1: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
3: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
4: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{The medium in heavy-ion collisions}% Force line breaks with \\
9:
10: \author{I.M. Dremin}
11: \email{dremin@lpi.ru}
12: \affiliation{%
13: Lebedev Physical Institute, \\Moscow 119991, Russia
14: }%
15:
16:
17: \date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
18:
19: \begin{abstract}
20: The nuclear index of refraction, the density of partons, their free path
21: length and energy loss in the matter created in heavy-ion collisions at
22: RHIC are estimated within the suggestion that the emission of Cherenkov
23: gluons is responsible for the observed two-bump structure of the angular
24: distribution of hadrons belonging to the companion (away-side) jet.
25: \end{abstract}
26:
27: \pacs{12.38.Mh, 25.75.Dw}
28:
29: \maketitle
30:
31: Collective effects and jets are the main tools for studies of the nuclear
32: matter created in heavy-ion collisions. The "in-vacuum" and "in-medium"
33: jets are different. The "in-vacuum" jets have been well studied in
34: $e^+e^-$-collisions (for reviews see, e.g., \cite{koch, dgar}). Jet
35: characteristics are, however, modified if jets traverse the nuclear medium.
36: Jet quenching or the suppression of high $p_T$ hadron spectra is one of the
37: well known effects induced by the dense matter. Elliptic flow and jet quenching
38: have been widely used for analysis of partonic properties of the matter, in
39: particular, for estimations of parton densities \cite{hein, wawa, vgyu, xnwa}.
40:
41: A quark traversing this medium can emit gluons by the mechanism analogous
42: to emission of Cherenkov photons in ordinary media. Thus, Cherenkov gluons
43: \cite{d1, d2, dim, mwa, kmwa, stoc, mrup} can serve as another diagnostic
44: tool. Similarly to photons, Cherenkov gluons are emitted along the cone.
45: Its half-angle is determined by the nuclear index of refraction $n$ as
46: \begin{equation}
47: \cos \theta_c=\frac {1}{n}. \label{cos}
48: \end{equation}
49: Therefore, the rings of hadrons similar to usual Cherenkov rings can be
50: observed in the plane perpendicular to the cone axis if $n>1$.
51:
52: Recent experimental observations at RHIC \cite{wang} shown in Fig. 1 revealed
53: the two-bump structure of the angular distribution of hadrons belonging to
54: the so-called companion (away-side) jet in central heavy-ion collisions.
55: There is no such structure in pp-collisions. The difference has been
56: attributed to "in-medium" effects. These features are clearly seen in Fig. 1
57: (the upper part for pp, lower one for Au-Au). One easily notices the
58: remarkable difference between particle distributions in the direction
59: opposite to the trigger jet maximum which is positioned at
60: $\Delta \phi = 0$. Both trigger and companion high-$p_T$
61: jets have been created in central Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt s=200$ GeV
62: at the periphery of a nucleus. They move in opposite directions. The trigger
63: parton immediately escapes the nucleus and, therefore, is detected as the
64: "in-vacuum" jet. The companion (away-side) jet traverses the whole nucleus
65: before it comes out. It is modified by "in-medium" effects. Beside normal
66: fragmentation, its initiating parton can emit Cherenkov gluons which produce
67: a ring of hadrons in the plane perpendicular to the jet axis.
68:
69: Thus we can ascribe two contributions to the away-side hadrons associated
70: with the companion jet: one from jet fragmentation and the other from Cherenkov
71: gluons. The hadrons from jet fragmentation are smoothly distributed within the
72: phase space volume. In distinction, the one-dimensional distribution along the
73: ring diameter of the away-side hadrons created by Cherenkov gluons must possess
74: two peaks because it is just the projection of the ring on its diameter. The
75: distance between these peaks is exactly equal to the diameter.
76:
77: In angular variables, the ring radius is given by $\theta _c$ in Eq.
78: (\ref{cos}). Let us note that $\Delta \phi $ in Fig. 1 coincides with
79: $\theta $ in our notations. Herefrom, it is determined that
80: $\theta _c \approx 70^0$ or $\langle n\rangle \approx 3$, where the average
81: should be done over gluon energy if $n$ depends on it.
82:
83: \begin{figure}
84: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{Fig5n.ps}
85: \caption{
86: The $\phi $-distribution of particles produced by trigger and
87: companion jets at RHIC \cite{wang} shows two peaks in $pp$ and three
88: peaks in AuAu-collisions.
89: }
90: \end{figure}
91:
92: For photons, the index of refraction is usually related to their forward
93: scattering amplitude. We use the similar relation for the nuclear index of
94: refraction $n$ using the forward scattering amplitude $F(E)$ at energy $E$
95: for gluons:
96: \begin{equation}
97: n(E)=1+\frac {2\pi N}{E}F(E). \label{ne}
98: \end{equation}
99: Here $N$ is the density of the scattering centers in a nucleus. The necessary
100: condition for emission of Cherenkov gluons is ${\rm Re} n(E)>1$ according to Eq.
101: (\ref{cos}). QCD estimates of $F(E)$ are rather indefinite. Therefore, we
102: rely on general properties of hadronic reactions known from experiment. The
103: real part of hadronic scattering amplitudes becomes positive either within
104: the upper wing of a Breit-Wigner resonance or at very high energies. Jet
105: energies available in RHIC experiment \cite{wang} (Fig. 1) are sufficient
106: only for production of resonances. Therefore, we attribute
107: the feature shown in Fig. 1 to resonance effects as discussed in \cite{dim}.
108: If the hadronization of gluons is a soft process then the gluon energy closely
109: corresponds to the energy of the produced resonance. It implies that in this
110: particular experiment \cite{wang} Cherenkov gluons can be emitted only
111: with energies within the upper wings of hadronic resonances. Their amplitude
112: is of the Breit-Wigner shape. For a single resonance at energy $E_R$ and
113: with width $\Gamma _R$ one gets
114: %
115: $$
116: {\rm Re} n(E)=1+
117: $$
118: \begin{equation}
119: \frac {2J+1}{(2s_1+1)(2s_2+1)}\cdot \frac {3\mu ^3\Gamma _R\nu }
120: {E_R^2}\cdot \frac{E-E_R}{E[(E-E_R)^2+\Gamma _R^2/4]}. \label{ren}
121: \end{equation}
122: %
123: Here $J$ is the spin of the resonance, $s_i$ are the spins of "incident
124: particles". We have replaced $N$ by the number of partonic scatterers $\nu $
125: within a single nucleon volume $4\pi /3\mu ^3$ with $\mu $ the pion mass.
126:
127: ${\rm Re} n>1$ for $E>E_R$ only. It is 1 at $E=E_R$, increases to the maximum
128: approximately at the resonance half-width
129: $E_0=E_R+\frac {\Gamma _R}{2}(1-\frac {\Gamma _R}{2E_R})$
130: and then decreases as $O(1/E^2)$. For $\Gamma _R\ll
131: E_R$ its value at the maximum is
132: \begin{equation}
133: {\rm Re} n(E_0)\approx 1+\frac {2J+1}{(2s_1+1)(2s_2+1)}\cdot \frac {3\mu ^3\nu }
134: {E_R^3}. \label{ren0}
135: \end{equation}
136: The average value of ${\rm Re} n$ is smaller than its value at the maximum.
137: Therefore, from experimental estimate of this average value equal to 3 and
138: Eq. (\ref{ren0}) one gets the lower bound for the effective number of partons
139: within the nucleon volume $\nu $
140: \begin{equation}
141: \nu >\frac {(2s_1+1)(2s_2+1)}{2J+1}\cdot \frac {2E_R^3}{3\mu ^3}. \label{num}
142: \end{equation}
143: According to Eq. (\ref{ren0}) the factor in front of $\nu $ is mostly
144: determined by the low-mass resonances with high statistical weights.
145: The $\rho $-meson is a typical representative. Inserting its parameters
146: in Eq. (\ref{num}) one gets $\nu > 40$. However, in principle, the sum over
147: all resonances should be used in Eq. (\ref{ren0}). The largest additional
148: items come from $\omega $ and $f_2$-mesons, each contributing about 0.3 of
149: the $\rho $ share. With rough estimate of other meson resonances the above
150: bound for $\nu $ becomes twice lower, i.e. about 20. The baryon contribution
151: is negligible.
152:
153: In experiment, the index of refraction is averaged in accordance with jet
154: evolution. One can approximate this averaging procedure by the Breit-Wigner
155: weight $\frac {\Gamma }{\pi }\cdot \frac {dE}{(E-E_R)^2+\Gamma _R^2/4}$
156: multiplying the expression (\ref{ren}) by it and integrating over energy in
157: the interval from $E_R$ to infinity. Then the average value of ${\rm Re} n$ is
158: \begin{equation}
159: \langle {\rm Re} n\rangle \approx 1+\frac {2J+1}{(2s_1+1)(2s_2+1)}\cdot \frac
160: {6\mu ^3 }{\pi E_R^3}\langle \nu \rangle. \label{nuav}
161: \end{equation}
162: For $\rho $-meson one gets $\langle \nu \rangle=60$. If all mesons are taken
163: into account the estimate would be $\langle \nu \rangle \approx 30$. This
164: value is consistent with estimates obtained earlier from hydrodynamical
165: interpretation of the observed collective flow
166: \cite{hein} and jet quenching analysis \cite{wawa, vgyu, xnwa}. Even if
167: the accuracy of all these estimates is up to the factor about 2, the
168: qualitative statement about the high density of partons stays valid. One can
169: claim that the state of this dense matter strongly differs from a cold nuclear
170: matter. Its scattering centers remind of some correlated current partons or
171: their preconfined states.
172:
173: According to the above discussion, one would expect that the ring regions
174: are enriched by pions originating from $\rho $-decays. The high parton density
175: at the initial stage somehow helps confinement provide softly the necessary
176: partonic contents of the resonance with mass supplied by the gluon energy.
177: The resonances in the ring region should have quite specific mass distribution
178: only within one Breit-Wigner wing. Their average mass must be somewhat higher
179: than the $\rho $-meson mass (about 840 MeV). It would
180: be interesting to observe directly the ring structure of events and study their
181: particle contents.
182:
183: Another information can be obtained from the height of the peaks in Fig. 1.
184: It determines the width of the Cherenkov ring $\delta $. This is the ring
185: in the plane perpendicular to the cone axis filled by evenly distributed
186: within it particles over the smooth background due to jet fragmentation.
187: Its projection on the diameter corresponds to the particle distribution which
188: has a minimum at the center, increases, reaches the maximum at the internal
189: radius of the ring $r_1$ and then decreases to zero at its external radius
190: $r_2$. For narrow rings ($\delta \ll r_i$) the height of the maximum over the
191: minimum is easily determined as
192: \begin{equation}
193: h_{max}=\sqrt {2r_1\delta }-\delta . \label{max}
194: \end{equation}
195: With $h_{max} \approx 1.6 - 1.2 = 0.4$ and $r_1 = 1.2$ in Fig. 1 one gets
196: \begin{equation}
197: \delta \approx 0.1. \label{delt}
198: \end{equation}
199: The ring of Cherenkov gluons is really quite narrow. Actually, Eq. (\ref{cos})
200: implies that the ring is squeezed to a circle.
201:
202: There are three physical reasons which can lead to the finite width of the ring.
203: First, it is the dispersion, i.e. the energy dependence of the index of
204: refraction. Its contribution to the width is well known \cite{land}
205: \begin{equation}
206: \delta _d=\int _0^{\delta _d}d\theta =\cot \theta _c\int _0^{\infty }
207: \frac {1}{n} \frac{dn}{dE} dE. \label{lan}
208: \end{equation}
209: If the Breit-Wigner expression (\ref{ren}) for $n(E)$ is used, the result is
210: \begin{equation}
211: \delta _d=0. \label{deld}
212: \end{equation}
213: It is amazing that there is no widening of the Cherenkov cone due to the
214: dispersion of $n(E)$ described by the formula (\ref{ren}) with Breit-Wigner
215: resonances.
216:
217: Second, the width of the Cherenkov ring can be due to the finite free path
218: length for partons. Qualitatively, it can be estimated as the ratio of the
219: parton wavelength $\lambda $ to the free path length $R_f$
220: \begin{equation}
221: \delta _f \sim \frac {\lambda }{R_f}. \label{rf}
222: \end{equation}
223: For $\lambda \sim 2/E_R$ and $\delta _f < 0.1$ one gets the estimate for
224: the free path length
225: \begin{equation}
226: R_f>20/E_R \sim 4.5/\mu \sim 7\cdot 10^{-13} cm. \label{rfn}
227: \end{equation}
228: This appears to be quite a reasonable estimate.
229:
230: Finally, the width of the ring can become larger due to resonance decays.
231: That is why there is the inequality sign in (\ref{rfn}). However, this can be
232: quantified only if the Monte Carlo program for jets with Cherenkov gluons is
233: elaborated.
234:
235: Let us note that the contribution of Cherenkov gluon emission to the away-side
236: hadrons at the minimum in Fig. 1 is rather small, of the order of 0.1 compared
237: to the total value at the minimum about 1.2. Jet fragmentation contributes an
238: order of magnitude larger number of hadrons at this point.
239:
240: The energy loss can be calculated using the standard formula
241: \begin{equation}
242: \frac {dE}{dx}=4\pi \alpha _S\int _{E_R}^{E_R+\Gamma _R}E\left (1-\frac {1}
243: {n^2(E)}\right )dE\approx 1 GeV/fm. \label{dedx}
244: \end{equation}
245: This estimate is an order of magnitude higher than the value of 0.1 GeV/fm
246: obtained in the model of \cite{kmwa} which is somewhat underestimated,
247: in our opinion. It is so large because rather high energies are required
248: to excite resonances. However, it is still smaller than the radiative loss.
249:
250: To conclude, we have estimated such parameters of the nuclear matter in
251: heavy-ion collisions as its nuclear index of refraction, the density of
252: partons, their free path length and energy loss. The RHIC data on the
253: two-bump structure of the hadron distribution in away-side jets have been
254: used within the notion of Cherenkov gluons. In accordance with previous
255: estimates our results show that the density of partons in high energy
256: heavy-ion collisions is very high. This favors the hypothesis about a
257: new state of dense matter created in heavy-ion collisions.
258:
259: \begin{acknowledgments}
260:
261: I thank B.M. Bolotovsky for fruitful discussions.
262: This work has been supported in part by the RFBR grants
263: 04-02-16445-a, 04-02-16333.
264: \end{acknowledgments}
265:
266:
267: \begin{thebibliography}{}
268: \bibitem{koch}
269: V.A. Khoze and W. Ochs, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 12}, 2949 (1997).
270: \bibitem{dgar}
271: I.M. Dremin and J.W. Gary, Phys. Rep. {\bf 349}, 301 (2001).
272: \bibitem{hein}
273: U.W. Heinz, J. Phys. G {\bf 31}, S717 (2005).
274: \bibitem{wawa}
275: E. Wang and X.N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89}, 162301 (2002).
276: \bibitem{vgyu}
277: I. Vitev and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89}, 252301 (2002).
278: \bibitem{xnwa}
279: X.N. Wang, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 595}, 165 (2004).
280: \bibitem{d1}
281: I.M. Dremin, Pisma v ZhETF {\bf 30}, 152 (1979); JETP Lett. {\bf 30},
282: 140 (1979).
283: \bibitem{d2}
284: I.M. Dremin, Yad. Fiz. {\bf 33}, 1357 (1981); Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 33},
285: 726 (1981).
286: \bibitem{dim}
287: I.M. Dremin, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 767}, 233 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0507167].
288: \bibitem{mwa}
289: A. Majumder and X.N. Wang, arXiv:nucl-th/0507062.
290: \bibitem{kmwa}
291: V. Koch, A. Majumder and X.N. Wang, arXiv:nucl-th/0507063.
292: \bibitem{stoc}
293: H. St\"ocker, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 750}, 121 (2005).
294: \bibitem{mrup}
295: J. Ruppert and B. M\"uller, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 618}, 123 (2005).
296: \bibitem{wang}
297: F. Wang (STAR Collaboration), J. Phys. G {\bf 30}, 1299 (2004).
298: \bibitem{land}
299: L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamika sploshnyh sred, M., Nauka, 1982,
300: p. 555.
301:
302: \end{thebibliography}
303:
304: \end{document}
305:
306: