1: \documentclass[12pt] {article}
2: \usepackage{psfrag}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{latexsym,amsfonts}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \pagestyle{plain}
7: \textwidth=16truecm
8: \textheight=23.6truecm
9: \topmargin-1.5cm
10: \hoffset-1.2cm
11: \baselineskip=24pt
12:
13: %
14: \begin{document}
15: \setcounter{page}{1}
16: \def\theequation{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
17: \def\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
18: \setcounter{section}{0}
19:
20:
21:
22: \title{On the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 + \gamma$ decay\\
23: in the Effective quark model with chiral $U(3)\times U(3)$ symmetry}
24:
25: \author{A. N. Ivanov$^{1,2,3}$\,\thanks{Corresponding author. E--mail:
26: ivanov@kph.tuwien.ac.at, Tel.: +43--1--58801--14261, Fax:
27: +43--1--58801--14299}~\thanks{Permanent Address: State Polytechnic
28: University, Department of Nuclear Physics, 195251 St. Petersburg,
29: Russian Federation}, A. Ya. Berdnikov$^3$, Ya. A. Berdnikov$^3$, M. Faber$^1$,\\
30: V. A. Ivanova$^3$, V. F. Kosmach$^3$, A. V. Nikitchenko$^3$, N. I.
31: Troitskaya$^3$}
32:
33: \date{\today}
34:
35:
36: \maketitle
37:
38:
39: \vspace{-0.5in}
40:
41:
42: \begin{center} {\it $^1$Atominstitut der \"Osterreichischen
43: Universit\"aten, Technische Universit\"at Wien, \\ Wiedner
44: Hauptstrasse 8-10, A-1040 Wien, \"Osterreich \\ and\\ $^2$Stefan
45: Meyer Institut f\"ur subatomare Physik,
46: \"Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften,
47: Boltzmanngasse 3, A-1090, Wien, \"Osterreich\\ and\\ $^3$State
48: Polytechnic
49: University, Polytechnicheskaya 29,\\
50: 195251, St Petersburg, Russian Federation}
51: \end{center}
52:
53: \begin{center}
54: \begin{abstract}
55: We analyse the angular distributions of the $\Sigma^0 \to
56: \Lambda^0\gamma$ decay rate in the laboratory and in the rest frame
57: of the $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon in the dependence on baryon
58: polarizations. We calculate the dynamical polarization vector of the
59: $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon. Within the Effective quark model with
60: chiral $U(3)\times U(3)$ symmetry (PRC {\bf 59}, 451 (1999)) we
61: calculate the transition magnetic moment $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$.
62: The theoretical value $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = -\,1.62$, measured
63: in nuclear magnetons, agrees well with the experimental data $\vert
64: \mu^{\exp}_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\vert = (1.61 \pm 0.08)$ and the
65: theoretical result, predicted within the naive quark model
66: $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = (\sqrt{3}/4)(\mu_{\Sigma^-} -
67: \mu_{\Sigma^+}) = (-\,1.57 \pm 0.01)$.
68: \end{abstract}
69: \end{center}
70:
71: PACS: 13.30.Eg, 13.75.Ev, 13.88.+e, 14.20.Jn
72:
73: \newpage
74:
75:
76: \section{Introduction}
77: \setcounter{equation}{0}
78:
79: The Effective quark model with chiral $U(3)\times U(3)$ symmetry
80: \cite{AI1} has been successfully applied to the calculation of the
81: non--leptonic decays of charmed $\Lambda^+_c$\,--\,baryon \cite{AI2,AI3},
82: the S--wave amplitudes of $\bar{K}N$ and $K^-d$ scattering at
83: threshold \cite{IV3,IV4} and the analysis of the polarization
84: properties of the $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon, produced from the Quark--gluon
85: plasma \cite{AI4}. The value of the $\sigma_{\pi N}$\,--\,term,
86: $\sigma_{\pi N} = 60\,{\rm MeV}$ calculated within the Effective quark
87: model with chiral $U(3)\times U(3)$ symmetry \cite{AI1}, agrees well
88: with the experimental value $\sigma^{\exp}_{\pi N} =
89: 61^{+\,1}_{-\,4}\,{\rm MeV}$, extracted from the experimental data on
90: the energy level displacement of the ground state of pionic hydrogen
91: \cite{PSI2}.
92:
93: In this paper we apply the Effective quark model with chiral
94: $U(3)\times U(3)$ symmetry to the calculation of the transition
95: magnetic moment $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$, responsible for the
96: $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 + \gamma$ decay. A new interest to this decay
97: is connected with the experimental search for the Kaonic Nuclear
98: Cluster $K^-pp$ state (the KNC ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H}$) \cite{EDB},
99: predicted within the Potential model approach by Akaishi and Yamazaki
100: \cite{TDB1} and the Phenomenological quantum field theory model in
101: \cite{AI05}. Experimentally the existence of the KNC
102: ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H}$ is analysed by means of the invariant--mass
103: spectrum of the $\Lambda^0p$ pair, induced by the decays
104: ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H} \to \Lambda^0 + p$ and ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm
105: H} \to \Sigma^0 + p$. Due to the decay $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 +
106: \gamma$ the experimental invariant--mass spectrum of the $\Lambda^0p$
107: pair should contain two peaks. One of these peaks is located at the
108: mass of the KNC ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H}$. It is defined by the
109: ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H} \to \Lambda^0 + p$ decay. Another one is
110: shifted to left from the mass of the KNC ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H}$ by
111: about $78\,{\rm MeV}$. This shift is defined by the photon energy in
112: the ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H} \to \Sigma^0 + p \to \Lambda^0 + \gamma +
113: p$ cascade decay.
114:
115: The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we calculate the
116: angular distributions of the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma$ decay rate
117: in the laboratory and in the rest frame of the $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon
118: in dependence on the polarizations of the baryons. We calculate the
119: dynamical polarization vector of the $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon. In
120: Section 3 we calculate the transition magnetic moment
121: $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = -\,1.62$, measured in nuclear magnetons.
122: The calculation is carried out in the Effective quark model with
123: chiral $U(3)\times U(3)$ symmetry. The theoretical result agrees well
124: with the experimental value $\vert
125: \mu^{(\exp)}_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\vert = (1.61 \pm 0.08)$ \cite{PDG04}
126: and the theoretical prediction within the naive quark model
127: $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = -\,1.57 \pm 0.01$ \cite{PDG04a}. In the
128: Conclusion we discuss the obtained results.
129:
130: \section{Angular distribution of the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 \gamma$
131: decay rate}
132:
133: The $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 \gamma$ decay is the $M1$ electromagnetic
134: transition. The amplitude of this transition is defined by
135: %
136: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.1}
137: M(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 \gamma) = \sqrt{4\pi
138: \alpha}\,e^*_{\mu}(k,\lambda)\langle \Lambda^0(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\vert
139: J^{\mu}(0)\vert \Sigma^0(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\rangle,
140: \end{eqnarray}
141: %
142: where $J^{\mu}(0)$ is the electromagnetic hadronic current,
143: $e^*_{\mu}(k,\lambda)$ is a polarization vector of a photon and
144: $\alpha = 1/137.036$ is the fine--structure constant. Due to the $M1$
145: transition the matrix element of the electromagnetic hadronic current
146: is
147: %
148: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.2}
149: \langle \Lambda^0(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\vert J^{\mu}(0)\vert
150: \Sigma^0(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\rangle = -\,g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\,
151: \bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\sigma^{\mu\nu} k_{\nu}
152: u_{\Sigma^0}(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0}),
153: \end{eqnarray}
154: %
155: where $\sigma^{\mu\nu} = (\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu} -
156: \gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\mu})/2$, $g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ is the effective
157: coupling constant of the transition $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0$, caused
158: by strong low--energy interactions, and $k = k_{\Sigma^0} -
159: k_{\Lambda^0}$, and
160: $\bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})$ and
161: $u_{\Sigma^0}(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})$ are the bispinors of
162: the $\Lambda^0$ and $\Sigma^0$ hyperons, normalized by
163: $\bar{u}_Y(k_Y,\sigma_Y)u_Y(k_Y,\sigma_Y) = 2m_Y$ for $Y = \Sigma^0$
164: and $\Lambda^0$.
165:
166: The width of the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 \gamma$ decay for unpolarized
167: baryons is proportional to
168: %
169: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.3}
170: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\sigma_{\Lambda^0} = \pm 1/2}
171: \sum_{\sigma_{\Sigma^0} = \pm
172: 1/2}\sum_{\lambda = \pm 1}\vert M(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0
173: \gamma)\vert^2 =\nonumber\\
174: \hspace{-0.3in} &&= 2\pi\alpha g^2_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\sum_{\lambda = \pm 1}
175: e^*_{\mu}(k,\lambda)e_{\alpha}(k,\lambda)k_{\nu}k_{\beta}\,{\rm
176: tr}\{(m_{\Sigma^0} + \hat{k}_{\Sigma^0})\sigma^{\mu\nu}(m_{\Lambda^0} +
177: \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0})\sigma^{\alpha\beta}\} =\nonumber\\
178: \hspace{-0.3in} &&= 2\pi\alpha g^2_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\sum_{\lambda = \pm 1}
179: e^*_{\mu}(k,\lambda)e_{\alpha}(k,\lambda)k_{\nu}k_{\beta}\,{\rm
180: tr}\{\hat{k}_{\Sigma^0}\sigma^{\mu\nu} \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0}\sigma^{\alpha\beta}\} =
181: 32\pi \alpha\, g^2_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} (k\cdot k_{\Sigma^0})(k\cdot k_{\Lambda^0}) =
182: \nonumber\\
183: \hspace{-0.3in} &&= 32\pi \alpha\,
184: g^2_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\,m^2_{\Sigma^0}\omega^2_0,
185: \end{eqnarray}
186: %
187: where $\omega_0 = (m^2_{\Sigma^0} - m^2_{\Lambda^0})/2 m_{\Lambda^0} =
188: 74.5\,{\rm MeV}$ \cite{PDG04} is the photon energy in the rest frame
189: of the $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon.
190:
191: The width of the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 \gamma$ decay is equal to
192: %
193: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.4}
194: \hspace{-0.3in} \Gamma(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma) &=&
195: \frac{\alpha}{\pi}\,\frac{g^2_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}}{m_{\Sigma^0}}\int
196: \delta^{(4)}(k_{\Lambda^0} + k - k_{\Sigma^0})\,(k\cdot k_{\Sigma^0})^2\,
197: \frac{d^3k_{\Lambda^0}}{E_{\Lambda^0}(\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})}
198: \frac{d^3k}{\omega(\vec{k})} = \nonumber\\
199: &=& 4\alpha g^2_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\,\omega^3_0.
200: \end{eqnarray}
201: %
202: Using the experimental value for the width of the $\Sigma^0 \to
203: \Lambda^0\gamma$ decay $\Gamma_{\exp}(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma)
204: =(8.9 \pm 0.8)\times 10^{-3}\,{\rm MeV}$ \cite{PDG04} we get
205: $g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = (8.6\pm 0.4)\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-1}$.
206: The effective coupling constant $g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ can be
207: expressed in terms of the transition magnetic moment
208: $g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = \mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}/2m_N$, where
209: $\vert \mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\vert = 1.61 \pm 0.08$ \cite{PDG04}.
210:
211: In the laboratory frame, where the $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon moves with
212: a velocity $\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0} = \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}/E_{\Sigma^0}$, the
213: angular distribution of the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 \gamma$ decay rate
214: can be investigated with respect to both the relative angle
215: $\vartheta_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ of the $\Sigma^0\Lambda^0$ pair and
216: the relative angle $\vartheta_{\Sigma^0\gamma}$ of the
217: $\Sigma^0\gamma$ pair.
218:
219: For the unpolarized baryons the angular distribution of the
220: $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon relative to the direction of the motion of the
221: $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon is
222: %
223: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.5}
224: 4\pi\,\frac{dB(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma)}{d\Omega_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}} =
225: \frac{1}{\gamma_{\Sigma^0}\omega_0}\,\frac{\vec{k}^{\;2}_{\Lambda^0}\,
226: \sqrt{1 - \vec{v}^{\;2}_{\Sigma^0}}}{\vert\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}
227: \vert - E_{\Lambda^0}\vert\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0}\vert\,\cos\vartheta_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}},
228: \end{eqnarray}
229: %
230: where $\gamma_{\Sigma^0} = 1/\sqrt{1 - \vec{v}^{\;2}_{\Sigma^0}}$.
231: The kinematical parameters of the baryons are related by
232: $E_{\Lambda^0} - \vert\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0} \vert
233: \vert\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0}\vert\,\cos\vartheta_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} =
234: (m_{\Sigma^0} - \omega_0)/\gamma_{\Sigma^0}$. This allows to obtain
235: the energy spectrum of the $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon
236: %
237: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.6}
238: \frac{dB(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma)}{dE_{\Lambda^0}} =
239: \frac{1}{2 \gamma_{\Sigma^0} \vert\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0}\vert\,\omega_0}.
240: \end{eqnarray}
241: %
242: In turn, the angular distribution of the photon relative to the
243: direction of the motion of the $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon takes the form
244: %
245: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.7}
246: 4\pi\,\frac{dB(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma)}{d\Omega_{\Sigma^0\gamma}} =
247: \frac{1}{4\pi \gamma^2_{\Sigma^0}}\,
248: \frac{1}{(1 -
249: \vert\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0}\vert\,\cos\vartheta_{\Sigma^0\gamma})^2}.
250: \end{eqnarray}
251: %
252: The photon energy in the laboratory frame is related to the photon
253: energy in the center of mass frame as $\omega_0 = \gamma_{\Sigma^0}
254: \omega\,(1 -
255: \vert\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0}\vert\,\cos\vartheta_{\Sigma^0\gamma})$. This
256: allows to calculate the energy spectrum of the photon
257: %
258: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.8}
259: \frac{dB(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma)}{d\omega} =
260: \frac{1 }{2 \gamma_{\Sigma^0} \vert\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0}\vert\,\omega_0 } =
261: \frac{1}{\omega_+ - \omega_-},
262: \end{eqnarray}
263: %
264: where $\omega_+ = \omega_0/\gamma_{\Sigma^0}(1 -
265: \vert\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0}\vert)$ and $\omega_- =
266: \omega_0/\gamma_{\Sigma^0}(1 + \vert\vec{v}_{\Sigma^0}\vert)$ are the
267: maximal and minimal energy of the photon, emitted by the
268: $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon in the laboratory frame.
269:
270: In the rest frame of the $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon the angular
271: distribution of the decay rate is equal to
272: %
273: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.9}
274: 4\pi\,\frac{dB(\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma)}{d\Omega_{\Lambda^0}} = 1,
275: \end{eqnarray}
276: %
277: where $d\Omega_{\Lambda^0} = 2\pi
278: \sin\vartheta_{\Lambda^0}d\vartheta_{\Lambda^0}$ and
279: $\vartheta_{\Lambda^0}$ is polar angle relative to the momentum
280: $\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0} = -\,\vec{k}$ of the $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon at
281: the rest frame of the $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon and $\vartheta_{\gamma}
282: = \pi - \vartheta_{\Lambda^0}$.
283:
284: For the polarized hyperons, which we denote as $\vec{\Sigma}^0$ and
285: $\vec{\Lambda}^0$, the expression (\ref{label2.3}) changes as follows
286: \cite{LL71} (see also \cite{AI01}):
287: %
288: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.10}
289: &&\sum_{\lambda = \pm 1}\vert M(\vec{\Sigma}^0 \to \vec{\Lambda}^0
290: \gamma)\vert^2 = 2\pi\alpha g^2_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\sum_{\lambda = \pm 1}
291: e^*_{\mu}(k,\lambda)e_{\alpha}(k,\lambda)k_{\nu}k_{\beta}\nonumber\\
292: &&\times\,{\rm
293: tr}\{(m_{\Sigma^0} + \hat{k}_{\Sigma^0})(1 + \gamma^5\hat{\zeta}_{\Sigma^0})
294: \sigma^{\mu\nu}(m_{\Lambda^0} +
295: \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0})(1 + \gamma^5\hat{\zeta}_{\Lambda^0})\sigma^{\alpha\beta}\}.
296: \end{eqnarray}
297: %
298: Here $\hat{\zeta}_Y = \gamma_{\mu}\zeta^{\mu}_Y$ for $Y = \Sigma^0,
299: \Lambda^0$, where $\zeta^{\mu}_Y$ is the 4--polarization vector of the
300: $Y$\,--\,hyperon \cite{LL71} (see also \cite{AI01}):
301: %
302: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.11}
303: \zeta^{\mu}_Y = \Bigg(\frac{\vec{k}_Y\cdot\vec{\xi}_{\,Y}}{m_Y},\vec{\xi}_{\,Y} +
304: \frac{\vec{k}_Y\,(\vec{k}_Y\cdot\vec{\xi}_{\,Y})}{m_Y (E_Y(\vec{k}_Y) +
305: m_Y)}\Bigg),
306: \end{eqnarray}
307: %
308: where $\vec{\xi}_Y$ is a 3--dimensional polarization vector of the
309: $Y$\,--\,hyperon, normalized to unity $\vec{\xi}^{\;2}_Y = 1$. The
310: polarization vector $\zeta^{\mu}_Y$ satisfies the constraints
311: $\zeta^2_Y = - 1$ and $k_Y\cdot \zeta_Y = 0$.
312:
313: The result of the calculation of the trace in (\ref{label2.10}) is
314: %
315: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.12}
316: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\sum_{\lambda = \pm 1}\vert M(\vec{\Sigma}^0 \to \vec{\Lambda}^0
317: \gamma)\vert^2 = 32\pi\alpha g^2_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\Big\{(k\cdot k_{\Sigma^0})^2 -
318: (k\cdot k_{\Sigma^0})^2(\zeta_{\Sigma^0}\cdot \zeta_{\Lambda^0}) \nonumber\\
319: \hspace{-0.3in}&& -
320: m_{\Sigma^0}(m_{\Sigma^0} + m_{\Lambda^0})\,
321: (k\cdot \zeta_{\Sigma^0})(k\cdot \zeta_{\Lambda^0}) -
322: \frac{1}{\omega^2}\,
323: (k\cdot k_{\Sigma^0})^2\,
324: (\vec{k}\times \vec{\zeta}_{\Sigma^0})\cdot
325: (\vec{k}\times \vec{\zeta}_{\Lambda^0})\nonumber\\
326: \hspace{-0.3in}&& -\frac{1}{\omega^2}\,(\vec{k}\times \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0})\cdot
327: (\vec{k}\times \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0})\,(k\cdot \zeta_{\Sigma^0})\,
328: (k\cdot \zeta_{\Lambda^0}) + \frac{1}{\omega^2}\,(k\cdot k_{\Sigma^0})(k\cdot
329: \zeta_{\Lambda^0})(\vec{k}
330: \times \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0})\cdot
331: (\vec{k}\times \vec{\zeta}_{\Sigma^0})\nonumber\\
332: \hspace{-0.3in}&& + \frac{1}{\omega^2}\,(k\cdot k_{\Sigma^0})(k\cdot
333: \zeta_{\Sigma^0})(\vec{k}\times \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})\cdot
334: (\vec{k}\times \vec{\zeta}_{\Lambda^0})\Big\}.
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: %
337: We have carried out the summation over the transverse polarizations of
338: the photon.
339:
340: The angular distribution of the $\vec{\Lambda}^0$\,--\,hyperon
341: relative to the direction of the motion of the
342: $\vec{\Sigma}^0$\,--\,hyperon can be written in the following general
343: form \cite{LL71}
344: %
345: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.13}
346: 4\pi \frac{dB(\vec{\Sigma}^0 \to
347: \vec{\Lambda}^0 \gamma)}{d\Omega_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}} =
348: 4\pi \frac{dB(\Sigma^0 \to
349: \Lambda^0 \gamma)}{d\Omega_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}}\,
350: (1 + \vec{P}_{\Lambda^0}\cdot \vec{\xi}_{\Lambda^0}),
351: \end{eqnarray}
352: %
353: where $\vec{P}_{\Lambda^0}$ is a dynamical polarization vector of the
354: $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon. Following the procedure expounded in \cite{LL71}
355: we obtain
356: %
357: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.14}
358: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\vec{P}_{\Lambda^0} = \Big\{\frac{m_{\Sigma^0} +
359: m_{\Lambda^0}}{m_{\Sigma^0}\omega^2_0}
360: (k_{\Lambda^0}\cdot \zeta_{\Sigma^0}) -
361: \frac{(\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}\times \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})^2}{\vert \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0} -
362: \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}\vert^2}\frac{k_{\Lambda^0}\cdot
363: \zeta_{\Sigma^0}}{m^2_{\Sigma^0}\omega^2_0}
364: - \frac{(\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}\times \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})\cdot
365: ((\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0} - \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})\times
366: \vec{\zeta}_{\Sigma^0})}{\vert \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}
367: - \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}\vert^2 m_{\Sigma^0}\omega_0}\Big\}
368: \nonumber\\
369: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\times \Big[E_{\Sigma^0}
370: \frac{\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}}{m_{\Lambda^0}} -
371: \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0} - \frac{(\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}\cdot \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})
372: \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}}{m_{\Lambda^0}(E_{\Lambda^0} + m_{\Lambda^0})}\Big]-
373: \Big(\frac{\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}\cdot \vec{\zeta}_{\Sigma^0}}{E_{\Sigma^0}}\Big)
374: \frac{\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}}{m_{\Lambda^0}} +
375: \frac{(\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}\cdot \vec{\zeta}_{\Sigma^0})
376: \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}}{m_{\Lambda^0}(E_{\Lambda^0} + m_{\Lambda^0})}\nonumber\\
377: \hspace{-0.3in}&&+ \frac{1}{\vert \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0} - \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}\vert^2}
378: \Big\{((\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0} - \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})\cdot \vec{\zeta}_{\Sigma^0})
379: (\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0} - \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}) -
380: \frac{(((\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0} - \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})\times
381: \vec{\zeta}_{\Sigma^0})\cdot (
382: \vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}\times \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}))\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}}{
383: m_{\Lambda^0}(E_{\Lambda^0} + m_{\Lambda^0})}\nonumber\\
384: \hspace{-0.3in} && + \frac{k_{\Lambda^0}\cdot
385: \zeta_{\Sigma^0}}{m_{\Sigma^0}\omega_0}\Big[
386: (\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}\times \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})\times (\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0} -
387: \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}) + \frac{(\vec{k}_{\Sigma^0}\times
388: \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0})^2
389: \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}}{m_{\Lambda^0}(E_{\Lambda^0} + m_{\Lambda^0})}\Big]\Big\}.
390: \end{eqnarray}
391: %
392: In the rest frame of the $\vec{\Sigma}^0$\,--\,hyperon the dynamical
393: polarization vector of the $\vec{\Lambda}^0$\,--\,hyperon takes the
394: form
395: %
396: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.15}
397: \vec{P}_{\Lambda^0} = - \frac{m_{\Sigma^0}}{m_{\Lambda^0}}\,
398: (\vec{n}_{\Lambda^0}\cdot \vec{\xi}_{\Sigma^0})\vec{n}_{\Lambda^0},
399: \end{eqnarray}
400: %
401: where $\vec{n}_{\Lambda^0} = \vec{k}_{\Lambda^0}/\omega_0$. Since in
402: the rest frame of the $\vec{\Sigma}^0$\,--\,hyperon
403: $\vec{k}_{\Lambda^0} = -\,\vec{k}$, $\vec{n}_{\Lambda^0}$ is a unit
404: vector $\vec{n}^{\,2}_{\Lambda^0} = 1$.
405:
406: The dynamical polarization of the $\vec{\Lambda}^0$\,--\,hyperon,
407: averaged over all directions of the vector $\vec{n}_{\Lambda^0}$,
408: amounts to
409: %
410: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.16}
411: \langle \vec{P}_{\Lambda^0}\rangle = -\,\frac{1}{3}\,
412: \frac{m_{\Sigma^0}}{m_{\Lambda^0}}\,\vec{\xi}_{\Sigma^0}.
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: %
415: Our results (\ref{label2.15}) and (\ref{label2.16}) agree well with
416: those obtained in \cite{RG57}--\cite{NB61}.
417:
418: \section{Transition magnetic moment $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$}
419: \setcounter{equation}{0}
420:
421: The transition magnetic moment $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ responsible
422: for the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0 + \gamma$ decay is related to the
423: effective coupling constant $g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ by
424: $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = 2m_Ng_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$. The calculation
425: of the effective coupling constant $g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ we carry
426: out in the Effective quark model with chiral $U(3)\times U(3)$
427: symmetry \cite{AI1}--\cite{AI4}. For this aim we calculate the matrix
428: element of the electromagnetic hadronic current $\langle
429: \Lambda^0(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\vert J^{\mu}(0)\vert
430: \Sigma^0(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\rangle$.
431:
432: After the application the reduction technique and the equations of
433: motion \cite{AI1,AI2} the matrix element $\langle
434: \Lambda^0(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\vert J^{\mu}(0)\vert
435: \Sigma^0(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\rangle$ takes the form
436: %
437: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.1}
438: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\langle
439: \Lambda^0(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\vert J^{\mu}(0)\vert
440: \Sigma^0(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\rangle = -\,\frac{1}{2}\,g^2_B\int d^4xd^4y
441: \,e^{\textstyle\,ik_{\Lambda^0}\cdot x - ik_{\Sigma^0}\cdot y}
442: \nonumber\\
443: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\hspace{1.5in}\times\, \bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})
444: \,\langle 0\vert {\rm T}(\eta_{\Lambda^0}(x)J_{\mu}(0)\bar{\eta}_{\Sigma^0}(y))
445: \vert 0\rangle_c\, u_{\Sigma^0}(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0}),
446: \end{eqnarray}
447: %
448: where ${\rm T}$ is a time--ordering operator, the index $c$ in
449: $\langle 0\vert \ldots\vert 0\rangle_c$ means the calculation of the
450: {\it connected} part of the vacuum expectation value, $J_{\mu}(0)$ is
451: the electromagnetic quark current
452: %
453: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.2}
454: J_{\mu}(0) = \frac{2}{3}\,\bar{u}_{\ell}(0)\gamma_{\mu}u_{\ell}(0) -
455: \frac{1}{3}\,\bar{d}_{\ell}(0)\gamma_{\mu}d_{\ell}(0)
456: - \frac{1}{3}\,\bar{s}_{\ell}(0)\gamma_{\mu}s_{\ell}(0),
457: \end{eqnarray}
458: %
459: where $u_{\ell}(0)$, $d_{\ell}(0)$ and $s_{\ell}(0)$ are current quark fields. The
460: summation over the ``colour'' index ${\ell} = 1,2,3$ is assumed. Then,
461: $\eta_{\Lambda^0}(x)$ and $\bar{\eta}_{\Sigma^0}(y)$ are the
462: three--quark densities \cite{AI1,AI2,QSR}
463: %
464: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.3}
465: \eta_{\Lambda^0}(x) &=& - \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\,\varepsilon^{ijk}\{[\bar{u^c}_i(x)\gamma_{\mu}s_j(x)]
466: \,\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 d_k(x) - [\bar{d^c}_i(x)\gamma_{\mu}s_j(x)]
467: \,\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 u_k(x)\},\nonumber\\
468: \eta_{\Sigma^0}(x) &=& - \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}\,\varepsilon^{ijk}\{[\bar{u^c}_i(x)
469: \gamma_{\mu}d_j(x)]\,\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 s_k(x) + [\bar{d^c}_i(x)\gamma_{\mu}u_j(x)]
470: \,\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 s_k(x)\}
471: \end{eqnarray}
472: %
473: coupled to the $\Lambda^0$ and $\Sigma^0$
474: hyperons \cite{AI1,AI2}
475: %
476: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.4}
477: {\cal L}_{\rm eff}(x) = \frac{g_B}{\sqrt{2}}\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)\,\eta_{\Lambda^0}(x) +
478: \frac{g_B}{\sqrt{2}}\bar{\Sigma}^0(x)\,\eta_{\Sigma^0}(x) + {\rm h.c.}.
479: \end{eqnarray}
480: %
481: The three--quark density $\bar{\eta}_{\Sigma^0}(x)$ is equal to
482: %
483: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.5}
484: \bar{\eta}_{\Sigma^0}(x)= + \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}\,\varepsilon^{ijk}\{\bar{s}_i(x)
485: \gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5
486: [\bar{d}_j(x)
487: \gamma_{\mu}u^c_k(x)] + \bar{s}_i(x)\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5
488: [\bar{u}_j(x)\gamma_{\mu}d^c_k(x)]\}.
489: \end{eqnarray}
490: %
491: The coupling constant $g_B$ is calculated in \cite{AI1,AI1a}: $g_B = 1.37
492: \times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-2}$.
493:
494: The matrix element (\ref{label3.1}) is defined by Feynman diagrams in
495: Fig.1.
496: %
497: \begin{figure}
498: \centering
499: \psfrag{x}{$x$}
500: \psfrag{y}{$y$}
501: \psfrag{S0}{$\Sigma^0$}
502: \psfrag{L0}{$\Lambda^0$}
503: \psfrag{u}{$u$}
504: \psfrag{d}{$d$}
505: \psfrag{s}{$s$}
506: \psfrag{g}{$\gamma$}
507: \psfrag{p1}{$k_{\Sigma^0}$}
508: \psfrag{p2}{$k_{\Sigma^0} + k_1 - k_2$}
509: \psfrag{p3}{$k_{\Lambda^0}$}
510: \psfrag{p4}{$k_2$}
511: \psfrag{p5}{$k_{\Sigma^0} - k_{\Lambda^0} + k_1$}
512: \psfrag{p6}{$k_1$}
513: \psfrag{p7}{$k_{\Lambda^0} + k_2 - k_1$}
514: \includegraphics[height=0.35\textheight]{shd.eps}
515: \caption{Feynman diagrams of the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0$ transition
516: in the Effective quark model with chiral $U(3)\times U(3)$ symmetry.}
517: \end{figure}
518: %
519: In the coordinate representation the analytical expression
520: of the matrix element (\ref{label3.1}) takes the form
521: %
522: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.6}
523: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\langle
524: \Lambda^0(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\vert J^{\mu}(0)\vert
525: \Sigma^0(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\rangle = -\,\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,g^2_B\int d^4xd^4y
526: \,e^{\textstyle\,ik_{\Lambda^0}\cdot x - ik_{\Sigma^0}\cdot y}\nonumber\\
527: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\, \bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})
528: \gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^5
529: S^{(d)}_F(x - y)\gamma_{\beta} S^{(u)}_F(y) \gamma_{\mu} S^{(u)}_F(-\,x)\gamma_{\alpha}
530: S^{(s)}_F(x - y)\gamma^{\beta}\gamma^5 u_{\Sigma^0}(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\nonumber\\
531: \hspace{-0.3in}&&- \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,g^2_B\int d^4xd^4y
532: \,e^{\textstyle\,ik_{\Lambda^0}\cdot x - ik_{\Sigma^0}\cdot y}\,
533: {\rm tr}\{\gamma_{\alpha}S^{(s)}_F(x - y)\gamma_{\beta}S^{(d)}_F(y - x)\}\nonumber\\
534: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\, \bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})
535: \gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^5
536: S^{(u)}_F(x) \gamma_{\mu} S^{(u)}_F( - y)\gamma^{\beta}\gamma^5
537: u_{\Sigma^0}(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\nonumber\\
538: \hspace{-0.3in}&&-\,\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,g^2_B\int d^4xd^4y
539: \,e^{\textstyle\,ik_{\Lambda^0}\cdot x - ik_{\Sigma^0}\cdot y}\nonumber\\
540: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\, \bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})
541: \gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^5
542: S^{(u)}_F(x - y)\gamma_{\beta} S^{(d)}_F(y) \gamma_{\mu} S^{(d)}_F(-\,x)\gamma_{\alpha}
543: S^{(s)}_F(x - y)\gamma^{\beta}\gamma^5 u_{\Sigma^0}(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\nonumber\\
544: \hspace{-0.3in}&&- \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,g^2_B\int d^4xd^4y
545: \,e^{\textstyle\,ik_{\Lambda^0}\cdot x - ik_{\Sigma^0}\cdot y}\,
546: {\rm tr}\{\gamma_{\alpha}S^{(s)}_F(x - y)\gamma_{\beta}S^{(u)}_F(y - x)\}\nonumber\\
547: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\, \bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})
548: \gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^5
549: S^{(d)}_F(x) \gamma_{\mu} S^{(d)}_F( - y)\gamma^{\beta}\gamma^5
550: u_{\Sigma^0}(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0}).
551: \end{eqnarray}
552: %
553: We have taken into account that only the isovector part
554: $(\bar{u}_{\ell}(0)\gamma_{\mu}u_{\ell}(0) - \bar{d}_{\ell}(0)\gamma_{\mu}d_{\ell}(0))/2$ of the
555: electromagnetic current gives the contribution to the transition
556: $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0$.
557:
558: In the momentum representation Eq.(\ref{label3.6}) reduces to the form
559: %
560: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.7}
561: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\langle
562: \Lambda^0(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0})\vert J^{\mu}(0)\vert
563: \Sigma^0(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\rangle = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,g^2_B
564: \bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}(k_{\Lambda^0},\sigma_{\Lambda^0})\int \frac{d^4k_1}{(2\pi)^4 i}
565: \frac{d^4k_2}{(2\pi)^4 i} \nonumber\\
566: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times \Bigg[
567: \gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^5 \frac{1}{m_d - \hat{k}_2}\gamma_{\beta} \frac{1}{m_u - \hat{k}_1}
568: \gamma_{\mu} \frac{1}{m_u - \hat{k}_{\Sigma^0} + \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0} - \hat{k}_1}\gamma_{\alpha}
569: \frac{1}{m_s - \hat{k}_{\Sigma^0} - \hat{k}_1 + \hat{k}_2}\gamma^{\beta}\gamma^5\nonumber\\
570: \hspace{-0.3in}&& +
571: {\rm tr}\Big\{\gamma_{\beta}\frac{1}{m_d - \hat{k}_2}\gamma_{\alpha}
572: \frac{1}{m_s - \hat{k}_2 - \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0} + \hat{k}_1}\Big\}
573: \gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^5 \frac{1}{m_u - \hat{k}_1}
574: \gamma_{\mu} \frac{1}{m_u - \hat{k}_{\Sigma^0} + \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0} - \hat{k}_1}
575: \gamma^{\beta}\gamma^5\nonumber\\
576: \hspace{-0.3in}&&+
577: \gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^5 \frac{1}{m_u - \hat{k}_2}\gamma_{\beta} \frac{1}{m_d - \hat{k}_1}
578: \gamma_{\mu} \frac{1}{m_d - \hat{k}_{\Sigma^0} + \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0} - \hat{k}_1}\gamma_{\alpha}
579: \frac{1}{m_s - \hat{k}_{\Sigma^0} - \hat{k}_1 + \hat{k}_2}\gamma^{\beta}\gamma^5\nonumber\\
580: \hspace{-0.3in}&& +
581: {\rm tr}\Big\{\gamma_{\beta}\frac{1}{m_u - \hat{k}_2}\gamma_{\alpha}
582: \frac{1}{m_s - \hat{k}_2 - \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0} + \hat{k}_1}\Big\}
583: \gamma^{\alpha}\gamma^5 \frac{1}{m_d - \hat{k}_1}
584: \gamma_{\mu} \frac{1}{m_d - \hat{k}_{\Sigma^0} + \hat{k}_{\Lambda^0} - \hat{k}_1}
585: \gamma^{\beta}\gamma^5\Bigg]\nonumber\\
586: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\,u_{\Sigma^0}(k_{\Sigma^0},\sigma_{\Sigma^0}).
587: \end{eqnarray}
588: %
589: Applying the heavy--baryon technique, accepted for the analysis of
590: baryon exchanges within Chiral Perturbation Theory (ChPT) \cite{JG83}
591: (see also \cite{EW79,AI00} and \cite{TE05}), to the calculation of the
592: momentum integrals \cite{AI1} we get (see also \cite{IV4}):
593: %
594: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.8}
595: g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} =
596: \frac{g^2_B}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{\langle \bar{q}q\rangle}{m_N}\,
597: \frac{m}{16\pi^2}\,{\ell n}\Big(1 + \frac{\Lambda^2_{\chi}}{m^2}\Big) =
598: -\,8.62\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-4},
599: \end{eqnarray}
600: %
601: where $\langle \bar{q}q\rangle $ is the quark condensate \cite{AI1,EQM}:
602: %
603: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.9}
604: \langle \bar{q}q\rangle = -\,\frac{3m}{4\pi^2}\,\Big[\Lambda^2_{\chi} -
605: m^2\,{\ell n}\Big(1 + \frac{\Lambda^2_{\chi}}{m^2}\Big)\Big] = (-\,253\,{\rm MeV})^3,
606: \end{eqnarray}
607: %
608: calculated at the normalization scale $\mu = \Lambda_{\chi}$, where
609: $\Lambda_{\chi} = 940\,{\rm MeV}$ is the scale of the spontaneous
610: breaking of chiral symmetry \cite{AI1}, and for $m_u = m_d = m =
611: 330\,{\rm MeV}$, the constituent quark mass defined in the chiral
612: limit \cite{AI1,EQM}. For the calculation of the integrals we have
613: neglected the mass differences between $\Sigma^0$, $\Lambda^0$ and $N$
614: and have set $m_{\Sigma^0} = m_{\Lambda^0} = m_N$. Hence, the
615: accuracy of the theoretical value (\ref{label3.8}) is not better than
616: $20\,\%$.
617:
618: For the effective coupling constant (\ref{label3.8}) the transition
619: magnetic moment $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ is equal to
620: %
621: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.10}
622: \mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = 2m_N g_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} =
623: \frac{g^2_B}{\sqrt{3}}\,\langle \bar{q}q\rangle\,
624: \frac{m}{8\pi^2}\,{\ell n}\Big(1 + \frac{\Lambda^2_{\chi}}{m^2}\Big) = -\,1.62,
625: \end{eqnarray}
626: %
627: which agrees well with both the experimental data $\vert
628: \mu^{\exp}_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\vert = (1.61 \pm 0.08)$ and the
629: theoretical value $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} =
630: (\sqrt{3}/4)\,(\mu_{\Sigma^-} - \mu_{\Sigma^+}) = (-\,1.57 \pm 0.01)$,
631: obtained within the naive quark model in terms of the magnetic moments
632: of the charged $\Sigma$\,--\,hyperons $\mu_{\Sigma^-} = (-\,1.160 \pm
633: 0.025)$ and $\mu_{\Sigma^+} = (2.458 \pm 0.010)$ \cite{PDG04}. In the
634: naive quark model the magnetic moments $\mu_{\Sigma^-}$ and
635: $\mu_{\Sigma^+}$ are defined in terms of the magnetic moments of
636: constituent quarks $\mu_{\Sigma^-} = (4\mu_d - \mu_s)/3$ and
637: $\mu_{\Sigma^+} = (4\mu_u - \mu_s)/3$. For the transition magnetic
638: moment $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ this gives $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} =
639: (\mu_d - \mu_u)/\sqrt{3}$ \cite{PDG04a}.
640:
641: As a result of the calculation of the momentum integrals in
642: Eq.(\ref{label3.7}) there appears the term proportional to
643: $\bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}\gamma^{\mu}u_{\Sigma^0}$. Since in the
644: heavy--baryon limit the spatial part of this current
645: $\bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}\vec{\gamma} u_{\Sigma^0}$ is of order of
646: $O(1/m^2_N)$, in the heavy--baryon limit it is equivalent to zero
647: relative to the contribution proportional to
648: $\bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}\sigma^{\mu\nu}k_{\nu}u_{\Sigma^0}$. In turn, the
649: time--component $\bar{u}_{\Lambda^0}\gamma^0u_{\Sigma^0}$ vanishes due
650: to the orthogonality of the spinorial functions
651: $\varphi^{\dagger}_{\Lambda^0}\varphi_{\Sigma^0} = 0$.
652:
653:
654: \section{Conclusion}
655:
656: We have analysed the angular distribution of the
657: $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperons, produced in the $\Sigma^0 \to
658: \Lambda^0\gamma$ decay, both in the laboratory and in the rest frame
659: of the $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon in dependence on the polarizations of
660: baryons. We have calculated the dynamical polarization vector of the
661: $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon. The obtained results can be used for the
662: analysis of the polarization properties of the
663: $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperons, produced in high--energy nucleus--nucleus
664: collisions and in the ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H} \to \Sigma^0 p$ decays
665: of the Kaonic Nuclear Cluster ${^2_{\!\bar{K}}}{\rm H}$ (the deeply
666: bound $K^-pp$ state). A measurement of the polarization of the
667: $\Sigma^0$\,--\,hyperon can be carried out through the measurement of
668: the polarization of the $\Lambda^0$\,--\,hyperon.
669:
670: The partial width of the $\Sigma^0 \to \Lambda^0\gamma$ decay is
671: defined by the transition magnetic moment $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$.
672: The calculation of $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ we have carried out
673: within the Effective quark model with chiral $U(3)\times U(3)$
674: symmetry. The theoretical value $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = -\,1.62$
675: agrees well with both the experimental one
676: $\mu^{\exp}_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}\vert = (1.61 \pm 0.08)$ and the
677: predicted within the naive quark model $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} =
678: (\sqrt{3}/4)\,(\mu_{\Sigma^-} - \mu_{\Sigma^+}) = (-\,1.57 \pm 0.01)$.
679:
680: In our approach the transition magnetic moment
681: $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ does not depend on the mass of constituent
682: $s$\,--\,quark. This agrees well with the naive quark model, where
683: $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0}$ is defined by the magnetic moments of the
684: constituent $u$\,--\, and $d$\,--\,quarks only:
685: $\mu_{\Sigma^0\Lambda^0} = (\sqrt{3}/4)\,(\mu_{\Sigma^-} -
686: \mu_{\Sigma^+}) = (\mu_d - \mu_u)/\sqrt{3}$ \cite{PDG04a}.
687:
688:
689:
690: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
691: \bibitem{AI1}
692: A. N. Ivanov, M. Nagy, and N. I. Troitskaya,
693: Phys. Rev. {\bf C59}, 451 (1999).
694: \bibitem{AI2}
695: Ya. A. Berdnikov, A. N. Ivanov, V. F. Kosmach, and N.I. Troitskaya,
696: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 60}, 015201 (1999).
697: \bibitem{AI3}
698: A. Ya. Berdnikov, Ya. A. Berdnikov, A. N. Ivanov, V. F. Kosmach, M. D. Scadron,
699: and N. I. Troitskaya,
700: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 014027 (2001).
701: \bibitem{PSI2}
702: H.--Ch. Schr\"oder {\it et al.},
703: Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 21}, 473 (2001).
704: \bibitem{IV3}
705: A. N. Ivanov, M. Cargnelli, M. Faber, J. Marton, N. I. Troitskaya, and
706: J. Zmeskal,
707: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 21}, 11 (2004); nucl--th/0310081.
708: \bibitem{IV4}
709: A. N. Ivanov, M. Cargnelli, M. Faber, H. Fuhrmann, V. A. Ivanova, J. Marton,
710: N. I. Troitskaya, and J. Zmeskal,
711: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 23}, 79 (2005); nucl--th/0406053.
712: \bibitem{AI4}
713: A.Ya. Berdnikov, Ya. A. Berdnikov, A. N. Ivanov, V. A. Ivanova, V. F. Kosmach, V. M. Samsonov,
714: N. I. Troitskaya, and V. Thatar Vento,
715: Acta Phys. Hung. A {\bf 22}, 139 (2005), nucl-th/0312045.
716: A. Andronic {\it et al.},
717: \bibitem{EDB}
718: {it Measurements of Strange Baryons and Kaonic Nuclear Clusters with FOPI};
719: T. Yamazaki, K. Suzuki, L. Fabietti, P. Kienle, and N. Hermann,
720: {\it Search for K Nuclear Clusters in Nuclear Collisions with FOPI},
721: (unpublished) 2005;
722: M. Agnello {\it et al.} (the FINUDA Collaboration),
723: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 212303 (2005).
724: \bibitem{TDB1}
725: Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki,
726: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 65}, 044005 (2002);
727: T. Yamazaki and Y. Akaishi,
728: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 535}, 70 (2002).
729: \bibitem{AI05}
730: A. N. Ivanov, P. Kienle, J. Marton, and E. Widmann,
731: {\it Phenomenological model of the Kaonic
732: Nuclear Cluster $K^-pp$ in the ground state}, nucl--th/0512037.
733: \bibitem{PDG04}
734: S. Eidelman {\it et al.} (The Particle Data Group),
735: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 595}, 1 (2004).
736: \bibitem{PDG04a}
737: (see \cite{PDG04} p.922)
738: \bibitem{LL71}
739: L. L. Landau und E. M. Lifschitz,
740: in {\it LEHRBUCH DER THEORETISCHEN PHYSIK}, Band IVa,
741: {\it RELATIVISTISCHE QUANTENTHEORIE} von
742: W. B. Berestetzki, E. M. Lifschitz, und L. P. Pitajewski,
743: Akademie--Verlag, Berlin, 1971, ss. 111--116, 270--274.
744: \bibitem{AI01}
745: A. Ya. Berdnikov, Ya. A. Berdnikov, A. N. Ivanov, V. A. Ivanova, V. F. Kosmach, and
746: N. I. Troitskaya,
747: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 12}, 341 (2001).
748: \bibitem{RG57}
749: R. Gatto,
750: Phys. Rev. {\bf 109}, 610 (1958).
751: \bibitem{GF58}
752: G. Feldman and T. Fulton,
753: Nucl. Phys. {\bf 8}, 106 (1958).
754: \bibitem{NB61}
755: N. Byers and H. Burkhardt,
756: Phys. Rev. {\bf 121}, 281 (1961).
757: \bibitem{QSR}
758: Sni--lin Zhu, W--Y. P. Hwang, and Ze--sen Yang,
759: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 1527 (1998) and references therein.
760: \bibitem{AI1a}
761: The coupling constant $g_B$ is defined by \cite{AI1}:
762: \[g_{\pi NN} = g^2_B\frac{2}{3}\,\frac{m}{F_{\pi}}\,\frac{\langle
763: \bar{q}q\rangle^2}{m^2_N},\] where $g_{\pi NN} = 13.21$ is the $\pi
764: NN$ coupling constant, $F_{\pi} = 92.4\,{\rm MeV}$ is the PCAC
765: constant of $\pi$\,--\,meson, $\langle \bar{q}q\rangle = (-\,253)^3\,{\rm
766: MeV}^3$ is the quark condensate (\ref{label3.9}), and $m = 330\,{\rm
767: MeV}$ is the constituent quark mass, calculated in the chiral limit.
768: This results in $g_B = 1.37\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-2}$.
769: \bibitem{JG83}
770: J. Gasser,
771: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 86}, 257 (2000) and references therein.
772: H. Leutwyler, PiN Newslett. {\bf 15}, 1 (1999);
773: B. Borasoy and B. Holstein,
774: Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 6}, 85 (1999);
775: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59}, 094025 (1999);
776: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 054021 (1999);
777: Ulf-G. Mei\ss ner,
778: PiN Newslett. {\bf 13}, 7 (1997);
779: H. Leutwyler,
780: Ann. of Phys. {\bf 235}, 165 (1994);
781: G. Ecker,
782: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 36}, 71 (1996);
783: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 35}, 1 (1995);
784: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 16}, 581 (1990);
785: E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar,
786: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 225}, 558 (1991);
787: J. Gasser, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 279}, 65 (1987);
788: J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,
789: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 250}, 465 (1985);
790: Ann. of Phys. {\bf 158}, 142 (1984);
791: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 125}, 321 (1983).
792: \bibitem{EW79}
793: E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 160}, 57 (1979),
794: In the multicolour QCD with gauge $SU(N_C)$ symmetry, where $N_C$ is the number of
795: quark degrees of freedom, baryon masses are proportional to $N_C$ at $N_C \to \infty$.
796: Hence, a heavy--baryon limit can be identified with
797: a leading order in the large $N_C$ expansion (see also R. Flores--Mendieta,
798: {\it Topics on heavy--baryon ChPT in the large $N_C$ limit}, hep--ph/0207138
799: and references therein).
800: \bibitem{AI00}
801: A. N. Ivanov, N. I. Troitskaya, H. Oberhummer, and M. Faber,
802: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 7}, 519 (2000),
803: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 8}, 129 (2000),
804: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 8}, 223 (2000);
805: A. N. Ivanov, V. A. Ivanova, H. Oberhummer, N. I. Troitskaya, and
806: M. Faber,
807: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 12}, 87 (2001);
808: A. N. Ivanov, M. Cargnelli, M. Faber, H. Fuhrmann, V. A. Ivanova, J. Marton,
809: N. I. Troitskaya, and J. Zmeskal,
810: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 23}, 1 (2005); nucl--th/0406081.
811: \bibitem{TE05}
812: T. E. O. Ericson and A. N. Ivanov,
813: {\it Isospin breaking in threshold $\pi $N scattering by radiative processes},
814: hep\,--\,ph/0503277.
815: \bibitem{EQM}
816: A. N. Ivanov, M. Nagy and N. I. Troitskaya,
817: Intern. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 7}, 7305 (1992);
818: A. N. Ivanov,
819: Intern. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 8}, 853 (1993);
820: A. N. Ivanov, N. I. Troitskaya and M. Nagy,
821: Intern. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 8}, 2027, 3425 (1993).
822: \end{thebibliography}
823: \end{document}
824:
825: