1: \documentclass[twocolumn,aps,amsmath,nofootinbib,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{psfig}
3: \newcommand\1{$\spadesuit$}
4: \def\btt#1{{\tt$\backslash$#1}}
5: \def\BibTeX{\rm B{\sc ib}\TeX}
6: \addtolength{\topmargin}{0.9cm}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10:
11: \title{Evidence for the Onset of Deconfinement\\
12: from Longitudinal Momentum Distributions?\\
13: Observation of the Softest Point of the Equation of State}
14:
15: \author{Marcus Bleicher}
16:
17: \address{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
18: J.~W.~Goethe Universit\"at, 60438 Frankfurt am Main,
19: Germany}
20:
21: \begin{abstract}
22: We analyze longitudinal pion spectra from $E_{\rm lab}= 2A$~GeV to $\sqrt
23: {s_{\rm NN}}=200$~GeV within Landau's hydrodynamical model.
24: From the measured data on the widths of the pion rapidity spectra,
25: we extract the sound velocity $c_s^2$ in the early stage of the reactions.
26: It is found that the sound velocity has a local minimum (indicating a
27: softest point in the equation of state, EoS) at $E_{\rm beam}=30A$~GeV.
28: This softening of the EoS is compatible with the assumption of the formation of a
29: mixed phase at the onset of deconfinement.
30: \end{abstract}
31:
32: \maketitle\nopagebreak
33:
34: Over the last years, a wealth of detailed data in the $20A-160A$~GeV
35: energy regime has become available.
36: The systematic study of these data revealed surprising (non-monotonous)
37: structures in various observables around $30A$~GeV beam energy.
38: Most notable irregular structures in that energy regime include,
39: \begin{itemize}
40: \item
41: the sharp maximum in the K$^+/\pi^+$ ratio \cite{Afanasiev:2002mx,Gazdzicki:2004ef},
42: \item
43: a step in the transverse momentum excitation function (as seen through
44: $\langle m_\perp\rangle -m_0$ ) \cite{Gazdzicki:2004ef,na49_blume},
45: \item
46: an apparent change in the pion per participant ratio \cite{Gazdzicki:2004ef} and
47: \item
48: increased ratio fluctuations (due to missing data at low energies it is unknown if this
49: is a local maximum or an ongoing increase of the fluctuations) \cite{Roland:2005pr}.
50: \end{itemize}
51:
52: It has been speculated, that these observation hint towards the onset of deconfinement
53: already at $30A$~GeV beam energy. Indeed, increased strangeness production \cite{Koch:1986ud}
54: and enhanced fluctuations have long been predicted as a sign of QGP
55: formation \cite{Bleicher:2000ek,Shuryak:2000pd,Heiselberg:2000ti,Muller:2001wj,Gazdzicki:2003bb,Gorenstein:2003hk} within different
56: frameworks and observables.
57: The suggestion of an enhanced strangeness to entropy ratio ($\sim K/\pi$) as indicator for the onset of QGP formation
58: was especially advocated in \cite{SMES}. Also the high and approximately
59: constant $K^\pm$ inverse slopes of the $m_T$ spectra above $\sim 30A$~GeV - the 'step' - was also found to be consistent
60: with the assumption of a parton $\leftrightarrow$ hadron phase transition at low SPS
61: energies \cite{Gorenstein:2003cu,Hama:2004re}.
62: Surprisingly, transport simulations (supplemented by recent lattice QCD (lQCD) calculations)
63: have also suggested that partonic degrees of freedom might already lead to
64: visible effects at $\sim 30A$~GeV \cite{Weber98,MT-prl,Bratkovskaya:2004kv}.
65: Finally, the comparison of the thermodynamic parameters $T$ and $\mu_B$
66: extracted from the transport models in the central overlap region
67: \cite{Bravina} with the experimental systematics on chemical
68: freeze-out configurations \cite{Braun-Munzinger:1996mq,Braun-Munzinger:1998cg,Cleymans}
69: in the $T-\mu_B$ plane do also suggest that a first glimpse on a deconfined state might be possible
70: around $10A-30A$~GeV.
71:
72: In this letter, we explore whether similar irregularities are also present in the
73: excitation function of longitudinal observables, namely rapidity distributions.
74: Here we will employ Landau's hydrodynamical model \cite{Fermi:1950jd,Landau:gs,Belenkij:cd,Shuryak:1972zq,Carruthers:ws,Carruthers:dw,Carruthers:1981vs}.
75: This model entered the focus again after the most remarkable observation that
76: the rapidity distributions at all investigated energies can be well
77: described by a single Gaussian at each energy. The energy dependence of the width
78: can also be reasonably described by the same model.
79: For recent applications of Landau's model to relativistic hadron-hadron and
80: nucleus-nucleus interactions the reader is referred to
81: \cite{Feinberg:1988et,Stachel:1989pa,Steinberg:2004vy,Murray:2004gh,Roland:2004} (and Refs. therein).
82:
83:
84: The main physics assumptions of Landau's
85: picture are as follows: The collision of two Lorentz-contracted nuclei
86: leads to full thermalization in a volume of size
87: $V/\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$. This justifies the use of thermodynamics and
88: establishes the system size and energy dependence. Usually, a simple equation
89: of state $p=c_s^2\epsilon$ with $c_s^2=1/3$ ($c_s$ denotes the speed of sound)
90: is assumed. For simplicity,
91: chemical potentials are not taken into account.
92: From these assumptions follows a universal formula for the distribution of the produced entropy, determined mainly
93: by the initial Lorentz contraction and Gaussian rapidity spectrum
94: for newly produced particles. Under the condition that $c_s$ is independent of temperature,
95: the rapidity density is given by \cite{Shuryak:1972zq,Carruthers:dw}:
96: \begin{equation}
97: \frac{dN}{dy}=\frac{Ks_{\rm NN}^{1/4}}{\sqrt{2\pi \sigma_y^2}}\,\exp\left(-\frac{y^2}{2\sigma_y^2}\right)
98: \label{eq1}
99: \end{equation}
100: with
101: \begin{equation}
102: \sigma_y^2=\frac{8}{3}\frac{c_s^2}{1-c_s^4}\,{\rm ln}({\sqrt {s_{\rm NN}}}/{2m_p})\quad,
103: \label{eq2}
104: \end{equation}
105: where $K$ is a normalisation factor and $m_p$ is the proton mass.
106: The model relates the observed particle
107: multiplicity and distribution in a simple and direct way to the parameters of
108: the QCD matter under consideration.
109:
110: Let us now analyze the available experimental data on rapidity distributions of negatively
111: charged pions in terms of the Landau model.
112: Fig. \ref{rapwidth} shows the measured root mean square $\sigma_y$ of the rapidity
113: distribution of negatively charged pions in central Pb+Pb (Au+Au) reactions
114: as a function of the beam rapidity. The dotted line indicates
115: the Landau model predictions with the commonly used constant sound velocity $c_s^2=1/3$.
116: The full line shows a linear fit through the data points, while the
117: data points \cite{na49_blume,Roland:2004,klay,brahms} are depicted by full symbols.
118: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
119: \begin{figure}[t]
120: \vspace*{-.8cm}\psfig{file=rw.eps,width=9.8cm}
121: \vspace*{-.6cm}\caption{\label{rapwidth} The root mean square $\sigma_y$ of the rapidity
122: distributions of negatively charged pions in central Pb+Pb (Au+Au) reactions
123: as a function of the beam rapidity $y_p$.
124: The dotted line indicates the Landau model prediction with $c_s^2=1/3$, while
125: the full line shows a linear fit through the data points.
126: Data (full symbols) are taken from \cite{na49_blume,Roland:2004,klay,brahms}.
127: The statistical errors given by the experiments are smaller than the symbol sizes.
128: Systematic errors are not available.}
129: \end{figure}
130: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
131:
132: At a first glance the energy dependence looks structureless.
133: The data seem to follow a linear dependence on the beam rapidity $y_p$ without
134: any irregularities.
135: However, the general trend of the rapidity widths is also well reproduced by
136: Landau's model with an equation of state with a fixed speed of sound.
137: Nevertheless, there seem to be systematic deviations.
138: At low AGS energies and at RHIC, the experimental points are generally
139: underpredicted by Eq.\ (\ref{eq2}), while in the SPS energy regime Landau's model overpredicts the
140: widths of the rapidity distributions.
141: Exactly these deviations from the simple Landau picture do allow to
142: gain information on the equation of state
143: of the matter produced in the early stage of the reaction.
144: By inverting Eq.\ (\ref{eq2}) we can express the speed of sound $c_s^2$ in the medium as a function of
145: the measured width of the rapidity distribution:
146: \begin{equation}
147: c_s^2=-\frac{4}{3}\frac{{\rm ln}({\sqrt {s_{\rm NN}}}/{2 m_p})}{\sigma_y^2}
148: +\sqrt{\left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{{\rm ln}({\sqrt {s_{\rm NN}}}/{2 m_p})}{\sigma_y^2}\right]^2+1}\quad.
149: \label{eq3}
150: \end{equation}
151: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
152: \begin{figure}[h!]
153: \vspace*{-.8cm}\psfig{file=c02.eps,width=9.8cm}
154: \vspace*{-.6cm}\caption{\label{cs2} Speed of sound as a function of beam energy for central
155: Pb+Pb (Au+Au) reactions as extracted from the data using Eq.\ (\ref{eq3}).
156: The statistical errors (not shown) are smaller than 3\%.}
157: \end{figure}
158: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
159:
160: Let us now investigate the energy dependence of the sound velocities extracted
161: from the data. Figure \ref{cs2} shows the speed of sound as a function of beam energy for central
162: Pb+Pb (Au+Au) reactions as obtained from the data using Eq.\ (\ref{eq3}).
163: The sound velocities exhibit a clear minimum (usually called the softest point) around a beam energy of
164: $30A$~GeV.
165: A localized softening of the equation of state is a long predicted signal for the mixed phase
166: at the transition energy from hadronic to partonic matter \cite{Hung:1994eq,Rischke:1995pe,Brachmann:1999mp}.
167: Therefore, we conclude that the measured data on the rapidity widths of negatively charged pions
168: are indeed compatible with the assumption of the onset of deconfinement at the lower SPS energy range.
169: However, presently we can not rule out that also an increased resonance contribution may
170: be the cause of the softening \cite{soft}.
171:
172: In conclusion, we have explored the excitation functions of the rapidity widths of negatively charged
173: pions in Pb+Pb (Au+Au) collisions.
174: \begin{itemize}
175: \item
176: The rapidity spectra of pions produced in central nucleus-nucleus reactions at all investigated energies can be
177: well described by single Gaussians.
178: \item
179: The energy dependence of the width of the pion rapidity distribution follows the
180: prediction of Landau's hydrodynamical model if a variation of the sound
181: velocity is taken into account.
182: \item
183: The speed of sound excitation function extracted from the data has a pronounced
184: minimum (softest point) at $E_{\rm beam}=30A$~GeV.
185: \item
186: This softest point might be due to the formation of a mixed phase indicating the onset of deconfinement at this energy.
187: \end{itemize}
188: Further explorations of this energy domain is needed and can be done at the future FAIR facility and
189: by CERN-SPS and BNL-RHIC experiments.
190:
191:
192: \noindent
193: \section*{Acknowledgements}
194: The author thanks C. Blume and M. Gazdzicki for fruitful and stimulating discussions.
195: This work was supported by GSI, DFG and BMBF.
196: This work used computational resources provided by the
197: Center for Scientific Computing at Frankfurt (CSC).
198:
199:
200:
201: \section*{References}
202: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
203:
204: %\cite{Afanasiev:2002mx}
205: \bibitem{Afanasiev:2002mx}
206: S.~V.~Afanasiev {\it et al.} [The NA49 Collaboration],
207: %``Energy dependence of pion and kaon production in central Pb + Pb
208: %collisions,''
209: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 66} (2002) 054902
210: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0205002].
211: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0205002;%%
212:
213: %\cite{Gazdzicki:2004ef}
214: \bibitem{Gazdzicki:2004ef}
215: M.~Gazdzicki {\it et al.} [NA49 Collaboration],
216: %``Report from NA49,''
217: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30} (2004) S701
218: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0403023].
219: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0403023;%%
220:
221: \bibitem{na49_blume} C. Blume, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31, S57 (2005)
222:
223: %\cite{Roland:2005pr}
224: \bibitem{Roland:2005pr}
225: C.~Roland [NA49 Collaboration],
226: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of particle ratios in central Pb + Pb
227: %collisions at 20-A-GeV - 158-A-GeV,''
228: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 31} (2005) S1075.
229: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G31,S1075;%%
230:
231: %\cite{Koch:1986ud}
232: \bibitem{Koch:1986ud}
233: P.~Koch, B.~Muller and J.~Rafelski,
234: %``Strangeness In Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions,''
235: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 142} (1986) 167.
236: %%CITATION = PRPLC,142,167;%%
237:
238: %\cite{Bleicher:2000ek,Shuryak:2000pd,Heiselberg:2000ti,Muller:2001wj}
239: \bibitem{Bleicher:2000ek}
240: M.~Bleicher, S.~Jeon and V.~Koch,
241: %``Event-by-event fluctuations of the charged particle ratio from
242: %non-equilibrium transport theory,''
243: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62} (2000) 061902
244: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006201].
245: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006201;%%
246:
247: %\cite{Shuryak:2000pd}
248: \bibitem{Shuryak:2000pd}
249: E.~V.~Shuryak and M.~A.~Stephanov,
250: %``When can long range charge fluctuations serve as a QGP signal?,''
251: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 63} (2001) 064903
252: [arXiv:hep-ph/0010100].
253: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010100;%%
254:
255: %\cite{Heiselberg:2000ti}
256: \bibitem{Heiselberg:2000ti}
257: H.~Heiselberg and A.~D.~Jackson,
258: %``Anomalous multiplicity fluctuations from phase transitions in heavy ion
259: %collisions,''
260: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 63} (2001) 064904
261: [arXiv:nucl-th/0006021].
262: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0006021;%%
263:
264: %\cite{Muller:2001wj}
265: \bibitem{Muller:2001wj}
266: B.~Muller,
267: %``Statistical fluctuations as probes of dense matter,''
268: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 702} (2002) 281
269: [arXiv:nucl-th/0111008].
270: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0111008;%%
271:
272: %\cite{Gazdzicki:2003bb,Gorenstein:2003hk}
273: \bibitem{Gazdzicki:2003bb}
274: M.~Gazdzicki, M.~I.~Gorenstein and S.~Mrowczynski,
275: %``Fluctuations and deconfinement phase transition in nucleus nucleus
276: %collisions,''
277: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 585}, 115 (2004)
278: [arXiv:hep-ph/0304052].
279: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304052;%%
280:
281: % -kaon/pion ratio:
282:
283: %\cite{Gorenstein:2003hk}
284: \bibitem{Gorenstein:2003hk}
285: M.~I.~Gorenstein, M.~Gazdzicki and O.~S.~Zozulya,
286: %``Fluctuations of strangeness and deconfinement phase transition in nucleus
287: %nucleus collisions,''
288: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 585}, 237 (2004)
289: [arXiv:hep-ph/0309142].
290: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309142;%%
291:
292:
293: \bibitem{SMES}
294: M. Gazdzicki and M. I. Gorenstein,
295: Acta Phys. Polon. B {\bf 30}, 2705 (1999).
296: %\cite{Hama:2004re}
297:
298: %\cite{Gorenstein:2003cu}
299: \bibitem{Gorenstein:2003cu}
300: M.~I.~Gorenstein, M.~Gazdzicki and K.~A.~Bugaev,
301: %``Transverse activity of kaons and the deconfinement phase transition in
302: %nucleus nucleus collisions,''
303: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 567}, 175 (2003)
304: [arXiv:hep-ph/0303041].
305: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303041;%%
306:
307: \bibitem{Hama:2004re}
308: Y.~Hama, F.~Grassi, O.~Socolowski, T.~Kodama, M.~Gazdzicki and M.~Gorenstein,
309: %``Energy dependence of the inverse slope parameter in heavy ion collisions,''
310: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 35} (2004) 179.
311: %%CITATION = APPOA,B35,179;%%
312:
313: \bibitem{Weber98}
314: H. Weber, C. Ernst, M. Bleicher {\it et al.},
315: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 442}, 443 (1998).
316:
317: \bibitem{MT-prl}
318: E. L. Bratkovskaya {\it et al.},
319: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 032302 (2004)
320:
321: \bibitem{Bratkovskaya:2004kv}
322: E.~L.~Bratkovskaya {\it et al.},
323: %``Strangeness dynamics and transverse pressure in relativistic nucleus nucleus
324: %collisions,''
325: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 69}, 054907 (2004)
326: %[arXiv:nucl-th/0402026].
327: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0402026;%%
328:
329: \bibitem{Bravina}
330: L. V. Bravina {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 60}, 024904 (1999),
331: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 698}, 383 (2002).
332:
333: %\cite{Braun-Munzinger:1996mq,Braun-Munzinger:1998cg}
334: \bibitem{Braun-Munzinger:1996mq}
335: P.~Braun-Munzinger and J.~Stachel,
336: %``Probing the phase boundary between hadronic matter and the
337: %quark-gluon-plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions,''
338: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 606}, 320 (1996).
339: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9606017;%%
340:
341: %\cite{Braun-Munzinger:1998cg}
342: \bibitem{Braun-Munzinger:1998cg}
343: P.~Braun-Munzinger and J.~Stachel,
344: %``Dynamics of ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions with heavy beams: An
345: %experimental overview,''
346: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 638}, 3 (1998).
347: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 9803015;%%
348:
349: \bibitem{Cleymans}
350: J. Cleymans and K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 60}, 054908 (1999).
351:
352:
353: \bibitem{Fermi:1950jd} E.~Fermi, Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 5}, 570 (1950).
354:
355: \bibitem{Landau:gs} L.~D.~Landau, Izv.\ Akad.\ Nauk Ser.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 17}, 51 (1953).
356:
357: \bibitem{Belenkij:cd} S.~Z.~Belenkij and L.~D.~Landau, Usp.\ Fiz.\ Nauk {\bf 56}, 309 (1955).
358:
359: %\cite{Shuryak:1972zq}
360: \bibitem{Shuryak:1972zq}
361: E.~V.~Shuryak,
362: %``Multiparticle Production In High Energy Particle Collisions,''
363: Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 16}, 395 (1972).
364: %%CITATION = YAFIA,16,395;%%
365:
366:
367: \bibitem{Carruthers:dw} P.~Carruthers, Annals N.Y.Acad.Sci. 229, 91 (1974).
368:
369: \bibitem{Carruthers:ws} P.~Carruthers and M.~Doung-van, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 8}, 859 (1973).
370:
371: \bibitem{Carruthers:1981vs} P.~Carruthers, LA-UR-81-2221
372:
373: %\cite{Feinberg:1988et}
374: \bibitem{Feinberg:1988et}
375: E.~L.~Feinberg,
376: %``Initial State Formation In The Hydrodynamical Theory Of Nucleon Nucleon
377: %Collisions,''
378: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 38} (1988) 229.
379: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C38,229;%%
380:
381: %\cite{Stachel:1989pa}
382: \bibitem{Stachel:1989pa}
383: J.~Stachel and P.~Braun-Munzinger,
384: %``Stopping In High-Energy Nucleus Nucleus Collisions: Analysis In The Landau
385: %Hydrodynamic Model,''
386: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 216}, 1 (1989).
387: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B216,1;%%
388:
389: %\cite{Steinberg:2004vy}
390: \bibitem{Steinberg:2004vy}
391: P.~Steinberg,
392: %``Landau hydrodynamics and RHIC phenomena,''
393: arXiv:nucl-ex/0405022.
394: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0405022;%%
395:
396: \bibitem{Murray:2004gh} M.~Murray, arXiv:nucl-ex/0404007.
397:
398: \bibitem{Roland:2004} G. Roland, Talk presented at Quark Matter 2004, see proceedings.
399:
400: \bibitem{klay}
401: J.Klay {\it et al.} [E895 Collaboration], Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 68}, 054905 (2003)
402:
403: \bibitem{brahms}
404: I.G. Bearden {\it et al.} [Brahms Collaboration], Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. {\bf 94}, 162301 (2005)
405:
406: %\cite{Hung:1994eq}
407: \bibitem{Hung:1994eq}
408: C.~M.~Hung and E.~V.~Shuryak,
409: %``Hydrodynamics near the QCD phase transition: Looking for the longest lived
410: %fireball,''
411: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 4003 (1995)
412: [arXiv:hep-ph/9412360].
413: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9412360;%%
414:
415: %\cite{Rischke:1995pe}
416: \bibitem{Rischke:1995pe}
417: D.~H.~Rischke, Y.~Pursun, J.~A.~Maruhn, H.~Stoecker and W.~Greiner,
418: %``The phase transition to the quark-gluon plasma and its effects on
419: %hydrodynamic flow,''
420: Heavy Ion Phys.\ {\bf 1}, 309 (1995)
421: [arXiv:nucl-th/9505014].
422: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9505014;%%
423:
424: %\cite{Brachmann:1999mp}
425: \bibitem{Brachmann:1999mp}
426: J.~Brachmann, A.~Dumitru, H.~Stoecker and W.~Greiner,
427: %``The directed flow maximum near c(s) = 0,''
428: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A {\bf 8}, 549 (2000)
429: [arXiv:nucl-th/9912014].
430: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9912014;%%
431:
432: \bibitem{soft}
433: R. Hagedorn, Nuov. Cim. Suppl. 3, 147 (1965); J. Rafelski and R. Hagedorn, Bielefeld Symp., ed. H. Satz, pp. 253 (1980)
434: \end{thebibliography}
435: \end{document}
436: