1: \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
2:
3: \usepackage{amsfonts}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{amsmath}
7: \usepackage{feynmf}
8: \usepackage{cancel}
9:
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: %Section dedicated to NEW COMMAND!
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: \newenvironment{size}%
14: {\small}
15:
16: \newcommand{\definmath}[2] {\newcommand{#1}{\ensuremath{#2}}}
17: %Puts a slash through a character
18: \newcommand{\slashchar}[1] {\cancel{#1}}
19: \newcommand{\emiss}{\slashchar{E}}
20: \newcommand{\ptmiss}{\slashchar{p}}
21:
22: %Layout commands:
23: \linespread{1.08}
24: \addtolength{\textwidth}{2cm}
25: \addtolength{\textheight}{3.1cm}
26: \setlength{\voffset}{-1cm}
27: \setlength{\hoffset}{-0.9cm}
28:
29: %Page style:
30: \usepackage{fancyhdr}
31: \pagestyle{fancy}
32: \fancyhf{}
33: \fancyhead[RO]{\thepage}
34: \fancyhead[LO]{\textit{TeV Mini Black Hole Decay at Future Colliders}}
35: \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
36: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37:
38: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
39: %{}
40: \begin{document}
41: \begin{titlepage}
42: \begin{flushleft}
43: {\Large\bf TeV Mini Black Hole Decay at Future Colliders}
44: \end{flushleft}
45:
46: \vspace{0.3cm}
47:
48: \begin{flushright}
49: \parbox[t]{13cm}{
50: {\bf Alex Casanova\dag, Euro Spallucci\ddag}\\[4pt]
51: {\footnotesize\dag Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica, Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Trieste and INFN, Sezione di Trieste}
52:
53: \vspace{0.5cm}
54:
55: {\footnotesize
56: {\bf Abstract}. It is generally believed that mini black holes decay by emitting elementary
57: particles with a black body energy spectrum. The original calculation lead to
58: the conclusion that about the $90$\% of the black hole mass is radiated away
59: in the form of photons, neutrinos and light leptons, mainly electrons and
60: muons.\\
61: With the advent of String Theory, such a scenario must be updated by including
62: new effects coming from the stringy nature of particles and interactions.
63: The main modifications with respect to the original picture of black hole
64: evaporation come from recent
65: developments of non-perturbative String Theory globally referred to as
66: \textit{TeV-Scale Gravity}. By taking for granted that black holes can be
67: produced in hadronic collisions, then their decay must take into account that:
68: (i) we live in a $D3$-Brane embedded into an higher dimensional bulk
69: spacetime; (ii) fundamental interactions, including gravity, are unified
70: at TeV energy scale.
71: Thus, the formal description of the Hawking radiation mechanism has to be
72: extended to the case of more than four spacetime dimensions and
73: include the presence of D-branes. This kind of topological defect in the
74: bulk spacetime fabric acts as a sort of ``~cosmic fly-paper~'' trapping
75: Electro-weak Standard Model elementary particles in our $(3+1)$-dimensional
76: universe. Furthermore, unification of fundamental interactions at an energy
77: scale many order of magnitude lower than the Planck energy implies that
78: any kind of fundamental particle, not only leptons, is expected to be emitted.\\
79: A detailed understanding of the new scenario is instrumental for optimal
80: tuning of detectors at future colliders, where, hopefully, this exciting new
81: physics will be tested.\\
82: In this article we review higher dimensional black hole decay, considering
83: not only the emission of particles according to Hawking mechanism, but also
84: their near horizon $QED/QCD$ interactions. The ultimate motivation is to build
85: up a phenomenologically reliable scenario, allowing a clear experimental
86: signature of the event.
87: }}
88: \end{flushright}
89:
90: \vspace{1cm}
91:
92: \noindent
93: {\footnotesize Submitted to: \textit{Class. Quantum Grav.}}
94:
95: \vspace{2cm}
96:
97: \noindent
98: {\footnotesize
99: \dag\; e-mail address: \texttt{casanova@infis.univ.trieste.it}\\
100: \ddag\; e-mail address: \texttt{spallucci@trieste.infn.it}}
101:
102: \end{titlepage}
103:
104: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
105: \section{Introduction}
106:
107: Recent developments, both in experimental and theoretical high energy physics,
108: seem to ``conjure'' the astonishing possibility to produce a mini black hole
109: in laboratory. From one hand, the next generation of particle accelerators,
110: as LHC, will reach a center of mass energy of $O(10)$ TeV; on the other
111: hand, non-perturbative String Theory, including $D$-branes, can accommodate
112: \textit{large} extra dimensions characterized by a compactification scale
113: many order of magnitude bigger than the Planck length. A promising realization
114: of these ideas is represented by ``TeV-Scale Gravity'' where it is possible
115: to introduce a unification scale, $M_*$, as low as some TeV (\cite{dvali:uno},
116: \cite{dvali:due}). If these theoretical models are correct
117: new exciting phenomenology (\cite{kc:origin}, \cite{hossen:uno})
118: is going to be observed at future colliders, as the physics of unified
119: interactions, including quantum gravity, will become accessible. No doubts, the
120: most spectacular expected event is a mini black hole production and
121: decay \cite{giddings:guida}. It has been conjectured
122: (\cite{thorne:hoop}, \cite{iop:rot}) that two partons
123: colliding with center of mass energy $\sqrt{\hat{s}}$ and impact parameter
124: smaller than the effective black hole event horizon radius $r_H(\sqrt{\hat{s}})$
125: will gravitationally collapse. One expects that proton-proton scattering at
126: LHC will produce, among many possible final states,
127: a rotating, higher dimensional, black hole \cite{myers:perry} with mass
128: $M_{BH}=\sqrt{\hat{s}}\sim 10$ TeV ; the estimated rate of black hole
129: production in geometrical approximation
130: (\cite{eardley:prod}, \cite{nambu:prod}, \cite{rychkov:prod}), is as high as one
131: per second (\cite{bh:lhc}, \cite{landsberg:due}),
132: less optimistic evaluations give $10^2-10^3$
133: per year. The evaporation mechanism considers mini black hole as
134: semi classical objects
135: %%%%%%%
136: \footnote{This is strictly valid only for black holes with masses $M_{BH}$
137: much above the fundamental higher dimensional Planck scale $M_*$
138: (see \cite{cav:due}).},
139: %%%%%%%
140: emitting particles with a black body energy spectrum \cite{art:hawk}
141: %%%%%%
142: \footnote{Throughout this paper we use the natural units $\hbar=c=k_B=1$.}:
143: %%%%%%
144:
145: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:spettroHawk}
146: \langle\, N\,\rangle_{\omega m s}=
147: \frac{\vert\, A\,\vert^2}{e^{\left(\, \omega-m\,\Omega_H\,\right) /T_{BH}}
148: -(-1)^{2s}}\; .
149: \end{equation}
150: Here, $\langle\, N\,\rangle_{\omega m s}$ is the average number of particles
151: with energy $\omega$, spin $s$, third component of angular momentum $m$,
152: emitted by a black hole with angular velocity $\Omega_H$ and temperature
153: $T_{BH}$. $|A|^2$ is the ``greybody factor''
154: accounting for the presence of a potential barrier surrounding the black hole.
155: All the relevant quantities (cross sections, decay rates, etc.)
156: are compute in the framework of relativistic quantum field theory,
157: which provides a low energy effective
158: description of black holes and particle interactions. From this point of view,
159: String Theory appears to provide ``only'' the general scenario, including extra
160: dimensions and $D$-branes, rather than computational techniques. On the other
161: hand, String Theory introduces the concept of \emph{minimal length} as the
162: minimal distance which can be physically probed
163: (\cite{euro:minlength1},\cite{euro:minlength2}). Including such
164: feature in the dynamics of black hole evaporation leads to a significant
165: change in the late phase of the process, as we shall discuss in the conclusion
166: of the paper.\\
167: The paper is organized as follows:
168: in Section \ref{sez:bhd} we recall the different phases of black hole
169: evaporation process, mainly focusing on Schwarzschild black hole decay.
170: In Section \ref{sez:qced} we consider the QED/QCD interaction among particles
171: directly emitted by black holes via Hawking mechanism;
172: thus, in Subsection \ref{sez:phch} we report some numerical results
173: about formation and development of photosphere and chromosphere
174: around a Schwarzschild black hole.
175: In Section \ref{sez:ult} we analize in more detail parton fragmentation
176: into hadrons and black hole emergent spectra: in Subsection \ref{sez:Hpost}
177: we consider the case in which a chromosphere forms and develops,
178: while in Subsection \ref{sez:Hdirect} the case in which simple near horizon
179: parton hadronization occurs.
180: In Section \ref{sez:conclu} we conclude with a brief summary of the results
181: and some open problems.
182:
183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
184: \section{Black Hole Decay}\label{sez:bhd}
185: By taking for granted that a mini black hole can be produced in hadronic
186: collisions, it will literally ``explode'' much before leaving any kind of
187: direct signal in the detectors
188: %%%%%%%%
189: \footnote{For an alternative scenario see \cite{casadio:uno}.}.
190: %%%%%%%%
191: From a theoretical point of view we can distinguish three main phases
192: in the decay process:
193:
194: \begin{enumerate}
195: \item {\bf Spin Down phase}: during this early stage the black hole
196: loses most of its angular momentum but only a fraction of its mass;
197: numerical simulations \cite{page:due} indicate that
198: $75$\% of angular momentum and about $25$\% of mass are radiated away.
199: Thus, more than one half of the mass is emitted after the black hole
200: has reached a non-rotating configuration.
201: \item {\bf Schwarzschild phase}: during this intermediate stage a spherically
202: symmetric, non-rotating, Schwarzschild black hole evaporates via Hawking
203: radiation, losing most of its mass.
204: \item {\bf Planck phase}: this is the final stage of evaporation, when the
205: residual mass approaches the fundamental Planck scale $M_*$, i.e.
206: $M_{BH}\simeq M_*$, and quantum gravity effects cannot be ignored.
207: \end{enumerate}
208:
209: \noindent
210: A characteristic feature of higher dimensional models, like ``TeV-Scale
211: Gravity'',
212: is that a $D$-dimensional black hole can emit energy and angular momentum
213: both in our $(3 + 1)$-dimensional ``brane-universe'' (\emph{brane emission}),
214: and in the $D$-dimensional ``bulk'' where the brane is embedded
215: (\emph{bulk emission}) \cite{emparan:BvsB}. A simple estimate suggests that
216: half energy is lost in the bulk \cite{cav:uno}; a more detailed
217: calculation
218: shows that black holes radiate mainly on the brane, even if the ratio between
219: energy emitted on the brane and in the bulk is not much greater than
220: one (\cite{kanti:finale},\cite{kanti:sca}).
221: As the Schwarzschild phase is considered the dominant stage,
222: and only the energy ($=$ particles) emitted on the brane can
223: be directly observed, we shall focus only on Schwarzschild black hole
224: brane emission, even if the black hole ``lives'' in $D=(4+n)$ dimensions.
225: In this case, equation (\ref{eqn:spettroHawk}) reads:
226:
227: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:sptHawknonrot}
228: \langle\, N\,\rangle_{\omega s}=
229: \frac{\vert\, A\,\vert^2}{e^{\omega /T_{BH}}-(-1)^{2s}}\; ,
230: \end{equation}
231: where
232:
233: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:temp}
234: T_{BH}=\frac{n+1}{4\pi\, r_H}\; ,
235: \end{equation}
236: and $r_H$ is the event horizon radius \cite{kanti:finale} given by
237: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:radhor}
238: r_H=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}\, M_*}\,
239: \left(\frac{M_{BH}}{M_*}\right)^\frac{1}{n+1}
240: \left(\frac{8\Gamma\left(\, \frac{n+3}{2}\,\right)}{n+2}\right)^\frac{1}{n+1}\;.
241: \end{equation}
242: In order to calculate power, $P$, and flux, $F$, emitted on brane
243: we proceed as follows.\\
244: First of all we calculate the ``greybody factor'' $\vert\, A\,\vert^2$
245: in equation (\ref{eqn:sptHawknonrot}). The ``greybody factor'' accounts for the
246: influence of spacetime curvature on particle motion; a particle created
247: near the event horizon must cross a ``gravitational potential barrier''
248: in order to escape to infinity \cite{misner:gravitation}.
249: Regarding brane emission, the ``greybody factor'' can be calculated as a
250: transmission factor across the potential barrier of the $(4+n)$-dimensional
251: Schwarzschild metric projected on the brane:
252:
253: \begin{equation} \label{met:schwBR}
254: ds^2=-\left[\ 1-\left(\, \frac{r_H}{r}\, \right)^{n+1}\, \right]\, dt^2+
255: \left[\, 1-\left(\, \frac{r_H}{r}\,\right)^ {n+1}\,\right]^{-1}dr^2+r^2\,
256: \left(\, d\theta^2 +\sin^2 \theta d\varphi^2\, \right)\;.
257: \end{equation}
258:
259: \noindent
260: Once $|A|^2$ is known (\cite{kanti:sca}, \cite{kanti:fermvet},
261: \cite{cvetic:finn}), it is possible to define a greybody cross section
262: \cite{teott:gen} as:
263: \begin{equation} \label{eqn:ottgen}
264: \sigma^{(s)}_{gb}\left(\,\omega\,\right)=\frac{\pi}{\omega^2}\,(2j+1)!\,\vert\,
265: A\,\vert^2\; ,
266: \end{equation}
267: where $j$ is the total angular momentum of the particle emitted by black hole.
268:
269: \begin{figure}[htb]
270: \begin{center}
271: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=7.5cm]{grey0.ps}
272: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=7.5cm]{grey05.ps}
273: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=7.5cm]{grey1.ps}
274: \caption{\small Greybody cross section for brane emission from a
275: (4+n)-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole, for with spin 0,
276: $\frac{1}{2}$ and 1 particles (Reprinted figures with permission from
277: \cite{kanti:finale}. Copyright SISSA/ISAS 2003).}
278: \label{fig:GBF}
279: \end{center}
280: \end{figure}
281: \noindent
282: The results obtained in \cite{kanti:finale} is shown in Figure \ref{fig:GBF};
283: we can see that
284: \begin{itemize}
285: \item greybody factor is a function of particle energy ($\omega$) and spin
286: ($s$);
287: \item greybody factor depends on the number $n$ of extra dimensions,
288: which lead to conclude that it will be possible to ``measure'' the number of
289: extra dimensions at future colliders (\cite{kanti:review}, \cite{harris:art2},
290: \cite{rizzo:bhlhc});
291: \item asymptotically the greybody factor tends to geometric optics cross
292: section
293:
294: \begin{equation}
295: \sigma_{g.o.}=\pi\left(\,\frac{n+3}{2}\, \right)^{2/(n+1)}\,
296: \left(\,\frac{n+3}{n+1}\,\right)\, r_H^2\; ,
297: \end{equation}
298:
299: because of the finiteness of the gravitational potential barrier,
300: i.e. the potential barrier has a maximum of energy $\omega_{max}$ given by:
301: \begin{equation}
302: \omega_{max}= \frac{1}{r_H}\sqrt{\frac{n+1}{n+3}}\,\left(\,
303: \frac{n+3}{2}\,\right)^{-\frac{1}{n+1}}\;.
304: \end{equation}
305: \noindent
306: When a particle is emitted with an
307: energy $\omega\gtrsim\omega_{max}$ the black hole behaves as an ideal black
308: body
309: with area $\sigma_{g.o.}$.
310: \end{itemize}
311: By integrating equation (\ref{eqn:sptHawknonrot}) we can obtain the contribution
312: of spin $s$, Standard Model particle, to $P$ and $F$:
313: \begin{itemize}
314: \item for $\omega \in [0,\omega_{max}]$, we integrate thermal spectrum
315: (\ref{eqn:sptHawknonrot}) with greybody factor $\sigma^{(s)}_{gb}(\omega)$;
316: \item for $\omega \in [\omega_{max},\infty]$, we integrate thermal spectrum
317: (\ref{eqn:sptHawknonrot}) with optical geometric cross section $\sigma_{g.o.}$.
318: \end{itemize}
319: Thus, we find
320:
321: \begin{equation}
322: P=\left(\frac{dE}{dt}\right)=\frac{1}{2\pi^2}\, \int_0^{\omega_{max}}d\omega\,
323: \omega^3\,
324: \frac{\sigma^{(s)}_{gb}(\omega)}{e^{\omega/T_{BH}}-(-1)^{2s}}
325: +\frac{1}{2\pi^2}\,\int_{\omega_{max}}^\infty\,d\omega\,\omega^3\,
326: \frac{\sigma_{g.o.}\, }{e^{\omega/T_{BH}}-(-1)^{2s}}\; ,
327: \end{equation}
328: and
329:
330: \begin{equation}
331: F=\left(\frac{dN}{dt}\right)=\frac{1}{2\pi^2}\,\int_0^{\omega_{max}}d\omega\,
332: \omega^2\,
333: \frac{\sigma^{(s)}_{gb}(\omega)}{e^{\omega/T_{BH}}-(-1)^{2s}}+\frac{1}{2\pi^2}
334: \int_{\omega_{max}}^\infty d\omega\,\omega^2\,
335: \frac{\sigma_{g.o.}}{e^{\omega/T_{BH}}-(-1)^{2s}}\;.
336: \end{equation}
337: %
338: Accounting for color and spin and considering an equal number of particles and
339: antiparticles emitted by black hole, we find the power and flux emitted by a
340: $(4+n)$-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole on brane through different type
341: of Standard Model particles, as reported in Table \ref{tab:PF}.
342:
343: \begin{table}[htb]
344: \begin{center}
345: \begin{tabular}{|l||r|r|r|r|}
346: \hline {\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}}
347: \textsc{Power} & $n=0$ & $n=2$ & $n=4$ & $n=6$ \\[6pt]
348: \hline
349: Quarks & 64,9\% & 62,9\% & 61,8\% & 61,3\% \\
350: Charged Leptons & 10,8\% & 10,5\% & 10,3\% & 10,2\% \\
351: Neutrinos & 5,4\% & 5,2\% & 5,2\% & 5,1\% \\
352: Photons & 1,4\% & 1,7\% & 1,8\% & 1,9\% \\
353: Gluons & 11,3\% & 13,5\% & 14,5\% & 14,9\% \\
354: Weak bosons & 4,3\% & 5,1\% & 5,4\% & 5,6\% \\
355: Higgs & 1,9\% & 1,0\% & 1,0\% & 1,0\% \\
356: \hline
357: \end{tabular}\\[10pt]
358: \begin{tabular}{|l||r|r|r|r|}
359: \hline {\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm} }
360: \textsc{Flux} & $n=0$ & $n=2$ & $n=4$ & $n=6$ \\[6pt]
361: \hline
362: Quarks & 66,5\% & 64,1\% & 62,1\% & 60,8\% \\
363: Charged Leptons & 11,1\% & 10,7\% & 10,4\% & 10,1\% \\
364: Neutrinos & 5,5\% & 5,3\% & 5,2\% & 5,1\% \\
365: Photons & 1,2\% & 1,5\% & 1,8\% & 1,9\% \\
366: Gluons & 9,3\% & 12,4\% & 14,1\% & 15,2\% \\
367: Weak bosons & 3,5\% & 4,6\% & 5,3\% & 5,7\% \\
368: Higgs & 3,1\% & 1,3\% & 1,2\% & 1,2\% \\
369: \hline
370: \end{tabular}
371: \caption{Power and Flux emitted by a (4+$n$)-dimensional Schwarzschild black
372: hole on brane through Standard Model particles.}
373: \label{tab:PF}
374: \end{center}
375: \end{table}
376: \noindent
377: We see that $\approx 75$\% of decay products are quarks,
378: anti quarks and gluons, while only $\approx 12$\% are charged leptons and
379: photons,
380: each particle carrying hundreds GeV of energy.
381: We conclude that the black hole decay is dominated by partons; since they
382: cannot be directly observed, we must to take into account fragmentation
383: into hadrons. Therefore, in next section we are going to study the effects of
384: $QED/QCD$ interactions (not only hadronization) among particles emitted near
385: event horizon, in order to understand what kind of spectra we can expect to
386: detect.
387:
388: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
389: \section{QED and QCD Effects}\label{sez:qced}
390:
391: In previous section we have outlined the evaporation process of a mini black
392: hole produced at colliders, with a main focus on the ``Schwarzschild Phase'',
393: concluding that brane black hole emission is dominated by quarks and gluons.
394: This emission, which we shall call ``\emph{direct emission}'', consists in the
395: near horizon creation of Standard Model particles through Hawking Mechanism
396: and in their flowing to infinity. However, the picture consisting of
397: Standard Model elementary
398: particles freely escaping to infinity with a black body energy spectrum
399: must be somehow improved by including QCD interaction effects as black hole
400: emission is dominated by quarks and gluons. The inclusion of their interactions
401: is instrumental to build up phenomenologically reliable model predicting
402: the form of the spectrum to be looked for.
403:
404: In the next section we shall consider in more detail
405: parton fragmentation into hadrons, here we are going to discuss something
406: which could happen before hadronization, i.e. the appearance of a quark-gluon
407: plasma around the black hole (\cite{heckler:uno}, \cite{heckler:due}).
408: One starts by considering quarks and gluons emitted
409: according to a black body law. It follows that the parton density
410: near the event horizon grows as $T_{BH}^3$. If temperature is high enough,
411: i.e. above some critical value,
412: one expects from $QCD$ quarks and gluons to interact through
413: ``\emph{bremsstrahlung}'' and ``\emph{pair production}'' processes.
414: These reactions are $2\rightarrow 3$ body processes increasing the number
415: of quarks and gluons nearby black hole and leading to a kind of quark/gluon
416: plasma surrounding the event horizon. While propagating through this plasma
417: quarks and gluons lose energy. When the average energy is low enough partons
418: fragment into hadrons.\\
419: Similar arguments can be applied to photons, electrons and positrons as well,
420: provided we replace $QCD$ interactions with the corresponding $QED$ processes.
421: Thus, we can define two distinct regions surrounding the black hole as follows:
422: \begin{itemize}
423: \item {\bf Photosphere}, is the spatial region around the black hole where
424: ``QED-brems\-strahlung'' and ``QED-pair production'' lead to formation
425: of an $e^\pm, \gamma$ plasma;
426: \item {\bf Chromosphere}, is the spatial region around black hole where
427: ``QCD-bremsstrahl\-ung'' and ``QCD-pair production'' lead to formation of a
428: quark/gluon plasma.
429: \end{itemize}
430: Spectrum distortion induced by the two ``atmospheres'' defined above will
431: be discussed in the remaining part of this section.
432:
433: An analytic description of photosphere and chromosphere dynamics is not
434: available at present; the best one can do is to resort to numerical resolution
435: of Boltzmann equation for the interacting particle
436: distribution function \cite{cline:num}. In order to get a first insight
437: of the phenomena we are considering, we shall introduce a further
438: simplification: we shall use ``flat spacetime'' diffusion relations even if
439: we are going to study the problem in the geometry of a Schwarzschild black
440: hole.\\
441: The number $ dn\left(\, \vec{p}\, ,r\, \right)$
442: of particles per unit volume element with momentum between $\vec{p}$ and
443: $\vec{p}+d\vec{p}$ is
444: $$
445: dn\left(\,\vec{p}\, ,r\,\right)= f\left(\,\vert\, \vec{p}\,\vert\ ,r\,\right)\,
446: d^3p\,r^2 \, dr\, d\Omega\; ,
447: $$
448: where the distribution function $f\left(\,\vert\, \vec{p}\,\vert\ ,r\,\right)$
449: solves the Boltzmann equation
450: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:boltzrad}
451: \frac{\partial}{\partial r}f\left(\, p\ ,p_t\ ,r\,\right)=
452: \frac{1}{v_r}C[f\left(\, p\ ,p_t\ ,r\,\right)]\;.
453: \end{equation}
454: In (\ref{eqn:boltzrad}) we introduced the radial velocity $v_r$, the transverse
455: component of the momentum $p_t$ and defined $p\equiv|\,\vec{p}\,|$. $C[\, f\, ]$
456: is the \emph{collision term} built out of scattering cross sections encoding
457: information about interactions taking place inside photo and chromosphere.
458:
459: According to QED (QCD), electrons and positrons (quarks and antiquarks) can lose
460: energy through the emission of photons (gluons):
461: $
462: e^\pm e^\pm\rightarrow e^\pm e^\pm\gamma \, (qq\rightarrow qqg).
463: $
464: Corresponding Feynman diagram is:
465: \begin{center}
466: \begin{fmffile}{brems}
467: \begin{fmfgraph}(80,80)
468: \fmfpen{thick}
469: \fmfbottom{i1,i2}
470: \fmftop{o1,o2,o3}
471: \fmf{fermion}{i2,v3,o3}
472: \fmf{photon}{v2,v3}
473: \fmf{fermion}{i1,v2,v1,o2}
474: \fmf{photon}{v1,o1}
475: \fmfdotn{v}{3}
476: \end{fmfgraph}
477: \end{fmffile}
478: \end{center}
479: In the ultra-relativistic limit, differential cross section in the center of
480: mass frame reads \cite{jauch:rohrlich}:
481: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:bremsdiff}
482: \frac{d\sigma}{d\omega}\approx\frac{\alpha^3}{E\omega m_f^2}
483: \left[\frac{4}{3}\left(E-\omega\right)+\frac{\omega^2}{E}\right]\times
484: \left[\log\left(\frac{4E^2(E-\omega)}{m^2_f\omega}\right)-\frac{1}{2}\right]\; ,
485: \end{equation}
486: where $m_f$ is the fermion mass, $\alpha$ is the electromagnetic (strong)
487: coupling costant, $E$ is the initial energy of each fermion, and
488: $\omega$ is the energy of emitted photon (gluon).\\
489: %The equation (\ref{eqn:bremsdiff}) implies that the probability to emit a
490: %photon diverges as its energy goes to zero; however, the emission of a zero
491: %energy photon has not effect on electron that emits it, since the electron
492: %will not lose energy. Therefore, either to eliminate the divergence
493: %in (\ref{eqn:bremsdiff}) or to account those photons which carry away
494: %significant energy,
495: To avoid infra-red divergences, it is convenient to use energy-averaged
496: total cross section (\cite{heckler:uno}, \cite{cline:num}):
497: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:brems}
498: \sigma\left(\,E\,\right) =
499: \int_0^\infty \frac{\omega}{E}\left(\, \frac{d\sigma}{d\omega}\,\right)
500: d\omega\approx \frac{\alpha^3}{m_f^2}\log\left(\frac{2E}{m_f}\right)\;.
501: \end{equation}
502: %\subsection{QED: Pair production}
503: The same type of cross section is obtained for pair production,
504: $
505: e^\pm\gamma\rightarrow e^\pm e^+ e^- \, (qg\rightarrow q\overline{q}q)
506: $; corresponding Feynman diagram is:
507: \begin{center}
508: \begin{fmffile}{pp}
509: \begin{fmfgraph*}(80,80)
510: \fmfpen{thick}
511: \fmfbottom{i1,i2}
512: \fmftop{o1,o2,o3}
513: \fmf{fermion}{i1,v2,v3,o3}
514: \fmf{fermion}{o1,v1,o2}
515: \fmf{photon}{v1,v2}
516: \fmf{photon}{i2,v3}
517: \fmfdotn{v}{3}
518: \end{fmfgraph*}
519: \end{fmffile}
520: \end{center}
521: At order $\alpha^3$ one finds:
522:
523: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:pp}
524: \sigma\left(\,\omega\,\right)
525: \approx\frac{\alpha^3}{m_f^2}\log\left(\frac{2\omega}{m_f}\right)\;,
526: \end{equation}
527: where $\omega$ is the incoming photon (gluon) energy.\\
528: Since $\sigma \propto 1/ m^2_f $, \emph{heavy fermions minimally affect
529: photo/chromosphere development}, and justify photo/chromosphere description
530: in terms of electrons, positrons and light quarks alone, as in \cite{cline:num}.
531:
532: Scattering processes discussed above do not occur in vacuum, rather they
533: take place in an hot plasma of almost-radially moving particles, which is what
534: we call photo/chromosphere. A simple way to take into account finite
535: temperature effects consists in replacing vacuum fermion masses
536: ($m_f$ in (\ref{eqn:brems}) and (\ref{eqn:pp})) with their thermal counterparts
537: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:mth}
538: m_{th}^2=m_f^2+M^2\left(\, T\,\right)\; ,
539: \end{equation}
540: where $T$ is the plasma temperature and $M$ is often referred to as the plasma
541: mass.\\The position (\ref{eqn:mth}) gives the propagator pole in momentum space
542: with an accuracy of $10$\% \cite{weldon:temp}.
543: For finite temperature gauge theories, one finds
544: $$
545: M^2\left(\, T\, \right)=g^2\, C\left(\, R\, \right)\, \frac{T^2}{8}\; ,
546: $$
547: where $g$ is gauge coupling constant, $C(R)$ is the quadratic Casimir invariant
548: for gauge group representation $R$. Relevant values of $C(R)$ in numerical
549: computations \cite{cline:num} are: $C(R)=1$ and $C(R)=4/3$ corresponding to
550: $U(1)$ and $SU(3)$ fundamental representation, respectively.
551: In the hot plasma scenario, fermions move inside
552: photo/chromosphere as ``free'' particles with a temperature dependent
553: effective mass $m_{th}$.\\
554: In next subsection we shall report main results for a numerical resolution of
555: Boltzmann equation (\ref{eqn:boltzrad}).
556:
557: \subsection{Numerical Results}\label{sez:phch}
558:
559: Let us start this subsection by investigating formation and development of
560: photo/chro\-mosphere around a four-dimensional Schwarzschild black
561: hole \cite{cline:num}, then we shall discuss as photo/\-chromosphere features
562: depend from the number of extra-dimensions.
563:
564: \subsubsection{Photosphere.}
565:
566: We already mentioned that scattering processes become important only beyond
567: some critical temperature $T_c^{QED}$.\\
568: Let us introduce $\mathcal{N}(r)$ as the number of collisions a typical
569: particle undergoes between the event horizon and some larger radius $r>r_H$.
570: $\mathcal{N}(r)$ can be written in terms of the bremsstrahlung and
571: pair production mean free path, $\lambda(r)$, as
572: $$
573: \mathcal{N}(r)=\int_{r_H}^r \frac{dr}{\lambda(r)}\;.
574: $$
575: We say that a photosphere surrounds the black hole if every particle is
576: scattered at least once between the event horizon and infinity:
577: \begin{equation}\label{ct}
578: \lim_{r\rightarrow \infty} \mathcal{N}(r)\geq 1.
579: \end{equation}
580: Thus, the critical temperature $T_c^{QED}$ is the black hole temperature
581: giving one for the limit (\ref{ct}). From numerical analysis we get
582: %%%%%%%%%%
583: \footnote{In \cite{heckler:uno}, $T_c^{QED}\simeq 45.2$ GeV.}:
584: %%%%%%%%%%
585: $$
586: T_c^{QED}\simeq 50\mbox{ GeV}.
587: $$
588:
589: Another important photosphere parameter is the inner radius $r_i$ which can be
590: defined by $\mathcal{N}\left(\, r_i\, \right)=1$,
591: i.e. the mean radial distance for a particle to be scattered once.
592: %
593: \begin{figure}[htb]
594: \begin{center}
595: \includegraphics[width=7.6cm]{fig6.eps}
596: \end{center}
597: \caption{\small Radii for inner photosphere surface for different temperatures;
598: remember that 1 GeV$^{-1}\simeq 0.197$ fm (Reprinted figure with permission
599: from \cite{cline:num}. Copyright 1999 by The American Physical Society).}
600: \label{fig:6}
601: \end{figure}
602: %{}
603: Data fit (Figure \ref{fig:6}) gives
604: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:inner}
605: \begin{array}{cc}
606: r_i=\frac{1}{\kappa T_{BH}},& \kappa=(6.446\pm 0.003)\times 10^{-4}.\\
607: \end{array}
608: \end{equation}
609: The inverse dependence from the temperature is due to the fact that
610: bremstrahlung and pair production mean free path decreases with the temperature.
611: Thus, the inner edge of the photosphere is closer to
612: the event horizon.
613: By inserting $r_H=\frac{1}{4\pi T_{BH}}$ in (\ref{eqn:inner}) we get:
614: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:rirH}
615: r_i=\frac{4\pi}{\kappa}r_H\simeq 2\times 10^4 r_H.
616: \end{equation}
617: Even in the case $D\geq 5$, we would not expect a different behavior
618: for inner radius.
619: Indeed, bremsstrahlung and pair production are scattering processes involving
620: Standard Model particles bound to the $D3$-brane.\\
621: From an experimental point of view, it is important to know the
622: average final energy $\overline{E}_f$ of particles when they start propagating
623: without significant interactions, i.e. the particle average energy at outer
624: photosphere surface, because this is the expected energy to be eventually
625: released in a detecting device.
626: %
627: \begin{figure}[htb]
628: \begin{center}
629: \includegraphics[width=7.6cm]{fig9a.eps}
630: \end{center}
631: \caption{\small Particle average energy at outer photosphere surface versus
632: temperature for $T_{BH}\leq 1.5$ TeV (Reprinted figure with permission from
633: \cite{cline:num}. Copyright 1999 by The American Physical Society).}
634: \label{fig:9}
635: \end{figure}
636: %
637: Figure \ref{fig:9} shows $\overline{E}_f$ for different black hole temperature
638: $T_{BH}$.
639: %
640: \begin{table}[htb]
641: \begin{center}
642: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|}
643: \hline {\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}}
644: $T_{BH}$ (GeV) & 60 & 300 & 1000 \\
645: \hline {\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}}
646: $\overline{E}_f$ (GeV)& $97.0$ & $79.5$ & $44.2$ \\
647: \hline
648: \end{tabular}
649: \end{center}
650: \caption{\small Average final energy for some values of temperature
651: (Reprinted table with permission from \cite{cline:num}.
652: Copyright 1999 by The American Physical Society).}
653: \label{tab:e_f}
654: \end{table}
655: %
656: In Table \ref{tab:e_f} we report some values extrapolated from
657: Figure \ref{fig:9}. Since, in the first approximation, particles are emitted
658: with a black body spectrum, the average energy of a particle close to the event
659: horizon is given by $\overline{E}_i\sim 3T_{BH}$; thus, we notice that for
660: $T_{BH}=60$ GeV, $\overline{E}_f$ is
661: not much different from $\overline{E}_i$,
662: because the temperature is only a little higher than
663: $T_c^{QED}$. In this regime the rate
664: of bremsstrahlung and pair production processes is not high enough to decrease
665: in a significant way particle energy. On the other hand, for $T_{BH}= 1000$ GeV,
666: $\overline{E}_f$
667: is much smaller than its initial value.
668: These results display in a clear way the role of the photosphere: above
669: a critical temperature the number of particles grows and the
670: average energy decreases. This effect is enhanced at higher black hole
671: temperature. Figure \ref{fig:11} shows up this behavior in a quite evident way.
672: %
673: \begin{figure}[htb]
674: \begin{center}
675: \includegraphics[width=7.6cm]{fig11a.eps}
676: %
677: \includegraphics[width=7.6cm]{fig11b.eps}
678: \end{center}
679: \caption{\small Particle number versus energy for a 4D Schwarzschild
680: black hole with $T_{BH}=1000$ GeV. {\bf (a)\,:} near the horizon.
681: {\bf (b)\,:} at the outer photosphere surface
682: (Reprinted figures with permission from \cite{cline:num}.
683: Copyright 1999 by The American Physical Society).}
684: \label{fig:11}
685: \end{figure}
686: %{}
687:
688: \subsubsection{Chromosphere.}
689:
690: By following the same procedure adopted for the photosphere, we find
691: $$
692: T_c^{QCD}\simeq 175\mbox{ MeV}.
693: $$
694: This result agrees with the analytic estimate in \cite{heckler:uno}. Thus,
695: we conclude that whenever black hole temperature is high enough to produce
696: a photosphere, then a chromosphere must be present as well. In such a case,
697: the chromosphere inner radius is close to the horizon, i.e.
698: $r_i\sim r_H$: a black hole with temperature
699: $T_{BH}\gtrsim T_c^{QCD}$
700: emits interacting quarks and gluons in the strong coupling regime
701: with initial black body average energy $\overline{E}_i\sim 3T_{BH}$.
702: As they propagate towards infinity their average energy decreases below
703: $\Lambda_{QCD}$ and then fragment into hadrons. In this way,
704: one finds the average final energy for quarks and gluons to be
705: $$
706: \overline{E}_f\sim 200-300\mbox{ MeV}.
707: $$
708: Transition from partons into hadrons ``marks'' the position of chromosphere
709: edge. Chromosphere emerging particle spectrum is fairly different from the direct
710: emission spectrum, as there are many more particles with a lower average energy
711: (Figure \ref{fig:18}).
712: %
713: \begin{figure}[htb]
714: \begin{center}
715: \includegraphics[width=7.6cm]{fig18a.eps}
716: %
717: \includegraphics[width=7.6cm]{fig18b.eps}
718: \end{center}
719: \caption{\small Particle number versus energy for a 4D Schwarzschild black hole
720: with $T_{BH}=1.5$ GeV. {\bf (a)\,:} Hawking emission spectrum at the horizon
721: and {\bf (b)\,:} final spectrum emerging from chromosphere (Reprinted figures
722: with permission from \cite{cline:num}.
723: Copyright 1999 by The American Physical Society).}
724: \label{fig:18}
725: \end{figure}
726:
727: \subsubsection{Concluding Remarks.}
728:
729: Main results obtained in this section can be summarized as follows:
730: \begin{itemize}
731: \item the presence of a photosphere, or a chromosphere,
732: surrounding the event horizon
733: implies a proliferation of emitted particles; energy conservation leads to a
734: lower average energy per particle. Thus, direct emission spectrum is modified:
735: a black hole with horizon temperature $T_{BH}=1.5$ GeV, effectively behaves
736: as black body at temperature about 100 MeV (Figure \ref{fig:18}).\\
737: When emitted particle interactions are properly accounted for,
738: the ``free'' Hawking spectrum is shifted to a an effective black body spectrum
739: to a temperature lower than the black hole temperature.
740: \item Whenever $T_{BH}\gtrsim \Lambda_{QCD}$, black hole emits quarks and
741: gluons and direct emission is partons dominated (Table \ref{tab:PF});
742: furthermore, since $T_c^{QCD}\lesssim \Lambda_{QCD}$,
743: strongly coupled quarks and gluons form a chromosphere
744: surrounding the event horizon. Thus, one concludes
745: that final particle spectra will be dominated by hadrons,
746: coming from parton confinement, and their decay products.
747: \end{itemize}
748: Results reported in this section have been obtained in the
749: geometry of a four-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole. However, examining
750: a more general $D$-dimensional case, the following features have to be taken
751: into account:
752: \begin{itemize}
753: \item scattering processes introduced previously are
754: $D$-independent, because they involve only $3$-Brane confined Standard Model
755: particles; so cross sections (\ref{eqn:brems}) and (\ref{eqn:pp})
756: are unaffected;
757: \item brane emission is an intrinsically four-dimensional process, thus,
758: photo/chromo\-sphere dynamics, emitted power, emitted particle number,
759: average initial
760: energy, near horizon particle density don't change in higher dimensions;
761: \item brane emission is dominated by quarks and gluons independently of $D$,
762: furthermore flux percentages of partons and photons, electrons and
763: positrons, are quite constant.
764: \end{itemize}
765: All these considerations lead us to conclude that the four
766: dimensional picture of black hole decay does not significantly change
767: when moving to higher dimensions.
768:
769: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
770: \section{Hadronization and Emergent Spectra}\label{sez:ult}
771:
772: We have seen in previous sections that final spectra, to be measured by
773: an asymptotic observer, are
774: going to
775: be dominated by hadrons, coming from parton confinement, and their decay
776: products,
777: mainly photons, neutrinos and $e^\pm$. For this reason, we are going to
778: consider first quarks and gluons
779: hadronization
780: and then black hole emergent spectra in two cases: i) a chromosphere forms
781: and develops; ii) simple near
782: horizon
783: parton hadronization occurs (as in \cite{macgibbon:webber}).
784:
785: In order to recall some usefull formula to study hadronization and hadron
786: decay processes, we are going to determine the \emph{ $\pi^0$ decay photon
787: emergent spectrum}.\\
788: Let us consider the formation of a neutral, light, $\pi^0$ meson.
789: Light mesons, like $\pi^0$, represent very likely decay products
790: for heavy hadrons. Furthermore, the preferential
791: decay channel, $\pi^0\longrightarrow \gamma + \gamma$, produces two photons
792: which can be easily detected.\\
793: Hadronization is an intrinsically non-perturbative effect.
794: As such it is difficult to describe in the framework of $QCD$.
795: Our ignorance about color non-perturbative dynamics can be parametrized in terms
796: of the so-called \emph{hadronization function}.
797: For a neutral pion the hadronization function reads \cite{cline:num}:
798:
799: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:pion}
800: \frac{dg_{j\pi}(Q,E_\pi)}{dE_\pi}=\frac{15}{16}\sqrt{\frac{Q}{E_\pi^3}}
801: \left(1-\frac{E_\pi}{Q}\right)^2\; ,
802: \end{equation}
803: where $g_{j\pi}(Q,E_\pi)$ denotes the number of $\pi^0$ produced in the
804: energy range $[E_\pi,E_\pi+dE_\pi]$ by an energy $Q$ parton of the
805: $j$-th kind. Thus, the flux of neutral pions emitted by a black hole,
806: per unit time, in the energy range $[E_\pi,E_\pi+dE_\pi]$ can be written as
807:
808: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:pionflux}
809: \frac{dN_\pi}{dE_\pi dt}= \sum_j \int_{E_\pi}^\infty dQ \frac{dg_{j\pi}(Q\ ,
810: E)}{dE_\pi}\,\frac{dN_j}{dQdt}\; ,
811: \end{equation}
812: where the sum runs over all the parton species relevant to neutral pion
813: formation.\\
814: As mentioned above, we can follow two approaches to clarify the physical meaning
815: of the term $dN_j/dQ\, dt$:
816: \begin{itemize}
817: \item \emph{Direct Hadronization}: $\frac{dN_j}{dQdt}$ denotes the number
818: of $j$-th species partons emitted
819: near the black hole horizon, per unit time, in the energy range between $Q$
820: and
821: $Q+dQ$, according with a black body spectrum
822:
823: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:flux}
824: \frac{dN_j}{dQ dt}= \frac{\sigma_{gb}^{(s)}(Q)}{\pi^2}\frac{Q^2}{e^{Q/T_{
825: BH}}-(-1)^{2s}}\; ,
826: \end{equation}
827: where $s$ is the parton spin, and $\sigma_{gb}^{(s)}$ is
828: the grey-body cross section (Figure \ref{fig:GBF}). Once emitted near the
829: horizon,quarks and gluons freely propagate toward infinity. However, when the
830: relative distance becomes higher than the threshold value
831: $\Lambda_{QCD}^{-1}\sim 1$ fm, then hadronization
832: starts.
833:
834: \item \emph{Hadronization after chromosphere formation}: differently from the
835: preceeding case, once emitted near the horizon,
836: quarks and gluons propagate toward infinity forming a chromosphere,
837: as discussed previously. Thus, $\frac{dN_j}{dQ\, dt}$ denotes the flux
838: of the $j$-th species partons
839: near the outer boundary of the chromosphere; this flux can be evaluated
840: following the method shown in reference \cite{cline:num}.
841: \end{itemize}
842: Then, the number of emergent photons, per unit time, in the energy range
843: $[E_\gamma,E_\gamma+dE_\gamma]$ is given by
844: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:fluxfot}
845: \frac{dN_\gamma }{dE_\gamma dt}= \int_{E_0}^\infty dE_\pi \frac{dg_{\gamma\pi}
846: (E_\pi,E_\gamma)}{dE_\gamma}\,\frac{dN_\pi}{dE_\pi dt}\; ,
847: \end{equation}
848: where, $E_0=E_\gamma+\frac{m_\pi^2}{4E_\gamma}$ is the minimum pion energy
849: which is necessary to produce a photon with energy $E_\gamma$, and
850: $m_\pi$ is the $\pi^0$ mass.
851: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
852: %\footnote{Dallo studio del decay $\pi^0\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ si p=
853: %u=F2 dimostrare che le energie massima e minima di un fotone emesso da un p=
854: %ione di energia $E_\pi= \gamma m_\pi$ sono $E_\gamma= E_\pi(1\pm\sqrt{1-\=
855: %gamma^{-2}})/2$. Rielaborando questa relazione =E8 possibile dimostrare che=
856: % un fotone di fissata energia $E_\gamma$ pu=F2 essere emesso da pioni con e=
857: %nergia tale che $E_\pi\geq E_\gamma+m_\pi^2/4E_\gamma$.};
858: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
859: The function $\frac{dg_{\gamma\pi}(E_\pi , E_\gamma)}{dE_\gamma}$ is the
860: number
861: of energy $E_\gamma$ photons produced by the decay of a pion
862: with energy $E_\pi$ in the laboratory frame:
863:
864: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:npifot}
865: \frac{dg_{\gamma\pi}(E_\pi,E_\gamma)}{dE_\gamma}= \frac{2}{\sqrt{E_\pi^2-m_\pi^
866: 2}}\; .
867: \end{equation}
868: By taking into account equations (\ref{eqn:pion}), (\ref{eqn:pionflux}),
869: (\ref{eqn:fluxfot}) and (\ref{eqn:npifot}) one obtains
870:
871: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:fluxfottot}
872: \frac{dN_\gamma}{dE_\gamma dt}= \sum_j \int_{E_0}^\infty dE_\pi \frac{15}{
873: 8E_\pi^{3/2}\sqrt{E_\pi^2-m_\pi^2}} \,
874: \int_{E_\pi}^\infty dQ \sqrt Q
875: \left(1-\frac{E_\pi}{Q}\right)^2 \,\frac{dN_j}{dQ dt}\; .
876: \end{equation}
877: This integral can be computed numerically once the
878: partonic flux $\frac{dN_j}{dQ dt}$ is given according with
879: either of the approaches discussed above.\\
880: Equation (\ref{eqn:fluxfottot}) provides the total flux of photons which
881: can be experimentally detected; these photons are not emitted by the black hole
882: itself but come from the pion decay.
883: Indeed we must to them add the near horizon ``direct'' emission spectrum.
884: However,
885: also the direct emission photons can lead to the formation of a photosphere
886: through electromagnetic interaction with $e^\pm$ and produce a modified
887: spectrum
888: (Figure \ref{fig:11}).
889: In what follows, we shall list some results obtained for photon emergent
890: spectra.
891: \subsection{Hadronization ``Post-Chromosphere''}\label{sez:Hpost}
892:
893: In this subsection we shall focus on photon emergent spectra accounting
894: hadronization after chromosphere formation.\\
895: Figure \ref{fig:19} shows the total spectrum of photons emitted by
896: a $4D$ Schwarzschild black hole with temperature $T_{BH}=50$ GeV.
897: Both direct emission photons (\underline{QED}) and $\pi^0$ (\underline{QCD})
898: decay photons are displayed; each case is considered both when
899: photo/chromosphere is present (solid curve), and when it is absent
900: (dashed curve). The whole photon spectrum is obtained in either case
901: by summing the solid and dashed lines.
902: %
903: \begin{figure}[htb]
904: \begin{center}
905: \includegraphics[width= 7.6cm]{fig19.eps}
906: \end{center}
907: \caption{\small Photon emission spectrum for a 4D Schwarzschild black hole
908: with temperature
909: $T_{BH}=50$ GeV. The continuous line denote the spectrum obtained by taking
910: into
911: account the presence of photosphere (QED) and chromosphere (QCD).
912: The dashed lines denote either the direct emission
913: spectrum, or the $\pi^0$ (QCD) decay spectrum following near horizon quark
914: hadronization (Reprinted figure with permission from \cite{cline:num}.
915: Copyright 1999 by The American Physical Society).}
916: \label{fig:19}
917: \end{figure}
918: %
919: From Figure \ref{fig:19} one sees that:
920: \begin{itemize}
921: \item peak energy of $\pi^0$ decay photons corresponds to an
922: energy equal to $m_\pi/2$; the photon distribution is widened by
923: ``Doppler effect'' as the pions do not decay at rest;
924: \item according with the previous remark, the photon spectrum in the
925: absence of chromosphere is wider, as the partons do not lose energy
926: in the chromosphere before hadronization;
927: \item the direct emission spectrum is picked around
928: $\sim 5T_{BH}$, while photosphere produces a larger number of photons with
929: smaller energy;
930: \item in the QED sector the photon peak is many orders of magnitude smaller
931: than the photon peak in the QCD sector; as quarks and gluons dominate direct
932: emission, the QCD degrees of freedom, leading to pions, decaying into photons,
933: are many more than direct emission photons. Thus, we conclude that $\pi^0$ decay
934: photons dominate the emergent spectrum in Figure
935: \ref{fig:19}, both in presence and absence of photo/chromosphere.
936: \end{itemize}
937: Figure \ref{fig:anchor} shows the decay photon spectrum in the presence of
938: chromosphere (solid line), and the direct emission spectrum (dashed line)
939: from a Schwarzschild black hole in $D=10$ dimensions, for
940: $M_*\simeq 1.3$ TeV e $M_{BH}/M_*= 5$.
941: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
942: %\footnote{Caso simile a quello considerato all'inizio della sezione \ref{se=
943: %z:schw} relativa allo studio della fase di Schwarzschild.};
944: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
945: In this case $T_{BH}\simeq 200$ GeV and the mean life is
946: $\tau_{BH}\simeq 4\times 10^{-27}$s.
947: %
948: \begin{figure}[htb]
949: \begin{center}
950: \includegraphics[width= 7.6cm]{bhlhcch.eps}
951: \end{center}
952: \caption{\small Chromosphere emergent photon decay spectrum
953: for a Schwarzschild black hole in $D=10$
954: dimensions, with $M_*\simeq 1.3$ TeV and $M_{BH}/M_*= 5$. The
955: dashed line shows the direct emission spectrum (Reprinted figure with permission
956: from \cite{anchor:gold}. Copyright 2003 by The American Physical Society).}
957: \label{fig:anchor}
958: \end{figure}
959: A qualitative analysis of Figure \ref{fig:anchor} shows that the two curves
960: are peaked around $m_\pi/2$ (solid line) and $\sim 5T_{BH}$ (dashed line),
961: that is, the involved physical processes
962: (direct emission, chromosphere development, hadronization and $\pi^0$ decay)
963: are spacetime dimension independent. This is consistent with the hypothesis
964: that elementary particle interactions are all localized on the spacetime
965: $3$-brane and do not feel the presence of bulk extra dimensions.\\
966: We can estimate the number of $\pi^0$ decay photons emitted at the outer
967: boundary of the chromosphere to be roughly about $5\cdot 10^4$ photons
968: \cite{anchor:gold}. This number can be improved by adding the photons emerging
969: from the photosphere and the contributions from different hadronic decays.
970:
971: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
972: \subsection{Direct Hadronization}\label{sez:Hdirect}
973:
974: In this subsection we shall consider some results regarding final energy spectra
975: accounting direct hadronization.\\
976: In order to determine \emph{emergent spectra of stable species}
977: ($e^\pm, (\nu\overline{\nu})_{e\mu\tau}$ and in particular $\gamma$),
978: production and decay of a $D$-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole
979: has been numerically performed by using black hole event generator
980: Charybdis v1.001 \cite{harris:art1}, while both the quark/gluon hadronization
981: and hadronic/leptonic decays have been numerically simulated by Pythia v6.227
982: \cite{pythia:62}.\\
983: In Table \ref{tab:parameters} we have reported some parameters obtained
984: for 100 generated events.
985: \begin{table}[htb]
986: \begin{center}
987: %\begin{size}
988: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|}
989: \hline{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}}
990: $D$ & $\langle\,M_{BH}\,\rangle$ (TeV) & $\langle\,T_{BH}\,\rangle$ (GeV) &
991: $\langle\,N_i\,\rangle$ & $\langle\,N_f\,\rangle$ & $\langle\,P\,\rangle$\\[2pt]
992: \hline{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}}
993: 6 &10.345 ($\pm$0.030)& 140.20 ($\pm$0.13) & 19.03 ($\pm$0.23)
994: & 1483 ($\pm$26) & 78.4 ($\pm$1.4)\\[4pt]
995: 7 &10.279 ($\pm$0.030)& 235.62 ($\pm$0.17) & 13.06 ($\pm$0.22)
996: & 1244 ($\pm$24) & 96.4 ($\pm$1.9)\\[4pt]
997: 8 &10.31 ($\pm$0.03) & 328.43 ($\pm$0.19) & 10.80 ($\pm$0.18)
998: & 1138 ($\pm$22) & 107.1 ($\pm$2.3)\\[4pt]
999: 9 &10.299 ($\pm$0.027)& 416.28 ($\pm$0.18) & 9.57 ($\pm$0.18)
1000: & 1028 ($\pm$22) & 109.5 ($\pm$2.5)\\[4pt]
1001: 10 &10.327 ($\pm$0.029)& 498.20 ($\pm$0.19) & 8.75 ($\pm$0.16)
1002: & 1014 ($\pm$26) & 116.9 ($\pm$2.7)\\[4pt]
1003: 11 &10.259 ($\pm$0.024)& 575.37 ($\pm$0.16) & 8.19 ($\pm$0.16)
1004: & 958 ($\pm$22) & 120 ($\pm$3)\\[4pt]
1005: \hline
1006: \end{tabular}
1007: %\end{size}
1008: \end{center}
1009: \caption{\small Direct hadronization parameters obtained by 100 generated
1010: events. $\langle\,M_{BH}\,\rangle$ and $\langle\,T_{BH}\,\rangle$ are the
1011: average mass and temperature of a Schwarzschild black hole produced by Charybdis
1012: generator; $\langle\,N_i\,\rangle$ is the average number of particles directly
1013: emitted by black hole according to the Charybdis simulation, while
1014: $\langle\,N_f\,\rangle$ is the average number of emergent stable particles after
1015: Pythia simulated direct hadronization. $\langle\,P\,\rangle$ is the average
1016: production factor, i.e. the number of emergent stable particles following from
1017: each particle directly emitted by the black hole.}
1018: \label{tab:parameters}
1019: \end{table}
1020: For different spacetime dimensions $D$,
1021: the simulations show that the average black hole mass $\langle\,M_{BH}\,\rangle$
1022: is approximatively costant, while the average temperature
1023: $\langle\,T_{BH}\,\rangle$ grows; as a consequence less and less particles are
1024: emitted out of the event horizon but they have more and more energy. Thus, the
1025: average number of particles directly emitted by black hole
1026: $\langle\,N_i\,\rangle$ and the average number of emergent stable particles
1027: $\langle\,N_f\,\rangle$ decrease with $D$, while the average number of emergent
1028: stable particles following from each particle directly emitted by the black hole
1029: $\langle\,P\,\rangle$ is an increasing function of $D$. Accounting direct
1030: hadronization, we can observe that black hole decay has very high multiplicity,
1031: i.e. a black hole emits a great number of stable particles of O($10^3$).\\
1032: In Figure \ref{fig:finalspt1} we show emergent energy spectra obtained from
1033: numerical simulations.
1034:
1035: \begin{figure}[htb]
1036: \begin{center}
1037: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=10cm]{fig1.ps}
1038: \end{center}
1039: \caption{\small Stable particle energy spectra for a $D=10$-dimensional
1040: Schwarzschild black hole accounting direct hadronization.}
1041: \label{fig:finalspt1}
1042: \end{figure}
1043: \noindent
1044: We notice that the final emergent spectra are dominated by photons and neutrinos.
1045: Since future collider detectors are not tuned to capture neutrino signals,
1046: a good signature could be missing energy or momentum;
1047: thus, in Table \ref{tab:miss} we show the average missing energy
1048: $\langle\,\emiss\,\rangle$ and the average missing transverse momentum
1049: $\langle\,\ptmiss_T\,\rangle$ for several $D$.
1050:
1051: \begin{table}[htb]
1052: \begin{center}
1053: %\begin{size}
1054: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|}
1055: \hline{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}}
1056: $D$ & 6 & 8 & 10 \\[2pt]
1057: \hline{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}}
1058: $\langle\,\emiss\,\rangle$ (TeV) &
1059: 2.65 ($\pm$0.07) & 2.63 ($\pm$0.08) & 2.55 ($\pm$0.10) \\[4pt]
1060: $\langle\,\ptmiss_T\,\rangle$ (TeV) &
1061: 1.82 ($\pm$0.05) & 1.81 ($\pm$0.07) & 1.76 ($\pm$0.08) \\[4pt]
1062: \hline
1063: \end{tabular}
1064: %\end{size}
1065: \end{center}
1066: \caption{\small Average missing energy and average missing transverse momentum
1067: for a $D$-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole accounting direct hadronization.}
1068: \label{tab:miss}
1069: \end{table}
1070: \begin{figure}[htb]
1071: \begin{center}
1072: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=10cm]{fig2.ps}
1073: \end{center}
1074: \caption{\small Photon energy spectra for a $D$-dimensional Schwarzschild
1075: black hole accounting direct hadronization.}
1076: \label{fig:finalspt2}
1077: \end{figure}
1078: \noindent
1079: Furthermore, in Figure \ref{fig:finalspt2} we show photon energy spectra; since
1080: these spectra could be directly observed at future colliders, the whole picture
1081: provides a possible experimental signature of TeV mini black hole evaporation.
1082: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1083: \section{Conclusions}\label{sez:conclu}
1084:
1085: In this article we have reviewed TeV mini black hole decay in models with large
1086: extra-dimensions, by taking into account not only the emission of particles
1087: according to the Hawking mechanism (referred to as ``direct emission''),
1088: but near horizon QCD/QED interactions, as well.\\
1089: We have focused on higher dimensional Schwarzschild black hole decay
1090: and we have observed that ``brane emission'' is parton dominated (see Table
1091: \ref{tab:PF}). Since partons cannot be directly observed, we must take into
1092: account fragmentation into hadrons; therefore, in order to
1093: understand what kind of spectra we can expect to detect, we have reported
1094: emergent photon spectra (Figures \ref{fig:19}, \ref{fig:anchor},
1095: \ref{fig:finalspt1} and \ref{fig:finalspt2}), both in the case of more realistic
1096: near horizon QCD interactions (parton bremsstrahlung/pair production and after
1097: that fragmentation into hadrons) and in the case of ``direct
1098: hadronization''. Thus, one finds that final emergent spectra, to be measured by
1099: an asymptotic observer, are dominated by hadrons and their decay products,
1100: mainly neutrinos and photons, both in presence and absence of photo/chromosphere.\\
1101: In the latter case, we have reported some results obtained
1102: by using Charybdis/Pythia event generator package: black hole decay event is
1103: characterized by a large multiplicity, as high as $10^3$ (see Table
1104: \ref{tab:parameters}) and a large missing energy and missing transverse
1105: momentum, as high as TeV (see Table \ref{tab:miss}). The whole picture provides
1106: a possible experimental signature at future colliders, as LHC and beyond.\\
1107: However, much work has still to be done to obtain a phenomenologically
1108: reliable signature at collider experiments. For instance, recoil effects of the
1109: produced black hole \cite{tanaka:esc}, or the influence of Planck phase on the
1110: experimental signature (\cite{hossen:due}, \cite{hossen:tre}) remain still to be
1111: accounted for. In the latter case, according to several theoretical frameworks,
1112: it has been argued that the final stage of black hole decay is characterized by
1113: a ``remnant'' formation, i.e. either the black hole temperature abruptly drops
1114: to zero \cite{adler:gup} or increases up to a maximum temperature and then
1115: continuosly approaches an extremal, degenerate configuration at a finite black
1116: hole mass (\cite{nico:nocom},\cite{euro:nocom1},\cite{euro:nocom2}). The effects
1117: of this remnant formation on black hole evaporation have been investigated in
1118: \cite{hossen:tre}. The main result is that black hole emits a larger number of
1119: Standard Model particles with a lower average energy and transverse momentum
1120: than in the case of total evaporation; more in detail, the total trasverse
1121: momentum ($\sum p_T$) is lowered by a quantity of the order of the remnant mass.\\
1122: In conclusion, the main feature of black hole decay is the missing of
1123: energy or transverse momentum. When a remnant is left after evaporation the
1124: missing transverse momentum is of the order of the remnant mass. The big
1125: acceptance of the detecting device at LHC will enable a complete event
1126: reconstruction and to determine the missing energy. A precise estimate of the
1127: missing energy in the framework of a specific regular black hole model is
1128: currently under investigation by the authors and the results will be reported
1129: elsewhere.
1130:
1131: \vspace{1cm}
1132:
1133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1134: %BIBLIOGRAFY (from file art.bib/bbl)
1135: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1136: %\noindent{\bf References}\\
1137: {\footnotesize
1138: \newcommand{\ç}{\"}
1139: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
1140: \bibliography{art}
1141: }
1142: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1143: \end{document}
1144: