1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in
3: %% Text Area: 8in (include Runningheads) x 5in
4: %% ws-ijmpa.tex : 28 July 2003
5: %% Tex file to use with ws-ijmpa.cls written in Latex2E.
6: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the
7: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
8: %% Copyright 1995, 2002 by World Scientific Publishing Co.
9: %% All rights are reserved.
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: %%
12:
13: \documentclass{ws-ijmpa}
14: \usepackage{amsmath}
15: \def\as{\alpha_s}
16: \newcommand{\qq}{q\bar q}
17: \newcommand{\xt}{\hat x_T}
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \markboth{Banfi, Laenen}
21: {Joint resummation for heavy quark production}
22:
23: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Publisher's Area please ignore %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
24: %
25: \catchline{}{}{}{}{}
26: %
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28:
29: \title{JOINT RESUMMATION FOR HEAVY QUARK PRODUCTION}
30:
31:
32: \author{\footnotesize ANDREA BANFI}
33:
34: \address{Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge\\
35: Madingley Road, CB3 0HE Cambridge, UK}
36:
37: \author{ERIC LAENEN\footnote{speaker}}
38:
39: \address{NIKHEF Theory Group\\
40: Kruislaan 409, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands}
41:
42: \maketitle
43:
44: %\pub{Received (Day Month Year)}{Revised (Day Month Year)}
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47: We present the joint threshold and recoil resummed transverse momentum
48: distributions for heavy quark hadroproduction, at next-to-leading
49: logarithmic accuracy. We exhibit their dependence on the production
50: channel and the color configurations, and compare these distributions
51: to eachother and to NLO.
52:
53: \keywords{Resummation; heavy quark production.}
54: \end{abstract}
55:
56: \section{Joint threshold and recoil resummation} %) A SECTION HEADING
57:
58: The formalism \cite{Li:1998is,Laenen:2000ij,Sterman:2004yk} of hadronic cross
59: sections for the joint resummation of distributions singular at
60: partonic threshold and at zero recoil has so far been applied to $Z/W$
61: production \cite{Kulesza:2002rh}, Higgs production \cite{Kulesza:2003wn},
62: and prompt photon hadroproduction~\cite{Laenen:2000de}.
63: For the latter $2\rightarrow 2$ process,
64: the formalism implements the notion that, in
65: the presence of QCD radiation, the actual transverse momentum produced
66: by the hard collision is not $\vec{p}_T$ but rather $\vec p_T-\vec
67: Q_T/2$, with $\vec Q_T$ the total transverse momentum of unobserved soft
68: recoiling partons. The joint-resummed partonic $p_T$ spectrum
69: has the form of a hard scattering cross section as a function of
70: $p_T'\equiv|\vec p_T-\vec Q_T/2|$, convoluted with a {\em
71: perturbative}, albeit resummed $\vec Q_T$ distribution.
72: We have extended~\cite{Banfi:2004xa} the joint resummation formalism
73: to the $p_T$ distribution of
74: heavy quarks produced in hadronic collisions. Key differences with
75: the prompt-photon case are, first, the presence of the heavy quark
76: mass $m$, preventing a singularity in the hard scattering function
77: when $Q_T = 2 p_T$ and, second, the possibility of multiple
78: colored states for the produced heavy quark pair.
79:
80: \section{Resummed heavy quark transverse momentum spectra}
81:
82: We consider the inclusive $p_T$ distribution of a heavy quark produced
83: via the strong interaction in a hadron-hadron collision at center of
84: mass (cm) energy $\sqrt{S}$.
85: Exact higher order corrections to the
86: differential cross sections for these partonic
87: processes have been computed to NLO
88: \cite{Nason:1989zy,Beenakker:1989bq,Beenakker:1991ma,Mangano:1992jk}.
89: Up to corrections ${\cal O}(1/p^2_T)$,
90: the observable may at any order \cite{Collins:1989gx} be
91: written in the following factorized form
92: \begin{equation}
93: \label{eq:crs-def}
94: \frac{d\sigma_{AB\to Q+X}}{d p_T}=
95: \sum_{a,b}\int_0^1 d\xi_a d\xi_b \, \phi_{a/A}(\xi_a,\mu)\phi_{b/B}(\xi_b,\mu)
96: \frac{d\hat\sigma_{ab\to Q+X}}{dp_T}(\xi_a,\xi_b,\alpha_s(\mu),p_T)\>,
97: \end{equation}
98: with $d\hat\sigma_{ab\to Q+X}/dp_T$ the partonic differential
99: cross-section, $\phi_{a/A}$ and $\phi_{b/B}$ parton densities, and
100: $\mu$ the factorization/renormalization scale.
101:
102: Threshold enhancements essentially
103: involve the energy of soft gluons. In the context of the
104: factorization (\ref{eq:crs-def}) we define hadronic and partonic
105: threshold by the conditions $S = 4m_T^2$ and $\hat{s} = 4m_T^2$,
106: respectively, with $m_T$ the transverse mass $\sqrt{m^2+p_T^2}$. It
107: is convenient to define the scaling variables
108: \begin{equation}
109: \label{eq:xT}
110: x_T^2=\frac{4 m_T^2}{S}\>,\qquad
111: \hat x_T^2=\frac{4 m_T^2}{\xi_a \xi_b S}\>\,,
112: \end{equation}
113: so that hadronic (partonic) threshold is at $x_T^2 =1$ ($\hat x_T^2 =
114: 1$). The higher order corrections to the partonic cross section
115: $d\hat\sigma_{ab}/dp_T$ contain distributions that are singular at
116: partonic threshold. Threshold resummation organizes such distributions
117: to all orders.
118:
119: There are also recoil effects, resulting from radiation of
120: soft gluons from initial-state partons. We wish to treat these
121: effects in the context of joint threshold and recoil resummation.
122: We identify a hard scattering with reduced cm
123: energy squared $Q^2$ and at transverse momentum $\vec{Q}_T$ with
124: respect to the hadronic cm system. This hard scattering produces a
125: heavy quark with transverse momentum
126: \begin{equation}
127: \label{eq:transverse}
128: \vec{p\,}_T'\equiv\vec p_T-\frac{\vec Q_T}{2}\>.
129: \end{equation}
130: The kinematically allowed range for the invariant mass $Q$ of the
131: heavy quark pair in this hard scattering is limited from below by
132: $2m_T' = 2\sqrt{m^2 + p_T'^2}$ so that threshold in the context of
133: joint resummation is defined by
134: \begin{equation}
135: \label{eq:4}
136: \tilde x_T^2\equiv\frac{4 m_T'^2}{Q^2} = 1\>.
137: \end{equation}
138: A refactorization analysis~\cite{Laenen:2000ij}
139: %on the lines of the one performed in Ref.~\cite{Laenen:2000ij}
140: leads to the following expression for the
141: observable in Eq.~(\ref{eq:crs-def})
142: \begin{equation}
143: \label{eq:8}
144: \frac{d\sigma_{AB\to Q+X}}{dp_T}
145: = \int d^2 Q_T \, \theta(\bar{\mu}-|\vec{Q}_T|)
146: \frac{d\sigma_{AB\to Q+X}}{dp_T d^2 \vec Q_T}\,,
147: \end{equation}
148: where $\bar{\mu}$ is a cut-off and
149: \begin{equation}
150: \label{eq:2}
151: \begin{split}
152: &\frac{d\sigma_{AB\to Q+X}}{dp_T d^2 \vec Q_T}= \sum_{ab=q\bar{q},gg}
153: p_T \int\frac{d^2 b}{(2\pi)^2}e^{i \vec b \cdot \vec Q_T}
154: \int\frac{dN}{2\pi i} \phi_{a/A}(N,\mu)\>\phi_{b/B}(N,\mu)\>
155: e^{E_{ab}(N,b)}\\
156: &\frac{e^{-2\>C_F \>t(N)\>(\mathrm{Re} L_\beta+1)}}{4\pi S^2}\left(
157: \tilde M^2_{\bf 1}(N)+\tilde M^2_{\bf 8}(N)
158: e^{C_A \>t(N)\> \left(\ln \frac{m_T^2}{m^2}+L_\beta\right)}
159: \right) \\
160: & \qquad\qquad
161: \times\left(\frac{S}{4(m^2+|\vec p_T-\vec Q_T/2|^2)}\right)^{N+1}
162: \!\!\!\!\>.
163: \end{split}
164: \end{equation}
165: Notice in particular the last factor, which provides a kinematic link
166: between recoil and threshold effects. The exponential functions
167: $E_{ab}$ \cite{Laenen:2000ij,Laenen:2000de} are to next-to-leading
168: logarithmic (NLL) accuracy
169: \begin{equation}
170: \label{eq:Eab}
171: E_{ab}(N,b) = \int_{\chi(N,b)}^Q \frac{d \mu'}{\mu'}
172: [A_a(\as(\mu'))+A_b(\as(\mu'))] 2\ln\frac{\bar N \mu'}{Q} -g b^2
173: \,,\qquad \bar N = N e^{\gamma_E}\,,
174: \end{equation}
175: where the coefficients $A_a$ and $A_b$
176: %are taken from Ref.~\cite{Laenen:2000ij},
177: can be found elsewhere~\cite{Laenen:2000ij},
178: and the function $\chi(N,b)$ is chosen to reproduce either NLL
179: resummed recoil or threshold distributions in the appropiate limits
180: \cite{Kulesza:2002rh}.
181: We also added to the perturbative exponent
182: the non-perturbative (NP) Gaussian smearing term $-gb^2$,
183: in terms of the impact parameter $b$.
184: We have introduced the variables
185: \begin{equation}
186: t(N)=\int_Q^{Q/N}\!\frac{d\mu'}{\mu'}\frac{\alpha_s(\mu')}{\pi}\>,
187: \;\;
188: \mathrm{Re} L_\beta = \frac{1+\beta^2}{2\beta}
189: \left(\ln\frac{1-\beta}{1+\beta}\right)
190: \>,
191: \quad \beta=\sqrt{1-m^2/m_T^2} \>.
192: \end{equation}
193: The functions $\tilde M^2_{\bf 1}(N), \tilde M^2_{\bf 8}(N)$ are
194: the Mellin moments of the lowest order heavy quark production matrix
195: elements for either the $q\bar{q}$ or $gg$ channel, as appropiate, the index
196: labeling the color-state of the heavy quark pair. Their explicit expressions
197: can be found elsewhere\cite{Banfi:2004xa}.
198: %
199: The threshold-resummed result can now easily be derived, by
200: substituting Eq.~(\ref{eq:2}) into (\ref{eq:8})
201: and neglecting $\vec Q_T$ in the last factor in
202: Eq.~(\ref{eq:2}). Then the $\vec Q_T$ integral sets $\vec b$ to zero
203: everywhere, yielding the threshold-resummed result.
204:
205: To illustrate these analytic results, we show for the
206: case of top quark production at the Tevatron
207: the $p_T$ distribution for the dominant $q\bar q$ channel in
208: %Fig.~(\ref{fig:ptspectra_qq})
209: Fig.~\ref{fig:ptspectra_qq}.
210: \begin{figure}
211: \centerline{\psfig{file=figure1.eps,width=\textwidth}}
212: \vspace*{8pt}
213: \caption{Top quark $p_T$ spectra and
214: $K$-factors for the $q\bar q$ channel. \label{fig:ptspectra_qq}}
215: \end{figure}
216: We observe that, while the resummed and NLO curves are close
217: for small and moderate
218: $p_T$ (the inset provides a somewhat better view of the low $p_T$ region),
219: for large $p_T$ values the resummed curves depart significantly
220: from the NLO curve. Of course, cross sections for top quark
221: production at such large $p_T$ at the Tevatron are far too small to be
222: measured, so that our plots at large $p_T$ have only theoretical
223: interest. For such large $p_T$ values, the hadronic threshold,
224: defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:xT}, approaches the partonic one, where
225: larger $N$ values dominate, a prerequisite for seeing significant
226: effects for both resummations. The enhancements relative to the Born
227: cross section are shown in the form of a K-factor.
228: Threshold resummation produces an overall enhancement of the
229: cross section that increases with increasing $p_T$, yielding e.g. an
230: enhancement over NLO at $p_T = 800\,\mathrm{GeV}$. Joint resummation almost
231: doubles that effect: the joint-resummed enhancement at large $p_T$
232: effectively constitutes a smearing of the threshold-resummed $p_T$ spectrum by
233: a resummed recoil function.
234:
235:
236: \section*{Acknowledgments}
237:
238: This work was supported by the Netherlands
239: Foundation for Fundamental Research of
240: Matter (FOM) and the National Organization for Scientific Research
241: (NWO).
242:
243: \begin{thebibliography}{0}
244:
245: \bibitem{Li:1998is}
246: \protect{H.-n.} Li,
247: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B454}, 328 (1999), hep-ph/9812363.
248: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B454,328;%%
249:
250: \bibitem{Laenen:2000ij}
251: E.~Laenen, G.~Sterman, and W.~Vogelsang,
252: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D63}, 114018 (2001), hep-ph/0010080.
253: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010080;%%
254:
255: \bibitem{Sterman:2004yk}
256: G.~Sterman and W.~Vogelsang,
257: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D71}, 114013 (2005), hep-ph/0409234
258: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409234;%%
259:
260: \bibitem{Kulesza:2002rh}
261: A.~Kulesza, G.~Sterman, and W.~Vogelsang,
262: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D66}, 014011 (2002), hep-ph/0202251.
263: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202251;%%
264:
265: \bibitem{Kulesza:2003wn}
266: A.~Kulesza, G.~Sterman, and W.~Vogelsang,
267: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D69}, 014012 (2004), hep-ph/0309264.
268: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309264;%%
269:
270: \bibitem{Laenen:2000de}
271: E.~Laenen, G.~Sterman, and W.~Vogelsang,
272: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 4296 (2000), hep-ph/0002078.
273: %%CITATION = PRLTA,84,4296;%%
274:
275: \bibitem{Banfi:2004xa}
276: A.~Banfi and E.~Laenen,
277: %``Joint resummation for heavy quark production,''
278: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 034003,
279: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0411241].
280: hep-ph/0411241.
281: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411241;%%
282:
283: \bibitem{Nason:1989zy}
284: P.~Nason, S.~Dawson, and R.~K. Ellis,
285: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B327}, 49 (1989).
286: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B327,49;%%
287:
288: \bibitem{Beenakker:1989bq}
289: W.~Beenakker, H.~Kuijf, W.~L. van Neerven, and J.~Smith,
290: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D40}, 54 (1989).
291: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D40,54;%%
292:
293: \bibitem{Beenakker:1991ma}
294: W.~Beenakker, W.~L. van Neerven, R.~Meng, G.~A. Schuler, and J.~Smith,
295: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B351}, 507 (1991).
296: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B351,507;%%
297:
298: \bibitem{Mangano:1992jk}
299: M.~L. Mangano, P.~Nason, and G.~Ridolfi,
300: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B373}, 295 (1992).
301: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B373,295;%%
302:
303: \bibitem{Collins:1989gx}
304: J.~C. Collins, D.~E. Soper, and G.~Sterman,
305: \newblock in {\it{Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics}}, A.H. Mueller ed.,
306: World Scientific, Singapore, 1989.
307:
308:
309:
310: \end{thebibliography}
311:
312:
313: \end{document}
314:
315:
316: