1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: %\usepackage{a4}
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: \title{Signals of $Z'$ boson in the Bhabha process within the LEP 2 data set}
7: \author{A.V. Gulov, V.V. Skalozub}
8: \maketitle
9:
10: \begin{abstract}
11: The LEP2 data set on the Bhabha process is analyzed with the aim
12: to detect the signals of the heavy virtual $Z'$ gauge bosons. The
13: state interacting with the left-handed standard-model doublets and
14: called the Chiral $Z'$ is investigated. This particle was
15: introduced already as the low-energy state allowed by the
16: renormalizability of the model. The contribution of the Chiral
17: $Z'$ state to the Bhabha process is described by two parameters:
18: the coupling to electrons and the $Z$-$Z'$ mixing angle. The
19: sign-definite one-parameter observable is proposed to measure the
20: $Z'$ coupling to the electron current. The one-parameter fit of
21: the data shows no signals of the particle. The alternative
22: two-parameter fit of the differential cross-sections is also
23: performed. It also shows no Chiral $Z'$ signals. The comparisons
24: with other fits are discussed.
25: \end{abstract}
26:
27: \section{Introduction}
28:
29: Searching for new heavy particles beyond the energy scale of the
30: standard model (SM) is an important problem of modern high energy
31: physics. In particular, in recently finished experiments at LEP
32: either model dependent or model independent searches for different
33: heavy virtual states were carried out and the masses and couplings
34: of numerous particles entering a number of popular models
35: extending the SM have been restricted \cite{EWWG}. As a general
36: observation it was found that the low bounds on the mass of a
37: specific particle are strongly model dependent ones and vary in a
38: wide energy range. For instance, the lower limit on the mass of
39: the $Z'$ gauge boson changes from $670$ GeV to $2$ TeV
40: \cite{EWWG}. At the accelerators of the next generation (the LHC,
41: in particular) the signals of new heavy particles are expected to
42: be clearly detected and some of them could be discovered. But the
43: underlying theory beyond the SM will hardly be settled. These
44: circumstances may serve as a motivation for the model-independent
45: description of new heavy virtual particles with specific quantum
46: numbers.
47:
48: In Refs. \cite{EPJC00,PRD00} the approach to pick out uniquely the
49: $Z'$ gauge boson in different scattering processes at low energies
50: has been developed and applied \cite{YAF04,PRD04} to analyze the
51: data of the LEP2 experiments. It is based on two main principles:
52: 1) the renormalizability of an underlying model extending the SM
53: is assumed; 2) the kinematics features of the specific processes
54: in which the $Z'$ appears as a virtual state are accounted for.
55: The former requirement results in the specific relations between
56: the low energy couplings of the $Z'$ with the particles of the SM
57: called the renormalization group (RG) relations and decreasing a
58: number of independent parameters. The latter gives a possibility
59: to introduce the observables which uniquely determine this state
60: in different scattering processes. It is important to notice that
61: at each stage of this analysis one also has to take into
62: consideration the derived correlations. The detailed analysis of
63: the existing in the literature \cite{diffcs} experimental data for
64: the annihilation $e^+ e^- \to \mu^+ \mu^-, e^+ e^- \to \tau^+
65: \tau^- $ processes and the Bhabha process, $e^+ e^- \to e^+ e^- $,
66: having as a goal searching for signal of the Abelian $Z'$ boson,
67: showed \cite{YAF04,PRD04}: 1) In the annihilation processes, the
68: present day data are in accordance with the $Z'$ existence, but
69: the data set is not bulk enough to detect the signals at more than
70: the $1\sigma$ confidence level (CL). 2) In the Bhabha process, the
71: signals can be determined at the $2 \sigma$ CL. The mass of the
72: particle was estimated to be $m_{Z'}\sim 1-1.2$ TeV. So one has to
73: expect that the increase of the data set could make the signals
74: more evident.
75:
76: An important finding in Ref \cite{EPJC00} was the result that at
77: low energies there are two types of the $Z'$ interactions with the
78: SM fermions compatible with the RG equations. The first is the
79: well known Abelian $Z'$ boson. And the second one is the ``Chiral
80: $Z'$'' interacting with the left-handed species, only. The RG
81: relations are different for these cases. Correspondingly,
82: different observables must be constructed in order to pick out the
83: signals of these states. So, searching for the Chiral $Z'$ is of
84: interest as a possibility of new physics beyond the SM.
85:
86: In the present paper the effects of the Chiral $Z'$ boson in the
87: Bhabha process $e^- e^+\to e^- e^+$ are investigated. We introduce
88: the one-parametric observable to pick out the low energy coupling
89: of the $Z'$ to the left-handed electrons. Because of a few
90: independent couplings entering the cross-section there is other
91: interesting possibility of two-parameter fits. We find that in
92: both cases the LEP2 data show no signals of the Chiral $Z'$ boson.
93: %The prospects of distinguishing the two types of $Z'$ bosons are
94: %discussed.
95:
96: \section{$Z'$ couplings at low energies}
97:
98: To be self-contained, let us remind the necessary results on the
99: description of the $Z'$ interactions at low energies. Suppose that
100: all new heavy particles are decoupled and the $Z'$ boson is
101: associated with some low-energy gauge subgroup. Then, as it was
102: shown in Ref \cite{EPJC00}, its couplings to the SM particles
103: satisfy so-called RG relations required by the renormalizability
104: of the underlying theory beyond the SM. By accounting for the
105: relations the number of independent parameters describing
106: cross-sections can be significantly reduced. Notice that all
107: popular $SO(10)$-based $Z'$ models are embedded into the mentioned
108: relations.
109:
110: To describe the types of the $Z'$ boson predicted by the RG
111: analysis let us introduce the phenomenological parametrization of
112: the low-energy $Z'$ couplings to the SM particles \cite{EPJC00}.
113: The couplings to the SM fermion left-handed doublets and
114: right-handed singlets $f$ are described by the Lagrangian
115: \[
116: {\cal L}_f=
117: \frac{\tilde{g}}{2}{Z}'_{0\mu}\sum\limits_{f}\bar{f}{\gamma^\mu}
118: \tilde{Y}(f)f,
119: \]
120: where ${Z}'_{0\mu}$ denotes the eigenstate of the $Z'$ gauge
121: group, $\tilde{g}$ stands for the charge corresponding to the
122: group, and $\tilde{Y}(f)$ are the unknown generators
123: characterizing the model beyond the SM. The generators are
124: diagonal $2\times 2$ matrices for the fermion doublets and numbers
125: for the fermion singlets. In the same manner, the $Z'$ couplings
126: to the scalar doublet $\phi$ are derived by adding the appropriate
127: term to the standard electroweak covariant derivative:
128: \[
129: {\cal L}_s=\left|\left( D^{{\rm ew,} \phi}_\mu -
130: \frac{i\tilde{g}}{2}\tilde{Y}(\phi){Z}'_{0\mu}
131: \right)\phi\right|^2,
132: \]
133: where the generator $\tilde{Y}(\phi)$ is the diagonal $2\times 2$
134: matrix.
135:
136: The RG relations predict two types of the $Z'$ boson -- the
137: Abelian and the Chiral one. The couplings of the Abelian $Z'$
138: boson is restricted by the relations
139: \begin{equation}\label{1}
140: \tilde{Y}(f_L)=\tilde{Y}_{fL}\cdot\hat{1},\quad
141: \tilde{Y}(\phi)=\tilde{Y}_{\phi}\cdot\hat{1},\quad
142: \tilde{Y}(f_R)-\tilde{Y}_{fL}=2T_{3,f}\tilde{Y}_\phi,
143: \end{equation}
144: where $\hat{1}$ is the $2\times 2$ unit matrix, and $T^3_f$ is the
145: third component of the fermion weak isospin. As is seen, the set
146: of independent couplings consists of one number for each SM
147: doublet ($\tilde{Y}_{fL}$ and $\tilde{Y}_\phi$). Introducing the
148: $Z'$ couplings to the vector and axial-vector currents,
149: \begin{eqnarray}\label{2}
150: &&v_f=\frac{\tilde{Y}(f_R)+\tilde{Y}_{fL}}{2}=\tilde{Y}_{fL}+T_{3,f}\tilde{Y}_\phi,
151: \nonumber\\ &&
152: a_f=\frac{\tilde{Y}(f_R)-\tilde{Y}_{fL}}{2}=T_{3,f}\tilde{Y}_\phi,
153: \end{eqnarray}
154: we see that the $Z'$ couplings to the axial-vector currents have
155: the universal absolute value, related to the $Z'$ coupling to
156: scalars. So, we can also use as an independent set of parameters
157: the $Z'$ couplings to the vector fermion currents ($v_f$) and the
158: $Z'$ coupling to the electron axial-vector current ($a_e=a$).
159:
160: The second possibility is the Chiral $Z'$. It is characterized by
161: the constraints
162: \begin{equation}\label{3}
163: \tilde{Y}(f_L)=-\tilde{Y}_{fL}\cdot\hat\sigma_3,\quad
164: \tilde{Y}(f_R)=0,\quad
165: \tilde{Y}(\phi)=-\tilde{Y}_{\phi}\cdot\hat\sigma_3
166: \end{equation}
167: where $\hat\sigma_3$ is the third Pauli matrix. The Chiral $Z'$
168: interacts with the SM doublets only that can be described by one
169: parameter for each doublet ($\tilde{Y}_{fL}$ and
170: $\tilde{Y}_\phi$).
171:
172: The $Z'$ couplings to the SM scalars necessarily leads to the
173: mixing of physical $Z$ and $Z'$ states. It is given by the
174: relation \cite{EPJC00}
175: \begin{equation}\label{4}
176: \theta_0 = \frac{\sin\theta_W\cos\theta_W}{\sqrt{4\pi\alpha}}
177: \frac{m^2_Z}{m^2_{Z'}} \tilde{g}\tilde{Y}_\phi
178: +O\left(\frac{m^4_Z}{m^4_{Z'}}\right)
179: \end{equation}
180: for both the Abelian and the Chiral $Z'$ bosons, where $\theta_W$
181: is the SM value of the Weinberg angle. As estimates fulfilled at
182: LEP2 energies showed, in spite of the smallness, the $Z$-$Z'$
183: mixing affects the $Z$-boson couplings and can produce the effects
184: of the order of that induced by the $Z'$ exchange diagrams. So it
185: cannot be neglected.
186:
187: Due to a reduced number of independent couplings it is possible to
188: pick out the $Z'$ signals in leptonic processes and efficiently
189: constraint the parameters of this particle. In our previous papers
190: \cite{PRD00,YAF04,PRD04} we have analyzed the signals of the
191: Abelian $Z'$ for $e^-e^+\to e^-e^+$, $e^-e^+\to \mu^-\mu^+$, and
192: $e^-e^+\to \tau^-\tau^+$ processes. We constructed the
193: one-parametric sign-definite observables responsible for $a^2$
194: coupling for each of the processes. It was also possible to
195: provide the one-parametric sign-definite observable for $v_e^2$ in
196: the Bhabha process $e^-e^+\to e^-e^+$. The LEP2 data on $e^-e^+\to
197: \mu^-\mu^+, \tau^-\tau^+$ processes show the signal for $a^2$ at
198: the 1$\sigma$ CL. The Bhabha process is mainly sensitive to the
199: vector coupling $v_e^2$, for which the signal is found at the
200: 2$\sigma$ CL.
201:
202: Below we turn to the analysis of the Bhabha process with the aim
203: to search for the Chiral $Z'$ gauge boson.
204:
205: \section{The differential cross-section}
206:
207: In four-fermion scattering processes $e^-e^+\to f\bar{f}$ there
208: are two leading-order (in the improved Born approximation) effects
209: related to the $Z'$-boson existence. The first one is the
210: amplitude with the virtual $Z'$ exchange $e^-e^+\to Z'\to
211: f\bar{f}$. In the lowest order in $m_{Z'}^{-2}$ it is resulted in
212: four-fermion contact couplings, which are various quadratic
213: combinations of $\tilde{g}\tilde{Y}_{f}/m_{Z'}$ for all possible
214: generators $\tilde{Y}_{f}$ for the considered type of the
215: $Z'$-boson.
216:
217: The second effect is originated by the $Z$-$Z'$ mixing. The mixing
218: affects the $Z$-boson exchange diagram, $e^-e^+\to Z\to f\bar{f}$,
219: by terms of order $\theta_0\tilde{g}\tilde{Y}_{f}$. Since the
220: mixing angle is proportional to $m_{Z'}^{-2}$, in the amplitude
221: the leading-order terms are described by the products
222: $\tilde{g}^2\tilde{Y}_{f}\tilde{Y}_\phi m_{Z'}^{-2}$ for all
223: generators $\tilde{Y}_{f}$.
224:
225: In what follows we will use the dimensionless coupling constants
226: \[
227: \bar{l}_f=\frac{m_Z}{\sqrt{4\pi}m_{Z'}}\tilde{g}\tilde{Y}_{fL},\quad
228: \bar{r}_f=\frac{m_Z}{\sqrt{4\pi}m_{Z'}}\tilde{g}\tilde{Y}(f_R),\quad
229: \bar{\phi}=\frac{m_Z}{\sqrt{4\pi}m_{Z'}}\tilde{g}\tilde{Y}_\phi,
230: \]
231: as well as the couplings to the vector and axial-vector fermion
232: currents, $\bar{v}_f$ and $\bar{a}_f$
233: \[
234: \bar{a}_f=\frac{m_Z}{\sqrt{4\pi}m_{Z'}}\tilde{g}a_f,\quad
235: \bar{v}_f=\frac{m_Z}{\sqrt{4\pi}m_{Z'}}\tilde{g}v_f.
236: \]
237: Then, the $Z'$-induced contact couplings are just the quadratic
238: combinations of $\bar{l}_f$, $\bar{r}_f$ (or, alternatively,
239: $\bar{a}_f$ and $\bar{v}_f$), and the $Z$-$Z'$ mixing effects are
240: described by $\bar{l}_f\bar{\phi}$, $\bar{r}_f\bar{\phi}$ (or
241: $\bar{a}_f\bar{\phi}$, $\bar{v}_f\bar{\phi}$).
242:
243: The above introduced coupling constants are related to the
244: traditional four-fermion contact couplings (usually marked as
245: $\epsilon$) through the expressions
246: \[
247: \epsilon_{LL} = -\bar{l}_e\bar{l}_f m_Z^{-2}/4, \quad
248: \epsilon_{RR} = -\bar{r}_e\bar{r}_f m_Z^{-2}/4, \quad
249: \epsilon_{LR} = -\bar{l}_e\bar{r}_f m_Z^{-2}/4, \ldots
250: \]
251: and
252: \[
253: \epsilon_{VV} = -\bar{v}_e\bar{v}_f m_Z^{-2}/4, \quad
254: \epsilon_{AA} = -\bar{a}_e\bar{a}_f m_Z^{-2}/4, \quad
255: \epsilon_{AV} = -\bar{a}_e\bar{v}_f m_Z^{-2}/4, \ldots
256: \]
257: Finally, the $Z$-$Z'$ mixing angle is determined by $\bar\phi$ as
258: follows,
259: \[
260: \theta_0\simeq\frac{m_W
261: \sin\theta_W}{\sqrt{\alpha}m_{Z'}}\bar\phi,
262: \]
263: where $\alpha$ is the fine structure constant.
264:
265: The leading effects in the cross-section are originated from the
266: interference of the SM amplitude with the new physics amplitude.
267: For the Bhabha process, the generic $Z'$-inspired deviation of the
268: cross-section from its SM prediction is
269: \begin{equation}\label{dcs-ch}
270: \Delta d\sigma^\mathrm{Bhabha}/dz = {\cal F}_L \bar{l}_e^2 + {\cal
271: F}_R \bar{r}_e^2 + {\cal F}_{LR} \bar{l}_e\bar{r}_e +{\cal
272: F}_{L\phi} \bar{l}_e\bar\phi +{\cal F}_{R\phi} \bar{r}_e\bar\phi.
273: \end{equation}
274: where $z$ is the cosine of the scattering angle, and ${\cal
275: F}={\cal F}(\sqrt{s},z)$ are known functions of the center-of-mass
276: energy and the scattering angle. It can be also expressed in terms
277: of the vector and axial vector couplings:
278: \[
279: \Delta d\sigma^\mathrm{Bhabha}/dz = {\cal F}_v \bar{v}_e^2 + {\cal
280: F}_a \bar{a}_e^2 + {\cal F}_{av} \bar{a}_e\bar{v}_e +{\cal
281: F}_{v\phi} \bar{v}_e\bar\phi +{\cal F}_{a\phi} \bar{a}_e\bar\phi.
282: \]
283:
284: For a fixed $z$ the factors ${\cal F}(\sqrt{s},z)$ are smooth
285: functions of $\sqrt{s}$. However, each factor ${\cal
286: F}(\sqrt{s},z)$ grows infinitely at $z \to 1$. This is caused by
287: the photon exchange in the $t$-channel. Due to this singular
288: behavior the experimental values and the uncertainties change
289: significantly with increasing of $z$. As it was shown in
290: \cite{PRD04}, it is possible to make the factors finite for all
291: the values of the scattering angle by dividing the differential
292: cross-section by some known monotonic function. For instance, the
293: factor ${\cal F}_{v}$ is a positive monotonic function of $z$. So
294: it can be chosen for normalization of the differential
295: cross-section:
296: \[
297: {\cal F}_v^{-1}\Delta d\sigma^\mathrm{Bhabha}/dz = F_L \bar{l}_e^2
298: + F_R \bar{r}_e^2 + F_{LR} \bar{l}_e\bar{r}_e +F_{L\phi}
299: \bar{l}_e\bar\phi +F_{R\phi} \bar{r}_e\bar\phi,
300: \]
301: \[
302: {\cal F}_v^{-1}\Delta d\sigma^\mathrm{Bhabha}/dz = \bar{v}_e^2 +
303: F_a \bar{a}_e^2 + F_{av} \bar{a}_e\bar{v}_e +F_{v\phi}
304: \bar{v}_e\bar\phi +F_{a\phi} \bar{a}_e\bar\phi.
305: \]
306:
307: This normalization gives us two benefits. First, the obtained
308: factors $F(\sqrt{s},z)$ are finite for all values of the
309: scattering angle $z$. Second, the experimental errors for
310: different bins become equalized that provides the statistical
311: equivalence of different bins. The latter is important for the
312: construction of integrated cross-sections.
313:
314: \section{One parametric fit for the Chiral $Z'$}
315:
316: The Chiral $Z'$ boson does not interact with the right-handed
317: species. So, only the factors ${\cal F}_L$ and ${\cal F}_{L\phi}$
318: survive in Eq. (\ref{dcs-ch}). They are plotted in Fig. 1 for the
319: center-of-mass energy 200 GeV.
320: \begin{figure}\label{fig-dcs-ch}
321: \centering
322: \includegraphics[bb= 0 0 300 200,width=.5\textwidth]
323: {fig1.eps} \caption{The factors ${\cal F}_L$ and ${\cal
324: F}_{L\phi}$ describing the Chiral $Z'$ effects in the differential
325: cross-section at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV.}
326: \end{figure}
327: As it was mentioned above, the factors are singular at $z\to 1$. On the
328: other hand, the normalized deviation of the differential
329: cross-section from its SM prediction,
330: \[
331: {\cal F}_v^{-1}\Delta d\sigma^\mathrm{Bhabha}/dz = F_L \bar{l}_e^2
332: + F_{L\phi} \bar{l}_e\bar\phi,
333: \]
334: is determined by two finite factors, $F_L$ and $F_{L\phi}$, which
335: are shown in Fig. 2.
336: \begin{figure}\label{fig-dcs-ch-norm}
337: \centering
338: \includegraphics[bb= 0 0 300 200,width=.5\textwidth]{fig2.eps}
339: \caption{ The normalized factors $F_L$ and $F_{L\phi}$ describing
340: the Chiral $Z'$ effects in the Bhabha process at $\sqrt{s}=200$
341: GeV (solid lines) and $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV (dashed lines).}
342: \end{figure}
343:
344: As it is seen, the four-fermion contact coupling $\bar{l}_e^2$
345: contributes mainly to the forward scattering angles, whereas the
346: $Z$-$Z'$ mixing term affects the backward angles. At the LEP
347: energies they can be of the same order of magnitude. The
348: contribution of the mixing vanishes with the energy growth.
349:
350: The key problem of the data treatment is the number of independent
351: parameters which should be determined in an experiment. A large
352: number of them disperses the experimental statistics leading to
353: significant uncertainties. This difficulty usually prompts one to
354: consider various restricted models, supposing some couplings to be
355: zero. In those cases the loss of generality is the price of the
356: statistical adequacy of fits. The effects of the Chiral $Z'$ boson
357: in the Bhabha process are described by two unknown parameters,
358: only. So, we have a possibility to derive the effective
359: experimental constraints on them without any additional
360: restrictions.
361:
362: First, let us construct a one-parametric observable which is most
363: preferred by the statistical treatment of data. As is clear, it is
364: impossible to separate the couplings $\bar{l}_e^2$ and
365: $\bar{l}_e\bar\phi$ in any observable which is an integrated
366: cross-section over some interval of $z$. However, the mixing
367: contribution can be eliminated in the cross-section of the form
368: (which is inspired by the forward-backward asymmetry)
369: \[
370: \Delta\sigma(z^*) = \int_{z^*}^{z_\mathrm{max}} {\cal
371: F}_v^{-1}(z)\Delta\frac{d\sigma}{dz} \, dz -
372: \int_{-z_\mathrm{max}}^{z^*} {\cal
373: F}_v^{-1}(z)\Delta\frac{d\sigma}{dz} \, dz,
374: \]
375: where the boundary value $z^*$ should be chosen to suppress the
376: coefficient at $\bar{l}_e\bar\phi$. The maximal value of the
377: scattering angle $z_\mathrm{max}$ is determined by a particular
378: experiment. In this way we introduce the one-parametric
379: sign-definite observable sensitive to $\bar{l}_e^2$.
380:
381: The LEP Collaborations DELPHI and L3 measured the differential
382: cross-sections with $z_\mathrm{max}=0.72$ \cite{diffcs}. The set
383: of boundary angles $z^*$ as well as the theoretic and experimental
384: values of the observable are collected in Table 1. The other LEP
385: Collaborations -- ALEPH and OPAL -- used $z_\mathrm{max}=0.9$
386: \cite{diffcs}. The corresponding data are presented in Table 2.
387: \begin{table}\label{tab-1}
388: \centering \caption{The boundary angles $z^*$ and the theoretic
389: values of the observable $\Delta\sigma(z^*)$ at
390: $z_\mathrm{max}=0.72$. The experimental values of the observable
391: are marked by (D) for DELPHI Collaboration and by (L) for L3
392: Collaboration.} \rule{0pt}{10pt}\\
393: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|r|} \hline $\sqrt{s}$,
394: GeV & $z^*$ & $\Delta\sigma(z^*)$ &
395: $\Delta\sigma^\mathrm{ex}(z^*)$ \\
396: \hline
397: 183 & -0.245 & 1742 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-2.38 \pm 7.03$ (L)\\
398: 189 & -0.252 & 1775 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-4.28 \pm 3.36$ (D)\\
399: & -0.251 & 1771 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $3.05 \pm 3.65$ (L)\\
400: 192 & -0.255 & 1788 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $4.57 \pm 7.32$ (D)\\
401: 196 & -0.259 & 1806 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $3.77 \pm 4.33$ (D)\\
402: 200 & -0.263 & 1823 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-1.95 \pm 4.05$ (D)\\
403: 202 & -0.265 & 1831 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $1.31 \pm 5.54$ (D)\\
404: 205 & -0.267 & 1843 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-4.09 \pm 3.89$ (D)\\
405: 207 & -0.269 & 1851 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $0.40 \pm 3.33$ (D)\\
406: \hline
407: \end{tabular}
408: \end{table}
409: \begin{table}\label{tab-2}
410: \centering \caption{The boundary angles $z^*$ and the theoretic
411: values of the observable $\Delta\sigma(z^*)$ at
412: $z_\mathrm{max}=0.9$. The experimental values of the observable
413: are marked by (A) for ALEPH Collaboration and by (O) for OPAL
414: Collaboration.}\rule{0pt}{10pt}\\
415: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|r|}
416: \hline $\sqrt{s}$, GeV & $z^*$ & $\Delta\sigma(z^*)$ &
417: $\Delta\sigma^\mathrm{ex}(z^*)$ \\
418: \hline
419: 130 & -0.217 & 2017 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-12.40 \pm 19.24$ (A) \\
420: &&& $-4.13 \pm 29.29$ (O) \\
421: 136 & -0.266 & 2092 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-50.21 \pm 16.64$ (A)\\
422: &&& $-34.18 \pm 31.58$ (O)\\
423: 161 & -0.370 & 2311 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-15.90 \pm 13.24$ (A)\\
424: &&& $-14.02 \pm 22.32$ (O)\\
425: 172 & -0.400 & 2398 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-12.11 \pm 12.50$ (A)\\
426: &&& $13.71 \pm 17.84$ (O)\\
427: 183 & -0.424 & 2474 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-1.51 \pm ~5.18$ (A)\\
428: &&& $11.04 \pm ~5.57$ (O)\\
429: 189 & -0.435 & 2512 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-0.63 \pm ~3.28$ (O) \\
430: 192 & -0.441 & 2531 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-3.48 \pm 9.85$ (O)\\
431: 196 & -0.447 & 2554 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $2.96 \pm ~5.09$ (O)\\
432: 200 & -0.454 & 2577 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $0.35 \pm ~4.68$ (O)\\
433: 202 & -0.457 & 2587 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-2.87 \pm ~9.00$ (O)\\
434: 205 & -0.461 & 2604 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $5.88 \pm ~4.67$ (O)\\
435: 207 & -0.464 & 2614 $\bar{l}_e^2$ & $-1.42 \pm ~3.46$ (O)\\
436: \hline
437: \end{tabular}
438: \end{table}
439:
440: The standard $\chi^2$-fit gives the following constraints for the
441: coupling $\bar{l}_e^2$ at the 68\% CL:
442: \begin{eqnarray}
443: \mathrm{ALEPH:} && \bar{l}_e^2= -0.00304\pm 0.00176 \nonumber\\
444: \mathrm{DELPHI:} && \bar{l}_e^2= -0.00054\pm 0.00086\nonumber\\
445: \mathrm{L3:} && \bar{l}_e^2= 0.00109\pm 0.00184 \nonumber\\
446: \mathrm{OPAL:} && \bar{l}_e^2= 0.00051\pm 0.00064\nonumber\\
447: \mathrm{Combined:} && \bar{l}_e^2= -0.00004\pm 0.00048\nonumber
448: \end{eqnarray}
449: Hence it is seen that the most precise data of DELPHI and OPAL
450: collaborations give no signal of the Chiral $Z'$ at the 1$\sigma$
451: CL. The combined value also shows no signal at the 1$\sigma$ CL.
452: From the combined fit the 95\% CL bound on the value of
453: $\bar{l}_e^2$ can be derived, $\bar{l}_e^2<9\times 10^{-4}$.
454: Supposing the $Z'$ coupling constant $\tilde{g}$ to be of the
455: order of the electroweak one, $\tilde{g}\simeq 0.6$, the
456: corresponding $Z'$ mass has to be larger than $0.5$ TeV.
457:
458: \section{Two parametric fit for the Chiral $Z'$}
459:
460: Now, let us carry out a complete two parametric fit of
461: experimental data based directly on the differential
462: cross-sections. Since in case of the Chiral $Z'$ there are only
463: two independent couplings, one has to expect that this fit has to
464: be reliable.
465:
466: In the fitting we used the available final data for the
467: differential cross-sections of the Bhabha process. The data set
468: consists of 299 bins including the data of ALEPH at 130-183 GeV,
469: DELPHI at 189-207 GeV, L3 at 183-189 GeV, and OPAL at 130-207 GeV
470: \cite{diffcs}.
471:
472: The $\chi^2$ function reads
473: \[
474: \chi^2(\bar{l}_e,\bar\phi)=\sum_i \left(\frac{\sigma^\mathrm{ex}_i
475: -
476: \sigma^\mathrm{th}_i(\bar{l}_e,\bar\phi)}{\delta\sigma^\mathrm{ex}_i}\right)^2,
477: \]
478: where $\sigma^\mathrm{ex}_i$ and $\delta\sigma^\mathrm{ex}_i$ are
479: the measured deviation from the SM value of the differential
480: cross-section for the $i$th bin (we used the SM predictions, given
481: by the collaborations) with the corresponding error, and
482: $\sigma^\mathrm{th}_i$ is the theoretical prediction for the
483: deviation from the SM due to the Chiral $Z'$ effects. The sum runs
484: over all the bins.
485:
486: According to Eq. (\ref{dcs-ch}), the theoretic predictions
487: $\sigma^\mathrm{th}_i$ are linear combinations of two products of
488: $Z'$ couplings
489: \begin{equation}\label{10}
490: \sigma^\mathrm{th}_i=\sum_{j=1}^{2} C_{ij}A_j,\quad
491: A_j=\{\bar{l}^2,\bar{l}_e\bar{\phi}\},
492: \end{equation}
493: where $C_{ij}$ are known coefficients. Introducing matrix
494: notations $\sigma^\mathrm{th}=\sigma^\mathrm{th}_i$,
495: $\sigma^\mathrm{ex}=\sigma^\mathrm{ex}_i$, $C=C_{ij}$, $A=A_j$,
496: the $\chi^2$-function can be rewritten as follows
497: \begin{equation}\label{11}
498: \chi^2(A)=(\sigma^\mathrm{ex}-CA)^\mathrm{T} D^{-1}
499: (\sigma^\mathrm{ex}-CA),
500: \end{equation}
501: where upperscript T denotes the matrix transposition, and $D$ is
502: the covariance matrix. The diagonal elements of $D$ are the
503: experimental errors squared,
504: $D_{ii}=(\delta\sigma^\mathrm{ex}_i)^2$, whereas the non-diagonal
505: elements of $D$ are responsible for possible correlations of the
506: observables.
507:
508: The $\chi^2$-function has a minimum, $\chi^2_\mathrm{min}$, at the
509: maximum-likelihood values of the $Z'$ couplings,
510: \begin{equation}\label{12}
511: \hat{A}=(C^\mathrm{T}D^{-1}C)^{-1}C^\mathrm{T}D^{-1}\sigma^\mathrm{ex}.
512: \end{equation}
513: From Eqs. (\ref{11}), (\ref{12}) we obtain
514: \begin{eqnarray}\label{13}
515: \chi^2(A)-\chi^2_\mathrm{min}&=& (\hat{A}-A)^\mathrm{T}
516: \hat{D}^{-1}(\hat{A}-A),
517: \nonumber\\
518: \hat{D}&=& (C^\mathrm{T}D^{-1}C)^{-1}.
519: \end{eqnarray}
520:
521: Usually, the experimental values $\sigma^\mathrm{ex}$ are
522: normal-distributed quantities with the mean values
523: $\sigma^\mathrm{th}$ and the covariance matrix $D$. The quantities
524: $\hat{A}$, being the superposition of $\sigma^\mathrm{ex}$, also
525: have the same distribution. It is easy to show that $\hat{A}$ has
526: the mean values $A$ and the covariance matrix $\hat{D}$.
527:
528: The inverse covariance matrix $\hat{D}^{-1}$ is the symmetric
529: $2\times 2$ matrix, which can be diagonalized. The number of
530: non-zero eigenvalues is determined by the rank of $\hat{D}^{-1}$,
531: which equals to the number of linear-independent terms in the
532: differential cross-section $\sigma^\mathrm{th}$. In the case of
533: Chiral $Z'$-boson, the rank of $\hat{D}^{-1}$ equals to 2. So, the
534: right-hand-side of Eq. (\ref{13}) is a quantity distributed as
535: $\chi^2$ with 2 degrees of freedom (d.o.f.). Since this random
536: value is independent of $A$, the confidence area in the parameter
537: space $A=\{\bar{l}_e$, $\bar{\phi}\}$ corresponding to the
538: probability $\beta$ can be defined as \cite{stat}:
539: \begin{equation}\label{14}
540: \chi^2\le \chi^2_\mathrm{min}+\chi^2_{\mathrm{CL},\beta},
541: \end{equation}
542: where $\chi^2_{\mathrm{CL,\beta}}$ is the $\beta$-level of the
543: $\chi^2$-distribution with 2 d.o.f.
544:
545: The parameter space of the Chiral $Z'$ is the plane ($\bar{l}_e$,
546: $\bar\phi$). The minimum of the $\chi^2$-function,
547: $\chi^2_\mathrm{min}=237.29$, is reached at zero value of
548: $\bar{l}_e$ ($\simeq 10^{-4}$) and almost independent of the value
549: of $\bar\phi$ (the maximal-likelihood values of the couplings).
550: The 95\% CL area ($\chi^2_\mathrm{CL}=5.99$) is shown in Figure 3.
551: \begin{figure}\label{fig-ch-many}
552: \centering
553: \includegraphics[bb= 0 0 275 235,width=.5\textwidth]
554: {fig3.eps} \caption{The 95\% CL area in $\bar{l}_e-\bar\phi$
555: plane. The final data of ALEPH 130-183 GeV, DELPHI GeV 189-207, L3
556: 183-189 GeV, and OPAL 130-207 GeV are combined.}
557: \end{figure}
558:
559: As one can see, the zero point, $\bar{l}_e = \bar\phi= 0$ (the
560: absence of the Chiral $Z'$ boson) is inside the confidence area.
561: The value of $\chi^2$ in this point (238.62) is indistinguishable
562: from the $\chi^2_\mathrm{min}$. In other words, the set of
563: experimental data cannot determine the signal of the Chiral
564: $Z'$-boson.
565:
566: As is seen from Figure 3, the value of $\bar{l}_e$ is constrained
567: as $\bar{l}_e<0.02$ at the 95\% CL. This upper bound is in an
568: agreement with the corresponding result of one-parameter fit
569: ($\bar{l}_e<0.03$). Thus, the $Z'$ mass has to be larger than
570: $0.75$ TeV, if the $Z'$ coupling constant $\tilde{g}$ is again
571: supposed to be of the order of the electroweak one,
572: $\tilde{g}\simeq 0.6$.
573:
574: The fit of the differential cross-sections leads to the better
575: accuracy on $\bar{l}_e$ than the fit of the integrated
576: cross-sections based on {\it the same data}. Due to a few number
577: of independent parameters the increase of the dispersion
578: (inevitable in case if an extra parameter is added) is compensated
579: by the increase in the bulk of available data. Without accounting
580: for the model-independent relations between the $Z'$ couplings it
581: is impossible to obtain such results.
582:
583: \section{Discussion}
584:
585: Let us summarize the results of our investigation. The LEP2 data
586: for the Bhabha process are adjusted to no signals of the Chiral
587: $Z'$ both for the one-parameter fit and for the two-parameter one.
588:
589: We stress once again that the key point of our consideration is
590: the RG relations between the low energy couplings of the $Z'$ with
591: the SM fermions. They were systematically used through the
592: analysis. Therefore only $Z'$ virtual states are responsible for
593: the deviations of the investigated cross-sections from the SM
594: values. This is the main feature of the developed approach. If the
595: relations were not accounted for, no significant constraints have
596: been found. In contrast, in the ``helicity model fits'' applied by
597: the LEP collaborations \cite{EWWG} the quantum numbers of a
598: specific virtual state, which could be responsible for the signal,
599: remains unknown basically. The such type fits are based on the
600: effective Lagrangian of the fermion contact interactions. They are
601: mainly intended to detect the signals of any type virtual states
602: contributing to a specific ``helicity model'' with one non-zero
603: contact coupling (AA-model, VV-model, etc.). The more general
604: four-parametric analysis based on the helicity models of the
605: fermion contact interactions was carried out in Ref. \cite{pankov}
606: with the aim to describe the all possible deviations from the SM.
607: The permissible domains in the parametric space of the models have
608: been derived. But, in this analysis it is also in principle
609: impossible to distinguish the specific states responsible for the
610: deviations. This is because, as it follows from the above
611: analysis, either the RG relations or the kinematics features of
612: specific processes were not accounted for.
613:
614: At LEP1 experiments \cite{LEP1} carried out at $Z$-boson peak the
615: $Z$-boson coupling constants $g_V$, $g_A$ are precisely measured.
616: The Bhabha process shows the 1$\sigma$ deviation from the SM
617: values for Higgs boson masses $m_H\ge 114$ GeV. It is interesting
618: to estimate the bounds on the $Z$--$Z'$ mixing following from
619: these experiments. To do that, let us express the measured
620: parameters $g_V$, $g_A$ through $\bar{l}_e$, $\bar{\phi}$,
621: \begin{equation}\label{lep1}
622: g_V-g_V^{\mathrm{SM}}= g_A-g_A^{\mathrm{SM}} = 12.2647
623: \bar{l}_e\bar{\phi},
624: \end{equation}
625: and assume that a total deviation of theory from experiments
626: follows due to the $Z$--$Z'$ mixing. This gives the low bound on
627: the mixing. If one assumes other possibilities for deviation the
628: mixing is increased. In this way one can check is this mixing
629: excluded by the experiments or not.
630:
631: \begin{figure}\label{fig-lep1}
632: \centering
633: \includegraphics[bb= 0 0 275 235,width=.5\textwidth]
634: {fig4.eps} \caption{The 68\% CL area in $g_A-g_V$ plane by the
635: LEP1 experiments \cite{LEP1}. The SM values of the couplings and
636: possible deviations of the couplings due to the Chiral $Z'$ are
637: shown.}
638: \end{figure}
639:
640: In Fig. 4 we reproduce the 1$\sigma$ CL area for the Bhabha
641: process from Ref. \cite{LEP1}. Let us take the SM values of the
642: couplings corresponding to the top quark mass $m_t=178$ GeV and
643: the Higgs scalar mass $m_H=114$ GeV. According to Eq.
644: (\ref{lep1}), the deviation of $g_V$, $g_A$ due to the Chiral $Z'$
645: boson has to be on the straight line shown in Fig. 4. This line is
646: completely outside the 1$\sigma$ CL area. So, the Chiral $Z'$ is
647: excluded in the Bhabha process by the LEP1 experiments. On the
648: other hand, Fig. 4 demonstrates the 1$\sigma$ deviation from the
649: SM. The signal could be compatible with another $Z'$ state -- the
650: Abelian $Z'$ boson. This possibility will be considered in detail
651: in a separate publication.
652: %
653: %Let us discuss a possibility of distinguishing the Abelian and the
654: %Chiral $Z'$. We believe that they are the remnants of different
655: %parts of the unknown underlying theory. The former particle is
656: %related to the $U(1)$ Abelian subgroup whereas the latter one is
657: %the state belonging to some non-Abelian subgroup. In principle,
658: %one could construct the observable which is exactly zero for the
659: %specific type of the $Z'$ boson. The total cross-section and the
660: %FB-asymmetries are insufficient to fulfill this requirement. The
661: %interval of scattering angles has to be divided at least into
662: %three regions and summed up with alternated signs (the so called
663: %central-edge asymmetries). However, the LEP2 statistics is
664: %deficient for such procedure.
665:
666: As it follows from the results of the present paper, there is no
667: light Chiral $Z'$ gauge boson with the mass $\sim 1$ TeV. Taking
668: into account the previous investigations \cite{YAF04,PRD04}, we
669: can conclude that the Abelian $Z'$ boson is the most perspective
670: neutral vector particle to be searched at the LHC.
671:
672: This work is supported by the grant F7/296-2001 of the Fundamental
673: Researches State Fund of Ukraine.
674:
675: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
676: \bibitem{EWWG} ALEPH Collaboration,
677: DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collaboration,
678: the LEP Electroweak Working Group, the SLD Heavy Flavour,
679: Electroweak Working Group,
680: hep-ex/0511027.
681: \bibitem{EPJC00} A.~Gulov and V.~Skalozub,
682: Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 17}, 685 (2000).
683: \bibitem{PRD00} A. Gulov and V. Skalozub,
684: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 055007 (2000).
685: \bibitem{YAF04} V.~Demchik, A.~Gulov, V.~Skalozub,
686: and A.Yu.~Tishchenko,
687: Yadernaya Fizika {\bf 67}, 1335 (2004)
688: [Physics of Atomic Nuclei {\bf 67}, 1312 (2004)].
689: \bibitem{PRD04} A.~Gulov and V.~Skalozub,
690: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 115010 (2004).
691: \bibitem{diffcs}
692: ALEPH Collaboration (R.~Barate et al.), Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 12},
693: 183-207 (2000); DELPHI Collaboration (J.~Abdallah et al.), Eur.
694: Phys. J. C {\bf 45}, 589-632 (2006);
695: % MEASUREMENT OF HADRON AND LEPTON PAIR PRODUCTION
696: % AT 130-GEV LESS THAN S**(1/2) LESS THAN 189-GEV AT LEP.
697: L3 Collaboration (M.~Acciarri et al.), Phys. Lett. B {\bf 479},
698: 101-117 (2000);
699: % TESTS OF THE STANDARD MODEL AND CONSTRAINTS ON NEW PHYSICS
700: % FROM MEASUREMENTS OF FERMION PAIR PRODUCTION AT 189-GEV TO 209-GEV AT LEP.
701: OPAL Collaboration (K.~Ackerstaff et al.), Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf
702: 2}, 441-472 (1998); OPAL Collaboration (G.~Abbiendi et al.), Eur.
703: Phys. J. C {\bf 6}, 1-18 (1999); OPAL Collaboration (G.~Abbiendi
704: et al.), Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 33}, 173-212 (2004).
705: \bibitem{stat}
706: W.T.~Eadie, D.~Dryard, F.E.~James, M.~Roos, and B.~Sadoulet, {\sl
707: Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics} (North-Holland
708: Publishing Company, 1971).
709: \bibitem{pankov}
710: A.A.~Babich, G.~Della Ricca, J.~Holt, P.~Osland, A.A.~Pankov, and
711: N.~Paver, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 29}, 103 (2003).
712: \bibitem{LEP1}
713: ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL
714: Collaboration, SLD Collaboration, LEP Electroweak Working Group,
715: SLD Electroweak Group, and SLD Heavy Flavour Group, Phys. Rept.
716: {\bf 427}, 257 (2006).
717: % arXiv:hep-ex/0509008
718: \end{thebibliography}
719:
720: \end{document}
721:
722:
723: \begin{table}
724: \caption{SM prediction for OPAL bins}
725: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
726: \hline
727: bins & 189 & 192 & 196 & 200 & 202 & 205 & 207 \\%
728: \hline
729: $[-0.9\phantom{0}, -0.72]$ & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.4 & 1.3 \\%
730: $[-0.72, -0.54]$ & 1.8 & 1.8 & 1.7 & 1.6 & 1.6 & 1.5 & 1.5 \\%
731: $[-0.54, -0.36]$ & 2.3 & 2.3 & 2.1 & 2.0 & 1.9 & 1.8 & 1.8 \\
732: $[-0.36, -0.18]$ & 3.0 & 2.9 & 2.7 & 2.5 & 2.4 & 2.2 & 2.2 \\
733: $[-0.18, \phantom{-}0\phantom{.00}]$ & 4.0 & 3.8 & 3.6 & 3.3 & 3.2 & 3.1 & 3.1 \\
734: $[\phantom{-}0\phantom{.00}, \phantom{-}0.09]$ & 5.3 & 4.9 & 4.6 & 4.5 & 4.4 & 4.4 & 4.3 \\
735: $[\phantom{-}0.09, \phantom{-}0.18]$ & 6.6 & 6.1 & 5.8 & 5.8 & 5.8 & 5.7 & 5.6 \\
736: $[\phantom{-}0.18, \phantom{-}0.27]$ & 8.8 & 8.5 & 8.3 & 8.1 & 8.0 & 7.8 & 7.6 \\
737: $[\phantom{-}0.27, \phantom{-}0.36]$ & 12.5 & 12.7 & 12.4 & 11.7 & 11.4 & 10.9 & 10.7 \\
738: $[\phantom{-}0.36, \phantom{-}0.45]$ & 19.0 & 18.5 & 18.0 & 17.3 & 16.9 & 16.3 & 15.9 \\
739: $[\phantom{-}0.45, \phantom{-}0.54]$ & 30.4 & 28.2 & 26.9 & 26.5 & 26.2 & 25.5 & 24.6 \\
740: $[\phantom{-}0.54, \phantom{-}0.63]$ & 49.7 & 45.4 & 43.5 & 43.7 & 43.7 & 42.4 & 40.3 \\
741: $[\phantom{-}0.63, \phantom{-}0.72]$ & 86.9 & 82.8 & 79.8 & 78.0 & 77.0 & 74.7 & 72.4 \\
742: $[\phantom{-}0.72, \phantom{-}0.81]$ & 212.0 & 206.7 & 198.4 & 190.0 & 186.1 & 181.3 & 179.0 \\
743: $[\phantom{-}0.81, \phantom{-}0.9\phantom{0}]$ & 608.4 & 571.7 & 552.0 & 547.4 & 544.5 & 532.3 & 515.4\\
744: \hline
745: \end{tabular}
746: \end{table}
747: