1: \documentclass[aps,psfig,epsfig,preprint] {revtex4}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \usepackage{color}
4: \newcommand{\pr}{\prime}
5: \newcommand{\na}{\nabla}
6: \newcommand{\C}{\cdot}
7: \newcommand{\ep}{\epsilon}
8: \newcommand{\vep}{\varepsilon}
9: \newcommand{\vphi}{\varphi}
10: \newcommand{\integralp}{\int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}}
11: \newcommand{\commu}[2]{[#1, #2]}
12: \newcommand{\acommu}[2]{\{#1, #2\}}
13: \newcommand{\lraw}{\longrightarrow}
14: \newcommand{\llaw}{\longleftarrow}
15: \newcommand{\Gafunc}[1]{\Gamma(#1-\frac{D}{2})}
16: \newcommand{\quadiv}[1]{\frac{#1 N_c}{(4\pi)^{D/2}}
17: (\frac{\mu^2}{m^2})^{\epsilon/2}\Gafunc{1}}
18: \newcommand{\logdiv}[1]{\frac{#1 N_c}{(4\pi)^{D/2}}
19: (\frac{\mu^2}{m^2})^{\epsilon/2}\Gafunc{2}}
20: \newcommand{\LNc}[2]{\frac{#1 N_c}{#2(4\pi)^2}}
21: \newcommand{\pa}{\partial}
22: \newcommand{\intddp}[1]{\int {\frac{d^D p}{(2\pi)^D}}#1}
23: \newcommand{\intdp}[1]{\int {\frac{d^4 p}{(2\pi)^4}}#1}
24: \newcommand{\td}{\tilde}
25: \newcommand{\sla}[1]{\slash\!\!\! #1}
26: \newcommand{\sct}[1]{\over{|\hspace{#1 in}|}}
27: \def\qq{Q\!\!\!\! Q}
28: \begin{document}
29: \draft
30: \title{
31: {\normalsize \hskip4.2in USTC-ICTS-05-10} \\{\bf Spectroscopy of
32: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$-States in Quark Model and
33: Baryon-Antibaryon Enhancements}}
34: \author{Gui-Jun Ding$^{a}$}
35: \author{Jialun Ping$^{b}$}
36: \author{ Mu-Lin Yan$^{a}$}
37: %\thanks{Email address: mlyan@ustc.edu.cn; corresponding
38: %author.}
39:
40: \affiliation{\centerline{$^a$ Interdisciplinary Center for
41: Theoretical Study,} \centerline{University of Science and Technology
42: of China,Hefei, Anhui 230026, China} \centerline{$^b$Department of
43: Physics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210097, China }}
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46: We study the mass spectrum of the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$
47: mesons both from common $S$ wave quark model with colormagnetic
48: interactions, and from the quark model with triquark correlations.
49: Two cluster configurations $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$ and
50: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$ are
51: considered. In the spectrums of both models, we find rather stable
52: states which have the same quantum numbers as the particle
53: resonances which are corresponding to the $p\overline{p}$
54: enhancement, $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement and
55: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement with spin-$\mathbf{0}$ or
56: $\mathbf{1}$. This implies these enhancements are NOT experimental
57: artifacts. The color-spin-flavor structures of $p\overline{p}$,
58: $p\overline{\Lambda}$, and $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancements
59: are revealed. It has been found that if there exists quark
60: correlation in the baryonium, the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement as a
61: baryonium is mainly a state of
62: $|\bf{120}_{cs},\overline{\bf{6}}_c,\bf{2},\bf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\bf{6}}_f\rangle
63: |\overline{\bf{120}}_{cs},\bf{6}_c,\bf{2},\overline{\bf{3}}_f\oplus\bf{6}_f\rangle$
64: in the configuration
65: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$, with few
66: mixture of $|\bf{70}_{cs},\bf{8}_c,\bf{2},\bf{8}_f\rangle
67: |\overline{\bf{70}}_{cs},\bf{8}_c,\bf{2},\bf{8}_f\rangle$ in the
68: configuration $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$, where the
69: subscripts cs,~c and f indicate colorspin, color and flavor
70: respectively. The existence of spin-$\mathbf{1}$
71: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda},\; p\overline{\Lambda},\; p\overline{p}$
72: enhancements is predicted.
73:
74: PACS numbers: 12.38.-t, 12.39.Jh, 12.40.Yx
75: \end{abstract}
76: \maketitle
77: \section{introduction}
78: There has recently been renewed theoretical interest in hadronic
79: states composed of more exotic quark configurations than the usual
80: q$\overline{\mbox{q}}$ for mesons and qqq for baryons. The interests
81: has been stimulated by the experimental discovery of many exotic
82: states, e.g. $\Theta^{+}$, $D_{s}$(2317), X(3872)\cite{exotic}.
83: Moreover, in the recent years, some baryon-antibaryon invariant mass
84: threshold enhancements have been observed in experiments[2-8]. In
85: order to interpret the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement
86: experiment\cite{Bes1}, the authors of Ref.\cite{Datta} pointed out
87: that the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ baryonium states should
88: exist. This claim comes from analyzing the interaction among the
89: quarks(antiquarks) in terms of the colormagnetic hyperfine
90: interaction\cite{colormag}:
91: \begin{equation}
92: \label{0.1}H^{\prime}=-\sum_{i>j}C_{ij}\;\vec{\sigma}_{i}\cdot\vec{\sigma}_{j}\;
93: \vec{\lambda}_{i}\cdot\vec{\lambda}_{j}
94: \end{equation}
95: where $\vec{\sigma}$ and $\vec{\lambda}$ are the Pauli matrices and
96: Gell-Mann matrices, and the indices i and j run over all the
97: constituent quarks and antiquarks. This analysis has been further
98: studied by means of the chiral soliton model\cite{yan,ding}. And a
99: remarkable prediction on the baryonium's mesonic decays from this
100: picture in Ref.\cite{ding} has been supported by the recent BES
101: experiment\cite{Bes} significantly. In this case, because of both
102: the experiment prompt and lack of a systemic study of the
103: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system in the quark model with
104: colormagnetic interaction in the literature, we try to provide such
105: an investigation to the spectroscopy of the exotic
106: $(\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$ configurations in quark model in
107: this work.
108:
109:
110: The $p\overline{p}$ enhancement is observed in
111: $J/\psi\rightarrow\gamma p\overline{{p}}$ \cite{Bes1}\cite{Bes}, and
112: $\psi^{\prime}\rightarrow\pi^{0} p\overline{{p}},\eta
113: p\overline{{p}}$ \cite{Bes2}. The $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement
114: has been observed in $J/\psi\rightarrow p \overline{\Lambda}K^{-}$
115: and $\psi^{\prime}\rightarrow p \overline{\Lambda}K^{-}$
116: \cite{Bes3}. In B decays, $p\overline{p}$, $p\overline{\Lambda}$ and
117: $\Lambda \overline{\Lambda}$ enhancements also were observed, such
118: as $B^{\pm}\rightarrow p\overline{p} K^{\pm}$\cite{bell1},
119: $B^{0}\rightarrow p\overline{\Lambda}\pi^{-}$\cite{bell2},
120: $B^{+}\rightarrow\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}K^{+}$\cite{bell3}. In
121: Ref.\cite{Bes1}, the data of $p\overline{p}$ invariant mass
122: threshold enhancement has been fitted with the $S$ and $P$ wave
123: Breit-Wigner resonance function, and the enhancement has naively
124: been attributed to existence of a $(p\overline{p})$-baryonium
125: resonance. Namely, the enhancement corresponds to a baryonium
126: particle. The theoretical studies on this picture are in
127: Refs.\cite{Datta,interpretation1,yan,ding}, and an experiment
128: recheck on it is in Ref.\cite{Bes}. Noting that in order to fix the
129: total angular momentum of the baryoniums the partial wave analysis
130: has to be done, and the $S$ wave or $P$ wave data fit can not fix
131: the spin of the baryonium. For instance, even though the baronium is
132: fitted out by $S$ wave, the total angular momentum of it can still
133: be non-zero because quark's intrinsic spin is $\mathbf{1/2}$ and the
134: particle is a multiquark system. For the sake of illustrating
135: convenience, we will call the baryonium particle revealed by the
136: possible enhancement effect measurements as {\it
137: enhancement-baryonium}, or shortly {\it enhancement} hereafter.
138: There are many interesting phenomena and puzzles in the
139: baryon-antibaryon physics. In this paper, we mainly focus on these
140: exotic states observed in the baryon antibaryon final states.
141: Because the S wave fit is favored over the P wave fit , we do not
142: consider the radial excitations in enhancements, and the models used
143: in this paper are $S$ wave type quark models, i.e., the relative
144: angular momentum between any two quarks in the models is
145: $\mathbf{0}$.
146:
147: Because the baryoniums finally decay into a baryon octet state plus
148: an antibaryon octet state and
149: $\bf{8}_{f}\otimes\bf{8}_{f}=\bf{1}_f\oplus\bf{8}_f\oplus\bf{8}_f\oplus\bf{10}_f
150: \oplus\overline{\bf{10}}_f\oplus\bf{27}_f$, these enhancements can
151: only possibly belong to flavor $\bf{1}_f$-plet,
152: $\bf{8}_f$-plet,$\bf{10}_{f}$-plet,$\overline{\bf{10}}_{f}$-plet or
153: $\bf{27}_{f}$-plet. And the quantum numbers of the $p\overline{p}$
154: enhancement most possibly are $J^{PC}=0^{-+}$, so it must consist of
155: $\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}$, $\rm{q}^{3}\overline{\rm{q}}^3$,
156: $\rm{q}^{5}\overline{\rm{q}}^5$ and so on, if the relative angular
157: momentum between quarks equals $\mathbf{0}$ . They are not possibly
158: the ordinary mesonic states, then they at least are composed of
159: $\mathbf{3}$ quarks and $\mathbf{3}$ antiquarks. The theoretical
160: interpretation of thess exotic state is a great challenge and many
161: proposals have been suggested
162: \cite{Datta,interpretation1,yan,ding,interpretation2}. Some of them
163: studied one particular state \cite{Datta,yan,ding}, others propose
164: the possible nature of these states or the possible classification
165: of these baryon-antibaryon enhancements\cite{interpretation2}. In
166: this work, we discuss the possible states of the baryon-antibaryon
167: system (or the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system) and try to give
168: a unified interpretation of these baryon-antibaryon enhancements in
169: common quark model and in quark model with quark correlation. Since
170: all these states have been observed in charmonium decay and B decay,
171: it is possible that these states possess the same nature. It should
172: be interesting to interpret them in a uniform framework.
173: \par
174: Color plays important role in multiquark states. The configuration
175: of color is uniquely fixed in the usual q$\overline{\rm{q}} $ mesons
176: and baryons consisting of qqq. In the multiquark system, however,
177: the color degree of freedom is "unfrozen" and there exist a great
178: variety of color configurations to form color singlet states, e.g.,
179: in the system of the $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$, the two quark
180: can be either in color $\mathbf{\overline{3}}_c$ or $\mathbf{6}_c$
181: state combining with the two antiquarks in color $\mathbf{3}_c$ or
182: $\mathbf{\overline{6}}_c$ state to give a singlet\cite{colorch}.
183: Many works also have been done in exploring this point of view in
184: pentaquark study\cite{petcolor}. This "color chemistry" idea is very
185: fascinating. Even though the question that how to cluster the quarks
186: into diquark, triquark or other structures in the systems by means
187: of the fundamental QCD dynamics remains to be open so far, the
188: quark-correlation has been proved to be a very useful and important
189: conception in the physics of multiquark
190: state\cite{correlation,ding2}.
191:
192:
193: \par
194: We will first discuss this system in common quark model where 3
195: quarks and 3 antiquarks are in relative S wave and there is not
196: correlation among the quarks(antiquarks). Under the QCD requirement
197: that the baryoniums have to be in color singlets, the spectrum of
198: enhancement has been calculated, and the eigenstates are linear
199: combinations of states which are in different SU(6)$_{cs}$
200: representations. For the sake of completeness, we then discuss the
201: effect of quark correlation in the baryinoim. There are many
202: different ways to form color singlet for the
203: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system, and we expect the mesonic
204: states corresponding to the different color couplings between the
205: quark subsystems have different physical properties. We consider two
206: case in this work, the first case is the
207: $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$ configuration and another
208: configuration is
209: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$. We assume
210: the mass splitting is due to the colormagnetic interaction
211: \cite{colormag}, we also list the possible states and the mass
212: splitting in the two cases. Since the S wave fit is favored, we
213: assume the relative angular momentum of the three quarks(antiquarks)
214: in each cluster is zero, and the two clusters are also in relative S
215: wave.
216: \par
217: In this work we take a close look at the
218: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system in quark model with the mass
219: splitting due to colormagnetic hyperfine interaction, and we don't
220: consider the effect of $\rm{SU(3)}_f$ flavor symmetry breaking, and
221: the results are qualitatively correct.
222:
223: The paper is organized as followings: in the section II, we review
224: the description of colormagnetic hyperfine interaction between
225: quarks in hadrons and its application to the
226: $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$ system; Section III is devoted to
227: study the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system in common quark
228: model; In Section IV, we study two interesting configurations with
229: quark correlation: $ (\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$ and $
230: (\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\overline{\rm{q}}^2\rm{q})$; Finally,
231: we briefly summary the results and give some discussions. In
232: Appendix A, we show an example to deal with the mixing of different
233: SU(6)$_{cs}$ multiplets under colormagnetic interaction, and we also
234: list the matrix form of the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ in the subspace
235: expanded by the states with definite spin in each case in Appendix
236: B.
237:
238: \section{colormagnetic hyperfine interaction and its application to
239: the $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$ mesons}
240:
241: The spectroscopically important interaction between quarks(aside
242: from the interaction which provides the confinement and sets the
243: overall scale) is the spin-spin force mediated by one gluon
244: exchange. The interaction hamiltonian $H'$ between quarks is given
245: by Eq(\ref{0.1}). Generally the coefficients $C_{ij}$ are dependent
246: on the quark masses of flavor i and j and the properties of the
247: spatial wave functions of the quarks and the antiquarks in the
248: system and parameterize the strength of the interaction. Following
249: the common colormagnetic hyperfine studies in literature
250: \cite{jaffe1,petcolor}, we take $C_{ij}=C$ neglecting the breaking
251: of the flavor $\rm{SU(3)}_f$ symmetry. It is straightforward to
252: express the colormagnetic interaction in terms of the quadratic
253: Casimir operators of SU(2)$_{s}$, SU(3)$_{c}$ and SU(6)$_{cs}$ of
254: the total system, the quarks and the antiquarks,
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: \nonumber
257: H^{\prime}&=&C[8N+2C_{6}(tot)-\frac{4}{3}S_{tot}(S_{tot}+1)-2C_{3}(tot)+4C_{3}(Q)+\frac{8}{3}S_{Q}(S_{Q}+1)-4C_{6}(Q)\\
258: \label{1.2}&&+4C_{3}(\overline{Q})+\frac{8}{3}S_{\overline{Q}}(S_{\overline{Q}}+1)-4C_{6}(\overline{Q})]
259: \end{eqnarray}
260: Where C$_{3}$ and C$_{6}$ are the quadratic Casimir operator of the
261: SU(3)$_c$ and SU(6)$_{cs}$, $S$ is the spin, the labels Q,
262: $\overline{Q}$ and $tot$ refer to the quarks, antiquarks, and the
263: entire system respectively, and N is the total number of the quarks
264: and antiquarks in the system, for the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$
265: system $N=6$. The Casimir operators are normalized conventionally,
266: e.g. $C_{3}(3)=\frac{4}{3},C_{6}(6)=\frac{35}{6}$. Eigenstates of
267: total SU(6)$_{cs}$ for $\rm{q}^{3}\overline{\rm{q}}^{3}$ are
268: generally mixtures of the states with different color and spin
269: representations of quarks and antiquarks respectively, and the
270: colormagnetic interaction usually mixes states of different total
271: colorspin.
272:
273:
274: So far various systems has been discussed in quark model with
275: colormagnetic interaction. It was first considered in
276: Ref.\cite{colormag}, where it was applied to study the mass
277: splittings of the S wave color singlet q$\overline{\rm{q}}$ mesons
278: and $\rm{q}^3$ baryons, and it gives a good description of the
279: spectrums. And Jaffe studied the $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$
280: system and the $0^{+}$ mesonic states with mass bellow 1GeV, i.e.,
281: $a_0(980)$, $f_0(980)$ are identified as four quarks states
282: \cite{jaffe1}. Dibaryon( the $\rm{q}^6$ system ) also was discussed
283: \cite{q6}. Recently pentaquark (the $\rm{q}^4\overline{\rm{q}}$
284: system) has been widely studied in colormagnetic interaction models
285: \cite{petcolor}.
286:
287:
288: In order to clarify the notations and methods in the studies of
289: colomagnetic interaction, we briefly review Jaffe's works on
290: $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$\cite{jaffe1,jaffe2}. Because of the
291: Fermi statistics, the allowed states of the 2 quarks are
292: \begin{equation}
293: \label{aa1}|\mathbf{21}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle,
294: ~~~~|\mathbf{15}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_f\rangle
295: \end{equation}
296: The 2 antiquarks are in conjugate representations,
297: \begin{equation}
298: \label{aa2}|\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_f\rangle,
299: ~~~~|\overline{\mathbf{15}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
300: \end{equation}
301: where the first number in the bracket is the dimension of the
302: irreducible representation of $\rm{SU(6)}_{cs}$ and the second
303: number is the dimension of the irreducible representation of
304: $\rm{SU(3)}_{f}$. The physical $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$ states
305: are color singlets, and there are four combinations:
306: \begin{eqnarray}
307: \nonumber&&\mathbf{21}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs}=\mathbf{1}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{405}_{cs},~~
308: \rm{with\;\;flavor\;\;in\;}
309: \overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\otimes\mathbf{3}_f=\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\\
310: \nonumber&&\mathbf{15}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{15}}_{cs}=\mathbf{1}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{189}_{cs},~~
311: \rm{with\;\;flavor\;\;in\;}
312: \mathbf{6}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f=\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_{f}\oplus\mathbf{27}_{f}\\
313: \nonumber&&\mathbf{21}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{15}}_{cs}=\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{280}_{cs},~~
314: \rm{with\;\;flavor\;\;in\;}
315: \overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f=\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\\
316: \label{aa3}&&\mathbf{15}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs}=\overline{\mathbf{35}}_{cs}\oplus\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs},~~
317: \rm{with\;\;flavor\;\;in\;}
318: \mathbf{6}_f\otimes\mathbf{3}_f=\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{10}_{f}
319: \end{eqnarray}
320: The four sector's multiplets are not mixed by the colormagnetic
321: interaction.
322:
323: For the $\mathbf{21}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs}$ case,
324: the $SU(6)_{cs}$ decomposition with respect to $SU(3)_{c}\otimes
325: SU(2)_{s}$ reveals the following color singlets:
326: \begin{eqnarray}
327: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\subset\mathbf{1}_{cs}\\
328: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\
329: \label{aa4}&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})~\rm{and}~(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{405}_{cs}
330: \end{eqnarray}
331: The wavefunctions of the spin-$\mathbf{2}$ states
332: $|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle$
333: and spin-$\mathbf{1}$
334: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle$
335: respectively are,
336: \begin{eqnarray}
337: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle
338: =|(\mathbf{21}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{3};\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f,)(\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs},
339: \overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{3}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle\\
340: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle
341: =|(\mathbf{21}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{3};\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f,)(\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs},
342: \overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{3}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle\\
343: \end{eqnarray}
344: The corresponding colormagnetic interaction energy are
345: $\frac{32}{3}$ and $-16$ respectively. Here the wave function is
346: expressed in terms of the conventional notations\cite{notation}:
347: \begin{eqnarray*}
348: &&|D_{cs}(tot),D_c(tot),2S(tot)+1;D_{f}(tot)\rangle \\
349: &=&|(D_{cs}(Q),D_c(Q),2S(Q)+1;D_{f}(Q)),(D_{cs}(\overline{Q}),
350: D_c(\overline{Q}),2S(\overline{Q})+1;D_{f}(\overline{Q})),\\
351: &&D_c(tot),2S(tot)+1;D_f(tot)\rangle,
352: \end{eqnarray*}
353: where $D_{cs}(tot),D_{cs}(Q),D_{cs}(\overline{Q})$ denote the
354: dimension of the irreducible $SU(6)_{cs}$ representation of the
355: total system, the quarks, and the antiquarks respectively. And
356: similarly for the notations $D_c(id),D_f(id)$, the $id$ represents
357: $tot, Q ~\rm{or}~\overline{Q}$. $S(tot),S(Q),S(\overline{Q})$ are
358: respectively the spin of the total system, the quarks and the
359: antiquarks.
360:
361: The two spin-$\mathbf{0}$ states are linear combinations of
362: $(\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{1})\otimes(\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{1})$
363: with
364: $(\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{3})\otimes(\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{3})$,
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle=\sqrt{\frac{6}{7}}|(\mathbf{21}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{3};\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f,)(\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{3}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle\\
367: \nonumber&&+\sqrt{\frac{1}{7}}|(\mathbf{21}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{1};\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f,)(\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle\\
368: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle=\sqrt{\frac{1}{7}}|(\mathbf{21}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{3};\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f,)(\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{3}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle\\
369: \label{aa5}&&-\sqrt{\frac{6}{7}}|(\mathbf{21}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{1};\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f,)(\overline{\mathbf{21}}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle
370: \end{eqnarray}
371: The colormagnetic interaction mixes these two states, and the
372: eigenstates of $H'$ (Eq.(\ref{1.2})) are
373: \begin{eqnarray}
374: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle_1=0.972|\mathbf{1}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle+0.233|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle\\
375: \label{aa6}&&|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle_2=0.233|\mathbf{1}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle-0.972|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle
376: \end{eqnarray}
377: The colormagnetic interaction energies ( i.e. the eigenvalues of
378: $H'$ ) are -43.26 and -19.37 respectively. The color singlet states
379: and the corresponding colormagnetic energies for the other three
380: sectors in Eq.(\ref{aa3}) have also been derived in the same way by
381: Jaffe\cite{jaffe1}. Thus, the color singlet spectroscopy of
382: $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$ states in quark model has been
383: revealed. Among all of these multiplets, the nonet multiplet
384: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{3}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\rangle_1$
385: has the largest colormagnetic binding energy. Therefore, they are
386: the lightest states, and one can physically regard them as the
387: known $0^{+}$ nonet mesons below 1 GeV. All of these have been done
388: and be well known. An interesting question and task is how to extent
389: Jaffe's analysis on $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$-system in quark
390: model into the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$-system, and to explore
391: the corresponding physics. In the following of this paper, we
392: perform such an investigation.
393:
394: \section{the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3 $ system and the enhancement from the common quark
395: model}
396: %Since the enhancements are at least of the configuration
397: %$\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$, in the following we will follow
398: %Jaffe's methods and use the colormagnetic interaction to perform
399: %the similar analysis for the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system.
400: %This is a a generation of Jaffe's work on
401: %$\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$, and because of the experimental
402: %discovery of the enhancements,
403: Since the experimental discovery of the enhancements which can be
404: regarded as baryoniums, it is necessary to explore the
405: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system in the framework of
406: colormagnetic interaction. Now let us to extent the Jaffe's studies
407: on $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}^2$ system to
408: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ one. Due to the increase of a pair of
409: quark and antiquark, the dimension of the irreducible representation
410: will become rather large, and more techniques and skills of group
411: theory are needed for dealing with this multiquark system. The
412: calculations are rather lengthy. In order to ensure the correctness
413: of calculation results, we have checked each analytical group theory
414: derivations by the computer program calculations.
415: % meanwhile we have
416: %written the explicit form of colormagnetic interaction by
417: %substituting the Pauli matrices and the Gell-Mann matrices, written
418: %the explicit forms of the wave functions of the states in
419: %$\rm{flavor}\otimes \rm{color}\otimes \rm{spin}$ space, and finally
420: %did the same calculation by computer.
421: The results obtained by the two approaches are exactly the same.
422:
423: Similar to studying the usual $\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}$ meson and
424: $\rm{q}^3$ baryon from the common quark model, we study the
425: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3 $ system in the quark model in order to
426: understand the observed baryon antibaryon enhancements, and all
427: quarks are in relative S wave. The configuration is schematically
428: shown in Fig.3.
429:
430: Because of the Fermi statistics, the three quarks's state must be
431: antisymmetric in the combined wavefunctions of
432: flavor$\otimes$color$\otimes$spin$\otimes$space. Because the quarks
433: are in a relative S wave, the flavor$\otimes$color$\otimes$spin
434: wavefunction must be antisymmetric. Under the group
435: $\rm{SU(18)}\supset \rm{SU(6)}_{cs}\otimes \rm{SU(3)}_{f}\supset
436: \rm{SU(3)}_{c}\otimes \rm{SU(2)}_{s}\otimes \rm{SU(3)}_{f}$, the
437: three quarks must be in a completely antisymmetric state and it
438: therefore transform under the
439: $\frac{18\cdot17\cdot16}{3!}=\mathbf{816}$ dimensional irreducible
440: representation of SU(18). The reduction of the SU(18) irreducible
441: representation $\mathbf{816}$ with respect to
442: $\rm{SU(6)}_{cs}\otimes \rm{SU(3)}_{f}$ is \cite{group}
443: \begin{equation}
444: \label{2.1}\mathbf{816}=(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_f)+(\mathbf{56}_{cs},
445: \mathbf{1}_f)+(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_f),
446: \end{equation}
447: Here the notation is the same as Eq.(\ref{aa1}), and the allowed
448: states of the 3 quarks are
449: \begin{equation}
450: \label{2.11}|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\;\;
451: |\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_f\rangle,\;\;|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_f\rangle,\;\;
452: \end{equation}
453: And the 3 antiquarks are in conjugate representations,
454: \begin{equation}
455: \label{2.12}|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\;\;
456: |\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},
457: \mathbf{1}_f\rangle,\;\;|\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle.\;\;
458: \end{equation}
459: Next we combine the states of the 3 quarks in Eq.(\ref{2.11}) and
460: that of the 3 antiquarks in Eq.(\ref{2.12}) to obtain the states of
461: the total systems which is color singlet, in the following we
462: consider the allowed states of the total system and the
463: corresponding colormagnetic energy case by case. In the text, we
464: mainly list the results and illustrate calculation skills, and in
465: Appendix A, we take the mixing of the three spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
466: in the case of $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\mathbf{20}_{cs}$ as an
467: example in order to show how analytical calculations are performed
468: in details. In Appendix B, we write the explicit matrix form of the
469: interaction hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ in the subspace expanded by the
470: states of definite spin in each case, from which we can obtain the
471: eigenstates and the corresponding colormagnetic energies.
472: \begin{enumerate}
473: \item $\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}$
474:
475: From Eq.(\ref{2.11}) and Eq.(\ref{2.12}), the multiplets must be in
476: the flavor representation
477: $\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f=\mathbf{64}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{1}_f$,
478: from Fig.1(VI) we can see
479: \begin{equation}
480: \label{2.60}\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}=\mathbf{175}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{189}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{1}_{cs}
481: \end{equation}
482: The $\rm{SU}(6)_{cs}$ decomposition with respect to
483: $\rm{SU(3)}_c\otimes \rm{SU(2)}_s$ which are listed in Table VII and
484: Table VIII shows the following color singlet,
485: \begin{eqnarray}
486: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\subset\mathbf{1}_{cs}\\
487: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\
488: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\;\; \rm{and} \;\;(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7})\subset\mathbf{175}_{cs}\\
489: \label{2.61}&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\;\; \rm{and}
490: \;\;(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{189}_{cs}
491: \end{eqnarray}
492: In order to derive the mass splitting due to $H^{\prime}$ by using
493: Eq.(\ref{1.2}), we must know which representations of the
494: $\rm{SU(3)}_{c}$ and of $\rm{SU}(2)_{s}$ the quarks and antiquarks
495: in the system belong to. In the followings, we study the $H'$
496: eigenstates with spin-$\mathbf{3}$, -$\mathbf{1}$ and -$\mathbf{0}$
497: respectively, and their corresponding eigenvalues:
498:
499: $\mathbf{A)}$, The spin-$\mathbf{3}$ states
500: $|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\mathbf{\overline{10}}_f\rangle$
501: and the spin-$\mathbf{2}$ states
502: $|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\mathbf{\overline{10}}_f\rangle$
503: are trivial. The wavefunction of the former is
504: \begin{equation}
505: \label{2.62}|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_f),
506: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
507: \end{equation}
508: Since
509: \begin{eqnarray*}
510: &&C_6(tot)=C_6(\mathbf{175_{cs}})=24,\;S_{tot}=\mathbf{3},\;C_{3}(tot)=C_3(\mathbf{1_{c}})=0,\;\\
511: &&C_3(Q)=C_3(\mathbf{1_c})=0,\;S_{Q}=\frac{3}{2},\;C_6(Q)=C_6(\mathbf{20_{cs}})=\frac{21}{2},\;\\
512: &&C_3(\overline{Q})=C_3(\mathbf{1_{c}})=0,\;S_{\overline{Q}}=\frac{3}{2},\;C_6(\overline{Q})=C_6(\mathbf{\overline{20}_{cs}})=\frac{21}{2}.
513: \end{eqnarray*}
514: Substituting the above quantities into Eq.(\ref{1.2}), then we get
515: the corresponding colormagnetic energy $16C$. And the latter is
516: \begin{equation}
517: \label{2.63}|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_f),
518: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
519: \end{equation}
520: The corresponding SU(6) Casimir operator is
521: $C_6(tot)=C_6(\mathbf{189_{cs}})=20$, and the colormagnetic energy
522: is also 16C.
523:
524: $\mathbf{B)}$, The two spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
525: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
526: and
527: $|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
528: are linear combinations of the states
529: $|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
530: and
531: $|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},
532: \mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,
533: \mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$.
534: Following the method of the Appendix A, we can obtain
535: \begin{eqnarray}
536: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=\sqrt{\frac{5}{9}}|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}),
537: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
538: \nonumber&&-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle,\\
539: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}),
540: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
541: \label{2.64}&&-\sqrt{\frac{5}{9}}|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
542: \end{eqnarray}
543: These two states are mixed by the colormagnetic interaction
544: hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$,
545: \begin{eqnarray*}
546: &&H^{\prime}|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=\frac{16C}{9}(19|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-\sqrt{5}|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle)\\
547: &&H^{\prime}|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=\frac{16C}{9}(-\sqrt{5}|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+5|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle)
548: \end{eqnarray*}
549: From above, we can learn that the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ can be
550: written explicitly as the following matrix form in subspace expanded
551: by the two states,
552: \begin{equation}
553: \frac{16C}{9}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
554: 19&-\sqrt{5}\\
555: -\sqrt{5}&5
556: \end{array}\right)
557: \end{equation}
558: The eigenstates are
559: \begin{eqnarray}
560: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_{1}=0.988|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.154|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
561: \nonumber&&=0.839|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.544|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}),\\
562: \label{2.65}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle,\\
563: \nonumber&& \\
564: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_{2}=0.154|\mathbf{175}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.988|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
565: \nonumber&&=-0.544|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.839|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}),\\
566: \label{2.66}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
567: \end{eqnarray}
568: The corresponding colormagnetic energy are 34.397C and 8.269C.
569:
570: $\mathbf{C)}$, In the same way, we can calculate the mixing of two
571: spin-$\mathbf{0}$ states
572: $|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
573: and
574: $|\mathbf{1}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$.
575: The eigenstates are
576: \begin{eqnarray}
577: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_{1}=0.996|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.090|\mathbf{1}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
578: \nonumber&&=0.526|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.851|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}),\\
579: \label{2.67}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle,\\
580: \nonumber&& \\
581: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_{2}=0.090|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.996|\mathbf{1}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
582: \nonumber&&=-0.851|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.526|(\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}),\\
583: \label{2.68}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
584: \end{eqnarray}
585: The colormagnetic energy separately are 25.889C and -9.889C.
586:
587: \item $\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}$ and $\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}$
588:
589: The two multiplets are related by charge conjugation, and we discuss
590: the case of $\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}$,
591: the flavor represntation is
592: $\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f=\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f$,
593: and
594: \begin{equation}
595: \label{2.48}\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}=\mathbf{840}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{280}_{cs}
596: \end{equation}
597: The color singlets are as followings
598: \begin{eqnarray}
599: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\
600: \label{2.49}&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\subset\mathbf{840}_{cs}
601: \end{eqnarray}
602: The two wavefunctions
603: $|\mathbf{840}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
604: and
605: $|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
606: are trivial, and they are as follows
607: \begin{equation}
608: \label{2.50}|\mathbf{840}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),
609: \mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
610: \end{equation}
611: \begin{equation}
612: \label{2.51}|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),
613: \mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
614: \end{equation}
615: The colormagnetic energy respectively are 16C and $-\frac{32}{3}$C.
616: In the same way we can obtain the wavefunctions in the case of
617: $\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}$ by interchange
618: quarks and antiquarks in Eq.(\ref{2.50}) and Eq.(\ref{2.51}), and
619: the corresponding colormagnetic energy is invariant.
620:
621: \item $\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}$
622:
623: The multiplets belong to the flavor representation
624: $\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f=\mathbf{1}_f$, and
625: \begin{equation}
626: \label{2.52}\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}=\mathbf{2695}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{405}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{1}_{cs}
627: \end{equation}
628: The overall color singlets are as followings,
629: \begin{eqnarray}
630: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\subset\mathbf{1}_{cs}\\
631: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\
632: \nonumber&&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\;\;\rm{and} \;\;(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{405}_{cs} \\
633: \label{2.53}&& (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\;\;\rm{and}
634: \;\;(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7})\subset\mathbf{2695}_{cs}
635: \end{eqnarray}
636: $\mathbf{A)}$, The spin-$\mathbf{2}$ and spin-$\mathbf{3}$ states
637: are trivial, their wavefunctions separately are
638: \begin{equation}
639: \label{2.54}|\mathbf{2695}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),
640: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
641: \end{equation}
642: \begin{equation}
643: \label{2.55}|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),
644: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
645: \end{equation}
646: The corresponding colormagnetic energy separately are 16C and -16C.
647:
648: $\mathbf{B)}$, The two spin-$\mathbf{0}$ states
649: $|\mathbf{1}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
650: and
651: $|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
652: are linear combinations of the states
653: $|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),
654: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
655: and $|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),
656: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$.
657: By using the latter two states as base vectors, the matrix
658: representation of $H'$ can be derived explicitly (please see
659: Appendix B, Eq.(\ref{B7})). Thus, $H'$'s eigenstates read
660: \begin{eqnarray}
661: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{}1_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1=0.591|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
662: \label{2.56}&&+0.807|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle,\\
663: \nonumber&& \\
664: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{}1_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_2=0.807|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
665: \label{2.57}&&-0.591|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
666: \end{eqnarray}
667: The corresponding colormagnetic energy are -82.533C and -29.467C.
668:
669: $\mathbf{C)}$, The two spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
670: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
671: and
672: $|\mathbf{2695}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$(or
673: $|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),
674: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
675: $|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),
676: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$)
677: are mixed by the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$. The matrix representation
678: of $H^{\prime}$ in the space expanded by the latter two states
679: vector have been given by Eq.(\ref{B8}) in Appendix B, then the
680: eigenstates are
681: \begin{eqnarray}
682: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1=0.864|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
683: \label{2.58}&&+0.504|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle,\\
684: \nonumber&& \\
685: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_2=-0.504|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
686: \label{2.59}&&+0.864|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
687: \end{eqnarray}
688: the corresponding eigenvalue are -48.331C, -5.003C.
689:
690: \item $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}\;\;and\;\;\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}.$
691:
692: Similar to the case 2., the multiplets are related together by
693: charge conjugation, then we discuss
694: $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}$, and we can
695: easily obtain the results for
696: $\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$. The states can
697: belong to the flavor representation
698: $\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f=\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f$,
699: and
700: \begin{equation}
701: \label{2.39}\mathbf{70}_{cs}\oplus\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}=\mathbf{896}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{280}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{189}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}
702: \end{equation}
703: The overall color singlets are
704: \begin{eqnarray}
705: \nonumber&& (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\
706: \nonumber&& (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\;\;\rm{and}\;\;
707: (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{189}_{cs}\\
708: \nonumber &&(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\
709: \label{2.40}&& (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\;\;\rm{and}\;\;
710: (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{896}_{cs}
711: \end{eqnarray}
712: $\mathbf{A)}$, The spin-$\mathbf{0}$ states are trivial, its
713: wavefunctions are
714: \begin{equation}
715: \label{2.41}|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
716: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
717: \end{equation}
718: The colormagnetic energy is 8C.
719:
720: $\mathbf{B)}$, The three spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
721: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$,
722: $|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
723: and
724: $|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
725: are linear combinations of the states
726: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$,
727: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
728: and
729: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
730: (please see Appendix A for details),
731: \begin{eqnarray}
732: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
733: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
734: \nonumber&&-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
735: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
736: \nonumber&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle;\\
737: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
738: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
739: \nonumber&&-\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
740: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
741: \nonumber&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle;\\
742: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
743: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
744: \nonumber&&+\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
745: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
746: \label{2.42}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
747: \end{eqnarray}
748: These states are mixed by colormagnetic interaction $H^{\prime}$,
749: from above we can calculate the eigenstates
750: \begin{eqnarray}
751: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_1=0.841|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.536|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
752: \nonumber&&+0.069|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-0.684|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
753: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
754: \nonumber&&-0.693|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),
755: \mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.226|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
756: \label{2.43}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle,\\
757: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_2=0.156|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.364|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
758: \nonumber&&+0.918|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-0.422|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
759: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
760: \nonumber&&+0.629|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.653|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
761: \label{2.44}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle,\\
762: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_3=-0.518|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.762|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
763: \nonumber&&+0.389|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-0.595|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
764: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
765: \nonumber&&+0.351|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.723|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
766: \label{2.45}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
767: \end{eqnarray}
768: The colormagnetic energy respectively are 24.634C, -12.007C, 7.373C.
769: \par
770: $\mathbf{C)}$, For the two spin-$\mathbf{2}$ states
771: $|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
772: and
773: $|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$(
774: or
775: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$,
776: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$),
777: %are linear combinations of
778: %$|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
779: %and
780: %$|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle.$
781: similar to calculating the mixing of the 3 spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
782: in the above, we can obtain the following eigenstates,
783: \begin{eqnarray}
784: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_1=\frac{3}{5}|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
785: +\frac{4}{5}|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
786: \nonumber&&=-0.447|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.894|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
787: \label{2.46}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle,\\
788: \nonumber&& \\
789: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_2=-\frac{4}{5}|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
790: +\frac{3}{5}|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
791: \nonumber&&=-0.894|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.447|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
792: \label{2.47}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
793: \end{eqnarray}
794: The colormagnetic energy are respectively -4C, 16C. The wavefunction
795: for $\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$ can be
796: obtained by change quarks and antiquarks in the wavefunction
797: Eq.(\ref{2.41}), Eq.(\ref{2.43}-\ref{2.47}), and the corresponding
798: colormagnetic energy is the same.
799:
800: \item$\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}$ and $\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$.
801:
802: The multiplets are related by charge conjugation, so we only discuss
803: $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}$ and the results
804: for $\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$ can be
805: obtained by exchange quarks and antiquarks. Its flavor
806: representation is $\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f=\mathbf{8}_f$,
807: The calculation is analogous to that of
808: $\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}$, and
809: \begin{equation}
810: \label{2.31}\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}=\mathbf{3200}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{405}_{cs}\oplus\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}
811: \end{equation}
812: with color singlets as followings from Table VII and Table VIII,
813: \begin{eqnarray}
814: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_{c},\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{35}_{cs} \\
815: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_{c},\mathbf{3})\subset\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs} \\
816: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_{c},\mathbf{1})\;\; \rm{and}\;\; (\mathbf{1}_{c},\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{405}_{cs} \\
817: \label{2.32} && (\mathbf{1}_{c},\mathbf{3})\;\; \rm{and}\;\;
818: (\mathbf{1}_{c},\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{3200}_{cs}
819: \end{eqnarray}
820: We study each spin states respectively:
821:
822: $\bf{A}$), The spin-$\mathbf{0}$ state is simple, Its wave function
823: is
824: \begin{equation}
825: \label{2.33}|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
826: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),
827: \mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
828: \end{equation}
829: The colormagnetic energy is $-24C$.
830:
831: $\mathbf{B}$), The three spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
832: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\hskip-0.15in\otimes\hskip-0.15in\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
833: $|\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\hskip-0.1in\otimes\hskip-0.1in\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
834: and
835: $|\mathbf{3200}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\hskip-0.1in\otimes\hskip-0.1in\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
836: ( or
837: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},
838: \overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\hskip-0.1in\otimes\hskip-0.1in\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
839: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};
840: \mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
841: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};
842: \mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$)
843: %are linear combinations of the direct product states
844: %$|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},
845: %\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\hskip-0.1in\otimes\hskip-0.1in\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
846: %$|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};
847: %\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
848: %and
849: %$|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};
850: %\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$.
851: are mixed by the interaction $H^{\prime}$, and the matrix form of
852: $H'$ is Eq.(\ref{B4}). The eigenstates are
853: \begin{eqnarray}
854: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1=0.416|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
855: \nonumber&&-0.670|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
856: \label{2.34}&&-0.615|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle,\\
857: \nonumber&& \\
858: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_2=0.732|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
859: \nonumber&&+0.648|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
860: \label{2.35}&&-0.212|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle,\\
861: \nonumber&& \\
862: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_3=0.540|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
863: \nonumber&&-0.362|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
864: \label{2.36}&&+0.760|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
865: \end{eqnarray}
866: The corresponding eigenvalues are $-45.078C,\; -14.477C,\; 7.555C $.
867:
868: $\mathbf{C}$), The two spin-$\mathbf{2}$ states
869: $|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
870: and
871: $|\mathbf{3200}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
872: are linear combinations of the states
873: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
874: and
875: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$.
876: $H'$'s matrix form is Eq.(\ref{B5}), and the eigenstates are
877: \begin{eqnarray}
878: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1=0.845|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
879: \label{2.37}&&+0.535|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle,\\
880: \nonumber&& \\
881: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_2=-0.535|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle\\
882: \label{2.38}&&+0.845|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
883: \end{eqnarray}
884: The corresponding eigenvalues are $16C$ and $-12C$. The eigenstates
885: for $\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$ can be
886: obtained by interchanging the quarks and the antiquarks, and the
887: corresponding eigenvalues are the same as those of
888: $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}$.
889:
890: \item $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$.
891:
892: Since
893: $\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f=\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f
894: \oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$,
895: the multiplets can be in flavor $\mathbf{1}_f$-plet,
896: $\mathbf{8}_f$-plet, $\mathbf{10}_f$-plet,
897: $\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f$-plet or $\mathbf{27}_f$-plet. From
898: Fig.1(I) we can see
899: \begin{equation}
900: \label{2.13}\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}=\mathbf{3675}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{405}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{280}_{cs}
901: \oplus\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{189}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{1}_{cs}
902: \end{equation}
903: The $\rm{SU}(6)_{cs}$ decomposition with respect to
904: $\rm{SU(3)}_c\otimes \rm{SU(2)}_s$ which are listed in Table VII and
905: Table VIII shows the following color singlet,
906: \begin{eqnarray}
907: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\subset\mathbf{1}_{cs}\\
908: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{35}_{cs}\;\;(\rm{there}\;\; \rm{exist}\;\; \rm{two}\;\;\mathbf{35}_{cs}-\rm{plets} )\\
909: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\;\; \rm{and} \;\;(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{189}_{cs}\\
910: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\
911: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\subset\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs}\\
912: \nonumber && (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1})\;\; \rm{and}
913: \;\;(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5})\subset\mathbf{405}_{cs}\\
914: \label{2.14} &&
915: (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5})\;\;\rm{and}\;\;
916: (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7})\subset\mathbf{3675}_{cs}
917: \end{eqnarray}
918:
919: {\bf A}), the spin-$\mathbf{3}$ eigenstates, since the
920: SU$_c$(3)$\otimes$ SU$_s$(2) decomposition of $\mathbf{70}_{cs}$ is
921: $\mathbf{70}_{cs}=(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2})+(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4})+(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})+(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2})$,
922: it is straightforward to get the wave function of the system with
923: spin-$\mathbf{3}$ :
924: \begin{equation}
925: \label{2.15}|\mathbf{3675}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle=|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
926: (\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
927: \mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle.
928: \end{equation}
929: By the Eq.(\ref{1.2}), the corresponding colormagnetic energy is
930: $16C$.
931:
932: {\bf B}), the spin-$\mathbf{2}$ eigenstates: The three
933: spin-$\mathbf{2}$ states
934: $|\mathbf{3675}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
935: $|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
936: and
937: $|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
938: are linear combinations of
939: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
940: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\\(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
941: and $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
942: (\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),$
943: $\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
944: but they are mixed by the colormagnetic interaction hamiltonian
945: $H^{\prime}$, and $H^{\prime}$ can be expressed as the matrix
946: Eq.(\ref{B1}) in the subspace expanded by the latter three states,
947: diagonalizing this matrix, we can obtain the eigenstates and
948: eigenvalues.
949: %\begin{equation}
950: %\label{2.16} \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
951: %0&-4\sqrt{2}&\;\;-4\sqrt{2}\\
952: %-4\sqrt{2}&4&-12\\
953: %-4\sqrt{2}&-12&4
954: %\end{array}\right)
955: %\end{equation}
956: The eigenstates are
957: \begin{eqnarray}
958: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1=-0.707|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
959: \label{2.17}&&+0.707|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
960: \nonumber&& \\
961: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2=-0.526|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
962: \nonumber&&-0.602|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
963: \label{2.18}&&-0.602|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
964: \nonumber&& \\
965: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_3=0.851|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
966: \nonumber&&-0.372|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
967: \label{2.19}&&-0.372|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle
968: \end{eqnarray}
969: And the corresponding eigenvalues are $16C,\; -12.944C,\; 4.944C$.
970:
971: {$\mathbf{C}$}), the spin-$\mathbf{1}$ eigenstates: The six
972: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
973: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$,
974: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2$,
975: $|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
976: $|\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
977: $|\mathbf{3675}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$
978: and
979: $|\mathbf{3675}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2$
980: are linear combination of the six direct product states
981: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
982: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
983: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
984: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
985: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
986: and
987: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$.
988: Noting that there are two $\mathbf{35}_{cs}$ in the outer product of
989: $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$, the states
990: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$
991: and
992: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2$
993: represent the two states respectively belonging to the two
994: $\mathbf{35}_{cs}$. ($\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}$) appears twice in the
995: decomposition of $\mathbf{3675}_{cs}$, then the states
996: $|\mathbf{3675}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$
997: and
998: $|\mathbf{3675}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2$
999: denote the two states corresponding to the two
1000: ($\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}$) respectively. Once again the states of
1001: definite spin and $\rm{SU(6)}_{cs}$ representation are mixed by
1002: $H^{\prime}$. By using the matrix representation of $H^{\prime}$,
1003: i.e., Eq.(\ref{B2}),
1004: %\begin{equation}
1005: %\label{2.20} \left(\begin{array}{cccccc}
1006: %\frac{32}{3}&-\frac{20\sqrt{2}}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{5}}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{5}}{3}&-\frac{8\sqrt{5}}{3}&0\\
1007: %-\frac{20\sqrt{2}}{3}&-\frac{32}{3}&-\frac{4\sqrt{10}}{3}&-\frac{4\sqrt{10}}{3}& 4\sqrt{10}&\frac{8\sqrt{5}}{3}\\
1008: %\frac{16\sqrt{5}}{3}&-\frac{4\sqrt{10}}{3}&-\frac{20}{3}&-4&-\frac{8}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{2}}{3}\\
1009: %\frac{16\sqrt{5}}{3}&-\frac{4\sqrt{10}}{3}&-4&-\frac{20}{3}&-\frac{8}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{2}}{3}\\
1010: %-\frac{8\sqrt{5}}{3}&4\sqrt{10}&-\frac{8}{3}&-\frac{8}{3}&-\frac{8}{3}&\frac{8\sqrt{2}}{3}\\
1011: %0&\frac{8\sqrt{5}}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{2}}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{2}}{3}&\frac{8\sqrt{2}}{3}&-16
1012: %\end{array}\right)
1013: %\end{equation}
1014: the eigenstates are
1015: \begin{eqnarray}
1016: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1=0.2|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1017: \nonumber&&-0.324|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1018: \nonumber&&-0.461|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1019: \nonumber&&-0.461|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1020: \nonumber&&+0.013|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1021: \label{2.21}&&+0.656|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1022: \nonumber&& \\
1023: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2=-0.750|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1024: \nonumber&&+0.363|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1025: \nonumber&&-0.303|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1026: \nonumber&&-0.303|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1027: \nonumber&&+0.349|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1028: \label{2.22}&&-0.025|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1029: \nonumber&& \\
1030: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_3=-0.274|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1031: \nonumber&&-0.764|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1032: \nonumber&&+0.184|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1033: \nonumber&&+0.184|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1034: \nonumber&&+0.521|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1035: \label{2.23}&&-0.044|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1036: \nonumber&& \\
1037: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_4=0.482|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1038: %\nonumber&&-0.763919|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1039: \nonumber&&-0.323|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1040: \nonumber&&-0.323|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1041: \nonumber&&+0.431|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1042: \label{2.24}&&-0.610|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1043: \nonumber&& \\
1044: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_5=-0.299|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1045: \nonumber&&-0.424|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1046: \nonumber&&-0.239|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1047: \nonumber&&-0.239|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1048: \nonumber&&-0.649|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1049: \label{2.25}&& -0.441|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1050: \nonumber&& \\
1051: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_6=-0.707|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1052: \label{2.26}&&+0.707|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle
1053: %\nonumber&&-0.648606|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1054: %\nonumber&& -0.441426|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1055: \end{eqnarray}
1056: Their corresponding eigenvalues are $-29.461C,\; 27.631C,\;
1057: -20.293C,\; -10.667C,\; 3.456C,\\ -2.667C $ respectively.
1058:
1059: ${\mathbf{D}})$, the spin-$\mathbf{0}$ eigenstates: similarly the
1060: four spin-$\mathbf{0}$ states
1061: $|\mathbf{1}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
1062: $|\mathbf{189}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
1063: $|\mathbf{405}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
1064: $|\mathbf{3675}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
1065: are linear combination of the four states
1066: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
1067: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
1068: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
1069: and
1070: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$.
1071: $H'$'s matrix form is Eq.(\ref{B3}), thus the eigenstates are
1072: \begin{eqnarray}
1073: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1=0.394|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1074: \nonumber&&+0.604|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1075: \nonumber&&-0.576|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1076: \label{2.27}&&-0.384|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1077: \nonumber&& \\
1078: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2=-0.725|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1079: %\nonumber&&+0.603879|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1080: \nonumber&&-0.649|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1081: \label{2.28}&&+0.229|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1082: \nonumber&& \\
1083: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_3=0.371|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1084: \nonumber&&+0.232|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1085: \nonumber&&-0.099|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1086: \label{2.29}&&+0.894|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,\\
1087: \nonumber&& \\
1088: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_4=0.425|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1089: \nonumber&&-0.763|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1090: \nonumber&&-0.487|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle\\
1091: \label{2.30}&&-0.033|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle
1092: \end{eqnarray}
1093: The eigenvalues are $-45.547C,\; 16C,\; -12.671C,\; 2.218C$
1094: respectively.
1095:
1096:
1097:
1098:
1099:
1100: \par
1101: ~~~Finally, as a matter of convenience, we list all the QCD-allowed
1102: states (i.e., color singlets) and their colormagnetic energy in the
1103: Table I. From this Table, we learned at first that the
1104: configurations corresponding to the
1105: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda},\;p\overline{\Lambda},\;p\overline{p},
1106: \;\cdots$ enhancements can have rather large negative colormagnetic
1107: energy. This indicates that these states should be visible in
1108: experiments, and therefore these results are consistent with the
1109: experiments reported in Ref.[2-8]. Secondly, we can see also that
1110: the binding colormagnetic energy of spin-$\mathbf{0}$ and
1111: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states are larger than ones of the states with
1112: spin-$\mathbf{2}$ and spin-$\mathbf{3}$.
1113: \par
1114: ~~~Specifically, and more concretely,
1115: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1$(the wave
1116: function is Eq.(\ref{2.56})) has the largest colormagnetic energy
1117: -82.533C, and it has the same quantum numbers with the
1118: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement \cite{bell3}, so this state
1119: possibly is just the candidate $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$
1120: enhancement. And the state
1121: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1$ with the wave
1122: function Eq.(\ref{2.58}) has colormagnetic energy -48.331C, then
1123: this state is also rather stable. This spin-$\mathbf{1}$
1124: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement as a prediction is expected
1125: to be observed by BES, Bell or CLEO in future. By similar analysis,
1126: the colormagnetic interaction energy of the state
1127: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$(the wave
1128: function is Eq.(\ref{2.27})) is $-45.547C$, and the $p\overline{p}$
1129: enhancement\cite{Bes1,Bes2} should belong to these states. Since the
1130: colormagnetic energy of the proton or antiproton is $-8C$ (please
1131: see Table II), we can estimate that the mass defect of the
1132: $p\overline{p}$ enhancement approximately is $29.547C$ which is
1133: compatible with the experimental observation, that the
1134: $p\overline{p}$ enhancement is bellow the threshold. Also we see
1135: that the states
1136: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$ whose wave
1137: function is Eq.(\ref{2.21}) has colormagnetic energy -29.461C, so
1138: these states could also be seen experimentally. Therefore we
1139: conjecture that both the spin-$\mathbf{0}$ and spin-$\mathbf{1}$
1140: $p\overline{p}$ enhancement may have been observed by
1141: BES\cite{Bes1,Bes2}. The states
1142: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$(the wave
1143: function is given by Eq.(\ref{2.33})) has colormagnetic energy -24C,
1144: and the $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement\cite{Bes3,bell2} can
1145: belong to these states. However the states
1146: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1$ whose wave
1147: function is given by Eq.(\ref{2.34}) has colormagnetic energy
1148: -45.078C, which is larger than the colormagnetic energy of the state
1149: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$, so it
1150: indicates that the vector $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement may be
1151: favored over the scalar one. Because the $p\overline{\Lambda}$
1152: enhancement has been seen in the process $J/\psi\rightarrow
1153: p\overline{\Lambda}K^{-}$ and $\psi^{\prime}\rightarrow
1154: p\overline{\Lambda}K^{-}$, and $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ are
1155: vector mesons, $K^{-}$ is a pseudoscalar meson, the relative angular
1156: momentum between $K^-$ and the $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement
1157: $l=0$ is favored, if the $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement is a
1158: vector state. We also conjecture that both the spin-$\mathbf{0}$ and
1159: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement has been
1160: observed by BES but the main content is spin-$\mathbf{1}$
1161: $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement.
1162: \par
1163: %\begin{widetext}
1164: \begin{table}
1165: \begin{center}
1166: \caption{Colormagnetic interaction energy of
1167: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ eigenstates in common quark model, and
1168: the conjugates states are not included. }
1169: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline\hline
1170: State& Wave Function& Colormagnetic &State & Wave Function& Colormagnetic \\
1171: & &Interaction Energy & & &Interaction Energy\\\hline \hline
1172: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.27})&-45.547C&$|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.28})&16C\\\hline
1173: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_3$&Eq.(\ref{2.29})&-12.671C&$|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_4$&Eq.(\ref{2.30})&2.218C\\\hline
1174: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.33})&-24C&$|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.41})&8C\\\hline
1175: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.50})&16C&$|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.56})&-82.533C\\\hline
1176: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.57})&-29.467C&$|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.67})&25.889C\\\hline
1177: $|\mathbf{1},\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.68})&-9.889C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.21})&-29.461C\\\hline
1178: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.22})&27.631C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_3$&Eq.(\ref{2.23})&-20.293C\\\hline
1179: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_4$&Eq.(\ref{2.24})&-10.667C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_5$&Eq.(\ref{2.25})&3.456C\\\hline
1180: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_6$&Eq.(\ref{2.26})&-2.667C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.34})&-45.078C\\\hline
1181: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.35})&-14.477C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_3$&Eq.(\ref{2.36})&7.555C\\\hline
1182: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.43})&24.634C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.44})&-12.007C\\\hline
1183: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_3$&Eq.(\ref{2.45})&7.373C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.51})&$-\frac{32}{3}$C\\\hline
1184: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.58})&-48.331C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.59})&-5.003C\\\hline
1185: $|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.65})&34.397C&$|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.66})&8.269C\\\hline
1186: $|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.17})&16C&$|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.18})&-12.944C\\\hline
1187: $|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle_3$&Eq.(\ref{2.19})&4.944C&$|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.37})&16C\\\hline
1188: $|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.38})&-12C&$|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_1$&Eq.(\ref{2.46})&-4C\\\hline
1189: $|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_2$&Eq.(\ref{2.47})&16C&$|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.55})&-16C\\\hline
1190: $|\mathbf{5},\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.63})&16C&$|\mathbf{7},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.15})&16C\\\hline
1191: $|\mathbf{7},\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.54})&16C&$|\mathbf{7},\mathbf{10}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$&Eq.(\ref{2.62})&16C\\\hline\hline
1192: \end{tabular}
1193: \end{center}
1194: \end{table}
1195: \end{enumerate}
1196: %\end{widetext}
1197:
1198: \section{the interesting configurations}
1199: Quark correlation turns out to play important role in multiquark
1200: states \cite{correlation,ding2}, so we consider the effect of quark
1201: correlation in the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system. Generally
1202: in the $\rm{q}^{3}\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ system there are many
1203: possible configuration: $(\rm{q})-(\rm{q}^{2}\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$,
1204: $(\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$,
1205: $(\rm{q}^{2})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$,
1206: $(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}^{2}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$,
1207: $(\overline{\rm{q}}^2)-(\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}})$,
1208: $(\rm{q}^{3})-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$,
1209: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$ and so on.
1210: In this paper, we only consider the symmetric configurations: $
1211: (\rm{q}^{3})-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$,
1212: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$, where
1213: under the changes $\rm{q}\leftrightarrow \overline{\rm{q}}$, the
1214: $1^{st}$-cluster and $2^{nd}$-cluster interchange each other. The
1215: reasons why we choose these configuration are both because triquark
1216: correlation has been proved to be important in
1217: pentaquark\cite{correlation}, and because the configurations are
1218: more symmetric than others. The cluster structure is postulated
1219: instead of being established by a dynamical calculation. But with
1220: the development of lattice QCD, we could study which configurations
1221: are more stable than others through lattice numerical
1222: calculations\cite{jaffe2}. It is assumed the two clusters are
1223: separated by a distance larger than the range of the colormagnetic
1224: force which is of short range and are kept together by the
1225: colorelectric force. Consequently, the colormagnetic hyperfine
1226: interaction operates only within each cluster, but is not felt
1227: between them.
1228: \par
1229: Each cluster can be in a variety of SU(3)$_{c}$ representations, and
1230: eventually two clusters together form the color singlet physical
1231: baryonium state. However, if two clusters are
1232: color singlets respectively, they will interact only via
1233: the van der Waal's force of QCD and will dissociate immediately into
1234: a baryon and a antibaryon, or be bound very weakly to form a very
1235: unstable particle which can not be regarded as a narrow resonance of
1236: baronium that responds to the enhancement.
1237:
1238: If the two clusters are connected via the color triplet bonds, the
1239: creation of a $\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}$ pair permits the system to
1240: break up into two separate states which are color singlet. So the
1241: lifetime of the state is comparable to that of the excited
1242: $\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}$ meson states or excited qqq baryon states,
1243: and the decay width is larger than 100 MeV, since the ordinary meson
1244: or baryon states are also bound together by color triplet
1245: bond\cite{petcolor,jaffe1}. In Jaffe's language\cite{jaffe1} the
1246: process is superallowed if it is heavy enough. Therefore, for our
1247: purpose, we only consider the configurations that the two clusters
1248: are separately in higher dimensional SU(3)$_{c}$ representation,
1249: such as the
1250: $\mathbf{15}_{c}-\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c$,$\mathbf{10}_{c}-\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c$,
1251: $\mathbf{8}_{c}-\mathbf{8}_c$,
1252: $\mathbf{6}_{c}-\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c$ configurations.
1253:
1254:
1255: \subsection{The $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$ Configuration}
1256: The configuration is schematically shown in Fig.4, from
1257: Eq.(\ref{2.11}) we see that the allowed states of the $\rm{q}^{3}$
1258: cluster are
1259: \begin{equation}
1260: \label{r2.1}|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_f\rangle,~~|\mathbf{50}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_f\rangle,~~|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_f\rangle
1261: \end{equation}
1262: The $\rm{SU(6)}_{cs}$ irreducible representation $\mathbf{70}_{cs}$,
1263: $\mathbf{56}_{cs}$, $\mathbf{20}_{cs}$ are decomposed as follows
1264: under $\rm{SU(3)}_{c}\otimes \rm{SU(2)}_{s}$
1265: \begin{eqnarray}
1266: \nonumber
1267: \mathbf{70}_{cs}&=&(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2})+(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4})
1268: +(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})+(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2}),\\
1269: \nonumber \mathbf{56}_{cs}&=&(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4})+(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2}),\\
1270: \label{2.2}
1271: \mathbf{20}_{cs}&=&(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})+(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4}),
1272: \end{eqnarray}
1273: where the first and the second numbers in the bracket are
1274: respectively the irreducible representations of $\rm{SU(3)}_{c}$ and
1275: $\rm{SU(2)}_{s}$. By using the conventional notation $ |
1276: D_{cs},D_c,2S+1;D_f \rangle$ to express the states, the possible
1277: states of the $\rm{q}^3$ cluster are
1278: \begin{eqnarray}
1279: \nonumber
1280: &&|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1281: |\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,
1282: \;\;\;
1283: |\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,
1284: \;\;\;
1285: |\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,
1286: \;\;\;
1287: |\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;\\
1288: \label{2.3}&&
1289: |\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle,
1290: \;\;\;
1291: |\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle,
1292: \;\;\;
1293: |\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle.
1294: \;\;\;
1295: \end{eqnarray}
1296: Noting the symmetry group of both color and flavor are SU(3), we use
1297: a subscript c and f to distinguish them.
1298: Similarly the possible states of $\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ cluster are
1299: \begin{eqnarray}
1300: \nonumber
1301: &&|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1302: |\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1303: |\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1304: |\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1305: |\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;\\
1306: \label{2.4}&&
1307: |\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1308: |\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1309: |\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle\;\;\;
1310: \end{eqnarray}
1311: where $\mathbf{20}_{cs}=\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}$.
1312:
1313: The above states are eigenstates of the colormagnetic interaction
1314: hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$, and we can calculate the corresponding
1315: eigenvalues, the results are listed in Table II.
1316: \begin{table}[hptb]
1317: \begin{center}
1318: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|}\hline\hline
1319: States & Eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$\\\hline
1320: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle
1321: \;\; (\;\rm{or}
1322: |\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle
1323: \;)\;\;$& 4C\\\hline
1324: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1325: |\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle
1326: \;)\;\;$& 2C\\\hline
1327: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1328: |\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle
1329: \;)\;\;$& -2C\\\hline
1330: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1331: |\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle
1332: \;)\;\;$& -8C\\\hline
1333: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1334: |\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle
1335: \;)\;\;$& -4C\\\hline
1336: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1337: |\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle
1338: \;)\;\;$& -14C\\\hline
1339: $|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1340: |\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle
1341: \;)\;\;$& 10C\\\hline
1342: $|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1343: |\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle
1344: \;)\;\;$& 8C\\\hline\hline
1345: \end{tabular}
1346: \caption{The possible states of the cluster $\rm{q}^{3}$ and the
1347: corresponding eigenvalues of the colormagnetic interaction hamiliton
1348: $H^{\prime}$ } \label{t1}
1349: \end{center}
1350: \end{table}
1351:
1352: From Eq.(\ref{2.3}) we can learn that the color singlet states
1353: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$
1354: and
1355: $|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle$
1356: are the usual baryon octet and baryon decuplet respectively, and
1357: from Table II, their mass difference is $16C$,
1358: % so $C$ is approximately as
1359: %\begin{equation}
1360: %\label{2.5} C=\frac{m_{\Delta}-m_{N}}{16}\approx18.3\rm{MeV}.
1361: %\end{equation}
1362: The states of the total system are the product of the subsystem
1363: $\rm{q}^{3}$'s states Eq.(\ref{2.3}) and the subsystem
1364: $\overline{\rm{q}}^3$'s states Eq.(\ref{2.4}). It is obvious that
1365: the system can be in the states
1366: \begin{eqnarray}
1367: \nonumber
1368: &&|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1369: |\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle\\
1370: \label{2.6}&&
1371: |\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle,\;\;\;
1372: |\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle
1373: \end{eqnarray}
1374: Their colormagnetic energy is $( -16C, 0, 0, 16C )$. In the above
1375: four states the two clusters are connected by color singlet bond.
1376: They easily dissociate into a baryon and an antibaryon just as we
1377: mentioned in the above, so we do not discuss these states further.
1378: We are interested in the states in which the two clusters are
1379: connected by color $\mathbf{10}$-plet bond or color
1380: $\mathbf{8}$-plet bond. It is easy to write out the possible states
1381: of this system, to reveal their flavor structure and the spin
1382: structure, and to calculate colormagnetic interaction energy. The
1383: results are listed in the Table III. We address that the clusters in
1384: these states are with color, and can not be observed individually,
1385: but the combines of them may be colorless and emerge as baryoniums.
1386: Using the results in the Table III, the discussions on enhancement
1387: are in order:
1388:
1389:
1390:
1391: \begin{table}[hptb]
1392: \begin{center}
1393: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}\hline\hline
1394: States of the Total System & SU$_{f}$(3) Structure & the Spin
1395: Structure& the Mass Splitting \\\hline
1396: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus
1397: \mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&8C\\\hline
1398: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_f$&$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&0\\\hline
1399: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus
1400: \mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}$&4C\\\hline
1401: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus
1402: \mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$&$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&0\\\hline
1403: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_f$&$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&-12C\\\hline
1404: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f$&$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&12C\\\hline
1405: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus
1406: \mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$&$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&0\\\hline
1407: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus
1408: \mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&-4C\\\hline
1409: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&-16C\\\hline
1410: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&8C\\\hline
1411: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_f$&$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&0\\\hline
1412: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{1}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}$&-8C\\\hline
1413: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_{f}$&$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&-12C\\\hline
1414: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_{f}$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&-16C\\\hline
1415: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{1}_{f}$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&-28C\\\hline
1416: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle$&$\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&-4C\\\hline
1417: $|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{10}_f+\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\mathbf{35}_f$&$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&12C\\\hline
1418: $|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\mathbf{35}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&8C\\\hline
1419: $|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{10}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&-4C\\\hline
1420: $|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle$&$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\mathbf{64}_f$&$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&20C\\\hline\hline
1421: \end{tabular}
1422: \caption{The allowed states of the total system in the configuration
1423: $(\rm{q}^{3})-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$ and the mass splitting.}
1424: \label{t2}
1425: \end{center}
1426: \end{table}
1427:
1428: \begin{enumerate}
1429:
1430: \item
1431: $\Lambda_1\overline{\Lambda}_1 $enhancement: From the Table III, we
1432: can see that the state
1433: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle$
1434: with flavor $\mathbf{1}_f$ and spin equaling $\mathbf{0}$ or
1435: $\mathbf{1}$ have the largest colormagnetic energy $-28C$, so this
1436: quark configuration is rather stable. Since the two clusters are all
1437: in flavor $\mathbf{1}_f$, they are of flavor $\Lambda_1$ ,
1438: $\overline{\Lambda}_1$ with color octet. It is well known that in
1439: the color singlet ground state multiplet, the SU$_{f}$(3) flavor
1440: singlet $\Lambda_1$ is forbidden by Fermi statistics\cite{PDG}. But
1441: the above composite boson state of $(\Lambda_1\overline{\Lambda}_1)$
1442: can belong to color singlet, and is not forbidden. And its quantum
1443: numbers are same as ones of the state $(\Lambda
1444: \overline{\Lambda})$. This $\Lambda_1\overline{\Lambda}_1$ (or
1445: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$) enhancement has been reported in
1446: Ref.\cite{bell3}.
1447:
1448: \item
1449: $p\overline{\Lambda}_1$ enhancement: Both the states
1450: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle$
1451: and
1452: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$
1453: have colormagnetic energy -16C, they are in the flavor
1454: $\mathbf{8}_{f}$-plet with spin $\mathbf{0}$ or $\mathbf{1}$. The
1455: total system can be in the $p\overline{\Lambda}$ like state because
1456: one of the clusters is in flavor representation $\mathbf{1}_{f}$.
1457: One of these states has also been reported by BES\cite{Bes3}and
1458: Belle\cite{bell2}, but its spin can not be fixed.
1459:
1460: \item
1461: $p\overline{p}$ enhancement: It is obvious that the $p\overline{p}$
1462: enhancement\cite{Bes1,Bes2} possibly belongs to the states
1463: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$,
1464: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$,
1465: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$,
1466: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},
1467: \mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{f}\rangle$,
1468: $|\mathbf{20}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{10}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},
1469: \mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$, and the
1470: corresponding colormagnetic energy are $8C,\; 4C,\;-4C,\; 8C,\; 8C$
1471: respectively. This indicates that among them, the quark
1472: configuration
1473: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}
1474: \rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$
1475: is more stable. Namely, in the $(\rm{q}^{3})-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3$)
1476: configuration, the the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement most possibly
1477: belongs to the states
1478: $|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},
1479: \mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_{f}\rangle$.
1480:
1481:
1482: \end{enumerate}
1483: Noting that both spin-$\mathbf{0}$, spin-$\mathbf{1}$
1484: $p\overline{p}$ enhancements and spin-$\mathbf{0}$,
1485: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancements are predicted.
1486: \subsection{The ($\rm{q}^{2}\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2$) Configuration}
1487: The configuration is schematically shown in Fig.5. Due to Fermi
1488: statistics, the two quarks in the cluster belong to the
1489: $(\mathbf{6}_{cs}\otimes\mathbf{6}_{cs})_{S}=\mathbf{21}_{cs}$
1490: dimensional representation of $\rm{SU(6)}_{cs}$ and irreducible
1491: $\rm{SU(3)}_f$ representation $\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f$, or to
1492: $(\mathbf{6}_{cs}\otimes\mathbf{6}_{cs})_{A}=\mathbf{15}_{cs}$
1493: dimensional representation of $\rm{SU(6)}_{cs}$ and $\rm{SU(3)}_f$
1494: representation $\mathbf{6}_f$. Performing the outer product of
1495: $\rm{SU(6)}_{cs}$ representations
1496: \begin{equation}
1497: \label{2.7}\mathbf{21}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{6}}_{cs}=\mathbf{6}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{120}_{cs},\;\;\;
1498: \mathbf{15}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{6}}_{cs}=\mathbf{6}_{cs}\oplus\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},
1499: \end{equation}
1500: we find out that the cluster $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}$ can be in
1501: the $\rm{SU(6)}_{cs}$ representation $\mathbf{6}_{cs}$,
1502: $\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs}$ or $\mathbf{120}_{cs}$, and the
1503: corresponding $\rm{SU(3)}_c\otimes \rm{SU(2)}_s$ decompositions are
1504: as followings
1505: \begin{eqnarray}
1506: \nonumber &&
1507: \mathbf{6}_{cs}=(\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{2}),\;\;\mathbf{15}_{cs}=(\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{1})+(\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{3}),\;\;\mathbf{21}_{cs}=(\mathbf{6}_{c},\mathbf{3})+(\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{1})\\
1508: \nonumber&&\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs}=(\mathbf{3}_{c},\mathbf{2})+(\mathbf{3}_{c},\mathbf{4})+(\overline{\mathbf{6}}_{c},\mathbf{2})+(\overline{\mathbf{6}}_{c},\mathbf{4})+(\mathbf{15}_{c},\mathbf{2})\\
1509: \label{2.8}&&\mathbf{120}_{cs}=(\mathbf{3}_{c},\mathbf{2})+(\mathbf{3}_{c},\mathbf{4})
1510: +(\mathbf{15}_{c},\mathbf{2})+(\mathbf{15}_{c},\mathbf{4})+(\overline{\mathbf{6}}_{c},\mathbf{2}).
1511: \end{eqnarray}
1512: And the cluster $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}$ can be in the flavor
1513: representation
1514: $\overline{\mathbf{3}}_{f}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f=\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f$
1515: or in
1516: $\mathbf{6}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f=\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f$.
1517: We can easily see the possible states of the cluster
1518: $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}$, which are listed in the followings.
1519: \begin{eqnarray}
1520: \nonumber
1521: &&|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle,\;\;|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle,\;\;
1522: |\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle,\\
1523: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle,\;\;|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle,\;\;
1524: |\mathbf{6}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle,\\
1525: \nonumber&&|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle,\;\;
1526: |\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle,\;\;
1527: |\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle\\
1528: \label{2.9}&&|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle,\;\;
1529: |\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle,\;\;|\mathbf{6}_{cs},\mathbf{3}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1530: .
1531: \end{eqnarray}
1532: Similarly the possible states of another cluster
1533: $\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2$ are
1534: \begin{eqnarray}
1535: \nonumber
1536: &&|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle,\;\;|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle,\;\;
1537: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle,\\
1538: \nonumber&&|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle,\;\;|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle,\;\;
1539: |\overline{\mathbf{6}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle,\\
1540: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{84}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle,\;\;
1541: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle,\;\;
1542: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle\\
1543: \label{2.10}&&|\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle,\;\;
1544: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle,\;\;
1545: |\overline{\mathbf{6}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle
1546: \end{eqnarray}
1547: We now consider the multiplets whose two subsystems are connected by
1548: $\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c$($\mathbf{6}_c$) or
1549: $\mathbf{15}_c$($\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c$) bond, neglecting these
1550: with the clusters being in $\mathbf{3}_c$ or
1551: $\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c$, since color triplet bond is easily
1552: broken. The states in Eq.(\ref{2.9}) and Eq.(\ref{2.10}) are
1553: eigenstates of the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$, and the eigenvalues can
1554: be calculated straightforwardly. The results are listed in Table
1555: IV.
1556:
1557: \begin{table}[hptb]
1558: \begin{center}
1559: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|}\hline\hline
1560: States& Eigenvalues of the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$\\\hline
1561: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle\;\;
1562: (\;\rm{or}\;|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle\;)$&
1563: $\frac{4}{3}C$\\\hline
1564: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle\;\;
1565: (\;\rm{or}\;|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle\;)$&
1566: $-\frac{8}{3}C$\\\hline
1567: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle\;\;(\;
1568: \rm{or}\;|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle\;)$&-8C\\\hline
1569: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle\;\;(\;
1570: \rm{or}\;|\mathbf{84}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle\;)$&4C\\\hline
1571: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1572: \;|\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle\;)$&$\frac{16}{3}C$\\\hline
1573: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle\;\;(\;\rm{or}
1574: \;|\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle\;)$&$\frac{4}{3}C$\\\hline\hline
1575: \end{tabular}
1576: \caption{The allowed states of the cluster
1577: $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}$ (or another cluster
1578: $\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2$ ) except those states whose color are in
1579: representation $\mathbf{3}_c$ or $\overline{\mathbf{3}}_c$, and the
1580: corresponding eigenvalues of the colormagnetic interaction
1581: hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$. } \label{t3}
1582: \end{center}
1583: \end{table}
1584:
1585: The states of the total system are formed by combining the states of
1586: the cluster $\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}$ in Eq.(\ref{2.9}) and that
1587: of another cluster $\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2$ in Eq.(\ref{2.10}),
1588: the allowed states of the system and the corresponding eigenvalues
1589: of the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ are given in the Table V and Table
1590: VI.
1591: \begin{table}[hptb]
1592: \begin{center}
1593: \caption{The allowed states of the total system in the configuration
1594: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}}$)-($\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2$) and the
1595: mass splitting.}
1596: \begin{tabular}{|c|l|c|c|}\hline\hline
1597: States of the total system&$~~~~~~~\;\;\rm{SU}_{f}$(3) structure&
1598: the Spin & the Mass \\
1599: & & Structure & Splitting\\\hline
1600: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1601: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1602: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$
1603: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&$\frac{8}{3}C$\\\hline
1604: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1605: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1606: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$
1607: &$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&$\frac{-4}{3}C$\\\hline
1608: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1609: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1610: &$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f(3)$
1611: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&$\frac{16}{3}C$\\
1612: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f$& & \\\hline
1613: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1614: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1615: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$
1616: &$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&$-\frac{4}{3}C$\\\hline
1617: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1618: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1619: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$
1620: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}$&$-\frac{16}{3}C$\\\hline
1621: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1622: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1623: &$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f(3)$
1624: &$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&$\frac{4}{3}C$\\
1625: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f$& & \\\hline
1626: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1627: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1628: &$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(3)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f$
1629: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&$\frac{16}{3}C$\\
1630: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{35}_f$& & \\\hline
1631: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1632: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1633: &$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(3)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f$
1634: &$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&$\frac{4}{3}C$\\
1635: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{35}_f$& & \\\hline
1636: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1637: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1638: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(5)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}(2)$
1639: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&$8C$\\
1640: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{35}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f\oplus\mathbf{64}_f$& & \\\hline
1641: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1642: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1643: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$
1644: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&-16C\\\hline
1645: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1646: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1647: &$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f(3)$
1648: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&$-\frac{8}{3}C$\\
1649: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f$& & \\\hline
1650: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1651: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1652: &$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f(3)$
1653: &$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&$-\frac{20}{3}C$\\
1654: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f$& & \\\hline
1655: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1656: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1657: &$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(3)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f$
1658: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&$-\frac{8}{3}C$\\
1659: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{35}_f$& & \\\hline
1660: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1661: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1662: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(5)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}(2)$
1663: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1}$&$\frac{32}{3}C$\\
1664: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{35}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f\oplus\mathbf{64}_f$& & \\\hline
1665: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1666: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1667: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(5)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}(2)$
1668: &$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&$\frac{20}{3}C$\\
1669: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{35}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f\oplus\mathbf{64}_f$& &
1670: \\\hline\hline
1671: \end{tabular}
1672: \label{t4}
1673: \end{center}
1674: \end{table}
1675: \begin{table}
1676: \caption{The Continuing of Table V.}
1677: \begin{center}
1678: \begin{tabular}{|c|l|c|c|}\hline\hline
1679: States of the total system&$~~~~~~~\;\;\rm{SU}_{f}$(3) structure&
1680: the Spin & the Mass \\
1681: & & Structure & Splitting\\\hline
1682: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1683: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1684: &$\mathbf{1}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(3)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f$
1685: &$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&$-\frac{20}{3}C$\\
1686: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f$& & \\\hline
1687: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1688: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1689: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(5)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}(2)$
1690: &$\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$&$\frac{20}{3}C$\\
1691: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{35}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f\oplus\mathbf{64}_f$& & \\\hline
1692: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1693: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1694: &$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(5)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f(2)\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}(2)$
1695: &$\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}$&$\frac{8}{3}C$\\
1696: &$\oplus\mathbf{27}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{35}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f\oplus\mathbf{64}_f$& &
1697: \\\hline\hline
1698: \end{tabular}
1699: \end{center}
1700: \end{table}
1701: By means of Table V and Table VI, we discuss the enhancements in the
1702: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$ cluster
1703: configuration in order:
1704:
1705: \begin{enumerate}
1706:
1707: \item $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$,
1708: $p\overline{\Lambda}$ and $p\overline{p}$ enhancements with spin
1709: $\mathbf{0}$ or $\mathbf{1}$: From the Table V and Table VI, we can
1710: see the multiplet state
1711: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1712: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1713: has the largest colormagnetic energy $-16C$, and its flavors are in
1714: $\mathbf{1}(2)_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f
1715: \oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$. The spin of
1716: these states equals 0 or 1, and with the baryon number being zero.
1717: Therefore the multiplet state
1718: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1719: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1720: can decay to (or couple to) baryon octet plus antibaryon octet.
1721: Namely, $(\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$, $p\overline{\Lambda}$ and
1722: $p\overline{p}$ enhancements)$\in$
1723: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1724: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$.
1725: These baryonium states may mix with the states in the
1726: $(q^3)-(\overline{q}^3)$ cluster configurations illustrated in the
1727: previous subsection. Namely, this mixing can be expressed as follows
1728: \begin{equation}\label{mix}
1729: |i\rangle =\alpha_i |(q^3)-(\overline{q}^3)\rangle_i
1730: +\beta_i|(q^2\overline{q})-(q\overline{q}^2)\rangle_i,
1731: \end{equation} where
1732: $i=\{\Lambda\overline{\Lambda},\;p\overline{\Lambda}, \;
1733: p\overline{p}, \;\cdots \}$, $\alpha_i$ and $\beta_i$ are constants,
1734: $|i\rangle$ is $i^{\rm th}$ physical baryonium state, $
1735: |(q^3)-(\overline{q}^3)\rangle_i$ is $i^{\rm th}$ baryonium state in
1736: $(q^3)-(\overline{q}^3)$ cluster configurations, and $
1737: |(q^2\overline{q})-(q\overline{q}^2)\rangle_i$ is $i^{\rm th}$
1738: baryonium state in $(q^2\overline{q})-(q\overline{q}^2)$ cluster
1739: configurations. We would like to argue that the physical baryonium
1740: states may favor the cluster structure with larger mass defect over
1741: that with smaller defect. Therefore, comparing the results of this
1742: subsection with ones of the previous subsection, we have
1743: \begin{eqnarray}\label{mixLL}
1744: {\rm to}~ \Lambda\overline{\Lambda}\;\;{\rm
1745: enhancement:}~~|\alpha_{i=\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}}| &>&
1746: |\beta_{i=\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}}|, \\
1747: \label{mixpL} {\rm to}~~ p\overline{\Lambda}\;\;{\rm
1748: enhancement:}~~|\alpha_{i=p\overline{\Lambda}}| &\simeq&
1749: |\beta_{i=p\overline{\Lambda}}|,\\
1750: \label{mixpp} {\rm to}~~~ p\overline{p}\;\;{\rm
1751: enhancement:}~~|\alpha_{i=p\overline{p}}| &<&
1752: |\beta_{i=p\overline{p}}|.
1753: \end{eqnarray}
1754: In some recent works in literature\cite{Datta,yan,ding}, the
1755: $p\overline{p}$ enhancement has been treated as a bound state of two
1756: clusters. Actually, under the approximation of neglecting van der
1757: Waal's force between two color singlet baryons, the clusters as
1758: elements of the enhancement are objects with color. The potentials
1759: used in \cite{Datta}\cite{yan}\cite{ding} should be due to "color
1760: chemistry bonds" that are caused by the unfrozen color degree of
1761: freedom in the system in the framework of this paper. The
1762: Eq.(\ref{mixpp}) indicates that the color, spin, flavor structures
1763: of $p \overline{p}$ enhancement are mainly of
1764: $|\bf{120}_{cs},\overline{\bf{6}}_c,\bf{2},\bf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\bf{6}}_f\rangle
1765: |\overline{\bf{120}}_{cs},\bf{6}_c,\bf{2},\overline{\bf{3}}_f\oplus\bf{6}_f\rangle$
1766: in the configuration
1767: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$, and mix
1768: with few $|\bf{70}_{cs},\bf{8}_c,\bf{2},\bf{8}_f\rangle
1769: |\overline{\bf{70}}_{cs},\bf{8}_c,\bf{2},\bf{8}_f\rangle$ in the
1770: configuration $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$.
1771:
1772: ~~Similarly, Eq.(\ref{mixLL}) indicates the color-spin-flavor
1773: structures of $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement are mainly
1774: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
1775: |\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
1776: in the configuration $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$, and plus
1777: few mixtures of the corresponding $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$
1778: enhancement state in the configuration
1779: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$. Moreover,
1780: by Eq.(\ref{mixpL}), the $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement should be
1781: half of the states in the $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$
1782: configuration plus half of that in the
1783: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$
1784: approximately.
1785:
1786: \item The enhancements with
1787: spin -$\mathbf{1}$ or -$\mathbf{2}$: The states
1788: $|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1789: |\mathbf{84}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{15}}_f\rangle$
1790: or
1791: $|\overline{\mathbf{84}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\mathbf{15}_f\rangle
1792: |\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1793: has colormagnetic energy $ -\frac{20}{3} C$, but their spins are
1794: $\mathbf{1}$ or $\mathbf{2}$. We address that the spins of the
1795: baryoniums come from the quark's intrinsic spin in this quark model
1796: with $S$-wave, instead of coming from their relative orbital
1797: angular momentum. These color singlet states are allowed.
1798:
1799: %\item The enhancements with
1800: %spin-$\mathbf{0}$, -$\mathbf{1}$, -$\mathbf{2}$ or -$\mathbf{3}$:
1801: %The colormagnetic energy of
1802: %$|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1803: %|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1804: %is $-\frac{16}{3}C$ with flavor representation
1805: %$\mathbf{1}_f(2)\oplus\mathbf{8}_f(4)\oplus\mathbf{10}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f$
1806: %and with spins $\mathbf{0},\mathbf{1},\mathbf{2}$ or $\mathbf{3}$,
1807: %then similarly the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement,
1808: %$p\overline{\Lambda}$ and $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancements
1809: %can also possibly belong to these states.
1810:
1811: ~~On all accounts, both the analysis from common quark model and
1812: from the model with quark correlation imply that the $p\overline{p}$
1813: enhancement, $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement and the
1814: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement are relatively easy to be
1815: found and these enhancements which have been seen by BES and Bell
1816: are not experiment artifacts. We predict that spin-$\mathbf{1}$
1817: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement may be observed in future
1818: and we conjecture that BES has observed both spin-$\mathbf{0}$,
1819: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ $p\overline{p}$ enhancement and spin-$\mathbf{0}$,
1820: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement in section III,
1821: these predictions are compatible with the above results obtained in
1822: subsection IV.A and subsection IV.B. These results should be further
1823: checked by experiment.
1824: \end{enumerate}
1825:
1826:
1827:
1828:
1829:
1830: \section{conclusion and discussion}
1831: In summary, we have studied the mass spectrum of the
1832: $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ mesons and the baryon antibaryon
1833: enhancements in the quark model with the interaction between quarks
1834: being the well-known colormagnetic interaction. First of all, We
1835: study ${\rm q}^3\overline{\rm q}^3$ system using common quark model
1836: without quark correlation with colormagnetic hyperfine interactions
1837: between quarks. By this model, we firstly found that the
1838: configurations corresponding to the
1839: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda},\;p\overline{\Lambda},\;p\overline{p},
1840: \;\cdots$ enhancement can have rather large negative colormagnetic
1841: energy. This indicates that these states should be ones with rather
1842: low energy, and hence be visible in experiments. These predictions
1843: are consistent with the experiments reported in literatures.
1844: Secondly, we found further that among those enhancements, the
1845: binding colormagnetic energy of spin-$\mathbf{0}$ and
1846: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states are larger than ones of the states with
1847: spin-$\mathbf{2}$ and spin-$\mathbf{3}$. Thirdly, the existence of
1848: the spin-$\mathbf{1}$ $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$,
1849: $p\overline{\Lambda}$ and $p\overline{p}$ enhancement is predicted.
1850:
1851:
1852: We further study this system in the quark model with quark
1853: correlation, we consider two interesting configurations
1854: $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$ and
1855: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$, and the
1856: two clusters are connected by color $\mathbf{8}$-plet bond,
1857: $\mathbf{10}$-plet bond and color $\mathbf{6}$-plet bond,
1858: $\mathbf{15}$-plet bond respectively. We find in the spectrum of
1859: both configurations there exist rather stable states which has the
1860: same quantum number with the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement,
1861: $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement and $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$
1862: enhancement, hence these enhancements are not experimental
1863: artifacts.
1864:
1865: To the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement, we found out that under the
1866: approximation of neglecting van der Waal's force between color
1867: singlet baryon and color singlet antibaryon, the clusters as
1868: elements of the enhancement are objects with color. The potentials
1869: used in the studies on the $p\overline{p}$-baryonium should be due
1870: to "color chemistry bonds" that are caused by the unfrozen color
1871: degree of freedom in the system in the framework of this paper. It
1872: has been shown that if there exist quark correlation in the
1873: baryonium, the state of $p\overline{p}$ enhancement are mainly of
1874: $|\bf{120}_{cs},\overline{\bf{6}}_c,\bf{2},\bf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\bf{6}}_f\rangle
1875: |\overline{\bf{120}}_{cs},\bf{6}_c,\bf{2},\overline{\bf{3}}_f\oplus\bf{6}_f\rangle$
1876: in the configuration
1877: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$, with
1878: small mixing $|\bf{70}_{cs},\bf{8}_c,\bf{2},\bf{8}_f\rangle
1879: |\overline{\bf{70}}_{cs},\bf{8}_c,\bf{2},\bf{8}_f\rangle$ in the
1880: configuration $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$. Similarly, the
1881: state of $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement are mainly
1882: $|\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f\rangle
1883: |\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
1884: in the configuration $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$, and plus
1885: few mixtures of the corresponding $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$
1886: enhancement state in the configuration
1887: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$. Moreover,
1888: the $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement should be half of the states
1889: in the $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$ configuration plus half of
1890: that in the
1891: $(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$
1892: approximately.
1893:
1894:
1895:
1896: ~~Considering all facts from common quark model and from the
1897: models
1898: with quark correlations, we conclude that the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement,
1899: $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement and the
1900: $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement are in existence, and the
1901: signal corresponding them must be visible. Actually, they have been
1902: shown experimentally by BES and Bell. In other words, those
1903: experiments are certainly not experimental artifacts. We predict
1904: that spin-$\mathbf{1}$ $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement will
1905: be observed in future and we conjecture that BES has observed both
1906: spin-$\mathbf{0}$, spin-$\mathbf{1}$ $p\overline{p}$ enhancement and
1907: spin-$\mathbf{0}$, spin-$\mathbf{1}$ $p\overline{\Lambda}$
1908: enhancement.
1909:
1910:
1911: The existed quark model with colormagnetic interaction only consider
1912: one gluon exchange interaction between quarks(antiquarks) and
1913: quarks(antiquarks), and the corrections from the quark's
1914: annihilation contribution( the so-called OZI violated graphs ) are
1915: not taken into account in the model's framework. The latter will
1916: bring small errors to the model, and the problem how to count the
1917: contributions of the quark's annihilation diagrams into the model
1918: still remains to be open so far. However, since many successes and
1919: reasonable results have been achieved in the studies of the
1920: multiquark systems within this model framework (i.e., the model is
1921: supported by the phenomenology), and our results presented in this
1922: paper are exact in the model,
1923: we argue that the results and predictions presented in this paper
1924: are reliable, and hence should be useful and meaningful for
1925: understanding the physics of both $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$
1926: system and the recent corresponding experiments reported by BES and
1927: Bell qualitatively.
1928:
1929:
1930: %A new viewpoint about the structure of the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement is
1931: %bought forth, that the $p\overline{p}$ enhancement is mainly the proton
1932: %and antiproton bound state, and also contain the mixing of the state
1933: %$|\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{8}_f\rangle|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
1934: %in the configuration $(\rm{q}^3)-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$,
1935: %$|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{6}}_c,\mathbf{2},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1936: %|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\mathbf{6}_c,\mathbf{2},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1937: %or
1938: %$|\mathbf{120}_{cs},\mathbf{15}_c,\mathbf{4},\mathbf{3}_f\oplus\overline{\mathbf{6}}_f\rangle
1939: %|\overline{\mathbf{120}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{15}}_c,\mathbf{4},\overline{\mathbf{3}}_f\oplus\mathbf{6}_f\rangle$
1940: %in the configuration
1941: %$(\rm{q}^2\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline{\rm{q}}^2)$.
1942: %\par
1943: %Finally from the common quark model with all quarks being in
1944: %relative S-waves, we study the spectrum of the
1945: %$\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ meson. We also find rather stable states
1946: %which has the same quantum number with the $p\overline{p}$
1947: %enhancement, $p\overline{\Lambda}$ enhancement and $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$
1948: %enhancement, so this further suggest the existence of these
1949: %enhancements.
1950: \par
1951: The effect of $\rm{SU(3)}_f$ symmetry broken is not taken into
1952: account in this paper, and the results are qualitatively correct. It
1953: is necessary to consider the effect of strange quark mass in order
1954: to make serious comparison with the experiments and predict exactly
1955: the masses of the multiplets of the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$
1956: meson.
1957: \par
1958: %Another elusive problem about the $\rm{q}^3\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ meson is
1959: %its decay property, such as $X(1835)\rightarrow\eta^{\prime}\pi\pi$ which was recently
1960: %discoveried by BES\cite{Bes}, where X(1835) is a $p\overline{p}$ enhancement. The decay is
1961: %relevant to its possible complex structure and very
1962: %difficult to deal with, so this problem will not be considered
1963: %further in this paper but in a forthcoming one.
1964: %\par
1965: %There are many puzzles in baryon antibaryon physics, and it deserves
1966: %being studied from various points of view, Study of these
1967: %enhancements will deepen our understanding of the low-energy sector
1968: %of QCD.
1969: \begin{center}
1970: {\bf ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
1971: \end{center}
1972: This work is partially supported by National Natural Science
1973: Foundation of China under Grant Numbers 90403021, and by the PhD
1974: Program Funds 20020358040 of the Education Ministry of China and
1975: KJCX2-SW-N10 of the Chinese Academy.
1976: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1977: \bibitem{exotic} T.Nakano et al(The LEPS
1978: collaboration),Phys.Rev.Lett.91(2003)012002,hep-ex/0301020; BABAR
1979: Collaboration, B.Aubert et al., Phys.Rev.Lett.90,242001(2003); Belle
1980: Collaboration, K.Abe et al., Phys.Rev.Lett.92,012002(2004).
1981: \bibitem{Bes1}BES Collaboration,J.Z.Bai et
1982: al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.91,022001(2003).
1983: \bibitem{Bes}BES Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 262001;
1984: hep-ex/0508025.
1985: \bibitem{Bes2}BES Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al.,Phys.Rev. D71 (2005)
1986: 072006,hep-ex/0503030.
1987: \bibitem{Bes3}BES Collaboration, M. Ablikim et
1988: al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.93,112002(2004).
1989: \bibitem{bell1}Belle Collaboration, K.Abe et al.,
1990: Phys.Rev.Lett.88,181803(2002).
1991: \bibitem{bell2}Belle Collaboration, M.-Z.Wang et al.,
1992: Phys.Rev.Lett.90,201802(2003).
1993: \bibitem{bell3}Belle Collaboration, Y.-J.Lee et al.,
1994: Phys.Rev.Lett.93.211801(2004).
1995: \bibitem{Datta} A.Datta and P.J.O'Donnell, Phys.Lett.B
1996: 567,273(2003), hep-ph/0306097.
1997: \bibitem{interpretation1} B.S.Zou and H.C.Chiang,
1998: Phys.Rev.D69.034004(2004); Xiao-Gang He, Xue-Qian Li and J.P.Ma,
1999: Phys.Rev.D71(2005)014031, hep-ph/0407083; Shi-Lin Zhu and Chong-Shou
2000: Gao, hep-ph/0507050; C.H.Chang and H.R.Pang, Commun.Theor.Phys.43,
2001: 275 (2005), hep-ph/ 0407188; Xiao-Gang He, Xue-Qian Li et al.,
2002: hep-ph/0509140 ; N.Kochelev and Dong-Pil Min, hep-ph/0508288.
2003:
2004: \bibitem{yan} Mu-Lin Yan, Si Li, Bin Wu and Bo-Qiang Ma, Phys. Rev.
2005: {\bf D72}, 034027 (2005).
2006: \bibitem{ding} Gui-Jun Ding and Mu-Lin Yan, Phys.Rev.C72:015208,2005,
2007: hep-ph/0502127.
2008:
2009: \bibitem{interpretation2}J.L.Rosner, Phys.Rev. D68 (2003)
2010: 014004, hep-ph/0303079; C.Z.Yuan, X.H.Mo and P.Wang, Phys.Lett.B626
2011: (2005)95-100, hep-ph/0506019.
2012: \bibitem{colorch} Hong-Mo Chan,
2013: Nucl.Phys.B136:401,1978; Phys.Lett.B76:634-640,1978.
2014: \bibitem{correlation}R.L.Jaffe and F.Wilcek, Phys.Rev.Lett 91,232003(2003),
2015: hep-ph/0307341; M.Karliner and H.J.Lipkin,
2016: Phys.Lett.B575:249-255,2003, hep-ph/0402260.
2017:
2018: \bibitem{ding2} Gui-Jun Ding and Mu-Lin Yan,Phys.Rev.{\bf D72}, 034014,(2005);
2019: hep-ph/0506119.
2020: \bibitem{petcolor} H.Hogaasen and P.Sorba,
2021: Nucl.Phys.B145:119,1978; Mod.Phys.Lett.A19:2403-2410,2004,
2022: hep-ph/0406078; Fl. Stancu,Phys.Lett. B595 (2004) 269-276;
2023: Erratum-ibid. B598 (2004) 295-295,hep-ph/0402044; Carl E.Carlson et
2024: al.,Phys.Lett. B573 (2003) 101-108,hep-ph/0307396; Jialun Ping et
2025: al., Phys.Lett. B602 (2004) 197-204, hep-ph/0408176.
2026: \bibitem{colormag} A.De Rujula, H.Georgi and S.L.Glashow,
2027: Phys,Rev.D.12,147(1975).
2028: \bibitem{jaffe1}R.L.Jaffe and K.Johnson, Phys.Lett.B60,201(1976);
2029: R.L.Jaffe, Phys.Rev.D15:267,1977; R.L.Jaffe, Phys.Rev.D15:281,1977.
2030: \bibitem{q6}P.~J.~Mulders, A.~T.~M.~Aerts and J.~J.~De Swart,Phys.Rev.D21, 2653 (1980).
2031: \bibitem{strottman}D.Strottman, Phys.Rev.D20,748 (1979).
2032: \bibitem{jaffe2}R.L.Jaffe, hep-ph/0507149.
2033: %\bibitem{cern}A. Ferrer,
2034: %A.A.Grigorian, V.F.Perepelitsa and
2035: %P.Sonderegger,Eur.Phys.J.C10,249(1999).
2036: \bibitem{PDG}Partcle Data Group, {\it 14. Quark Model}, in Phys. Lett. {\bf B592}, 1
2037: (2004), {\it pp154-159}.
2038:
2039: \bibitem{group}C.Itzykson, M.Nauenberg, Rev.Mod.Phys.38:95-120,1966.
2040: \bibitem{cpf} S. I. So and D. Strottman, J.Math.Phys.20:153-176, 1979;
2041: D. Strottman, J.Math.Phys.20:1643-1647,1979.
2042: \bibitem{chenjq}Jin-Quan Chen et al, Tables of the
2043: SU(mn)$\supset$SU(m)$\times$SU(n) Coefficients of Fractional
2044: Parentage(World Scientific,1991).
2045: \bibitem{notation}W.G.McKay and J.Patera, Tables of Dimensions, Indices, and Branching Rules for
2046: Representations of Simple Lie Algebras, (Marcel Dekker, New York,
2047: 1981) p.98.
2048: \end{thebibliography}
2049: %\newpage
2050: \begin{appendix}
2051: \section{The mixing of states with definite spin under the colormagnetic interaction hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ }
2052: %\begin{center}
2053: %\bf{Appendix}
2054: %\end{center}
2055: In this appendix, as an example, we will illustrate that in the case
2056: of $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}$ the three
2057: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
2058: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$,
2059: $|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
2060: and
2061: $|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
2062: are mixed due to the colormagnetic interaction $H^{\prime}$, and are
2063: linear combinations of the states
2064: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$,
2065: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f)(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
2066: and
2067: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),,\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$.
2068: The eigenstates and the corresponding colormagnetic interaction
2069: energy are calculated, for the other cases, these quantities can
2070: also be calculated following the same method.
2071: \begin{eqnarray}
2072: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=\left\{\begin{array}{c
2073: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2074: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2075: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{896}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2076: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2077: \nonumber&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\left\{\begin{array}{c
2078: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2079: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2080: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{896}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2081: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2082: \nonumber&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\left\{\begin{array}{c
2083: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2084: \\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4})\end{array} \right|
2085: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{896}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2086: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2087: \nonumber&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle;\\
2088: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=\left\{\begin{array}{c
2089: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2090: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2091: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2092: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2093: \nonumber&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\left\{\begin{array}{c
2094: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2095: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2096: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2097: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2098: \nonumber&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\left\{\begin{array}{c
2099: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2100: \\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4})\end{array} \right|
2101: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2102: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2103: \nonumber&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle;\\
2104: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=\left\{\begin{array}{c
2105: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2106: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2107: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2108: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2109: \nonumber&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\left\{\begin{array}{c
2110: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2111: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2112: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2113: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2114: \nonumber&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\left\{\begin{array}{c
2115: c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} & \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2116: \\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4})\end{array} \right|
2117: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}
2118: |(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\\
2119: \label{a1}&&\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle;
2120: \end{eqnarray}
2121: $\rm{SU}_{cs}(6)\supset \rm{SU}_{c}(3)\times \rm{SU}_{s}(2)$
2122: coefficients of fractional parentage can be calculated following the
2123: Ref.\cite{cpf}, and some results has been listed in the Ref.
2124: \cite{chenjq}. From this book, we can find the
2125: $\rm{SU}_{cs}(6)\supset \rm{SU}_{c}(3)\times \rm{SU}_{s}(2)$
2126: coefficients of fractional parentage which appear in the above
2127: formula,
2128: \begin{eqnarray}
2129: \nonumber&&\left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2130: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs} \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4}) &
2131: (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2132: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{896}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=-\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}},\;\;
2133: \left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2134: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2135: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2136: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{896}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}\\
2137: \nonumber&&\left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2138: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs} \\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2}) &
2139: (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4})\end{array} \right|
2140: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{896}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}},\;\;
2141: \left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2142: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2143: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2144: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}\\
2145: \nonumber&&\left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2146: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2147: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2148: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=-\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}},\;\;
2149: \left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2150: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2151: \\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4})\end{array} \right|
2152: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{280}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}\\
2153: \nonumber&&\left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2154: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2155: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2156: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}},\;\;
2157: \left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2158: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}
2159: \\(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2}) & (\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2})\end{array} \right|
2160: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}\\
2161: \label{a2}&&\left\{\begin{array}{c c }\mathbf{70}_{cs} &
2162: \overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs} \\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2}) &
2163: (\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4})\end{array} \right|
2164: \left.\begin{array}{c}\mathbf{35}_{cs}\\(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3})\end{array}\right\}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}}
2165: \end{eqnarray}
2166: Substituting Eq.(\ref{a2}) into Eq.(\ref{a1}) we can obtain
2167: \begin{eqnarray}
2168: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
2169: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2170: \nonumber&&-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
2171: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
2172: \nonumber&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle;\\
2173: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
2174: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2175: \nonumber&&-\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
2176: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
2177: \nonumber&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle;\\
2178: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
2179: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2180: \nonumber&&+\sqrt{\frac{4}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
2181: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+\sqrt{\frac{1}{9}}|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
2182: \label{A3}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
2183: \end{eqnarray}
2184: From the above, we can learn that $\langle
2185: \mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f|H^{\prime}|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{cs}\rangle=\frac{516}{27}C$,
2186: $\langle
2187: \mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f|H^{\prime}|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_{cs}\rangle=\frac{90}{9}C$
2188: etc., so $H^{\prime}$ can be expressed as the the following matrix
2189: form in the space expanded by the three spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
2190: $|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$,
2191: $|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$,
2192: $|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
2193: \begin{equation}
2194: \label{A4} \frac{1}{27}C\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
2195: 516&240&-48\\
2196: 240&264&192\\
2197: -48&192&-240
2198: \end{array}\right)
2199: \end{equation}
2200: Diagonalizing the above matrix, we can obtain the eigenstates and
2201: the corresponding colormagnetic interaction energy,
2202: \begin{eqnarray}
2203: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_1=0.841|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.536|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2204: \nonumber&&+0.069|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-0.684|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
2205: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2206: \nonumber&&-0.693|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.226|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
2207: \label{A5}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle,\\
2208: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_2=0.156|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.364|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2209: \nonumber&&+0.918|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-0.422|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
2210: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2211: \nonumber&&+0.629|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.653|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
2212: \label{A6}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle,\\
2213: \nonumber&&|\mathbf{3},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle_3=-0.518|\mathbf{896}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle+0.762|\mathbf{280}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2214: \nonumber&&+0.389|\mathbf{35}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle=-0.595|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),
2215: (\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle\\
2216: \nonumber&&+0.351|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle-0.723|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\\
2217: \label{A7}&&(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle
2218: \end{eqnarray}
2219: The colormagnetic energy respectively are 24.634C, -12.007C, 7.373C.
2220:
2221: \section{The matrix representation of the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ in the subspace of states with fixed spin}
2222: In the following, we list the matrix form of the colormagnetic
2223: interaction hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ in the subspace expanded by the
2224: states of fixed spin in each case, and the constant $C$ in front
2225: each of matrix is omitted.
2226: \begin{enumerate}
2227: \item $\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}$
2228:
2229: {\bf{A}}), the spin-$\mathbf{0}$ state, there exist two
2230: spin-$\mathbf{0}$ states
2231: $|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),
2232: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
2233: and $|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),
2234: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
2235: and the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ can be expressed as the following
2236: matrix form in the subspace expanded by the latter state vectors ,
2237: \begin{equation}
2238: \label{B7}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
2239: -48&-8\sqrt{10}\\
2240: -8\sqrt{10}&-64
2241: \end{array}\right)
2242: \end{equation}
2243: {\bf{B}}), the spin-$\mathbf{1}$ state, in the subspace expanded by
2244: the two spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states
2245: $|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),
2246: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
2247: and $|(\mathbf{56}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),
2248: (\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{1}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle,$
2249: the matrix representation of $H^{\prime}$ is
2250: \begin{equation}
2251: \label{B8}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
2252: -112/3&-40\sqrt{2}/3\\
2253: -40\sqrt{2}/3&-16
2254: \end{array}\right)
2255: \end{equation}
2256:
2257: %\item $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}\;\;and\;\;\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}.$
2258:
2259: %The two spin-$\mathbf{2}$ states
2260: %$|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
2261: %and
2262: %$|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{4};\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f\rangle$
2263: %expand the subspace, and the $H^{\prime}$'s matrix form is
2264: %\begin{equation}
2265: %\label{B6}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
2266: %12&8\\
2267: %8&0
2268: %\end{array}\right)
2269: %\end{equation}
2270:
2271: \item $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}$ and $\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$.
2272:
2273: {\bf{A}}), the spin-$\mathbf{1}$ state, the three spin-$\mathbf{1}$
2274: states
2275: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},
2276: \overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\hskip-0.0in\otimes\hskip-0.0in\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
2277: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};
2278: \mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
2279: and
2280: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};
2281: \mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
2282: expand the Hilbert space, and the matrix form of $H^{\prime}$ is
2283: \begin{equation}
2284: \label{B4}\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
2285: -40/3&4\sqrt{10}/3&16\sqrt{10}/3\\
2286: 4\sqrt{10}/3&-76/3&-56/3\\
2287: 16\sqrt{10}/3&-56/3&-40/3
2288: \end{array}\right)
2289: \end{equation}
2290: {\bf{B}}), the spin-$\mathbf{2}$ state, there are two
2291: spin-$\mathbf{2}$ base vectors
2292: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$
2293: and
2294: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{1}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{1}_f\rangle$,
2295: and $H^{\prime}$'s matrix form is the following form:
2296: \begin{equation}
2297: \label{B5}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
2298: 8&4\sqrt{10}\\
2299: 4\sqrt{10}&-4
2300: \end{array}\right)
2301: \end{equation}
2302:
2303: \item $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}$
2304:
2305: {\bf{A}}), the spin-$\mathbf{2}$ states, there are three
2306: spin-$\mathbf{2}$ states
2307: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
2308: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\;\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\\(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
2309: and $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),
2310: (\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),$
2311: $\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5},\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
2312: and the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ can be expressed as the following
2313: matrix form in the subspace expanded by them,
2314: \begin{equation}
2315: \label{B1} \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
2316: 0&-4\sqrt{2}&\;\;-4\sqrt{2}\\
2317: -4\sqrt{2}&4&-12\\
2318: -4\sqrt{2}&-12&4
2319: \end{array}\right)
2320: \end{equation}
2321: {\bf{B}}), the spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states, in the subspace of six
2322: spin-$\mathbf{1}$ states $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,\\
2323: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
2324: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
2325: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
2326: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
2327: and
2328: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(|\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),$$\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
2329: the matrix representation of $H^{\prime}$ is
2330: \begin{equation}
2331: \label{B2} \left(\begin{array}{cccccc}
2332: \frac{32}{3}&-\frac{20\sqrt{2}}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{5}}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{5}}{3}&-\frac{8\sqrt{5}}{3}&0\\
2333: -\frac{20\sqrt{2}}{3}&-\frac{32}{3}&-\frac{4\sqrt{10}}{3}&-\frac{4\sqrt{10}}{3}& 4\sqrt{10}&\frac{8\sqrt{5}}{3}\\
2334: \frac{16\sqrt{5}}{3}&-\frac{4\sqrt{10}}{3}&-\frac{20}{3}&-4&-\frac{8}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{2}}{3}\\
2335: \frac{16\sqrt{5}}{3}&-\frac{4\sqrt{10}}{3}&-4&-\frac{20}{3}&-\frac{8}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{2}}{3}\\
2336: -\frac{8\sqrt{5}}{3}&4\sqrt{10}&-\frac{8}{3}&-\frac{8}{3}&-\frac{8}{3}&\frac{8\sqrt{2}}{3}\\
2337: 0&\frac{8\sqrt{5}}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{2}}{3}&\frac{16\sqrt{2}}{3}&\frac{8\sqrt{2}}{3}&-16
2338: \end{array}\right)
2339: \end{equation}
2340: {\bf{C}}), the spin-$\mathbf{0}$ state, the four spin-$\mathbf{0}$
2341: states
2342: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
2343: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{4};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$,
2344: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
2345: and
2346: $|(\mathbf{70}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),(\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs},\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{2};\mathbf{8}_f),\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1};\mathbf{8}_f\otimes\mathbf{8}_f\rangle$
2347: expand the Hilbert space. And the hamiltonian $H^{\prime}$ can be
2348: expressed as
2349: \begin{equation}
2350: \label{B3} \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
2351: 0&-4\sqrt{10}&8\sqrt{5}&0\\
2352: -4\sqrt{10}&-16& 12\sqrt{2}&8\\
2353: 8\sqrt{5}&12\sqrt{2}&-8&-8\sqrt{2}\\
2354: 0&8&-8\sqrt{2}&-16
2355: \end{array}\right)
2356: \end{equation}
2357:
2358:
2359:
2360: \end{enumerate}
2361: \end{appendix}
2362: \newpage
2363: \begin{table}[hptb]
2364: \begin{center}
2365: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|l|c|}\hline\hline
2366: Young tabular&Dimension&$\parbox{10cm}{\begin{center}
2367: SU$_{c}$(3)$\otimes$ SU$_{s}$(2) content\end{center}}$&
2368: Eigenvalue of \\
2369: & & &Casimir operator\\\hline
2370: & 3675&$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7}),3(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),7(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),6(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),$&36\\
2371: \includegraphics[width=1cm]{D3675.eps}& & \parbox{10cm}{\vskip-55pt $2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{7}),2(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{1}),4(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{3}),3(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{7}),2(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{1}),$}& \\
2372: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-55pt$4(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),3(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{7}),3(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{1}),6(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3}),4(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{5}),$}& \\
2373: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-55pt$(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{3}),$}& \\
2374: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-55pt$(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{64}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{64}_c,\mathbf{3})$}& \\\hline
2375: &3200 &$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),4(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),3(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{1}),$& 42\\
2376: \includegraphics[width=1.25cm]{D3200.eps} & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-35pt$2(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{1}),3(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{7}),2(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{1}),$}& \\
2377: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-45pt$4(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3}),3(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{1}),$}& \\
2378: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-55pt$2(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{3}),2(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{64}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{65}_c,\mathbf{5})$}& \\\hline
2379: & 2695&$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{1}),$&48\\
2380: \includegraphics[width=1.5cm]{D2695.eps} & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-40pt $(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{1}),$}& \\
2381: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-40pt$3(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3}),2(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{3}),$}& \\
2382: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-40pt$(\overline{\mathbf{35}}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{64}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{64}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{64}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{64}_c,\mathbf{7})$}& \\\hline
2383: & 896&$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),3(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{1}),$&30\\
2384: \includegraphics[width=0.75cm]{D896.eps}& &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-20pt$2(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3}),$}& \\
2385: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-20pt$(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{3})$}& \\\hline
2386: & 840&$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{5}),$&36\\
2387: \includegraphics[width=1cm]{D840.eps} & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-20pt$(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{3}),$}& \\
2388: & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-20pt$(\mathbf{35}_c,\mathbf{5})$}& \\\hline
2389: & 405&$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),$&28 \\
2390: \includegraphics[width=1cm]{D405.eps} & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-35pt$(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{5})$}&
2391: \\\hline\hline
2392: %$\overline{280}$&$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),$&24\\
2393: % &$(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3})$& \\\hline
2394: \end{tabular}
2395: \caption{The possible SU(6)$_{cs}$ representation of the total
2396: system, its SU$_{c}$(3)$\otimes$ SU$_{s}$(2) content and the
2397: corresponding eigenvalue of Casimir operator. } \label{t5}
2398: \end{center}
2399: \end{table}
2400: \begin{table}
2401: \caption{The Continuing of Table VII.}
2402: \begin{center}
2403: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|l|c|}\hline\hline
2404: Young tabular&Dimension&$\parbox{10cm}{\begin{center}
2405: SU$_{c}$(3)$\otimes$ SU$_{s}$(2) content\end{center}}$&
2406: Eigenvalue of \\
2407: & & &Casimir operator\\\hline
2408: & 280&$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{5}),$&24\\
2409: \includegraphics[width=0.75cm]{D280.eps} & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-40pt$(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3})$}& \\\hline
2410: & 189&$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),2(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{3}),$&20\\
2411: \includegraphics[width=0.5cm]{D189.eps} & &\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-30pt$(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{1})$}& \\\hline
2412: & & & \\
2413: \includegraphics[width=0.5cm]{D175.eps} & \parbox{1cm}{\vskip-50pt175}&\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-50pt$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{7}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{5}),(\mathbf{10}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\overline{\mathbf{10}}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{27}_c,\mathbf{3})$}&\parbox{1cm}{\vskip-50pt24}\\\hline
2414: & & & \\
2415: \includegraphics[width=0.5cm]{D35.eps}
2416: &\parbox{1cm}{\vskip-70pt35}&\parbox{10cm}{\vskip-70pt$(\mathbf{1}_c,\mathbf{3}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{1}),(\mathbf{8}_c,\mathbf{3})$}&\parbox{1cm}{\vskip-70pt12}\\\hline\hline
2417: \end{tabular}
2418: \end{center}
2419: \end{table}
2420: \newpage
2421: \begin{figure}[hptb]
2422: \begin{center}
2423: %\includegraphics*[30pt,230pt][580pt,610pt]{su6.eps}
2424: \includegraphics[width=17.5cm]{su6.eps}
2425: \caption{The SU(6)$_{cs}$ outer product for $\rm{q}^3$ and
2426: $\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ ~(I)~
2427: $\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{70}}_{cs}=\mathbf{3675}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{405}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{280}_{cs}
2428: \oplus\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{189}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{1}_{cs};$~(II)~$\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}=
2429: \mathbf{3200}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{405}_{cs}\oplus\overline{\mathbf{280}}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs};\;
2430: (\rm{III})\;\mathbf{70}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}=\mathbf{896}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{280}_{cs}\oplus
2431: \mathbf{189}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs};~(IV)~\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}_{cs}=\mathbf{840}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{280}_{cs};~(V)~\mathbf{56}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{56}}_{cs}=\mathbf{2695}_{cs}\oplus
2432: \mathbf{405}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{1}_{cs};~(VI)~\mathbf{20}_{cs}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{20}}=\mathbf{175}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{189}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{35}_{cs}\oplus\mathbf{1}_{cs}.$}
2433: \end{center}
2434: \vspace{0.5in}
2435: \includegraphics[width=17.5cm]{su3.eps}
2436: \caption{The SU(3)$_f$ direct product for $\rm{q}^{3}$ and
2437: $\overline{\rm{q}}^3$ (I)
2438: $\mathbf{8}_{f}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f=\overline{\mathbf{35}}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_{f}\oplus\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f;
2439: \;(\rm{II})\;
2440: \mathbf{10}_{f}\otimes\overline{\mathbf{10}}_f=\mathbf{64}_f\oplus\mathbf{27}_f\oplus\mathbf{8}_f\oplus\mathbf
2441: {1}_f$}.
2442: \end{figure}
2443: %\end{document}
2444: \begin{figure}
2445: \begin{center}
2446: \includegraphics*[5pt,580pt][400pt,800pt]{f3.eps}
2447: \caption{The configuration in common quark model, where gray circles
2448: denote quarks and red circles denote antiquarks}.
2449: \end{center}
2450: \end{figure}
2451: \begin{figure}[hptb]
2452: \begin{center}
2453: \includegraphics*[5pt,580pt][400pt,800pt]{f1.eps}
2454: \caption{The configuration $(\rm{q}^{3})-(\overline{\rm{q}}^3)$,
2455: where gray circles denote quarks and red circles denote antiquarks.
2456: }.
2457: \end{center}
2458: \end{figure}
2459: \begin{figure}[hptb]
2460: \begin{center}
2461: \includegraphics*[5pt,580pt][400pt,800pt]{f2.eps}
2462: \caption{The configuration
2463: $(\rm{q}^{2}\overline{\rm{q}})-(\rm{q}\overline {\rm{q}}^2$), where
2464: gray circles denote quarks and red circles denote antiquarks}.
2465: \end{center}
2466: \end{figure}
2467: \end{document}
2468: