1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %		rct.tex		October 4 2005 

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: 

5: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

6: 

7: \oddsidemargin -0.3cm

8: \textwidth 17.1cm

9: \textheight 22.2cm

10: \topmargin -0.2cm

11: \bibliographystyle{phlb}

12: 

13: \unitlength1pt

14: \pagestyle{plain}

15: %\usepackage{graphicx}

16: \usepackage{amssymb}

17: %\usepackage{graphicx}

18: %\usepackage{epsfig}

19: \usepackage{latexsym}

20: \usepackage{amsmath}

21: %\usepackage{drafthead}

22: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}

23: \usepackage{array}

24: \usepackage{tabularx}

25: %\usepackage{truncate}

26: \usepackage{fancybox}

27: \usepackage{supertabular}

28: 

29: \usepackage{color}

30: 

31: 

32: \newcommand{\figwidth}{8cm}

33: \newcommand{\figheight}{6.5cm}

34: 

35: \newcommand{\Frac}[2]{\frac{\displaystyle #1}{\displaystyle #2}}

36: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}

37: \newcommand{\IM}{\mbox{\rm Im}}

38: \newcommand{\eqn}[1]{(\ref{#1})}

39: \newcommand{\mev}{\, \mbox{\rm MeV}}

40: \newcommand{\gev}{\, \mbox{\rm GeV}}

41: \newcommand{\Li}{\mbox{\rm Li}_2}

42: \newcommand{\MSb}{{\overline{\rm MS}}}

43: %\newcommand\lsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower4pt\hbox{\hskip1pt$\sim$}}

44: %    \raise1pt\hbox{$<$}}}

45: %\newcommand\gsim{\mathrel{\rlap{\lower4pt\hbox{\hskip1pt$\sim$}}

46: %    \raise1pt\hbox{$>$}}}

47: \newcommand{\lsim}{\stackrel{<}{_\sim}}

48: \newcommand{\gsim}{\stackrel{>}{_\sim}}

49: \newcommand{\VAP}{\langle V \! A P\rangle}

50: \newcommand{\order}{{\cal O}}

51: 

52: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

53: %  Some definitions 

54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

55: \newcommand{\chpt}{$\chi$PT }

56: \newcommand{\rcht}{R$\chi$T }

57: \newcommand{\CQg}{\left( {\langle\bar q q \rangle^{(2)}(\mu)\over 

58: f_\pi^3}\right)}

59: \newcommand{\CQ}{\left( {\langle\bar q q \rangle^{(2)}(\mu)\over f^2}\right)}

60: \newcommand{\ds}{\displaystyle}

61: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

62: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

63: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

64: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

65: \newcommand{\nl}{\nonumber\\}

66: \newcommand{\dg}{\dagger}

67: \newcommand{\hl}{\hline}

68: \newcommand{\vsl}{v\hskip-.2cm/}

69: \newcommand{\real}{{\rm Re}}

70: \newcommand{\imag}{{\rm Im}}

71: \newcommand{\hepph}[1]{{\tt hep-ph/#1}} 

72: \newcommand{\hepex}[1]{{\tt hep-ex/#1}}

73: \newcommand{\heplat}[1]{{\tt hep-lat/#1}}  

74: %

75: \newcommand{\cO}{{\cal O}}

76: \newcommand{\cQ}{{\cal Q}}

77: \newcommand{\cA}{{\cal A}}

78: \newcommand{\mbf}{\mathbf} 

79: \newcommand{\mrm}{\mathrm} 

80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

81: \newcommand{\ket}{\,\rangle}

82: \newcommand{\bra}{\langle \,}

83: \newcommand{\KET}{\,\rangle}

84: \newcommand{\BRA}{\langle \,}

85: \newcommand{\mathbold}{\bf}

86: 

87: \newcommand{\um}{u_{\mu}}

88: \newcommand{\uM}{u^{\mu}}

89: \newcommand{\un}{u_{\nu}}

90: \newcommand{\uN}{u^{\nu}}

91: \newcommand{\1}{\lambda_1}

92: \newcommand{\2}{\lambda_2}

93: \newcommand{\3}{\lambda_3}

94: \newcommand{\Pm}{\nabla_\mu P}

95: \newcommand{\Pn}{\nabla_\nu P}

96: \newcommand{\PM}{\nabla^\mu P}

97: \newcommand{\PN}{\nabla^\nu P}

98: \newcommand{\uu}{u \cdot u }

99: \newcommand{\dmun}{\nabla_{[ \mu} u_{\nu ] }}

100: 

101: \newcommand{\es}{\varepsilon^{\phantom{a}}_{\mathrm{S}}}

102: \newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon^{\phantom{a}}_{\mathrm{P}}}

103: \newcommand{\ppa}{\lambda_1^{\mathrm{PP}}}

104: \newcommand{\ppb}{\lambda_2^{\mathrm{PP}}}

105: \newcommand{\ppc}{\lambda_3^{\mathrm{PP}}}

106: \newcommand{\ssa}{\lambda_1^{\mathrm{SS}}}

107: \newcommand{\ssb}{\lambda_2^{\mathrm{SS}}}

108: \newcommand{\ssc}{\lambda_3^{\mathrm{SS}}}

109: \newcommand{\spa}{\lambda_1^{\mathrm{SP}}}

110: \newcommand{\spb}{\lambda_2^{\mathrm{SP}}}

111: \newcommand{\spc}{\lambda_3^{\mathrm{SP}}}

112: \newcommand{\lam}{\lambda}

113: \newcommand{\bs}{b^{\mathrm{S}}}

114: \newcommand{\bp}{b^{\mathrm{P}}}

115: \newcommand{\bsp}{b^{\mathrm{SP}}}

116: \newcommand{\bsm}{{b^{\mathrm{S}\,\mu}}}

117: \newcommand{\bpm}{{b^{\mathrm{P}\,\mu}}}

118: \newcommand{\bspm}{{b^{\mathrm{SP}\,\mu}}}

119: \newcommand{\bsn}{{b^{\mathrm{S}\,\nu}}}

120: \newcommand{\bpn}{{b^{\mathrm{P}\,\nu}}}

121: \newcommand{\bspn}{{b^{\mathrm{SP}\,\nu}}}

122: \newcommand{\as}{{a^{\mathrm{S}}}}

123: \newcommand{\ap}{{a^{\mathrm{P}}}}

124: \newcommand{\asp}{{a^{\mathrm{SP}}}}

125: \newcommand{\ks}{{k^{\mathrm{S}}}}

126: \newcommand{\kp}{{k^{\mathrm{P}}}}

127: \newcommand{\ksp}{{k^{\mathrm{SP}}}}

128: 

129: \def\mapright#1#2{\smash{

130:      \mathop{-\!\!\!-\!\!\!\rightarrow}\limits^{#1}_{#2}}}

131: 

132: 

133: 

134: 

135: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

137: %%Graphics definition

138: %

139: \newif\ifpdf

140: \ifx\pdfoutput\undefined

141: \pdffalse % we are not running PDFLaTeX

142: \else

143: \pdfoutput=1 % we are running PDFLaTeX

144: \pdftrue

145: \fi

146: 

147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

148: %%%%%-----  commands      ----------%%%%%%

149: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

150: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

151: %Put your definitions here

152: %Commandlist:

153: %%%%%%%punctuation, arrays%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

154: \newcommand{\fs}{\; .}

155: \newcommand{\co}{\; ,}  

156: \newcommand{\non}{\nonumber}

157: \newcommand{\no}{\nonumber \\}

158: 

159: %%%%%%%  misc symbols %%%%%%%%%

160: \newcommand{\nc}{{N_{\!c}}}

161: \newcommand{\nf}{{N_{\!f}}}

162: 

163: \newcommand{\QCD}{{\rm QCD} }

164: %\newcommand{\eff}{{\rm eff}}

165: 

166: \newcommand{\br}{\langle}  %bra

167: \newcommand{\ke}{\rangle} %ket

168: 

169: %%%%%%%%%pions%%%%%%%

170: \newcommand{\Fz}{F_0} 

171: \newcommand{\Bz}{B_0} 

172: 

173: \newcommand{\Gz}{G_0} 

174: \newcommand{\GS}{G_S}

175: \newcommand{\GP}{G_P}

176: 

177: \newcommand{\uucon}{\br  0|\bar u u | 0 \ke_0 }

178: 

179: %%specific stuff:Resonance parameters%%%%

180: \newcommand{\Sres}{{\cal S}}

181: \newcommand{\Pres}{{\cal P}}

182: \newcommand{\Ares}{{\cal A}}

183: \newcommand{\Vres}{{\cal V}}

184: 

185: \newcommand{\MS}{M_S}

186: \newcommand{\MP}{M_P}

187: \newcommand{\MA}{M_A}

188: \newcommand{\MV}{M_V}

189: 

190: \newcommand{\lS}{\lambda^S}

191: \newcommand{\lP}{\lambda^P}

192: \newcommand{\lA}{\lambda^A}

193: \newcommand{\lV}{\lambda^V}

194: 

195: \newcommand{\lSS}{\lambda^{SS}}

196: \newcommand{\lSP}{\lambda^{SP}}

197: \newcommand{\lSA}{\lambda^{SA}}

198: \newcommand{\lSV}{\lambda^{SV}}

199: \newcommand{\lPP}{\lambda^{PP}}

200: \newcommand{\lPA}{\lambda^{PA}}

201: \newcommand{\lPV}{\lambda^{PV}}

202: 

203: \newcommand{\lSPP}{\lambda^{SPP}}

204: 

205: \newcommand{\cL}{c^{\cal L}} %

206: 

207: %%%%%%%%%%model ansatz%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

208: 

209: \newcommand{\model}{{\Sres\Pres}}

210: \newcommand{\Lm}{L^\model}

211: \newcommand{\Cm}{C^\model}

212: 

213: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

214: %---------------------end of commands-----------------------%

215: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

217: 

218: \begin{document}

219: \begin{titlepage}

220: 

221: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

222: %Some more stuff to get graphics to work

223: \ifpdf

224: \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf, .jpg}

225: \else

226: \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.eps, .jpg}

227: \fi

228: 

229: \vspace*{-1.8cm}

230: \begin{flushright}

231: {\small\sf  IFIC/05-25\\FTUV/05-1004\\}

232: \end{flushright}

233: 

234: 

235: \vspace*{2.5cm} 

236: \begin{center}

237: {\Large\bf One-loop Renormalization of Resonance Chiral Theory~:}  \\

238: $   $ \\

239: {\Large\bf Scalar and Pseudoscalar Resonances$^*$}

240: \\[20mm]

241: 

242: {\normalsize\bf \sc I. Rosell$^{1}$, P. Ruiz-Femen\'{\i}a$^2$}

243: and {\normalsize\bf \sc J. Portol\'es$^1$} \\

244: %\\[10pt]

245: 

246: 

247: \vspace{1.4cm} 

248: 

249: ${}^{1)}$ {\em Departament de F\'{\i}sica Te\`orica, IFIC, CSIC --- 

250: Universitat de Val\`encia \\ 

251: Edifici d'Instituts de Paterna, Apt. Correus 22085, E-46071 

252: Val\`encia, Spain} \\[10pt]

253: ${}^{2)}$ {\em Theory Division, Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, \\

254: F\"ohringer Ring 6, D-80805 M\"unchen, Germany} \\

255: \end{center}

256: 

257: 

258: \vfill

259: \begin{abstract}

260: We consider the Resonance Chiral Theory with one multiplet of 

261: scalar and pseudoscalar resonances, up to bilinear couplings in the

262: resonance fields, and evaluate its $\beta$-function at one-loop

263: with the use of the background field method. Thus

264: we also provide the full set of operators that renormalize the theory at

265: one loop and render it finite.

266: 

267: \end{abstract}

268: 

269: \vfill

270: \noindent 

271: *~Work supported in part by HPRN-CT2002-00311 (EURIDICE).

272: \end{titlepage}

273: 

274: 

275: 

276: \section{Introduction}

277: It is well known that the study of low--energy hadrodynamics is

278: tampered with by our present inability to implement non-perturbative

279: Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) fully in those processes. 

280: Hence, conspicuously, in order to disentangle New Physics effects

281: from the Standard Model we need to work out a frame that enforces

282: QCD in this energy region as close as possible.

283: \par

284: In the very low--energy regime

285: (typically $E \ll M_V$, where $M_V$ is short for the mass of the

286: lightest vector meson multiplet) Chiral Perturbation Theory ($\chi$PT)

287: \cite{Weinberg:1978kz,Gasser:1983yg} has become a successful model-independent 

288: tool that exploits the main features of an Effective Theory approach

289: to QCD, namely the symmetries of the underlying theory and the

290: phenomenologically suited assumption of spontaneous breaking of the

291: chiral symmetry.

292: $\chi$PT is a non-decoupling Effective Theory ruled by the 

293: $SU(N_F)_L \otimes SU(N_F)_R$ chiral symmetry of massless \QCD and it is

294: built in terms of the

295: pseudo-Goldstone bosons (to be identified with the lightest multiplet

296: of pseudoscalar mesons) that are generated in the phase transition 

297: driven by the spontaneous breaking of the symmetry, all the heavier states

298: being integrated out. This framework is worked out as a perturbative

299: expansion in the momenta and masses of the pseudoscalar mesons and

300: it has proven to be a rigorous and fruitful scheme \cite{Ecker:1994gg}.

301: Although \chpt is non-renormalizable {\em stricto sensu}, it supports

302: a perturbative renormalization procedure where all loop divergences

303: can be reabsorbed (when regularized within a scheme that respects

304: chiral symmetry) into a finite number of new operators. This procedure

305: is well defined order by order in the chiral expansion. Accordingly

306: its generating functional has been systematically calculated up to

307: ${\cal O}(p^6)$, that is two loops for

308: even--intrinsic--parity processes 

309: \cite{Gasser:1983yg,Fearing:1994ga,Unterdorfer:2002zg}

310: and one loop in the odd--intrinsic--parity sector \cite{Akhoury:1990px}.

311: $\chi$PT has profusely guided light meson dynamics in the last twenty

312: years.

313: \par

314: At higher energies ($M_V \lsim E \lsim 2 \gev$) the situation is more

315: involved. This regime is populated by many resonances and the absence

316: of a mass gap in the spectrum of states makes difficult to provide

317: a formal Effective Theory approach to implement \QCD properly. Hence we 

318: have to rely on additional information provided by the strong interaction

319: underlying theory. Large--$N_C$ \QCD \cite{'tHooft:1973jz}

320: furnishes a practical scenario to work with. The

321: $N_C \rightarrow \infty$ limit strongly constrains meson dynamics by

322: asserting that the Green Functions of the theory are described by the

323: tree diagrams of an effective local Lagrangian with local vertices and

324: meson fields, higher corrections in $1/N_C$ being yielded by loops

325: described within the same Lagrangian theory. In addition the spectrum

326: of this limit of \QCD is given by an infinite set of non-decaying meson

327: states. This scheme has supplied thorough insights to extract information

328: from the theory \cite{Manohar:1998xv,Pich:2002xy}. Nevertheless

329: a strict formulation

330: of large--$N_C$ \QCD in the $N_C \rightarrow \infty$ limit is still 

331: lacking, mainly due to the fact that we do not know how to implement

332: an infinite spectrum in a model--independent manner.

333: \par

334: The known phenomenology of hadron processes seems to support the 

335: assumption that when a resonance leads the dynamics of an observable,

336: heavier resonances, with the same quantum numbers, tend to play a decreasing

337: role. This reasonable endorsed conjecture helps us to modelize 

338: large--$N_C$ \QCD with a Lagrangian theory that involves, besides pseudoscalar

339: mesons, one $U(3)$ multiplet of scalar, pseudoscalar, vector and 

340: axial-vector resonances, each one to be identified with the 

341: lightest corresponding states

342: in the phenomenological spectrum. The remaining restrictions on the 

343: theory come from the symmetry properties of QCD, like chiral symmetry

344: driving the interactions of the pseudoscalar mesons and $U(3)$ unitary

345: symmetry for the matter fields (resonances) \cite{Coleman:1969sm}.

346: This

347: construction, that constitutes the basis of the Resonance Chiral Theory

348: (R$\chi$T),

349: was carried out in detail in Ref.~\cite{Ecker:1988te}, though

350: considering operators with only one resonance field in the

351: even-intrinsic-parity

352: sector\footnote{An extension to operators contributing, upon integration,

353: to the ${\cal O}(p^6)$ \chpt  Lagrangian is under way \cite{nosfuture}.}. 

354: Notice that

355: in contrast to many modelizations of the resonance fields that have been

356: widely employed in the literature, \rcht only uses basic \QCD symmetry 

357: features without any additional {\em ad hoc} assumptions. Its model

358: aspect only comes from the fact that we do not include an infinite spectrum

359: in the theory, which is one of the features of 

360: the $N_C \rightarrow \infty$ limit of QCD. Finally

361: the elements that provide the theory, symmetries and spectrum, give the

362: structure of the operators but do not supply information on the couplings

363: of the Lagrangian. However these are strongly constrained by 

364: short-distance properties of the underlying \QCD dynamics~: an interplay

365: between hadronic form factors and 

366: Green functions of the \QCD currents can furnish all--important information

367: on the couplings \cite{Ecker:1989yg} through a matching procedure that

368: has been very much used lately with notable success 

369: \cite{Moussallam:1997xx,Cirigliano:2004ue}.

370: Other modelizations have also been used to fulfill this task 

371: \cite{Prades:1993ys}.

372: \par

373: Since its inception \rcht has been applied both to the study of resonance

374: contributions in weak interaction processes (radiative and non--leptonic

375: kaon decays) \cite{Ecker:1992de} and to the study of form factors of mesons

376: \cite{Guerrero:1997ku} where only the \rcht Lagrangian at tree level has been

377: used and, accordingly, the leading contribution in the

378: large--$N_C$ model we are describing has been obtained. The next-to-leading

379: order in the $1/N_C$ expansion arises from one loop calculations within

380: the theory and its control starts to be necessary both on grounds of 

381: the convergence of the predictions and to straighten our knowledge of

382: non-perturbative QCD. Some pioneering work at one-loop has already been

383: performed \cite{GomezDumm:2000fz,Rosell:2004mn} showing not only the technical 

384: difficulties that appear but also the conceptual intricacies that involve

385: the construction of the theory.

386: \par

387: \rcht is non-renormalizable. Moreover the lack of an expansion parameter

388: in the Lagrangian does not make feasible the application of a perturbative

389: renormalization program based on a well defined power-counting scheme

390: analogous to the one in $\chi$PT. Nevertheless

391: from a practical point of view the situation is similar to the \chpt case

392: \cite{Buchler:2003vw}.

393: As shown in Ref.~\cite{Rosell:2004mn}, where the vector form factor of the

394: pion was calculated at one loop in R$\chi$T, it is possible to construct a 

395: finite number of operators, within the theory, whose couplings can 

396: absorb the divergences coming from one loop

397: diagrams. The only requirement is, of course, that the regularization procedure

398: of the loop divergences respects the symmetries of the Lagrangian.

399: \par

400: In the present article we have studied the full one-loop generating functional

401: that arises from \rcht when one multiplet of scalar and pseudoscalar 

402: resonances are considered and only up to 

403: bilinear couplings in the resonances are

404: included. We have evaluated the divergent contributions

405: and, consequently, we have obtained the full set of operators needed to

406: renormalize the theory properly. The conceptual differences with the

407: \chpt renormalization program will also be stressed.

408: \par

409: In Section~2 we describe shortly the content of \rcht that is of interest

410: in our case. Section~3 is devoted to explain the procedure and hints that

411: we follow to perform the evaluation of the generating functional, whose

412: results are given in Section~4 and commented in Section~5. In Section~6

413: we point out the conclusions and summarize. Most of the

414: technical details

415: are relegated to the Appendices.

416: 

417: \section{\rcht with scalar and pseudoscalar resonances}

418: 

419: We consider the R$\chi$T Lagrangian constituted by pseudo-Goldstone

420: bosons (the lightest pseudoscalar mesons) and one multiplet of both 

421: scalar and pseudoscalar resonances. Motivated by the large-$N_C$ limit

422: we include $U(3)$ multiplets for the spectrum though we limit ourselves

423: to $SU(3)$ external currents as we are not interested in anomaly related

424: issues. Our Lagrangian reads~:

425: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:lagr1}

426: \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{R}\chi\mathrm{T}}(\phi, \mathrm{S},\mathrm{P})

427: &=&\mathcal{L}_{\chi}^{(2)}\,+\,

428: \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{kin}}(\mathrm{S},\mathrm{P}) \,+\,

429: \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{S})\,+\,  \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{P})\,+

430: \, \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{S},\mathrm{P}) \, ,

431: \end{eqnarray}

432: where $\mathcal{L}_{\chi}^{(2)}$ is the $\cO(p^2)$ $\chi$PT Lagrangian,

433: \begin{eqnarray}

434: \mathcal{L}_{\chi}^{(2)}&=&

435: \frac{F^2}{4} \bra u_\mu u^\mu \, + \, \chi_+ \ket \,,

436: \end{eqnarray}

437: with $F \simeq 92.4 \mev$ the decay constant of the pion in the chiral limit

438: and the brackets $\langle ... \rangle$ stand for a trace in the flavour

439: space. The kinetic term for the scalar $S(0^{++})$ and pseudoscalar

440: $P(0^{-+})$ resonances is~:

441: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:kineticsp}

442: \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{kin}} (\mathrm{S},\mathrm{P}) &=& \frac{1}{2} 

443: \, \sum_{R \, = \, S,P} \bra \nabla^\mu R \,\nabla_\mu R \,-\, M_R^2\, R^2 

444: \ket  \,, 

445: \end{eqnarray}

446: that also includes interaction terms through the covariant derivatives.

447: Finally the pure interacting terms for resonances and pseudoscalars are

448: given by \cite{Ecker:1988te,nosfuture}~:

449: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:spint}

450: \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{S})&=& c_d \bra S \, u_\mu u^\mu \ket  +

451:  c_m \bra S \,\chi_+ \ket  

452: + \ssa \bra SS \,u^\mu u_\mu \ket + \ssb \bra S u_\mu S u^\mu

453:  \ket  + \ssc \bra SS\, \chi_+ \ket \,,\,

454:  \phantom{\frac{1}{2}} \nonumber \\

455: \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{P})&=&i\,d_m \bra P \,\chi_- \ket  \,

456: +\, \ppa \bra PP \,u^\mu u_\mu \ket \,+\, \ppb \bra P u_\mu P u^\mu 

457: \ket \, +\, \ppc \bra PP\, \chi_+ \ket \,,\,\phantom{\frac{1}{2}} \\

458: \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{S},\mathrm{P})&=&\spa\bra \{ \nabla_\mu S, P \} 

459: u^\mu \ket + i \, \spb \bra \{ S, P \} \chi_- \ket \, , 

460: \phantom{\frac{1}{2}} \nonumber

461: \end{eqnarray}

462: where all the couplings are real valued.

463: We follow closely the notation of Refs.~\cite{Ecker:1988te,nosfuture} that, 

464: for convenience, is recalled in Appendix~\ref{app:uno}.

465: \par

466: Several comments on our Lagrangian theory are suitable here~:

467: \begin{enumerate}

468: \item[-] Notice that we are not including the \chpt Lagrangian of 

469: $\cO (p^4)$ and higher orders. It has been shown \cite{Ecker:1988te} 

470: that ${\cal L}_{\chi}^{(4)}$

471: is largely saturated\footnote{This is much more clear 

472: in the case of vector and axial-vector

473: resonances as their phenomenology is better known.} by the resonance 

474: exchange generated by the linear terms in the resonance field given by

475: ${\cal L}_2(S)$ and ${\cal L}_2(P)$, hence the

476: explicit introduction of ${\cal L}_{\chi}^{(4)}$ would amount to include an

477: overlap between both resonance contributions.

478: An analogous analysis at $\cO(p^6)$ has not been

479: performed systematically but it also looks a reasonable assumption. 

480: Thus our theory stands for a complete resonance saturation of the 

481: \chpt Lagrangian.

482: \item[-] The structure of the resonance interacting operators follows a

483: definite pattern. The linear terms in the resonance fields were already

484: introduced in Ref.~\cite{Ecker:1988te} and have the structure 

485: $\langle R \, \chi^{(2)} \rangle$, where

486: $\chi^{(2)} \, \equiv \, \chi_{\pm}, \, u_{\mu}u^{\mu} \,$

487: is a chiral tensor, involving Goldstone bosons and external currents,

488: of $\cO(p^2)$ in the chiral counting\footnote{This is in fact the origin

489: of the subindex 2 in the Lagrangian (${\cal L}_2$),

490: i.e. that the Goldstone and external

491: currents are introduced with chiral tensors of that order.}. However

492: the theory does not look

493: consistent with these pieces only. This is because the kinetic term

494: in Eq.~(\ref{eq:kineticsp}), due to the covariant derivative,

495: also includes an interacting term with two resonances. Hence it seems

496: congruous to include all the interacting terms with two resonances

497: that have the structure of the kinetic term, i.e. 

498: $\langle R \, R \, \chi^{(2)} \rangle$, as we have done \cite{nosfuture}. 

499: 

500: \item[-] The \rcht Lagrangian satisfies, by construction, the strictures

501: of chiral dynamics at very low-energies ($E \ll M_R$). Notwithstanding, it 

502: is clear that there is no small coupling or kinematical parameter that could

503: allow us to perform a perturbative expansion in order to solve the 

504: effective action of the theory, as it happens in \chpt. Hence it looks that

505: the exclusion of many (infinite) operators (e.g. one resonance and a 

506: ${\cal O}(p^4)$ chiral tensor, etc), satisfying the required symmetries,

507: is not justified. The way out to this assessments has several components.

508: On one side \rcht is not an Effective 

509: Theory but a consistent phenomenological Lagrangian model where many of

510: the constraints from \QCD are enforced. In particular it can be seen

511: \cite{nosfuture} that short-distance conditions limit strongly the operators

512: that are allowed (those with higher order chiral tensors tend to violate the

513: \QCD ruled asymptotic behaviour of Green's functions or form factors).

514: On the other side we have the large-$N_C$

515: limit in order to guide a loop perturbative expansion, not in the Lagrangian,

516: but in the observables evaluated with it. 

517: \par 

518: It has also been proposed 

519: \cite{Bruns:2004tj} that, due to the fact that the chiral counting is

520: spoiled when resonances are included in loops, it could be possible to

521: keep the chiral counting by disentangling the \lq \lq {\em hard}" modes

522: that could be absorbed in the

523: renormalization program. In this way one gets a chiral expansion even if

524: resonance contributions in the loop are considered. This procedure can

525: be useful but only if one is interested in the application at very low

526: energies out of the resonance region. 

527: 

528: \item[-] The Lagrangian theory described by Eq.~(\ref{eq:lagr1}) satisfies

529: the $N_C$ counting rules \cite{'tHooft:1973jz,Kaiser:2000gs}.

530: Leading operators in the large-$N_C$ limit have one trace in the flavour

531: space and we attach to this leading order terms. From the interaction vertices

532: we see that the couplings $F, c_d, c_m$ and $d_m$ are

533: of $\cO(\sqrt{N_C})$ while $\lambda_i^{SS}, \lambda_i^{PP}$ and 

534: $\lambda_i^{SP}$ are of $\cO(1)$. Short-distance constraints on the

535: asymptotic behaviour of form factors and Green functions 

536: \cite{Pich:2002xy,Ecker:1989yg} provide, in the $N_C \rightarrow \infty$

537: limit, the following relations~:

538: \begin{eqnarray}  \label{eq:largecd} 

539: c_m \, = \, c_d \, = \, \sqrt{2} \; d_m & = & \frac{F}{2} \; ,  

540: \end{eqnarray}

541: and $M_P^2  =  2 \, (1 \, - \, \delta) \, M_S^2 $ with

542:  $\delta \, \simeq \, 3 \, \pi  \alpha_S \, F^2/M_S^2 \sim \, 0.08 \, \alpha_S$.

543: Short-distance constraints on the $\lambda_i^{RR}$ couplings in the 

544: $N_C \rightarrow \infty$ are, at the

545: moment, more controversial \cite{nosfuture,ffheretic}~:

546: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:largecd2}

547: \lambda_3^{SS} \, = \, \lambda_3^{PP} & = & 0 \; , \nonumber \\

548: \lambda_1^{SP} \, = \, 4 \, \lambda_2^{SP} \, = \, - \, \frac{d_m}{c_m} 

549: & = & - \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \; , 

550: \end{eqnarray}

551: where we have used Eq.~(\ref{eq:largecd}). 

552: In Appendix~\ref{app:dos} we explain how these last results are obtained. 

553: Though the relations shown in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:largecd},\ref{eq:largecd2}) could

554: be used to simplify the outcome

555: of the calculations presented in this article, we will give the 

556: full results without 

557: short-distance constraints built-in so as not to lose generality.

558: \end{enumerate}

559: The lack of an expansion coupling or parameter in \rcht hinders a 

560: perturbative renormalization like the one applied in \chpt. Nevertheless 

561: a complete one-loop calculation of the vector form factor of the pion

562: in \rcht \cite{Ecker:1988te} was performed in Ref.~\cite{Rosell:2004mn}

563: with special attention to the renormalization program. It was shown that,

564: using dimensional regularization,

565: all the divergences could be absorbed by the introduction of local

566: operators fulfilling the symmetry requirements. This is a particular case 

567: of the well known fact that all divergences are local in a quantum field

568: theory \cite{Collins}, and are given by a polynomial in the external 

569: momenta or masses. Hence it is reasonable to consider the construction of the 

570: full set of operators that renders our ${\cal L}_{R\chi T}(\phi,S,P)$ theory

571: finite up to one-loop. Accordingly we perform the one-loop

572: generating functional of our Lagrangian theory to evaluate the full set of

573: divergences that arise. This we pursue in the rest of the article.

574: 

575: \section{Generating functional at one loop}

576: 

577: The generating functional of the connected Green functions, $W[J]$,

578: is the logarithm of the vacuum-to-vacuum transition amplitude in the

579: presence of external sources $J(x)$ coupled to bilinear quark currents~:

580: \begin{equation}

581: e^{\,i \, W[J]} \, = \, \frac{1}{{\cal N}} \, \int  \, [\, d \psi \, ] \, \, \, 

582: e^{\, i \, S_0[\psi,J]} \; ,

583: \end{equation}

584: where the normalization is such that $W[0]=0$ and the field $\psi$ is,

585: in our case, short for the Goldstone and resonance mesons.

586: The evaluation of the generating functional of our Lagrangian theory

587: ${\cal L}_{R\chi T}(\phi,S,P)$,

588: is readily done with the background field method \cite{bfm,bfm2},

589: where the action is expanded around the classical fields $\psi_{cl}$.

590: By defining the quantum field as 

591: $\Delta \psi = \psi - \psi_{cl}$, the expansion up to one loop ($L=1$)

592: is given by~:

593: \begin{align}

594: W[J]_{L=1} \, = \, S_0[\psi_{cl},J] \, - \, i \, \ln \left[ \,  

595:  \int \, [\, d \Delta \psi \, ] \, \exp \left( \phantom{\frac{1}{2}}

596: \right. \right. & 

597: \! \! \! \!   i

598: \int \, d^4x_1 \, \frac{\delta \, S_0[\psi,J]}{\delta \psi_i(x_1)} \, 

599: \Big|_{\psi_{cl}}

600: \, \Delta \psi_i(x_1) \, \nonumber \\ 

601: %& &   \\ 

602: \! \! \! \! \! \!\! \! \! &  \! \!\! \! \! \! \!\!

603: \! \! \! \!\! \! \! \! \! \! \!\! \! \! 

604: \!\! \! \! 

605: \! \! \! \!\! \! \! \! \! \! \!\! \! \! \!\! \! \! \!\! \! \! \!\! \! \! 

606: \left. \left.+ \, \frac{i}{2!} \, \int \,

607:  d^4x_1 \, d^4x_2 \, \, \Delta \psi_i(x_1) \, 

608: \frac{\delta^2 \, S_0[\psi,J]}{\delta \psi_i(x_1) \, \delta \psi_j(x_2)} \,

609:  \Big|_{\psi_{cl}} \, \Delta \psi_j(x_2) \, \right) \, 

610:  \right]   ,

611: \end{align}

612: but for an irrelevant constant. The $i,j$ indices run over all the

613: different fields and are summed over. The classical field $\psi_{cl}$

614: is, by definition, the solution of~:

615: \begin{equation} \label{eq:eom}

616: \frac{\delta S_0[\psi,J]}{\delta \psi_i(x)} \, \Bigg|_{\psi_{cl}} \, = \, 0 \, ,

617: \end{equation}

618: that provides the implicit relation $\psi_{cl} = \psi_{cl}[J]$ and

619: the Equations of Motion (EOM) for the classical fields. 

620: The explicit expressions of the latter are detailed in 

621: Appendix~\ref{app:tres}. Solving the

622: remaining gaussian integral in the Euclidean spacetime and coming back

623: to Minkowsky we have finally~:

624: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:sl1}

625: W[J]_{L=1}  &=& S_0[\psi_{cl},J] \, + \, S_1[\psi_{cl},J]\, ,  \\

626: S_1[\psi_{cl},J] &=& \frac{i}{2} \,

627: \ln  \,\mbox{det} \, {\cal D}(\psi_{cl},J) 

628:  \, \;, 

629: \end{eqnarray}

630: where $ {\cal D}(\psi_{cl},J)$ is the quadratic differential operator

631: specified by~:

632: \begin{equation}

633: \langle \, x \,  | \, {\cal D}(\psi_{cl},J) \, | \,  y \, 

634: \rangle_{ij} \, = \,

635:  \frac{\delta^2 \, S_0[\psi,J]}{\delta \psi_i(x) \, \delta \psi_j(y)} 

636: \Bigg|_{\psi_{cl}} \; .

637: \end{equation}

638: The action at one loop needs regularization and, following the use

639: within $\chi$PT, we will proceed by working

640: in $D$ spacetime dimensions, a procedure that preserves the relevant symmetries

641: of our theory. 

642: Divergences in the functional integration are local and, within dimensional 

643: regularization, can be absorbed through local operators that satisfy 

644: the same symmetries

645: than the original theory \cite{Collins}. The one-loop renormalized 

646: Lagrangian is thus defined by~:

647: \begin{equation} \label{eq:renoo}

648:  {\cal L}_{1}[\psi,J] \, = \,  

649: \mu^{D-4} \, \left( \, {\cal L}_{1}^{\mathrm{ren}}[\psi,J; \mu] \, + \, 

650:  \frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \, \frac{1}{D-4} \, 

651:  {\cal L}_{1}^{\mathrm{div}}[\psi,J] \, \right) \, .

652: \end{equation}

653: In Eq.~(\ref{eq:renoo}) we

654: have split the one-loop bare Lagrangian into a renormalized and

655:  a divergent part, and the scale $\mu$ is

656: introduced in order to restore the correct dimensions in the

657:  renormalized Lagrangian for $D\ne 4$. The divergent

658: part ${\cal L}_{1}^{\mathrm{div}}$ contains the counterterms

659:  which exactly cancel the divergences found

660: in the result for the one-loop generating functional of Eq.~(\ref{eq:sl1}).

661: \par

662: Up to one loop ${\cal L}_{1}[\psi,J]$ can be written in terms of

663: a minimal basis of $N$ operators 

664: $ {\cal O}_i[\psi,J]$. For a non-renormalizable theory, such

665: as R$\chi$T, $N$

666: grows with the number of loops. Accordingly we expect to find in our evaluation

667: of $ S_1[\psi,J]$ many more operators that those in the original

668: tree level theory $S_0[\psi,J]$. The structure of these

669: obeys the same construction principles (symmetries) that

670: gave ${\cal L}_{R\chi T}(\phi,S,P)$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:lagr1}),

671: though we foresee  that higher-order chiral tensors may be involved.

672: A detailed study of the functional integration shows that the new terms

673: have the structure $\chi^{(4)}$, $ R \, \chi^{(4)} $ or $R \, R \, \chi^{(4)}$

674: (with a single or multiple traces) and $\chi^{(2)}$, $R\, \chi^{(2)}$ 

675: and $ R \, R \, \chi^{(2)}$

676: (with multiple traces)~\footnote{As it will be emphasized later, in the

677: procedure and due to a necessary field redefinition, terms with more than

678: two resonances will be generated. We attach to our initial scheme and

679: only will keep terms with up to two resonances.}.

680: 

681: \subsection{Expansion around the classical solutions}

682: Following the aforementioned procedure we expand the action associated

683: to our Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{R \chi T}(\phi,S,P)$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:lagr1})

684: around the solutions of the classical EOM~: $u_{cl}(\phi)$, $S_{cl}$

685: and $P_{cl}$. The fluctuations of the pseudoscalar Goldstone fields 

686: $\Delta_i$ ($i=0,...,8$), and of the scalar and pseudoscalar resonances 

687: $\varepsilon_{S_i}$ and 

688: $\varepsilon_{P_i}$, are parameterized 

689: as~\footnote{This is a convenient choice for the pseudoscalar fluctuation

690: variables in order to simplify several cumbersome expressions. Notice

691: that, once the  ``gauge'' $u_R = u_L^{\dagger} \equiv u$ is enforced,

692: it implies that the classical and the quantum Goldstone fields 

693: commute~: $u_{cl} \, \exp(i \Delta /2) = \exp(i \Delta / 2) \, u_{cl}$.}~:

694: \begin{align} \label{eq:fluc1}

695: u_R&=\,u_{cl}\,e^{i \Delta / 2}\, ,  &u_L&=\,u_{cl}^\dagger  \, 

696: e^{-i\Delta / 2}\,, \nonumber \\

697: S&=\,S_{cl}\,+\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{\es} \,, 

698: &P&=\,P_{cl}\,+\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{\ep}\,,

699: \end{align}

700: with 

701: \begin{align} \label{eq:fluc2}

702: \Delta &=\,\Delta_i \lam_i / F \,, 

703: &\es&=\,{\es}_{i}\,\lam_i\,, 

704: & \ep&=\,{\ep}_{i}\,\lam_i\,.

705: \end{align}

706: In the following we will drop the subindex ``$cl$'' for simplicity.

707: \par

708: Expanding the Lagrangian using Eqs.~(\ref{eq:fluc1},\ref{eq:fluc2}) up to 

709: terms quadratic in the fields 

710: ($\Delta_i ,\,\varepsilon_{S_i} ,\,\varepsilon_{P_i}$) and using 

711: the EOM of Appendix~\ref{app:tres},

712: we obtain the second-order

713: fluctuation Lagrangian, that takes the form~\footnote{The intricacies of 

714: this evaluation are explained in detail in Appendix~\ref{app:cuatro}.}~:

715: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:expansion}

716: \Delta \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{R}\chi\mathrm{T}}&=& -\frac{1}{2}\,\Delta_i 

717: \left( d'_\mu d'^\mu + \sigma \right)_{ij} \Delta_j 

718: - \frac{1}{2}\,{\es}_{i} \left( d^\mu d_\mu + \ks \right)_{ij} {\es}_{j} 

719: - \frac{1}{2}\,{\ep}_{i} \left( d^\mu d_\mu + \kp \right)_{ij} {\ep}_{j} 

720: \nonumber \\

721: %

722: &&+ \,{\es}_{i}\, \as_{ij}\, \Delta_j 

723: + \,{\ep}_{i}\, \ap_{ij}\, \Delta_j 

724: +\,{\ep}_i\, \asp_{ij}\, {\es}_j  \phantom{\frac{1}{2}} \nonumber \\ 

725: %

726: &&

727: + \,{\es}_{k}\, \bs_{\mu \, ki}\, d^\mu_{ij} \Delta_j 

728: + \,{\ep}_{k}\, \bp_{\mu \, ki}\, d^\mu_{ij} \Delta_j  

729: +\, {\ep}_k \, \bsp_{\mu \, ki}\, d^\mu_{ij} {\es}_j   \,\, . 

730: \phantom{\frac{1}{2}} 

731: \end{eqnarray}

732: Derivatives and matrices are defined in Appendix~\ref{app:cuatro} where it is 

733: also shown that in order to write $\Delta \mathcal{L}_{R \chi T}$ 

734: in the form displayed above we need

735: to perform two field redefinitions. This procedure generates 

736: operators with multiple resonance fields. However

737: our theory, as specified in Section~2, does not include operators 

738: with more than two resonances and,

739: for consistency, we shall keep this structure in the fluctuation

740:  Lagrangian, thus

741: disregarding operators with three or more resonance

742: fields in the following. We will comment later on the

743:  consequences of this feature.

744: It is customary to write the second-order fluctuation Lagrangian as ~:

745: \begin{equation} \label{eq:gausso}

746: \Delta {\cal L}_{\mathrm{R} \chi \mathrm{T}} \, = \, 

747: - \, \frac{1}{2} \, \eta \, \left( \, \Sigma_{\mu} \, \Sigma^{\mu} \, + \, 

748: \Lambda \, \right) \, \eta^{\top} \; , 

749: \end{equation}

750: where $\eta$ collects the fluctuation fields, 

751: $\eta=\left(\Delta_i,{\es}_j,{\ep}_k\right)$, $i,j,k = 0,...,8$, 

752: $\eta^{\top}$ is its transposed and the rest of definitions are given 

753: in Appendix~\ref{app:cuatro}.

754: 

755: \subsection{Divergent part of the generating functional at one loop}

756: 

757: After we have performed the second-order fluctuation on our Lagrangian

758: theory we come back to our discussion at the beginning of this Section 

759: in order to identify the one-loop generating functional, specified now

760: by the action~:

761: \begin{equation}

762: S_{1} \, = \, \frac{i}{2} \, \ln \, \mbox{det} \, 

763: \left( \, \Sigma_{\mu} \, \Sigma^{\mu} \, + \, \Lambda \, \right) \; .

764: \end{equation}

765: We use dimensional regularization to extract the 

766: divergence of this expression. As emphasized in the literature

767: \cite{Barvinsky:1985an} it is convenient to employ the Schwinger-DeWitt

768: proper-time representation, embedded in the heat-kernel formalism,

769: in order to extract the residue at the $D-4$ pole. Ref.~\cite{bfm} 

770: shows that, in fact, symmetry considerations can also provide this 

771: information (at least up to one loop).

772: \par

773: Hence we get~:

774: \begin{equation}\label{eq:oneloop}

775: S_{1}=-\frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \, \frac{1}{D-4} 

776: \int \mathrm{d}^4x \,\, \mbox{Tr}\,  \left( \, \frac{1}{12} \, Y_{\mu\nu}\, 

777: Y^{\mu\nu} \, + \,  \frac{1}{2} \Lambda^2 \, \right) \, + \, 

778: S_1^{\mathrm{finite}}\,  , 

779: \end{equation}

780: where $\mbox{Tr}$ is short for the trace in the flavour space,

781: $Y_{\mu \nu}$

782: denotes the field strength tensor of $Y_{\mu}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:y}):

783: $Y_{\mu \nu} = 

784: \partial_{ \mu} Y_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu} Y_{\mu} + [Y_{\mu}, Y_{\nu}]$. The 

785: finite remainder $S_1^{\mathrm{finite}}$ cannot be simply expressed

786:  as a local Lagrangian, but can be worked out 

787: for a given transition~\cite{Gasser:1983yg,Unterdorfer:2002zg}.

788: \par

789: Finally we get the one-loop divergence as~:

790: %

791: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:s1div}

792: {S}_{1}^{\mathrm{div}}

793: &= & - \, \frac{1}{(4 \, \pi)^2} \, \frac{1}{D-4} \, \int d^4 x \, 

794: {\cal L}_{1}^{\mathrm{div}} \; , 

795: \end{eqnarray}

796: where

797: \begin{eqnarray}

798: {\cal L}_{1}^{\mathrm{div}} & = &   

799: \,\frac{1}{12} \langle \gamma_{\mu\nu}^{\prime} \gamma^{\prime\,\mu\nu} 

800: + 2 \gamma_{\mu\nu}\gamma^{\mu\nu}\rangle \,

801: +\frac{1}{2} \langle \sigma^2 + \kp^2 + \ks^2 \rangle 

802: +\langle \as {\as}^\top + \ap {\ap}^\top + \asp {\asp}^\top \rangle

803: \nonumber \\ 

804: &&

805: - \frac{1}{12} \langle  \gamma^{\prime\,\mu\nu} \left( {\bs_{\mu}}^\top 

806: \bs_{\nu} +{\bp_{\mu}}^\top \bp_{\nu} \right) \rangle \,

807:  - \, \frac{1}{12} \langle \gamma^{\mu\nu}

808: \left( \bs_{\mu}{\bs_\nu}^{\top}+\bp_{\mu}{\bp_\nu}^\top+ 

809: \bsp_{\mu}{\bsp_\nu}^{\top}+{\bsp_{\mu}}^\top \bsp_{\nu} \right)

810: \rangle  \nonumber \\ 

811: &&

812: -\langle {\as}^\top \big( \bar{d}^{\mu}_+ \bs_\mu + \frac{1}{2}

813:  {\bsp_\mu}^\top \bpm \big) 

814:  +{\ap}^\top \big( \bar{d}^{\mu}_+ \bp_\mu - \frac{1}{2} {\bsp_\mu} 

815:  \bsm \big)

816: % \rangle - \langle 

817: +{\asp}^\top \big( \hat{d^\mu} \bsp_\mu + \frac{1}{2} {\bpm} 

818: {\bs_\mu}^\top \big) \rangle \nonumber \\

819: &&

820: + \frac{1}{4} \langle \sigma \big( {\bs_\mu}^\top \bsm +{\bp_\mu}^\top

821:  \bpm \big)

822: +\ks \big(  \bsm {\bs_\mu}^\top+{\bsp_\mu}^\top \bspm \big) 

823: + \kp \big(  \bpm {\bp_\mu}^\top+  \bspm{\bsp_\mu}^\top \big) 

824: %\rangle \, +\frac{1}{4} \langle 

825: \rangle 

826: \nonumber \\

827: &&

828:  +\frac{1}{4} \langle \tilde{d}^{\mu}_- {\bs_\mu}^\top \bar{d}^{\nu}_+ 

829: \bs_\nu + 

830: \tilde{d}^{\mu}_- {\bp_\mu}^\top \bar{d}^{\nu}_+ \bp_\nu +

831: \hat{d^\mu} {\bsp_\mu}^\top \hat{d^\nu} \bsp_\nu \rangle \nonumber \\

832: &&\

833:  -\frac{1}{12} \langle \tilde{d}_{+\mu} {\bs_\nu}^\top \bar{d}^{[\mu}_-

834:  \bsn^{]} + 

835: \tilde{d}_{+\mu} {\bp_\nu}^\top \bar{d}^{[\mu}_- \bpn^{]} +

836: \hat{d_\mu} {\bsp_\nu}^\top \hat{d}^{[\mu} \bspn^{]} \rangle \nonumber \\

837: &&

838: +\frac{1}{4} \langle \tilde{d}^{\mu}_- {\bs_\mu}^\top {\bsp_\nu}^\top 

839: \bpn

840: -\tilde{d}^{\mu}_- {\bp_\mu}^\top \bsp_\nu \bsn

841: +\hat{d^\mu} {\bsp_\mu}^\top \bpn {\bs_\nu}^\top \rangle \nonumber \\

842: &&

843: -\frac{1}{12} \langle \tilde{d}^{\mu}_+ {\bsn}^\top {\bsp_{[\mu}}^\top 

844: \bp_{{\nu]}}

845: -\tilde{d}^{\mu}_+ {\bpn}^\top {\bsp_{[\mu}} \bs_{{\nu]}}

846: +\hat{d^\mu} {\bspn}^\top {\bp_{[\mu}} {\bs_{{\nu]}}}^\top

847:  \rangle \nonumber \\

848: &&

849: +\frac{1}{48} \langle \big( {\bs_\mu}^\top \bsm{\bs_\nu}^\top\bsn+ 

850: {\bs_\mu}^\top \bsn{\bs_\nu}^\top\bsm+{\bs_\mu}^\top \bs_\nu {\bsm}^\top 

851: \bsn\big)\nonumber \\

852: && \qquad

853:  +\big( {\bp_\mu}^\top \bpm{\bp_\nu}^\top\bpn+ {\bp_\mu}^\top 

854: \bpn{\bp_\nu}^\top\bpm+{\bp_\mu}^\top \bp_\nu {\bpm}^\top \bpn\big)\nonumber \\

855: && \qquad

856: +\big( {\bsp_\mu}^\top \bspm{\bsp_\nu}^\top\bspn+ {\bsp_\mu}^\top 

857: \bspn{\bsp_\nu}^\top\bspm 

858: \, \, +\,  {\bsp_\mu}^\top \bsp_\nu {\bspm}^\top \bspn\big)

859: \rangle\nonumber \\

860: &&

861: +\frac{1}{24} \langle \big( {\bs_\mu}^\top \bsm{\bp_\nu}^\top\bpn+ 

862: {\bs_\mu}^\top \bsn{\bp_\nu}^\top\bpm+{\bs_\mu}^\top \bs_\nu {\bpm}^\top 

863: \bpn\big)\nonumber \\

864: && \qquad

865: +\big( {\bsp_\mu}^\top \bspm{\bsn}{\bs_\nu}^\top+ {\bsp_\mu}^\top

866:  \bspn{\bs_\nu}{\bsm}^\top+{\bsp_\mu}^\top \bspn {\bsm} {\bs_\nu}^\top 

867:  \big)\nonumber \\

868: && \qquad

869:  +\big(  \bpm {\bp_\mu}^\top{\bspn}{\bsp_\nu}^\top+ \bpm 

870: {\bp_\nu}^\top {\bspn}{\bsp_\mu}^\top  +\bp_\mu{\bp_\nu}^\top 

871:  {\bspm} 

872: {\bspn}^\top \big)

873: \rangle \, ,

874: \end{eqnarray}

875: % 

876: where derivatives and matrices are defined in Appendix~\ref{app:cuatro}

877: and $\gamma_{\mu \nu} = \partial_{\mu} \gamma_{\nu} - 

878: \partial_{\nu} \gamma_{\mu} + [ \gamma_{\mu}, \gamma_{\nu} ]$

879: (correspondingly for $\gamma_{\mu \nu}'$).

880: Moreover for two vectors

881: $A_{\mu}$,$ B_{\mu}$ we write $A_{[\mu}B_{\nu]}= A_\mu B_\nu - A_\nu B_\mu$.

882: This result is completely general for the second-order fluctuation Lagrangian

883: in Eq.~(\ref{eq:expansion}). However, and as explained in Appendix D, the 

884: expressions given there are valid only for operators with up to two resonances

885: as we limit ourselves in this article.

886: 

887: \subsection{Result}

888: 

889: When worked out, $S_1^{\mathrm{div}}$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:s1div}) can be 

890: expressed in a basis of operators that satisfy the same symmetry requirements

891: than our starting Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{\mathrm{R} \chi \mathrm{T}}(\phi, S,P)$.

892: A minimal basis of $R\chi T$ operators that, upon integration of the 

893: resonances, contributes to the ${\cal O}(p^6)$ $\chi PT$ Lagrangian, in 

894: $SU(3)$, will be found elsewhere~\cite{nosfuture}. However, up to now,

895: a basis for the one-loop $R \chi T$ has still not been worked out. This

896: is precisely our result generated by $S_1^{\mathrm{div}}$. Hence, at one

897: loop, the $R\chi T$ Lagrangian needed to renormalize our theory reads~:

898: \begin{equation} \label{eq:main}

899: {\cal L}_{1} \, = \,   \sum_ {i=1}^{18} \, \alpha_i \, 

900: {\cal O}_i \, + \, \sum_{i=1}^{68} \, \beta_i^R \, {\cal O}_i^R \, + \, 

901: \sum_{i=1}^{383} \, \beta_i^{RR} \, {\cal O}_i^{RR} \; .

902: \end{equation}

903: The ${\cal O}_i$ operators correspond to those up to ${\cal O}(p^4)$ in 

904: $U(3)_L \otimes U(3)_R$ $\chi PT$ \cite{Herrera-Siklody:1996pm}. 

905: ${\cal O}_i^{R}$ and ${\cal O}_i^{RR}$ involve one and two resonance

906: fields, respectively, together with $\chi^{(2)}$ and $\chi^{(4)}$ chiral

907: tensors. The couplings in the bare Lagrangian $ {\cal L}_{1}$ read,

908: in accordance with Eq.~(\ref{eq:renoo})~:

909: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:rge}

910: \alpha_i & = & \mu^{D-4} \, \left( \, \alpha_i^r(\mu) \, + \, 

911: \frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \, \frac{1}{D-4} \, \gamma_i  \right) \; , \nonumber \\

912: \beta_i^R & = & \mu^{D-4} \, \left( \, \beta_i^{R,r}(\mu) \, + \, 

913: \frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \, \frac{1}{D-4} \, \gamma_i^R  \right) \; , \nonumber \\

914: \beta_i^{RR} & = & \mu^{D-4} \, \left( \, \beta_i^{RR,r}(\mu) \, + \, 

915: \frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \, \frac{1}{D-4} \, \gamma_i^{RR}  \right) \; ,

916: \end{eqnarray}

917: where  $\gamma_i$, $\gamma_i^R$ and $\gamma_i^{RR}$ are the

918: divergent coefficients given by 

919: $S_1^{\mathrm{div}}$ that constitute the $\beta$-function of our

920: Lagrangian (we use the terminology of Ref.~\cite{Buchler:2003vw}).

921: The determination of the latter

922: though straightforward involves a long calculation. In order

923: to diminish the possibility of errors we have performed two independent

924: evaluations. One of them has been carried out with the help of the 

925: FORM~3 program \cite{Vermaseren:2000nd} and the other with 

926: Mathematica \cite{Wolfram}.

927: The full result when scalar and pseudoscalar resonances

928: are included is rather lengthy. In Appendix~\ref{app:cinco} we provide

929: the sets ${\cal O}_i$, ${\cal O}_i^S$ and ${\cal O}_i^{SS}$. The 

930: coefficients $\gamma_i$ are fully given, however $\gamma_i^S$ and 

931: $\gamma_i^{SS}$ are only brought when just scalar resonances are considered,

932: which reduces the total number of operators to 177.

933: The complete result with the inclusion of pseudoscalar resonances

934: is available at \texttt{http://ific.uv.es/quiral/rt1loop.html} 

935: or upon request from the authors.

936: 

937: \section{Features and use of the renormalized \rcht Lagrangian}

938: 

939: In order to understand the aspects and use of the renormalized $R \chi T$

940: Lagrangian that we have obtained above, we would like to emphasize

941: here several of its features~:

942: \begin{itemize}

943: \item[1/] In Table~\ref{tab:e1} we have collected the full basis

944:  of ${\cal O}(p^2)$ and

945: ${\cal O}(p^4)$ $U(3)_L \otimes U(3)_R$ $\chi$PT

946: operators generated in the functional integration at one loop. We 

947: should recover the result first obtained in Ref.~\cite{Herrera-Siklody:1996pm}.

948: After the comparison is made~\footnote{Notice that the notation

949: of Ref.~\cite{Herrera-Siklody:1996pm} is different to ours though, to ease

950: the comparison, the order chosen is the same. We always

951: quote our notation for the operators.} 

952: we agree indeed with their results.

953: Notice though that in order to disentangle the resonances,

954: it is not enough to withdraw

955: all the resonance couplings. This is because the derivative terms in

956: ${\cal L}_{\mathrm{kin}}(S,P)$, which do not carry any resonance coupling,

957: also contribute through the functional

958: integration to several of the operators, namely 

959: ${\cal O}_4$, ${\cal O}_7$, ${\cal O}_{13}$, ${\cal O}_{14}$

960: and ${\cal O}_{15}$

961: in Table~\ref{tab:e1}. We have confirmed that 

962: ${\cal L}_{\mathrm{kin}}(S,P)$ gives precisely the difference between

963: our coefficients

964: $\gamma_4$, $\gamma_7$, $\gamma_{13}$, $\gamma_{14}$, $\gamma_{15}$  

965: and those of Ref.~\cite{Herrera-Siklody:1996pm} 

966: once the resonance couplings have been switched off.

967: \item[2/] Our result provides the running of the $\alpha_i$, 

968: $\beta_i^R$ and $\beta_i^{RR}$ couplings through the renormalization

969: group equations (RGE). From Eq.~(\ref{eq:rge}) we get~:

970: \begin{equation} \label{eq:rgeq}

971: \mu \, \frac{d}{d \mu} \, \alpha_i^r(\mu) \, = \, 

972: - \, \frac{\gamma_i}{16 \,\pi^2} \; , 

973: \end{equation}

974: and, analogously, for $\beta_i^R$ and $\beta_i^{RR}$. This result can be

975: potentially useful if we are interested in the phenomenological evaluation

976: of the resonance couplings at this order. Though $\mu$ is known

977: to be of the order of a typical scale of the physical system, let us say

978: $\mu = M_S$ or $\mu = M_P$, there always remains some ambiguity on the 

979: precise value of $\mu$ at which the low-energy couplings are extracted

980: from the phenomenology.

981: The RGE (\ref{eq:rgeq}) provides an estimate of the reliance of 

982: such determinations.

983: If the coupling under request varies drastically with

984: the scale it is clear that the value obtained phenomenologically

985: has a large uncertainty, while if it has a smooth running 

986: the determination is more reliable. 

987: \par

988: Within this issue it is interesting to take a closer look to the 

989: running of the resonance couplings in the original \rcht 

990: Lagrangian \cite{Ecker:1988te}, namely, $c_d^r(\mu)$, $c_m^r(\mu)$ and

991: $d_m^r(\mu)$. Their corresponding $\beta$-function coefficients are

992: $\beta_1^S$, $\beta_4^S$ and $\beta_{44}^P$, respectively (notice that we are

993: taking into account here the complete results, including scalar and

994: pseudoscalar resonances). We obtain~:

995: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:evolution}

996: \mu \, \frac{d}{d  \mu} \, c_d^r (\mu) & = & - \, \frac{N}{16 \pi^2} \, 

997: c_d \, \frac{M_S^2}{F^2} \, \left[ \, 2 \lambda_1^{SS} \, + \, 

998: 4 \lambda_2^{SS} \, - \, 3 \frac{c_d^2}{F^2} \, - \, 

999:  (\lambda_1^{SP})^2 \, \right] \, , \nonumber \\ & & \nonumber \\

1000: \mu \, \frac{d}{d  \mu} \, c_m^r (\mu) & = & - \,\frac{N}{32 \pi^2} \, 

1001: \frac{M_S^2}{F^2} \, \left[ \, c_d \left( \, 1 \, - \, 4 \, 

1002: \frac{c_d c_m}{F^2} \right) \,

1003: - \, 4 \,  \lambda_1^{SP} \, \left( \, d_m \, + \,  c_m

1004:  \, \lambda_1^{SP} \, 

1005: \right) \, \right] \, ,   \\  & & \nonumber  \\

1006: \mu \, \frac{d}{d  \mu} \, d_m^r (\mu) & = & - \, \frac{N}{16 \pi^2} \,

1007: \lambda_1^{SP} \, \frac{M_P^2}{F^2}  

1008: \left(   1  -   2  \frac{M_S^2}{M_P^2} \right) \, 

1009: \left[  c_d \,  

1010: - \, 2 \,  c_m \, - \, 

1011: 2 \, d_m \,  

1012: \lambda_1^{SP}  \right] 

1013: \, ,

1014: \nonumber

1015: \end{eqnarray}

1016: where $N$ is the number of flavours. First of all note that

1017: the running, as expected, is a next-to-leading order effect in the 

1018: $1/N_C$ expansion. This fact is guided by the $M_R^2/F^2$ factors 

1019: taking into account that $M_R \sim {\cal O}(1)$ and 

1020: $F \sim {\cal O}(\sqrt{N_C})$.

1021: Another interesting aspect is the interval over which $\mu$ runs. It is 

1022: well known \cite{Collins} that the couplings are only relevant at the 

1023: scale of the momenta involved in the processes (in order to diminish the

1024: role of the logarithms). In our case $\mu \sim M_S, \, M_P$. Thus we do not

1025: expect a large running for the scale, namely a few hundreds of MeV. This

1026: last conclusion brings us to the next point. At next to leading

1027: order in $1/N_C$ we can

1028: ignore the running on the right-hand-side of Eqs.~(\ref{eq:evolution}). 

1029: Hence we can input the leading order values for the couplings, given

1030: by Eqs.~(\ref{eq:largecd},\ref{eq:largecd2}) to obtain the leading 

1031: logarithm in the evolution of $c_m^r(\mu)$ and $d_m^r(\mu)$. It is remarkable

1032: that, at this order, Eqs.~(\ref{eq:evolution}) predict no running 

1033: for these coupling constants, as the right-hand-side

1034: of their RGE vanishes. Unfortunately we cannot

1035: conclude anything about $c_d$, as there are no known constraints on

1036: $\lambda_1^{SS}$ and $\lambda_2^{SS}$. If the Large-$N_C$ estimates for 

1037: the couplings are to be reliable we come to the conclusion that the 

1038: predictions for $c_m$ and $d_m$ are rather robust. Moreover the same

1039: exercise for the ${\cal O}_i$ operators involving only Goldstone and

1040: external fields in Tab.~\ref{tab:e1} shows that also 

1041: ${\cal O}_2$, ${\cal O}_8$, ${\cal O}_9$, ${\cal O}_{10}$, ${\cal O}_{11}$,

1042: ${\cal O}_{12}$, ${\cal O}_{16}$ and ${\cal O}_{18}$ do not run at one loop,

1043: i.e. all those operators involving $\chi_+$ and/or $\chi_{-}$. Also notice

1044: that $c_m$ and $d_m$ rule operators sharing this feature.

1045: \item[3/] In the procedure we have employed to evaluate the functional

1046: integration of ${\cal L}_{\mathrm{R} \chi \mathrm{T}}$ up to one loop

1047: we have withdrawn those operators with three or more resonance fields

1048: and kept up to two resonances. A cut in the number of resonances is 

1049: necessary because to reach the Gaussian expression in Eq.~(\ref{eq:gausso})

1050: we need to perform several field transformations 

1051: (see Appendix~\ref{app:cuatro}) that generate operators with 

1052: more resonance fields which in turn 

1053: require additional field transformations and so on. 

1054: One of the differences of \rcht

1055: with respect to \chpt (in the strong \cite{Gasser:1983yg} or 

1056: electroweak interaction \cite{Kambor:1989tz} form of the latter)

1057: is that we 

1058: do not have an expansion parameter into the Lagrangian that can provide

1059: a natural cut for higher order terms in these field transformations.

1060: Notice that the cut in the number of resonances seems to hinder

1061: our result, as it does not allow us to renormalize divergent one loop

1062: diagrams with three or more resonance fields as external legs. However

1063: we would not expect to treat these loops as we are not including, in our 

1064: leading order Lagrangian, interacting terms with three or more resonance

1065: fields.

1066: \end{itemize}

1067: %

1068: \begin{figure}

1069: \begin{center}

1070: \includegraphics[scale=0.70]{fig1.eps}

1071: \caption{\label{fig:loop}

1072: One-loop contributions to the 

1073: $\Pi_{SS}^{ij}(q^2)$ correlator in

1074: the chiral limit when only scalar resonances are included. 

1075: A single line stands for a Goldstone boson while

1076: a double line indicates a scalar resonance. Their result is divergent.}

1077: \end{center}

1078: \end{figure}

1079: % 

1080: To end this Section we would like to show a simple example of the application

1081: of our result. We consider the one-loop renormalization of the two-point

1082: function of scalar currents~:

1083: \begin{equation}

1084: \Pi_{SS}^{ij} (q^2) \, = \, i \, \int  d^4 x \, e^{i q \cdot x} \, 

1085: \langle 0 |T\{ S^i(x) S^j(0)\} | 0 \rangle \, , \qquad \, \;  \; 

1086: S^i(x) = \overline{q}(x) \lambda^i q(x) \; , 

1087: \end{equation}

1088: in the chiral limit and when only scalar resonances are considered. The 

1089: divergent loop diagrams contributing are those depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:loop}.

1090: In order to cancel the divergences one needs to add the counterterm 

1091: contributions in Fig.~\ref{fig:counter}, where diagram $C_1$ is given by

1092: ${\cal O}_{12} + 2 {\cal O}_{16} = \langle \chi_+^2 \rangle$

1093: in Table~\ref{tab:e1}, $C_2$ by 

1094: ${\cal O}_{4}^{S}=\langle S \chi_{+} \rangle $ in 

1095: Table~\ref{tab:e2} and $C_3$ by 

1096: ${\cal O}_{1}^{SS}= \langle S S \rangle$ in Table~\ref{tab:e3}.

1097: The cancellation works as follows:

1098: One part of the contribution of $C_1$ cancels completely the divergence in the 

1099: loops $L_1+L_2$. Another piece of $C_1$ together with $C_2$ eliminates the 

1100: divergence coming from $L_3$ and, finally, all remaining contributions of 

1101: $C_1$ and $C_2$ add to $C_3$ in order to render $L_4$ finite. Notice that,

1102: as there are no nonlocal divergences, 

1103: the contributions of 1PR diagrams are brought finite once 1PI diagrams

1104: have been properly renormalized.

1105: %

1106: \begin{figure}[h]

1107: \begin{center}

1108: \vspace*{1.4cm}

1109: \includegraphics[scale=0.68]{fig2.eps}

1110: \caption{\label{fig:counter}

1111: Counterterm contributions that renormalize the one-loop result of 

1112: Fig.~\ref{fig:loop}. A double line stands for a scalar resonance.}

1113: \end{center}

1114: \vspace*{-0.4cm}

1115: \end{figure}

1116: %

1117: 

1118: \section{Summary}

1119: 

1120: \rcht provides a consistent framework to study the energy region of 

1121: the hadronic resonances, $M_V \lsim E \lsim 2 \, \gev$. It embodies a 

1122: phenomenological Lagrangian where Goldstone bosons and resonances fields

1123: are kept as active degrees of freedom; this is the key 

1124: ingredient for the application of the large-$N_C$ expansion. Recently, 

1125: and after its multiple explorations at tree level, it has emerged

1126: some interest in the application of \rcht at one loop level mainly 

1127: to understand how the features of QCD are implemented into the theory.

1128: \par

1129: In this

1130: work we have systematically obtained, by using the background field method

1131: and for the first time, both the full basis of operators and

1132: the $\beta$-function coefficients that render finite, up to one loop, our

1133: initial Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{\mathrm{R} \chi \mathrm{T}}$ in 

1134: Eq.~(\ref{eq:lagr1}). This would correspond to the next-to-leading order in 

1135: the $1/N_C$ expansion but including one multiplet of scalar and pseudoscalar

1136: resonances only. Our main result is given by Eq.~(\ref{eq:main}) and the

1137: $\gamma_i$, $\gamma_i^R$, $\gamma_i^{RR}$ parameters in Eq.~(\ref{eq:rge}).

1138: The outcome is relevant for the study of those diagrams involving a loop

1139: with up to two resonances and any number of Goldstone bosons in the legs.

1140: \vspace*{0.4cm} \\

1141: %\newpage

1142: \noindent{\large\bf Acknowledgements}

1143: \vspace*{0.3cm} \\

1144: The authors would like to thank G.~Amor\'os, G.~Ecker, R.~Kaiser and A.~Pich 

1145: for hints and conversations on the topic of this work. 

1146: P.~Ruiz-Femen\'\i a is indebted to

1147: M.~Aguado and T.~Hahn for their help with Mathematica programming.

1148: I.~Rosell is supported by a FPU scholarship of the Spanish MEC.

1149: This work has been supported in part by

1150: MEC (Spain) under Grant FPA2004-00996, by Generalitat Valenciana

1151: (Grants GRUPOS03/013, GV04B-594 and GV05/015) and by ERDF funds from the 

1152: European Commission.

1153: %\newpage

1154: \appendix

1155: \newcounter{erasmo}

1156: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{erasmo}}

1157: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{erasmo}.\arabic{equation}}

1158: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{erasmo}}

1159: \setcounter{erasmo}{1}

1160: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1161: \setcounter{table}{0}

1162: 

1163: \section{Notation}

1164: \label{app:uno}

1165: 

1166: In this article we follow the notation introduced in 

1167: Ref.~\cite{Ecker:1988te} that we collect here.

1168: \par

1169: The non-linear realization of spontaneously broken chiral symmetry

1170: $G = U(3)_L \otimes U(3)_R$ is defined by the action of the group on the

1171: elements $u_{R,L}(\phi)$ of the coset space $G \, / \, U(3)_V$~:

1172: \begin{eqnarray}

1173: u_L(\phi)  & \mapright{G}{} &  g_L \, u_L(\phi) \, h(g,\phi)^{\dagger} \, ,

1174: \nonumber \\

1175: u_R(\phi) & \mapright{G}{} & g_R \, u_R(\phi) \,   h(g,\phi)^{\dagger} \, ,  

1176: \end{eqnarray}

1177: where $g=(g_L,g_R) \in G$ and $h(g,\phi) \in U(3)_V$. 

1178: \par

1179: The following chiral tensors have been used:

1180: \begin{eqnarray}

1181: u_\mu&=&i\,\left\{u_R^\dagger \left(\partial_\mu - i r_\mu\right) 

1182: u_R -u_L^{\dagger} \left(\partial_\mu - i \ell_\mu \right) u_L\right\}\,,

1183:  \nonumber \\ 

1184: \Gamma_\mu &=& \frac{1}{2} \, 

1185: \left\{u_R^\dagger \left(\partial_\mu - i r_\mu

1186: \right) u_R +u_L^{\dagger}\left(\partial_\mu - i\ell_\mu \right) u_L

1187: \right\}\, , 

1188: \nonumber \\

1189: \chi_\pm&=&u_R^\dagger\chi u_L \pm u_L^{\dagger}\chi^\dagger u_R \,,

1190:  \nonumber \\ 

1191: \chi&=& 2B_0\left(s+ip\right) \, , 

1192: \end{eqnarray}

1193: where $s,p,r$ and $\ell$ are scalar, pseudoscalar, right and left external

1194: fields, respectively. The covariant derivative is defined by

1195: \begin{eqnarray}

1196: \nabla_\mu X &=& \partial_\mu X + \left[\Gamma_\mu, X \right] \, ,

1197: \end{eqnarray}

1198: for any $X$ transforming as 

1199: \begin{eqnarray}

1200: X \, \mapright{G}{} \, h(g,\phi) \, X \, h(g,\phi)^ {\dagger}  \; ,

1201: \end{eqnarray}

1202: under the chiral group, like the tensors $u_{\mu}$, $\chi_{\pm}$ or

1203: the resonance fields $S,P$.

1204: \par 

1205: We can take the choice of coset representative such that 

1206: $u_R(\phi) = u_L^{\dagger}(\phi) \equiv u(\phi)$,

1207: whose explicit form in the exponential

1208: parameterization is~:

1209: \begin{eqnarray}

1210: u(\phi) \, = \, \exp \left( \frac{i}{\sqrt{2} \, F} \, \phi \right) \; \; 

1211: & , & \; \; \phi \, = \, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \, \sum_{i=0}^{8} \, \lambda_i \,

1212: \phi_i \; , 

1213: \end{eqnarray}

1214: where the normalization of the Gell-Mann matrices is given by 

1215: $\langle \lambda_i \lambda_j \rangle = 2 \delta_{ij}$ and $\phi$

1216: is the 

1217: nonet of pseudo-Goldstone fields. Scalar and pseudoscalar resonances have

1218: analogous $U(3)_V$ content to the one described by $\phi$~:

1219: \begin{equation}

1220: \phi =  

1221: \left(

1222: \begin{array}{ccc}

1223:  \frac{1}{\sqrt 2}\pi^0 + \frac{1}{\sqrt 6}\eta_8

1224:  + \frac{1}{\sqrt 3}\eta_0 

1225: & \pi^+ & K^+ \\

1226: \pi^- & - \frac{1}{\sqrt 2}\pi^0 + \frac{1}{\sqrt 6}\eta_8 

1227:  + \frac{1}{\sqrt 3}\eta_0  

1228: & K^0 \\

1229:  K^- & \bar{K}^0 & - \frac{2}{\sqrt 6}\eta_8 

1230:  + \frac{1}{\sqrt 3}\eta_0  

1231: \end{array}

1232: \right)

1233: \ . 

1234: \end{equation}

1235: 

1236: 

1237: 

1238: \appendix

1239: \newcounter{aristocles}

1240: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{aristocles}}

1241: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{aristocles}.\arabic{equation}}

1242: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{aristocles}}

1243: \setcounter{aristocles}{2}

1244: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1245: \setcounter{table}{0}

1246: 

1247: \section{Short-distance constraints on the $\lambda_i^{RR}$ couplings}

1248: \label{app:dos}

1249: 

1250: Most of the short-distance constraints on the couplings of \rcht come from

1251: matching Green functions of QCD currents evaluated within the resonance

1252: theory with the results obtained in the leading OPE expansion 

1253: \cite{Cirigliano:2004ue}. Another source of conditions arise from form factors.

1254: Parton dynamics demands that two-body form factors of hadronic currents

1255: should vanish at 

1256: infinite momentum transfer \cite{Lepage:1979zb}, property known as 

1257: Brodsky-Lepage behaviour. It is also phenomenologically well known

1258: that any hadronic form factor seems to share this feature, 

1259: at least in the case of stable asymptotic states.

1260: \par

1261: Form factors of QCD currents that involve resonance asymptotic states

1262: do not necessarily fall in the group above. Hence it is not clear whether

1263: the latter should satisfy the Brodsky-Lepage behaviour. 

1264: It is often

1265: claimed that as resonances are non-decaying states in the 

1266: $N_C \rightarrow \infty$ limit, 

1267: they should not be treated differently from (real) stable states. However

1268: one shall keep in mind that the strict large-$N_C$ limit also requires

1269: to consider 

1270: an infinite number of resonances, so the discussion is far from settled.

1271: \par

1272: Leaving aside this issue, if one enforces the Brodsky-Lepage behaviour 

1273: on the resonance form factors 

1274: useful constraints among the couplings are found~\cite{nosfuture}. From the

1275: pseudoscalar form factor $\langle P^i | p^j | S^k \rangle$ and

1276: $\langle P^i | s^j | \pi^k \rangle$ we obtain, respectively,

1277: \begin{equation}

1278: \lambda_1^{SP} \, = \, 4 \, \lambda_2^{SP} \, ,

1279: \end{equation}

1280: and

1281: \begin{equation}

1282: \lambda_1^{SP} \, = \, - \, \frac{d_m}{c_m} \; .

1283: \end{equation}

1284: Finally the scalar form factors $\langle P^i | s^j | P^k \rangle$ and

1285: $\langle S^i | s^j | S^k \rangle$ give

1286: \begin{equation}

1287: \lambda_3^{PP} \, = \, \lambda_3^{SS} \, = \, 0 \; .

1288: \end{equation}

1289: 

1290: \appendix

1291: \newcounter{ciceron}

1292: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{ciceron}}

1293: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{ciceron}.\arabic{equation}}

1294: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{ciceron}}

1295: \setcounter{ciceron}{3}

1296: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1297: \setcounter{table}{0}

1298: 

1299: \section{Equations of Motion for the classical fields}

1300: \label{app:tres}

1301: 

1302: The classical fields are defined by Eq.~(\ref{eq:eom}). 

1303: From the \rcht Lagrangian in Eq.~(\ref{eq:lagr1}),

1304: the EOM's for the Goldstone and resonance fields are obtained as the system

1305: of coupled equations~:

1306: \begin{align}

1307: \nabla^\mu u_\mu \,=&\, \frac{i}{2}  \chi_- 

1308: -\frac{2c_d}{F^2} \nabla^\mu \left\{u_\mu ,S \right\} 

1309: +\frac{i\,c_m}{F^2}  \left\{\chi_- ,S\right\}  \,-\frac{1}{2F^2} 

1310: \big[u_\mu,[\nabla^\mu S,S] \big]

1311: -\frac{2 \ssa}{F^2} \nabla_\mu \left\{ u^\mu, SS\right\} \nonumber \\

1312: & -\frac{4\ssb}{F^2} \nabla_\mu \left( S\, u^\mu S\right)\,+\,

1313: \frac{i\,\ssc}{F^2} \left\{ \chi_- ,SS\right\}

1314: -\frac{d_m}{F^2}  \left\{\chi_+ , P\right\} \,-\,\frac{1}{2F^2} 

1315: \big[u_\mu,[\nabla^\mu P,P] \big] \nonumber \\

1316: &-\,\frac{2 \ppa}{F^2} \nabla_\mu \left\{ u^\mu, PP\right\} 

1317: -\,\frac{4\ppb}{F^2} \nabla_\mu \left( P\, u^\mu P\right)\,

1318: +\,\frac{i\,\ppc}{F^2} \left\{ \chi_- ,PP\right\}

1319: -\frac{2\spa}{F^2} \nabla^\mu \{ \nabla_\mu S, P \} \nonumber \\

1320: & +\frac{\spa}{2F^2} \Big[ u_\mu , \big[ S , \{ P, u^\mu \} \big] \Big]  

1321: -\frac{\spb}{F^2} \big\{ \chi_+ , \{ S, P \} \big\} \, , \\

1322: & & \nonumber 

1323: \end{align}

1324: \begin{align}

1325: \nabla^\mu \nabla_\mu S \,=&\, -M_S^2 \,S \,+\, c_m \, \chi_+ 

1326:  \,+\,c_d \, u_\mu u^\mu  \, 

1327: +\, \ssa \left\{ S, u_\mu u^\mu \right\}\,+\, 2 \ssb u_\mu S u^\mu 

1328: \phantom{\frac{1}{2}}\nonumber \\

1329: &+\, \ssc \left\{ S, \chi_+ \right\}\,  -\, \lam_1^{\mathrm{SP}} 

1330: \nabla_\mu \{ P , u^\mu \}

1331: \,+\, i \lam_2^{\mathrm{SP}} \{ P , \chi_- \}  \, , \phantom{\frac{1}{2}}\\

1332: & & \nonumber \\

1333: \nabla^\mu \nabla_\mu P \,=&\, -M_P^2 \,P \,+\, i \,d_m \, \chi_- \,+\,

1334:  \ppa \left\{ P, u_\mu u^\mu \right\}\,+\, 2 \ppb u_\mu P u^\mu 

1335:  \phantom{\frac{1}{2}} \nonumber \\

1336: & +\, \ppc \left\{ P, \chi_+ \right\} \, +\, \lam_1^{\mathrm{SP}}  

1337: \{ \nabla_\mu S , u^\mu \}

1338: \,+\, i \lam_2^{\mathrm{SP}} \{ S , \chi_- \}\, \,.\phantom{\frac{1}{2}}

1339: \end{align}

1340: 

1341: \appendix

1342: \newcounter{catilina}

1343: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{catilina}}

1344: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{catilina}.\arabic{equation}}

1345: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{catilina}}

1346: \setcounter{catilina}{4}

1347: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1348: \setcounter{table}{0}

1349: 

1350: \section{Second-order fluctuation of the Lagrangian}

1351: \label{app:cuatro}

1352: 

1353: The expansion around the classical solution of the fields in our

1354: Lagrangian ${\cal L}_{R \chi T}(\phi,S,P)$ up to second order

1355: (as required for the one loop evaluation) gives~:

1356: \begin{eqnarray}

1357: \Delta \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{R}\chi\mathrm{T}}

1358: &=&\Delta \mathcal{L}_{\chi}^{(2)}\,+\,\Delta \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{kin}}

1359: (\mathrm{S},\mathrm{P}) 

1360: \,+\,  \Delta \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{S})\, +\, 

1361:  \Delta \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{P})\,+\, 

1362:  \Delta \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{S},\mathrm{P}) \, ,\quad 

1363: \end{eqnarray}

1364: where

1365: \begin{align}

1366: \Delta \mathcal{L}_{\chi}^{(2)}\,=&-\frac{F^2}{8}\bra 

1367: \chi_+ \Delta^2 \ket \,+\, \frac{F^2}{4} \bra \nabla^\mu \Delta

1368:  \nabla_\mu \Delta \,+\, \frac{1}{4} \left[ u_\mu,\Delta \right] 

1369:  \left[ u^\mu,\Delta \right] \ket \,, 

1370: \end{align}

1371: %

1372: %

1373: \begin{align}

1374: \Delta \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{kin}}(\mathrm{S},\mathrm{P})\,=

1375: &\,\frac{1}{4}\bra \nabla^\mu \es \nabla_\mu \es \ket 

1376: \,-\, \frac{M_S^2}{4}\bra \es \, \es \ket \,+\, \frac{1}{32} \bra 

1377: \big[ [u^\mu,\Delta],S\big] \big[ [u_\mu,\Delta],S\big] \ket \,\nonumber \\ 

1378: & -\, \frac{1}{8} \bra  [\nabla_\mu \Delta,\Delta][S, \nabla^\mu S]

1379: \ket \,+\, \frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}} \bra  [ u_\mu,\Delta]

1380: \Big( [S, \nabla^\mu \es]-[ \nabla^\mu S, \es]\Big) \ket \nonumber \\ 

1381: & +\,\frac{1}{4}\bra 

1382: \nabla^\mu \ep \nabla_\mu \ep \ket \,-\, \frac{M_P^2}{4}\bra \ep \, 

1383: \ep \ket \,+\, \frac{1}{32} \bra \big[ [u^\mu,\Delta],P\big] 

1384: \big[ [u_\mu,\Delta],P\big] \ket \,\nonumber \\ 

1385: & -\, \frac{1}{8} \bra  [\nabla_\mu \Delta,\Delta][P, \nabla^\mu P]

1386: \ket \,+\, \frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}} \bra  [ u_\mu,\Delta] 

1387: \Big( [P, \nabla^\mu \ep] - [\nabla^\mu P, \ep] \Big) \ket \,,

1388: \end{align}

1389: %

1390: %

1391: %

1392: \begin{align}

1393: \Delta \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{S})\,=&-\frac{i\,c_m}{2\sqrt{2}}\bra 

1394: \es \{\Delta,\chi_-\} \ket \,-\, \frac{c_m}{8} \bra \{S, \Delta\} 

1395: \{\chi_+,\Delta\}\ket - \frac{c_d}{\sqrt{2}} \bra \es \{\nabla_\mu 

1396: \Delta, u^\mu \} \ket\nonumber \\

1397: &\, + \bra \left( c_d \, S + \ssa SS \right) \left( \nabla^\mu 

1398: \Delta \nabla_\mu \Delta +\frac{1}{8} \Big \{  \big[\Delta,[u_\mu,\Delta]

1399: \big],u^\mu\Big\} \right)  \ket \, 

1400: +\,\frac{\ssa}{2} \bra \varepsilon^{2}_{\mathrm{S}}\, u^\mu u_\mu \ket 

1401:  \nonumber \\

1402: &-\, \frac{\ssa}{\sqrt{2}} \bra \left\{ S, \es \right\} \left\{ u_\mu , 

1403: \nabla^\mu \Delta\right\} \ket

1404: \,+\, \ssb \bra S\, \nabla_\mu \Delta\, S \,\nabla^\mu \Delta \ket \,+\,

1405: \frac{\ssb}{2}\bra \es u_\mu \es u^\mu \ket \nonumber \\

1406: &-\sqrt{2}\ssb \bra \es \big( \nabla_\mu \Delta \,S \,u^\mu + u_\mu S \,

1407: \nabla^\mu \Delta \big) \ket  \,+\,

1408: \frac{\ssb}{4} \bra  \big[ [\Delta, u_\mu ],\Delta \big] S \,u^\mu S \ket 

1409:  \nonumber \\&

1410: -\,\frac{\ssc}{8} \bra \{ SS ,\Delta \}  \{\chi_+,\Delta\}  \ket \,-\,

1411:  \frac{i\, \ssc}{2\sqrt{2}}  \bra \{ S, \es \} \{ \chi_- , \Delta \} \ket

1412: \,+\,  \frac{\ssc}{2} \bra \varepsilon^{2}_{\mathrm{S}} \,\chi_+ \ket \,,

1413: \label{problem}\\ \nonumber 

1414: \end{align}

1415: %

1416: %

1417: %

1418: \begin{align}

1419: \Delta \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{P})\,=&\,\frac{d_m}{2\sqrt{2}}\bra \ep 

1420: \{\Delta,\chi_+\} \ket \,-\, \frac{i\,d_m}{8} \bra \{ P, \Delta\} 

1421: \{\chi_-,\Delta\}\ket  \nonumber \\

1422: &\,+\ppa \bra PP \left( \nabla^\mu \Delta \nabla_\mu \Delta +\frac{1}{8} 

1423: \Big\{  \big[\Delta,[u_\mu,\Delta]\big],u^\mu\Big\} \right)  \ket  

1424: \,+\,\frac{\ppa}{2} \bra \varepsilon^{2}_{\mathrm{P}}\, u^\mu u_\mu \ket

1425: \nonumber \\

1426: & -\, \frac{\ppa}{\sqrt{2}} \bra \left\{ P, \ep \right\} \left\{ u_\mu ,

1427:  \nabla^\mu \Delta\right\} \ket

1428: \,+\, \ppb \bra P\, \nabla_\mu \Delta\, P \,\nabla^\mu \Delta \ket \,+\,

1429: \frac{\ppb}{2}\bra \ep u_\mu \ep u^\mu \ket \nonumber \\

1430: &-\sqrt{2}\ppb \bra \ep \big( \nabla_\mu \Delta \,P \,u^\mu + u_\mu P \,

1431: \nabla^\mu \Delta \big) \ket\,   \ket \,+\,

1432: \frac{\ppb}{4} \bra  \big[ [\Delta, u_\mu ],\Delta \big] P \,u^\mu P \ket  

1433: \nonumber \\&

1434: -\,\frac{\ppc}{8} \bra \{ PP ,\Delta \}  \{\chi_+,\Delta\}  \ket \,-\,

1435:  \frac{i\, \ppc}{2\sqrt{2}}  \bra \{ P, \ep \} \{ \chi_- , \Delta \} \ket

1436: \,+\,  \frac{\ppc}{2} \bra \varepsilon^{2}_{\mathrm{P}} \,\chi_+ \ket \,, 

1437: \label{problem2} 

1438: \end{align}

1439: %

1440: %

1441: \begin{align}

1442: \Delta \mathcal{L}_{2}(\mathrm{S},\mathrm{P})\,=&\frac{\spa}{8}\bra 

1443: \{ \nabla_\mu S, P \} \big[ [\Delta, u^\mu ], \Delta \big] \ket

1444: -\frac{\spa}{\sqrt{2}} \bra  \nabla^\mu \Delta \big( \{ \nabla_\mu \es ,

1445:  P\} + \{ \nabla_\mu S,\ep\}  \big)\ket \nonumber \\

1446: &+  \frac{\spa}{4\sqrt{2}} \bra \big[ [ u_\mu, \Delta ], S  \big] \big( 

1447: \{\ep , u^\mu \} - \sqrt{2}\{ P , \nabla^\mu \Delta \} \big) \ket

1448: +\frac{\spa}{2} \bra \{\nabla_\mu \es, \ep \} u^\mu \ket \nonumber \\

1449: & +\frac{\spa}{4\sqrt{2}} \bra \big[ [u_\mu, \Delta ], \es \big] \{ P , 

1450: u^\mu\} \ket

1451: +\frac{\spa}{8} \bra \big[ [ \Delta, \nabla_\mu \Delta ] , S \big] \{ P , 

1452: u^\mu\} \ket \nonumber \\

1453: &-\frac{i\, \spb}{8} \bra \{ S,P \} \big\{\Delta, \{ \chi_- , \Delta \}

1454:  \big\} \ket

1455: +\frac{\spb}{2\sqrt{2}} \bra \{ \Delta, \chi_+ \} \Big( \{\es, P \} +

1456:  \{ S, \ep\} \Big) \ket \nonumber \\

1457: & +\frac{ i\, \spb}{2} \bra \chi_- \{ \es, \ep \} \ket   \, .\label{problem3} 

1458: \end{align}

1459: 

1460: The evaluation of the path integral requires a Gaussian rearrangement of

1461: the integration variables.

1462: However the second-order fluctuation

1463: $\Delta {\cal L}_{R \chi T}$ does not have this structure due to the terms

1464: $\bra PP \,\nabla_\mu \Delta \nabla^\mu \Delta \ket$,

1465: $\bra P \,\nabla_\mu  \Delta\,P\, \nabla^\mu \Delta \ket$, 

1466: $ \bra S \nabla_\mu \Delta \nabla^\mu \Delta \ket $,

1467: $\bra SS \,\nabla_\mu \Delta \nabla^\mu \Delta \ket$,

1468: $\bra S \,\nabla_\mu  \Delta\,S\, \nabla^\mu \Delta \ket$

1469: and $\bra \{ \nabla_\mu \es, P \} \nabla^\mu \Delta \ket $

1470: in Eqs.(\ref{problem},\ref{problem2},\ref{problem3}). A way out is provided

1471: by a redefinition of the fields that eliminates the unwanted terms~:

1472: \begin{align} \label{eq:redefine}

1473: \Delta \, \rightarrow \, & \, \Delta  \,- \frac{c_d}{F^2} 

1474: \left\{ \Delta, S \right\} 

1475: - \frac{\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1}{F^2} \left\{\Delta ,SS\right\} -

1476: \frac{2\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2}{F^2} S\, \Delta \, S \, 

1477: - \frac{\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_1}{F^2} \left\{\Delta ,PP\right\} -

1478: \frac{2\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_2}{F^2} P\, \Delta \, P \,, \nonumber \\

1479: \es \, \rightarrow \, & \, \es \,+ \sqrt{2} \spa \{ P, \Delta\} - 

1480: \frac{\sqrt{2}\spa c_d}{F^2} \big\{ P , \{ \Delta, S \} \big\} \, ,

1481: \end{align} 

1482: where the following constants have been defined~:

1483: \begin{align}

1484: \tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1&\equiv \, \lam^{\mathrm{SS}}_1 

1485: -\frac{3}{2}\frac{c_d^2}{F^2} \,, &

1486: \tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2&\equiv \, \lam^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 

1487: -\frac{3}{2}\frac{c_d^2}{F^2} \,, \nonumber \\

1488: \tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_1&\equiv \, \lam^{\mathrm{PP}}_1 

1489: -{(\spa)}^2 \,, \phantom{\frac{1}{2}} &

1490: \tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_2&\equiv \, \lam^{\mathrm{PP}}_2 

1491: -{(\spa)}^2 \,.\phantom{\frac{1}{2}}

1492: \end{align}

1493: The transformation of the integration measure only yields $\delta^4(0)$

1494: terms which

1495: have no effect on the theory~\cite{Politzer:1980me}~\footnote{In dimensional

1496: regularization the later result is immediate, as $\delta^d(0)=0$.}.

1497: 

1498: Performing the transformations given by Eq.~(\ref{eq:redefine}) on

1499: $\Delta \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{R}\chi\mathrm{T}}$

1500: and keeping only terms with up to two resonances we finally obtain~:

1501: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:rchtapp}

1502: \Delta \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{R}\chi\mathrm{T}}&=& -\frac{1}{2}\,\Delta_i 

1503: \left( d'_\mu d'^\mu + \sigma \right)_{ij} \Delta_j 

1504: - \frac{1}{2}\,{\es}_{i} \left( d^\mu d_\mu + \ks \right)_{ij} {\es}_{j} 

1505: - \frac{1}{2}\,{\ep}_{i} \left( d^\mu d_\mu + \kp \right)_{ij} {\ep}_{j} 

1506: \nonumber \\

1507: %

1508: &&+ \,{\es}_{i}\, \as_{ij}\, \Delta_j 

1509: + \,{\ep}_{i}\, \ap_{ij}\, \Delta_j 

1510: +\,{\ep}_i\, \asp_{ij}\, {\es}_j  \phantom{\frac{1}{2}} \nonumber \\ 

1511: %

1512: &&

1513: + \,{\es}_{k}\, \bs_{\mu \, ki}\, d^\mu_{ij} \Delta_j 

1514: + \,{\ep}_{k}\, \bp_{\mu \, ki}\, d^\mu_{ij} \Delta_j  

1515: +\, {\ep}_k \, \bsp_{\mu \, ki}\, d^\mu_{ij} {\es}_j   \,\, , 

1516: \phantom{\frac{1}{2}} 

1517: \end{eqnarray}

1518: that has the proper Gaussian structure and where the

1519: following definitions have been introduced~:

1520: 

1521: \begin{eqnarray}

1522: d^\mu_{ij}&=&\delta_{ij}\,\partial^\mu + {\gamma_{ij}^\mu}\big|_{\chi}

1523:  \, ,\\ \nonumber \\ 

1524: %

1525: %

1526: d'^\mu_{ij}&=& d^\mu_{ij} +{\gamma_{ij}^\mu}\big|_{\mathrm{R}} \, , \\

1527: \nonumber \\

1528: %

1529: %

1530: {\gamma_{ij}^\mu}\big|_{\chi}&=&-\frac{1}{2} \bra \Gamma^\mu 

1531: [\lam_i,\lam_j] \ket \, , \\ \nonumber \\

1532: %

1533: %

1534: {\gamma_{ij}^\mu}\big|_{\mathrm{R}}&=&\frac{c_d \spa}{2F^2}

1535:  \bra \{ P, \lam_i\} \{ u^\mu, \lam_j \} \ket 

1536: + (-\frac{1}{16F^2}+\frac{c_d^2}{8F^4}) \bra [S,\nabla^\mu S]\, 

1537: [\lam_i,\lam_j] \ket   \nonumber \\

1538: && -\frac{1}{16F^2} \bra [P,\nabla^\mu P]\, [\lam_i,\lam_j] \ket    

1539: -\frac{\spa}{16F^2} \bra \big[ S, \{ P, u^\mu \} \big] [\lam_i, 

1540: \lam_j ] \ket \nonumber \\

1541: && +\frac{\ssb \spa}{F^2}  \bra \{ P, \lam_i \} \big( \lam_j S 

1542: \,u^\mu + u^\mu S \,\lam_j  \big)\ket

1543: +\frac{\ssa \spa}{2F^2} \bra \big\{ S, \{ P, \lam_i \} \big\} 

1544: \{ u^\mu, \lam_j \} \ket \nonumber \\

1545: &&-\frac{c_d^2 \spa}{2F^4} \bra \{ S, \lam_i \} \big[[P, u^\mu],

1546:  \lam_j \big]\ket -  \Big\{i\leftrightarrow j\Big\}\, , \\ \nonumber \\

1547: %

1548: %

1549: \ks_{ij}&=&\delta_{ij}M_S^2 -\frac{\lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_1}{2}\bra 

1550: u^\mu u_\mu \{\lambda_i,\lambda_j\} \ket -\lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 

1551: \bra \lambda_i u_\mu \lambda_j u^\mu \ket - \frac{\lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_3}{2} 

1552: \bra \chi_+ \{\lambda_i , \lambda_j \} \ket \, , \\ \nonumber \\ 

1553: %

1554: %

1555: \kp_{ij}&=&\delta_{ij}M_P^2 -\frac{\ppa}{2}\bra u^\mu u_\mu 

1556: \{\lam_i,\lam_j\} \ket -\ppb \bra \lam_i u_\mu \lam_j u^\mu \ket 

1557: - \frac{\ppc}{2} \bra \chi_+ \{\lam_i , \lam_j \} \ket \, ,  

1558: %

1559: \end{eqnarray}

1560: %

1561: \begin{eqnarray}

1562: \sigma_{ij}&=&\frac{1}{16} \bra \chi_+  \{ \hat{\lambda}_i,\hat{\lambda}_j \}   \ket

1563: -\frac{1}{16} \bra [ u_\mu,\hat{\lambda}_i][u^\mu,\hat{\lambda}_j]\ket 

1564: \nonumber \\

1565: %

1566: &&-\frac{c_d}{4F^2} \bra \nabla^2 S \{ \lambda_i , \lambda_j \} \ket

1567: +\frac{c_m}{8F^2} \bra \{ S,\hat{\lambda}_i\} \{ \chi_+, \hat{\lambda}_j \} 

1568: \ket  

1569: +\frac{c_d}{8F^2} \bra \{ S,u^\mu\} \big[ [u_\mu, \hat{\lambda}_i], 

1570: \hat{\lambda}_j\big] \ket \nonumber \\

1571: %

1572: &&

1573: -\frac{c_d \spa}{2F^2}\big(  \bra  \{ \nabla_\mu P, \hat{\lam}_i \} 

1574: \{ u^\mu, \hat{\lam}_j \}  \ket +

1575:  \bra  \{  P, \hat{\lam}_i \} \{\nabla_\mu u^\mu, \hat{\lam}_j \} 

1576:   \ket \big) \nonumber \\

1577: %

1578: &&+\frac{i}{2F^2} \big( \frac{d_m}{4} + c_m \spa \big)\bra \{ P, 

1579: \hat{\lam}_i \} \{ \chi_- , \hat{\lam}_j \} \ket

1580: -\frac{1}{32F^2} \bra \big[ S,[ u^\mu,\lambda_i ]\big]  \big[S, 

1581: [u_\mu,\lambda_j]\big] \ket  \nonumber \\

1582: %

1583: &&+\frac{1}{8F^2}  \bra[u^\mu ,\lambda_i ] 

1584:  \big[ u_\mu , \tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1 \{ SS, \lambda_j 

1585:  \}+2\tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 S\lambda_j S \big) \big] \ket 

1586: \nonumber \\

1587: &&+\frac{1}{8F^2}  \bra[u^\mu ,\lambda_i ] 

1588: \big[\lambda_j, \big( \lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_1 \{ SS, u_\mu \}+2 

1589: \lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 S u_\mu S \big) \big] \Big) \ket 

1590: \nonumber \\

1591: %

1592: &&-\frac{1}{8F^2}  \bra \{ \chi_+ ,\lambda_i \} \Big( \big(

1593:  \tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1

1594: -\lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_3 \big)

1595:  \{ SS, \lambda_j \}+2\tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 S\lambda_j 

1596:  S \Big) \ket  

1597: -\frac{c_d^2}{2F^4} \bra \{ \nabla^\mu S, \lambda_i \} \{ \nabla_\mu S ,

1598:  \lambda_j \} \ket\nonumber \\

1599: %

1600: &&-\frac{c_d^2}{4F^4} \bra \{S, \lambda_i  \} \{  \nabla^2 S , 

1601: \lambda_j\} \ket

1602: -\frac{\tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1}{4F^2} \bra \nabla^2 S^2 

1603: \{ \lambda_i , \lambda_j \} \ket -\frac{\tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2}{F^2} 

1604: \bra \lambda_i \nabla_\mu \big( \nabla^\mu S \lambda_j  S \big) \ket  

1605:  \nonumber \\ 

1606: %

1607: &&+\frac{M_S^2 {(\spa)}^2}{2F^2} \bra \{ P, \lam_i \} \{ P, \lam_j \} 

1608: \ket

1609: -\frac{\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_1}{8F^2} \bra \{ \chi_+ ,\lam_i \}\{ PP, 

1610: \lam_j \} \ket

1611: -\frac{\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_2}{4F^2} \bra \{ \chi_+ ,\lam_i \}P\, 

1612: \lam_j P  \ket \nonumber \\

1613: %

1614: && -\frac{ \spa \spb}{ 2F^2} \bra \big\{ P, \{ P, \lam_i \} \big\} \{ \chi_+,

1615:  \lam_j \} \ket \,  

1616: + \, \frac{\ppc}{8F^2} \bra \{ PP , \lam_i \} \{ \chi_+, \lam_j \} \ket 

1617: \nonumber \\

1618: % 

1619: && -\frac{\ssc{(\spa)}^2}{F^2}\bra \{ P, \lam_i \} \{ P, \lam_j \} 

1620: \chi_+ \ket \, 

1621: -\,\frac{1}{32F^2} \bra \big[ P,[ u^\mu,\lam_i ]\big]  \big[P, [u_\mu,\lam_j]

1622: \big] \ket \nonumber \\

1623: %

1624: && +\frac{c_d^2 {(\spa)}^2}{4F^4} \bra \big[ [u^\mu,P],\lambda_i \big] \big[ 

1625: [u_\mu,P], \lambda_j \big] \ket 

1626: \,- \, \frac{{(\spa)}^2}{4F^2} \bra \big[ [u^\mu,\lambda_i], \{P, \lambda_j\} 

1627: \big] \{P,u_\mu \} \ket \nonumber \\

1628: %

1629: &&-\frac{1}{8F^2} \bra \Big(\ppa \{ u_\mu, PP \}+2\ppb P \,u_\mu P \Big) 

1630: \big[ [ \lam_i , u^\mu ], \lam_j \big] \ket \nonumber \\

1631: %

1632: &&- \, \frac{{(\spa)}^2}{F^2} \bra u^\mu \{ P, \lam_i \} \Big(  \ssa \{ P,

1633:  \lam_j \} u_\mu +

1634:  \ssb u_\mu \{ P, \lam_j \} \Big) \ket \nonumber \\

1635: %

1636: &&+\frac{\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_1}{8F^2} \bra \big[ u_\mu , \{ PP, 

1637: \lam_i \} \big] [u^\mu ,\lam_j ] \ket 

1638: +\frac{\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_2}{4F^2} \bra [ u_\mu , P\, \lam_i P 

1639: \,] [u^\mu ,\lam_j ] \ket  \nonumber \\

1640: %

1641: &&-\frac{\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_1}{4F^2} \bra \nabla^2 P^2 \{ \lam_i

1642:  , \lam_j \} \ket 

1643: -\frac{\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_2}{F^2} \bra \lam_i \nabla_\mu \big(

1644:  \nabla^\mu P \lam_j  P \big) \ket

1645:  -\frac{{(\spa)}^2}{2F^2} \bra \{ \nabla_\mu P, \lam_i \} \{ \nabla^\mu P, 

1646:  \lam_j \} \ket 

1647: \nonumber \\

1648: %

1649: %

1650: && +\frac{i\spb}{8F^2} \bra \{ S,P \} \big\{ \lam_i, \{ \chi_-, \lam_j \} 

1651: \big\} \ket 

1652:  \,+ \, \frac{i\,\ssc \spa}{2F^2} \bra \big\{ S, \{ P, \lam_i \} \big\} \{ 

1653: \chi_- ,\lam_j \} \ket \nonumber \\

1654: %

1655: && -\frac{c_d^2 \spa}{2F^4} \bra \{ P, \lam_i \}  \big\{ u^\mu ,

1656:  \{ \nabla_\mu S, 

1657: \lam_j \} \big\} \ket \, - \, \frac{ \ssb \spa }{ F^2} \bra

1658:  \nabla_\mu \Big( \{ P, \lam_i \} \big(

1659:  \lam_j S u^\mu + u^\mu S \lam_j \big) \Big) \ket \nonumber \\

1660: %

1661: &&-\frac{ \ssa \spa}{2F^2} \bra \{ P, \lam_i \}  \nabla_\mu  \big\{ S , 

1662: \{u^\mu , \lam_j \} \big\} \ket \nonumber \\

1663: %

1664: &&+\frac{\spa}{8F^2} \bra  [ u^\mu ,\lam_i] \Big(  \big[ \lam_j, 

1665: \{ \nabla_\mu S, P \} \big] +

1666:  2\big[ \nabla^\mu S, \{ P, \lam_j \} \big] -2 \big[ S , \{ \nabla^\mu P, 

1667:  \lam_j \} \big] \Big) \ket  \nonumber \\

1668: %

1669: &&

1670: +\frac{\spa}{2F^2} \bra \{ u^\mu , \lam_i \} \Big( \frac{c_d^2}{F^2} 

1671: \big\{ P, \{ \nabla_\mu S, \lam_j \} \big\} - 

1672: \ssa  \big\{ S, \{ \nabla_\mu P, \lam_j \} \big\} \Big) \ket 

1673: +  \Big\{i\leftrightarrow j\Big\} \, , 

1674: \end{eqnarray}

1675: %

1676: %

1677: \begin{eqnarray}

1678: \as_{ij}&=&-\frac{i\,c_m}{2\sqrt{2}F}\bra \chi_- \{\lambda_i,

1679: \hat{\lambda}_j\} \ket

1680: -\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}F} \bra [\nabla^\mu S, \lambda_i ] [ u_\mu,

1681: \hat{\lambda}_j ] \ket 

1682: -\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}F} \bra [S, \lambda_i ] [\nabla^\mu  u_\mu,

1683: \hat{\lambda}_j ] \ket\nonumber \\

1684: %

1685: &&+\frac{c_d^2}{\sqrt{2}F^3} \bra \{u^\mu, \lambda_i \} \{\nabla_\mu S, 

1686: \lambda_j \} \ket  

1687: -\frac{i \, \lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_3}{2\sqrt{2} F} \bra \{ S , \lambda_i 

1688: \} \{ \chi_- , \hat{\lambda}_j \} \ket

1689: -\frac{M_S^2 \spa}{\sqrt{2} F} \bra P \{ \lam_i , \hat{\lam}_j \} \ket   

1690: \nonumber \\

1691: %

1692: &&

1693: + \frac{\spb}{2\sqrt{2}F} \bra \{ P, \lam_i \} \{ \chi_+ , \hat{\lam}_j 

1694:  \} \ket 

1695: +\frac{\spa \ssc }{\sqrt{2}F}\bra \{\chi_+,\lam_i\}\{P,\hat{\lam}_j \} 

1696: \ket 

1697: -\frac{\spa}{\sqrt{2}F}\bra \nabla^2 P \{ \lam_i, \hat{\lam}_j  \} 

1698: \ket \nonumber \\

1699: %

1700: &&

1701: %

1702:  -\frac{\spa}{4\sqrt{2}F}\bra \{P, u^\mu \} \big[ \lam_i ,

1703:  [u_\mu,\hat{\lam}_j ] \big] \ket

1704: +\frac{\spa}{\sqrt{2}F} \bra \{P, \hat{\lam}_j \} \Big( \ssa 

1705: \{u_\mu u^\mu, \lam_i\} +2\ssb u_\mu \lam_i u^\mu \Big) \ket 

1706: \nonumber \\

1707: %

1708: && +\frac{c_d}{\sqrt{2}F^3} \bra \{u^\mu, \lambda_i \} 

1709:  \left( \tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1 \{  \nabla_\mu(SS), \lambda_j 

1710:  \} +2 

1711: \tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 \nabla_\mu(S\lambda_j S) \right)  

1712: %

1713: \ket  

1714:  \nonumber \\

1715: %

1716: %

1717: && +\frac{ \sqrt{2} \lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 \, c_d}{F^3} \bra  \{ 

1718: \nabla^\mu S, \lambda_j \} \Big(  S u_\mu \lambda_i  + \lambda_i u_\mu S 

1719: \Big) \ket 

1720: +\frac{ \lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_1 \, c_d}{\sqrt{2} F^3} \bra \{ S, \lambda_i 

1721: \} \big\{ u_\mu, \{ \nabla^\mu S, \lambda_j \} \big\} \ket 

1722:  \nonumber \\

1723: %

1724: && +\frac{c_d}{4\sqrt{2}F^3} \bra [ S, \lambda_i] \big[ u_\mu,\{ \nabla^\mu

1725:  S,\lambda_j\}\big] \ket 

1726: +\frac{i\, c_m }{2\sqrt{2} F^3} \bra \{ \chi_-,\lambda_i \}  \Big(\tilde{

1727: \lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1 \{ SS, \lambda_j \}+2\tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2

1728:  S\lambda_j S \Big) \ket \nonumber \\

1729: %

1730: && +\frac{i\, c_m}{2\sqrt{2}F^3} \bra \{ \chi_-, \lam_i\} \Big( 

1731: \tilde{\lam}_1^{\mathrm{PP}} \{PP, \lam_j\}

1732: +2\tilde{\lam}_2^{\mathrm{PP}}P\,\lam_j P \Big) \ket 

1733:  \nonumber \\

1734: %

1735: &&+\frac{c_d}{\sqrt{2}F^3} \bra \{u^\mu, \lam_i \} 

1736: \Big( \tilde{\lam}_1^{\mathrm{PP}} \{ \nabla_\mu (PP),\lam_j\} 

1737: +2\tilde{\lam}_2^{\mathrm{PP}}\nabla_\mu (P\,\lam_j P) \Big) \ket \nonumber \\

1738: %

1739: &&

1740:  +\frac{c_d\spa}{\sqrt{2}F^3} \bra  \{\nabla_\mu P,\lam_i\}\{\nabla^\mu S,

1741:  \lam_j\} \ket \; , \\ \nonumber \\

1742: %

1743: %

1744: \ap_{ij}&=& \frac{d_m}{2\sqrt{2}F} \bra \chi_+ \{\lam_i, \hat{\lam}_j \} 

1745: \ket 

1746: +\frac{\spb}{2\sqrt{2}F}\bra \{S,\lam_i\}\{\chi_+, \hat{\lam}_j\}\ket 

1747: \nonumber \\

1748: %

1749: && -\frac{\spa}{4\sqrt{2}F}\bra\{u_\mu,\lam_i\} \big[S,[u^\mu, \hat{\lam}_j]

1750: \big]\ket

1751: -\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}F} \bra \Big( [P,\lam_i]  [\nabla^\mu u_\mu, \hat{\lam}_j 

1752: ] + 2 [\nabla^\mu P, \lam_i ]

1753: [u_\mu, \hat{\lam}_j ] \Big) \ket \nonumber \\

1754: %

1755: && +\frac{i\,\spa}{\sqrt{2}F} \spb\bra \{\chi_-,\lam_i\}\{P, 

1756: \hat{\lam}_j\}\ket 

1757: -\frac{i \, \ppc}{2\sqrt{2} F} \bra \{ P , \lam_i \} \{ \chi_- , 

1758: \hat{\lam}_j \} \ket  \nonumber \\

1759: %

1760: &&

1761: +\frac{{(\spa)}^2}{\sqrt{2}F} \bra \{u^\mu, \lam_i\}\{\nabla_\mu P, 

1762: \hat{\lam}_j  \}\ket

1763: +\frac{c_d\spa}{\sqrt{2}F^3}\bra \{\nabla_\mu S, \lam_i\} \{ \nabla^\mu S,

1764:  \lam_j \} \ket \nonumber \\

1765: %

1766: &&-\frac{d_m}{2\sqrt{2} F^3} \bra \{ \chi_+,\lam_i \} \Big(  

1767: \tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1\{SS,\lam_j\} 

1768: +2\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 S\,\lam_j S 

1769: +\tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_1\{ PP , \lam_j \} +2 

1770: \tilde{\lam}^{\mathrm{PP}}_2 P \,\lam_j P \Big) \ket\,  \nonumber \\

1771: %

1772: %

1773: && -\frac{c_d {(\spa)}^2}{\sqrt{2}F^3} \bra \{u^\mu, \lam_i\} 

1774:  \big\{P,\{\nabla_\mu S,\lam_j\} \big\} \ket

1775: %

1776: +\frac{c_d}{4\sqrt{2}F^3} \bra  [P,\lam_i] \big[ u_\mu,

1777: \{\nabla^\mu S,\lam_j\}\big] \ket

1778: \nonumber \\

1779: %

1780: && +\frac{c_d }{\sqrt{2} F^3}\bra \{\nabla^\mu S,\lam_j\} \Big(

1781:  \ppa \big\{ u_\mu ,\{P,\lam_i\} \big\}

1782: +2\ppb \left( P \,u_\mu \lam_i +\lam_i u_\mu P \right) \Big) \ket  

1783:  \, , \\ \nonumber \\

1784: %

1785: \asp_{ij}&=&\frac{i\,\spb}{2} \bra \chi_- \{ \lam_i,\lam_j\} \ket  

1786: \, , 

1787: %\end{eqnarray}

1788: %

1789: %\begin{eqnarray}

1790: \end{eqnarray}

1791: %

1792: \begin{eqnarray}

1793: {{\bs}^{\mu}_{ij}}&=& -\frac{c_d}{\sqrt{2}F} \bra u^\mu \{ \lambda_i ,

1794: \hat{\lambda}_j \} \ket

1795: -\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}F}\bra [S,\lambda_i][u^\mu,\hat{\lambda}_j]\ket 

1796: -\frac{\lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_1}{\sqrt{2}F} \bra \{ S, \lambda_i \} \{ 

1797: u^\mu, \hat{\lambda}_j \} \ket 

1798:  \nonumber \\

1799: %

1800: &&- \frac{\sqrt{2}\lambda^{\mathrm{SS}}_2}{F} \bra S \Big( u^\mu 

1801: \lambda_i \hat{\lambda}_j + 

1802: \hat{\lambda}_j \lambda_i u^\mu \Big) \ket 

1803: -\frac{\spa}{\sqrt{2}F}\bra \nabla^\mu P \{\lam_i, \hat{\lam}_j \}

1804: \ket \nonumber \\

1805: %

1806: &&+ \frac{c_d }{\sqrt{2} F^3} \bra \{ u^\mu , \lambda_i \} \Big( 

1807: \tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_1 \{ SS, \lambda_j \} +2

1808: \tilde{\lambda}^{\mathrm{SS}}_2 S\lambda_j S 

1809: + \tilde{\lam}_1^{\mathrm{PP}} \{PP,\lam_j\} 

1810: +2\tilde{\lam}_2^{\mathrm{PP}}P\lam_jP \Big) \ket \,  , \nonumber \\

1811:  \\ \nonumber 

1812: %

1813: %

1814: {{\bp}^{\mu}_{ij}}&=&-\frac{\spa}{\sqrt{2}F} \bra \nabla^\mu S

1815:  \{\lam_i,\hat{\lam}_j \} \ket 

1816: -\frac{1}{4\sqrt{2}F}\bra [P,\lam_i][u^\mu,\hat{\lam}_j]\ket  

1817: -\frac{\ppa}{\sqrt{2}F} \bra \{ P, \lam_i \} \{ u^\mu, \hat{\lam}_j \} 

1818: \ket \nonumber \\ 

1819: %

1820: && - \frac{\sqrt{2}\ppb}{F} \bra P  \Big( u^\mu \lam_i \hat{\lam}_j +

1821: \hat{\lam}_j \lam_i u^\mu\Big) \ket  

1822:  +\frac{{(\spa)}^2}{\sqrt{2}F} \bra\{u^\mu,\lam_i\}\{P, \hat{\lam}_j\}

1823:   \ket \, , \\ \nonumber \\

1824: %

1825: %

1826: {{\bsp}^{\mu}_{ij}}&=& \frac{\spa}{2} \bra u^\mu \{\lam_i,\lam_j\} \ket \, ,

1827: \end{eqnarray}

1828: %

1829: %

1830: and the following definitions have been used,

1831: \begin{equation}

1832: \hat{\lambda}_i \,\equiv \, \lambda_i - \frac{c_d}{F^2} 

1833: \{ \lambda_i , S \} \,, \qquad \qquad

1834: \nabla_\mu \left( A \,\lambda_i\, B \right) \, \equiv \, 

1835: \nabla_\mu A \, \lambda_i \, B \, + \, A \, \lambda_i \, \nabla_\mu B  \,,

1836: \end{equation}

1837: where $A$ and $B$ are any chiral tensor or resonance field.

1838: \par

1839: As commented in the text we can write Eq.~(\ref{eq:rchtapp}) as~:

1840: \begin{equation}

1841: \Delta {\cal L}_{\mathrm{R} \chi \mathrm{T}} \, = \, 

1842: - \, \frac{1}{2} \, \eta \, \left( \, \Sigma_{\mu} \, \Sigma^{\mu} \, + \, 

1843: \Lambda \, \right) \, \eta^{\top} \; , 

1844: \end{equation}

1845: where $\eta$ collects the fluctuation fields, 

1846: $\eta=\left(\Delta_i,{\es}_j,{\ep}_k\right)$, $i,j,k = 0,...,8$, 

1847: $\eta^{\top}$ is its transposed and $\Sigma_\mu$ and $\Lambda$ are defined as~:

1848: \begin{eqnarray}

1849: \left( \Sigma_\mu \right)_{ij} &=&\delta_{ij} \, \partial_\mu\, + \, 

1850: \left( Y_{\mu} \right)_{ij} \, ,\\

1851: & & \nonumber \\

1852: \left( Y_{\mu} \right)_{ij} & = & \left( \begin{array}{ccc}

1853: \gamma'_{\mu} & \frac{1}{2} {\bs_{\mu}}^{\top} &

1854: \frac{1}{2} {\bp_{\mu}}^{\top}

1855: \\\\ -\frac{1}{2} \bs_{\mu} & \gamma_{\mu} & \frac{1}{2} {\bsp_{\mu}}^{\top} 

1856: \\\\

1857: -\frac{1}{2} \bp_{\mu}  & -\frac{1}{2} \bsp_{\mu}& \gamma_{\mu}\end{array} 

1858: \right)_{ij}\;\;\;,\label{eq:y}\\ \nonumber \\ 

1859: & & \nonumber 

1860: \end{eqnarray}

1861: \begin{eqnarray}

1862: \left( \Lambda \right)_{ij}  &=& \left( \begin{array}{ccc}

1863: \sigma+ 

1864: \frac{1}{4}{\bs_{\mu}}^{\top} \bsm  

1865: & -\as^{\top}+\frac{1}{2}\tilde{d^{\mu}_-} {\bs_{\mu}}^{\top}

1866: &-\ap^{\top}+\frac{1}{2}\tilde{d^{\mu}_-} {\bp_{\mu}}^{\top}

1867:  \\

1868:  \\

1869: + \frac{1}{4}{\bp_{\mu}}^{\top} \bpm 

1870: & + 

1871: \frac{1}{4}{\bp_{\mu}}^{\top} \bspm 

1872: & - 

1873:  \frac{1}{4}{\bs_{\mu}}^{\top} {\bspm}^{\top} 

1874: \\ \\

1875: \\

1876:  -\as+\frac{1}{2} \bar{d^{\mu}_+} \bs_{\mu}

1877: &\ks+ \frac{1}{4}\bsm {\bs_{\mu}}^{\top}  

1878: & -\asp^{\top}+\frac{1}{2}\hat{d^{\mu}} {\bsp_{\mu}}^{\top}

1879: \\

1880: \\

1881:  + \frac{1}{4}{\bsp_{\mu}}^{\top}

1882:   \bpm 

1883: & + \frac{1}{4}{\bsp_{\mu}}^{\top} 

1884: \bspm 

1885: &  + 

1886: \frac{1}{4}\bsm{\bp_{\mu}}^{\top} 

1887: \\ \\ \\

1888: -\ap+\frac{1}{2} \bar{d^{\mu}_+} \bp_{\mu} 

1889: &-\asp+\frac{1}{2} \hat{d^{\mu}} \bsp_{\mu} 

1890: & \kp+ \frac{1}{4}\bpm {\bp_{\mu}}^{\top}  \\ \\

1891:  - \frac{1}{4}\bspm \bs_{\mu} 

1892: & + \frac{1}{4}\bpm 

1893: {\bs_{\mu}}^{\top} 

1894: & + \frac{1}{4}\bspm

1895:   {\bsp_{\mu}}^{\top} 

1896:  \end{array} \right)_{ij} \; .\nonumber \\ 

1897: \end{eqnarray}

1898: Here some new expressions have been defined~:

1899: \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:gamos}

1900: \gamma^{\mu} &=&{\gamma^\mu}\big|_{\chi} \, , \nonumber \\

1901: \gamma'^{\mu} &=& {\gamma^\mu}\big|_{\chi} + {\gamma^\mu}\big|_{\mathrm{R}} 

1902: \, ,\nonumber \\ 

1903: \hat{d^{\mu}} \, X &=& \partial^{\mu} \, X \, + \, \left[ \, \gamma^{\mu}  \, ,

1904: X \, \right] \, , \nonumber  \\

1905: \tilde{d^{\mu}_{\pm}} X &=& \hat{d^{\mu}} \,  X \, \pm \, 

1906: \left(\gamma'^{\mu}-\gamma^{\mu}\right)\,X \,,\nonumber  \\

1907: \bar{d^{\mu}_{\pm}} X &=& \hat{d^{\mu}} \, X \, \pm \, X\,

1908: \left(\gamma'^{\mu}-\gamma^\mu \right) \, .

1909: \end{eqnarray}

1910: 

1911: \appendix

1912: \newcounter{ovidio}

1913: \renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{ovidio}}

1914: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{ovidio}.\arabic{equation}}

1915: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{ovidio}.\arabic{table}}

1916: \setcounter{ovidio}{5}

1917: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1918: \setcounter{table}{0}

1919: 

1920: \section{Results~: Operators and coefficients of the $\beta$-function}

1921: \label{app:cinco}

1922: 

1923: In this Appendix we collect part of our results. In Table~\ref{tab:e1}

1924: we have written the operators that involve only Goldstone fields

1925: and/or external

1926: currents. The coefficients of the $\beta$-function are generated by 

1927: full ${\cal L}_{\mathrm{R} \chi \mathrm{T}}$, i.e. including both

1928: scalar and pseudoscalar resonances. They can be compared 

1929: with the study of one-loop renormalization

1930: of $U(3)_L \otimes U(3)_R$ $\chi$PT up to ${\cal O}(p^4)$ in 

1931: Ref.~\cite{Herrera-Siklody:1996pm}. The operators in this table constitute

1932: a minimal basis. If one wishes to disentangle the pseudoscalar 

1933: contributions one has to cancel the corresponding

1934: resonance couplings and substitute

1935: $N/16 \rightarrow N/24$ in $\gamma_4$, $0 \rightarrow N/48$ in 

1936: $\gamma_7$, $N/4 \rightarrow N/6$ in $\gamma_{13}$, $-N/4 \rightarrow

1937: -N/6$ in $\gamma_{14}$ and $-N/8 \rightarrow -N/12$ in $\gamma_{15}$.

1938: \par

1939: In Tables~\ref{tab:e2}, \ref{tab:e3} we collect the operators involving

1940: one and two scalar resonances, respectively. The $\beta$-function 

1941: coefficients are those obtained by considering 

1942: Goldstone and scalar resonances only. 

1943: The full result when pseudoscalar resonances are also introduced

1944: in the theory can be looked up at

1945: \texttt{http://ific.uv.es/quiral/rt1loop.html} 

1946: or upon request from the authors. We would like to emphasize that

1947: the basis of operators has been simplified by the use of the EOM in 

1948: Appendix~\ref{app:tres} but possible $U(3)$ algebraic relations have

1949: not been employed. Accordingly our basis is not necessarily minimal.

1950: In the tables $N$ is the number of flavours and $u\cdot u \equiv u_\mu u^\mu$.

1951: {\small

1952: \begin{center}

1953: \tabletail{\hline}

1954: \topcaption{\label{tab:e1} Operators involving only Goldstone bosons and

1955:  external currents and

1956: their $\beta$-function coefficients at one loop, when both scalar and

1957: pseudoscalar resonances are included. }

1958: \begin{supertabular}{|>{$}r<{$} | >{$}c<{$} | >{$}p{12cm}<{$} |}

1959: \hline & & \\

1960: i & \cO_i &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad \gamma_i  \\ & & \\ \hline \hline 

1961: 

1962: 1&       \bra  u \cdot u \ket &   - 2    N        {\ppa}    {M_P^2} + 1/2    N        {M_P^2}    (\spa)^2 - 2    N        {\ssa}    {M_S^2}

1963:           + 1/2    N        {M_S^2}    (\spa)^2 + N  F^{-2}  c_d^2    {M_S^2} \\ \hline

1964: 

1965: 2&       \bra  {\chi_+} \ket &   - 2    N        {\ppc}    {M_P^2} - 2    N        {\ssc}    {M_S^2} \\ \hline

1966: 

1967: 3&      - \bra  u_\mu \ket^2 &    2        {\ppb}    {M_P^2} - 1/2        {M_P^2}    (\spa)^2 + 2        {\ssb}    {M_S^2}

1968:           - 1/2        {M_S^2}    (\spa)^2 - c_d^2  F^{-2}  {M_S^2} \\ \hline

1969: 

1970: 4&       \bra  u_\mu   u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu   \ket &  1/6    N    F^{-4}    c_d^4 - 1/12    N        (\spa)^2 + 1/24    N

1971:                  (\spa)^4 + 1/16    N     + 1/6    N  F^{-2}  c_d^2    (\spa)^2 - 1/6    N  F^{-2}  c_d^2 \\ \hline

1972: 

1973: 5&       \bra  u \cdot u\ket^2 &  1/2    F^{-4}    c_d^4 - 1/2        {\ppa}    (\spa)^2 +     (\ppa)^2 - 1/2        {\ssa}

1974:              (\spa)^2 +     (\ssa)^2 + 1/8        (\spa)^4 + 1/16     - F^{-2}c_d^2    {\ssa} + 1/2  F^{-2}  c_d^2

1975:          (\spa)^2 - 1/4  F^{-2}  c_d^2 \\ \hline

1976: 

1977: 6&       \bra  u_\mu   u_\nu \ket^2 &  F^{-4}    c_d^4 -     {\ppb}    (\spa)^2 + 2        (\ppb)^2 - 

1978:              {\ssb}    (\spa)^2 + 2        (\ssb)^2 + 1/4        (\spa)^4 + 1/8     - 2  F^{-2}  c_d^2    {\ssb} +F^{-2} c_d^2

1979:          (\spa)^2 - 1/2  F^{-2}  c_d^2 \\ \hline

1980: 

1981: 7&       \bra  u \cdot u  u \cdot u \ket &  1/3    N    F^{-4}    c_d^4 - 1/2    N        {\ppa}    (\spa)^2 + N        (\ppa)^2 - 1/2

1982:              N        {\ssa}    (\spa)^2 + N        (\ssa)^2 + 1/12    N        (\spa)^2 + 1/12    N        (\spa)^4 -

1983:          N  F^{-2}  c_d^2    {\ssa} + 1/3    N  F^{-2}  c_d^2    (\spa)^2 - 1/12    N  F^{-2}  c_d^2 \\ \hline

1984: 

1985: 8&     \bra  {\chi_+} \ket \bra u \cdot u \ket &  F^{-4}    c_d^3    c_m + 2        {\ppa}    {\ppc} - 1/2        {\ppc}    (\spa)^2 + 2

1986:                  {\ssa}    {\ssc} - 1/2        {\ssc}    (\spa)^2 + 1/8     +F^{-2} d_m    c_d    {\spa} +F^{-2} c_d    c_m    (\spa)^2 - 1/

1987:          2  F^{-2}  c_d    c_m -F^{-2} c_d^2    {\ssc} - 1/4  F^{-2}  c_d^2 \\ \hline

1988: 

1989: 9&       \bra  {\chi_+}  u \cdot u \ket &  N    F^{-4}    c_d^3    c_m + 2    N        {\ppa}    {\ppc} - 1/2    N        {\ppc}    (\spa)^2

1990:           + 2    N        {\ssa}    {\ssc} - 1/2    N        {\ssc}    (\spa)^2 + 1/8    N     + N F^{-2}   d_m    c_d    {\spa} + NF^{-2}

1991:          c_d    c_m    (\spa)^2 - 1/2    N  F^{-2}  c_d    c_m - N  F^{-2}  c_d^2    {\ssc} - 1/4    N F^{-2}   c_d^2 \\ \hline

1992: 

1993: 10&       \bra  {\chi_+}\ket^2 &  F^{-4}    c_d^2    c_m^2 +     (\ppc)^2 +     (\ssc)^2 + 1/16     + 2  F^{-2}  d_m

1994:              c_m    {\spa} + F^{-2}d_m^2 - 1/2   F^{-2} c_d    c_m + F^{-2}c_m^2    (\spa)^2 \\ \hline

1995: 

1996: 11&      \bra  {\chi_-}\ket^2 &      {\spa}    {\spb} - 1/8        (\spa)^2 - 2        (\spb)^2 + F^{-2}d_m    c_d    {\spa}

1997:           - 2  F^{-2}  d_m    c_m    {\spa} - F^{-2}d_m^2    (\spa)^2 +F^{-2} c_d    c_m - 1/4  F^{-2}  c_d^2 - F^{-2}c_m^2 \\ \hline

1998: 

1999: 12&    1/2  \bra  \chi_+^2 +\chi_-^2 \ket &N    F^{-4}    c_d^2    c_m^2 + N        (\ppc)^2 + N        (\ssc)^2 + 1/16  N               + N  F^{-2}  d_m^2 + 1/2    N   F^{-2} c_d    c_m + N  F^{-2}    c_m^2    (\spa)^2 

2000: +N        {\spa}    {\spb} - 1/8    N        (\spa)^2 - 2    N        (\spb)^2 + NF^{-2}

2001:              d_m    c_d    {\spa} - N  F^{-2}  d_m^2    (\spa)^2  - 1/4    N  F^{-2}  c_d^2 - N

2002:          F^{-2} c_m^2 \\ \hline

2003: 

2004: 13&     - i \,\bra  f_+^{\mu\nu}  u_\mu  u_\nu \ket & - 1/6    N          (\spa)^2 + 1/4    N

2005:                 - 1/3    N   F^{-2}   c_d^2 \\ \hline

2006: 

2007: 14&    1/4    \bra  f^{+\,2}_{\mu\nu}  -f^{-\,2}_{\mu\nu}  \ket &   - 1/4    N   + 1/6    N        (\spa)^2 + 1/3    N   F^{-2} c_d^2   \\ \hline

2008: 

2009: 15&     1/2    \bra  f^{+\,2}_{\mu\nu}  +f^{-\,2}_{\mu\nu}  \ket  &  - 1/8    N  - 1/12    N        (\spa)^2 - 1/6    N   F^{-2} c_d^2

2010:           \\ \hline

2011: 

2012: 16&  1/4  \bra  \chi_+^2   -\chi_-^2  \ket & 2 N    F^{-4}    c_d^2    c_m^2 + 2 N        (\ppc)^2 +2 N        (\ssc)^2 + 1/8    N

2013:               + 8  F^{-2}  N    d_m    c_m    {\spa} +2 N  F^{-2}  d_m^2 - 3    N   F^{-2} c_d    c_m + 2N F^{-2}   c_m^2    (\spa)^2

2014: -2N        {\spa}    {\spb} + 1/4    N        (\spa)^2 + 4    N        (\spb)^2 -2 NF^{-2}

2015:              d_m    c_d    {\spa}  +2 N  F^{-2}  d_m^2    (\spa)^2  + 1/2    N  F^{-2}  c_d^2 + 2N     F^{-2} c_m^2 \\ \hline

2016: 

2017: 17&  -    \bra  u_\mu  \ket \bra u^\mu   u \cdot u \ket & - 4        {\ppa}    {\ppb} +     {\ppa}    (\spa)^2 +     {\ppb}   

2018:          (\spa)^2 - 4        {\ssa}    {\ssb} +     {\ssa}    (\spa)^2 +     {\ssb}    (\spa)^2 - 1/2        (\spa)^4 + 1/

2019:          4     + 2 F^{-2}   c_d^2    {\ssa} + 2  F^{-2}  c_d^2    {\ssb} - F^{-2} c_d^2 \\ \hline

2020: 

2021: 18&       \bra  u_\mu  \ket \bra u^\mu   {\chi_+} \ket &   - 2    F^{-4}    c_d^3    c_m + 4        {\ppb}    {\ppc} - 

2022:              {\ppc}    (\spa)^2 + 4        {\ssb}    {\ssc} -     {\ssc}    (\spa)^2 - 1/4     - 2  F^{-2}  d_m    c_d    {\spa} - 2

2023:           F^{-2}   c_d    c_m    (\spa)^2 + F^{-2}c_d    c_m - 2  F^{-2}  c_d^2    {\ssc} + 1/2  F^{-2}  c_d^2  \\  \hline

2024: \end{supertabular}

2025: \end{center}}

2026: \vspace*{0.5cm}

2027: %\newpage

2028: %

2029: {\small \begin{center}

2030: \tabletail{\hline}	 

2031: \topcaption{\label{tab:e2} Operators with one scalar 

2032: resonance and their $\beta$-function 

2033: coefficients when only scalar resonances are included.}

2034: \begin{supertabular}{|>{$}r<{$} | >{$}c<{$} | >{$}p{11.5cm}<{$} |}

2035: \hline & & \\

2036: i & \cO_i^{S} & \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad \gamma_i^{S} \\ & & \\ \hline \hline 

2037: 1 &

2038: 

2039:        \bra S \, u \cdot u  \ket &   - 3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {M_S^2} + 2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \,

2040:        {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} + 4 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 2 &

2041: 

2042:        \bra S \ket \bra u \cdot u  \ket &   - 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {M_S^2} + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa}

2043:        \, {M_S^2} + F^{-2} \, c_d \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 3 &

2044: 

2045:       \bra u^\mu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, S \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {M_S^2} + 4 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} + 4 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d

2046:           \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} -  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 4 &

2047: 

2048:        \bra S \, \chi_+  \ket &   - 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {M_S^2} + 1/2 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \,

2049:        {M_S^2} \\ \hline 5 &

2050: 

2051:        \bra S \ket \bra \chi_+  \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {M_S^2} + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \,

2052:        {M_S^2} \\ \hline 6 &

2053: 

2054:        \bra S \, u_\mu  u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket &   - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \,

2055:          c_d^3 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssb} + 1/6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 1/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - 2/3 \, N

2056:           \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} + 1/12 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \\ \hline 7 &

2057: 

2058:        \bra S \, u \cdot u  \, u \cdot u  \ket &  10/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssa} - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, 

2059:          c_d^3 \, {\ssb} + 1/6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 4/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - 2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, (\ssa)^2 + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb}

2060:           - 1/24 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \\ \hline 8 &

2061: 

2062:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, u \cdot u  \ket &   - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssa} + 10/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, 

2063:          c_d^3 \, {\ssb} - 1/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - 2/3 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb}

2064:           + 1/12 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \\ \hline 9 &

2065: 

2066:        \bra S \ket \bra u \cdot u  \, u \cdot u  \ket &  8/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssb}

2067:           + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 + 1/3 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - 2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, (\ssa)^2 -  F^{-2}

2068: 	  \,c_d \, {\ssb} - 1/24 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \\ \hline 10 &

2069: 

2070:        \bra u^\mu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, \left\{ S , u \cdot u \right\} \ket &  4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 - 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \,

2071:          {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssb} - 3/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 4F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 8/3 F^{-2}\, c_d \, {\ssa} - 2F^{-2} \, c_d \,

2072:          (\ssa)^2 + 1/24 F^{-2}\, c_d \\ \hline 11 &

2073: 

2074:        \bra u^\mu  \, S \ket \bra u_\mu  \, u \cdot u  \ket &  8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 8 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \,

2075:          {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 4 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, (\ssa)^2 + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \,

2076: 	 c_d \\ \hline 12 &

2077: 

2078:        \bra S \ket \bra u_\mu  \, u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket &   - 2/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 + 2/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssa}

2079:           + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} - 1/12 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \\ \hline 13 &

2080: 

2081:        \bra S \, u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \ket &   - 8/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 + 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssa}

2082:           + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 4/3 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} - 8 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/3

2083:           \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \\ \hline 14 &

2084: 

2085:        \bra S \,  u^\mu   u^\nu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, u_\nu  \ket &   - 8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 +

2086:          8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssa} + 16 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssb} +2\, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 8 \, F^{-2}

2087: 	 \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2\, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d    \, {\ssb} - 8 \,

2088: 	 F^{-2} \, c_d \, (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 15 &

2089: 

2090:        \bra S \, u \cdot u  \ket \bra u \cdot u  \ket &  4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^5 + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssa} + F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 4 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \,

2091:          {\ssa} \, {\ssb} -  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} - 4 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, (\ssa)^2 -  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb}

2092: 	 \\ \hline 16 &

2093: 

2094:      i\,  \bra u_\mu f_+^{\mu\nu} u_\nu  \, S \ket &  1/3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^3 - 1/3 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - 2/3 \, N   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} + 1/

2095:          12 \, N   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \\ \hline 17 &

2096: 

2097:       i \, \bra \{ S , u_\mu   u_\nu \}   \, f_+^{\mu\nu}  \,  \ket &   - 1/6 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^3 + 1/6 \, 

2098:          N   \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} + 1/3 \, N   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} - 1/24 \, N   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d

2099: 	 \\ \hline 18 &

2100: 

2101:      i \,  \bra u_\mu  \ket \bra f_+^{\mu\nu}  \, \left[ S , u_\nu  \right] \ket &   - 1/3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^3

2102:           + 1/3   \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} + 1/12   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \\ \hline 19 &

2103: 

2104:       i\,  \bra S \ket \bra f_+^{\mu\nu}  \,  u_\mu   u_\nu   \ket &   - 2/3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^3

2105:           + 2/3   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} + 1/6   \, F^{-2} \, c_d \\ \hline 20 &

2106: 

2107:        \bra f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, \left\{ u_\mu  , \nabla_\nu S \right\} \ket &  1/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 1/3 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,

2108:          c_d \, {\ssa} - 2/3 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} + 1/12 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \\ \hline 21 &

2109: 

2110:        \bra u_\mu  \ket \bra f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, \nabla_\nu S  \ket &  2/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa}

2111:           - 1/6 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \\ \hline 22 &

2112: 

2113:        \bra u_\mu  \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \ket \bra \nabla_\nu S  \ket &  2/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa}

2114:           - 1/6 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \\ \hline 23 &

2115: 

2116:        \bra S \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, f_{-\, \mu\nu}  \ket &  1/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 1/3 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa}

2117:           - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} + 1/12 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \\ \hline 24 &

2118: 

2119:        \bra S \ket \bra f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, f_{-\,\mu\nu}  \ket &  1/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa}

2120:           - 1/12 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \\ \hline 25 &

2121: 

2122:        \bra S \, \left\{ \chi_+  , u \cdot u \right\} \ket &  2 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, c_m + N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \, N \, 

2123:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m + N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, 

2124:          c_d^3 - N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} + 1/2 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} - 1/4 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssc} - 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d -

2125:          1/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 26 &

2126: 

2127:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, \chi_+  \ket &   - 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 1/2 \, N

2128:           \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m + 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} - 4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, 

2129:          {\ssb} + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \\ \hline 27 &

2130: 

2131:        \bra S \, u \cdot u  \ket \bra \chi_+  \ket &  4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, c_m + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \,

2132:          c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssc} + F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 3/2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} - 4 \, F^{-2} \,

2133:          c_d \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssc} - 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, c_d - F^{-2} \, c_m \,

2134: 	 {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 28 &

2135: 

2136:        \bra S \, \chi_+  \ket \bra u \cdot u  \ket &  4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssa} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \,

2137:          c_m + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssc} + F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} - F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} - 3/

2138:          2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssc} - 3/8 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d -  F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssa} + 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,c_m

2139: 	 \\ \hline 29 &

2140: 

2141:        \bra u^\mu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, \left\{ S , \chi_+ \right\} \ket &  4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2

2142:           \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m - F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, 

2143:          {\ssc} + 1/2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} + c_d \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssc} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, c_d +  F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssa} - 1/

2144:          4 \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 30 &

2145: 

2146:        \bra u^\mu  \, S \ket \bra u_\mu  \, \chi_+  \ket &  8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssa}

2147:           - 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssb} - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 

2148:          4 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} +  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} - 4 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} \,

2149: 	 {\ssc} +  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} + 1/2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssb} - 1/2 \,

2150: 	 F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 31 &

2151: 

2152:        \bra S \ket \bra \chi_+  \, u \cdot u  \ket &  4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, c_m - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, 

2153:          c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^3 \, {\ssc} + F^{-4} \, c_d^3 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc}

2154:           + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} - 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssc} - 3/8 \,

2155: 	   F^{-2} \,c_d - F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 32 &

2156: 

2157:        i\, \bra \chi_-  \, \left\{ u^\mu  , \nabla_\mu S  \right\} \ket &  3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, c_m - 3/2 \, N \, F^{-4}  

2158:           \, c_d^3 + 1/2 \, N   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} + N   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} + 3/8 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, c_d - N   \,  F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, c_m

2159:           \, {\ssb} - 3/4 \, N   \,  F^{-2} \,c_m \\ \hline 33 &

2160: 

2161:        i\,\bra u^\mu  \, \chi_-  \ket \bra \nabla_\mu S  \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, c_m + F^{-4}   \, c_d^3

2162:           +    F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssa} - 3/4   \, F^{-2} \, c_d - 2   \, F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 3/2 F^{-2}  \, c_m

2163: 	  \\ \hline 34 &

2164: 

2165:       i\, \bra \chi_-  \ket \bra u^\mu  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket &  6 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, c_m - 3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^3 +

2166:           F^{-2} \,  c_d \, {\ssa} + 2   \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssb} + 3/4   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d - 2   \, F^{-2}

2167: 	  \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 4   \, F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 3/2   \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 35 &

2168: 

2169:       i\, \bra \chi_-  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket \bra u^\mu  \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, c_m + F^{-4}   \, c_d^3

2170:           +   F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - 3/4   \,  F^{-2} \,c_d - 2   \,  F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssa} + 3/2   \, 

2171: 	  F^{-2} \,c_m \\ \hline 36 &

2172: 

2173:        \bra S \, \chi_+  \, \chi_+  \ket &   - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m^2 + 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssc} + 2 \, N \, 

2174:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m - N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d - N \, F^{-2} \,

2175: 	 c_m \, {\ssa} + 1/4 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,c_m \\ \hline 37 &

2176: 

2177:        \bra S \ket \bra \chi_+  \, \chi_+  \ket &   - F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m^2 + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m - 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, c_d - 

2178:          F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 38 &

2179: 

2180:        \bra S \, \chi_+  \ket \bra \chi_+  \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m^2 + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m \, {\ssc} + 4 \, 

2181:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m -  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d -  F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssa} - 

2182: 	 F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 39 &

2183: 

2184:        \bra S \, \chi_-  \, \chi_-  \ket &  6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m^2 - 8 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m + 5/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, 

2185:          c_d^3 - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} - N \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} + N \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssc} - 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_d + N \, F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, N \, c_m \, 

2186:          {\ssb} - 2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssc} + 1/4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 40 &

2187: 

2188:        \bra S \ket \bra \chi_-  \, \chi_-  \ket &  2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m^2 - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \,

2189:          c_d^3 - 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} +  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssc} + 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, c_d + F^{-2} \,

2190: 	 c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, c_m \\ \hline 41 &

2191: 

2192:        \bra S \, \chi_-  \ket \bra \chi_-  \ket &  8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m^2 - 10 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, c_m + 3 \, F^{-4} \,

2193:          c_d^3 - F^{-2} \, c_d \, {\ssa} -  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssb} + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,c_d \, {\ssc} + 2 \,

2194: 	 F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 4 \,  F^{-2} \,c_m \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 

2195: \end{supertabular}

2196: \end{center}}

2197: \vspace*{1cm}

2198: %\newpage

2199: %

2200: {\small \begin{center}

2201: \tabletail{\hline}

2202: \tablecaption{\label{tab:e3} Operators with two scalar resonances

2203:  and their $\beta$-function 

2204: coefficients when only scalar resonances are included.}

2205: \begin{supertabular}{|>{$}r<{$} | >{$}c<{$} | >{$}p{11.2cm}<{$} |} \hline & & \\

2206: i & \cO_i^{SS} &\qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad \gamma_i^{SS} \\ & & \\ \hline \hline 

2207: 1 &

2208: 

2209:        \bra SS \ket &  N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^4} \\ \hline 2 &

2210: 

2211:        \bra S \ket^2 &  F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^4} \\ \hline 3 &

2212: 

2213:        \bra SS \, u \cdot u  \ket &   - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} - N \, F^{-4}

2214:           \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + 1/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} + N \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 \, {M_S^2} +

2215: 	  4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 \, {M_S^2} + 1/16 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 4 &

2216: 

2217:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, S \ket &   - 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} + 3/2 \, N \, 

2218:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + 4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} - N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb}

2219: 	 \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 5 &

2220: 

2221:        \bra u^\mu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, SS \ket &   - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb}

2222:           \, {M_S^2} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {M_S^2} + F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2}

2223:           - 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 6 &

2224: 

2225:        \bra u^\mu  \, S \ket^2 &   - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} + 2 \, 

2226:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {M_S^2} - 3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \, {M_S^2} + 4 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 \, {M_S^2} + 1/

2227:          8 \,  F^{-2} \,{M_S^2} \\ \hline 7 &

2228: 

2229:        \bra S \ket \bra S \, u \cdot u  \ket &   - 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} - 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} - 2 \, 

2230:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 \,

2231: 	 {M_S^2} + 3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \, {M_S^2} - 1/8 \,  F^{-2} \,{M_S^2} \\ \hline 8 &

2232: 

2233:        \bra SS \ket \bra u \cdot u  \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} - 5/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + 3/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, 

2234:          {M_S^2} +  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 \, {M_S^2} + 1/16 \,  F^{-2} \,{M_S^2} \\ \hline 9 &

2235: 

2236:        \bra SS \, \chi_+  \ket &  N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {M_S^2} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} \, {M_S^2} - 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, 

2237:          c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 10 &

2238: 

2239:        \bra S \ket \bra S \, \chi_+  \ket &  2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {M_S^2} - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} \, {M_S^2} - 4 \, F^{-4} \, 

2240:          c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 11 &

2241: 

2242:        \bra SS \ket \bra \chi_+  \ket &  F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {M_S^2} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {M_S^2} + 

2243:        F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {M_S^2} \\ \hline 12 &

2244: 

2245:        \bra u^\mu  \, u^\nu  \, S \, u_\mu  \, u_\nu  \, S \ket &  2/3 \, N \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 8/3 \, N \, 

2246:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 1/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/3 \, N \, F^{-4}

2247:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 8/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/24 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/24 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/12

2248:           \, N \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 1/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 + 1/64 \, N  F^{-2} \,\\ \hline 13 &

2249: 

2250:        \bra S \, u_\mu  \, S \, u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket &   - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4

2251:           + 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/6 \, N \, 

2252:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/6 \, F^{-2} \, N \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 14 &

2253: 

2254:        \bra S \, u \cdot u  \, S \, u \cdot u  \ket &  2/3 \, N \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 + 4 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \,

2255:          c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, 

2256:          (\ssa)^2 - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 8/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/12 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/

2257:          16 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^3 + N \, F^{-2}

2258: 	 \, (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 15 &

2259: 

2260:        \bra SS \,  u_\mu   u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket &  4/3 \, N \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, 

2261:          {\ssa} - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 1/6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 1/3

2262:           \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 +  N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 + 5/48 \, 

2263:          N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/24 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/12 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 1/3 \, N \,

2264: 	 F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 5/192 \, N F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 16 &

2265: 

2266:        \bra SS \, u \cdot u  \, u \cdot u  \ket &  4/3 \, N \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 + 10/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, 

2267:          c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa}

2268:           + 1/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - 5/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2

2269:           + 7/48 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/24 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} - 11/12 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 + 1/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 + 1/192 \, N  \, F^{-2} \,

2270:           \\ \hline 17 &

2271: 

2272:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, \left\{ S , u \cdot u \right\} \ket &   - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} + 4 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 1/3

2273:           \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 11/6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 3/2 \, N \, F^{-4}

2274:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/24 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,

2275:          (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/24 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \\ \hline 18 &

2276: 

2277:        \bra u_\mu S u^\mu  \, u_\nu S u^\nu  \ket &  2/3 \, N \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, 

2278:          {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - 4/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, 

2279:          {\ssb} + 20/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/24 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/12 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,

2280:          (\ssa)^2 + 1/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/64 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,\\ \hline 19 &

2281: 

2282:        \bra u_\nu S S u^\nu  \, u \cdot u  \ket &  4/3 \, N \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 14/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, 

2283:          c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + 1/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 8 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa}

2284:           + 7/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - 1/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2

2285:           - 3/16 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, (\ssb)^2 + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \,

2286: 	  {\ssa} + 1/4 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 5/192 \, N\, F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 20 &

2287: 

2288:        \bra u^\mu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, \left\{ SS , u \cdot u \right\} \ket &  1/24  F^{-2} \,+ 16/3 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 16/3 \, 

2289:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + 1/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 14/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb}

2290:           - 11/6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 8/3 \, 

2291:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/

2292:          24 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 21 &

2293: 

2294:        \bra u^\mu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, \left\{ u_\nu S u^\nu  , S \right\} \ket &  8/3 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \,

2295:          {\ssa} - 2/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 16/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 8/3 \,

2296:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 + 1/4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2

2297:           + F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 4 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} + F^{-2}

2298: 	  \, (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 22 &

2299: 

2300:        \bra u^\mu  \, S \ket \bra u_\mu  \, \left\{ S , u \cdot u \right\} \ket &   - 1/12  F^{-2} \,+ 16 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 64/

2301:          3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 80/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + 8/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 24 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, 

2302:          {\ssb} - 14/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 8 \, 

2303:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 7/12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/24 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 6 \,  F^{-2} \,

2304:          (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb} + 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^3 + 5/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 

2305: 	 F^{-2} \,(\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 23 &

2306: 

2307:        \bra u^\mu  \, S \, u^\nu  \, S \ket \bra u_\mu  \, u_\nu  \ket &  16/3 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 16 \, 

2308:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 32/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 64/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, 

2309:          {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 16/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 8/3 \, 

2310:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 2/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 4 \, F^{-2}

2311: 	 \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb} + 3/4 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \\ \hline 24 &

2312: 

2313:        \bra u^\mu  \, SS \ket \bra u_\mu  \, u \cdot u  \ket &  3/16  F^{-2} \,+ 24 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 48 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, 

2314:          {\ssa} - 24 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + 32 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 24 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - 1/2 \, 

2315:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 3/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 6 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \,

2316: 	 {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^3 - 3/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 25 &

2317: 

2318:        \bra S \ket \bra S \,  u_\mu   u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket &  1/48  F^{-2} \,+ 4 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 16/3 \, F^{-6}

2319:           \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 20/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 4/

2320:          3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2

2321:           - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 1/6 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline

2322: 	  26 &

2323: 

2324:        \bra S \ket \bra S \, u \cdot u  \, u \cdot u  \ket &   - 1/96 F^{-2} \, + 4 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 + 8/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 20/3

2325:           \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + 14/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 1/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2

2326:           - 6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/6 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 2

2327:           \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^3 - 1/6 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \\ \hline 27 &

2328: 

2329:        \bra S \, u_\mu  \, S \, u \cdot u  \ket \bra u^\mu  \ket &  8/3 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb}  + 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 16/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 14/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \,

2330:          {\ssa} - 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 16/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 + 1/2 \, 

2331:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2

2332: 	 \, {\ssb} + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^3 - 3/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2}

2333: 	 \, (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 28 &

2334: 

2335:        \bra S \, u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, S \ket &   - 5/24  F^{-2} \,+ 16 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 64/3 \, F^{-6} \, 

2336:          c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 80/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 16/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 16 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 

2337:          16/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 16 \, F^{-4} \, 

2338:          c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 + 7/6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/6 \, F^{-2} \,

2339: 	 {\ssa} - 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 29 &

2340: 

2341:        \bra S \, \left[ u^\mu  , u^\nu  \right] \ket^2 &  3/64 F^{-2} \, - 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + F^{-6} \, c_d^4 +

2342:          6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 3/8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, (\ssb)^2 -  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb} -

2343:          1/4 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/16 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^3

2344: 	 \\ \hline 30 &

2345: 

2346:        \bra S \, \left\{ u^\mu  , u^\nu  \right\} \ket^2 &  3/64 F^{-2} \, + 6 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa}

2347:           - 14 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 10 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 

2348:          3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 3/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 10 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/16 \, F^{-4} \, 

2349:          c_d^2 - 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, (\ssb)^2 -  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 3/16 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^3

2350:           \\ \hline 31 &

2351: 

2352:        \bra S \, u \cdot u  \ket^2 &  3/32  F^{-2} \,+ 12 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 16 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 12 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, 

2353:          {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 16 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 14 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, 

2354:          (\ssa)^2 - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 3/8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 4 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb}

2355:           + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^3 - 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \,

2356: 	  (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 32 &

2357: 

2358:        \bra SS \ket \bra u_\mu  \, u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket &   - 1/96  F^{-2} \,+ 2 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 10/3 \, F^{-6} \, 

2359:          c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 3/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 11/48 \, 

2360:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/12 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/6 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \\ \hline 33 &

2361: 

2362:        \bra SS \ket \bra u \cdot u  \, u \cdot u  \ket &   - 7/192  F^{-2} \,+ 4 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 32/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} + 7/3

2363:           \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 5/

2364:          48 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/12 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^3 \\ \hline 34 &

2365: 

2366:        \bra SS \, u_\nu u^\mu u^\nu  \ket \bra u_\mu  \ket &  5/48 F^{-2} \, + 16/3 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 16/3 \, F^{-6} \, 

2367:          c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 16 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 20/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 5/

2368:          3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 56/3 \, F^{-4} \, 

2369:          c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 1/12 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb}

2370:           - 8 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssb)^3 \\ \hline 35 &

2371: 

2372:        \bra SS \,  u^\mu   u_\nu   \ket \bra u_\mu  \, u^\nu  \ket &   - 3/16 F^{-2} \, + 56/3 \, 

2373:          F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 24 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 112/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 16/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 80/

2374:          3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 20/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 16/3 \, F^{-4} \, 

2375:          c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 64/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 + 11/12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 8 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, (\ssb)^2 -   F^{-2} \,

2376:          (\ssa)^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \,(\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 36 &

2377: 

2378:        \bra SS \, u \cdot u  \ket \bra u \cdot u  \ket &   - 3/32 F^{-2} \, + 28/3 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 12 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} - 32/

2379:          3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} + 10/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 40/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, 

2380:          {\ssa} + 10/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 - 10/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/

2381:          24 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 3/2 \,  F^{-2}

2382: 	 \,(\ssa)^2 - 2 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^3 + F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 37 &

2383: 

2384:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, u \cdot u  \ket \bra S \ket &  1/12 F^{-2} \, + 4 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 40/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, 

2385:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssb} - 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa}

2386:           + 6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/8 \, F^{-4} \, 

2387:          c_d^2 - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 4 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb} + 2/3 \, F^{-2} \,

2388: 	 (\ssa)^2 + 1/12 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 2 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 38 &

2389: 

2390:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, S \ket \bra u \cdot u  \ket &  8/3 \, F^{-8} \, c_d^6 - 8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssa} + 8/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \,

2391:          {\ssb} - 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 20/3 \, F^{-4}

2392:           \, c_d^2 \, (\ssa)^2 + 13/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2

2393:           - 4 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 39 &

2394: 

2395:        \bra u^\mu  \, u^\nu  \, \nabla_\mu S  \, \nabla_\nu S  \ket &  2/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 4/3 \, N \, 

2396:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/6 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2

2397:           + 5/48 \, F^{-2} \, N \\ \hline 40 &

2398: 

2399:        \bra u^\mu  \, u^\nu  \, \nabla_\nu S  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket &  14/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 4 \, N \, F^{-4}

2400:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 8/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 3/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 4

2401:           \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 + 23/48 \, N  \, F^{-2} \,\\ \hline 41 &

2402: 

2403:        \bra u^\mu  \, \nabla_\mu S  \, u^\nu  \, \nabla_\nu S  \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &  2 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 4/3 \, N \, 

2404:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 8/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 4/3

2405:           \, N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \\ \hline 42 &

2406: 

2407:        \bra \nabla_\mu S  \, u_\nu \nabla^\mu S u^\nu  \ket &  2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 1/6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4/

2408:          3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/3 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \\ \hline 43 &

2409: 

2410:       \bra u \cdot u  \,  \nabla^\mu S  \, \nabla_\mu S   \ket &  2/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 2\,N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa}

2411:           + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 5/6 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/3 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 4/

2412:          3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/48 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,\\ \hline 44 &

2413: 

2414:        \bra u_\mu  \ket \bra u^\mu  \,  \nabla^\nu S  \, \nabla_\nu S   \ket &  1/24  F^{-2} \,+ 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, 

2415:          c_d^4 - 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} -  F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, 

2416:          {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 1/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 45 &

2417: 

2418:        \bra u^\mu  \, u^\nu  \ket \bra \nabla_\mu S  \, \nabla_\nu S  \ket &  7/12  F^{-2} \,+ 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 

2419:          4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 5/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \,  F^{-2}

2420: 	 \,(\ssa)^2 \\ \hline 46 &

2421: 

2422:        \bra u^\mu  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket \bra u^\nu  \, \nabla_\nu S  \ket &  7/12  F^{-2} \,+ 28/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4

2423:           - 20/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 14/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 5/

2424:          3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 4 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssb)^2

2425: 	 \\ \hline 47 &

2426: 

2427:        \bra u^\mu  \, \nabla_\nu S  \ket^2 &   - 1/24 F^{-2} \, + 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa}

2428:           - 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 7/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} - 4/3

2429:           \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 48 &

2430: 

2431:        \bra u^\mu  \, \nabla_\nu S  \ket \bra u^\nu  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket &  7/12 F^{-2} \, + 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 

2432:          4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 5/3

2433:           \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 1/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, F^{-2} \,

2434: 	  (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 49 &

2435: 

2436:        \bra u^\mu  \, \left\{ \nabla_\mu S  , \nabla_\nu S  \right\} \ket \bra u^\nu  \ket &   - 7/12 F^{-2} \, - 8/3 \, 

2437:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 8/3 \,  F^{-2} \,

2438:          {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 50 &

2439: 

2440:        \bra \nabla^\mu S  \ket \bra \nabla_\mu S  \, u \cdot u  \ket &  1/24 F^{-2} \, + 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2

2441:           \, {\ssa} - 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} -

2442: 	  2/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 7/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 51 &

2443: 

2444:        \bra \nabla_\mu S  \, \left\{ u^\mu  , u^\nu  \right\} \ket \bra \nabla_\nu S  \ket &   - 7/12  F^{-2} \,- 8/3 \, 

2445:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 8/3 \,  F^{-2} \,

2446:          {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 4/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 4/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \\ \hline 52 &

2447: 

2448:        \bra u \cdot u  \ket \bra \nabla^\mu S  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket &   - 1/48  F^{-2} \,+ 2/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, 

2449:          c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 7/6 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} - 1/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \\

2450: 	 \hline 53 &

2451: 

2452:        i\,\bra u_\mu  \, u_\nu  \, SS \, f_+^{\mu\nu}  \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &  1/3 \, N \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 - 1/6 \, N \, 

2453:          F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 1/3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/8 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 + 1/24 \, N \, F^{-2} \, 

2454:           \\ \hline 54 &

2455: 

2456:        i\,\bra u_\mu  \, S \, u_\nu  \, S \, f_+^{\mu\nu}  \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &   - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa}

2457:           + 1/6 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 + 2/3 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 1/6 \, N   \, F^{-2} \,

2458: 	  {\ssb} \\ \hline 55 &

2459: 

2460:       i\, \bra S \, u_\mu  \, u_\nu  \, S \, f_+^{\mu\nu}  \ket &   - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/

2461:          4 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 - 1/12 \, N   \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} + 1/6 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 +

2462: 	 2/3 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 7/96 \, N \,  F^{-2}  \\ \hline 56 &

2463: 

2464:       i\, \bra u_\mu f_+^{\mu\nu} u_\nu  \, SS \ket &   - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 + 1/3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, N \, 

2465:          F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/12 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/6 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 2/3 \, N   \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssb)^2 - 1/96 \, N  \, F^{-2} \,

2466:           \\ \hline 57 &

2467: 

2468:        i\,\bra u_\mu  \ket \bra f_+^{\mu\nu}  \, \left[ SS , u_\nu  \right] \ket &  2/3 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 - 

2469:          F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 1/3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/12 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 + 1/3   \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb}

2470:           + 1/6   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/12   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 1/96  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 58 &

2471: 

2472:        i\,\bra u_\mu  \, S \ket \bra f_+^{\mu\nu}  \, \left[ S , u_\nu  \right] \ket &  4/3 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 -

2473:          4/3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 4/3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/6 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 + 1/6   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa}

2474:           + 1/3   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/48  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 59 &

2475: 

2476:       i\,\bra S \ket \bra u_\mu  \, S \, f_+^{\mu\nu}  \, u_\nu  \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &   - 2/3 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 +

2477:          2/3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/3   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 1/6   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 1/12

2478:             \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 1/96  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 60 &

2479: 

2480:        i\,\bra SS \ket \bra f_+^{\mu\nu}  \,  u_\mu   u_\nu   \ket &  4/3 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 -

2481:         2\, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 1/3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 + 1/6   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/3   \,

2482: 	F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/48  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 61 &

2483: 

2484:        i\,\bra u_\mu f_+^{\mu\nu} u_\nu  \, S \ket \bra S \ket &   - 4/3 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 + 4/3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4}

2485:             \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 2/3   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 1/3   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 1/6   \, 

2486: 	    F^{-2} \,{\ssb} + 1/48  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 62 &

2487: 

2488:        i\,\bra f_+^{\mu\nu}  \,  \nabla_\mu S  \, \nabla_\nu S   \ket &  1/3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 - 1/6

2489:           \, N\, F^{-2} \,   \\ \hline 63 &

2490: 

2491:        \bra u_\mu  \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, \nabla_\nu S  \, S \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &   - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 1/3 \, N

2492:           \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 64 &

2493: 

2494:        \bra u_\mu  \, \nabla_\nu S  \, S \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &   - 5/6 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 1/3 \, N

2495:           \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/6 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 4/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2

2496:           - 1/48 \, N\,  F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 65 &

2497: 

2498:        \bra u_\mu  \, S \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, \nabla_\nu S  \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &  4/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 1/3 \, N

2499:           \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/3 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \\ \hline

2500: 	  66 &

2501: 

2502:        \bra u_\mu  \ket \bra f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, \left\{ S , \nabla_\nu S  \right\} \ket &  1/48 F^{-2} \, - 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, 

2503:          c_d^4 + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb}

2504:           - 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 1/6 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 67 &

2505: 

2506:       \bra u_\mu  \, S \ket \bra f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, \nabla_\nu S  \ket &   - 1/24  F^{-2} \,- 8/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4

2507:           + 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 2/3

2508:           \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \\ \hline 68 &

2509: 

2510:        \bra \nabla_\mu S  \ket \bra f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, \left\{ S , u_\nu  \right\} \ket &   - 1/48  F^{-2} \,+ 4/3 \, F^{-6}

2511:           \, c_d^4 - 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 + 1/

2512:          6 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 69 &

2513: 

2514:        \bra S \ket \bra f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, \left\{ u_\mu  , \nabla_\nu S  \right\} \ket &  1/48 F^{-2} \, - 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, 

2515:          c_d^4 + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 1/6

2516:           \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 70 &

2517: 

2518:        \bra S \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \ket \bra u_\mu  \, \nabla_\nu S  \ket &   - 1/24  F^{-2} \,- 8/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4

2519:           + 8/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 16/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 8/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb}

2520:           + 1/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 8/3 \, F^{-2} \,

2521: 	  (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 71 &

2522: 

2523:        \bra S \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket \bra u_\nu  \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \ket &  1/24  F^{-2} \,+ 8/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 4

2524:           \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 2/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} + 2/3 \, F^{-2} \,

2525: 	  (\ssa)^2 \\ \hline 72 &

2526: 

2527:        \bra S \, f_+^{\mu\nu}  \, S \, f_{+\,\mu\nu}  \ket &  1/12 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/24 \, N\, 

2528:        F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 73 &

2529: 

2530:        \bra SS \, f_+^{\mu\nu}  \, f_{+\,\mu\nu}  \ket &   - 1/12 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/24 \, N \, 

2531:        F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 74 &

2532: 

2533:        \bra S \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, S \, f_{-\,\mu\nu}  \ket &  2/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 1/6 \, N \, 

2534:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/6 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 75 &

2535:  

2536:        \bra SS \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, f_{-\,\mu\nu}  \ket &   - 2/3 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 1/3 \, N \, 

2537:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4/3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/12 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/6 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 2/3 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,

2538:          (\ssb)^2 - 1/96 \, N\,  F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 76 &

2539: 

2540:        \bra S \ket \bra S \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, f_{-\,\mu\nu}  \ket &  1/48  F^{-2} \,- 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 4/

2541:          3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} -

2542: 	 1/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 1/6 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 77 &

2543: 

2544:        \bra S \, f_-^{\mu\nu}  \ket^2 &   - 1/48 F^{-2} \, - 4/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 4/3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa}

2545:           + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 1/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 +

2546: 	  1/6 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 2/3 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 78 &

2547: 

2548:        \bra SS \ket \bra f_-^{\mu\nu}  \, f_{-\,\mu\nu}  \ket &   - 1/96  F^{-2} \,- 2/3 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 

2549:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 1/6 \,   \,F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/12 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/6 \,

2550: 	 F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \\ \hline 79 &

2551: 

2552:        \bra S \, \chi_+  \, S \, u \cdot u  \ket &   - N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 4 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + N \, F^{-6} \, 

2553:          c_d^4 - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 1/4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 2 \, N \, 

2554:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \,

2555:          c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - N \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} - N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2

2556:           - 1/16 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 80 &

2557: 

2558:        \bra SS \, \left\{ \chi_+  , u \cdot u \right\} \ket &   - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 2 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + N

2559:           \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 1/8 \, N \, F^{-4} \, 

2560:          c_d \, c_m + N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc}

2561:           - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 3/4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/2 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, 

2562:          {\ssc} - 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc}

2563: 	 \\ \hline 81 &

2564: 

2565:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, \left\{ S , \chi_+ \right\} \ket &  1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/8 \, 

2566:          N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, 

2567:          {\ssb} - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 

2568:          1/2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 82 &

2569: 

2570:        \bra u_\nu SS u^\nu \, \chi_+  \ket &   - 4 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 8 \, N \, 

2571:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/4 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 -

2572: 	 4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 \, {\ssc} - 3/64 \, N\,  F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 83 &

2573: 

2574:        \bra u_\mu  \ket \bra u^\mu  \, \left\{ SS , \chi_+ \right\} \ket &  3/64 F^{-2}- F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 2 \,

2575:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m -

2576:          2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2

2577:           \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/4

2578: 	  \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 1/2 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 84 &

2579: 

2580:        \bra u_\mu  \ket \bra u^\mu  \, S \, \chi_+  \, S \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \,

2581:          {\ssc} + 2 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m - 4

2582:           \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, 

2583:          {\ssb} - 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \,

2584: 	 {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\

2585: 	 \hline 85 &

2586: 

2587:        \bra u_\mu  \, S \ket \bra u^\mu  \, \left\{ S , \chi_+ \right\} \ket &   - 3/32 F^{-2} \, - 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m

2588:           + 6 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 4 \, 

2589:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb}

2590:           - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \,  F^{-2} \,

2591:          (\ssa)^2 + 3 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 3/4 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} - 4 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 \,

2592: 	 {\ssc} + F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 86 &

2593: 

2594:        \bra u_\mu  \, SS \ket \bra u^\mu  \, \chi_+  \ket &  3/32 F^{-2} \, - 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 8 \, F^{-6} \, 

2595:          c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + 6 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d \, 

2596:          c_m + 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 4 \, F^{-4}

2597:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 2

2598:           \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \,

2599: 	  F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 3/8 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssc} \\ \hline 87 &

2600: 

2601:        \bra S \ket \bra S \, \left\{ \chi_+  , u \cdot u \right\} \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + 3 \, 

2602:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 5/8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + F^{-4}

2603:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 3/4 \, 

2604:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} -  F^{-2} \,{\ssb}

2605: 	 \, {\ssc} - 3/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 1/16 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 88 &

2606: 

2607:        \bra S \, \chi_+  \ket \bra S \, u \cdot u  \ket &  3/32 F^{-2} \, - 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 6 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - F^{-4} \, c_d

2608:           \, c_m + 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, 

2609:          c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} -  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 3 \,  F^{-2} \,

2610:          {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 3/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 + 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\

2611: 	 \hline 89 &

2612: 

2613:        \bra SS \ket \bra \chi_+  \, u \cdot u  \ket &   - 3/64 F^{-2} \, - 2 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + 3 \, 

2614:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 3/4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 3 \, 

2615:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 3/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 3/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - F^{-2} \,

2616:          (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 3/16 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 90 &

2617: 

2618:        \bra SS \, u \cdot u  \ket \bra \chi_+  \ket &   - 3/64  F^{-2} \,- 2 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + 3 \, 

2619:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 2 \,

2620:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb}

2621:           + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/2 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} - 

2622:          7/4 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 4 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 \, {\ssc} + F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 + 3/16 \, F^{-2}

2623: 	 \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 91 &

2624: 

2625:        \bra SS \, \chi_+  \ket \bra u \cdot u  \ket &   - 3/64  F^{-2} \,- 2 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + 3 \, 

2626:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 + F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 3/4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 3 \, 

2627:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 9/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 5/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 3/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} -  F^{-2} \,

2628:          (\ssa)^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 + 3/16 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 92 &

2629: 

2630:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, \chi_+  \ket \bra S \ket &  3/32 F^{-2} \, - 8 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 \, {\ssc} + F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4}

2631:           \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 12 \,

2632:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4 \,  F^{-2} \,

2633:          {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-2} \,

2634: 	 (\ssb)^2 \\ \hline 93 &

2635: 

2636:        \bra u_\nu S u^\nu  \, S \ket \bra \chi_+  \ket &  F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, 

2637:          c_m + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, 

2638:          {\ssc} - 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \,

2639: 	 {\ssb} + F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \\ \hline 94 &

2640: 

2641:        \bra \chi_+  \,  \nabla^\mu S  \, \nabla_\mu S   \ket &  1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 -  N \, F^{-2} \,

2642:        {\ssa} \\ \hline 95 &

2643: 

2644:        \bra \chi_+  \ket \bra \nabla^\mu S  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket &  1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 -F^{-2} {\ssa} \\ \hline

2645:        96 &

2646: 

2647:        \bra \chi_+  \, \nabla^\mu S  \ket \bra \nabla_\mu S  \ket &  F^{-4} \, c_d^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb}

2648:        \\ \hline 97 &

2649: 

2650:        i\,\bra u^\mu  \, \nabla_\mu S  \, \chi_-  \, S \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &   - 15 \, N \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 9 \, N \, F^{-6}  

2651:           \, c_d^4 + 4 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 14 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m

2652:           - 3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 10 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - 2 \, N \,

2653:          F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 + 2 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} +

2654: 	 N   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 98 &

2655: 

2656:        i\,\bra u^\mu  \, \nabla_\mu S  \, S \, \chi_-  \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &   - 13 \, N \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 8 \, N \, F^{-6}  

2657:           \, c_d^4 + 6 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 10 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 5/2 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \,

2658:          c_m - 9/2 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 7 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 2 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc}

2659:           - 15/8 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 - N   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/2 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 2 \, N  

2660:           \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 3/4 \, N   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} + 3/32 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 99 &

2661: 

2662:        i\,\bra u^\mu  \, \chi_-  \, \nabla_\mu S  \, S \,  \ket \, + \, \mathrm{h.c.} &  2 \, N \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m - N \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4

2663:           + 3 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 2 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 5/4 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m - 3/

2664:          2 \, N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + N \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 5/8 \, N \, F^{-4}   \,

2665: 	 c_d^2 \\ \hline 100 &

2666: 

2667:        i\,\bra u^\mu  \ket \bra \nabla_\mu S  \, \left\{ S , \chi_- \right\} \ket &  6 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-6}  

2668:           \, c_d^4 + F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 13/4 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m - F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + F^{-4}  

2669:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 5/2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 +  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} \, {\ssb} -  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 1/4

2670:             \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/2   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 3/4   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 3/4   \, F^{-2} \,

2671: 	    {\ssc} - 3/32\,  F^{-2} \,   \\ \hline 101 &

2672: 

2673:        i\,\bra u^\mu  \, \left\{ S , \chi_- \right\} \ket \bra \nabla_\mu S  \ket &  6 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-6}  

2674:           \, c_d^4 + 3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 4 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 11/4 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m - 2

2675:           \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 9/4 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2

2676:           +  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} \, {\ssb} -  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 1/4   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/2   \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 3/4   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 3/4   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} -  \,

2677:          3/32  F^{-2} \\ \hline 102 &

2678: 

2679:        i\,\bra \chi_-  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket \bra u^\mu  \, S \ket &  8 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4

2680:           + 2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 8 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} - 5/2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m + 4 \, F^{-4} \,

2681:            c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 - 2   \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssa} \, {\ssc} -  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} +  

2682:           F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 + 3/2   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} + 3/16  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 103 &

2683: 

2684:        i\,\bra S \ket \bra \chi_-  \, \left\{ u^\mu  , \nabla_\mu S  \right\} \ket &   - 4 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 2 \,

2685:          F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 + 5 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 1/4 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \,

2686:          c_m - 4 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/4 \, F^{-4} \,

2687:            c_d^2 +  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} \, {\ssb} -  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 1/4   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/2   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 2   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, F^{-2} \,

2688:            {\ssb} - 3/4   \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssc} - 3/32  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 104 &

2689: 

2690:        i\,\bra S \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket \bra u^\mu  \, \chi_-  \ket &  8 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 4 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^4

2691:           - 2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 7/2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m + 2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4}  

2692:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 3/2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 - 2   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} -  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} +  F^{-2} \,  (\ssa)^2 + 3/2   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} + 3/

2693:          16  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 105 &

2694: 

2695:        i\,\bra S \, \left\{ u^\mu  , \nabla_\mu S  \right\} \ket \bra \chi_-  \ket &   - 20 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 10 \,

2696:          F^{-6}   \, c_d^4 + 11 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 18 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 11/4 \, F^{-4}   \,

2697:          c_d \, c_m - 7 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 9 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 3 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - F^{-4}

2698:             \, c_d^2 +   F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} -   F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} + 1/4   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/2   \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 2   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 1/4

2699:             \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 3/4   \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssc} - 3/32  F^{-2} \,  \\ \hline 106 &

2700: 

2701:        i\,\bra S \, \chi_-  \ket \bra u^\mu  \, \nabla_\mu S  \ket &   - 20 \, F^{-6}   \, c_d^3 \, c_m + 16 \, F^{-6}   \,

2702:          c_d^4 + 14 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 12 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 7/2 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d \, c_m -

2703:          12 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 16 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} + 6 \, F^{-4}   \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - 4 \, F^{-4}   \,

2704:          c_d^2 + 4   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} - 2   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} +  F^{-2} \,  {\ssa} +   F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - 4   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 2   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} + 4

2705:             \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 3/2   \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} + 3/16   F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 107 &

2706: 

2707:        \bra SS \, \chi_+  \, \chi_+  \ket &   - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 2 \, N \, F^{-4}

2708:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssc)^2 + 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 - N

2709:           \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/4 \, N \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssc} \\

2710: 	  \hline 108 &

2711: 

2712:        \bra S \, \chi_+  \, S \, \chi_+  \ket &   - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 2 \, N \,

2713:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssc)^2 + 1/4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/8 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2

2714:           - N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 109 &

2715: 

2716:        \bra S \ket \bra S \, \chi_+  \, \chi_+  \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 4 \, F^{-4} \, 

2717:          c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 3/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 - 2 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \, {\ssc} -

2718: 	 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 110 &

2719: 

2720:        \bra S \, \chi_+  \ket^2 &   - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc}

2721:           + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, (\ssc)^2 + 3/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \,  F^{-2} \,

2722:          {\ssb} \\ \hline 111 &

2723: 

2724:        \bra SS \ket \bra \chi_+  \, \chi_+  \ket &   - F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 3/4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/4 \, F^{-4} \,

2725:          c_m^2 - 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssc} \\ \hline 112 &

2726: 

2727:        \bra SS \, \chi_+  \ket \bra \chi_+  \ket &   - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssc} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 4 \, F^{-4} \, 

2728:          c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 3/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 - 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} -

2729: 	 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} + 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc} \\ \hline 113 &

2730: 

2731:        \bra S \, \chi_-  \, S \, \chi_-  \ket &   - 14 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^2 \, c_m^2 + 22 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 8 \, 

2732:          N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 12 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m

2733:           \, {\ssc} - 3/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 3 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 4 \, N \, 

2734:          F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 3/4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssa} + 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssb}

2735:           + 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 - N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \,

2736: 	  {\ssc} - 1/4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \\ \hline 114 &

2737: 

2738:        \bra SS \, \chi_-  \, \chi_-  \ket &   - 18 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^2 \, c_m^2 + 26 \, N \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 9 \, N

2739:           \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 10 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 12 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m

2740:           \, {\ssc} - N \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 9/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 6 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 4 \, N \, F^{-4}

2741:           \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssa} + 4 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssb} + 1/

2742:          2 \, N \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 + N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 1/8 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 - N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 + 1/4 \, N \, F^{-2} \, {\ssc}

2743:           - N \, F^{-2} \, (\ssc)^2 - 1/64 \, N\,  F^{-2} \, \\ \hline 115 &

2744: 

2745:        \bra S \ket \bra S \, \chi_-  \, \chi_-  \ket &  1/32 F^{-2} \, - 16 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^2 \, c_m^2 + 20 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m

2746:           - 6 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, 

2747:          {\ssc} + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 3 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc}

2748:           - F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssa} + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssb} - F^{-4} \, c_m^2 - F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 

2749:          2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssa)^2 + 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 1/4

2750: 	 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssc)^2 \\ \hline 116 &

2751: 

2752:        \bra SS \ket \bra \chi_-  \, \chi_-  \ket &   - 1/64 F^{-2} \, - 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^2 \, c_m^2 + 4 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m

2753:           - F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssc} + 1/2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 3/

2754:          2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} - 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 + 2 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssa} +  F^{-2} \,{\ssa}

2755:           \, {\ssc} + 1/8 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} - 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 - 1/4 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssc} -  F^{-2}

2756: 	  \,(\ssc)^2 \\ \hline 117 &

2757: 

2758:        \bra S \, \chi_-  \ket^2 &   - 1/32 F^{-2} \, - 20 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^2 \, c_m^2 + 28 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m - 10 \, 

2759:          F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 12 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssc} + 

2760:          F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 6 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 7 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc} + 4 \,

2761:          F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssa} + 4 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssb} - F^{-4} \, c_m^2 - F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 1/2 \, F^{-2} \,

2762:          (\ssa)^2 + 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} \, {\ssc} - 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - F^{-2} \, (\ssb)^2 - 2 \, 

2763: 	 F^{-2} \,(\ssc)^2 \\ \hline 118 &

2764: 

2765:        \bra SS \, \chi_-  \ket \bra \chi_-  \ket &  1/32  F^{-2} \,- 32 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^2 \, c_m^2 + 44 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^3 \, c_m

2766:           - 14 \, F^{-6} \, c_d^4 - 20 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssa} - 20 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m \, {\ssb} + 16 \, F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m

2767:           \, {\ssc} - F^{-4} \, c_d \, c_m + 9 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssa} + 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssb} - 10 \, F^{-4} \, c_d^2 \, {\ssc}

2768:           + 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssa} + 8 \, F^{-4} \, c_m^2 \, {\ssb} + F^{-4} \, c_m^2 - F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssb} + 2 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssa} \, {\ssc} - 1/

2769:          2 \,  F^{-2} \,(\ssa)^2 + 2 \,  F^{-2} \,{\ssb} \, {\ssc} + 1/4 \, F^{-2} \, {\ssb} - 2 \, F^{-2} \, (\ssc)^2 \\ \hline 

2770: 

2771: \end{supertabular}

2772: \end{center}}

2773: 

2774: 

2775: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2776: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2777: 

2778: \begin{thebibliography}{10}

2779: 

2780: 

2781: %\cite{Weinberg:1978kz}

2782:  \bibitem{Weinberg:1978kz}

2783: S.~Weinberg,

2784: %``Phenomenological Lagrangians,''

2785: Physica A {\bf 96} (1979) 327.

2786: %%CITATION = PHYSA,A96,327;%%

2787: 

2788: %\cite{Gasser:1983yg}

2789: \bibitem{Gasser:1983yg}

2790: J.~Gasser and H.~Leutwyler,

2791: %``Chiral Perturbation Theory To One Loop,''

2792: Ann. Phys.\  {\bf 158} (1984) 142; \\

2793: %%CITATION = APNYA,158,142;%%

2794: J.~Gasser and H.~Leutwyler,

2795: %``Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions In The Mass Of The Strange Quark,''

2796: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 250} (1985) 465.

2797: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B250,465;%%

2798: 

2799: %\cite{Ecker:1994gg}

2800: \bibitem{Ecker:1994gg}

2801:   G.~Ecker,

2802:   %``Chiral perturbation theory,''

2803:   Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 35} (1995) 1

2804:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9501357]; \\

2805:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501357;%%

2806:   A.~Pich,

2807:   %``Chiral perturbation theory,''

2808:   Rept.\ Prog.\ Phys.\  {\bf 58} (1995) 563

2809:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9502366].

2810:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9502366;%%

2811: 

2812: %\cite{Fearing:1994ga}

2813: \bibitem{Fearing:1994ga}

2814:   H.~W.~Fearing and S.~Scherer,

2815:   %``Extension of the chiral perturbation theory meson Lagrangian to order

2816:   %p(6),''

2817:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53} (1996) 315

2818:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9408346]; \\

2819:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9408346;%%

2820: %\cite{Bijnens:1999sh}

2821: %\bibitem{Bijnens:1999sh}

2822:   J.~Bijnens, G.~Colangelo and G.~Ecker,

2823:   %``The mesonic chiral Lagrangian of order p**6,''

2824:   JHEP {\bf 9902} (1999) 020

2825:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9902437]; \\

2826:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902437;%%

2827:   %\cite{Bijnens:1999hw}

2828: %\bibitem{Bijnens:1999hw}

2829:   J.~Bijnens, G.~Colangelo and G.~Ecker,

2830:   %``Renormalization of chiral perturbation theory to order p**6,''

2831:   Annals Phys.\  {\bf 280} (2000) 100

2832:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9907333]; \\

2833:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907333;%% 

2834: 

2835:  %\cite{Unterdorfer:2002zg}

2836: \bibitem{Unterdorfer:2002zg}

2837:  R.~Unterdorfer,

2838:   %``The one-loop functional of chiral SU(2),''

2839:   JHEP {\bf 0207} (2002) 053

2840:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0205162]; \\

2841: %\cite{Schweizer:2002ft}

2842: %\bibitem{Schweizer:2002ft}

2843:   J.~Schweizer,

2844:   %``Explicit generating functional for pions and virtual photons,''

2845:   JHEP {\bf 0302} (2003) 007

2846:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0212188]; \\

2847:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212188;%%  %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205162;%%

2848:  %\cite{Unterdorfer:2005au}

2849: %\bibitem{Unterdorfer:2005au}

2850:   R.~Unterdorfer and G.~Ecker,

2851:   %``Generating functional for strong and nonleptonic weak interactions,''

2852:   arXiv:hep-ph/0507173.

2853:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507173;%% 

2854:   

2855: 

2856: %\cite{Akhoury:1990px}

2857: \bibitem{Akhoury:1990px}

2858:   R.~Akhoury and A.~Alfakih,

2859:   %``Invariant Background Field Method For Chiral Lagrangians Including

2860:   %Wess-Zumino Terms,''

2861:   Annals Phys.\  {\bf 210} (1991) 81; \\

2862:   %%CITATION = APNYA,210,81;%%

2863: %\cite{Ebertshauser:2001nj}

2864: %\bibitem{Ebertshauser:2001nj}

2865:   T.~Ebertshauser, H.~W.~Fearing and S.~Scherer,

2866:   %``The anomalous chiral perturbation theory meson Lagrangian to order p**6

2867:   %revisited,''

2868:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 054033

2869:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0110261]; \\

2870:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110261;%%

2871: %\cite{Bijnens:2001bb}

2872: %\bibitem{Bijnens:2001bb}

2873:   J.~Bijnens, L.~Girlanda and P.~Talavera,

2874:   %``The anomalous chiral Lagrangian of order p**6,''

2875:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23} (2002) 539

2876:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0110400].

2877:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110400;%%  

2878: 

2879: 

2880: %\cite{'tHooft:1973jz}

2881: \bibitem{'tHooft:1973jz}

2882:   G.~'t Hooft,

2883:   %``A Planar Diagram Theory For Strong Interactions,''

2884:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 72} (1974) 461; \\

2885:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B72,461;%%

2886: %\cite{Witten:1979kh}

2887: %\bibitem{Witten:1979kh}

2888:   E.~Witten,

2889:   %``Baryons In The 1/N Expansion,''

2890:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 160} (1979) 57.

2891:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B160,57;%%

2892: 

2893: 

2894: \bibitem{Manohar:1998xv}

2895: %\cite{Knecht:1997ts}

2896: %\bibitem{Knecht:1997ts}

2897:   M.~Knecht and E.~de Rafael,

2898:   %``Patterns of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in the large N(c)  limit

2899:   %of QCD-like theories,''

2900:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 424} (1998) 335

2901:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9712457]; \\

2902:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712457;%%

2903: %\cite{Manohar:1998xv}

2904:   A.~V.~Manohar,

2905:   %``Large N QCD,''

2906:   arXiv:hep-ph/9802419.

2907:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802419;%%

2908: 

2909: 

2910: %\cite{Pich:2002xy}

2911: \bibitem{Pich:2002xy}

2912: %For reviews  see 

2913: A.~Pich, 

2914: in {\em  Phenomenology of 

2915: large-$N_C$ QCD}, ed. R.F.~Lebed (World Scientific, 2002) p. 239,

2916: %``Colourless mesons in a polychromatic world,''

2917: arXiv:hep-ph/0205030.

2918: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205030;%%

2919: 

2920: 

2921: %\cite{Coleman:1969sm}

2922: \bibitem{Coleman:1969sm}

2923:   S.~R.~Coleman, J.~Wess and B.~Zumino,

2924:   %``Structure Of Phenomenological Lagrangians. 1,''

2925:   Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 177} (1969) 2239; \\

2926:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,177,2239;%%

2927: %\cite{Callan:1969sn}

2928: %\bibitem{Callan:1969sn}

2929:   C.~G.~Callan, S.~R.~Coleman, J.~Wess and B.~Zumino,

2930:   %``Structure Of Phenomenological Lagrangians. 2,''

2931:   Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf 177} (1969) 2247.

2932:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,177,2247;%%

2933: 

2934: 

2935: %\cite{Ecker:1988te}

2936: \bibitem{Ecker:1988te}

2937: G.~Ecker, J.~Gasser, A.~Pich and E.~de Rafael,

2938: %``The Role Of Resonances In Chiral Perturbation Theory,''

2939: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 321} (1989) 311.

2940: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B321,311;%%

2941: 

2942: \bibitem{nosfuture}

2943: V.~Cirigliano, G.~Ecker, M.~Eidem\"uller, R.~Kaiser, A.~Pich and

2944: J. Portol\'es, work in preparation.

2945: 

2946: %\cite{Ecker:1989yg}

2947: \bibitem{Ecker:1989yg}

2948: G.~Ecker, J.~Gasser, H.~Leutwyler, A.~Pich and E.~de Rafael,

2949: %``Chiral Lagrangians For Massive Spin 1 Fields,''

2950: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 223} (1989) 425.

2951: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B223,425;%%

2952: 

2953: 

2954: %\cite{Moussallam:1997xx}

2955: \bibitem{Moussallam:1997xx}

2956: B.~Moussallam,

2957: %``A sum rule approach to the violation of Dashen's theorem,''

2958: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 504} (1997) 381

2959: [arXiv:hep-ph/9701400]; \\

2960: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701400;%%

2961: %\cite{Peris:1998nj}

2962: %\bibitem{Peris:1998nj}

2963: S.~Peris, M.~Perrottet and E.~de Rafael,

2964: %``Matching long and short distances in large-N(c) {QCD},''

2965: JHEP {\bf 9805} (1998) 011

2966: [arXiv:hep-ph/9805442]; \\

2967: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805442;%%  

2968: %\cite{Knecht:2001xc}

2969: %\bibitem{Knecht:2001xc}

2970: M.~Knecht and A.~Nyffeler,

2971: %``Resonance estimates of O(p**6) low-energy constants and QCD  short-distance

2972: %constraints,''

2973: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21} (2001) 659

2974: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106034]; \\

2975: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106034;%%

2976: %\bibitem{Ruiz-Femenia:2003hm}

2977: P.~D.~Ruiz-Femenia, A.~Pich and J.~Portol\'es,

2978: %``Odd-intrinsic-parity processes within the resonance effective theory of

2979: %QCD,''

2980: JHEP {\bf 0307} (2003) 003

2981: [arXiv:hep-ph/0306157].

2982: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306157;%%

2983: 

2984: %\cite{Cirigliano:2004ue}

2985: \bibitem{Cirigliano:2004ue}

2986: V.~Cirigliano, G.~Ecker, M.~Eidem\"uller, A.~Pich and J.~Portol\'es,

2987: %``The  Green function in the resonance region,''

2988: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 596} (2004) 96

2989: [arXiv:hep-ph/0404004]; \\

2990: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404004;%%

2991: %\cite{Cirigliano:2005xn}

2992: %\bibitem{Cirigliano:2005xn}

2993:   V.~Cirigliano, G.~Ecker, M.~Eidem\"uller, R.~Kaiser, A.~Pich and 

2994:   J.~Portol\'es,

2995:   %``The  Green function and SU(3) breaking in K(l3) decays,''

2996:   JHEP {\bf 04} (2005) 006 [arXiv:hep-ph/0503108]; \\

2997:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503108;%%

2998: %\cite{Sanz-Cillero:2005ef}

2999: %\bibitem{Sanz-Cillero:2005ef}

3000:   J.~J.~Sanz-Cillero,

3001:   %``Spin-1 correlators at large N(c): Matching OPE and resonance theory up to

3002:   %O(alpha(s)),''

3003:   arXiv:hep-ph/0507186.

3004:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507186;%%

3005: 

3006: 

3007: %\cite{Prades:1993ys}

3008: \bibitem{Prades:1993ys}

3009:   J.~Prades,

3010:   %``Massive spin 1 field chiral Lagrangian from an extended Nambu-Jona-Lasinio

3011:   %model of QCD,''

3012:   Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 63} (1994) 491

3013:   [Erratum-ibid.\ C {\bf 11} (1999) 571]

3014:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9302246].

3015:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9302246;%%

3016: 

3017: %\cite{Ecker:1992de}

3018: \bibitem{Ecker:1992de}

3019:   G.~Ecker, J.~Kambor and D.~Wyler,

3020:   %``Resonances in the weak chiral Lagrangian,''

3021:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 394} (1993) 101; \\

3022:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B394,101;%%

3023: %\cite{D'Ambrosio:1997tb}

3024: %\bibitem{D'Ambrosio:1997tb}

3025:   G.~D'Ambrosio and J.~Portol\'es,

3026:   %``Spin-1 resonance contributions to the weak chiral Lagrangian: The  vector

3027:   %field formulation,''

3028:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 533} (1998) 494

3029:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9711211].

3030:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711211;%%

3031: 

3032: %\cite{Guerrero:1997ku}

3033: \bibitem{Guerrero:1997ku}

3034:   F.~Guerrero and A.~Pich,

3035:   %``Effective field theory description of the pion form factor,''

3036:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 412} (1997) 382

3037:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9707347]; \\

3038:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707347;%%

3039: %\cite{GomezDumm:2003ku}

3040: %\bibitem{GomezDumm:2003ku}

3041:   D.~Gomez Dumm, A.~Pich and J.~Portol\'es,

3042:   %``tau $\to$ pi pi pi nu/tau decays in the resonance effective theory,''

3043:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 073002

3044:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0312183].

3045:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312183;%%

3046: 

3047: \bibitem{GomezDumm:2000fz}

3048:   D.~Gomez Dumm, A.~Pich and J.~Portol\'es,

3049:   %``The hadronic off-shell width of meson resonances,''

3050:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 054014

3051:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0003320]; \\

3052:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003320;%%

3053: %\cite{Cata:2001nz}

3054: %\bibitem{Cata:2001nz}

3055:   O.~Cat\`a and S.~Peris,

3056:   %``An example of resonance saturation at one loop,''

3057:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 056014

3058:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0107062]; \\

3059:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107062;%%

3060: %\cite{GomezDumm:2000fz}

3061: %\cite{Sanz-Cillero:2002bs}

3062: %\bibitem{Sanz-Cillero:2002bs}

3063:   J.~J.~Sanz-Cillero and A.~Pich,

3064:   %``Rho meson properties in the chiral theory framework,''

3065:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 27} (2003) 587

3066:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0208199].

3067:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208199;%%

3068: %\cite{Rosell:2004mn}

3069: 

3070: \bibitem{Rosell:2004mn}

3071:   I.~Rosell, J.~J.~Sanz-Cillero and A.~Pich,

3072:   %``Quantum loops in the resonance chiral theory: The vector form factor,''

3073:   JHEP {\bf 0408} (2004) 042

3074:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0407240].

3075:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407240;%%

3076: 

3077: %\cite{Buchler:2003vw}

3078: \bibitem{Buchler:2003vw}

3079:   M.~Buchler and G.~Colangelo,

3080:   %``Renormalization group equations for effective field theories,''

3081:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 32} (2003) 427

3082:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0309049].

3083:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309049;%%

3084:   

3085: %\cite{Bruns:2004tj}

3086: \bibitem{Bruns:2004tj}

3087:   P.~C.~Bruns and U.~G.~Meissner,

3088:   %``Infrared regularization for spin-1 fields,''

3089:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 40} (2005) 97

3090:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0411223].

3091:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411223;%%

3092:  

3093: %\cite{Kaiser:2000gs}

3094: \bibitem{Kaiser:2000gs}

3095: %  R.~Kaiser and H.~Leutwyler,

3096: %  %``Large N(c) in chiral perturbation theory,''

3097: %  Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17} (2000) 623

3098: %  [arXiv:hep-ph/0007101]; \\

3099:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007101;%%

3100: %\cite{Kaiser:2005eu}

3101: %\bibitem{Kaiser:2005eu}

3102:   R.~Kaiser,

3103:   %``Large N(c) in chiral resonance Lagrangians,''

3104:   arXiv:hep-ph/0502065.

3105:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502065;%%

3106: 

3107: \bibitem{ffheretic}

3108: I.~Rosell, J.J.~Sanz-Cillero and A.~Pich, work in preparation.

3109: 

3110: \bibitem{Collins}

3111: J.~C.~Collins, \lq \lq Renormalization", 

3112: Cambridge University Press (1984).

3113: 

3114: \bibitem{bfm}

3115: %\cite{'tHooft:1973us}

3116: %\bibitem{'tHooft:1973us}

3117:   G.~'t Hooft,

3118:   %``An Algorithm For The Poles At Dimension Four In The Dimensional

3119:   %Regularization Procedure,''

3120:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 62} (1973) 444.

3121:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B62,444;%% 

3122:   

3123: \bibitem{bfm2}   

3124: %\cite{Ramond:1989yd}

3125: %\bibitem{Ramond:1989yd}

3126:   P.~Ramond,

3127:   %``Field Theory: A Modern Primer,''

3128:   Front.\ Phys.\  {\bf 74} (1989) 1; \\

3129:   %%CITATION = FRPHA,74,1;%%

3130: %\cite{DeWitt:2003pm}

3131: %\bibitem{DeWitt:2003pm}

3132:   B.~S.~DeWitt,

3133:   %``The global approach to quantum field theory. Vol. 1, 2,''

3134:   Int.\ Ser.\ Monogr.\ Phys.\  {\bf 114} (2003) 1.

3135:   %%CITATION = IMPHA,114,1;%

3136:   

3137: %\cite{Barvinsky:1985an}

3138: \bibitem{Barvinsky:1985an}

3139:   A.~O.~Barvinsky and G.~A.~Vilkovisky,

3140:   %``The Generalized Schwinger-Dewitt Technique In Gauge Theories And Quantum

3141:   %Gravity,''

3142:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 119} (1985) 1; \\

3143:   %%CITATION = PRPLC,119,1;%%

3144:   %\cite{Lee:1988rr}

3145: %\bibitem{Lee:1988rr}

3146:   C.~Lee, T.~Lee and H.~Min,

3147:   %``Background Field And Schwinger-Dewitt Proper Time Algorithm For The

3148:   %Low-Energy Effective Field Theory Action,''

3149:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 39} (1989) 1681; \\

3150:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D39,1681;%%

3151: %\cite{Ball:1988xg}

3152: %\bibitem{Ball:1988xg}

3153:   R.~D.~Ball,

3154:   %``Chiral Gauge Theory,''

3155:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 182} (1989) 1; \\

3156:   %%CITATION = PRPLC,182,1;%%

3157: %\cite{Vassilevich:2003xt}

3158: %\bibitem{Vassilevich:2003xt}

3159:   D.~V.~Vassilevich,

3160:   %``Heat kernel expansion: User's manual,''

3161:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 388} (2003) 279

3162:   [arXiv:hep-th/0306138].

3163:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0306138;%%

3164:   

3165: %\cite{Herrera-Siklody:1996pm}

3166: \bibitem{Herrera-Siklody:1996pm}

3167:   P.~Herrera-Siklody, J.~I.~Latorre, P.~Pascual and J.~Tar\'on,

3168:   %``Chiral effective Lagrangian in the large-N/c limit: The nonet case,''

3169:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 497} (1997) 345

3170:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9610549].

3171:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610549;%%  

3172:   

3173: %\cite{Vermaseren:2000nd}

3174: \bibitem{Vermaseren:2000nd}

3175:   J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,

3176:   %``New features of FORM,''

3177:   arXiv:math-ph/0010025.

3178:   %%CITATION = MATH-PH 0010025;%%

3179:   

3180: \bibitem{Wolfram} Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 5.1,

3181:                   Champaign, IL (2004).   

3182: 

3183: %\cite{Kambor:1989tz}

3184: \bibitem{Kambor:1989tz}

3185:   J.~Kambor, J.~Missimer and D.~Wyler,

3186:   %``The Chiral Loop Expansion Of The Nonleptonic Weak Interactions Of Mesons,''

3187:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 346} (1990) 17; \\

3188:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B346,17;%%

3189: %\cite{Ecker:2000zr}

3190: %\bibitem{Ecker:2000zr}

3191:   G.~Ecker, G.~Isidori, G.~Muller, H.~Neufeld and A.~Pich,

3192:   %``Electromagnetism in nonleptonic weak interactions,''

3193:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 591} (2000) 419

3194:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0006172].

3195:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006172;%%  

3196: 

3197: \bibitem{Lepage:1979zb} 

3198: G.P.~Lepage and S.J.~Brodsky, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 87} (1979) 359; \\

3199: %\bibitem{Lepage:1980fj} 

3200: G.P.~Lepage and S.J.~Brodsky, 

3201: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 22} (1980) 2157;\\

3202: %\bibitem{Brodsky:1981rp} 

3203: S.J.~Brodsky and G.P.~Lepage, Phys. Rev. D

3204: {\bf 24} (1981) 1808.

3205: 

3206: 

3207: \bibitem{Politzer:1980me}

3208:   H.~D.~Politzer,

3209:   %``Power Corrections At Short Distances,''

3210:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 172} (1980) 349;\\

3211:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B172,349;%%

3212: %\cite{Arzt:1993gz}

3213: %\bibitem{Arzt:1993gz}

3214:   C.~Arzt,

3215:   %``Reduced effective Lagrangians,''

3216:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 342}, 189 (1995)

3217:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9304230];\\

3218:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9304230;%%

3219: %\cite{Grosse-Knetter:1993nu}

3220:   C.~Grosse-Knetter,

3221:   %``Hamiltonian quantization of effective Lagrangians with massive vector

3222:   %fields,''

3223:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 48}, 2854 (1993)

3224:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9304310].

3225:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9304310;%%

3226: 

3227: 

3228: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  

3229: % %% %% %%

3230: 

3231: \end{thebibliography}

3232: 

3233: \end{document}

3234: )

3235: