1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.11 2004/10/31 08:06:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46:
47: \newcommand{\msbar}{$\overline{\mbox{MS}}$ }
48:
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: %% FRONTMATTER
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52:
53: \begin{document}
54:
55:
56: \begin{flushright}
57: CERN-PH-TH/2005-118
58: \end{flushright}
59:
60:
61: \title{Impact of large-x
62: resummation\\ on parton distribution functions
63: \footnote{Talk given by G.~Corcella at DIS 2005,
64: XIII Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering,
65: April 27--May 1, 2005, Madison, WI, U.\ S.\ A.}
66: }
67:
68: \classification{12.38.Bx, 12.38.Cy}
69: \keywords {Resummation, parton distribution functions}
70:
71: \author{G. Corcella}{
72: address={CERN, Department of Physics,
73: Theory Division, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland}
74: }
75:
76: \author{L. Magnea}{
77: address={
78: Universit\`a di Torino and INFN, Sezione di Torino, Via P.~Giuria 1, I-10125,
79: Torino, Italy}
80: }
81:
82:
83:
84: \begin{abstract}
85: We investigate the effect of large-$x$ resummation on parton distributions
86: by performing a fit of Deep Inelastic Scattering data from the NuTeV,
87: BCDMS and NMC collaborations, using NLO and NLL soft-resummed coefficient
88: functions. Our results show that soft resummation has a visible impact on
89: quark densities at large $x$. Resummed parton fits would
90: therefore be needed whenever
91: high precision is required for cross sections evaluated near partonic
92: threshold.
93: \end{abstract}
94:
95: \maketitle
96:
97: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
98: %% MAINMATTER
99: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
100:
101:
102: A precise knowledge of parton distribution functions (PDF's) at large $x$ is
103: important to achieve the accuracy goals of the LHC and other
104: high energy accelerators. We present
105: a simple fit of Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) structure function
106: data, and extract NLO and NLL-resummed quark densities,
107: in order to establish qualitatively the effects of soft-gluon
108: resummation.
109:
110: Structure functions $F_i(x,Q^2)$ are given by the convolution of
111: coefficient functions and PDF's. Finite-order
112: coefficient functions present logarithmic terms that are singular at
113: $x = 1$, and originate from soft or collinear gluon radiation.
114: These contributions need to be resummed to extend the validity
115: of the perturbative prediction.
116: Large-$x$ resummation for the DIS coefficient function was performed
117: in \cite{Sterman:1986aj,Catani:1989ne} in the massless approximation,
118: and in \cite{Laenen:1998kp,Corcella:2003ib} with the inclusion of
119: quark-mass effects, relevant at small $Q^2$.
120:
121: Soft resummation is naturally performed in moment space,
122: where large-$x$ terms correspond, at ${\cal O}(\alpha_s)$, to
123: single ($\alpha_s \ln N$) and double ($\alpha_s \ln^2 N$) logarithms
124: of the Mellin variable $N$. In the following, we shall consider values
125: of $Q^2$ sufficiently large to neglect quark-mass effects.
126: Furthermore, we shall implement soft resummation in the next-to-leading
127: logarithmic (NLL) approximation, which corresponds to keeping terms ${\cal O}
128: (\alpha_s^n \ln^{n+1} N )$ (LL) and ${\cal O} (\alpha_s^n \ln^n N)$
129: (NLL) in the Sudakov exponent.
130:
131: To gauge the impact of the resummation on the DIS cross section, we can
132: evaluate the charged-current (CC) structure function $F_2$
133: convoluting NLO and NLL-resummed \msbar coefficient functions with the NLO
134: PDF set CTEQ6M \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. We consider $Q^2 = 31.62$~GeV$^2$,
135: since it is one of the values of $Q^2$ at which the NuTeV collaboration
136: collected data \cite{Naples:2003ne}. In Fig.~\ref{fdel} we plot $F_2(x)$ with
137: and without resummation (Fig. 1a), as well as the normalized difference
138: $\Delta = (F_2^{\mathrm{res}} - F_2^{\mathrm{NLO}})/F_2^{\mathrm{NLO}}$
139: (Fig. 1b).
140: We note that the effect of the resummation is an enhancement of $F_2$ for
141: $x > 0.6$. Such an enhancement is compensated by a decrease at smaller $x$:
142: the resummation, in fact, does not change the first moment of $F_2$, since
143: we include in the Sudakov exponent only terms $\sim \ln^k N$, which vanish
144: for $N = 1$.
145: \begin{figure}
146: \centerline{\resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f2_th.ps}}%
147: \hfill%
148: \resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{diff.ps}}}
149: \caption{(a): CC structure function $F_2(x)$ using NLO
150: (dashes) and NLL-resummed (solid) coefficient functions, at $Q^2 =
151: 31.62$~GeV$^2$;
152: (b): relative difference $\Delta = (F_2^{\mathrm{res}} -
153: F_2^{\mathrm{NLO}})/F_2^{\mathrm{NLO}}$}
154: \label{fdel}
155: \end{figure}
156: \begin{figure}[ht!]
157: \centerline{\resizebox{0.55\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{nutev2.ps}}}
158: \caption{Comparison of NuTeV data on the CC structure function
159: $F_2(x,Q^2)$ with
160: a theoretical prediction using CTEQ6M PDF's and NLO (dots)
161: or NLL-resummed (solid) coefficient functions.}
162: \label{fignut}
163: \end{figure}
164: Our predictions for $F_2$ at different values of $Q^2$ can be compared
165: with NuTeV data at large $x$. The results of the comparison are shown in
166: Fig.~\ref{fignut}: although the resummation moves the prediction towards
167: the data, we are still unable to reproduce the large-$x$ data.
168: \begin{figure}[ht!]
169: \centerline{\resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f2_1259.ps}}%
170: \hfill%
171: \resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f31259.ps}}}
172: \caption{NuTeV data and best-fit curves at $Q^2=12.59$~GeV$^2$ for
173: $F_2^q$ (a) and $x F_3$ (b).}
174: \label{fits}
175: \end{figure}
176: Several effects are involved in the mismatch: at very large values of
177: $x$, power corrections will certainly play a role.
178: Moreover, we have used so far a parton set (CTEQ6M), extracted by a
179: global fit which did not account for the NuTeV data. Rather, data from
180: the CCFR experiment \cite{Yang:2000ju}, which disagree at large
181: $x$ with NuTeV \cite{Naples:2003ne}, were used.
182: The discrepancy has recently been
183: described as understood \cite{tzanov}; however,
184: it is not possible to draw any firm conclusion from our comparison.
185:
186: We wish to reconsider the CC data in the context of
187: an indipendent fit. We shall
188: use NuTeV data on $F_2(x)$ and $x F_3(x)$ at $Q^2 = 31.62$~GeV$^2$
189: and 12.59~GeV$^2$, and
190: extract NLO and NLL-resummed quark distributions from the fit.
191: $F_2$ contains
192: a gluon-initiated contribution $F_2^g$, which is not
193: soft-enhanced and is very small at large $x$: we can therefore safely
194: take $F_2^g$ from a global fit, e.g. CTEQ6M, and limit our
195: fit to the quark-initiated term $F_2^q$. We choose a
196: parametrization of the form $F_2^q (x) = F_2 (x) - F_2^g (x) = A
197: x^{- \alpha} (1 - x)^\beta (1 + b x)$; $ x F_3(x) = C x^{-\rho}
198: ( 1 - x )^\sigma ( 1 + k x )$. The best-fit parameters and
199: the $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom
200: are quoted in \cite{noi}. In Fig.~\ref{fits}, we present the
201: NuTeV data on $F_2(x)$ and $x F_3(x)$ at $Q^2 = 12.59$~GeV$^2$, along
202: with the best-fit curves. Similar plots at $Q^2 = 31.62$~GeV$^2$ are
203: shown in Ref.~\cite{noi}.
204:
205:
206: In order to extract individual quark distributions, we need
207: to consider also neutral current data. We use BCDMS
208: \cite{Benvenuti:1989fm} and NMC \cite{Arneodo:1996qe} results, and
209: employ the parametrization of the nonsinglet
210: structure function $F_2^{\mathrm{ns}} = F_2^p - F_2^D$ provided by
211: Ref.~\cite{DelDebbio:2004qj}. The parametrization~\cite{DelDebbio:2004qj}
212: is based on neural networks trained on Monte-Carlo copies of the data set,
213: which include all information on errors and correlations: this gives
214: an unbiased representation of the probability distribution in
215: the space of structure functions.
216:
217: Writing $F_2$, $x F_3$ and $F_2^\mathrm{ns}$ in terms of their parton
218: content, we can extract NLO and NLL-resummed quark
219: distributions, according to whether we use NLO or NLL coefficient
220: functions. We assume isospin symmetry of the sea, i.e. $s = \bar s$ and
221: $\bar u = \bar d$, we neglect the charm density, and impose a
222: relation $\bar s = \kappa \, \bar u$. We obtain
223: a system of three equations, explicitly presented in \cite{noi},
224: that can be solved in terms of $u$, $d$ and $s$. We begin by working
225: in $N$-space, where the resummation has a simpler form and quark
226: distributions are just the ratio of the appropriate structure
227: function and coefficient function. We
228: then revert to $x$-space using a simple
229: parametrization $q(x) = D x^{-\gamma}(1 - x)^\delta$.
230:
231: Figs.~\ref{up}--\ref{up1} show the effect of the resummation on the
232: up-quark distribution at $Q^2 = 12.59$ and 31.62~GeV$^2$, in $N$- and
233: $x$-space respectively. The best-fit values of $D$, $\gamma$ and
234: $\delta$, along with the $\chi^2/\mathrm{dof}$, can be found in \cite{noi}.
235: The impact of the resummation is noticeable at large $N$ and $x$: there,
236: soft resummation enhances the coefficient function and its moments,
237: hence it suppresses the quark densities extracted from structure
238: function data. In principle, also $d$ and $s$ densities are affected by
239: the resummation; the errors on their moments, however, are too large for
240: the effect to be statistically significant.
241: In \cite{noi} it was also shown that the results for the up quark
242: at 12.59 and 31.62 GeV$^2$ are consistent with NLO perturbative evolution.
243: \begin{figure}
244: \centerline{\resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{un2.ps}}%
245: \hfill%
246: \resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{ux2.ps}}}
247: \caption{NLO and resummed up quark distribution at $Q^2 = 12.59$~GeV$^2$
248: in moment (a) and $x$ (b) spaces. Following \cite{noi}, in $x$ space,
249: we have plotted the edges of a band corresponding to a prediction at
250: one-standard-deviation confidence level (statistical errors only).}
251: \label{up}
252: \end{figure}
253: \begin{figure}
254: \centerline{\resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{un3.ps}}%
255: \hfill%
256: \resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{ux3.ps}}}
257: \caption{The same as in Fig.~\ref{up}, but at $Q^2 = 31.62$ GeV$^2$.}
258: \label{up1}
259: \end{figure}
260:
261: In summary, we have presented a comparison of NLO and NLL-resummed quark
262: densities extracted from large-$x$ DIS data. We found
263: a suppression of valence quarks in the $10-20 \%$ range at $x > 0.5$, for
264: moderate $Q^2$.
265: We believe that it would be interesting and fruitful to extend
266: this analysis and include large-$x$ resummation in the toolbox of global
267: fits. Our results show in fact that this would be necessary
268: to achieve precisions better than $10 \%$ in processes involving
269: large-$x$ partons.
270:
271:
272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
273: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
274: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
275: %% of the above.
276: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
277:
278: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
279:
280: %\bibitem{Gluck:1996ve}
281: %M.~Gluck, S.~Kretzer and E.~Reya,
282: %\emph{Phys.\ Lett.\ B} {\bf 380} (1996) 171
283: %[Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 405} (1997) 391].
284:
285: \bibitem{Sterman:1986aj} G.~Sterman,
286: %``Summation Of Large Corrections To Short Distance Hadronic Cross-Sections,''
287: \emph{Nucl.\ Phys.\ B} {\bf 281} (1987) 310.
288: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B281,310;%%
289:
290: \bibitem{Catani:1989ne}
291: S.~Catani and L.~Trentadue,
292: %``Resummation Of The QCD Perturbative Series For Hard Processes,''
293: \emph{Nucl.\ Phys.\ B} {\bf 327} (1989) 323.
294: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B327,323;%%
295:
296: %\bibitem{Catani:1990rr}
297: %S.~Catani, B.~R.~Webber and G.~Marchesini,
298: %\emph{Nucl.\ Phys.\ B} {\bf 349} (1991) 635.
299:
300:
301: %\bibitem{Vogt:2000ci}
302: %A.~Vogt, \emph{Phys.\ Lett.\ B} {\bf 497} (2001) 228.
303:
304: \bibitem{Laenen:1998kp}
305: E.~Laenen and S.~O.~Moch,
306: \emph{Phys.\ Rev.\ D} {\bf 59} (1999) 034027.
307:
308:
309:
310: \bibitem{Corcella:2003ib}
311: G.~Corcella and A.~D.~Mitov,
312: \emph{Nucl.\ Phys.\ B} {\bf 676} (2004) 346.
313:
314: \bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}
315: J.~Pumplin, D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,
316: \emph{JHEP} {\bf 0207} (2002) 012.
317:
318: \bibitem{Naples:2003ne}
319: D.~Naples {\it et al.} [NuTeV Collaboration],
320: hep-ex/0307005.
321:
322: \bibitem{Yang:2000ju}
323: U.~K.~Yang {\it et al.} [CCFR/NuTeV Collaboration],
324: \emph{Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ } {\bf 86} (2001) 2742.
325:
326: \bibitem{tzanov}
327: M.~Tzanov {\it et al.} [NuTeV Collaboration], these proceedings.
328:
329: \bibitem{noi}
330: G.~Corcella and L.~Magnea, hep-ph/0506278.
331:
332: \bibitem{Benvenuti:1989fm}
333: A.~C.~Benvenuti {\it et al.} [BCDMS Collaboration],
334: \emph{Phys.\ Lett.\ B} {\bf 237} (1990) 592.
335:
336: \bibitem{Arneodo:1996qe}
337: M.~Arneodo {\it et al.} [New Muon Collaboration],
338: \emph{Nucl.\ Phys.\ B} {\bf 483} (1997) 3.
339:
340: \bibitem{DelDebbio:2004qj}
341: L.~Del Debbio, S.~Forte, J.~I.~Latorre, A.~Piccione and J.~Rojo,
342: \emph{JHEP} {\bf 0503} (2005) 080.
343:
344: \end{thebibliography}
345:
346:
347: \end{document}
348: \endinput
349: %%
350: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
351:
352: