1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %

3: % Title: CP violation in the $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay

4: %

5: % Authors: T. M. Aliev, S. Rai Choudhury, A. S. Cornell and Naveen Gaur

6: %

7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8: 

9: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

10: 

11: \usepackage{amssymb}

12: \usepackage{latexsym}

13: \usepackage{epsfig}

14: \usepackage{citesort}

15: 

16: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}

17: 

18: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-15pt}

19: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0pt}

20: \setlength{\textwidth}{17.5cm}

21: \setlength{\topmargin}{-0.4in}

22: \setlength{\textheight}{22.5cm}

23: \addtolength{\jot}{3pt}

24: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-3pt}

25: 

26: \def\baselinestretch{1.2}

27: 

28: \newcommand{\cleqn}{\setcounter{equation}{0}}

29: 

30: %@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

31: 

32: \def\ds{\displaystyle}

33: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}

34: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

35: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

36: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

37: \def\beeq{\begin{eqnarray}}

38: \def\eeeq{\end{eqnarray}}

39: \def\ve{\vert}

40: \def\vel{\left|}

41: \def\ver{\right|}

42: \def\nnb{\nonumber}

43: \def\ga{\left(}

44: \def\dr{\right)}

45: \def\aga{\left\{}

46: \def\adr{\right\}}

47: \def\lla{\left<}

48: \def\rra{\right>}

49: \def\rar{\rightarrow}

50: \def\nnb{\nonumber}

51: \def\la{\langle}

52: \def\ra{\rangle}

53: \def\ba{\begin{array}}

54: \def\ea{\end{array}}

55: \def\tr{\mbox{Tr}}

56: \def\ssp{{\Sigma^{*+}}}

57: \def\sso{{\Sigma^{*0}}}

58: \def\ssm{{\Sigma^{*-}}}

59: \def\xis0{{\Xi^{*0}}}

60: \def\xism{{\Xi^{*-}}}

61: \def\qs{\la \bar s s \ra}

62: \def\qu{\la \bar u u \ra}

63: \def\qd{\la \bar d d \ra}

64: \def\qq{\la \bar q q \ra}

65: \def\gGgG{\la g^2 G^2 \ra}

66: \def\q{\gamma_5 \not\!q}

67: \def\x{\gamma_5 \not\!x}

68: \def\g5{\gamma_5}

69: \def\sb{S_Q^{cf}}

70: \def\sd{S_d^{be}}

71: \def\su{S_u^{ad}}

72: \def\ss{S_s^{??}}

73: \def\sbp{{S}_Q^{'cf}}

74: \def\sdp{{S}_d^{'be}}

75: \def\sup{{S}_u^{'ad}}

76: \def\ssp{{S}_s^{'??}}

77: \def\sig{\sigma_{\mu \nu} \gamma_5 p^\mu q^\nu}

78: \def\fo{f_0(\frac{s_0}{M^2})}

79: \def\ffi{f_1(\frac{s_0}{M^2})}

80: \def\fii{f_2(\frac{s_0}{M^2})}

81: \def\O{{\cal O}}

82: \def\sl{{\Sigma^0 \Lambda}}

83: \def\es{\!\!\! &=& \!\!\!}

84: \def\ap{\!\!\! &\approx& \!\!\!}

85: \def\ar{&+& \!\!\!}

86: \def\ek{&-& \!\!\!}

87: \def\cp{&\times& \!\!\!}

88: \def\se{\!\!\! &\simeq& \!\!\!}

89: \def\ses{\!\!\! &\sim& \!\!\!}

90: \def\kpm{&\pm& \!\!\!}

91: \def\kmp{&\mp& \!\!\!}

92: 

93: % .........................................................

94: 

95: \def\simlt{\stackrel{<}{{}_\sim}}

96: \def\simgt{\stackrel{>}{{}_\sim}}

97: 

98: % .........................................................

99: 

100: \begin{document}

101: 

102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

103: %  Titlepage

104: 

105: \begin{titlepage}

106: 

107: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

108: 

109: \vspace*{-0.5truecm}

110: \begin{flushright}

111: {\tt hep-ph/0506188 \\

112: YITP-05-33}

113: \end{flushright}

114: \vspace*{0.5truecm}

115: 

116: \begin{center}

117: 

118: {\Large \bf \boldmath CP violation in the $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay}\\

119: 

120: \hspace{10pt}\\

121: \vspace{1truecm}

122: 

123: {\bf T. M. Aliev$^a$ \footnote{taliev@metu.edu.tr},

124: S. Rai Choudhury$^b$\footnote{src@physics.du.ac.in},

125: A. S. Cornell$^c$\footnote{alanc@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp}

126: and

127: Naveen Gaur$^b$\footnote{naveen@physics.du.ac.in}}

128: \vskip .8cm

129: $^a ${\it Department of Physics, Middle East Technical University ,

130: 06531, Ankara, Turkey}, \\

131: {\it Institute of Physics, Baku, Azerbaijan.} \\

132: $^b$ {\it Department of Physics $\&$ Astrophysics,

133: University of Delhi, Delhi - 110 007, India.} \\

134: $^c${\it Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics,

135: Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.}

136: 

137: \vskip 2cm

138: {\bf Abstract}

139: \vskip .2cm

140: \begin{quote}

141: Standard Model (SM) CP asymmetries in $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ are

142: expected to be very small. This feature could help in the

143: understanding of new physics scenarios which predict the existence

144: of CP odd phases in various Wilson coefficients. In this paper we

145: have analyzed the $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay in beyond the SM

146: scenarios where the Wilson coefficients have new CP odd phases.

147: The sensitivity of the CP asymmetries on these new weak phases is

148: discussed.

149: \end{quote}

150: \end{center}

151: 

152: %\vspace{1cm}

153: ~~~PACS numbers: 13.20.He, 12.60.--i, 13.88.+e

154: 

155: \end{titlepage}

156: 

157: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

158: %  Section 1: Introduction

159: 

160: \section{Introduction}

161: 

162: One of the key ingredients in the Standard Model (SM) is CP violation,

163: which can be described by the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM)

164: matrix\cite{R1}. However, even with this description we still have

165: an incomplete picture concerning the origin of CP violation in the

166: SM. The exploitation of CP violation from the theoretical and

167: experimental sides of physics is very exciting, as it may open a

168: window to the existence of new physics beyond the SM. Note that the

169: existence of CP violation is a well established fact in $K$\cite{R3}

170: and $B$\cite{R4} meson systems.

171: 

172: \par In order to study the sources of CP violation it is promising to

173: consider those observables which are sensitive to the possible CP

174: phases. For example, CP asymmetries in decay widths and lepton

175: polarization asymmetries, such as explored in references

176: \cite{R5,R7,R8,R10}.

177: 

178: \par One of the promising directions for measuring CP violation is the

179: analysis of rare semi-leptonic decays. From the experimental

180: perspective the exclusive decay modes, such as $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$

181: and $B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-$, are easy to measure. Two years ago the

182: Belle\cite{R11} and BaBar\cite{R12} collaborations announced the

183: following results for the branching ratios for the $B \to K \ell^+

184: \ell^-$ and $B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-$ decays;

185: \bea

186: Br(B \rar K \ell^+ \ell^-) = \left\{ \begin{array}{lc}

187: \left( 4.8^{+1.0}_{-0.9} \pm 0.3 \pm 0.1\right) \times

188: 10^{-7}& \cite{R11}~,\\ \\

189: \left( 0.65^{+0.14}_{-0.13} \pm 0.04\right) \times 10^{-6}&

190: \cite{R12}~,\end{array} \right. \nnb

191: \eea

192: \bea

193: Br(B \rar K^* \ell^+ \ell^-) = \left\{ \begin{array}{lc}

194: \left( 11.5^{+2.6}_{-3.4} \pm 0.8 \pm 0.2\right) \times

195: 10^{-7}& \cite{R11}~,\\ \\

196: \left( 0.88^{+0.23}_{-0.29}\right) \times 10^{-6}&

197: \cite{R12}~.\end{array} \right. \nnb

198: \eea

199: 

200: \par The analysis for study of possible CP violation in $B \to K^*

201: \ell^+ \ell^-$ was done in earlier works \cite{R13,Kruger:2000zg}.

202: The goal of our present work is to similarly study the possible CP

203: violation asymmetry in the exclusive $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay

204: using the most general form of the effective Hamiltonian, including

205: all possible forms of interactions. Such an analysis will be useful

206: for comparisons with experimental results, as the inclusive modes are

207: generally hard to measure. Note that the CP violation in the decay $B

208: \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ is induced by the $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$

209: transition, which in the SM is practically equal to zero. This is due to

210: the CKM factors $V_{ub} V_{us}^*$ being negligible, with the result

211: that the unitarity condition produces only an overall phase factor in

212: the matrix element. Therefore the CP asymmetry is strongly

213: suppressed. As such, any deviation from zero for the CP asymmetry

214: would be an indication of new physics.

215: 

216: \par This paper is organized as follows. In section 2, using

217: the most general form of the effective Hamiltonian, we derive the

218: matrix element of the $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay in terms of the $B

219: \to K$ transition form-factors. We also derive in this section the

220: general analytic expression for the CP violating asymmetry. Section 3

221: contains our numerical analysis of the CP violating asymmetries

222: together with our conclusions.

223: 

224: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

225: %  Section 2

226: 

227: \section{The matrix element for the $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay}

228: 

229: In this section we calculate the matrix element for the $B \to K

230: \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay, which is governed by the $b \to s \ell^+

231: \ell^-$ transition at the quark level. The most general form of

232: the effective Hamiltonian,  for the $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$

233: transition (in terms of the twelve model independent four-Fermi

234: interactions) can be written in the following form\cite{R14};

235: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eff}

236: {\cal H}_{eff} & = & \displaystyle \frac{\alpha G_F}{\sqrt{2} \pi}

237: V_{tb} V_{ts}^* \Bigg[ C_{SL} \left( \bar{s} i \sigma_{\mu \nu}

238: \frac{q^{\nu}}{q^2} L b \right) \bar{\ell} \gamma^{\mu} \ell +

239: C_{BR} \left( \bar{s} i \sigma_{\mu \nu} \frac{q^{\nu}}{q^2} R b

240: \right)

241: \bar{\ell} \gamma^{\mu} \ell \nonumber \\

242: && \hspace{0.8in} + C_{LL}^{tot}\left( \bar{s}_L \gamma_{\mu} b_L

243: \right) \bar{\ell}_L \gamma^{\mu} \ell_L + C_{LR}^{tot} \left(

244: \bar{s}_L \gamma_{\mu} b_L \right) \bar{\ell}_R \gamma^{\mu} \ell_R

245: + C_{RL} \left( \bar{s}_R \gamma_{\mu} b_R \right) \bar{\ell}_L

246: \gamma^{\mu}

247: \ell_L \nonumber \\

248: && \hspace{0.8in} + C_{RR} \left( \bar{s}_R \gamma_{\mu} b_R \right)

249: \bar{\ell}_R \gamma^{\mu} \ell_R + C_{LRLR} \left( \bar{s}_L b_R

250: \right) \bar{\ell}_L \ell_R + C_{RLLR} \left( \bar{s}_R b_L \right)

251: \bar{\ell}_L \ell_R \nonumber \\

252: && \hspace{0.8in} + C_{LRRL} \left( \bar{s}_L b_R \right)

253: \bar{\ell}_R \ell_L + C_{RLRL} \left( \bar{s}_R b_L \right)

254: \bar{\ell}_R \ell_L + C_T \bar{s} \sigma_{\mu \nu} b \bar{\ell}

255: \sigma^{\mu \nu} \ell

256: \nonumber \\

257: && \hspace{0.8in} + i C_{TE} \epsilon^{\mu \nu \alpha \beta} \bar{s}

258: \sigma_{\mu \nu} b \bar{\ell} \sigma_{\alpha \beta} \ell \Bigg] ,

259: \label{Hamiltonian}

260: \end{eqnarray}

261: where $L/R = \frac{1}{2} ( 1 \mp \gamma_5 )$, the $C_X$'s are the

262: Wilson coefficients of the four-Fermi interactions and

263: $q_{\mu}=(p_B-p_K)_{\mu}= (p_+ + p_-)_{\mu}$ is the momentum

264: transfer. Among the twelve Wilson coefficients several already

265: exist in the SM. For example, the first two terms with

266: coefficients $C_{SL}$ and $C_{BR}$ describe the penguin operators,

267: where in the SM these coefficients are equal to  $-2 m_s

268: C_7^{eff}$ and $-2 m_b C_7^{eff}$. The next four terms in

269: Eq.(\ref{eff}) are the vector type interactions with coefficients

270: $C_{LL}^{tot}$, $C_{LR}^{tot}$, $C_{RL}$ and $C_{RR}$. Two of

271: these vector interactions, $C_{LL}^{tot}$ and $C_{LR}^{tot}$, also

272: exist in the SM with the form $(C_9^{eff}-C_{10})$ and

273: $(C_9^{eff}+C_{10})$. Therefore we can say that the coefficients

274: $C_{LL}^{tot}$ and $C_{LR}^{tot}$ describe the sum of the

275: contributions from the SM and the new physics, where they can be

276: written as; \bea

277: C_{LL}^{tot} &=& C_9^{eff} - C_{10} + C_{LL}~, \nnb \\

278: C_{LR}^{tot} &=& C_9^{eff} + C_{10} + C_{LR}~. \nnb

279: \eea

280: The terms with coefficients $C_{LRLR}$, $C_{RLLR}$, $C_{LRRL}$ and

281: $C_{RLRL}$ describe the scalar type interactions. The last two terms,

282: with the coefficients $C_T$ and $C_{TE}$, describe the tensor type

283: interactions.

284: 

285: \par Now that we have the effective Hamiltonian, describing the $b \to

286: s \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay at a scale $\mu\simeq m_B$, we can write down

287: the matrix elements for the $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay. The matrix

288: element for this decay can be obtained by 

289: sandwiching the effective Hamiltonian between $B$ and $K$ meson

290: states; which are parameterized in terms of form-factors which depend

291: on the momentum transfer squared, $q^2=(p_B-p_K)^2= (p_+-p_-)^2$. It

292: follows from Eq.(\ref{eff}) that in order to calculate the amplitude

293: of the $B \to 

294: K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay the following matrix elements are required;

295: $$\lla K\vel \bar s \gamma_\mu b \ver B \rra ,

296: \lla K \vel \bar s i\sigma_{\mu\nu} q^\nu b \ver B \rra ,

297: \lla K \vel \bar s b \ver B \rra ,

298: \lla K \vel \bar s \sigma_{\mu\nu} b \ver B \rra . $$

299: These matrix elements are defined as follows \cite{R16,R17,R20};

300: \bea \label{e6002}

301: \lla K(p_{K}) \vel \bar s \gamma_\mu b \ver B(p_B) \rra = f_+

302: \Bigg[ (p_B+p_K)_\mu - \frac{m_B^2-m_K^2}{q^2} \, q_\mu \Bigg] +

303: f_0 \,\frac{m_B^2-m_K^2}{q^2} \, q_\mu , \eea

304: 

305:  \bea \label{e6003} \lla K(p_{K}) \vel \bar s

306: \sigma_{\mu\nu}

307:  b \ver B(p_B) \rra = -i \, \frac{f_T}{m_B+m_K}

308: \Big[ (p_B+p_K)_\mu q_\nu - q_\mu (p_B+p_K)_\nu\Big]~. \eea

309:  Note

310: that the finiteness of Eq.(\ref{eff}) at $q^2=0$ is guaranteed by

311: assuming that $f_+(0) = f_0(0)$.

312: \par The matrix elements $\lla K(p_{K}) \vel \bar s i \sigma_{\mu\nu}

313: q^\nu b \ver B(p_B) \rra$ and $\lla K \vel \bar s b \ver B \rra$ can

314: be obtained from Eqs.(\ref{e6002}) and (\ref{e6003}) by multiplying

315: both sides of these equations by $q^\mu$ and using the equations of

316: motion, we get;

317: \bea \label{e6004} \lla

318: K(p_{K}) \vel \bar s b \ver B(p_B) \rra & = &

319: f_0 \, \frac{m_B^2-m_K^2}{m_b-m_s} , \\

320: \label{e6005} \lla K(p_{K}) \vel \bar s i \sigma_{\mu\nu} q^\nu b

321: \ver B(p_B) \rra & = & \frac{f_T}{m_B+m_K} \Big[ (p_B+p_K)_\mu q^2 -

322: q_\mu (m_B^2-m_K^2) \Big] . \eea

323: 

324: \par As we have already mentioned the form-factors entering

325: Eqs.(\ref{e6002})-(\ref{e6005}) represent the hadronization

326: process, where in order to calculate these form-factors

327: information about the nonperturbative region of QCD is required.

328: Therefore for the estimation of the form-factors to be reliable a

329: nonperturbative approach is needed. Among the nonperturbative

330: approaches the QCD sum rule \cite{R15} is more predictive in

331: studying the properties of hadrons. The form-factors appearing in

332: the $B \to K$ transition are computed in the framework of the

333: three point QCD sum rules \cite{R16} and  in the light cone QCD

334: sum rules\cite{R17,R20}. We will use the result of the work

335: in \cite{R20} where radiative corrections to the leading twist

336: wave functions and $SU(3)$ breaking effects are taken into

337: account. As a result the form-factors are parameterized in the

338: following way \cite{R20};  

339: \beq\label{fi}

340: f_i(q^2)=\frac{r_1}{1-q^2/m_1^2}+\frac{r_2}{(1-q^2/m_1^2)^2} ,

341: \eeq where $1=+$ or $T$, and \beq\label{f0}

342: f_0(q^2)=\frac{r_2}{1-q^2/m_{fit}^2} , \eeq with $m_1=5.41$GeV

343: and the other parameters as given in Table 1.

344: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

345: %  Table

346: \begin{table}[htb]

347: \begin{center}

348: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|}

349:   \hline

350:    & $r_1$ &$r_2$ &$m_{fit}^2$ \\

351:   \hline \hline

352:  $f_+ $&$ 0.162$ &$0.173$ &$--$  \\

353:   $f_0$ & 0. &$ 0.33$ &37.46 \\

354:   $f_T$&$ 0.161 $&$0.198$& $--$  \\

355:   \hline

356: \end{tabular}

357: \caption{\it The parameters for the form-factors of the $B \to K$

358: transition as given in \cite{R20}.}\label{app:table:1}

359: \end{center}

360: \end{table}

361: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

362: 

363: \par Using the definition of the form factors given in

364: Eqs.(\ref{e6002})-(\ref{e6005}) we arrive at the following matrix

365: element for the $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay;

366: \bea \label{e6006} {\cal M}(B\rightarrow K

367: \ell^{+}\ell^{-}) & = & \frac{G_F \alpha}{4 \sqrt{2} \pi} V_{tb}

368: V_{ts}^\ast \Bigg\{ \bar \ell \gamma^\mu \ell \, \Big[

369: A (p_B+p_K)_\mu + B q_\mu \Big] \nnb \\

370: &&\hspace{1in}+ \bar \ell \gamma^\mu \gamma_5 \ell \, \Big[

371: C (p_B+p_K)_\mu  + D q_\mu \Big]

372: +\bar \ell \ell \,Q

373: + \bar \ell \gamma_5 \ell \, N \nnb \\

374: &&\hspace{1in}+ 4 \bar \ell \sigma^{\mu\nu}  \ell\, (- i G )

375: \Big[ (p_B+p_K)_\mu q_\nu - (p_B+p_K)_\nu q_\mu

376: \Big] \nnb \\

377: &&\hspace{1in}+ 4 \bar \ell \sigma^{\alpha\beta}  \ell \,

378: \epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} \, H

379: \Big[ (p_B+p_K)_\mu q_\nu - (p_B+p_K)_\nu q_\mu \Big]

380: \Bigg\} .

381: \eea

382: 

383: \par The functions entering Eq.(\ref{e6006}) are defined as;

384: \bea

385: \label{e6007} A &=& (C_{LL}^{tot} + C_{LR}^{tot} + C_{RL} +

386: C_{RR}) f_+ +

387: 2 (C_{BR}+C_{SL}) \frac{f_T}{m_B+m_{K}} , \nnb \\

388: B &=& (C_{LL}^{tot} + C_{LR}^{tot}+ C_{RL} + C_{RR}) f_- -

389: 2 (C_{BR}+C_{SL})\frac{f_T}{(m_B+m_{K})q^2}(m_B^2-m_K^2) , \nnb \\

390: C &=& (C_{LR}^{tot} + C_{RR} - C_{LL}^{tot} - C_{RL}) f_+ ,\nnb \\

391: D &=& (C_{LR}^{tot} + C_{RR} - C_{LL}^{tot} - C_{RL}) f_- , \nnb \\

392: Q &=& f_0 \frac{m_B^2-m_K^2}{m_b-m_s}(C_{LRLR} + C_{RLLR}+C_{LRRL} +

393: C_{RLRL}) ,\nnb \\

394: N &=& f_0 \frac{m_B^2-m_K^2}{m_b-m_s}(C_{LRLR} + C_{RLLR}-C_{LRRL} -

395: C_{RLRL}) ,\nnb \\

396: G &=& \frac{C_T}{m_B+m_K} f_T ,\nnb \\

397: H &=& \frac{C_{TE}}{m_B+m_K} f_T ,

398: \eea

399: where

400: \bea

401: f_- = (f_0-f_+) \frac{m_B^2-m_K^2}{q^2}~.\nnb

402: \eea

403: 

404: \par From Eq.(\ref{e6006}) it follows that the difference from the SM

405: is due to the last four terms only, namely the scalar and tensor type

406: interactions. For an analysis of the CP asymmetry it is necessary to

407: compute the differential decay width for $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$. From

408: the expression of the matrix element given in Eq.(\ref{e6006}) we

409: calculate the following result for the dilepton invariant mass

410: spectrum;

411: \bea \label{e6008} \frac{d\Gamma}{d\hat{s}}(B \rar K \ell^+ \ell^-)

412: = \frac{G^2 \alpha^2 m_B}{2^{14} \pi^5} \vel V_{tb}V_{ts}^\ast

413: \ver^2 \lambda^{1/2}(1,\hat{r}_K,\hat{s}) v \Delta(\hat{s})~, \eea

414: where

415: $\lambda(1,\hat{r}_K,\hat{s})=1+\hat{r}_K^2+\hat{s}^2-2\hat{r}_K-2\hat{s}-

416: 2\hat{r}_K\hat{s}$, $\hat{s}=q^2/m_B^2$, $\hat{r}_K=m_K^2/m_B^2$,

417: $\hat{m}_\ell=m_\ell/m_B$, $v=\sqrt{1-4\hat{m}_\ell^2/\hat{s}}$ is the

418: final lepton velocity, and $\Delta(\hat{s})$ is;

419: \bea

420: \label{e6009} \Delta & = & \frac{4 m_B^2}{3} \mbox{\rm

421: Re}\Big[ -96 \lambda m_B^3 \hat{m}_\ell (A G^\ast) + 24 m_B^2

422: \hat{m}_\ell^2 (1-\hat{r}_K) (C D^\ast) +

423: 12 m_B \hat{m}_\ell (1-\hat{r}_K) (C N^\ast) \nnb \\

424: && + 12 m_B^2 \hat{m}_\ell^2 \hat{s} \,\vel D \ver^2 +

425: 3 \hat{s} \,\vel N \ver^2 + 12 m_B \hat{m}_\ell \hat{s} (D N^\ast)

426: + 256 \lambda m_B^4 \hat{s} v^2  \,\vel H \ver^2

427: + \lambda m_B^2 (3-v^2)\,\vel A \ver^2 \nnb \\

428: && +s 3 \hat{s} v^2  \,\vel Q \ver^2

429: + 64 \lambda m_B^4 \hat{s} (3-2 v^2)\,\vel G \ver^2

430: + m_B^2 \big\{2 \lambda - (1-v^2)\big[ 2 \lambda -

431: 3(1-\hat{r}_K)^2 \big] \big\}\,\vel C \ver^2 \Big]~.

432: \eea

433: 

434: \par As we have already mentioned, our goal in this work is the study 

435: of possible CP violating asymmetries beyond the SM in the $B \to K

436: \ell^+ \ell^-$ decay; at this point we shall briefly remind the reader

437: of the situation in the SM. In the SM the $C_9$ Wilson coefficient is

438: the only one to have 

439: strong and weak phases. Strong phases arise from the short distance

440: effects and resonances whereas the weak phase comes from the CKM 

441: elements. The remaining two coefficients, $C_7$ and $C_{10}$, are

442: strictly real within the SM. From the parameterization of the

443: form-factors it follows 

444: that they are inherently real and thus the imaginary parts in the

445: functions in Eq.(\ref{e6009}) can come only from the Wilson

446: coefficients in Eq.(\ref{eff}). By {\it strong} and {\it weak} phases

447: we mean the phases which are CP even and odd respectively.

448: In other words we shall consider the picture where CP

449: violating effects due to the short distance dynamics are parameterized

450: by the Wilson coefficients. In principle all Wilson coefficients can

451: have nonzero strong and weak phases . 

452: %%%%%%%%%%%

453: \par In general the amplitude for $\bar{B} \to K$ has the general form

454: \cite{Kruger:2000zg};

455: \beq

456: A(\bar{B} \to K) = e^{i \phi_1} A_1 e^{i \delta_1}

457: + e^{i \phi_2} A_2 e^{i \delta_2} ,

458: \label{cp1}

459: \eeq

460: where the strong phases are labeled as $\delta$'s and the weak phases

461: by $\phi$'s. As noted above the strong phases are CP even, whereas

462: weak phases are odd under CP. Thus we arrive at an amplitude for the

463: conjugated process, $B \to \bar{K}$, from Eq.(\ref{cp1}); 

464: \beq

465: \bar{A}(B \to \bar{K}) = e^{-i \phi_1} A_1 e^{i \delta_1}

466: + e^{-i \phi_2} A_2 e^{i \delta_2} , 

467: \label{cp2}

468: \eeq

469: where the amplitudes of the decay rate of particle and anti-particle

470: can be defined by the CP asymmetry (in the decay rate) as; 

471: \beq

472: A_{CP} = \frac{ |A|^2 - |\bar{A}|^2}{ |A|^2 + |\bar{A}|^2}

473: =  

474: \frac{- 2 A_1 A_2 Sin(\phi_1 - \phi_2) Sin(\delta_1 - \delta_2)}{A_1^2

475: + 2 A_1 

476: A_2 Cos(\phi_1 - \phi_2) Cos(\delta_1 - \delta_2) + A_2^2} .

477: \label{cp3}

478: \eeq

479: Note that from the above expression we observe that in order to have

480: CP asymmetry we should have both strong and weak phases in the

481: amplitude; where the strong phases are provided by $C_9^{eff}$. In the SM the weak phases for

482: the $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$ transition are negligible and hence the CP

483: asymmetry for processes based on the quark level transitions, $b \to s

484: \ell^+ \ell^-$, are highly suppressed. We will now consider the CP

485: asymmetry in the decay width which is defined as;

486: \beq\label{acp}

487: A_{CP}(q^2)= \frac{\displaystyle

488: \frac{d\Gamma}{d\hat{s}}(\overline{B} \to K \ell^+ \ell^-)

489: -\frac{d\Gamma}{d\hat{s}}(B \to

490: \overline{K} \ell^+ \ell^-)}{\displaystyle

491: \frac{d\Gamma}{d\hat{s}}(\overline{B} \to K \ell^+ \ell^-)

492: + \frac{d\Gamma}{d\hat{s}}(B \to \overline{K} \ell^+ \ell^-)} .

493: \eeq

494: Note that one can also have a CP asymmetry from the Forward-Backward

495: (FB) asymmetry\cite{Choudhury:1997xa}. However, in our present case

496: the FB asymmetry for $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ vanishes within the SM.  

497: 

498: \par We shall now consider the minimal extension of these Wilson

499: coefficients. In this approach we shall assume that the Wilson

500: coefficients corresponding to scalar and tensor type interactions

501: vanish identically (of course in the general case we can consider all

502: Wilson coefficients with an arbitrary weak phase). For scalar type

503: operators which emerge in Supersymmetric (SUSY) models and two Higgs

504: Doublet Models (2HDM) this assumption is justified when we have

505: electrons or muons in the final state. The reason being that in SUSY

506: and 2HDM these operators originate from an Higgs exchange which

507: results in Wilson coefficients which are proportional to $m_\ell$, and

508: hence negligible for $\ell = e, \mu$.

509: 

510: \par The Wilson coefficients for the dipole operator obeys;

511: \beq C_{BR}=-2 C_7^{eff} m_b \quad , \quad

512: C_{SL} = - 2 C_7^{eff} m_s ,

513: \eeq

514: with

515: $$ C_7^{eff} = |C_7^{eff}| exp(i \phi_7) , $$

516: where $\phi_7$ is an arbitrary phase and it is not constrained by the

517: already observed branching ratio $Br(B\to K^* \gamma)$.

518: 

519: \par Regarding the appearance of the new weak phase in $C_{10}$ we

520: feel that a few words are in order. One of the possible discrepancies

521: between the experimental results\cite{R21} and the theoretical

522: prediction for $B\to \pi K$ (from the $B \to \pi \pi$ data) can be

523: resolved, 

524: as proposed in \cite{R22}, by introducing a complex phase in the

525: Wilson coefficient $C_{10}=C_{10}^{SM} \exp(i\phi_{10})$.

526: %, where $\phi_{10}=\frac{103}{180} \pi$. 

527: In this prescription the weak phase

528: given to $C_{10}$ does not effect the CP asymmetry in $B \to K \ell^+

529: \ell^-$.

530: 

531: \par We will assume that the Wilson coefficients $C_{RL}$ and $C_{RR}$

532: also have weak phases, that is;

533: \bea

534: C_{RL}&=& |C_{RL}| \exp(i\phi_{RL}) , \nonumber\\

535: C_{RR}&=& |C_{RR}| \exp(i\phi_{RR}) .

536: \eea

537: 

538: \par The Wilson coefficient $C_{9}^{eff}(m_{b}, q^{2})$ has a finite

539: phase, where, in order to better appreciate this, we write its

540: explicit phase content as;

541: \begin{eqnarray}

542: \label{c9} C_{9}^{eff}(m_{b})=C_{9}(m_{b})\Bigg\{ 1 + \frac{\alpha_s

543: \ga \mu \dr }{\pi} \omega \ga \hat s \dr \Bigg\} + Y_{SD}\ga m_{b},

544: \hat s \dr+Y_{LD} \ga m_{b}, \hat s \dr~ ,

545: \end{eqnarray}

546: where $C_{9}(m_{b})=4.334$. Here $\omega \ga \hat s \dr$ represents

547: the ${\cal{O}}(\alpha_{s})$ corrections coming from the four quark

548: operator ${\cal{O}}_{9}$ \cite{R23};

549: \bea \omega \ga

550: \hat s \dr &=& - \frac{2}{9} \pi^2 - \frac{4}{3} Li_2 \ga \hat s

551: \dr - \frac{2}{3} \ln \ga \hat s\dr \,\ln \ga 1 -\hat s \dr

552: - \,\frac{5 + 4 \hat s}{3 \ga 1 + 2 \hat s \dr} \ln \ga 1 -\hat s \dr

553: \nnb \\

554: &&-\frac{2 \hat s \ga 1 + \hat s \dr \ga 1 - 2 \hat s \dr} {3 \ga 1

555: - \hat s \dr^2 \ga 1 + 2 \hat s \dr} \, \ln \ga \hat s\dr + \frac{5

556: + 9 \hat s - 6 {\hat s}^2} {3 \ga 1 - \hat s \dr \ga 1 + 2 \hat s

557: \dr}~. \eea

558: 

559: \par In Eq.(\ref{c9}) $Y_{SD}$ and $Y_{LD}$ represent, respectively,

560: the short and long distance contributions to the four quark operators

561: ${\cal{O}}_{i=1,\cdots,6}$ \cite{R23,R24}. Here $Y_{SD}$ can be

562: obtained by a perturbative calculation;

563: \bea Y_{SD}\ga

564: m_{b}, \hat s \dr &=& g \ga \hat m_c,\hat s \dr

565: \left[3 C_1 + C_2 + 3 C_3 + C_4 + 3 C_5 + C_6 \right] \nnb \\

566: &&- \frac{1}{2} g \ga 1,\hat s \dr

567: \left[4 C_3 +4 C_4 + 3 C_5 + C_6 \right] \nnb \\

568: &&- \frac{1}{2} g \ga 0,\hat s \dr \left[ C_3 + 3  C_4 \right]

569: + \frac{2}{9} \left[ 3 C_3 + C_4 + 3 C_5 + C_6 \right] \nnb \\

570: &&- \frac{V_{us}^* V_{ub}}{V_{ts}^* V_{tb}} \left[ 3 C_1 + C_2

571: \right] \left[ g \ga 0,\hat s \dr - g \ga \hat m_c,\hat s \dr

572: \right]~, \eea

573: where the loop function $g \ga m_q, s \dr$ represents the loops of

574: quarks with mass $m_{q}$ at the dilepton invariant mass $s$. This

575: function develops absorptive parts for dilepton energies $s= 4

576: m_q^{2}$;

577: \bea g \ga \hat m_q,\hat s \dr & = & -

578: \frac{8}{9} {\rm ln} \hat m_q + \frac{8}{27} + \frac{4}{9} y_q -

579: \frac{2}{9} \ga 2 + y_q \dr \sqrt{\vel 1 - y_q \ver} \nnb \\

580: &&\times \Big\{ \Theta(1 - y_q) \ga {\rm ln} \frac{1  + \sqrt{1 -

581: y_q}}{1  -  \sqrt{1 - y_q}} - i \pi \dr + \Theta(y_q - 1) 2 \,{\rm

582: arctan} \frac{1}{\sqrt{y_q - 1}} \Big\}, \eea

583: where  $\hat m_q= m_{q}/m_{b}$ and $y_q=4 \hat m_q^2/\hat

584: s$. Therefore, due to the extension of the absorptive parts of $g \ga

585: \hat m_q,\hat s \dr$ we see that the strong phases come from

586: $Y_{SD}$. In particular one notices that the terms proportional to $g

587: \ga 0,\hat s \dr$ have a non-vanishing imaginary part independent of

588: the dilepton invariant mass.

589: 

590: \par In addition to these perturbative contributions the $\bar{c}c$

591: loops can excite low-lying charmonium states $\psi(1s), \cdots,

592: \psi(6s)$ whose contributions are represented by $Y_{LD}$ \cite{R25};

593: \bea Y_{LD}\ga m_{b}, \hat s \dr&=& \frac{3}{\alpha^2}

594: \Bigg\{ - \frac{V_{cs}^* V_{cb}}{V_{ts}^* V_{tb}} \,C^{\ga 0 \dr}

595: - \frac{V_{us}^* V_{ub}}{V_{ts}^* V_{tb}}

596: \left[ 3 C_3 + C_4 + 3 C_5 + C_6 \right] \Bigg\} \nnb \\

597: &&\hspace{0.2in}\times \sum_{V_i = \psi \ga 1 s \dr, \cdots, \psi \ga

598: 6 s \dr}

599: \ds{\frac{ \pi \kappa_{i} \Gamma \ga V_i \rar \ell^+ \ell^- \dr

600: M_{V_i} } {\ga M_{V_i}^2 - \hat s m_b^2 - i M_{V_i} \Gamma_{V_i} \dr

601: }}~, \eea

602: where $\kappa_i$ is a phenomenological parameter taken here to

603: be 2.3 so as to produce the correct branching ratio of $Br(B \to

604: J/\psi K^* \to K^* \ell \ell) = Br(B \to J/\psi K^*) Br(J/\psi \to

605: \ell \ell)$ \cite{R7}, and $C^{\ga 0 \dr} \equiv

606: 3 C_1+C_2 + 3 C_3 + C_4 + 3 C_5 + C_6=0.362$. Contrary to $Y_{SD}$ the

607: long-distance contribution in $Y_{LD}$ has both weak and strong

608: phases. The weak phases follow from the CKM elements whereas the

609: strong phases come from the $\hat{s}$ values for which the $i$-th

610: charmonium states are on shell. Therefore, the Wilson coefficient

611: $C_{9}^{eff}(m_{b})$ has both weak and strong phases already in the

612: SM.

613: 

614: \par In this sense the Wilson coefficients $C_7^{eff}(m_b)$ and

615: $C_{10}(m_b)$ can not develop any strong phase, and thus, $\phi_7$ and

616: $\phi_{10}$ should necessarily originate from physics beyond the

617: SM. As such the phases of $\phi_7$ and $\phi_{10}$ can be chosen to

618: have a purely {\em weak} character.

619: 

620: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

621: %  Section 3

622: 

623: \section{Numerical analysis}

624: 

625: In this section we present our numerical results for the asymmetries

626: $A_{CP}$ for the $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay. Note that the parameters

627: for the hadronic form-factors are taken from Table I. For values of

628: the Wilson coefficients in the SM we have used $C_3=0.011$,

629: $C_4=-0.026$, $C_5=0.007$, $C_6=-0.031$, $C_7^{eff}=-0.313$,

630: $C_9=4.344$, and $C_{10}=-4.664$. For further numerical analysis the

631: values of the new Wilson coefficients are needed, where we have varied

632: them in the range $-|C_{10}|<C_X<|C_{10}|$. The experimental value of

633: the branching ratio of the $B \to K(K^*) \ell^+ \ell^-$

634: decays\cite{R11,R12} and the bound on $Br(B \to \mu^+

635: \mu^-)$\cite{R26} suggest that this is the right order of

636: magnitude. It should be noted that the experimental 

637: results lead to strong restrictions on some of the Wilson

638: coefficients, namely $-2\leq C_{LL}$ and $C_{RL}\leq 2.3$, while the

639: remaining coefficients vary in the range $-|C_{10}|<C_X<|C_{10}|$. For

640: the remaining parameters we take $m_b=4.8$GeV, $m_c=1.35$GeV,

641: $m_B=5.28$GeV and $m_{K}=0.496$GeV.

642: 

643: \par For the kinematical interval the dilepton invariant mass is $4

644: m_{\ell}^{2} \leq q^2 \leq (m_B-m_{K})^2$ where the $J/\psi$ family of

645: resonances can be excited. The dominant contribution comes from the

646: three low-lying resonances $J/\psi, \psi^{'}, \psi^{''}$ in the

647: interval $8$GeV$^2\simlt q^2\simlt 14.5$GeV$^2$. In order to minimize

648: the hadronic uncertainties we will discard this subinterval in the

649: analysis below by dividing the $q^2$ region in to $low$ and $high$

650: dilepton mass intervals;

651: \bea

652: &&\mbox{Region I}:\ \ \ 4 m_{\ell}^{2} \leq q^2 \leq

653: 8~\mathrm{GeV}^2,\nnb\\

654: &&\mbox{Region II}:\ \ \ 14.5~\mathrm{GeV}^2 \leq q^2 \leq

655: (m_B-m_{K})^2,

656: \eea

657: where the contribution of the higher resonances do still exist in the

658: second region.

659: 

660: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

661: % Figure

662: \begin{figure}[t]

663: \epsfig{file=1.eps,width=.48\textwidth}

664: \epsfig{file=2.eps,width=.48\textwidth}

665: \caption{\it Plot of the CP asymmetry in $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ as a

666: function of the phase of $C_7 (\phi_7)$ and the dilepton invariant mass. The

667: left plot is for Region - I and the right plot is for Region - II. The other

668: Wilsons are taken to have their SM values.}

669: \label{fig:1}

670: \end{figure}

671: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

672: 

673: \par As mentioned previously, we have analyzed the case where there

674: are four weak phases: $\phi_7$, $\phi_{10}$, $\phi_{RL}$ and

675: $\phi_{RR}$.

676: 

677: \par In fig. \ref{fig:1} we have presented $A_{CP}$ in the

678: $\phi_{7}$--$q^{2}$ plane for the $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay for Region

679: I and Region II respectively. In Region I the CP

680: asymmetry is practically independent of $q^2$, becoming maximal in the

681: value for CP violation at $\phi_{7}=\pi/2$. In Region II, however, the

682: $q^2$ dependence is comparatively enhanced as the dominance of the dipole

683: coefficient is now reduced. Aside from this our figures suggest that

684: the CP asymmetry in Region II is four times larger than in Region I,

685: and this confirms our earlier expectation.

686: 

687: \par Since the CP asymmetry is dependent on $q^2$ and the new weak

688: phases there can appear some difficulties. The dependence of one of

689: the variables, for example $q^2$, can be removed by integrating over

690: $q^2$ in the allowed practical kinematical region, where the averaged

691: asymmetries could be measured more easily experimentally. Therefore we

692: shall now discuss only averaged CP asymmetries, which we define in the

693: following way. That is, our averaging procedure is defined by;

694: \beq 

695: \lla A_{CP} \rra = \frac{\displaystyle \int_{R_i} A_{CP} 

696: \frac{d \Gamma}{d q^{2}} d

697: q^{2}}{\displaystyle \int_{R_i} \frac{d \Gamma}{d q^{2}} d q^{2}}. 

698: \eeq

699: where $R_i$ means Region I or II.

700: 

701: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

702: % Figure

703: \begin{figure}[hbt]

704: \begin{center}

705: \epsfig{file=3.eps,width=.5\textwidth}

706: \caption{\it The averaged CP asymmetry ($\langle A_{CP} \rangle$) in

707: the $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay, where $C_7$ has a phase. The

708: remaining Wilsons are taken to have their SM values.} 

709: \label{fig:2}

710: \end{center}

711: \end{figure}

712: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

713: 

714: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

715: % Figure

716: \begin{figure}[hbt]

717: \begin{center}

718: \epsfig{file=crl_1.eps,width=.5\textwidth}

719: \caption{\it A plot of the CP asymmetry in $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ as a

720: function of the phase $\phi_{RL}$ and the dilepton invariant mass. In

721: this plot we have taken $|C_{RL}| = 2$ and with the other Wilsons as

722: having their SM values.} 

723: \end{center}

724: \label{fig:3a}

725: \end{figure}

726: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

727: 

728: \par We now depict in fig. \ref{fig:2} the $\phi_7$ dependence of the 

729: averaged asymmetries $\langle A_{CP} \rangle$. From this figure it can

730: be observed that the average $\langle CP\rangle$ asymmetry can attain

731: values of $3\%$. Differences from zero of any value of $\langle A_{CP}

732: \rangle$ would be an unambiguous indication of the existence physics

733: beyond the SM.  

734: 

735: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

736: % Figure

737: \begin{figure}[htb]

738: \begin{center}

739: \epsfig{file=crl.eps,width=.5\textwidth}

740: \caption{\it The averaged CP asymmetry ($\langle A_{CP} \rangle$) in

741: the $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay against the total branching ratio of

742: $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$. In this plot we have taken various values of

743: magnitudes of $C_{RL}$ (as stated in the figure) and varied the phase

744: in a range $0 \le \phi_{RL} \le 2 \pi$. We have plotted only Region -

745: II here.}  

746: \label{fig:3}

747: \end{center}

748: \end{figure}

749: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

750: 

751: \par In fig. \ref{fig:3a} we have plotted the dependence of CP

752: asymmetry on the dilepton invariant mass and $\phi_{RL}$. In

753: fig. 5 we have shown the same kind of plot but for

754: $\phi_{RR}$. We have also shown the correlation of averaged CP

755: asymmetry and the integrated branching ratios. In fig. \ref{fig:3} the

756: variation of $\langle A_{CP} \rangle$ with integrated branching ratio

757: for $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ for $C_{RL}$ is shown. In this figure we

758: have used three different values of $C_{RL}$ and have varied the phase

759: ($\phi_{RL}$) in the range $0 \le \phi_{RL} \le 2 \pi$. All the

760: other Wilsons are taken to have their SM values. In a similar

761: graph, given in fig. \ref{fig:4}, we have varied $C_{RR}$.

762: 

763: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

764: % Figure

765: \begin{figure}[htb]

766: \begin{center}

767: \epsfig{file=crr_1.eps,width=.5\textwidth}

768: \caption{\it A plot of the CP asymmetry in $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ as a

769: function of the phase $\phi_{RR}$ and the dilepton invariant mass. In

770: this plot we have taken $|C_{RR}| = 2$ and with the other Wilsons as

771: having their SM values.} 

772: \end{center}

773: \label{fig:4a}

774: \end{figure}

775: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

776: 

777: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

778: % Figure

779: \begin{figure}[htb]

780: \begin{center}

781: \epsfig{file=crr.eps,width=.5\textwidth}

782: \caption{\it The averaged CP asymmetry ($\langle A_{CP} \rangle$) in

783: the $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay against the total branching ratio of

784: $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$. In this plot we have taken various values of

785: magnitudes of $C_{RR}$ (as stated in the figure) and varied the phase

786: in a range $0 \le \phi_{RR} \le 2 \pi$. We have plotted only Region -

787: II here.}    

788: \label{fig:4}

789: \end{center}

790: \end{figure}

791: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

792: 

793: \par In the present work we have studied the sensitivity of the CP

794: violating asymmetry on the new weak phases appearing in the Wilson

795: coefficients. We have also observed that the CP asymmetry in Region II

796: is 4-5 times larger than that observed in Region I when we consider a

797: weak phase $\phi_7$. This can be understood in that in Region II

798: contributions coming from other operators become comparable with the

799: dipole operator $O_7$, where this operator is dominant in Region

800: I. Having obtained the averaged $\langle A_{CP} \rangle$ asymmetry we

801: obtained a maximal value of approximately 3\%. Note that an additional

802: weak phase in $C_{10}$ will not give rise to any CP asymmetry,

803: however, if non-standard\footnote{by non-standard we mean operators

804: which are not present within the SM} electroweak operators are

805: considered then the CP asymmetry in the region of high dilepton

806: invariant mass can reach a value of up to 10\%. 

807: 

808: \par As stated earlier, we can also, in principle, have weak phases in

809: scalar and pseudo-scalar operators. The presence of weak phases in

810: these operators can also substantially effect the CP asymmetry. The

811: popular extensions of the SM, such as SUSY and 2HDM, all predict the

812: existence of such operators. However, the magnitude of these Wilson

813: coefficients is predicted to be small when the lepton $\ell = e$ or

814: $\mu$. In the presence of these operators one also gets a non-zero

815: value for the FB asymmetry in $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$. The FB

816: asymmetry could provide another measure of CP

817: asymmetry\cite{Choudhury:1997xa} which has not been considered in this

818: work.   

819: 

820: \par The observation of CP asymmetry in $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ would

821: not only tell us about the nature of weak phases but would also give

822: us an insight in to the structure of the effective

823: Hamiltonian. Therefore the measurement of the CP violating asymmetry

824: would provide us with an useful insight into the mechanism of CP

825: violation, which in turn would serve as a good test for physics beyond

826: the SM.   

827: 

828: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

829: %  Section : Acknowledgements

830: 

831: \section*{Acknowledgments}

832: The work of SRC and NG was supported by the Department of Science \&

833: Technology (DST), India under grant no SP/S2/K-20/99. The work of ASC

834: was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

835: (JSPS), under fellowship no P04764.

836: 

837: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

838: 

839: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

840: 

841: \bibitem{R1}

842: %\cite{Cabibbo:1963yz}

843: %\bibitem{Cabibbo:1963yz}

844:   N.~Cabibbo,

845:   %``Unitary Symmetry And Leptonic Decays,''

846:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 10}, 531 (1963);

847:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,10,531;%%

848: %\cite{Hewett:1996ct}

849: %\bibitem{Hewett:1996ct}

850:   J.~L.~Hewett and J.~D.~Wells,

851:   %``Searching for supersymmetry in rare B decays,''

852:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5549 (1997)

853:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9610323] ;

854:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610323;%%

855: %

856: %\bibitem{R2}

857: %\cite{Kobayashi:1973fv}

858: %\bibitem{Kobayashi:1973fv}

859:   M.~Kobayashi and T.~Maskawa,

860:   %``CP Violation In The Renormalizable Theory Of Weak Interaction,''

861:   Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\  {\bf 49}, 652 (1973).

862:   %%CITATION = PTPKA,49,652;%%

863: 

864: %%%%%%%%%%%%

865: 

866: \bibitem{R3}

867: %\cite{Christenson:1964fg}

868: %\bibitem{Christenson:1964fg}

869:   J.~H.~Christenson, J.~W.~Cronin, V.~L.~Fitch and R.~Turlay,

870:   %``Evidence For The 2 Pi Decay Of The K(2)0 Meson,''

871:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 13}, 138 (1964).

872:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,13,138;%%

873: 

874: \bibitem{R4}

875: %\cite{Aubert:2001nu}

876: %\bibitem{Aubert:2001nu}

877:   B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BABAR Collaboration],

878:   %``Observation of CP violation in the B0 meson system,''

879:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 87}, 091801 (2001)

880:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0107013];

881:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107013;%%

882: %\cite{Aubert:2004qm}

883: %\bibitem{Aubert:2004qm}

884:   B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BaBar Collaboration],

885:   %``Observation of direct CP violation in B0 $\to$ K+ pi- decays,''

886:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 93}, 131801 (2004)

887:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0407057];

888:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0407057;%%

889: %\cite{Abe:2001xe}

890: %\bibitem{Abe:2001xe}

891:   K.~Abe {\it et al.}  [Belle Collaboration],

892:   %``Observation of large CP violation in the neutral B meson system,''

893:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 87}, 091802 (2001)

894:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0107061];

895:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107061;%%

896: %\cite{Chao:2004mn}

897: %\bibitem{Chao:2004mn}

898:   Y.~Chao {\it et al.}  [Belle Collaboration],

899:   %``Evidence for direct CP violation in B0 $\to$ K+ pi- decays,''

900:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 93}, 191802 (2004)

901:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0408100].

902:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0408100;%%

903: 

904: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

905: 

906: \bibitem{R5}

907: %\cite{Chen:2002zk}

908: %\bibitem{Chen:2002zk}

909:   C.~H.~Chen and C.~Q.~Geng,

910:   %``Probing new physics in B $\to$ K(*) l+ l- decays,''

911:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 094018 (2002)

912:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0209352] ;

913:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209352;%%

914: %

915: %\bibitem{R6}

916: %\cite{Aliev:1997gh}

917: %\bibitem{Aliev:1997gh}

918:   T.~M.~Aliev, H.~Koru, A.~Ozpineci and M.~Savci,

919:   %``Light cone QCD sum rule analysis of B $\to$ K l+ l- decay,''

920:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 400}, 194 (1997)

921:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9702209];

922:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9702209;%%

923: %

924: %\cite{Aliev:1997dg}

925: %\bibitem{Aliev:1997dg}

926:   T.~M.~Aliev, M.~Savci, A.~Ozpineci and H.~Koru,

927:   %``Two Higgs doublet model and lepton polarization in the  B $\to$ K tau+ tau-

928:   %decay,''

929:   J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 24}, 49 (1998)

930:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9705222];

931:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705222;%%

932: %

933: %\cite{Aliev:2000jx}

934: %\bibitem{Aliev:2000jx}

935:   T.~M.~Aliev, M.~K.~Cakmak and M.~Savci,

936:   %``General analysis of lepton polarizations in rare B $\to$ K* l+ l- decay

937:   %beyond the standard model,''

938:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 607}, 305 (2001)

939:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0009133];

940:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009133;%%

941: %

942: %\cite{Aliev:2000ae}

943: %\bibitem{Aliev:2000ae}

944:   T.~M.~Aliev and M.~Savci,

945:   %``Lepton polarization and CP-violating effects in B $\to$ K* tau+ tau-  decay

946:   %in standard and two Higgs doublet models,''

947:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 481}, 275 (2000)

948:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0003188] ;

949:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003188;%%

950: %

951: %\cite{Aliev:2004hi}

952: %\bibitem{Aliev:2004hi}

953:   T.~M.~Aliev, V.~Bashiry and M.~Savci,

954:   %``Polarized lepton pair forward-backward asymmetries in B $\to$ K* l+ l-

955:   %decay beyond the standard model,''

956:   JHEP {\bf 0405}, 037 (2004)

957:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0403282] ;

958:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403282;%%

959: %

960: %\cite{Aliev:2002ux}

961: %\bibitem{Aliev:2002ux}

962:   T.~M.~Aliev, A.~Ozpineci, M.~Savci and C.~Yuce,

963:   %``T violation in B $\to$ K* l+ l- decay beyond standard model,''

964:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 115006 (2002)

965:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0208128];

966:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208128;%%

967: %

968: %\cite{Aliev:2001pq}

969: %\bibitem{Aliev:2001pq}

970:   T.~M.~Aliev, M.~K.~Cakmak, A.~Ozpineci and M.~Savci,

971:   %``New physics effects to the lepton polarizations in the B $\to$ K l+ l-

972:   %decay,''

973:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 055007 (2001)

974:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0103039].

975:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103039;%%

976: 

977: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

978: 

979: \bibitem{R7}

980: %\cite{Kruger:1996cv}

981: %\bibitem{Kruger:1996cv}

982:   F.~Kruger and L.~M.~Sehgal,

983:   %``Lepton Polarization in the Decays $B\to X_s\mu~+\mu~-$ and $B\to

984:   %X_s\tau~+\tau~-$,''

985:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 380}, 199 (1996)

986:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9603237];

987:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9603237;%%

988: %\cite{Hewett:1995dk}

989: %\bibitem{Hewett:1995dk}

990:   J.~L.~Hewett,

991:   %``Tau polarization asymmetry in B $\to$ X(s) tau+ tau-,''

992:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 4964 (1996)

993:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9506289].

994:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9506289;%%

995: 

996: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%

997: 

998: \bibitem{R8}

999: %\cite{Aliev:2001fc}

1000: %\bibitem{Aliev:2001fc}

1001:   T.~M.~Aliev, A.~Ozpineci and M.~Savci,

1002:   %``Exclusive B $\to$ K* l+ l- decay with polarized K* and new physics

1003:   %effects,''

1004:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 511}, 49 (2001)

1005:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0103261];

1006:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103261;%%

1007: %

1008: %\cite{Aliev:2000cm}

1009: %\bibitem{Aliev:2000cm}

1010:   T.~M.~Aliev, A.~Ozpineci and M.~Savci,

1011:   %``Fourth generation effects in rare exclusive B $\to$ K* l+ l- decay,''

1012:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 585}, 275 (2000)

1013:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0002061] ;

1014:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002061;%%

1015: %

1016: %\bibitem{R9}

1017: %\cite{Aliev:1999gp}

1018: %\bibitem{Aliev:1999gp}

1019:   T.~M.~Aliev, C.~S.~Kim and Y.~G.~Kim,

1020:   %``A systematic analysis of the exclusive B $\to$ K* l+ l- decay,''

1021:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 014026 (2000)

1022:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9910501].

1023:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910501;%%

1024: 

1025: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1026: 

1027: \bibitem{R10}

1028: %\cite{Gaur:2003dy}

1029: %\bibitem{Gaur:2003dy}

1030:   N.~Gaur,

1031:   %``Lepton polarization asymmetries in B $\to$ X/s tau+ tau- in MSSM,''

1032:   arXiv:hep-ph/0305242 ;

1033:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305242;%%

1034: %

1035: %\cite{Choudhury:2003mi}

1036: %\bibitem{Choudhury:2003mi}

1037:   S.~R.~Choudhury, N.~Gaur, A.~S.~Cornell and G.~C.~Joshi,

1038:   %``Lepton polarization correlations in B $\to$ K* tau- tau+,''

1039:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054016 (2003)

1040:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0304084];

1041:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304084;%%

1042: %

1043: %\cite{RaiChoudhury:1999qb}

1044: %\bibitem{RaiChoudhury:1999qb}

1045:   S.~Rai Choudhury, A.~Gupta and N.~Gaur,

1046:   %``tau polarisation asymmetry in B $\to$ X/s tau+ tau- in SUSY models with

1047:   %large tan(beta),''

1048:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 115004 (1999)

1049:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9902355] ;

1050:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902355;%%

1051: %

1052: %\cite{Cornell:2003qt}

1053: %\bibitem{Cornell:2003qt}

1054:   A.~S.~Cornell and N.~Gaur,

1055:   %``The forward backward asymmetries of B $\to$ X/s tau+ tau- in the MSSM,''

1056:   JHEP {\bf 0309}, 030 (2003)

1057:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0308132].

1058:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308132;%%

1059: 

1060: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1061: 

1062: \bibitem{R11}

1063: %\cite{Ishikawa:2003cp}

1064: %\bibitem{Ishikawa:2003cp}

1065:   A.~Ishikawa {\it et al.}  [Belle Collaboration],

1066:   %``Observation of the electroweak penguin decay B $\to$ K* l+ l-,''

1067:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 261601 (2003)

1068:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0308044].

1069:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0308044;%%

1070: 

1071: \bibitem{R12}

1072: %\cite{Aubert:2003cm}

1073: %\bibitem{Aubert:2003cm}

1074:   B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BABAR Collaboration],

1075:   %``Evidence for the rare decay B $\to$ K* l+ l- and measurement of the B $\to$

1076:   %K l+ l- branching fraction,''

1077:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 91}, 221802 (2003)

1078:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0308042].

1079:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0308042;%%

1080: 

1081: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1082: 

1083: \bibitem{R13}

1084: %\cite{Aliev:1999re}

1085: %\bibitem{Aliev:1999re}

1086:   T.~M.~Aliev, D.~A.~Demir and M.~Savci,

1087:   %``Probing the sources of CP violation via B $\to$ K* l+ l- decay,''

1088:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 074016 (2000)

1089:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9912525].

1090:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912525;%%

1091: 

1092: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1093: 

1094: %\cite{Kruger:2000zg}

1095: \bibitem{Kruger:2000zg}

1096:   F.~Kruger and E.~Lunghi,

1097:   %``Looking for novel CP violating effects in anti-B $\to$ K* l+ l-,''

1098:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 014013 (2001)

1099:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0008210] ;

1100:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008210;%%

1101: %

1102: %\cite{Kruger:2000ff}

1103: %\bibitem{Kruger:2000ff}

1104:   F.~Kruger and J.~C.~Romao,

1105:   %``Flavour-conserving CP phases in supersymmetry and implications for

1106:   %exclusive B decays,''

1107:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 034020 (2000)

1108:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0002089] ;

1109:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002089;%%

1110: %

1111: %\cite{Cornell:2004cp}

1112: %\bibitem{Cornell:2004cp}

1113:   A.~S.~Cornell and N.~Gaur,

1114:   %``Lepton polarization asymmetries for B $\to$ K* l+ l-: A model independent

1115:   %approach,''

1116:   JHEP {\bf 0502}, 005 (2005)

1117:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0408164] ;

1118:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408164;%%

1119: %

1120: %\cite{Cornell:2005kb}

1121: %\bibitem{Cornell:2005kb}

1122:   A.~S.~Cornell, N.~Gaur and S.~K.~Singh,

1123:   %``FB asymmetries in the B $\to$ K* l+ l- decay: A model independent

1124:   %approach,''

1125:   arXiv:hep-ph/0505136.

1126:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505136;%%

1127: 

1128: %%%%%%%%%%%

1129: 

1130: \bibitem{R14}

1131: %\cite{Fukae:1999ww}

1132: %\bibitem{Fukae:1999ww}

1133:   S.~Fukae, C.~S.~Kim and T.~Yoshikawa,

1134:   %``A systematic analysis of the lepton polarization asymmetries in the  rare B

1135:   %decay, B $\to$ X/s tau+ tau-,''

1136:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 074015 (2000)

1137:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9908229].

1138:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908229;%%

1139: 

1140: %%%%%%%%%%%

1141: 

1142: \bibitem{R15}

1143: %\cite{Shifman:1978bx}

1144: %\bibitem{Shifman:1978bx}

1145:   M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein and V.~I.~Zakharov,

1146:   %``QCD And Resonance Physics. Sum Rules,''

1147:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 147}, 385 (1979).

1148:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,385;%%

1149: 

1150: %%%%%%%%%%%

1151: 

1152: \bibitem{R16}

1153: %\cite{Colangelo:1995jv}

1154: %\bibitem{Colangelo:1995jv}

1155:   P.~Colangelo, F.~De Fazio, P.~Santorelli and E.~Scrimieri,

1156:   %``QCD Sum Rule Analysis of the Decays $B \to K \ell~+ \ell~-$ and $B \to K~*

1157:   %\ell~+ \ell~-$,''

1158:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 3672 (1996)

1159:   [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 57}, 3186 (1998)]

1160:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9510403].

1161:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9510403;%%

1162: 

1163: %%%%%%%%%%%

1164: 

1165: \bibitem{R17}

1166: %\cite{Ball:2001fp}

1167: %\bibitem{Ball:2001fp}

1168:   P.~Ball and R.~Zwicky,

1169:   %``Improved analysis of B $\to$ pi e nu from QCD sum rules on the

1170:   %light-cone,''

1171:   JHEP {\bf 0110}, 019 (2001)

1172:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0110115] ;

1173:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110115;%%

1174: %

1175: %\bibitem{R18}

1176: %\cite{Ball:1998tj}

1177: %\bibitem{Ball:1998tj}

1178:   P.~Ball,

1179:   %``B $\to$ pi and B $\to$ K transitions from {QCD} sum rules on the

1180:   %light-cone,''

1181:   JHEP {\bf 9809}, 005 (1998)

1182:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9802394]; 

1183:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802394;%%

1184: %\bibitem{R19}

1185: %\cite{Aliev:1997gh}

1186: %\bibitem{Aliev:1997gh}

1187:   T.~M.~Aliev, H.~Koru, A.~Ozpineci and M.~Savci,

1188:   %``Light cone QCD sum rule analysis of B $\to$ K l+ l- decay,''

1189:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 400}, 194 (1997)

1190:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9702209].

1191:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9702209;%%

1192: 

1193: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1194: 

1195: \bibitem{R20}

1196: %\cite{Ball:2004ye}

1197: %\bibitem{Ball:2004ye}

1198:   P.~Ball and R.~Zwicky,

1199:   %``New results on B $\to$ pi, K, eta decay formfactors from light-cone sum

1200:   %rules,''

1201:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 014015 (2005)

1202:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0406232].

1203:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406232;%%

1204: 

1205: %%%%%%%%%%%

1206: 

1207: \bibitem{R21}

1208: %\cite{Chao:2003ue}

1209: %\bibitem{Chao:2003ue}

1210:   Y.~Chao {\it et al.}  [Belle Collaboration],

1211:   %``Improved measurements of branching fractions for B $\to$ K pi, pi pi and  K

1212:   %anti-K decays,''

1213:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 111102 (2004)

1214:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0311061].

1215:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0311061;%%

1216: %\cite{Aubert:2002jb}

1217: %\bibitem{Aubert:2002jb}

1218:   B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BABAR Collaboration],

1219:   %``Measurements of branching fractions and CP-violating asymmetries in B0

1220:   %$\to$ pi+ pi-, K+ pi-, K+ K- decays. ((B)),''

1221:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 89}, 281802 (2002)

1222:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0207055];

1223:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0207055;%%

1224: %\cite{Aubert:2004km}

1225: %\bibitem{Aubert:2004km}

1226:   B.~Aubert {\it et al.}  [BABAR Collaboration],

1227:   %``Measurements of branching fractions and CP-violating asymmetries in

1228:   %B-meson decays to the charmless two-body states K0 pi+, anti-K0 K+, and  K0

1229:   %anti-K0,''

1230:   arXiv:hep-ex/0408080.

1231:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0408080;%%

1232: 

1233: %%%%%%%%%%%

1234: 

1235: \bibitem{R22}

1236: %\cite{Buras:2000gc}

1237: %\bibitem{Buras:2000gc}

1238:  A.~J.~Buras and R.~Fleischer,

1239:   %``Constraints on the CKM angle gamma and strong phases from B $\to$ pi K

1240:   %decays,''

1241:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 16}, 97 (2000)

1242:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0003323] ;

1243:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003323;%%

1244: %

1245: %\cite{Buras:2003yc}

1246: %\bibitem{Buras:2003yc}

1247:   A.~J.~Buras, R.~Fleischer, S.~Recksiegel and F.~Schwab,

1248:   %``The B $\to$ pi K puzzle and its relation to rare B and K decays,''

1249:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 32}, 45 (2003)

1250:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0309012] ;

1251:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309012;%%

1252: %

1253: %\cite{Buras:2004ub}

1254: %\bibitem{Buras:2004ub}

1255:   A.~J.~Buras, R.~Fleischer, S.~Recksiegel and F.~Schwab,

1256:   %``Anatomy of prominent B and K decays and signatures of CP-violating new

1257:   %physics in the electroweak penguin sector,''

1258:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 697}, 133 (2004)

1259:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0402112] ;

1260:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402112;%%

1261: %

1262: %\cite{Buras:2003dj}

1263: %\bibitem{Buras:2003dj}

1264:   A.~J.~Buras, R.~Fleischer, S.~Recksiegel and F.~Schwab,

1265:   %``B $\to$ pi pi, new physics in B $\to$ pi K and implications for rare K and

1266:   %B decays,''

1267:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 92}, 101804 (2004)

1268:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0312259] ;

1269:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312259;%%

1270: %

1271: %\cite{Yoshikawa:2003hb}

1272: %\bibitem{Yoshikawa:2003hb}

1273:   T.~Yoshikawa,

1274:   %``A possibility of large electro-weak penguin contribution in B

1275:   % $\to$ K pi modes,''

1276:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054023 (2003)

1277:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0306147] ;

1278:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306147;%%

1279: %

1280: %\cite{Gronau:2003kj}

1281: %\bibitem{Gronau:2003kj}

1282:   M.~Gronau and J.~L.~Rosner,

1283:   %``Rates and asymmetries in B $\to$ K pi decays,''

1284:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 572}, 43 (2003)

1285:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0307095] ;

1286:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307095;%%

1287: %

1288: %\cite{Beneke:2003zv}

1289: %\bibitem{Beneke:2003zv}

1290:   M.~Beneke and M.~Neubert,

1291:   %``QCD factorization for B $\to$ P P and B $\to$ P V decays,''

1292:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 675}, 333 (2003)

1293:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0308039].

1294:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308039;%%

1295: 

1296: 

1297: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1298: 

1299: \bibitem{R23}

1300: %\cite{Misiak:1992bc}

1301: %\bibitem{Misiak:1992bc}

1302:   M.~Misiak,

1303:   %``The b $\to$ s e+ e- and b $\to$ s gamma decays with next-to-leading

1304:   %logarithmic QCD corrections,''

1305:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 393}, 23 (1993)

1306:   [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 439}, 461 (1995)].

1307:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B393,23;%%

1308: 

1309: %%%%%%%%%%%

1310: 

1311: \bibitem{R24}

1312: %\cite{Buras:1994dj}

1313: %\bibitem{Buras:1994dj}

1314:   A.~J.~Buras and M.~Munz,

1315:   %``Effective Hamiltonian for B $\to$ X(s) e+ e- beyond leading logarithms in

1316:   %the NDR and HV schemes,''

1317:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 186 (1995)

1318:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9501281].

1319:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501281;%%

1320: 

1321: %%%%%%%%%%%

1322: 

1323: \bibitem{R25}

1324: %\cite{Deshpande:1988bd}

1325: %\bibitem{Deshpande:1988bd}

1326:   N.~G.~Deshpande, J.~Trampetic and K.~Panose,

1327:   %``Resonance Background To The Decays B $\to$ S Lepton+ Lepton-, B $\to$ K*

1328:   %Lepton+ Lepton- And B $\to$ K Lepton+ Lepton-,''

1329:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 39}, 1461 (1989);

1330:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D39,1461;%%

1331: %

1332: %\cite{Lim:1988yu}

1333: %\bibitem{Lim:1988yu}

1334:   C.~S.~Lim, T.~Morozumi and A.~I.~Sanda,

1335:   %``A Prediction For D Gamma (B $\to$ S Lepton Anti-Lepton) / D Q**2 Including

1336:   %The Long Distance Effects,''

1337:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 218}, 343 (1989).

1338:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B218,343;%%

1339: 

1340: %%%%%%%%%%%

1341: 

1342: \bibitem{R26}

1343: %\cite{Abazov:2004dj}

1344: %\bibitem{Abazov:2004dj}

1345:   V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.}  [D0 Collaboration],

1346:   %``A search for the flavor-changing neutral current decay B/s0 $\to$ mu+ mu-

1347:   %in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.96-TeV with the D0 detector,''

1348:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 94}, 071802 (2005)

1349:   [arXiv:hep-ex/0410039].

1350:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0410039;%%

1351: 

1352: %%%%%%%%%%%

1353: 

1354: %\cite{Choudhury:1997xa}

1355: \bibitem{Choudhury:1997xa}

1356:   S.~R.~Choudhury,

1357:   %``Forward-backward asymmetry in B $\to$ X/d e+ e-,''

1358:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 6028 (1997)

1359:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9706313];

1360:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706313;%%

1361: %

1362: %\cite{Buchalla:2000sk}

1363: %\bibitem{Buchalla:2000sk}

1364:   G.~Buchalla, G.~Hiller and G.~Isidori,

1365:   %``Phenomenology of non-standard Z couplings in exclusive semileptonic  b

1366:   %$\to$ s transitions,''

1367:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 014015 (2001)

1368:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0006136].

1369:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006136;%%

1370: 

1371: \end{thebibliography}

1372: 

1373: \end{document}

1374: 

1375: %EndOfFile

1376: