1:
2: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
3:
4: \usepackage{epsfig,times}
5: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
6: %
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: % Definitions
9: %
10: \def \Bcet {$B^-_c \to \eta' \ell^- \bar{\nu}~$}
11:
12: \def \bcen {\begin{center}}
13: \def \ecen {\end{center}}
14:
15: \def \etal {{\sl et.al.},}
16: \def \be {\begin{equation}}
17: \def \ee {\end{equation}}
18: \def \bea {\begin{eqnarray}}
19: \def \eea {\end{eqnarray}}
20: \def \bfig {\begin{figure}}
21: \def \efig {\end{figure}}
22: \def \bc {\B_c}
23: \def \ra {\rightarrow}
24:
25: \def\baselinestretch{1.2}
26:
27: \oddsidemargin-.5cm \evensidemargin-1cm \textwidth17.5cm
28: \textheight22.5cm \topmargin-1.2cm
29: \begin{document}
30:
31: \begin{titlepage}
32:
33: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
34:
35: \begin{flushright}
36: {\tt hep-ph/0509143}
37: \end{flushright}
38:
39: \vskip 1.2cm
40:
41: \bcen {\Large \bf \boldmath \Bcet decay and lepton
42: polarization asymmetry } \\
43:
44: \vskip 1.8cm
45:
46: {\sc \sffamily V.
47: Bashiry$^1$\footnote{bashiry@newton.physics.metu.edu.tr}} \vskip
48: .8cm
49: $^1${\sl ENGINEERING FACULTY, \\
50: CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY,\\ Via Mersin 10, Turkey.}
51: \\[2ex]
52: \ecen
53:
54: \vskip 1.6cm
55: \begin{abstract}
56: \noindent In this paper we study the lepton polarization asymmetry
57: for the simileptonic OZI-forbidden annihilation \Bcet decay where
58: $l=\mu,\tau$. Our results show that the branching ratio turn out to
59: be of order $10^{-4}$. Beside, we find that longitudinal,
60: transversal and normal components of lepton polarizations can be
61: measured for both $\mu$ and $\tau$ decay modes in the future
62: experiments at the LHC.
63:
64:
65: \vspace{2cm} PACS numbers 14.40, Nd 13.20, He 13.60-r, 11.30.Er
66: \end{abstract}
67: \newpage
68: \setcounter{page}{1}
69:
70: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
71: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}
72: \section{Introduction}
73: The $B_c$ meson was first observed in CDF\cite{CDF,CDF1} detector
74: at the Fermilab Tevatron in 1.8 TeV $p\bar p$ collisions. It was
75: measured to have a mass $M_{B_c}=6.40\pm0.39\pm0.13 GeV$ and
76: lifetime $\tau_{B_c}=0.46^{+0.18}_{-0.16}\pm0.03ps$, which agree
77: with the theoretical predictions\cite{production, beneke}. Its mass
78: and the spectrum of the binding system can be computed by potential
79: model\cite{potential,prod}, PNRQCD\cite{prod,pnrqcd} and lattice
80: QCD\cite{latt} etc. The results are in the region, $m_{B_c}\simeq
81: 6.2\sim 6.4$GeV. Its lifetime was estimated in terms of the
82: effective theory of weak interaction and by applying the effective
83: Lagrangian to the inclusive processes of $B_c$
84: decays\cite{prod,dec,bigi,changli}. According to the estimates, the
85: lifetime is $\tau_{B_c}\simeq 0.4$ps, a typical one for weak
86: interaction via virtual $W$ boson. Further detailed experimental
87: studies can be performed at B factories ( KEK , SLAC) and CERN large
88: Hadron Collider(LHC). Especially, at LHC with the luminosity ${\cal
89: L}=10^{34}cm^{-2}s^{-1}$ and $\sqrt{s}=14\rm TeV$, the number of
90: $B_c^{\pm}$ events is expected to be about $10^{8}\sim10^{10}$ per
91: year \cite{LHC}, so there seems to exist a real possibility to study
92: not only some $B_c$ rare decays, but also CP violation, T violation
93: and polarization asymmetries. The studies of CP violation, T
94: violation and polarization asymmetries are specially interesting
95: since they can serve as good tools to test the predictions of SM or
96: to reveal the new physics effects beyond the SM.
97:
98: The study of $B_c$ meson, the ground state of the heavy-flavored
99: binding system $(\bar{c}b)$, the bottom and the charm, constitute a
100: very rich laboratory since this meson is also a suitable object for
101: studying the predictions of QCD. As $B_c$ meson has many decay
102: channels because of its sufficiently large mass predictions of QCD
103: are more reliable. The $B_c$ meson decays provide windows for
104: reliable determination of the CKM matrix element $V_{cb}$ and can
105: shed light on new physics beyond the standard model.
106:
107: In the framework of the SM its decays can occur via three
108: mechanisms: (1) the c-quark decay with the b-quark being a
109: spectator, (2) the b-quark decay with the c-quark being a spectator,
110: (3) b-quark and c-quark annihilation. The first two mechanisms are
111: expected to contribute about $90\%$ of the total width, and the
112: remaining $10\%$ is owed to the annihilation process.
113:
114: \par
115: There is another decay mode which does not belong to the three
116: aforementioned types, and it can only occur via the OZI processes.
117: As we know that the OZI rule\cite{OZI} plays an important role in
118: the processes which occur via strong interaction and in general at
119: the parton level the concerned calculations are carried out in the
120: framework of the perturbative QCD (PQCD).
121:
122: The first investigation of the OZI-forbidden annihilation decays
123: \Bcet in QCD was carried out in 1999 \cite{akio}. In their work,
124: an effective Lagrangian was adopted to avoid introducing the $B_{c}$
125: meson wave function, meanwhile they dealt with the light meson by
126: using an effective $g_{a}^*g_{b}^*\to \eta^{'}$ coupling
127: \cite{yang}\cite{close}, which was obtained in the NRQM
128: approximation. The valence quark $q$ and anti-quark $\bar{q}$ in the
129: light meson were assumed to possess equal momenta and be on their
130: mass shells, i.e., $p_q=p_{\bar{q}}$ and $p_q^2=m_q^2$. The
131: branching ratio estimated to be $ Br(B_c \to \eta' \ell
132: \bar{\nu})=1.6\times 10^{-4}$ for $l=\mu,e$, which is accessible at
133: CERN LHC.
134:
135: In this paper, we investigate lepton polarization
136: asymmetries in semileptonic annihilation decay \Bcet.
137:
138: The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we give the details
139: of the calculation of the amplitude and polarization asymmetries.
140: Section 3 is devoted to numerical results and discussions.
141:
142: \section{Calculations}
143:
144: The effective Lagrangian responsible for $(b\bar{c})\rightarrow
145: g^*_a g^*_b l\bar\nu$ decay is \cite{akio} \bea {\cal M} (b\bar c
146: \ra g^*_a g^*_b l^- \nu )= \frac{G_{F}}{\sqrt{2}}
147: V_{cb}g_s^2 Tr[T_a T_b] \bar{v}_c (p_c )
148: \left[
149: \gamma_{\mu}(1-\gamma_{5} )
150: \frac{i}{\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}p_{b} -\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}K -m_b}
151: \gamma_{\beta}
152: \frac{i}{\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}p_{b} -\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}k_1 -m_b}
153: \gamma_{\alpha} \right. \nonumber\\
154: \left. +\gamma_{\alpha} \frac{i}{\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}k_{1}
155: -\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}p_{c}-m_c}
156: \gamma_{\beta}
157: \frac{i}{\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}K-\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}p_{c}-m_c}
158: \gamma_{\mu}(1-\gamma_{5} )
159: +\gamma_{\beta} \frac{i}{-\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}p_{c}+\slash{\hskip
160: -0.23cm}k_{2} -m_c}
161: \gamma_{\mu}(1-\gamma_{5} )
162: \frac{i}{\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}p_{b}-\slash{\hskip -0.23cm}k_{1} -m_b}
163: \gamma_{\alpha}\right] u_{b}(p_{b})
164: \nonumber \\
165: \times
166: {\bar l}\gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{l}
167: +\left(\alpha\leftrightarrow\beta, k_{1}\leftrightarrow k_{2}
168: \right). \eea Using the Dirac equation and identity for Dirac
169: matrices, after long but straightforward calculations for an
170: effective Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{eff}$ we get\cite{akio}: \\
171: \be {\cal L}_{eff}= \frac{G_{F}}{\sqrt{2}}
172: V_{cb}g_{s}^{2} Tr[T_{a}T_{b}]
173: \bar{c}\gamma_{\delta}(1-\gamma_{5})
174: b{\hskip 2mm} {\bar l}\gamma_{\mu}(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{l}
175: {\cal F}^{\delta\mu\alpha\beta}\frac{1}{k^2_1}\frac{1}{k^2_2}
176: \langle g^*_{a\alpha} g^*_{b\beta} \mid\eta^{\prime}\rangle. \ee
177: where $K=k_1+k_2$ is the momentum of $\eta'$, ${\cal
178: F}^{\delta\mu\alpha\beta}$ represents the combination of momenta and
179: contains loop integrations, which is explicitly shown in
180: \cite{akio}.
181:
182: Having obtained the effective Lagrangian, the total amplitude can be
183: obtained by sandwiching the ${\cal L}_{eff}$ between annihilated
184: meson state $| B^-_c\rangle $ and created non-meson state
185: $\langle0| $by using the definition \be \langle 0\mid
186: \bar{c}\gamma_{\mu}(1-\gamma_{5})b\mid B_{c}(P)\rangle=
187: if_{B_c}P_{\mu} \ee and the $g^*_a g^*_b \rightarrow\eta^{\prime}$
188: coupling \be \langle g^*_a g^*_b \mid\eta^{\prime}\rangle=g_s^2
189: \delta_{ab} \frac{A_{\eta^{\prime}} }{k_{1}\cdot
190: k_{2}}\epsilon_{\alpha\beta m n } k_{1}^m k_{2}^n \ee which has been
191: widely used in $\eta^{\prime}$ and pseudoscalar productions in heavy
192: quarkonium decays and in high energy collidors\cite{close}.
193:
194: Here the
195: parameter $A_{\eta^{\prime}}$ is understood as a combination of
196: $SU(3)$ mixing angles and nonperturbative objects, and can be
197: extracted from the decay $J/\Psi\rightarrow\eta^{\prime}\gamma$.
198:
199: Using the definitions mentioned above and performing the loop
200: integrations via Dimensional Regularization, the amplitude is found
201: as follows:\be {\cal M}=\frac{G_{F}}{\sqrt{2}}
202: V_{cb}g_s^4 Tr[T_a T_b]\delta_{ab}4A_{\eta^{\prime}} if_{B_c}
203: \frac{i}{16\pi^2}\left( P_{\mu}f_{1}+K_{\mu}f_{2}\right)
204: \bar{l}\gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_{5})\nu_{l}
205: \ee
206: Where $P_{\mu}$ and $K_{\mu}$ are the momentums of $B_c$ and $\eta^{\prime}$, respectively.
207: With $f_{1}, f_{2}$ defined by \bea f_{1}&=&-4C_{11}(K,
208: p_{b}-K, 0, 0, m_{b})+4C_{12}(K, p_{b}-K, 0, 0,m_{b})
209: \nonumber \\
210: &&-2C_{11}(\frac{K}{2}, \frac{K}{2}-p_{b}, 0,
211: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{b})
212: -2C_{12}(\frac{K}{2}, \frac{K}{2}-p_{b}, 0,
213: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{b})
214: \nonumber \\
215: &&-4C_{11}(K, p_{c}-K, 0, 0, m_{c})+4C_{12}(K, p_{c}-K, 0, 0,m_{c})
216: \nonumber \\
217: &&+2C_{11}(\frac{K}{2}, \frac{K}{2}-p_{c}, 0,
218: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c})
219: +2C_{12}(\frac{K}{2}, \frac{K}{2}-p_{c}, 0,
220: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c})
221: \nonumber \\
222: && +\frac{2m_{b}}{m_{c} }C_{12}(\frac{K}{2}, p_{b}-K, 0,
223: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{b})
224: -\frac{2m_{c}}{m_{b} }C_{12}(\frac{K}{2}, p_{c}-K, 0,
225: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c})
226: \nonumber \\
227: &&
228: -\frac{2M(m_{b}-m_{c})}{m_{b}m_{c}}\left(
229: C_{12}(\frac{K}{2}-p_{c}, P-K,
230: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c}, m_{b})
231: \right. \\
232: && \left. -\frac{m_{c}}{M}C_{11}(\frac{K}{2}- p_{c}, P-K,
233: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c}, m_{b}) \right), \nonumber
234: \eea
235: and
236: {\small
237: \bea
238: &f_{2}&=\frac{-4Mm_{b}}{K^2 -2p_{b}{\cdot}K}
239: \left(
240: 2C_{11}(K, p_{b}-K, 0, 0, m_{b})-C_{12}(K, p_{b}-K, 0, 0,m_{b})
241: +C_{11}(\frac{K}{2}, \frac{K}{2}-p_{b}, 0,
242: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{b})
243: \right) \nonumber \\
244: &&+\frac{4Mm_{c}}{K^2 -2p_{c}{\cdot}K}
245: \left(
246: 2C_{11}(K, p_{c}-K, 0, 0, m_{c})-C_{12}(K, p_{c}-K, 0, 0,m_{c})
247: +C_{11}(\frac{K}{2}, \frac{K}{2}-p_{c}, 0,
248: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c})
249: \right)
250: \nonumber \\
251: &&+\frac{M}{m_{c}}
252: \left(
253: C_{11}(\frac{K}{2}, p_{b}-K,
254: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, 0, m_{b})
255: -2C_{12}(\frac{K}{2}, p_{b}-K,
256: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, 0, m_{b})
257: +C_{0}(\frac{K}{2}, p_{b}-K,
258: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, 0, m_{b})
259: \right)
260: \nonumber \\
261: &&-\frac{M}{m_{b}}
262: \left(
263: C_{11}(\frac{K}{2}, p_{c}-K,
264: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, 0, m_{c})
265: -2C_{12}(\frac{K}{2}, p_{c}-K,
266: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, 0, m_{c})
267: +C_{0}(\frac{K}{2}, p_{c}-K,
268: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, 0, m_{c})
269: \right)
270: \nonumber \\
271: &&-\frac{M(m_{b}-m_{c})}{m_{b}m_{c}}
272: \left(
273: C_{11}(\frac{K}{2}-p_{c}, P-K,
274: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c}, m_{b})
275: -2C_{12}(\frac{K}{2}-p_{c}, P-K,
276: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c}, m_{b})
277: \right. \nonumber \\
278: &&\left. +C_{0}(\frac{K}{2}-p_{c}, P-K,
279: \frac{m_{\eta^{\prime}}}{2}, m_{c}, m_{b})
280: \right) \eea } The three points loop functions and their definitions
281: are as follows \cite{veltman}:
282: \begin{equation}
283: C_0;C_{\mu}(p,k,m_1,m_2,m_3)=\frac{1}{i \pi}\int
284: d^nq\frac{1;q_{\mu}}{(q^2-m_1^2)((q+p)^2-m_2^2)((q+p+k)^2-m_3^2)},
285: \end{equation}
286: where $C_\mu=p_\mu C_{11}+ k_\mu C_{12}$. Using the Feynman
287: parametrization we obtain the explicit forms of $C_0, C_{11}$ and
288: $C_{12}$ in terms of Feynman parameters as
289: \begin{eqnarray}&&C_0=\int_0^1\int_0^{1-x}\frac{-1}{L(x,y)}dx dy\nonumber\\
290: &&C_{11}=\int_0^1\int_0^{1-x}\frac{1-x}{L(x,y)}dx dy,\,\,\,\,\,\,
291: C_{12}=\int_0^1\int_0^{1-x}\frac{y}{L(x,y)}dx dy,
292: \end{eqnarray}
293: where
294: \begin{equation}
295: L= m_2^2+(m_1^2-m_2^2) x-p^2x+p^2x^2-m_2^2y+m_3^2y -k^2y+k^2y^2-2 x
296: y p.k.
297: \end{equation}
298:
299: For the heavy $b$ and $c$
300: quarks, it is reasonable to neglect the relative momentum of the
301: quark constituents and their binding energy relative to their
302: masses. In this nonrelativistic limit, the constituents are on mass
303: shell and move together with the same velocity. It implies the
304: following equations to a good accuracy \be
305: M(B_{c})=m_{c}+m_{b}, {\hskip
306: 0.5cm} p_{\bar c}=\frac{m_c}{M}P, {\hskip
307: 0.5cm}p_{b}=\frac{m_b}{M}P.
308: \ee
309: Now let us calculate the decay width of the process \Bcet taking
310: into account the lepton polarization. Four components of spin vector
311: of lepton $s_{\mu }$ in terms of $\vec{\eta }$, the unit vector
312: along the $\ell $
313: lepton spin in its rest frame are given by
314: \be
315: s_{0}=\frac{\vec{p_{\ell }}\cdot \vec{\eta }}{m_{\ell }%
316: }\, , \vec{s}=\vec{\eta }+\frac{s_{0}}{%
317: E_{\ell }+m_{\ell }}\vec{p_{\ell }}\,. \label{41} \ee In the
318: $B^{+}_{c}$ rest frame, the partial decay rate is found to be \be
319: d\Gamma =\frac{1}{(2\pi )^{3}}\frac{1}{8M_{B_c}}\mid M\mid
320: ^{2}dE_{\eta^{\prime} }dE_{\ell }\,, \label{42} \ee where \be
321: |{\cal{M}}|^2=A_{0}(x,y)+(A_{L}\vec{e}_{L}+A_{N}\vec{e}_{N}+A_{T}\vec{e}_{T})\cdot
322: \vec{\eta}\,, \label{43} \ee
323: where $\vec{e}_{i}\ (i=L,N,T)$ is the
324: unit vector along the longitudinal, normal and transversal
325: components of the lepton polarization, defined as:
326: \begin{eqnarray}
327: \vec{e}_{L} &=&{\frac{\vec{p}_{\ell }}{|\vec{p}_{\ell }|}}, \nonumber \\
328: \vec{e}_{T} &=&{\frac{\vec{p}_{\ell }\times (\vec{q}\times \vec{p}_{\ell })}{|%
329: \vec{p}_{\ell }\times (\vec{q}\times \vec{p}_{\ell })|}}, \nonumber \\
330: \vec{e}_{N} &=&{\frac{\vec{q}\times \vec{p}_{\ell }}{|\vec{q}\times \vec{p}%
331: _{\ell }|}}\,, \label{44}
332: \end{eqnarray}
333: respectively. The quantities $A_{0} $, $A_{L}$, $A_{N}$, $A_{T}$
334: can be calculated directly and are given by
335: \begin{eqnarray}
336: A_0(t,s)&=& 4M^4_B \{-|f_1|^2 [r_{\eta'} + r_{\ell})+(-1+t)(-1
337: +t+s)]\nonumber\\&+&|f_2|^2 [r_2 (-1 + r_{\ell})-(1 + r_{\ell}-t)(1
338: + r_{\ell}-t-s)]\nonumber\\&-& 2Re[f_1 f^*_2] [r_2- (1 +
339: r_{\ell}-t)(-1+ s + t)]\}\label{a0}\nonumber\\\\
340: A_L(t,s)&=& 2M^4_B \{-|f_1|^2 [(-2 + s +
341: 2t)\sqrt{-4r_{\ell}+t^2}+\sqrt{-4r_{\eta'}+s^2}~t
342: \cos(z)]\\
343: &+&|f_2|^2 [(-2r_{\eta'} + s
344: (1+r_{\ell}-t))\sqrt{-4r_{\ell}+t^2}+\sqrt{-4r_{\eta'}+s^2}~t(-1-r_{\ell}+t)
345: \cos(z)]\nonumber\\
346: &+& Re[f_1 f^*_2] [(2-2r_{\eta'}+2r_{\ell}-( 2+ s)t
347: \sqrt{-4r_{\ell}+t^2}+\sqrt{-4r_{\eta'}+s^2}(-2+t)t
348: \cos(z)]\}\nonumber\\ \nonumber\\
349: A_N(t,s)&=&-4M^4_B\sqrt{r_{\ell}}\sqrt{-4r_{\ell}+t^2}\sqrt{-4r_{\eta'}+s^2}\sin(z)
350: Im[f_1 f^*_2]\\ \nonumber\\
351: A_T(t,s)&=&-4M^4_B\sqrt{r_{\ell}}\sqrt{-4r_{\eta'}+s^2}\sin(z)\{|f_1|^2+|f_2|^2(1+r_{\ell}-t)-Re[f_1
352: f^*_2](-2+t)\}
353: \end{eqnarray}
354: where $ r_{\eta'}=\frac{M^2_B}{m_{\eta'}^2}$ , $
355: r_{\ell}=\frac{M_B^2}{m_{\ell}^2},\ t=\frac{2 E_{\ell}}{M_B},\
356: s=\frac{2 E_{\eta'}}{M_B}$ are normalized energies of the lepton and
357: $\eta'$, respectively. $\cos(z)$ is given by: \be
358: \cos(z)=\frac{2(1+r_2+r_{\ell}-s)+(-2+s)t}{\sqrt{(-4r_{\ell}+t^2)(-4r_{\eta'}+s^2)}}
359: \ee Here the $z$ is a angle between the final lepton($\ell$) and
360: $\eta'$ particles.\\
361: Using Eq.($\ref{a0}$) we get the following expression for differential decay rate:
362: \bea
363: \frac{d\Gamma(s)}{ds}
364: =\frac{\Delta (s)}{8(2\pi)^3}C^2 M^3, \eea where \be
365: C=\frac{8}{3}\alpha^{2}_s f_{B_c}A_{\eta^{\prime}}
366: \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}V_{cb}. \ee
367: and the expression for $\Delta$ is as:
368: \bea \Delta &=& \frac{(1+r_{\eta'}-r_{\ell}-s)^2
369: \sqrt{-4r_{\eta'}+s^2}}{3(1+r_{\eta'}-s)^3} \Big\{2(1+r_{\eta'}-s)(-4r_{\eta'}+s^2)
370: (|f_1|^2+|f_2|^2+2Re[f_1 f^*_2 ])\nonumber \\&-& 4r_{\ell}\{|f_1|^2 (-3+ r_{\eta'}+3s-s^2)
371: +|f_2|^2(r_{\eta'}-3r^2_{\eta'}+3r_{\eta'}s-s^2)\nonumber\\&+& Re[f_1 f^*_2](8r_{\eta'}-3-3r_{\eta'} s + s^2)\}
372: \Big\}
373: \eea
374: It should be mentioned that if one neglects the lepton
375: mass($r_{\ell}=0$), the results in \cite{akio} are obtained.
376: If we define the longitudinal, normal and transversal $\ell$
377: polarization asymmetries by \be P_{i}(s)={\frac{d\Gamma
378: (\vec{e}_{i})-d\Gamma (-\vec{e}_{i})}{d\Gamma ( \vec{e}_{i})+d\Gamma
379: (-\vec{e}_{i})}}\,,\ (i=L,N,T)\,, \label{49} \ee
380: we find that
381: \be \label{Pi} P_{i}(s)={\frac{\int A_{i}(t,s)dt}{\int
382: A_{0}(t,s)dt}}\,,\ (i=L,N,T)\,. \label{410} \ee
383: \section{Numerical Results and Discussions}
384: In this section the numerical analysis is done not only for the
385: differential decay width but also for the polarization
386: asymmetries($P_i$). For numerical results, we take $\alpha_s
387: =\alpha_s (M_{B_c})=0.2$,
388: $V_{cb}=0.04$, $A_{\eta^{\prime}}=0.2$ and $\tau_{B_c} =0.46ps$.
389: The decay constant $f_{B_c}$ probes the strong(nonpertubative) QCD
390: dynamics which bind $b$ and $\bar c$ quarks to form the bound state
391: $B_c$. In nonrelativistic limit, $f_{B_c}$ can be related to the
392: value of the $B_c$ wave function at origin\cite{van}. Leptonic
393: decay constant is estimated by QCD sum rules\cite{aliev} and using
394: the nonrelativistic potential models\be
395: f_{B_c}=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
396: 450 MeV & \mbox{(Buchm{\"u}ller-Tye potential\cite{p1})}\\
397: 512 MeV & \mbox{(power law potential\cite{p2})}\\
398: 479 MeV & \mbox{(logarithmic potential\cite{p3})}\\
399: 687 MeV & \mbox{(cornell potential\cite{p4})}
400: \end{array}\right.
401: \ee
402: For numerical illustrations, we take $f_{B_c}=0.5\, Gev$.
403: We also do numerical integration in eq. (\ref{Pi}) for $s$ values in
404: the interval $s\epsilon[2 \sqrt{r_{\eta'}},1+ r_{\eta'}-r_{\ell}]$
405: with respect to $t$ ranging from $t_{Min} $ to $t_{Max} $ which
406: are given as: \bea t_{Min}&=& \frac{(1 + r_{\eta'} + r_{\ell} - s)(2
407: - s)}{2(1+r_{\eta'} - s)}- \frac{|(1 + r_{\eta'} - r_{\ell} -
408: s)|\sqrt{(-4 r_{\eta'} + s^2)}}{2(1 + r_{\eta'} - s)}\nonumber\\
409: t_{Max}&=& \frac{(1 + r_{\eta'} + r_{\ell} - s)(2 -
410: s)}{2(1+r_{\eta'} - s)}+ \frac{|(1 + r_{\eta'} - r_{\ell} -
411: s)|\sqrt{(-4 r_{\eta'} + s^2)}}{2(1 + r_{\eta'} - s)} \eea
412: The dependence of the the branching ratio on normalized $\eta^{\prime}$ momentum
413: for $ \mu$ and $\tau$ cases are displayed in
414: Fig.1 and Fig. 2. It is seen that the normalized $\eta^{\prime}$
415: momentum distribution is peaked at small values of $s$. In fact, it
416: is reasonable if we consider the expressions of $f_1$ and $f_2$ in
417: terms of basic scalar functions $C_0$ and $C_{12}$ and $C_{11}$ in
418: \cite{veltman}, the normalized $\eta^{\prime}$ momentum distribution
419: behaves as \be {\propto}\frac{1}{ \sqrt{s^{2}-r_{\eta^{\prime}} }},
420: \ee when $s$ is small. Therefore, there is a singularity at the
421: starting point of the distribution, but it is integrable and give
422: finite decay width. The branching ratio is estimated to be \be
423: Br(B_c \to \eta' \mu \bar{\nu}~)\sim 1.6\times 10^{-4}, \ee \be
424: Br(B_c \to \eta' \tau \bar{\nu}~)\sim 2.2\times 10^{-4}, \ee for
425: $\mu$ , $e$ leptons and
426: $\tau$ leptons, respectively.
427:
428: Fig.3 and Fig.4 are displaying the dependency of $P_L$ for $\mu$
429: and $\tau$ leptons, respectively. We see that the $P_L$ for $\tau$
430: lepton can take both negative and positive values. Precisely, for
431: $s\leq 0.45$ it takes negative values and elsewhere it is
432: positive.
433:
434: Fig.5 and Fig.6 are displaying the dependency of $P_N$ for $\mu$
435: and $\tau$ leptons, respectively. We see that for both leptons $P_N$
436: is negative and has minimum at $s\simeq 0.83$ and $s\simeq 0.75$ , respectively.
437:
438: Fig.7 and Fig.8 are displaying the dependency of $P_T$ for $\mu$
439: and $\tau$ leptons, respectively. We see that for both leptons $P_T$
440: is negative and has minimum at $s\simeq 0.95$ and $s\simeq 0.75$ , respectively.
441:
442: Finally, a few words about the detectibilty of the lepton polarization asymmetries at $B$ factories or future
443: hadron colliders, are in order. As an estimation, we choose the
444: averaged values of the longitudinal, transversal and normal
445: polarizations for both $\mu$ and $\tau$ leptons (see TABLE 1).
446: \begin{center}
447: TABLE 1. The averaged Longitudinal, Normal and Transversal
448: polarization for $\mu$ and $\tau$ leptons. \vskip 0.5cm
449:
450:
451: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
452: \hline
453: % after \\: \hline or \cline{col1-col2} \cline{col3-col4} ...
454: $\langle P_i\rangle$&$B_c\rightarrow \eta' \mu \nu_\mu$ & $B_c\rightarrow \eta' \tau \nu_\tau$ \\\hline
455: $\langle P_L\rangle$ & 0.71 & 0.258 \\
456: $\langle P_N\rangle$ & -0.007 & -0.1 \\
457: $\langle P_T\rangle$& -0.009 & -0.09 \\
458: \hline
459: \end{tabular}
460: \end{center}
461: Experimentally, to measure an asymmetry $\langle P_i\rangle$ of a
462: decay with the branching ratio $B$ at the $n\sigma$ level, the
463: required number of events is given by the formula $N=n^2/({\cal{B}}
464: \langle P_i\rangle^2 )$. It follows from this expression and TABLE 1
465: that to observe the lepton polarizations $\langle P_L\rangle\,,
466: \langle P_N\rangle$ and $\langle P_T\rangle$ in \Bcet decay at
467: $1\sigma$ level, the expected number of events are
468: $N=(1,3,10^4)\times10^7$, respectively. On the other hand, the
469: number of $B\overline{B}$ pairs that are expected to be produced at
470: B factories and LHCb will be $10^8$ and $10^{12} B\overline{B}$
471: pairs, respectively. A comparison of these numbers allows us to
472: conclude that not only the measurements of the longitudinal
473: polarization of muon and longitudinal, normal and transversal
474: polarization of $\tau$ lepton, but also the measurements of the
475: normal and transversal polarizations of the $\mu$ lepton with the
476: order of $\approx \% 1$ (see TABLE 1) could be accessible at $B$
477: factories.
478:
479: In conclusion, we carried out
480: a study on the semileptonic
481: annihilation decays \Bcet and lepton polarization asymmetries.\\
482: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
483: % Acknowledgment and bibliography
484: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
485: \bigskip
486: \noindent {\large\bf Acknowledgment}
487:
488: The author thanks TM Aliev for
489: helpful discussions.
490:
491: \noindent
492:
493:
494: \bigskip
495:
496:
497: {\small
498: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
499: \bibitem{CDF} CDF Collaboration, F. Abe {\em et al.}, {\it Phys. Rev.
500: D} {\bf 58}, 112004 (1998).
501:
502: \bibitem{CDF1} CDF Collaboration, D. Acosta {\em et al.},
503: hep-ex/0505076.
504: \bibitem{production}
505: {\sc {C.H.Chang and Y.Q.Chen}},
506: \newblock {\em Phys.~Lett.} {\bf B284}(1992)127;\\
507: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D46} (1992) 3845, {\bf
508: D50}(1994)6013(E);\\
509: {\sc {E.Braaten, K.Cheung and T.C.Yuan}},
510: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D48} (1993) 4230;\\
511: {\sc {K.Kolodziej, A.Leike and R{\"u}ckl,}}
512: \newblock {\em Phys.~Lett.} {\bf B355}(1995)327.
513: \bibitem{mass}
514: {\sc {W.Kwong and J.Rosner}},
515: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D44}(1991)212;
516:
517: \bibitem{potential} E. Eichen and C. Quigg, {\it Phys. Rev. D} {\bf 49},
518: 5845(1994); Y.Q. Chen and Y.P. Kuang, {\it Phys. Rev. D} {\bf 46},
519: 1165(1992); S. Goldfrey, {\it Phys. Rev. D} {\bf 70}, 054017 (2004).
520:
521: \bibitem{prod} N. Brambilla {\it etal}., hep-ph/0412158.
522:
523: \bibitem{pnrqcd} N. Brambilla, Y. Sumino and A. Vairo, {\it Phys. Rev.
524: D} {\bf 65} 034001, (2002).
525:
526: \bibitem{latt} QCDHP, Fermilab Lattice and UKQCD Collaborations,
527: I.F. Allison et al, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 94}, 172001 (2005);
528: {\it Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl.} {\bf 129} 340 (2004); {\it Nucl.
529: Phys. B, Proc. Suppl.} {\bf 140} 440 (2005); UKQCD Collaboration,
530: H.P. Shanahan et al, {\it Phys. Lett. B} {\bf 453}, 289 (1999).
531:
532: \bibitem{dec} Chao-Hsi Chang and Yu-Qi Chen,
533: {\it Phys. Rew. D} {\bf 49}, 3399 (1994).
534: \bibitem{bigi} I. Bigi, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf 371}, 105 (1996);
535: I. Bigi, M Shifman, N. Uraltsev and A. Vainshtein, {\it Phys. Rev.
536: Lett.} {\bf 71} (1993) 496; A. Manohar and M. Wise, {\it Phys. Rew.
537: D} {\bf 49}, 1310 (1994).
538:
539: \bibitem{changli} Chao-Hsi Chang, Shao-Long Chen, Tai-Fu Feng and
540: Xue-Qian Li, {\it Phys. Rev. D} {\bf 64}, 014003 (2001).
541:
542:
543: \bibitem{lus}
544: {\sc {M.Lusignoli and M.Masetti,}}
545: \newblock {\em Z.Phys.} {\bf C51}(1991)549;\\
546: {\sc {N.Isgur, D.Scora, B.Grinstein, and M.B.Wise}}
547: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D39}(1989)799;\\
548: {\sc {N.Isgur and D.Scora}},
549: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D52}(1995)2783;\\
550: {\sc{C.H.Chang and Y.Q.Chen}}
551: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D49}(1994)3399.
552:
553: \bibitem{beneke}
554: {\sc {M.Beneke and G.Buchalla,}}
555: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D53}(1996)4991.
556: \bibitem{LHC} I.P.Gouz, V.V. Kiselev, et. al., Phys.Atom.Nucl. 67 (2004) 1559-1570; Yad.Fiz.67 (2004) 1581-1592.
557: \bibitem{OZI} S. Okubo, Phys.Lett.{\bf 5}(1963)163; G. Zweig,
558: CERN Report No. 8182/TH 401; G.Zweig, CERN Rep.8419/TH-412 (1964);
559: J. Iizuka, Prog.Theor.Phys. Suppl. {\bf 37-8} (1966) 21.
560: \bibitem{akio}
561: {\sc {Akio Sugamoto and Yadong Yang}},
562: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D60}(1999)054009;
563:
564: \bibitem{yang} Akio Sugamoto, Yadong Yang Phys.Rev.D 60 (1999) 054009
565: \bibitem{close} F.E. Close, G.R. Farrar and Z. Li, Phys.Rev. {\bf D55}
566: (1997) 5749; F. Close and Q. Zhao, Phys.Lett. {\bf B586} (2004) 332.
567:
568: %\bibitem{korner}
569: %{\sc {J.G.K{\"o}rner \it{et al.,}}}
570: %\newblock {\em Nucl.~Phys.} {\bf B229} (1983) 115.
571:
572: \bibitem{veltman}
573: {\sc {G.Passarino and M.Veltman,}}
574: \newblock {\em Nucl.~Phys.} {\bf B160} (1979)151;
575: {\sc {G. 't Hooft and M.Veltman,}}
576: \newblock {\em Nucl. Physs.} {\bf B153} (1979)365.
577:
578: %\bibitem{yang}
579: %{\sc {D.S.Du, H.Y.Jin and Y.D.Yang}},
580: %\newblock {Phys. Lett.}{\bf B414}(1997)130.
581:
582: \bibitem{van}
583: {\sc{R.Van Royen and V.F.Wesskopf,}}
584: \newblock{Nuovo Cimento} {\bf 50}(1967)617, {\bf 5}(1967)583.
585: \bibitem{aliev}
586: T. M. ALIEV, O. YILMAZ \newblock{Nuovo Cimento} {\bf C105} (1992).
587: \bibitem{p1}
588: {\sc {W.Buchm{\"u}ller and S.-H.H.Tye}},
589: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D24}(1981)132.
590:
591: \bibitem{p2}
592: {\sc {A.Martin,}}
593: \newblock {Phys. Lett.} {\bf B93}(1980)338.
594:
595: \bibitem{p3}
596: {\sc {C.Quigg and J.L.Rosner,}}
597: \newblock {Phys. Lett.} {\bf B71}(1977)153.
598:
599: \bibitem{p4}
600: {\sc{E.Eichten, K.Gottfried, T.Kinoshita, K.D.Lane, and T.-M.Yan}},
601: \newblock {\em Phys.~Rev.} {\bf D17}(1978)3090, {\bf D21}(1980)313(E).
602:
603:
604: \end{thebibliography}
605: }
606:
607: \newpage
608: \begin{center}
609: \large{Figure Captions}
610: \end{center}
611: \vspace{4cm} Figure 1: The distribution of $dBr/ds$ as a function of
612: $s$(normalized energy of $\eta'$) for the $B_c\rightarrow \eta'
613: \mu\nu_{\mu}$ decay.\\
614: Figure 2: The same as Figure 1 but for for the $B_c\rightarrow
615: \eta'
616: \tau\nu_{\tau}$ decay.\\
617: Figure 3:The dependence of the longitudinal lepton polarization
618: $P_L$ on $s$ for the $B_c\rightarrow \eta' \mu\nu_{\mu}$ decay.\\
619: Figure 4: The same as Figure 3 but for the $B_c\rightarrow \eta'
620: \tau\nu_{\tau}$ decay.\\
621: Figure 5:The dependence of the normal lepton polarization $P_N$ on
622: $s$ for the $B_c\rightarrow \eta' \mu\nu_{\mu}$ decay.\\
623: Figure 6: The same as Figure 5 but for the $B_c\rightarrow \eta'
624: \tau\nu_{\tau}$ decay.\\
625: Figure 7:The dependence of the transversal lepton polarization $P_T$
626: on $s$ for the $B_c\rightarrow \eta' \mu\nu_{\mu}$decay.\\
627: Figure 8: The same as Figure 7 but for the $B_c\rightarrow \eta'
628: \tau\nu_{\tau}$decay.\\
629: \newpage
630: \begin{center}
631: \begin{figure}
632: \vskip 3.5 cm
633: \special{psfile=Br_mu.eps hoffset= 90 voffset=-100 hscale=90 vscale=90 angle=0}
634: \vskip 2.8cm \caption{}\label{brmu1}
635: %{\bf Fig. 1--a}
636: \end{figure}
637: \end{center}
638: \begin{center}
639: \begin{figure}
640: \vskip 3.70 cm
641: \special{psfile=Br_tau.eps hoffset= 90 voffset=-100 hscale=90 vscale=90 angle=0}
642: \vskip 2.8cm \caption{}\label{brmu2}
643: %{\bf Fig. 1--a}
644: \end{figure}
645: \end{center}
646: \begin{center}
647: \begin{figure}
648: \vskip -1.9 cm
649: \special{psfile=pl_mu.eps hoffset= 90 voffset=-100 hscale=90 vscale=90 angle=0}
650: \vskip 2.8cm \caption{}\label{brmu3}
651: %{\bf Fig. 1--a}
652: \end{figure}
653: \end{center}
654: \newpage
655: \begin{center}
656: \begin{figure}
657: \vskip 3.5 cm
658: \special{psfile=pl_tau.eps hoffset= 90 voffset=-100 hscale=90 vscale=90 angle=0}
659: \vskip 2.8cm \caption{}\label{brmu4}
660: %{\bf Fig. 1--a}
661: \end{figure}
662: \end{center}
663: \begin{center}
664: \begin{figure}
665: \vskip 3.70 cm
666: \special{psfile=pn_mu.eps hoffset= 90 voffset=-100 hscale=90 vscale=90 angle=0}
667: \vskip 2.8cm \caption{}\label{brmu5}
668: %{\bf Fig. 1--a}
669: \end{figure}
670: \end{center}
671: \begin{center}
672: \begin{figure}
673: \vskip -1.9 cm
674: \special{psfile=pn_tau.eps hoffset= 90 voffset=-100 hscale=90 vscale=90 angle=0}
675: \vskip 2.8cm \caption{}\label{brmu6}
676: %{\bf Fig. 1--a}
677: \end{figure}
678: \end{center}
679: \newpage
680: \begin{center}
681: \begin{figure}
682: \vskip 3.5 cm
683: \special{psfile=pt_mu.eps hoffset= 90 voffset=-100 hscale=100 vscale=100 angle=0}
684: \vskip 2.8cm \caption{}\label{brmu7}
685: %{\bf Fig. 1--a}
686: \end{figure}
687: \end{center}
688: \begin{center}
689: \begin{figure}
690: \vskip 3.70 cm
691: \special{psfile=pt_tau.eps hoffset= 90 voffset=-100 hscale=100 vscale=100 angle=0}
692: \vskip 2.8cm \caption{}\label{brmu8}
693: %{\bf Fig. 1--a}
694: \end{figure}
695: \end{center}
696: \end{titlepage}
697: \end{document}
698: