1: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
3: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
4: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
5: \usepackage{psfig}% bold math
6: %************************************************************
7: \newcommand{\BR}{{\cal B}}
8: \newcommand{\BRz}{{\cal B}_0}
9: \newcommand{\afs}{\alpha_s}
10: \newcommand{\jpc}{J^{PC}}
11: \newcommand{\alf}{\alpha}
12: \newcommand{\eff}{\varepsilon}
13: \newcommand{\sintht}{\sin{\theta}}
14: \newcommand{\costht}{\cos{\theta}}
15: \newcommand{\Npsp}{N_{\psi^\prime}}
16: \newcommand{\gev}{\,\mbox{GeV}}
17: \newcommand{\mev}{\,\mbox{MeV}}
18: \newcommand{\bip}{B^+}
19: \newcommand{\bim}{B^-}
20: \newcommand{\biz}{B^0}
21: \newcommand{\dep}{D^+}
22: \newcommand{\dem}{D^-}
23: \newcommand{\dez}{D^0}
24: \newcommand{\dzb}{\overline{D}^0}
25: \newcommand{\dszb}{\overline{D}^{*0}}
26: \newcommand{\pip}{\pi^+}
27: \newcommand{\pim}{\pi^-}
28: \newcommand{\piz}{\pi^0}
29: \newcommand{\rop}{\rho^+}
30: \newcommand{\rom}{\rho^-}
31: \newcommand{\roz}{\rho^0}
32: \newcommand{\threepi}{\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0}
33: \newcommand{\kap}{K^+}
34: \newcommand{\kam}{K^-}
35: \newcommand{\kst}{K^*}
36: \newcommand{\kaz}{K^0}
37: \newcommand{\ko}{K_0}
38: \newcommand{\ks}{K_S^0}
39: \newcommand{\kzb}{\overline{K}^0}
40: \newcommand{\kszb}{\overline{K}^{*0}}
41: \newcommand{\kl}{K_L^0}
42: \newcommand{\pbar}{\bar{p}}
43: \newcommand{\etap}{\eta^{\prime}}
44: \newcommand{\etac}{\eta_c}
45: \newcommand{\etacp}{\eta_c^{\prime}}
46: \newcommand{\hc}{h_c}
47: \newcommand{\psp}{\psi^{\prime}}
48: \newcommand{\psip}{\psi(2S)}
49: \newcommand{\pspp}{\psi^{\prime \prime}}
50: \newcommand{\psipp}{\psi(3770)}
51: \newcommand{\jpsi}{J/\psi}
52: \newcommand{\DD}{D^+ D^-}
53: \newcommand{\EE}{e^+e^-}
54: \newcommand{\MM}{\mu^+\mu^-}
55: \newcommand{\TT}{\tau^+\tau^-}
56: \newcommand{\GG}{\gamma\gamma}
57: \newcommand{\PP}{\pi^+\pi^-}
58: \newcommand{\KK}{K^+K^-}
59: \newcommand{\pp}{\pi^+\pi^-}
60: \newcommand{\kk}{K^+K^-}
61: \newcommand{\kskl}{K^0_SK^0_L}
62: \newcommand{\KKSC}{K^{*+}K^-}
63: \newcommand{\KKSN}{K^{*0}\overline{K^0}}
64: \newcommand{\zz}{\bar{p} p}
65: \newcommand{\LL}{\ell^+\ell^-}
66: \newcommand{\rpi}{\rho\pi}
67: \newcommand{\OP}{\omega\pi^0}
68: \newcommand{\RP}{\rho\pi}
69: \newcommand{\RET}{\rho\eta}
70: \newcommand{\RETp}{\rho\eta^{\prime}}
71: \newcommand{\OET}{\omega\eta}
72: \newcommand{\OETp}{\omega\eta^{\prime}}
73: \newcommand{\FET}{\phi\eta}
74: \newcommand{\FETp}{\phi\eta^{\prime}}
75: \newcommand{\ogpi}{\omega\pi^0}
76: \newcommand{\omegapi}{\omega\pi^0}
77: \newcommand{\rhopi}{\rho\pi}
78: \newcommand{\rhopin}{\rho^0 \pi^0}
79: \newcommand{\ccbar}{c\bar{c}}
80: \newcommand{\ccb}{c\overline{c}}
81: \newcommand{\QQb}{Q\overline{Q}}
82: \newcommand{\qqb}{q\overline{q}}
83: \newcommand{\nnb}{n\overline{n}}
84: \newcommand{\ppbar}{p\bar{p}}
85: \newcommand{\BBb}{B\overline{B}}
86: \newcommand{\KKb}{K\overline{K}}
87: \newcommand{\ppb}{p\overline{p}}
88: \newcommand{\aab}{\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}}
89: \newcommand{\LLb}{\Lambda \overline{\Lambda}}
90: \newcommand{\ddbar}{D\bar{D}}
91: \newcommand{\ddb}{D\overline{D}}
92: \newcommand{\DDb}{D\overline{D}}
93: \newcommand{\DzDzbar}{D^0 \overline{D^0}}
94: \newcommand{\kskp}{K^0_S K^+ \pi^- + c.c.}
95: \newcommand{\kskn}{K^{*0}(892)\overline{K^0}+c.c.}
96: %%%%%---------------------------------------------------------
97: \newcommand{\bnnb}{(n\overline{n})}
98: \newcommand{\bppb}{(p\overline{p})}
99: \newcommand{\bllb}{(n\overline{\Lambda})}
100: \newcommand{\bnpb}{(n\overline{p})}
101: \newcommand{\bnbp}{(\overline{n} p)}
102: \newcommand{\bnlb}{(n\overline{\Lambda})}
103: \newcommand{\bnbl}{(\overline{n} \Lambda)}
104: \newcommand{\bplb}{(p\overline{\Lambda})}
105: \newcommand{\bpbl}{(\overline{p} \Lambda)}
106: %%%%%---------------------------------------------------------
107: \newcommand{\VP}{1^-0^-}
108: %%%%%---------------------------------------------------------
109: \newcommand{\jpsipp}{J/\psi \pi^+\pi^-}
110: \newcommand{\ppjpsi}{\pi^+\pi^- J/\psi}
111: \newcommand{\gpp}{\gamma \pi^+\pi^-}
112: \newcommand{\gkk}{\gamma K^+K^-}
113: \newcommand{\gppb}{\gamma p\overline{p}}
114: \newcommand{\PPJP}{\pi^+\pi^- J/\psi}
115: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}
116: \newcommand{\lra}{\longrightarrow}
117: \newcommand{\jpsito}{J/\psi \rightarrow }
118: \newcommand{\psipto}{\psi(2S) \rightarrow }
119: \newcommand{\psippto}{\psi(3770) \rightarrow }
120: \newcommand{\psito}{J/\psi \rightarrow }
121: \newcommand{\pspto}{\psi^{\prime} \rightarrow }
122: \newcommand{\psppto}{\psi^{\prime \prime} \rightarrow }
123: \newcommand{\EETO}{e^+e^-\to}
124: \newcommand{\M}{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}M}
125: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
126: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
127: \newcommand{\beqn}{\begin{eqnarray}}
128: \newcommand{\eeqn}{\end{eqnarray}}
129: \newcommand{\beqns}{\begin{eqnarray*}}
130: \newcommand{\eeqns}{\end{eqnarray*}}
131: \newcommand{\bfg}{\begin{figure}}
132: \newcommand{\efg}{\end{figure}}
133: \newcommand{\bitm}{\begin{itemize}}
134: \newcommand{\eitm}{\end{itemize}}
135: \newcommand{\bnum}{\begin{enumerate}}
136: \newcommand{\enum}{\end{enumerate}}
137: \newcommand{\btbl}{\begin{table}}
138: \newcommand{\etbl}{\end{table}}
139: \newcommand{\btbu}{\begin{tabular}}
140: \newcommand{\etbu}{\end{tabular}}
141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
142: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}
143: \def\CTP{Commun. Theor. Phys.}
144: \def\EPJC{Eur. Phys. J. C}
145: \def\HEPNP{HEP \& NP}
146: \def\IJMP{Int. J. Mod. Phys. A}
147: \def\NCA{Nuovo Cimento}
148: \def\NIM{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
149: \def\NIMA{Nucl. Instrum. Methods A}
150: \def\NP{Nucl. Phys.}
151: \def\NPB{Nucl. Phys. B}
152: \def\PLB{Phys. Lett. B}
153: \def\PRL{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
154: \def\PR{Phys. Rev.}
155: \def\PRC{Phys. Rev. C}
156: \def\PRD{Phys. Rev. D}
157: \def\PRP{Phys. Rep.}
158: \def\PTP{Prog. Theor. Phys.}
159: \def\ZPC{Z. Phys. C}
160: %\input{newcmd}
161: %************************************************************
162: \begin{document}
163: \preprint{Draft-PRD}
164:
165: \title{\boldmath Baryon Antibaryon Nonets}
166: \author{C.~Z.~Yuan}
167: \email{yuancz@mail.ihep.ac.cn}
168: \author{X.~H.~Mo}
169: \author{P.~Wang}
170: \affiliation{Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing
171: 100039, China}
172:
173: \date{\today}
174:
175: \begin{abstract}
176: The baryon-antibaryon $SU(3)$ nonets are proposed as a scheme to
177: classify the increased number of experimentally observed
178: enhancements near the baryon antibaryon mass threshold. The scheme is
179: similar to the Fermi-Yang-Sakata model, which was put forth
180: about fifty years ago in explaining the mesons observed at that time.
181: According to the present scheme, many new baryon-antibaryon bound
182: states are predicted, and their possible productions in quarkonium decays
183: and $B$ decays are suggested for experimental search.
184: \end{abstract}
185:
186: \pacs{13.25.Gv, 12.38.Qk, 14.40.Gx}
187:
188: \maketitle
189:
190: \section{Introduction}
191:
192: Low mass baryon-antibayron enhancements have recently been
193: observed in charmonium and $B$ decays.
194: In charmonium decays,
195: $\ppb$ and $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancements are observed in
196: $\jpsi \ra \gamma \ppb$~\cite{besgppb},
197: $\psp \ra \piz \ppb,~\eta \ppb$~\cite{bespaeppb}, and $\jpsi \ra p
198: \overline{\Lambda} K^- +c.c.$~\cite{bespkl}, as well as in $\psp
199: \ra p \overline{\Lambda} K^- +c.c.$ decays~\cite{bespkl} by BES
200: collaboration. In $B$ decays, many baryon-antibayron-pair-contained
201: final states have been measured by CLEO, Belle and BABAR collaborations,
202: such as $\biz \ra D^{*-} p \overline{n}$~\cite{cleobdcy},
203: $B^{\pm} \ra \ppb K^{\pm}$~\cite{belbppk},
204: $\overline{\biz} \ra D^{*0} \ppb,~D^{0} \ppb$~\cite{belbdpp},
205: $\biz \ra p \overline{\Lambda} \pi^-$~\cite{belbplpi},
206: $\bip \ra \ppb \pi^+,~\ppb K^{*+}$, $\biz \ra \ppb \kaz$~\cite{belbpppk},
207: $\bip \ra \LLb \kap$~\cite{belbllk},
208: $\biz \ra \overline{D}^{*0} \ppb,~\overline{D}^{0} \ppb$~\cite{bababdcy},
209: and so on, with observed enhancements in $\ppb$, $p\overline{\Lambda}$ and $\LLb$ mass spectra. Except for the enhancement in $\jpsi \ra
210: \gamma \ppb$, which is claimed to be very narrow and below the
211: $\ppb$ mass threshold, all other states are slightly above the
212: baryon antibaryon mass threshold and the widths are a few ten to
213: less than 200~MeV/$c^2$. Stimulated by recent experimental
214: results, a number of theoretical speculations and investigations
215: are put forth~\cite{th_gppb,th_cbbpair}, some focus on the
216: interpretation of a particular final state~\cite{th_gppb}, for
217: instance $\jpsi \ra \gamma \ppb$, while others discuss the final
218: states containing baryon and antibaryon pair~\cite{th_cbbpair}.
219: Most of these works devote to the improvement of previous models
220: or exploration of the production and decay dynamics, but it is
221: still far from understanding the problem.
222:
223: The discovery of increased number of baryon-antibaryon enhancements
224: near thresholds can not help reminding us of the era prior to the
225: development of $SU(3)$ quark model, when the so-called elementary
226: particles emerged one by one. In this Letter, instead of studying the
227: dynamics of the production or decay of these states, we try to find a
228: way to classify them. We suggest a nonet scheme to accommodate the
229: baryon-antibaryon enhancements observed in charmonium and $B$ decays.
230: We surmise, with certain kind of interaction, for example, the residual
231: strong force between the quarks inside the baryons, some multiplets can be formed as the baryon-antibaryon bound states. Our idea is enlightened by
232: the Fermi-Yang-Sakata (FYS) model, in which the mesons were interpreted
233: as baryon-antibaryon bound states. In the following parts of the Letter,
234: we first review the FYS model briefly, then put forward a
235: baryon-antibaryon nonet scheme, by virtue of which, many new
236: baryon-antibaryon bound states are expected.
237: Finally, the search for these states are discussed.
238:
239: \section{Fermi-Yang-Sakata Model}
240:
241: In 1950s, as the number of the so-called elementary particles increased,
242: it became less likely that all of them were truly elementary. Under such
243: circumstance, as a tentative scheme, Fermi and Yang
244: proposed~\cite{fermi_yang} that the $\pi$-meson may be a composite
245: particle formed by the association of a nucleon and an
246: anti-nucleon, with strong attractive force in between which
247: binds them together. Since the mass of the $\pi$-meson is substantially
248: smaller than twice the mass of a nucleon, it is necessary to
249: assume that the binding energy is extremely large which is
250: unappealing theoretically.
251:
252: In 1955 after the discovery of the strangeness, Sakata extended
253: Fermi-Yang's idea by including a strange baryon $\Lambda$ and its
254: anti-particle~\cite{sakata}, and intended providing a physical
255: meaning for the Nishijima-Gell-Mann's rule~\cite{nishijima}. Four
256: years later, the most modern-like version of the FYS model was
257: developed by Ikeda, Ogawa and Ohnuki~\cite{ikeda}. They assumed
258: that proton $p$, neutron $n$ and $\Lambda$ are basic particles
259: which compose other baryons and mesons as suggested by the FYS
260: model. They proposed a framework which explicitly assures the
261: equivalence of the three basic particles, $p$, $n$ and $\Lambda$,
262: in the limit of an mass. This leads to the introduction of a new
263: invariance under the exchange of $\Lambda$ and $p$ or $\Lambda$ and $n$
264: in addition to the usual charge independence and the conservation of
265: electrical and hyperonic charge. They utilized $U(3)$ group to analyze the symmetry of the FYS model and obtained exactly the same classification of
266: the pseudoscalar mesons as the quark model as long as the basic elements
267: $p$, $n$ and $\Lambda$ are replaced by $u$, $d$ and $s$ quarks.
268: The symmetry analysis of Ikeda, Ogawa and Ohnuki was so successful that
269: all the pseudoscalar mesons known by 1961 could be accounted for, and
270: moreover, a new particle $\eta$ was predicted which was shortly
271: discovered~\cite{exp_eta}.
272:
273: However, after the theory of unitary symmetry of strong interactions
274: was put forward~\cite{gmnm}, especially when hyperon $\Omega^-$ was
275: predicted definitely by Gell-Mann~\cite{gellman} and its existence was
276: confirmed experimentally~\cite{exp_omega}, the FYS model became a history
277: for the quark model. In fact, even when the FYS model was proposed,
278: it encountered a profound difficulty which was the enormous binding energy for sticking the nucleons together to form a meson. On the contrary,
279: for the newly observed baryon antibaryon enhancements near thresholds,
280: the binding energy is small compared with the mass of a nucleon.
281: So we turn to the FYS model to classify these bound states.
282:
283: %\section{Pseudoscalar and Vector Nonets}
284: \section{$0^-$ and $1^-$ Nonets}
285:
286: We come back to the FYS model, but from a different point of view.
287: In our scheme, the baryon-antibaryon bound states do not refer to
288: ordinary mesons, such as $\pi$, $K$, $\eta$, but to
289: the bound states formed by baryon and antibaryon. The interaction
290: between the baryon and antibaryon is probably the residual force
291: between the strong interaction of the quarks and gluons inside the baryon
292: or antibaryon. On one hand, the masses of the three-quark systems
293: (the baryon and the antibaryon) increase by a small amount
294: due to the residual forces
295: required to form the bound state; on the other hand, the binding energy
296: between the two three-quark systems decreases the mass of the
297: baryon-antibaryon system to lower than the sum of the masses of
298: the three-quark systems, but very close to the baryon-antibaryon
299: mass threshold. This supplies as a phenomenological surmise, the real
300: physics awaits for the validity of the quantum chromodynamics.
301:
302: Similar to the $SU(3)$ quark-antiquark nonets, we postulate the
303: existence of special octets and singlets (nonets) whose elements
304: are baryon-antibaryon bound states, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_nnt}.
305: Hereafter, we limit our study to the low-mass baryons: $p$, $n$ and
306: $\Lambda$. For a baryon-antibaryon bound state, its quantum numbers
307: are obtained in the following way:
308: \begin{itemize}
309: \item Its spin ($S$) is 0 or 1, from the addition of the component baryons.
310: \item The parity is $(-1)^{L+1}$, where $L$
311: is the orbital angular momentum between the baryon and the antibaryon.
312: In case of $S$-wave ($L=0$), the parity is odd ($-$), while for
313: $P$-wave, the parity is even ($+$).
314: \item For pure neutral system,
315: such as $\nnb$, $\ppb$, or $\LLb$, the $C$-parity is %calculated by
316: $(-1)^{L+S}$. For charged members, we define the generalized
317: $C$-parity~\cite{haber} by the neutral member of the nonet, but under
318: $C$-parity transformation, the particle changes into its anti-particle.
319: \end{itemize}
320:
321: \begin{figure}[htb]
322: \centerline{\hbox{\psfig{file=oct.eps,width=5.0cm,height=5.0cm}}}
323: \caption{\label{fig_nnt}Baryon-antibaryon nonet. The $J^P$ of
324: this nonet is either $0^{-}$ or $1^{-}$. The three circles in
325: the figure indicate the following three states: $(\nnb -
326: \ppb)/\sqrt{2}$, $(\nnb + \ppb -2 \LLb)/\sqrt{6}$, and $(\nnb +
327: \ppb + \LLb)/\sqrt{3}$. }
328: \end{figure}
329: \begin{table}[bth]
330: \caption{\label{tab_nnt}Quantum numbers of baryon-antibaryon nonet
331: with $J^P=0^{-}$ or $1^{-}$. $I$ is isospin, $I_3$ is the third
332: component of $I$, ${\cal S}$ is the strangeness and $Q$ is the
333: charge of the state. The column ``symbol" gives nomenclature of the
334: $0^{-}$ and $1^{-}$ states for easy reference in the Letter.} {
335: %pseudoscalar and vector states for easy reference in the Letter.} {
336: \small\footnotesize
337: \begin{tabular}{clrrc} \hline \hline
338: state & I($I_3$) &${\cal S}$& Q & Symbol \\ \hline
339: $\bnbp$& 1($+1 $) & 0 &$+1$ &$\pi^+_B$/$\rho^+_B$ \\
340: $\bnpb$& 1($-1 $) & 0 &$-1$ &$\pi^-_B$/$\rho^-_B$ \\
341: ${\displaystyle \frac{(\nnb-\ppb)}{\sqrt{2}}}$ {\rule[-2mm]{0mm}{7mm}}
342: & 1($ 0 $) & $ 0 $ &$0$ &$\pi^0_B$/$\rho^0_B$ \\
343: $\bplb$&$\frac{1}{2}$($+\frac{1}{2}$) & $+1 $ &$+1$ &$K^+_B/K^{*+}_B$ \\
344: $\bnlb$&$\frac{1}{2}$($-\frac{1}{2}$) & $+1 $ &$ 0$ &$K^0_B/K^{*0}_B$ \\
345: $\bnbl$&$\frac{1}{2}$($+\frac{1}{2}$) & $-1 $ &$ 0$
346: &$\overline{K}^0_B/
347: \overline{K}^{*0}_B$ \\
348: $\bpbl$&$\frac{1}{2}$($-\frac{1}{2}$) & $-1 $ &$-1$ &$K^-_B/\overline{K}^{*-}_B$ \\
349: ${\displaystyle \frac{(\nnb+\ppb-2\LLb)}{\sqrt{6}}}$ {\rule[-2mm]{0mm}{7mm}}
350: & 0($ 0 $) & $ 0 $ &$0$ &$\eta^8_B/\omega^8_B$ \\\hline
351: ${\displaystyle \frac{(\nnb+\ppb+\LLb)}{\sqrt{3}}}$ {\rule[-2mm]{0mm}{7mm}}
352: & 0($ 0 $) & $ 0 $ &$0$ &$\eta^1_B/\omega^1_B$ \\ \hline \hline
353: \end{tabular} \\
354: }
355: \end{table}
356: %\end{table*}
357:
358: The property of the $S$-wave spin-singlet states
359: ($J^{P}=0^{-}$) or the $S$-wave spin-triplet states
360: ($J^{P}=1^{-}$) nonet is summarized in Table~\ref{tab_nnt},
361: which leads to the relation of their production rates in experiments.
362: For simplicity, we assign the particles in the nonets the same names as
363: the meson nonets formed by quark-antiquark, but with a subscript $B$ for
364: distinction. For example, the $0^-$ isospin vector states are denoted as
365: $\pi^+_B$, $\pi^0_B$, and $\pi^-_B$, while the $1^-$ strange
366: particles are referred to as $K^{*0}_B$, $K^{*+}_B$, and their
367: anti-particles. In general, there is mixing between the 8th
368: component of the $SU(3)$ octet and the $SU(3)$ singlet. Since the
369: masses of proton and neutron differ by only 1.3~MeV$/c^2$, but the mass
370: of $\Lambda$ is 177~MeV$/c^2$ greater, one is invited to assume ideal
371: mixing between them, thus one is pure $(\ppb+\nnb)$ and the other is pure
372: $\LLb$. This is to be verified by experiments.
373:
374: If the electromagnetic interaction is neglected, the production
375: rates of these baryon-antibaryon bound states in $\jpsi$ and
376: $\psp$ decays can be simply related by $SU(3)$ symmetry except for a phase
377: space factor. For example, the production rates of
378: baryon-antibaryon bound states with $J^P=1^-$ accompanying by a
379: pseudoscalar meson are related by: $\pi^0\rho^0_B : \pi^+\rho^-_B :
380: \pi^-\rho^+_B : K^+\overline{K}^{*-}_B : K^0\overline{K}^{*0}_B:
381: K^-K^{*+}_B : \overline{K^0}K^{*0}_B : \eta\omega_B : \eta\phi_B :
382: \eta^\prime\omega_B : \eta^\prime\phi_B = 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 :
383: 1 : X^2_{\eta} : Y^2_{\eta} : X^2_{\eta^\prime} :
384: Y^2_{\eta^\prime}$. Here $X_\eta,~X_{\eta^\prime},~Y_\eta$, and
385: $Y_{\eta^\prime}$ are the mixing coefficients of $\eta$ and
386: $\eta^\prime$ \cite{etaxy}:
387: \beqns
388: |\eta\rangle &=& X_\eta\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |u\overline{u}
389: + d\overline{d} \rangle + Y_\eta |s\overline{s} \rangle~, \\
390: |\eta^\prime\rangle &=& X_{\eta^\prime}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
391: |u\overline{u} + d\overline{d} \rangle + Y_{\eta^\prime}
392: |s\overline{s} \rangle~,
393: \eeqns
394: with $X_\eta=Y_{\eta^\prime}$, $X_{\eta^\prime}=-Y_\eta$, and
395: $X_\eta^2+Y_\eta^2=1$. Assuming aforementioned states predominantly
396: decay to baryon-antibaryon pair, and considering the fact that
397: $\rho^0_B\to n \overline{n}$ and $\omega_B\to n \overline{n}$ are hard
398: to be detected experimentally, above relation can be reformulated
399: in terms of the experimentally detected final states:
400: $\pi^0(p\overline{p}) : \pi^+(n\overline{p}) :
401: \pi^-(\overline{n}p) : K^+(\overline{p}\Lambda) :
402: K^0(\overline{n}\Lambda): K^-(p\overline{\Lambda}) :
403: \overline{K^0}(n\overline{\Lambda}) : \eta(p\overline{p}) :
404: \eta(\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}) : \eta^\prime(p\overline{p}) :
405: \eta^\prime(\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}) \cong \frac{1}{2} : 1 : 1 :
406: 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : \frac{X^2_{\eta}}{2} : Y^2_{\eta} :
407: \frac{X^2_{\eta^\prime}}{2} : Y^2_{\eta^\prime}$. The production
408: rates of baryon-antibaryon bound states with other quantum numbers
409: are expressed similarly. The phase space is proportional to
410: $p^3$ for the production of the $J^P=1^-(0^-)$ baryon-antibaryon bound
411: state with an accompanying pseudoscalar (vector) meson,
412: where $p$ is the momentum of the baryon-antibaryon bound state.
413:
414: The $\ppb$ state observed in $\jpsi$ radiative
415: decays is $\eta_B$ or $\piz_B$ if it is a $S$-wave
416: state due to spin-parity conservation, and the
417: $p\overline{\Lambda}$ states in $\jpsi$ decays is $K^{*+}_B$ or
418: $K^+_B$. In $B$ decays, since parity is not conserved,
419: the spin-parity of the state is to be determined by the angular
420: distributions of the final state particles.
421:
422: \section{Experimental Searches}
423:
424: Because of the large phase space, $B$ decays play important roles in the
425: study of the baryon-antibaryon resonances. Many of
426: the baryon-antibaryon-pair-contained final states have been analyzed
427: experimentally as mentioned above, other interesting modes to be searched
428: for are given in Table~\ref{tab_bch}. The complexity here is the possible
429: existence of two or more baryon-antibaryon resonances in the same final
430: states and in a very small mass region, since many different $J^{P}$
431: states can be produced in $B$ decays, depending on the other
432: particles accompanying the baryon-antibaryon resonances.
433:
434: %\begin{table*}[bth]
435: \begin{table}[htb]
436: \caption{\label{tab_bch}Possible decay modes
437: containing baryon-antibaryon nonets in $B$ decays.}
438: {\small %\footnotesize
439: \begin{tabular}{cl|cl} \hline \hline
440: &~ decay mode & &~ decay mode \\
441: \hline
442: $d\overline{b}\ra$
443: & $d\overline{s}$ &$u\overline{b}\ra$
444: & $u\overline{s}$ \\ \hline
445: $B^0 \ra$ & $\piz\bnlb$ &$B^+ \ra$ & $\pip\bnlb$ \\
446: & $\pim\bplb$ & & $\piz\bplb$ \\
447: & $\kap\bnpb$ & & $\kap\bppb$ \\
448: & $\ks \bppb$ & & $\kap\bllb$ \\
449: & $\ks \bllb$ & & $\ks \bnbp$ \\
450: & $\eta\bnlb$ & & $\eta\bplb$ \\
451: & $\etap\bnlb$ & & $\etap\bplb$ \\
452: & $\roz\bnlb$ & & $\rop\bnlb$ \\
453: & $\rom\bplb$ & & $\roz\bplb$ \\
454: & $K^{*+}\bnpb$ & & $K^{*+}\bppb$ \\
455: & $K^{*0}\bppb$ & & $K^{*+}\bllb$ \\
456: & $K^{*0}\bllb$ & & $K^{*0}\bnbp$ \\
457: & $\omega\bnlb$ & & $\omega\bplb$ \\
458: & $\phi \bnlb$ & & $\phi \bplb$ \\ \hline
459: $d\overline{b}\ra$
460: &$d(\overline{c}c\overline{s})$
461: &$u\overline{b}\ra$
462: & $u(\overline{c}c\overline{s})$ \\ \hline
463: $B^0 \ra$ & $\etac\bnlb$ &$B^+ \ra$ & $\etac\bplb$ \\
464: & $\jpsi\bnlb$ & & $\jpsi\bplb$ \\ \hline
465: $d\overline{b}\ra$
466: &$d(\overline{c}u\overline{d})$
467: &$u\overline{b}\ra$
468: & $u(\overline{c}u\overline{d})$ \\ \hline
469: $B^0 \ra$ & $\dzb\bppb$ &$B^+ \ra$ & $\dzb\bnbp$ \\
470: & $\dzb\bllb$ & & \\
471: & $\dem\bnbp$ & & \\
472: &$\dszb (2007)\bppb$& &$\dszb (2007)\bnbp$\\
473: &$\dszb (2007)\bllb$& & \\
474: &$D^{*-}(2010)\bnbp$& & \\
475: &$D_s^- \bplb$ & & \\
476: \hline \hline
477: \end{tabular} %%\\
478: }
479: \end{table}
480: %\end{table*}
481:
482: Charmonium is another domain to study the baryon-antibaryon states.
483: Unlike $B$ decays, conservation law holds a rein on a possible decay mode
484: herein. By virtue of the quantum numbers listed in Table~\ref{tab_nnt},
485: some decay modes involving the $0^-$ and $1^-$ baryon-antibaryon bound
486: states are listed in Table~\ref{tab_cch}.
487:
488: %\begin{table*}[bth]
489: \begin{table}[bthp]
490: \caption{\label{tab_cch}Decay modes containing
491: baryon-antibaryon nonets in charmonium decays. The first $J^P$ is
492: for the accompanying particle while the second for the
493: baryon-antibaryon resonance.}
494: {\footnotesize%%\small
495: \begin{tabular}{clc} \hline \hline
496: &~~~~~~~~decay mode & Note \\
497: \hline
498:
499: $1^-\&0^{-}$ & $\roz\bppb,~\rop\bnpb,~\rom\bnbp$ & \\
500: & $K^{*+}\bpbl,~K^{*-}\bplb$ &$\ast$\\
501: & $K^{*0}\bnbl,~\overline{K}^{*0}\bnlb$&$\ast$\\
502: & $\omega\bppb$ & \\
503: & $\phi\bllb$ &$\ast$\\
504: $1^+\&0^{-}$ & $b_1^0(1235)\bppb$ &$\ast$\\
505: & $b_1^+(1235)\bnpb,~b_1^-(1235)\bnbp$&$\ast$\\
506: & $h_1(1170)\bppb,~h_1(1170)\bllb,~$ &$\ast$\\
507: & $K_1^{+}(1270)\bpbl,~K_1^{-}(1270)\bplb$
508: &$\ast$\\
509: & $K_1^{0}(1270)\bnbl,~
510: \overline{K}_1^{0}(1270)\bnlb$ &$\ast$\\
511: & $K_1^{+}(1400)\bpbl,~K_1^{-}(1400)\bplb$
512: &$\ast$\\
513: & $K_1^{0}(1400)\bnbl,~
514: \overline{K}_1^{0}(1400)\bnlb$ &$\ast$\\
515: \hline
516: $0^-\&1^{-}$ & $\piz\bppb,~\pip\bnpb,~\pim\bnbp$ & \\
517: & $\kap\bpbl,~\kaz\bnbl$ & \\
518: & $\kam\bplb,~\kzb\bnlb$ & \\
519: & $\eta\bppb,~\eta\bllb$ & \\
520: & $\etap\bppb,~\etap\bllb$ &$\ast$\\
521: $0^+\&1^{-}$ & $a_0^0(980)\bppb$ & \\
522: & $a_0^+(980)\bnpb,~a_0^-(980)\bnbp$ & \\
523: & $a_0^0(1450)\bppb$ &$\ast$\\
524: & $a_0^+(1450)\bnpb,~a_0^-(1450)\bnbp$&$\ast$\\
525: & $f_0(980)\bppb,~f_0(980)\bllb,$ & \\
526: & $f_0(1370)\bppb,~f_0(1370)\bllb,$ &$\ast$\\
527: & $\ko^{*+}(1430)\bpbl,~\ko^{*-}(1430)\bplb$
528: &$\ast$\\
529: & $\ko^{*0}(1430)\bnbl,~
530: \overline{\ko}^{*0}(1430)\bnlb$ &$\ast$\\
531: $1^+\&1^{-}$ & $a_1^0(1260)\bppb$ &$\ast$\\
532: & $a_1^+(1260)\bnpb,~a_1^-(1260)\bnbp$&$\ast$\\
533: & $f_1(1285)\bppb,~f_1(1420)\bllb,$ &$\ast$\\
534: & $K_1^{+}(1270)\bpbl,~K_1^{-}(1270)\bplb$
535: &$\ast$\\
536: & $K_1^{0}(1270)\bnbl,~
537: \overline{K}_1^{0}(1270)\bnlb$ &$\ast$\\
538: & $K_1^{+}(1400)\bpbl,~K_1^{-}(1400)\bplb$
539: &$\ast$\\
540: & $K_1^{0}(1400)\bnbl,~
541: \overline{K}_1^{0}(1400)\bnlb$ &$\ast$\\
542: $2^+\&1^{-}$ & $a_2^0(1320)\bppb$ &$\ast$\\
543: & $a_2^+(1320)\bnpb,~a_2^-(1320)\bnbp$&$\ast$\\
544: & $f_2(1270)\bppb,$ &$\ast$\\
545: & $f^{\prime}_2(1525)\bllb$ &$\ast \ast$\\
546: & $K_2^{*+}(1430)\bpbl,~K_2^{*-}(1430)\bplb$
547: &$\ast$\\
548: & $K_2^{*0}(1430)\bnbl,~
549: \overline{K}_2^{*0}(1430)\bnlb$ &$\ast$\\
550: \hline \hline
551: \end{tabular} \\
552: $\ast$: not allowed in $\jpsi$ decays;\\
553: $\ast$ $\ast$: not allowed in $\psp$ decay.}
554: \end{table}
555: %\end{table*}
556:
557: The production of the $0^-$ baryon-antibaryon bound states in
558: $\jpsi$ (or $\psp$) decays can be accompanied by a vector meson. For
559: the iso-vector bound states, one may look for the $\rho N \overline{N}$
560: (nucleon antinucleon) final states,
561: including $\rho^+ n \overline{p}$, $\rho^0 p \overline{p}$ and
562: $\rho^- p \overline{n}$; for the iso-scalar bound state, one may look for
563: the $\omega p \overline{p}$ final state; while for the strange
564: states, one may look for the $K^{*+} \Lambda \overline{p} +
565: c.c.$ and $K^{*0} \Lambda \overline{n} + c.c.$ final states. The neutron or
566: anti-neutron which is not detected may be %measured by
567: reconstructed by kinematic fit in the event selection. %reconstruction.
568: The $SU(3)$ singlet state can be searched for by measuring $\phi \LLb$
569: final state. The measurement of the $0^-$ baryon-antibaryon bound states
570: together with an axial-vector meson is less promising since almost all the
571: axial-vector mesons are resonances.
572:
573: The production of the $1^-$ baryon-antibaryon bound states can be
574: accompanied by a pseudoscalar ($\pi$, $\eta$, $\eta'$, $K$),
575: scalar, tensor or axial-vector meson. The most promising way
576: to look for them is in the decays with a pseudoscalar meson:
577: analyze $\pi N \overline{N}$ for the iso-vector bound states;
578: analyze $\eta p \overline{p}$ for iso-scalar bound state;
579: and analyze $K^{+} \Lambda \overline{p} + c.c.$ and $K^{0} \Lambda
580: \overline{n} + c.c.$ for the strange bound states. The $SU(3)$ singlet
581: bound state can be searched for via $\eta' \LLb$.
582:
583: It should be noted that the neutral non-strange $0^-$ baryon-antibaryon
584: bound states can also be produced via radiative decays of $\jpsi$ (or
585: $\psp$), while the $1^-$ baryon-antibaryon bound states can not be
586: produced this way due to spin-parity conservation.
587:
588: Although among charmonium decays $\jpsi$ provides a good source of the
589: baryon-antibaryon bound states because of the large data samples,
590: there are disadvantages: the phase space is too small and there are
591: many $N^*$'s near nucleon meson mass threshold, which affect the
592: identification of the states. The $\psp$ decays have larger phase space,
593: however, the data samples are smaller, and there is a large fraction of
594: charmonium transition. CLEOc and BESIII will surely help to improve the
595: %statistics, and a partial wave analysis (PWA) is desirable to
596: statistics, and the partial wave analysis is desirable to
597: take the $N^*$ contribution into account correctly.
598:
599: It is also possible to perform such searches in
600: bottomonium ($\Upsilon$) decays, with the existing data sample at
601: CLEO-III and possibly more if $B$-factories take data at
602: $\Upsilon(1S)$. The phase space is much larger than in
603: charmonium, and the $N^*$ states are far from the
604: baryon-antibaryon mass threshold. In principle, all modes listed
605: in Table~\ref{tab_cch} can be searched for in bottomonium decays.
606:
607: \mbox{} \\
608: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}
609:
610: Although our discussion is limited to $S$-wave, $SU(3)$
611: baryon-antibaryon bound states, it can be easily extended
612: in many aspects. First, the $P$-wave, $D$-wave and even higher angular
613: momentum multiplets are also expected to exist. Thus we
614: have $J^P=0^+$, $1^+$, $2^+,\cdots$, states. Second, the scheme can be
615: extended by including more baryons, for example, the charmed
616: baryon $\Lambda_c$. As has been reported by the Belle
617: collaboration, an enhancement was observed in $\Lambda_c \bar{p}$
618: mass spectrum near the threshold~\cite{bellelcp}. This can be
619: interpreted as a member in the $SU(4)$ multiplets.
620: Last, the extension to the baryon-meson, or the meson-meson bound states is
621: in principle straightforward. Nevertheless, the existence of such
622: kinds of resonances can merely be determined by experiment.
623:
624: In summary, the observations of the enhancements near the
625: baryon antibaryon mass thresholds in charmonium and $B$ decays bring us
626: fresh ideas in the study of hadron spectroscopy. With the known
627: symmetry properties of strong interaction, we foresee the
628: existence of the nonet baryon-antibaryon bound states and their
629: possible quantum numbers in a revived FYS model, even though we cannot
630: calculate the binding energies from the first principle of QCD at present.
631: In the light of our scheme, we know where to find these bound
632: states in $\jpsi$, $\psp$, $\Upsilon$ and $B$ meson decays. The
633: search can be conducted with the existing or soon available
634: CLEOc, BESIII, and $B$-factory data.
635:
636: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
637: \bibitem{besgppb}BES Collaboration, J.~Z.~Bai {\em et al.},
638: \Journal\PRL{91}{022001}{2003}.
639: \bibitem{bespaeppb}BES Collaboration, M.~Ablikim {\em et al.},
640: hep-ex/0503030.
641: \bibitem{bespkl}BES Collaboration, M.~Ablikim {\em et al.},
642: \Journal\PRL{93}{112002}{2004}.
643: \bibitem{cleobdcy}CLEO Collaboration, S.~Anderson {\em et al.},
644: \Journal\PRL{86}{2732}{2001}.
645: \bibitem{belbppk}Belle Collaboration, K.~Abe {\em et al.},
646: \Journal\PRL{88}{181803}{2002}.
647: \bibitem{belbdpp}Belle Collaboration, K.~Abe {\em et al.},
648: \Journal\PRL{89}{151802}{2002}.
649: \bibitem{belbplpi}Belle Collaboration, M.-Z.~Wang {\em et al.},
650: \Journal\PRL{90}{201802}{2003}.
651: \bibitem{belbpppk}Belle Collaboration, M.-Z.~Wang {\em et al.},
652: \Journal\PRL{92}{131801}{2004}.
653: \bibitem{belbllk}Belle Collaboration, Y.-J.~Lee {\em et al.},
654: \Journal\PRL{93}{211801}{2004}.
655: \bibitem{bababdcy}BABAR Collaboration, B.~Aubert {\em et al.},
656: hep-ex/0408035.
657: \bibitem{th_gppb}
658: A.~Datta and P.~J.~O'Donnell, \Journal\PLB{567}{273}{2003};
659: A.~Sibirtsev {\em et al.}, hep-ph/0411386;
660: D.~V.~Bugg, \Journal\PLB{598}{8}{2004};
661: Chong-Shou Gao and Shi-Lin Zhu,
662: \Journal\CTP{42}{844}{2004}, hep-ph/0308205;
663: B.~S.~Zou and H.~C.~Chiang, \Journal\PRD{69}{034004}{2004};
664: B.~Loiseau and S.~Wycech, hep-ph/0501112.
665: \bibitem{th_cbbpair}
666: J.~L.~Rosner, \Journal\PRD{68}{014004}{2003};
667: Xiao-Gang~He, Xue-Qian~Li and J.~P.~Ma, hep-ph/407083;
668: Chao-Hsi Chang and Hou-Rong Pang, hep-ph/0407188.
669: \bibitem{fermi_yang}E.~Fermi and C.~N.~Yang,
670: \Journal\PR{76}{1739}{1949}.
671: \bibitem{sakata}S.~Sakata, \Journal\PTP{16}{686}{1956}.
672: \bibitem{nishijima}T.~Nakano and K.~Nishijima,
673: \Journal\PTP{10}{581}{1953}; K.~Nishijima,
674: \Journal\PTP{12}{107}{1954}; {\em idid}, {\bf 13} (1955) 285;
675: M.~Gell-Mann, \Journal\PR{92}{833}{1953}.
676: \bibitem{ikeda}M.~Ikeda, S.~Ogawa and Y.~Ohnuki,
677: \Journal\PTP{22}{715}{1959}.
678: \bibitem{exp_eta}A.~Pevsner {\em et al.}, \Journal\PRL{7}{421}{1961};
679: C.~Alff {\em et al.}, \Journal\PRL{9}{325}{1962}.
680: \bibitem{gmnm}M.~Gell-Mann, \Journal\PR{125}{1067}{1962};
681: Y.~Ne'eman, \Journal\NP{26}{222}{1961}.
682: \bibitem{gellman}M.~Gell-Mann, {\em Proceedings of the International
683: Conference on High-Energy Nuclear Physics}, Geneva, 1962 (CERN
684: Scientific Infromation Service, Geneva, Switzerland, 1962), p.805.
685: \bibitem{exp_omega}G.~S.~Abrams {\em et al.},
686: \Journal\PRL{13}{670}{1964}; V.~E.~Barnes, \Journal\PRL{12}{204}{1964}.
687: \bibitem{haber}H.~E.~Haber and J.~Perrier, \Journal\PRD{32}{2961}{1985}.
688: \bibitem{etaxy}J.~L.~Rosner, \Journal\PRD{27}{1101}{1983};
689: L.~K$\ddot{\hbox{o}}$pke and N.~Wermes, \Journal\PR{174}{67}{1989}.
690: \bibitem{bellelcp}Belle Collaboration, K.~Abe {\em et al.},
691: hep-ex/0409005.
692: \end{thebibliography}
693:
694: \end{document}
695: