1: \documentclass[dvips,12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \textheight 9.5in \textwidth 6.5in
4: \oddsidemargin -0.15in \topmargin -0.7in
5: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5}
6: \begin{document}
7: \thispagestyle{empty}
8:
9: \begin{center}
10: {\large{\bf Critical Opalescence in Baryonic QCD Matter}}\\
11: \vspace{2cm}
12: {\large N.~G.~Antoniou, F.~K.~Diakonos, A.~S.~Kapoyannis}\\
13: {\it Department of Physics, University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece}\\
14: \vspace{0.5cm}
15: {\large K.~S.~Kousouris}\\
16: {\it National Research Center ``Demokritos'', Institute of Nuclear
17: Physics, Ag. Paraskevi, 15310 Athens, Greece}
18: \vspace{1cm}
19:
20: \end{center}
21: \vspace{0.5cm}
22:
23: \begin{abstract}
24: We show that critical opalescence, a clear signature of second-order phase transition in conventional
25: matter, manifests itself as critical intermittency in QCD matter produced in
26: experiments with nuclei. This behaviour is revealed in transverse momentum spectra
27: as a pattern of power laws in factorial moments, to all orders, associated with baryon
28: production. This phenomenon together with a similar effect in the isoscalar sector of
29: pions (sigma mode) provide us with a set of observables associated with the
30: search for the QCD critical point in experiments with nuclei at high energies.
31: \end{abstract}
32:
33: \vspace{3cm}
34: PACS numbers: 05.70.Jk,12.38.Mh
35:
36: \vspace{1cm}
37:
38: {\small
39: {\it e-mail addresses:}
40:
41: nantonio@phys.uoa.gr (N.G.~Antoniou)
42:
43: fdiakono@phys.uoa.gr (F.K.~Diakonos)
44:
45: akapog@phys.uoa.gr (A.S.~Kapoyannis)
46:
47: kousouris@inp.demokritos.gr (K.S.~Kousouris)}
48:
49:
50:
51: \newpage
52: \setcounter{page}{1}
53:
54: It has been suggested recently that the baryon number fluctuations, in
55: event-by-event studies of multiparticle production, may lead to new
56: observables, in experiments with nuclei, associated with the existence and
57: location of the critical point in the QCD phase diagram [1]. Theoretically,
58: the significance of the baryon number density $n_B(\vec{x})$ near the
59: critical point comes from the fact that its fluctuations, expressed in terms
60: of the density-density correlator $\left<n_B(\vec{x})n_B(0)\right>$, follow
61: the same power law as the sigma field correlator
62: $\left<\sigma(\vec{x})\sigma(0)\right>$
63: associated with the chiral order parameter
64: $\sigma(\vec{x})\sim\bar{\Psi}\Psi$
65: [1,2]. As a result, the critical thermodynamics of QCD matter in equilibrium
66: can be
67: formulated in terms of the baryon number density $n_B(\vec{x})$,
68: an alternative but equivalent order parameter related to the final state of
69: nuclear collisions when they freeze out close to the critical point. The
70: corresponding theory of critical power laws in the baryon sector, the observability of
71: which we explore in this Letter, is based on the effective action belonging to $3d$
72: Ising universality class:
73: \begin{equation}
74: \Gamma_c\left[n_B\right]=T_c^{-5}g^2\int d^3\vec{x}
75: \left[\frac{1}{2}\left|\nabla n_B\right|^2+
76: Gg^{\delta-1}T_c^8 \left|T_c^{-3}n_B\right|^{\delta+1}\right]
77: \end{equation}
78: where $\delta\simeq5$ is the isotherm critical exponent and $G$ a universal,
79: dimensionless coupling in the effective potential, with a value in the range
80: $G\simeq1.5-2$ [3]. In writing eq.~(1) we have considered, following the above
81: discussion, the order parameter $m(\vec{x})= gT_c^{-2}n_B\left(\vec{x}\right)$,
82: associated with the fluctuations of baryon number density at the critical point;
83: the factor $T_c^{-2}$ guarantees dimensional consistency and $g$ is a nonuniversal
84: dimensionless constant.
85:
86: The free energy (1) in order to describe a critical system of QCD matter
87: produced in nuclear collisions, must be adapted to the relativistic geometry
88: of the collision. To this end, the longitudinal coordinate $x_{\parallel}$ is
89: replaced by the space-time rapidity $y$ and the corresponding measure of
90: integration in (1) takes the form: $dx_{\parallel}=\tau_c\cosh y dy$ where
91: $\tau_c$ is the formation time of the critical point. In the central region
92: of size $\delta y$ the configurations $n_B\left(y,\vec{x}_{\perp}\right)$
93: contributing to the partition function are boost invariant quantities
94: defining at the same time two dimensional baryon-number density
95: configurations $\rho_B\left(\vec{x}_{\perp}\right)$ in the transverse plane:
96: $n_B\left(\vec{x}_{\perp}\right)=\rho_B\left(\vec{x}_{\perp}\right)
97: \left[2\tau_c\sinh\left(\delta y/2\right)\right]^{-1}$.
98: Integrating now in rapidity and rescaling the basic variables:
99: $\vec{x}_{\perp} \rightarrow T_c\vec{x}_{\perp}$,
100: $\rho_B \rightarrow T_c^{-2}\rho_B$, eq.~(1) is simplified as follows:
101: \begin{equation}
102: \Gamma_c\left[\rho_B\right]=Cg^2\int d^2\vec{x}_{\perp}
103: \left[\frac{1}{2}\left|\nabla_{\perp} \rho_B\right|^2+
104: G\left(gC\right)^{\delta-1}\rho_B^{\delta+1}\right]
105: \end{equation}
106: \[
107: C\equiv\left(T_c \tau_{eff} \right)^{-1} \;,\;
108: \tau_{eff} \equiv 2\tau_c \sinh \left(\delta y/2\right)
109: \]
110: The critical fluctuations of systems belonging to the class (2) of a $2d$
111: effective action can be consistently described in a scheme where the
112: saturation of the partition function is obtained considering the contribution
113: of the singular solutions $\rho_B^{\left( s \right)}$ of the Euler-Lagrange
114: equation [4]:
115: \begin{equation}
116: Z\simeq \sum_s e^{-\Gamma_c [\rho_B^{\left( s \right)}]} \; ; \;
117: \nabla_{\perp}^2 \rho_B^{\left( s \right)} -
118: \left(\delta+1\right) G \left(gC\right)^{\delta-1}
119: \left[\rho_B^{\left( s \right)}\right]^{\delta}=0
120: \end{equation}
121: The description of the critical system in this scheme is optimal if
122: $Cg^2 \gg 1$.
123:
124: The main characteristics of critical QCD matter ($\delta \simeq 5$,
125: $G\simeq 2$) produced in nuclear collisions and described by eqs.~(3) are
126: summarized as follows [4]:
127: \newline (a) The system is organized within critical domains (clusters) of a
128: maximal size (correlation length):
129: $\xi_{\perp}\simeq \frac{\pi\tau_c}{8}\sinh\left(\delta y/2\right)$.
130: \newline (b) For typical nuclear collisions ($\tau_c\simeq 10$ fm,
131: $\delta y \geq 2$) the transverse correlation length becomes sufficiently
132: large ($\xi_{\perp}\geq 6$ fm) allowing for critical fluctuations to
133: develop in full strength when the system freezes out near the critical point.
134: \newline (c) Within a critical domain
135: ($\left|\delta \vec{x}_{\perp}\right| \leq \xi_{\perp}$) the correlator
136: obeys a power law corresponding to a fractal dimension
137: $d_F=\frac{2\delta}{\delta +1}$ ($d_F\simeq\frac{5}{3}$):
138: $\left<\rho_B(\vec{x}_{\perp})\rho_B(0)\right>\sim
139: \left|\vec{x}_{\perp}\right|^{d_F -2}$.
140: This power law is the origin of critical opalescence [5] in baryonic QCD
141: matter produced in high-energy nuclear collisions.
142:
143: In conventional matter (QED matter) the phenomenon of critical opalescence
144: is revealed when light of long wavelength (comparable to the correlation
145: length) scatters from a substance near criticality. The intensity of
146: scattered light is proportional to the Fourier transform of the
147: density-density correlator and becomes singular for small momentum transfer
148: $k$ giving rise to a macroscopic effect [5]. In QCD matter, correspondingly,
149: the Fourier transform of the correlator
150: $\left<\rho_B(\vec{x}_{\perp})\rho_B(0)\right>$ obeys also a power law:
151: \[
152: \left<\rho_{\vec{k}}\rho_{\vec{k}}^*\right> \sim
153: \int d^2 \vec{x}_{\perp} e^{-i \vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}_{\perp}}
154: \left<\rho_B(\vec{x}_{\perp})\rho_B(0)\right>
155: \]
156: \begin{equation}
157: \left<\rho_B(\vec{x}_{\perp})\rho_B(0)\right> \sim
158: \left|\vec{x}_{\perp}\right|^{d_F-2} \; ; \;
159: \left|\vec{x}_{\perp}\right|\stackrel{<}{\sim}\xi_{\perp}
160: \end{equation}
161: \[
162: \left<\rho_{\vec{k}}\rho_{\vec{k}}^*\right> \sim
163: |\vec{k}|^{-d_F} \; ; \;
164: |\vec{k}| \stackrel{>}{\sim} \xi_{\perp}^{-1}
165: \]
166: where $\rho_{\vec{k}}$ is the Fourier transform of $\rho_B(\vec{x}_{\perp})$
167: and $\left<\rho_{\vec{k}}\rho_{\vec{k}}^*\right>$ the two-particle
168: correlator in transverse momentum plane, associated with baryon production in
169: nuclear collisions. More precisely,
170: \begin{equation}
171: \left<\rho_{\vec{k}}\rho_{\vec{k}}^*\right> =
172: \sum_{\vec{p}} \left<\rho_B(\vec{p})\rho_B(\vec{p}+\vec{k})\right> \sim
173: \left<\rho_B(0)\rho_B(\vec{k})\right>
174: \end{equation}
175: under the assumption that the dependence of
176: $\left<\rho_B(\vec{p})\rho_B(\vec{p}+\vec{k})\right>$
177: on the reference momentum $\vec{p}$, is weak.
178:
179: The power law (4) in momentum space can be generalized to a self-similarity
180: property of multiparticle correlators, valid for the solution (3) of QCD
181: matter at criticality [4]:
182: \begin{equation}
183: \left<\rho_B(\lambda\vec{k}_1)\cdots\rho_B(\lambda\vec{k}_{q-1})\rho_B(0)\right>
184: =\lambda^{-d_F(q-1)}
185: \left<\rho_B(\vec{k}_1)\cdots\rho_B(\vec{k}_{q-1})\rho_B(0)\right>,\;
186: (q=2,3,\ldots)
187: \end{equation}
188: In geometrical language, eqs.~(6) define a fractal dimension $\tilde{d}_F$ in
189: transverse momentum space, independent of $q$ ($\tilde{d}_F=2-d_F$),
190: directly related to the isotherm critical exponent of QCD:
191: $\tilde{d}_F=\frac{2}{\delta+1}$ [6]. The observable effect implied by (6) is
192: a specific class of power laws, satisfied by the scaled factorial moments of
193: all orders [7]:
194: \begin{equation}
195: F_q(M)=
196: \left[\frac{\left<N_B(N_B-1)\cdots(N_B-q+1)\right>}{\left<N_B\right>^q}\right]_
197: {\delta S_M} \sim
198: M^{d_F (q-1)}\;\; (M \gg 1)
199: \end{equation}
200: ($q=2,3\ldots$) defined in small domains $\delta S_M$ of transverse momentum
201: plane, constructed by a subdivision of the available space in $M^2$
202: two-dimensional cells ($\delta S_M \sim M^{-2}$). The power laws (7) with
203: a characteristic linear spectrum of indices
204: $\alpha_q=(2-\tilde{d}_F)(q-1)$, describe, in general, the fluctuations in a
205: second-order phase transition [6,8] but here, in particular, they reveal the
206: effect of critical intermittency associated with the production of baryonic
207: QCD matter near the critical point. This phenomenon is the analogue of
208: critical opalescence, observed in conventional matter near criticality. Both
209: phenomena have their origin in the power laws of the correlators in
210: configuration space, implying giant density fluctuations at the critical
211: point as a result of the appropriate fractal geometry, valid within the
212: universality class of the critical system under consideration.
213:
214: In order to make the prediction (7) a transparent signature for the QCD
215: critical point in experiments with nuclei, one may proceed to a Monte Carlo
216: simulation of critical events in the case of a typical process A+A at high
217: energies. We have chosen collisions of medium size nuclei producing net baryons in
218: the central region with average multiplicity $\left<N_B\right>\simeq 60$, at
219: energies corresponding to CERN-SPS. At the critical point we expect an
220: extended plateau in the rapidity spectrum of net baryons [1] allowing for a
221: choice $\delta y \simeq 5$ in the system under consideration. A
222: self-consistency requirement in this treatment is the constraint $Cg^2~\gg~1$
223: which may justify a posteriori the saddle point saturation of the partition
224: function leading to eqs.~(3). In order to clarify this issue for the above
225: system under simulation, we consider the following generic form coming from
226: the thermal average $\left<\rho_B\right>$ with the aid of eqs.~(3):
227: \begin{equation}
228: \left<N_B\right>\simeq \frac{1}{g} \left(\frac{S_{cr}}{CG^{1/\delta}}\right)^
229: {\frac{\delta}{\delta+1}}
230: \frac{\Gamma\left(\frac{2}{1+\delta}\right)}
231: {\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{1+\delta}\right)}\;\;\;
232: (\delta\simeq5,\;G\simeq2,\;\tau_c\simeq 10 fm)
233: \end{equation}
234: where $S_{cr}$ is the area of the critical cluster,
235: $S_{cr}\simeq {\cal O}(\xi^2_{\perp})$.
236: For the specifications of the system under study we find
237: $Cg^2~\simeq ~{\cal O}(10^3)$,
238: a result which fulfils comfortably the consistency requirement ($Cg^2~\gg~1$).
239:
240: The simulation of events involving critical fluctuations in the baryonic density
241: requires the generation of baryon transverse momenta correlated according to the
242: power-law (4).
243: One possibility to produce such a set of momenta is to use the method of L\'{e}vy
244: random walks [9]. It is convenient to perform independent one-dimensional walks in
245: each transverse momentum component separately and then form the Cartesian product in
246: order to obtain the corresponding vectors. In this case the successive steps in each
247: dimension are chosen according to the probability density:
248: \begin{equation}
249: \tilde{\rho}(p_i)=\frac{\nu p_{min}^{\nu}}{1-\left(\frac{p_{min}}
250: {p_{max}}\right)^{\nu}} p_i^{-1 -\nu}~~~~;~~~~p_{min} \leq p_i \leq p_{max},
251: ~~~~i=x,y
252: \end{equation}
253: To generate a single event one performs $n-1$ random walk steps in each direction ($p_x$
254: or $p_y$) where $n$ is the multiplicity of the event. At each step the updated position
255: of the walker determines the $p_x$ (or $p_y$) coordinate of the baryon transverse
256: momentum respectively. The starting transverse momentum vector in each event is chosen
257: uniformly in $[-p_{max},p_{max}] \times [-p_{max},p_{max}]$. The produced set of baryon transverse
258: momenta possesses the correct fractal dimension $\tilde{d}_F=\frac{1}{3}$ provided that
259: $\frac{p_{min}}{p_{max}} \approx 10^7$ and $\nu=\frac{1}{6}$.
260: The described algorithm can be used to generate an ensemble of events involving critical baryon density
261: fluctuations. The corresponding fractal pattern can be revealed through factorial moment analysis [7].
262: In Fig.~1 we show, in a log-log plot, the results obtained for an ensemble of 100
263: critical events each one having the multiplicity $n=\langle N_B \rangle =60$.
264: The full circles are the calculated moments up to the 4th order. The solid lines are the theoretical predictions according to eq.~(7). It is clearly
265: seen that the factorial moments follow to a good approximation and for a wide range of scales a power-law behaviour $F_q \sim (M^2)^{s_q}$ with exponents
266: $s_q$ satisfying very well the theoretical prediction $s_q=(q-1)(1-\frac{\tilde{d}_F}{2})$. In the same plot we show for comparison the behaviour of the second
267: moment (grey triangles) in a conventional system corresponding to the formation of mixed events from the original
268: ensemble of the critical events. As expected, the effect of critical fluctuations has
269: disappeared in the system of mixed events (the slope $s_2^{(m)}\simeq0$).
270:
271: \vspace{1cm}
272: {\includegraphics[width=6in,height=4in]{fig1.eps}}
273:
274: {\bf Fig.~1.} {\it The log-log plot of the factorial moments of order $q=2,3,4$ (full circles) for an ensemble of 100 critical events
275: generated by the Monte-Carlo algorithm described in the text. The corresponding theoretical power-law predictions are shown
276: with solid lines. The grey triangles present the result for the second moment for a set of mixed events.}
277: \vspace{1cm}
278:
279: We have shown that baryon-number density fluctuations, near the QCD critical
280: point, develop a distinct pattern of power laws, in transverse momentum
281: plane, associated with the effect of critical intermittency in QCD matter.
282: The observability of this effect is enhanced by the conjecture that the same
283: power laws (Fig.~1) are expected also in the case of net proton-number density
284: fluctuations, avoiding therefore the observational ambiguities from the
285: contribution of neutrons to the factorial moments (7). In fact, it has been
286: argued by Hatta and Stephanov [1] that the singular parts of baryon
287: susceptibility ($\chi_B$) and proton number fluctuations coincide,
288: $\chi_B \sim \left<\delta N_{p-\bar{p}} \delta N_{p-\bar{p}}\right>$.
289: As a result, the power laws associated with these singularities are the same
290: for both the baryon-number and proton-number density correlators. With these
291: remarks we may
292: conclude that proton number measurements in transverse momentum plane may
293: reveal the effect of critical baryon-number intermittency in nuclear
294: collisions, as a signal of QCD criticality. If one combines this observable
295: effect with the corresponding phenomenon in the sigma mode of pion production
296: [10] then a complete set of observables, associated with the existence and
297: location of the QCD critical point, naturally emerges.
298:
299: \vspace{1cm}
300: This work was supported in part by the Research Committee of the University of Athens
301: (research funding program ``Kapodistrias'') and the EPEAEK research funding program ``PYTHAGORAS I'' (70/3/7315) (Ministry of Education).
302:
303: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
304:
305: \bibitem{1} S.~Gavin, nucl-th/9908070;
306: N.~G.~Antoniou, F.~K.~Diakonos, and A.~S.~Kapoyannis, hep-ph/0012163;
307: D.~Bower, and S.~Gavin, Phys.~Rev.~C {\bf 64}, 051902(R) (2001);
308: N.~G.~Antoniou, Nucl.~Phys.~B (Proc.~Suppl.) {\bf 92}, (2001);
309: N.~G.~Antoniou, Acta Physica Polonica {\bf 33}, 1521 (2002);
310: K.~S.~Kousouris, ``Baryonic fluctuations at the QCD critical
311: point'', Proc.~``Correlations and Fluctuations in QCD'', Workshop on Multiparticle
312: Production, Crete, Greece, World Scientific (2003);
313: Y.~Hatta, and M.~A.~Stephanov, Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 91}, 102003 (2003)
314: [arXiv:hep-ph/0302002];
315: Y.~Hatta, and T.~Ikeda, Phys.~Rev.~D {\bf 67}, 014028 (2003)
316: [arXiv:hep-ph/0210284].
317:
318: \bibitem{2} M.~A.~Stephanov, Prog.~Theor.~Phys.~Suppl.~{\bf 153}, 139 (2004)
319: [arXiv:hep-ph/0402115].
320:
321: \bibitem{3} J.~Berges, N.~Tetradis, and C.~Wetterich, Phys.~Rep. {\bf 363},
322: 223 (2002);
323: M.~M.~Tsypin, Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 73}, 2015 (1994).
324:
325: \bibitem{4} N.~G.~Antoniou, Y.~F.~Contoyiannis, F.~K.~Diakonos,
326: and C.~G.~Papadopoulos, Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 81}, 4289 (1998);
327: N.~G.~Antoniou, Y.~F.~Contoyiannis, F.~K.~Diakonos,
328: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 62}, 3125 (2000).
329:
330: \bibitem{5} A.~Lesne, ``Renormalization Methods; Critical Phenomena, Chaos,
331: Fractal Structures'', John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1998;
332: P.~M.~Chaikin, T.~C.~Lubensky, ``Principles of condensed matter physics'',
333: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
334:
335: \bibitem{6} N.~G.~Antoniou, F.~K.~Diakonos, I.~S.~Mistakidis,
336: and C.~G.~Papadopoulos, Phys.~Rev.~D {\bf 49}, 5789 (1994).
337:
338: \bibitem{7} A.~Bialas, and R.~Peshanski, Nucl.~Phys.~B {\bf 273}, 703 (1986);
339: Nucl.~Phys.~B {\bf 308}, 857 (1988);
340: E.~A.~De Wolf, I.~M.~Dremin, and W.~Kittel, Phys.~Rep.~{\bf 270}, 1 (1996).
341:
342: \bibitem{8} H.~Satz, Nucl.~Phys.~B {\bf 326}, 613 (1989);
343: A.~Bialas, and R.~C.~Hwa, Phys.~Lett.~B {\bf 253}, 436 (1991).
344:
345: \bibitem{9} P.~A. Alemany and D.~H. Zanette, Phys. Rev.~E {\bf 49}, R956 (1994).
346:
347: \bibitem{10} N.~G.~Antoniou, Y.~F.~Contoyiannis, F.~K.~Diakonos,
348: A.~I.~Karanikas, and C.~N.~Ktorides, Nucl.~Phys.~A {\bf 693}, 799 (2001);
349: N.~G.~Antoniou, Y.~F.~Contoyiannis, F.~K.~Diakonos, and G.~Mavromanolakis,
350: Nucl.~Phys.~A {\bf 761}, 149 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0505185].
351:
352: \end{thebibliography}
353:
354: \end{document}
355: