1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.11 2004/10/31 08:06:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46:
47: \newcommand{\msbar}{$\overline{\mbox{MS}}$ }
48:
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: %% FRONTMATTER
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52:
53: \begin{document}
54: \begin{flushright}
55: CERN-PH-TH/2005-122
56: \end{flushright}
57:
58: \title{Heavy flavours: theory summary\footnote{Talk
59: given at DIS 2005, XIII Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering,
60: April 27--May 1, 2005, Madison, WI, U.\ S.\ A.}}
61:
62: \classification{12.38.Bx, 14.40.Lb, 14.40.Nd}
63: \keywords {Heavy quarks, heavy hadrons, parton distributions,
64: fragmentation functions}
65:
66: \author{G. Corcella}{
67: address={CERN, Department of Physics,
68: Theory Division, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland}
69: }
70:
71:
72:
73:
74: \begin{abstract}
75: I summarize the theory talks given
76: in the Heavy Flavours Working Group.
77: In particular, I discuss heavy-flavour
78: parton distribution functions, threshold resummation for heavy-quark
79: production, progress in fragmentation functions, quarkonium production,
80: heavy-meson hadroproduction.
81: \end{abstract}
82:
83: \maketitle
84:
85: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
86: %% MAINMATTER
87: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
88:
89:
90: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
91: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
92: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
93: %% of the above.
94: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
95:
96: \section{Introduction}
97:
98: Heavy-flavour physics is currently one of the main fields of investigation,
99: in both theoretical and experimental particle physics.
100: In this talk, I summarize the main theoretical issues that were
101: presented in the Heavy Flavour session of DIS 2005.
102: Among the topics discussed, we had updates on heavy-flavour parton
103: distributions, large-$x$ resummation for heavy quark production in DIS,
104: heavy-quark fragmentation functions to next-to-next-to-leading
105: order, progress in heavy-meson and quarkonium production.
106:
107:
108:
109: \section{Heavy-quark parton distributions}
110:
111: Relevant work was carried out on the subject of heavy-quark
112: parton distribution functions. Progress was reported by R.~Thorne, from
113: the MRST collaboration, concerning
114: the formulation of the Variable Flavour
115: Number Scheme (VFNS) for heavy quarks at NNLO.
116:
117: In fact, there are problems in defining VFNS for heavy quarks.
118: When switching naively from a given order in the coupling
119: constant $\alpha_S$ with $n_f$ flavours, to the same
120: order, but with $n_f+1$ flavours, one would get a discontinuity
121: when $Q^2$ is equal to the heavy quark mass.
122: At NNLO, for example, the contribution to a heavy-quark structure function
123: $F_2^H(x,Q^2)$ with $n_f$ flavours is
124: $\sim\alpha_S^3C_2^{\mathrm{FF},3}\otimes f^{n_f}$, where
125: $C_2^{\mathrm{FF},3}$ is the
126: fixed-flavour (FF) coefficient function
127: and $f$ the parton distribution function.
128: The corresponding contribution, in the region of
129: $n_f+1$ flavours, is instead
130: $\sim\alpha_S^2C_2^{\mathrm{VF},2}\otimes f^{n_f+1}$, where
131: $C_2^{\mathrm{VF},2}$ is the variable-flavour (VF)
132: coefficient function. As a result, $F_2^H(x,Q^2)$ would be
133: discontinuous through the heavy-quark mass threshold $Q^2=m_H^2$.
134:
135: The Thorne--Roberts (TR) prescription handles this discontinuity by freezing
136: higher-order terms when crossing the value $Q^2=m_H^2$.
137: At LO, for instance, the TR prescription reads, in terms of gluon ($g$) and
138: heavy quark ($h$, $\bar h$) densities:
139: \begin{eqnarray}
140: {{\alpha_S(Q^2)}\over{4\pi}}C_{2,Hg}^{\mathrm{FF},1}
141: \left({{Q^2}\over{m_H^2}}\right)\otimes g^{n_f}(Q^2)&\to &
142: {{\alpha_S(M^2)}\over{4\pi}}C_{2,Hg}^{\mathrm{FF},1}(1)\otimes g^{n_f}(m_H^2)
143: \nonumber\\
144: &+&
145: C_{2,HH}^{\mathrm{VF},0}\left({{Q^2}\over{m_H^2}}\right)\otimes
146: (h+\bar h)(Q^2).
147: \label{tr}
148: \end{eqnarray}
149: In Eq.~(\ref{tr}), we note the `frozen' term
150: $\sim\alpha_S(M^2)C_{2,Hg}^{\mathrm{FF},1}(1)$.
151: In order to apply this prescription to NNLO,
152: we would need the FF ${\cal O}(\alpha_S^3)$
153: heavy-quark coefficient functions for $Q^2\leq m_H^2$,
154: which have not been computed yet.
155: However, a reliable approximation of such functions can be obtained, gaining
156: information from the available calculations which resum threshold logarithms
157: and leading $\ln(1/x)$ terms, and from the known NNLO
158: coefficient functions and space-like splitting functions.
159:
160: Using this method, parton densities are still discontinuous at
161: $Q^2=m_H^2$, but structure functions are now continuous.
162: Results were presented for the charm-quark
163: structure function $F_2^c(x,Q^2)$: the
164: NNLO VFNS prediction fits rather well the ZEUS and H1 data, while the NLO
165: result is always below the data.
166:
167: F.~Olness, from the CTEQ collaboration, also
168: presented recent work on heavy-quark parton
169: distributions, implemented in the CTEQ6HQ set.
170: Mainly, the new set resums logarithms of the heavy-quark mass
171: $\ln(m_H^2/\mu_F^2)$ in the full kinematic range, by reabsorbing them
172: in the heavy-quark distribution function.
173: This yields a small, but
174: visible difference with respect to the previous set CTEQ6M.
175: The predictions obtained using the CTEQ6HQ parton distributions
176: fit the HERA data on $F_2^c(x,Q^2)$ quite well.
177:
178: Progress was reported on the determination of the strange-quark density,
179: which, in the previous CTEQ sets,
180: was tied to the $\bar u$ and $\bar d$ distributions
181: via the relation $s=\bar s=\kappa(\bar u+\bar d)/2$.
182: This assumption might lead to an underestimate of the
183: uncertainty on the $s$-quark density.
184: Rather, the $s$ quark can be treated as an additional set, described
185: by a more
186: general parametrization, which can be fitted to data.
187: Preliminary results with an independent $s$-quark density give reasonable
188: $\chi^2$ when comparing with DIS and Tevatron data.
189:
190: Moreover, the talk by F.~Olness also discussed soft-resummation for
191: $b$ production in DIS, which might also be included in future fits
192: of CTEQ parton distribution functions.
193:
194: \section{Threshold resummation}\vspace{-0.45cm}
195: \section{for heavy-quark production in DIS}
196:
197: Soft-gluon resummation for heavy-quark production in DIS was
198: discussed in the talk by A.~Mitov. In fact, the DIS $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$
199: coefficient functions present, at ${\cal O}(\alpha_S)$,
200: terms $\sim 1/(1-x)_+$ and $\sim [\ln(1-x)/(1-x)]_+$, which become large
201: for $x\to 1$ and need to be resummed (threshold resummation).
202: Such contributions correspond to collinear- or soft-gluon radiation.
203:
204: It was pointed out that the large-$x$
205: behaviour of the coefficient functions crucially depend, via the ratio
206: $m/Q$, on the mass of the final-state quark. In fact, a light quark emits
207: both soft- and collinear-divergent radiation, while gluon radiation off
208: a heavy quark can only be soft-enhanced. As a result, the two regimes
209: $m/Q\simeq 1$ and $m/Q\ll 1$ must be treated separately when performing
210: large-$x$ resummation.
211:
212: The threshold resummation reported by A.~Mitov
213: was performed in the next-to-leading
214: logarithmic approximation (NLL), which corresponds to keeping in the
215: Sudakov exponent terms $\sim\alpha_S^n\ln^{n+1} N$ (LL) and
216: $ \sim\alpha_S^n\ln^n N$ (NLL), where $N$ is the Mellin moment variable.
217: In fact, soft resummation is analytically performed in $N$-space, and the
218: results are then inverted to $x$-space.
219: Predictions were presented for the charm-quark structure function
220: $F_2^c(x,Q^2)$, for charged-current interactions, in
221: the environment of the HERA and NuTeV
222: experiments. The results showed that threshold resummation
223: is relevant, especially at small $Q^2$. Moreover, resumming large-$x$ terms
224: in the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ coefficient function yields a milder
225: dependence on both factorization and renormalization scales,
226: which corresponds to a reduction of the theoretical uncertainty.
227:
228: \section{NNLO perturbative fragmentation function}
229:
230: A.~Mitov also reported on
231: progress in heavy-quark fragmentation functions.
232: The energy distribution of a heavy quark presents, at fixed
233: order, terms $\sim\alpha_S^n\ln^k(Q^2/m^2)$ ($k\leq n$),
234: where $Q$ is the hard scale of the process, that are large for
235: $m\ll Q$, which is often the case.
236: Such logarithms can be resummed using
237: the approach of perturbative fragmentation functions, which
238: expresses the energy spectrum of a heavy quark as the
239: convolution of a coefficient function, describing the emission of a
240: massless parton, and a perturbative fragmentation function $D(m,\mu_F)$,
241: associated with the fragmentation of a massless parton
242: (a light quark or a gluon) into a massive quark.
243: The dependence of $D(m,\mu_F)$ on the factorization scale $\mu_F$
244: is determined by solving the Dokshitzer--Gribov--Altarelli--Parisi
245: (DGLAP) evolution equations, once an initial condition at a scale
246: $\mu_{0F}$ is given. Neglecting powers $(m/Q)^p$,
247: the initial condition of the perturbative fragmentation function was proved
248: to be process independent and calculated several years ago to NLO.
249: This talk discussed the recent calculation of
250: NNLO contributions, i.e. up to ${\cal O}(\alpha_S^2)$.
251:
252: Denoting by
253: $Q$ and $q$ heavy and light quarks respectively, NNLO corrections
254: to the initial condition of the perturbative fragmentation function
255: come from the elementary processes:
256: $Q\to Qgg$, $Q\to Qq\bar q$, $Q\to QQ\bar Q$, $\bar Q\to Q\bar Q \bar Q$,
257: $q(\bar q)\to Q\bar Q q(\bar q)$ and $g\to Q\bar Q g$, which have now
258: been fully computed.
259:
260: Solving the DGLAP equations, for an evolution from $\mu_{0F}$ to $\mu_F$,
261: allows us to resum terms $\sim\ln(\mu_F^2/\mu^2_{0F})$, i.e.
262: $\sim\ln(Q^2/m^2)$ if we choose $\mu_{0F}\simeq m$ and $\mu_F\simeq Q$
263: (collinear resummation).
264: In particular, the leading logarithms
265: are $\alpha_S^n\ln^n(Q^2/m^2)$, the NLLs
266: $\alpha_S^n\ln^{n-1}(Q^2/m^2)$, the NNLLs $\alpha_S^n\ln^{n-2}(Q^2/m^2)$.
267: In principle, the calculation of the initial condition of the perturbative
268: fragmentation function to NNLO would allow one to study the spectrum of heavy
269: quarks in the NNLO approximation, with NNLL collinear resummation.
270: However, for this level of accuracy to be achieved, one would also need
271: NNLO Altarelli--Parisi time-like splitting functions, which are
272: currently known to NLO. The computation of NNLO corrections
273: to such functions is in progress.
274:
275: \section{Hadroproduction of heavy mesons}\vspace{-0.45cm}
276: \section{in a massive VFNS}
277:
278: We had a presentation from I.~Schienbein
279: on hadroproduction of heavy mesons in a
280: Massive Variable Flavour Number Scheme (MVFNS).
281: Considering, for example,
282: $D$-meson production at the Tevatron ($p\bar p\to DX$),
283: the MVFNS subtracts and
284: resums logarithms of the heavy-quark mass $\ln(\mu_F^2/m^2)$. Unlike
285: the perturbative fragmentation function approach discussed above, it
286: keeps powers of $m/Q$ in the hard-scattering cross section.
287: This prescription is equivalent to $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ mass
288: factorization in a scheme where the heavy-quark mass regularizes the
289: collinear divergences. It was numerically checked that the
290: short-distance coefficient function corresponds to the
291: $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ one in the limit where the heavy-quark mass tends to
292: zero.
293: As a result, predictions can be obtained still using
294: $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ parton distributions and fragmentation
295: functions, but convoluted with a massive hard-scattering cross section.
296:
297:
298: The considered partonic subprocesses that were calculated
299: are $gg\to c\bar c$ and
300: $q\bar q\to c\bar c$, at LO; $qq\to c\bar cg$, $q\bar q\to c\bar c g$
301: and $gq\to c\bar cq$, at NLO.
302: If the heavy (charm) quark is in the initial state,
303: it is treated in the massless approximation.
304:
305: Using the CTEQ6M parton distribution function set and the
306: Binnewies--Kniehl--Kr\"amer (BKK) NLO fragmentation functions, fitted to the
307: OPAL data, predictions were given on the transverse momentum of
308: $D^0$, $D^{*+}$, $D^+$ and $D_s^+$ mesons at the Tevatron.
309: It was considered just prompt charm production, while $D$ production from
310: $B$-meson decays was not taken into account.
311: Within the error range, agreement was found with the CDF data, although
312: the ratio of the central values of theoretical predictions and data is
313: about 1.5--1.8, which may warrant further investigation.
314: A prediction was finally given for the transverse momentum distribution
315: of $c$-flavoured baryons $\Lambda^+_c$.
316:
317: This approach will be in the near future extended to $B$-meson production
318: at the Tevatron, and both $D$ and $B$ mesons in Deep Inelastic Scattering.
319:
320: \section{Heavy-quarkonium production}
321:
322:
323: The talk by J.--P. Lansberg discussed the production of
324: heavy quarkonium ($Q\bar Q$) in a new model, which consists of an extension
325: of the Colour Singlet Model (CSM) and the Colour Octet Model (COM).
326: The naive CSM factorizes heavy-quarkonium production in a hard and a soft part.
327: In the hard process,
328: $Q$ and $\bar Q$ are assumed to be on-shell, in a
329: colour-singlet state, with zero relative momentum, in a $^3S_1$
330: angular-momentum state (for $J/\psi$, $\psi^\prime$ and $\Upsilon$).
331: As far as the soft part is concerned,
332: the amplitude for the quark-binding probability
333: is a wave function, solution of the Schr\"odinger equation.
334: This model is, however, unable to reproduce the Tevatron Run I data from CDF on
335: $J/\psi$ and $\psi^\prime$ direct production.
336:
337: The COM proposes instead
338: that quarkonium states are produced by the fragmentation of a
339: gluon, which is transversely polarized, so that, according to Non-Relativistic
340: QCD (NRQCD), the quarkonium is to have itself transverse polarization.
341: Nevertheless, this prediction disagrees with CDF measurements of
342: unpolarized or slightly longitudinally polarized quarkonium states.
343:
344: The new model
345: goes beyond the static and on-shell approximations of the CSM.
346: $^3S_1$ quarkonium (${\cal Q}=Q\bar Q$) is produced via gluon fusion
347: $gg\to {\cal Q}g$, but it includes new contributions with respect
348: to the usual CSM (see J.--P.~Lansberg's presentation in
349: these proceedings for details).
350:
351: To describe the soft, non-perturbative part, two
352: phenomenological vertex functions are chosen:
353: $\psi(\vec p_{\mathrm{rel}})\sim \exp[-\vec p_{\mathrm{rel}}^2/\Lambda^2]$
354: and $\psi(\vec p_{\mathrm{rel}})\sim
355: \left(1+\vec p^2_{\mathrm{rel}}/\Lambda^2\right)^{-2}$,
356: where $\vec p_{\mathrm{rel}}$ is the relative $Q\bar Q$ momentum and
357: $\Lambda$ is a free size parameter.
358: The results yielded by this model
359: are in good agreement with RICH data on $J/\psi$,
360: and Tevatron data on $J/\psi$, $\psi^\prime$ and $\Upsilon(1S)$ production.
361: Fragmentation contributions are then taken from the COM, which gives
362: transverse polarization, and included in the model.
363: The agreement with polarization measurements at the Tevatron is
364: shown to be now pretty good.
365:
366:
367: \section{NLO charmonium production in $\gamma\gamma$ collisions}
368:
369: The talk given by B.~Kniehl
370: discussed NLO charmonium production in
371: photon--photon collisions. The computation of NLO corrections to such processes
372: is a relevant improvement, since it
373: reduces renormalization and factorization scale dependence and allows
374: a test of NRQCD.
375:
376: New results were presented for processes
377: $\gamma\gamma\to J/\psi X$, with direct photons and prompt $J/\psi$'s,
378: within the framework of NRQCD. In the considered processes,
379: $X$ can be a purely hadronic state, or a hadronic state with a prompt
380: photon. Phenomenological results were presented for $e^+e^-$ colliders,
381: with characteristics similar to the TESLA Linear Collider
382: project, and a centre-of-mass energy
383: $\sqrt{s}=500$~GeV. Cuts on transverse momentum and rapidity of
384: final-state photons were set to $p_T^\gamma>3$~GeV and $|y^\gamma|<2.79$.
385:
386: It was shown that, unlike the LO, the NLO prediction yields very little
387: dependence on the phase-space slicing parameters adopted to cancel soft
388: and collinear singularities.
389: Results were presented for the $J/\psi$ rapidity and transverse momentum
390: spectrum at LO and NLO, along with the NLO $K$-factor. NLO
391: corrections exhibit a remarkable impact on both shape and normalization of
392: the distributions which were shown.
393:
394: In fact, for $\gamma\gamma\to J/\psi X$, the $K$ factor is large because
395: of the subprocesses $\gamma\gamma\to c\bar c [^3S_1^{(8)}]g$
396: and $\gamma\gamma\to c\bar c [^3S_1^{(8)}]q\bar q$, which are
397: mediated by the gluon splitting $g\to c\bar c$, where the $c\bar c$ pair
398: is in a $^3S_1^{(8)}$ state.
399:
400: The presented analysis will be extended to electron--proton
401: photoproduction and hadroproduction, which will yield
402: predictions that could be compared with data from HERA II, the
403: Tevatron Run II and, ultimately, the LHC.
404:
405:
406:
407: \section{Conclusions}
408:
409: The heavy-flavour session of DIS 2005 had a number
410: of interesting theory talks.
411:
412: The reported progress in heavy-quark parton distribution functions
413: will be a key ingredient for precision studies of heavy-flavour physics
414: at present and future high-energy colliders, such as the LHC.
415:
416: Large-$x$ resummation in the coefficient function for
417: heavy-quark production in DIS will allow us to extract resummed parton
418: densities as well.
419: The NNLO calculation of the initial condition of
420: heavy-quark perturbative fragmentation functions could allow the promotion
421: of the perturbative fragmentation function approach to NNLO/NNLL accuracy if
422: time-like Altarelli--Parisi splitting functions were to be known
423: at NNLO. Given the process independence of the perturbative fragmentation
424: function, we shall be able to apply
425: such results to any process whose coefficient
426: functions are known to NNLO.
427:
428: An alternative approach to address heavy-quark (hadron) production is
429: the MVFNS, which was used to predict
430: charm-flavoured hadron production at the Tevatron. Some discrepancies
431: between theory and CDF data in the central values of the $D$
432: transverse-momentum distribution may require further investigation.
433: It may also be worthwhile
434: comparing MVFNS and perturbative fragmentation function approaches.
435:
436: Quarkonium production studies were also discussed.
437: A new model was proposed, which goes beyond the static approximation
438: of the CSM, uses the COM for the fragmentation, and is able to
439: reproduce Tevatron and RICH data on $J/\psi$, $\psi^\prime$ and
440: $\Upsilon$ production.
441:
442: NLO charmonium production in two-photon collisions
443: was also discussed. The results, shown for $J/\psi$
444: production at an $e^+e^-$ collider with
445: $\sqrt{s}=500$~GeV, exhibit a relevant effect of the inclusion of NLO
446: corrections.
447:
448: In summary, all the given talks show active work and progress on heavy-flavour
449: phenomenology, which will allow the performance of increasingly more accurate
450: measurements in Deep Inelastic Scattering experiments, as well as at
451: any present and future hadron collider facility.
452:
453: %\begin{thebibliography}{99}
454:
455: %\bibitem{thorne}
456: %R.~Thorne, hep-ph/0506251.
457:
458: %\bibitem{olness}
459: %F.~Olness, these proceedings.
460:
461: %\bibitem{mitov}
462: %A.D.~Mitov,
463:
464: %\bibitem{mitov1}
465: %A.D.~Mitov, these proceedings.
466:
467: %\bibitem{schein}
468: %I.~Schienbein, these proceedings.
469:
470: %\bibitem{lansberg}
471: %J.-P.~Lansberg, these proceedings.
472:
473: %\bibitem{kniehl}
474: %B.~Kniehl, these proceedings.
475:
476:
477:
478: %\end{thebibliography}
479:
480:
481: \end{document}
482: \endinput
483: %%
484: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
485:
486: