluon production, one needs to

6259: consider radiation of gluons from the target as well as from the

6260: projectile quark. One can avoid these contributions by working in the

6261: light cone gauge as shown by \cite{KM}. This however necessitates

6262: inclusion of the contribution of the extra terms, proportional to the

6263: gauge vector, in the propagator. The contribution of $M_1$ and $M_2$

6264: is therefore

6265: \begin{eqnarray}

6266: &&(M_1^\mu + M_2^\mu) \left[-g_{\mu\nu} + 

6267: {(k_\mu \eta_\nu + \eta_\mu k_\nu)\over  \eta \cdot k}\right] (M_1^\nu + M_2^\nu)  

6268:  = 16 p^-p^- \nonumber\\

6269: &&\Bigg\{ {z(1-z)^2 \over [z {\un k} - (1-z){\un q}]^2}

6270: Tr [V^{\dagger}({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})]  t^a \, t^a 

6271: [V({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] \nonumber\\

6272: &+& {z(1 - z)^2 \over k_T^2} 

6273: Tr [V({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})]  t^a \, t^a 

6274: [V^{\dagger}({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})]  \nonumber\\

6275: &+& 2 z^2  \bigg[V^\dagger ({\un q} + {\un k}) t^a - 

6276: t^a V^\dagger ({\un q} + {\un k}) \bigg] 

6277: \bigg[ {1 \over [z {\un k} -(1-z) {\un q}]^2} t^a V({\un q} + {\un k}) - 

6278: {1\over k_T^2} V({\un q} + {\un k}) t^a \bigg]

6279: \nonumber \\

6280: &+&  \Bigg[

6281: (1-z)^2 (1 + z^2) {q_T^2 \over k_T^2  [z {\un k} - (1-z) {\un q}]^2} + {z^2(1-z^2) 

6282: \over  [z{\un k} - (1-z) {\un q}]^2}

6283: - {1-z^2 \over k_T^2}\Bigg] \nonumber\\ 

6284: &&Tr \, t^a [V^{\dagger}({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] 

6285: t^a [V({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2

6286: \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})]\Bigg\}

6287: \label{eq:amp_12}

6288: \end{eqnarray}

6289: where $Tr$ denotes trace of color matrices. A tedious but straightforward calculation 

6290: of the rest of the diagrams leads to 

6291: 

6292: \begin{eqnarray}

6293: |M_3^{\dagger}M_1| &=& 16 \,p^-p^- \, z(1 + z^2) 

6294: {q_T^2 -z {\un q} \cdot ({\un q} + {\un k}) \over q_T^2 [z{\un k} - (1-z){\un q}]^2}

6295: [U^{\dagger ab}({\un q} + {\un k}) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] 

6296: \nonumber\\

6297: &&Tr \, t^b\, t^a [V({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] \nonumber\\

6298: |M_3^{\dagger} M_2|&=& 16 \,p^-p^- z (1 + z^2) 

6299: {{\un q} \cdot {\un k} \over q_T^2 k_T^2} 

6300:  [U^{\dagger ab}({\un q} + {\un k}) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] 

6301:  Tr\,t^b [V({\un q} + {\un k})\nonumber\\ &&- (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})]\,t^a \nonumber\\

6302: |M_3|^2 &=& 16 p^- p^- {z(1+ z^2) \over q_t^2} 

6303: [U^{\dagger ab}({\un q} + {\un k}) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] 

6304: [U^{ca}({\un q} + {\un k}) - \delta^{ca} (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] \nonumber\\

6305: &&Tr\,  t^b \, t^c \nonumber\\ 

6306: |M^{\dagger}_3 M_4| &=&- 16\, p^-p^- z (1 + z^2) \int {d^2l \over (2\pi)^2} 

6307: {{\un q}\cdot {\un l}  \over q_T^2 l_T^2} \,

6308: [U^{\dagger ab}({\un q} + {\un k}) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})]  

6309: \nonumber\\

6310: &&[U^{ca}({\un k} - {\un l}) - \delta^{ca}(2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un k} - {\un l})] \,

6311: Tr\,t^b [V({\un q} + {\un l}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un l})] t^c 

6312: \nonumber\\

6313: |M_4^{\dagger} M_1| &=& - 16 p^-p^- z (1 + z^2) \int {d^2l \over (2\pi)^2}

6314: {(1 - z) {\un q} \cdot {\un l} - z {\un k} \cdot {\un l} \over l_T^2 [z{\un k} - (1-z){\un q}]^2} 

6315: [U^{\dagger ab}({\un k} - {\un l}) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2  \delta^2({\un k} - {\un l})]

6316: \nonumber\\  

6317: &&Tr\, t^b [V^{\dagger }({\un q} + {\un l}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un l})]  t^a 

6318: [V({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] \nonumber\\

6319: |M_4^{\dagger} M_2| &=& -16 p^-p^- z (1 + z^2) \int {d^2l \over (2\pi)^2} 

6320: {{\un k} \cdot {\un l} \over l_T^2 k_T^2} 

6321: [U^{\dagger ac}({\un k} - {\un l}) - \delta^{ac}(2\pi)^2  \delta^2({\un k} - {\un l})] 

6322:  \nonumber\\

6323: &&Tr \,t^c  [V^{\dagger }({\un q} + {\un l}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un l})]  

6324: [V({\un q} + {\un k}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un k})] t^a \nonumber \\

6325: |M_4|^2 &=& 16 p^-p^- z (1 + z^2) 

6326:  \int {d^2l \over (2\pi)^2} {d^2\bar{l} \over (2\pi)^2} 

6327: {{\un l} \cdot     \bar{ {\un l}}  

6328: \over l_T^2 \bar{l}_T^2} 

6329: [U^{\dagger ac}({\un k} - \bar{ {\un l}}) - \delta^{ac}(2\pi)^2 

6330: \delta^2({\un k} - \bar{{\un l}})] 

6331: \nonumber\\

6332: &&[U^{ab}({\un k} - {\un l}) - \delta^{ab}(2\pi)^2  \delta^2({\un k} - {\un l})] 

6333:  Tr  \, t^c t^b 

6334: [V^{\dagger}({\un q} + {\un l}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2({\un q} + {\un l})]\nonumber \\

6335: &&[V({\un q} +  \bar{{\un l}}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta^2 ({\un q} +  \bar{{\un l}})]

6336: \label{eq:amp_34}

6337: \end{eqnarray}

6338: where for any interference term, there is an equal conjugate contribution. To get

6339: the cross section, one needs to average (sum) over the initial (final) state degrees

6340: of freedom and include the phase space and flux factors. The invariant cross 

6341: section for production of a quark with transverse momentum $q_T$ and energy 

6342: fraction $z$ and a gluon with transverse momentum $k_T$ (and energy fraction 

6343: $1-z$) is given by

6344: \begin{eqnarray}

6345: z \, (1-z) \, {d\sigma^{qA\rightarrow qgX} \over dz \,d^2 q\,d^2k } = 

6346: {\alpha_s \over 128 \, \pi^4 \, p^- p^-}  \,|M|^2 

6347: \label{eq:cs_qg}

6348: \end{eqnarray}

6349: where $|M|^2$ is defined in (\ref{eq:amp_mu}) and given in

6350: (\ref{eq:amp_12},\ref{eq:amp_34}).  This cross section looks quite

6351: more complicated than single inclusive quark or gluon

6352: production. Nevertheless, the degrees of freedom are again Wilson

6353: lines in fundamental or adjoint representation as before. Here, one

6354: has correlators of more than two Wilson lines (which were not present

6355: in single inclusive production of quarks and gluons).  To do a

6356: quantitative study of two hadron production in proton-nucleus cross

6357: section, one needs to convolute this cross section with the

6358: distribution function of the quark in a proton and the two hadron

6359: fragmentation function.

6360: 

6361: One can use the two particle cross section derived here (after the

6362: convolution with distribution and fragmentation functions) to

6363: investigate two hadron correlations in proton-nucleus collisions at

6364: RHIC and LHC. The expectation is that due to classical multiple

6365: scattering (no quantum evolution), the correlation function will

6366: become wider. Inclusion of quantum corrections can be achieved by

6367: solving the JIMWLK equations for the higher point functions of the

6368: Wilson lines and using the solution in the above cross section. This

6369: should be valid as long as the produced quark and gluon have the same

6370: (or similar) rapidities. One expects that inclusion of quantum

6371: evolution would lead to reduced correlation between the produced

6372: hadrons.  The effects of quantum evolution on the two hadron

6373: correlation should be most dramatic when the produced hadrons are

6374: widely separated in rapidity, as considered in the previous section.

6375: 

6376: 

6377: 

6378: 

6379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6380: 

6381: \subsubsection{Quark--Anti-quark Pair Production}

6382: 

6383: 

6384: We finally consider production of a quark anti-quark pair in proton-nucleus

6385: collisions. This has been investigated in detail in 

6386: \cite{Kharzeev:2003sk, Tuchin:2004rb,Gelis:2003vh,Blaizot:2004wu, Blaizot:2004wv}. 

6387: Here, we follow the derivation of the \cite{Blaizot:2004wu,

6388: Blaizot:2004wv} since it is most closely related to the Color Glass

6389: Condensate formalism. For technical details and more references, we

6390: refer the reader to \cite{Blaizot:2004wu}. The starting point is the

6391: classical background field of a single nucleus in terms of the nuclear

6392: color charge density given by

6393: \begin{eqnarray}

6394: A^\mu_A (x)=-g\delta^{\mu-}\delta(x^+)\frac{1}{\partial_T^2}

6395: \rho_A ({\un x}) 

6396: \end{eqnarray}

6397: in the covariant gauge and its Fourier transform in momentum space 

6398: \begin{eqnarray}

6399: A^\mu_A (q)=2\pi g\delta^{\mu-}\delta(q^+)

6400: \frac{\rho_A ({\un q})}{q_T^2}\,\, .

6401: \label{eq:A_mom}

6402: \end{eqnarray}

6403: Note that (\ref{eq:A_mom}) is linear in the color charge density even

6404: though it does describe the classical field created by a dense

6405: nucleus. This is a property of the covariant gauge chosen here and is

6406: not true in a general gauge.

6407: 

6408: Since proton is treated as a dilute object while the nucleus taken to

6409: be a Color Glass Condensate, one needs to keep only the linear term in

6410: the color charge density of the proton while in the nucleus, the color

6411: charge density is kept to all orders. The general solution of the

6412: classical equations of motion for a proton-nucleus collision was found

6413: in \cite{Blaizot:2004wu,DM} and is given by

6414: \begin{eqnarray}

6415: A^\mu(q)= A_{reg}^\mu(q)

6416: +\delta^{\mu -} A_{sing}^-(q)\; ,

6417: \end{eqnarray}

6418: where $ A_{reg}^\mu$ is given by  

6419:  \begin{eqnarray}

6420:  A_{reg}^\mu(q)&=& A_p^\mu(q) +

6421: \frac{ig}{q^2 + i \, \epsilon \, q^+} \int\frac{d^2 k_1}{(2\pi)^2}

6422: \bigg\{

6423: C_{u}^\mu (q, {\un k_1})\, 

6424: \left[U( {\un k_2})-(2\pi)^2\delta( {\un k_2})\right]

6425: \nonumber\\

6426: &&

6427: + C_{v\, , reg}^\mu(q)\, 

6428: \left[\tilde{U}({\un k_2}) - (2\pi)^2 \delta ({k_2})\right]

6429: \bigg\}

6430: \frac{{\rho_p}({\un k_1} )} 

6431: {k_{1\, T}^2}\; 

6432: \label{eq:field_1}

6433: \end{eqnarray}

6434: and the singular term is given by 

6435: \begin{eqnarray}

6436: A_{sing}^-(q)\equiv

6437: -\frac{ig}{q^+}\int \frac{d^2 k_1}{(2\pi)^2}

6438: \left[\tilde{U}({\un k_2}) - (2\pi)^2\delta({\un k_2})\right]

6439: \frac{{\rho_p}({\un k_1})}{k_{1\, T}^2}

6440: \end{eqnarray}

6441: where $U$ and $\tilde{U}$ (note the factor of $1/2$ in the definition

6442: of $\tilde{U}$) are matrices in the adjoint representation and

6443: \begin{eqnarray}

6444: U({\un x}) &\equiv& {\cal P} \exp\left[i g\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}

6445: dz^+ A_A^- (z^+,{\un x}) \cdot T

6446: \right]\; ,\nonumber\\

6447: \tilde{U}({\un x}) &\equiv &{\cal P} \exp\left[i \frac{g}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}

6448: dz^+ A_A^-(z^+,{\un x})\cdot T

6449: \right]\; ,

6450: \end{eqnarray}

6451: and $T^a$ are the generators of the adjoint representation of $SU(N)$

6452: and ${\un k_1}$ is the momentum transfer from the proton and 

6453: ${\un k_2} \equiv {\un q} - {\un k_1}$ is the momentum transfer from the nucleus. The

6454: coefficients $C_{u}^\mu (q,{\un k_1})$ and $C_{v, reg}^\mu (q)$ are

6455: defined by

6456: \begin{eqnarray}

6457: && 

6458: C_{u}^+(q,k_{1\, T})\equiv -\frac{k_{1\, T}^2}{q^- + i\epsilon}\;,\; 

6459: C_{u}^-(q,k_{1\, T})\equiv \frac{k_{2\, T}^2 - q_T^2}{q^+}\;,\;

6460: C_{u}^i(q,{\un k_1})\equiv -2 k_1^i\; \;

6461: \nonumber\\

6462: && 

6463: C_{v, reg}^+ (q) \equiv 2q^+ \;\;

6464: C_{v, reg}^- (q) \equiv 2q^-- \frac{q^2}{q^+}\;\;

6465: C_{v, reg}^i (q) \equiv 2 q^i

6466: \end{eqnarray}

6467: and $C_{v, reg}^\mu (q)$ and $C_{v}^\mu (q)$ are related through

6468: $C_{v, reg}^\mu (q)=C_v^\mu (q) + \delta^{\mu -}\frac{q^2}{q^+} $. To

6469: get the amplitude, one again uses the quark propagator in the

6470: background field of the nucleus which includes multiple scattering

6471: from the target nucleus and includes multiple scatterings from the

6472: quark, anti-quark and gluon lines. The final amplitude is given by

6473: \begin{eqnarray}

6474: &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!

6475: {\cal M}(q,p)\!=\!g^2\!\int\!\frac{d^2 k_1 } {(2\pi)^2}

6476: \frac{d^2 k} {(2\pi)^2}

6477: \frac{\rho_{p,a}( {\un k_1})}{k_{1,\, T}^2}

6478: \!\int\!\! d^2 x d^2 y

6479: e^{i {\un k} \cdot {\un x}}

6480: e^{i( {\un p}\!+\! {\un q}\!-\!{\un k}\!-\!{\un k_1})\cdot {\un y}}

6481: \nonumber\\

6482: &&\times\Bigg\{

6483: \frac

6484: {\overline{u}(q)\gamma^+(\slq-\slk+m)\gamma^-

6485: (\slq-\slk-\slk_1+m)\gamma^+

6486: [V ({\un x}) t^a \, V^\dagger ({\un y})]

6487: v(p)}

6488: {2p^+[( {\un q} - {\un k})^2+m^2]+2q^+[({\un q} - {\un k} - {\un k_1})^2+m^2]}

6489: \nonumber\\

6490: && + 

6491: \overline{u}(q)\left[

6492: \frac {\slC_u  (p+q, {\un k_1})}  {(p+q)^2}

6493: -

6494: \frac{\gamma^+}{p^++q^+}

6495: \right]t^b v(p)\, U^{ba}({\un x})

6496: \Bigg\}\; .

6497: \label{eq:M_qqbar}

6498: \end{eqnarray}

6499: where $V$ is in the fundamental representation and $p$ and $q$ are the

6500: momenta of the quark and anti-quark and $m$ denotes the quark

6501: mass. Note that the Wilson line $\tilde{U}$ (with the $1/2$ in the

6502: exponent) has dropped out of the expression for the amplitude due to

6503: cancellation between the regular and singular contributions.To get the

6504: cross section, we need to square this amplitude, sum (average) over

6505: the final (initial) state degrees of freedom and color average over

6506: the sources which is tedious but straightforward. Here we just give

6507: the final result \cite{Blaizot:2004wv}

6508: \begin{eqnarray}

6509: &&\frac{d\sigma}{d^2 p d^2 q dy_p dy_q}=

6510: \frac{\alpha_s^2}{(2\pi)^4 C_F}

6511: \int d^2 k_1 d^2 k_2 

6512: \frac{\delta^2 ( {\un p}  + {\un q} - {\un k_1} - {\un k_2})}

6513: {k_{1,\, T}^2\, k_{2,\, T}^2}

6514: \nonumber\\

6515: &&

6516: \times\Bigg\{

6517: \int d^2k d^2 k^{\prime} \, 

6518: {\rm tr}_{\rm d}

6519: \Big[(\slq\!+\!m)T_{q\bar{q}}(\slp\!-\!m)

6520: \gamma^0 T_{q\bar{q}}^{\prime\dagger}\gamma^0\Big]

6521: \varphi_{A}^{q\bar{q},q\bar{q}}

6522: ({\un k}, {\un k_2} \! - \! {\un k};

6523: {\un k}^\prime, {\un k_2}\! - \! {\un k}^\prime)

6524: \nonumber\\

6525: &&\;\;

6526: +\int d^2 k \, 

6527: {\rm tr}_{\rm d}

6528: \Big[(\slq\!+\!m)T_{q\bar{q}}(\slp\!-\!m)

6529: \gamma^0 T_{g}^{\dagger}\gamma^0\Big]

6530: \varphi_{A}^{q\bar{q},g}

6531: ({\un k}, {\un k_2}\!-\! {\un k};{\un k_2})

6532: \nonumber\\

6533: &&\;\;

6534: +\int d^2 k \, 

6535: \!{\rm tr}_{\rm d}

6536: \Big[(\slq\!+\!m)T_{g}(\slp\!-\!m)\gamma^0 T_{q\bar{q}}^{\dagger}\gamma^0\Big]

6537: \varphi_{A}^{q\bar{q},g}

6538: ({\un k},{\un k_2}\!-\! {\un k};{\un k_2})

6539: \nonumber\\

6540: &&

6541: + \,  {\rm tr}_{\rm d} \, 

6542: \Big[(\slq\!+\!m)T_{g}(\slp\!-\!m)\gamma^0 T_{g}^{\dagger}\gamma^0\Big]

6543: \varphi_{A}^{g,g}({\un k_2})

6544: \Bigg\}

6545: \varphi_p({\un k_1})

6546: \label{eq:cs_qqbar}

6547: \end{eqnarray}

6548: where 

6549: \begin{eqnarray}

6550: &&T_{q\bar{q}}( {\un k_1},{\un k})\equiv 

6551: \frac{\gamma^+(\slq-\slk+m)\gamma^-(\slq-\slk-\slk_1+m)\gamma^+}

6552: {2p^+[( {\un q}\!-\!{\un k})^2+m^2]+2q^+[({\un q}\!-\!{\un k}\!-\!{\un k_1})^2+m^2]}

6553: \nonumber\\

6554: &&T_{g}({\un k_1})\equiv 

6555: \frac{\slC_{L}(p+q,{\un k_1})} {(p+q)^2}

6556: \label{eq:Tqqbar-Tg}

6557: \end{eqnarray}

6558: and  $T_{q\bar{q}}, T_{q\bar{q}}^\prime, T_g$ are related to Eqs.~(\ref{eq:Tqqbar-Tg}) via 

6559: \begin{eqnarray}

6560: T_{q\bar{q}}\equiv T_{q\bar{q}}({\un k_1},{\un k})\;,\;

6561: T_{q\bar{q}}^\prime

6562: \equiv T_{q\bar{q}}({\un k_1},{\un k_t}^\prime)\; ,\; 

6563: T_g\equiv T_{g}({\un k_1})

6564: \end{eqnarray}

6565: and $\varphi$'s are the Fourier transforms of two, three and four

6566: point functions of Wilson lines \cite{Blaizot:2004wv}. For example,

6567: \begin{eqnarray}

6568: \varphi_A^{q\bar{q},g}({\un l};{\un k})\equiv

6569: \frac{2\pi^2 R_A^2 l_T^2}{g^2 N_c}

6570: \int d^2 x\, d^2 y\, 

6571: e^{i({\un k} \cdot {\un x} + ({\un l} - {\un k})\cdot {\un y})}\; 

6572: {\rm tr} \, \left<

6573: V ({\un x}) t^a V^\dagger ({\un y}) t^b U_{ba}(0)

6574: \right>

6575: \end{eqnarray}

6576: 

6577: There are a few remarks in order here. First, the quark anti-quark

6578: production cross section is again expressed in terms of the Wilson

6579: lines just like the other cross sections in Color Glass Condensate

6580: approach to high energy proton-nucleus collisions. Furthermore, the

6581: standard $k_T$-factorization does not hold in general, at least in its

6582: most common form, even though one does recover the $k_T$-factorized

6583: form of the cross section in the leading twist region. For a

6584: quantitative study of the breakdown of $k_T$ factorization in this

6585: context, we refer the reader to \cite{Fujii:2005vj}.  We also note

6586: that one can integrate over the momenta of the final state anti-quark

6587: (or quark) in order to get the cross section for single inclusive

6588: quark production. Finally, to include quantum corrections of the form

6589: $\alpha_s \, \ln 1/x$ in the cross section above one needs to solve

6590: the JIMWLK equation for the $n$ point function of Wilson line and use

6591: them in the cross section in (\ref{eq:cs_qqbar}). This may then be

6592: used to quantitatively investigate production of heavy (or light)

6593: quark anti-quark pairs in proton-nucleus collisions at RHIC and LHC.

6594: 

6595: 

6596: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6597: 

6598: \section{Results from dAu Collisions at RHIC}

6599: \label{data}

6600: 

6601: Now we are going to review the experimental data obtained from $d+Au$

6602: experiments at RHIC. We will show that at mid-rapidity $d+Au$

6603: collisions provide a control experiment giving us evidence of jet

6604: quenching due to strong final state interactions indicating formation

6605: of quark-gluon plasma. We will then proceed by reviewing the results

6606: from forward rapidity in $d+Au$ collisions: they confirm the

6607: qualitative expectations of saturation/Color Glass Condensate physics,

6608: summarized in \fig{toy}. Therefore we argue that RHIC experiments have

6609: seen the first experimental confirmation of Color Glass Condensate in

6610: nuclear collisions.

6611: 

6612: 

6613: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6614: 

6615: \subsection{Mid-Rapidity}

6616: 

6617: \subsubsection{Cronin Effect in dAu}

6618: 

6619: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6620: \begin{figure}

6621: \vspace*{1.5cm}

6622: \begin{center}

6623: \begin{tabular}[t]{cc} 

6624: \epsfig{file=fig3_new.eps,width=8cm} & \vspace*{-12cm} \epsfig{file=fig4.eps,width=7cm} \\ 

6625: \hspace*{8cm} & \vspace*{-5cm} \epsfig{file=dAu_Fig3.eps,width=7cm}

6626: \end{tabular}

6627: \end{center}

6628: \caption{Nuclear modification factor for charged hadrons and neutral pions 

6629: produced in $d+Au$ and $Au+Au$ collisions at mid-rapidity, as reported

6630: by (clockwise from left) PHENIX \protect\cite{phenix}, STAR \protect\cite{star}

6631: and BRAHMS \protect\cite{brahmsaa} collaborations.}

6632: \label{pbs}

6633: \end{figure}

6634: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6635: 

6636: The experimental program at RHIC involved $d+Au$ collisions at the

6637: center of mass energy $\sqrt{s} = 200$~GeV per nucleon. While the

6638: above analysis of particle production was, strictly speaking, designed

6639: for $pA$ and DIS, we believe that its results can be applied to $d+Au$

6640: collisions as well.  $d+Au$ scattering also involves a scattering of a

6641: small projectile on a large nucleus, similar to DIS and $pA$. The only

6642: assumption we have made in our above analysis was that the saturation

6643: scale of the projectile is much smaller than transverse momentum of

6644: produced particles, which allowed us to neglect saturation effects in

6645: the projectile's wave function.  The fact that deuteron has the atomic

6646: number of $A=2$ increases its saturation scale compared to that of a

6647: proton by a small factor of $A^{1/3} \approx 1.26$. Therefore, the

6648: region of transverse momentum above the deuteron saturation scale,

6649: where our analysis is applicable, would still be very wide in $d+Au$

6650: collisions. It is, therefore, a good approximation to apply our above

6651: conclusions to $d+Au$ collisions.

6652: 

6653: 

6654: Nuclear modification factor for charged hadrons produced in $d+Au$

6655: collisions at mid-rapidity was measured by all four experimental

6656: collaborations at RHIC \cite{phenix,phobos,star,brahmsaa}. The data

6657: from BRAHMS \cite{brahmsaa}, PHENIX \cite{phenix} and STAR \cite{star}

6658: collaborations is shown in Fig. \ref{pbs} and the data from PHOBOS

6659: collaboration \cite{phobos} is shown in \fig{phobos_mide}. One can see

6660: that $R^{dAu}$ at mid-rapidity at RHIC exhibits Cronin enhancement

6661: \cite{Cronin}, in agreement with theoretical expectations of multiple 

6662: rescattering models, shown in \fig{cron}

6663: \cite{KNST,KM,ktbroadening1,ktbroadening2,Vitev03,ktbroadening3,BKW,KKT}.

6664: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6665: \begin{figure}[hbt]

6666: \begin{center}

6667: \epsfxsize=8cm

6668: \leavevmode

6669: \hbox{\epsffile{phobosrda.eps}}

6670: \end{center}

6671: \caption{Nuclear modification factor for charged hadrons produced in 

6672: $d+Au$ collisions reported by PHOBOS collaboration

6673: \protect\cite{phobos} in pseudo-rapidity range of $0.2 < \eta < 1.4$

6674: for four bins of centrality.}

6675: \label{phobos_mide}

6676: \end{figure}

6677: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6678: 

6679: The PHOBOS data, presented in \fig{phobos_mide} allows one to study

6680: $R^{dAu}$ as a function of centrality. Analyzing \eq{rpa1}, along with

6681: its asymptotic high-$p_T$ limit of Eq. (\ref{rpaghkt}), we see that

6682: high-$p_T$ $R^{dAu}$ in the quasi-classical multiple rescattering

6683: approach is an increasing function of $A$, or, equivalently,

6684: centrality. These theoretical expectations are confirmed by the data

6685: in \fig{phobos_mide}, where $R^{dAu}$ is clearly an increasing

6686: function of the collision centrality. 

6687: 

6688: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6689: \begin{figure}[hbt]

6690: \begin{center}

6691: \epsfxsize=6.cm

6692: \leavevmode

6693: \hbox{\epsffile{dabrahms.eps}}

6694: \end{center}

6695: \caption{Predictions of saturation model from \cite{KLN} (solid and dashed lines) 

6696: for the total charged particle multiplicity $dN_{ch}/d\eta$ in $d+Au$

6697: collisions compared to the experimental data from

6698: \protect\cite{brahms_mult} as a function of pseudo-rapidity. }

6699: \label{kln}

6700: \end{figure}

6701: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6702: An intriguing property of the PHOBOS data from \fig{phobos_mide}

6703: \cite{phobos} is that the height of the Cronin maximum in it is much 

6704: lower than in the data from BRAHMS, PHENIX and STAR collaborations

6705: shown in \fig{pbs} \cite{brahmsaa,phenix,star}. The origin of this

6706: disagreement appear to be in the fact that PHOBOS was collecting data

6707: in the pseudo-rapidity interval of $0.2 < \eta < 1.4$, whereas the

6708: other three collaborations presented the data at $\eta =0$. This

6709: decrease of Cronin maximum with increasing rapidity can already be

6710: interpreted as a precursor of the suppression predicted by saturation

6711: physics shown above in \fig{toy}. However, we will postpone this

6712: discussion till Sect. \ref{cgcsuppr} where the data at more forward

6713: rapidities will be presented.

6714: 

6715: Another interesting feature of the $d+Au$ data at mid-rapidity is that

6716: other observables, such as integrated charged hadron multiplicity as a

6717: function of rapidity \cite{phobos_mult,brahms_mult}, appear to be in

6718: agreement with saturation/CGC models. In \fig{kln} we show a

6719: prediction of saturation model from \cite{KLN} for the total charged

6720: particle multiplicity $dN_{ch}/d\eta$, compared to the data from

6721: \cite{brahms_mult}. The model in \cite{KLN} uses $k_T$-factorization 

6722: formula for gluon production from \eq{ktpa} integrated over all $k_T$

6723: with the unintegrated gluon distribution on the nucleus ``frozen'' at

6724: a constant at transverse momenta below $Q_s$ and falling off as $\sim

6725: 1/k_T^2$ for $k_T > Q_s$ (for details see \cite{KLN}).  As one can see

6726: the agreement between the prediction from \cite{KLN} and the data is

6727: very good.

6728: 

6729: 

6730: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6731: 

6732: %\subsubsection{Evidence for Quark-Gluon Plasma: High-$p_T$ Suppression 

6733: % and Disappearance of Back-to-back Correlations in AuAu Collisions}

6734: 

6735: %\subsubsection{Back-to-back Correlations}

6736: 

6737: 

6738: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6739: 

6740: \subsubsection{$dAu$ as a Control Experiment for Quark-Gluon Plasma Production}

6741: 

6742: $dAu$ collisions can be used as a control experiment for formation of

6743: quark-gluon plasma (QGP) in $AuAu$ collisions at RHIC. As was

6744: originally suggested in \cite{Bj,BDMPS1,BDMPS,EL,EL2}, creation of a

6745: dense hot medium, such as QGP, in high energy heavy ion collisions

6746: should lead to a depletion of high-$p_T$ particles produced in the

6747: collisions. This phenomenon is known as {\sl jet quenching}

6748: \cite{EL}. The underlying physics is rather straightforward: high-$p_T$ 

6749: particles produced in the medium would loose energy in interactions

6750: with the medium. As a result there would be less high-$p_T$ particles

6751: produced in the heavy ion collisions than one would naively expect by

6752: scaling the number of high-$p_T$ particles produced in a $pp$

6753: collisions by the number of elementary nucleon-nucleon collisions

6754: $N_{coll}$.

6755: 

6756: One usually measures this suppression by analyzing the nuclear

6757: modification factor for $AA$ collisions, which is defined as

6758: \be

6759: R^{AA} \, = \, \frac{\frac{dN^{AA}}{d^2 k_T \, dy}}{N_{coll} \,

6760: \frac{dN^{pp}}{d^2 k_T \, dy}}.

6761: \ee

6762: Jet quenching due to {\sl energy loss} of particles in the medium

6763: would result in $R^{AA}$ being suppressed. The calculations of such

6764: suppression were carried out in \cite{BDMPS1,BDMPS,EL}, where both

6765: multiple rescatterings in the medium and medium-induced particle

6766: emissions were taken into account.

6767: 

6768: The data on $R^{AA}$ collected at RHIC was reported in

6769: \cite{phenixAA,phobosaa,starAA,brahmsaa}. Here those data are shown in 

6770: \fig{pbs}, along with the nuclear modification factor for $d+Au$ collisions. 

6771: As on can see from \fig{pbs}, jet quenching was observed in $Au+Au$

6772: collisions at RHIC with $R^{AuAu} < 1$ for all measured $p_T$. 

6773: 

6774: For jet quenching to become a signal of creation of quark-gluon plasma

6775: one has to prove that the observed suppression is really due to energy

6776: loss of jets in the produced matter, which would be a {\sl final}

6777: state effect. In principle, jet quenching can be accounted for by the

6778: small-$x$ evolution effects in the nuclear wave functions, similar to

6779: those described for $pA$ collisions in Sect. \ref{qepa} leading to

6780: suppression shown in \fig{toy}. Such suppression would be the {\sl

6781: initial} state effect. In fact, it has even been suggested in

6782: \cite{KLM} that the suppression observed in 

6783: \cite{phenixAA,phobosaa,starAA,brahmsaa} could be due to initial state 

6784: effects induced by small-$x$ evolution. The initial state suppression

6785: should be observable already in $d+Au$ collisions, while the final

6786: state energy loss is typical only for $AA$ collisions and should not

6787: manifest itself in $d+Au$. In that sense $d+Au$ scattering is a

6788: control experiment for QGP formation \cite{GM1}.

6789: 

6790: The data presented in \cite{phenix,phobos,star,brahmsaa} and shown

6791: here in Figs. \ref{pbs} and \ref{phobos_mide} clearly indicate absence

6792: of suppression in $R^{dAu}$. The Cronin enhancement observed in these

6793: data is in agreement with the classical gluon field dynamics for $pA$

6794: collisions of Sect. \ref{clpa}: the same initial state classical

6795: fields would lead to Cronin-like enhancement of $R^{AA}$ in $AA$

6796: collisions \cite{JMNV}. One can therefore conclude that jet quenching

6797: observed for $AA$ collisions in

6798: \cite{phenixAA,phobosaa,starAA,brahmsaa} is due to strong {\sl final}

6799: state interactions leading to energy loss of partons in the medium.

6800: 

6801: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6802: \begin{figure}[htb]

6803: \begin{center}

6804: \epsfxsize=8cm

6805: \leavevmode

6806: \hbox{\epsffile{dAu_Fig4.eps}}

6807: \end{center}

6808: \caption{Two-particle correlation functions for $pp$, $d+Au$ and central $Au+Au$ 

6809: collisions measured by STAR collaboration at mid-rapidity

6810: \protect\cite{starb2b}.}

6811: \label{star_corr}

6812: \end{figure}

6813: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6814: 

6815: The case for production of hot and dense medium is strengthened by

6816: observation of two-particle correlations. In $pp$ collisions a

6817: high-$p_T$ jet is usually accompanied by another high- or

6818: intermediate-$p_T$ jet balancing its transverse momentum. This is

6819: known as {\sl back-to-back} jet correlations. In the presence of dense

6820: medium absorbing many of the produced jets, such back-to-back

6821: correlations should be reduced, and possibly wiped out completely. To

6822: see whether this takes place, and to eliminate possible initial state

6823: nuclear wave functions effects, one has to study two-particle

6824: correlation functions in $Au+Au$, $d+Au$ and $pp$ collisions. 

6825: 

6826: The data on such correlations was reported by the STAR collaboration

6827: in \cite{starb2b} and is shown here in

6828: \fig{star_corr}. \fig{star_corr} depicts the correlation function

6829: (with constant background subtracted) between a trigger particle

6830: (hadron) with $4$~GeV~$<p_T (trig) < 6$~GeV and and associated

6831: particle with $2$~GeV~$< p_T < p_T (trig)$ for $pp$, $d+Au$ and

6832: central $Au+Au$ collisions as a function of the azimuthal angle

6833: $\Delta \phi$ between the two particles. First of all one should note

6834: that back-to-back correlations in $Au+Au$ collisions (with $\Delta

6835: \phi = \pi$) are completely wiped out in \fig{star_corr}. Secondly, 

6836: the back-to-back correlations in $pp$ and $d+Au$ are, approximately,

6837: the same. Therefore one concludes that disappearance of back-to-back

6838: correlations in $Au+Au$ collisions is due to {\sl final} state

6839: effects.

6840: 

6841: Final state interactions have to be quite strong to eliminate more

6842: than half of the jets (see \fig{pbs}) and completely wipe out their

6843: back-to-back correlations (see \fig{star_corr}). Such strong

6844: interactions are likely to lead to thermalization of the produced

6845: dense medium: if partons interact strongly with high-$p_T$ jet

6846: particles, they would interact strongly with each other reaching

6847: thermal equilibrium. It is therefore quite plausible that $d+Au$

6848: scattering experiments indicate the formation of QGP in $Au+Au$

6849: collisions.

6850: 

6851: 

6852: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6853: 

6854: \subsection{Forward Rapidity}

6855: 

6856: \subsubsection{Suppression at all $p_T$: Evidence for the Color Glass Condensate}

6857: \label{cgcsuppr}

6858: 

6859: The results on nuclear modification factor $R^{dAu}$ at forward

6860: rapidity were first presented by BRAHMS collaboration in

6861: \cite{brahms-1}. The final version of the data published in 

6862: \cite{brahms-2} is shown in here in \fig{bdata}. There the nuclear 

6863: modification factor $R^{d+Au}$ is plotted as a function of transverse

6864: momentum $p_T$ for charged hadrons at rapidities $\eta = 0, 1$ and for

6865: negatively charged hadrons at rapidities $\eta = 2.2, 3.2$. The data

6866: of \fig{bdata} demonstrates suppression of hadron production as one

6867: goes from central towards forward rapidity. We can clearly see that

6868: Cronin maximum gradually disappears and {\sl suppression} sets in as

6869: rapidity becomes larger: this clearly {\sl confirms} the qualitative

6870: prediction of \fig{toy} based on Color Glass Condensate/saturation

6871: physics \cite{KLM,KKT,AAKSW}.

6872: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6873: \begin{figure}[htb]

6874: \begin{center}

6875: \epsfxsize=18.5cm

6876: \leavevmode

6877: \hbox{\epsffile{brahmsdata.eps}}

6878: \end{center}

6879: \caption{Nuclear modification factor for charged hadrons at rapidities 

6880: $\eta = 0, 1$ and for negatively charged hadrons at rapidities $\eta =

6881: 2.2, 3.2$ reported by BRAHMS collaboration in

6882: \protect\cite{brahms-2}.}

6883: \label{bdata}

6884: \end{figure}

6885: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6886: 

6887: BRAHMS data on forward suppression in $d+Au$ from \cite{brahms-2} is

6888: independently confirmed by other RHIC experiments. In \fig{F1} we show

6889: the data on hadronic nuclear modification factor $R^{d+Au}$ reported

6890: by PHOBOS collaboration in \cite{phobosdA}. While PHOBOS collaboration

6891: does no have such a wide rapidity acceptance as BRAHMS, one can see

6892: the onset of suppression of $R^{d+Au}$ at high $p_T$ already at

6893: pseudo-rapidities of $\eta = 1.0 \div 1.4$.

6894: 

6895: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6896: \begin{figure}[ht]

6897: \begin{center}

6898: \epsfxsize=10cm

6899: \leavevmode

6900: \hbox{\epsffile{Figure1_8_2.eps}}

6901: \end{center}

6902: \caption{Data on nuclear modification factor $R^{d+Au}$ for hadrons 

6903: presented by PHOBOS collaboration in \protect\cite{phobosdA}.}

6904: \label{F1}

6905: \end{figure}

6906: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6907: 

6908: 

6909: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6910: \begin{figure}[ht]

6911: \begin{center}

6912: \epsfxsize=10cm

6913: \leavevmode

6914: \hbox{\epsffile{phenix2_2.eps}}

6915: \end{center}

6916: \caption{Data on $R^{CP}$ for hadrons presented by PHENIX collaboration 

6917: in \protect\cite{phenixdA}.}

6918: \label{hrcp}

6919: \end{figure}

6920: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6921: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6922: \begin{figure}[hb]

6923: \begin{center}

6924: \epsfxsize=8cm

6925: \leavevmode

6926: \hbox{\epsffile{star_pi0.eps}}

6927: \end{center}

6928: \caption{Data on $R^{d+Au}$ for neutral pions presented by STAR collaboration 

6929: in \protect\cite{stardA} superimposed with the BRAHMS collaboration

6930: data for negatively charged hadrons from \protect\cite{brahms-2}.}

6931: \label{Frcp}

6932: \end{figure}

6933: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6934: 

6935: In Figs. \ref{hrcp} and \ref{Frcp} we show the data presented by

6936: PHENIX \cite{phenixdA} and STAR \cite{stardA} collaborations. Instead

6937: of $R^{pA}$ from \eq{rpaex} one sometimes is interested in ratio of

6938: particle production rates in central over peripheral collisions, which

6939: is defined by

6940: \be\label{rcp}

6941: R^{CP} (k_T, y) \, = \, \frac{\frac{1}{N_{coll}} \, \frac{d

6942: N^{pA}}{d^2 k \, dy} \mbox{(central)}}{\frac{1}{N_{coll}} \, \frac{d

6943: N^{pA}}{d^2 k \, dy} \mbox{(peripheral)}}.

6944: \ee 

6945: As once can see by comparing \eq{rcp} to \eq{rpaex}, $R^{CP}$ is very

6946: similar to $R^{pA}$, with the difference of using the peripheral $pA$

6947: collisions instead of $pp$ as a reference in the denominator. The

6948: conclusions of the above analysis of $R^{pA}$ summarized in \fig{toy}

6949: would also apply to $R^{CP}$: we would also expect a transition from

6950: Cronin enhancement to suppression in $R^{CP}$ with increasing

6951: rapidity.

6952: 

6953: 

6954: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6955: \begin{figure}[hb]

6956: \begin{center}

6957: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

6958: \epsfig{file=rda0.eps,width=5.2cm} \hspace*{-1.5cm}& 

6959: \epsfig{file=rda1.eps,width=5.2cm} \hspace*{-1.5cm}& 

6960: \epsfig{file=rda2.eps,width=5.2cm} \hspace*{-1.5cm}&  

6961: \epsfig{file=rda3.eps,width=5.2cm}

6962: \end{tabular}

6963: \end{center}

6964: \caption{Fit of nuclear modification factor $R_{dAu}$ of charged particles 

6965: for different rapidities from \protect\cite{KKT2}. In the top two

6966: figures, corresponding to $\eta=0,1$, the solid line corresponds to

6967: $(h^-+h^+)/2$ contribution calculated with $\kappa=0$ in the

6968: isospin-independent approximation, while the dashed line gives the

6969: same $(h^-+h^+)/2$ contribution but with $\kappa=1$~GeV. In the lower

6970: two plots, corresponding to $\eta=2.2,3.2$, the solid line gives the

6971: $h^-$ contribution calculated in the constituent quark model with

6972: $\kappa=0$, the dashed line gives the same $h^-$ contribution for

6973: $\kappa=1$~GeV, while the dotted line at $\eta=2.2,3.2$ gives the

6974: $(h^++h^-)/2$ contribution with $\kappa=0$ (see text).  Data is from

6975: \cite{brahms-2}.}

6976: \label{fig:rda}

6977: \end{figure}

6978: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6979: 

6980: \fig{hrcp} plots PHENIX data on $R^{CP}$ for hadrons as a function of $p_T$

6981: for three different centrality bins both for forward rapidity ($1.4 <

6982: \eta < 2.2$, denoted by squares) and for backward rapidity 

6983: ($-2.2 < \eta < -1.4$, denoted by circles) \cite{phenixdA}. We see

6984: that $R^{CP}$ is suppressed at forward pseudo-rapidities $1.4 < \eta <

6985: 2.2$ in agreement with \fig{bdata}. \fig{Frcp} presents preliminary

6986: STAR data on $R^{d+Au}$ for $\pi^0$'s as a function of transverse

6987: momentum $p_T$ at rapidity $\eta = 4$ \cite{stardA} superimposed with

6988: BRAHMS data on negatively charge hadrons at lower rapidities. One can

6989: see that suppression gets progressively stronger at forward

6990: rapidities, in agreement with \fig{bdata}, leading to a very strong

6991: suppression of $\pi^0$'s at $\eta =4$.

6992: 

6993: 

6994: Of course the qualitative confirmation of the CGC-based predictions is

6995: a very important experimental evidence for saturation/CGC

6996: physics. However it is important to demonstrate the quantitative

6997: agreement of BRAHMS data \cite{brahms-2} with the CGC expectations. A

6998: saturation/CGC-based model was constructed in \cite{KKT2}, which

6999: involved a new parameterization of the dipole-nucleus scattering

7000: amplitude $N_G$ (see \eq{eq:kkt} below and discussion around it), with

7001: the saturation scale matching that of the Golec-Biernat--W\"{u}thoff

7002: model of DIS on a proton \cite{GBW}. Together with a simple model for

7003: $n_G$, the resulting $N_G$ from \eq{eq:kkt} was used in \eq{paevc1} to

7004: give the gluon production cross section. At forward rapidities

7005: high-$p_T$ particle production is close to the kinematic limit, which

7006: is obtained by demanding that projectile's Bjorken $x$ is less than

7007: $1$, $x_p = (k_T /\sqrt{s}) \, e^\eta \le 1$, leading to $k_T \le

7008: \sqrt{s} \, e^\eta$. The effective $x_1$ is rather large and valence

7009: quark contribution becomes important. The latter is given by

7010: Eqs. (\ref{eq:cs_v_quark}) and (\ref{eq:cs_dipole_F}) and was also

7011: taken into account in

7012: \cite{KKT2}. To compare the quark and gluon production cross sections 

7013: with the data one indeed needs to convolute them with fragmentation

7014: functions.  The resulting fit of BRAHMS data from \fig{bdata} is shown

7015: in \fig{fig:rda} (see also \cite{JamalH}). Since BRAHMS data at

7016: rapidities $\eta = 0,1$ is for total charged hadrons, while the data

7017: at rapidities $\eta = 2.2, 3.2$ is for negatively charged hadrons, the

7018: charge asymmetry issues had to be taken into account \cite{GSV}. One

7019: may also worry that in the given kinematics the saturation-based

7020: description of high-$p_T$ hadron production in $pp$ collisions may not be

7021: well-justified: in that sense the success of the saturation model from

7022: \cite{KKT2} in describing particle spectra in $pp$ collisions can be

7023: considered as just a parameterization of the $pp$ data. What is

7024: important is that saturation correctly describes particle production

7025: in $d+Au$ collisions, i.e., the numerator in \eq{rpa}. To model

7026: non-perturbative effects a shift of the saturation scale $\kappa$ was

7027: introduced in \cite{KKT2}: however, this shift can be put to zero

7028: without significantly impacting the quality of the fit, as one can see

7029: from \fig{fig:rda}. (The non-perturbative shift appears to improve the

7030: agreement with the data at mid-rapidity (the dashed line on the left

7031: panel in \fig{fig:rda}) indicating that non-perturbative effects may

7032: still be important at corresponding values of Bjorken $x$.) We,

7033: therefore, conclude that BRAHMS data from

7034: \fig{bdata}

7035: \cite{brahms-2} is in both qualitative and quantitative agreement with

7036: the saturation/CGC physics.

7037: 

7038: 

7039: The model from \cite{KKT2} is based on \eq{ktpa} with the unintegrated

7040: gluon distribution functions calculated in the saturation/CGC

7041: approach. In that sense it is consistent with the model of \cite{KLN}

7042: used to describe total charged particle multiplicity in $d+Au$

7043: collisions, as shown in \fig{kln}. Both models are inspired by

7044: saturation physics, but reflect different aspects of it: the model

7045: from \cite{KKT2} deals with the high-$p_T$ hadronic spectra, and is,

7046: therefore, more accurate at high-$p_T$. At the same time the model in

7047: \cite{KLN} concentrates on total particle multiplicity, which is most 

7048: sensitive to low-$p_T$ hadron production: therefore, that model is

7049: more precise at low-$p_T$.

7050: 

7051: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7052: \begin{figure}[htb]

7053: \begin{center}

7054: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

7055: \epsfig{file=rcp0.eps,width=5.2cm} \hspace*{-1.5cm}& 

7056: \epsfig{file=rcp1.eps,width=5.2cm} \hspace*{-1.5cm}& 

7057: \epsfig{file=rcp2.eps,width=5.2cm} \hspace*{-1.5cm}&  

7058: \epsfig{file=rcp3.eps,width=5.2cm}

7059: \end{tabular}

7060: \end{center}

7061: \caption{Data from \cite{brahms-2} on nuclear modification factor $R_{CP}$ of charged 

7062: particles $(h^++h^-)/2$ for rapidities $\eta=0,1$ and of negatively

7063: charged particles $h^-$ for $\eta=2.2,3.2$ superimposed with the

7064: results of the model from \cite{KKT2}. Full and open dots, described

7065: by the solid and dashed lines correspondingly, give the ratio of

7066: particle yields in 0-20$\%$ and 30-50$\%$ centrality events

7067: correspondingly divided by the yields from 60-80$\%$ centrality events

7068: scaled by the mean number of binary collisions \cite{brahms-2}.}

7069: \label{fig:rcp}

7070: \end{figure}

7071: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7072: 

7073: In \fig{fig:rcp} we show BRAHMS data on $R^{CP}$ for the same

7074: rapidities as in \fig{fig:rda}. Full dots correspond to more central

7075: collisions, while open dots correspond to more peripheral collisions

7076: (see the caption of \fig{fig:rcp}). One can see that, in agreement

7077: with the expectation of saturation/CGC (see Sect. \ref{clpa}), the

7078: Cronin maximum at $\eta =0$ is an increasing function of

7079: centrality. At forward rapidities the centrality dependence changes:

7080: $R^{CP}$ becomes a decreasing function of centrality, again in

7081: agreement with expectations of saturation/CGC approach (see

7082: Sect. \ref{qepa}). On top of this qualitative agreement between the

7083: data and the theory of CGC, in \fig{fig:rcp} we observe quantitative

7084: correspondence of the data and the results of the saturation-inspired

7085: model from \cite{KKT2}.

7086: 

7087: There have been several attempts to explain the suppression of

7088: particle production from \fig{bdata} in the frameworks alternative or

7089: parallel to CGC. In \cite{GSV,Ramona} the suppression of

7090: \cite{brahms-2} was analyzed in the framework of standard shadowing

7091: models. The conclusion of \cite{GSV} was that the observed suppression

7092: is much stronger than one would anticipate using the common

7093: parameterizations of nuclear shadowing.\footnote{A successful fit of

7094: the data from \cite{brahms-2} by shadowing models would only produce

7095: new parameterizations of quark and gluon shadowing, without

7096: calculating them from first principles, as we have done here in the

7097: CGC framework.} In \cite{QV} it was argued that multiple rescattering

7098: in the nuclei would lead to observed suppression: however, this

7099: conclusion appears to be in contradiction with our Sect. \ref{clpa},

7100: where we prove that multiple rescatterings lead to enhancement of the

7101: nuclear modification factor. Recently a new model was proposed in

7102: \cite{KNPJS} in which the origin of suppression in \fig{bdata} was

7103: attributed to energy conservation which was imposed by Sudakov

7104: from-factors. The model of \cite{KNPJS} includes both multiple

7105: rescatterings and small-$x$ evolution: hence at the moment the

7106: conceptual differences between the CGC approach and the model from

7107: \cite{KNPJS} are not clear. Parton recombination models also appear 

7108: to be able to accommodate the data by completely redefining the

7109: hadronization mechanism \cite{HYF}.

7110: 

7111: 

7112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7113: 

7114: \subsubsection{Future Experimental Tests}

7115: \label{fet}

7116: 

7117: 

7118: Despite the successes of the Color Glass Condensate in predicting the

7119: suppression of the hadron production cross section in proton

7120: (deuteron)-nucleus collisions as compared to proton-proton collisions

7121: in the forward rapidity region at RHIC and the change of centrality

7122: dependence as one goes from mid to forward rapidity, one would like to

7123: quantitatively understand to which degree CGC is the dominant physics

7124: at forward rapidity RHIC and LHC collisions and possibly at

7125: mid-rapidity LHC collisions. So far, the main evidence for CGC at RHIC

7126: comes from the $p_T$ spectrum of single inclusive hadron production in

7127: deuteron-gold collisions in the forward rapidity region.

7128: 

7129: A difficulty with a quantitative understanding of the physics behind

7130: the observed suppression of the hadron spectra in deuteron-nucleus

7131: collisions at RHIC is that hadronization by its nature is

7132: non-perturbative and is not well-understood from first principles. To

7133: avoid non-perturbative physics or to, at least, minimize its effects,

7134: one needs to consider high $p_T$ processes. Exactly at what $p_T$

7135: non-perturbative physics can be safely neglected can not be addressed

7136: by pQCD and one needs experimental input. The RHIC data on transverse

7137: momentum spectra of pions produced in proton-proton collisions in

7138: forward rapidity suggest that NLO pQCD works well down to $p_T \sim

7139: 1.5 -2$ GeV \cite{sofer}. Therefore one may expect the weak coupling

7140: methods employed by CGC to work at similar $p_T$'s for differential

7141: cross sections, even though perturbative approaches usually work much

7142: better for ratios of cross sections due to possible (partial)

7143: cancellations of large corrections in both the numerator and the

7144: denominator.

7145: 

7146: The experimental situation is complicated by the fact the forward

7147: rapidity data published by BRAHMS is for negatively charged hadrons,

7148: production of which is suppressed, as compared to neutral or charge

7149: averaged hadrons, in proton-proton collisions. This can bias the

7150: nuclear modification factor as pointed out in \cite{GSV}. However, the

7151: preliminary data on neutral pion production from STAR at rapidity

7152: $\eta = 4$ shown above in \fig{Frcp} demonstrates clear suppression up

7153: to $p_T \approx 2$~GeV. If this preliminary STAR data is confirmed, it

7154: will help clarify the role of isospin effects in the observed

7155: suppression of the hadron spectra at forward rapidity.

7156: 

7157: The situation will improve drastically at LHC where due to an order of

7158: magnitude higher center of mass energy, the saturation scale is

7159: expected to be higher so that the weak coupling methods of CGC will be

7160: much more reliable and the available phase space in transverse momenta

7161: will be much larger even at rapidities as high as $5-6$ which should

7162: eliminate or minimize phase space edge effects even for moderately

7163: large transverse momenta.

7164: 

7165: Nevertheless, one can further test applicability of the Color Glass

7166: Condensate at RHIC by considering its electromagnetic signatures, for

7167: example in photon and dilepton production considered earlier. As noted

7168: above, the CGC building blocks for single particle production cross

7169: sections in proton-nucleus collisions are the fundamental and adjoint

7170: dipole cross sections, describing the scattering of quarks and gluons

7171: from the target. Therefore, one can "measure" or (more precisely)

7172: constrain the dipole cross section in one process and then use it to

7173: make predictions for other processes.  This is in direct analogy with

7174: particle production cross sections in pQCD where one has universal

7175: (process independent) ingredients in the form of distribution and

7176: fragmentation functions, which are measured in one process and then

7177: used to make predictions for other processes, which give rise to the

7178: predictive power of the theory.

7179: 

7180: Here we consider models of the dipole cross section (we consider those

7181: which include the small $x$ evolution governed by JIMWLK or BK

7182: equations only) which have been used to fit the data, either in DIS at

7183: HERA or pA at RHIC. We then use these models to make predictions for

7184: photon and dilepton production cross sections and their modification

7185: factors at RHIC and LHC. We show that measuring the photon production

7186: cross section at RHIC can impose significant constraints on the models

7187: of the dipole cross section and further clarify the role of the Color

7188: Glass Condensate at RHIC.

7189: 

7190: The first model of the dipole cross section we consider is that of

7191: Iancu, Itakura and Munier \cite{IIM} which was used to fit the proton

7192: structure functions at HERA. It has the correct behavior in the

7193: saturation region and in the geometric scaling region but does not

7194: have the correct double logarithmic limit built in. Furthermore, it is

7195: fit to the data on proton targets and not on nuclear targets. The IIM

7196: model of the dipole cross section is

7197: \begin{eqnarray}

7198: \int d^2 b \, N (r_T, b_T, \ln 1/x_g ) \, \equiv 

7199: \, \pi \, R^2  \,\,{\cal N} \,(x_g, r_T Q_s)

7200: \label{eq:cs_iim}

7201: \end{eqnarray}

7202: where 

7203: \begin{eqnarray}

7204: {\cal N} \,(x_g, r_T Q_s) = 1 - e^{-a \ln^2 (b\,r_T Q_s)},   \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,

7205: \mbox{for} \hspace*{5mm} r_T \, Q_s > 2 

7206: \nonumber

7207: \end{eqnarray}

7208: and 

7209: \begin{eqnarray}

7210: {\cal N} \,(x_g, r_T Q_s) = {\cal N}_0 \exp \Bigg\{ 2 \ln ({r_T Q_s \over 2})

7211: \bigg [\gamma_s + {\ln 2/r_T Q_s \over \kappa \lambda \ln 1/x_g} \bigg] \Bigg\},

7212: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \mbox{for} \hspace*{5mm}

7213: r_T \, Q_s \le 2 

7214: \label{eq:cs_param}

7215: \end{eqnarray}

7216: The constants $a, b$ are determined by matching the solutions at $r_T

7217: \, Q_s =2$ while $\gamma_s = 0.63$ and $\kappa = 9.9$ are determined

7218: from LO BFKL.  The form of the saturation scale

7219: $Q_s^2$ is taken to be $Q_s^2 \equiv (x_0/x)^{\lambda}$~GeV$^2$ with

7220: $x_0, \lambda, R, {\cal N}_0$ determined from fitting the HERA data on

7221: proton structure function $F_2$ \cite{IIM}.

7222: 

7223: \vspace*{.5cm}

7224: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7225: \begin{figure}[ht]

7226: \begin{center}

7227: \epsfxsize=7cm

7228: \leavevmode

7229: \hbox{\epsffile{R_dilep_rhic.eps}}

7230: \end{center}

7231: \caption{Invariant mass dependence of the nuclear modification factor for 

7232: dilepton production in proton(deuteron)-nucleus scattering at RHIC.}

7233: \label{fig:R_dilep_rhic}

7234: \end{figure}

7235: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7236: 

7237: This model of the dipole cross section was used in

7238: \cite{Jalilian-Marian:2004er} to make predictions for the transverse

7239: momentum integrated nuclear modification factor $R_{pA}$ for dilepton

7240: production cross section in deuteron (proton)--nucleus collisions at

7241: RHIC. (For the $p_T$-dependence of dilepton $R_{pA}$ see

7242: \cite{BGD}.)  Here we show the main result of \cite{Jalilian-Marian:2004er} 

7243: for the nuclear modification factor for central collisions and at

7244: $y=2.2$ in Fig. \ref{fig:R_dilep_rhic} which shows a clear suppression

7245: in analogy with the nuclear modification factor in hadron production

7246: at RHIC that can be understood as being due to the quantum evolution

7247: of the dipole-nucleus cross section, present in both hadron and

7248: dilepton production cross sections. In the case of a deuteron

7249: projectile, nuclear shadowing (anti-shadowing) of the deuteron wave

7250: function is included by using the HKM parameterization \cite{HKM}.

7251: 

7252: 

7253: We also show the nuclear modification factor for central collisions

7254: and at rapidity $y=5$ for the integrated over transverse momentum

7255: dilepton nuclear modification factor at LHC as a function of the

7256: dilepton invariant mass $M$ in Fig. \ref{fig:R_dilep_lhc}, where again

7257: a similar suppression is seen. Here one can extend the calculations to

7258: much higher dilepton masses since the saturation scale is very large

7259: due to the large forward rapidity and the order of magnitude increase

7260: in the center of mass energy at LHC as compared to RHIC.

7261: 

7262: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7263: \begin{figure}[htb]

7264: \begin{center}

7265: \epsfxsize=7cm

7266: \leavevmode

7267: \hbox{\epsffile{R_dilep_lhc.eps}}

7268: \end{center}

7269: \caption{Invariant mass dependence of the nuclear modification factor for 

7270: dilepton production in proton-nucleus scattering at LHC.}

7271: \label{fig:R_dilep_lhc}

7272: \end{figure}

7273: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7274: 

7275: 

7276: We note that the IIM parameterization of the dipole cross section is

7277: originally done for a proton target. Here we have assumed a simple

7278: scaling of the dipole profile function by $A^{1/3}$ in order to use it

7279: for nuclear targets. There is another parameterization of the dipole

7280: cross section, due to Kharzeev, Tuchin and one of the authors

7281: \cite{KKT2}, which has been used to fit the hadron production data in

7282: deuteron-nucleus collisions at RHIC. This model has the advantage that

7283: it has the correct high $p_t$ limit built in, unlike the IIM

7284: parameterization. It is given by

7285: \begin{eqnarray}

7286: N (r_T, x_g) \, = \, 1- \exp\left[-\frac{1}{4} \left(r_T^2

7287: \frac{C_F}{N_c} \, Q_s^2\right)^{\gamma(x_g,r_T^2)}\right].

7288: \label{eq:kkt}

7289: \end{eqnarray}

7290: where the anomalous dimension $\gamma(y, r_T^2)$ is parameterized as 

7291: \begin{eqnarray}

7292: \gamma(y, r_T^2) \, = \, \frac{1}{2}\left(1+\frac{\xi 

7293: (y, r_T^2)}{\xi (y, r_T^2) + \sqrt{2 \,\xi (y, r_T^2)}+  7

7294: \zeta(3)\, c} \right),

7295: \label{eq:andim}

7296: \end{eqnarray}

7297: with $y= \ln 1/x_g$ and  

7298: \begin{eqnarray}

7299: \xi (y, r_T^2) \, = \, \frac{\ln\left[1/( r_T^2 \, Q_{s0}^2 ) 

7300: \right]}{(\lambda/2)(y-y_0)}\,,

7301: \label{eq:xi}

7302: \end{eqnarray}

7303: and $c$ is a constant fitted to the data. This parameterization has

7304: the correct high-$p_T$ behavior where $\gamma \rightarrow 1$. In

7305: Fig. \ref{fig:dipole_a} we show the profile function for the two

7306: dipole parameterizations as a function of the dimensionless variable

7307: $r_T Q_s$ for a nuclear target for $x_g = 1.6 \,\times \, 10^{-4}$

7308: (which corresponds to $p_T =1.5$ GeV at $y=3.8$ at RHIC). Clearly, the

7309: two dipole profiles are quite different.

7310: 

7311: %\vspace{8mm}

7312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7313: \begin{figure}[ht]

7314: \begin{center}

7315: \epsfxsize=7cm

7316: %\epsfysize=4.5cm

7317: \leavevmode

7318: \hbox{\epsffile{dipole_a.eps}}

7319: \end{center}

7320: \caption{Quark anti-quark dipole profile for a nuclear target.}

7321: \label{fig:dipole_a}

7322: \end{figure}

7323: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7324: 

7325: We now use the two parameterizations of the dipole cross section to

7326: calculate the photon production cross section in deuteron-gold

7327: collisions at RHIC. To get the cross section, we need to convolute the

7328: partonic production cross section in (\ref{eq:frag_pho}) with the

7329: quark (and anti-quark) distribution function in a deuteron. We

7330: therefore use

7331: \cite{Jalilian-Marian:2005zw}

7332: \begin{eqnarray}

7333: {d\sigma^{d(A)\, A \rightarrow \gamma(k_T, y_{\gamma})\, X}\over 

7334: d^2b \, d^2k \, dy_{\gamma}}\!\!\! &=& \!\!\!

7335: {1\over (2\pi)^2} \sum_f  \int dx_q \,

7336: [q_f(x_q,k_T^2) + \bar{q}_f(x_q,k_T^2)]\, {D_{\gamma/q}(z,k_T^2) \over z}

7337: \sigma_{dipole}^F (x_g,{k_T\over z}, {\un b})

7338: \label{eq:cs_pho_da}

7339: \end{eqnarray}

7340: to calculate the nuclear modification factor for photon production in deuteron-gold

7341: collisions at RHIC at $y=3.8$ and for the most central collisions. This will be 

7342: eventually measured at RHIC by the STAR detector.

7343: 

7344: 

7345: It is clear that the two parameterizations lead to quite different

7346: results shown in \fig{fig:R_pho_rhic}. This may be understood to be

7347: due to the different dipole shapes in the two approaches, so that a

7348: future measurement of this ratio can help constrain the models of the

7349: dipole cross section. Each parameterization of the dipole cross

7350: section has its advantages and disadvantages. For example, the IIM

7351: parameterization is a fit to the proton structure function, which

7352: involves a convolution of the dipole cross section with the photon

7353: wave function squared. Therefore, the dipole cross section is weighed

7354: preferentially in the physical cross section and some dipole sizes

7355: play a bigger role than others. The KKT parameterization on the other

7356: hand is a fit to particle production data which is a less inclusive

7357: observable than a fully inclusive structure function and therefore is

7358: more constraining on the dipole cross section. However, it is partly

7359: complicated by hadronization and the need for a convolution with the

7360: hadron fragmentation functions. Electromagnetic signatures of the

7361: Color Glass Condensate therefore offer a more precise means by which

7362: the quantitative aspects of CGC may be probed.

7363: 

7364: ~\hspace*{5mm}

7365: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7366: \begin{figure}[hb]

7367: \begin{center}

7368: \epsfig{file=R_pho_rhic1.eps,width=7cm}

7369: \caption{Nuclear modification factor for photon production.}

7370: \label{fig:R_pho_rhic}

7371: \end{center}

7372: \end{figure}

7373: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7374: 

7375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7377: \begin{figure}[ht]

7378: \begin{center}

7379: \epsfig{file=lhc0.eps,width=6.5cm}

7380: \caption{Nuclear modification factor $R^{pA}$ of charged particles 

7381: $(h^++h^-)/2$ at LHC energies $\sqrt{s}=5500$~GeV at mid-rapidity

7382: $\eta=0$ as predicted in \protect\cite{KKT2} (dashed line) versus

7383: $R^{dAu}$ of $(h^++h^-)/2$ for RHIC energies $\sqrt{s}=200$~GeV at

7384: $\eta=3.2$ (solid line).}

7385: \label{lhc}

7386: \end{center}

7387: \end{figure}

7388: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7389: 

7390: Having a parameterization of the dipole-nucleus scattering amplitude

7391: $N$ should allow one to make predictions for particle production at

7392: LHC. In \fig{lhc} we present a prediction from \cite{KKT2} for the

7393: nuclear modification factor $R^{pA}$ of charged particles at

7394: mid-rapidity at LHC (dashed line). It appears that the amount of

7395: suppression to be seen at mid-rapidity $pA$ collisions at LHC is

7396: roughly equal to the currently observed at forward rapidity $d+A$

7397: collisions at RHIC (solid line in \fig{lhc}). It would be very

7398: interesting to verify this prediction. If suppression at mid-rapidity

7399: $pA$ collisions at LHC is observed, then one would be able to

7400: appreciate how special RHIC energy range is: while the center of mass

7401: collisions energy at RHIC is high, it is still low enough to have

7402: Cronin enhancement at mid-rapidity in $d+Au$ collisions, allowing to

7403: use $d+Au$ as a control experiment for the suppression of particle

7404: production observed in $Au+Au$ indicating creation of quark-gluon

7405: plasma.

7406: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7407: \begin{figure}[b]

7408: \begin{center}

7409: \epsfxsize=6cm

7410: \leavevmode

7411: \hbox{\epsffile{2Gkt.eps}}

7412: \end{center}

7413: \caption{Two-gluon production in $pA$ collision in $k_T$-factorization 

7414: approximation, which includes linear BFKL evolution only.}

7415: \label{2Gkt_fig}

7416: \end{figure}

7417: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7418: 

7419: Another interesting experimental test of Color Glass Condensate

7420: physics is in measuring two-particle correlations. While the exact

7421: numerical analysis of \eq{2Gincl} leading to numerical predictions to

7422: be verified experimentally has not been done yet, one can use the fact

7423: that for $k_{1T}, k_{2T} \gg Q_s$ all the higher-twist multiple

7424: rescattering effects are not important and the two-gluon production

7425: cross section (\ref{2Gincl}) (generalized to $pA$) reduces to the

7426: following expression for gluon multiplicity \cite{lr}

7427: \ben

7428: \frac{d N^{p \, A}}

7429: {d^2 k_1 \, dy_1 \, d^2 k_2 \, dy_2 \, d^2 B} ({\un x}_{0{\tilde 0}})

7430: \bigg|_{y_2 \gg y_1}\, = \, \frac{\as^2 \, N_c}{\pi^2 \, C_F} \, 

7431: \frac{1}{{\un k}_1^2 \, {\un k}_2^2} \, \int d^2 q_1 \, d^2 q_2 \, \phi_p ({\un q}_2^2, Y-y) 

7432: \, f ({\un k}_2 - {\un q}_2, {\un q}_1, y_2 - y_1)

7433: \een

7434: \be\label{2Gkt}

7435: \times \, \phi_A (({\un k}_1 - {\un q}_1)^2, y_1),

7436: \ee

7437: where $f ({\un k}_2 - {\un q}_2, {\un q}_1, y_2 - y_1)$ is given by

7438: the BFKL equation (\ref{bfkleq}) with the initial conditions from

7439: \eq{bfkl_init} and both $\phi_p$ and $\phi_A$ have linear evolution only. 

7440: \eq{2Gkt} is the expression for two-gluon production 

7441: in $k_T$-factorization formalism \cite{lr} applied to $pA$

7442: collisions. It is illustrated in \fig{2Gkt_fig}.

7443: 

7444: 

7445: Following Kharzeev, Levin, and McLerran \cite{KLM2}, we apply

7446: \eq{2Gkt} to the case when the rapidity interval between the two produced 

7447: gluons is very large. For instance, in RHIC $d+Au$ kinematics, we are

7448: interested in the case when one of the gluons is produced at

7449: mid-rapidity and the other one is produced at forward deuteron

7450: rapidity. This is the case of Mueller-Navelet jets, which were

7451: originally proposed in \cite{MN} by Mueller and Navelet as an

7452: observable allowing to study experimentally the BFKL dynamics.

7453: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7454: \begin{figure}[hbt]

7455: \begin{center}

7456: \epsfxsize=8cm

7457: \leavevmode

7458: \hbox{\epsffile{dazim.eps}}

7459: \end{center}

7460: \caption{Prediction from \protect\cite{KLM2} of suppression of back-to-back 

7461: correlations of high-$p_T$ hadrons produced in $d+Au$ collisions as

7462: compared to $pp$ collisions. }

7463: \label{dazim}

7464: \end{figure}

7465: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7466: 

7467: Since \eq{2Gkt} also applies to gluon production in $pp$ collisions,

7468: one can compare the strength of back-to-back correlations in $pA$ and

7469: $pp$ collisions with one gluon at mid-rapidity and the other one at

7470: forward rapidity. The authors of \cite{KLM2} argued that BFKL

7471: evolution between the two produced gluons would deplete back-to-back

7472: correlations of produced gluons due to onset of anomalous dimension

7473: (\ref{nu0val}) in $pA$ scattering. The effect is similar to

7474: suppression in $R^{pA}$ discussed above in Sect. \ref{qepa}. The

7475: resulting prediction for suppression of back-to-back correlations from

7476: \cite{KLM2} is shown in \fig{dazim}, where the two-particle correlator

7477: is plotted as a function of the azimuthal angle between the particles

7478: for $d+Au$ and $pp$ collisions (with a constant background

7479: subtracted). Once can see that the strength of back-to-back

7480: correlations should be reduced due to the anomalous dimension effects

7481: in $d+Au$ collisions. Experimental verification of the qualitative

7482: behavior predicted in \fig{dazim} by the authors of \cite{KLM2} would

7483: be an interesting and important test of CGC. Preliminary results from

7484: STAR collaboration \cite{Ogawa} appear to confirm the qualitative

7485: expectation of suppression of back-to-back correlations for particles

7486: produced with a large rapidity interval between them, but more

7487: experimental tests are needed to reach a conclusion.

7488: 

7489: 

7490: 

7491: 

7492: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7493: 

7494: \section{Conclusions}

7495: \label{conc}

7496: 

7497: In writing a review of a rapidly developing field, one is bound to

7498: omit recent developments, which happen in parallel to the writing of

7499: the article. The topic of pomeron loop corrections to JIMWLK and BK

7500: evolution equations has received a lot of attention in the recent

7501: literature \cite{loop1,loop2,loop3,loop4,loop5}. Pomeron loops are

7502: corrections to the non-linear evolution equations which are not

7503: enhanced by powers of color charge density, or, equivalently, powers

7504: of $A$. A typical pomeron loop brings in an extra (parametric) factor

7505: of $\as^2 \, \exp \{ (\alpha_P - 1) \, Y\}$

7506: \cite{dip3,yuri_bk}. Such corrections become important when 

7507: $\as^2 \, \exp \{ (\alpha_P - 1) \, Y\} \, \sim \, 1$. Therefore,

7508: JIMWLK and BK evolution equations are valid up to rapidities

7509: \cite{dip3,yuri_bk}

7510: \be\label{qetop}

7511: Y \, \le \, Y_{loop} \, = \, \frac{1}{\alpha_P -1} \, \ln \frac{1}{\as^2}.

7512: \ee

7513: \eq{qetop}, along with \eq{qcond}, describes the applicability region

7514: of JIMWLK and BK evolution equations. For rapidities higher than

7515: $Y_{loop}$ pomeron loop corrections become important and have to be

7516: included. In the recent papers \cite{loop1,loop2,loop3,loop4,loop5}

7517: corrections to JIMWLK evolution were discussed, which would take into

7518: account pomeron loop contributions. The consequences of pomeron loop

7519: corrections for observables in $pA$ collisions are not clear at

7520: present.

7521: 

7522: Another important class of processes which we have omitted here are

7523: the exclusive and semi-exclusive processes. In the quasi-classical

7524: approximation the diffractive DIS structure functions were calculated

7525: in \cite{Hebecker,KMc}. In the framework of dipole model one can

7526: construct an evolution equation governing single diffractive

7527: dissociation amplitudes for DIS, as it was done in \cite{KL}. The

7528: results of both \cite{Hebecker,KMc} and \cite{KL} can easily be

7529: generalized to $pA$ collisions. Diffractive particle production was

7530: calculated for both DIS and $pA$ in the quasi-classical approximation

7531: in \cite{yuridiff}. Unfortunately, due to limited detector

7532: capabilities, it appears to be very difficult, if not impossible, to

7533: measure these exclusive processes at RHIC. Since our review here is

7534: dedicated to RHIC physics we had to omit such processes.

7535: 

7536: We conclude by pointing out once again that we have reviewed the state

7537: of the field at the moment of writing. Future developments are likely

7538: to bring in many new exciting results, possibly modifying some of the

7539: discussed conclusions and adding on to the material presented here.

7540: 

7541: 

7542: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7543: 

7544: \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Acknowledgments}

7545: \section*{Acknowledgments}

7546: 

7547: We would like to express out gratitude to Adrian Dumitru, Dima

7548: Kharzeev, Alex Kovner, Francois Gelis, Kazu Itakura, Genya Levin,

7549: Larry McLerran, Al Mueller, Dirk Rischke, Mark Strikman, Derek Teaney,

7550: Kirill Tuchin, Raju Venugopalan, and Heribert Weigert for many

7551: productive and enjoyable collaborations on the subject. We would like

7552: to thank Alberto Accardi, Rolf Baier, Ian Balitsky, Jean-Paul Blaizot,

7553: Misha Braun, Miklos Gyulassy, Ulrich Heinz, Edmond Iancu, Boris

7554: Kopeliovich, Xin-Nian Wang, and Urs Wiedemann for many stimulating and

7555: informative discussions.

7556: 

7557: The work of J.J-M. is supported in part by the U.S. Department of

7558: Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02-00ER41132. The research of Yu. K. is

7559: supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant

7560: No. DE-FG02-05ER41377.

7561: 

7562: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7563: 

7564: \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{References}

7565: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

7566: %\itemsep -2pt 

7567: 

7568: %\bibitem{jmk} J. Jalilian-Marian, Yu. V. Kovchegov, Progr. Part. Nucl. 

7569: %Phys., (2005).  

7570: 

7571: %\cite{Gribov:tu}

7572: \bibitem{GLR}

7573: L.~V.~Gribov, E.~M.~Levin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

7574: %``Semihard Processes In QCD,''

7575: Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 100}, 1 (1983).

7576: %%CITATION = PRPLC,100,1;%%

7577: 

7578: %\cite{Mueller:wy}

7579: \bibitem{MQ}

7580: A.~H.~Mueller and J.~w.~Qiu,

7581: %``Gluon Recombination And Shadowing At Small Values Of X,''

7582: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 268}, 427 (1986).

7583: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B268,427;%%

7584: 

7585: %\cite{McLerran:1993ni}

7586: \bibitem{MV}

7587: L.~D.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,

7588: %``Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei,''

7589: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 2233 (1994)

7590: [arXiv:hep-ph/9309289];

7591: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9309289;%%

7592: %\cite{McLerran:1993ka}

7593: %\bibitem{McLerran:1993ka}

7594: %L.~D.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,

7595: %``Gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei at small transverse

7596: %momentum,''

7597: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 3352 (1994)

7598: [arXiv:hep-ph/9311205];

7599: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9311205;%%

7600: %\cite{McLerran:1994vd}

7601: %\bibitem{McLerran:1994vd}

7602: %L.~D.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,

7603: %``Green's functions in the color field of a large nucleus,''

7604: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 2225 (1994)

7605: [arXiv:hep-ph/9402335].

7606: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9402335;%%

7607: 

7608: %\cite{Kovchegov:1996ty}

7609: \bibitem{yuri1}

7610:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov,

7611:   %``Non-Abelian Weizsaecker-Williams field and a two-dimensional effective

7612:   %color charge density for a very large nucleus,''

7613:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 5463 (1996)

7614:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9605446].

7615:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605446;%%

7616: 

7617: %\cite{Kovchegov:1997pc}

7618: \bibitem{yuri2}

7619:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov,

7620:   %``Quantum structure of the non-Abelian Weizsaecker-Williams field for a  very

7621:   %large nucleus,''

7622:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5445 (1997)

7623:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9701229].

7624:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701229;%%

7625: 

7626: \bibitem{jkmw}

7627: J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner, L.~D.~McLerran and H.~Weigert,

7628: %``The intrinsic glue distribution at very small x,''

7629: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5414 (1997)

7630: [arXiv:hep-ph/9606337].

7631: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606337;%%

7632: 

7633: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1997jx}

7634: \bibitem{jklw1}

7635: J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner, A.~Leonidov and H.~Weigert,

7636: %``The BFKL equation from the Wilson renormalization group,''

7637: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 504}, 415 (1997)

7638: [arXiv:hep-ph/9701284].

7639: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701284;%%

7640: 

7641: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1997gr}

7642: \bibitem{jklw2}

7643: J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner, A.~Leonidov and H.~Weigert,

7644: %``The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Towards the high  density

7645: %regime,''

7646: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 014014 (1999)

7647: [arXiv:hep-ph/9706377].

7648: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706377;%%

7649: 

7650: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1997dw}

7651: \bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:1997dw}

7652:   J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner and H.~Weigert,

7653:   %``The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: Gluon evolution at

7654:   %finite parton density,''

7655:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 014015 (1999)

7656:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9709432].

7657:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709432;%%

7658: 

7659: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:1998cb}

7660: \bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:1998cb}

7661:   J.~Jalilian-Marian, A.~Kovner, A.~Leonidov and H.~Weigert,

7662:   %``Unitarization of gluon distribution in the doubly logarithmic regime at

7663:   %high density,''

7664:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 034007 (1999)

7665:   [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 59}, 099903 (1999)]

7666:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9807462].

7667:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807462;%%

7668: 

7669: %\cite{Kovner:1999bj}

7670: \bibitem{Kovner:1999bj}

7671:   A.~Kovner and J.~G.~Milhano,

7672:   %``Vector potential versus colour charge density in low-x evolution,''

7673:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 014012 (2000)

7674:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9904420].

7675:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904420;%%

7676: 

7677: %\cite{Kovner:2000pt}

7678: \bibitem{Kovner:2000pt}

7679:   A.~Kovner, J.~G.~Milhano and H.~Weigert,

7680:   %``Relating different approaches to nonlinear QCD evolution at finite  gluon

7681:   %density,''

7682:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 114005 (2000)

7683:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0004014].

7684:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004014;%%

7685: 

7686: %\cite{Iancu:2000hn}

7687: \bibitem{Iancu:2000hn}

7688:   E.~Iancu, A.~Leonidov and L.~D.~McLerran,

7689:   %``Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. I,''

7690:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 692}, 583 (2001)

7691:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0011241].

7692:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011241;%%

7693: 

7694: %\cite{Iancu:2001ad}

7695: \bibitem{Iancu:2001ad}

7696:   E.~Iancu, A.~Leonidov and L.~D.~McLerran,

7697:   %``The renormalization group equation for the color glass condensate,''

7698:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 510}, 133 (2001)

7699:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0102009].

7700:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102009;%%

7701: 

7702: %\cite{Iancu:2001md}

7703: \bibitem{Iancu:2001md}

7704:   E.~Iancu and L.~D.~McLerran,

7705:   %``Saturation and universality in QCD at small x,''

7706:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 510}, 145 (2001)

7707:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0103032].

7708:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103032;%%

7709: 

7710: %\cite{Ferreiro:2001qy}

7711: \bibitem{Ferreiro:2001qy}

7712:   E.~Ferreiro, E.~Iancu, A.~Leonidov and L.~McLerran,

7713:   %``Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. II,''

7714:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 703}, 489 (2002)

7715:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0109115].

7716:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109115;%%

7717: 

7718: %\cite{Weigert:2000gi}

7719: \bibitem{Weigert:2000gi}

7720:   H.~Weigert,

7721:   %``Unitarity at small Bjorken x,''

7722:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 703}, 823 (2002)

7723:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0004044].

7724:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004044;%%

7725: 

7726: %\cite{Rummukainen:2003ns}

7727: \bibitem{RW}

7728:   K.~Rummukainen and H.~Weigert,

7729:   %``Universal features of JIMWLK and BK evolution at small x,''

7730:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 739}, 183 (2004)

7731:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0309306].

7732:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309306;%%

7733: 

7734: %\cite{Mueller:1993rr}

7735: \bibitem{dip1}

7736: A.~H.~Mueller,

7737: %``Soft gluons in the infinite momentum wave function and the BFKL pomeron,''

7738: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 415}, 373 (1994).

7739: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B415,373;%%

7740: 

7741: %\cite{Mueller:1994jq}

7742: \bibitem{dip2}

7743: A.~H.~Mueller and B.~Patel,

7744: %``Single and double BFKL pomeron exchange and a dipole picture of high-energy hard processes,''

7745: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 425}, 471 (1994)

7746: [arXiv:hep-ph/9403256].

7747: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403256;%%

7748: 

7749: %\cite{Mueller:gb}

7750: \bibitem{dip3}

7751: A.~H.~Mueller,

7752: %``Unitarity And The Bfkl Pomeron,''

7753: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 437}, 107 (1995)

7754: [arXiv:hep-ph/9408245].

7755: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9408245;%%

7756: 

7757: %\cite{Chen:1995pa}

7758: \bibitem{CM}

7759: Z.~Chen and A.~H.~Mueller,

7760: %``The Dipole picture of high-energy scattering, the BFKL equation and many gluon compound states,''

7761: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 451}, 579 (1995).

7762: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B451,579;%%

7763: 

7764: %\cite{Balitsky:1995ub}

7765: \bibitem{balitsky}

7766: I.~Balitsky,

7767: %``Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,''

7768: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 463}, 99 (1996)

7769: [arXiv:hep-ph/9509348];

7770: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9509348;%%

7771: %\cite{Balitsky:1997mk}

7772: %\bibitem{Balitsky:1997mk}

7773: %I.~Balitsky,

7774: %``Operator expansion for diffractive high-energy scattering,''

7775: arXiv:hep-ph/9706411;

7776: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706411;%%

7777: %\cite{Balitsky:1998ya}

7778: %\bibitem{Balitsky:1998ya}

7779: %I.~Balitsky,

7780: %``Factorization and high-energy effective action,''

7781: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 014020 (1999)

7782: [arXiv:hep-ph/9812311].

7783: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812311;%%

7784: 

7785: %\cite{Kovchegov:1999yj}

7786: %\bibitem{Kovchegov:1999yj}

7787: \bibitem{yuri_bk}

7788:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov,

7789:   %``Small-x F2 structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron

7790:   %exchanges,''

7791:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 034008 (1999)

7792:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9901281];

7793:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9901281;%%

7794: %\cite{Kovchegov:1999ua}

7795: %Y.~V.~Kovchegov,

7796: %``Unitarization of the BFKL pomeron on a nucleus,''

7797: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 074018 (2000)

7798: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905214].

7799: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905214;%%

7800: 

7801: %\cite{Froissart:ux}

7802: \bibitem{froi}

7803: M.~Froissart,

7804: %``Asymptotic Behavior And Subtractions In The Mandelstam Representation,''

7805: Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 123}, 1053 (1961).

7806: %%CITATION = PHRVA,123,1053;%%

7807: 

7808: %\cite{Bartels:hh}

7809: \bibitem{Bartels}

7810: J.~Bartels,

7811: %``A Note On The Infrared Cutoff Dependence Of The Bfkl Pomeron,''

7812: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 19}, 1611 (1993);

7813: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G19,1611;%%

7814: %\cite{Bartels:1995yk}

7815: %\bibitem{Bartels:1995yk}

7816: J.~Bartels, H.~Lotter and M.~Vogt,

7817: %``A Numerical Estimate of the Small-$k_T$ Region in the BFKL Pomeron,''

7818: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 373}, 215 (1996)

7819: [arXiv:hep-ph/9511399].

7820: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9511399;%%

7821: 

7822: \bibitem{BFKL}

7823: %\cite{Kuraev:fs}

7824: %\bibitem{Kuraev:fs}

7825: E.~A.~Kuraev, L.~N.~Lipatov and V.~S.~Fadin,

7826: %``The Pomeranchuk Singularity In Nonabelian Gauge Theories,''

7827: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 45}, 199 (1977)

7828: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 72}, 377 (1977)];

7829: %%CITATION = SPHJA,45,199;%%

7830: %\cite{Balitsky:ic}

7831: %\bibitem{Balitsky:ic}

7832: I.~I.~Balitsky and L.~N.~Lipatov,

7833: %``The Pomeranchuk Singularity In Quantum Chromodynamics,''

7834: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 28}, 822 (1978)

7835: [Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 28}, 1597 (1978)].

7836: %%CITATION = SJNCA,28,822;%%

7837: 

7838: 

7839: %\cite{Kovner:1995ts}

7840: \bibitem{KMW1}

7841: A.~Kovner, L.~D.~McLerran and H.~Weigert,

7842: %``Gluon production at high transverse momentum in the McLerran-Venugopalan

7843: %model of nuclear structure functions,''

7844: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 3809 (1995)

7845: [arXiv:hep-ph/9505320].

7846: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9505320;%%

7847: 

7848: %\cite{Kovner:1995ja}

7849: \bibitem{KMW2}

7850: A.~Kovner, L.~D.~McLerran and H.~Weigert,

7851: %``Gluon production from nonAbelian Weizsacker-Williams fields in

7852: %nucleus-nucleus collisions,''

7853: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 6231 (1995)

7854: [arXiv:hep-ph/9502289].

7855: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9502289;%%

7856: 

7857: %\cite{Kovchegov:1997ke}

7858: \bibitem{KR}

7859: Yu.~V.~Kovchegov and D.~H.~Rischke,

7860: %``Classical gluon radiation in ultrarelativistic nucleus nucleus  collisions,''

7861: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 56}, 1084 (1997)

7862: [arXiv:hep-ph/9704201].

7863: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704201;%%

7864: 

7865: %\cite{Gyulassy:1997vt}

7866: \bibitem{GM}

7867: M.~Gyulassy and L.~D.~McLerran,

7868: %``Yang-Mills radiation in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions,''

7869: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 56}, 2219 (1997)

7870: [arXiv:nucl-th/9704034].

7871: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9704034;%%

7872: 

7873: %\cite{Kovchegov:1998bi}

7874: \bibitem{KM}

7875:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov and A.~H.~Mueller,

7876:   %``Gluon production in current nucleus and nucleon nucleus collisions in  a

7877:   %quasi-classical approximation,''

7878:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 529}, 451 (1998)

7879:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9802440].

7880:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802440;%%

7881: 

7882: %\cite{Dumitru:2001ux}

7883: \bibitem{DM}

7884: A.~Dumitru and L.~D.~McLerran,

7885: %``How protons shatter colored glass,''

7886: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 700}, 492 (2002)

7887: [arXiv:hep-ph/0105268].

7888: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105268;%%

7889: 

7890: %\cite{Kovchegov:2001sc}

7891: \bibitem{KT}

7892: Yu.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~Tuchin,

7893: %``Inclusive gluon production in DIS at high parton density,''

7894: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 074026 (2002)

7895: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111362].

7896: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111362;%%

7897: 

7898: 

7899: %\cite{Gelis:2002nn}

7900: \bibitem{GJD}

7901: F.~Gelis and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

7902: %``From DIS to proton nucleus collisions in the color glass condensate  model,''

7903: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 074019 (2003)

7904: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211363];

7905: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211363;%%

7906: %\cite{Dumitru:2001jn}

7907: %\bibitem{Dumitru:2001jn}

7908: A.~Dumitru and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

7909: %``Scattering of gluons from the color glass condensate,''

7910: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 547}, 15 (2002)

7911: [arXiv:hep-ph/0111357]; 

7912: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111357;%%

7913: %\cite{Dumitru:2002qt}

7914: %\bibitem{Dumitru:2002qt}

7915: %A.~Dumitru and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

7916: %``Forward quark jets from protons shattering the colored glass,''

7917: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89}, 022301 (2002)

7918: [arXiv:hep-ph/0204028].

7919: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204028;%%

7920: 

7921: 

7922: %\cite{Blaizot:2004wv}

7923: \bibitem{BGV}

7924:   J.~P.~Blaizot, F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,

7925:   %``High energy p A collisions in the color glass condensate approach. II:

7926:   %Quark production,''

7927:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 743}, 57 (2004)

7928:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0402257];

7929:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402257;%%

7930: %\cite{Blaizot:2004wu}

7931: %\bibitem{Blaizot:2004wu}

7932: %  J.~P.~Blaizot, F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,

7933:   %``High energy p A collisions in the color glass condensate approach. I: Gluon

7934:   %production and the Cronin effect,''

7935:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 743}, 13 (2004)

7936:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0402256];

7937:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402256;%%

7938: %\cite{Gelis:2003vh}

7939: %\bibitem{Gelis:2003vh}

7940:   F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,

7941:   %``Large mass q anti-q production from the color glass condensate,''

7942:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 014019 (2004)

7943:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0310090].

7944:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310090;%%

7945: 

7946:  %\cite{Dumitru:2002qt}

7947: \bibitem{Dumitru:2002qt}

7948:   A.~Dumitru and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

7949:   %``Forward quark jets from protons shattering the colored glass,''

7950:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89}, 022301 (2002)

7951:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0204028].

7952:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204028;%%

7953: 

7954: %\cite{Gelis:2001da}

7955: \bibitem{Gelis:2001da}

7956:   F.~Gelis and A.~Peshier,

7957:   %``Probing colored glass via q anti-q photoproduction,''

7958:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 697}, 879 (2002)

7959:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0107142].

7960:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107142;%%

7961: 

7962: %\cite{Dumitru:2001jn}

7963: \bibitem{Dumitru:2001jn}

7964:   A.~Dumitru and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

7965:   %``Scattering of gluons from the color glass condensate,''

7966:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 547}, 15 (2002)

7967:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0111357].

7968:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111357;%%

7969: 

7970: %\cite{Gelis:2002nn}

7971: \bibitem{Gelis:2002nn}

7972:   F.~Gelis and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

7973:   %``From DIS to proton nucleus collisions in the color glass condensate

7974:   %model,''

7975:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 074019 (2003)

7976:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0211363].

7977:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211363;%%

7978: 

7979: 

7980: %\cite{Kovchegov:2000hz}

7981: \bibitem{yuriaa}

7982:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov,

7983:   %``Classical initial conditions for ultrarelativistic heavy ion  collisions,''

7984:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 692}, 557 (2001)

7985:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0011252].

7986:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011252;%%

7987: 

7988: %\cite{Balitsky:2004rr}

7989: \bibitem{Ian04}

7990:   I.~Balitsky,

7991:   %``Scattering of shock waves in QCD,''

7992:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 114030 (2004)

7993:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0409314].

7994:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409314;%%

7995: 

7996: %\cite{Krasnitz:1999wc}

7997: \bibitem{KV}

7998: A.~Krasnitz and R.~Venugopalan,

7999: %``The initial energy density of gluons produced in very high energy  nuclear collisions,''

8000: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 84}, 4309 (2000)

8001: [arXiv:hep-ph/9909203];

8002: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9909203;%%

8003: %\cite{Krasnitz:2000gz}

8004: %\bibitem{Krasnitz:2000gz}

8005: %A.~Krasnitz and R.~Venugopalan,

8006: %``The initial gluon multiplicity in heavy ion collisions,''

8007: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 86}, 1717 (2001)

8008: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007108];

8009: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007108;%%

8010: %\cite{Krasnitz:2001qu}

8011: %\bibitem{Krasnitz:2001qu}

8012: A.~Krasnitz, Y.~Nara and R.~Venugopalan,

8013: %``Coherent gluon production in very high energy heavy ion collisions,''

8014: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 87}, 192302 (2001)

8015: [arXiv:hep-ph/0108092];

8016: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108092;%%

8017: %\cite{Krasnitz:2003jw}

8018: %\bibitem{Krasnitz:2003jw}

8019: %  A.~Krasnitz, Y.~Nara and R.~Venugopalan,

8020:   %``Classical gluodynamics of high energy nuclear collisions: An erratum  and

8021:   %an update,''

8022:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 727}, 427 (2003)

8023:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0305112];

8024:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305112;%%

8025: %\cite{Krasnitz:2002mn}

8026: %\bibitem{Krasnitz:2002mn}

8027: %  A.~Krasnitz, Y.~Nara and R.~Venugopalan,

8028:   %``Gluon production in the color glass condensate model of collisions of

8029:   %ultrarelativistic finite nuclei,''

8030:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 717}, 268 (2003)

8031:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0209269].

8032:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209269;%%

8033: 

8034: 

8035: %\cite{Lappi:2003bi}

8036: \bibitem{Lappi}

8037: T.~Lappi,

8038: %``Production of gluons in the classical field model for heavy ion  collisions,''

8039: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 67}, 054903 (2003)

8040: [arXiv:hep-ph/0303076].

8041: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303076;%%

8042: 

8043: %\cite{Gunion:qs}

8044: \bibitem{GB}

8045: J.~F.~Gunion and G.~Bertsch,

8046: %``Hadronization By Color Bremsstrahlung,''

8047: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 25}, 746 (1982).

8048: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,746;%%

8049: 

8050: 

8051: %\cite{Lipatov:1991nf}

8052: \bibitem{Lipatov1}

8053: L.~N.~Lipatov,

8054: %``High-energy scattering in QCD and in quantum gravity and two-dimensional

8055: %field theories,''

8056: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 365}, 614 (1991).

8057: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B365,614;%%

8058: 

8059: %\cite{amueller}

8060: \bibitem{amueller}

8061:   A.~H.~Mueller,

8062:   %``DIS 2003: An overview,''

8063:   arXiv:hep-ph/0307265.

8064:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307265;%%

8065: 

8066: 

8067: %\cite{Iancu:2002xk}

8068: \bibitem{ILM}

8069:   E.~Iancu, A.~Leonidov and L.~McLerran,

8070:   %``The colour glass condensate: An introduction,''

8071:   arXiv:hep-ph/0202270.

8072:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202270;%%

8073: 

8074: %\cite{Iancu:2003xm}

8075: \bibitem{IV}

8076:   E.~Iancu and R.~Venugopalan,

8077:   %``The color glass condensate and high energy scattering in QCD,''

8078:   arXiv:hep-ph/0303204.

8079:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303204;%%

8080: 

8081: %\cite{Weigert:2005us}

8082: \bibitem{Heribert}

8083:   H.~Weigert,

8084:   %``Evolution at small x(bj): The color glass condensate,''

8085:   arXiv:hep-ph/0501087.

8086:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501087;%%

8087: 

8088: 

8089: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8090: 

8091: %\cite{Adler:2003ii}

8092: \bibitem{phenix}

8093:   S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.}  [PHENIX Collaboration],

8094:   %``Absence of suppression in particle production at large transverse  momentum

8095:   %in s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV d + Au collisions,''

8096:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 072303 (2003)

8097:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0306021].

8098:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0306021;%%

8099: 

8100: %\cite{Back:2003ns}

8101: \bibitem{phobos}

8102:   B.~B.~Back {\it et al.}  [PHOBOS Collaboration],

8103:   %``Centrality dependence of charged hadron transverse momentum spectra in  d +

8104:   %Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

8105:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 072302 (2003)

8106:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0306025].

8107:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0306025;%%

8108: 

8109: %\cite{Adams:2003im}

8110: \bibitem{star}

8111:   J.~Adams {\it et al.}  [STAR Collaboration],

8112:   %``Evidence from d + Au measurements for final-state suppression of high  p(T)

8113:   %hadrons in Au + Au collisions at RHIC,''

8114:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 072304 (2003)

8115:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0306024].

8116:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0306024;%%

8117: 

8118: 

8119: 

8120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8121: 

8122: 

8123: %\cite{Back:2003hx}

8124: \bibitem{phobos_mult}

8125:   B.~B.~Back {\it et al.}  [PHOBOS Collaboration],

8126:   %``Pseudorapidity distribution of charged particles in d + Au collisions  at

8127:   %s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

8128:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 93}, 082301 (2004)

8129:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0311009].

8130:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0311009;%%

8131: 

8132: %\cite{Arsene:2004cn}

8133: \bibitem{brahms_mult}

8134:   I.~Arsene {\it et al.}  [BRAHMS Collaboration],

8135:   %``Centrality dependence of charged-particle pseudorapidity distributions

8136:   %from d + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

8137:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 94}, 032301 (2005)

8138:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0401025].

8139:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0401025;%%

8140: 

8141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8142: 

8143: 

8144: \bibitem{brahms-1}

8145: R.~Debbe, [BRAHMS Collaboration], talk given at the APS DNP Meeting at

8146: Tucson, AZ, October, 2003;

8147: %\cite{Debbe:2004ci}

8148: %\bibitem{Debbe:2004ci}

8149: R.~Debbe  [BRAHMS Collaboration],

8150: %``High p(T) hadron spectra at high rapidity,''

8151: arXiv:nucl-ex/0403052.

8152: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0403052;%%

8153: 

8154: %\cite{Arsene:2004ux}

8155: \bibitem{brahms-2}

8156:   I.~Arsene {\it et al.}  [BRAHMS Collaboration],

8157:   %``On the evolution of the nuclear modification factors with rapidity and

8158:   %centrality in d + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

8159:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 93}, 242303 (2004)

8160:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0403005].

8161:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0403005;%%

8162: 

8163: %\cite{Back:2004bq}

8164: \bibitem{phobosdA}

8165:   B.~B.~Back {\it et al.}  [PHOBOS Collaboration],

8166:   %``Pseudorapidity dependence of charged hadron transverse momentum spectra  in

8167:   %d + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

8168:   Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 70}, 061901 (2004)

8169:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0406017].

8170:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0406017;%%

8171: 

8172: %\cite{Adler:2004eh}

8173: \bibitem{phenixdA}

8174:   S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.}  [PHENIX Collaboration],

8175:   %``Nuclear modification factors for hadrons at forward and backward rapidities

8176:   %in deuteron gold collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

8177:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 94}, 082302 (2005)

8178:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0411054].

8179:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0411054;%%

8180: 

8181: 

8182: %\cite{Barnby:2004yc}

8183: \bibitem{stardA}

8184:   G. Rakness [STAR Collaboration], talks given at XXXXth Rencontres de

8185:   Moriond, ``QCD and Hadronic Interactions at High Energy'', March

8186:   12-19, 2005, La Thuile, Italy and at the XIII International Workshop

8187:   on Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS2005), April 27 - May 1, 2005,

8188:   Madison, Wisconsin, USA; see also L.~S.~Barnby [STAR Collaboration],

8189:   %``Identified particle dependence of nuclear modification factors in

8190:   % d + Au %collisions at RHIC,'' J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30}, S1121 (2004)

8191:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0404027].  %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0404027;%%

8192: 

8193: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8194: 

8195: 

8196: %\cite{Kharzeev:2002pc}

8197: \bibitem{KLM}

8198:   D.~Kharzeev, E.~Levin and L.~McLerran,

8199:   %``Parton saturation and N(part) scaling of semi-hard processes in QCD,''

8200:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 561}, 93 (2003)

8201:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0210332].

8202:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210332;%%

8203: 

8204: %\cite{Kharzeev:2003wz}

8205: \bibitem{KKT}

8206:   D.~Kharzeev, Y.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~Tuchin,

8207:   %``Cronin effect and high-p(T) suppression in p A collisions,''

8208:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 094013 (2003)

8209:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0307037].

8210:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307037;%%

8211: 

8212: %\cite{Albacete:2003iq}

8213: \bibitem{AAKSW}

8214:   J.~L.~Albacete, N.~Armesto, A.~Kovner, C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8215:   %``Energy dependence of the Cronin effect from non-linear QCD evolution,''

8216:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 92}, 082001 (2004)

8217:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0307179].

8218:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307179;%%

8219: 

8220: %\cite{Baier:2003hr}

8221: \bibitem{BKW}

8222:   R.~Baier, A.~Kovner and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8223:   %``Saturation and parton level Cronin effect: Enhancement vs suppression  of

8224:   %gluon production in p A and A A collisions,''

8225:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054009 (2003)

8226:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0305265].

8227:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305265;%%

8228: 

8229: %\cite{Kharzeev:2002ei}

8230: \bibitem{KLN}

8231:   D.~Kharzeev, E.~Levin and M.~Nardi,

8232:   %``QCD saturation and deuteron nucleus collisions,''

8233:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 730}, 448 (2004)

8234:   [Erratum-ibid.\ A {\bf 743}, 329 (2004)]

8235:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0212316].

8236:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212316;%%

8237: 

8238: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8239: 

8240: %\cite{Levin:1997mg}

8241: \bibitem{genya}

8242: E.~Levin,

8243: %``Everything about Reggeons. I: Reggeons in *soft* interaction,''

8244: arXiv:hep-ph/9710546.

8245: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9710546;%%

8246: 

8247: %\cite{Mueller:1989st}

8248: \bibitem{GlaMue}

8249: A.~H.~Mueller,

8250: %``Small X Behavior And Parton Saturation: A QCD Model,''

8251: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 335}, 115 (1990).

8252: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B335,115;%%

8253: 

8254: %\cite{Glauber:1955qq}

8255: \bibitem{Glauber}

8256:   R.~J.~Glauber,

8257:   %``Cross-Sections In Deuterium At High-Energies,''

8258:   Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 100}, 242 (1955).

8259:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,100,242;%%

8260: 

8261: 

8262: %\cite{Lam:1999wu}

8263: \bibitem{LM}

8264:   C.~S.~Lam and G.~Mahlon,

8265:   %``Color neutrality and the gluon distribution in a very large nucleus,''

8266:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 014005 (2000)

8267:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9907281];

8268:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907281;%%

8269: %\cite{Lam:2000nz}

8270: %\bibitem{Lam:2000nz}

8271: %  C.~S.~Lam and G.~Mahlon,

8272:   %``Longitudinal resolution in a large relativistic nucleus: Adding a

8273:   %dimension to the McLerran-Venugopalan model,''

8274:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 114023 (2000)

8275:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0007133];

8276:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007133;%%

8277: %\cite{Lam:2001ax}

8278: %\bibitem{Lam:2001ax}

8279: %  C.~S.~Lam and G.~Mahlon,

8280:   %``Non-Gaussian correlations in the McLerran-Venugopalan model,''

8281:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 016004 (2001)

8282:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0102337].

8283:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102337;%%

8284: 

8285: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8286: 

8287: \bibitem{KS}

8288: B. L. Ioffe, JETP Lett. {\bf 9}, 163 (1969); {\bf 10}, 143 (1969);

8289: Phys. Lett. {\bf 30B}, 123 (1969);

8290: %\cite{Kovchegov:2001dh}

8291: %\bibitem{KS}

8292:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov and M.~Strikman,

8293:   %``Ioffe time in double logarithmic approximation,''

8294:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 516}, 314 (2001)

8295:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0107015] and references therein.

8296:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107015;%%

8297: 

8298: 

8299: 

8300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8301: 

8302: %\cite{Stasto:2000er}

8303: \bibitem{geom}

8304: A.~M.~Stasto, K.~Golec-Biernat and J.~Kwiecinski,

8305: %``Geometric scaling for the total gamma* p cross-section in the low x  region,''

8306: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 86}, 596 (2001)

8307: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007192].

8308: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007192;%%

8309: 

8310: %\cite{Levin:1999mw}

8311: \bibitem{LT}

8312: E.~Levin and K.~Tuchin,

8313: %``Solution to the evolution equation for high parton density QCD,''

8314: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 573}, 833 (2000)

8315: [arXiv:hep-ph/9908317].

8316: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908317;%%

8317: 

8318: 

8319: %\cite{Iancu:2002tr}

8320: \bibitem{IIM1}

8321: E.~Iancu, K.~Itakura and L.~McLerran,

8322: %``Geometric scaling above the saturation scale,''

8323: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 708}, 327 (2002)

8324: [arXiv:hep-ph/0203137].

8325: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203137;%%

8326: 

8327: 

8328: 

8329: %\cite{Mueller:2002zm}

8330: \bibitem{MT}

8331: A.~H.~Mueller and D.~N.~Triantafyllopoulos,

8332: %``The energy dependence of the saturation momentum,''

8333: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 640}, 331 (2002)

8334: [arXiv:hep-ph/0205167];

8335: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205167;%%

8336: %\cite{Triantafyllopoulos:2002nz}

8337: %\bibitem{Triantafyllopoulos:2002nz}

8338:   D.~N.~Triantafyllopoulos,

8339:   %``The energy dependence of the saturation momentum from RG improved BFKL

8340:   %evolution,''

8341:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 648}, 293 (2003)

8342:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0209121].

8343:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209121;%%

8344: 

8345: 

8346: %\cite{Mueller:2003bz}

8347: \bibitem{Mueller3}

8348: A.~H.~Mueller,

8349: %``Nuclear A-dependence near the saturation boundary,''

8350: arXiv:hep-ph/0301109.

8351: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301109;%%

8352: 

8353: %\cite{Munier:2003vc}

8354: \bibitem{MP}

8355:   S.~Munier and R.~Peschanski,

8356:   %``Geometric scaling as traveling waves,''

8357:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 232001 (2003)

8358:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0309177];

8359:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309177;%%

8360: %\cite{Munier:2004xu}

8361: %\bibitem{Munier:2004xu}

8362: %  S.~Munier and R.~Peschanski,

8363:   %``Universality and tree structure of high energy QCD,''

8364:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 077503 (2004)

8365:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0401215];

8366:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0401215;%%

8367: %\cite{Marquet:2005qu}

8368: %\bibitem{Marquet:2005qu}

8369:   C.~Marquet, R.~Peschanski and G.~Soyez,

8370:   %``Traveling waves and geometric scaling at non-zero momentum transfer,''

8371:   arXiv:hep-ph/0502020.

8372:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502020;%%

8373: 

8374: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8375: 

8376: %\cite{Braun:2000wr}

8377: \bibitem{Braun1}

8378: M.~Braun,

8379: %``Structure function of the nucleus in the perturbative QCD with N(c)  $\to$ infinity (BFKL pomeron fan diagrams),''

8380: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 16}, 337 (2000)

8381: [arXiv:hep-ph/0001268].

8382: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001268;%%

8383: 

8384: 

8385: %\cite{Golec-Biernat:2001if}

8386: \bibitem{GBMS}

8387:   K.~Golec-Biernat, L.~Motyka and A.~M.~Stasto,

8388:   %``Diffusion into infra-red and unitarization of the BFKL pomeron,''

8389:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 074037 (2002)

8390:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0110325];

8391:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110325;%%

8392: %\cite{Golec-Biernat:2003ym}

8393: %\bibitem{gbs}

8394:   K.~Golec-Biernat and A.~M.~Stasto,

8395:   %``On solutions of the Balitsky-Kovchegov equation with impact parameter,''

8396:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 668}, 345 (2003)

8397:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0306279].

8398:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306279;%%

8399: 

8400: %\cite{Gotsman:2002yy}

8401: \bibitem{GLLM}

8402:   E.~Gotsman, E.~Levin, M.~Lublinsky and U.~Maor,

8403:   %``Towards a new global QCD analysis: Low x DIS data from non-linear

8404:   %evolution,''

8405:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27}, 411 (2003)

8406:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0209074];

8407:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209074;%%

8408: %\cite{Levin:2001yv}

8409: %\bibitem{Levin:2001yv}

8410:   E.~Levin and M.~Lublinsky,

8411:   %``Non-linear evolution and high energy diffractive production,''

8412:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 521}, 233 (2001)

8413:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0108265];

8414:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108265;%%

8415: %\cite{Levin:2001et}

8416: %\bibitem{Levin:2001et}

8417:   E.~Levin and M.~Lublinsky,

8418:   %``Parton densities and saturation scale from non-linear evolution in DIS  on

8419:   %nuclei,''

8420:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 696}, 833 (2001)

8421:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0104108];

8422:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104108;%%

8423: %\cite{Lublinsky:2001yi}

8424: %\bibitem{Lublinsky:2001yi}

8425:   M.~Lublinsky, E.~Gotsman, E.~Levin and U.~Maor,

8426:   %``Non-linear evolution and parton distributions at LHC and THERA  energies,''

8427:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 696}, 851 (2001)

8428:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0102321].

8429:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102321;%%

8430: 

8431: %\cite{Lublinsky:2001bc}

8432: \bibitem{Misha}

8433:   M.~Lublinsky,

8434:   %``Scaling phenomena from non-linear evolution in high energy DIS,''

8435:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21}, 513 (2001)

8436:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0106112].

8437:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106112;%%

8438: 

8439: %\cite{Albacete:2005ef}

8440: \bibitem{AAMSW}

8441:   J.~L.~Albacete, N.~Armesto, J.~G.~Milhano, C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8442:   %``Nuclear size and rapidity dependence of the saturation scale from QCD

8443:   %evolution and experimental data,''

8444:   arXiv:hep-ph/0502167;

8445:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502167;%%

8446: %\cite{Albacete:2004gw}

8447: %\bibitem{Albacete:2004gw}

8448: % J.~L.~Albacete, N.~Armesto, J.~G.~Milhano, C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8449:   %``Numerical analysis of the Balitsky-Kovchegov equation with running

8450:   %coupling: Dependence of the saturation scale on nuclear size and rapidity,''

8451:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 014003 (2005)

8452:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0408216].

8453:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408216;%%

8454: 

8455: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8456: 

8457: 

8458: %\cite{Kopeliovich:1998nw}

8459: \bibitem{KTS}

8460: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, A.~V.~Tarasov and A.~Schafer,

8461: %``Bremsstrahlung of a quark propagating through a nucleus,''

8462: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 59}, 1609 (1999)

8463: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808378].

8464: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808378;%%

8465: 

8466: 

8467: %\cite{Kovner:2001vi}

8468: \bibitem{KW2}

8469: A.~Kovner and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8470: %``Eikonal evolution and gluon radiation,''

8471: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 114002 (2001)

8472: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106240].

8473: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106240;%%

8474: 

8475: 

8476: %\cite{Cronin:zm}

8477: \bibitem{Cronin}

8478: J.~W.~Cronin, H.~J.~Frisch, M.~J.~Shochet, J.~P.~Boymond, R.~Mermod, P.~A.~Piroue and R.~L.~Sumner,

8479: %``Production Of Hadrons With Large Transverse Momentum At 200-Gev, 300-Gev, And 400-Gev,''

8480: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 11}, 3105 (1975).

8481: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D11,3105;%%

8482: 

8483: 

8484: %\cite{Kopeliovich:2002yh}

8485: \bibitem{KNST}

8486: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, J.~Nemchik, A.~Schafer and A.~V.~Tarasov,

8487: %``Cronin effect in hadron production off nuclei,''

8488: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 88}, 232303 (2002)

8489: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201010].

8490: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201010;%%

8491: 

8492: \bibitem{ktbroadening1}

8493: X.~N.~Wang,

8494: %``Where is the jet quenching in Pb + Pb collisions at 158-A-GeV?,''

8495: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 81} (1998) 2655;

8496: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9804384].

8497: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804384;%%

8498: M.~Gyulassy and P.~Levai,

8499: %``Jet quenching and Cronin enhancement in A + A at s**(1/2) = 20-A-GeV  vs. 200-A-GeV,''

8500: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 442} (1998)~1;

8501: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9807247].

8502: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807247;%%

8503: X.~N.~Wang, 

8504: %``Systematic study of high p(T) hadron spectra in p p, p A and A A  collisions from SPS to RHIC energies,''

8505: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 61} (2000) 064910.

8506: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9812021;%%

8507: %

8508: \bibitem{ktbroadening2}

8509: E.~Wang and X.~N.~Wang,

8510: %``Interplay of soft and hard processes and hadron p(T) spectra in p A and  A A collisions,''

8511: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 64} (2001) 034901;

8512: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0104031;%%

8513: Y.~Zhang, G.~Fai, G.~Papp, G.~G.~Barnafoldi and P.~Levai, 

8514: %``High-p(T) pion and kaon production in relativistic nuclear collisions,''

8515: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 65} (2002) 034903;

8516: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109233;%%

8517: I.~Vitev and M.~Gyulassy,

8518: %``High-pt tomography of d+Au and Au+Au at SPS, RHIC, and LHC,''

8519: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89} (2002) 252301.

8520: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209161;%%

8521: %

8522: \bibitem{Vitev03}

8523: I.~Vitev,

8524: %``Initial state parton broadening and energy loss probed 

8525: % in d + Au at  RHIC,''

8526: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 562}, 36 (2003);

8527: [arXiv:nucl-th/0302002].

8528: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0302002;%%

8529: %

8530: \bibitem{ktbroadening3}

8531: X.~N.~Wang,

8532: %``Rapidity asymmetry in high-energy d + A collisions,''

8533: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 565} (2003) 116;

8534: %[arXiv:nucl-th/0303004].

8535: X.~N.~Wang,

8536: %``High p(T) hadron spectra, azimuthal anisotropy and back-to-back  correlations in high-energy heavy-ion collisions,''

8537: arXiv:nucl-th/0305010;

8538: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0305010;%%

8539: X.~Zhang and G.~Fai,

8540: %``The charged-hadron / pion puzzle at the relativistic heavy ion collider,''

8541: arXiv:hep-ph/0306227.

8542: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306227;%%

8543: G.~G.~Barnafoldi, G.~Papp, P.~Levai and G.~Fai,

8544: %``Nuclear reaction mechanisms and the Cronin effect,''

8545: arXiv:nucl-th/0307062.

8546: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0307062;%%

8547: 

8548: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8549: 

8550: %\cite{Braun:2000bh}

8551: \bibitem{Braun2}

8552: M.~A.~Braun,

8553: %``Inclusive jet production on the nucleus in the perturbative QCD with  N(c) $\to$ infinity,''

8554: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 483}, 105 (2000)

8555: [arXiv:hep-ph/0003003].

8556: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003003;%%

8557: 

8558: %\cite{Braun:2004sd}

8559: \bibitem{Braun3}

8560:   M.~A.~Braun,

8561:   %``Jet production in p A and A A collisions in the perturbative QCD pomeron

8562:   %model,''

8563:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 39}, 451 (2005)

8564:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0410164];

8565:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410164;%%

8566: %\cite{Braun:2005ma}

8567: %\bibitem{Braun:2005ma}

8568: %  M.~A.~Braun,

8569:   %``On the inclusive gluon jet production off the nucleus in the perturbative

8570:   %QCD,''

8571:   arXiv:hep-ph/0502184.

8572:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502184;%%

8573: 

8574: 

8575: %\cite{Iancu:2004bx}

8576: \bibitem{IIT}

8577:   E.~Iancu, K.~Itakura and D.~N.~Triantafyllopoulos,

8578:   %``Cronin effect and high-p(T) suppression in the nuclear gluon distribution

8579:   %at small x,''

8580:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 742}, 182 (2004)

8581:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0403103].

8582:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403103;%%

8583: 

8584: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8585: 

8586: %\cite{Gelis:2002ki}

8587: \bibitem{Gelis:2002ki}

8588:   F.~Gelis and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

8589:   %``Photon production in high energy proton nucleus collisions,''

8590:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 014021 (2002)

8591:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0205037].

8592:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205037;%%

8593: 

8594: %\cite{Gelis:2002fw}

8595: \bibitem{Gelis:2002fw}

8596:   F.~Gelis and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

8597:   %``Dilepton production from the color glass condensate,''

8598:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 094014 (2002)

8599:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0208141].

8600:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208141;%%

8601:   

8602:   %\cite{Baier:2004tj}

8603: \bibitem{Baier:2004tj}

8604:   R.~Baier, A.~H.~Mueller and D.~Schiff,

8605:   %``Saturation and shadowing in high-energy proton nucleus dilepton

8606:   %production,''

8607:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 741}, 358 (2004)

8608:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0403201].

8609:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403201;%%

8610: 

8611: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2005zw}

8612: \bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:2005zw}

8613:   J.~Jalilian-Marian,

8614:   %``Production of forward rapidity photons in high energy heavy ion

8615:   %collisions,''

8616:   arXiv:hep-ph/0501222.

8617:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501222;%%

8618:   

8619:   %\cite{Aurenche:1987fs}

8620: \bibitem{Aurenche:1987fs}

8621:   P.~Aurenche, R.~Baier, M.~Fontannaz and D.~Schiff,

8622:   %``Prompt Photon Production At Large P(T) Scheme Invariant QCD Predictions And

8623:   %Comparison With Experiment,''

8624:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 297}, 661 (1988).

8625:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B297,661;%%

8626: 

8627:  %\cite{Kopeliovich:2001hf}

8628: \bibitem{Kopeliovich:2001hf}

8629:   B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, J.~Raufeisen, A.~V.~Tarasov and M.~B.~Johnson,

8630:   %``Nuclear effects in the Drell-Yan process at RHIC and LHC,''

8631:   Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 67}, 014903 (2003)

8632:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0110221].

8633:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110221;%%

8634:   

8635:   %\cite{Johnson:2001xf}

8636: \bibitem{Johnson:2001xf}

8637:   M.~B.~Johnson {\it et al.},

8638:   %``Energy loss versus shadowing in the Drell-Yan reaction on nuclei,''

8639:   Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 65}, 025203 (2002)

8640:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0105195].

8641:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105195;%%

8642: 

8643: %\cite{Betemps:2004xr}

8644: \bibitem{BGD}

8645:   M.~A.~Betemps and M.~B.~Gay Ducati,

8646:   %``Dilepton low p(T) suppression as an evidence of the color glass

8647:   %condensate,''

8648:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 116005 (2004)

8649:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0408097].

8650:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408097;%%

8651: 

8652: 

8653: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8654: 

8655: %\cite{Kharzeev:2004bw}

8656: \bibitem{KLM2}

8657:   D.~Kharzeev, E.~Levin and L.~McLerran,

8658:   %``Jet azimuthal correlations and parton saturation in the color glass

8659:   %condensate,''

8660:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 748}, 627 (2005)

8661:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0403271].

8662:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403271;%%

8663: 

8664: %\cite{Kovchegov:2002nf}

8665: \bibitem{ktflow}

8666: Yu.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~L.~Tuchin,

8667: %``Elliptic flow from minijet production in heavy ion collisions,''

8668: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 708}, 413 (2002)

8669: [arXiv:hep-ph/0203213];

8670: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203213;%%

8671: %\cite{Kovchegov:2002cd}

8672: %\bibitem{Kovchegov:2002cd}

8673: % Y.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~L.~Tuchin,

8674: %``Correlation functions and cumulants in elliptic flow analysis,''

8675: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 717}, 249 (2003)

8676: [arXiv:nucl-th/0207037].

8677: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0207037;%%

8678: 

8679: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2004da}

8680: \bibitem{JMK}

8681:   J.~Jalilian-Marian and Y.~V.~Kovchegov,

8682:   %``Inclusive two-gluon and valence quark-gluon production in DIS and p A,''

8683:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 114017 (2004)

8684:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0405266].

8685:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405266;%%

8686: 

8687: 

8688: %\cite{Nikolaev:2003zf}

8689: \bibitem{NSZZ}

8690:   N.~N.~Nikolaev, W.~Schafer, B.~G.~Zakharov and V.~R.~Zoller,

8691:   %``Nonlinear k(T) factorization for forward dijets in DIS off nuclei in  the

8692:   %saturation regime,''

8693:   J.\ Exp.\ Theor.\ Phys.\  {\bf 97}, 441 (2003)

8694:   [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 124}, 491 (2003)]

8695:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0303024].

8696:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303024;%%

8697: 

8698: 

8699: %\cite{Kharzeev:2003sk}

8700: \bibitem{Kharzeev:2003sk}

8701:   D.~Kharzeev and K.~Tuchin,

8702:   %``Open charm production in heavy ion collisions and the color glass

8703:   %condensate,''

8704:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 735}, 248 (2004)

8705:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0310358].

8706:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310358;%%

8707: 

8708: %\cite{Tuchin:2004rb}

8709: \bibitem{Tuchin:2004rb}

8710:   K.~Tuchin,

8711:   %``Heavy quark production by a quasi-classical color field in proton  nucleus

8712:   %collisions,''

8713:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 593}, 66 (2004)

8714:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0401022].

8715:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0401022;%%

8716: 

8717: %\cite{Gelis:2003vh}

8718: \bibitem{Gelis:2003vh}

8719:   F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,

8720:   %``Large mass q anti-q production from the color glass condensate,''

8721:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 014019 (2004)

8722:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0310090].

8723:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310090;%%

8724: 

8725: %\cite{Blaizot:2004wu}

8726: \bibitem{Blaizot:2004wu}

8727:   J.~P.~Blaizot, F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,

8728:   %``High energy p A collisions in the color glass condensate approach. I: Gluon

8729:   %production and the Cronin effect,''

8730:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 743}, 13 (2004)

8731:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0402256].

8732:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402256;%%

8733: 

8734: %\cite{Blaizot:2004wv}

8735: \bibitem{Blaizot:2004wv}

8736:   J.~P.~Blaizot, F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,

8737:   %``High energy p A collisions in the color glass condensate approach. II:

8738:   %Quark production,''

8739:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 743}, 57 (2004)

8740:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0402257].

8741:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402257;%%

8742: 

8743: %\cite{Fujii:2005vj}

8744: \bibitem{Fujii:2005vj}

8745:   H.~Fujii, F.~Gelis and R.~Venugopalan,

8746:   %``Quantitative study of the violation of k(T)-factorization in

8747:   %hadroproduction of quarks at collider energies,''

8748:   arXiv:hep-ph/0504047.

8749:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504047;%%

8750: 

8751: 

8752: 

8753: 

8754: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8755: 

8756: 

8757: %\cite{Arsene:2003yk}

8758: \bibitem{brahmsaa}

8759:   I.~Arsene {\it et al.}  [BRAHMS Collaboration],

8760:   %``Transverse momentum spectra in Au + Au and d + Au collisions at

8761:   %s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV and the pseudorapidity dependence of high p(T)

8762:   %suppression,''

8763:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 072305 (2003)

8764:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0307003].

8765:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0307003;%%

8766: 

8767: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8768: 

8769: 

8770: 

8771: %\cite{Adler:2003au}

8772: \bibitem{phenixAA}

8773:   S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.}  [PHENIX Collaboration],

8774:   %``High-p(T) charged hadron suppression in Au + Au collisions at  s(NN)**(1/2)

8775:   %= 200-GeV,''

8776:   Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 69}, 034910 (2004)

8777:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0308006];

8778:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0308006;%%

8779: %\cite{Adcox:2002pe}

8780: %\bibitem{aaphenix}

8781: K.~Adcox {\it et al.}  [PHENIX Collaboration],

8782: %``Centrality dependence of the high p(T) charged hadron suppression in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 130-GeV,''

8783: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 561}, 82 (2003)

8784: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0207009];

8785: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0207009;%%

8786: %\cite{Adler:2003qi}

8787: %\bibitem{Adler:2003qi}

8788:   S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.}  [PHENIX Collaboration],

8789:   %``Suppressed pi0 production at large transverse momentum in central Au +  Au

8790:   %collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

8791:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 072301 (2003)

8792:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0304022].

8793:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0304022;%%

8794: 

8795: %\cite{Back:2003qr}

8796: \bibitem{phobosaa}

8797:   B.~B.~Back {\it et al.}  [PHOBOS Collaboration],

8798:   %``Charged hadron transverse momentum distributions in Au + Au collisions  at

8799:   %s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

8800:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 578}, 297 (2004)

8801:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0302015].

8802:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0302015;%%

8803: 

8804: %\cite{Adler:2002xw}

8805: \bibitem{starAA}

8806:   C.~Adler {\it et al.}  [STAR Collaboration],

8807:   %``Centrality dependence of high p(T) hadron suppression in Au + Au collisions

8808:   %at s(NN)**(1/2) = 130-GeV,''

8809:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89}, 202301 (2002)

8810:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0206011];

8811:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0206011;%%

8812: %\cite{Adams:2003kv}

8813: %\bibitem{Adams:2003kv}

8814:   J.~Adams {\it et al.}  [STAR Collaboration],

8815:   %``Transverse momentum and collision energy dependence of high p(T) hadron

8816:   %suppression in Au + Au collisions at ultrarelativistic energies,''

8817:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 172302 (2003)

8818:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0305015].

8819:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0305015;%%

8820: 

8821: 

8822: 

8823: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8824: 

8825: %\cite{Bjorken:1982tu}

8826: \bibitem{Bj}

8827: J.~D.~Bjorken,

8828: %``Energy Loss Of Energetic Partons In Quark - Gluon Plasma: Possible Extinction Of High P(T) Jets In Hadron - Hadron Collisions,''

8829: FERMILAB-PUB-82-059-THY (unpublished).

8830: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=fermilab-pub-82-059-thy}{SPIRES entry}

8831: 

8832: 

8833: %\cite{Baier:1996sk}

8834: \bibitem{BDMPS1}

8835: R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller, S.~Peigne and D.~Schiff,

8836: %``Radiative energy loss and p(T)-broadening of high energy partons in  nuclei,''

8837: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 484}, 265 (1997)

8838: [arXiv:hep-ph/9608322].

8839: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9608322;%%

8840: 

8841: %\cite{Baier:1996kr}

8842: \bibitem{BDMPS}

8843: R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller, S.~Peigne and D.~Schiff,

8844: %``Radiative energy loss of high energy quarks and gluons in a  finite-volume quark-gluon plasma,''

8845: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 483}, 291 (1997)

8846: [arXiv:hep-ph/9607355];

8847: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607355;%%

8848: %\cite{Baier:1996vi}

8849: %\bibitem{Baier:1996vi}

8850: %R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller, S.~Peigne and D.~Schiff,

8851: %``The Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal effect in QED,''

8852: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 478}, 577 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9604327];

8853: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604327;%%

8854: %\cite{Baier:1998yf}

8855: %\bibitem{Baier:1998yf}

8856: R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller and D.~Schiff,

8857: %``Radiative energy loss of high energy partons traversing an expanding  {QCD} plasma,''

8858: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 58}, 1706 (1998)

8859: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803473];

8860: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803473;%%

8861: %\cite{Baier:1998kq}

8862: %\bibitem{Baier:1998kq}

8863: %R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller and D.~Schiff,

8864: %``Medium-induced radiative energy loss: Equivalence between the BDMPS and  Zakharov formalisms,''

8865: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 531}, 403 (1998)

8866: [arXiv:hep-ph/9804212];

8867: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804212;%%

8868: %\cite{Baier:2001yt}

8869: %\bibitem{Baier:2001yt}

8870: %R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller and D.~Schiff,

8871: %``Quenching of hadron spectra in media,''

8872: JHEP {\bf 0109}, 033 (2001)

8873: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106347];

8874: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106347;%%

8875: %\cite{Baier:1994bd}

8876: %\bibitem{Baier:1994bd}

8877: R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, S.~Peigne and D.~Schiff,

8878: %``Induced gluon radiation in a QCD medium,''

8879: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 345}, 277 (1995)

8880: [arXiv:hep-ph/9411409].

8881: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411409;%%

8882: 

8883: %\cite{Wang:1994fx}

8884: \bibitem{EL}

8885: X.~N.~Wang, M.~Gyulassy and M.~Plumer,

8886: %``The LPM effect in QCD and radiative energy loss in a quark gluon plasma,''

8887: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 3436 (1995)

8888: [arXiv:hep-ph/9408344];

8889: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9408344;%%

8890: %\cite{Gyulassy:2000fs}

8891: %\bibitem{Gyulassy:2000fs}

8892: M.~Gyulassy, P.~Levai and I.~Vitev,

8893: %``Non-Abelian energy loss at finite opacity,''

8894: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 85}, 5535 (2000)

8895: [arXiv:nucl-th/0005032];

8896: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0005032;%%

8897: %\cite{Gyulassy:2003mc}

8898: %\bibitem{Gyulassy:2003mc}

8899:   M.~Gyulassy, I.~Vitev, X.~N.~Wang and B.~W.~Zhang,

8900:   %``Jet quenching and radiative energy loss in dense nuclear matter,''

8901:   arXiv:nucl-th/0302077;

8902:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0302077;%%

8903: %\cite{Gyulassy:2000gk}

8904: %\bibitem{Gyulassy:2000gk}

8905: M.~Gyulassy, I.~Vitev and X.~N.~Wang,

8906: %``High p(T) azimuthal asymmetry in noncentral A + A at RHIC,''

8907: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 86}, 2537 (2001)

8908: [arXiv:nucl-th/0012092];

8909: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0012092;%%

8910: %\cite{Vitev:2002pf}

8911: %\bibitem{Vitev:2002pf}

8912: I.~Vitev and M.~Gyulassy,

8913: %``High-p(T) tomography of d + Au and Au + Au at SPS, RHIC, and LHC,''

8914: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89}, 252301 (2002)

8915: [arXiv:hep-ph/0209161];

8916: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209161;%%

8917: %\cite{Wang:2003mm}

8918: %\bibitem{Wang:2003mm}

8919:   X.~N.~Wang,

8920:   %``High p(T) hadron spectra, azimuthal anisotropy and back-to-back

8921:   %correlations in high-energy heavy-ion collisions,''

8922:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 595}, 165 (2004)

8923:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0305010].

8924:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0305010;%%

8925: 

8926: %\cite{Kovner:2003zj}

8927: \bibitem{EL2}

8928:   A.~Kovner and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8929:   %``Gluon radiation and parton energy loss,''

8930:   arXiv:hep-ph/0304151;

8931:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304151;%%

8932: %\cite{Salgado:2003gb}

8933: %\bibitem{Salgado:2003gb}

8934:   C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8935:   %``Calculating quenching weights,''

8936:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 014008 (2003)

8937:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0302184];

8938:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302184;%%

8939: %\cite{Salgado:2002cd}

8940: %\bibitem{Salgado:2002cd}

8941: %  C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8942:   %``A dynamical scaling law for jet tomography,''

8943:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89}, 092303 (2002)

8944:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0204221];

8945:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204221;%%

8946: %\cite{Eskola:2004cr}

8947: %\bibitem{Eskola:2004cr}

8948:   K.~J.~Eskola, H.~Honkanen, C.~A.~Salgado and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

8949:   %``The fragility of high-p(T) hadron spectra as a hard probe,''

8950:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 747}, 511 (2005)

8951:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0406319].

8952:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406319;%%

8953: 

8954: %\cite{Gyulassy:2004zy}

8955: \bibitem{GM1}

8956:   M.~Gyulassy and L.~McLerran,

8957:   %``New forms of QCD matter discovered at RHIC,''

8958:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 750}, 30 (2005)

8959:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0405013].

8960:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0405013;%%

8961: 

8962: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8963: 

8964: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2004er}

8965: \bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:2004er}

8966:   J.~Jalilian-Marian,

8967:   %``Electromagnetic signatures of the color glass condensate: Dileptons,''

8968:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 739}, 319 (2004)

8969:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0402014].

8970:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0402014;%%

8971: 

8972: %\cite{Kharzeev:2004yx}

8973: \bibitem{KKT2}

8974:   D.~Kharzeev, Y.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~Tuchin,

8975:   %``Nuclear modification factor in d + Au collisions: Onset of suppression in

8976:   %the color glass condensate,''

8977:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 599}, 23 (2004)

8978:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0405045].

8979:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405045;%%

8980: 

8981: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2004xm}

8982: \bibitem{JamalH}

8983:   J.~Jalilian-Marian,

8984:   %``Forward rapidity hadron production in deuteron gold collisions from valence

8985:   %quarks,''

8986:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 748}, 664 (2005)

8987:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0402080].

8988:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0402080;%%

8989: 

8990: 

8991: 

8992: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8993: 

8994: 

8995: %\cite{Iancu:2003uh}

8996: \bibitem{loop1}

8997:   E.~Iancu and A.~H.~Mueller,

8998:   %``From color glass to color dipoles in high-energy onium onium  scattering,''

8999:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 730}, 460 (2004)

9000:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0308315];

9001:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308315;%%

9002: %\cite{Iancu:2003zr}

9003: %\bibitem{Iancu:2003zr}

9004: %  E.~Iancu and A.~H.~Mueller,

9005:   %``Rare fluctuations and the high-energy limit of the S-matrix in QCD,''

9006:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 730}, 494 (2004)

9007:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0309276].

9008:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309276;%%

9009: 

9010: %\cite{Mueller:2004se}

9011: \bibitem{loop2}

9012:   A.~H.~Mueller and A.~I.~Shoshi,

9013:   %``Small-x physics beyond the Kovchegov equation,''

9014:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 692}, 175 (2004)

9015:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0402193];

9016:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402193;%%

9017: %\cite{Mueller:2005ut}

9018: %\bibitem{Mueller:2005ut}

9019:   A.~H.~Mueller, A.~I.~Shoshi and S.~M.~H.~Wong,

9020:   %``Extension of the JIMWLK equation in the low gluon density region,''

9021:   arXiv:hep-ph/0501088.

9022:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501088;%%

9023: 

9024: 

9025: %\cite{Iancu:2004iy}

9026: \bibitem{loop3}

9027:   E.~Iancu and D.~N.~Triantafyllopoulos,

9028:   %``A Langevin equation for high energy evolution with pomeron loops,''

9029:   arXiv:hep-ph/0411405;

9030:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411405;%%

9031: %\cite{Iancu:2005nj}

9032: %\bibitem{Iancu:2005nj}

9033: %  E.~Iancu and D.~N.~Triantafyllopoulos,

9034:   %``Non-linear QCD evolution with improved triple-pomeron vertices,''

9035:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 610}, 253 (2005)

9036:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0501193];

9037:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501193;%%

9038: %\cite{Blaizot:2005vf}

9039: %\bibitem{Blaizot:2005vf}

9040:   J.~P.~Blaizot, E.~Iancu, K.~Itakura and D.~N.~Triantafyllopoulos,

9041:   %``Duality and Pomeron effective theory for QCD at high energy and large

9042:   %N(c),''

9043:   arXiv:hep-ph/0502221;

9044:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502221;%%

9045: %\cite{Hatta:2005rn}

9046: %\bibitem{Hatta:2005rn}

9047:   Y.~Hatta, E.~Iancu, L.~McLerran, A.~Stasto and D.~N.~Triantafyllopoulos,

9048:   %``Effective Hamiltonian for QCD evolution at high energy,''

9049:   arXiv:hep-ph/0504182.

9050:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504182;%%

9051: 

9052: 

9053: 

9054: %\cite{Levin:2004yd}

9055: \bibitem{loop4}

9056:   E.~Levin and M.~Lublinsky,

9057:   %``Balitsky's hierarchy from Mueller's dipole model and more about target

9058:   %correlations,''

9059:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 607}, 131 (2005)

9060:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0411121];

9061:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411121;%%

9062: %\cite{Levin:2005au}

9063: %\bibitem{Levin:2005au}

9064: %  E.~Levin and M.~Lublinsky,

9065:   %``Towards a symmetric approach to high energy evolution: Generating

9066:   %functional with Pomeron loops,''

9067:   arXiv:hep-ph/0501173.

9068:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501173;%%

9069: 

9070: %\cite{Kovner:2005nq}

9071: \bibitem{loop5}

9072:   A.~Kovner and M.~Lublinsky,

9073:   %``In pursuit of pomeron loops: The JIMWLK equation and the Wess-Zumino

9074:   %term,''

9075:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 085004 (2005)

9076:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0501198];

9077:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501198;%%

9078: %\cite{Kovner:2005jc}

9079: %\bibitem{Kovner:2005jc}

9080: %  A.~Kovner and M.~Lublinsky,

9081:   %``Remarks on high energy evolution,''

9082:   JHEP {\bf 0503}, 001 (2005)

9083:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0502071];

9084:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502071;%%

9085: %\cite{Kovner:2005en}

9086: %\bibitem{Kovner:2005en}

9087: %  A.~Kovner and M.~Lublinsky,

9088:   %``From target to projectile and back again: Selfduality of high energy

9089:   %evolution,''

9090:   arXiv:hep-ph/0502119;

9091:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502119;%%

9092: %\cite{Kovner:2005uw}

9093: %\bibitem{Kovner:2005uw}

9094: %  A.~Kovner and M.~Lublinsky,

9095:   %``Dense - dilute duality at work: Dipoles of the target,''

9096:   arXiv:hep-ph/0503155.

9097:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503155;%%

9098: 

9099: 

9100: 

9101: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

9102: 

9103: 

9104: %\cite{Buchmuller:1998jv}

9105: \bibitem{Hebecker}

9106:   W.~Buchmuller, T.~Gehrmann and A.~Hebecker,

9107:   %``Inclusive and diffractive structure functions at small x,''

9108:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 537}, 477 (1999)

9109:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9808454];

9110:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808454;%%

9111: %\cite{Buchmuller:1996xw}

9112: %\bibitem{Buchmuller:1996xw}

9113:   W.~Buchmuller, M.~F.~McDermott and A.~Hebecker,

9114:   %``Gluon radiation in diffractive electroproduction,''

9115:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 487}, 283 (1997)

9116:   [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 500}, 621 (1997)]

9117:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9607290];

9118:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607290;%%

9119: %\cite{Buchmuller:1995mr}

9120: %\bibitem{Buchmuller:1995mr}

9121:   W.~Buchmuller and A.~Hebecker,

9122:   %``Semiclassical Approach to Structure Functions at Small x,''

9123:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 476}, 203 (1996)

9124:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9512329].

9125:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512329;%%

9126: 

9127: %\cite{Kovchegov:1999kx}

9128: \bibitem{KMc}

9129:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov and L.~D.~McLerran,

9130:   %``Diffractive structure function in a quasi-classical approximation,''

9131:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 054025 (1999)

9132:   [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 62}, 019901 (2000)]

9133:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9903246].

9134:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903246;%%

9135: 

9136: %\cite{Kovchegov:1999ji}

9137: \bibitem{KL}

9138:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov and E.~Levin,

9139:   %``Diffractive dissociation including multiple pomeron exchanges in high

9140:   %parton density QCD,''

9141:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 577}, 221 (2000)

9142:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9911523].

9143:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911523;%%

9144: 

9145: %\cite{Kovchegov:2001ni}

9146: \bibitem{yuridiff}

9147:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov,

9148:   %``Diffractive gluon production in proton nucleus collisions and in DIS,''

9149:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 114016 (2001)

9150:   [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 68}, 039901 (2003)]

9151:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0107256].

9152:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107256;%%

9153: 

9154: 

9155: 

9156: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

9157: 

9158: 

9159: 

9160: 

9161: %\cite{Jaroszewicz:1980mq}

9162: \bibitem{Jar}

9163: T.~Jaroszewicz,

9164: %``Infrared Divergences And Regge Behavior In QCD,''

9165: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 11}, 965 (1980).

9166: %%CITATION = APPOA,B11,965;%%

9167: 

9168: %\cite{Mueller:up}

9169: \bibitem{MuellerCarg}

9170: A.~H.~Mueller,

9171: %``Deep Inelastic Scattering And Small X Physics,''

9172: CU-TP-658

9173: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=cu-tp-658}{SPIRES entry}

9174: {\it Lectures given at NATO Advanced Study Institute: Frontiers in

9175: Particle Physics, Cargese, France, 1-13 Aug 1994.}

9176: 

9177: %\cite{Lepage:1980fj}

9178: \bibitem{BL}

9179: G.~P.~Lepage and S.~J.~Brodsky,

9180: %``Exclusive Processes In Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics,''

9181: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22}, 2157 (1980).

9182: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,2157;%%

9183: 

9184: %\cite{Brodsky:1997de}

9185: \bibitem{BPP}

9186: S.~J.~Brodsky, H.~C.~Pauli and S.~S.~Pinsky,

9187: %``Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone,''

9188: Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 301}, 299 (1998)

9189: [arXiv:hep-ph/9705477].

9190: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705477;%%

9191: 

9192: %\cite{Forshaw:dc}

9193: \bibitem{FR}

9194: J.~R.~Forshaw and D.~A.~Ross, {\it Quantum Chromodynamics And The

9195: Pomeron}, Cambridge University Press, 1997. 

9196: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=4124910}{SPIRES entry}

9197: 

9198: %\cite{Lipatov:1985uk}

9199: \bibitem{Lipatov2}

9200: L.~N.~Lipatov,

9201: %``The Bare Pomeron In Quantum Chromodynamics,''

9202: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 63}, 904 (1986)

9203: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 90}, 1536 (1986)].

9204: %%CITATION = SPHJA,63,904;%%

9205: 

9206: %\cite{Gribov:ac}

9207: \bibitem{GLR2}

9208: L.~V.~Gribov, E.~M.~Levin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

9209: %``Singlet Structure Function At Small X: Unitarization Of Gluon Ladders,''

9210: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 188}, 555 (1981).

9211: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B188,555;%%

9212: 

9213: %\cite{Brodsky:1984nx}

9214: \bibitem{Chevy}

9215: S.~J.~Brodsky, J.~C.~Collins, S.~D.~Ellis, J.~F.~Gunion and A.~H.~Mueller,

9216: %``Intrinsic Chevrolets At The Ssc,''

9217: DOE/ER/40048-21 P4

9218: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=doe\%2Fer\%2F40048-21\%2Fp4}{SPIRES entry}

9219: {\it Submitted to Proc. of 1984 Summer Study on the SSC, Snowmass, CO, Jun 23 - Jul 13, 1984}

9220: 

9221: %\cite{Bartels:1994jj}

9222: \bibitem{BW}

9223: J.~Bartels and M.~Wusthoff,

9224: %``The Triple Regge limit of diffractive dissociation in deep inelastic

9225: %scattering,''

9226: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 66}, 157 (1995).

9227: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C66,157;%%

9228: 

9229: %\cite{Dokshitzer:sg}

9230: \bibitem{DGLAP}

9231: Y.~L.~Dokshitzer,

9232: % ``Calculation Of The Structure Functions For Deep Inelastic Scattering And E+

9233: %E- Annihilation By Perturbation Theory In Quantum Chromodynamics. (In

9234: %Russian),''

9235: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 46}, 641 (1977)

9236: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 73}, 1216 (1977)];

9237: %%CITATION = SPHJA,46,641;%%

9238: %\cite{Gribov:ri}

9239: %\bibitem{Gribov:ri}

9240: V.~N.~Gribov and L.~N.~Lipatov,

9241: %``Deep Inelastic E P Scattering In Perturbation Theory,''

9242: Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 15}, 781 (1972)

9243: [Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 15}, 438 (1972)];

9244: %%CITATION = YAFIA,15,781;%%

9245: %\cite{Altarelli:1977zs}

9246: %\bibitem{Altarelli:1977zs}

9247: G.~Altarelli and G.~Parisi,

9248: %``Asymptotic Freedom In Parton Language,''

9249: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 126}, 298 (1977).

9250: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B126,298;%%

9251: 

9252: %\cite{Ayala:1996em}

9253: \bibitem{AGL}

9254: A.~L.~Ayala, M.~B.~Gay Ducati and E.~M.~Levin,

9255: %``QCD evolution of the gluon density in a nucleus,''

9256: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 493}, 305 (1997)

9257: [arXiv:hep-ph/9604383];

9258: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604383;%%

9259: %\cite{Ayala:1996ed}

9260: %\bibitem{Ayala:1996ed}

9261: %A.~L.~.~Ayala, M.~B.~Gay Ducati and E.~M.~Levin,

9262: %``Unitarity boundary for deep inelastic structure functions,''

9263: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 388}, 188 (1996)

9264: [arXiv:hep-ph/9607210];

9265: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607210;%%

9266: %\cite{AyalaFilho:1997du}

9267: %\bibitem{AyalaFilho:1997du}

9268: %A.~L.~Ayala Filho, M.~B.~Gay Ducati and E.~M.~Levin,

9269: %``Parton densities in a nucleon,''

9270: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 511}, 355 (1998)

9271: [arXiv:hep-ph/9706347];

9272: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706347;%%

9273: %\cite{AyalaFilho:1997kz}

9274: %\bibitem{AyalaFilho:1997kz}

9275: %A.~L.~Ayala Filho, M.~B.~Gay Ducati and E.~M.~Levin,

9276: %``Scaling violation and shadowing corrections at HERA,''

9277: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 8}, 115 (1999)

9278: [arXiv:hep-ph/9710539].

9279: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9710539;%%

9280: 

9281: 

9282: 

9283: %\cite{Yang:1954ek}

9284: \bibitem{YM}

9285: C.~N.~Yang and R.~L.~Mills,

9286: %``Conservation Of Isotopic Spin And Isotopic Gauge Invariance,''

9287: Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 96}, 191 (1954).

9288: %%CITATION = PHRVA,96,191;%%

9289: 

9290: %\cite{Nikolaev:1990ja}

9291: \bibitem{NZ}

9292: N.~N.~Nikolaev and B.~G.~Zakharov,

9293: %``Colour Transparency And Scaling Properties Of Nuclear Shadowing In Deep

9294: %Inelastic Scattering,''

9295: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 49}, 607 (1991).

9296: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C49,607;%%

9297: 

9298: \bibitem{LL}

9299: L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, ``Textbook On Theoretical Physics. Vol. 3:

9300: Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory'', Butterworth-Heinemann,

9301: 3rd edition, (1981).

9302: 

9303: %\cite{Mueller:1988xy}

9304: \bibitem{Muesol}

9305:   A.~H.~Mueller,

9306:   %``Virtual Pair Creation In A Strong Bremsstrahlung Field: A QED Model For

9307:   %Parton Saturation,''

9308:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 307}, 34 (1988).

9309:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B307,34;%%

9310: 

9311: %\cite{vonWeizsacker:1934sx}

9312: \bibitem{WW}

9313:   C.~F.~von Weizsacker, %``Radiation Emitted In Collisions Of Very Fast Electrons,'' 

9314:   Z.\ Phys.\ {\bf 88}, 612 (1934); 

9315:   %%CITATION = ZEPYA,88,612;%% 

9316:   E. J. Williams, Kgl. Dansk. Vid. Selsk. {\bf 13}

9317:   (1935); Proc. Roy. Soc. {\bf A139}, 163 (1933).

9318: 

9319: 

9320: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2000ad}

9321: \bibitem{JMJV}

9322:   J.~Jalilian-Marian, S.~Jeon and R.~Venugopalan,

9323:   %``Wong's equations and the small x effective action in QCD,''

9324:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 036004 (2001)

9325:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0003070].

9326:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003070;%%

9327: 

9328: 

9329: %\cite{Ayala:1995kg}

9330: \bibitem{ajmv1}

9331: A.~Ayala, J.~Jalilian-Marian, L.~D.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,

9332: %``The Gluon propagator in nonAbelian Weizsacker-Williams fields,''

9333: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 2935 (1995)

9334: [arXiv:hep-ph/9501324].

9335: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501324;%%

9336: 

9337: %\cite{Ayala:1995hx}

9338: \bibitem{ajmv2}

9339: A.~Ayala, J.~Jalilian-Marian, L.~D.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,

9340: %``Quantum corrections to the Weizsacker-Williams gluon distribution function at

9341: %small x,''

9342: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 458 (1996)

9343: [arXiv:hep-ph/9508302].

9344: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9508302;%%

9345: 

9346: 

9347: %\cite{Hebecker:1998kv}

9348: \bibitem{hw}

9349:   A.~Hebecker and H.~Weigert,

9350:   %``Small-x parton distributions of large hadronic targets,''

9351:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 432}, 215 (1998)

9352:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9804217].

9353:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804217;%%

9354: 

9355: 

9356: %\cite{Fadin:1998py}

9357: \bibitem{FL}

9358:   V.~S.~Fadin and L.~N.~Lipatov,

9359:   %``BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation,''

9360:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 429}, 127 (1998)

9361:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9802290].

9362:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802290;%%

9363: 

9364: %\cite{Ciafaloni:1998gs}

9365: \bibitem{CC}

9366:   M.~Ciafaloni and G.~Camici,

9367:   %``Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation,''

9368:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 430}, 349 (1998)

9369:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9803389].

9370:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803389;%%

9371: 

9372: %\cite{Balitsky:2001mr}

9373: \bibitem{BB}

9374:   I.~I.~Balitsky and A.~V.~Belitsky,

9375:   %``Nonlinear evolution in high-density QCD,''

9376:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 629}, 290 (2002)

9377:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0110158].

9378:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110158;%%

9379: 

9380: %\cite{'tHooft:1973jz}

9381: \bibitem{'tHooft}

9382:   G.~'t Hooft,

9383:   %``A Planar Diagram Theory For Strong Interactions,''

9384:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 72}, 461 (1974).

9385:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B72,461;%%

9386: 

9387: %\cite{Itakura:2003jp}

9388: \bibitem{IKMT}

9389:   K.~Itakura, Y.~V.~Kovchegov, L.~McLerran and D.~Teaney,

9390:   %``Baryon stopping and valence quark distribution at small x,''

9391:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 730}, 160 (2004)

9392:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0305332].

9393:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305332;%%

9394: 

9395: 

9396: %\cite{Navelet:1997tx}

9397: \bibitem{NW}

9398:   H.~Navelet and S.~Wallon,

9399:   %``Onium onium scattering at fixed impact parameter: Exact equivalence

9400:   %between the color dipole model and the BFKL pomeron,''

9401:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 522}, 237 (1998)

9402:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9705296];

9403:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705296;%%

9404: %\cite{Navelet:1996jx}

9405: %\bibitem{Navelet:1996jx}

9406:   H.~Navelet, R.~Peschanski, C.~Royon and S.~Wallon,

9407:   %``Proton structure functions in the dipole picture of BFKL dynamics,''

9408:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 385}, 357 (1996)

9409:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9605389];

9410:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605389;%%

9411: %\cite{Boonekamp:1998ve}

9412: %\bibitem{Boonekamp:1998ve}

9413:   M.~Boonekamp, A.~De Roeck, C.~Royon and S.~Wallon,

9414:   %``gamma* gamma* total cross-section in the dipole picture of BFKL

9415:   %dynamics,''

9416:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 555}, 540 (1999)

9417:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9812523].

9418:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812523;%%

9419: 

9420: 

9421: %L.N. Lipatov, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 63} (1986) 904 

9422: %\cite{Lipatov:1993qn}

9423: \bibitem{Lipatov3}

9424: L.~N.~Lipatov,

9425: %``High-energy asymptotics of multicolor QCD and two-dimensional conformal 

9426: %field theories,''

9427: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 309} (1993) 394;

9428: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B309,394;%%

9429: %\cite{Lipatov:1993yb}

9430: %\bibitem{Lipatov:1993yb}

9431: %L.~N.~Lipatov,

9432: %``High-energy asymptotics of multicolor QCD and exactly solvable lattice 

9433: %models,''

9434: JETP Lett.\  {\bf 59} (1994) 596

9435: [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 59} (1994) 571]

9436: [arXiv:hep-th/9311037].

9437: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9311037;%%

9438: 

9439: 

9440: %\cite{Kovchegov:2003dm}

9441: \bibitem{KSW}

9442:   Y.~V.~Kovchegov, L.~Szymanowski and S.~Wallon,

9443:   %``Perturbative odderon in the dipole model,''

9444:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 586}, 267 (2004)

9445:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0309281].

9446:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309281;%%

9447: 

9448: 

9449: %\cite{Ryskin:yz}

9450: \bibitem{Ryskin}

9451: M.~G.~Ryskin,

9452: %``High Transverse Momentum Hadron Production In The Pionization Region And Vacuum Singularity In QCD. (In Russian),''

9453: Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 32}, 259 (1980);

9454: %%CITATION = YAFIA,32,259;%%

9455: %\cite{Levin:za}

9456: %\bibitem{Levin:za}

9457: E.~M.~Levin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

9458: %``Quantum Chromodynamics Prediction For Heavy Lepton Pair Production In Pionization Region. (In Russian),''

9459: Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 32}, 802 (1980);

9460: %%CITATION = YAFIA,32,802;%%

9461: %\cite{Levin:1987ad}

9462: %\bibitem{Levin:1987ad}

9463: %E.~M.~Levin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

9464: %``The Hadron - Nucleus Interaction In QCD At High-Energy,''

9465: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 304}, 805 (1988).

9466: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B304,805;%%

9467: 

9468: 

9469: 

9470: %\cite{Freund:2002ux}

9471: \bibitem{FRWS}

9472:   A.~Freund, K.~Rummukainen, H.~Weigert and A.~Schafer,

9473:   %``Geometric scaling in inclusive e A reactions and nonlinear perturbative

9474:   %QCD. ((T)),''

9475:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 90}, 222002 (2003)

9476:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0210139];

9477:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210139;%%

9478: 

9479: 

9480: %\cite{Iancu:2004es}

9481: \bibitem{IMM}

9482:   E.~Iancu, A.~H.~Mueller and S.~Munier,

9483:   %``Universal behavior of QCD amplitudes at high energy from general tools of

9484:   %statistical physics,''

9485:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 606}, 342 (2005)

9486:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0410018].

9487:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410018;%%

9488: 

9489: 

9490: %\cite{Dietrich:2004hq}

9491: \bibitem{DDD}

9492:   D.~D.~Dietrich,

9493:   %``Saturation momentum at fixed and running coupling,''

9494:   arXiv:hep-ph/0411192.

9495:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411192;%%

9496: 

9497: 

9498: %\cite{Kovner:2001bh}

9499: \bibitem{KW1}

9500:   A.~Kovner and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

9501:   %``Nonlinear QCD evolution: Saturation without unitarization,''

9502:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 051502 (2002)

9503:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0112140];

9504:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112140;%%

9505: %\cite{Kovner:2002xa}

9506: %\bibitem{Kovner:2002xa}

9507: %  A.~Kovner and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

9508:   %``Perturbative saturation and the soft pomeron,''

9509:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 034031 (2002)

9510:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0204277];

9511:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204277;%%

9512: %\cite{Kovner:2002yt}

9513: %\bibitem{Kovner:2002yt}

9514: %  A.~Kovner and U.~A.~Wiedemann,

9515:   %``No Froissart bound from gluon saturation,''

9516:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 551}, 311 (2003)

9517:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0207335].

9518:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207335;%%

9519: 

9520: 

9521: %\cite{Ferreiro:2002kv}

9522: \bibitem{FIIM}

9523:   E.~Ferreiro, E.~Iancu, K.~Itakura and L.~McLerran,

9524:   %``Froissart bound from gluon saturation,''

9525:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 710}, 373 (2002)

9526:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0206241];

9527:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206241;%%

9528: %\cite{Iancu:2002aq}

9529: %\bibitem{Iancu:2002aq}

9530:   E.~Iancu, K.~Itakura and L.~McLerran,

9531:   %``A Gaussian effective theory for gluon saturation,''

9532:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 724}, 181 (2003)

9533:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0212123].

9534:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212123;%%

9535: 

9536: 

9537: 

9538: 

9539: %\cite{Mueller:1970fa}

9540: \bibitem{Mueller_cross}

9541:   A.~H.~Mueller,

9542:   %``O(2,1) Analysis Of Single Particle Spectra At High-Energy,''

9543:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 2}, 2963 (1970).

9544:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D2,2963;%%

9545: 

9546: 

9547: 

9548: %\cite{Catani:1990eg}

9549: \bibitem{CCH}

9550:   S.~Catani, M.~Ciafaloni and F.~Hautmann,

9551:   %``High-Energy Factorization And Small X Heavy Flavor Production,''

9552:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 366}, 135 (1991).

9553:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B366,135;%%

9554: 

9555: 

9556: %\cite{Kopeliovich:2003tz}

9557: \bibitem{Boris03}

9558:   B.~Z.~Kopeliovich,

9559:   %``Transparent nuclei and deuteron gold collisions at RHIC,''

9560:   Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 68}, 044906 (2003)

9561:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0306044].

9562:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0306044;%%

9563: 

9564: 

9565: %\cite{Abramovsky:fm}

9566: \bibitem{AGK}

9567: V.~A.~Abramovsky, V.~N.~Gribov and O.~V.~Kancheli,

9568: %``Character Of Inclusive Spectra And Fluctuations Produced In Inelastic Processes By Multi - Pomeron Exchange,''

9569: Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 18} (1973) 595

9570: [Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 18} (1974) 308].

9571: %%CITATION = YAFIA,18,595;%%

9572: 

9573: %\cite{Bartels:1996hw}

9574: \bibitem{BR}

9575:   J.~Bartels and M.~G.~Ryskin,

9576:   %``The space-time picture of the wee partons and the AGK cutting rules  in

9577:   %perturbative QCD,''

9578:   Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 76}, 241 (1997)

9579:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9612226].

9580:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612226;%%

9581: 

9582: 

9583: %\cite{Bondarenko:2003ym}

9584: \bibitem{BKL}

9585:   S.~Bondarenko, M.~Kozlov and E.~Levin,

9586:   %``QCD saturation in the semi-classical approach,''

9587:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 727}, 139 (2003)

9588:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0305150].

9589:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305150;%%

9590: 

9591: 

9592: %\cite{Dumitru:2002wd}

9593: \bibitem{markstrikman}

9594:  A.~Berera, M.~Strikman, W.~S.~Toothacker, W.~D.~Walker and J.~J.~Whitmore,

9595:   %``The Limiting Curve of Leading Particles from Hadron-Nucleus Collisions at

9596:   %Infinite A,''

9597:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 403}, 1 (1997)

9598:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9604299]; 

9599:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604299;%%

9600:  L.~Frankfurt, V.~Guzey, M.~McDermott and M.~Strikman,

9601:   %``Revealing the black body regime of small x DIS through final state

9602:   %signals,''

9603:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 87}, 192301 (2001)

9604:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0104154]; 

9605:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104154;%%

9606:   A.~Dumitru, L.~Gerland and M.~Strikman,

9607:   %``Proton breakup in high-energy p A collisions from perturbative QCD,''

9608:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 90}, 092301 (2003)

9609:   [Erratum-ibid.\  {\bf 91}, 259901 (2003)]

9610:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0211324]. 

9611:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211324;%%

9612: 

9613: %\cite{Dumitru:2005gt}

9614: \bibitem{aaj}

9615:   A.~Dumitru, A.~Hayashigaki and J.~Jalilian-Marian,

9616:   %``The Color Glass Condensate and hadron production in the forward region,''

9617:   arXiv:hep-ph/0506308.

9618:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0506308;%%

9619: 

9620:  \bibitem{boris}

9621: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, J.~Raufeisen and A.~V.~Tarasov,

9622: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 503}, 91 (2001);  

9623: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012035;%%

9624: S.~J.~Brodsky, A.~Hebecker and E.~Quack,

9625: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 2584 (1997).

9626: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9609384;%%

9627: 

9628: %\cite{Levin:fw}

9629: \bibitem{lr}

9630: E.~M.~Levin and M.~G.~Ryskin,

9631: %``Inclusive Sections Of The Particle Production With Large Transverse Impulses

9632: %In Multiperipheral And Parton Models,''

9633: Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 21}, 1072 (1975).

9634: %%CITATION = YAFIA,21,1072;%%

9635: 

9636: %\cite{Mueller:1986ey}

9637: \bibitem{MN}

9638:   A.~H.~Mueller and H.~Navelet,

9639:   %``An Inclusive Minijet Cross-Section And The Bare Pomeron In QCD,''

9640:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 282}, 727 (1987).

9641:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B282,727;%%

9642: 

9643: %\cite{Ogawa:2004sy}

9644: \bibitem{Ogawa}

9645:   A.~Ogawa  [STAR Collaboration],

9646:   %``Forward physics at STAR: Status of analysis on forward and mid rapidity

9647:   %correlation measurements in p + p and d + Au,''

9648:   arXiv:nucl-ex/0408004.

9649:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0408004;%%

9650: 

9651: 

9652: \bibitem{ayala}

9653: A.~Ayala, J.~Jalilian-Marian, L.~D.~McLerran and R.~Venugopalan,

9654: %``The Gluon propagator in nonAbelian Weizsacker-Williams fields,''

9655: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 2935 (1995)

9656: [arXiv:hep-ph/9501324],

9657: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501324;%%

9658: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 458 (1996)

9659: [arXiv:hep-ph/9508302];

9660: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9508302;%%

9661: E.~Iancu, A.~Leonidov and L.~D.~McLerran,

9662: %``Nonlinear gluon evolution in the color glass condensate. I,''

9663: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 692}, 583 (2001)

9664: [arXiv:hep-ph/0011241].

9665: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011241;%%

9666: 

9667: 

9668: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

9669: 

9670: %\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2003mf}

9671: \bibitem{JMNV}

9672:   J.~Jalilian-Marian, Y.~Nara and R.~Venugopalan,

9673:   %``The Cronin effect, quantum evolution and the color glass condensate,''

9674:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 577}, 54 (2003)

9675:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0307022].

9676:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0307022;%%

9677: 

9678: 

9679: %\cite{Adams:2003im}

9680: \bibitem{starb2b}

9681:   J.~Adams {\it et al.}  [STAR Collaboration],

9682:   %``Evidence from d + Au measurements for final-state suppression of high  p(T)

9683:   %hadrons in Au + Au collisions at RHIC,''

9684:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 072304 (2003)

9685:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0306024];

9686:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0306024;%%

9687: %\cite{Adler:2002tq}

9688: %\bibitem{starb2b}

9689: %  C.~Adler {\it et al.}  [STAR Collaboration],

9690:   %``Disappearance of back-to-back high p(T) hadron correlations in central Au +

9691:   %Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''

9692:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 90}, 082302 (2003)

9693:   [arXiv:nucl-ex/0210033].

9694:   %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0210033;%%

9695: 

9696: 

9697: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

9698: 

9699: 

9700: %\cite{Golec-Biernat:1998js}

9701: \bibitem{GBW}

9702:   K.~Golec-Biernat and M.~Wusthoff,

9703:   %``Saturation effects in deep inelastic scattering at low Q**2 and its

9704:   %implications on diffraction,''

9705:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 014017 (1999)

9706:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9807513];

9707:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807513;%%

9708: %\cite{Golec-Biernat:1999qd}

9709: %\bibitem{Golec-Biernat:1999qd}

9710: %  K.~Golec-Biernat and M.~Wusthoff,

9711:   %``Saturation in diffractive deep inelastic scattering,''

9712: %  Phys.\ Rev.\ 

9713: D {\bf 60}, 114023 (1999)

9714:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9903358].

9715:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903358;%%

9716: 

9717: 

9718: %\cite{Guzey:2004zp}

9719: \bibitem{GSV}

9720:   V.~Guzey, M.~Strikman and W.~Vogelsang,

9721:   %``Observations on d A scattering at forward rapidities,''

9722:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 603}, 173 (2004)

9723:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0407201].

9724:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407201;%%

9725: 

9726: %\cite{Vogt:2004cs}

9727: \bibitem{Ramona}

9728:   R.~Vogt,

9729:   %``Shadowing effects on the nuclear suppression factor, R(d Au), in d + Au

9730:   %interactions,''

9731:   arXiv:hep-ph/0405060.

9732:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405060;%%

9733: 

9734: %\cite{Qiu:2004da}

9735: \bibitem{QV}

9736:   J.~w.~Qiu and I.~Vitev,

9737:   %``Coherent QCD multiple scattering in proton nucleus collisions,''

9738:   arXiv:hep-ph/0405068.

9739:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405068;%%

9740: 

9741: %\cite{Kopeliovich:2005ym}

9742: \bibitem{KNPJS}

9743:   B.~Z.~Kopeliovich, J.~Nemchik, I.~K.~Potashnikova, M.~B.~Johnson and I.~Schmidt,

9744:   %``Breakdown of QCD factorization at large Feynman x,''

9745:   arXiv:hep-ph/0501260.

9746:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501260;%%

9747: 

9748: 

9749: %\cite{Hwa:2004in}

9750: \bibitem{HYF}

9751:   R.~C.~Hwa, C.~B.~Yang and R.~J.~Fries,

9752:   %``Forward production in d + Au collisions by parton recombination,''

9753:   Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 71}, 024902 (2005)

9754:   [arXiv:nucl-th/0410111].

9755:   %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0410111;%%

9756: 

9757: 

9758:   %\cite{Bourrely:2003bw}

9759: \bibitem{sofer}

9760:   C.~Bourrely and J.~Soffer,

9761:   %``Do we understand the single-spin asymmetry for pi0 inclusive production  in

9762:   %p p collisions?,''

9763:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 36}, 371 (2004)

9764:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0311110].

9765:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311110;%%

9766: 

9767: %\cite{Iancu:2003ge}

9768: \bibitem{IIM}

9769:   E.~Iancu, K.~Itakura and S.~Munier,

9770:   %``Saturation and BFKL dynamics in the HERA data at small x,''

9771:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 590}, 199 (2004)

9772:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0310338].

9773:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310338;%%

9774: 

9775: 

9776: %\cite{Hirai:2001np}

9777: \bibitem{HKM}

9778:   M.~Hirai, S.~Kumano and M.~Miyama,

9779:   %``Determination of nuclear parton distributions,''

9780:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 034003 (2001)

9781:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0103208].

9782:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103208;%%

9783: 

9784: 

9785: 

9786: 

9787: 

9788: 

9789: 

9790: \end{thebibliography}

9791: 

9792: 

9793: \end{document}

9794: