1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}
2: \textwidth 155mm
3: \textheight 245mm
4: \topmargin -2cm
5: \oddsidemargin -0.5cm
6: %\evensidemargin 0.5cm
7: \pagestyle{empty}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \begin{center}
12: {\large{\bf GLUON DOMINANCE MODEL\\
13: AND MULTIPARTICLE PRODUCTION}}
14:
15: \vspace*{5mm}
16:
17: \underline{E.S.Kokoulina}\footnote{E--mail: {\tt
18: kokoulin@sunse.jinr.ru}}
19:
20: \vspace*{3mm}
21:
22: {\it JINR, 141980, Dubna, Moscow region, Russia}
23: \end{center}
24:
25: \vspace*{5mm}
26:
27: {\small{ \centerline{\bf Abstract} Gluon dominance model is
28: proposed to study multiparticle production. This model describes
29: multiplicity distributions in $e^+e^-$, $p\bar p$ annihilation and
30: $pp$ interactions. \vspace*{3mm}
31:
32: {\bf 1.~~Introduction}
33:
34: \vspace*{3mm}
35:
36: To investigate multiparticle
37: production (MP) at high energy two stage model was built [1-4].
38: It is based on the use of QCD and the phenomenological scheme of
39: hadronisation. The model describes well multiplicity distributions
40: (MD) and their moments in $e^+e^-$ annihilation, $pp$ and $p\bar
41: p$ interactions. It confirms of fragmentation mechanism of
42: hadronisation in $e^+e^-$annihilation and the transition to
43: recombination one in hadron and nucleus interactions. It can
44: explain the shoulder structure in MD at higher energies and the
45: behavior of $f_2$ in pure $p \bar p$ annihilation at few tens
46: GeV/c by the inclusion of intermediate quark topologies. The
47: mechanism of the soft photons (SP) production as a sign of
48: hadronisation and estimates the emission region size of them is
49: proposed [5].
50:
51: \vspace*{3mm}
52:
53: {\bf 2.~~Study of $e^+e^-$
54: --annihilation}
55:
56: \vspace*{3mm}
57:
58: We began our study from $e^+e^-$ annihilation. It can be realized
59: through the formation of virtual $\gamma$ or $Z^0$--boson which
60: then decays into two quarks:
61: $e^+e^-\rightarrow(Z^0/\gamma)\rightarrow q\bar q.$ The $e^+e^-$--
62: reaction is simple for analysis, as the produced state is pure
63: $q\overline q$.
64:
65: The perturbative QCD (pQCD) may be applied to describe the process
66: of parton (quark or gluon) fission at big virtuality. This stage
67: can be named as the cascade stage. When partons reach small
68: virtuality, they change into hadrons, which we observe. At this
69: stage we can not apply pQCD. Therefore phenomenological models are
70: used to describe hadronisation.
71:
72: At studying MP at high energy we used ideas of A.~Giovannini [6]
73: to describe quark-gluon jets as Markov branching processes. Three
74: elementary processes contribute into QCD jets: (1) gluon fission;
75: (2) quark bremsstrahlung and (3) quark pair production.
76: A.Giovannini had constructed a system of differential equations
77: for generating functions (GF) of parton ($q$, $g$) jet and
78: obtained MD of partons formed from quark
79: \begin{equation}
80: \label{4} P_{0}^P(Y)=\left (\frac{k_p}{k_p+\overline m}\right
81: )^{k_p}, \quad P_{m}^P(Y)=\frac{k_p(k_p+1)\dots(k_p+
82: m-1)}{m!}\left(\frac{\overline m} {\overline
83: m+k_p}\right)^{m}\left( \frac{k_p}{k_p+\overline m}\right)^{k_p},
84: \end{equation}
85: where $\overline m$ is the mean multiplicity, $k_p$-- parameter.
86: These MD are known as negative binomial distributions (NBD). The
87: GF for them is
88: \begin{equation}
89: \label{6} Q^{(q)}(z,Y)=\sum\limits_{m=0}^{\infty} z^{m} P_{m}(Y)=
90: \left[1+ \overline m/k_p (1-z)\right]^{-k_p}.
91: \end{equation}
92:
93: Two stage model [1-2] has taken (\ref{4}) to describe the cascade
94: stage and adds to it a sub narrow binomial distribution (BD) for
95: the hadronisation stage. We had chosen BD basing on the analysis
96: of experimental data in $e^+e^-$- annihilation lower than 9 GeV.
97: Second correlation moments were negative at these energyies. We
98: add the hadronisation stage to the parton one with the help of a
99: factorization. MD in this process can be written as follows:
100: \begin{equation}
101: \label{7} P_n(s)=\sum\limits_mP^P_mP_n^H(m,s),
102: \end{equation}
103: where $P_m^P$ is MD for partons (\ref{4}), $P_n^H(m,s)$ - MD for
104: hadrons produced from $m$ partons at the stage of hadronisation.
105: Further we substitute variable $Y$ on a center of masses energy
106: $\sqrt s$. MD of hadrons $P_n^H$ formed from one parton and their
107: GF $Q^H_p(z)$ are [1-2]
108: \begin{equation}
109: \label{12} P_n^H=C^n_{N_p}\left(\frac{\overline n^h_p}
110: {N_p}\right)^n\left(1-\frac{\overline n_p^h}
111: {N_p}\right)^{N_p-n},\quad Q^H_p=\left[1+\frac{\overline n^h_p}
112: {N_p}(z-1)\right]^{N_p},
113: \end{equation}
114: where $C_{N_p}^n$ - binomial coefficient, $\overline n^h_p$ and
115: $N_p$ ($p=q,g$) have a sense of mean multiplicity and maximum of
116: secondary hadrons are formed from parton at the stage of
117: hadronisation.
118:
119: MD of hadrons in $e^+e^-$ annihilation are
120: determined by convolution of two stages (cascade and
121: hadronisation)
122: \begin{equation}
123: \label{13} P_n(s)=\sum\limits_{m=o}^{\infty}
124: P_m^P\frac{1}{n!}\frac{\partial^n}{\partial z^n}
125: (Q^H)^{2+m}|_{z=0},
126: \end{equation}
127: where $2+m$ is the total number of partons (two quarks and $m$
128: gluons).
129:
130: The parameter $\alpha=N_g/N_q$ distinguishes the hadrons produced
131: from quark or gluon. Introducing expressions (\ref{4}), (\ref{12})
132: in (\ref{13}) we obtain MD of hadrons in $e^+e^-$ annihilation
133: ($N=N_q$, $\overline n^h=\overline n^h_q$)
134:
135: \begin{equation}
136: \label{15} P_n(s)= \sum\limits_{m=0} ^{M_g}P_m^PC^n_{(2+\alpha
137: m)N} \left(\frac{\overline n^h} {N}\right)^n\left(1-\frac
138: {\overline n^h}{N}\right)^{(2 +\alpha m)N-n}.
139: \end{equation}
140:
141: The results of comparison of expression (\ref{15}) with
142: experimental data [7] are led in [2]. The significance of $\alpha
143: $ is equal to $0.2$ with some deviations. If we know from our
144: comparison $\alpha , N_q$ and $\overline n^h_q$ then we can
145: determine for gluon $N_g=\alpha N$ and $\overline n_g^h= \alpha
146: \overline n^h$. It is surprising these parameters remain constant
147: without considerable deviations in spite of the indirect finding:
148: $N_g\sim 3-4$ and $\overline n_g^h\sim 1$ (Fig. 1). This behaviour
149: is evidence of the universality of gluon hadronisation. As $\alpha
150: < 0.2$ we come to a conclusion that hadronisation of gluons is
151: softer than of quarks.
152:
153: \begin{figure}[h!]% Fig.1.
154: \leavevmode
155: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
156: \centering
157: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=2.8in, angle=0]{ALPNH-A.EPS}
158: \caption{$N_g=\alpha N_q$.} \label{secondfig}
159: \end{minipage}\hfill
160: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
161: \centering
162: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3in, angle=0]{sigma4ne.eps}
163: \caption{$\sigma (n)$ in $pp$.} \label{threddfig}
164: \end{minipage}\\
165: \end{figure}
166:
167: \vspace*{3mm}
168:
169: {\bf 3.~~Study of $pp$ interactions}
170:
171: \vspace*{3mm}
172:
173: The study of MD in $pp$ interactions is implemented in the
174: framework of the project "Thermalization" [8]. This project is
175: aimed at studying the collective behavior of secondary particles
176: and advancement to the high multiplicity region (HMR) beyond of
177: available data [9] in proton-proton interactions at 70 GeV/c.
178:
179: The calculation by the MC PHYTHIA code has shown that the standard
180: generator predicts a value of the cross section which is in a good
181: agreement with the experimental data at small multiplicity
182: ($n_{ch}<10$) but it underestimates the value $\sigma(n_{ch})$ by
183: two orders of the magnitude at $n_{ch}=18$ (Fig. 2). The existing
184: models are sensitive in HMR [10] (Fig. 2)
185:
186: We are guided by a scheme building of hadron interactions to
187: describe MD with the quark-gluon language as well as to
188: investigate HMR. The existing models are sensitive in this region
189: [e.g. 8]. We consider that at the first stage of $pp$ interactions
190: the initial quarks and gluons take part in the formation of
191: quark-gluon system (QGS). On the second stage they can transform
192: to hadrons. We proposed two schemes. In the first scheme
193: hadroproduction is studied with account of the parton fission
194: inside the QGS. If we are not interested in what is going inside
195: QGS, then come to the second scheme [3].
196:
197: When we took model where some of quarks and gluons from protons
198: participate in the production of hadrons the parameters of that
199: model differed very much from parameters obtained in $e^+e^-$-
200: annihilation, especially for hadronisation. That is why the scheme
201: with active quarks was rejected, and quarks from protons were
202: remained inside of the leading particles. In according of this
203: result all of the newly born hadrons are formed by gluons. Such
204: gluons we name active and a model involving theirs into
205: hadroproduction - the gluon dominance model (GDM) [4].
206:
207: Both of schemes describe well MD at 69 GeV/c. From the comparison
208: with experimental data [9] the maximum number of active gluons
209: appeared in QGS is restricted to 6, $\overline n_g^h=1.63\pm
210: 0.12,$ the part of evaporated gluons from QGS equal to $0.47 \pm
211: 0.01$. We conclude from this research that the branch processes
212: are weak. A maximal possible number of hadrons from the gluon in
213: first scheme looks very much like the number of partons in the
214: glob of cold quark-gluon plasma of L.Van Hove [11]. After the
215: evaporation the part of active gluons do not convert into hadrons.
216: They stay in QGS and become sources of soft photons (SP) [5].
217:
218: From neutral mesons data [12] hadronization parameters of $\pi ^0$
219: were founded (the second scheme). The analysis of the mean
220: multiplicity of $\pi^0$-- mesons versus the number of charged
221: particles $n_{ch}$ gives the limitations to the number of neutral
222: mesons at given $n_{ch}$ [3]. The obtained estimations of
223: probabilities for a production charged and neutral hadrons from
224: gluon at the its passing of hadronization permits to get in
225: framework of GDM [4] "the charged hadron/pion" ratio in pp
226: interactions, which is in an agreement with data [13].
227:
228: The application of GDM to describe MD in the region 102-800 GeV/c
229: [14] in both schemes leads to good results [5]. Parameters of GDM
230: in this domain are given in Table 1.
231: \begin{center}
232: Table 1. Parameters of TSTM.
233: \end{center}
234: \renewcommand{\tablename}{Table}
235: \begin{center}
236: \begin{tabular}{||c||c|c|c|c|c|c||c||}
237: \hline \hline
238: $p,$ GeV/c & $\overline m$ & $M_g$ & $N$&$\overline n^h$&$\Omega $&$\chi^2/$ndf\\
239: \hline \hline
240: 102 & $2.75\pm 0.08$ & 8 & $3.13\pm 0.56$ & $1.64 \pm 0.04$ & $1.92\pm 0.08$ & 2.2/5\\
241: \hline
242: 205 & $2.82 \pm 0.20$ & 8 & $4.50 \pm 0.10$& $2.02 \pm 0.12$& $2.00 \pm 0.07$ &2.0/8 \\
243: \hline
244: 300& $2.94 \pm 0.34$ & 10 &$4.07 \pm 0.86$ & $2.22 \pm 0.23$& $1.97 \pm 0.05$ & 9.8/9 \\
245: \hline
246: 405& $2.70 \pm 0.30$& 9& $4.60 \pm 0.24$ & $2.66 \pm 0.22$ & $1.98 \pm 0.07$ &16.4/12 \\
247: \hline
248: 800 & $3.41 \pm 2.55$& 10&$ 20.30 \pm 10.40 $& $2.41 \pm 1.69$ & $2.01 \pm 0.08$&10.8/12\\
249: \hline \hline
250: \end{tabular}
251: \end{center}
252: A growth of $\overline n^h_g$ in $pp$ interactions indicates a
253: change mechanism of hadronization of gluons in comparison with
254: $e^+e^-$ annihilation. It is considered that in the $e^+e^-$
255: process the partons transform to hadrons by the fragmentation
256: mechanism (the thermal medium is absent). Our analysis gives
257: $\overline n_g^h \sim 1$ [2]. The recombination is specific for
258: the hadron interactions. In these processes pairs from gluons
259: appear almost simultaneously and recombine to various hadrons
260: [15]. The value $\overline n_g^h$ becomes bigger $\sim 2-3$, that
261: indicates this transition.
262:
263: At the top energy (200-900 GeV) the shoulder structure appears in
264: $P_n$ [16]. The comparison of data with one NBD does not describe
265: data. But the weighted superposition of two NBD gives a good
266: description of the shoulder structure $P_n(s)$ [6]. We modify our
267: GDM considering that the gluon fission is realized at higher
268: energies. The independent evaporation of gluons sources of hadrons
269: occures by single gluons and also groups from two and more fission
270: gluons. We name such groups of gluons - clans, too. Their
271: independent emergence and following hadronization is a content of
272: GDM. MD in GDM with two kinds of clans are:
273: $$ P_n(s)=\alpha _1\sum\limits_{m_1=0}^{Mg_1}\frac{e^{-\overline
274: m_1} \overline m_1^{m_1}}{m_1!} C^{n-2}_{m_1\cdot
275: N}\left(\frac{\overline n^h}
276: {N}\right)^{n-2}\left(1-\frac{\overline n^h} {N}\right)^{m_1\cdot
277: N-(n-2)}+
278: $$
279: \begin{equation}
280: \label{48} + \alpha
281: _2\sum\limits_{m_2=0}^{Mg_2}\frac{e^{-\overline m_2} \overline
282: m_2^{m_2}}{m_2!} C^{n-2}_{2\cdot m_2\cdot N}\left(\frac{\overline
283: n^h} {N}\right)^{n-2}\left(1-\frac{\overline n^h}
284: {N}\right)^{2\cdot m_2\cdot N-(n-2)},
285: \end{equation}
286: where $\alpha _1$ and $\alpha _2$ are the contribution single and
287: double gluon clans ($\alpha _1 + \alpha _2 =1$). The comparison
288: (\ref{48}) with experimental data for proton interactions at
289: $\sqrt s= 62.2$ GeV [16] gives the following values of parameters:
290: $N=7.06\pm 3.48$, $\overline m_1 =3.59 \pm 0.03$, $\overline
291: m_2=1.15\pm 0.25$, $\overline n_h=3.23\pm 0.14$, $Mg_1=8$,
292: $Mg_2=4$, $\alpha _1/\alpha _2 \sim 1.8$ at $\chi
293: ^2/$ndf=$9.12/13$ (Fig. 3).
294:
295: The main feature of our GDM approach is the dominance of active
296: gluons in MP. We expect the emergence of them in experiments at
297: high energy (SPS, RHIC) and the formation of quark-gluon plasma.
298: We consider that our QGS can be a candidate for this.
299:
300: \vspace*{3mm}
301:
302: {\bf 3.~~Study of $p\bar p$ annihilation}
303:
304: \vspace*{3mm}
305:
306: In the midst of hadron interactions the $p\bar p$ annihilation
307: shows up especially interesting. Experimental data at tens GeV/c
308: [18] point out on some maxima in differences between $p\bar p$ and
309: $pp$ inelastic topological cross sections what may witness about
310: the contribution of different mechanisms of MP
311: \begin{equation}
312: \label{50} \Delta \sigma _n(p\overline p -pp)= \sigma _n(p
313: \overline p) - \sigma _n (pp).
314: \end{equation}
315: The important information about them may be picked out from the
316: analysis of the second correlative moment for negative charged
317: particles $f_2^{--}$
318: \begin{equation}
319: \label{49} f_2^{--}=\overline {n_-(n_--1)}-{\overline{n}_-}^2.
320: \end{equation}
321: The negative value of second correlative moments is characteristic
322: for a more narrow MD than Poisson, and they indicate the
323: predominance of the hadronization stage in MP.
324:
325: At the initial stage of annihilation three valent $q\overline
326: q$-pairs ($uud$ and $\overline u \overline u \overline d$) are.
327: They can turn to the "leading" mesons which consist from: a)
328: valent quarks or b) valent and vacuum quarks. In the case a) only
329: three "leading" neutral pions (the "0" topology) or two charged
330: and one neutral "leading" mesons ("2" - topology) may form. In b)
331: case the "4"- and "6"- topology is realized for "leading" mesons.
332: We suggest that the formation neutron and antineutron (a charge
333: exchange) can be realized.
334:
335: We can suggest a simple scheme when some of active gluons are
336: formed at the moment of annihilation and fragment into hadrons. If
337: the GF for a single active gluon $Q_1(z)=[1+\overline n/N(z-1)]^N$
338: [3], then $f_2=Q_1^{''}(z)|_{z=1} -[Q_1(z)|_{z=1}]^2 = -(\overline
339: n^h)^2/N < 0.$ Reciprocally for m gluons GF and $f_2$ will be
340: \begin{equation}
341: \label{53} Q_m(z)=[1+\overline n^h/N(z-1)]^{mN}, \quad
342: f_2=-m(\overline n^h)^2/N.
343: \end{equation}
344: We consider that if $m$ grows while increasing the energy of the
345: colliding particles then $f_2$ will decrease almost linearly from
346: $m$. Such behavior qualitatively agrees with experimental data
347: [18]. According to GDM for $p\overline p$ annihilation and taking
348: into account three intermediate charged topologies and active
349: gluons, GF $Q(z)$ for final MD may be written as the convolution
350: gluon and hadron components:
351: $$Q(z)=c_0\sum\limits_m^{M_0}
352: P_m^G [1+\frac{\overline n^h}{N}(z-1)]^{mN}+c_2\sum\limits_m^{M_2}
353: z^2 P_m^G [1+\frac{\overline n^h}{N}(z-1)]^{mN}
354: +c_4\sum\limits_m^{M_4} z^4 P_m^G [1+\frac{\overline
355: n^h}{N}(z-1)]^{mN}.
356: $$
357: The parameters of $c_0$, $c_2$ and $c_4$ are determined as the
358: part of intermediate topology ("0", "2" or "4") to the
359: annihilation cross section ($c_0 + c_2 + c_4 =1).$ For the sake of
360: a simplicity we are limited by cut Poisson distribution with the
361: finite number of gluons for $P_m^G$. The comparison of the
362: experimental data (Fig. 4) gives the following values of
363: parameters: $\overline m=3.36 \pm 0.18$, $N=4.01\pm 0.61$,
364: $\overline n^h$=1.74 $\pm $0.26, the ratio $c_0$ : $c_2$ : $c_4$ =
365: 15 : 40 : 0.05 at $\chi ^2/ndf=5.77/4$ and $M_0 \sim M_2 \sim
366: 1-2$, $M_4\sim 4$.
367:
368: \begin{figure}[h!]% Fig.1.
369: \leavevmode
370: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
371: \centering
372: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3in, angle=0]{Clan62s.eps}
373: \caption{MD in GDM (clan).} \label{secondfig}
374: \end{minipage}\hfill
375: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
376: \centering
377: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3in, angle=0]{Dsigan.eps}
378: \caption{MD in $p\overline p$ at 14.75 GeV/c.} \label{threddfig}
379: \end{minipage}\\
380: \end{figure}
381:
382: \vspace*{3mm}
383:
384: {\bf 3.~~Soft photons}
385:
386: \vspace*{3mm}
387:
388: The production of photons in particle collisions at high energies
389: was studied in many experiments [19]. In project "Thermalization"
390: it is planned to investigate low energetic photons with $p_t \leq
391: 0.1GeV/c$ and $x \leq 0.01$ [8]. These photons are named soft
392: photons (SP). Experiments shown that measured cross sections of SP
393: are several times larger than the expected ones from QED inner
394: bremsstrahlung. Phenomenological models were proposed to explain
395: the SP excess (the glob model of Lichard and Van Hove [11]).
396:
397: We consider that at a certain moment the QGS or excited new
398: hadrons may set in an almost equilibrium state during a short
399: time. That is why, to describe massless photons, we have used the
400: black body emission spectrum. At 70 GeV/c an inelastic cross
401: section is equal to $\sim 40 mb$, the SP formation cross section
402: is about $4 mb$ [8] and since $ \sigma _{\gamma} \simeq n_{\gamma
403: }(T)\cdot \sigma _{in}$ then $n_{\gamma }\approx 0.1$. If
404: $n_{\gamma }$ and temperature $T(p)$ ($p$--momentum) are known,
405: then we can estimate the emission region size $L$ of SP. The
406: obtained values $L\sim 4-6 fm$ [4,5] that is reasonable size.
407:
408: In our study we had undertaken an attempt to give description in
409: different processes of MP by means of a unified approach based on
410: quark-gluon picture with using the phenomenological hadronisation.
411: We have obtained agreements of our schemes with experimental data
412: in $e^+e^-$, $p\overline p$ annihilation and $pp$ and nucleus
413: collisions in a very wide energy domain.
414:
415:
416:
417:
418: %The Proceedings of the Workshop will include all contributions.
419: %It will be issued after the Workshop.
420: %The {\bf deadline} for the contributions is {\bf 30 September 2005.}
421:
422: %%Recommended no more then 12 pages for contribution for 40 min. talk
423: %%and then 6 pages for contribution for 20 min. talk.
424: %
425: %Contribution for 40 min. talk limited by 12 pages and
426: %for 20 min. -- by 6 pages.
427: %
428: %Due to such limitations more than one level of headings is not recommended.
429: %
430: %Manuscripts will be accepted in both a hard--copy form (preferrable)
431: %and in the electronic form of monolithic PostScript file.
432: %
433: %Electronic version of Workshop Proceedings will be available,
434: %publications for it will be accepted in the PDF file format.
435: %
436: %Electronic contributions (PS and PDF files) should be sent via
437: %e-mail to\\
438: %\centerline{{\tt migulina@moonhe.jinr.ru}}
439: %
440: %Please, use Base64 encoding and subject "Dubna'2005".
441: %
442: %The Proceedings will be issued as a book of standard A4 size; so you
443: %should submit your hard--copy on standard A4 paper, where text area
444: %without page numbers should be 245 by 155 millimeters.
445: %You should not typeset page numbers.
446: %
447: %Paragraphs should have a first line indented by about 6~mm except where the
448: %paragraph is preceded by a heading.
449: %
450: %It is also important to reproduce the spacing of the text and
451: %headings as shown here. Text should be slightly more than
452: %single--spaced; typeset no more than 45 lines per page, 80 characters per line.
453: %
454: %Please preserve the style of the title, authors' and addresses'
455: %lists, headings, text font and line
456: %spacing in order to provide a uniform style for the
457: %proceedings volume.
458: %
459: %Equations should be centered and numbered consecutively.
460: %
461: %
462: %
463: %{\bf 2.~~Sizes and fonts}
464: %
465: %\vspace*{3mm}
466: %
467: %The title should be in 14~pt boldface and in uppercase.
468: %
469: %The authors' names should be in 12~pt roman.
470: %
471: %The addresses should be in 10~pt italic.
472: %
473: %The headings should be in 14~pt boldface and with arabic numbering.
474: %
475: %The abstract text should be in 10~pt.
476: %
477: %The figure captions should be in 10~pt.
478: %
479: %The table captions, table column heads and table body text
480: %should be in 10~pt.
481: %
482: %Footnote text should be in 10~pt, and reference text should be
483: %in 12~pt.
484: %
485: %\vspace*{3mm}
486: %
487: %{\bf 3.~~Tables}
488: %
489: %\vspace*{3mm}
490: %
491: %The tables should to have a uniform style throughout the
492: %paper. It does not matter how you choose to place
493: %the inner lines of the table.
494: %The top and bottom horizontal lines should be single, and
495: %there should be single
496: %vertical lines on the perimeter. For the inner
497: %lines of the table, it looks better if they are kept to a
498: %minimum.
499: %
500: %It is best to embed the tables in the text where they are first
501: %cited (see Table.1).
502: %
503: %The caption heading for a table should be placed at the
504: %top of the table.
505: %
506: %
507: %\vspace*{3mm}
508: %
509: %{\bf 4.~~Figures}
510: %
511: %
512: %\vspace*{3mm}
513: %
514: %Authors are advised to prepare their figures in black and white.
515: %Please prepare the figures in high resolution (at least 300 dpi) for half--tone
516: %illustrations or images. Half--tone pictures must be sharp enough
517: %for reproduction.
518: %
519: %It is best to embed the figures in the text where they are first
520: %cited (see Figure.1). Please horizontally center figures within text area.
521: %Recommended size for text embedded figures are from one third to one half
522: %of text area in vertical.
523: %
524: %The caption heading for a figure should be placed below that figure.
525: %
526: %
527: %\vspace*{3mm}
528: %
529: %{\bf 5.~~Citations}
530: %
531: %
532: %\vspace*{3mm}
533: %
534: %You should use square brackets for citation e.g. [2]. Please note that
535: %the citation should appear before the punctuation mark,
536: %e.g. [4], in the body text.
537: %
538: %
539: %\vspace*{3mm}
540: %
541: %{\bf 5.~~Final Manuscript}
542: %
543: %
544: %\vspace*{3mm}
545: %
546: %The final hard--copy that you submit must be absolutely clean and unfolded.
547: %It will be printed directly without any further editing. Use a printer
548: %that has a good resolution printout (600 dpi or higher). There should
549: %not be any corrections on the printed pages, nor should adhesive
550: %tape cover any lettering. Photocopies are not acceptable.
551: %
552: %Your manuscript will not be reduced or enlarged when filmed so please
553: %ensure that indices and other small pieces of text are legible.
554: %
555: %
556: %
557: %{\bf Acknowledgments}
558: %
559: %\vspace*{3mm}
560: %
561: %If you wish to acknowledge funding bodies etc.,
562: %the acknowledgments may be placed in a separate section at the end of the
563: %text, before the bibliography. This section should not be numbered.
564:
565: %\begin{figure}[h!]% Fig.1.
566: % \leavevmode
567: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
568: %\centering
569: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3in, angle=0]{Clan62s.eps}
570: %\caption{MD in GDM (clan).} \label{secondfig}
571: %\end{minipage}\hfill
572: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
573: %\centering
574: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3in, angle=0]{dsigan.eps}
575: %\caption{MD in $p\overline p$ at 14.75 GeV/c.} \label{threddfig}
576: %\end{minipage}\\
577: %\end{figure}
578:
579: \vspace*{3mm}
580:
581: {\bf References}
582:
583: \vspace*{3mm}
584:
585: \begin{tabular}{rp{135mm}}
586:
587: [1] &V.I.~Kuvshinov and E.S.~Kokoulina, Acta Phys.Polon., {\bf B13},
588: p.533, 1982.\\
589:
590: [2] &E.S.~Kokoulina, XI Ann.Sem. NPCS, Minsk, Belarus, 2002,
591: hep-ph/0209334; E.S.Kokoulina, ISMD32, 2002.\\
592:
593: [3] &E.S.~Kokoulina and V.A.~Nikitin, hep-ph/0308139;
594: E.S.Kokoulina, Acta Phys.Polon., {\bf B35}, p.295, 2004.\\
595:
596: [4] &E.S. Kokoulina and V.A. Nikitin, ISHEPP, 2004,
597: hep-ph/0502224; P.F. Ermolov et al., ISHEPP, 2004,
598: hep-ph/0503254.\\
599:
600: [5] &M.K.Volkov et al., Particles and Nuclei, Letters,
601: {bf 1}, p.16, 2004.\\
602:
603: [6] &A.~Giovannini, Nucl.Phys., {\bf B 161}, p.429, 1979;
604: A.~Giovannini and R.~Ugocioni, hep-ph/0405251.\\
605:
606: [7] &W.Braunschweig et al. Z. Physik $\bf {C 45}$, 193
607: (1989); H.W.Zheng et al. Phys. Rev. $\bf {D 42}$, 737 (1990);
608: P.Abreu et al. Z.Phys. $\bf {C 52}$, 271 (1991); P.D.Acton et. al.
609: Z.Physik. $\bf {C53}$, 539 (1992), Alexander G. et al. Z.Physik.
610: $\bf {C 72}$, 191 (1996); K.Acketstaff et al. Z.Physik. $\bf {C
611: 75}$, 193 (1997); G.Abbiendi et al. CERN-EP/99-178.\\
612:
613: [8] &P.F.Ermolov et al. Yad. Phys., {\bf 67}, p.108, 2004.\\
614:
615: [9] &V.V.Babintsev et al. IHEP preprint M-25, Protvino (1976); V.V.
616: Ammosov et al., Phys. Let., {\bf 42B}, p.519, 1972.\\
617:
618: [10] &O.G. Chikilev and P.V. Chliapnikov, Yad. Phys.,{ \bf55 },
619: p.820, 1992.\\
620:
621: [11] &P.Lichard and L.Van Hove, Phys.Let., {\bf B245}, p.605,
622: 1990.\\
623:
624: [12] &V.S. Murzin and L.I. Sarycheva.
625: \emph{Interactions of high energy hadrons}. Nauka, Moscow, 1983,
626: pp.194-207; V.G. Grishin, Phys. El.Part. and At.Yad., {bf 10},
627: p.608, 1979; K. Jaeger et al.,Phys. Rev., {bf D11}, p.2405,
628: 1975.\\
629:
630: [13] &K. Adcox et. al, Nucl.Phys., {bf A757}, p.184, 2005;
631: B. Alper et al, Nucl. Phys., {bf B100}, p.237, 1975.\\
632:
633: [14] &C.Bromberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {bfseries 31}, 1563 (1973);
634: W.M.Morse et al., Phys.R ev., {\bf D15}, 66 (1977); S.Barish et
635: al., Phys. Rev., {\bf D9}, 2689 (1974); A.Firestoun et al., Phys.
636: Rev.,{\bf D10}, 2080 (1974); P.Slattery, Phys.Rev., {\bf D7}, 2073
637: (1973).\\
638:
639: [15] &R.C.~ Hwa and C.B.~ Yang, Phys. Rev., {bf C67}, p.034902,
640: 2003; R.Hwa.\\
641:
642: [16] &G.I. Alner et al., Z. Phys., {bf C33}, p.1, 1986;
643: R.E.~ Ansorge et al., Z.Phys., {\bf C43}, p.357, 1989.\\
644:
645: [17] &A.~ Breakstoune et al., Phys.Rev., {bf D30}, p.528,
646: 1984.\\
647:
648: [18] &J.G. Rushbrooke and B.R. Webber, Phys. Rep., {bf C44},
649: p.1, 1978.\\
650:
651: [19] &P.V.Chliapnikov et al., Phys. Let., {\bf 141B}, 276 (1984);
652: S.Banerjee et al., Phys.Let.,{\bf B305},182 (1983); J.Antos et
653: al., Z.Phys., {\bf C59}, 547 (1993); J.F.Owens., Rev. Mod.Phys.,
654: {\bf 59},465 (1987).\\
655:
656:
657:
658: \end{tabular}
659:
660: \end{document}
661: