1: \documentclass[prd,showpacs,showkeys,preprintnumbers,aps]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
4: \topmargin=-.8cm
5:
6: \makeatletter
7: \def\setcaption#1{\def\@captype{#1}}
8: \makeatother
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: \preprint{TH-1026}
13: \title{Color Ferromagnetic Quark Matter in Neutron Stars}
14:
15: \author{Aiichi Iwazaki$^{\rm a}$\footnote{$\!\!$Electronic address: \tt
16: iwazaki@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp},
17: Osamu Morimatsu$^{\rm b}$\footnote{$\!\!$Electronic address: \tt
18: osamu.morimatsu@kek.jp},
19: Tetsuo Nishikawa$^{\rm c}$\footnote{$\!\!$Electronic address: \tt
20: nishi@th.phys.titech.ac.jp} and
21: Munehisa Ohtani$^{\rm d}$\footnote{$\!\!$Electronic address: \tt
22: ohtani@rarfaxp.riken.jp}}
23:
24: \address{$^{\rm a}$Department of Physics, Nishogakusha University,
25: Kashiwa Ohi Chiba 277-8585,\ Japan. \\
26: $^{\rm b}$Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, High Energy
27: Accelerator Research Organization, 1-1, Ooho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki,
28: 305-0801, Japan \\
29: $^{\rm c}$Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro,
30: Tokyo, 152-8551, Japan\\
31: $^{\rm d}$Radiation Laboratory, RIKEN,
32: 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan}
33:
34: \date{July 11, 2005}
35: \begin{abstract}
36: %%\tightenlines
37: Color superconducting state has been known as a possible phase
38: of quark matter with sufficiently large baryon number
39: density so as for perturbative analysis to be valid.
40: We point out that
41: a color ferromagnetic state is another possible
42: phase of such a sufficiently dense quark matter.
43: Furthermore,
44: we show that the color ferromagnetic phase
45: is energetically more favored than the color superconducting phase
46: in the quark matter with smaller baryon number density.
47: We expect that increasing baryon density in neutron stars
48: transforms nuclear matter into the quark matter
49: of the color ferromagnetic phase, not color superconducting phase.
50: We find that a critical mass of the
51: neutron star with such an internal structure is
52: about $1.6M_{\odot}$.
53: \end{abstract}
54: %
55: \pacs{12.38.-t, 12.38.Mh, 25.75.Nq, 26.60.+c, 97.60.Jd}
56: \keywords{Quark Matter, Color Superconductivity, Quantum Hall States,
57: Neutron Stars}
58: \maketitle
59: %
60: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
61: %
62: Neutron stars have quite dense nuclear matter\cite{neutron}
63: at their inner core.
64: The density is expected to reach at least several times the normal nuclear
65: density ($\simeq 2.8\times 10^{14}\mbox{g/cm}^3$).
66: Observationally\cite{ob}, the average density of
67: the neutron stars is about twice the normal nuclear density,
68: when their mass is $1.4 M_{\odot}$ and their radius is $10$km.
69: (Even if we take the radius as $13$km, the average density
70: exceeds the normal nuclear density.)
71: Although their radii have not yet been determined definitely,
72: this naive estimation implies that the hadronic matter at the center of
73: the neutron stars is much more dense than the normal nuclear density.
74:
75: It is natural to expect that the neutron stars
76: involve quark matter at their center.
77: As the density of the hadronic matter increases, nucleons begin to
78: overlap each other at about three times the normal nuclear density.
79: This suggests that a transition between hadrons and quarks
80: occurs at a few times the normal nuclear density and
81: hence the quark matter may be realized at a core of the neutron stars.
82: Thus, it is quite important to analyze the quark matter in
83: understanding properties of the neutron stars.
84:
85: So far, several phases of the quark matter have been studied: normal
86: quark gas state, color superconducting state\cite{color} and color
87: ferromagnetic state\cite{cf,cf3} which we have recently pointed out.
88: In the normal quark gas state, quarks interact weakly with
89: each other and
90: the SU(3) gauge symmetry remains exact.
91: This state is naively expected to be realized in
92: quark matter with sufficiently large baryon number density
93: so as for the gauge coupling constant to be much small.
94: But this expectation does not hold in the quark matter with low
95: temperature. Such a quark matter has been shown to
96: form di-quark condensates and form
97: the color superconducting states; color flavor locked (CFL) state involves three flavors in the
98: condensates,
99: while two-flavor superconducting (2SC) state does only two light flavors in them.
100: Owing to these condensates, the SU(3) gauge symmetry is
101: broken fully or partially in the color superconducting states.
102: On the other hand,
103: the color ferromagnetic state (CF)
104: is such a state that a color magnetic field
105: arises spontaneously due to gluon's dynamics
106: and quarks occupy Landau levels under the color magnetic field.
107: Because of the magnetic field, the gauge symmetry is partially broken also
108: in this state.
109:
110:
111: The color ferromagnetic state was firstly discussed by Savvidy\cite{savvidy}
112: as a more stable vacuum than the perturbative one, namely, as a possible
113: candidate for
114: quark matter with
115: vanishing baryon number density.
116: This argument is based on the fact that
117: a nonzero color magnetic field minimizes
118: the one-loop effective potential of the magnetic field.
119: Since the one-loop approximation
120: is valid in a system with small gauge coupling constant,
121: this CF state may be realized
122: in the quark matter
123: with sufficiently large baryon number density, not
124: in the quark matter with vanishing baryon number density.
125: Since the energy density of quarks
126: under the color magnetic field is lower than
127: that in the absence of the field, the nontrivial minimum remains
128: in the effective potential including the effects of the quarks.
129: Therefore, the CF is a possible phase of
130: the dense quark matter as well as the color superconducting states.
131:
132:
133: There is, however, a naive argument that
134: the color magnetic field does not arise
135: because magnetic mass of gluons
136: could be produced in the dense quark matter;
137: owing to the mass, the magnetic field is expelled or
138: screened. We would like to mention in this point that
139: although the electric mass, i.e.~Debye mass, of the gluons can be
140: generated in the dense quark matter,
141: the magnetic mass can be hardly produced just as
142: the magnetic mass of photons in electron gas. Only the exception is
143: the color superconducting quark matter\cite{huang}, where
144: the magnetic field is suppressed.
145:
146: This nontrivial state, however, was shown\cite{nielsen} to be unstable
147: in the vacuum soon after the work by Savvidy.
148: There exist unstable modes of gluons which possess imaginary mass.
149: We have shown\cite{cf,cf3} that the instability can be cured
150: (see also \cite{bor}) in the dense quark matter by
151: the formation of fractional quantum Hall states
152: of the unstable gluons.
153: %(Here we have used
154: %a non-perturbative argument
155: %for the formation of the quantum Hall states of the gluons. The
156: %argument is established in the physics of quantum Hall states.
157: %This situation is
158: %similar to the case of
159: %non-perturbative arguments needed
160: %to show the existence of the di-quark condensate in
161: %the color superconductors.)
162: Therefore, there are two possible phases of the dense
163: quark matter at low temperature; the color superconducting phase without
164: the color magnetic field and the stable ferromagnetic phase with the
165: color magnetic field.
166: In the color superconducting phase, the energy density
167: of quarks is smaller than that of the normal quark gas
168: due to the di-quark condensates. Similarly, in the color ferromagnetic phase,
169: their energy density is smaller than that of
170: the normal quark gas due to the presence of the magnetic field.
171: Obviously, these two phases are incompatible with each other.
172: %(Although we have pointed out\cite{cf} the
173: %coexistence of 2SC and CF, we do not
174: %address the state here.)
175:
176: In this letter we determine which phase is realized in the quark matter
177: with sufficiently large baryon density
178: so as for the perturbative approximation or loop approximation to
179: be valid.
180: For the purpose, we compare the free energy of the phases
181: at zero temperature
182: in terms of baryon chemical potential and find
183: the state with the lowest free energy.
184: The free energy, $\Omega$, of quark matter has contributions from quarks
185: and gluons,
186: %
187: \begin{equation}
188: \Omega=\Omega_q+\Omega_{gl}.
189: \end{equation}
190: where $\Omega_q$ represents the free energy of quarks, while $\Omega_{gl}$ does
191: vacuum energy in which main contributions come from gluon's loops (and gluon's condensation
192: in the case of CF phase).
193:
194: We first estimate
195: the vacuum energies, $\Omega_{gl}$ in each phase of
196: sufficiently dense quark matter.
197: In the one-loop approximation,
198: the gluon vacuum energy \cite{cf,cf3},
199: ${\rm Re}V(gB)=\frac{9}{32\pi^2}(gB)^2(\log(gB/\Lambda^2)-1/2)$
200: vanishes at $gB=0$ in the
201: color superconducting phases, while it takes
202: ${\rm Re}V(gB=\Lambda^2)=\frac{9}{64\pi^2}(gB)^2$ in CF phase;
203: we have included loop effects of quarks with three flavors in $V(gB)$.
204: ($g$ is a gauge coupling constant.)
205: We should also take into account of the condensation energy of
206: gluons, which stabilize the color magnetic field by forming
207: a quantum Hall state in the CF phase. The energy is
208: given by $-2B^2=-2(gB)^2/g^2$ \cite{cf3}.
209: Thus, the free energies, $\Omega_{gl}$, are given by
210:
211: \begin{equation}
212: \Omega_{gl}=0 \quad \mbox{for CS},\quad \Omega_{gl}=-\frac{9}{64\pi^2}(gB)^2-2\frac{(gB)^2}{g^2} \quad \mbox{for CF}
213: \end{equation}
214: respectively.
215:
216: Secondly, we wish to estimate the free energies, $\Omega_{q}$ of quarks.
217: Before doing so,
218: we give a brief review of the color ferromagnetic phase
219: (see \cite{cf3} for more details).
220: As has been shown, one-loop effective potential of
221: color magnetic field, $B$, shows not only a non-trivial minimum, but also
222: the presence of imaginary part for $gB\neq 0$,
223: $V(gB)=\frac{9}{32\pi^2}(gB)^2(\log(gB/\Lambda^2)-1/2)-\frac{i}{8\pi}(gB)^2$.
224: The real part of $V(gB)$ shows the spontaneous generation of
225: the color magnetic field.
226: (We may assume that the direction of the field in the color space points
227: to $\lambda_3$.)
228: But the presence of the imaginary part of $V(gB)$
229: indicates that the state is unstable.
230: In other words the state is not true minimum in energy. Actually,
231: There exist unstable modes of gauge fields with
232: $\lambda_3$ color
233: charges.
234: These unstable modes occupy the lowest Landau level ($n=0$)
235: with spins parallel to $B$ and have
236: spectrum, $E_g^2=k^2+2gB(n+1/2)-2gB=k^2-gB<0$, where
237: $k$ represents a momentum parallel to the spatial direction of the
238: magnetic field. Among them,
239: the modes with $E_g(k=0)$ whose amplitudes increase most rapidly,
240: make a stable vacuum.
241: %
242: As we have shown in previous papers, the unstable modes of the gauge
243: fields with $k=0$, which are spatially two-dimensional ones,
244: condense to make stable
245: fractional quantum Hall states: Repulsive self-interaction of the gluons
246: occupying the Lowest Landau
247: level leads to
248: the quantum Hall state even if the interaction is
249: small.
250: This formation of the quantum Hall
251: state\cite{qh} is similar to the case that two-dimensional electrons under
252: strong magnetic field form fractional quantum Hall states due to the Coulomb repulsion.
253: Since the condensate has the color charges,
254: the formation of the quantum Hall states is possible
255: only when the quark matter is present;
256: the quarks supply the color charges for the stable vacuum.
257: Therefore, the color ferromagnetic phase
258: is a possible state of the quark matter with sufficiently large baryon number
259: density so as for the loop approximation to be valid.
260: The gluon condensations leading to the quantum Hall states
261: produce a sufficiently large magnetic mass to the unstable modes
262: to stabilize the color ferromagnetic state.
263: In this way, it turns out that the state in true minimum of the effective potential
264: is a stable CF state which gains the condensation energy of the gluons, $-2B^2$.
265:
266: Here, we note
267: that there is one unknown dimensional parameter in QCD
268: associated with a renormalization scale, $\Lambda$ in $V(gB)$.
269: In our case $gB$ is such a parameter.
270: Although the reliable value of $gB$
271: has not yet been determined phenomenologically,
272: we expect that it has a typical scale of QCD.
273: Here, we assume that the value of
274: $gB$ is around $(200\mbox{MeV})^2$.
275:
276: Now, we turn to calculate the free energies of quarks in the CF phase.
277: Quarks in SU(3) gauge theory are in a color triplet;
278: $q=(q_{\rm r},q_{\rm g},q_{\rm b})$.
279: Among them, quarks, $q_{\rm r}$ and $q_{\rm g}$, occupy Landau levels under the
280: color magnetic field, $B\propto \lambda_3$.
281: Spectra of such quarks are
282: given by $E_q^2=m_f^2+k^2+gB(n+1/2+s_z)$ where $s_z=\pm 1/2$ represents a
283: spin contribution and $m_f$ is the quark mass with flavor, $f$. We take $m_{\rm u,d}=0$ and
284: $m_{\rm s}=100\mbox{MeV}\sim 300\mbox{MeV}$.
285: Each Landau level has
286: the degeneracy per unit area being given by $gB/4\pi$.
287: The spectra of the quarks, $q_{\rm r}$ and $q_{\rm g}$, are identical
288: to each other.
289: %
290: %We assume that the magnetic field, $B$, is sufficiently large so that
291: %all of quarks, $q_{\rm r}$ and $q_{\rm g}$, occupy only the lowest Landau
292: %level. In other words, the chemical potential of the quarks
293: %is lower than $\sqrt{m_f^2+gB}$.
294: Hence, the number density, $n_f$, and the energy density, $\rho_f$, of each
295: flavor of quarks are given by
296: %
297: \begin{align}
298: n_f =&
299: %\frac{gB}{4\pi}\int\frac{dk}{2\pi}
300: =\frac{gB}{4\pi^2} \sqrt{\mu_f^2-m_f^2}+\cdots \ ,
301: %\nonumber\\
302: \hspace{2em} \rho_f = % \frac{gB}{4\pi}\int \frac{dk}{2\pi}E_q =
303: \frac{gB}{8\pi^2}\left(\mu_f\sqrt{\mu_f^2-m_f^2}
304: +m_f^2\ln\frac{\mu_f+\sqrt{\mu_f^2-m_f^2}}{m_f}\right)+\cdots \ ,
305: \end{align}
306: where we have explicitly shown only the contributions of the lowest Landau level;
307: we should understand that contributions of higher Landau levels are present in the above formulae.
308: $\mu_f$ denotes the chemical potential of
309: quarks, with the color types, $q_{\rm r}$ and $q_{\rm g}$.
310: We should note that the chemical potential of $q_{\rm r}$ is the same as the
311: one of $q_{\rm g}$,
312: since we have an exchange symmetry between $q_{\rm r}$ and $q_{\rm g}$.
313: On the other hand, spectra of the quark, $q_{\rm b}$, are
314: given by $\sqrt{m_f^2+\vec{k}^2}$. Namely, the quarks do not
315: couple with the magnetic field.
316: Then, the number density, $\tilde{n}_f$, and the energy density,
317: $\tilde{\rho}_f$, of the quark with the color type, $q_{\rm b}$, are given, respectively, by
318: %
319: \begin{align}
320: \tilde{n}_{f} =& \frac{(\tilde{\mu}_f^2-m_f^2)^{3/2}}{3\pi^2}\ ,
321: %\nonumber \\
322: \hspace{2em} \tilde{\rho}_{f} = \frac{2\tilde{\mu}_f^2-m_f^2}{8\pi^2}
323: \tilde{\mu}_f\sqrt{\tilde{\mu}_f^2-m_f^2} -\frac{m_f^4}{8\pi^2}
324: \ln\frac{\tilde{\mu}_f+\sqrt{\tilde{\mu}_f^2-m_f^2}}{m_f} \ ,
325: \end{align}
326: %
327: where $\tilde{\mu}_f$ is the chemical potential of the quarks, $q_{\rm b}$.
328:
329: In the following, we should take into account three important conditions\cite{alford}
330: which must be satisfied by the quarks and electrons
331: in a realistic situation, namely, in neutron stars.
332: These are the conditions of color neutrality, electric neutrality and
333: beta-equilibrium,
334: %
335: \begin{align}
336: \label{color}
337: &n_{\rm u}+n_{\rm d}+n_{\rm s}=\tilde{n}_{\rm u}+\tilde{n}_{\rm d}+
338: \tilde{n}_{\rm s} & \mbox{(color neutrality)}, \\
339: \label{electric}
340: & \frac{2}{3}(2n_{\rm u}+\tilde{n}_{\rm u})-\frac{1}{3}(2n_{\rm d}+2n_{\rm s}+\tilde{n}_{\rm d}+\tilde{n}_{\rm s})-n_e=0 &
341: \mbox{(electric neutrality)}, \\
342: \label{beta}
343: &\mu_{\rm s}=\mu_{\rm d}=\mu_{\rm u}+\mu_e \quad \mbox{and} \quad \tilde{\mu}_{\rm s}=\tilde{\mu}_{\rm d}=\tilde{\mu}_{\rm u}+\mu_e &
344: \mbox{(beta-equilibrium)},
345: \end{align}
346: %
347: where $n_e=\mu_e^3/3\pi^2$ and $\mu_e$ denote the number density of
348: electrons and their chemical potential, respectively.
349: The color neutrality condition comes
350: from the average of each color charge vanishing,
351: $\langle\lambda_3\rangle=\langle\lambda_8\rangle=0$.
352: The electric neutrality condition comes from the fact that
353: the total electric charge density in neutron star should vanish.
354: (Here we do not consider a possibility of mixing phase.)
355: Note that the number density of each flavor
356: $\bar{n}_f$ is given by,
357: $\bar{n}_f=2n_f+\tilde{n}_f$.
358: Furthermore, the beta-equilibrium
359: condition comes from u, d and s quarks transforming into each other
360: in neutron stars such as $d \,\,\,\mbox{or s} \to u+e$, or its
361: inverse process due to the weak interactions. These conditions reduce
362: many independent variables to only one such as the baryon chemical potential.
363:
364:
365: Using these number densities and energy densities,
366: we can calculate the free energy of the quark matter
367: in the color ferromagnetic phase,
368: %
369: \begin{eqnarray}
370: \Omega_q^{\rm CF}&=&2\rho_{\rm u}+\tilde{\rho_{\rm u}}+2\rho_{\rm d}
371: +\tilde{\rho_{\rm d}}+2\rho_{\rm s}+\tilde{\rho_{\rm s}}+\rho_e
372: -\sum_{f=\rm u,d,s}(2\mu_f n_f+\tilde{\mu}_f \tilde{n}_f)
373: -\mu_e n_e \nonumber \\
374: &=&2\rho_{\rm u}+\tilde{\rho}_{\rm u}+2\rho_{\rm d}+\tilde{\rho}_{\rm d}
375: +2\rho_{\rm s}+\tilde{\rho}_{\rm s}+\rho_e-\mu_B
376: n_B
377: \end{eqnarray}
378: \noindent where
379: the second line of the equation has been derived using the conditions,
380: eqs.(\ref{color})-(\ref{beta}).
381: $\mu_B$ and $n_B$ are the baryon chemical potential and the baryon number
382: density. ($\rho_e=\mu_e^4/4\pi^2$ is the energy
383: density of electrons.)
384: These can be represented such that,
385: %
386: \begin{align}
387: \mu_B &=\frac{2(\mu_{\rm u}+\mu_{\rm d}+\mu_{\rm s})
388: +\tilde{\mu}_{\rm u}+\tilde{\mu}_{\rm d}+\tilde{\mu}_{\rm s}}{3},
389: \\
390: n_B&=\frac{\bar{n}_{\rm u}+\bar{n}_{\rm d}+\bar{n}_{\rm s}}{3}.
391: \end{align}
392: %
393: As we have mentioned, this free energy as well as the other
394: physical quantities can be expressed
395: simply in terms of the baryon chemical potential, $\mu_B$,
396: using the above three conditions.
397:
398: In this way, we can calculate the free energy of the quarks in the
399: color ferromagnetic phase.
400: When the baryon number density becomes larger,
401: quarks occupy higher Landau levels.
402: We can find numerically that
403: as quarks start to occupy higher Landau levels than the lowest Landau level,
404: the free energy rapidly approaches to that
405: of the normal quark gas with no magnetic field;
406: $\Omega_q^{\rm CF}/\Omega_q^{\rm NG}
407: \to 1 $ as $\mu \to \infty$,
408: as we have shown in the previous paper\cite{cf}.
409: This is because the ratio depends only on the
410: dimensionless quantity $gB/\mu^2$ in the limit.
411:
412:
413: In order to compare this free energy with those of the color
414: superconducting states (CFL and 2SC) and the normal quark gas
415: state (NG), we write down the free energies of these states\cite{alford},
416: %
417: \begin{align}
418: \Omega_q^{\rm CFL}&=\frac{-\mu_B^4+9\mu_B^2m_{\rm s}^2}{108\pi^2} {
419: -\frac{m_{\rm s}^4}{32\pi^2}\left(1-12\ln\frac{3m_{\rm s}}{2\mu_B}\right)}
420: -\frac{\mu_B^2\Delta_{\rm CFL}^2}{3\pi^2} & \\
421: \Omega_q^{\rm 2SC}&=\frac{-\mu_B^4+9\mu_B^2m_{\rm s}^2}{108\pi^2} {
422: -\frac{m_{\rm s}^4}{32\pi^2}\left(5-12\ln\frac{3m_{\rm s}}{2\mu_B}\right) }
423: -\frac{\mu_B^2\Delta_{\rm 2SC}^2}{9\pi^2} & \\
424: \Omega_q^{\rm NG}&=\frac{-\mu_B^4+9\mu_B^2m_{\rm s}^2}{108\pi^2} {
425: -\frac{m_{\rm s}^4}{32\pi^2}\left(7-12\ln\frac{3m_{\rm s}}{2\mu_B}\right) }
426: &
427: \end{align}
428: %
429: where $\Delta_{\rm CFL}$ and $\Delta_{\rm 2SC}$ are
430: the gap energies in the color superconducting phases, CFL and 2SC, respectively.
431: The formulae have been obtained up to second order in
432: $m_{\rm s}^2/\mu_B^2$, with the assumption that $m_{\rm s}^2$ is of the same order
433: as $\mu_B\Delta_c/3$ ($c={\rm CFL}$ or $c={\rm 2SC}$).
434: Then, the last two terms in $\Omega^{\rm CFL}$ and $\Omega^{\rm 2SC}$
435: become of the same order of the magnitude. It turns out that
436: the di-quark pairing effects in the superconducting states reduce
437: the energies by $(\mu_B\Delta_c/3)^2\sim m_{\rm s}^4$ from the energy of NG.
438:
439: We should mention that the free energies obtained above
440: are reliable only for the quark matter with the small gauge coupling constant, in other words,
441: with sufficiently large baryon number density.
442: Quarks interact weakly with each others.
443: Hereafter we apply the free energies for quark matters with
444: realistic baryon number density such as several times of normal nuclear density.
445: It is expected that such quark matters are present in neutron stars.
446:
447:
448: Theoretically, the values of the gap parameters have much ambiguity,
449: so that we consider a range of the parameter
450: such as $10\,\mbox{MeV}<\Delta_c<100\,\mbox{MeV}$, supposing
451: $\Delta_{\rm CFL}\simeq \Delta_{\rm 2SC}$. We also consider a range of the strange
452: quark mass such as $100\,\mbox{MeV}<m_{\rm s}<300\, \mbox{MeV}$.
453: %Taking $\sqrt{gB}=400\mbox{MeV}$, we find solutions of
454: %eqs.(\ref{color})-(\ref{beta}) in the range of
455: %$300\,\mbox{MeV}<$
456: %$\mu_{f}<400\,\mbox{MeV}$ where the restriction
457: %to the lowest Landau level is satisfied.
458:
459:
460: In Fig.1 we show the free energy densities of the phases
461: in terms of the baryon
462: chemical potential, $\mu_B$ relative to the free energy density of NG phase,
463: i.e.~$\Delta \Omega=\Omega_q^c-\Omega_q^{\rm NG}$.
464: We take $gB=(200\mbox{MeV})^2$ and a large strange quark
465: mass, $m_{\rm s}=275$MeV along with a large gap parameter $\Delta=80$MeV
466: to reduce the free energies of CFL or 2SC phases.
467: (We have taken a value of the gauge coupling constant, $g^2/4\pi=0.3$.)
468: Obviously, the color ferromagnetic phase
469: is the most favored in the region depicted in Fig.1.
470: With the increase of the baryon chemical potential, higher Landau
471: levels are occupied and the CF free energy approaches to
472: that of the normal quark matter; $\Omega_q^{\rm CF}\simeq \Omega_q^{\rm NG}-b(gB)^2$.
473: Eventually, CFL phase
474: becomes energetically more favored than the ferromagnetic phase
475: in the extremely large chemical potential as can be seen in Fig.1.
476:
477:
478: Physically, the energy density of the quarks
479: ($\Omega_q^{\rm CF}\sim -O(gB\mu^2)$) in the magnetic field
480: is much smaller than the
481: energy density of the normal quark gas
482: ($\Omega_q^{\rm NG}\sim -O(\mu^4)$), since all of quarks
483: occupy the lowest Landau level in the
484: limit of large magnetic field.
485: Even if the pairing effects
486: in the color superconducting states are taken into account,
487: this situation is not altered.
488: The pairing
489: effects reduce the energy density of the normal quark gas
490: only by the order of $\Delta^2\mu^2$;
491: $\Omega_q^{\rm CFL}\simeq \Omega_q^{\rm NG}-a\Delta^2\mu^2$ with a
492: positive numerical factor $a$.
493: With increasing the quark chemical
494: potential, $\mu$,
495: quarks become occupying higher Landau levels
496: and the energy density approaches rapidly that of the normal quark
497: \vspace*{1em}
498:
499: \noindent
500: \begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
501: \begin{center}
502: \setcaption{figure}
503: %\begin{figure}[tbph]
504: % \centering
505: \includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip=yes]{dfe.eps}
506: \caption{The free energy of various phases as a function of
507: the chemical potential $\mu_B$, relative to the normal quark gas state.}
508: \label{fig:freeenergy}
509: %\end{figure}
510: \end{center}
511: \end{minipage}
512: \hspace{2em}
513: \begin{minipage}{.5\textwidth}
514: \begin{center}
515: \setcaption{figure}
516: %\begin{figure}[tbph]
517: % \centering
518: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip=yes]{mass-radius_hl.eps}
519: \caption{Mass-radius relation of the compact stars
520: in unit of the solar mass.}
521: \label{fig:MR}
522: %\end{figure}
523: \end{center}
524: \end{minipage}
525: %
526: %
527: gas\cite{cf};
528: $\Omega_q^{\rm CF}\simeq \Omega_q^{\rm NG}-b(gB)^2$
529: with a positive numerical factor, $b\simeq 0.055 $.
530: This is because the limit of $\mu\to \infty$, is equivalent
531: to the limit of $gB\to 0$. Hence,
532: in an intermediate value of $\mu$, $\Omega_q^{\rm CF}$ becomes larger
533: than $\Omega_q^{\rm CFL}$. This general argument implies that
534: as far as $b(gB)^2>a\Delta^2\mu^2$,
535: the color ferromagnetic phase is more favored,
536: i.e.~$\Omega^{\rm CF}<\Omega^{\rm CFL}$ for small chemical potential
537: or large magnetic field.
538:
539: In this way, the color ferromagnetic phase is more favored
540: than the CFL phase or 2SC phase, if the chemical potential, $\mu$,
541: satisfies, $b(gB)^2>a\Delta^2\mu^2$, but is sufficiently
542: large for the loop approximation to be valid.
543: Then, an intriguing question we should ask is \lq what
544: is the critical baryon chemical potential
545: between hadron phase and the quark phase ?'.
546: %
547: In order to answer the
548: question, we need to know precisely the free energy of gluons $\Omega_{gl}$, in the color
549: ferromagnetic phase. The critical point
550: depends very sensitively on the value, $\Omega_{gl}$,
551: which is of the order of $(100\mbox{MeV})^4$.
552: Due to a forth power of an energy scale,
553: its contribution to the free energy is
554: quite sensitive to the energy scale so that
555: it is difficult to obtain precisely the critical point.
556:
557:
558: Finally,
559: in Fig.2 we show the mass-radius relation of a
560: hybrid neutron star composed of
561: a nuclear matter
562: and the quark matter in the CF phase
563: in its core.
564: The relation has been obtained by solving
565: the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation
566: with the use of the equation of states of the quark matter
567: as well as the nuclear matter.
568: As a nuclear matter, we have used an equation of state by
569: Akmal, Pandharipande, and Ravenhall (APR)\cite{apr}.
570: We have used tentatively $\Omega_{gl}=(180\mbox{MeV})^4$,
571: $gB=(200\mbox{MeV})^2$, $\Delta_c=80$MeV and $m_{\rm s}=275$MeV.
572: In Fig.2,
573: the dotted line represents the relation for a neutron star containing only
574: nuclear matter (NM). The solid line for the hybrid star involving the
575: CF quark matter inside of the nuclear matter.
576: For comparison, we also show the relation (dashed line) of
577: a hybrid star composed of the CFL quark
578: matter with the same $\Omega_{gl}$ inside of the nuclear matter.
579: It turns out that the critical mass of the hybrid neutron
580: stars discussed in the paper is consistent with observations\cite{ob}.
581: We will report the details in the near future.
582:
583: \vspace*{2em}
584:
585: A.~I.~and M.~O.~express thanks to the member of theory
586: group in KEK for their hospitality.
587: This work was partially supported by Grants-in-Aid of the Japanese Ministry
588: of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology (No. 13135218).
589:
590:
591: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
592: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
593: \bibitem{neutron}S.L. Shapiro and S.A. Teukolsky, Black Holes, White Dwarfs
594: and Neutron Stars, John Wiley and Sons, (1983).
595: \bibitem{ob}J.M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, astro-ph/0405262.
596: \bibitem{color}K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, hep-ph/0011333.
597: \bibitem{cf}A. Iwazaki and O. Morimatsu, Phys. Lett. B 571 (2003) 61; \\
598: A. Iwazaki, O, Morimatsu, T. Nishikawa and M. Ohtani,
599: Phys. Lett. B 579 (2004) 347.
600: \bibitem{cf3}A. Iwazaki, O, Morimatsu, T. Nishikawa and M. Ohtani,
601: Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 034014.
602: \bibitem{savvidy}G.K. Savvidy, Phys. Lett. B 71 (1977) 133.\\
603: H. Pagels, Lecture at Coral Gables, Florida, 1978.
604: \bibitem{huang}M. Huang and I.A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 094030.
605: \bibitem{nielsen}N.K. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B 144 (1978) 376;
606: Phys. Lett. B 79 (1978) 304.
607: \bibitem{bor}A.O. Starinets, A.S. Vshivtsev and V.Ch. Zhukovskii,
608: Phys. Lett. B 322 (1994) 403; \\
609: V. Skalozub and M. Bordag, Nucl. Phys. B 576 (2000) 430.
610: \bibitem{qh}S. Das Sarma and A. Pinczuk (Eds.),
611: Perspectives in Quantum Hall Effects, (Wiley, New York, 1997).
612: \bibitem{alford}M. Alford and K. Rajagopal, JHEP 0206 (2002) 031; \\
613: M. Alford, M. Braby, M. Paris and S. Reddy, nucl-th/0411016.
614: \bibitem{apr}A. Akmal, V.R. Pandharipande and D.G. Ravenhall,
615: Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 1804.
616: \end{thebibliography}
617:
618: \end{document}
619:
620: