1: \documentclass[a4paper]{jpconf}

2: %\documentstyle[times,pramana,epsf,floats]{ias}

3: %\documentstyle[aps,manuscript]{revtex}

4: %\newcommand{\MF}{{\large{\manual META}\-{\manual FONT}}}

5: %\newcommand{\manual}{rm}        % Substitute rm (Roman) font.

6: %\newcommand\bs{\char '134 }     %

7: \input epsf

8: %\documentclass{article}

9: %\usepackage[active]{srcltx} % Remove this line for the finished MS.

10: \oddsidemargin -.3 in

11: \textwidth 7in

12: \textheight 9in

13: \topmargin -.5in

14: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

15: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

16: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

17: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

18: \def\phii{\phi_{i}}

19: \def\phij{\phi_{j}}

20: \def\phihati{\hat{\phi_{i}}}

21: \def\phihatj{\hat{\phi_{j}}}

22: \def\Phii{\Phi_{i}}

23: \def\Phij{\Phi_{j}}

24: \def\Phihati{\hat{\Phi_{i}}}

25: \def\Phihatj{\hat{\Phi_{j}}}

26: \def\fof{\frac{\delta S}{\delta\Phi_i}|_{\Phi_{i}=\phi_{i}}}

27: \def\sof{\frac{\delta^{2} S}{\delta\Phi_i \delta\Phi_j}|_{\Phi=\phi}}

28: \def\dvdphi{\frac{\partial V}{\partial\phii}}

29: \def\vecx{\underline{x}}

30: \def\vece{\underline{e}}

31: \def\veck{\underline{k}}

32: \def\kdotx{\underline{k}\cdot\underline{x}}

33: \def\momvol{\frac{d^{3}\underline{k}}{(2\pi)^{3}}}

34: \def\nn{\nonumber}

35: \newcommand{\lrb}{\left(}

36: \newcommand{\rrb}{\right)}

37: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}

38: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}

39: \def\adagk{a^{\dag}_{k}}

40: \def\adag-k{a^{\dag}_{-k}}

41: \def\a-k{a_{-k}}

42: \def\ak{a_{k}}

43: \def\ddagk{d^{\dag}_{k}}

44: \def\ddag-k{d^{\dag}_{-k}}

45: \def\d-k{d_{-k}}

46: \def\dk{d_{k}}

47: 

48: \def\Bdagk{A^{\dag}_{\theta(k)}}

49: \def\Bdag-k{A^{\dag}_{\theta(k)}}

50: \def\B-k{A_{\theta(-k)}}

51: \def\Bk{A_{\theta(k)}}

52: 

53: \def\Ck{D_{\theta(k)}}

54: \def\Cdagk{D^{\dag}_{\theta(k)}}

55: \def\C-k{D_{\theta(-k)}}

56: \def\Cdag-k{D^{\dag}_{\theta(k)}}

57: 

58: \def\Fk{F_{k}}

59: \def\Fdagk{F^{\dag}_{k}}

60: \def\F-k{F_{k}}

61: \def\Fdag-k{F^{\dag}_{-k}}

62: 

63: \def\Adagk{A^{\dag}_{k}}

64: \def\Adag-k{A^{\dag}_{-k}}

65: \def\A-k{A_{-k}}

66: \def\Ak{A_{k}}

67: \def\Ddagk{D^{\dag}_{k}}

68: \def\Ddag-k{D^{\dag}_{-k}}

69: \def\Gdagk{G^{\dag}_{k}}

70: \def\Gdag-k{G^{\dag}_{-k}}

71: \def\G-k{G_{-k}}

72: \def\Gk{G_{k}}

73: \def\omsumpi{\lrb\frac{\Omega_{\pi}}{\omega_{\pi}}+\frac{\omega_{\pi}}{\Omega_{\pi}}\rrb}

74: \def\omsumsigma{\lrb\frac{\Omega_{\Sigma}}{\omega_{\Sigma}}+\frac{\omega_{\Sigma}}{\Omega_{\Sigma}}\rrb}

75: \def\omdifpi{\lrb\frac{\Omega_{\pi}}{\omega_{\pi}}-\frac{\omega_{\pi}}{\Omega_{\pi}}\rrb}

76: \def\omdifsigma{\lrb\frac{\Omega_{\Sigma}}{\omega_{\Sigma}}-\frac{\omega_{\Sigma}}{\Omega_{\Sigma}}\rrb}

77: \def\bmat{\lrb\begin{array}{c}}

78: \def\emat{\end{array}\rrb}

79: \def\phii{\phi_{i}}

80: \def\lb{\label}

81: \begin{document}

82: \title{Pions emerging from an Arbitrarily Disoriented Chiral Condensate.}

83: \author{{\bf B.Bambah$^1$}and\\ {\bf K.V.S. Shiv Chaitanya}}

84: \address{$^1$ School of Physics \\ University of

85:   Hyderabad, Hyderabad-500 046,India}

86: \ead{bbsp@uohyd.ernet.in}

87: \author{\bf C.Mukku$^2$}

88: \address{$^2$ Department of Mathematics Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014,India}

89: \address{$^2$ Department of Computer Science \& Applications\\ Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014,India}

90: \ead{c\_mukku@yahoo.com}

91: Relativistic heavy ion collisions either with fixed target or with

92: head on collisions are providing results which suggest that the

93: chiral phase transition does take place with temperatures crossing

94: 170Mev. The comparatively large sizes of the heavy ions involved

95: in the collisions along with their energy/nucleon, provides a

96: large interaction region for the quarks and gluons. This region is

97: where the Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) forms. The picture we therefore

98: have is that of a collision region where a QGP is formed in a

99: highly non-equilibrium situation with chiral symmetry being

100: restored. This plasma then expands and cools, causing the restored

101: chiral symmetry to be broken once again. In a recent paper [1], we

102: have given a quantum field theoretical model providing

103: multiplicities of pions which would be observed if the QGP

104: undergoes a rapid quench in its expansion or if the expansion is

105: adiabatic. It was also shown how the rapid quench scenario, which

106: is appropriate for the formation of the disoriented chiral

107: condensate (DCC) has a enhancement in the multiplicities of the

108: observed pions. Thus the enhancement signatures in the pion

109: multiplicities are signals for the formation of the DCC also. In

110: our analysis, we had assumed the expansion of the QGP to be

111: isotropic for simplicity. However, recent results from RHIC

112: suggest that there may be anisotropy built in from the nature of

113: the collisions. Not all collisions will be head on with zero

114: impact parameter. There will be instances where there will be

115: non-zero impact parameter causing the impact region to be

116: elliptical and the corresponding QGP to have an elliptical flow.

117: From the nature of our quantum field theoretical model, borrowing

118: from the studies of scalar fields on expanding universes, such as

119: the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universe, it is easy to extend the

120: study to include anisotropy such as that caused by an elliptic

121: flow. We shall report these results elsewhere, in a separate

122: communication [2]. Here, we shall be examining another aspect of

123: the restoration of chiral symmetry. The particular form of our

124: model allows for many metastable states through which the DCC can

125: form. In particular, we find that mixing between various erstwhile

126: pion states in the collision region can produce different signals

127: in the multiplicities of the final state pions.\\ We start with an

128: $O(4)$ quartet of scalar fields in order that we can construct the

129: dynamics of quenched pions in the formation of a disoriented

130: chiral condensate. The background field is the classical

131: disoriented vacuum and the Hamiltonian of the quantum fluctuations

132: around the background field is derived from the $O(4)$ sigma

133:  model keeping one-loop quantum corrections (quadratic order in the fluctuations)[1].

134: The resulting dynamical Hamiltonian for the pion and sigma fields

135: fields in terms of the neutral , charged  pion and sigma creation

136: and annihilation operators ($a,a^{\dag},c,c^{\dag},b $ $b^{\dag}$,

137: and $d,d^{\dag}$)  is[1]: \bea

138:  H&=&\int \momvol

139: \frac{1}{2}\{

140: \frac{\omega_{\pi}}{a^3}(a_k^{\dag}a_k+a_ka^{\dag}_k)

141: +\frac{\omega_{\pi}}{2a^3}(\frac{\Omega_{\pi}^2}{\omega_{\pi}^2}-1)(a_k^{\dag}a_k+a_ka_k^{\dag}+a_{-k}a_{k}+a_{-k}^{\dag}a_{k}^{\dag})\\\nn

142: \\ \nn

143: &+&\frac{\omega_{\Sigma}}{a^3}(

144:  d_k^{\dag}d_k+d_kd^{\dag}_k)+\frac{\omega_{\Sigma}}{2a^3}(\frac{\Omega_\Sigma^2}{\omega_{\Sigma}^2}-1)(d_k^{\dag}d_k+d_kd_k^{\dag}+d_{-k}d_{k}+d_{-k}^{\dag}d_{k}^{\dag})\}\\

145:  \nn &+&

146:  \frac{\omega_{\pi}}{a^3}(b_k^{\dag}b_k+c_kc^{\dag}_k)

147: +\frac{\omega_{\pi}}{2a^3}(\frac{\Omega_{\pi_\pm}^2}{\omega_{\pi}^2}-1)(b_k^{\dag}b_k+c_kc_k^{\dag}+b_{-k}c_{k}+c_{-k}^{\dag}b_{k}^{\dag})\\

148: \nn &+&

149:  \frac{\lambda a^3v^2cos^2(\rho)sin^2(\theta)}{4\omega_\pi}

150: (b_k b_{-k}+b_{k}c^{\dag}_k

151:  +c^{\dag}_k b_{k}+c_k c_{-k}+c^{\dag}_k

152:  c^{\dag}_{-k}+c_kb^{\dag}_k+b^{\dag}_{k}c_{k}+b^{\dag}_{k}b^{\dag}_{-k}))\\

153:  \nn

154:  &+& \frac{\lambda

155: a^3v^2cos(\rho)sin(\rho)sin^2(\theta)}{2\omega_\pi}

156: \lrb b_k a_{-k}+b_{k}a^{\dag}_k+c^{\dag}_k a_{k}+c_k

157: a_{-k}+c^{\dag}_k

158: a^{\dag}_{-k}+c_ka^{\dag}_k+b^{\dag}_{k}a_{k}+b^{\dag}_{k}a^{\dag}_{-k}\rrb\\

159: \nn

160:  &+ &\frac{\lambda

161: a^3v^2sin(\rho)sin(\theta)cos(\theta)}{\sqrt{\omega_\pi\omega_{\Sigma}}}\lrb

162:  d_k a_{-k}+d_{k}a^{\dag}_k+d^{\dag}_k a_{k}+d^{\dag}_k

163:  a^{\dag}_{-k}\rrb

164:  \nn \\

165: &+& \frac{\lambda

166: a^3v^2cos(\rho)sin(\theta)cos(\theta)}{\sqrt{\omega_{\pi}\omega_{\Sigma}}}

167:  \lrb

168:  b_k d_{-k}+b_{k}d^{\dag}_k+c^{\dag}_k d_{k}+c_k d_{-k}+c^{\dag}_k d^{\dag}_{-k}+c_kd^{\dag}_k+b^{\dag}_{k}d_{k}+b^{\dag}_{k}d^{\dag}_{-k}\rrb

169:  \}\eea

170:  where \be

171: \frac{\omega^{2}_{\pi}(k)}{a^{6}}\equiv\frac{\omega^{2}_{\pi_0}(k)}{a^{6}}=\frac{\omega^{2}_{\pi_\pm}(k)}{a^{6}}=(m_{\pi}^{2}+\frac{\veck^{2}}{a^{2}}):\:

172: \frac{\omega^{2}_{\Sigma}(k)}{a^{6}}=(m_{\Sigma}^{2}+\frac{\veck^{2}}{a^{2}})\ee

173: and

174: \bea

175: \frac{\Omega^2_{\pi_0}-\omega^2_{\pi_0}}{a^6}&=&\lambda[(<\Phi^2>-v^2)+2v_3^2]

176: \nn \\ \frac{\Omega^2_{\pi

177: {\pm}}-\omega^2_{\pi_{\pm}}}{a^6}&=&\lambda[(<\Phi^2>-v^2)+2v_+v_-]

178: \nn

179: \\

180: \frac{\Omega^2_{\Sigma}-\omega^2_{\Sigma}}{a^6}&=&\lambda[(<\Phi^2>-v^2)+2\sigma^2]

181: \eea

182: 

183: The background field  in the disoriented phase is given by :

184: \begin{equation}

185: \left(\begin{array}{c}v_+\\ v_-\\ v_3=v\\

186: \sigma\end{array}\right)\equiv <\Phi>,

187: \end{equation}

188:  In keeping with the disorientation of the vacuum on a three sphere we   parametrize the background field  through three angles:\be

189: <\Phi>=\lrb \ba{c}

190: vCos(\rho)Sin(\theta)Sin(\alpha)\\vCos(\rho)Sin(\theta)Cos(\alpha)\\vSin(\rho)Sin(\theta)\\vCos(\theta)\ea

191: \rrb.\ee

192: The dynamical evolution of  a system governed by this Hamiltonian

193: is considered  from  a  non equilibrium state state of restored

194: symmetry $<\Phi>=0$ at high temperatures to   the equilibrium

195: state of broken symmetry  $<\Phi>=v$ due to  the  subsequent

196: expansion and cooling of the QGP.   The time evolution can be

197: modeled through a time dependence of the parameter $<\Phi>(t)$,

198: which depends on the way in which the system relaxes to

199: equilibrium. In addition there is a time dependence of the

200: expansion factor $a(t)$ which allows for the rate of the expansion

201: of the plasma.  The following scenarios are possible:\\ {\bf A}. A

202: sudden quench from a state of restored symmetry to a state of

203: broken symmetry in a rapidly cooling expanding plasma, the

204: configuration of the  field  lags behind the expansion of the

205: plasma.If $\tau$ is the time the state spends in the symmetry

206: restored phase, a quench can be modeled by assuming that for

207: $0\let\le\tau$ the vacuum expectation value $<\Phi^2>=0$ and for

208: $t

209: >\frac{\tau}{2}$ the vacuum relaxes to its value

210: $<\Phi^2>=<v^2>$. In

211:  such a case the dynamical evolution of  $<\Phi>$ could be modeled by

212:  $

213: <\Phi >(t)=v \Theta[(t-\tau)]$

214: In addition in  a realistic scenario the expansion coefficient

215: $a(t)$ must also be a function of time and has been modeled

216: appropriately in ref [1]. For a sudden quench scenario the

217: Hamiltonian given in equation 1 diagonalizes  to\be H=\int

218: \momvol\frac{1}{2a^3}\{

219: \Omega_{\pi}(k,t)\{(A^{\dag}_{k} A_{k} +

220: \frac{1}{2}) +( C^{\dag}_{k} C_{k} + B^{\dag}_{k}

221: B_{k}+1)\}+\Omega_{\Sigma}(k,t)(D^{\dag}_{k}D_{k}+\frac{1}{2})\}.

222: \ee

223: by a unitary matrix given by a squeezed transformation \be

224: U(r,t)=e^{\int \momvol

225: r(k,t)\{(a^{\dag}_{k}a^{\dag}_{-k}-a_{k}a_{-k})+(d^{\dag}_{k}d^{\dag}_{-k}-d_{k}d_{-k})+(c_{k}b_{-k}+b_{k}c_{-k})-(c^{\dag}_{k}b^{\dag}_{-k}+b^{\dag}_{k}c^{\dag}_{-k})\}}

226: \ee

227: where $r_k$ is the squeezing parameter related to the physical

228: variables $\Omega_{\pi}(k,t)$ and $\omega_{\pi}(k)$ through \be

229: Tanh(2r_k)= \frac{(\frac{\Omega_k(t)}{\omega_\pi})^2-1}

230:  {(\frac{\Omega_k(t)}{\omega_\pi})^2+1} \ee The quench consists

231: of a rapid change of frequency of the time dependent harmonic

232: oscillator from $\Omega_\pi(k,t))$ to $\omega_\pi(k)$ though the

233: time evolution of $<\Phi>(t) $ and $a(t)$. It can be shown that

234: for a sudden frequency jump, such as that of a quench, there is

235: substantial squeezing, resulting in an enhancement of low momentum

236: modes signalling a DCC. The details of the evolution of the

237: Hamiltonian of a system undergoing a sudden quench (enhanced

238: squeezing) also show up in the difference in multiplicity

239: distributions of the charged and neutral pions illustrated in

240: Figure 1.

241: \begin{figure}[htbp]

242: \begin{center}

243: \epsfxsize=6cm\epsfbox{graph3.ps}\end{center} \caption{Shows the

244: variation of $P_{n0}$ (solid line)and $P_{nc}$(dashed line) with

245: $n$ for the {\bf quenched} limit ($r_0=4$)}

246: \end{figure}

247: 

248: {\bf B}. Another non-equilibrium  situation that can arise  is

249: one where the  system can go through a metastable disordered

250: vacuum given by eqn[6] and then relax by quantum fluctuations to

251: an equilibrium configuration. Here  $\theta$  and $\rho$ measure

252: the degree of disorientation of the condensate in isospin space (

253: for charge conservation $\alpha=\frac{\pi}{4}$) . The

254: disorientation can be in the neutral sector $\rho=\frac{\pi}{2}$

255: in which case the angle $\theta $ mixes the neutral pion and sigma

256: field resulting in oscillations and enhancement of neutral pions

257: over the charged pions, we will call this case 1 . The

258: disorientation can be in the charged sector

259: $\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}$, where the angle $\rho$ mixes the charged

260: pions and the neutral pions resulting in charged oscillations and

261: enhancement of charged pions over the neutral pions we will call

262: this case 2. As an illustration of these effects we examine case 1

263: briefly. All the details of case 1 and 2 will be given in an

264: expanded later communication [2]. For case 1 the examination of

265: the Hamiltonian ( obtained by putting $\rho=\frac{\pi}{2}$ ) shows

266: a non-zero mixing term coming from the $\pi_{0}$-$\Sigma$ sector.

267: The misalignment of the vacuum through an angle $\theta$ induces a

268: mixing of the two fields. The mixed fields are

269:  \be

270: \bmat\Bk\\\Ck\emat=\bmat

271: Cos(\theta)\;\;\;Sin(\theta)\\-Sin(\theta)\;\;\;Cos(\theta)\emat\bmat\ak\\\dk\emat\ee

272: The diagonalization procedure for this case involves two squeezing

273: transformations of the mixed fields

274:  \bea

275:  \Fk&=&\mu A_{\theta(k)}+\nu A^{\dag}_{\theta(-k)} \nn\\

276:   \Gk&=&\rho D_{\theta(k)}+\sigma

277: D^{\dag}_{\theta(-k)}.  \eea The diagonalized form is

278: \be H_{\pi/2}=\int \momvol \{ \frac{\Omega_{\pi_\pm}}{a^3}(

279: C^{\dag}_{k} C_{k} +

280: B^{\dag}_{k}B_{k}+1)+\frac{\sqrt{\Omega_{\pi}\Omega_{\Sigma}}}{4

281: a^3}\lrb(\Fdagk\Fk+\frac{1}{2})+(\Gdagk\Gk+\frac{1}{2})\rrb\}\ee

282: During time evolution again we have a time dependent frequency for

283: the state of mixed neutral pions and sigma   which changes from

284: $\frac{\sqrt{\Omega_{\pi}(k,t)\Omega_{\Sigma}(k,t)}}{4 a^3}$

285: to$\frac{\sqrt{\omega_{\pi}(k,t)\omega_{\Sigma}(k,t)}}{4 a^3}$

286: this time through the time evolution of $\theta(t) $ from the

287: disoriented value to 0 and $a(t)$. There is again an enhancement

288: of neutral pions as a result of the DCC formation and furthermore

289: a  mixing in the neutral sector . In addition there are

290: oscillations in the number of neutral pions as the disorientation

291: $\theta$ changes with time shown  in Figure 2.

292: \begin{figure}[htbp]

293: \begin{center}

294: \epsfxsize=6cm\epsfbox{number.ps}\end{center} \caption{Shows the

295: oscillations in the number of neutral pions as a function of the

296: disorientation $\theta$ for the value of the squeezing parameters

297: $"red=\nu=.5,green=\nu=1,blue=\nu=1.5$}

298: \end{figure}

299: 

300: 

301: A case of particular interest , in view of latest preliminary

302: experimental results  is case 2 i.e. $\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}$

303: because there is a mixing of charged and neutral fields due to the

304: disorientation. This gives rise to interesting charge-neutral

305: fluctuations  which can be measured in  a DCC detection

306: experiment[3]. A full discussion of the detailed theory  is given

307: in [2].

308: 

309: To conclude we have modeled  the evolution of the disoriented

310: chiral condensate  through both a sudden quench and with a

311: transition through a metastable state with arbitrary

312: disorientation and have shown that the total multiplicity

313: distributions of charged and neutral pions functions are dramatic

314: characteristic signals for the DCC  and are related directly to

315: the way in which the DCC forms. These are unambiguous, therefore

316: they must be examined thoroughly in searches for the DCC [4]. We

317: are encouraged by the first preliminary data of references [3] and

318: [4], from the analysis of the WA98 experiment at the CERN SPS in

319: which some events show an excess of photons (neutral pion excess)

320: within the overlap region of charged and photon multiplicity

321: detectors, the preliminary results given in ref [4] are shown in

322: figure 3.\begin{figure}[htbp]

323: \begin{center}

324: \epsfxsize=6cm\epsfbox{exp-graf.eps}\end{center} \caption{Shows the

325: photon hits and charged particle hits in WA98 from ref. 4}

326: \end{figure} In view of the results presented in this section, we

327: hope that the future will bring more exotic events with charge

328: excess and neutral and charged multiplicity oscillations.

329: \newpage

330: 

331: 

332: 

333: 

334: {\bf References}

335: \begin{itemize}

336: \item[1.] B. Bambah and C. Mukku, Phys. Rev. D. {\bf70 }(3) 0340001

337: (2004).\\B.A. Bambah and C.Mukku, Annals of Physics 314,

338: 34,(2004)\item[2.] B. A. Bambah , C. Mukku and K.V.S Shiv

339: Chaitanya {\it Dynamics of the Dcc with Arbitrary Disorientation

340: in Isospin Space}( In preparation).

341: \item[3.] T. Nayak ,Pramana 57 ,285,(2001).

342: \item[4.] M.M. Aggarwal et al., e-print archive:nucl-ex/0012004.\\ Madan M

343: Aggarwal, Pramana {\bf 60}, No.5,   987 , (2003)

344: \end{itemize}

345: 

346: 

347: 

348: \end{document}

349: