1: \documentstyle[11pt,

2: %showkeys,

3: epsfig]{article}

4: 

5: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-0.0cm}

6: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.0cm}

7: \setlength{\topmargin}{0.3cm}

8: \setlength{\baselineskip}{20pt}

9: \setlength{\textwidth}{16cm}

10: \setlength{\textheight}{22cm}

11: \begin{document}

12: 

13: \relax

14: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}

15: 

16: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

17: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

18: \def\bs{\begin{subequations}}

19: \def\es{\end{subequations}}

20: \def\calm{{\cal M}}

21: \def\lx{\lambda}

22: \def\ex{\epsilon}

23: \def\Lx{\Lambda}

24: 

25: \newcommand{\mut}{\tilde{\mu}}

26: \newcommand{\vrm}{{\rm v}}

27: \newcommand{\tl}{\tilde t}

28: \newcommand{\ttt}{\tilde T}

29: \newcommand{\rhot}{\tilde \rho}

30: \newcommand{\ptt}{\tilde p}

31: \newcommand{\drho}{\delta \rho}

32: \newcommand{\drhot}{\delta {\tilde \rho}}

33: \newcommand{\dchi}{\delta \chi}

34: \newcommand{\A}{A}

35: \newcommand{\B}{B}

36: \newcommand{\mmu}{\mu}

37: \newcommand{\mnu}{\nu}

38: \newcommand{\ii}{i}

39: \newcommand{\jj}{j}

40: \newcommand{\jl}{[}

41: \newcommand{\jr}{]}

42: \newcommand{\ml}{\sharp}

43: \newcommand{\mr}{\sharp}

44: 

45: \newcommand{\da}{\dot{a}}

46: \newcommand{\db}{\dot{b}}

47: \newcommand{\dn}{\dot{n}}

48: \newcommand{\dda}{\ddot{a}}

49: \newcommand{\ddb}{\ddot{b}}

50: \newcommand{\ddn}{\ddot{n}}

51: \newcommand{\pa}{a^{\prime}}

52: \newcommand{\pn}{n^{\prime}}

53: \newcommand{\ppa}{a^{\prime \prime}}

54: \newcommand{\ppb}{b^{\prime \prime}}

55: \newcommand{\ppn}{n^{\prime \prime}}

56: \newcommand{\fda}{\frac{\da}{a}}

57: \newcommand{\fdb}{\frac{\db}{b}}

58: \newcommand{\fdn}{\frac{\dn}{n}}

59: \newcommand{\fdda}{\frac{\dda}{a}}

60: \newcommand{\fddb}{\frac{\ddb}{b}}

61: \newcommand{\fddn}{\frac{\ddn}{n}}

62: \newcommand{\fpa}{\frac{\pa}{a}}

63: \newcommand{\fpb}{\frac{\pb}{b}}

64: \newcommand{\fpn}{\frac{\pn}{n}}

65: \newcommand{\fppa}{\frac{\ppa}{a}}

66: \newcommand{\fppb}{\frac{\ppb}{b}}

67: \newcommand{\fppn}{\frac{\ppn}{n}}

68: 

69: \newcommand{\dphi}{\delta \phi}

70: \newcommand{\at}{\tilde{\alpha}}

71: \newcommand{\pt}{\tilde{p}}

72: \newcommand{\rhb}{\bar{\rho}}

73: \newcommand{\pb}{\bar{p}}

74: \newcommand{\pbb}{\bar{\rm p}}

75: \newcommand{\rht}{\tilde{\rho}}

76: \newcommand{\kt}{\tilde{k}}

77: \newcommand{\kb}{\bar{k}}

78: \newcommand{\wt}{\tilde{w}}

79: 

80: \newcommand{\dA}{\dot{A_0}}

81: \newcommand{\dB}{\dot{B_0}}

82: \newcommand{\fdA}{\frac{\dA}{A_0}}

83: \newcommand{\fdB}{\frac{\dB}{B_0}}

84: 

85: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

86: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

87: \def\bs{\begin{subequations}}

88: \def\es{\end{subequations}}

89: \newcommand{\een}{\end{subequations}}

90: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{subequations}}

91: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{eqalignno}}

92: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{eqalignno}}

93: 

94: \def \lta {\mathrel{\vcenter

95:      {\hbox{$<$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}}}

96: \def \gta {\mathrel{\vcenter

97:      {\hbox{$>$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}}}

98: 

99: \def\g{\gamma}

100: \def\mpl{M_{\rm Pl}}

101: \def\ms{M_{\rm s}}

102: \def\ls{l_{\rm s}}

103: \def\l{\lambda}

104: \def\m{\mu}

105: \def\n{\nu}

106: \def\a{\alpha}

107: \def\b{\beta}

108: \def\gs{g_{\rm s}}

109: \def\d{\partial}

110: \def\co{{\cal O}}

111: \def\sp{\;\;\;,\;\;\;}

112: \def\r{\rho}

113: \def\dr{\dot r}

114: 

115: \def\e{\epsilon}

116: \newcommand{\NPB}[3]{\emph{ Nucl.~Phys.} \textbf{B#1} (#2) #3}   

117: \newcommand{\PLB}[3]{\emph{ Phys.~Lett.} \textbf{B#1} (#2) #3}   

118: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}        

119: \newcommand\fverb{\setbox\pippobox=\hbox\bgroup\verb}

120: \newcommand\fverbdo{\egroup\medskip\noindent%

121:                         \fbox{\unhbox\pippobox}\ }

122: \newcommand\fverbit{\egroup\item[\fbox{\unhbox\pippobox}]}

123: \newbox\pippobox

124: \def\tr{\tilde\rho}

125: \def\lb{w}

126: \def\bbox{\nabla^2}

127: \def\mt{{\tilde m}}

128: \def\rct{{\tilde r}_c}

129: 

130: \def \lta {\mathrel{\vcenter

131:      {\hbox{$<$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}}}

132: \def \gta {\mathrel{\vcenter

133:      {\hbox{$>$}\nointerlineskip\hbox{$\sim$}}}}

134: 

135: \noindent

136: \begin{flushright}

137: 

138: \end{flushright} 

139: \vspace{1cm}

140: \begin{center}

141: { \Large \bf Dark Energy and Dark Matter in Galaxy Halos\\} 

142: \vspace{0.5cm}

143: {N. Tetradis} 

144: \\

145: \vspace{0.5cm}

146: {\it University of Athens, Department of Physics, \\

147: University Campus, Zographou 157 84, Athens, Greece.} 

148: \\

149: \vspace{1cm}

150: \abstract{

151: We consider the possibility that the dark matter is coupled through its

152: mass to a scalar field associated with the dark energy of the Universe.

153: In order for such a field to play a role at the present cosmological 

154: distances, it must be effectively massless at galactic 

155: length scales.

156: We discuss the effect of the field on the distribution of dark

157: matter in galaxy halos. We show that the profile of the distribution 

158: outside the galaxy core 

159: remains largely unaffected and the approximately flat rotation curves persist.

160: The dispersion of the dark matter velocity is enhanced by a potentially

161: large factor relative to the case of zero coupling between dark energy and

162: dark matter. The counting rates in terrestrial dark matter

163: detectors are similarly enhanced. Existing bounds on the properties 

164: of dark matter

165: candidates can be extended to the coupled case, by taking into

166: account the enhancement factor. 

167: \\

168: \vspace{1cm}

169: PACS numbers: 95.35.+d, 98.35.Gi, 98.80.Cq

170: } 

171: \end{center}

172: 

173: 

174: \newpage

175: 

176: According to our present understanding of the matter content of the

177: Universe, its energy density is dominated by dark energy and dark matter. 

178: The usual assumption is that 

179: the dark energy is associated with the potential of an evolving

180: scalar field \cite{wetdil,peeblesold}, while the dark matter is composed

181: of weakly interacting massive particles. 

182: Usually these two sectors are assumed to interact only 

183: gravitationally. Attempts to resolve the coincidence problem (the 

184: comparable present contributions to the total energy density from the 

185: two components) are based on the presence of an additional interaction 

186: between the dark matter 

187: and the scalar field \cite{wetcosmon}.

188: The cosmological evolution now depends on the potential of the field, as well

189: as on the type and strength of the interaction \cite{amendola}. 

190: For a scalar field to be relevant for the cosmological evolution today,

191: so as to resolve the coincidence problem, the scale for its effective 

192: mass must be 

193: set by the present value of the Hubble parameter \cite{wetcosmon}.

194: This means that the field is effectively massless at galactic length scales.

195: Its coupling to the dark matter particles results in a long-range 

196: force that can affect the details of structure formation 

197: \cite{peeblesfar,peeblessim}.

198: 

199: The presence of a long-range scalar interaction in addition to gravity

200: can modify the distribution of dark matter in galaxy halos. In particular,

201: it is not certain that the dark matter distribution can maintain a

202: form that results in approximately 

203: flat rotation curves for objects orbiting galaxies. 

204: Recent simulations of structure formation \cite{peeblessim} are not detailed

205: enough at the scales of interest in order to resolve this question. 

206: 

207: We consider an interaction between the scalar field and the

208: dark matter particles that can be modelled through 

209: a field-dependent particle mass. The action takes

210: the form

211: \begin{equation}

212: {\cal S}=\int d^4x \sqrt{-g}

213: \left(M^2 R -\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}

214: {\partial_\mu \phi}\,

215: {\partial_\nu \phi}

216: -U(\phi) \right)

217: -\sum_i \int m(\phi(x_i))d\tau_i

218: +{\cal S}_b,

219: \label{one} \end{equation}

220: where $d\tau_i=\sqrt{

221: -g_{\mu\nu}(x_i)dx^\mu_idx^\nu_i}$ and

222: the second integral is taken over particle trajectories. The contribution

223: ${\cal S}_b$ describes the standard baryonic component. 

224: Variation of the action with respect to $\phi$ results in the

225: equation of motion 

226: \be

227: \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}{\partial_\mu}

228: \left(\sqrt{-g}\,\,g^{\mu\nu}{\partial_\nu \phi}

229: \right)=

230: \frac{dU}{d\phi}-\frac{d\ln m(\phi(x))}{d\phi}\,\, T^\mu_{~\mu},

231: \label{two} \ee

232: where the energy-momentum tensor associated with the gas of particles

233: is 

234: \be

235: T^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}} 

236: \sum_i \int d\tau_i \,\, m(\phi(x_i))\,\, 

237: \frac{dx_i^\mu}{d \tau_i}\frac{dx_i^\nu}{d \tau_i}

238: \delta^{(4)}(x-x_i).

239: \label{three} \ee

240: 

241: 

242: We are interested in static spherically symmetric configurations,

243: with the scalar field varying slowly with the radial distance $r$. 

244: Our treatment is relevant up to 

245: a distance $r_1 \sim 100$ kpc beyond which the dark matter becomes very

246: dilute. For $r \gta r_1$ 

247: we expect 

248: that $\phi$ quickly becomes constant with a value close 

249: to $\phi(r_1)\equiv \phi_1$. 

250: This is the value that

251: drives the present cosmological expansion. Here we assume that the

252: cosmological evolution of 

253: $\phi_1$ is negligible for the time scales of interest, so that

254: the asymptotic configuration is static to a good approximation. 

255: 

256: 

257: We approximate:

258: $m(\phi)\simeq m(\phi_0)+[dm(\phi_0)/d\phi]\, \dphi

259: \equiv m_0+m'_0 \, \dphi$, with $\phi_0$ the value of the field at 

260: the center of the galaxy ($r=0$). We work within the

261: leading order in $\dphi$ and assume that $m'/m\simeq m'_0/m_0$ 

262: for all $r$. Also

263: $dU/d\phi$ can be approximated by a constant between $r=0$ and $r=\infty$.

264: For the scalar field to provide a resolution of the coincidence problem,

265: the two terms in the r.h.s. of eq. (\ref{two}) must be of 

266: similar magnitude in the cosmological solution.

267: This means that 

268: $dU/d\phi$ must be comparable to $(m'_0/m_0)\rho_\infty$.

269: We expect $\rho_\infty$ to be a fraction of the critical density, i.e. 

270: $\rho_\infty \sim 3$ keV/cm$^3$. 

271: On the other hand, the energy density 

272: in the central region of the static

273: solution ($r \lta 100$ kpc) is that of the galaxy halo 

274: ($\sim 0.4$ GeV/cm$^3$ for our neighborhood of the Milky Way).

275: This makes $dU/d\phi$ negligible in the r.h.s. of

276: eq. (\ref{two}) for a static configuration. The potential is

277: expected to become important only for $r \to \infty$, where the

278: static solution must be replaced by the cosmological one.

279: Similar arguments indicate that we

280: can neglect $U$ relative to $\rho$. Also the scalar field must be effectively

281: massless at the galactic scale. 

282: For these reasons we expect that the form of the 

283: potential plays a negligible role at the galactic level. Our analysis

284: can be carried out with $U=0$ and is model independent.

285: 

286: 

287: We treat 

288: the dark matter as a weakly interacting, dilute gas.

289: We are motivated by the phenomenological 

290: success of the isothermal sphere \cite{peeblesb} in 

291: describing the flat part of the rotation curves. 

292: We do not address the question of the density profile in the inner part of

293: the galaxies ($r \lta 5$ kpc). 

294: We approximate the energy-momentum tensor of the dark matter

295: as $T^\mu_{~\nu}={\rm diag} (-\rho,p,p,p)$ with

296: $p(r)=\rho(r)\, \langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle

297: =m(\phi(r))\, n(r)\, \langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle$. The 

298: dispersion 

299: %of each component 

300: of the dark matter velocity is

301: assumed to be constant and small: $\langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle \ll 1$. 

302: The gravitational field is considered in the 

303: Newtonian approximation: $g_{00}\simeq 1+2\Phi$, with

304: $\Phi = {\cal O}\left( m'_0\dphi/m_0\right)$. 

305: In the weak field limit and for

306: $p \ll \rho$, the conservation of the energy-momentum tensor gives 

307: \be

308: p'=-\rho\, \Phi'-\rho \, \frac{m'_0}{m_0} (\dphi)',

309: \label{extra} \ee

310: with the prime on $p$, $\Phi$, $\dphi$ denoting a derivative with 

311: respect to $r$. Integration of this equation gives

312: $n\simeq n_0

313: \exp \left(-\Phi/\langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle 

314: -(m'_0/m_0)\dphi/\langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle \right).$

315: %We can define an effective temperature $T_0$

316: %through the relation:

317: %$\langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle=T_0/m_0$. 

318: In order to make the picture more complete we also

319: allow for a pressureless baryonic component in the core. We assume that its

320: energy density has the phenomenological profile

321: $\rho_b(r)=\rho_B\, f \left( r/r_c \right)$, with $f(x)$ a

322: decreasing function of $x$.

323: We do not discuss the physics that leads to such a profile. 

324: We include the baryonic contribution only in order to 

325: estimate its effect on the dark matter distribution in the

326: outer regions of the galaxy.

327: 

328: 

329: With the above assumptions we obtain the equations of motion 

330: \be 

331: \Phi''+ \frac{2}{r}\Phi'=\frac{1}{4M^2} \, \rho_0 

332: \exp \left(-\alpha \Phi-\at \dphi \right)

333: +\frac{1}{4M^2} \, \rho_B \,\,

334: f \left(\frac{r}{r_c} \right),

335: \label{five} \ee

336: and 

337: \be

338: (\dphi)''+\frac{2}{r}(\dphi)'=\frac{m'_0}{m_0}\, \rho_0 

339: \exp \left(-\alpha \Phi-\at \dphi \right),

340: \label{six} \ee

341: where $M=(16\pi G_N)^{-1/2}$ is the reduced Planck mass, 

342: $\rho_0=m_0n_0$ the energy density of dark

343: matter at $r=0$, $\alpha

344: %=m_0/T_0

345: =1/\langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle$, 

346: and $\at=m'_0/(m_0 \langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle)$.

347: We emphasize that, even though $|\Phi| \ll 1$, the 

348: combination $\Phi/ \langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle$, 

349: that appears in the exponent in the

350: expression for the number density $n$, can be large.

351: Similarly, the expansion of the mass around the value 

352: $m_0=m(\phi_0)$ assumes the smallness of the dimensionless parameter 

353: $|m'_0 \dphi/m_0|$. However, the combination 

354: $\at \dphi=(m'_0 \dphi/m_0)/\langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle$, 

355: that appears in the exponent, can be

356: large.

357: 

358: 

359: A linear combination of eqs. (\ref{five}), (\ref{six}) gives

360: \be

361: \frac{d^2u}{dz^2}+\frac{2}{z}\frac{du}{dz}+\exp u

362: +\frac{R}{1+\kappa^2}\,\, f\left( \frac{z}{z_c} \right)=0,

363: \label{seven} \ee

364: where

365: $u=-\alpha \Phi-\at \dphi$, $z=\beta r$, $z_c=\beta r_c$,

366: $R={\rho_B}/{\rho_0}$, 

367: and $\beta^2=(1+\kappa^2)\alpha {\rho_0}/{4M^2}$. 

368: The parameter 

369: $\kappa^2=4M^2\left( {m'_0}/{m_0}\right)^2$

370: determines the strength of the new interaction relative to gravity. 

371: For large $z$ all regular solutions approach the

372: form $\exp u= 2/z^2$.

373: Another linear combination of eqs. (\ref{five}), (\ref{six}) gives 

374: \be 

375: \frac{d^2v}{dz^2}+\frac{2}{z}\frac{dv}{dz}

376: +\frac{\kappa^2R}{1+\kappa^2} \,\, f\left( \frac{z}{z_c}\right)=0,

377: \label{eight} \ee 

378: with 

379: $v=-\kappa^2 \alpha \Phi+\at\dphi.$

380: For large $z$ the solution of this equation is 

381: $v=c_0+{c_1}/{z}.$

382: Combining the two solutions gives the leading result for large $r$

383: \be

384: \Phi'=

385: \frac{2\langle \vrm_d^2 \rangle}{1+\kappa^2}

386: \frac{1}{r}.

387: \label{nine} \ee

388: If the new interaction is universal for ordinary and dark matter, the

389: experimental constraints impose $\kappa^2 \ll 1$. In this case, it is

390: reasonable to expect a negligible effect in the distribution of

391: matter in galaxy halos. 

392: However, if $\phi$ interacts only with dark matter, as we assume here,

393: this bound can 

394: be relaxed significantly. 

395: 

396: 

397: 

398: According to eq. (\ref{nine}), 

399: a massive particle in orbit around the galaxy, at a large distance $r$ from

400: its center, has a velocity 

401: $\vrm_c^2=2\langle \vrm^2_{d} \rangle/(1+\kappa^2).$

402: We can use this expression in order to fix 

403: $\langle \vrm^2_d \rangle$ for

404: a given value of $\kappa$. 

405: The approximately 

406: flat rotation curves are a persistent feature 

407: even in the case that the dark matter is coupled to a scalar

408: field through

409: its mass. The effect of the new scalar interaction is encoded in the factor

410: $\kappa^2$. When this is small, the velocity of

411: an object orbiting the galaxy is of the order of the square root of

412: the dispersion of the 

413: dark matter velocity. If $\kappa^2$ is large, the 

414: rotation velocity can become much smaller than the typical 

415: dark matter velocity. 

416: 

417: 

418: %The dimensionful quantity $\beta$

419: %can be written as

420: %$\beta^2={\rho_0}/(2M^2 \vrm^2_c).$ 

421: %In this way it is determined only through the observed rotation velocity 

422: %$\vrm_c$ and the density of dark matter at the center of the galaxy.

423: %The explicit strong dependence on $\kappa$ disappears. 

424: %This results in

425: %a profile for the rotation curves that is only weakly dependent on $\kappa$.

426: The Newtonian potential can be expressed as

427: $\Phi'=-2\left(u'+v'\right)/\vrm^2_c$.

428: This allows us to write the rotation velocity as

429: \be

430: \left(\frac{\vrm}{\vrm_c}\right)^2=\frac{r\Phi'}{\vrm^2_c}=-\frac{z}{2}

431: \left(\frac{du}{dz}+\frac{dv}{dz} \right).

432: \label{ten} \ee

433: We can also relate the 

434: parameters $z$ and $r$ through the expression

435: \be

436: z=\beta r\simeq\left(

437: \frac{\rho_0}{0.2\,M_\odot/{\rm pc}^3}

438: \right)^{1/2} \,

439: \frac{150~{\rm km/s}}{\vrm_c} \,\, \frac{r}{{\rm kpc}}.

440: \label{eleven} \ee

441: 

442: 

443: \begin{figure}[t]

444:  %\vspace{1.cm}

445:  \centerline{\epsfig{figure=fig0.eps,width=15cm,angle=0}}

446:  \caption{\it

447: The shape of the rotation curves for various values of $\kappa$ and $R$.

448: }

449:  \label{fig2}

450:  \end{figure}

451: 

452: 

453: 

454: 

455: In order to study the rotation velocity profile

456: more quantitatively we integrate

457: eqs. (\ref{seven}), (\ref{eight}) in the interval $0 \leq z \leq  30$.

458: We normalize the 

459: Newtonian potential $\Phi$ so that $\Phi(0)=0$. Also, according to our 

460: definition, $\dphi(r_0)=0$. These relations imply $u(0)=v(0)=0$.

461: The initial conditions $du(0)/dz=dv(0)/dz=0$

462: guarantee that 

463: the solution is regular at $r=0$.

464: In fig. 1 we present the solution of eqs. (\ref{seven}), (\ref{eight})

465: for various values of $\kappa$ and $R$. 

466: In all cases we use $f(x)=\exp(-x)$ and $z_c=0.5$.

467: We observe that the 

468: solutions do not differ substantially. 

469: Approximately flat rotation curves are expected for 

470: $z \gta 5$, consistently with observations \cite{peeblesb}. 

471: This behaviour persists for other forms of the profile of baryonic

472: matter, as long as dark matter dominates over

473: baryonic matter for $z\gta$ 3. The flat part of the rotation curves

474: is largely insensitive to the structure of the core.

475: The departure from spherical symmetry for the distribution of matter in

476: the core of a spiral galaxy is also expected to be a minor effect. 

477: 

478: Independently of the value of $\kappa^2$, the interaction of dark matter 

479: with the scalar field associated with dark energy does not destroy the

480: approximately 

481: flat profile of the rotation curves. Other considerations, however, could

482: constrain the coupling 

483: $\kappa^2=4M^2\left( {m'_0}/{m_0}\right)^2$. 

484: The dispersion of the dark matter velocity is 

485: $\langle \vrm^2_{d} \rangle=(1+\kappa^2) \vrm_c^2/2$. 

486: For a value of $\vrm_c$ deduced from observations, 

487: $\langle \vrm^2_{d} \rangle$ increases with $\kappa$. For sufficiently

488: large $\kappa$, it seems possible that $\vrm_c$

489: may exceed the escape velocity from the galaxy.

490: It turns out, however, that this is not the case. Outside the core of the 

491: galaxy and for

492: $r\lta r_1$, the binding potential for

493: a dark matter particle is $\Phi+(\at/\alpha)\dphi$. For large $r$, 

494: eq. (\ref{eight}) implies that $v=-\kappa^2\alpha\Phi+\at \dphi=$ constant. The

495: binding potential becomes $(1+\kappa^2)\Phi=(1+\kappa^2)\vrm^2_c\ln(r/r_1)$, 

496: where we have omitted an overall constant. For a particle

497: at a distance $r_*$ from the center of the galaxy, 

498: the escape velocity becomes

499: $\vrm^2_{esc}=2(1+\kappa^2)[\ln(r_1/r_*)+1]$. The value of $\vrm_{esc}$

500: is larger 

501: than the standard one \cite{spergel}

502: by a factor $(1+\kappa^2)$, 

503: so that $\langle \vrm^2_{d} \rangle$ remains substantially

504: smaller than $\vrm^2_{esc}$ for $r_* \ll r_1$. 

505: A particle that does not interact with the

506: scalar field is bound only by the the potential $\Phi$. However, the scale of

507: its velocity is set by $\vrm_c$, so that again it cannot escape. 

508: 

509: 

510: Our discussion supports the conclusion that the presence in galaxies 

511: of a scalar field related to dark energy does not have any disastrous 

512: phenomenological consequences. 

513: On the contrary, this scenario may be much more interesting for dark 

514: matter searches than the conventional one. Depending on the value of $\kappa$,

515: the typical velocity of dark matter particles can exceed significantly the

516: observed rotation velocity ($\sim 220$ km/s for the Milky Way). 

517: As the density profile is not significantly modified, 

518: the estimated 

519: local energy density of dark matter remains the same 

520: as in the case with $\kappa^2=0$.

521: It is $\sim 0.4$ GeV/cm$^3$ for our neighborhood of the Milky Way. 

522: %(In order 

523: %for the solution of eq. (\ref{seven}) to reproduce this value, an appropriate

524: %adjustment of $R=\rho_B/\rho_0$ and $r_c$ may be necessary.) 

525: As a result the flux of dark matter particles towards a terrestrial

526: detector is larger roughly by a factor $(1+\kappa^2)^{1/2}$ relative to the 

527: $\kappa^2=0$ case. A detailed study must take into 

528: account the motion of the Earth through our galaxy. However, the Earth

529: velocity is of the order of $\vrm_c$, and gives only a modest correction.

530: The cross section for the elastic scattering of 

531: halo particles by target nuclei through weak or strong interactions

532: is largely independent of the particle velocity \cite{witten}.

533: The leading effect of a non-zero value of $\kappa$

534: is that the counting rates, that are

535: proportional to the velocity, are increased

536: by the factor $(1+\kappa^2)^{1/2}$. 

537: This makes the dark matter easier to detect. 

538: Existing bounds on dark matter properties from direct searches

539: can be extended to include the case of non-zero $\kappa$.

540: The bound on the cross section for the interaction  

541: of dark matter with the material of the detector must be strengthened by 

542: $(1+\kappa^2)^{1/2}$.

543: 

544: 

545: The allowed range of $\kappa$ is limited by the observable implications

546: of the model that describes the dark sector. Strong constraints arise

547: from the measured fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background. The 

548: dependence of the mass of 

549: dark matter particles on an evolving scalar field 

550: during the cosmological evolution since the 

551: decoupling is reflected in the microwave background. The magnitude of the

552: effect is strongly model dependent. In the models of ref. 

553: \cite{amendola,mainini}, which assume an exponential dependence of the 

554: dark matter mass on the field, the observations result in

555: the constraint $\kappa^2 \lta 0.01$. 

556: In the model of refs. \cite{peeblesfar,peeblessim}

557: the dark matter mass is a linear function of the field. The induced

558: scalar interaction among dark matter particles is screened by an additional

559: relativistic dark matter species. As a result, 

560: the model is viable even for couplings 

561: $\kappa^2 \simeq 1$. 

562: A similar mechanism is employed in ref. \cite{massimo} in

563: order to satisfy the observational constraints. In this model

564: the interaction between dark matter and dark energy 

565: becomes important only during the recent evolution

566: of the Universe.

567: 

568: It is reasonable to expect that 

569: the resolution of the coincidence problem through an interaction

570: between dark matter and dark energy will 

571: have to rely on a coupling not significantly

572: weaker that gravity. It seems unlikely that a coupling $\kappa^2\ll 1$ 

573: can lead to a cosmological evolution drastically different from 

574: that in the decoupled case. We expect 

575: the effects described in this letter to be

576: natural consequences of any viable model that achieves the resolution of the

577: coincidence problem through the coupling of dark matter to dark energy.

578: 

579: 

580: 

581: 

582: \vspace {0.5cm}

583: \noindent{\bf Acknowledgments}\\

584: \noindent 

585: I would like to thank C. Wetterich for many useful discussions. 

586: This work was 

587: %partially 

588: supported through 

589: %the RTN contract MRTN--CT--2004--503369 of the European Union, and 

590: the research program ``Pythagoras II'' (grant 70-03-7992) 

591: of the 

592: Ministry of National Education, partially funded by the European

593: Union.

594: %and ``Kapodistrias'' of the University of Athens (grant 70/4/6469). 

595: 

596: 

597: 

598: \vskip 1.5cm

599: 

600: \begin{thebibliography}{999}

601: 

602: %\cite{Wetterich:1987fm}

603: \bibitem{wetdil}

604:   C.~Wetterich,

605:   %``Cosmology And The Fate Of Dilatation Symmetry,''

606:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 302} (1988) 668.

607:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B302,668;%%

608: 

609: %\cite{Peebles:1987ek}

610: \bibitem{peeblesold}

611:   P.~J.~E.~Peebles and B.~Ratra,

612:   %``Cosmology With A Time Variable Cosmological 'Constant',''

613:   Astrophys.\ J.\  {\bf 325} (1988) L17.

614:   %%CITATION = ASJOA,325,L17;%%

615: 

616: 

617: %\cite{Wetterich:1994bg}

618: \bibitem{wetcosmon}

619:   C.~Wetterich,

620:   %``The Cosmon model for an asymptotically vanishing time dependent

621:   %cosmological 'constant',''

622:   Astron.\ Astrophys.\  {\bf 301} (1995) 321

623:   [arXiv:hep-th/9408025].

624:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9408025;%%

625: 

626: \bibitem{amendola}

627:   L.~Amendola,

628:   %``Coupled quintessence,''

629:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 043511

630:   [arXiv:astro-ph/9908023];

631:   %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9908023;%%

632: \\

633:   L.~Amendola and D.~Tocchini-Valentini,

634:   %``Baryon bias and structure formation in an accelerating universe,''

635:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 043528

636:   [arXiv:astro-ph/0111535].

637:   %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0111535;%%

638: 

639: 

640: \bibitem{peeblesfar}

641:   G.~R.~Farrar and P.~J.~E.~Peebles,

642:   %``Interacting dark matter and dark energy,''

643:   Astrophys.\ J.\  {\bf 604} (2004) 1

644:   [arXiv:astro-ph/0307316].

645:   %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0307316;%%

646: 

647: \bibitem{peeblessim}

648:   A.~Nusser, S.~S.~Gubser and P.~J.~E.~Peebles,

649:   %``Structure Formation With a Long-Range Scalar Dark Matter Interaction,''

650:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 083505

651:   [arXiv:astro-ph/0412586].

652:   %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0412586;%%

653: 

654: \bibitem{peeblesb}

655:   P.~J.~E.~Peebles,

656:   ``Principles of Physical Cosmology'', 

657:   Princeton University Press (1993).

658: 

659: %\cite{Drukier:1986tm}

660: \bibitem{spergel}

661:   A.~K.~Drukier, K.~Freese and D.~N.~Spergel,

662:   %``Detecting Cold Dark Matter Candidates,''

663:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 33} (1986) 3495.

664:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D33,3495;%%

665: 

666: 

667: %\cite{Goodman:1984dc}

668: \bibitem{witten}

669:   M.~W.~Goodman and E.~Witten,

670:   %``Detectability Of Certain Dark-Matter Candidates,''

671:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 31} (1985) 3059.

672:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D31,3059;%%

673: 

674: 

675: \bibitem{mainini}

676:   R.~Mainini and S.~A.~Bonometto,

677:   %``Dark matter and dark energy from the solution of the strong CP-problem,''

678:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 93} (2004) 121301

679:   [arXiv:astro-ph/0406114];

680:   %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0406114;%%

681: \\

682:   R.~Mainini, L.~P.~L.~Colombo and S.~A.~Bonometto,

683:   %``Dark matter and dark energy from a single scalar field and CMB data,''

684:   arXiv:astro-ph/0503036.

685:   %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0503036;%%

686: 

687: \bibitem{massimo}

688:   M.~Pietroni,

689:   %``Dark energy condensation,''

690:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72} (2005) 043535

691:   [arXiv:astro-ph/0505615].

692:   %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0505615;%%

693: 

694: 

695: \end{thebibliography}

696: 

697: \end{document}

698: 

699: