1: %% ****** Start of file slactemplate.tex ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12: %
13: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
14: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
15: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
16: %
17: \documentclass[slac_one]{revtex4}
18: \usepackage{graphicx}
19: \usepackage{fancyhdr}
20: \usepackage{epsfig}
21: \pagestyle{fancy}
22: \fancyhead{} % clear all fields
23: \fancyfoot{} % clear all fields
24: %\fancyhead[C]{\it {2005 International Linear Collider Workshop -
25: %Stanford U.S.A.}}
26: \fancyfoot[LE,LO]{PSN 0610}
27: \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
28: \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt}
29: \renewcommand{\sfdefault}{phv}
30: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
31: \setlength{\textheight}{235mm}
32: \setlength{\textwidth}{178mm}%{170mm}
33: \setlength{\topmargin}{-20mm}
34:
35: \newcommand{\mst}{m_{\tilde{t}_1}}
36: \newcommand{\neu}{\tilde{\chi}^0}
37: \newcommand{\mneu}[1]{m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_{#1}}}
38:
39: \newcommand{\gev}{\,\, \mathrm{GeV}}
40:
41: \newcommand{\MW}{M_{\rm W}}
42: \newcommand{\MZ}{M_{\rm Z}}
43: \newcommand{\MH}{M_{\rm H}}
44: \newcommand{\mt}{m_{\rm t}}
45: \newcommand{\Pf}{{\rm f}}
46: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha}
47: \newcommand{\als}{\alpha_{\rm s}}
48: \newcommand{\SinEff}{${\sin^2\theta^{\mbox{\footnotesize lept}}_{\mbox{\footnotesize eff}}}$}
49: \newcommand{\sineff}{\sin^2\theta^{\mbox{\scriptsize lept}}_{\mbox{\scriptsize eff}}}
50: \newcommand{\SinEfff}{$\sin^2\theta^{f}_{\mbox{\footnotesize eff}}$}
51: \newcommand{\sinefff}{\sin^2\theta^{f}_{\mbox{\scriptsize eff}}}
52:
53: \begin{document}
54:
55: %Title of paper
56: \title{{\small{2005 International Linear Collider Workshop - Stanford,
57: U.S.A.}} %% Please keep this conference title here
58: \hfill {\rm\small FERMILAB-Conf-05-318-T\\[-.5ex] \ \hfill
59: DESY 05-122\\[-.5ex] \ \hfill WUE-ITP-2005-007\\}%
60: %\\
61: \vspace{6pt}
62: Indirect Determination of the Higgs Mass Through Electroweak Radiative
63: Corrections} %% Paper title goes here
64:
65:
66: % Repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed
67: %
68: % \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
69: % \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
70: % other information
71:
72: \author{A.~Freitas}
73: \affiliation{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510-500, USA}
74: %
75: \author{M.~Awramik}
76: \affiliation{DESY, Platanenallee 6, D-15738 Zeuthen, Germany;\newline
77: Institute of Nuclear Physics PAS, Radzikowskiego 152, PL-31342 Cracow, Poland}
78: %
79: \author{M.~Czakon}
80: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Universit\"at
81: W\"urzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 W\"urzburg, Germany;\\
82: Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, Uniwersytecka 4,
83: PL-40007 Katowice, Poland}
84:
85: \begin{abstract}
86: Electroweak precision observables allow stringent tests of the
87: Standard Model at the quantum level and imply interesting bounds on the mass of
88: the Higgs boson through higher-order loop effects. Very significant constraints
89: come especially from the determination of the mass of the $W$ boson and from
90: the effective leptonic weak mixing angle. After shortly reviewing the status of
91: theoretical computations of the $W$ mass, the new calculation of two-loop
92: corrections with closed fermion loops to the effective leptonic weak mixing
93: angle is discussed in detail. The phenomenological implications of the new
94: result are analyzed including an estimate of remaining uncertainties.
95: \end{abstract}
96:
97: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract
98: \maketitle
99:
100: \thispagestyle{fancy}
101:
102: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
103: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
104: % Put \label in argument of \section for cross-referencing
105: %\section{\label{}}
106:
107: \section{INTRODUCTION} % Section title should be in all capitals.
108:
109: In recent years, the Standard Model of electroweak interactions has been
110: confirmed experimentally with outstanding success. Not only was almost all the
111: particle content discovered at accelerator experiments, but their properties
112: and interactions have been measured with high precision, in agreement with the
113: model prediction. The only missing piece is the Higgs boson, which is
114: responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking. However, even today we can
115: obtain meaningful constraints on the Higgs boson mass from electroweak
116: precision measurements. Due to the impressive accuracy of some of these
117: experimental results, they are sensitive to electroweak radiative corrections
118: at the next-to-leading (NLO) and sometimes next-to-next-to-leading (NNLO)
119: level, and thus depend on the impact of the Higgs boson entering in the loops.
120:
121: Two of the most important quantities in this respect are the mass of the $W$
122: boson, $\MW$ and the sine of the leptonic effective weak mixing angle \SinEff.
123: The $W$-boson mass can be inferred from the muon decay constant $G_\mu$, which is
124: generated through virtual W-boson exchange, so that $G_\mu \propto 1/\MW^2$.
125: The effective weak mixing angle, on the other hand, reflects the ratio of the
126: vector and axial-vector couplings, $v_f$ and $a_f$, of the $Z$ boson to fermions
127: ($f$) at the $Z$ boson pole:
128: \begin{equation}
129: \label{eq:def}
130: \sinefff = \frac{1}{4}
131: \left(1+{\rm Re} \frac{v_f}{a_f}\right).
132: \end{equation}
133: Since these couplings can be measured most
134: precisely for leptons, the \emph{leptonic} effective weak mixing angle \SinEff\
135: is usually taken as a reference.
136:
137: The current experimental world average for the $W$-boson mass is $\MW = (80.425
138: \pm 0.034)$ GeV \cite{exp}. Recently, a lot of progress has been made towards
139: establishing accurate theoretical prediction for $\MW$. The best result
140: \cite{mw} includes the complete two-loop corrections \cite{muon,AC2} and
141: some three-loop contributions \cite{qcd3,mt6}. The remaining theoretical error
142: is estimated to be $\delta\MW \sim 4$ MeV, which is well below the current experimental
143: uncertainty. Still, the electroweak two-loop corrections total to
144: $\sim 30$ MeV and are thus mandatory for electroweak precision analyses.
145:
146: The effective weak mixing angle \SinEff\ is mainly
147: derived from various asymmetries measured around the $Z$ boson peak at
148: $e^+ e^-$ colliders after subtraction of QED effects.
149: The current experimental accuracy,
150: $\sineff = 0.23150 \pm 0.00016$ \cite{exp} implies strong indirect constraints
151: on the allowed range for the Higgs boson mass $\MH$. Therefore it is important
152: to develop precise theoretical calculations for this quantity.
153:
154: Usually, \SinEff\ is computed as a function of the electromagnetic coupling
155: $\alpha$, the muon constant $G_\mu$ and the masses of the $Z$ boson, $\MZ$, and
156: the top quark, $\mt$ (other fermion masses are numerically irrelevant). As
157: explained before, $\MW$ is calculated from $G_\mu$, but in addition to these
158: corrections, the computation of \SinEff\ involves the corrections to the $Z$
159: vertex form factors.
160: The latter are expressed by the quantity $\kappa = 1+\Delta\kappa$,
161: in such a way that the effective weak mixing angle can also be written as:
162: \begin{equation}
163: \sineff = \left(1- M_W^2/M_Z^2 \right) \left(1+
164: \Delta\kappa \right),
165: \label{eq:kappa}
166: \end{equation}
167: and at tree-level, $\Delta\kappa = 0$. Higher-order corrections to \SinEff\ have
168: been under extensive theoretical study over the last two decades. Besides the
169: one-loop result~\cite{sirlin,1loop}, two- and three-loop QCD corrections are
170: available \cite{qcd2,qcd3,qcd3light}, but for the electroweak two-loop
171: contributions only partial results were known. By means of a large mass
172: expansion in the heavy top quark mass, the formally leading ${\cal
173: O}(\alpha^2 \mt^4)$~\cite{ewmtmh,ewmt4} and next-to-leading ${\cal O}(\alpha^2
174: \mt^2 \MZ^2)$~\cite{ewmt2} terms were computed. A part of the missing two-loop
175: contributions was incorporated by the complete electroweak two-loop corrections to
176: $\MW$ \cite{muon,AC2}. While these corrections effected a shift in $\MW$
177: of 4 MeV compared to the previously known ${\cal O}(\alpha^2 \mt^2 \MZ^2)$
178: contributions, the induced shift in \SinEff\ was very sizable, $\delta\sineff =
179: 8 \times 10^{-5}$, thus implying that the missing two-loop terms in the form
180: factor $\Delta\kappa$ can be of similar order.
181:
182:
183: \section{ELECTROWEAK TWO-LOOP CORRECTIONS TO \boldmath \SinEff}
184:
185: As a first step towards completing the electroweak two-loop corrections to
186: \SinEff, results for the fermionic (i.e. diagrams with closed fermion loops)
187: two-loop corrections were presented recently~\cite{sineff}. The genuine
188: two-loop vertex diagrams are represented by the generic topologies in
189: Fig.~\ref{fig:diags}.
190: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
191: \begin{figure}[tb]
192: \begin{center}
193: \psfig{figure=v2vb2.ps, width=4cm}
194: \psfig{figure=v2vb1.ps, width=3.1cm} \hspace{1ex}
195: \psfig{figure=v2t.ps, width=3.1cm} \hspace{1ex}
196: \psfig{figure=v2vbH.ps, width=3.1cm} \hspace{1ex}
197: \end{center}
198: \vspace{-4ex}
199: \caption{
200: Genuine two-loop $Zl^+l^-$ vertex diagrams contributing to \SinEff.
201: \label{fig:diags}}
202: \end{figure}
203: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
204: Higher-order corrections to the process $e^+e^- \to f \bar{f}$ near the $Z$ pole
205: can be consistently computed by performing an expansion of the amplitude around
206: the complex pole ${\cal M}_{\rm Z}^2 = \MZ^2 - i \MZ \Gamma_{\rm Z}$,
207: \begin{equation}
208: {\cal A}[e^+e^- \to f \bar{f}] = \frac{R}{s-{\cal M}_{\rm Z}^2} + S +
209: (s-{\cal M}_{\rm Z}^2) S' +
210: \dots \label{eq:polexp}
211: \end{equation}
212: Here
213: $\Gamma_{\rm Z}$ is the $Z$ decay width. After subtracting
214: contributions from s-channel photon exchange and $\gamma$-$Z$ interference, the
215: vertex corrections form factor at NNLO is derived to be
216: \begin{equation}
217: \kappa^{(2)}_\Pf =
218: \frac{\hat{a}_\Pf^{(2)} \, v_\Pf^{(0)} \, a_\Pf^{(0)} -
219: \hat{v}_\Pf^{(2)} \, (a_\Pf^{(0)})^2 -
220: (\hat{a}_\Pf^{(1)})^2 \, v_\Pf^{(0)} +
221: \hat{a}_\Pf^{(1)} \, \hat{v}_\Pf^{(1)} \, a_\Pf^{(0)}}{(a_\Pf^{(0)})^2
222: (a_\Pf^{(0)}-v_\Pf^{(0)})} \Biggr|_{s = \MZ^2},
223: \end{equation}
224: where the superscripts in parentheses indicate the loop order. In this quantity,
225: IR-divergencies from QED contributions drop out, which involves a delicate
226: interplay between one- and two-loop terms in the form factors.
227: %
228: The UV-divergencies are cancelled by on-shell renormalization. The relevant
229: counterterms are derived using the methods of Ref.~\cite{muon}.
230:
231: The new part of this work is the computation of the two-loop $Zf\bar{f}$ vertex
232: corrections, which are treated with two independent technical methods. The first
233: method uses large mass expansions for the diagrams with internal top-quark lines
234: and the differential equation method for diagrams with only light fermions $f
235: \neq t$, the
236: masses of which are neglected. Contrary to previous work \cite{ewmt2}, the
237: expansion in $x = \MZ^2/\mt^2$ is performed to high precision, by executing the
238: series to the order $x^{10}$, reaching an overall relative precision of $\sim
239: 10^{-5}$ of the final result. The coefficients of the expansion are 2-loop
240: tadpole and 1-loop vertex diagrams, which can be evaluated efficiently with
241: well-known analytical formulae. The contributions from diagrams without top-quark
242: propagators involve only two independent scales, $\MZ$ and $\MW$, allowing a
243: fully analytical treatment. Even for the limited set of diagrams with closed
244: fermions loops, a large number of scalar integrals with non-trivial structures
245: in the numerator are involved. They can be reduced to a set of scalar master
246: integrals by using integration-by-parts identities \cite{ibp}.
247: Owing to size of the linear equation system associated with this reduction
248: procedure, the algorithm has been implemented in the dedicated C++
249: library \textsc{DiaGen/IdSolver} \cite{diagen}, which performs the necessary
250: steps in a highly automized way.
251: Analytical
252: results for these master integrals are obtained by the differential equation
253: method \cite{diffeq}. This is illustrated by the following example,
254: \begin{equation}
255: p^2 \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}p^2} \left[
256: \raisebox{-5.4mm}{\psfig{figure=v2p1.ps, width=1.6cm}}\;\right]
257: =
258: \frac{p^2}{p^2+m^2} \Biggl( \frac{4-D}{2}(4 + 5 \frac{m^2}{p^2})
259: \left[ \raisebox{-5.4mm}{\psfig{figure=v2p1.ps, width=1.6cm}}\;\right]
260: + \frac{10 - 3D}{2} \left[ \raisebox{-5.4mm}{\psfig{figure=v2p0.ps, width=1.6cm}}\;\right]
261: - \frac{2-D}{2} \left[ \raisebox{-3mm}{\psfig{figure=t134.ps, width=0.95cm}}\right]
262: \Biggr).
263: \end{equation}
264: Here the thick lines represent massive propagators with mass $m$, the thin
265: lines denote massless propagators and $p$ is the momentum flowing into the
266: vertex. $D$ is the dimension of dimensional regularization.
267: The momentum derivate of the scalar integrals on the left-hand side
268: results in the same integral and simpler integral topologies on the right-hand
269: side. Feeding in analytical results for these simpler integrals, the
270: differential equation can be solved in terms of generalized polylogarithms.
271: All integrals were also checked by using low-momentum expansions.
272:
273: The second method makes use of numerical integrations based on dispersion
274: relations. A scalar two-loop integral with a self-energy sub-loop as in
275: Fig.~\ref{fig:disp}~(a) can be expressed as \cite{intnum}
276: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
277: \begin{figure}
278: \centering
279: \rule{0mm}{0mm}\vspace{-1.2ex}
280: \begin{tabular}{c@{\hspace{2cm}}c}
281: \epsfig{figure=sbau_pages.epsi, width=3.7cm, bb=210 450 330 530, clip=true} &
282: \psfig{figure=v2p4_f.ps, width=3cm}\raisebox{1.15cm}{$\!\!\!\to$} \
283: \psfig{figure=v2p4_F.ps, width=4cm} \\[-.5ex]
284: (a) & (b) \\
285: \end{tabular}
286: \caption{(a) General representation of a two-loop scalar diagram with
287: self-energy sub-loop. (b) Reduction of triangle sub-loop to self-energy sub-loop
288: by means of Feynman parameters.}
289: \label{fig:disp}
290: \end{figure}
291: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
292: \begin{equation}
293: T_{N+1}(p_i;m_i^2) = - \int_{s_0}^\infty {\rm d}s \;
294: \Delta B_0(s,m_N^2,m_{N+1}^2)
295: \int {\rm d}^4 q \,
296: \frac{1}{q^2-s} \,
297: \frac{1}{(q+p_1)^2 - m_1^2} \cdots \frac{1}{(q+p_1+\dots+p_{N-1})^2 -
298: m_{N-1}^2},
299: \end{equation}
300: where $\Delta B_0$ is the discontinuity of the scalar one-loop self-energy
301: function. The second integral can be evaluated into a standard $N$-point
302: one-loop function, leaving the integration over $s$ to be performed
303: numerically. In general, one can also introduce dispersion relations for
304: triangle sub-loops \cite{intnum2}, but it is often technically easier to
305: reduce them to self-energy sub-loops by introducing Feynman parameters
306: \cite{feynpar},
307: \begin{equation}
308: \begin{array}{c}
309: \ [(q+p_1)^2-m_1^2]^{-1} \; [(q+p_2)^2-m_2^2]^{-1} = \int_0^1 {\rm d}x
310: \; [(q+\bar{p})^2 - \overline{m}^2]^{-2} \\
311: \bar{p} = x\,p_1 + (1-x)p_2, \qquad
312: \overline{m}^2 = x \, m_1^2 + (1-x) m_2^2 - x(1-x)(p_1-p_2)^2.
313: \end{array}
314: \end{equation}
315: This is indicated diagrammatically in Fig.~\ref{fig:disp}~(b). The integration
316: over the Feynman parameters is also performed numerically. As a result, all
317: master integrals for the vertex topologies can be evaluated by at most 3-dim.
318: numerical integrations. Before performing the numerical integrations, possible
319: UV- and IR-divergencies need to be subtracted from the integrals. While this
320: second method is applicable to two-loop vertex corrections with an arbitrary
321: number of mass scales, it is slower and leads to much large expressions than the
322: first method. Nevertheless it provides an important check of the result.
323:
324: Special caution is needed for the diagrams with a fermion triangle loop (see
325: the third diagram in Fig.~\ref{fig:diags}), which involve the $\gamma_5$
326: matrix. In dimensional regularization, it is not possible to fulfill the two
327: relations $\{\gamma_\mu,\gamma_5\} = 0$ and
328: Tr$(\gamma^\alpha\gamma^\beta\gamma^\gamma\gamma^\delta\gamma_5) = 4 i
329: \epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}$ simultaneously. As in Ref.~\cite{muon},
330: the contributions resulting in $\epsilon$-tensors were therefore evaluated in
331: four dimensions, based on the observation that these terms are free of
332: UV-divergencies. Potential soft and collinear divergencies of single diagrams
333: are regulated using a photon mass, with a subsequent careful expansion for zero
334: photon masses.
335:
336:
337: \section{RESULTS}
338:
339: The new result for the fermionic two-loop corrections is combined with
340: corrections of order ${\cal O}(\alpha)$, ${\cal O}(\al\als)$ \cite{qcd2},
341: ${\cal O}(\al\als^2)$ \cite{qcd3} and leading three-loop terms of ${\cal
342: O}(\al\als^2\mt^4)$ and ${\cal O}(\al^3\mt^6)$ \cite{mt6}. Reducible terms of
343: the same order are taken into account, but no resummations are preformed. The
344: most precise prediction of \SinEff\ is obtained as a function of the muon decay
345: constant $G_\mu$, from which the $W$-boson mass is calculated by including the
346: radiative corrections to $\MW$ as given in Ref.~\cite{mw}.
347:
348: Fig.~\ref{fig:res} shows the final result for \SinEff\ as a function of the Higgs mass
349: compared to the current experimental value.
350: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
351: \begin{figure}[tb]
352: \begin{center}
353: \epsfig{figure=sw2.Cplx.errCur1.eps, width=10cm,
354: bb=40 218 651 571}
355: \end{center}
356: \vspace{-5ex}
357: \caption{Prediction for \SinEff\ including two-loop corrections compared to the
358: current direct experimental measurement, with 1$\sigma$ bands from experimental
359: input. The chosen input parameters are $\MZ = (91.1876 \pm 0.0021)$ GeV,
360: $\Gamma_{\rm Z} = 2.4952$ GeV, $\mt = 178.0 \pm 4.3$ GeV, $m_{\rm b} = 4.85$
361: GeV, $\Delta\alpha(\MZ^2) = 0.05907 \pm 0.00036$, $\als(\MZ^2) = 0.117 \pm
362: 0.002$, $G_\mu = 1.16637 \times 10^{-5} \gev^{-2}$.}
363: \label{fig:res}
364: \end{figure}
365: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
366: Included in the plot are the error bands due to the uncertainties of the
367: experimental input parameters entering into the theoretical prediction and of
368: the direct measurement of \SinEff. As evident from the figure, the
369: identification of computation and measurement for \SinEff\ favor relatively
370: small values for $\MH$. With the new two-loop corrections, the best-fit value
371: for $\MH$ moved from 148 GeV (using formulae of Ref.~\cite{ewmt2})
372: to 168 GeV (for $\mt = 178$ GeV).
373:
374: The numerical result for the leptonic effective weak mixing angle has been
375: published in Ref.~\cite{sineff} as a parametric fitting formula that is
376: accurate in the range 10 GeV $\leq \MH \leq$ 1 TeV. It has also been
377: implemented into the newest version 6.42 of the program \textsc{Zfitter}
378: \cite{zfitter}, with some changes recently discussed in
379: Ref.~\cite{Freitas:2004mn}, and was used in the latest release of electroweak
380: precision global fits of the Standard Model. The impact of the new result for
381: \SinEff\ shifts the 95\% confidence level upper bound on the Higgs mass upwards
382: by 23 GeV to 260 GeV \cite{exp}.
383:
384: Together with the inclusion of the new two-loop result in the prediction for
385: \SinEff, a assessment of the uncertainties from missing higher order
386: contributions is required. Since for practical purposes \SinEff\ is given as a
387: function of the muon decay constant $G_\mu$, it is useful to evaluate the
388: theoretical error for this parametrization, i.e. combining the radiative
389: corrections to $\MW$ and the $Z$ vertex.
390: A simple method to estimate the higher order uncertainties assumes
391: that the perturbation series follows roughly a geometric progression.
392: This presumption implies relations like
393: $
394: {\cal O}(\al^2\als) = {\cal O}(\al^2)/{\cal O}(\al) \, {\cal O}(\al\als).
395: $
396: With this method one obtains the following errors for $\MH$ between 10 and 1000
397: GeV in units of $10^{-5}$: between 2.3 and 2.0 for the ${\cal O}(\alpha^2 \als)$
398: contributions beyond the leading $\mt^4$ term, between 1.8 and 2.5 for ${\cal
399: O}(\alpha^3)$, between 1.1 and 1.0 for ${\cal O}(\alpha \als^3)$ and between 1.7
400: and 2.4 for ${\cal O}(\alpha^2 \als^2)$. The missing bosonic ${\cal
401: O}(\alpha^2)$ corrections cannot be appraised from geometric progression.
402: However, considering they have a prefactor $\al^2$ but no specific enhancement
403: factor, they are estimated to be about $1.2 \times 10^{-5}$.
404: To account for possible deviations from the geometric series behavior, an
405: overall factor $\sqrt{2}$ was included to arrive at a total error of
406: $\delta_{\rm th}\!\sineff = 4.9 \times 10^{-5}$.
407:
408: Alternatively, the error from a higher-order QCD loop can be assessed by
409: varying the scale of the strong coupling constant $\als$ or the top-quark mass
410: $\mt$ in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme in the highest available perturbation
411: order. The scale variation leads to an error estimate of 0.1 to $3.9 \times
412: 10^{-5}$ for the ${\cal O}(\al^2\als)$ corrections and of less than $10^{-6}$
413: for the ${\cal O}(\al\als^3)$ contributions. These numbers are of the same
414: order as the estimated errors from the geometric progression method, so that the
415: total error given above seems to be fairly reliable.
416:
417: The new error estimate was used in the latest electroweak global fits \cite{exp}
418: and lead to a reduction of the width of the well-known {\it blue band}, which
419: indicates the theoretical error in the indirect determination of the Higgs mass.
420:
421:
422: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
423:
424: In this contribution, recent progress in the calculation of higher-order
425: corrections to the most important electroweak precision observables and their
426: impact on the indirect determination of the Higgs mass was reported.
427:
428: The complete fermionic ${\cal O}(\alpha^2)$ corrections to the leptonic effective
429: weak mixing angle \SinEff\ have been calculated and numerical results were
430: presented. As an additional check,
431: the computation of the two-loop vertex integrals was performed with
432: two independent methods. The new result, together with an estimate of the
433: remaining theoretical error, was included in the latest version of the program
434: \textsc{Zfitter} and used for the latest global electroweak fits of the Standard
435: Model.
436:
437: The calculation of the remaining bosonic electroweak two-loop corrections is
438: currently in progress and will be available soon \cite{future}. Furthermore, we
439: are working on adapting the new results for quark final states, where particular
440: attention has to be paid to the $Zb\bar{b}$ vertex, since it includes additional
441: massive top-quark propagators \cite{future}.
442:
443:
444: % If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
445: \begin{acknowledgments}
446: The authors are grateful to G.~Weiglein for valuable contributions, comments and
447: communications concerning this project.
448: M.~C. was supported by the Sofja Kovalevskaja Award of the Alexander
449: von Humboldt
450: Foundation sponsored by the German Federal Ministry of Education and
451: Research. M.~A. and M.~C. were supported by
452: the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research (KBN)
453: for the research project in years 2004-2005.
454: \end{acknowledgments}
455:
456:
457: %\begin{thebibliography}{9} % Use for 1-9 references
458: \begin{thebibliography}{99} % Use for 10-99 references
459:
460: \bibitem{exp}
461: The %LEP Collaborations, the
462: LEP Electroweak Working Group and the SLD
463: Electroweak and Heavy Flavour Groups,
464: %``A combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and
465: %constraints on the
466: %standard model,''
467: hep-ex/0412015.
468: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0412015;%%
469:
470: \bibitem{mw}
471: M.~Awramik, M.~Czakon, A.~Freitas and G.~Weiglein,
472: %``Precise prediction for the W-boson mass in the standard model,''
473: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 053006 (2004).
474: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311148;%%
475:
476: \bibitem{muon}
477: A.~Freitas, W.~Hollik, W.~Walter and G.~Weiglein,
478: %``Complete fermionic two-loop results for the M(W)-M(Z)
479: %interdependence,''
480: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495}, 338 (2000)
481: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 570}, 260 (2003)],
482: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007091;%%
483: %A.~Freitas, W.~Hollik, W.~Walter and G.~Weiglein,
484: %``Electroweak two-loop corrections to the M(W) - M(Z) mass correlation
485: %in the standard model,''
486: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 632},189 (2002)
487: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 666}, 305 (2003)];
488: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202131;%%
489: M.~Awramik and M.~Czakon,
490: %``Complete two loop electroweak contributions to the muon lifetime in
491: %the standard model,''
492: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 568}, 48 (2003).
493: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305248;%%
494:
495: \bibitem{AC2}
496: M.~Awramik and M.~Czakon,
497: %``Complete two loop bosonic contributions to the muon lifetime in the
498: %standard model,''
499: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89}, 241801 (2002);
500: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208113;%%
501: A.~Onishchenko and O.~Veretin,
502: %``Two-loop bosonic electroweak corrections to the muon lifetime and
503: %M(Z) M(W) interdependence,''
504: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 551}, 111 (2003);
505: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209010;%%
506: M.~Awramik, M.~Czakon, A.~Onishchenko and O.~Veretin,
507: %``Bosonic corrections to Delta(r) at the two loop level,''
508: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 053004 (2003).
509: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209084;%%
510:
511: \bibitem{qcd3}
512: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, J.~H.~K\"uhn and M.~Steinhauser,
513: %``QCD corrections from top quark to relations between electroweak parameters to order alpha-s**2,''
514: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 3394 (1995).
515: %[hep-ph/9504413].
516: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9504413;%%
517:
518: \bibitem{mt6}
519: M.~Faisst, J.~H.~K\"uhn, T.~Seidensticker and O.~Veretin,
520: %``Three loop top quark contributions to the rho parameter,''
521: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 665}, 649 (2003).
522: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302275;%%
523:
524: \bibitem{sirlin}
525: A.~Sirlin,
526: %``Radiative Corrections In The SU(2)-L X U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,''
527: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22}, 971 (1980);\\
528: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,971;%%
529: W.~J.~Marciano and A.~Sirlin,
530: %``Radiative Corrections To Neutrino Induced Neutral Current Phenomena In The SU(2)-L X U(1) Theory,''
531: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22}, 2695 (1980)
532: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 31}, 213 (1980)].
533: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,2695;%%
534:
535: \bibitem{1loop}
536: G.~Degrassi and A.~Sirlin,
537: %``Comparative Analysis Of Electroweak Corrections To E+ E- $\to$ F Anti-F In
538: %On-Shell And (Ms) Frameworks,''
539: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 352}, 342 (1991);
540: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B352,342;%%
541: P.~Gambino and A.~Sirlin,
542: %``Relation between sin**2 Theta-w (m(z)) and sin**2 Theta-effective
543: %(leptonic),''
544: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 1160 (1994).
545: % [hep-ph/9309326].
546: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9309326;%%
547:
548: \bibitem{qcd2}
549: A.~Djouadi and C.~Verzegnassi,
550: %``Virtual Very Heavy Top Effects In Lep / Slc Precision Measurements,''
551: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 195}, 265 (1987);
552: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B195,265;%%
553: A.~Djouadi,
554: %``O (Alpha Alpha-S) Vacuum Polarization Functions Of The Standard Model Gauge
555: %Bosons,''
556: Nuovo Cim.\ A {\bf 100}, 357 (1988);
557: %%CITATION = NUCIA,A100,357;%%
558: B.~A.~Kniehl,
559: %``Two Loop Corrections To The Vacuum Polarizations In Perturbative QCD,''
560: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 347}, 86 (1990);
561: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B347,86;%%
562: F.~Halzen and B.~A.~Kniehl,
563: %``Delta R Beyond One Loop,''
564: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 353}, 567 (1991);
565: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B353,567;%%
566: B.~A.~Kniehl and A.~Sirlin,
567: %``Dispersion relations for vacuum polarization functions in electroweak
568: %physics,''
569: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 371}, 141 (1992),
570: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B371,141;%%
571: %B.~A.~Kniehl and A.~Sirlin,
572: %``On the effect of the t anti-t threshold on electroweak parameters,''
573: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 47}, 883 (1993);
574: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D47,883;%%
575: A.~Djouadi and P.~Gambino,
576: %``Electroweak gauge bosons selfenergies: Complete QCD corrections,''
577: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 3499 (1994)
578: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 53}, 4111 (1996)].
579: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9309298;%%
580:
581: \bibitem{qcd3light}
582: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, J.~H.~K\"uhn and M.~Steinhauser,
583: %``Three-loop polarization function and O(alpha(s)**2) corrections to the production of heavy quarks,''
584: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 482}, 213 (1996).
585: %[hep-ph/9606230].
586: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606230;%%
587:
588: \bibitem{ewmtmh}
589: J.~J.~van der Bij and F.~Hoogeveen,
590: %``Two Loop Correction To Weak Interaction Parameters Due To A Heavy Fermion Doublet,''
591: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 283}, 477 (1987).
592: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B283,477;%%
593:
594: \bibitem{ewmt4}
595: R.~Barbieri, M.~Beccaria, P.~Ciafaloni, G.~Curci and A.~Vicere,
596: %``Radiative correction effects of a very heavy top,''
597: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 288}, 95 (1992)
598: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 312}, 511 (1993)],
599: %[hep-ph/9205238].
600: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9205238;%%
601: %R.~Barbieri, M.~Beccaria, P.~Ciafaloni, G.~Curci and A.~Vicere,
602: %``Two loop heavy top effects in the Standard Model,''
603: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 409}, 105 (1993);
604: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B409,105;%%
605: J.~Fleischer, O.~V.~Tarasov and F.~Jegerlehner,
606: %``Two loop heavy top corrections to the rho parameter: A Simple formula valid
607: %for arbitrary Higgs mass,''
608: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 319}, 249 (1993),
609: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B319,249;%%
610: %J.~Fleischer, O.~V.~Tarasov and F.~Jegerlehner,
611: %``Two loop large top mass corrections to electroweak parameters: Analytic
612: %results valid for arbitrary Higgs mass,''
613: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 3820 (1995).
614: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D51,3820;%%
615:
616: \bibitem{ewmt2}
617: G.~Degrassi, P.~Gambino and A.~Sirlin,
618: %``Precise calculation of M(W), sin**2(Theta(W)(M(Z))), and
619: %sin**2(Theta(eff)(lept)),''
620: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 394}, 188 (1997).
621: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9611363;%%
622:
623: \bibitem{sineff}
624: M.~Awramik, M.~Czakon, A.~Freitas and G.~Weiglein,
625: %``Complete two-loop electroweak fermionic corrections to
626: %sin**2(Theta(lept)(eff)) and indirect determination of the Higgs boson
627: %mass,''
628: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 93}, 201805 (2004).
629: % [hep-ph/0407317].
630: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407317;%%
631:
632: \bibitem{ibp}
633: K.~G.~Chetyrkin and F.~V.~Tkachov,
634: %``Integration By Parts: The Algorithm To Calculate Beta Functions In 4
635: %Loops,''
636: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 192}, 159 (1981);
637: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B192,159;%%
638: S.~Laporta and E.~Remiddi,
639: %``The analytical value of the electron (g-2) at order alpha~3 in QED,''
640: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 379}, 283 (1996);
641: % [hep-ph/9602417].
642: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602417;%%
643: S.~Laporta,
644: %``High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference
645: %equations,''
646: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 15}, 5087 (2000).
647: % [hep-ph/0102033].
648: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102033;%%
649:
650: \bibitem{diagen}
651: M.~Czakon, \textsc{DiaGen/IdSolver} library (unpublished).
652:
653: \bibitem{diffeq}
654: A.~V.~Kotikov,
655: %``Differential equations method: The Calculation of vertex type Feynman
656: %diagrams,''
657: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 259}, 314 (1991);
658: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B259,314;%%
659: E.~Remiddi,
660: %``Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,''
661: Nuovo Cim.\ A {\bf 110}, 1435 (1997).
662: % [arXiv:hep-th/9711188].
663: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9711188;%%
664:
665: \bibitem{intnum}
666: S.~Bauberger, F.~A.~Berends, M.~B\"ohm and M.~Buza,
667: %``Analytical and numerical methods for massive two loop self-energy diagrams,''
668: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 434} (1995) 383.
669: %[hep-ph/9409388];\\
670: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9409388;%%
671:
672: \bibitem{intnum2}
673: S.~Bauberger and M.~B\"ohm,
674: %``Simple one-dimensional integral representations for two loop self-energies: The Master diagram,''
675: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 445} (1995) 25.
676: %[hep-ph/9501201].
677: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501201;%%
678: A.~Czarnecki, U.~Kilian and D.~Kreimer,
679: %``New representation of two loop propagator and vertex functions,''
680: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 433}, 259 (1995);
681: % [hep-ph/9405423].
682: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405423;%%
683: A.~Frink, B.~A.~Kniehl, D.~Kreimer and K.~Riesselmann,
684: %``Heavy-Higgs lifetime at two loops,''
685: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 4548 (1996);
686: % [hep-ph/9606310].
687: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606310;%%
688: A.~Frink, U.~Kilian and D.~Kreimer,
689: %``New representation of the two-loop crossed vertex function,''
690: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 488}, 426 (1997).
691: % [hep-ph/9610285].
692: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610285;%%
693:
694: \bibitem{feynpar}
695: A.~Ghinculov and J.~J.~van der Bij,
696: %``Massive two loop diagrams: The Higgs propagator,''
697: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 436} (1995) 30.
698: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405418;%%
699:
700: \bibitem{zfitter}
701: A.~B.~Arbuzov, M.~Awramik, M.~Czakon, A.~Freitas, M.~W.~Gr\"unewald,
702: K.~M\"onig, S.~Riemann, T.~Riemann, {\it ZFITTER: a semi-analytical
703: program for fermion pair production in $e^+e^-$ annihilation, from
704: version 6.21 to version 6.42},
705: hep-ph/0507146,
706: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507146;%%
707: submitted to Comp.\ Phys.\ Commun.\\
708: \ [\texttt{http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/theory/research/zfitter/}].
709:
710: \bibitem{Freitas:2004mn}
711: A.~Freitas and K.~M\"onig,
712: %``Corrections to quark asymmetries at LEP,''
713: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 40}, 493 (2005).
714: % [hep-ph/0411304].
715: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411304;%%
716:
717: \bibitem{future}
718: M.~Awramik, M.~Czakon and A.~Freitas, in preparation.
719:
720: \end{thebibliography}
721:
722:
723: \end{document}
724: %\fancyhead[C]{\it {XXII Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics at Stanford University,
725: %December 13-19, 2004}}
726: