1: It is believed that the strong interactions are described by a quantum
2: field theory known as quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
3: \cite{ph4,qcd1}. QCD from many aspects is an unique theory. Quantum
4: electrodynamics (QED), and its expansion to the electroweak standard
5: model of particle physics, is also a quantum field theory. However,
6: QED breaks down at short distances and is not well-defined. QED is
7: renormalizable theory but it loses all his credibility as we approach
8: to Landau pole. On the other hand if the cutoff goes to infinity, QED
9: becomes trivial. QED is not the only theory with a Landau pole
10: problem, every theory which is not asymptotically free suffers from
11: this problem. The quantum field theory of gravity obtained from
12: general relativity suffers from nonrenormalizability. QCD is the
13: only known theory which is free from such problems. QCD only needs few
14: parameters to be defined completely, one universal coupling strength
15: and one mass for each kind of quark.
16:
17: In following chapter we introduce part of QCD which
18: is relevant to nuclear physics. We refrain from discussing all
19: details since it can be found in many quantum-field theory textbooks, see e.g., Refs.~\cite{ph4,qcd1}.
20: \section{QCD Symmetries}
21: In this section we will introduce the
22: underlying symmetries of QCD. The Lagrangian of QCD is given by
23: \cite{ph4,qcd1},
24: \begin{equation}
25: \mathcal{L}=\bar{q}(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m^{0})q-\frac{1}{4}(F^{a}_{\mu\nu})^{2}+g\bar{q}\gamma^{\mu}A_{\mu}q, \label{qcd1}
26: \end{equation}
27: where $q$ is the quark field which is defined in the fundamental
28: representation of the color and flavor group, and the conjugate Dirac
29: field is defined as $\bar{q}=q^{\dag}\gamma^{0}$. The gluon field
30: matrix $A^{\mu}=A^{a}_{\mu}\lambda^{a}/2$ is defined in the
31: fundamental $SU(N_{c}=3)$ representation, $\lambda^{a}$ being the
32: generators of the gauge group which satisfies
33: $[\lambda^{a}/2,\lambda^{b}/2]=if^{abc}\lambda^{c}/2$. We define $g$ as strong
34: coupling constant. The field strength $F^{a}_{\mu\nu}$ is given by
35: \begin{equation}
36: F^{a}_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A^{a}_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A^{a}_{\mu}+gf^{abc}A^{b}_{\mu}A^{c}_{\mu}.
37: \end{equation}
38: The non-Abelian nature of QCD is manifested by the quadratic term in the gauge field strength. The color and
39: flavour indices of the quark field are suppressed. $m^{0}$ is the current
40: quark mass which is not directly observable if QCD confines quarks. The current quark mass is color-independent and can be
41: brought diagonal in flavour space. There are six flavours of quarks,
42: each of which has a different mass. The three light quarks are called
43: up (u), down (d) and strange (s), while the three heavy quarks are
44: called charm (c), bottom (b) and top (t). The following values for the light current quark masses are found from the Particle Data group \cite{qcd-data},
45: \begin{equation}
46: m^{0}_{u}=2~~\text{to}~~ 8~~\text{MeV}, \hspace{1cm} m^{0}_{d}=5~~\text{to}~~ 15~~\text{MeV},\hspace{1cm} m^{0}_{s}=100~~\text{to}~~300~~\text{MeV}.
47: \end{equation}
48: Notice that the quark masses are renormalization-scheme dependent. The
49: above values are obtained in a subtraction scheme at a renormalization
50: scale $\mathcal{O}(1\text{GeV})$. In addition to flavour, quarks carry
51: another quantum number known as colour. Each quark comes in three
52: colours, red, green and blue.
53:
54:
55: The Lagrangian Eq.~(\ref{qcd1}) has a large classical symmetry: we have the local gauge symmetry $SU(N_{c})$ by construction,
56: \begin{eqnarray}
57: &&q\to U_{c}q, \hspace{2cm} \bar{q}\to\bar{q}U^{\dag}_{c}, \hspace{2cm} U_{c}(x)=\exp(i\theta^{a}(x)(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2})_{c}),\nonumber\\
58: && A_{\mu}\to U_{c}A_{\mu}U^{\dag}_{c}-\frac{1}{g}U_{c}i\partial_{\mu}U^{\dag}_{c}. \nonumber\
59: \end{eqnarray}
60: We have also global flavour symmetry which does not affect the gluon fields,
61: \begin{equation}
62: q\to U_{V}q, \hspace{2cm} \bar{q}\to\bar{q}U^{\dag}_{V},\hspace{2cm} U_{V}=\exp(i\theta^{a}_{V}(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2})_{F}). \label{qcd2}
63: \end{equation}
64: where $(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2})_{F}$ denotes the generators of the
65: flavor group $U(N_{f})$ and $N_{f} $ denotes the number of
66: flavors. The above symmetry is referred to as vector flavor symmetry
67: $U_{V}(N_{f})$. When the generator matrix is taken unit matrix we have
68: $U_{V}(1)$ symmetry associated with conservation of baryon number. There is
69: another global symmetry which is exact at $m^{0}=0$, namely chiral
70: symmetry. This symmetry is very similar to vector flavor symmetry,
71: apart from an extra factor of $\gamma_{5}$ in the generator of
72: the transformation.
73: \begin{equation}
74: q\to U_{A}q, \hspace{2cm} \bar{q}\to\bar{q}U_{A}, \hspace{2cm} U_{A}=\exp\left(i\gamma_{5}\theta_{A}^{a}(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2})_{F}\right).
75: \end{equation}
76: Notice that due to the factor $\gamma_{5}$ the quark field and its
77: conjugate partner are transformed by the same matrix in contrast
78: to vector transformation Eq.~(\ref{qcd2}). This transformation is
79: called the axial-vector transformation and can be combined with
80: the vector transformation to define a bigger symmetry at chiral
81: $m^{0}=0$ which is then called chiral symmetry $U_{V}(N_{f})\times
82: U_{A}(N_{f})$. One may alternatively define right- and left-handed
83: quark fields by following transformation
84: \begin{equation}
85: q_{L}=\frac{1-\gamma_{5}}{2}q,
86: \hspace{2cm}q_{R}=\frac{1+\gamma_{5}}{2}q,
87: \end{equation}
88: The right- and left-handed massless fermions are eigenvalues of the
89: helicity or chirality (with eigenvalue $\pm 1$) and are not mixed
90: together. The chiral symmetry can be equivalently written as
91: $U_{L}(N_{f})\times U_{R}(N_{f})$.
92:
93:
94: It is believed that intermediate-energy hadronic physics, say over
95: range of energy MeV-GeV is adequately described by the dynamics of the
96: lowest-mass quarks, $u$ and $d$. The overall classical symmetry of
97: the Lagrangian with $N_{f}=2$ becomes
98: \begin{equation}
99: SU(N_{c})_{\text{local}}\times(SU(2)_{L}\times SU(2)_{R}\times
100: U(1)_{V}\times U(1)_{A})_{\text{global}},
101: \end{equation}
102: Not all above-mentioned symmetries survive quantization. Particles
103: with opposite helicity are related by a parity transformation,
104: therefore in a chirally symmetric world the hadrons should come in
105: parity doublets. However, in a real life we do not observe such
106: degeneracy. Therefore, one can conclude that chiral symmetry is not
107: realized in the ground state and chiral symmetry is spontaneously
108: broken. The Goldstone theorem tell us that the spontaneous
109: breaking of a continuous global symmetry implies the existence of
110: associated massless spinless particles. This indeed
111: confirmed due to the existence of the light pseudoscalar mesons in
112: nature (pions, kaons and etas) as the corresponding Goldstone
113: bosons \cite{qcd2}. Moreover, the existence of quark condensate $\langle\bar{q}q\rangle$
114: implies that the $SU(N_{f})_{L}\times SU(N_{f})_{R}$ symmetry is
115: spontaneously broken down to $SU(N_{f})_{V}$. Therefore one may
116: conceive QCD quark condensate as an order parameter for
117: chiral symmetry breaking. The concept of
118: spontaneous broken chiral symmetry is the cornerstone in the
119: understanding of the low-energy hadronic spectrum.
120:
121: The $U(1)_{A}$ symmetry implies that all hadrons should come with
122: opposite parity partners. However, this is not the case, therefore
123: this symmetry must be broken somehow. If the spontaneous symmetry
124: breaking mechanism works here, then one should observe Goldstone
125: boson associated with $U(1)_{A}$, namely an $I=0$ pseudoscalar meson
126: having roughly the same mass as the pion. Surprisingly there is no
127: such Goldstone boson. This problem is sometime called $U(1)_{A}$
128: puzzle. It turned out that the
129: $U(1)_{A}$ symmetry is explicitly broken by quantum effects. This
130: effect is known as the axial anomaly \cite{qcd3}. It was shown by 't Hoof that
131: due to instanton effects, the $U(1)_{A}$ symmetry is not manifested
132: in nature \cite{qcd3}.
133:
134: Finally, at $m^{0}=0$, the QCD Lagrangian is
135: invariant under a scale transformation which is called
136: dilatational symmetry:
137: \begin{equation}
138: q(x)\to \epsilon^{3/2}q(\epsilon^{-1}x), \hspace{2cm} A^{a}_{\mu}(x)\to\epsilon A^{a}_{\mu}(\epsilon^{-1}x), \hspace{2cm} x_{\mu}\to \epsilon^{-1}x_{\mu}.
139: \end{equation}
140: This symmetry is again broken at quantum level due to the trace
141: anomaly \cite{qcd4}.
142:
143: \section{Non-perturbative features of QCD}
144: In this section we shall recapitulate the most important features of
145: QCD which are not accessible perturbatively. Let us firstly elaborate
146: why perturbation theory in terms of coupling $g$ can not be used in
147: the low-energy regime of the theory. Having introduced the gauge fixing
148: term and an associated ghost term by means of the Faddeev-Popv procedure \cite{ph4,qcd1,qcd5},
149: one can carry out perturbation theory in terms of coupling. Due to the renormalization process, a
150: renormalization scale $\mu$ enters the algebra \cite{qcd6}. Therefore the running coupling is described by the RG equation
151: \begin{equation}
152: \frac{dg(\mu)}{d\ln \mu}=\beta(g).
153: \end{equation}
154: Where the coupling is small, the $\beta$ function can be computed perturbatively,
155: \begin{equation}
156: \beta(g)=-\frac{\beta_{0}}{(4\pi)^{2}}g^{3}-\frac{\beta_{1}}{(4\pi)^{4}}g^{5}+...,
157: \end{equation}
158: with
159: \begin{equation}
160: \beta_{0}=11-\frac{2}{3}N_{f}, \hspace{2cm} \beta_{1}=102-\frac{38}{3}N_{f}.
161: \end{equation}
162: Therefore, one can readily calculate the effective running coupling
163: \begin{equation}
164: \alpha_{s}(\mu)=\frac{g^{2}(\mu)}{4\pi}=\frac{12\pi}{(33-2N_{f})\ln(\mu^{2}/\Lambda^{2})}\times[1-\frac{(918-114N_{f})\ln(\ln(\mu^{2}/\Lambda^{2}))}{(33-2N_{f})^{2}\ln(\mu^{2}/\Lambda^{2})}],
165: \end{equation}
166: where $\Lambda$ is a scale parameter of QCD and depends on the subtraction scheme and the number of active flavours,
167: \begin{equation}
168: \Lambda_{\overline{MS}}^{(5)}=(208^{+25}_{-23}) \text{MeV},
169: \end{equation}
170: where the symbol $\overline{MS}$ stands for minimal subtraction scheme
171: \cite{qcd1} and the superscripts indicate the number of active
172: flavours. This value is taken from an analysis of the various high
173: energy processes, see Ref.~\cite{qcd7}. The most striking feature of
174: the running coupling is that it decreases logarithmically as $\mu$
175: increases. Therefore perturbation theory works very well for large
176: $\mu$. This phenomenon is called asymptotic freedom
177: \cite{qcd8}. However, if $\mu$ is near $\Lambda_{\overline{MS}}$,
178: perturbation theory does not work anymore and non-perturbative
179: phenomena enter the stage. Admittedly, there is no unambiguous method
180: available to connect small and large distances in QCD.
181:
182: One of the most important non-perturbative features of QCD is dynamical
183: chiral symmetry breaking which is responsible for generation of a quark
184: mass from nothing\footnote{There is another very different way to
185: generate mass from vacuum, the so-called Casimir effect
186: \cite{qcd-new81} which originates from the response of vacuum in the
187: presence of non-perturbative boundary condition. The existence of boundary conditions in quantum
188: field theory is not always free of problems (see e. g.,
189: \cite{qcd-new82}).}. In order to show that this phenomenon is purely
190: non-perturbative, we employ the QCD gap equation \cite{asy},
191: \begin{equation}
192: S(p)^{-1}=(i\gamma .p+m^{0})+\int \frac{d^{4}q}{(2\pi)^{4}} g^{2}D_{\mu\nu}(p-q)\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\gamma_{\mu}S(q)\Gamma^{a}_{\nu}(p,q), \label{qcd-gap}
193: \end{equation}
194: where $m^{0}$ and $g$ are the current-quark bare mass and the coupling constant,
195: respectively. $D_{\mu\nu}(p-q)$ is the dressed-gluon
196: propagator and $\Gamma^{a}_{\nu}(p,q)$ is the dressed-quark-gluon vertex.
197: The general solution of the gap equation is a dressed-quark propagator of the form
198: \begin{equation}
199: S(p)=\frac{1}{i\gamma .pA(p^{2})+B(p^{2})}=\frac{Z(p^{2})}{i\gamma .p+M(p^{2})}. \label{qcd-s}
200: \end{equation}
201: One may now use the gap equation to work out the fermion self-energy perturbatively \cite{qcd9}. One obtains,
202: \begin{equation}
203: B(p^{2})=m^{0}\left(1-\frac{\alpha}{\pi}\ln (p^{2}/m^{2})+...\right).
204: \end{equation}
205: It is observed that at all orders of loop expansion terms are
206: proportional to the current-quark mass and consequently vanish as
207: $m^{0}\to 0$. Therefore, no mass (the quark mass is defined as a pole
208: of the dressed-quark propagator) is generated at current-quark mass
209: equal to zero, i.e. the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking is
210: impossible in perturbation theory and there is no mixing between left-
211: and right-handed quarks ``perturbatively''. Notice that apart from the
212: trivial solution $B(p^{2})=0$ at $m=0$, a non-trivial solution
213: $B(p^{2})\ne 0$ can indeed be found at the chiral point, albeit
214: accessible non-perturbatively. The renormalization effect is not
215: included in Eq.~(\ref{qcd-gap}), but it does not change the above
216: argument \cite{qcd9}. As we already mentioned, there is a close
217: relationship between the generation of the quark mass, $B(p^{2})\ne
218: 0$, and the fact that $\langle\bar{q}q\rangle\ne 0$. The quark
219: condensate in QCD is given by the trace of the full quark propagator
220: Eq.~(\ref{qcd-s}),
221: \begin{equation}
222: \langle\bar{q}q\rangle=-i\lim_{y\to x} \Tr S(x,y).
223: \end{equation}
224: Notice that since $\bar{q}q$ is a gauge invariant object, one may take any
225: gauge to obtain the dressed quark propagator which has a general
226: form as equation (\ref{qcd-s}). It is obvious when we have
227: $B(p^{2})= 0$, never does the quark condensate take place, simply
228: because of the identity $\Tr\gamma_{\mu}=0$. It has been shown in
229: Landau gauge that the dynamical quark mass, $M(p^{2})$ is large in
230: infrared, $M(0)\sim 0.5$ GeV, but is power-law suppressed in the
231: ultraviolet \cite{qcd10},
232: \begin{equation} \label{qcd-mass}
233: M(p^{2})
234: ^{\text{large}-p^{2}}=\frac{2\pi^{2}\gamma_{m}}{3}\frac{-\langle\bar{q}q\rangle^{0}}{p^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\ln[\frac{p^{2}}{\Lambda_{QCD}}]\right)^{1-\gamma_{m}}},
235: \end{equation}
236: where $\gamma_{m}=12/(33-2N_{f})$ is the mass anomalous dimension and
237: $\langle\bar{q}q\rangle^{0}$ is the renormalization group invariant
238: vacuum quark condensate. The dressed-quark mass-function
239: Eq.~(\ref{qcd-mass}) is a longstanding prediction of the
240: Dyson-Schwinger equation \cite{asy} and has been recently confirmed by
241: quenched lattice QCD \cite{qcd11}. It has been shown in many
242: non-perturbative approaches that the emergence of a dynamical quark mass
243: leads to the non-vanishing of quark condensate and vice versa, e.g.,
244: see chapter 6.
245:
246: Another important non-perturbative feature of QCD is color confinement
247: \cite{qcd12}. Loosely speaking, confinement is defined as the absence of any
248: colored object in nature. But it is possible that there exists a
249: composite colored particle which can form colorless bound states with another
250: colored particle like quarks. The color confinement is still not
251: properly understood, and a clear and indisputable mechanism
252: responsible for this effect yet remains to be discovered \footnote{The
253: Clay Foundation is offering $\$1$ million prize to anyone who can
254: provide a mathematical proof of confinement.}. Confinement
255: originates non-perturbatively, since it is associated with a linear
256: potential with a string tension $\sigma\propto
257: \Lambda^{2}e^{-\int\frac{dg}{\beta(g)}}$ which is obviously non-perturbative in
258: the coupling\footnote{Note that the string picture of quark confinement is not
259: free of flaws, since string breaking will occur once the potential
260: energy approaches the quark pair creation threshold.}.
261:
262: One may wonder if there is a non-trivial solution for gap equation
263: $B(p^{2})\ne 0$ which gives rise to a pole of the quark propagator,
264: which would contradict QCD confinement since the quark is colored
265: \footnote{It is well-known that for confinement it is sufficient
266: that no colored Schwinger function possesses a spectral
267: representation. It is equivalent to say that all colored Schwinger
268: functions violate reflection positivity \cite{germany,asy}. This is one way of realization of QCD confinement. There
269: are in fact many different ways that the confinement can be realized such as monopole condensation effect, infrared
270: enhancement of the ghost propagator etc. For a review of this subject see Ref.\cite{qcd12}.}. Indeed this is one of
271: the subtle point in every QCD model and can not be easily resolved. In
272: principle, there will be a long-range force between massive quarks to
273: confine them and also a short range spin-spin interaction between
274: massive dressed quarks. The former will modify the low momentum part
275: of the propagator to remove the quark from being on-shell. Actually,
276: this describes a phenomenologically motivated picture of a constituent
277: quark model based on the dynamical symmetry breaking. Having said
278: that it is very hard to incorporate the dynamical symmetry breaking
279: and the confinement into a QCD model. In fact, many models
280: constructed to describe the low-energy properties of hadrons are
281: assumed to be only dominated by the quark flavor dynamics and
282: dynamical symmetry breaking and are indeed reliable only at
283: intermediate scales, between confinement scale few hundred MeV up to a
284: scale about 1 GeV.
285:
286:
287: \section{Effective low-energy quark interaction}
288: Physical hadrons are colorless objects and their properties seem to
289: be determined by the flavor dynamics which is induced by an effective QCD
290: interaction. The first step toward a construction of such
291: effective theory is to integrate out gluonic degrees of freedom, then by standard bozonization and hadronization methods \cite{qcd13} derive
292: the desired effective low-energy theories based on relevant degrees of
293: freedom. There have been many attempts to attack this difficult
294: problem. Two very well established
295: methods are the global color model approach introduced by
296: Cahill and Roberts \cite{qcd14}, and the so-called field strength approach
297: introduced by Reinhardt and collaborators \cite{qcd15}. Our main goal in this section is
298: to give a taste of such approaches and focus only on the main themes
299: rather than details. First we rewrite the quark-gluon
300: interaction term in QCD Lagrangian Eq~(\ref{qcd1}) by rewriting
301: \begin{equation}
302: \bar{q}\gamma^{\mu}A_{\mu}q=A^{a}_{\mu}J^{\mu}_{a}, \hspace{2cm}
303: J^{\mu}_{a}=\bar{q}\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\gamma^{\mu}q.
304: \end{equation}
305: The full quantum theory of QCD is solved by computing the
306: functional integral describing the vacuum-to-vacuum transition
307: amplitude,
308: \begin{equation}
309: Z_{QCD}=\int \mathcal{D}q\mathcal{D}\bar{q}\int \mathcal{D}
310: A^{a}_{\mu} e^{i\int d^{4}x \mathcal{L}_{QCD}}.
311: \end{equation}
312: In order to handle the gluonic part of the QCD functional integral, one
313: first has to define gauge inequivalent orbits by using a standard gauge fixing
314: procedure and the Faddeev-Popov method \cite{ph4,qcd1} (in what follows we assume that
315: this procedure has already been carried out). We now split the above
316: generating functional integral as
317: \begin{equation}
318: Z_{QCD}=\int \mathcal{D}q\mathcal{D}\bar{q} \exp\left(i\int d^{4}x
319: \bar{q}(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m^{0})q+\Gamma[J]\right),
320: \end{equation}
321: where the gluon part of action is defined in
322: \begin{equation}
323: \Gamma[J]=\log \int \mathcal{D}A^{a}_{\mu}\exp\left(-\frac{1}{4} \int
324: F^{2}+g\int A^{a}_{\mu}J^{\mu}_{a}\right).
325: \end{equation}
326: If we could evaluate exactly the gluonic part of the functional integral
327: then we would be done. But unfortunately this integration can not be
328: handled unless we resort to some sort of systematic approximation
329: (this is due to the presence of cubic and quartic terms of $A^{a}_{\mu}$ in
330: the Lagrangian). One possibility to proceed is to expand the effective
331: action in powers of the quark current $J^{a}_{\mu}$ as suggested by
332: Cahill and Roberts \cite{qcd14},
333: \begin{eqnarray}
334: \Gamma[J]&=&\Gamma[J=0]+g\int
335: \Gamma^{(1)a}_{\mu}J^{\mu}_{a}dx_{1}+\frac{g^{2}}{2}\int
336: \Gamma^{2}(x_{1},x_{2})^{a_{1}a_{2}}_{\mu_{1}\mu_{2}}J^{\mu_{1}}_{a_{1}}J^{\mu_{2}}_{a_{2}}dx_{1}dx_{2}+...\nonumber\\
337: &+&\frac{g^{n}}{n!}\int
338: \Gamma^{(n)}(x_{1},x_{2},..x_{n})^{a_{1}..a_{n}}_{\mu_{1}...\mu_{n}}J^{\mu_{1}}_{a_{1}}...J^{\mu_{n}}_{a_{n}}
339: dx_{1}... dx_{n},\label{qcd-ex}\
340: \end{eqnarray}
341: where the coefficients
342: \begin{equation}
343: \Gamma^{(n)}(x_{1},x_{2},...,x_{n})^{a_{1}...a_{n}}_{\mu_{1}...
344: \mu_{n}}= \left(\frac{\partial^{n}\Gamma[J]}{\partial
345: J^{a_{1}}_{\mu_{1}}..
346: \partial J^{a_{n}}_{\mu_{n}}}\right)_{J=0},
347: \end{equation}
348: are defined as one-particle irreducible gluon correlation functions in
349: the absence of quarks, \begin{eqnarray}
350: \Gamma^{(1)}(x_{1})^{a_{1}}_{\mu_{1}}&=&\langle
351: A^{a_{1}}_{\mu_{1}}(x_{1})\rangle,\nonumber\\
352: \Gamma^{(2)}(x_{1},x_{2})^{a_{1},a_{2}}_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}&=&\langle
353: A^{a_{1}}_{\mu_{1}}(x_{1})A^{a_{2}}_{\mu_{2}}(x_{2})\rangle-\langle
354: A^{a_{1}}_{\mu_{1}}(x_{1})\rangle\langle
355: A^{a_{2}}_{\mu_{2}}(x_{2})\rangle. \nonumber\
356: \end{eqnarray}
357: In the above expression, the brackets denotes the functional average over the gluon field
358: \begin{equation}
359: \langle...\rangle=\frac{\int \mathcal{D}A...\exp\left(-\frac{1}{4}\int F^{2}\right)}{\int \mathcal{D}A \exp\left(-\frac{1}{4}\int F^{2}\right)}.
360: \end{equation}
361: The zeroth order term $\Gamma[J=0]$ does not depend on the quark field and
362: is therefore an irrelevant constant. The first order term
363: $\Gamma^{(1)}$ gives the expectation value of the gluon field and is zero
364: in the absence of external fields. The leading non-trivial term is
365: $\Gamma^{2}(x_{1},x_{2})^{a_{1}a_{2}}_{\mu_{1}\mu_{2}}=D^{ab}_{\mu\nu}(x-y)$
366: which is the exact gluon propagator and includes all gluon
367: self-interactions and gluon-ghost interactions. Notice that the quark
368: loops are incorporated through the quark current attached as legs to
369: the exact gluon propagator. The main approximation in this approach is to
370: ignore all terms $n\geq 3$. Note that none of the gluon correlation
371: functions is gauge or Lorentz invariant. While each term in the
372: expansion is separately invariant under Lorentz and ``global color
373: symmetry'', nevertheless the whole expansion in Eq.~(\ref{qcd-ex}) is invariant
374: under local gauge symmetry. We truncate Eq.~(\ref{qcd-ex}) up to $n=2$,
375: and with this simplification the QCD generating functional is approximated by
376: \begin{equation}
377: Z_{QCD}\approx \int \mathcal{D}q \mathcal{D}\bar{q}\exp(iS_{QFD}),
378: \end{equation}
379: where the $S_{QFD}$ is the induced non-local QCD action which describes the quark flavour dynamics,
380: \begin{equation}
381: S_{QFD}= \int \bar{q}(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m^{0})q+\frac{g^{2}}{2}\int\int
382: \bar{q}(x)\gamma_{\mu}\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}q(x)D(x-y)\bar{q}(y)\gamma_{\mu}\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}q(y).
383: \end{equation}
384: The exact form of $D(x)$ is not available at the moment.
385: Hence, the main phenomenology task is to simulate the simplest form of
386: gluon propagator in order to reproduce the confinement and asymptotic
387: freedom of quarks. Although there is no a priori reason to believe
388: that the effective interaction of quarks propagating in the QCD vacuum
389: should retain the form of a one gluon exchange interaction, it has
390: been proved that already this simple approximation reproduces most
391: phenomenological models such as the instanton liquid model \cite{non1},
392: Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model \cite{njl}, various chiral bag or
393: topological-soliton models \cite{qcd14} and the Dyson-Schwinger equation approximation \cite{asy}, etc.
394: As an example, a useful starting point for low energy effective action is to employ a gluon propagator which is reduced to its crudest form,
395: \begin{equation}
396: D^{ab}_{\mu\nu}(x-y)=\frac{1}{\Lambda_{\chi}^{2}}\delta(x-y)g_{\mu\nu}\delta^{ab},
397: \end{equation}
398: where $\Lambda_{\chi}$ is a constant with dimension of
399: $(\text{energy})^{2}$. This choice leads to a local NJL type
400: model with interaction:
401: \begin{equation}
402: \mathcal{L}_{I}=-\frac{g^{2}}{2\Lambda_{\chi}^{2}}[ \bar{q}(x)\gamma_{\mu}\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}q(x)][\bar{q}(x)\gamma^{\mu}\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}q(x)]. \label{qcd-njl}
403: \end{equation}
404: This interaction describes a system of quarks interacting via a
405: two-body-force. The local form of the interaction of course causes
406: ultraviolet divergences, which introduces an energy scale
407: $\Lambda_{\chi}$, breaking the scale invariance of the classical
408: Yang-Mills Lagrangian (at zero current quark mass), in an anomalous fashion. We have
409: sketched how an effective quark theory can be approximately obtained
410: from QCD by eliminating gluonic degrees of freedom. This is slightly
411: different from the RG approach discussed in the first part of the thesis in which
412: our main goal was to eliminate the high-energy degrees of
413: freedom. Having said that, both have the same foundation, namely
414: eliminating the irrelevant degrees of freedom and as we already discussed can be implemented
415: at the same time.
416:
417: Unfortunately, there is no economic way to derive
418: effective theories from QCD for a given system. Therefore, one may
419: write down the most general Lagrangian based on relevant degrees of
420: freedom, having imposed some general constraints such as symmetry
421: properties. This approach was introduced by Weinberg \cite{qcd16} and later
422: by Gasser and Leutwyler \cite{qcd17}. For an example, an effective chiral quark theory can be presented as
423: \begin{equation}
424: \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}}(x)=\sum_{n}c_{n}\mathcal{O}_{n}(x)\left(\frac{1}{\Lambda}\right)^{\text{dim}\mathcal{O}_{n}-4},
425: \end{equation}
426: where $\mathcal{O}_{n}$ are the local chiral-invariant operators
427: consisting of quark fields and $c_{n}$ are dimensionless coupling
428: constants. The theory is only valid below the scale
429: $\Lambda$, and the momenta of the loop integrals are cut off at
430: $\Lambda$. One may now truncate the above series and by first obtaining the
431: coupling constant through experimental input, calculate other
432: quantities. This EFT approach has been discussed in detail in Ref.~\cite{qcd17}.
433:
434: \section{Fierz-transformation and the effective quark interaction}
435: The NJL model Lagrangian Eq.~(\ref{qcd-njl}) contains the color
436: octet flavor singlet currents of quark. Since hadrons are color
437: singlets, it is desirable to recast the Lagrangian in such to
438: act in color singlet channels. This can be accomplished by a Fierz
439: transformation, see e.g., Ref.~\cite{njl,njl-ma}, using the relation
440: \begin{equation}
441: \left(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\right)_{ij}\left(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\right)_{kl}=\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{N^{2}_{c}}\right)\delta_{il}\delta_{kj}-\frac{1}{N_{c}}\left(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\right)_{il}
442: \left(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\right)_{kj},
443: \end{equation}
444: If we take the interaction in $\bar{q}q$ channel, then the first part
445: of the above expression creates color singlet mesons, while the second
446: part is color octet. However, the signs behind the color singlet and
447: the color octet are opposite, therefore if we choose the negative sign for
448: color singlet (in the Lagrangian level), i.e. an attractive
449: interaction, then the interaction for color octet will be repulsive
450: and consequently no bound state exist for this channel consistent with
451: nature. Moreover, at large $N_{c}$ the color octet $\bar{q}q$ can be
452: neglected. In the same fashion one can recast the interaction in the $qq$
453: channel. In order to make a color-singlet baryon out of three quarks, we
454: first couple two quarks in the fundamental triplet representation
455: $3_{c}$ which leads to either a sextet $6_{c}$ or an antitriplet
456: $\bar{3}_{c}$. But only an antitriplet can be combined with another
457: quark in $3_{c}$ to make a color singlet state. Notice as well that
458: $\bar{3}_{c}$ is antisymmetric and $6_{c}$ is symmetric in color
459: quantum numbers. We can now use the following Fierz transformation,
460: \begin{equation}
461: \left(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\right)_{ij}\left(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\right)_{kl}=\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{N^{2}_{c}}\right)\delta_{il}\delta_{kj}+\frac{1}{2N_{c}}\epsilon_{mik}\epsilon_{mlj}.
462: \end{equation}
463: It is obvious that the interaction in the $qq$ $\bar{3}_{c}$ channel becomes
464: attractive, therefore diquark formation in $\bar{3}_{c}$ is in
465: principle possible. In the same way, one can ``Fierz'' the flavor and
466: Dirac quantum numbers. For the meson channel we use
467: \begin{equation}
468: \delta_{ij}\delta_{kl}=2\left(\frac{\lambda^{0}}{2}\right)_{il}\left(\frac{\lambda^{0}}{2}\right)_{kj}+2\sum_{a=1}^{N^{2}_{f}-1}\left(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\right)_{il}\left(\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}\right)_{kj}.
469: \end{equation}
470: Notice that in contrast to color group $SU(N_{c})$ the flavor group is
471: $U(N_{f})$, hence the flavor generators includes
472: $\lambda^{0}/2=\openone/\sqrt{2N_{f}}$. One may immediately read off
473: from the above decomposition that for $N_{f}=3$, mesons occur as nonets
474: under flavor transformation. For the diquark channel we use
475: \begin{equation}
476: \delta_{ij}\delta_{kl}=2\sum_{m=1}^{3}\left(\frac{\lambda_{s}^{m}}{2}\right)_{il}\left(\frac{\lambda_{s}^{m}}{2}\right)_{kj}+2\sum_{n=1}^{6}\left(\frac{\lambda_{a}^{n}}{2}\right)_{il}\left(\frac{\lambda_{a}^{n}}{2}\right)_{kj},
477: \end{equation}
478: where $\lambda^{m}_{s}$ denotes the symmetric generators of
479: $U(N_{f})$, i. e. $\lambda^{7},-\lambda^{5}$, and
480: $\lambda^{2}$. The antisymmetric part $\lambda^{n}_{a}$ stands for $\lambda^{0,1,3,4,6,8}$ .
481: Finally the Dirac indices can be rearranged for meson channels by making use of
482: \begin{equation}
483: (\gamma_{\mu})_{ij}(\gamma^{\mu})_{kl}=\delta_{il}\delta_{kj}+(i\gamma_{5})_{il}(i\gamma_{5})_{kj}-\frac{1}{2}\left((\gamma_{\mu})_{il}(\gamma^{\mu})_{kj}
484: +(\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{5})_{il}(\gamma^{\mu}\gamma_{5})_{kj}\right).
485: \end{equation}
486: For the diquark channel we employ
487: \begin{equation}
488: (\gamma_{\mu})_{ij}(\gamma^{\mu})_{kl}=C_{ik}C_{lj}+(i\gamma_{5}C)_{ik}(Ci\gamma_{5})_{lj}-\frac{1}{2}\left((\gamma_{\mu}C)_{ik}(C\gamma^{\mu})_{lj}
489: +(\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{5}C)_{ik}(C\gamma^{\mu}\gamma_{5})_{lj}\right),
490: \end{equation}
491: where $C=i\gamma^{2}\gamma^{0}$ is the charge conjugate matrix. Using
492: all the above transformations, one can now rewrite the gluon exchange
493: Lagrangian Eq.~(\ref{qcd-njl}) (for $N_{f}=N_{c}=3$) in the following compact form
494: \begin{eqnarray}
495: \mathcal{L}_{I}&=&-\frac{g^{2}}{2\Lambda_{\chi}^{2}}\left[ \bar{q}\gamma_{\mu}\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}q\right]\left[\bar{q}\gamma^{\mu}\frac{\lambda^{a}}{2}q\right]=\mathcal{L}_{I}^{\bar{q}q}+\mathcal{L}^{qq}_{I},\nonumber\\
496: &=&
497: \frac{g^{2}}{3\Lambda_{\chi}^{2}}\{\left(\bar{q}\mathcal{M}_{\alpha}q\right)\left(\bar{q}\mathcal{M}^{\alpha}q\right)+\left(\bar{q}\Sigma_{\alpha}q^{c}\right)\left(\bar{q}^{c}\Sigma^{\alpha}q\right)\},\
498: \end{eqnarray}
499: where the charge conjugate spinor spinor is given by $q^{c}=C\bar{q}^{T}$ and the other notations are defined as follows
500: \begin{eqnarray}
501: \mathcal{M}_{\alpha}&=&\openone_{c}\otimes\left(\frac{\lambda^{A}}{2}\right)_{F}\otimes\Gamma_{\alpha}, \hspace{2cm} A=0,...8,\nonumber\\
502: \Sigma_{\alpha}&=&\left(\frac{i\epsilon^{a}}{\sqrt{2}}\right)_{c}\otimes t^{A}_{F}\otimes\Gamma_{\alpha} \hspace{2cm} a=1,2,3; \hspace{1cm} t^{A}_{F}\in\{\lambda_{a},\lambda_{s}\},\nonumber\\
503: \Gamma_{\alpha}&\in&\{\openone,i\gamma_{5},\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\gamma_{\mu},\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{5}\}.\
504: \end{eqnarray}
505: We will study with full detail the mesons, diquarks and the baryons structures within a non-local version of the above Lagrangian in the chapter 6.
506:
507:
508: Here some remarks are in order. First of all, the Fierz transformation
509: does not spoil chiral symmetry. The meson channel
510: $\mathcal{L}^{\bar{q}q}_{I}$ and diquark $\mathcal{L}^{qq}_{I}$ are
511: separately chirally invariant. The main difference between mesonic and
512: diquark interaction stems from the Pauli principle. The diquark $qq$
513: vertices are antisymmetric in color indices, hence the Pauli principle
514: requires a certain combinations of Dirac and flavor vertices. Notice
515: that for $N_{c}\neq 3$, one has to replace the factor $1/3$ with
516: $(N_{c}-1)/2N_{c}$ and $1/N_{c}$ for meson and diquark channels,
517: respectively. This indicates that in large $N_{c}$ limit, the colored
518: diquark channels are suppressed by a $1/N_{c}$ factor and only color
519: singlet mesons and baryons survive. This is in accordance with
520: Witten's conjecture that in the large-$N_{c}$ limit, QCD transforms
521: into a theory of weakly interacting mesons and baryons emerging as
522: solitons of this theory \cite{qcd18}. We will elaborate on this
523: conjecture in the next chapter.
524:
525:
526: