1: \documentclass[twocolumn,a4paper,english]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{ae,color,graphicx}
3: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
4: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
5: \usepackage[english]{babel}
6: %%\usepackage[pdftex]{color,graphicx}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Event-by-Event Analysis of Baryon-Strangeness Correlations:\\
11: Pinning Down the Critical Temperature and Volume of QGP Formation}
12: \author{Stephane Haussler$^{1}$, Horst Stöcker$^{1,2}$, and Marcus Bleicher$^{2}$}
13: \affiliation{1) Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS),
14: Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Max-von-Laue-Str. 1,
15: 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany\\
16: 2) Institut für Theoretische Physik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe
17: Universität, Max-von-Laue-Str. 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany }
18:
19: \begin{abstract}
20: The recently proposed baryon-strangeness correlation ($C_{BS}$) is studied
21: with a string-hadronic transport model (UrQMD) for various energies from $E_{\rm lab}=4$~AGeV to
22: $\sqrt s=200$~AGeV. It is shown that rescattering among secondaries
23: can not mimic the predicted correlation pattern expected for a Quark-Gluon-Plasma.
24: However, we find a strong increase of the $C_{BS}$ correlation function
25: with decreasing collision energy both for pp and Au+Au/Pb+Pb reactions.
26: For Au+Au reactions at the top RHIC energy ($\sqrt s=200$~AGeV),
27: the $C_{BS}$ correlation is constant for all centralities and compatible
28: with the pp result. With increasing width of the rapidity window, $C_{BS}$ follows
29: roughly the shape of the baryon rapidity distribution.
30: We suggest to study the energy and centrality dependence of $C_{BS}$ which allow to
31: gain information on the onset of the deconfinement transition in temperature and volume.
32: \end{abstract}
33: \maketitle
34:
35:
36: Several observables \cite{Bass:1998vz} have been proposed throughout the last decades
37: to study the characteristics of the highly excited matter
38: created in heavy ions collisions, where a Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) is believed to be created.
39: Among these observables, that give the opportunity to probe whether
40: or not the system went through a phase of deconfined quarks and gluons,
41: the ones related to fluctuations and correlations
42: seem to be the most prospective. Fluctuation probes might be more adequate for the
43: exploration of heavy ion reactions, because the distributions of energy density
44: or initial temperature, isospin and particle density have strong fluctuations
45: from event to event \cite{Stodolsky:1995ds,Shuryak:1997yj,Bleicher:1998wd}.
46: On the theoretical side event-by-event fluctuations where suggested to study
47: \begin{itemize}
48: \item
49: kinetic and chemical equilibration in nuclear collisions \cite{Gazdzicki:1992ri,Mrowczynski:1997kz,Bleicher:1998wu,Belkacem:1999ui,Mrowczynski:1999sf,Capella:1999uc,Mrowczynski:1999un,Mrowczynski:2004cg,Sa:2001ma,Mekjian:2004qf},
50: \item
51: the onset of the deconfinement phase \cite{Asakawa:2000wh,Muller:2001wj,Bleicher:2000ek,Koch:2001zn,Jeon:2003gk,Shi:2005rc,Jeon:2005kj}
52: \item
53: the location of the tri-critical end-point of the QCD phase transition \cite{Stephanov:1998dy,Stephanov:1999zu,Hatta:2003wn} or
54: \item
55: the formation of exotic states, like DCCs \cite{Bleicher:2000tr}.
56: \end{itemize}
57: On the experimental side, progress has been made by many experiments
58: to extract momentum and particle number ratio fluctuations from
59: heavy ion reaction: E-by-E fluctuations are actively studied in the SPS energy regime (starting from 20~AGeV on)
60: by the NA49 group \cite{Appelshauser:1999ft,Reid:1999it,Afanasev:2000fu,Anticic:2003fd,Roland:2004pu,Alt:2004ir,Alt:2004gx,Rybczynski:2004yw,Roland:2005pr} and the CERES collaboration \cite{Adamova:2003pz,Sako:2004pw,Appelshauser:2004xj,Appelshauser:2004ms}.
61: At RHIC energies the PHENIX \cite{Adcox:2002mm,Adcox:2002pa,Adler:2003xq} and
62: STAR \cite{Adams:2003st,Adams:2003uw,Adams:2004kr} experiments
63: are addressing the field of single event physics.
64:
65: Recently a novel event-by-event observable has been introduced by Koch et al. \cite{Koch:2005vg},
66: the baryon-strangeness correlation coefficient $C_{BS}$.
67: This correlation is proposed as a tool to specify the nature (ideal QGP or strongly coupled QGP or hadronic matter)
68: of the highly compressed and heated matter created in heavy ions collisions.
69: The idea is that depending on the phase the system is in, the relation between
70: baryon number and strangeness will be different:
71: On the one hand, if one considers an ideal plasma of quarks and gluons,
72: strangeness will be carried by freely moving strange and anti-strange quarks,
73: carrying baryon number in strict proportions.
74: This leads to a strong correlation between the baryon number and strangeness.
75: On the other hand, if the degrees of freedom are of hadronic nature, this correlation
76: is different, because it is possible to carry strangeness without baryon number, e.g. in mesons or QGP bound states.
77:
78: To quantify to which degree strangeness and baryon number are correlated,
79: the following correlation coefficient has been proposed \cite{Koch:2005vg}:
80:
81: \begin{equation}\label{eq:definition}
82: C_{BS}=-3 \frac{\langle BS\rangle-\langle B\rangle\langle S\rangle}{\langle S^{2}\rangle-\langle S\rangle^{2}}\quad,
83: \end{equation}
84: where $B$ is the baryon charge and $S$ is the strangeness.
85: If a QGP is created, the expected value of $C_{BS}$ will be unity as expected from lattice QCD,
86: compatible with the ideal weakly coupled QGP.
87: In the case of a hadron gas, where the correlation is non trivial,
88: this quantity has been evaluated in \cite{Koch:2005vg} to be $C_{BS}=0.66$.
89:
90: In this paper, we study the correlation coefficient $C_{BS}$
91: with the Ultra-relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics model (UrQMD v2.2).
92: The UrQMD is a non-equilibrium microscopic transport model that simulates the full space-time evolution of heavy ions collisions.
93: It is valid from a few tens of MeV to several TeV per nucleons in the laboratory frame.
94: It describes the rescattering of incoming and produced particles,
95: the excitation and fragmentation of color strings
96: and the formation and decay of resonances.
97: This model has been used before to study event-by-event fluctuations rather successfully \cite{Bleicher:1998wd,Bleicher:1998wu,Bleicher:2000ek,Bleicher:2000tr,Jeon:2005kj} and yields a
98: reasonable description of inclusive particle distributions.
99: For a complete review of the model, the reader is referred to \cite{Bass:1998ca,Bleicher:1999xi}.
100:
101: Since the UrQMD is based on hadrons and strings it provides an estimate of the $C_{BS}$ value in
102: the case where no QGP is created, however taking into account the rescattering and the non-equilibrium nature
103: of the heavy ion reactions.
104: $C_{BS}$ is evaluated from the event-by-event fluctuation analyses following \cite{Koch:2005vg,kochpriv}:
105:
106: \begin{equation}\label{eq:calcul}
107: C_{BS}=-3 \frac{ \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n} B^{(n)} S^{(n)} - (\frac{1}{N} \sum_{n} B^{(n)}) (\frac{1}{N} \sum_{n} S^{(n)}) }
108: {\frac{1}{N} \sum_{n} (S^{(n)})^2 - (\frac{1}{N} \sum_{n} S^{(n)})^2}
109: \end{equation}
110:
111: $B^{(n)}$ and $S^{(n)}$ stand for the baryon number and strangeness in a given event $n$.
112:
113: \begin{figure}
114: \begin{center}
115: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{acceptance}
116: \end{center}
117: \caption{Correlation coefficient for central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}=200$ shown as a function of the
118: maximum rapidity accepted.
119: Circles are the calculation with HIJING \cite{Wang:1991ht}.
120: Squares are the result of the UrQMD calculation and triangles of the JETSET for $e^+e^-$ at $\sqrt{s}=200$.
121: The arrows are the values of a quark gluon plasma and of an hadron gas at a temperature $T=170$
122: and chemical potential $\mu_{B}=0$ \cite{Koch:2005vg}.
123: Both HIJING and JETSET results are taken from \cite{Koch:2005vg}.
124: \label{fig::acceptance}}
125: \end{figure}
126: The correlation coefficient $C_{BS}$ is depicted in Fig. \ref{fig::acceptance} as a
127: function of the maximum rapidity accepted ($|y|\le y_{max}$).
128: The analyzed sample consists of central Au+Au events at $\sqrt{s}=200$~AGeV.
129: For small acceptance windows around midrapidity, $C_{BS}$ stays roughly constant.
130: While for a large acceptance window, $C_{BS}$ increases due to the inclusion of
131: the fragmentation region with high baryon density.
132: The different models deviate from each other for large acceptances due
133: to differences in the handling of the fragmentation region, with small rapidity acceptance (relevant for the
134: RHIC experiments), HIJING, JETSET and UrQMD yield consistent results.
135: If the window acceptance covers all produced particles,
136: $C_{BS}$ has to vanish because of baryon number conservation.
137:
138: In case a QGP is created, the signal given by the $C_{BS}$ coefficient should survive the hadronic phase.
139: With a strong enough longitudinal flow,
140: strangeness and baryon number within a given rapidity range should be frozen in.
141: The used rapidity window can not be too wide in order to avoid global baryon number and strangeness conservation.
142: Nevertheless, the acceptance window must be wide enough to avoid smearing due to hadronization.
143:
144: Figure \ref{fig::excitationfunction} depicts the energy excitation function of $C_{BS}$ in both p+p
145: and centrals Au+Au/Pb+Pb collisions.
146: As discussed in \cite{Koch:2005vg}, $C_{BS}$ increases with an increase of the baryon chemical
147: potential $\mu_{B}$ when going to lower beam energies.
148: With increasing collision energy, and therefore decreasing $\mu_{B}$, $C_{BS}$ goes down
149: to $C_{BS} \approx 0.4$ at the highest RHIC energy available.
150: Surprisingly, the general trend is the same for both p+p and Au+Au/Pb+Pb.
151: Measuring the energy dependence of $C_{BS}$ correlation around midrapidity might therefore allow to
152: map out the onset of the QGP production.
153:
154: \begin{figure}
155: \begin{center}
156: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{excitation_function}
157: \end{center}
158: \caption{Correlation coefficient $C_{BS}$ for central Au+Au/Pb+Pb (full symbols) and
159: minimum bias $p+p$ collisions (open symbols) as a function of $\sqrt{s}$.
160: The maximum rapidity accepted is $y_{max}=0.5$.
161: \label{fig::excitationfunction}}
162: \end{figure}
163:
164: The dependence of $C_{BS}$ on the number participants is studied in figure \ref{fig::participants}.
165: The number of participants is determined via the scaled number of $\pi^{-}$'s in $4\pi$
166: geometry ($N_{part}=0.2 <\pi^{-}>$).
167: This quantity is proportional to the overlap volume of the colliding nuclei and thus to the number of participants.
168: The UrQMD model predicts a flat dependence of $C_{BS}$ on centrality.
169: $C_{BS} \approx 0.4$ from $p+p$ to central $Au+Au$ events.
170: This is in strong contrast with what is to be expected if the system enters a QGP phase at some centrality.
171: In this case $C_{BS}$ will increase (whether linearly or as a step function depends on the onset behaviour
172: of the QGP phase)
173: from peripheral AA or pp towards central AA collisions. This might allow to extract in detail the volume dependence
174: of the deconfinement transition at RHIC.
175:
176: \begin{figure}
177: \begin{center}
178: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{participants}
179: \end{center}
180: \caption{Correlation coefficient for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}=200$ as a function of the number of participants.
181: The maximum rapidity accepted is $y_{max}=0.5$.
182: Full symbols are the results for Au+Au and the open symbol shows the p+p value.
183: \label{fig::participants}}
184: \end{figure}
185:
186:
187: To summarize, we have studied the dependence of the baryon-strangeness correlation coefficient
188: as a function of the center of mass energy from $E_{lab}=4$~AGeV to $\sqrt s=200$~AGeV for pp and central Au+Au/Pb+Pb
189: reactions. At $\sqrt s=200$~AGeV we have explored the centrality dependence of the $C_{BS}$ correlation.
190: $C_{BS}$ is found to decrease from the lower energies towards the top RHIC energy available (here $C_{BS} \approx 0.4$).
191: For minimum bias $Au+Au$ events at $\sqrt{s}=200$, we predict a flat centrality dependence of $C_{BS}$ near
192: midrapidity. At the highest RHIC energy the $C_{BS}$ value from the microscopic transport model
193: is roughly half the one expected in the case of a QGP.
194: We suggest to study the energy and centrality dependence of $C_{BS}$ which allow to
195: gain information on the onset of the deconfinement transition in temperature and volume.
196: The CERES/NA49 and STAR experiments should be able to perform these analysis with their accumulated data.
197:
198:
199: \section*{Acknowledgements}
200:
201: This work is supported by GSI and BMBF.
202:
203: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
204:
205: %%signatures of the quark gluon plasma
206: \bibitem{Bass:1998vz}
207: S.~A.~Bass, M.~Gyulassy, H.~Stoecker and W.~Greiner,
208: %``Signatures of quark-gluon-plasma formation in high energy heavy-ion collisions: A critical review,'' 1
209: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 25}, R1 (1999)
210: %% [arXiv:hep-ph/9810281].
211:
212: %\cite{Stodolsky:1995ds,Shuryak:1997yj,Bleicher:1998wd}
213: \bibitem{Stodolsky:1995ds}
214: L.~Stodolsky,
215: %``Temperature fluctuations in multiparticle production,'' 2
216: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75} (1995) 1044.
217: %%CITATION = PRLTA,75,1044;%%
218:
219: %\cite{Shuryak:1997yj}
220: \bibitem{Shuryak:1997yj}
221: E.~V.~Shuryak,
222: %``Event-per-event analysis of heavy ion collisions and thermodynamical 3
223: %fluctuations,''
224: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 423} (1998) 9
225: [arXiv:hep-ph/9704456].
226: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704456;%%
227:
228:
229: %\cite{Bleicher:1998wd}
230: \bibitem{Bleicher:1998wd}
231: M.~Bleicher {\it et al.},
232: %``Fluctuations and inhomogenities of energy density and isospin in Pb + Pb 4
233: %at the SPS,''
234: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 638} (1998) 391.
235: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A638,391;%%
236:
237: %\cite{Gazdzicki:1992ri,Mrowczynski:1997kz,Mrowczynski:1999sf,Mrowczynski:1999un}
238: \bibitem{Gazdzicki:1992ri}
239: M.~Gazdzicki and S.~Mrowczynski,
240: %``A Method to study 'equilibration' in nucleus-nucleus collisions,'' 5
241: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 54} (1992) 127.
242: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C54,127;%%
243:
244: %\cite{Mrowczynski:1997kz}
245: \bibitem{Mrowczynski:1997kz}
246: S.~Mrowczynski,
247: %``Hadronic matter compressibility from event-by-event analysis of heavy-ion 6
248: %collisions,''
249: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 430} (1998) 9
250: [arXiv:nucl-th/9712030].
251: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9712030;%%
252:
253:
254:
255:
256:
257:
258: %\cite{Bleicher:1998wu,Belkacem:1999ui}
259: \bibitem{Bleicher:1998wu}
260: M.~Bleicher {\it et al.},
261: %``Can momentum correlations prove kinetic equilibration in heavy ion 7
262: %collisions at 160-A-GeV?,''
263: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 435} (1998) 9
264: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803345].
265: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803345;%%
266:
267: %\cite{Belkacem:1999ui}
268: \bibitem{Belkacem:1999ui}
269: M.~Belkacem, Z.~Aouissat, M.~Bleicher, H.~Stoecker and W.~Greiner,
270: %``Moments of event observable distributions and many-body correlations,'' 8
271: arXiv:nucl-th/9903017.
272: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9903017;%%
273:
274: %\cite{Mrowczynski:1999sf}
275: \bibitem{Mrowczynski:1999sf}
276: S.~Mrowczynski,
277: %``Chemical fluctuations in high-energy nuclear collisions,'' 9
278: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 459} (1999) 13
279: [arXiv:nucl-th/9901078].
280: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9901078;%%
281:
282: %\cite{Capella:1999uc}
283: \bibitem{Capella:1999uc}
284: A.~Capella, E.~G.~Ferreiro and A.~B.~Kaidalov,
285: %``Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy-ion collisions and the quark-gluon 10
286: %string model,''
287: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 11} (1999) 163
288: [arXiv:hep-ph/9903338].
289: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903338;%%
290:
291: %\cite{Mrowczynski:1999un}
292: \bibitem{Mrowczynski:1999un}
293: S.~Mrowczynski,
294: %``Generalizing Phi-measure of event-by-event fluctuations in high-energy 11
295: %heavy-ion collisions,''
296: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 465} (1999) 8
297: [arXiv:nucl-th/9905021].
298: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9905021;%%
299:
300: %\cite{Sa:2001ma}
301: \bibitem{Sa:2001ma}
302: B.~H.~Sa, X.~Cai, A.~Tai and D.~M.~Zhou,
303: %``Behavior of event-by-event fluctuations in the charged particle ratio in
304: %relativistic nucleus nucleus collisions,''
305: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 66} (2002) 044902
306: [arXiv:nucl-th/0112038].
307: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0112038;%%
308:
309: %\cite{Mekjian:2004qf}
310: \bibitem{Mekjian:2004qf}
311: A.~Z.~Mekjian,
312: %``Fluctuations in the statistical model of relativistic heavy ion
313: %collisions,''
314: arXiv:nucl-th/0411063.
315: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0411063;%%
316:
317: %\cite{Mrowczynski:2004cg}
318: \bibitem{Mrowczynski:2004cg}
319: S.~Mrowczynski, M.~Rybczynski and Z.~Wlodarczyk,
320: %``Transverse momentum versus multiplicity fluctuations in high-energy nuclear collisions,''
321: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 70} (2004) 054906
322: [arXiv:nucl-th/0407012].
323: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0407012;%%
324:
325:
326: %\cite{Asakawa:2000wh,Muller:2001wj,Bleicher:2000ek,Koch:2001zn,Jeon:2003gk,Shi:2005rc,Jeon:2005kj}
327: \bibitem{Asakawa:2000wh}
328: M.~Asakawa, U.~W.~Heinz and B.~Muller,
329: %``Fluctuation probes of quark deconfinement,'' 12
330: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 85} (2000) 2072
331: [arXiv:hep-ph/0003169].
332: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003169;%
333:
334: %\cite{Bleicher:2000ek,Koch:2001zn,Jeon:2005kj}
335: \bibitem{Bleicher:2000ek}
336: M.~Bleicher, S.~Jeon and V.~Koch,
337: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of the charged particle ratio from 14
338: %non-equilibrium transport theory,''
339: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62} (2000) 061902
340: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006201].
341: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006201;%%
342:
343: %\cite{Muller:2001wj}
344: \bibitem{Muller:2001wj}
345: B.~Muller,
346: %``Statistical fluctuations as probes of dense matter,'' 13
347: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 702} (2002) 281
348: [arXiv:nucl-th/0111008].
349: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0111008;%%
350:
351:
352: %\cite{Koch:2001zn}
353: \bibitem{Koch:2001zn}
354: V.~Koch, M.~Bleicher and S.~Jeon,
355: %``Event-by-event fluctuations and the QGP,'' 15
356: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 698} (2002) 261
357: [Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 702} (2002) 291]
358: [arXiv:nucl-th/0103084].
359: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0103084;%%
360:
361: %\cite{Jeon:2003gk}
362: \bibitem{Jeon:2003gk}
363: S.~y.~Jeon and V.~Koch,
364: %``Event-by-event fluctuations,'' 16
365: arXiv:hep-ph/0304012.
366: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304012;%%
367:
368: %\cite{Shi:2005rc}
369: \bibitem{Shi:2005rc}
370: L.~j.~Shi and S.~y.~Jeon,
371: %``Charge transfer fluctuations as a signal for QGP,'' 17
372: arXiv:hep-ph/0503085.
373: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503085;%%
374:
375: %\cite{Jeon:2005kj}
376: \bibitem{Jeon:2005kj}
377: S.~Jeon, L.~Shi and M.~Bleicher,
378: %``Detecting QGP with charge transfer fluctuations,'' 18
379: arXiv:nucl-th/0506025.
380: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0506025;%%
381:
382: %\cite{Stephanov:1998dy,Stephanov:1999zu}
383: \bibitem{Stephanov:1998dy}
384: M.~A.~Stephanov, K.~Rajagopal and E.~V.~Shuryak,
385: %``Signatures of the tricritical point in {QCD},'' 19
386: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81} (1998) 4816
387: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806219].
388: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806219;%%
389:
390: %\cite{Stephanov:1999zu}
391: \bibitem{Stephanov:1999zu}
392: M.~A.~Stephanov, K.~Rajagopal and E.~V.~Shuryak,
393: %``Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the {QCD} critical 20
394: %point,''
395: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 114028
396: [arXiv:hep-ph/9903292].
397: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903292;%%
398:
399: %\cite{Hatta:2003wn}
400: \bibitem{Hatta:2003wn}
401: Y.~Hatta and M.~A.~Stephanov,
402: %``Proton number fluctuation as a signal of the QCD critical end-point,'' 21
403: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91} (2003) 102003
404: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 91} (2003) 129901]
405: [arXiv:hep-ph/0302002].
406: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302002;%%
407:
408: %\cite{Bleicher:2000tr}
409: \bibitem{Bleicher:2000tr}
410: M.~Bleicher, J.~Randrup, R.~Snellings and X.~N.~Wang,
411: %``Enhanced event-by-event fluctuations in pion multiplicity as a signal of 22
412: %disoriented chiral condensates at RHIC,''
413: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62} (2000) 041901
414: [arXiv:nucl-th/0006047].
415: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0006047;%%
416:
417:
418:
419: %% here
420:
421:
422: %\cite{Reid:1999it}
423: \bibitem{Reid:1999it}
424: J.~G.~Reid [NA49 Collaboration],
425: %``Event-by-event physics in NA49,''
426: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 661} (1999) 407.
427: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A661,407;%%
428:
429: %\cite{Appelshauser:1999ft,Reid:1999it,Afanasev:2000fu,Anticic:2003fd,Roland:2004pu,Alt:2004ir,}
430: \bibitem{Appelshauser:1999ft}
431: H.~Appelshauser {\it et al.} [NA49 Collaboration],
432: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of average transverse momentum in central Pb +
433: %Pb collisions at 158-GeV per nucleon,''
434: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 459} (1999) 679
435: [arXiv:hep-ex/9904014].
436: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9904014;%%
437:
438: %\cite{Afanasev:2000fu}
439: \bibitem{Afanasev:2000fu}
440: S.~V.~Afanasev {\it et al.} [NA49 Collaboration],
441: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of the kaon to pion ratio in central Pb + Pb
442: %collisions at 158-GeV per nucleon,''
443: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86} (2001) 1965
444: [arXiv:hep-ex/0009053].
445: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0009053;%%
446:
447:
448:
449: %\cite{Alt:2004ir}
450: \bibitem{Alt:2004ir}
451: C.~Alt {\it et al.} [NA49 Collaboration],
452: %``Electric charge fluctuations in central Pb + Pb collisions at 20-AGeV,
453: %30-AGeV, 40-AGeV, 80-AGeV and 158-AGeV,''
454: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 70} (2004) 064903
455: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0406013].
456: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0406013;%%
457:
458: %\cite{Roland:2004pu}
459: \bibitem{Roland:2004pu}
460: C.~Roland {\it et al.} [NA49 Collaboration],
461: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of particle ratios in central Pb + Pb
462: %collisions at 20-A-GeV to 158-A-GeV,''
463: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30} (2004) S1381
464: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0403035].
465: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0403035;%%
466:
467:
468: %\cite{Anticic:2003fd}
469: \bibitem{Anticic:2003fd}
470: T.~Anticic {\it et al.} [NA49 Collaboration],
471: %``Transverse momentum fluctuations in nuclear collisions at 158-A-GeV,''
472: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 70} (2004) 034902
473: [arXiv:hep-ex/0311009].
474: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0311009;%%
475:
476: %\cite{Alt:2004gx}
477: \bibitem{Alt:2004gx}
478: C.~Alt {\it et al.} [NA49 Collaboration],
479: %``System size and centrality dependence of the balance function in A + A
480: %collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 17.2-GeV,''
481: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 71} (2005) 034903
482: [arXiv:hep-ex/0409031].
483: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0409031;%%
484:
485: %\cite{Rybczynski:2004yw}
486: \bibitem{Rybczynski:2004yw}
487: M.~Rybczynski {\it et al.} [NA49 Collaboration],
488: %``Multiplicity fluctuations in nuclear collisions at 158-A-GeV,''
489: J.\ Phys.\ Conf.\ Ser.\ {\bf 5} (2005) 74
490: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0409009].
491: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0409009;%%
492:
493:
494: %\cite{Roland:2005pr}
495: \bibitem{Roland:2005pr}
496: C.~Roland [NA49 Collaboration],
497: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of particle ratios in central Pb + Pb
498: %collisions at 20-A-GeV - 158-A-GeV,''
499: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 31} (2005) S1075.
500: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G31,S1075;%%
501:
502: %\cite{Adamova:2003pz,Sako:2004pw,Appelshauser:2004xj,Appelshauser:2004ms}
503: \bibitem{Adamova:2003pz}
504: D.~Adamova {\it et al.} [CERES Collaboration],
505: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of the mean transverse momentum in 40-A-GeV/c,
506: %80-A-GeV/c, and 158-A-GeV/c Pb - Au collisions,''
507: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 727} (2003) 97
508: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0305002].
509: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0305002;%%
510:
511: %\cite{Appelshauser:2004xj}
512: \bibitem{Appelshauser:2004xj}
513: H.~Appelshauser [CERES Collaboration],
514: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of the mean transverse momentum M(p(T)) at SPS
515: %energies,''
516: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 53} (2004) 253.
517: %%CITATION = PPNPD,53,253;%%
518:
519: %\cite{Sako:2004pw}
520: \bibitem{Sako:2004pw}
521: H.~Sako and H.~Appelshaeuser [CERES/NA45 Collaboration],
522: %``Event-by-event fluctuations at 40-A-GeV/c, 80-A-GeV/c, and 158-A-GeV/c in
523: %Pb + Au collisions,''
524: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30} (2004) S1371
525: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0403037].
526: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0403037;%%
527:
528: %\cite{Appelshauser:2004ms}
529: \bibitem{Appelshauser:2004ms}
530: H.~Appelshauser {\it et al.} [CERES Collaboration],
531: %``Event-by-event fluctuations at SPS,''
532: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 752} (2005) 394
533: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0409022].
534: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0409022;%%
535:
536: % PHENIX
537:
538: %\cite{Adcox:2002mm,Adcox:2002pa,Adler:2003xq}
539: \bibitem{Adcox:2002mm}
540: K.~Adcox {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
541: %``Net charge fluctuations in Au + Au interactions at s(NN)**(1/2) =
542: %130-GeV,''
543: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89} (2002) 082301
544: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0203014].
545: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0203014;%%
546:
547: %\cite{Adcox:2002pa}
548: \bibitem{Adcox:2002pa}
549: K.~Adcox {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
550: %``Event-by-event fluctuations in mean p(T) and mean e(T) in s(NN)**(1/2) =
551: %130-GeV Au + Au collisions,''
552: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 66} (2002) 024901
553: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0203015].
554: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0203015;%%
555:
556:
557: %\cite{Adler:2003xq}
558: \bibitem{Adler:2003xq}
559: S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
560: %``Measurement of non-random event-by-event fluctuations of average
561: %transverse momentum in s**(1/2) = 200-GeV Au + Au and p + p collisions,''
562: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 93} (2004) 092301
563: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0310005].
564: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0310005;%%
565:
566: % STAR %
567:
568:
569: %\cite{Adams:2003st,Adams:2003uw,Adams:2004kr}
570: \bibitem{Adams:2003st}
571: J.~Adams {\it et al.} [STAR Collaboration],
572: %``Multiplicity fluctuations in Au + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) =
573: %130-GeV,''
574: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 68} (2003) 044905
575: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0307007].
576: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0307007;%%
577:
578:
579: %\cite{Adams:2003uw}
580: \bibitem{Adams:2003uw}
581: J.~Adams {\it et al.} [STAR Collaboration],
582: %``Event-by-event fluctuations in Au Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = %130-GeV,'' arXiv:nucl-ex/0308033.
583: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0308033;%%
584:
585:
586:
587: %\cite{Adams:2004kr}
588: \bibitem{Adams:2004kr}
589: J.~Adams {\it et al.} [STAR Collaboration],
590: %``Hadronization geometry and charge-dependent number autocorrelations on
591: %axial momentum space in Au Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 130-GeV,''
592: arXiv:nucl-ex/0406035.
593: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0406035;%%
594:
595: %\cite{Koch:2005vg}
596: \bibitem{Koch:2005vg}
597: V.~Koch, A.~Majumder and J.~Randrup,
598: %``Baryon-strangeness correlations: A diagnostic of strongly interacting
599: %matter,''
600: arXiv:nucl-th/0505052.
601: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0505052;%%
602:
603: %\cite{Bass:1998ca}
604: \bibitem{Bass:1998ca}
605: S.~A.~Bass {\it et al.},
606: %``Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,''
607: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 41} (1998) 225
608: [arXiv:nucl-th/9803035].
609: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9803035;%%
610:
611: %\cite{Bleicher:1999xi}
612: \bibitem{Bleicher:1999xi}
613: M.~Bleicher {\it et al.},
614: %``Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum
615: %molecular dynamics model,''
616: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 25} (1999) 1859
617: [arXiv:hep-ph/9909407].
618: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9909407;%%
619:
620: \bibitem{kochpriv}
621: Note that this relation has an additional factor $-3$ which was accidentally omitted in the pre-print
622: \cite{Koch:2005vg}. (J. Randrup, private communication, 2005)
623:
624: \bibitem{Wang:1991ht}
625: X.~N.~Wang and M.~Gyulassy,
626: %%``HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in p p, p A and A A collisions,''
627: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44} (1991) 3501.
628:
629:
630:
631:
632:
633:
634:
635:
636:
637:
638:
639:
640:
641:
642:
643:
644:
645: %%act
646:
647:
648:
649:
650:
651:
652:
653:
654:
655:
656:
657:
658:
659:
660:
661:
662:
663:
664:
665:
666:
667: %%%EXPeriment%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
668: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
669:
670: % NA49 %
671:
672:
673:
674:
675:
676:
677:
678:
679:
680:
681: \end{thebibliography}
682:
683: \end{document}
684: