1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \textwidth6.5in \textheight9in \evensidemargin0pt
5: \oddsidemargin0pt
6: %The following command is needed for papers submitted to the archive
7: \topmargin-1.1cm
8:
9: %\newcommand{\gtap}{{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
10: %\newcommand{\ltap}{{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
11: \def\br(#1,#2){\left\langle#1#2\right\rangle}
12: \def\sq(#1,#2){\left[#1#2\right]}
13: \def\s(#1,#2){s_{#1 #2}}
14: \def\t(#1,#2,#3){s_{#1 #2 #3}}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17: \begin{titlepage}
18:
19: \hspace*{\fill}\parbox[t]{5.5cm}
20: {hep-ph/0510362\\
21: CERN-PH-TH/2005-064\\
22: FERMILAB-PUB-05/487-T\\
23: ILL-(TH)-05-04\\
24: \today} \vskip2cm
25: \begin{center}
26: {\Large \bf Production of a $Z$ Boson and Two Jets \\
27: \bigskip with One Heavy-Quark Tag} \\
28: \medskip
29: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
30: {\large {\bf J.~Campbell}$^1$,
31: {\bf R.~K.~Ellis}$^{1,2}$,
32: {\bf F.~Maltoni}$^{1,3}$,
33: and {\bf S.~Willenbrock}$^{4}$} \\
34: \bigskip\bigskip\medskip
35: $^{1}$CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland\\ \bigskip
36: $^{2}$Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory \\
37: P.~O.~Box 500, Batavia, IL\ \ 60510 \\ \bigskip
38: $^{3}$Institut de Physique Th\'eorique, Universit\'e Catholique de Louvain \\
39: Chemin du Cyclotron, 2, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium \\
40: \bigskip
41: $^{4}$Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign \\
42: 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL\ \ 61801 \\ \bigskip
43: \end{center}
44:
45: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
46:
47: \begin{abstract}
48: We present a next-to-leading-order calculation of the production of
49: a $Z$ boson with two jets, one or more of which contains a heavy
50: quark ($Q=c,b$). We show that the cross section with only one
51: heavy-quark jet is larger than that with two heavy-quark jets at
52: both the Fermilab Tevatron and the CERN LHC. These processes are
53: the dominant irreducible backgrounds to a Higgs boson produced in
54: association with a $Z$ boson, followed by $h\to b\bar b$. Our
55: calculation makes use of a heavy-quark distribution function, which
56: resums collinear logarithms and makes the next-to-leading-order
57: calculation tractable.
58: \end{abstract}
59:
60: \end{titlepage}
61:
62: \section{Introduction}%
63: \label{sec:intro}
64:
65: The discovery of new physics at hadron colliders often relies on a
66: detailed understanding of standard-model background processes.
67: Prominent among these is the production of weak bosons ($W,Z$) in
68: association with jets, one or more of which contains a heavy quark
69: ($Q=c,b$). The prime example is the discovery of the top quark at
70: the Fermilab Tevatron, which required a thorough understanding of
71: the $W+$jets background, with one or more heavy-quark jets
72: \cite{Abe:1995hr,Abachi:1995iq,Acosta:2001ct}. The discovery of
73: single-top-quark production via the weak interaction requires an
74: even more sophisticated understanding of this background
75: \cite{Abazov:2005zz,Acosta:2004bs}.
76:
77: In this paper we present a next-to-leading-order (NLO) calculation
78: of the production of a $Z$ boson in association with two or more
79: jets, one or more of which contains a heavy quark. This is the
80: dominant irreducible background to the production of a Higgs boson
81: in association with a $Z$ boson, followed by $h\to b\bar b$
82: \cite{Stange:1993ya,Stange:1994bb}. This signal is currently being
83: sought at the Tevatron with either one or both $b$ jets tagged
84: \cite{Acosta:2005ga}. The calculation we present provides the
85: irreducible background at NLO for both cases.
86:
87: The production of a $Z$ boson plus two jets with at least one
88: heavy-quark jet is also a background to the production of a Higgs
89: boson in association with one or more $b$ jets, which is a discovery
90: mode for a supersymmetric Higgs boson at large values of $\tan\beta$
91: \cite{Dicus:1988cx,Kunszt:1991qe,Kao:1995gx,Dai:1994vu,Dai:1996rn,
92: Richter-Was:1997gi,Barger:1997pp,Choudhury:1998kr,Huang:1998vu,Drees:1997sh,
93: Carena:1998gk,Diaz-Cruz:1998qc,Balazs:1998nt,Balazs:1998sb,Dicus:1998hs,
94: unknown:1999fr,Carena:2000yx,Affolder:2000rg,Campbell:2002zm,Maltoni:2003pn,
95: Harlander:2003ai,Dittmaier:2003ej,Dawson:2003kb,Dawson:2004sh,
96: Campbell:2004pu}.\footnote{The minimal supersymmetric standard model
97: requires two Higgs doublets; the ratio of their vacuum expectation
98: values is $\tan\beta\equiv v_2/v_1$.} This background process is
99: also a benchmark for this Higgs discovery channel. The search for a
100: supersymmetric Higgs boson via this mode is underway at the Tevatron
101: \cite{Affolder:2000rg,Acosta:2005bk,Abazov:2005yr}, and will be
102: vigorously pursued at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
103: \cite{Abdullin:2005yn,Schumacher:2004da}.
104:
105: When one considers the production of a heavy quark at a hadron
106: collider, ones first thought is usually of a virtual gluon splitting
107: into a final-state $Q\overline Q$ pair, as shown in
108: Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQ}(a), or via gluon fusion, as shown in
109: Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQ}(b). However, initial gluons splitting into a
110: $Q\overline Q$ pair is just as important a source at the Tevatron,
111: and even more important at the LHC, when only one heavy quark is
112: observed at high transverse momentum ($p_T$). In that situation, it
113: is advantageous to think of the initial gluon as splitting into a
114: collinear $Q\overline Q$ pair, with one heavy quark remaining at low
115: $p_T$ while the other heavy quark participates in the hard
116: scattering and emerges at high $p_T$. The heavy quark that
117: participates in the hard scattering can be treated as part of the
118: proton sea, with a parton distribution function that is calculated
119: perturbatively from the Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi
120: (DGLAP) evolution equations \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz}.
121: The production of a $Z$ boson with two jets, one of which contains a
122: heavy quark, then proceeds as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQj}.
123:
124: \begin{figure}[ht]
125: \begin{center}
126: \vspace*{.2cm}
127: \hspace*{0cm}
128: \epsfxsize=10cm \epsfbox{diagZQQ.ps}
129: \vspace*{-.8cm}
130: \end{center}
131: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the associated production of a $Z$
132: boson and two high-$p_T$ heavy quarks ($Q=c,b$).} \label{fig:ZQQ}
133: \end{figure}
134:
135: \begin{figure}[ht]
136: \begin{center}
137: \vspace*{0cm}
138: \hspace*{0cm}
139: \epsfxsize=10cm \epsfbox{diagZQj.ps}
140: %\vspace*{-.8cm}
141: \end{center}
142: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the associated production of a $Z$
143: boson and two high-$p_T$ jets, one of which contains a heavy quark
144: ($Q=c,b$).} \label{fig:ZQj}
145: \end{figure}
146:
147: The reasons for using a heavy-quark distribution function are
148: twofold. First, it resums collinear logarithms of the form $\ln
149: Q/m_Q$ to all orders, where $Q$ is the scale of the hard
150: scattering. Second, it simplifies the leading-order process,
151: which makes a higher-order calculation tractable.
152:
153: This paper completes the NLO calculation of $Z+$jets, with one or
154: more heavy quarks, up to two jets \cite{Campbell:2000bg}. The
155: production of a $Z$ plus one jet, with one or more heavy quarks, was
156: presented in Ref.~\cite{Campbell:2003dd}, and agrees well with data
157: from the Tevatron \cite{Abazov:2004zd}. The inclusive production of
158: a $Z$ with one or more heavy quarks was presented in
159: Ref.~\cite{Maltoni:2005wd}.
160:
161: \section{$ZQj$ at NLO}\label{sec:ZQj}%
162:
163: The leading-order (LO) processes for $Z$ plus two jets, one or more
164: of which contains a heavy quark, are $q\bar q(gg)\to ZQ\overline Q$
165: (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQ}) and $Qq(g)\to ZQq(g)$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQj}). The
166: LO cross sections are given in Table~\ref{tab:lo}, with the jets
167: satisfying the conditions $p_T>15$ GeV, $|\eta|<2$ (2.5 at the LHC),
168: and $\Delta R_{jj}>0.7$. At the Tevatron, the leading-order cross
169: sections for these two classes of processes are comparable; at the
170: LHC, the latter dominates. The processes $Qq(g)\to ZQq(g)$ are
171: relatively more important at the LHC than at the Tevatron because
172: they are initiated by a heavy sea quark, whose distribution function
173: rises at small values of $x$. Furthermore, $Qg\to ZQg$ is larger
174: than $Qq\to ZQq$ at the LHC, while they are comparable at the
175: Tevatron, since the former involves the gluon distribution function,
176: which is large at small values of $x$. For the same reason, $gg\to
177: ZQ\overline Q$ is dominant at the LHC compared with $q\bar q\to
178: ZQ\overline Q$, while the latter is more important at the Tevatron.
179:
180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
181: %%%%%%%%%% TABLE LO
182: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
183:
184: \begin{table}[p]
185: \caption{Leading-order cross sections (pb) for $Z$ boson plus two
186: jets, one or two of which contains a heavy quark, at the Tevatron
187: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$) and the LHC ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV
188: $pp$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$ GeV and $|\eta|<2$ (2.5 at
189: the LHC), with $\Delta R_{jj}>0.7$. No branching ratios or tagging
190: efficiencies are included. The labels on the columns have the
191: following meaning: $ZQj=$ exactly two jets, one of which contains a
192: heavy quark; $ZQ\overline Q=$ exactly two jets, both of which
193: contain a heavy quark. The CTEQ6L1 parton distribution functions are
194: used \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}, with the factorization and
195: renormalization scales chosen as $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_Z$. Also given, in
196: square brackets, is the LO cross section obtained without using a
197: heavy-quark distribution function, from $gq(g)\to ZQ\overline
198: Qq(g)$.} \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
199: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
200: \medskip
201: \begin{center}
202: \hspace*{-1cm}
203: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|cc|cc|}
204: \hline \hline
205: & \multicolumn{4}{|c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\
206: \cline{2-5}
207: Process & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Tevatron} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{LHC} \\
208: \cline{2-5}
209: & $ZQj$ & $ZQ\overline Q$ & $ZQj$ & $ZQ\overline Q$ \\
210: \hline
211: $bq\to Zbq+bg\to Zbg$ & 0.89+1.29=2.18 [1.91] & -- & 76+276=352 [191] & -- \\
212: $q\bar q\to Zb\bar b+gg\to Zb\bar b$ & -- & 1.89+0.58=2.47 & -- & 13+96=109 \\
213: \hline
214: $cq\to Zcq+cg\to Zcg$ & 1.37+1.83=3.20 [3.26] & -- & 98+345=443 [271] & -- \\
215: $q\bar q\to Zc\bar c+gg\to Zc\bar c$ & -- & 1.89+0.45=2.34 & -- & 12+75=87 \\
216: \hline\hline
217: \end{tabular}
218: \end{center}
219: \label{tab:lo}
220: \end{table}
221:
222: As is often the case, the distinction between the various
223: processes is lost once one goes beyond leading order.
224: Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj}(a) shows a Feynman diagram which ostensibly
225: contributes to the NLO correction to $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$,
226: while the Feynman diagram in Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj}(b) ostensibly
227: contributes to the NLO correction to $Qq\to ZQq$, and the diagram
228: in Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj}(c) to the NLO correction to $gg\to
229: ZQ\overline Q$. However, all three diagrams contribute to the same
230: amplitude, and therefore interfere. Thus one cannot uniquely
231: identify them with any of the leading-order processes.
232:
233: \begin{figure}[ht]
234: \begin{center}
235: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=16cm \epsfbox{diagZQQj.ps}
236: \vspace*{-.8cm}
237: \end{center}
238: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the NLO correction to the
239: associated production of a $Z$ boson and two high-$p_T$ jets, one or
240: more of which contains a heavy quark ($Q=c,b$).} \label{fig:ZQQj}
241: \end{figure}
242:
243: The next-to-leading-order calculations in this paper were
244: performed with the Monte-Carlo code MCFM \cite{Ellis:1999ec}. The
245: leading-order calculations were performed both with this code and
246: with MadEvent \cite{Maltoni:2002qb}. The NLO corrections are
247: included in the code MCFM by implementing the virtual helicity
248: amplitudes of Ref.~\cite{Bern:1997sc}. These are given in the
249: four-dimensional helicity scheme, which is used throughout the
250: calculation. The real corrections are adapted from
251: Ref.~\cite{Nagy:1998bb} and singularities are handled using the
252: dipole subtraction method~\cite{Catani:1996vz}. Since the matrix
253: elements contain the decay of the gauge boson into massless
254: particles, the code is general enough to provide results for final
255: states from $\gamma^*,Z^*\to \ell^+\ell^-$ (including
256: interference). For this paper we specialize to the case of a real
257: $Z$ boson.
258:
259: The processes involved in the calculation are as follows:
260: \begin{itemize}
261: \item $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Q$ at tree level (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQ}) and one loop
262: \item $gg\to ZQ\overline Q$ at tree level (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQ}) and one loop
263: \item $Qq\to ZQq$ at tree level (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQj}) and one loop
264: \item $Qg\to ZQg$ at tree level (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQj}) and one loop
265: \item $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Qg$ at tree level
266: \item $gg\to ZQ\overline Qg$ at tree level
267: \item $Qg\to ZQgg$ at tree level
268: \item $Qq\to ZQqg$ at tree level
269: \item $gq\to ZQ\overline Qq$ at tree level (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj})
270: \item $Qg\to ZQq\bar q$ at tree level
271: \end{itemize}
272: We also include the processes $QQ'\to ZQQ'$, $Q\overline Q'\to
273: ZQ\overline Q'$, and $Q\overline Q\to ZQ'\overline Q'$ at LO.
274: These processes are already small at LO, so it is safe to neglect
275: their NLO corrections. For charm final states, we only take
276: $Q=Q'=c$; for bottom, $Q,Q'=c,b$.
277:
278: The results of our calculation are presented in
279: Tables~\ref{tab:tev_excl} and \ref{tab:lhc_excl}. The columns
280: $ZQj$ and $ZQ\overline Q$ contain the leading-order cross sections
281: (in parentheses) for the processes $Qq(g)\to ZQq(g)$ and $q\bar
282: q(gg)\to ZQ\overline Q$, respectively, taken from
283: Table~\ref{tab:lo}. We require the jets to satisfy the conditions
284: $p_T>15$ GeV, $|\eta|<2$ (2.5 at the LHC), and $\Delta
285: R_{jj}>0.7$. The heavy-quark mass is neglected here and throughout
286: the calculation (except where noted). To obtain the NLO cross
287: sections for $ZQj$ and $ZQ\overline Q$, which involve the
288: radiation of additional partons ({\it e.g.}, Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj}),
289: two partons are combined into a single jet by adding their
290: four-momenta if $\Delta R_{jj}<0.7$. If the combined partons are
291: both heavy quarks, then the process contributes to the column
292: labeled $Z(Q\overline Q)j$. This is a $Z+2j$ event in which one
293: jet contains two heavy quarks, which changes the tagging
294: probability for that jet \cite{Acosta:2004nj}. It is calculated
295: with a finite heavy-quark mass ($m_c=1.4$ GeV, $m_b=4.75$ GeV) in
296: order to regulate the logarithmic divergence present when the
297: heavy quarks are collinear. If all three partons are well
298: separated, then the process contributes to either $ZQ\overline Qj$
299: or $ZQjj$.\footnote{The matrix elements for both $Z(Q\overline
300: Q)j$ and $ZQ\overline Qj$ are calculated with a finite heavy-quark
301: mass, but massive phase space is used only in the former. We
302: checked that the quark mass is numerically irrelevant to the
303: latter process.}
304:
305: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
306: %%%%%%%%%% TABLES - EXCLUSIVE %%%%%%%%%%%%
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
308:
309: \begin{table}[t]
310: \caption{Cross sections (pb) for $Z$-boson plus two (or more) jets,
311: one or more of which contains a heavy quark, at the Tevatron
312: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$
313: GeV and $|\eta|<2$. Two final-state partons are merged into a single
314: jet if $\Delta R_{jj}<0.7$. No branching ratios or tagging
315: efficiencies are included. Numbers in parenthesis are leading-order
316: results. The labels on the columns have the following meaning:
317: $ZQj=$ exactly two jets, one of which contains a heavy quark;
318: $ZQ\overline Q=$ exactly two jets, both of which contain a heavy
319: quark; $Z(Q\overline Q)j=$ exactly two jets, one of which contains a
320: heavy-quark pair; $ZQ\overline Qj=$ exactly three jets, two of which
321: contain a heavy quark; $ZQjj=$ exactly three jets, one of which
322: contains a heavy quark. For the last set of processes, the labels
323: mean: $Zjj=$ exactly two jets, including heavy quarks; $Zjjj=$
324: exactly three jets, including heavy quarks. For $ZQj$ and
325: $ZQ\overline Q$, both the leading-order (in parentheses) and
326: next-to-leading-order cross sections are given. The CTEQ6M parton
327: distribution functions are used throughout, except for the LO cross
328: sections in parentheses, where CTEQ6L1 is used
329: \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. The factorization and renormalization scales
330: are chosen as $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_Z$.}
331:
332: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
333: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
334: \medskip
335:
336: %%%%% MCFM results
337: \begin{center}
338: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|ccccc|}
339: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Tevatron} &
340: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\[1pt]
341: \hline
342: & $ZQj$ & $ZQ\overline Q$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ & $ZQ\overline Qj$ & $ZQjj$ \\
343: \hline
344: bottom & (2.18) 5.23 & (2.47) 3.07 & 0.634 & 0.672 & 0.326 \\
345: charm & (3.20) 7.49 & (2.34) 2.75 & 2.00 & 0.621 & 0.495 \\
346: \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{$Zjj$} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$Zjjj$} \\
347: \hline $Z+$jets & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{(163) 182} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{22.9} \\
348: \hline
349: \end{tabular}
350: \end{center}
351: %%%%% MCFM results
352:
353: \label{tab:tev_excl}
354: \end{table}
355:
356: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
357:
358: \begin{table}[t]
359: \caption{Same as Table~\ref{tab:tev_excl}, except at the LHC
360: ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$ GeV
361: and $|\eta|<2.5$.}
362:
363: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
364: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
365: \medskip
366: %%%%% MCFM results
367: \begin{center}
368: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|ccccc|}
369: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{LHC} &
370: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\[1pt]
371: \hline
372: & $ZQj$ & $ZQ\overline Q$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ & $ZQ\overline Qj$ & $ZQjj$ \\
373: \hline
374: bottom & (352) 421 & (109) 92.1 & 23.5 & 60.8 & 92.1 \\
375: charm & (443) 623 & (87) 75.2 & 58.6 & 49.3 & 123 \\
376: \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{$Zjj$} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$Zjjj$} \\
377: \hline $Z+$jets & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{(6090) 4840} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{1810} \\
378: \hline
379: \end{tabular}
380: \end{center}
381: %%%%% MCFM results
382:
383: \label{tab:lhc_excl}
384: \end{table}
385:
386: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
387:
388: We checked that the effect of the heavy-quark mass is negligible
389: by comparing $ZQ\overline Q$ at tree level with and without a
390: finite quark mass. Similarly, we found that the heavy-quark mass
391: is also negligible for $ZQ\overline Qj$ at tree level, as
392: expected.
393:
394: The NLO correction to $ZQj$ is quite sizable at the Tevatron, more
395: than 100\%. One of the reasons is that the process $q\bar q\to
396: ZQ\overline Qg$ (where one of the heavy quarks is outside the
397: acceptance) makes a relatively large contribution. This is not
398: really a NLO correction to $Qq(g)\to ZQq(g)$, but rather a new
399: channel. This contribution is about 1.2 pb for both bottom and
400: charm at the Tevatron. In contrast, this process makes a
401: relatively small contribution to $ZQj$ at the LHC, only 10 pb for
402: bottom and 4 pb for charm.
403:
404: We also list in Tables~\ref{tab:tev_excl} and \ref{tab:lhc_excl}
405: the LO (in parentheses) and NLO cross sections for $Zjj$
406: \cite{Campbell:2000bg,Campbell:2002tg,Campbell:2003hd}, and the LO
407: cross section for $Zjjj$. In these cross sections we have
408: included the contribution from light partons as well as heavy
409: quarks. Thus, for example, the fraction of $Z+2j$ events in which
410: only one of the jets contains heavy quarks is given by
411: $[ZQj+Z(Q\overline Q)j]/Zjj$.
412:
413: In Tables~\ref{tab:tev_incl} and \ref{tab:lhc_incl} we list the
414: results in an inclusive manner, and also include the NLO result
415: for $Z$ plus one heavy-quark jet \cite{Campbell:2003dd}. In
416: addition, we give the NLO cross section for $Zj$
417: \cite{Campbell:2003dd}, including both light and heavy partons.
418: Thus $ZQ+X$ is the cross section for a $Z$ plus at least one
419: heavy-quark jet; it is the sum of the columns labeled $ZQ$, $ZQj$,
420: and $ZQ\overline Q$ in Tables 1 and 2 of
421: Ref.~\cite{Campbell:2003dd}, including all contributing processes.
422: $Z(Q\overline Q)$ contains one jet which contains a heavy-quark
423: pair. It is calculated at LO, including the heavy-quark mass in
424: order to regulate the collinear divergence present in $q\bar q\to
425: Z(Q\overline Q)$. $ZQj+X$ has at least two jets, one of which
426: contains a heavy quark; it is the sum of the columns labeled $ZQj$
427: and $ZQjj$ in Tables~\ref{tab:tev_excl} and \ref{tab:lhc_excl}.
428: $ZQ\overline Q+X$ has at least two jets, two of which contain a
429: heavy quark; it is the sum of the columns labeled $ZQ\overline Q$
430: and $ZQ\overline Qj$ in Tables~\ref{tab:tev_excl} and
431: \ref{tab:lhc_excl}. Finally, $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ contains two
432: jets, one of which contains a heavy-quark pair; it is calculated
433: at LO with a finite quark mass.
434:
435: We estimate the uncertainties in the NLO inclusive cross sections
436: by varying the renormalization scale, the factorization scale, and
437: the parton distribution functions independently. The
438: renormalization scale is varied over $\mu_R = (0.5 - 2) M_Z$, with
439: $\mu_F = M_Z$. Similarly, we vary $\mu_F = (0.5 - 2) M_Z$ with
440: $\mu_R = M_Z$. The uncertainties due to scale variation are
441: significantly reduced at NLO in comparison with the LO
442: calculation. Significant renormalization-scale dependence remains
443: since the process is ${\cal O}(\alpha_S^2)$. The parton
444: distribution functions are varied over the 41 different sets
445: contained in CTEQ6M \cite{Pumplin:2002vw,Huston:2005jm}.
446: A symmetric uncertainty
447: on the cross sections can be obtained from these sets by using
448: Eq.~(26) of Ref.~\cite{Pumplin:2001ct}. In addition, we have
449: studied the deviation of the cross section in each direction
450: separately, as in Ref.~\cite{Nadolsky:2001yg}. However, we find
451: that the difference between the positive and negative deviations
452: is not significant in any of the cases and thus we report only
453: symmetric uncertainties.
454:
455: As an example of the use of these tables, consider the inclusive
456: cross section for $Z+$ 2 jets with one heavy-quark tag. This
457: cross section is obtained from
458: \begin{equation}
459: \sigma = \epsilon_Q \sigma_{ZQj+X} + 2 \epsilon_Q (1-\epsilon_Q)
460: \sigma_{ZQ\overline Q+X}
461: + \epsilon_{Q\overline Q} \sigma_{Z(Q\overline Q)j}
462: \end{equation}
463: where $\epsilon_Q$ is the tagging probability for a heavy-quark jet,
464: and $\epsilon_{Q\overline Q}$ is the tagging probability for a jet
465: containing a heavy-quark pair.
466:
467: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
468: %%%%%%%%%% TABLES - INCLUSIVE %%%%%%%%%%%%
469: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
470:
471: \begin{table}[p]
472: \caption{Inclusive cross sections (pb) for $Z$ boson plus one or two
473: jets, one or two of which contains a heavy quark, at the Tevatron
474: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$
475: GeV and $|\eta|<2$. Two final-state partons are merged into a single
476: jet if $\Delta R_{jj}<0.7$. No branching ratios or tagging
477: efficiencies are included. Numbers in parenthesis are leading-order
478: results. The labels on the columns have the following meaning:
479: $ZQ+X=$ at least one jet, at least one of which contains a heavy
480: quark; $Z(Q\overline Q)=$ one jet which contains a heavy-quark pair;
481: $ZQj+X=$ at least two jets, one of which contains a heavy quark;
482: $ZQ\overline Q+X=$ at least two jets, two of which contain a heavy
483: quark; $Z(Q\overline Q)j=$ two jets, one of which contains a
484: heavy-quark pair. The last row gives the inclusive cross section
485: for jets containing both light and heavy partons. The CTEQ6M parton
486: distribution functions are used throughout, except for the LO cross
487: sections in parentheses, where CTEQ6L1 is used
488: \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. The factorization and renormalization scales
489: are chosen as $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_Z$. The uncertainties are from the
490: variation of the renormalization scale, the factorization scale, and
491: the parton distribution functions, respectively.}
492:
493: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
494: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
495: \medskip
496: \begin{center}
497: \hspace*{-1.2cm}
498: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|cc|ccc|}
499: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Tevatron} &
500: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\[1pt]
501: \hline
502: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Z+1$ jet $+X$} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$Z+2$ jets $+X$} \\
503: \cline{2-6}
504: & $ZQ+X$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)$ & $ZQj+X$ & $ZQ\overline Q+X$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ \\
505: \hline
506: bottom& (8.23) 18.1&2.1&(2.19) $5.56^{+1.2}_{-0.9}\,^{+0.07}_{-0.05}\,^{+0.5}_{-0.5}$&(2.49) $3.74^{+0.45}_{-0.45}\,^{+0.12}_{-0.12}\,^{+0.15}_{-0.15}$&$0.63^{+0.26}_{-0.16}\,^{+0.06}_{-0.06}\,^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$\\
507: charm & (11.3) 27.5&6.6&(3.21) $8.23^{+1.7}_{-1.4}\,^{+0.15}_{-0.26}\,^{+0.8}_{-0.8}$&(2.35) $3.47^{+0.44}_{-0.37}\,^{+0.0}_{-0.87}\,^{+0.14}_{-0.14}$&$2.08^{+0.85}_{-0.53}\,^{+0.22}_{-0.16}\,^{+0.15}_{-0.15}$\\
508:
509: \hline
510: all jets & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{(898) 1070} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{(163) $205^{+19}_{-19}\,^{+7}_{-2}\,^{+5}_{-5}$}\\
511: \hline
512: \end{tabular}
513: \end{center}
514: \label{tab:tev_incl}
515: \end{table}
516:
517: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
518:
519: \begin{table}[p]
520: \caption{Same as Table~\ref{tab:tev_incl}, except at the LHC
521: ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$ GeV
522: and $|\eta|<2.5$.}
523:
524: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
525: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
526: \medskip
527: \begin{center}
528: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|cc|ccc|}
529: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{LHC} &
530: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\[1pt]
531: \hline
532: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Z+1$ jet $+X$} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$Z+2$ jets $+X$} \\
533: \cline{2-6}
534: & $ZQ+X$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)$ & $ZQj+X$ & $ZQ\overline Q+X$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ \\
535: \hline
536: bottom& (826) 1060&25&(353) $513^{+84}_{-58}\,^{+44}_{-35}\,^{+25}_{-25}$&(111) $153^{+20}_{-20}\,^{+2}_{-2}\,^{+9}_{-9}$&$24^{+10}_{-6}\,^{+0.3}_{-0.3}\,^{+1.2}_{-1.2}$\\
537: charm & (989) 1430&50&(443) $746^{+110}_{-110}\,^{+0}_{-46}\,^{+45}_{-45}$&(90) $125^{+17}_{-17}\,^{+2}_{-2}\,^{+8}_{-8}$&$59^{+23}_{-15}\,^{+2}_{-2}\,^{+3}_{-3}$\\
538:
539: \hline
540: all jets & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{ (15300) 18400} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{(6090) $6650^{+470}_{-500}\,^{+170}_{-50}\,^{+240}_{-240}$}\\
541: \hline
542: \end{tabular}
543: \end{center}
544: \label{tab:lhc_incl}
545: \end{table}
546:
547: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
548:
549: We show in Figures~\ref{fig:pt_tev} and \ref{fig:pt_lhc} the
550: transverse-momentum spectrum of the $Z$ boson in events with at
551: least two jets, one of which contains a bottom quark, at the
552: Tevatron and the LHC. Both the LO and NLO distributions are shown.
553: The radiative corrections do not significantly change the shape of
554: the distribution, as is often the case when the quantity plotted
555: is not affected by the change in the kinematics due to additional
556: radiation.
557:
558: \begin{figure}[t]
559: \begin{center}
560: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=14cm]{ptz_tev.ps}
561: \end{center}
562: \caption{Transverse-momentum distribution of the $Z$ boson in events
563: with at least two jets, one of which contains a bottom quark, at the
564: Tevatron ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$). The jets satisfy the
565: conditions $p_T>15$ GeV, $|\eta|<2$, and $\Delta R_{jj}>0.7$. Both
566: LO (dashed) and NLO (solid) distributions are shown.}
567: \label{fig:pt_tev}
568: \end{figure}
569:
570: \begin{figure}[t]
571: \begin{center}
572: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm}
573: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=14cm]{ptz_lhc.ps}
574: \end{center}
575: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:pt_tev}, but at the LHC
576: ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$). The jets satisfy the conditions $p_T>15$
577: GeV, $|\eta|<2.5$, and $\Delta R_{jj}>0.7$.} \label{fig:pt_lhc}
578: \end{figure}
579:
580: \section{Conclusions}%
581:
582: In this paper we present a NLO calculation of the production of a
583: $Z$ boson plus two jets, one or more of which contains a heavy
584: quark. This greatly improves the accuracy with which this
585: fundamental background is known at the Tevatron and the LHC. We
586: provide our results in both an exclusive (Tables~\ref{tab:tev_excl}
587: and \ref{tab:lhc_excl}) and an inclusive manner
588: (Tables~\ref{tab:tev_incl} and \ref{tab:lhc_incl}). The NLO cross
589: section is significantly greater than the LO cross section for the
590: default scale choice $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_Z$.
591:
592: Our calculation makes use of the heavy quarks present in the
593: proton sea, which are perturbatively calculable. This makes the
594: LO calculation simpler, thus allowing a higher-order calculation
595: to be tractable. We showed that the processes $Qq(g)\to ZQq(g)$
596: are a significant source of $ZQj$ events at the Tevatron, and the
597: dominant source at the LHC.
598:
599: Alternatively, one could eschew the heavy quarks in the proton sea,
600: and regard the proton as containing only light quarks and gluons. In
601: that approach, the LO processes for $ZQj$ are $gq(g)\to ZQ\overline
602: Qq(g)$, where one of the heavy quarks is outside the acceptance of
603: the detector. We give the results of this calculation in square
604: brackets in Table~\ref{tab:lo}, using CTEQL1 with $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_Z$.
605: The results are quite consistent with the LO results of the
606: heavy-quark approach at the Tevatron, but at the LHC they lie
607: somewhat below, though within a factor of two. In any case, the most
608: accurate cross sections are the NLO results presented in this paper,
609: based on the heavy-quark approach.
610:
611: An important application of these results is to the search for the
612: Higgs boson via $q\bar q\to Zh$, followed by $h\to b\bar b$, where
613: the signal is $Z+2j$ with one or two $b$ tags \cite{Acosta:2005ga}.
614: We provide NLO results for the backgrounds with either one or two
615: heavy-quark jets. We have shown that the majority of such events
616: have only one heavy-quark jet. We see from Tables~\ref{tab:tev_incl}
617: and \ref{tab:lhc_incl} that $Zbj+X$ is nearly twice as big as
618: $Zb\bar b+X$ at the Tevatron, and more than three times as large at
619: the LHC. Similarly, $Zcj+X$ is about thrice $Zc\bar c+X$ at the
620: Tevatron, and about six times as large at the LHC.
621:
622: \section*{Acknowledgments}
623:
624: \indent\indent We are grateful for conversations with C.~Ciobanu,
625: T.~Junk, T.~Liss, S.~Lowette, B.~Mellado, K.~Pitts, P.~Venlaer,
626: and C.~Weiser. J.~C. and S.~W.~thank the Aspen Center for Physics for
627: hospitality. This work was supported in part by the
628: U.~S.~Department of Energy under contracts Nos.~DE-AC02-76CH03000
629: and DE-FG02-91ER40677.
630:
631: \begin{thebibliography}{99}%
632:
633: \bibitem{Abe:1995hr}
634: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
635: %``Observation of top quark production in anti-p p collisions,''
636: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2626 (1995)
637: [arXiv:hep-ex/9503002].
638: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9503002;%%
639:
640: \bibitem{Abachi:1995iq}
641: S.~Abachi {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
642: %``Observation of the top quark,''
643: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2632 (1995)
644: [arXiv:hep-ex/9503003].
645: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9503003;%%
646:
647: \bibitem{Acosta:2001ct}
648: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
649: %``Study of the heavy flavor content of jets produced in association with W
650: %bosons in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
651: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 052007 (2002)
652: [arXiv:hep-ex/0109012].
653: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0109012;%%
654:
655: \bibitem{Abazov:2005zz}
656: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
657: %``Search for single top quark production in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) =
658: %1.96-TeV,''
659: arXiv:hep-ex/0505063.
660: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0505063;%%
661:
662: \bibitem{Stange:1993ya}
663: A.~Stange, W.~J.~Marciano and S.~Willenbrock,
664: %``Higgs bosons at the Fermilab Tevatron,''
665: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 1354 (1994)
666: [arXiv:hep-ph/9309294].
667: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9309294;%%
668:
669: \bibitem{Stange:1994bb}
670: A.~Stange, W.~J.~Marciano and S.~Willenbrock,
671: %``Associated production of Higgs and weak bosons, with H $\to$ b anti-b, at
672: %hadron colliders,''
673: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 4491 (1994)
674: [arXiv:hep-ph/9404247].
675: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9404247;%%
676:
677: \bibitem{Acosta:2004bs}
678: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
679: %``Search for electroweak single top quark production in p anti-p collisions
680: %at s**(1/2) = 1.96-TeV,''
681: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 012005 (2005)
682: [arXiv:hep-ex/0410058].
683: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0410058;%%
684:
685: \bibitem{Acosta:2005ga}
686: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
687: %``Search for Higgs bosons decaying into b anti-b and produced in association
688: %with a vector boson in proton antiproton collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
689: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 95}, 051801 (2005)
690: [arXiv:hep-ex/0503039].
691: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0503039;%%
692:
693: \bibitem{Dicus:1988cx}
694: D.~A.~Dicus and S.~Willenbrock,
695: %``Higgs Boson Production From Heavy Quark Fusion,''
696: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 39}, 751 (1989).
697: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D39,751;%%
698:
699: \bibitem{Kunszt:1991qe}
700: Z.~Kunszt and F.~Zwirner,
701: %``Testing the Higgs sector of the minimal supersymmetric standard model at
702: %large hadron colliders,''
703: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 385}, 3 (1992)
704: [arXiv:hep-ph/9203223].
705: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9203223;%%
706:
707: \bibitem{Kao:1995gx}
708: C.~Kao and N.~Stepanov,
709: %``Discovering the Higgs bosons of minimal supersymmetry with muons,''
710: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 5025 (1995)
711: [arXiv:hep-ph/9503415].
712: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9503415;%%
713:
714: \bibitem{Dai:1994vu}
715: J.~Dai, J.~F.~Gunion and R.~Vega,
716: %``LHC detection of neutral MSSM Higgs bosons via g g $\to$ b anti-b h $\to$ b
717: %anti-b b anti-b,''
718: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 345}, 29 (1995)
719: [arXiv:hep-ph/9403362].
720: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403362;%%
721:
722: \bibitem{Dai:1996rn}
723: J.~Dai, J.~F.~Gunion and R.~Vega,
724: %``Detection of neutral MSSM Higgs bosons in four-b final states at the
725: %Tevatron and the LHC: An update,''
726: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 387}, 801 (1996)
727: [arXiv:hep-ph/9607379].
728: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607379;%%
729:
730: \bibitem{Richter-Was:1997gi}
731: E.~Richter-Was and D.~Froidevaux,
732: %``MSSM Higgs searches in multi-b-jet final states at the LHC,''
733: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 76}, 665 (1997)
734: [arXiv:hep-ph/9708455].
735: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9708455;%%
736:
737: \bibitem{Barger:1997pp}
738: V.~D.~Barger and C.~Kao,
739: %``Detecting the Higgs bosons of minimal supergravity with muon pairs,''
740: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 424}, 69 (1998)
741: [arXiv:hep-ph/9711328].
742: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711328;%%
743:
744: \bibitem{Choudhury:1998kr}
745: D.~Choudhury, A.~Datta and S.~Raychaudhuri,
746: %``Higgs boson signals in three b-jet final states at the Fermilab
747: %Tevatron,''
748: arXiv:hep-ph/9809552.
749: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809552;%%
750:
751: \bibitem{Huang:1998vu}
752: C.~S.~Huang and S.~H.~Zhu,
753: %``Supersymmetric Higgs bosons discovery potential at hadron colliders
754: %through b g channel,''
755: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 075012 (1999)
756: [arXiv:hep-ph/9812201].
757: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812201;%%
758:
759: \bibitem{Drees:1997sh}
760: M.~Drees, M.~Guchait and P.~Roy,
761: %``Stringent new bounds on supersymmetric Higgs bosons from existing Tevatron
762: %data,''
763: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 80}, 2047 (1998)
764: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 81}, 2394 (1998)]
765: [arXiv:hep-ph/9801229].
766: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9801229;%%
767:
768: \bibitem{Carena:1998gk}
769: M.~Carena, S.~Mrenna and C.~E.~M.~Wagner,
770: %``MSSM Higgs boson phenomenology at the Tevatron collider,''
771: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 075010 (1999)
772: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808312].
773: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808312;%%
774:
775: \bibitem{Diaz-Cruz:1998qc}
776: J.~L.~Diaz-Cruz, H.~J.~He, T.~Tait and C.~P.~Yuan,
777: %``Higgs bosons with large bottom Yukawa coupling at Tevatron and LHC,''
778: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 80}, 4641 (1998)
779: [arXiv:hep-ph/9802294].
780: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802294;%%
781:
782: \bibitem{Balazs:1998nt}
783: C.~Balazs, J.~L.~Diaz-Cruz, H.~J.~He, T.~Tait and C.~P.~Yuan,
784: %``Probing Higgs bosons with large bottom Yukawa coupling at hadron
785: %colliders,''
786: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 055016 (1999)
787: [arXiv:hep-ph/9807349].
788: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807349;%%
789:
790: \bibitem{Balazs:1998sb}
791: C.~Balazs, H.~J.~He and C.~P.~Yuan,
792: %``{QCD} corrections to scalar production via heavy quark fusion at hadron
793: %colliders,''
794: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 114001 (1999)
795: [arXiv:hep-ph/9812263].
796: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812263;%%
797:
798: \bibitem{Dicus:1998hs}
799: D.~Dicus, T.~Stelzer, Z.~Sullivan and S.~Willenbrock,
800: %``Higgs boson production in association with bottom quarks at
801: %next-to-leading order,''
802: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 094016 (1999)
803: [arXiv:hep-ph/9811492].
804: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811492;%%
805:
806: \bibitem{unknown:1999fr}
807: %``ATLAS detector and physics performance. Technical design report. Vol. 2,''
808: ATLAS Collaboration, Technical Design Report, CERN-LHCC-99-15.
809:
810: \bibitem{Carena:2000yx}
811: M.~Carena {\it et al.},
812: ``Report of the Tevatron Higgs working group,''
813: arXiv:hep-ph/0010338.
814: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010338;%%
815:
816: \bibitem{Campbell:2002zm}
817: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
818: %``Higgs boson production in association with a single bottom quark,''
819: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 095002 (2003)
820: [arXiv:hep-ph/0204093].
821: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204093;%%
822:
823: \bibitem{Maltoni:2003pn}
824: F.~Maltoni, Z.~Sullivan and S.~Willenbrock,
825: %``Higgs-boson production via bottom-quark fusion,''
826: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 093005 (2003)
827: [arXiv:hep-ph/0301033].
828: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301033;%%
829:
830: \bibitem{Harlander:2003ai}
831: R.~V.~Harlander and W.~B.~Kilgore,
832: %``Higgs boson production in bottom quark fusion at next-to-next-to-leading
833: %order,''
834: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 013001 (2003)
835: [arXiv:hep-ph/0304035].
836: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304035;%%
837:
838: \bibitem{Dittmaier:2003ej}
839: S.~Dittmaier, M.~Kramer and M.~Spira,
840: %``Higgs radiation off bottom quarks at the Tevatron and the LHC,''
841: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 074010 (2004)
842: [arXiv:hep-ph/0309204].
843: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309204;%%
844:
845: \bibitem{Dawson:2003kb}
846: S.~Dawson, C.~B.~Jackson, L.~Reina and D.~Wackeroth,
847: %``Exclusive Higgs boson production with bottom quarks at hadron colliders,''
848: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 074027 (2004)
849: [arXiv:hep-ph/0311067].
850: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311067;%%
851:
852: \bibitem{Dawson:2004sh}
853: S.~Dawson, C.~B.~Jackson, L.~Reina and D.~Wackeroth,
854: %``Higgs boson production with one bottom quark jet at hadron colliders,''
855: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94}, 031802 (2005)
856: [arXiv:hep-ph/0408077].
857: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408077;%%
858:
859: \bibitem{Campbell:2004pu}
860: J.~Campbell {\it et al.}, in {\sl Les Houches 2003: Physics at TeV
861: Colliders},
862: %``Higgs boson production in association with bottom quarks,''
863: arXiv:hep-ph/0405302.
864: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405302;%%
865:
866: \bibitem{Affolder:2000rg}
867: T.~Affolder {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
868: %``Search for neutral supersymmetric Higgs bosons in p anti-p collisions at
869: %s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
870: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 4472 (2001)
871: [arXiv:hep-ex/0010052].
872: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0010052;%%
873:
874: \bibitem{Acosta:2005bk}
875: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
876: %``A search for supersymmetric Higgs bosons in the di-tau decay mode in p
877: %anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
878: arXiv:hep-ex/0506042.
879: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0506042;%%
880:
881: \bibitem{Abazov:2005yr}
882: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
883: %``Search for neutral supersymmetric Higgs bosons in multijet events at
884: %s**(1/2) = 1.96-TeV,''
885: arXiv:hep-ex/0504018.
886: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0504018;%%
887:
888: \bibitem{Abdullin:2005yn}
889: S.~Abdullin {\it et al.},
890: %``Summary of the CMS potential for the Higgs boson discovery,''
891: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 39S2}, 41 (2005).
892: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C39S2,41;%%
893:
894: \bibitem{Schumacher:2004da}
895: M.~Schumacher,
896: %``Investigation of the discovery potential for Higgs bosons of the minimal
897: %supersymmetric extension of the standard model (MSSM) with ATLAS,''
898: arXiv:hep-ph/0410112.
899: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410112;%%
900:
901: \bibitem{Aivazis:1993pi}
902: M.~A.~G.~Aivazis, J.~C.~Collins, F.~I.~Olness and W.~K.~Tung,
903: %``Leptoproduction of heavy quarks. 2. A Unified QCD formulation of charged
904: %and neutral current processes from fixed target to collider energies,''
905: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 3102 (1994)
906: [arXiv:hep-ph/9312319].
907: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9312319;%%
908:
909: \bibitem{Collins:1998rz}
910: J.~C.~Collins,
911: %``Hard-scattering factorization with heavy quarks: A general treatment,''
912: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 094002 (1998)
913: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806259].
914: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806259;%%
915:
916: \bibitem{Campbell:2000bg}
917: J.~M.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
918: %``Radiative corrections to Z b anti-b production,''
919: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 114012 (2000)
920: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006304].
921: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006304;%%
922:
923: \bibitem{Campbell:2003dd}
924: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
925: %``Associated production of a Z boson and a single heavy-quark jet,''
926: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 074021 (2004)
927: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312024].
928: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312024;%%
929:
930: \bibitem{Abazov:2004zd}
931: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
932: %``A measurement of the ratio of inclusive cross sections sigma(p p $\to$ Z +
933: %b-jet)/sigma(p p $\to$ Z + jet) at s**(1/2) = 1.96-TeV,''
934: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94}, 161801 (2005)
935: [arXiv:hep-ex/0410078].
936: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0410078;%%
937:
938: \bibitem{Maltoni:2005wd}
939: F.~Maltoni, T.~McElmurry and S.~Willenbrock,
940: %``Inclusive production of a Higgs or Z boson in association with heavy
941: %quarks,''
942: arXiv:hep-ph/0505014.
943: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505014;%%
944:
945: \bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}
946: J.~Pumplin, D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,
947: %``New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD
948: %analysis,''
949: JHEP {\bf 0207}, 012 (2002)
950: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201195].
951: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201195;%%
952:
953:
954: \bibitem{Huston:2005jm}
955: J.~Huston, J.~Pumplin, D.~Stump and W.~K.~Tung,
956: %``Stability of NLO global analysis and implications for hadron collider
957: %physics,''
958: JHEP {\bf 0506}, 080 (2005)
959: [arXiv:hep-ph/0502080].
960: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502080;%%
961:
962: \bibitem{Ellis:1999ec}
963: K.~Ellis {\it et al.} [QCD Tools Working Group],
964: %``Report of the QCD tools working group,''
965: arXiv:hep-ph/0011122.
966: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011122;%%
967:
968: \bibitem{Maltoni:2002qb}
969: F.~Maltoni and T.~Stelzer,
970: %``MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph,''
971: JHEP {\bf 0302}, 027 (2003)
972: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208156].
973: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208156;%%
974:
975: \bibitem{Bern:1997sc}
976: Z.~Bern, L.~J.~Dixon and D.~A.~Kosower,
977: %``One-loop amplitudes for e+ e- to four partons,''
978: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 513}, 3 (1998)
979: [arXiv:hep-ph/9708239].
980: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9708239;%%
981:
982: \bibitem{Nagy:1998bb}
983: Z.~Nagy and Z.~Trocsanyi,
984: %``Next-to-leading order calculation of four-jet observables in electron
985: %positron annihilation,''
986: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 014020 (1999)
987: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 62}, 099902 (2000)]
988: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806317].
989: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806317;%%
990:
991: \bibitem{Catani:1996vz}
992: S.~Catani and M.~H.~Seymour,
993: %``A general algorithm for calculating jet cross sections in NLO QCD,''
994: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 485}, 291 (1997)
995: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 510}, 503 (1997)]
996: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605323].
997: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605323;%%
998:
999: \bibitem{Acosta:2004nj}
1000: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
1001: %``Measurements of bottom anti-bottom azimuthal production correlations in
1002: %proton antiproton collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
1003: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 092001 (2005)
1004: [arXiv:hep-ex/0412006].
1005: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0412006;%%
1006:
1007: \bibitem{Campbell:2002tg}
1008: J.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
1009: %``Next-to-leading order corrections to W + 2jet and Z + 2jet production at
1010: %hadron colliders,''
1011: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 113007 (2002)
1012: [arXiv:hep-ph/0202176].
1013: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202176;%%
1014:
1015: \bibitem{Campbell:2003hd}
1016: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis and D.~L.~Rainwater,
1017: %``Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for W + 2jet and Z + 2jet production
1018: %at the CERN LHC,''
1019: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 094021 (2003)
1020: [arXiv:hep-ph/0308195].
1021: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308195;%%
1022:
1023: \bibitem{Pumplin:2001ct}
1024: J.~Pumplin {\it et al.},
1025: %``Uncertainties of predictions from parton distribution functions. II: The
1026: %Hessian method,''
1027: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 014013 (2002)
1028: [arXiv:hep-ph/0101032].
1029: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101032;%%
1030:
1031: \bibitem{Nadolsky:2001yg}
1032: P.~M.~Nadolsky and Z.~Sullivan,
1033: %``PDF uncertainties in W H production at Tevatron,''
1034: % in {\it Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001) } ed. N.~Graf,
1035: eConf {\bf C010630}, P510 (2001)
1036: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110378].
1037: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110378;%%
1038:
1039: \end{thebibliography}%
1040:
1041:
1042:
1043: \begin{titlepage}
1044:
1045: \hspace*{\fill}\parbox[t]{5.5cm} {
1046: %{hep-ph/0510362\\
1047: %CERN-PH-TH/2005-064\\
1048: %FERMILAB-PUB-05/487-T\\
1049: %ILL-(TH)-05-04\\
1050: \today} \vskip2cm
1051: \begin{center}
1052: {\Large \bf Erratum: Production of a $Z$ Boson and Two Jets \\
1053: \bigskip with One Heavy-Quark Tag} \\
1054: \medskip
1055: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
1056: {\large {\bf J.~Campbell}$^1$,
1057: {\bf R.~K.~Ellis}$^2$,
1058: {\bf F.~Maltoni}$^3$,
1059: and {\bf S.~Willenbrock}$^4$} \\
1060: \bigskip\bigskip\medskip
1061: $^{1}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow \\
1062: Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom \\
1063: \bigskip
1064: $^{2}$Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory \\
1065: P.~O.~Box 500, Batavia, IL\ \ 60510 \\ \bigskip
1066: $^{3}$Institut de Physique Th\'{e}orique and \\
1067: Centre for Particle Physics and Phenomenology (CP3) \\
1068: Universit\'{e} Catholique de Louvain\\[1mm]
1069: Chemin du Cyclotron 2 \\
1070: B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium \\
1071: \bigskip
1072: $^{4}$Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign \\
1073: 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL\ \ 61801 \\ \bigskip
1074: \end{center}
1075:
1076: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
1077:
1078: \end{titlepage}
1079:
1080:
1081: We recently presented a next-to-leading-order (NLO) calculation of
1082: $Z+2$ jets, with one or more heavy-quarks ($Q=c,b)$, at hadron
1083: colliders \cite{Campbell:2005zv}. This process is a background to
1084: numerous searches at hadron colliders, in particular the search for
1085: the Higgs boson: it is the principal irreducible background to
1086: $q\bar q\to Zh$, followed by $h\to b\bar b$, and a significant
1087: reducible background to $gg\to h\to ZZ\to \ell^+\ell^-\ell^+\ell^-$
1088: when both jets contain heavy quarks that decay semi-leptonically. We
1089: neglected the heavy-quark mass throughout that calculation, except
1090: when two heavy quarks were produced from a virtual gluon, $g^*\to
1091: Q\bar Q$, in which case it is mandatory to keep the quark mass
1092: nonzero when the heavy quarks are collinear. This occurs when two
1093: heavy quarks are contained in the same jet. More generally, one
1094: cannot neglect the quark mass if the invariant mass of the quark
1095: pair coming from $g^*\to Q\bar Q$ is not large compared with the
1096: quark mass.
1097:
1098: In a subsequent NLO calculation of $W+2$ jets, with one or more $b$
1099: quarks, we learned that this can also occur in another situation
1100: \cite{Campbell:2006cu}, which we overlooked in
1101: Ref.~\cite{Campbell:2005zv}. If both heavy quarks are at large
1102: transverse momentum ($p_T$) compared to their mass, then the mass
1103: may be safely neglected \cite{FebresCordero:2006sj}. However, there
1104: are NLO processes in which one heavy quark is at high $p_T$ while
1105: another is at low $p_T$ (and is missed by the detector), yet their
1106: invariant mass is not large compared to their mass. If this
1107: heavy-quark pair comes from a virtual gluon splitting to a
1108: heavy-quark pair, $g^*\to Q\bar Q$, then one cannot neglect the
1109: quark mass. This can occur in the NLO processes $q\bar q\to ZQ\bar
1110: Qg$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQg}) and $gq\to ZQ\bar Qq$
1111: (Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj}), both of which contribute to $ZQj$ when one
1112: heavy quark is missed.
1113:
1114: \setcounter{figure}{0}
1115:
1116:
1117: \begin{figure}[ht]
1118: \begin{center}
1119: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=5cm \epsfbox{diagqqZQQg.eps}
1120: \vspace*{-.8cm}
1121: \end{center}
1122: \caption{Diagram contributing to the NLO correction to the
1123: associated production of a $Z$ boson and two high-$p_T$ jets, one or
1124: more of which contains a heavy quark ($Q=c,b$).} \label{fig:ZQQg}
1125: \end{figure}
1126:
1127: \begin{figure}[ht]
1128: \begin{center}
1129: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=16cm \epsfbox{diagZQQj.ps}
1130: \vspace*{-.8cm}
1131: \end{center}
1132: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the NLO correction to the
1133: associated production of a $Z$ boson and two high-$p_T$ jets, one or
1134: more of which contains a heavy quark ($Q=c,b$).} \label{fig:ZQQj}
1135: \end{figure}
1136:
1137: To demonstrate this, we show in Fig.~\ref{fig:tev-b} the
1138: invariant-mass distribution of the heavy-quark pair from $q\bar q\to
1139: Zb\bar bg$ when it contributes to the final state $Zbj$, with the
1140: other heavy quark outside the acceptance of the detector (taken to
1141: be $p_T>15$ GeV, $|\eta|<2$, $\Delta R_{jj}>0.7$), at the Fermilab
1142: Tevatron ($\sqrt S=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$). There are two curves, one
1143: with (solid, blue) and one without (dashed, red) the quark mass
1144: included. It is clear that the quark mass has a large influence on
1145: the cross section (the area under the curves).
1146:
1147:
1148:
1149: \begin{figure}[ht]
1150: \begin{center}
1151: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=14cm]{tev-b.ps}
1152: \vspace*{-.8cm}
1153: \end{center}
1154: \caption{The differential cross section for $Z$ plus two jets, one
1155: of which contains a $b$ quark, vs. the invariant mass of the $b$
1156: quark and another $b$ quark that lies outside the acceptance of the
1157: detector (taken to be $p_T>15$ GeV, $|\eta|<2$, $\Delta
1158: R_{jj}>0.7$), at the Fermilab Tevatron ($\sqrt S=1.96$ TeV $p\bar
1159: p$). Only the contribution from the subprocess $q\bar q\to Zb\bar
1160: bg$ is shown. The (solid, blue) curve includes the $b$ quark mass,
1161: while the (dashed, red) curve does not.} \label{fig:tev-b}
1162: \end{figure}
1163:
1164: In the case of the process $gq\to ZQ\bar Qq$, which involves the
1165: splitting $g\to Q\bar Q$ in the initial state
1166: [Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj}(b)] as well as the final state
1167: [Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj}(a)], this requires that we abandon the dipole
1168: subtraction method \cite{Catani:1996vz} in favor of subtracting the
1169: mass singularity via the truncated $Q$ distribution function
1170: \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz}
1171: \begin{equation}
1172: \tilde Q(x,\mu) =
1173: \frac{\alpha_S(\mu)}{2\pi}\ln\left(\frac{\mu^2}{m_Q^2}\right)\int_x^1\frac{dy}{y}P_{qg}\left(\frac{x}{y}\right)g(y,\mu)
1174: \end{equation}
1175: where $P_{qg}(z)={1\over 2}[z^2+(1-z)^2]$ is the DGLAP splitting
1176: function. The counterterm is constructed by calculating $\tilde
1177: Qq\to ZQq$; this cancels the initial-state logarithmic dependence on
1178: the heavy-quark mass in $gq\to ZQ\bar Qq$, and yields a cross
1179: section in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ factorization scheme. This
1180: technique was developed in Ref.~\cite{Campbell:2006cu}.
1181:
1182: We have revisited our NLO calculation of $Z+2$ jets, with one or
1183: more heavy quarks, and corrected this omission. Specifically, we
1184: recalculated the NLO processes\footnote{It is not necessary to
1185: recalculate $gg\to ZQ\overline Qg$, since there is no contribution
1186: from a virtual gluon splitting to a heavy-quark pair, $g^*\to Q\bar
1187: Q$. We recalculated it nevertheless, and found that the effect of
1188: the heavy-quark mass is about $-6\%$ at the Tevatron and $-12\%$ at
1189: the LHC. However, since this subprocess makes a relatively small
1190: contribution to the cross section, this change is negligible.}
1191: \begin{itemize}
1192: \item $q\bar q\to ZQ\overline Qg$ at tree level [Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQg}]
1193: \item $gq\to ZQ\overline Qq$ at tree level [Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQj}]
1194: \end{itemize}
1195: using a finite heavy-quark mass throughout ($m_c = 1.4$ GeV, $m_b =
1196: 4.75$ GeV).
1197:
1198: The results for the exclusive and inclusive cross sections at the
1199: Fermilab Tevatron and the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are
1200: presented in Tables~II-V. These should replace the corresponding
1201: tables in Ref.~\cite{Campbell:2005zv}. While there are small
1202: changes throughout the tables, the only significant change is in the
1203: NLO cross section for $Zbj$ at the Tevatron in
1204: Table~\ref{tab:tev_excl} (as well as the inclusive cross section
1205: $Zbj+X$ in Table~\ref{tab:tev_incl}), which was reduced by 16\% by
1206: including the $b$-quark mass (5.23 pb $\to$ 4.37 pb). The dominant
1207: effect of the $b$-quark mass was on the subprocess $q\bar q\to
1208: ZQ\bar Qg$ [Fig.~\ref{fig:ZQQg}], which was reduced by more than
1209: 50\% (1.16 pb $\to$ 0.50 pb). A similar percentage reduction occurs
1210: at the LHC (9 pb $\to$ 4 pb), but this subprocess is so small at
1211: that machine that it hardly affects the total result for $Zbj$.
1212:
1213: We raised the $p_T$ threshold on the acceptance for $b$ jets to
1214: greater than 15 GeV, and found that the effect of the $b$ mass
1215: became less. This is consistent with our findings that the effect of
1216: the $c$ mass is smaller than that of the $b$ mass for the same $p_T$
1217: threshold.
1218:
1219: \setcounter{table}{1}
1220:
1221:
1222: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1223: %%%%%%%%%% TABLES - EXCLUSIVE %%%%%%%%%%%%
1224: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1225:
1226: \begin{table}[t]
1227: \caption{Cross sections (pb) for $Z$-boson plus two (or more) jets,
1228: one or more of which contains a heavy quark, at the Tevatron
1229: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$
1230: GeV and $|\eta|<2$. Two final-state partons are merged into a single
1231: jet if $\Delta R_{jj}<0.7$. No branching ratios or tagging
1232: efficiencies are included. Numbers in parenthesis are leading-order
1233: results. The labels on the columns have the following meaning:
1234: $ZQj=$ exactly two jets, one of which contains a heavy quark;
1235: $ZQ\overline Q=$ exactly two jets, both of which contain a heavy
1236: quark; $Z(Q\overline Q)j=$ exactly two jets, one of which contains a
1237: heavy-quark pair; $ZQ\overline Qj=$ exactly three jets, two of which
1238: contain a heavy quark; $ZQjj=$ exactly three jets, one of which
1239: contains a heavy quark. For the last set of processes, the labels
1240: mean: $Zjj=$ exactly two jets, including heavy quarks; $Zjjj=$
1241: exactly three jets, including heavy quarks. For $ZQj$ and
1242: $ZQ\overline Q$, both the leading-order (in parentheses) and
1243: next-to-leading-order cross sections are given. The CTEQ6M parton
1244: distribution functions are used throughout, except for the LO cross
1245: sections in parentheses, where CTEQ6L1 is used
1246: \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. The factorization and renormalization scales
1247: are chosen as $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_Z$.}
1248:
1249: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
1250: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
1251: \medskip
1252:
1253: %%%%% MCFM results
1254: \begin{center}
1255: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|ccccc|}
1256: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Tevatron} &
1257: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\[1pt]
1258: \hline
1259: & $ZQj$ & $ZQ\overline Q$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ & $ZQ\overline Qj$ & $ZQjj$ \\
1260: \hline
1261: bottom & (2.18) 4.37 & (2.47) 3.07 & 0.634 & 0.672 & 0.326 \\
1262: charm & (3.20) 7.35 & (2.34) 2.75 & 2.00 & 0.621 & 0.495 \\
1263: \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{$Zjj$} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$Zjjj$} \\
1264: \hline $Z+$jets & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{(163) 182} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{22.9} \\
1265: \hline
1266: \end{tabular}
1267: \end{center}
1268: %%%%% MCFM results
1269:
1270: \label{tab:tev_excl}
1271: \end{table}
1272:
1273: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1274:
1275: \begin{table}[t]
1276: \caption{Same as Table~\ref{tab:tev_excl}, except at the LHC
1277: ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$ GeV and
1278: $|\eta|<2.5$. (This table is nearly identical to Table~III of
1279: Ref.~\cite{Campbell:2005zv}.)}
1280:
1281: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
1282: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
1283: \medskip
1284: %%%%% MCFM results
1285: \begin{center}
1286: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|ccccc|}
1287: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{LHC} &
1288: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\[1pt]
1289: \hline
1290: & $ZQj$ & $ZQ\overline Q$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ & $ZQ\overline Qj$ & $ZQjj$ \\
1291: \hline
1292: bottom & (352) 418 & (109) 92.1 & 23.5 & 60.8 & 92.1 \\
1293: charm & (443) 624 & (87) 75.2 & 58.6 & 49.3 & 123 \\
1294: \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{$Zjj$} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$Zjjj$} \\
1295: \hline $Z+$jets & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{(6090) 4840} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{1810} \\
1296: \hline
1297: \end{tabular}
1298: \end{center}
1299: %%%%% MCFM results
1300:
1301: \label{tab:lhc_excl}
1302: \end{table}
1303:
1304: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1305:
1306:
1307:
1308: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1309: %%%%%%%%%% TABLES - INCLUSIVE %%%%%%%%%%%%
1310: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1311:
1312: \begin{table}[p]
1313: \caption{Inclusive cross sections (pb) for $Z$ boson plus one or two
1314: jets, one or two of which contains a heavy quark, at the Tevatron
1315: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$
1316: GeV and $|\eta|<2$. Two final-state partons are merged into a single
1317: jet if $\Delta R_{jj}<0.7$. No branching ratios or tagging
1318: efficiencies are included. Numbers in parenthesis are leading-order
1319: results. The labels on the columns have the following meaning:
1320: $ZQ+X=$ at least one jet, at least one of which contains a heavy
1321: quark; $Z(Q\overline Q)=$ one jet which contains a heavy-quark pair;
1322: $ZQj+X=$ at least two jets, one of which contains a heavy quark;
1323: $ZQ\overline Q+X=$ at least two jets, two of which contain a heavy
1324: quark; $Z(Q\overline Q)j=$ two jets, one of which contains a
1325: heavy-quark pair. The last row gives the inclusive cross section
1326: for jets containing both light and heavy partons. The CTEQ6M parton
1327: distribution functions are used throughout, except for the LO cross
1328: sections in parentheses, where CTEQ6L1 is used
1329: \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. The factorization and renormalization scales
1330: are chosen as $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_Z$. The uncertainties are from the
1331: variation of the renormalization scale, the factorization scale, and
1332: the parton distribution functions, respectively.}
1333:
1334: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
1335: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
1336: \medskip
1337: \begin{center}
1338: \hspace*{-1.2cm}
1339: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|cc|ccc|}
1340: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Tevatron} &
1341: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\[1pt]
1342: \hline
1343: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Z+1$ jet $+X$} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$Z+2$ jets $+X$} \\
1344: \cline{2-6}
1345: & $ZQ+X$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)$ & $ZQj+X$ & $ZQ\overline Q+X$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ \\
1346: \hline
1347: bottom& (8.23) 18.1&2.1&(2.18) $4.70^{+1.2}_{-0.9}\,^{+0.07}_{-0.05}\,^{+0.5}_{-0.5}$&(2.47) $3.74^{+0.45}_{-0.45}\,^{+0.12}_{-0.12}\,^{+0.15}_{-0.15}$&$0.63^{+0.26}_{-0.16}\,^{+0.06}_{-0.06}\,^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$\\
1348: charm & (11.3) 27.5&6.6&(3.20) $7.85^{+1.7}_{-1.4}\,^{+0.15}_{-0.26}\,^{+0.8}_{-0.8}$&(2.34) $3.37^{+0.44}_{-0.37}\,^{+0.0}_{-0.87}\,^{+0.14}_{-0.14}$&$2.00^{+0.85}_{-0.53}\,^{+0.22}_{-0.16}\,^{+0.15}_{-0.15}$\\
1349:
1350: \hline
1351: all jets & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{(898) 1070} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{(163) $205^{+19}_{-19}\,^{+7}_{-2}\,^{+5}_{-5}$}\\
1352: \hline
1353: \end{tabular}
1354: \end{center}
1355: \label{tab:tev_incl}
1356: \end{table}
1357:
1358: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1359:
1360: \begin{table}[p]
1361: \caption{Same as Table~\ref{tab:tev_incl}, except at the LHC
1362: ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$). A jet lies in the range $p_T>15$ GeV and
1363: $|\eta|<2.5$. (This table is nearly identical to Table~V of
1364: Ref.~\cite{Campbell:2005zv}.)}
1365:
1366: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
1367: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
1368: \medskip
1369: \begin{center}
1370: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|cc|ccc|}
1371: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{LHC} &
1372: \multicolumn{5}{c|}{$\sigma$ (pb)}\\[1pt]
1373: \hline
1374: & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Z+1$ jet $+X$} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$Z+2$ jets $+X$} \\
1375: \cline{2-6}
1376: & $ZQ+X$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)$ & $ZQj+X$ & $ZQ\overline Q+X$ & $Z(Q\overline Q)j$ \\
1377: \hline
1378: bottom& (826) 1060&25&(352) $510^{+84}_{-58}\,^{+44}_{-35}\,^{+25}_{-25}$&(109) $153^{+20}_{-20}\,^{+2}_{-2}\,^{+9}_{-9}$&$24^{+10}_{-6}\,^{+0.3}_{-0.3}\,^{+1.2}_{-1.2}$\\
1379: charm & (989) 1430&50&(443) $747^{+110}_{-110}\,^{+0}_{-46}\,^{+45}_{-45}$&(87) $125^{+17}_{-17}\,^{+2}_{-2}\,^{+8}_{-8}$&$59^{+23}_{-15}\,^{+2}_{-2}\,^{+3}_{-3}$\\
1380:
1381: \hline
1382: all jets & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{ (15300) 18400} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{(6090) $6650^{+470}_{-500}\,^{+170}_{-50}\,^{+240}_{-240}$}\\
1383: \hline
1384: \end{tabular}
1385: \end{center}
1386: \label{tab:lhc_incl}
1387: \end{table}
1388:
1389: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1390:
1391:
1392: \section*{Acknowledgments}
1393:
1394: \indent\indent We are grateful for conversations with Gavin Salam.
1395: This work was supported in part by the U.~S.~Department of Energy
1396: under contracts Nos.~DE-AC02-76CH03000 and DE-FG02-91ER40677.
1397:
1398: \begin{thebibliography}{99}%
1399:
1400: \bibitem{Campbell:2005zv}
1401: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
1402: %``Production of a Z boson and two jets with one heavy-quark tag,''
1403: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 054007 (2006)
1404: [arXiv:hep-ph/0510362].
1405: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0510362;%%
1406:
1407: \bibitem{Campbell:2006cu}
1408: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
1409: %``Production of a W boson and two jets with one b-quark tag,''
1410: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 75}, 054015 (2007)
1411: [arXiv:hep-ph/0611348].
1412: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D75,054015;%%
1413:
1414: \bibitem{FebresCordero:2006sj}
1415: F.~Febres Cordero, L.~Reina and D.~Wackeroth,
1416: %``NLO QCD corrections to W boson production with a massive b-quark jet pair
1417: %at the Tevatron p anti-p collider,''
1418: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 034007 (2006)
1419: [arXiv:hep-ph/0606102].
1420: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0606102;%%
1421:
1422: \bibitem{Catani:1996vz}
1423: S.~Catani and M.~H.~Seymour,
1424: %``A general algorithm for calculating jet cross sections in NLO QCD,''
1425: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 485}, 291 (1997)
1426: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 510}, 503 (1997)]
1427: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605323].
1428: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605323;%%
1429:
1430: \bibitem{Aivazis:1993pi}
1431: M.~A.~G.~Aivazis, J.~C.~Collins, F.~I.~Olness and W.~K.~Tung,
1432: %``Leptoproduction of heavy quarks. 2. A Unified QCD formulation of charged
1433: %and neutral current processes from fixed target to collider energies,''
1434: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 3102 (1994)
1435: [arXiv:hep-ph/9312319].
1436: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9312319;%%
1437:
1438: \bibitem{Collins:1998rz}
1439: J.~C.~Collins,
1440: %``Hard-scattering factorization with heavy quarks: A general treatment,''
1441: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 094002 (1998)
1442: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806259].
1443: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806259;%%
1444:
1445: \bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}
1446: J.~Pumplin, D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,
1447: %``New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD
1448: %analysis,''
1449: JHEP {\bf 0207}, 012 (2002)
1450: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201195].
1451: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201195;%%
1452:
1453: \end{thebibliography}%
1454:
1455: \end{document}
1456:
1457: