1: \documentclass{ws-ijmpa}

2: \usepackage{graphicx}

3: 

4: 

5: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-4pt}{$

6: \,\stackrel{\textstyle <}{\sim}\,$}}

7: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-4pt}{$

8: \,\stackrel{\textstyle >}{\sim}\,$}}

9: 

10: \newcommand{\gev}{\mbox{~GeV}}

11: 

12: \newcommand{\half}{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}

13: 

14: % transverse vectors

15: \newcommand{\tvec}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath{$#1$}}}

16: \newcommand{\svec}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath{$\scriptstyle #1$}}}

17: 

18: 

19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

20: 

21: \begin{document}

22: 

23: \markboth{M.~Diehl}{Distribution of partons in the transverse plane}

24: 

25: \catchline{}{}{}{}{}

26: 

27: \title{ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF PARTONS \\ IN THE TRANSVERSE PLANE}

28: 

29: \author{M.~DIEHL} 

30: \address{Deutsches Elektronen-Synchroton DESY, 22603 Hamburg, Germany}

31: 

32: \maketitle

33: 

34: %% \begin{history}

35: %% \received{DAY MONTH YEAR}

36: %% \revised{DAY MONTH YEAR}

37: %% \end{history}

38: 

39: \begin{abstract}

40: Elastic nucleon form factors constrain the spatial distribution of

41: quarks in the impact parameter plane.  A recent analysis found that

42: the average impact parameter of quarks strongly depends on their

43: longitudinal momentum, and obtained an estimate of the orbital angular

44: momentum carried by valence quarks in the proton.

45: \end{abstract}

46: 

47: %% \keywords{TYPE KEYWORDS HERE, SEPARATE THEM WITH SEMI-COLON}

48: 

49: 

50: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

51: 

52: \section{Generalized parton distributions}

53: 

54: Parton densities are among the most important sources of information

55: on hadron structure at the level of quarks and gluons.  The

56: conventional densities describe the distribution of longitudinal

57: momentum and helicity carried by partons in a fast-moving hadron.

58: Generalized parton distributions (GPDs) complement this essentially

59: one-dimensional picture with information on the directions transverse

60: to the one in which the hadron

61: moves.\cite{Burkardt:2002hr,Diehl:2003ny} In this talk I present main

62: results of a study of the interplay between transverse and

63: longitudinal degrees of freedom.\cite{Diehl:2004cx}

64: 

65: Thanks to short-distance factorization GPDs appear in exclusive

66: scattering processes such as deeply virtual Compton scattering

67: ($\gamma^* p\to \gamma p$) and hard meson production.  In such

68: processes a finite momentum is transferred to the proton.  As a

69: consequence, GPDs depend on two longitudinal parton momentum fractions

70: and in addition on the invariant momentum transfer $t$ to the proton.

71: Understanding the interplay between the two longitudinal parton

72: momenta remains an outstanding task, and in the following I consider

73: the simpler case where they are equal.  The so-called skewness

74: parameter $\xi$ is then zero, and the distributions depend on a single

75: longitudinal momentum fraction $x$ and on $t$.

76: 

77: At small $x$ and not too large $t$, phenomenological experience from

78: high-energy scattering suggests a simple

79: parameterization\cite{Goeke:2001tz}

80: \begin{equation}

81:   \label{regge-form}

82: H(x,t) \sim x^{- (\alpha + \alpha' t)} 

83:   = x^{-\alpha} \exp[\, t \alpha' \log(1/x) \,]

84: \end{equation}

85: of a generic GPD at $\xi=0$.  Literally, this form corresponds to the

86: exchange of a single Regge trajectory linear in $t$, but in a broader

87: sense it may be taken as an effective power-law valid in a limited

88: range of small $x$ and $t$.  For $t=0$ such a power behavior is indeed

89: used in many parameterizations of conventional parton densities.  It

90: is well known that for sea quark and gluon distributions one finds

91: effective exponents $\alpha$ that are very different from the

92: corresponding values extracted for meson or Pomeron exchange in soft

93: scattering processes.\cite{Landshoff:2000mu} In addition, analyses of

94: $J/\Psi$ production at HERA find $\alpha'$ significantly smaller than

95: the corresponding value for Pomeron exchange in soft reactions like

96: $pp\to pp$ or $\gamma p\to \rho p$.\cite{Chekanov:2004mw} On the other

97: hand, the typical values $\alpha\approx 0.5$ for valence quark

98: distributions at low momentum scale rather closely correspond to the

99: leading meson trajectories in Regge phenomenology of soft

100: interactions.  There is presently no direct measurement of $\alpha'$

101: for valence quark distributions.

102: 

103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

104: 

105: \section{Impact parameter}

106: 

107: At given longitudinal momenta one can trade the dependence of a GPD on

108: $t$ for the dependence on the transverse momentum transferred to the

109: proton.  A very intuitive picture is obtained by Fourier transforming

110: the GPD with respect to this transverse momentum

111: transfer.\cite{Burkardt:2002hr,Diehl:2002he} The conjugate variable

112: $\tvec{b}$, called impact parameter, gives the transverse distance of

113: the struck parton from the center of momentum (c.o.m.) of the proton.

114: The c.o.m.\ of a system is the weighted average $\sum_i x_i \tvec{b}_i

115: /\sum_i x_i$ of the transverse positions $\tvec{b}_i$ of its

116: constituents, with the weights being their individual momentum

117: fractions $x_i$.

118: 

119: For $\xi=0$ the Fourier transformed GPDs give the probability to find

120: a parton with specified momentum fraction $x$ and impact parameter

121: $\tvec{b}$ in the proton.  The average squared impact parameter at

122: a given $x$ is

123: \begin{equation}

124:   \label{av-b}

125: \langle b^2 \rangle_x = 4 \frac{\partial}{\partial t} 

126:                         \log H(x,t) \Big|_{t=0} \, .

127: \end{equation}

128: This average depends on the resolution scale $\mu$ and obeys an

129: evolution equation similar to the one for conventional parton

130: densities.\cite{Diehl:2004cx} The form (\ref{regge-form}) translates

131: into $\langle b^2 \rangle_x$ growing like $\log(1/x)$ in the small-$x$

132: limit.  In the opposite limit, the impact parameter of a parton with

133: large $x$ tends to coincide with the c.o.m.\ of the proton (see

134: Fig.~\ref{fig:bsquared}a).  It is plausible to assume that, because of

135: confinement, the distance $b/(1-x)$ of the struck parton from the

136: c.o.m.\ of the remaining \emph{spectator} partons on average remains

137: finite for $x\to 1$.

138: 

139: \begin{figure}

140: \begin{center}

141: \includegraphics[width=0.42\textwidth,%

142:   bb=0 -70 289 136]{geometry.eps}

143: \hfill

144: \includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth,%

145:   bb=50 50 390 292]{avb.eps}

146: \end{center}

147: %

148: \caption{\label{fig:bsquared} (a) Three-quark configuration with one

149:   fast quark in the proton.  The thick line denotes the c.o.m.\ of the

150:   proton and the dashed line the c.o.m.\ of the two spectator quarks.

151:   (b) Average impact parameter $[ \langle b^2 \rangle_x ]^{1/2}$ for

152:   valence $u$ quarks (lower curve) and the corresponding distance

153:   $(1-x)^{-1}\, [ \langle b^2 \rangle_x ]^{1/2}$ of the struck quark

154:   from the c.o.m.\ of the spectators (upper curve).}

155: \end{figure}

156: 

157: 

158: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

159: 

160: \section{Information from the electromagnetic Dirac form factors}

161: 

162: Information on the valence combination $H_v^q = H^q - H^{\bar{q}}$ of

163: unpolarized quark and antiquark GPDs can be obtained from the sum rule

164: \begin{equation}

165:   \label{dirac-sumrule}

166: F_1^{p}(t) = \textstyle \int\limits_0^1 dx\, \Big[

167:    \frac{2}{3} H_v^{u}(x,t) 

168:  - \frac{1}{3} H_v^{d}(x,t) \Big]

169: \end{equation}

170: relating them to the Dirac form factor of the proton, and from the

171: analogous sum rule for the neutron.  We fitted the measured form

172: factors to an ansatz\cite{Diehl:2004cx}

173: \begin{equation}

174:   \label{H-fit}

175:   H_v^q(x,t) = q_v(x) \exp[\, t f_q(x) \,]

176: \end{equation}

177: with valence quark densities $q_v$ taken from the CTEQ6M

178: parameterization at scale $\mu=2 \gev$.  We chose $f_q(x)$ to

179: interpolate between limiting behaviors $\alpha' \log(1/x)$ at small

180: $x$ and $A^q (1-x)^2$ at large $x$, respectively corresponding to the

181: form (\ref{regge-form}) for $x\to 0$ and to a finite size of the

182: proton for $x\to 1$.  A good description of proton and neutron form

183: factors can be achieved, with a parameter $\alpha' \approx 0.9

184: \gev^{-2}$ consistent with expectations from soft Regge phenomenology.

185: A key result of our analysis is the strong change of the average

186: impact parameter over the entire $x$ range, shown in

187: Fig.~\ref{fig:bsquared}b.

188: 

189: 

190: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

191: 

192: \section{Spin and the electromagnetic Pauli form factors}

193: 

194: An analog of (\ref{dirac-sumrule}) relates the valence combination

195: $E_v^q = E^q - E^{\bar{q}}$ of proton helicity-flip GPDs to the Pauli

196: form factor.  Transformed to impact parameter space, a combination of

197: $H^q$ and $E^q$ describes the density of unpolarized quarks in a

198: transversely polarized proton.\cite{Burkardt:2002hr} Positivity of the

199: density for arbitrary quark and proton polarization implies a

200: bound\cite{Burkardt:2003ck}

201: \begin{eqnarray}

202: \Big[ E^q(x,t=0) \Big]^2 &\leq &  m^2 

203: \Big[ q(x) + \Delta q(x) \Big]\, \Big[ q(x) - \Delta q(x) \Big]\,

204: \nonumber \\

205:  && {}\times 4\, \frac{\partial}{\partial t} 

206:     \log \Big[H^q(x,t)\pm \tilde H^q(x,t)\Big]_{t=0}

207: \end{eqnarray}

208: in terms of the parton densities $q \pm \Delta q$ of right and left

209: handed quarks and the average impact parameter of quarks with either

210: helicity.  The strong decrease with $x$ of the right-hand side puts

211: strong constraints on $E^q$.  We fitted the data of proton and neutron

212: Pauli form factors to a parameterization

213: \begin{equation}

214:   \label{E-fit}

215: E_v^q(x,t) = \mathcal{N}_q\,

216:         x^{-\alpha} (1-x)^{\beta_q}\, \exp[\, t g_q(x) \,] ,

217: \end{equation}

218: with $g_q$ constructed as $f_q$ in (\ref{H-fit}) and normalization

219: factors $\mathcal{N}_q$ determined by the magnetic moments of proton

220: and neutron.  Good fits to the data are obtained with $\alpha \approx

221: 0.5$, again corresponding to expectations from soft Regge

222: phenomenology, and for a wide range of $\beta_u$ and $\beta_d$

223: restricted mainly by the positivity constraints on~$E^q$.

224: 

225: Quite remarkably, the uncertainties on the parameters in our fit

226: result in very little variation of the orbital angular momentum of

227: valence quarks, given by Ji's sum rule as\cite{Ji:1996ek}

228: \begin{equation}

229: L_v^q =

230: \half \textstyle\int\limits_0^1 dx\, 

231:   \Big[ x E_v^q(x,t=0) + x q_v(x) - \Delta q_v(x) \Big] .

232: \end{equation}

233: The results shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:L} correspond to a range $L_v^u -

234: L_v^d = - \half\, ( 0.77 \div 0.92)$.  The combination $L_v^u + L_v^d

235: = - \half\, (0.11 \div 0.22)$ has large errors and is rather small due

236: to partial cancellation between the two quark flavors.

237: 

238: \begin{figure}

239: \begin{center}

240: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth,%

241:   bb=50 50 398 291]{Lu.eps}

242: \hfill

243: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth,%

244:   bb=50 50 398 291]{Ld.eps}

245: \end{center}

246: %

247: \caption{\label{fig:L} The orbital angular momentum carried by valence

248:   quarks at scale $\mu=2 \gev$, obtained in the range of parameters

249:   for which we obtain a good fit to the Pauli form

250:   factors.\protect\cite{Diehl:2004cx}}

251: \end{figure}

252: 

253: Electromagnetic form factors can only constrain the difference of

254: quark and antiquark distributions.  In this they are complementary to

255: hard scattering processes like deeply virtual Compton scattering,

256: which provide access to the sea quark sector.

257: 

258: 

259: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

260: 

261: \section*{Acknowledgments}

262: 

263: This work is supported by the Helmholtz Association, contract number

264: VH-NG-004.

265: 

266: 

267: 

268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

269: 

270: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

271: 

272: \bibitem{Burkardt:2002hr}

273: M.~Burkardt,

274: %``Impact parameter space interpretation for generalized parton

275: %distributions,''

276: {\it Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.}\ {\bf A 18}, 173 (2003)

277: [hep-ph/0207047].

278: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207047;%%

279: 

280: \bibitem{Diehl:2003ny}

281: M.~Diehl,

282: %``Generalized parton distributions,''

283: {\it Phys.\ Rept.}\  {\bf 388}, 41 (2003)

284: [hep-ph/0307382]; \\

285: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307382;%%

286: %

287: %\bibitem{Belitsky:2005qn}

288: A.~V.~Belitsky and A.~V.~Radyushkin,

289: %``Unraveling hadron structure with generalized parton

290: %distributions,'' 

291: hep-ph/0504030.

292: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504030;%%

293: 

294: \bibitem{Diehl:2004cx}

295: M.~Diehl {\it et al.},

296: % T.~Feldmann, R.~Jakob and P.~Kroll,

297: %``Generalized parton distributions from nucleon form factor data,''

298: {\it Eur.\ Phys.\ J.}\ {\bf C 39}, 1 (2005)

299: [hep-ph/0408173].

300: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408173;%%

301: 

302: \bibitem{Goeke:2001tz}

303: K.~Goeke {\it et al.},

304: % M.~V.~Polyakov and M.~Vanderhaeghen,

305: %``Hard exclusive reactions and the structure of hadrons,''

306: {\it Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.}\  {\bf 47}, 401 (2001)

307: [hep-ph/0106012]; \\

308: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106012;%%

309: %

310: %\bibitem{Guidal:2004nd}

311: M.~Guidal {\it et al.},

312: % M.~V.~Polyakov, A.~V.~Radyush\-kin and M.~Vanderhaeghen,

313: %``Nucleon form factors from generalized parton distributions,''

314: hep-ph/0410251.

315: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410251;%%

316: 

317: \bibitem{Landshoff:2000mu}

318: P.~V.~Landshoff,

319: %``Pomeron physics: An update,''

320: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.}\  {\bf 99A}, 311 (2001)

321: [hep-ph/0010315].

322: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010315;%%

323: 

324: \bibitem{Chekanov:2004mw}

325: S.~Chekanov {\it et al.}\ (ZEUS Collab.),

326: %``Exclusive electroproduction of J/psi mesons at HERA,''

327: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.}\ {\bf B 695}, 3 (2004)

328: [hep-ex/0404008];\\

329: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0404008;%%

330: %

331: C.~Kiesling (H1 Collab.),

332: Procs.\ of the 13th International Workshop on Deep Inelastic

333: Scattering (DIS 05), Madison, WI, 2005.

334: 

335: \bibitem{Diehl:2002he}

336: M.~Diehl,

337: %``Generalized parton distributions in impact parameter space,''

338: {\it Eur.\ Phys.\ J.}\ {\bf C 25}, 223 (2002)

339: %[Erratum-ibid.\ C {\bf 31}, 277 (2003)]

340: [hep-ph/0205208].

341: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205208;%%

342: 

343: \bibitem{CTEQ} 

344: J. Pumplin {\it et al.},

345: %``New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD

346: %analysis,''

347: {\it JHEP} {\bf 0207}, 012 (2002)

348: [hep-ph/0201195].

349: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201195;%%

350: 

351: \bibitem{Burkardt:2003ck}

352: M.~Burkardt,

353: %``Some inequalities for the generalized parton distribution

354: %E(x,0,t),'' 

355: {\it Phys.\ Lett.}\ {\bf B 582}, 151 (2004)

356: [hep-ph/0309116].

357: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309116;%%

358: 

359: \bibitem{Ji:1996ek}

360: X.~D.~Ji,

361: %``Gauge invariant decomposition of nucleon spin,''

362: {\it Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.}\  {\bf 78}, 610 (1997)

363: [hep-ph/9603249].

364: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9603249;%%

365: 

366: \end{thebibliography}

367: 

368: \end{document}

369: