1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside,onecolumn]{article}
2: \usepackage[]{latexsym}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: %
5: \setlength{\oddsidemargin} {0.0 cm}
6: \setlength{\evensidemargin} {0.0 cm}
7: \setlength{\topmargin} {0.0 cm}
8: \setlength{\textwidth} {16.5cm}
9: \setlength{\textheight} {22.0cm}
10: %
11: %
12: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}
13: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
14: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\mbox{$\langle\, #1 \mid$}}
15: \newcommand{\bbra}[1]{\mbox{$\left\langle\, #1 \right\mid$}}
16: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\mbox{$\mid #1\,\rangle$}}
17: \newcommand{\bket}[1]{\mbox{$\left\mid #1\,\right\rangle$}}
18: \newcommand{\pro}[2]{\mbox{$\langle\, #1 \mid #2\,\rangle$}}
19: \newcommand{\expec}[1]{\mbox{$\langle\, #1\,\rangle$}}
20: \newcommand{\expecl}[1]{\mbox{$\left\langle\,\strut\displaystyle{#1}\,\right\rangle$}}
21: \newcommand{\real}{\mbox{{\rm I\hspace{-2truemm} R}}}
22: \renewcommand{\natural}{\mbox{{\rm I\hspace{-2truemm} N}}}
23: \newcommand{\re}{\real{\rm e}}
24: \renewcommand{\a}{\hat a}
25: \newcommand{\ac}{\hat a^{\dagger}}
26: \renewcommand{\b}{\hat b}
27: \newcommand{\bc}{\hat b^\dagger}
28: \renewcommand{\d}{\mbox{{\rm d}}}
29: %
30: %
31: \setcounter{equation}{0}
32: \def\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
33: %
34: %
35: %
36: \title{\bf Probing quantum gravity effects in black holes at LHC}
37: %
38: %
39: \author{
40: G.L.~Alberghi$^{a,b,c}$\thanks{alberghi@bo.infn.it},$\ $
41: R.~Casadio$^{a,b}$\thanks{casadio@bo.infn.it},$\ $
42: D.~Galli$^{a,b}$\thanks{galli@bo.infn.it},$\ $
43: D.~Gregori$^{a,b}$\thanks{gregori@bo.infn.it},$\ $
44: A.~Tronconi$^{a,b}$\thanks{tronconi@bo.infn.it}$\ $ and
45: V.~Vagnoni$^{b}$\thanks{vagnoni@bo.infn.it}
46: \\
47: $^a${\em Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Bologna}
48: \\
49: {\em via Irnerio~46, 40126 Bologna Italy}
50: \\
51: $^b${\em Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna}
52: \\
53: {\em via Irnerio~46, 40126 Bologna, Italy}\\
54: %
55: $^c${\em Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Bologna}
56: \\
57: {\em via Ranzani~1, 40126 Bologna Italy}}
58: %
59: %
60: \begin{document}
61: %
62: %
63: \maketitle
64: %
65: %
66: \begin{abstract}
67: We study modifications of the Hawking emission in the evaporation of
68: miniature black~holes possibly produced in accelerators when their mass
69: approaches the fundamental scale of gravity, set to $1\,$TeV according
70: to some extra dimension models.
71: Back-reaction and quantum gravity corrections are modelled
72: by employing modified relations between the black hole mass
73: and temperature. We release the assumption that black holes explode
74: at $1\,$TeV or leave a remnant, and let them evaporate to much
75: smaller masses.
76: We have implemented such modified decay processes into an existing
77: micro-black hole event generator, performing a study of the decay
78: products in order to search for phenomenological evidence of quantum
79: gravity effects.
80: \end{abstract}
81: %
82: \setcounter{page}{1}
83: %
84: %
85: \section{Introduction}
86: \setcounter{equation}{0}
87: %
88: One of the most exciting features of models with large extra
89: dimensions~\cite{arkani,RS} is that the fundamental scale of gravity
90: $M_{\rm G}$ could be as low as the electroweak scale
91: ($M_{\rm G}\simeq 1$~TeV) and black holes may therefore
92: be produced in our accelerators~\cite{banks,Giddings3}.
93: Black holes have been studied in both compact~\cite{argyres} and
94: infinitely extended~\cite{chamblin,ehm} extra~dimensions (see
95: also~\cite{cavaglia} for recent reviews).
96: The basic feature of black hole production is that its cross section
97: should essentially be given by the horizon area of the forming black
98: hole and grows with the centre of mass energy of the colliding particles
99: as a power which depends on the number of
100: extra-dimensions~\cite{banks,Giddings3}.
101: \par
102: Once the black hole has formed (and after possible transients),
103: Hawking radiation~\cite{hawking} is expected to set off.
104: The standard description of this effect leads to the (canonical)
105: Planckian distribution for emitted particles and black hole life-times
106: so short that the decay of micro black holes can be viewed
107: as sudden~\cite{dimopoulos}.
108: This picture has been implemented in numerical
109: codes~\cite{charybdis,trunoir} which normally let the black hole decay
110: down to a mass of order $M_{\rm G}$ via the Hawking law and then
111: explode into a (selectable) number of decay products.
112: However, energy conservation is not guaranteed {\em a priori\/}
113: in the canonical ensemble and the black hole temperature in fact
114: diverges for vanishing black hole mass.
115: Energy conservation is therefore enforced by means of kinematical
116: contraints.
117: From a theoretical point of view, such issues can be taken care of
118: by employing the more consistent microcanonical description of black
119: hole evaporation~\cite{mfd} which has been first applied in the context
120: of large extra dimensions in Refs.~\cite{bc,hossenfelder1,rizzo}.
121: It was then shown that actual life-times can vary greatly depending
122: on the model details~\cite{bcLHC,rizzo}.
123: Further, the possibility of ending the evaporation by leaving a stable
124: remnant has also been recently considered~\cite{hossenfelder2}.
125: \par
126: The issue of the end of the evaporation is really an open question
127: theoretically, because we do not have a reliable theory of quantum
128: gravity.
129: One could in fact go as far as to say that theoretical physicists
130: are looking forward to detecting black holes at the Large Hadron
131: Collider (LHC) in order to finally have experimental data about
132: quantum gravity.
133: The very detection of these objects would already be evidence that
134: $M_{\rm G}$ is not the (naive) Planck energy (about $10^{19}\,$GeV)
135: and extra dimensions do exist.
136: Furthermore, the late stage of black hole evaporation (when its mass
137: $M\sim M_{\rm G}$) could tell us more about the details of
138: quantum gravity.
139: The question then naturally arises as whether deviations from the
140: Hawking law induced by the underlying theory of quantum gravity
141: can actually be detected.
142: The purpose of this report is precisely to study if a modified
143: evaporation law at small black hole mass ($M\sim M_{\rm G}$)
144: can produce detectable differences provided energy conservation
145: is properly enforced.
146: The latter requirement in fact changes the actual distribution
147: of emitted particles even for the case of the standard Hawking law,
148: as we shall also show.
149: For this purpose, we have developed modifications to the CHARYBDIS Monte Carlo
150: code \cite{charybdis}, which we shall describe in some details in Section~\ref{TTGM}.
151: Preliminary results from a few test runs are then analyzed in
152: Section~\ref{sim}.
153: \par
154: We use units with $c=\hbar=k_{\rm B}=1$ and denote the fundamental
155: gravity length in $D$ space-time dimensions as $\ell_{D}$.
156: %
157: %
158: %
159: \section{Black hole evaporation}
160: \setcounter{equation}{0}
161: %
162: The no-hair theorems guarantee that a black hole is characterized by
163: its mass, charges and angular momentum only.
164: The only parameter characterizing an uncharged non-rotating black hole is
165: thus its mass $M$.
166: On considering solutions to the Einstein equations
167: (or applying Gauss' theorem) in $4+d$ dimensions, one can derive
168: the following relation between the mass and the horizon radius of such
169: a black hole,
170: \be
171: R_{\rm H}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}\,M_{\rm G}}\,
172: \left(\frac{M}{M_{\rm G}}\right)^{\frac{1}{d+1}}
173: \left(\frac{8\,\Gamma\left(\frac{d+3}{2}\right)}{d+2}
174: \right)^{\frac{1}{d+1}}
175: \ ,
176: \ee
177: and its temperature is given by
178: \be
179: T_{\rm H} =\frac{d+1}{4\,\pi\,R_{\rm H}}
180: \ .
181: \label{TH}
182: \ee
183: \par
184: Once formed, the black hole begins to evolve.
185: In the standard picture the evaporation process can be
186: divided into three characteristic stages~\cite{Giddings3}:
187: %
188: \begin{enumerate}
189: %
190: \item {\sc Balding phase:}
191: the black hole radiates away the multipole moments
192: it has inherited from the initial configuration,
193: and settles down in a hairless state.
194: A certain fraction of the initial mass will also be
195: lost in gravitational radiation.
196: %
197: \item {\sc Evaporation phase:}
198: it starts with a spin down phase in which the Hawking
199: radiation~\cite{hawking} carries away the angular momentum, after
200: which it proceeds with the emission of thermally distributed
201: quanta until the black hole reaches the Planck mass (replaced by
202: the fundamental scale $M_{\rm G}$ in the models we are considering
203: here).
204: The radiation spectrum contains all the Standard Model particles,
205: which are emitted on our brane, as well as gravitons, which are
206: also emitted into the extra~dimensions.
207: It is in fact expected that most of the initial energy is emitted
208: during this phase into Standard Model particles~\cite{ehm}
209: although this conclusion is still being debated (see,
210: e.g.~Ref.~\cite{cavaglia2}).
211: %
212: \item {\sc Planck phase:}
213: once the black hole has reached a mass close to the effective Planck
214: scale $M_{\rm G}$, it falls into the regime of quantum gravity and
215: predictions become increasingly difficult.
216: It is generally assumed that the black hole will either completely
217: decay in some last few Standard Model particles or a stable remnant
218: be left which carries away the remaining energy~\cite{hossenfelder2}.
219: %
220: \end{enumerate}
221: \par
222: In our approach we will consider possible modifications to the
223: second and third phases.
224: On one hand, we will modify the Hawking phase by employing a
225: different relation between the horizon radius and the temperature.
226: On the other hand, we will look at the possibility that the evaporation
227: may not end at the fundamental scale $M_{\rm G}$ ($\sim 1\,$TeV)
228: but proceeds further until a lower energy has been reached.
229: %
230: %
231: \subsection{Quantum gravity and Monte Carlo generator}
232: %
233: \label{TTGM}
234: %
235: Several Monte Carlo codes which
236: simulate the production and decay of micro-black holes
237: (see, e.g.~Refs.~\cite{charybdis,trunoir,ahn}) are available nowadays.
238: Instead of developing from scratch a new event generator, we have
239: found convenient to adopt the CHARYBDIS code, implementing relevant
240: modifications therein. In the following we are going to describe
241: them in some detail.
242: \par
243: In order to let the black hole evaporate below
244: $M_{\rm G}$, one needs to treat the mass of the emitted particles
245: properly.
246: That includes having the correct phase space measure in the
247: Planckian number density for the emitted particles,
248: \be
249: N_m(\vec k)=\frac{d^3 k}{e^{\omega/T_{\rm H}}\pm 1}
250: \ ,
251: \label{N_k}
252: \ee
253: where $m$ is the particle mass, $\vec k$ the particle 3-momentum
254: and $\omega=\sqrt{k^2+m^2}$.
255: Moreover, since $N_m$ depends on $m$ and not just on the statistics,
256: one cannot assume a fixed ratio of production for fermions versus
257: bosons but particle multiplicity should be used when generating
258: particle types randomly.
259: We therefore use the multiplicities predicted by the Standard
260: Model~\cite{pdg}.
261: \par
262: In order to include possible quantum gravity effects, we then
263: employ modified expressions for the temperature of the form
264: \be
265: T=F_i\,T_{\rm H}
266: \ ,
267: \ee
268: in which, to cover results in the existing literature (for a partial
269: list of approaches to the problem, see
270: Refs.~\cite{mfd,hossenfelder1,rizzo,bcLHC,nicolini}), we shall
271: consider two possible modifying factors,
272: \be
273: F_{1}(\ell,\alpha,n)=\frac{R_{\rm H}^n}{R_{\rm H}^n+\alpha\,\ell^n}
274: \label{Tmod1}
275: \ee
276: and
277: \be
278: F_{2}(\ell,n_1,n_2)=\left[1-\left(\frac{\ell}{R_H}\right)^{n_1}\right]^{n_2}
279: \label{Tmod2}
280: \ ,
281: \ee
282: where $\ell$, $\alpha$, $n$, $n_1$, and $n_2$ are parameters that can be
283: adjusted (see below).
284: Note that $F_1$ leads to a vanishing temperature for vanishing black hole
285: mass (horizon radius), whereas with $F_2$ the temperature vanishes at
286: finite $M$ (see~\cite{nicolini} and References therein).
287: Specific examples are shown in Fig.~\ref{T} together with the
288: standard Hawking law~(\ref{TH}).
289: \par
290: A list of some adjustable parameters is given in Table~\ref{FreePar} and
291: we just wish to make a few remarks.
292: The initial black hole mass $M_0$ can be either fixed (to within the maximum
293: centre mass energy expected at the LHC) or generated randomly.
294: During the decay, when $M<M_{\rm f}$ the black hole explodes in a selectable
295: number $N_{\rm f}$ of fragments.
296: An important aspect of our analysis is that we set the grey-body factors
297: to 1 for all kinds of particles.
298: It is to be expected that this approximation becomes too restrictive,
299: particularly if the final black hole mass is of the order of (a few) GeV.
300: However, we are not currently aware of any computations of grey-body factors
301: which include massive particles and have left this issue for future developments.
302: %
303: %
304: %
305: %
306: \begin{table}[h]
307: \centerline{
308: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
309: \hline
310: $M_0$
311: &
312: Initial black hole mass
313: &
314: $1-14$\,TeV; random
315: \\
316: \hline
317: $M_{\rm f}$
318: &
319: Minimum black hole mass
320: &
321: $1-1000$\,GeV
322: \\
323: \hline
324: $N_{\rm f}$
325: &
326: number of final fragments
327: &
328: $2-6$
329: \\
330: \hline
331: $d$
332: &
333: number of extra dimensions
334: &
335: $2-6$
336: \\
337: \hline
338: $F_i$
339: &
340: modified temperature
341: &
342: $1$ (no modification), $F_1$, $F_2$
343: \\
344: \hline
345: \end{tabular}
346: }
347: \caption{Parameters that can be adjusted in the Monte Carlo generator
348: and their ranges.
349: For each modified temperature, one can also set the corresponding
350: parameters as described in the text.}
351: \label{FreePar}
352: \end{table}
353: %
354: %
355: %
356: %
357: \begin{figure}[t]
358: \centerline{
359: \raisebox{4cm}{$T$}
360: \epsfxsize=200pt\epsfbox{Tmod1.eps}
361: \hspace{0.5cm}
362: \raisebox{4cm}{$T$}
363: \epsfxsize=200pt\epsfbox{Tmod2.eps}
364: }
365: \hspace{7cm}
366: $M$
367: \hspace{7cm}
368: $M$
369: %
370: \caption{Black hole temperature (in GeV) as a function of the black hole
371: mass (in GeV).
372: In the left panel, we compare the Hawking law (solid line) to
373: the case in Eq.~(\ref{Tmod1}) for $\ell=10^{-3}\,$GeV$^{-1}$, $\alpha=5$, $n=5$
374: (dashed line) and $\ell=10^{-3}\,$GeV$^{-1}$, $\alpha=5$, $n=1$ (dotted line).
375: In the right panel, the Hawking law (solid line) is compared
376: to the modified case~(\ref{Tmod2}) for $\ell=1.14\cdot 10^{-4}\,$GeV$^{-1}$,
377: $n_1=1$, $n_2=1$ (dotted line).
378: \label{T}
379: }
380: \end{figure}
381: %
382: %
383: %
384: \section{Simulation results}
385: %
386: \label{sim}
387: %
388: %
389: %
390: \begin{figure}[ht]
391: \centerline{
392: \epsfxsize=220pt\epsfbox{panam.eps}
393: \hspace{0.5cm}
394: \epsfxsize=220pt\epsfbox{energy.eps}
395: }
396: %
397: \caption{Left panel: abundance of Standard Model particles produced during
398: the evaporation of 10~TeV black holes, for a run of 10000 events with
399: the modified law~(\ref{Tmod1}) (solid histogram) and with the standard
400: CHARYBDIS generator (dashed histogram).
401: The fundamental scale of gravity is set to 1~TeV, temperature parameters
402: are the same as in left panel of Fig.~\ref{T} and number of extra dimensions
403: $d=2$.
404: Right panel: energy distribution of the emitted particles obtained
405: with the modified law~(\ref{Tmod1}) (solid histogram), including only
406: particles emitted when the black hole has a mass exceeding 1~TeV
407: (dashed histogram), and with the standard CHARYBDIS generator
408: (dotted histogram).
409: \label{panam}
410: }
411: \end{figure}
412: %
413: %
414: The standard CHARYBDIS generator simulates the evaporation of a micro-black
415: hole according to the Hawking's law until the black hole mass reaches the
416: fundamental scale of gravity $M_{\rm G}$ in a given model of extra dimensions
417: (e.g.,~at 1~TeV).
418: Once the scale $M_{\rm G}$ is reached, the black hole remnant is decayed into
419: a few bodies simply according to phase space.
420: As described in the previous section, in our modified version we implemented
421: ways to cope with the evaporation well below the fundamental scale, down to
422: negligible black hole masses.
423: We shall thus compare the outcomes of the generator for the standard and
424: modified versions from a phenomenological point of view.
425: \par
426: In the simulations run this far, we noted that modified
427: temperatures~(\ref{Tmod1}) and~(\ref{Tmod2}) produced qualitatively similar
428: results when the black hole mass such that $R_{\rm H}>\ell$.
429: Further, the case of Eq.~(\ref{Tmod2}) corresponds to a remnant of radius
430: $R_{\rm H}=\ell$ which has been considered elsewhere~\cite{hossenfelder2}.
431: We shall therefore refer only to the results obtained for the temperature modified
432: by the factor $F_1$ with the parameters given in the caption of Fig.~\ref{T}.
433: Since the temperature behaviour at low mass values is no longer divergent
434: and tends to zero for $M=0$ in this case, we do expect a continuous
435: emmission of increasingly softer particles until the black hole evaporates
436: completely.
437: Once the black hole mass has decreased below the threshold for
438: producing a given particle, such a particle can no longer be emitted.
439: Hence one expects that the production of the heavier particles, i.e.~massive gauge
440: bosons and top quarks, is scarsely affected, while the emission of soft
441: low mass (or massless) particles is largely enhanced.
442: \par
443: A comparison of the relative abundance of the Standard Model particles
444: produced by the black hole evaporation with and without using the modified
445: law of the form~(\ref{Tmod1}) -- before parton evolution and hadronization are
446: performed -- is shown in the left panel of Fig.~\ref{panam}.
447: In the right panel of Fig.~\ref{panam} we show the energy distribution
448: of the emitted particles.
449: As expected, the modified law dramatically changes the spectrum
450: at low energy, leaving the spectrum at large energy moderately affected.
451: This translates into a much larger multiplicity of isotropically emitted
452: soft particles which might be a possible phenomenological signature of
453: quantum gravity effects.
454: %
455: %
456: %
457: \section{Conclusions}
458: \setcounter{equation}{0}
459: %
460: %
461: We have considered possible modifications for the decay of
462: micro-black holes around the fundamental scale of gravity
463: $M_{\rm G}$ (of order $1$~TeV).
464: Inspired by the microcanonical description of the Hawking
465: evaporation and other treatments in the literature, we have
466: studied modified statistical laws for the temperature
467: together with the requirement of energy conservation enforced
468: up to the end of the evaporation at a scale
469: $M_{\rm f}\ll M_{\rm G}$.
470: \par
471: The numerical simulations we have run so far suggest that
472: such modification mainly affect the total number of light and massless
473: particles emitted at very small energy.
474: On lowering the minimum black hole mass $M_{\rm f}$ increases
475: this number. The detection of the isotropic emission of a large number of
476: soft isolated particles (i.e. not associated to jet-like topologies)
477: could be an evidence in favour of a specific decay law or of a
478: specific theory of quantum gravity.
479: \par
480: In our analysis we have not explicitly considered the case in which
481: black holes leave stable remnants since it has already been
482: reported in Ref.~\cite{hossenfelder2}.
483: Let us just mention that very large values of $\alpha$ and/or $\ell$
484: in the modified temperature~(\ref{Tmod1}) (together with energy conservation)
485: would make it very hard for the black holes to continue the emission for
486: $M\ll M_{\rm G}$ and stable remnants would be effectively produced.
487: %
488: %
489: %
490: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
491: %
492: \bibitem{arkani}
493: N.~Arkani-Hamed, S.~Dimopoulos and G.~Dvali, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 429},
494: 263 (1998);
495: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803315;%%
496: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59}, 0806004 (1999);
497: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807344;%%
498: I.~Antoniadis, N.~Arkani-Hamed, S.~Dimopoulos and G.~Dvali,
499: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 436}, 257 (1998).
500: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804398;%%
501: %
502: \bibitem{RS}
503: L.~Randall and R.~Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 4690 (1999);
504: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9906064;%%
505: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 3370 (1999).
506: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905221;%%
507: %
508: \bibitem{banks}
509: T.~Banks and W.~Fishler, {\em A model for high energy scattering in
510: quantum gravity}, hep-th/9906038;
511: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9906038;%%
512: S.B.~Giddings and E.~Katz, {\em Effective theories and black hole
513: production in warped compactifications}, hep-th/0009176;
514: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0009176;%%
515: %
516: \bibitem{Giddings3}
517: S.B.~Giddings and S.~Thomas, {\em High energy colliders as black
518: hole factories: the end of short distance physics}, hep-ph/0106219.
519: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106219;%%
520: %
521: \bibitem{argyres}
522: P.C.~Argyres, S.~Dimopoulos and J.~March-Russell, Phys. Lett.
523: {\bf B 441}, 96 (1998);
524: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9808138;%%
525: R.~Casadio and B.~Harms, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 487} (2000) 209;
526: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0004004;%%
527: R.~Casadio, Annals Phys. {\bf 307}, 195 (2003).
528: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304099;%%
529: %
530: \bibitem{chamblin}
531: A.~Chamblin, S.~Hawking and H.S.~Reall, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61},
532: 0605007 (2000);
533: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9909205;%%
534: R.~Casadio and L.~Mazzacurati, Mod. Phys. Lett. A {\bf 18}, 651 (2003);
535: %%CITATION = GR-QC 0205129;%%
536: R.~Casadio, A.~Fabbri and L.~Mazzacurati,
537: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65}, 084040 (2002).
538: %%CITATION = GR-QC 0111072;%%
539: %
540: \bibitem{ehm}
541: R.~Emparan, G.T.~Horowitz and R.C.~Myers, Phys. Rev. Lett.
542: {\bf 85} (2000) 499;
543: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0003118;%%
544: %
545: \bibitem{cavaglia}
546: M.~Cavaglia, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 18}, 1843 (2003);
547: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210296;%%
548: P.~Kanti, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 19}, 4899 (2004).
549: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402168;%%
550: %
551: \bibitem{hawking}
552: S.W.~Hawking, Nature {\bf 248}, 30 (1974);
553: %%CITATION = NATUA,248,30;%%
554: Comm. Math. Phys. {\bf 43}, 199 (1975).
555: %%CITATION = CMPHA,43,199;%%
556: %
557: \bibitem{dimopoulos}
558: S.~Dimopoulos and G.~Landsberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87} (2001)
559: 161602.
560: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106295;%%
561: %
562: \bibitem{charybdis}
563: C.~M.~Harris, P.~Richardson and B.R.~Webber,
564: JHEP {\bf 0308}, 033 (2003).
565: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307305;%%
566: %
567: \bibitem{trunoir}
568: S.~Dimopoulos and G.~Landsberg,
569: {\em Black hole production at future colliders},
570: in {\it Proc.~of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle
571: Physics (Snowmass 2001)},
572: edited by N.~Graf, eConf {\bf C010630}, P321 (2001).
573: %%CITATION = ECONF,C010630,P321;%%
574: %
575: \bibitem{mfd}
576: R.~Casadio, B.~Harms and Y.~Leblanc, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}
577: 1309 (1998);
578: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9706005;%%
579: R.~Casadio and B.~Harms, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 044014 (1998);
580: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9712017;%%
581: Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A14}, 1089 (1999).
582: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9806032;%%
583: %
584: \bibitem{bc}
585: R.~Casadio and B.~Harms, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64} (2001) 024016;
586: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0101154;%%
587: %
588: \bibitem{hossenfelder1}
589: S.~Hossenfelder, S.~Hofmann, M.~Bleicher and H.~Stoecker,
590: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66}, 101502 (2002)
591: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109085;%%
592: %
593: \bibitem{rizzo}
594: T.~G.~Rizzo,
595: ``TeV-scale black holes in warped higher-curvature gravity,''
596: hep-ph/0510420;
597: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0510420;%%
598: ``TeV-scale black hole lifetimes in extra-dimensional Lovelock gravity,''
599: arXiv: hep-ph/0601029.
600: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0601029;%%
601: %
602: \bibitem{bcLHC}
603: R.~Casadio and B.~Harms, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 17}, 4635 (2002)
604: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0110255;%
605: %
606: \bibitem{nicolini}
607: P.~Nicolini,
608: ``Noncommutative nonsingular black holes'',
609: hep-th/0510203;
610: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0510203;%%
611: P.~Nicolini, A.~Smailagic and E.~Spallucci,
612: ``Noncommutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole,''
613: gr-qc/0510112.
614: %%CITATION = GR-QC 0510112;%%
615: %
616: \bibitem{hossenfelder2}
617: B.~Koch, M.~Bleicher and S.~Hossenfelder,
618: ``Black hole remnants at the LHC'',
619: hep-ph/0507138.
620: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507138;%%
621: %
622: \bibitem{cavaglia2}
623: V.~Cardoso, M.~Cavaglia and L.~Gualtieri,
624: ``Hawking emission of gravitons in higher dimensions: non-rotating black
625: holes,''
626: hep-th/0512116.
627: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0512116;%%
628: %
629: \bibitem{ahn}
630: E.~J.~Ahn and M.~Cavaglia,
631: ``Simulations of black hole air showers in cosmic ray detectors,''
632: hep-ph/0511159.
633: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0511159;%%
634: %
635: \bibitem{pdg}
636: S.~Eidelman {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group],
637: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 592} (2004) 1.
638: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B592,1;%%
639: %
640: \end{thebibliography}
641: %
642: %
643: \end{document}
644: