1: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4}

2: % \documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}

3: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4}

4: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,amsmath,amssymb,epsf]{revtex4}

5: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,epsf,

6: %superscriptaddress,groupedaddress, tightenlines]{revtex4}

7: \documentclass[aps,twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,

8: epsf,superscriptaddress,groupedaddress, tightenlines]{revtex4}

9: %\usepackage{axodraw}

10: % You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references

11: % Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS

12: % BibTeX style file (bst file), so only uncomment the line

13: % below if necessary.

14: %\bibliographystyle{apsrev}

15: 

16: \usepackage{graphicx}

17: \usepackage{amsmath}

18: \usepackage{bm}

19: \usepackage{color}

20: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}

21: \newcommand{\vslash}{v\hspace*{-5.5pt}\slash}

22: \newcommand{\Aslash}{{\cal A}\hspace*{-5.5pt}\slash}

23: \newcommand{\Bslash}{{\cal B}\hspace*{-5.5pt}\slash}

24: \newcommand{\Dslash}{D\hspace*{-5.5pt}\slash}

25: \newcommand{\varepsslash}{\varepsilon\hspace*{-5.5pt}\slash}

26: \newcommand{\lqcd}{\Lambda_{QCD}}

27: \def\nslash{n\!\!\!\slash}

28: \def\bnslash{\bar n\!\!\!\slash}

29: \def\bn{\bar n}

30: \newcommand{\ri}[1]{{\color{red} #1}}

31: \newcommand{\blui}[1]{{\color{blue} #1}}

32: 

33: \def\OMIT#1{}

34: 

35: \begin{document}

36: \preprint{MIT-CTP 3625}

37: \preprint{UCSD/PTH 05-05}

38: % Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report

39: % number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.

40: % Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.

41: % Use the 'preprintnumbers' class option to override journal defaults

42: % to display numbers if necessary

43: 

44: 

45: %Title of paper

46: \title{%\mbox{}\\[4pt]

47: Factorization in $B \to K \pi \ell^+ \ell^-$ decays}

48: 

49: % repeat the \author .. \affiliation  etc. as needed

50: % \email, \thanks, \homepage, \altaffiliation all apply to the current

51: % author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail

52: % address or url should go in the {}'s for \email and \homepage.

53: % Please use the appropriate macro foreach each type of information

54: 

55: % \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last

56: % \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the

57: % other information

58: % \affiliation can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.

59: \author{Benjam\'\i{}n Grinstein}

60: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of California at San Diego,

61:   La Jolla, CA 92093}

62: 

63: 

64: \author{Dan Pirjol}

65: \affiliation{Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute for

66:   Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139}

67: %\homepage[]{Your web page}

68: %\thanks{}

69: %\altaffiliation{}

70: 

71: 

72: 

73: %Collaboration name if desired (requires use of superscriptaddress

74: %option in \documentclass). \noaffiliation is required (may also be

75: %used with the \author command).

76: %\collaboration can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.

77: %\collaboration{}

78: %\noaffiliation

79: 

80: \date{\today}

81: 

82: \begin{abstract}

83: % insert abstract here

84: We derive factorization relations

85: for the transverse helicity amplitudes in $B\to K\pi \ell^+ \ell^-$ at

86: leading order in $\Lambda/m_b$, in the kinematical region with an energetic

87: kaon and a soft pion. We identify and compute a new contribution of leading

88: order in $\Lambda/m_b$

89: to the $B\to K\pi\ell^+\ell^-$ amplitude which is not present in the

90: one-body decay $B\to K^* \ell^+\ell^-$. As an application we study the

91: forward-backward asymmetry (FBA) of the lepton momentum angular distribution 

92: in $B\to K\pi \ell^+ \ell^-$ decays away from the $K^*$ resonance.

93: The FBA in these decays has a zero at 

94: $q_0^2 = q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$, which can be used, in principle,  for determining 

95: the Wilson coefficients $C_{7,9}$ and testing the Standard Model. We point out 

96: that the slope of the $q_0^2(M_{K\pi}^2)$ curve contains the same information 

97: about the Wilson coefficients as the location

98: of the zero, but is less sensitive to unknown nonperturbative dynamics. We estimate

99: the location of the zero at leading order in factorization, and using a resonant

100: model for the $B\to K\pi\ell^+\ell^-$ nonfactorizable amplitude.

101: \end{abstract}

102: 

103: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line

104: \pacs{12.39.Fe, 14.20.-c, 13.60.-r}

105: %12.39.Fe Chiral Lagrangians

106: %14.20.-c Baryons (including antiparticles)

107: %13.60.-r photon-hadron interaction

108: 

109: % insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this

110: %\keywords{}

111: 

112: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, \pacs, and \keywords

113: \maketitle

114: 

115: %\tighten

116: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands

117: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands

118: %\section{Introduction}

119: % Put \label in argument of \section for cross-referencing

120: %\section{\label{}}

121: %\subsection{introduction}

122: %\subsubsection{}

123: 

124: 

125: 

126: \section{Introduction}

127: 

128: The rare electroweak penguin decays $b\to s\gamma$ and $b\to s

129: \ell^+ \ell^-$ are sensitive probes of the flavor structure of the

130: Standard Model, and provide a promising testing ground for the study

131: of new physics effects (see Ref.~\cite{Ali} for a recent review of the

132: experimental situation).

133: Several clean tests have been proposed in these decays, which are sensitive 

134: to the chiral structure of the quark couplings in the Standard Model. 

135: Examples of such tests involve measuring 

136: the photon polarization in $b\to s\gamma$

137: and the zero of the forward-backward asymmetry in $b\to s\ell^+\ell^-$ \cite{fb}.

138: 

139: Our understanding of these decays has advanced considerably over the

140: past few years, through the derivation of factorization relations for

141: exclusive $B\to K^{(*)} \ell^+\ell^-$ and $B\to K^* \gamma$  decays at large recoil. 

142: First derived at lowest order in perturbation theory \cite{befe,fbcor1}, 

143: these factorization theorems were proved to all orders in $\alpha_s$ 

144: \cite{bpsff,ps1,Beneke:2003pa,hillff,CK,pol,BHN}

145: using the soft-collinear effective theory \cite{scet,scet1}.

146: 

147: In this paper we introduce a new factorization relation for the multibody 

148: rare decays

149: $B\to K\pi\ell^+\ell^-$ in the kinematical region with a soft pion and an 

150: energetic kaon, at leading order in $\Lambda/m_b$. The schematic form of the 

151: factorization relation is given below in Eq.~(\ref{factmulti}). This extends the

152: application of factorization to final states in $B\to X_s \ell^+\ell^-$ 

153: containing a few hadrons, with small total invariant mass. 

154: 

155: A particularly clean test for new physics effects in these decays is based 

156: on the forward-backward asymmetry of the (charged) lepton momentum in 

157: $B\to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-$ 

158: with respect to the decay axis $q = p_{\ell^+} + p_{\ell^-}$. 

159: This is defined as

160: \begin{multline}\label{AFBdef}

161:  A_{FB}(q^2) = 

162:  \frac1{d\Gamma(q^2)/dq^2}\Bigg[\int_{0}^{1} \mbox{d} \cos\theta_+ 

163:  \frac{d\Gamma(q^2,\theta_+)}{dq^2 d\cos\theta_+}\\

164: - \int_{-1}^0 \mbox{d} \cos\theta_+ \frac{d\Gamma(q^2,\theta_+)}{dq^2 d\cos\theta_+}\Bigg]

165: \end{multline}

166: where $\theta_+$ is the angle between $\vec p_{\ell^+}$ and $\vec q$ in the

167: rest frame of the lepton pair. 

168: 

169: 

170: 

171: As pointed out in \cite{fb,ABHH}, due to certain form factor relations at large 

172: recoil \cite{ffrel,befe}, this asymmetry has a zero at $q_0^2$

173: which depends mostly on Wilson coefficients in the weak Hamiltonian

174: with little hadronic uncertainty. 

175: The position of the zero was computed in \cite{fbcor1,fbcor2,fbcor3}, using

176: the complete leading order factorization formula.

177: The most updated result, including isospin violation effects, is \cite{fbcor3}

178: \begin{eqnarray}\label{1}

179: q_0^2 &=& - 2m_B m_b \frac{\mbox{Re}(C_7^{\rm eff}(q_0^2))}{\mbox{Re }(C_9^{\rm eff}(q_0^2))}

180: (1+\tau(\alpha_s)) + 

181: \delta_{\rm fact} \\ 

182: & &= \left\{

183: \begin{array}{cc}

184: 4.15\pm 0.27 \mbox{ GeV}^2 & (B^+\to K^{*+}) \\

185: 4.36^{+0.33}_{-0.31} \mbox{ GeV}^2 & (B^0\to K^{*0}) \\

186: \end{array}

187: \right. \nn

188: \end{eqnarray}

189: Here $\tau \sim \alpha_s(m_b)$ is a radiative correction and $\delta_{\rm 

190: fact}$

191: denotes factorizable corrections which break the form factor relations. 

192: Precise measurements of the position of the zero $q_0^2$ can

193: give direct information about new physics effects through the

194: values of the Wilson coefficient $C_9^{\rm eff}$ (with $C_7^{\rm eff}$ 

195: determined from $B\to X_s\gamma$ decays).

196: 

197: The branching ratios of the $B\to K^* \ell^+\ell^-$ exclusive modes have 

198: been measured \cite{expexclusive} with the results

199: \begin{eqnarray}

200: && {\cal B}(B\to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) = \\

201: && = \left\{

202: \begin{array}{cc}

203: %(0.88^{+0.33}_{-0.29}\pm 0.10) \times 10^{-6} & \mbox{(BABAR)} \nonumber \\

204: (7.8^{+1.9}_{-1.7}\pm 1.2) \times 10^{-7} & \mbox{(BABAR)} \nonumber \\

205: (16.5\pm 2.3 \pm 0.9 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-7} &\mbox{(BELLE)}\\

206: \end{array}\right.\nn

207: \end{eqnarray}

208: Differential distributions of the $q^2$-spectrum are also available,

209: as binned branching ratios.  First measurements of the forward-backward

210: asymmetry  $A_{FB}(q^2)$ have

211: been presented by the BELLE Collaboration \cite{expexclusive}, but due to 

212: large errors the position and even existence of a zero are still inconclusive.

213: 

214: \OMIT{

215: \begin{figure}[b!]

216: \begin{tabular}{cc}

217: {\includegraphics[height=5cm]{afbkstarll.eps}}

218: \end{tabular}

219: \caption{\label{fig1} 

220: Experimental data on the forward-backward asymmetry in $B\to K^*\ell^+\ell^-$

221: decays from BELLE~\cite{expexclusive}.

222: }

223: \end{figure}

224: }

225: 

226: In practice, the $K^*$ is always observed through its strong decay products 

227: $K^* \to K\pi$. We point out that this has several interesting 

228: implications. The multibody factorization relation proven here contains

229: a new factorizable contribution 

230: to the decay amplitude of leading order in $\Lambda/m_b$, which is not

231: present in the $B\to K^* \ell^+\ell^-$ factorization relation.

232: This introduces a shift in the position of the zero of the FBA in this region. 

233: As an application of the new factorization

234: relations, we compute the correction to the position of the zero arising

235: from this effect.

236: 

237: Another novel effect is the existence of a zero of the FBA also for a nonresonant 

238: $K\pi$ pair, which occurs at a certain dilepton invariant mass 

239: $q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$ depending on the hadronic invariant mass $M_{K\pi}$. 

240: In principle, this extends the applicability of the

241: SM test using the zero of the FB asymmetry also to nonresonant 

242: $B\to K\pi \ell^+\ell^-$ decays. In practice however, the calculation

243: of the position of the zero is complicated by the appearance of additional

244: nonperturbative contributions to the amplitude. We estimate the unknown 

245: nonfactorizable amplitude in $B\to K\pi \ell^+\ell^-$ in terms of a $K^*$ resonant

246: model.

247: 

248: We propose an alternative test of the SM using the {\em slope}  of the

249: $q_0^2(M_{K\pi}^2)$ curve, which can be shown to contain the same information about

250: the Wilson coefficients as the location of the zero itself. In contrast to the

251: absolute position of the zero, which depends on less well known hadronic parameters,

252: the slope of  the zero curve can be shown to be less sensitive to such effects.

253: 

254: In Sec.~II we introduce the SCET formalism and write down the effective 

255: Lagrangian for the rare $B\to X_s e^+e^-$ decay. Sec.~III presents the factorization

256: relations for the $B\to K \pi \ell^+\ell^-$ helicity amplitudes in the kinematical

257: region with a soft pion and a hard kaon. 

258: Sec.~IV lists the expressions for distributions in these decays, and gives

259: a qualitative discussion of the zero of the FBA in the nonresonant region.

260: Sec.~V contains a numerical analysis of the asymmetry, and finally Sec.~VI

261: summarizes our results.

262: 

263: 

264: 

265: \section{SCET formalism}

266:  

267: In the Standard Model the $\Delta S=1$ rare $B\to X_s \ell^+\ell^-$ decays are mediated 

268: by the weak Hamiltonian

269: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Heff}

270: H_W = -\frac{G_F}{\sqrt2} \lambda_t^{(s)} \sum_{i=1}^{10} C_i O_i(\mu)

271: \end{eqnarray}

272: with $\lambda_q^{(s)} = V_{tb} V^*_{ts}$.

273: The dominant contributions come from the radiative penguin 

274: $O_{7} = \frac{em_b}{4\pi^2 }\bar s\sigma_{\mu\nu} P_R F^{\mu\nu} b$

275: and the two operators containing the lepton fields $\ell = e, \mu$

276: \begin{eqnarray}

277: O_9 = \frac{\alpha}{\pi}(\bar s \gamma_\mu P_L b)(\bar \ell \gamma^\mu \ell)\,,\quad

278: O_{10} = \frac{\alpha}{\pi}(\bar s \gamma_\mu P_L b)(\bar \ell \gamma^\mu\gamma_5 \ell) 

279: \,.

280: \end{eqnarray}

281: We use everywhere in this paper the operator basis for $O_{1-6}$ defined in Ref.~\cite{CMM}.

282: Smaller contributions to the amplitude arise from T-products of the operators in

283: Eq.~(\ref{Heff}) with the electromagnetic current.

284: 

285: We choose the kinematics of the decay such that the total dilepton

286: momentum $q_\mu = (p_{\ell^+} + p_{\ell^-})_\mu$ points along the 

287: $-\vec e_3$ direction, and has the components $q = (q^0, 0, 0, -|\vec q\,|)$, expressed

288: in usual four-dimensional coordinates $a^\mu = (a^0, \vec a)$.

289: The hadronic system moves in the 

290: opposite direction $+\vec e_3$ in the $B$ rest frame. We define the light-cone unit 

291: vectors $n^\mu = (1,0,0,1), \bar n^\mu =(1,0,0,-1)$.

292: They can be used to project any vector $a^\mu$ onto light-cone directions, according to

293: $a_+ = n_\mu a^\mu$ and $a_- = \bn_\mu a^\mu$. Finally, we introduce a

294: basis of orthogonal unit vectors $\varepsilon_\pm

295: = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}(0,1,\mp i, 0), \varepsilon_0 = 1/\sqrt{q^2}(|\vec q|,0,0,q_0)$.

296: 

297: 

298: 

299: We will be interested in the kinematical

300: region with $q^2 \ll m_b^2$, for which the hadronic 

301: system has a large light-cone momentum component along $n$.

302: This defines the hard scale  $Q \equiv \bar n\cdot p_X  \sim m_b 

303: \gg \Lambda$, with $\Lambda \sim 500 $ MeV the typical scale

304: of the strong interactions.

305: 

306: 

307: The effective Hamiltonian Eq.~(\ref{Heff}) is matched in the SCET$_{I}$ onto

308: \begin{eqnarray}\label{HeffSCET}

309: H_W = -\frac{G_F}{\sqrt2} \lambda_t^{(s)} \frac{\alpha}{\pi}

310: \left\{ (\bar \ell\gamma_\mu \ell) J_V^\mu + (\bar \ell\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 \ell) J_A^\mu \right\}

311: \end{eqnarray}

312: where the currents $J_{V,A}^\mu$ have each the general form

313: \begin{eqnarray}\nn

314:  J^\mu_i &=& 

315:   c_1^{(i)}(\omega)\, \bar q_{n,\omega} \gamma_\perp^\mu P_L\, b_v\\

316: && +\,

317: [c_2^{(i)}(\omega) v^\mu +  c_3^{(i)}(\omega) n^\mu ]\,\, \bar q_{n,\omega} P_R\, b_v \\

318: \label{JeffSCET}

319: &+&  b_{1L}^{(i)}(\omega_j)\, J^{(1L)\mu}(\omega_j) 

320:   + b_{1R}^{(i)}(\omega_j)\, J^{(1R)\mu}(\omega_j) \nn \\

321: %+ {\cal O}(\lambda^2) \\

322: && + \, [b_{1v}^{(i)}(\omega_j) v^\mu + b_{1n}^{(i)}(\omega_j) n^\mu ]\,\, J^{(10)}(\omega_j)  \nn

323: \end{eqnarray}

324: with $i=V,A$, and integration over $\omega_j = (\omega_1, \omega_2)$ is implicit on the right-hand side.

325: This expansion contains the most general operators up to order $O(\lambda)$,

326: with $\lambda^2 = \Lambda/Q$.

327: The subleading operators are defined as

328: \begin{eqnarray}

329: J^{(1L,1R)}_\mu(\omega_1,\omega_2) &=& \bar q_{n,\omega_1}\, 

330: \Gamma^{(1L,1R)}_{\mu\alpha}

331:   \Big[\frac1{\bar n\cdot {\cal P}} ig {\cal B}^\alpha_{\perp n}\Big]_{\omega_2}

332:   b_v , \nn\\

333: J^{(10)}(\omega_1,\omega_2) &=& \bar q_{n,\omega_1}\, 

334:   \Big[\frac1{\bar n\cdot {\cal P}} ig \Bslash^\perp_n\Big]_{\omega_2}

335:   P_L\, b_v , 

336: \end{eqnarray}

337: with $\{\Gamma^{(1L)}_{\mu\alpha}\,, \Gamma^{(1R)}_{\mu\alpha}\} =

338: \{\gamma^\perp_\mu \gamma^\perp_\alpha P_R\,, \gamma^\perp_\alpha \gamma^\perp_\mu P_R\}$.

339: The collinear gauge invariant fields are defined as $q_n = W^\dagger \xi_n$, $ig {\cal B}_\mu = W^\dagger

340: [\bar n\cdot iD_c, iD_{c\mu}^\perp] W$, with $\xi_n$ the collinear quark field and 

341: $W = \exp[-g (\bn\cdot A_{n,q})/(\bn\cdot q)]$ a Wilson line of the collinear

342: gluon field.

343: We use throughout the notations of Ref.~\cite{ps1} with

344: $n\cdot v = \bn\cdot v = 1$.

345:  

346: 

347: The Wilson coefficients of the leading order SCET operators appearing in the 

348: matching of 

349: $J_{V,A}^\mu$ are \cite{scet}

350: \begin{eqnarray}

351: && c_1^{(V)}(\omega,\mu) = \left(

352: C_9^{\rm eff} + 2m_b(\mu) \frac{n\!\cdot\! q}{q^2} C_7^{\rm eff}(\mu) (1+\tau(\omega, \mu)) \right)\nn \\ 

353: \label{c1V}

354: &&\qquad\times (1 - \frac{\alpha_s C_F}{4\pi} f_v(\omega,\mu)) 

355: + O(\alpha_s^2(Q)) \\

356: \label{c1A}

357: && c_1^{(A)}(\omega,\mu) = C_{10}(1 - \frac{\alpha_s C_F}{4\pi} f_v(\omega,\mu)) + O(\alpha_s^2(Q))

358: \end{eqnarray}

359: The effective Wilson coefficients $C_{7,9}^{\rm eff}$ include the contributions of the

360: operators $O_{1-6}$ and $O_8$. For convenience they are listed in the Appendix, together with the

361: functions $f_v(\omega,\mu)$ containing the $O(\alpha_s(Q))$

362: contribution to the Wilson coefficient of the vector current in SCET, and

363: $\tau(\omega,\mu)$ giving the additional contribution from the tensor current.

364: %We will use in our numerical evaluation the NNLL

365: %results for the Wilson coefficients $C_{9,10}$ obtained recently in Refs.~\cite{NNLL}.

366: 

367: The Wilson coefficients of the $O(\lambda)$ SCET$_{\rm I}$ operators are given at

368: leading order in $\alpha_s(Q)$ by

369: \begin{eqnarray}\label{b1LO}

370: && b^{(V)}_{1L}(\omega_1,\omega_2) = - \frac{2n\cdot q}{q^2} \Big[C_7^{\rm eff}  

371: + \frac{\bar x \omega}{8m_b} e_u \bar C_2 t_\perp(x, m_c) 

372: %+ e_d \frac{\omega_2}{x \omega m_b} C_8^{\rm eff}}

373: \Big] \nn \\

374: && b^{(V)}_{1R}(\omega_1,\omega_2) = \Big( 2m_b(\mu) \frac{\bn\cdot q}{q^2} C_7^{\rm eff} + 

375: C_9^{\rm eff} \Big) \frac{1}{\omega} \\

376: && \qquad + \frac{2n\cdot q}{q^2} \Big(

377: \frac{\bar x\omega}{8m_b} e_u \bar C_2 t_\perp(x, m_c)  \Big) \nn \\

378: && b^{(A)}_{1L}(\omega_1,\omega_2) = 0 \\

379: && b^{(A)}_{1R}(\omega_1,\omega_2) = C_{10}\frac{1}{\omega}

380: \end{eqnarray}

381: with $\omega_1 = x \omega\,, \omega_2 = - \bar x \omega$, and $\bar x = 1-x$.

382: We neglect here smaller contributions from the operators $O_{3-6}$ and the 

383: gluon penguin $O_8$, which will be retained only in the leading order SCET 

384: Wilson coefficients $c_1^{(V,A)}(\omega,\mu)$. 

385: The complete expression can be extracted from Ref.~\cite{fbcor1}.

386: The Wilson coefficients $\bar C_i$

387: are defined in the Appendix. The function $t_{\perp}(x,m_c)$

388: appears in matching from graphs with both the photon and the transverse collinear

389: gluon emitted from the charm loop

390: \cite{fbcor1} and is given in Eq.~(\ref{tperp}) of the Appendix.

391: 

392: 

393: The coupling of the virtual photon $\gamma^*\to \ell^+\ell^-$ to the light 

394: quarks can also occur through diagrams with intermediate hard-collinear

395: quarks propagating along the photon momentum \cite{CK}. (Such a description

396: is appropriate only for a range of the dilepton invariant mass 

397: $q^2 \leq 1.5$ GeV$^2$ which can be considered hard-collinear, see below.)

398: Such contributions are mediated by new terms in the SCET$_{\rm I}$ effective 

399: Lagrangian, which in the SM contains only one operator at leading order

400: \begin{eqnarray}\label{spI}

401: {\cal H}_{\rm sp} &=& \frac{4G_F}{\sqrt2} \lambda_t^{(s)}\\

402:  & & \times \sum_{q=u,d,s}

403: b_{\rm sp}^{(q)}(\omega_j) (\bar q_{\bn,\omega_3} \nslash

404: P_L b_v )(\bar q_{n,\omega_1} \frac{\bnslash}{2} P_L s_{n,\omega_2} )\nn

405: \end{eqnarray}

406: The Wilson coefficient is given by

407: \begin{eqnarray}

408: b_{\rm sp}^{(q)}(z) &=& \frac{\lambda_u^{(s)}}{\lambda_t^{(s)}} 

409: (\bar C_2+\frac{\bar C_1}{N_c}) \delta_{qu} -

410: (\bar C_4+\frac{\bar C_3}{N_c})\\

411: & & + O(\alpha_s(Q))  \nn

412: \end{eqnarray}

413: where we neglect again smaller contributions proportional to $C_8$.

414: 

415: 

416: For application to exclusive $B\to M$ form factors, with $M=\pi\,, \rho\,,\cdots$ a light

417: meson, the SCET$_{\rm I}$ effective Lagrangian

418: in Eq.~(\ref{HeffSCET}) has to be matched onto SCET$_{\rm II}$ operators.

419: This requires taking into account the interaction with the soft spectator quark

420: in the B meson \cite{scet1, bpsff}. Working to leading order in SCET$_{\rm II}$, this matching

421: contains two types of operators~\cite{bpsff,ps1,befe,CK,hillff}

422: \begin{eqnarray}\label{scet12}

423: && 

424: J_i^\mu \to 

425: c_1^{(i)}(\omega) O_{\rm nf}^\mu + [c_2^{(i)}(\omega) v^\mu +  c_3^{(i)}(\omega) n^\mu ]

426: O'_{\rm nf}  \nn \\

427: && \hspace{2cm} + J^\mu_{\rm i,f} + \delta_{i,V} J^\mu_{\rm sp} + \cdots 

428: \end{eqnarray}

429: The first type are the so-called `nonfactorizable' operators, denoted here

430: as $O_{\rm nf}^\mu, O'_{\rm nf}$. They are defined such that they 

431: include the contributions of the leading operators

432: in the SCET$_{\rm I}$ Lagrangian.

433: The second type of operators are the so-called  

434: factorizable and spectator interaction 

435: operators, denoted as $J_{\rm f}^\mu$ and $J^\mu_{\rm sp}$, respectively.

436: Although their form is similar, they arise in matching from different

437: operators in SCET$_{\rm I}$, as follows. 

438: The operators $J_{\rm f}^\mu$ are obtained from 

439: the $O(\lambda)$ operators in the SCET$_{\rm I}$ current.

440: The spectator operators contribute only to $J_V^\mu$ in Eq.~(\ref{HeffSCET}),

441: and arise from the SCET$_{\rm I}$ weak nonleptonic

442: effective Hamiltonian Eq.~(\ref{spI}).

443: The ellipses denote terms suppressed by powers of $\Lambda/m_b$.

444: 

445: 

446: The matrix elements of the nonfactorizable operators in 

447: Eq.~(\ref{scet12}) corresponding to a $B\to M_n$ transition, 

448: are parameterized in terms of soft form factors. We

449: define them as \cite{befe}

450: \begin{eqnarray}\label{zetaBM}

451: && \langle M_n(p_M)|O'_{\rm nf}|\bar B\rangle = 2E_M \zeta_0(E_M, \mu) \\

452: &&

453: \langle M_n(p_M)|O_{\rm nf}^\mu \varepsilon_{-\mu}^*|\bar B\rangle = 

454: 2E_M \zeta_\perp(E_M)

455: \end{eqnarray}

456: where in the first matrix element  $M_n$ is a pseudoscalar meson,

457: and in the second $M_n$ is a transversely polarized vector meson.

458: 

459: 

460: The factorizable operators in Eq.~(\ref{scet12}) are nonlocal 

461: soft-collinear four-quark operators. As mentioned above, they

462: are of two types, denoted as factorizable-type (f), 

463: and spectator-type (sp). 

464: The $J^\mu_{\rm i,f}$ operators have the generic form 

465: \begin{eqnarray}\label{factgen}

466: && J^\mu_{\rm i,f} \sim \int \mbox{d}x \mbox{d}z \mbox{d}k_+ 

467: b^{(i)}(z) J (x,z,k_+) \\

468: && \hspace{1cm} \times (\bar q_{k+} \Gamma_S b_v)

469: (\bar q_{n,\omega_1} \Gamma_C q_{n,\omega_2}) \nn

470: \end{eqnarray}

471: where $b(z)$ are SCET$_{\rm I}$ Wilson coefficients, and

472: $J$ are jet functions. They are given in explicit form in Eq.~(\ref{JeffIIfact}) below.

473: We use a momentum space notation for the

474: nonlocal soft operator, defined by

475: \begin{eqnarray}

476: (\bar q_{k+}^i  b_v^j)(0) = \int \frac{d\lambda}{4\pi} 

477: e^{-\frac{i}{2} \lambda k_+} \bar q(\lambda\frac{n}{2}) Y(\lambda,0) b_v^j(0)

478: \end{eqnarray}

479: with $Y(\lambda,0)= P\exp(ig\int d\alpha n_\mu A^\mu (\alpha n/2))$ a 

480: soft Wilson  line along the direction $n_\mu$.

481: 

482: 

483: 

484: 

485: There are two jet functions, defined as Wilson coefficients appearing in the 

486: matching of T-products of the SCET$_{\rm I}$ currents Eq.~(\ref{JeffSCET}) with the 

487: ultrasoft-collinear subleading Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{q\xi}^{(1)}$,

488: onto SCET$_{\rm II}$ \cite{bpsff,ps1,bprs}

489: \begin{eqnarray}

490: && T [\bar q_{n,\omega_1} ig {\cal B}_{n,\omega_2}^{\perp \alpha}]^{ia}(0)

491: [ig \Bslash_n^\perp q_n]_{\omega=0}^{jb}(y) =  \\

492: && i\delta^{ab} \delta(y_+) \delta^{(2)}(y_\perp)

493: \frac{1}{\omega} \int_0^1 \mbox{d} x \int \frac{d k_+}{4\pi}

494: e^{ik_+ y_-/2} \nn\\

495: && \times \{

496: J_\parallel(x,z,k_+) [(\nslash \gamma_\perp^\alpha)^{ji} [\bar q_{n,x\omega} 

497: \frac{\bnslash}{2} q_{n,-\bar x\omega}]\nn\\

498: && \hspace{2cm} +

499: (\nslash\gamma_5 \gamma_\perp^\alpha)^{ji} [\bar q_{n,x\omega} \frac{\bnslash}{2}\gamma_5 q_{n,-\bar x\omega}] ] \nn\\

500: && \quad + J_\perp(x,z,k_+) (\nslash \gamma_\perp^\alpha 

501: \gamma_\perp^\beta)^{ji}

502: [\bar q_{n,x\omega} \frac{\bnslash}{2} \gamma^\beta_\perp q_{n,-\bar x\omega}] \} \nonumber

503: \end{eqnarray}

504: with $\omega_1 = z\omega$ and

505: $\omega=\omega_1-\omega_2$. The jet functions 

506: are generated by physics at the hard-collinear scale $\mu_c^2 \sim Q\Lambda$,

507: and have perturbative expansions in $\alpha_s(\mu_c)$.

508: At lowest order in $\alpha_s(\mu_c)$ they are given by 

509: \cite{bpsff,ps1}

510: \begin{eqnarray}\label{jets}

511: J_{\perp,\parallel}(x,z,k_+) =

512: \frac{\pi \alpha_s C_F}{N_c} \delta(x-z) \frac{1}{\bar x k_+}

513: \end{eqnarray}

514: 

515: 

516: Finally, the spectator-type operators have the form 

517: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Heffspgen}

518: && J^\mu_{\rm sp} = 

519: \int_0^1 \mbox{d}z b_{\rm sp}(z) \int dk_-  

520: J_{\rm sp}(k_- - \frac{q^2}{n\cdot q}) \\

521: && \qquad \times (\bar q_{k_-} \gamma^\mu

522: \bnslash \nslash P_L b_v) (\bar s_{n,z\omega} \frac{\bnslash}{2} P_L q_{n,-\bar z\omega}) \nn

523: \end{eqnarray}

524: The jet function $J_{\rm sp}(k_-)$ is the same as the jet function

525: appearing in the factorization relation for $B \to \gamma\ell\bar\nu$.

526: It can be extracted from the results of Ref.~\cite{LPW}

527: and is given at one-loop order by

528: \begin{eqnarray} 

529: \label{Jsp-given}

530: J_{\rm sp}(k_-) = \frac{1}{k_-  + i\epsilon}\Big(1 + \frac{\alpha_s C_F}{4\pi}

531: (L^2 - 1 

532: - \frac{\pi^2}{6}) \Big)

533: \end{eqnarray}

534: with $L = \log[(-n\cdot q k_- - i\epsilon)/\mu^2]$.

535: 

536: The matrix elements of the factorizable and spectator operators in the

537: $\bar B\to M_n$ transition at large recoil are computed as convolutions of 

538: the product of collinear and soft matrix elements. 

539: Adding also the nonfactorizable contribution, the generic

540: form of the factorization relation for the hadronic matrix element for

541: $\bar B\to M_n$  + leptons is written as \cite{bpsff} (with $i=V,A$)

542: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Mfactgen}

543: && \langle M_n |J_i |\bar B\rangle = c_j^{(i)} 2 E_M \zeta^{BM} \\

544: && + \int \mbox{d}x \mbox{d}z \mbox{d}k_+ 

545: b^{(i)}(z) J_j (x,z,k_+) \nn \\

546: && \hspace{1cm} \times \langle 0 |\bar q_{k+} \Gamma_S b_v |\bar B(v)\rangle

547: \langle M_n |\bar q_{n,\omega_1} \Gamma_C q_{n,\omega_2} |0\rangle \nn\\

548: && + \int \mbox{d}x b_{\rm sp}(x) \phi_M(x) \int  \mbox{d}k_-

549: J_{\rm sp} (k_-) \langle 0 | \bar q_{k_-} \Gamma_S b_v|\bar B\rangle \nn\,.

550: \end{eqnarray}

551: 

552: 

553: The nonperturbative soft and collinear matrix elements appearing in this relation

554: are given by the B-meson and light meson light-cone wave functions, respectively. 

555: We list here their expressions, adopting the following

556: phase conventions for the meson states

557: \begin{eqnarray}

558: && (\pi^+, \pi^0, \pi^-) = (u\bar d, \frac{1}{\sqrt2}(u\bar u - d\bar d) , d\bar u ) \\

559: && (B^-, \bar B^0) = (b\bar u, b\bar d) \,. \nn

560: \end{eqnarray}

561: The light mesons' light cone wave functions are given by

562: \begin{eqnarray}

563: && \langle \bar K_n(p_K) | \bar s_{n,\omega_1} \bnslash P_L q_{n,\omega_2}| 0\rangle =

564: \frac{i}{2} f_K \bn\!\cdot\! p_K \phi_K(x) \\

565: && \langle \bar K^*_n(p_{K^*},\eta) | \bar s_{n,\omega_1} 

566: \bnslash \gamma_\perp^\mu q_{n,\omega_2}| 0\rangle =

567: \frac12 f_{K^*}^T \bn\!\cdot\! p_{K^*} \eta^{*\mu}_\perp \phi_{K^*}^\perp(x) \,.\nn

568: \end{eqnarray}

569: and

570: the B meson light-cone wave function is defined as \cite{befe}

571: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Bwf}

572: && \langle 0 | \bar u^i_{k_+} b_v^j|B^-(v)\rangle = \\

573: && -\frac{i}{4}f_B m_B \left\{

574: \frac{1+\vslash}{2} [\bnslash  \phi_+^B(k_+) +

575: \nslash \phi_-^B(k_+) ]\gamma_5 \right\}_{ji} \nonumber

576: \end{eqnarray}

577: The matrix element of the $\bar q_{k_-} b_v$ appearing in the last term of

578: Eq.~(\ref{Mfactgen}) 

579: can be obtained from this by the substitution $n_\mu \leftrightarrow \bn_\mu$.

580: 

581: 

582: \subsection{Factorization in multibody B decays}

583: 

584: We consider here the application of the SCET formalism to

585: rare $\bar B \to \bar K_n \pi \ell^+\ell^-$ decays into final states 

586: containing one energetic hadron $\bar K_n$ and a soft hadron $\pi$.

587: The heavy-light currents in Eq.~(\ref{JeffSCET}) contribute to such

588: processes again through T-products 

589: with the ultrasoft-collinear subleading Lagrangian \cite{scet1}. Typical

590: diagrams in SCET$_{\rm I}$ contributing to these T-products are shown in 

591: Fig.~\ref{fig4}.

592: 

593: \begin{figure}

594: {\includegraphics[height=1.8cm]{Fact1.eps}}

595: {\includegraphics[height=1.8cm]{Fact2.eps}}

596: \caption{\label{fig4} 

597: Leading order SCET$_{\rm I}$ graphs contributing to 

598: the factorizable amplitude for $\bar B \to \bar K_n \pi $ + leptons. 

599: a) the T-product $\{J_{V,A}^\mu\,, i{\cal L}_{q\xi_n}^{(1)}\}$, 

600: where the filled circle represents the SCET current $J_{V,A}^\mu$; b)

601: spectator-type contribution, with the virtual photon attaching to 

602: the light current quark; the intermediate quark propagator can be

603: either hard-collinear along the photon direction $\bn_\mu$, or 

604: hard, depending on the ratio $n\cdot q \Lambda/q^2$ being larger or 

605: less than 1, respectively.

606: After matching onto SCET$_{\rm II}$ these graphs contribute

607: to the operators $J_{\rm i,f}$ and $J_{\rm sp}$, respectively.

608: }

609: \end{figure}

610: 

611: After integrating out the modes with virtuality $p_{hc}^2 \sim \Lambda Q$ 

612: connected with the hard-collinear degrees of freedom, these T-products

613: are matched onto SCET$_{\rm II}$ \cite{bpsff}.

614: Performing a Fierz transformation of the four-quark operators, one finds

615: the following result for the factorizable operators 

616: \begin{eqnarray}\label{JeffIIfact}

617: && J^\mu_{\rm i, fact} =  -\frac{1}{2\omega} 

618: \int \mbox{d}x \mbox{d}z \mbox{d}k_+ b_{1L}^{(i)}(z) J_\perp(x,z,k_+) \\

619: &&\qquad\qquad \times 

620: (\bar q_{k_+} \nslash \gamma^\perp_\mu \gamma_\perp^\lambda P_R  b_v)

621: (\bar s_{n,\omega_1} 

622: \frac{\bnslash}{2} \gamma_\perp^\lambda q_{n,\omega_2}) \nn\\

623: &&

624: - \frac{1}{2\omega}

625: \int \mbox{d}x \mbox{d}z \mbox{d}k_+ b_{1R}^{(i)}(z) J_\parallel(x,z,k_+) \nn \\

626: &&\qquad\qquad \times 

627: (\bar q_{k_+} \nslash \gamma^\perp_\mu P_R  b_v)(\bar s_{n,\omega_1} 

628: \frac{\bnslash}{2} P_L q_{n,\omega_2}) \nn \\

629: &&

630: - \frac{1}{\omega}

631: \int \mbox{d}x \mbox{d}z \mbox{d}k_+ [b_{1v}^{(i)}(z) v_\mu + b_{1n}^{(i)}(z) n_\mu)]\nn\\

632: && \qquad \times J_\parallel(x,z,k_+)

633:  (\bar q_{k_+} \nslash  P_L b_v)(\bar s_{n,\omega_1} 

634: \frac{\bnslash}{2} P_L q_{n,\omega_2}) \nn 

635: \end{eqnarray}

636: The coefficients $b_j(z)$ are related to the

637: Wilson coefficients $b_j(\omega_1,\omega_2)$ of Eqs.~(\ref{b1LO})

638: as $b_j(z) \equiv b_j((1-z)\omega, z\omega)$;

639: the labels of the collinear fields are parameterized as 

640: $\omega_1 = x\omega, \omega_2 = -\omega (1-x), 

641: \omega = \omega_1 - \omega_2 = \bn\cdot p_M$, with $p_M$ the

642: momentum of the collinear meson $M_n$ produced by the

643: collinear part of the operator.

644: 

645: Finally, the spectator-type factorizable operators arise from

646: diagrams where the photon attaches to the light current quark 

647: Fig.~\ref{fig4}b.  Although the spectator quark is not 

648: involved in these contributions, we will continue to use the

649: same terminology as in the $B\to M_n$ case, due to the similarity of 

650: the corresponding operators.

651: 

652: 

653: The effective theory treatment of these contributions depends on the 

654: relative size of the virtuality of the photon $q^2$ and the typical 

655: hard-collinear scale $m_b \Lambda$. These two scales correspond to the

656: two terms $k_- + q^2/n\cdot q + i\varepsilon$ in the propagator of the

657: intermediate quark in Fig.~\ref{fig4}b. 

658: 

659: Several approaches are used in the literature to deal with these 

660: contributions, which we briefly review in the following. 

661: One possible approach, used in \cite{fbcor1,fbcor3} in QCD factorization, 

662: is to keep both terms in the propagator, and not expand in their ratio.

663: From the point of view of the effective theory, this approach 

664: is equivalent to treating the photon as a hard-collinear mode

665: moving along the photon $\bn_\mu$ direction \cite{CK}. This approach is 

666: certainly appropriate for real photons, and for hard-collinear photons

667: $q^2 \sim 1.5$  GeV$^2$. It is not clear whether it can be also applied to 

668: photons with $q^2 \sim 4 $ GeV$^2$, as is the case here. 

669: 

670: In this approach the spectator-type effective Hamiltonian Eq.~(\ref{spI}) 

671: contributes to exclusive decays through T-ordered products with the leading

672: order SCET$_{\rm I}$ Lagrangian describing photon-quark couplings 

673: \cite{LPW,CK}.

674: After matching onto SCET$_{\rm II}$, these T-products are matched onto

675: one single operator, which can be written as an addition to $J_V^\mu$,

676: and is given by

677: \begin{eqnarray}

678: && J^\mu_{\rm sp} =  \frac{8\pi^2}{q^2} \sum_{q=u,d,s} e_q 

679: \int_0^1 \mbox{d}z b_{\rm sp}^{(q)}(z) \int dk_-  J_{\rm sp}(k_- - \frac{q^2}{n\cdot q}) \nn\\

680: \label{Heffsp}

681: && \qquad \times (\bar q_{k_-} \gamma_\mu

682: \bnslash \nslash P_L b_v) (\bar s_{n,\omega_1} \frac{\bnslash}{2} P_L q_{n,\omega_2}) \

683: \end{eqnarray}

684: For consistency with the other factorizable operators included, we work to

685: tree level in $\alpha_s(Q)$, but keep terms of $O(\alpha_s(\mu_c))$ in the 

686: matrix elements of the factorizable operators. 

687: 

688: In the kinematical region we are interested in, a more appropriate treatment

689: of these contributions makes use of an expansion in powers of

690: $n\cdot q \Lambda/q^2 \sim 0.37 $. This is similar to the approach adopted in 

691: Ref.~\cite{bdi} for weak annihilation contributions to $B\to \pi\ell^+\ell^-$. 

692: The SCET$_{\rm II}$ operators obtained in this way are similar to those in

693: Eq.~(\ref{Heffsp}), except that the soft operator is local. Keeping terms to 

694: second order in $n\cdot q \Lambda/q^2$, the spectator operator in this approach

695: reads

696: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Heffsplocal} 

697: && J^\mu_{\rm sp} =  \frac{16\pi^2}{q^2} \sum_q e_q

698: \Big\{ \frac{q^\alpha}{q^2} (\bar q \gamma^\mu \gamma_\alpha \nslash  P_L b)\\

699: && \qquad +

700: \Big( \frac{g^{\alpha\beta}}{q^2} - \frac{2q^\alpha q^\beta}{q^4} \Big)

701: (\bar q \gamma^\mu \gamma_\alpha (-i \stackrel{\leftarrow}{D}_\beta) \nslash  

702: P_L b) \Big\} \nn \\

703: && \qquad \times \int_0^1 \mbox{d}z b_{\rm sp}^{(q)}(z) 

704: (\bar s_{n,\omega_1} \frac{\bnslash}{2} P_L q_{n,\omega_2}) \nn

705: \end{eqnarray}

706: 

707: 

708: In this paper we will adopt the latter

709: approach to the treatment of the spectator amplitude, working at leading 

710: order in $n\cdot q \Lambda/q^2$. We quote our results in terms of the first

711: approach, which has an additional convolution over $k_-$.

712: However, it is straightforward to translate between the two approaches, 

713: simply by replacing

714: \begin{equation}\label{subst}

715: J_{\text{sp}}(k_-)  \leftrightarrow 

716: \frac{n\cdot q}{q^2}

717: \end{equation}

718: below (in, e.g., Eqs.~(\ref{Hsp}) and (\ref{hspdef})). The advantage

719: of this approach is that the predictions are independent on the

720: details of the matrix elements of the nonlocal soft operator (the B meson 

721: light-cone wave functions), but can be computed exactly in the soft pion

722: limit to second order in the $n\cdot q \Lambda/q^2$ expansion.

723: 

724: 

725: In order to have a clean power counting

726: of the transition amplitudes, we divide the phase space of the

727: $B\to K\pi\ell^+\ell^-$ decay into several regions,

728: shown in Fig.~\ref{figdal}:

729: 

730: 

731: I) the region with one soft pion and one energetic

732: kaon $B\to K_n \pi_S$, $E_\pi \sim \Lambda, E_K \sim Q$ and

733: $M_{K\pi}^2 \sim \Lambda Q$. This region will be the main

734: interest of our paper.

735: 

736: II)

737: the region $B\to (K_n \pi_n)_{K^*}$ describing decays into

738: an energetic $K\pi$ pair with a small invariant mass $M_{K\pi}\sim

739: \Lambda$.  This is dominated by one-body decays into a collinear

740: meson $B\to K^*_n$, followed by $K_n^* \to K_n\pi_n$. This region

741: will be treated essentially the same way as a one-body decay.

742: 

743: III) the region with a soft kaon and an energetic pion $E_K \sim \Lambda, E_\pi

744: \sim Q$. The decay amplitude in this region is suppressed by $\Lambda/Q$

745: relative to that in the other two regions I, II, and will be neglected in the

746: rest of the paper.

747: 

748: 

749: 

750: \begin{figure}

751: \centering

752: \begin{picture}(300,170)

753: \put(10,20){\includegraphics[height=4.5cm]{dal_fba.eps}}

754: \put(-5,145){

755: {\large

756: $E_\pi$

757: }}

758: \put(-15,125){

759: {\large

760: (GeV)

761: }}

762: \put(80,-5){

763: {\large

764: $M_{K\pi}\mbox{ (GeV)}$

765: }}

766: \put(72,65){

767: {\large

768: $\mbox{ I}$

769: }}

770: \put(74,95){

771: {\large

772: $\mbox{ II}$

773: }}

774: \put(40,130){

775: {\large

776: $\mbox{ III}$

777: }}

778: \end{picture}

779: %{\includegraphics[height=4cm]{dal_fba_gr1.eps}}

780: \caption{\label{figdal} 

781: The phase space of the decay $B\to K\pi \ell^+ \ell^-$ at $q^2 = 4$ GeV$^2$,

782: in variables $(M_{K\pi}, E_\pi)$.

783: The 3 regions shown correspond to: (I) soft pion $E_\pi \sim \Lambda$;

784: the shaded region $E_\pi\leq 0.5$ GeV

785: shows the region of applicability of chiral perturbation theory; (II)

786: collinear pion and kaon $E_\pi \sim Q,

787: E_K > 1$ GeV; 

788: (III) soft kaon $E_K < 1$ GeV.

789: }

790: \end{figure}

791: 

792: We will use the SCET formalism described above to derive a factorization 

793: relation in the region (I).

794: The matrix elements of the nonfactorizable operators are

795: parameterized in terms of soft nonperturbative matrix elements,

796: in analogy with the $B\to M_n$ transition.

797: We define them as complex functions of the momenta of the final

798: state hadrons, with mass dimension zero 

799: \begin{eqnarray}\label{zeta}

800: &&

801: \langle M_n M'_S|O_{\rm nf}^\mu \varepsilon_{-\mu}^*|\bar B\rangle = 

802: \zeta_\perp^{BMM'}(E_M,p_{M'})\\

803: && \langle M_n M'_S|O'_{\rm nf}|\bar B\rangle = \zeta_0^{BMM'}(E_M,p_{M'})

804: \nn

805: \end{eqnarray}

806: 

807: 

808: The matrix elements of the factorizable and spectator-type

809: operators are given again by convolutions as in Eq.~(\ref{Mfactgen}),

810: with a different soft matrix element

811: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Mfactgen1}

812: && \langle M_n M'_S |J_{\rm i} |\bar B(v)\rangle \sim 

813: \int \mbox{d}x \mbox{d}z \mbox{d}k_+ 

814: b^{(i)}(z) J_j (x,z,k_+) \nn \\

815: && \hspace{0.5cm} \times \langle M'_S |\bar q_{k+} \Gamma_S b_v |\bar B(v)\rangle

816: \langle M_n |\bar q_{n,\omega_1} \Gamma_C q_{n,\omega_2} |0\rangle \\

817: && + \int \mbox{d}x b_{\rm sp}(x) \phi_M(x) \int  \mbox{d}k_-

818: J_{\rm sp} (k_-) \langle 0 | \bar q_{k_-} \Gamma_S b_v|\bar B\rangle \nn\,.

819: \end{eqnarray}

820: 

821: These factorization relations contain several new hadronic nonperturbative

822: matrix elements, which we define next.

823: The new $\bar B\to \pi$ soft matrix element 

824: is defined in terms of the soft operator

825: \begin{eqnarray}

826: O_{\mu}(k_+) = \int \frac{d\lambda}{4\pi} 

827: e^{-\frac{i}{2}\lambda k_+}  \bar u(\lambda \frac{n}{2}) Y_n(\lambda,0) 

828: \gamma^\perp_\mu \frac{\nslash}{2} P_R b_v(0)

829: \end{eqnarray}

830: appearing in the term in Eq.~(\ref{JeffIIfact}) proportional to $b_{1R}(z)$,

831: and in the spectator operator. In the latter, one has to take into account that 

832: the light-like separation between the fields is along the direction $\bn_\mu$,

833: rather than $n_\mu$ as in the factorizable operators $J^\mu_{\rm i, fact}$.

834: 

835: 

836: The matrix element of the operator $O_\mu$ defines a soft function $S$ as

837: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Sdef}

838: \langle \pi^+\!(p_\pi) | O_{\mu}\! (k_+) |\bar B^0\!(v) \rangle \!=\!

839: -(g^\perp_{\mu\nu} - i \varepsilon^\perp_{\mu\nu}) p^\nu_\pi

840: S(k_+, t^2, p_\pi^+)\nn\\

841: \end{eqnarray}

842: with $t = m_B v - p_\pi$.

843: For simplicity of notation, we will drop the kinematical arguments 

844: of the soft function $S(k_+, t^2, \zeta)$ whenever no risk of confusion

845: is possible, and show explicitly only its 

846: dependence on the integration variable $k_+$.

847: The matrix elements of the spectator operator in Eq.~(\ref{Heffsp})

848: are obtained from Eq.~(\ref{Sdef}), with the replacements $n \leftrightarrow \bn$ and 

849: $\varepsilon^\perp_{\mu\nu} \to

850: - \varepsilon^\perp_{\mu\nu}$.

851: 

852: The function $S(k_+)$ is the B physics

853: analog of a generalized parton distribution function (GPD), commonly

854: encountered in nucleon physics \cite{GPD}.

855: The support of this function is the range $-n\cdot p_\pi \leq

856: k_+ \leq \infty$, and its physical interpretation is different

857: for positive and negative values of $k_+$. For $k_+ > 0$ 

858: (the resonance region) the soft function gives the amplitude of

859: finding a $u\bar d$ pair in the $\bar B^0$ meson, while for

860: $k_+ < 0$ (the transition region), the soft function gives the

861: amplitude for the $b\to u$ transition of the $\bar B^0$ meson

862: into a $\pi^+$ meson. The soft function $S(k_+)$ is continuous at

863: the transition point $k_+=0$ \cite{GPD}, which is important for ensuring the

864: convergence of the $k_+$ convolutions in the factorization relation

865: Eq.~(\ref{factmulti}).

866: 

867: We recall here the main properties of the soft function $S(k_+)$,

868: which were discussed in Ref.~\cite{FK,rad}.

869: Time invariance of the strong interactions constrains it to be real. 

870: Its zeroth moment with respect to $k_+$ is given by 

871: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Snorm}

872: \int_{-p_\pi^+}^\infty dk_+ S(k_+, t^2, p_\pi^+) = -\frac14 n\cdot p f_T(t^2)

873: \end{eqnarray}

874: with $f_T(t^2)$ the $B\to \pi$ tensor form factor 

875: defined as 

876: \begin{eqnarray}\label{fTdef}

877: \langle \pi(p') |\bar q i\sigma_{\mu\nu} b | \bar B(p)\rangle =

878: f_T(t^2) (p_\mu p'_\nu - p_\nu p'_\mu)

879: \end{eqnarray}

880: Its $N$-th moments with

881: respect to $k_+$ are related in a similar way to $\bar B\to \pi$ form factors of

882: dimension $3+N$ heavy-light currents of the form $\bar q (n\cdot iD)^{N} b_v$ \cite{rad}. 

883: 

884: 

885: 

886: In the soft pion region, chiral symmetry can be used to

887: relate $S(k_+, t^2, \zeta)$ in the region $k_+ > 0$ to one of the B 

888: meson light-cone wave functions $\phi_+^B(k_+)$ defined in Eq.~(\ref{Bwf}),

889: according to \cite{GPchiral}

890: \begin{eqnarray}\label{SChPT}

891: S(k_+, t^2, \zeta) = \frac{g f_B m_B}{4f_\pi}

892: \frac{1}{v\cdot p_\pi + \Delta} \phi_+^B(k_+)

893: \end{eqnarray}

894: Here $g$ is the $BB^*\pi$ coupling appearing in the leading order heavy hadron

895: chiral effective Lagrangian \cite{wise,BuDo,TM,review}.

896: No such constraint is obtained using chiral symmetry for $S(k_+,t^2,\zeta)$ in 

897: the transition region ( $k_+ <0$).

898: 

899: 

900: Collecting all the contributions, the amplitude for $B\to M_n M'_S$ + leptons is given by

901: a sum of

902: factorizable and nonfactorizable terms, corresponding to the matrix

903: elements of the SCET$_{\rm II}$ operators in Eq.~(\ref{scet12}). This leads

904: to a factorization relation for such processes, which can be

905: written schematically as 

906: \begin{eqnarray}\label{factmulti}

907: && A(B\to [M_n M'_S]\mbox{+leptons} ) = c_i(\bar n \cdot p_M) \zeta^{BMM'} \\

908: && \quad +

909: \int dz \int dx dk_+ b_i(z) J_j(x, z, k_+) \phi_M(x) S(k_+; p_{M'}) \nonumber \\

910: && \quad +

911: \int dx\, b_{\rm sp}(x) \phi_M(x) \int dk_+ J_{\rm sp}(k_+) S(k_+; p_{M'}) \nonumber 

912: \end{eqnarray}

913: This factorization relation 

914: %Eq.~(\ref{factmulti}) for multibody decays $B\to M_n M'_S $ + leptons 

915: has several important properties \cite{GPchiral}.

916: First, the nonfactorizable contributions to the decay amplitudes of semileptonic

917: and radiative decays satisfy symmetry relations following from the universality 

918: of the soft matrix element $\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}$. They contribute only to the

919: decays $\bar B\to [M_n M'_S]_{h=-1}\ell^+\ell^-$ into final hadronic

920: states with total helicity $-1$. Second, the amplitude for $+1$ helicity is factorizable, and given by

921: a convolution as seen in the second term of Eq.~(\ref{factmulti}). 

922: Finally, the factorizable terms contain a new source of strong phases,

923: arising from the region $k_+\leq 0$ where the jet function develops a nonzero

924: absorbtive part. This represents a new, factorizable, mechanism for generating final state

925: rescattering.

926: 

927: Treating the spectator amplitudes in an expansion in powers of $n\cdot q\Lambda/q^2$

928: according to Eq.~(\ref{Heffsplocal}), the soft matrix elements are given by

929: $B\to \pi$ form factors of dimension-3 and 4 local operators. The leading order term

930: contains the form factors of the vector current

931: \begin{eqnarray}

932: \langle \pi(p_\pi)|\bar u \gamma_\mu b|\bar B(p)\rangle \!\!=\!\!

933: f_+(t^2) (p+p_\pi)_\mu\!\! +\!\! f_-(t^2) (p\! -\! p_\pi)_\mu

934: \end{eqnarray}

935: The $f_\pm(t^2)$ form factors appear in the matrix element of Eq.~(\ref{Heffsplocal})

936: in the combination $f_+ - f_-$. 

937: %which is related to the tensor form factor $f_T(t^2)$

938: %defined in Eq.~(\ref{fTdef}) by the heavy quark symmetry relation $f_+ - f_- = m_B f_T$. 

939: In the hard photon approach, the last term of Eq.~(\ref{factmulti})

940: has the form $A_{\rm sp} \sim f_T(t^2) \int_0^1 dx\, b_{\rm sp}(x) \phi_M(x)$, which follows

941: from making the substitution Eq.~(\ref{subst}) in this relation, and using Eq.~(\ref{Snorm}).

942: 

943: At subleading order in $n\cdot q\Lambda/q^2$, the form factors of dimension-4

944: currents $\bar u \gamma_\alpha iD_\beta  b$ are also needed. They can be computed in the

945: soft pion limit using chiral perturbation theory methods as discussed in Ref.~\cite{GP1}.

946: 

947: 

948: In the following section

949: we derive the detailed form of these factorization relations for the

950: $\bar B\to K\pi\ell^+\ell^-$ decays.

951: 

952: 

953: 

954: \section{Factorization relations for $\bar B\to K\pi \ell^+\ell^-$}

955:   

956: The decay amplitudes $\bar B\to \bar K_n \pi\ell^+\ell^-$ into an energetic

957: kaon and one soft pion can be parameterized in terms of 6 independent

958: helicity amplitudes $H^{(V,A)}_\lambda(\bar B\to \bar K_n \pi)$ with $\lambda

959: = \pm 1, 0$. They are defined as the matrix elements of the two

960: hadronic currents in Eq.~(\ref{HeffSCET})

961: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Hdef}

962: H^{(V,A)}_\lambda(\bar B\to \bar K_n \pi) = 

963: \varepsilon_\lambda^{\mu *}\langle \bar K \pi|

964: J_{V,A}^\mu |\bar B(v)\rangle

965: \end{eqnarray}

966: 

967: 

968: Working at leading order in $1/m_b$, the helicity amplitudes

969: can be written as a sum of nonfactorizable and factorizable terms,

970: arising from the corresponding SCET$_{\rm II}$ operators in Eq.~(\ref{scet12})

971: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Hsum}

972: H^{(V,A)}_\lambda(B\to K_n \pi) \!=\!\!\!\! \sum_{i=\rm nf,f, sp}\!\!

973: H^{(V,A),i}_\lambda(B\to K_n \pi) 

974: \end{eqnarray}

975: The three contributions to each helicity amplitudes are computed as described

976: in Sec.~II. The nonfactorizable terms are given in terms of the soft functions

977: $\zeta_i^{BK\pi}$ defined in Eq.~(\ref{zeta}), and the factorizable and 

978: spectator contributions

979: are given by factorization relations of the form shown in Eq.~(\ref{factmulti}).

980: In this section we present explicit results for the transverse

981: helicity amplitudes.

982: 

983: 

984: We start by recalling the results for the one-body decays $B\to K^*_n \ell^+\ell^-$. The 

985: factorization relations for this case are well-known

986: \cite{fbcor1,bpsff,ps1,Beneke:2003pa,CK,pol} and are given by

987: (with $i=V,A$)

988: \begin{eqnarray}\label{H+I}

989: && H_+^{(i)}(\bar B\to \bar K^*_n) = 0\\

990: \label{H-I}

991: && H_-^{(i)}(\bar B\to \bar K^*_n) = 

992: c_1^{(i)}\bar n\cdot p_{K^*} \zeta_\perp^{BK^*}\\

993: && \hspace{1cm} - 

994: m_B^2 \int_0^1 dz b_{1L}^{(i)}(z) \zeta_{J\perp}^{BK^*}(z) \nn 

995: \end{eqnarray}

996: Note that the leading order spectator operator does not contribute to the 

997: decay with a transverse vector meson in the final state.

998: 

999: The function $\zeta_{J\perp}^{BK^*}(z)$ appearing in the factorizable

1000: term is defined as a convolution of the jet function with the 

1001: light-cone wave functions of the $K^*$ and $B$ mesons

1002: \begin{eqnarray}

1003: \zeta_{J\perp }^{BK^*}\!(z) \!=\! \frac{f_B f_{K^*}^T}{m_B}\!\int \!

1004: d\!x d k_+ J_\perp(x,z,k_+) \phi_B^+(k_+) \phi_{K^*}^\perp(x)

1005: \end{eqnarray}

1006: Using the result for the jet function Eq.~(\ref{jets}) at

1007: leading order in $\alpha_s(\mu_c)$, the integrals can be 

1008: performed explicitly, and the function $\zeta_{J\perp}(z)$

1009: is given by

1010: \begin{eqnarray}\label{zetaJtree}

1011: \zeta_{J\perp }^{BK^*}(z) = \frac{\pi \alpha_s C_F}{N_c} \frac{f_B f_{K^*}^T}{m_B}

1012: \frac{1}{\lambda_{B+}} \frac{\phi_{K^*}^\perp(z)}{\bar z}

1013: \end{eqnarray}

1014: with the first inverse moment of the B wave function 

1015: \begin{eqnarray}

1016: \lambda_{B+}^{-1} = \int_0^\infty dk_+ \frac{\phi_+^B(k_+)}{k_+}

1017: \end{eqnarray}

1018: 

1019: The corresponding amplitudes for the charge conjugate mode

1020: $B\to K^*_n\ell^+ \ell^-$ are obtained from this by exchanging

1021: $H_+ \leftrightarrow H_-$.

1022: The vanishing of the right-handed helicity amplitude at leading order in

1023: $\Lambda/m_b$ is a general result for the soft (nonfactorizable) component

1024: of the form factors in $B\to M_n$, combined with the absence of the

1025: factorizable contribution for this particular transition.

1026: This result is usually expressed as two exact symmetry relations among the

1027: tensor and vector $B\to V$

1028: form factors at large recoil \cite{ffrel,befe}.

1029: 

1030: 

1031: We proceed next to discuss the multibody

1032: decays $\bar B\to \bar K\pi \ell^+\ell^-$, in the kinematical

1033: region with $q^2 \sim 4$ GeV$^2$.  According to the discussion

1034: of Sec.~II.A, the form of the factorization relation is different

1035: in the three regions of the Dalitz plot shown in Fig.~\ref{figdal}.

1036: Our main interest is in the region I, with one energetic kaon, and 

1037: a soft pion. In this paper we prove a new factorization relation for

1038: the transverse helicity amplitudes in this region.

1039: 

1040: 

1041: 

1042: We consider for definiteness the mode $\bar B^0 \to K_n^- \pi^+ \ell^+\ell^-$.

1043: Collecting the partial results in Sec.~II.A, 

1044: we find the following results for the transverse helicity amplitudes in this

1045: mode (with $i=V,A$), valid in the region I 

1046: \begin{eqnarray}\label{HKplpimi}

1047: && H_-^{(i)}(\bar B^0 \to K_n^- \pi^+ \ell^+\ell^-) = 

1048: H_{\rm nf}^{(i)} + \delta_{i,V} \frac23 H_{\rm sp}^{(u)} \\

1049: && H_+^{(i)}(\bar B^0 \to K_n^- \pi^+ \ell^+\ell^-) = H_{\rm f}^{(i)}

1050: \end{eqnarray}

1051: where the three terms correspond to the nonfactorizable, spectator and factorizable

1052: terms in Eq.~(\ref{Hsum}), respectively. They are given by

1053: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Hnf}

1054: && H_{\rm nf}^{(i)} = c_1^{(i)}(\bn\cdot p_K, \mu)  \zeta_\perp^{BK\pi} \,,\\

1055: && H_{\rm f}^{(i)} = -\frac12 f_K (\varepsilon_+^*\cdot p_\pi) \\

1056: && \times \int_0^1 dz dx b_{1R}^{(i)}(z) \int_{-p_\pi^+}^{\infty} dk_+ 

1057: J_\parallel (x,z,k_+) S(k_+) \phi_K(x)\,, \nn \\

1058: && H_{\rm sp}^{(q)} = \frac{(4\pi)^2}{q^2} 

1059: f_K (\bn\cdot p_K)(\varepsilon_-^*\cdot p_\pi) 

1060: \label{Hsp}\\

1061: && \times \int_0^1 dx b_{\rm sp}^{(q)}(x) \phi_K(x) 

1062: \int_{-p_{\pi-}}^{\infty} dk_- J_{\rm sp}(k_-)

1063: S(k_-) \nn \,.

1064: \end{eqnarray}

1065: 

1066: The nonfactorizable operators contribute only to the left-handed helicity

1067: amplitudes, and are given by the soft functions $\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}$.

1068: They are the same for both $i=V,A$ amplitudes. Furthermore, the same

1069: soft functions would appear also in factorization relations for semileptonic

1070: decays into multibody states, such as $\bar B\to \pi_n \pi \ell\bar\nu$.

1071: This universality is the analog of the form factor relations for the 

1072: nonfactorizable amplitudes \cite{ffrel,befe}, well-known from one-body

1073: decays, to the multibody case.

1074: 

1075: The factorizable operators give nonvanishing 

1076: contributions $H_{\rm f}^{(i)}$ to the right-handed helicity amplitudes. The appearance

1077: of these contributions is a new effect, specific to the multibody decays

1078: \cite{pol,GPchiral}. On the other hand, the spectator operator contributes

1079: only to the left-handed helicity amplitudes.

1080: 

1081: The helicity amplitudes for  all other 

1082: $\bar B\to K_n\pi\ell^+\ell^-$ decays can be obtained in a similar way. 

1083: The results are tabulated in Table \ref{Htable}.

1084: 

1085: 

1086: \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages

1087: \caption{\label{Htable} 

1088: The transverse helicity amplitudes $H_\pm^{(i)}$ with $i=V,A$,

1089: for the different charge states in $\bar B\to \bar K_n\pi \ell^+\ell^-$ 

1090: decays, at leading order in $\Lambda/Q$. The building blocks $H_{\rm nf}^{(i)},

1091: H_{\rm f}^{(i)}, H_{\rm sp}^{(q)}$ are given in Eqs.~(\ref{Hnf})-(\ref{Hsp}).

1092: }

1093: \begin{ruledtabular}

1094: \begin{tabular}{|r|c|c|}

1095:  &  $H_{-}^{(i)}$ & $H_{+}^{(i)}$ \\

1096: \hline

1097: $\bar B^0 \to K^-\pi^+\ell^+\ell^-$ & 

1098:   $H_{\rm nf}^{(i)}  + \delta_{i,V} \frac23 H_{\rm sp}^{(u)}$ & 

1099:   $H_{\rm f}^{(i)}$ \\

1100: $K_S\pi^0\ell^+\ell^-$ & 

1101:   $\frac12 (H_{\rm nf}^{(i)} - \delta_{i,V} \frac13 H_{\rm sp}^{(d)})$ & 

1102:   $\frac12 H_{\rm f}^{(i)}$ \\

1103: \hline

1104: $B^- \to K^-\pi^0\ell^+\ell^-$ & 

1105:   $\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(H_{\rm nf}^{(i)}  + \delta_{i,V} \frac23 H_{\rm sp}^{(u)})$ &

1106:   $\frac{1}{\sqrt2}H_{\rm f}^{(i)}$ \\

1107: $K_S \pi^-\ell^+\ell^-$ & 

1108:   $\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(H_{\rm nf}^{(i)} - \delta_{i,V} \frac13 H_{\rm sp}^{(d)})$ & 

1109:   $\frac{1}{\sqrt2}H_{\rm f}^{(i)}$ \\

1110: \end{tabular}

1111: \end{ruledtabular}

1112: \end{table}

1113: 

1114: 

1115: The structure of these results displays universality of hard-collinear effects.

1116: This is manifested as the fact that all factorizable terms $H_{\rm f}^{(i)}$ 

1117: depend on the same $x,k_+$ convolution 

1118: \begin{eqnarray}

1119: I_{\rm f}(z,p_\pi) \equiv \int_0^1 dx

1120: \int_{-p_{\pi}^+}^{\infty} dk_+ 

1121: J_\parallel (x,z,k_+) S(k_+) \phi_K(x)

1122: \end{eqnarray}

1123: and all spectator contributions depend on the same $k_-$ integral

1124: \begin{eqnarray}

1125: I_{\rm sp}(n\cdot q) = 

1126: \int_{-p_{\pi}^-}^{\infty} dk_- 

1127: J_{\rm sp}(k_-) S(k_-) 

1128: \end{eqnarray} 

1129: This universality is similar to that appearing in other factorization relations

1130: in exclusive decays. Examples are the relation

1131: between the rare leptonic decays $B_s\to \ell^+\ell^-\gamma$ and the

1132: radiative leptonic decay $B\to \gamma\ell\bar\nu$ \cite{LPW}, and the 

1133: relation among factorizable contributions in heavy-light form factors at 

1134: large recoil, and the nonleptonic $B$ decays into two light mesons \cite{bprs}. 

1135: The integral $I_{\rm sp}(n\cdot q)$ appears also in the leading order factorization

1136: relation for exclusive semileptonic radiative decay $B\to \pi\gamma 

1137: \ell\bar \nu$ \cite{rad}, and could be determined from measurements

1138: of this decay.

1139: 

1140: Treating the spectator amplitude using the $n\cdot q \Lambda/q^2$ expansion,

1141: the amplitude $H_{\rm sp}^{(q)}$ can be obtained as explained from Eq.~(\ref{Hsp}),

1142: at leading order in this expansion, by the substitution Eq.~(\ref{subst})

1143: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Hsp1}

1144: && H_{\rm sp}^{(q)} = - \frac{4\pi^2}{q^2 \bn\cdot q} f_K m_B \bn\cdot p_K 

1145: (\varepsilon_-^*\cdot p_\pi) f_T(t^2) \\

1146: && \qquad \times \int_0^1 dz b_{\rm sp}^{(q)}(z) \phi_K(z) \nn

1147: \end{eqnarray}

1148: 

1149: 

1150: In the numerical estimates of this paper, we will use the leading order

1151: chiral perturbation theory result Eq.~(\ref{SChPT}) for the soft function

1152: $S(k_+)$ in the resonance region

1153: $k_+ > 0$. The contribution to the $k_+$ convolutions in $H_{\rm f}^{(i)}$

1154: and $H_{\rm sp}^{(q)}$ from the transition region $-n\cdot p_\pi \leq k_+ \leq 0$ will be

1155: neglected, which

1156: can be expected to be a good approximation for very soft pions

1157: (the region $E_\pi \leq 500 $ MeV, corresponding to the lower shaded region in 

1158: Fig.~\ref{figdal}). 

1159: We emphasize that, although

1160: the use of the chiral perturbation theory result for $S(k_+)$ is restricted 

1161: to part of the region (I), the factorization relations proved in this paper

1162: are valid over the entire region (I). Their unrestricted application requires a model

1163: for the soft function $S(k_+)$ whose validity extends beyond the limitations of

1164: chiral perturbation theory.

1165: 

1166: 

1167: With these approximations, additional universality emerges,

1168: connecting the amplitudes in this problem to other B decays, to all orders in

1169: the perturbative expansion at the hard-collinear scale.

1170: The factorizable helicity amplitudes $H_{\rm f}^{(i)}$

1171: take a simpler form, and can be written as

1172: \begin{eqnarray}\label{HfChPT}

1173: H_{\rm f}^{(i)} = \frac12 m_B^2 S_R(p_\pi)

1174:  \int_0^1 dz b_{1R}^{(i)}(z) \zeta_{J}^{BK}(z)

1175: \end{eqnarray}

1176: where the nonperturbative dynamics is contained in the factorizable convolution

1177: defined as

1178: \begin{eqnarray}

1179: \zeta_J^{BK}(z) \!=\! \frac{f_B f_K}{m_B}\!\int_0^1 \!\!\!\!

1180: dx \!\int_0^{\infty} \!\!\!\! dk_+ \! J_\parallel(x,z,k_+) \phi_B^+(k_+) \phi_{K}(x)

1181: \end{eqnarray}

1182: The same function appears also in the factorizable contribution 

1183: to the $B\to K$

1184: form factors at large recoil \cite{bpsff}, and in the factorization

1185: relation for nonleptonic 

1186: decays $B\to KM$

1187: with $M = \pi, K, \cdots$ a light meson \cite{bprs}.

1188: The pion momentum dependence in Eq.~(\ref{HfChPT}) 

1189: is contained in the function $S_R(p_\pi)$

1190: given by \cite{GPchiral}

1191: \begin{eqnarray}

1192: S_R(p_\pi) = \frac{g}{f_\pi} \frac{\varepsilon_+^*\cdot p_\pi}

1193: {v\cdot p_\pi + \Delta - i\Gamma_{B^*}/2}

1194: \end{eqnarray}

1195: with $\Delta = m_{B^*}-m_B \simeq 50$ MeV. 

1196: 

1197: A similar result is obtained for the spectator amplitude at leading

1198: order in chiral perturbation theory, for which we find (treating the 

1199: $q^2$ as a hard-collinear scale)

1200: \begin{eqnarray}\label{HspChPT}

1201: && H_{\rm sp}^{(q)} = \frac{4\pi^2}{q^2} 

1202: f_B f_K m_B (\bn\!\cdot\! p_K)

1203: \Big(\frac{g}{f_\pi} \frac{\varepsilon_-^*\cdot p_\pi}{v\cdot p_\pi + \Delta}

1204: \Big) \\

1205: && \qquad  \times

1206: \int_0^1 dx b_{\rm sp}^{(q)}(x) \phi_K(x) 

1207: \int_0^\infty dk_- J_{\rm sp}(k_-) \phi_+^B(k_-) \nn

1208: \end{eqnarray}

1209: The $k_-$ convolution in this relation is identical to that appearing 

1210: in the leading order factorization relation for radiative semileptonic 

1211: decays $B\to\gamma \ell \bar \nu$. 

1212: 

1213: 

1214: Adopting the approach of expanding in $n\cdot q \Lambda/q^2$, the 

1215: result for $H_{\rm sp}^{(q)}$ requires the $B\to \pi$ form

1216: factors, for which one finds at leading order in HHChPT \cite{wise,BuDo,TM,review}

1217: \begin{eqnarray}

1218: m_B f_T(t^2) = f_+(t^2) - f_-(t^2) = -g\frac{f_B m_B}{f_\pi} \frac{1}{E_\pi + \Delta}

1219: \end{eqnarray}

1220: We will use these expressions together with 

1221: Eq.~(\ref{Hsp1}) in the numerical evaluations of Sec.~V.

1222: 

1223: 

1224: \section{Decay rates and the FB asymmetry}

1225: 

1226: 

1227: The differential decay rate for $B\to K\pi \ell^+\ell^-$ is given by

1228: (see, e.g. \cite{KM})

1229: \begin{eqnarray}

1230: && \frac{1}{\Gamma_0} \frac{d^2\Gamma}{dq^2 d\cos\theta_+ dM_{K\pi}^2 dE_\pi} = 

1231: \frac{q^2}{2(4\pi)^3 m_B^2 m_b^5}\\

1232: &&

1233: \quad \times \Big\{2\sin^2\theta_+ (|H_0^V|^2 + |H_0^A|^2) \nn \\

1234: && +\, (1 + \cos^2\theta_+) (|H_+^V|^2 + |H_+^A|^2 + |H_-^V|^2 + |H_-^A|^2)\nn\\

1235: && \quad +\, 4\cos\theta_+  \mbox{Re}(H_-^V H_-^{A*} - H_+^V H_+^{A*})\Big\} \nn

1236: \end{eqnarray}

1237: with $\Gamma_0 = G_F^2\alpha^2/(32 \pi^4) |\lambda_t^{(s)}|^2 m_b^5$.

1238: We denoted $\theta_+$

1239: the angle between the direction of the positron momentum and the decay

1240: axis in the rest frame of the lepton pair, for a fixed configuration of the 

1241: hadronic state $K\pi$ defined by $(M_{K\pi}, E_\pi)$.

1242: 

1243: Integrating over $\cos\theta_+$ one finds for the forward-backward

1244: asymmetry (FBA) defined as in Eq.~(\ref{AFBdef})

1245: \begin{eqnarray}

1246: A_{FB} \propto \mbox{Re }(H_-^V H_-^{A*} - H_+^V H_+^{A*})

1247: %A_{FB} = -\frac32 \frac{\mbox{Re }(H_-^V H_-^{A*} - H_+^V H_+^{A*})}

1248: %{\sum_\lambda (|H_\lambda^{V}|^2 + |H_\lambda^{A}|^2)}

1249: \end{eqnarray}

1250: This defines a triply differential asymmetry depending on $(q^2, M_{K\pi}, E_\pi)$.

1251: Integrating also over $E_\pi$ gives a doubly differential $A_{FB}$ depending

1252: only on $(q^2, M_{K\pi})$. We denote them with the same symbol, and distinguish

1253: between them by their arguments.

1254: 

1255: The condition for a zero of the FBA can be written down straightforwardly

1256: using the expressions for the helicity amplitudes in factorization given 

1257: previously in Sec.~III. The equation for the zero is different in the

1258: two regions (I) and (II), according to the different form of the factorization

1259: relations in each of them. It is convenient to  write this equation in a 

1260: common form in both regions, as

1261: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eqzero}

1262: \mbox{Re }\Big( c_1^{(V)} (M_{K\pi}, q^2) - a ) = 0\,.

1263: \end{eqnarray}

1264: The quantity $a$ stands for the contribution of the factorizable and

1265: spectator type amplitudes, and in general is a function of all kinematical

1266: variables $(M_{K\pi}, q^2, E_\pi)$.

1267: 

1268: In the region (II) with a collinear kaon and pion, this correction

1269: is given by the (complex) quantity

1270: \begin{eqnarray}

1271: a_{\rm II} = 

1272: -\frac{m_B^2}{E_{K^*}\,\bar n\cdot q}\,C_7^{\text{eff}}\,\frac{\zeta_{J\perp }^{BK^*\text{eff}}}{\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}}

1273: \end{eqnarray}

1274: where the factorizable coefficient, 

1275: $\zeta_{J\perp }^{BK^*\text{eff}}$, which has implicit dependence on $(M_{K\pi},q^2)$, is defined by

1276: \begin{eqnarray}

1277:  \int_0^1 dz b_{1L}^{(V)}(z)  \zeta_{J\perp }^{BK^*}(z)= 

1278: -\frac{2n\cdot q}{q^2}\,C_7^{\text{eff}} \,\zeta_{J\perp }^{BK^*\text{eff}} 

1279: \end{eqnarray}

1280: The zero of the FBA in region (II) was considered previously

1281: in Refs.~\cite{fb,ABHH,fbcor1,fbcor2,fbcor3}, treating the problem as

1282: a one-body decay $B\to K^*\ell^+\ell^-$.

1283: 

1284: In the region (I) with a soft pion and a collinear kaon, this correction

1285: contains two terms, arising from the spectator and the factorizable 

1286: contributions, respectively. We adopt everywhere in the following the

1287: leading order chiral perturbation theory results for the amplitudes

1288: given in Eqs.~(\ref{HfChPT}) and  (\ref{HspChPT}).

1289: Working at tree level in matching at the

1290: scale $\mu = Q$, but to all orders in the hard-collinear scale, one finds

1291: \begin{eqnarray}\label{aI}

1292: a_{\rm I} &=& - e_q S_R^*(p_\pi) \frac{h^{(q)}_{\rm sp}}{\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}} \\

1293: & &

1294: + \Big(\frac{m_B^2}{4E_K} \Big)^2 |S_R(p_\pi)|^2 C_9^{\rm eff} 

1295: \frac{\zeta_J^{BK} \zeta_J^{BK eff}}{|\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi} |^2} \nn

1296: \end{eqnarray}

1297: The first term contains the contribution of the spectator amplitude,

1298: and depends on the charge states of the final and initial state through

1299: the superscript $q=u,d$, denoting the flavor of the quark attaching to the

1300: photon. The quantity $h^{(q)}_{\rm sp}$, given by

1301: \begin{eqnarray}\label{hspdefhc}

1302: h^{(q)}_{\rm sp} &=& \frac{4\pi^2}{q^2}

1303: f_B f_K m_B (\bn\!\cdot\! p_K)

1304: \int_0^1 dx b_{\rm sp}^{(q)}(x) \phi_K(x) \\

1305: & &\times 

1306: \int_0^\infty dk_- J_{\rm sp}(k_-) \phi_+^B(k_-) \nn

1307: \end{eqnarray}

1308: depends on kinematic variables only through the explicit factor

1309:   of $\bar n\cdot p_K/q^2$, to the order we are working.

1310: For completeness, we quote also the expression for this amplitude at leading order

1311: in $n\cdot q \Lambda/q^2$, which is used in the actual numerical computation of Sec.~V

1312: \begin{eqnarray}\label{hspdef}

1313: h^{(q)}_{\rm sp} = \frac{4\pi^2}{q^2 \bn\cdot q}

1314: f_B f_K m_B (\bn\!\cdot\! p_K)

1315: \end{eqnarray}

1316: The first term in Eq.~(\ref{aI}) contributes to Re$(a_{\rm I})$ with an 

1317: undetermined sign, depending on the unknown $\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}$.

1318: 

1319: 

1320: The second term in Eq.~(\ref{aI}) is due to the right-handed

1321: helicity amplitudes $H_+^{(i)}$. Its dependence on $E_\pi$

1322: is explicit in $S_R(p_\pi)$, and the remaining factors depend only on $(M_{K\pi},q^2)$. 

1323: The factorizable coefficients in the numerator are defined as

1324: \begin{eqnarray}

1325: && \int_0^1 dz b_{1R}^{(V)}(z) \zeta_{J}^{BK}(z) \equiv \frac{1}{\bn\cdot p_K}C_9^{\rm eff}

1326: \zeta_J^{BK\rm eff}\\

1327: && \int_0^1 dz b_{1R}^{(A)}(z) \zeta_{J}^{BK}(z) \equiv \frac{1}{\bn\cdot p_K}C_{10}

1328: \zeta_J^{BK}

1329: \end{eqnarray}

1330: where we kept only the tree level matching result for $b_{1R}^{(A)}(z)$. Numerical evaluation 

1331: of these factorizable amplitudes in the next section shows that the contribution

1332: of this term to Re$(a_{\rm I})$ is positive.

1333: 

1334: 

1335: 

1336: To explore the implications of these results, let us assume as a starting point that 

1337: the helicity amplitudes $H_\pm$ in both regions

1338: are dominated by the nonfactorizable contributions,  proportional to $\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}$ (in region

1339: (I)), and $\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}$ (in region (II)). 

1340: This corresponds to taking $a=0$ in both regions.

1341: In this approximation, the condition for the zero of the FBA reads 

1342: simply Re($c_1^{(V)})=0$, which can be solved exactly.

1343: For the $B\to M_n$ transition, this condition reproduces the

1344: well-known result following from the large energy form factor relations

1345: \cite{fb,ABHH,ffrel,fbcor1,fbcor2}. 

1346: 

1347: Since the zero of the FBA is related to the vanishing of the 

1348: Wilson coefficient Re $(c_1^{(V)})$, 

1349: such a zero must be present also for B decays into multibody

1350: states containing one energetic kaon~\footnote{The existence of a zero of the

1351: FBA in inclusive $B\to X_s \ell^+\ell^-$ decays was noticed and

1352: studied in Refs.~\cite{FBAincl,FBAincl1}. In this paper we address only the

1353: semi-inclusive decays $B\to K_n \pi$ with low hadronic invariant mass, 

1354: for which the inclusive

1355: methods of Refs.~\cite{FBAincl,FBAincl1} are not applicable.}.

1356: In particular, the FBA in $B\to K_n \pi 

1357: \ell^+ \ell^-$ must have a zero 

1358: at a certain point $q_0^2=q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$

1359: which depends only on the invariant mass of the hadronic system. 

1360: Adding the second term in Eq.~(\ref{eqzero}) shifts the position

1361: of this zero, and introduces a dependence on the pion energy, $q_0^2 =

1362: q_0^2(M_{K\pi},E_\pi)$.  This extends the well-known result for the zero of the FBA in

1363: $B\to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-$ to multibody hadronic states.

1364: 

1365: It is interesting to comment on

1366: existing computations of the decay amplitudes and FB asymmetry in 

1367: $B\to K\pi \ell^+\ell^-$ \cite{ABHH,fbcor1,fbcor2,fbcor3}, which keep only the $K^*$ 

1368: resonant amplitude. Of course, this is justified in the region (II), where the 

1369: pion and the kaon are

1370: collinear. However, in the region (I) this contribution is in fact  parametrically suppressed,

1371: since by leading order soft-collinear factorization, the $K^*_n K_n \pi_S$ 

1372: vertex does not exist at leading order in $O(\Lambda/m_b)$.

1373: 

1374: Computing the factorizable corrections in the region (I) parameterized by the 

1375: term $a_{\rm I}$ requires

1376: that we know the nonfactorizable soft function $\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}$. 

1377: There are several possible ways of determining $\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}$ from data.

1378: For example, according to Eq.~(\ref{HKplpimi}), the helicity amplitude $|H_-^A|$ receives no

1379: factorizable or spectator contributions. Assuming that it can be isolated, its

1380: measurement would give a clean determination of $|\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}|$.

1381: Another method involves measuring $H_-^{(V)}$ in decays with a neutral kaon in the

1382: final state, for which the spectator contribution is small (see Table I).

1383: We assume that the factorizable coefficients can be computed in perturbation theory.

1384: We postpone a detailed numerical analysis for Sec.~V, and discuss in the following

1385: general properties of the zero of the FBA which are independent on the details of the

1386: hadronic parameters.

1387: 

1388: 

1389: \begin{figure}

1390: \hskip-20pt\includegraphics[height=5.3cm]{qual1.eps}

1391: \caption{\label{fig:qualitative} Plot of the zero in the

1392:   Forward-Backward Asymmetry as a function of the parameter $F$ of

1393:   Eq.~(\ref{FBAs2}), for several values of $M_{K\pi}$. The top (green) curve has

1394:   lowest $M_{K\pi}$ and the bottom (blue) one has highest  $M_{K\pi}$.

1395:   $F_0$ corresponds to the value of $F$ in the absence of factorizable

1396:   and spectator corrections. The maxima of the curves, labelled by

1397:   $F_*$, lie to the left of $F_0$ for all relevant values of $M_{K\pi}$. }

1398: \end{figure}

1399: 

1400: 

1401: \subsection{Qualitative discussion of the zero of the FBA}

1402: \label{sec:qual}

1403: Before proceeding with the details of the numerical study, we would like

1404: to discuss some of the qualitative properties of the zero of the FBA in the

1405: multibody decay $B\to K\pi\ell^+\ell^-$. The general behaviour of the

1406: solution can be seen by studying the solutions of the simplified equation

1407: \begin{eqnarray}\label{FBAsimple}

1408: C_9 + 2 m_b \frac{n\cdot q}{q^2} C_7 - a(M_{K\pi}) = 0

1409: \end{eqnarray}

1410: where 

1411: $a(M_{K\pi})$ denotes the factorizable correction.

1412: In this simplified version of Eq.~(\ref{eqzero}) we have neglected 

1413: additional dependence of $a$ on $q^2$, which is adequate if one

1414: is interested in the qualitative change in the zero in the FBA

1415: at fixed $q^2$. We also have

1416: neglected here the radiative corrections. They introduce small

1417: logarithmic dependence on $M_{K\pi}$, and do not change the

1418: qualitative features of the solution.

1419: 

1420: 

1421: It is convenient to write the equation Eq.~(\ref{FBAsimple}) in an equivalent form

1422: \begin{eqnarray}\label{FBAs2}

1423: \frac{n\cdot q}{q^2} = - \frac{1}{2m_b C_7} (C_9 - a(M_{K\pi})) \equiv \frac{F(M_{K\pi})}{m_B}

1424: \end{eqnarray}

1425: The solution to this equation gives the location, $q^2_0$, of

1426:   the zero of the FBA:

1427: \begin{equation}

1428: \label{eq:q2zero-qual}

1429: q^2_0(M_{K\pi})=\frac{m_B^2}{F}-\frac{M^2_{K\pi}}{F-1}

1430: \end{equation}

1431:  The condition that the FBA-zero lies in the physical region, $0\leq

1432: q_0^2\leq(m_B-M_{K\pi})^2$, imposes constraints on $F=F(M_{K\pi})$. The upper

1433: bound $q_0^2\leq(m_B-M_{K\pi})^2$ implies that $F(M_{K\pi})\geq 1$, while

1434: from $0\leq q_0^2$ we learn that

1435: \begin{equation}

1436: \label{eq:F-cond}

1437: F(M_{K\pi})\geq1+\frac{M^2_{K\pi}}{m_B^2-M_{K\pi}^2}\geq1\,.

1438: \end{equation}

1439: In terms of the correction $a$ the condition for the existence of a

1440: FBA-zero is therefore

1441: \begin{equation}

1442: a(M_{K\pi})\leq C_9+\frac{2m_bm_B}{m_B^2-M_{K\pi}^2}C_7\,.

1443: \end{equation}

1444: 

1445: 

1446: If the function $F=F(M_{K\pi})$ is roughly constant and satisfies

1447: the condition in (\ref{eq:F-cond}), then Eq.~(\ref{eq:q2zero-qual})

1448: gives that the zero of the FBA decreases with increasing

1449: $M_{K\pi}$. These conditions hold if $a(M_{K\pi})\ll C_9$. Since we expect

1450: the correction term to be small we also expect the FBA-zero to

1451: decrease as $M_{K\pi}$ increases. 

1452: 

1453: We can gain further insights into the solution by considering $q_0^2$

1454: as a function of $F$ for fixed $M_{K\pi}$ in

1455: Eq.~(\ref{eq:q2zero-qual}). Fig.~\ref{fig:qualitative} shows plots of

1456: $q_0^2$ vs.\ $F$ for several fixed values of $M_{K\pi}$. The sequence of

1457: curves moves down with increasing $M_{K\pi}$, which just restates the

1458: observation that at fixed $F$ the zero decreases with increasing

1459: $M_{K\pi}$. The point $F=F_0$ corresponds to $a=0$. The maxima of the

1460: curves are at $F_*(M_{K\pi})=(1-M_{K\pi}/m_B)^{-1}$, and, for physical

1461: values they lie to the left of $F_0$, that is, $F_*<F_0$. To see how

1462: $q_0^2$ depends on $M_{K\pi}$ when $F=F(M_{K\pi})$ is not constant,

1463: consider as starting value a point on the top curve. An increase in

1464: $M_{K\pi}$ first moves the point down to a lower curve (as if $F$ were

1465: constant), and then also along the lower curve to a different value of

1466: $F$. The region to the right of $F_*$ is most interesting since we

1467: expect the physical function to lie in a region of $F$ close to

1468: $F_0$. In this region, if $F$ increases with $M_{K\pi}$ then $q_0^2$

1469: decreases with (increasing) $M_{K\pi}$. The opposite is not necesarily

1470: true: whether $q_0^2$ increases with $M_{K\pi}$ or not depends on how

1471: steeply $F$ decreases with $M_{K\pi}$.

1472: 

1473: 

1474: Next, we would like to understand what the effect of changing $a\to a +\delta

1475: a$ is, corresponding to adding correction terms sequentially. A shift

1476: $\delta F>0$ for fixed $M_{K\pi}$ corresponds to moving to the right along a

1477: fixed curve. In the region to the right of $F_*$ this decreases

1478: $q_0^2$. Note that $\delta a =(2m_bC_7/m_BC_9)\delta F$ and

1479: $C_7/C_9<0$. Therefore, an 

1480: increase in  $a$ gives an increase in $q_0^2$. 

1481: 

1482: 

1483: 

1484: 

1485: \section{Numerical study}

1486: 

1487: We investigate in this section the numerical effects of the new right-handed 

1488: amplitude on the position of the zero of the FB asymmetry. As explained, 

1489: we treat separately the decay amplitudes in the two regions (I) and (II), and

1490: ignore the contribution from region (III). For definiteness, we consider here the

1491: mode $\bar B^0 \to  K^-\pi^+\ell^+\ell^-$ for which the soft pion detection efficiency

1492: is better than for the neutral pion modes.

1493: 

1494: The decay amplitudes in the collinear region (II) will be represented by a

1495: Breit-Wigner model, as

1496: \begin{eqnarray}

1497: && H_-^V(\bar B^0 \to K^- \pi^+ \ell^+\ell^-) = h_-^V(\bar B\to \bar K^*) \\

1498: && \qquad \times g_{K^* K\pi} (\varepsilon_-^*\cdot p_\pi) BW_{K^*}(M_{K\pi})\nn \\

1499: && H_-^A(\bar B^0 \to K^- \pi^+ \ell^+\ell^-) = h_-^A(\bar B\to \bar K^*) \\

1500: && \qquad \times g_{K^* K\pi} (\varepsilon_-^*\cdot p_\pi) BW_{K^*}(M_{K\pi})\nn 

1501: \end{eqnarray}

1502: and $H_+^{V,A} = 0$, with

1503: $h_-^{V,A}$ the one-body helicity amplitudes for $B\to K^* \ell^+\ell^-$ 

1504: given above in Eq.~(\ref{H-I}).

1505: The Breit-Wigner function corresponding to a $K^*$ resonance is defined as

1506: \begin{eqnarray}

1507: BW_{K^*}(M) = \frac{1}{M^2 - M_{K^*}^2 + i M_{K^*} \Gamma_{K^*}}

1508: \end{eqnarray}

1509: Finally, the $K^{*0} K^+\pi^-$ coupling with a charged pion can be determined from the

1510: total $K^* \to K\pi$ width, $\Gamma = g_{K^*K\pi}^2 p_\pi^3/(16\pi m_{K^*}^2)$,

1511: with the result $g_{K^*K\pi} = 9.1$.

1512: 

1513: 

1514: 

1515: \begin{figure}

1516: \includegraphics[height=6cm]{q2zeroes.eps}

1517: \caption{\label{fig3} Plot of the position of the zero of the

1518: forward-backward asymmetry

1519: $q_0^2=q_0^2(M_X)$ as a function of the invariant mass of the $K\pi$

1520: system, obtained by neglecting the factorizable contributions to the

1521: helicity amplitudes, for different values of the renomalization point

1522: $\mu$.}

1523: \end{figure}

1524: 

1525: 

1526: 

1527: The factorization relations in region (I) require the nonfactorizable

1528: amplitude $\zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}$. 

1529: In the absence of experimental information about this quantity, we adopt

1530: a $K^*$ resonance model for it, defined as 

1531: \begin{eqnarray}

1532: && \zeta_\perp^{BK\pi}(M_{K\pi}, E_\pi) = \bn\cdot p_{K^*} \zeta_\perp^{BK^*} \\

1533: && \qquad \times g_{K^*K\pi}

1534: (\varepsilon_-^*\cdot p_\pi) BW_{K^*}(M_{K\pi})\,.\nn

1535: \end{eqnarray}

1536: where the kinematical factor $\bn\cdot p_{K^*} = 2E_{K^*} = \frac{1}{m_B}(m_B^2-q^2)$

1537: can be chosen corresponding to an on-shell $K^*$ meson.

1538: For the kinematical dependence of the soft function $\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}(q^2)$

1539: we adopt a modified pole shape \cite{fbcor3,BZ}

1540: \begin{eqnarray}\label{zmodel}

1541: \zeta_\perp^{BK^*}(q^2) = \frac{\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}(0)}{1 - 1.55 \frac{q^2}{m_B^2} +

1542: 0.575 (\frac{q^2}{m_B^2})^2}

1543: \end{eqnarray}

1544: and quote results corresponding to the two values $\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}(0) = 0.3$ 

1545: and $0.1$. These two choices should cover both cases of soft-dominated, and 

1546: hard-dominated tensor form factor.

1547: 

1548: We will use this model to define a FBA differential in $(q^2, M_{K\pi})$, integrated

1549: over the pion energy $E_\pi$. Separating the contributions from the regions (I) and 

1550: (II), this is given by

1551: \begin{eqnarray}

1552: A_{\rm FB}(q^2, M_{K\pi}) &=& \int_{\rm (I)} dE_\pi \mbox{Re }[H_-^V H_-^{A*} - H_+^V H_+^{A*}] \nn\\

1553: & & + \int_{\rm (II)} dE_\pi \mbox{Re }[H_-^V H_-^{A*}]

1554: \end{eqnarray}

1555: The integration over $E_\pi$ can be simplified by approximating

1556: $\bar n\cdot p_K\approx m_B-\bar n\cdot q$ in region I. Then the result can be

1557: expressed in terms of three phase space 

1558: integrals $I_{0,1,2}$, arising from region (I), 

1559: and another integral $\bar I_0$ in region (II), defined as

1560: \begin{eqnarray}

1561: && I_j = \int_{E_\pi^{\rm min}}^{E_\pi^{\rm cut}} dE_\pi \frac{|\varepsilon_+\cdot p_\pi|^2}

1562: {(E_\pi + \Delta)^j}\,,\,\, j = 0,1,2\\

1563: && \bar I_0 = \int_{E_\pi^{\rm cut}}^{E_\pi^{\rm max}} dE_\pi  |\varepsilon_+\cdot p_\pi|^2

1564: \,.

1565: \end{eqnarray}

1566: These integrals depend implicitly on $(M_{K\pi},q^2)$. Numerically, for

1567: $E_\pi^{\rm cut}=500~\text{MeV}$ we find 

1568: $I_0=0.019~\text{GeV}^3$, $I_1=0.047~\text{GeV}^2$,

1569: $I_2=0.12~\text{GeV}$ and 

1570: $\bar I_0=0.12~\text{GeV}^3$, at $M_{K\pi}=1~\text{GeV}$ and $q^2=4~\text{GeV}^2$.

1571: 

1572: \begin{widetext}

1573: The zero of the FBA

1574: is given by the solution of the equation

1575: \begin{eqnarray}

1576: \label{eq:qzero2}

1577: \mbox{Re } [c_1^{(V)} - a_{\rm sp} - a_{\rm f} ] = 0\,,

1578: \end{eqnarray}

1579: where $a_{\rm sp}$ and $ a_{\rm f}$ denote the factorizable contributions, arising

1580: from the spectator amplitude, and from the factorizable (both in one-body and in the

1581: two-body amplitudes). The $a_{\rm sp}$ coefficient is

1582: given by

1583: \begin{equation}

1584: \label{asp-model}

1585: a_{\rm sp} = -\frac23 \frac{g}{f_\pi} \frac{h_{\rm sp}^{(u)}}{\bn\cdot p_{K^*} 

1586: g_{K^*} \zeta_\perp^{BK^*}}

1587: \frac{I_1}{I_0 + \bar I_0} [M_{K\pi}^2 - M_{K^*}^2 + iM_{K^*} \Gamma_{K^*}]

1588: \end{equation}

1589: where $h_{\rm sp}^{(q)}$ is defined in Eq.~(\ref{hspdef}).

1590: 

1591: The factorizable term contains contributions from the one-body

1592: decay amplitude, and from the new right-handed amplitude appearing in the

1593: two-body mode

1594: \begin{equation}

1595: \label{af-model}

1596: a_{\rm f} = -\frac{2m_B^2}{\bn\cdot p_{K^*}\bn \cdot q}\, C_7^{\text{eff}}\,

1597:  \frac{\zeta_{J\perp}^{BK^*\text{eff}}}{ \zeta_\perp^{BK^*}}  \frac{\bar I_0}{I_0 + \bar I_0} 

1598:  + \frac{g^2 m_B^4}{4f_\pi^2 g^2_{K^*K\pi}(\bn\cdot p_K)^2(\bn\cdot p_{K^*})^2} 

1599: C_9^{\rm eff}\frac{\zeta_J^{BK} \zeta_J^{BK\rm eff}}{(\zeta_\perp^{BK^*})^2} (M_{K\pi}^2 - M_{K^*}^2)^2

1600: \frac{I_2}{I_0 + \bar I_0} 

1601: \end{equation}

1602: \end{widetext} 

1603: 

1604: 

1605: 

1606: 

1607: We compute the factorizable matrix elements using the leading order

1608: jet functions from Eq.~(\ref{jets}). This gives for the integrals of the 

1609: factorizable functions $\zeta_J(z)$

1610: \begin{eqnarray}

1611: \zeta^{BK}_J&=\frac{\pi\alpha_sC_F}{N_c}\frac{f_Bf_K}{m_B} \frac1{\lambda_{B+}}\int_0^1dz\,\frac{\phi_K(z)}{1-z}\,,\\

1612: \zeta^{BK^*}_{J\perp}&=\frac{\pi\alpha_sC_F}{N_c}

1613: \frac{f_Bf^T_{K^*}}{m_B} \frac1{\lambda_{B+}}\int_0^1dz\,\frac{\phi^T_{K^*}(z)}{1-z}\,,

1614: \end{eqnarray}

1615: and for the effective ones

1616: \begin{eqnarray}

1617: \zeta^{BK\text{eff}}_J&=&\zeta^{BK}_J\left[\left(1+\frac{2m_b(\mu)\bn\cdot q}{q^2}

1618: \frac{C_7^{\text{eff}}}{C_9^{\text{eff}}}\right)\right.\nn\\

1619: &&\qquad\qquad +\left.

1620: \frac{e_uE_K^2}{m_b\bar n\cdot q}\frac{\bar C_2}{C_9^{\text{eff}}}I^{BK}_J\right]\,,\\

1621: \zeta^{BK^*\text{eff}}_{J\perp}&=& \zeta^{BK^*}_{J\perp}\left[1+

1622: \frac{2e_uE_{K^*}}{8m_b}\frac{\bar C_2}{C_7^{\text{eff}}}I^{BK^*}_{J\perp}\right]\,,

1623: \end{eqnarray}

1624: where

1625: \begin{eqnarray}

1626: I^{BK}_J&=\int_0^1dz\, t_\perp(z,m_c)\phi_K(z)\Big/ \int_0^1dz\frac{\phi_K(z)}{1-z}\,,\\

1627: I^{BK^*}_{J\perp}&=\int_0^1dz\, t_\perp(z,m_c)\phi^T_{K^*}(z)\Big/ 

1628: \int_0^1dz\frac{\phi^T_{K^*}(z)}{1-z}\,,

1629: \end{eqnarray}

1630: For the computation of the integrals

1631: we use the $K^{(*)}$ light-cone wave functions 

1632: \begin{eqnarray}

1633: \phi_K(x) = 6x\bar x \Big(1 + 3 a_{1K} (2x-1) + {\frac32} a_{2K} [5(2x-1)^2-1] \Big)\nn\\

1634: \end{eqnarray}

1635: and analogous for $\phi_{K^*}^\perp(x)$, with coefficients $a_{iK^*}^\perp$. 

1636: The values of the first two Gegenbauer moments are given in

1637: Table~\ref{tablein}.  Also listed there are the remaining 

1638: hadronic parameters used in the computation. 

1639: 

1640: The resulting values of the factorizable matrix elements are tabulated

1641: in Table~\ref{tableout}, which also lists the effective Wilson

1642: coefficients $C^{\text{eff}}_{7,9}$ (computed at $\mu=4.8$~GeV,

1643: $q^2=4$~GeV$^2$). The effective matrix elements $\zeta^{BK\text{eff}}_J$

1644: and $\zeta^{BK^*\text{eff}}_{J\perp}$ depend on $(M_{K\pi}, q^2)$, partly

1645: through implicit dependence of the integrals $I^{BK}_J$ and

1646: $I^{BK^*}_{J\perp}$. To gain some understanding of the relative importance

1647: of the terms that contribute to the effective matrix elements, we

1648: quote these integrals at $M_{K\pi}=m_{K^*},q^2=4.0\text{~GeV}^2$:

1649: $I^{BK}_J=-0.704- 2.564i$ and $I^{BK^*}_{J\perp}=-0.566- 2.67i$.

1650: 

1651: \begin{table}[h!]%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages

1652: \caption{\label{tablein} Input parameters used in the numerical computation.}

1653: \begin{ruledtabular}

1654: \begin{tabular}{cc|cc}

1655: % &  &  &  \\

1656: %\hline

1657: $m_b^{\rm 1S}$ & $4.68 \pm 0.03$ GeV \cite{mb}   &   $f_K$ & 160 MeV \\

1658: $\bar m_c(\bar m_c)$ & $1224 \pm 57$ MeV \cite{mc}  &  $f_{K^*}^T$   & 175 MeV  \\

1659: $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ & $0.119$ & $a_{1K}$   & $0.3$  \\

1660: $\lambda_{B+}$ & $350$ MeV &  $a_{2K}$  & $0.1$  \\

1661: $g$ & $0.5$ \cite{ff} & $a_{1K^*}^\perp $   & $0.2$  \\

1662: $f_B$ & 200 MeV &  $a_{2K^*}^\perp$  & $0.1$  \\

1663: $\lambda^{(s)}_u/ \lambda^{(s)}_t$ & $-0.0106+0.0174i$~\cite{Charles:2004jd} & $g_{K^*K\pi} $ & 9.1 \\

1664: \end{tabular}

1665: \end{ruledtabular}

1666: \end{table}

1667: 

1668: 

1669: 

1670: \begin{figure*}

1671: \begin{tabular}{cc}

1672: {\includegraphics[height=6cm]{q2VSmX3.eps}\hspace{1cm}

1673: \includegraphics[height=6cm]{q2VSmX1.eps}}

1674: \end{tabular}

1675: \caption{\label{fig7} Plot of the position of the zero of the

1676: forward-backward asymmetry $q_0^2=q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$ as a function of the

1677: invariant mass of the $K\pi$ system. The plots show the change in the

1678: position of the zero due to the spectator and factorizable

1679: amplitudes, Eq.~(\ref{eqzero}), for three values of the pion energy

1680: cut-off $E_\pi^{\rm cut}=300, 500$~MeV and $E_\pi^{\rm cut}=700$~MeV

1681: separating regions I and II. The dotted (blue) line denotes

1682: the position of the zero in the absence of the factorizable and

1683: spectator contributions (for $\mu = 4.8$ GeV).

1684: The non-factorizable matrix element is taken to be 

1685: $\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}(0) =

1686: 0.3$ (left) and $\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}(0) = 0.1$ (right).}

1687: \end{figure*}

1688: 

1689: 

1690: It is straightforward to estimate the numerical importance of

1691: each term in the correction $a$ appearing in the equation Eq.~(\ref{eqzero})

1692: for the zero of the FBA. To this end we evaluate at

1693: $M_{K\pi}=m_{K^*}, q^2=4.0\text{~GeV}^2$, and use

1694: $E^{\text{cut}}_\pi=500~\text{MeV}$ and $\zeta^{BK^*}_{\perp}(0)=0.3$ 

1695: in the model of Eq.~(\ref{zmodel}). We obtain (all in GeV units):

1696: \begin{eqnarray}

1697: a_{\text{sp}} &\sim &  -(0.016+0.014i) (M_{K\pi} 

1698: ^2 - M_{K^*}^2 + iM_{K^*} \Gamma_{K^*})\,,\nn\\

1699: \label{numestimate}

1700: a_{\text{f}}  &\sim & (0.533 + 0.321 i) \\

1701: &&\qquad\qquad + (0.004 -0.003i) (M_{K\pi}^2 - M_{K^*}^2)^2\,. \nn

1702: \end{eqnarray}

1703: We have kept explicit the rapidly varying dependence on the inverse

1704: Breit-Wigner function, so we may get some idea of the relative

1705: size of the coefficients. The first term in the factorizable amplitude

1706: can be regarded as a negative correction to Re$(C_9^{\text{eff}})$ in 

1707: $c_1^{(V)}$ of about $\sim 10\%$. Thus it 

1708: effectively shifts the zero of the FBA upwards by the same amount. 

1709: The second term in $a_{\text{f}}$  

1710: and $a_{\text{sp}}$ are negligible on resonance but may be important at

1711: large $M_{K\pi}$.

1712: 

1713: 

1714: 

1715: 

1716: 

1717: Using this model, we solve for the zeros of the FBA in $B\to K\pi \ell^+\ell^-$

1718: decays, finding $q_0^2$ for given $(M_{K\pi}, E_\pi^{\rm cut})$. The

1719: results are shown in Figs.~\ref{fig3}--\ref{fig7}. In Fig.~\ref{fig3}

1720: we plot the result for $q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$ obtained by neglecting the

1721: factorizable and spectator terms (the solution to $\mbox{Re

1722: }(c_1^{(V)})=0$) for three values of the renormalization scale, $\mu =

1723: 2.4, 4.8, 9.6$~GeV. We used here NNLL results for the Wilson coefficients

1724: and the 2-loop matrix elements of the operators $O_{1,2}$ obtained in

1725: Ref.~\cite{Asatrian}.  The position of the zero at threshold is

1726: \begin{eqnarray}

1727: q_0^2|_{M_{K\pi}=M_K+M_\pi} = 3.75^{+0.12}_{-0.25} \mbox{ GeV}^2

1728: \end{eqnarray}

1729: where the uncertainty includes only the scale dependence. This result

1730: depends only mildly on $M_{K\pi}$, as seen from Fig.~\ref{fig3}.

1731: 

1732: 

1733: 

1734: In Fig.~\ref{fig7} we show also the effect of including the

1735: factorizable and spectator terms in Eq.~(\ref{eq:qzero2}), for three

1736: values of the cut-off on the pion energy $E_\pi^{\rm cut}=300$ MeV, 500 MeV and

1737: 700 MeV separating regions I and II.

1738: The parameters used in evaluating this plot are listed in

1739: Tables~\ref{tablein} and~\ref{tableout}. 

1740: For comparison, we present in Fig.~\ref{fig7}

1741: results with $\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}(0)=0.3$ (left) and $\zeta_\perp^{BK^*}(0)=0.1$ 

1742: (right). 

1743: The latter choice effectively amplifies the

1744: factorizable and spectator corrections, and can be taken as a

1745: conservative upper bound of these effects. The dependence of the

1746: results on $E_\pi^{\text{cut}}$ is an artifact of the separation of

1747: regions discussed above and indicates the uncerainty in this

1748: procedure. For this reason we have taken rather extreme values of

1749: $E_\pi^{\text{cut}}$. The overall trend of $q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$ decreasing

1750: towards the right of the plots is readily understood from the

1751: qualitative discussion in Sec.~\ref{sec:qual}: it follows from the

1752: correction term $a$ being small. Similarly, that the inclusion of

1753: spectator and factorizable corrections tends to increase the value of

1754: $q_0^2$ for fixed $M_{K\pi}$ follows from positivity of $a$.  

1755: 

1756: The results show a marked dependence (especially for small $M_{K\pi}$) of 

1757: the zero position on the

1758: pion energy cut-off $E_\pi^{\rm cut}$ which separates the regions (I) and (II).

1759: This is essentially due to the dominance of the factorizable contribution in

1760: region (II). A conservative way to use our results is to take the

1761: smaller value of $E_\pi^{\rm cut}=300$ MeV, for which the chiral perturbation theory

1762: result can be expected to be the most precise. 

1763: 

1764: 

1765: 

1766: 

1767: 

1768: \begin{table}[h!]%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages

1769: \caption{\label{tableout} 

1770: Results for the effective Wilson coefficients and factorizable and

1771: spectator  matrix 

1772: elements. The values of the

1773: effective Wilson coefficients are at the scale $\mu = 4.8$ GeV and $q^2=4$ 

1774: GeV$^2$. The factorizable matrix elements are computed at the scale

1775: $\mu_c = 1.5$ GeV.}

1776: \begin{ruledtabular}

1777: \begin{tabular}{cc|cc}

1778: % &  &  &  \\

1779: %\hline

1780:  $[C_9^{\rm eff}]_{\rm NNLL}$ & $4.579+0.082i$ & $\zeta_J^{BK}$   & $0.036$  \\

1781: $[C_7^{\rm eff}]_{\rm NNLL}$ & $-0.388-0.020i$ & $\zeta_{J\perp}^{BK^*}$  &

1782:   $0.035$  \\

1783:  & & $\frac{q^2 \bn\cdot q}{\bar n\cdot p_K}h^{(u)}_{sp} $ & $(0.135+0.124 i)\text{GeV}^3$\\

1784: \end{tabular}

1785: \end{ruledtabular}

1786: \end{table}

1787: 

1788: So far our considerations were restricted to the case of 

1789: $\bar B^0 \to K^-\pi^+\ell^+\ell^-$ decays. Going over to the CP conjugate mode

1790: $B^0 \to K^+\pi^-\ell^+\ell^-$, the position of the zero could change because of 

1791: direct CP violation present in the spectator amplitude $H_{\rm sp}^{(q)}$,

1792: which is furthermore enhanced by a $4\pi^2$ factor (see Eq.~(\ref{Hsp})). Denoting

1793: the factorizable corrections analogous to $a_{\rm sp}$ and $a_{\rm f}$ for the CP conjugate 

1794: mode with $\bar a_i$, we find

1795: \begin{eqnarray}

1796: \bar a_{\text{sp}}\!\sim\!   -(0.016-0.014i) 

1797: (M_{K\pi}^2\! -\! M_{K^*}^2\! +\! iM_{K^*} \Gamma_{K^*})\,,

1798: \end{eqnarray}

1799: such that the CP asymmetry in the position of the zero is induced through the finite

1800: $K^*$ width, and is small. Beyond tree level, such an effect will be

1801: introduced at order $\alpha_s(Q)$ through matching corrections to $b_{\rm sp}$.

1802: 

1803: We consider next another observable, the slope of the curve for the zero of the 

1804: FBA in Fig.~\ref{fig7}.

1805: From Eq.~(\ref{eq:q2zero-qual}), this is given by

1806: \begin{eqnarray}\label{slope}

1807: \frac{dq_0^2(M_{K\pi}^2)}{dM_{K\pi}^2} \!=\! - \frac{1}{F-1}\! +\!

1808: \Big( \frac{M_{K\pi}^2}{(F-1)^2} - \frac{m_B^2}{F^2} \Big) \frac{dF(M_{K\pi}^2)}{dM_{K\pi}^2}

1809: \end{eqnarray}

1810: $F(M_{K\pi}^2)$ is defined in Eq.~(\ref{FBAs2}) and depends on the Wilson 

1811: coefficients $C_{7,9}$, also on the factorizable contributions  $a(M_{K\pi})$. 

1812: The last term contributes through the $M_{K\pi}$ dependence of  $a(M_{K\pi})$,

1813: and is 

1814: \begin{eqnarray}

1815: \frac{dF(M_{K\pi}^2)}{dM_{K\pi}^2} = \frac{m_B}{2m_b C_7} 

1816: \frac{da(M_{K\pi}^2)}{dM_{K\pi}^2} \simeq 0.02\,,

1817: \end{eqnarray}

1818: where we used the result Eq.~(\ref{numestimate}) for $a_{\rm sp}(M_{K\pi})$ and 

1819: neglected the tiny contribution from $a_f$. The contribution of this term to 

1820: Eq.~(\ref{slope})

1821: is multiplied with a factor of order 1-2. Thus, even assigning this

1822: estimate a conservative error of $\sim 200\%$, its contribution to the slope 

1823: Eq.~(\ref{slope}) for values $M_{K\pi} \sim 1 $ GeV, is negligible compared to the 

1824: first term depending only on $F$ (recall that $F \sim 4$). 

1825: This is also seen in the curves in Fig.~\ref{fig7}, whose slopes are essentially

1826: the same for all choices of the hadronic parameters considered. This shows that a

1827: measurement of the slope of the zero could provide a useful source of information 

1828: about

1829: the Wilson coefficients $C_{7,9}$, but without the hadronic uncertainties associated with

1830: the absolute position of the zero.

1831: 

1832: 

1833: 

1834: \section{Conclusions}  

1835: 

1836: We studied in this paper the helicity

1837: structure of the exclusive rare $\bar B\to \bar K \pi \ell^+\ell^-$ decays

1838: in the region of phase space with one energetic kaon and a soft pion.

1839: In this region the helicity amplitudes are given by new factorization relations,

1840: containing an universal soft matrix element, and

1841: a new nonperturbative matrix element for the $B\to \pi$ transition

1842: analogous to the off-forward parton distribution functions.

1843: 

1844: 

1845: The most important difference with the $\bar B\to \bar K^*_n \ell^+\ell^-$

1846: decays at large recoil is the appearance in the multibody case of a

1847: nonvanishing right-handed helicity amplitude $\bar B\to [\bar K

1848: \pi]_{h=+1}\ell^+\ell^-$ at leading order in $\Lambda/m_b$.  

1849: This can be computed in factorization, in terms of the $B\to \pi$

1850: off-forward matrix element of a nonlocal heavy-to-light operator. 

1851: In the soft pion limit this nonperturbative matrix element can be computed

1852: in chiral perturbation theory, and is related to the B meson light-cone wave function

1853: \cite{GPchiral}.

1854: 

1855: 

1856: We explored the implications of these results for the existence of a

1857: zero of the forward-backward asymmetry of the lepton momentum,

1858: pointing out two new results.  First, the FBA has a zero also for

1859: nonresonant $B\to K \pi \ell^+\ell^-$ decays, occuring at a determined

1860: value of the dilepton invariant mass $q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$, depending on the 

1861: hadronic invariant mass $M_{K \pi}$. Second, there are calculable 

1862: corrections to the position of the zero, which can be computed in factorization.

1863: We use the factorization relations derived in this paper to compute

1864: these correction terms. We present explicit numerical results working

1865: at leading order in chiral perturbation theory \cite{GPchiral}, and show that

1866: the results for the zero of the FBA in $\bar B\to [\bar K\pi]_{K^*}\ell^+\ell^-$ 

1867: hold to a good precision also in the nonresonant region.

1868: \vspace{0.5cm}

1869: 

1870: 

1871: 

1872: 

1873: % If in two-column mode, this environment will change to single-column

1874: % format so that long equations can be displayed. Use

1875: % sparingly.

1876: %\begin{widetext}

1877: % put long equation here

1878: %\end{widetext}

1879: 

1880: % figures should be put into the text as floats.

1881: % Use the graphics or graphicx packages (distributed with LaTeX2e)

1882: % and the \includegraphics macro defined in those packages.

1883: % See the LaTeX Graphics Companion by Michel Goosens, Sebastian Rahtz,

1884: % and Frank Mittelbach for instance.

1885: %

1886: % Here is an example of the general form of a figure:

1887: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label

1888: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.

1889: % Use the figure* environment if the figure should span across the

1890: % entire page. There is no need to do explicit centering.

1891: 

1892: % Surround figure environment with turnpage environment for landscape

1893: % figure

1894: % \begin{turnpage}

1895: % \begin{figure}

1896: % \includegraphics{}%

1897: % \caption{\label{}}

1898: % \end{figure}

1899: % \end{turnpage}

1900: 

1901: % tables should appear as floats within the text

1902: %

1903: % Here is an example of the general form of a table:

1904: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label

1905: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.

1906: % Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the

1907: % \begin{tabular}{} command.

1908: % The ruledtabular enviroment adds doubled rules to table and sets a

1909: % reasonable default table settings.

1910: % Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column

1911: % Add \usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}

1912: % environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the the [H]

1913: % placement option to break a long table (with less control than 

1914: % in longtable).

1915: % \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages

1916: % \caption{\label{}}

1917: % \begin{ruledtabular}

1918: % \begin{tabular}{}

1919: % Lines of table here ending with \\

1920: % \end{tabular}

1921: % \end{ruledtabular}

1922: % \end{table}

1923: 

1924: % Surround table environment with turnpage environment for landscape

1925: % table

1926: % \begin{turnpage}

1927: % \begin{table}

1928: % \caption{\label{}}

1929: % \begin{ruledtabular}

1930: % \begin{tabular}{}

1931: % \end{tabular}

1932: % \end{ruledtabular}

1933: % \end{table}

1934: % \end{turnpage}

1935: 

1936: % Specify following sections are appendices. Use \appendix* if there

1937: % only one appendix.

1938: \appendix*

1939: \section{Effective Wilson coefficients}

1940: 

1941: We collect here for convenience the expressions for 

1942: the effective Wilson coefficients used in the numerical study of 

1943: Section IV.

1944: Working to NNLL order, they are given by

1945: \begin{eqnarray}

1946: && C_9^{\rm eff} = C_9 - (\bar C_1 + \frac{\bar C_2}{3}) ( 8G(m_c) + \frac43)\\

1947: && \quad -

1948: \bar C_3 ( 8 G(m_c) - \frac43 G(0) - \frac{16}{3} G(m_b) + \frac{2}{27} ) \nonumber \\

1949: && \quad + \bar C_4 ( 4 G(0) - \frac83 G(m_c) + \frac{16}{3} G(m_b) + \frac{14}{9} ) \nonumber \\

1950: && - \bar C_5 (8 G(m_c) - 4 G(m_b) - \frac{14}{27}) \nonumber \\ 

1951: && - \bar C_6 ( \frac83 G(m_c) - \frac43 G(m_b) + \frac29) \nonumber \\

1952: && - \frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi} [ 2\bar C_1 (F_1^{(9)}(q^2) + \frac{F_2^{(9)}(q^2)}{6})

1953:  + \bar C_2 F_2^{(9)}(q^2) + C_8^{\rm eff} F_8^{(9)}] \nonumber 

1954: \end{eqnarray}

1955: and

1956: \begin{eqnarray}

1957: && C_7^{\rm eff} = C_7 - \frac49 \bar C_3 - \frac43 \bar C_4 

1958: + \frac19 \bar C_5 + \frac13 \bar C_6 \\

1959: && \quad - \frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi}[\bar C_2 F_2^{(7)}(q^2) + C^{\rm eff}_8 

1960: F_8^{(7)}(q^2) ]\nonumber

1961: \end{eqnarray}

1962: They are expressed in terms of the modified Wilson coefficients $\bar C_{1-6}$,

1963: which are defined by expressing the operators $O_{1-6}$ of Ref.~\cite{CMM}

1964: in terms of the basis of \cite{BBL} using 4-dimensional Fierz identities.

1965: They are given by \cite{fbcor1}

1966: \begin{eqnarray}

1967: && \bar C_1 = \frac12 C_1\,,\qquad \bar C_2 = C_2 - \frac16 C_1 \\

1968: &&\bar C_3 = C_3 - \frac16 C_4 + 16 C_5 - \frac83 C_6 \,,\quad 

1969: \bar C_4 = \frac14 C_4 + 8 C_6 \nonumber \\

1970: && \bar C_5 = C_3 - \frac16 C_4 + 4 C_5 - \frac23 C_6\,,\quad 

1971: \bar C_6 = \frac12 C_4 + 2 C_6 \nonumber 

1972: \end{eqnarray}

1973: where $C_i$ are the Wilson coefficients in the operator basis of Ref.~\cite{CMM}.

1974: The $\bar C_i$ coefficients coincide with the Wilson coefficients in the basis of

1975: Ref.~\cite{BBL}, but are different beyond leading log

1976: approximation. The relation between the two sets of coefficients can be found in

1977: Refs.~\cite{CMM,fbcor1}.

1978: The effective Wilson coefficient $C_8^{\rm eff}$ is given by

1979: \begin{eqnarray}

1980: C_8^{\rm eff} = C_8 + \frac43 \bar C_3 - \frac13 \bar C_5\,.

1981: \end{eqnarray}

1982: 

1983: The one-loop function $G(m_q)$ is given by

1984: \begin{eqnarray}

1985: G(m_q) = \int_0^1 \mbox{d} x x(1-x) \log\Big(

1986: \frac{-q^2 x(1-x) + m_q^2 - i\epsilon}{\mu^2} \Big) \nonumber

1987: \end{eqnarray}

1988: The functions $F_{1,2}^{(9)}(q^2), F_2^{(7)}(q^2)$ appearing in the

1989: 2-loop matching conditions are listed in 

1990: Eqs.~(54)-(56) of the second reference in Ref.~\cite{Asatrian}. The functions $F_8^{(7,9)}(q^2)$ are

1991: given in Eqs.~(82), (83) of Ref.~\cite{fbcor1}.

1992: 

1993: We list here the functions $f_v$ and $\tau$ appearing in the expression of the

1994: Wilson coefficient $c_1^{(V)}$ Eq.~(\ref{c1V})

1995: \begin{eqnarray}

1996: && f_v(\omega,\mu) = \frac12 \log^2\frac{m_b^2}{\mu^2} - \frac52 \log\frac{m_b^2}{\mu^2} + 2\log \frac{m_b^2}{\mu^2}

1997: \log\frac{\omega}{m_b} \nn\\

1998: && + 

1999: 2\log^2 \frac{\omega}{m_b} + 2 \mbox{Li}_2(1-\frac{\omega}{m_b}) + \frac{3\omega-2m_b}{m_b-\omega}

2000: \log\frac{\omega}{m_b}\nn\\

2001: && + \frac{\pi^2}{12} + 6\,, \\

2002: && \tau(\omega, \mu)=\frac{\alpha_s C_F}{4\pi}

2003: \Big[ \frac{\omega}{m_b-\omega}\log\frac{\omega}{m_b}  + \log\frac{m_b^2}{\mu^2} \Big] \,.

2004: \end{eqnarray}

2005: 

2006: 

2007: In the numerical evaluation of the Wilson coefficient $c_1^{(V)}$ we replace the

2008: $\overline{MS}$ mass $m_b(\mu)$ with the pole mass $m_b^{\rm pole}$ using the one-loop

2009: result

2010: \begin{eqnarray}

2011: m_b(\mu) = m_b^{\rm pole} \Big( 1 + \frac{\alpha_s C_F}{4\pi} (-6\log \frac{\mu}{m_b} - 4 )\Big)

2012: \end{eqnarray}

2013: and keeping only the term linear in $\alpha_s$.

2014: 

2015: Finally, we give here the function $t_\perp(x,m_c)$ appearing in the

2016: Wilson coefficient of the subleading $O(\lambda)$ SCET$_{\rm I}$ operators.

2017: This is given in Eq.~(27) of Ref.~\cite{fbcor1}, which we reproduce here for completeness

2018: \begin{widetext}

2019: \begin{eqnarray}\label{tperp}

2020: && t_\perp(x,m_c) = \frac{4m_B}{\bar x \omega} I_1(m_c) +

2021: \frac{4q^2}{\bar x^2 \omega^2} [B_0(\bar x m_B^2 + x q^2, m_c) -

2022: B_0(q^2, m_c)] 

2023: \end{eqnarray}

2024: with 

2025: \begin{eqnarray}

2026: && B_0(s, m_c) = -2\sqrt{\frac{4m_c^2}{s}-1} \arctan 

2027: \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{4m_c^2}{s}-1}}\\

2028: && I_1(m_c) = 1 + \frac{2m_c^2}{\bar x(m_B^2-q^2)} [L_1(x_+) + L_1(x_-) -

2029: L_1(y_+) - L_1(y_-)] \nn

2030: \end{eqnarray}

2031: 

2032: \end{widetext}

2033: The function $L_1(x)$ and its arguments are defined as

2034: \begin{eqnarray}

2035: && L_1(x) = \log\frac{x-1}{x} \log(1-x) - \frac{\pi^2}{6} + 

2036: \mbox{Li}_2(\frac{x}{x-1}) \nn \\

2037: && x_\pm = \frac12 \pm \sqrt{\frac14 - \frac{m_c^2}{\bar x m_B^2 + x q^2}} \\

2038: && y_\pm = \frac12 \pm \sqrt{\frac14 - \frac{m_c^2}{q^2}}

2039: \end{eqnarray}

2040: 

2041: 

2042: % If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.

2043: \vspace{0.5cm}

2044: \begin{acknowledgments}

2045: D.P. would like to thank G. Hiller for useful discussions. 

2046: We are grateful to Tim Gershon and Masashi Hazumi for comments on the manuscript.

2047: This work was supported in part by the DOE under grant DE-FG03-97ER40546 (BG),

2048: and by the DOE under cooperative research agreement

2049: DOE-FC02-94ER40818 and by the NSF under grant PHY-9970781 (DP).

2050: \end{acknowledgments}

2051: \vfill

2052: % Create the reference section using BibTeX:

2053: %\bibliography{basename of .bib file}

2054: 

2055: 

2056: 

2057: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

2058: 

2059: \bibitem{Ali}

2060: A.~Ali, ``Review of heavy quark physics: Theory,'', talk at ICHEP 2004, Beijing,

2061: China, arXiv:hep-ph/0412128.

2062:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412128;%%

2063: 

2064: \bibitem{befe}

2065: M.~Beneke and T.~Feldmann,

2066: %``Symmetry-breaking corrections to heavy-to-light B meson form factors at

2067: %large recoil,''

2068: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 592}, 3 (2001).

2069: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0008255].

2070: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008255;%%

2071: 

2072: \bibitem{fbcor1}

2073: M.~Beneke, T.~Feldmann and D.~Seidel,

2074: %``Systematic approach to exclusive B $\to$ V l+ l-, V gamma decays,''

2075: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 612}, 25 (2001).

2076: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0106067].

2077: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106067;%%

2078: 

2079: 

2080: 

2081: \bibitem{expinclusive}

2082: B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BABAR Collaboration],

2083: %``Measurement of the B $\to$ X/s l+ l- branching fraction with a sum over

2084: %exclusive modes,''

2085: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 93}, 081802 (2004).

2086: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0404006].

2087: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0404006;%%

2088: 

2089: \bibitem{expexclusive}

2090: B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BABAR Collaboration], hep-ex/0507005;

2091: B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BABAR Collaboration],

2092: %``Evidence for the rare decay B $\to$ K* l+ l- and measurement of the B $\to$

2093: %K l+ l- branching fraction,''

2094: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 221802 (2003).

2095: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0308042].

2096: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0308042;%%

2097: K.~Abe {\it et al.}  [Belle Collaboration],

2098: %``Measurement of the differential q**2 spectrum and forward-backward asymmetry

2099: %for B $\to$ K(*) l+ l-,''

2100: arXiv:hep-ex/0410006.

2101: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0410006;%%

2102: 

2103: \bibitem{multiexp}

2104: S.~Nishida {\it et al.}  [Belle Collaboration],

2105: %``Radiative B meson decays into K pi gamma and K pi pi gamma final  states,''

2106: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89}, 231801 (2002).

2107: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0205025].

2108: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0205025;%%

2109: 

2110: 

2111: \bibitem{fb}

2112: G.~Burdman,

2113: %``Short distance coefficients and the vanishing of the lepton asymmetry  in B

2114: %$\to$ V l+ l-,''

2115: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 4254 (1998).

2116: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9710550].

2117: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9710550;%%

2118: 

2119: 

2120: \bibitem{ABHH}

2121: A.~Ali, P.~Ball, L.~T.~Handoko and G.~Hiller,

2122: %``A comparative study of the decays B $\to$ (K,K*) l+ l- in standard  model

2123: %and supersymmetric theories,''

2124: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 074024 (2000).

2125: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9910221].

2126: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910221;%%

2127: 

2128: \bibitem{ffrel}

2129: J.~Charles, A.~Le Yaouanc, L.~Oliver, O.~Pene and J.~C.~Raynal,

2130: %``Heavy-to-light form factors in the heavy mass to large energy limit of

2131: %{QCD},''

2132: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 014001 (1999);

2133: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9812358].

2134: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812358;%%

2135: G.~Burdman and G.~Hiller,

2136: %``Semileptonic form-factors from B $\to$ K* gamma decays in the large  energy

2137: %limit,''

2138: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 113008 (2001).

2139: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0011266].

2140: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011266;%%

2141: 

2142: 

2143: \bibitem{FBAincl}

2144: A.~Ali, E.~Lunghi, C.~Greub and G.~Hiller,

2145: %``Improved model-independent analysis of semileptonic and radiative rare  B

2146: %decays,''

2147: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 034002 (2002).

2148: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0112300].

2149: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112300;%%

2150: 

2151: \bibitem{FBAincl1}

2152: A.~Ghinculov, T.~Hurth, G.~Isidori and Y.~P.~Yao,

2153: %``Forward-backward asymmetry in B $\to$ X/s l+ l- at the NNLL level,''

2154: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 648}, 254 (2003).

2155: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0208088].

2156: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208088;%%

2157: 

2158: %\cite{Akeroyd:2004mj}

2159: \bibitem{Akeroyd:2004mj}

2160: A.~G.~Akeroyd {\it et al.}  [SuperKEKB Physics Working Group Collaboration],

2161: %``Physics at super B factory,''

2162: hep-ex/0406071.

2163: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0406071;%%

2164: 

2165: %\cite{Abe:2004sx}

2166: \bibitem{Abe:2004sx}

2167: K.~Abe {\it et al.}  [Belle Collaboration],

2168: %``New measurements of time-dependent CP-violating asymmetries in B0 $\to$ K(S)

2169: %K(S) K(S) and K(S) pi0 gamma decays at Belle,''

2170: hep-ex/0411056.

2171: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0411056;%%

2172: 

2173: 

2174: \bibitem{fbcor2}

2175: T.~Feldmann and J.~Matias,

2176: %``Forward-backward and isospin asymmetry for B $\to$ K* l+ l- decay in the

2177: %standard model and in supersymmetry,''

2178: JHEP {\bf 0301}, 074 (2003).

2179: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0212158].

2180: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212158;%%

2181: 

2182: \bibitem{fbcor3}

2183: M.~Beneke, T.~Feldmann and D.~Seidel,

2184:   %``Exclusive radiative and electroweak b $\to$ d and b $\to$ s penguin decays

2185:   %at NLO,''

2186:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 41}, 173 (2005)

2187: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0412400].

2188:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412400;%%

2189: 

2190: 

2191: \bibitem{scet}

2192: C.~W.~Bauer, S.~Fleming and M.~E.~Luke,

2193: %``Summing Sudakov logarithms in B $\to$ X/s gamma in effective field  theory,''

2194: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 014006 (2001);

2195: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0005275].

2196: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005275;%%

2197: %\bibitem{Bauer:2000yr}

2198: C.~W.~Bauer, S.~Fleming, D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart,

2199: %``An effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light 

2200: % decays,''

2201: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 114020 (2001)

2202: %[hep-ph/0011336];

2203: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011336;%%

2204: %

2205: %\cite{Bauer:2001ct}

2206: %\bibitem{Bauer:2001ct}

2207: C.~W.~Bauer and I.~W.~Stewart,

2208: %``Invariant operators in collinear effective theory,''

2209: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 516}, 134 (2001)

2210: %[hep-ph/0107001];

2211: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107001;%%

2212: %

2213: %\cite{Bauer:2001yt}

2214: %\bibitem{Bauer:2001yt}

2215: C.~W.~Bauer, D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart,

2216: %``Soft-collinear factorization in effective field theory,''

2217: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 054022 (2002)

2218: %[hep-ph/0109045].

2219: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109045;%%

2220: 

2221: \bibitem{scet1}

2222: M.~Beneke, A.~P.~Chapovsky, M.~Diehl and T.~Feldmann,

2223:   %``Soft-collinear effective theory and heavy-to-light currents beyond  leading

2224:   %power,''

2225:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 643}, 431 (2002).

2226: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0206152].

2227:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206152;%%

2228: 

2229: 

2230: %\cite{Bauer:2002aj}

2231: \bibitem{bpsff}

2232: C.~W.~Bauer, D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart,

2233: %``Factorization and endpoint singularities in heavy-to-light decays,''

2234: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 071502 (2003).

2235: %[hep-ph/0211069].

2236: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211069;%%

2237: 

2238: 

2239: \bibitem{ps1}

2240: D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart,

2241: %``A complete basis for power suppressed collinear-ultrasoft operators,''

2242: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 094005 (2003)

2243: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 69}, 019903 (2004)];

2244: %[hep-ph/0211251].

2245: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211251;%%

2246: D.~Pirjol and I.~W.~Stewart,

2247: %``The phenomenology of rare and semileptonic B decays,''

2248: eConf {\bf C030603}, MEC04 (2003)

2249: [arXiv:hep-ph/0309053].

2250: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309053;%%

2251: 

2252: 

2253: \bibitem{NNLL}

2254: P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 673}, 238 (2003);

2255: M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch,  [arXiv:hep-ph/0411071].

2256: 

2257: \bibitem{Beneke:2003pa}

2258: M.~Beneke and T.~Feldmann,

2259: %``Factorization of heavy-to-light form factors in soft-collinear effective

2260: %theory,''

2261: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 685}, 249 (2004);

2262: %[hep-ph/0311335].

2263: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311335;%%

2264: %

2265: %\bibitem{Lange:2003pk}

2266: B.~O.~Lange and M.~Neubert,

2267: %``Factorization and the soft overlap contribution to heavy-to-light form

2268: %factors,''

2269: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 690}, 249 (2004).

2270: %[hep-ph/0311345].

2271: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311345;%%

2272: 

2273: \bibitem{hillff}

2274: R.~J.~Hill, T.~Becher, S.~J.~Lee and M.~Neubert,

2275:   %``Sudakov resummation for subleading SCET currents and heavy-to-light form

2276:   %factors,''

2277:   JHEP {\bf 0407}, 081 (2004).

2278: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0404217].

2279:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404217;%%

2280: 

2281: \bibitem{GPchiral}

2282: B.~Grinstein and D.~Pirjol,

2283:   %``Chiral symmetry and exclusive B decays in the SCET,''

2284:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 615}, 213 (2005)

2285:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0501237].

2286:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501237;%%

2287: 

2288: \bibitem{CMM}

2289: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, M.~Misiak and M.~Munz,

2290:   %``Weak radiative B-meson decay beyond leading logarithms,''

2291:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 400}, 206 (1997)

2292:   [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 425}, 414 (1998)]

2293: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/9612313].

2294:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612313;%%

2295: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, M.~Misiak and M.~Munz,

2296:   %``$|$Delta(F)$|$ = 1 nonleptonic effective Hamiltonian in a simpler scheme,''

2297:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 520}, 279 (1998)

2298: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/9711280].

2299:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711280;%%

2300: 

2301: \bibitem{GPrad}

2302: B.~Grinstein and D.~Pirjol,

2303: %``Long-distance effects in B $\to$ V gamma radiative weak decays,''

2304: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 093002 (2000)

2305: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0002216].

2306: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002216;%%

2307: 

2308: \bibitem{CK}

2309: J.~g.~Chay and C.~Kim,

2310: %``Rare radiative exclusive B decays in soft-collinear effective theory,''

2311: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 034013 (2003).

2312: %[hep-ph/0305033].

2313: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305033;%%

2314: 

2315: \bibitem{pol}

2316: B.~Grinstein, Y.~Grossman, Z.~Ligeti and D.~Pirjol,

2317: %``The photon polarization in B $\to$ X gamma in the standard model,''

2318: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 011504 (2005).

2319: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0412019].

2320: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412019;%%

2321: 

2322: \bibitem{BHN}

2323: T.~Becher, R.~J.~Hill and M.~Neubert,

2324:   %``Factorization in B $\to$ V gamma decays,''

2325:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 094017 (2005)

2326:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0503263].

2327:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503263;%%

2328: 

2329: \bibitem{LPW}

2330: E.~Lunghi, D.~Pirjol and D.~Wyler,

2331:   %``Factorization in leptonic radiative B $\to$ gamma e nu decays. ((U)),''

2332:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 649}, 349 (2003)

2333:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0210091].

2334:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210091;%%

2335: 

2336: \bibitem{bdi}

2337: B.~Grinstein, D.~R.~Nolte and I.~Z.~Rothstein,

2338:   %``A method for extracting cos(alpha),''

2339:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 84}, 4545 (2000)

2340:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9910245].

2341:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910245;%%

2342:   %%Cited 1 time in SPIRES-HEP

2343: 

2344: \bibitem{bprs}

2345: C.~W.~Bauer, D.~Pirjol, I.~Z.~Rothstein and I.~W.~Stewart,

2346:   %``B $\to$ M(1) M(2): Factorization, charming penguins, strong phases, and

2347:   %polarization,''

2348: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 054015 (2004).

2349: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0401188].

2350: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0401188;%%

2351: 

2352: \bibitem{multi}

2353: D.~Atwood, T.~Gershon, M.~Hazumi and A.~Soni,

2354:   %``Mixing-induced CP violation in B $\to$ P(1) P(2) gamma in search of clean

2355:   %new physics signals,''

2356:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 076003 (2005)

2357: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0410036].

2358:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410036;%%

2359: T.~Gershon and M.~Hazumi,

2360:   %``Time-dependent CP violation in B0 $\to$ P0 P0 X0 decays,''

2361:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 596}, 163 (2004)

2362: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0402097].

2363:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402097;%%

2364: 

2365: \bibitem{exp}

2366: B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BABAR Collaboration],

2367: %``Amplitude analysis of B+- $\to$ pi+- pi-+ pi+- and B+- $\to$ K+- pi-+

2368: %pi+-,''

2369: arXiv:hep-ex/0408032;

2370: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0408032;%%

2371: A.~Bondar  [Belle Collaboration],

2372: %``Dalitz analysis of B $\to$ K+ pi+ pi- and B $\to$ K+ K+ K-,''

2373: arXiv:hep-ex/0411004.

2374: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0411004;%%

2375: 

2376: \bibitem{GPD}

2377: X.~D.~Ji,

2378:   %``Deeply-virtual Compton scattering,''

2379:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 7114 (1997)

2380:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9609381].

2381:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9609381;%%

2382: A.~V.~Radyushkin,

2383:   %``Nonforward parton distributions,''

2384:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 5524 (1997)

2385:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9704207].

2386:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704207;%%

2387: 

2388: \bibitem{FK}

2389: T.~Feldmann and P.~Kroll,

2390:   %``Skewed parton distributions for B $\to$ pi transitions,''

2391:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 12}, 99 (2000)

2392:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9905343].

2393:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905343;%%

2394: 

2395: \bibitem{rad}

2396: V.~Cirigliano and D.~Pirjol,

2397:   %``Factorization in exclusive semileptonic radiative B decays,''

2398:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 094021 (2005)

2399:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0508095].

2400:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0508095;%%

2401: 

2402: 

2403: \bibitem{wise}

2404: M.~B.~Wise,

2405: %``Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark,''

2406: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 45}, 2188 (1992).

2407: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D45,2188;%%

2408: 

2409: \bibitem{BuDo}

2410: G.~Burdman and J.~F.~Donoghue,

2411: %``Union of chiral and heavy quark symmetries,''

2412: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 280}, 287 (1992).

2413: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B280,287;%%

2414: 

2415: \bibitem{TM}

2416: T.~M.~Yan {\em et al.},

2417: %H.~Y.~Cheng, C.~Y.~Cheung, G.~L.~Lin, Y.~C.~Lin and H.~L.~Yu,

2418: %``Heavy quark symmetry and chiral dynamics,''

2419: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, 1148 (1992)

2420: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 55}, 5851 (1997)].

2421: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D46,1148;%%

2422: 

2423: \bibitem{review}

2424: M.~B.~Wise,

2425: %``Combining chiral and heavy quark symmetry,''

2426: arXiv:hep-ph/9306277.

2427: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9306277;%%

2428: 

2429: \bibitem{GP1}

2430: B.~Grinstein and D.~Pirjol,

2431: %``Symmetry-breaking corrections to heavy meson form-factor relations,''

2432: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 533}, 8 (2002)

2433: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201298].

2434: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201298;%%

2435: 

2436: \bibitem{KM} 

2437: C.~S.~Kim, Y.~G.~Kim, C.~D.~L\"u and T.~Morozumi,

2438: %``Azimuthal angle distribution in B $\to$ K* (--> K pi) l+ l- at low

2439: %invariant m(l+ l-) region,''

2440: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 034013 (2000)

2441: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0001151].

2442: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001151;%%

2443: 

2444: \bibitem{mb}

2445: C.~W.~Bauer, Z.~Ligeti, M.~Luke, A.~V.~Manohar and M.~Trott,

2446: %``Global analysis of inclusive B decays,''

2447: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 094017 (2004)

2448: [arXiv:hep-ph/0408002].

2449: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408002;%%

2450: 

2451: \bibitem{mc}

2452: A.~H.~Hoang and A.~V.~Manohar,

2453: %``Charm quark mass from inclusive semileptonic B decays,''

2454: arXiv:hep-ph/0509195.

2455: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0509195;%%

2456: 

2457: \bibitem{ff}

2458: M.~C.~Arnesen, B.~Grinstein, I.~Z.~Rothstein and I.~W.~Stewart,

2459: %``A precision model independent determination of $|$V(ub)$|$ from B $\to$ pi

2460: %e nu,''

2461: arXiv:hep-ph/0504209.

2462: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504209;%%

2463: 

2464: %\bibitem{PDG}

2465: %S.~Eidelman {\it et al.}  [Particle Data Group],

2466: %  %``Review of particle physics,''

2467: %  Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 592}, 1 (2004).

2468: %  %%CITATION = PHLTA,B592,1;%%

2469: 

2470: \bibitem{BBL}

2471: G.~Buchalla, A.~J.~Buras and M.~E.~Lautenbacher,

2472:   %``Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms,''

2473:   Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\  {\bf 68}, 1125 (1996)

2474: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/9512380].

2475:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512380;%%

2476: 

2477: \bibitem{Asatrian}

2478: %D.~Seidel, 

2479: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 094038 (2004).

2480: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403185;%%

2481: H.~H.~Asatrian, H.~M.~Asatrian, C.~Greub and M.~Walker,

2482:   %``Two-loop virtual corrections to B $\to$ X/s l+ l- in the standard model,''

2483:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 507}, 162 (2001);

2484: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0103087].

2485:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103087;%%

2486: H.~H.~Asatryan, H.~M.~Asatrian, C.~Greub and M.~Walker,

2487:   %``Calculation of two loop virtual corrections to b $\to$ s l+ l- in the

2488:   %standard model,''

2489:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 074004 (2002).

2490: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0109140].

2491:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109140;%%

2492: 

2493: \bibitem{BZ}

2494: P.~Ball and R.~Zwicky,

2495: %``B/(d,s) $\to$ rho, omega, K*, Phi decay form factors from light-cone sum

2496: %rules revisited,''

2497: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 014029 (2005)

2498: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0412079].

2499: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412079;%%

2500: 

2501: 

2502: 

2503: %\cite{Charles:2004jd}

2504: \bibitem{Charles:2004jd}

2505: J.~Charles {\it et al.}  [CKMfitter Group],

2506: %``CP violation and the CKM matrix: Assessing the impact of the

2507: %asymmetric  B

2508: %factories,''

2509: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 41}, 1 (2005)

2510: [arXiv:hep-ph/0406184].

2511: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406184;%%

2512: 

2513: \end{thebibliography}

2514: \end{document}

2515: %

2516: % ****** End of file template.aps ******

2517: 

2518: \begin{figure}

2519: \centering

2520: \begin{picture}(300,170)

2521: \put(35,20){\includegraphics[height=4.5cm]{zeropict_gr1.eps}}

2522: \put(0,147){

2523: {\large

2524: $(n.q)/q^2$

2525: }}

2526: \put(-5,130){

2527: {\large

2528: (GeV$^{-1}$)

2529: }}

2530: \put(120,0){

2531: {\large

2532: $M_{K\pi}\mbox{ (GeV)}$

2533: }}

2534: \end{picture}

2535: %\includegraphics[height=5cm]{zeropict_gr1.eps}

2536: \caption{\label{fig8} 

2537: Plot for the qualitative discussion of the zeros of the FBA in the multibody

2538: decay $B\to K\pi \ell^+ \ell^-$. The grey lines give $n\cdot q/q^2$ as a function

2539: of $M_{K\pi}$ at $q^2=4$ GeV$^2$. The colored lines show three different choices 

2540: for the right-hand

2541: side of the equation for the zero of the FBA, as discussed in the text. Their intersection

2542: with the grey line give the zeros of the FBA.}

2543: \end{figure}

2544: 

2545: 

2546: Consider both sides of this equation as functions of $M_{K\pi}$ at fixed $q^2$.

2547: The left-hand side is a two-valued function, shown in Fig.~\ref{fig8} 

2548: at $q^2=4$ GeV$^2$ (the grey lines). The upper branch corresponds to the hadronic

2549: system having a large momentum along $n$, and the lower branch has the hadronic

2550: system moving in the opposite direction. For this reason we will be interested 

2551: only in the upper branch. The values of

2552: $n\cdot q/q^2$ at the extremal points of the interval

2553:  $M_{K\pi} = (0, m_B - \sqrt{q^2})$ are 

2554: \begin{eqnarray}

2555: \frac{n\cdot q}{q^2} = \left\{

2556: \begin{array}{cl}

2557: \frac{m_B}{q^2}\,, & M_{K\pi} = 0 \\

2558: \frac{1}{\sqrt{q^2}}\,, & M_{K\pi} = m_B - \sqrt{q^2} \\

2559: \end{array}

2560: \right.

2561: \end{eqnarray}

2562: Regardless of the shape of the function $F(M_{K\pi})$ appearing on the

2563: right-hand side of Eq.~(\ref{FBAs2}), the zero is constrained to lie

2564: on the dark grey curve. 

2565: The location of the zero along the dark grey curve depends on the detailed

2566: form of the function $a(M_{K\pi})$. We show in Fig.~\ref{fig8} three

2567: possible forms for this function. The green horizontal line corresponds

2568: to a constant $a$. With increasing $q^2$, the position of the zero

2569: moves to the left along the grey curve, which means that

2570: $q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$ is  a decreasing function of $M_{K\pi}$.

2571: 

2572: Consider next a nonzero and positive factorizable term $a(M_{K\pi})$ 

2573: (the violet curve). At any given

2574: $q^2$, its inclusion moves the position of the zero to the right, which gives

2575: the following property, following from the positivity condition on $a$.

2576: \vspace{0.2cm}

2577: 

2578: {\em Property } The

2579: zero of the FBA $q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$ is shifted to higher values by a positive

2580: and moderately large right-handed

2581: factorizable contribution.

2582: \vspace{0.2cm}

2583: 

2584: It is clear that for a sufficiently large factorizable 

2585: amplitude $a(M_{K\pi})$, the zero may 

2586: disappear completely. This happens  if the curve $F(M_{K\pi})$

2587: intersects the grey line only along its lower branch. 

2588: \ri{Assuming that the function $F(M_{K\pi})$ is not too fast

2589: varying, the condition for existence of a zero can be formulated

2590: as inequalities on its values at the extremal points.}

2591: These are  upper and lower bounds for $a(M_{K\pi})$ 

2592: at the boundaries of the interval $M_{K\pi} = (0, m_B - \sqrt{q^2})$

2593: \begin{eqnarray}

2594: && a(0) \geq C_9 + 2m_b C_7 \frac{M_B}{q^2} \\

2595: && a(M_B - \sqrt{q^2}) \leq C_9 + 2m_b C_7 \frac{1}{\sqrt{q^2}} 

2596: \end{eqnarray}

2597: These bounds must be satisfied for all values of $q^2$ in an interval

2598: in order for a zero to exist in this interval.

2599: They  are satisfied with the values of the hadronic input

2600: parameters used in the next section.

2601: 

2602: Finally, we point out that a richer structure of the zeros of the FBA

2603: is obtained if the function $a(M_{K\pi})$ oscillates (the yellow line).

2604: Such oscillations may appear for example, if the 

2605: higher kaon resonances are included into a model of the nonfactorizable

2606: amplitude. 

2607: For the case shown in Fig.~\ref{fig8} there are 5 zeros at the particular

2608: value of $q^2$ shown, with different values of $M_{K\pi}$. The general structure

2609: of such zeros can be very complicated, with 

2610: $q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$ an oscillating function. However, the single

2611: valued nature of $a(M_{K\pi})$ restricts $q_0^2(M_{K\pi})$ to be also 

2612: single valued. 

2613: We restrict our considerations to the range $M_{K\pi} \leq 1.8$ GeV.

2614: We leave a more complete study, including also the resonances

2615: in this mass region, for a later work.

2616: 

2617: The effect of the $B^*$ pole contribution is rather small for values of the 

2618: $M_{K\pi}$ invariant mass

2619: below 1 GeV, but becomes noticeable for $M_{K\pi}$ above 1 GeV

2620: where it shifts the pole towards larger values of $q^2$. 

2621: Although the details of these results depend on the

2622: specific parameter values adopted here, the shift to larger values of $q_0^2$

2623: can be shown to be generic. One artifact of our model is the existence

2624: of a common intersection point at $M_{K\pi}=M_{K^*}$ of the curves with 

2625: different $E_\pi^{\rm max}$. Apart from this, the main features of the curves

2626: in Fig.~\ref{fig7} do not depend 

2627: on the assumption of our model of $K^*$ pole dominance, and should remain valid

2628: when higher kaon resonances are included. 

2629: