1: \documentclass[12pt,epsf]{article}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,epsf,showkeys]{article}
3:
4: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
5:
6: \setlength{\textwidth}{14.7cm}
7: \setlength{\textheight}{22.5cm}
8: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.0cm}
9: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.0cm}
10: \setlength{\topmargin}{-0.0cm}
11: \setlength{\headsep}{0.0cm}
12: \setcounter{topnumber}{2}
13: \setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}
14: \setcounter{totalnumber}{3}
15: \def\topfraction{.9}
16: \def\bottomfraction{.9}
17: \def\textfraction{.2}
18: \def\floatpagefraction{.1}
19: \textfloatsep 3mm plus 1mm minus 1mm
20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
21: %%%%%%% %%%%%%%
22: %%%%%%% DEFINITION %%%%%%%
23: %%%%%%% %%%%%%%
24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25: \newcommand{\bsigma}{\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}}
26: \newcommand{\bnabla}{\mbox{\boldmath $\nabla$}}
27: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
28: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
29: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
30: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
31:
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33: %%%%%%% %%%%%%%
34: %%%%%%% Cover page %%%%%%%
35: %%%%%%% %%%%%%%
36: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37: \begin{document}
38: \thispagestyle{empty}
39: \vspace*{-15mm}
40: %----------
41: \baselineskip 1pt
42: \begin{flushright}
43: \begin{tabular}{l}
44: {\bf OCHA-PP-258}\\
45: {\bf February 2006}\\
46: {\bf hep-ph/0602203}
47: \end{tabular}
48: \end{flushright}
49: \baselineskip 24pt
50: \vglue 10mm
51:
52: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
53: % Title
54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
55: \begin{center}
56: {\LARGE\bf
57: Meson Strings and Flavor Branes
58: }
59: \vspace{7mm}
60:
61: \baselineskip 18pt
62: {\bf Masako BANDO$^1$, Akio SUGAMOTO$^{2,3}$ and Sachiko TERUNUMA$^3$}
63: \vspace{2mm}
64:
65: {\it
66: $^1$Physics Division, Aichi University, Aichi 470-0296, Japan\\
67: $^2$Department of Physics, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo 112-8610, Japan\\
68: $^3$Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo 112-8610, Japan
69: }\\
70: \vspace{10mm}
71: \end{center}
72: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
73: %%%%% %%%%%
74: %%%%% Abstract %%%%%
75: %%%%% %%%%%
76: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
77: \begin{center}
78: {\bf Abstract}\\[7mm]
79: \begin{minipage}{14cm}
80: \baselineskip 16pt
81: \noindent
82: %%%%%---------------------------------
83:
84:
85: We investigate the shape of meson strings in the five-dimensional
86: curved space and the potential between the quark and anti-quark
87: in a QCD-like string model based on D6 flavor branes in the presence of D4 color branes
88: wrapping one of the compactified
89: dimension on an $S^1$.
90: The flavor
91: branes on which both ends of a meson string lie are assumed to be separated
92: in this five dimensional space, depending on the values of the constituent quark masses. It is
93: shown in this picture that a
94: meson string with different flavors at two ends changes shape
95: at a critical distance. There is, however, no critical distance for a
96: meson with the same flavor.
97: At this critical distance,
98: the potential between a quark and anti-quark with different flavors
99: gives a point of reflection and
100: changes shape near this point. Accordingly, the attractive force between a
101: quark and an anti-quark seems to
102: become stronger when the distance between the flavor branes connecting
103: meson strings becomes larger.
104: This indicates that quark systems with different flavors can
105: form high-density states.
106:
107: %%----------------------------------
108: \end{minipage}
109: \end{center}
110:
111: %%%----------------------------------
112: %%%
113: %%%
114: %%% Main body of the paper
115: %%%
116: %%%
117: %%%----------------------------------
118: \newpage
119: \baselineskip 18pt
120: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
121: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
122: %%%%%%%%%%%
123: %%%Citation of reference is ~\cite{reference} .
124: %%%%Numbering of equation is \label{equation},
125: %%%%%%and referring the equation is(\ref{equation}) .
126: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
127:
128: %%%--------------------------------------------
129: \section{Introduction}
130: The origin of families is one of the most important subjects
131: of particle physics.
132: It is well known that quarks and leptons appear as three repetitive families,
133: each of which forms a multiplet of the strong, weak and
134: electromagnetic gauge symmetries.
135: The coupling constants of these gauge interactions are uniquely determined by the symmetry
136: principle and are independent of the flavors.
137: By contrast, flavor interactions determined by the Yukawa coupling to Higgs fields are
138: mysterious; their coupling strength exhibits hierarchical structure depending on the flavor
139: of the matter
140: fields.
141: Many proposals for the origin of flavor have been made:
142: It may originate from some family quantum number, Abelian or non-Abelian, by imposing a horizontal
143: symmetry. However, such hierarchical structure
144: could not be derived from such symmetries.
145: One promising idea is
146: to extend our 4-dimensional space to a higher-dimensional space
147: and to attribute the origin of flavor to
148: the structure of the extra dimesions.
149: If we can gain some information from such an idea with higher-dimensional space-time, we may be
150: able to take an
151: important step toward the understanding of flavor.
152:
153: In the previous papers \cite{BKST, S}, we studied QCD strings based on the picture that a quark is
154: identified as a colored flavored string, one end of which has a color (color end) and the other end
155: of which has a flavor (flavor end). Therefore, the string of a free quark emerges from a point on
156: a color brane and terminates at a point on a flavor brane. Furthermore,
157: apart from the stack of color branes, the flavor branes are
158: considered to be separated flavor by flavor in the
159: direction
160: of the extra dimension. Hereafter, we denote the coordinate of this extra dimension by $u$.
161: A meson consists of two strings from a quark and an anti-quark, but they are joined to form a single
162: meson string, because color ends of two strings can be annhilated, and only flavor ends appear on
163: individual flavor branes. Similarly, a baryon consists of three strings, with the flavor ends
164: of the three strings located on individual flavor branes,
165: and the color ends of the three strings, if the colors are
166: red, green and blue, can annhilate to form a junction.
167: In this way, we studied the exotic
168: hadron of pentaquarks in the previous papers~\cite{BKST, S}.
169: In such a picture, the hierarchical structure of the masses of quarks
170: can be naturally explained by taking proper allocations of
171: flavor branes in the
172: curved space. In addition, the existence of a horizon-like
173: singularity coming from the stack of $N_c$ color
174: branes can account for the non-perturbative linear potential
175: bertween a quark and an anti-quark.
176:
177: In this paper, we study the shape of meson strings in the five-dimensional curved
178: space and calculate the potential between the quark and anti-quark in detail.
179: Leaving the details to Ref. \cite{BKST},
180: we briefly explain the picture of flavor branes exising
181: in the space extended to extra dimensions.
182: Here we adopt a ealistic QCD-like model in the string theory developed by Witten and others
183: ~\cite{N=0a}. In this model, all the supersymmetries
184: are broken by the compactification of one of the extra dimensions on
185: an $S^1$ which is wrapped by D4 color branes.
186: In the model, the gauge theory is represented by open strings, while the gravity theory is represented by
187: closed strings. Because the two theories are dual,
188: we can replace the non-perturbative QCD by the
189: corresponding classical gravity theory.
190: The original space of the gravity theory is flat.
191: However, once heavy sheets of $N_c$ color ($D_4$) branes
192: are placed perpendicular to the extra dimension $u$,
193: it is
194: deformed in this extra dimension.
195: Because each endpoint of a meson string lies on a flavor brane, meson strings posseses
196: different shapes, according to the variety of the flavors of the quarks on two ends.
197:
198: Let us simplify the ten-dimensional space-time of string theory to a
199: 5-dimensional space-time,
200: including only the extra coordinate $u$
201: in addition to the usual Minkowski space, $(t, z, {\bf x}_{\perp})$.
202: The world volumes of the stack of
203: $N_{c}$ color branes and the separately allocated flavor branes extend along the Minkowski space
204: but are perpendicular to the $u$ direction.
205: This curved space can be expressed as
206: \begin{equation}
207: ds^2=f(u)(-dt^2+dz^2+d{\bf x}_{\perp}^2)+g(u)du^2,
208: \end{equation}
209: with the functions $f(u)$ and $g(u)$.
210: In a realistic QCD-like model, they are ~\cite{N=0a}
211: \begin{eqnarray}
212: f(u)&=&(u/R')^{3/2},~~g(u)=(f(u)h(u))^{-1}, \nonumber \\
213: h(u)&=&1-(U_{KK}/u)^3, \label{QCD like model}
214: \end{eqnarray}
215: with $R'$ and $U_{KK}$ given by
216: \begin{equation}
217: R'^{3}=2\pi\alpha_{c}N_{c}\alpha'/M_{KK},~~\mbox{and}~~ U_{KK}=\frac{8\pi}{9}\alpha_{c}N_{c}\alpha'M_{KK},
218: \end{equation}
219: where $(2\pi \alpha')^{-1}$ is the string tension of the starting Lagrangian, being $O(M_{\rm{Planck}}^2)$,
220: and $\alpha_{c}$ is the QCD (with
221: $N_c$ colors) coupling.
222: The warp factor $f(u)$ is a monotonically increasing function of $u$.
223: \footnote{For reference, we also give the metric of the proto-type model of
224: Mardacena~\cite{M}, possessing $N=4$ supersymmetries,
225: \begin{equation}
226: f(u)=g(u)^{-1}=(u/R)^2, \label{maldacenametric}
227: \end{equation}
228: with the radius $\mathbf{R}$ of $AdS_5$ space given by
229: \begin{equation}
230: R^4=8\pi\alpha_{c} N_{c} \alpha'^2, \label{R^4}
231: \end{equation}
232: In this case $f(u)$ is also an increasing function of
233: $u$. }
234: In the following, we write $\alpha'$ (of the order of the Planck length squared)
235: dependence explicitly. This was omitted in Ref. \cite{BKST}.
236:
237: In such a deformed space including the one extra dimension $u$,
238: there exist ``flavor branes" on which the endpoints of the hadron strings
239: are placed, while quarks are
240: expressed as open strings having one endpoint on the flavor brane and the other endpoint
241: on the ``color brane''.
242: The shape of a hadron string chooses its most economical path in this curved space.
243: It is analogous to a catenary
244: under the influence of gravity on the earth.
245: In our case, gravity is along the $u$-direction,
246: and its nature is different from that of gravity on the earth.
247:
248: Here we concentrate our attention on a meson string with
249: different flavors at either end and calculate their shapes and the potentials between the
250: quark and anti-quark, especaily those with different flavors.
251:
252: \section{QCD strings in curved space}
253: First, we give a brief survey of the formulae needed in this paper\cite{BKST}.
254: The string action in the background curved space is expressed as
255: \begin{equation}
256: S= \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int d\tau d\sigma
257: \sqrt{-(\dot{X}^{M}\dot{X}_{M})(X'^{N}X'_{N})+(\dot{X}^{M}X'_{M})^2}, \label{action}
258: \end{equation}
259: where the dot and the prime represent derivatives with respect to $\tau$ and $\sigma$,
260: respectively, and $X^{M}(\tau,\sigma)$
261: describes the configuration of the worldsheet of a string with the two
262: parameters $\tau$ and $\sigma$. Here, the outside space ({\it i.e.} the target space) of $X^{M}$ is curved, and the contraction $\dot{X}^{M}\dot{X}_{M}$, {\it etc.}, represents that with the metric $G_{MN}(x)\dot{X}^{M}\dot{X}^{N}$, ${\it etc}$.
263:
264: If we fix the parameterization of the worldsheet,
265: choosing $\sigma=z$ and $\tau=t$, and take the static limit, $\dot{X}^{M}=0\,
266: (M\ne 0)$, the string action (\ref{action}) in the time interval $\Delta t$ reads
267: \begin{equation}
268: S=\frac{\Delta t}{2\pi\alpha'}\int dz L,
269: \end{equation}
270: with the ``Lagrangian"
271: \begin{equation}
272: L=\sqrt{f(u)^2(1+({\bf x}'_{\perp})^2))+f(u)g(u)(u')^2}. \label{L}
273: \end{equation}
274:
275: By regarding $z$ as ``time",
276: the following equation of motion is derived:
277: \begin{equation}
278: u'=\frac{1}{(-H)} \sqrt{\frac{f}{g}\left( f^2-(-H)^2-({\bf p}_{\perp})^2 \right)},
279: \label{eq:shape}
280: \end{equation}
281: with the three conserved quantities
282: \begin{equation}
283: (-H)=\frac{f(u)^2}{L}, ~~\mbox{and}~~ ({\bf p}_{\perp})={\bf x}'_{\perp} (-H). \label{pperp}
284: \end{equation}
285:
286: The shape of the string $u(z)$ is determined by
287: Eq.~(\ref{eq:shape}), once we fix the boundary conditions, and
288: the coordinates of the endpoints of the string are denoted by $(U_1,Z_1)$ and $(U_2, Z_2)$.
289:
290: The ``action" during the change of $u$ from ${U_1}$ to ${U_2}$ is given by
291: \begin{equation}
292: \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\int_{U_1}^{U_2} dz L =\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\int_{U_1}^{U_2} du \frac{1}{u'} \frac{f(u)^2}{(-H)},
293: \label{actionunittime}
294: \end{equation}
295: and thus the energy stored inside a string is
296: \begin{equation}
297: E=\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int^{U_2}_{U_1}du \sqrt{
298: \frac{f(u)^3g(u)}{f(u)^2-(-H)^2-({\bf p}_{\perp})^2}}. \label{Energy}
299: \end{equation}
300: We can also estimate the change of $z$ from ${U_1}$ to ${U_2}$ as
301: \begin{equation}
302: r=Z_2-Z_1=\int^{U_2}_{U_1}~\frac{du}{u'}=(-H) \int^{U_2}_{U_1}du~~\sqrt{
303: \frac{g(u)}{f(u) \left(f(u)^2-(-H)^2-({\bf p}_{\perp})^2 \right)}}, \label{z}
304: \end{equation}
305: with the string shape determined by Eq.~(\ref{eq:shape}).
306: Note that this general formulation is also applicable to
307: the more complicated web-like exotic hadrons and string systems.
308:
309: \section{Meson string}
310: Now let us consider a meson string representing a bound state of $(q_1\bar q_2)$.
311: This is a string connecting the
312: flavor brane at ($u=U_1,\ z=Z_1)$ of quark $q_1$ and the flavor
313: brane at ($u=U_2,\ z=Z_2)$ of anti-quark $\bar q_2$.
314: We take $z$ to be the direction in which the string is streched. In our picture,
315: quarks are not point particles but also strings.
316: However, it is acceptable to regard point particles $q_1$ and $\bar q_2$ as being
317: placed on the flavor branes at $u=U_1$ and $u=U_2$, respectively, with
318: the gluonic QCD string connecting them.
319: Then, our meson string can be understood as the entire system consisting of the quark, anti-quark and the gluonic QCD string conecting them. Then, the distance $r=Z_2-Z_1$ can be interpreted
320: as the distance between the point quark $q_1$ and the anti-quark $\bar q_2$
321: in the ordinary Minkowski space.
322: We can choose ${\bf x}_{\perp}={\bf 0}$ for mesons.
323: Then, the string connecting the quark $q_1$ and
324: the anti-quark
325: $\bar q_2$ appears on the $(z, u)$-plane.
326: Then, the equation of motion takes the simple form
327: \begin{equation}
328: u'\equiv \frac{du}{dz}=\frac{1}{f_0^2} \,
329: \sqrt{\frac{f(u)}{g(u)}\left( f^2(u)-f_0^2 \right)},
330: \label{eq:mesonshape}
331: \end{equation}
332: with
333: \begin{equation}
334: E=\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\, \int^{U_2}_{U_1}du \sqrt{
335: \frac{f(u)^3g(u)}{f(u)^2-f_0^2}}. \label{mesonEnergy}
336: \end{equation}
337:
338: Here, we fix the constant value $(-H)$ at the point $u=U_0$; that is, we have
339: $(-H)=f(U_0)\equiv f_0$.
340: This means that $u=U_0$ is a stationary point of $u$ giving $u'=0$. We can always find $Z_0$ for
341: which
342: $u(Z_0)=U_0$ and $u'(Z_0)=0$ hold, and therfore
343: we can take $Z_0=0$ hereafter without loss of generality.
344:
345: There are two cases here. The first is that in which
346: the stationary point, $(z, u)=(0, U_0)$, giving $u'=0$, exists on
347: the string streching between
348: their ends. The second is that in which
349: the stationary point $(0, U_0)$ is not on the string but is outside
350: the string.
351: In the former case, if $Z_1 \le 0$, then $Z_2 \ge 0$, or vice versa. In the latter case,
352: both $Z_1$
353: and $Z_2$ are positive or negative. In order to find a string profile, it is useful to note
354: that the solution of Eq.~(\ref{eq:shape}) is
355: symmetric under the exchange $z\rightarrow -z$, so that
356: if we find a solution $(z, u=u(z))$, then $(-z, u=u(z))$ is also a solution. Therefore, we
357: have only to solve the equation for $z \le 0$. In Eq.(\ref{eq:mesonshape}), we have
358: $u'\ge 0$, and thus
359: if we start to solve the solution from the point $(z=0, U_0)$,
360: $u(z)$ increases monotonically in the positive $z$ direction
361: ($0 \le z \le Z_2)$.
362: We have to prepare two such solutions with $0 \le z \le Z_1$ and
363: $0 \le z \le Z_2$.
364: In the case that there is a stationary
365: point on a meson string, we obtain a solution of the string profile
366: by connecting at $z=0$ the above two solutions, the solution with
367: $0 \le z \le Z_2$, and the reversed solution of $0 \le z \le Z_1$
368: with respect to the $u$-axis (by exchanging $z$ and $-z$).
369: In the
370: other case, in which the stationary point lies outside the meson string,
371: the profile of the meson string is the $U_1 \le u \le U_2$
372: part of the solution of $0 \le z \le Z_2$,
373: where we have assumed $U_1 \le U_2$.
374: The former string is a combination of the string from
375: $(-|Z_1|, -|U_1|)$
376: to $(0,U_0)$ and that from $(0,U_0)$ to $(Z_2, U_2)$.
377: On the other hand, in the latter case, the string can be expressed
378: as that connecting the points $(0,U_0)$ and $(Z_2, U_2)$
379: by substructing the string from $(0,U_0)$ to $(Z_1, U_1)$.
380: Here, the minimum value $U_0$ is determined as a function of their
381: separation parameter, $r=Z_2-Z_1$, via Eq.~(\ref{z}).
382:
383: Now, from Eq.~(\ref{z}), the separation parameter reads
384: \begin{eqnarray}
385: r=Z_2-Z_1=f_0 \left[ \int_{U_0}^{U_2} \pm \int_{U_0}^{U_1}\right] du
386: \sqrt{\frac{g(u)}{f(u) \left(f(u)^2-f_0^2 \right)}},
387: \label{stringlength}
388: \end{eqnarray}
389: and the energy can be written from (\ref{Energy}) as
390: \begin{eqnarray}
391: E=\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\, \left[ \int_{U_0}^{U_2} \pm \int_{U_0}^{U_1}\right]
392: du \sqrt{ \frac{f(u)^3g(u)}{f(u)^2-f_0^2}}.
393: \label{totenergystring}
394: \end{eqnarray}
395: In the above expressions, we take the signature $+$ in the first case, $Z_1\le 0 \le Z_2$,
396: and
397: $-$ in the second case, $0 \le Z_1 \le Z_2$.
398:
399: The string shape is determined in such a manner as to minimize this
400: energy for a given separation $r$ between a quark and an anti-quark.
401: %
402: %
403: \begin{figure}
404: \begin{center}
405: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{meson1.eps}
406: \end{center}
407: \caption{Typical profile of the shape of a
408: string connecting $q_{1}$ and $\bar q_{2}$ in the QCD-like model.}
409: \label{mesonstring}
410: \end{figure}
411: %---------------
412: A typical shape of a string for the case of a relatively large separation $r$ is depicted
413: in Fig. 1, where
414: the endpoints of the string terminate on the first brane and the second brane at
415: $(Z_1,U_1)$ and $(Z_2,U_2)$, respectively.
416:
417: In the large separation limit($r\to \infty$), therefore, the
418: string departing from the quark at $u=U_1$ quickly goes down vertically to the lowest possible value, $u=U_0\approx U_{\rm KK}$, and
419: then moves horizontally from $Z_1$ to $Z_2$,
420: approximately maintaining the relation $u \approx U_{\rm KK}$.
421: Then it goes up to the anti-quark point at $u=U_2$.
422: This means that the basic shape of the meson string at a large separation is rectangular.
423:
424: In order to understand this almost rectangular shape of the
425: meson string, the following expression of the energy is useful:
426: \begin{equation}
427: E= \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int^{U_2}_{U_1} \sqrt{
428: f(u) \left(f(u)dz^2+g(u)du^2\right)}.
429: \label{useful energy}
430: \end{equation}
431: The approximately rectangular shape consists of two parts, the vertical and
432: horizontal parts. Using the above expression of energy, we find
433: \begin{equation}
434: E(\textrm{basic rectangular})\sim E_{\rm{vertical}} + E_{\rm{horizontal}},
435: \end{equation}
436: where
437: \begin{equation}
438: E_{\rm vertical}
439: =\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\left[\int^{U_2}_{ U_{KK}}
440: + \int^{U_1}_{ U_{KK}}\right]
441: \sqrt{f(u)g(u)}du ,
442: \end{equation}
443: \begin{equation}
444: E_{\rm horizontal}
445: = \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int^{Z_2}_{Z_1} f(u)dz .
446: \label{horizontalgeneral}
447: \end{equation}
448: Because $f(u)$ is an increasing function of $u$, $f(u)$ is smallest at $u=U_{KK}$.
449: Here, the region
450: of $u$ is restricted by $u \ge U_{KK}$,
451: due to the existence of the horizon-like singularity at $u=U_{KK}$.
452: Therefore, the horizontal part on which
453: $u$ is as small as possible near $u=U_{KK}$ is energetically favored.
454:
455: Let us define the quark mass (the constituent quark mass) $m_i$ as the vertical part of the string energy in the limit of large separation,
456: namely the energy of the string stretching along the vertical line from the quark at $U_i$ on the
457: $i$-th flavor
458: brane to the horizon-like brane at $u=U_{\rm KK}$:
459: \begin{equation}
460: m_i \equiv \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int^{U_i}_{U_{KK}}\sqrt{f(u)g(u)}du\, .
461: \label{quarkmass}
462: \end{equation}
463: Then, the remaining energy obtained after subtracting the quark masses can be understood as
464: the potential energy $V(r)$ between the quark and anti-quark,
465: \begin{equation}
466: V(r)= E_{tot}(r)-m_{q_1}-m_{q_2}\, .
467: \end{equation}
468: In the limit of large separation, the basic rectangular shape appears, and its horizontal part
469: gives a typical potential energy,
470: \begin{equation}
471: V(r) \approx \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int^{Z_2}_{Z_1} f(u)
472: \approx \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\,\, {f(U_{KK})}\, r,\quad r=Z_2-Z_1,
473: \label{horizontal}
474: \end{equation}
475: Therefore, in the limit of large separation,
476: the QCD-like string model yields a linear potential proportional to $r$ with the
477: coefficient\footnote{
478: Note that in Maldacena's prototype model \cite{M}, there is no horizon-like singularity,
479: namely $f(U_{\rm MIN})=f(0)=0$. Therefore,
480: in this case,
481: the linear potential does not appear,
482: and the potential becomes Coulomb-like, which reflects the conformal symmetry
483: at large distance.}
484: \begin{equation}
485: k= \frac{ f(U_{KK})}{2\pi\alpha'}.
486: \label{QCDlikemodel}
487: \end{equation}
488:
489: \section{Parameters of the QCD meson string}
490: Now let us determine the parameters appearing in the QCD-like string model from the
491: information connecting the QCD strings and hadron phenomena.
492:
493: We denote the tension of QCD strings as $k$, which is expressed in
494: terms of the Regge slope, $\alpha'_{\rm{QCD}}$,
495: \footnote{The parameter $\alpha' _{\rm{QCD}}$
496: in the meson potential is the Regge slope of QCD
497: strings, and it is different from the tension $\alpha'$ appearing
498: in our original action. The latter is of the order of the Planck length squared.}
499: as
500: \begin{equation}
501: k=\frac{1}{2\pi\, \alpha'_{\rm{QCD}}}.
502: \end{equation}
503: Let us derive this relation. First, if we rotate the QCD
504: string relativistically and classically estimate its energy
505: (or its mass $M$) and its angular momentum $J$,
506: then we have the relation coming from the so-called Regge trajectory,
507: \begin{equation}
508: J=\alpha'_{\rm{QCD}}\, M^2=\frac{1}{2\pi k} M^2.
509: \end{equation}
510: Next, utilizing the experimental data for the $J$ dependence of $M^2$ (Regge slope)~\cite{Reggeslopehara},we fix $\alpha'_{\rm{QCD}}=0.9 \rm{(GeV)^{-2}}$. we then obtain the coefficient of the
511: linear potential as
512: \begin{equation}
513: E=kr, \qquad k=0.88{\rm \, GeV}/{\rm fermi}=0.176 ({\rm GeV})^2,
514: \label{linearpot}
515: \end{equation}
516: which is identified with
517: \begin{equation}
518: k= \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\,\, f(U_{\rm KK})
519: \end{equation}
520: in our model.
521: Then, using the expression for $f(u)$ in Eq.~(\ref{QCD like model}), we have
522: \begin{equation}
523: k= \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\,\, f(U_{\rm KK})=\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\,\,
524: \left(\frac{ U_{KK}}{R'}\right )^{3/2},
525: \end{equation}
526: where $R'$ and $U_{KK}$ are given in terms of $M_{KK}$ as
527: \begin{equation}
528: R'^{3}=\frac{2\,\pi\alpha_{c}N_{c}\, \alpha'}{M_{KK}},~~\mbox{and}~~ U_{KK}
529: =\frac{8\pi}{9}\,\, \alpha_{c}\, N_{c}\,\, \alpha'M_{KK}.
530: \end{equation}
531: Therefore, we have the following expression of $k$ in terms of $M_{KK}$:
532: \begin{equation}
533: k= \frac{8}{27}\,\,M_{KK}^2 \,\, (\alpha_c N_c).
534: \end{equation}
535: We should remark here that in the above equation,
536: the parameter $\alpha'$, the string tension of the order of the
537: Planck scale in the original Lagrangian, disappears, and hence
538: $k$ and $M_{KK}$ are the parameters of
539: QCD scale.
540: By taking $ (\alpha_c N_c)\sim 1$, we obtain
541: \begin{equation}
542: M_{KK} \approx \sqrt{\frac{27}{8}\times 0.176}\ \ {\rm GeV} \approx 0.77\,\, {\rm GeV}.
543: \end{equation}
544:
545: For convenience, we express the parameters in the integration
546: appearing in the above in terms of
547: non-dimensional variables. The quark mass given in Eq.~(\ref{quarkmass})
548: can be rewritten as
549: \begin{equation}
550: m_i \equiv \frac{U_{KK}}{2\pi\alpha'} \int^{v_i}_{1}\sqrt{f(v)g(v)}dv
551: = \frac{4M_{KK}}{9} \int^{v_i}_{1}\sqrt{\frac{1}{1-v^{-3}}}dv\, ,
552: \label{rquarkmass}
553: \end{equation}
554: with the non-dimensional parameter $v=\frac{u}{U_{KK}}$.
555: The expression for the energy of a string given in Eq.~(\ref{totenergystring})
556: can be written as
557: \begin{eqnarray}
558: E&=&\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\, \left[ \int^{U_2}_{U_0} \pm \int^{U_1}_{U_0} \right] du \sqrt{
559: \frac{f(u)^3g(u)}{f(u)^2-f_0^2}} \\
560: &=&\frac{4M_{KK}}{9}\, \left[ \int_{v_0}^{v_2}\pm\int_{v_0}^{v_1}\right]
561: v^3\sqrt{ \frac{1}{(v^3-v_0^3)(v^3-1)}}\, dv\, ,
562: \label{rtotenergystring}
563: \end{eqnarray}
564: with the length $r$ given by
565: \begin{eqnarray}
566: r&=& f_0 \left[ \int^{U_2}_{U_0} \pm \int^{U_1}_{U_0} \right] du \sqrt{
567: \frac{g(u)}{f(u) \left(f(u)^2-f_0^2\right)}} \\
568: &=&\frac{3}{2M_{KK}} \left[ \int_{v_0}^{v_2}\pm\int_{v_0}^{v_1}\right]
569: \sqrt{\frac{v_0^3}{(v^3-1)(v^3-v_0^3)}}\, dv\, ,
570: \label{rstringlength}
571: \end{eqnarray}
572: where $v_0=U_0/U_{KK}$.
573:
574: The value $U_i=U_{KK}v_i$, determining the position of
575: each flavor brane can be obtained from Eq.~(\ref{quarkmass}),
576: once we fix the experimental values of
577: the constituent quark masses $m_i$.
578: \footnote{The quark mass given by Eq. (\ref{rquarkmass}) is the constituent quark mass rather
579: than the current quark mass, since
580: the non-perturbative QCD effects in this mass are
581: taken into account by the deformed space-time.}
582: In Table \ref{ufrom}, we list the values of the
583: constituent quark masses with the
584: corresponding values of
585: $U_i$ evaluated from Eq.~(\ref{quarkmass}).
586:
587: Note that the parameters $U_i$ are all expressed in units
588: of $U_{KK}=\frac{8\pi}{9}\alpha'M_{KK} $, with the Planck scale
589: parameter $\alpha'$ included.
590: Therefore, the separation of the flavor branes
591: in the extra direction is expressed in the extremely small units of
592: $O({\rm GeV}/M_{\rm Planck}^2)=O(10^{-38} {\rm GeV}^{-1})$.
593: However, this is the only parameter which explicitely includes
594: the Plank scale parameter, $\alpha'$,
595: and all the other physical quantities, such as the string
596: energy $E$ and the separqation
597: length $r$ in the Minkowski space, are of the QCD scale ($\sim$ O(GeV)).
598:
599: \begin{table}[htb]
600: %\begin{wraptable}{l}{\halftext}
601: \caption{The values $U_i$ (in units of $U_{KK}$) which
602: determine the positions of the flavor branes .}
603: \begin{center}
604: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|p{1cm}|} \hline\hline
605: quark &$ m_u$ &$m_s$ &$m_c$ &$m_b$ &$m_t$ \\ \hline
606: mass(GeV) &0.363 & 0.546 & 1.5 &4.5 & 176 \\ \hline
607: $9m_i/4m_{KK}$ & 1.061 & 1.595& 4.383& 13.15&514.3 \\ \hline
608: $U_i$ (in the $U_{KK}$ unit) & 1.599 & 2.086& 4.826& 13.58&514.8 \\ \hline
609: \end{tabular}
610: \end{center}
611: %end{wraptable}
612: \label{ufrom}
613: \end{table}
614:
615: \section{Numerical study of the meson string profile}
616: Having fixed the parameters in our QCD model, we next
617: study how the shape of meson string is deformed when the separation distance, $r$,
618: decreases.
619:
620: Let us consider a meson consisting of a light quark and a heavier
621: anti-quark, which are located on
622: the lower and higher branes, respectively.
623: Here ``higher and lower'' means those of
624: ``larger and smaller'' values of $u$. When the distance $r$ between a quark and an anti-quark
625: becomes sufficiently small, the energetically favored shape
626: is such that the string starting from
627: the lighter quark goes up directly to the heavier quark at
628: the higher position, which differs from the standard
629: shape, which goes down to a stationary point and then up to the heavier quark.
630: In this way, we can draw a rough sketch for the manner in which the
631: shape of meson strings change depending on the separation distance $r$.
632:
633: Now we report the results of a numerical calculation of the shape of meson strings,
634: starting from $q_i$ of the $i$-th brane and
635: stretching to $q_j$ on the $j$-th
636: brane, by solving Eq.~(\ref{eq:mesonshape}).
637: First, in Fig.~{\ref{udstring}}, we display
638: the shape of the $({u \bar d})$ string in the
639: $(\bar{z},\bar{u})$ plane, where
640: \begin{equation}
641: \bar{z}=zM_{KK} ,
642: \end{equation}
643: \begin{equation}
644: \bar{U}=u/U_{KK} .
645: \end{equation}
646: It is seen that the shape changes with the
647: the separation distance $r$, as expected.
648: If $r$ is very large,
649: we see that the string almost reaches to the minimal point,
650: $U_{KK}$. This is a typical shape of a meson string.
651: By contrast, in the
652: small separation limit,
653: it shrinks to zero length with a total energy tending to zero.
654: \footnote{
655: We will come back to this short dintance behavior in a subsequent section. }
656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
657: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
658: %%%%%ud string %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
659: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
660: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
661: \begin{figure}
662: \begin{center}
663: \includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{udstring.eps}
664: \end{center}
665: \caption{Profiles of a $u\bar d$ string, where $\bar{z}=zM_{KK}$ and $\bar{U}=u/U_{KK}$
666: in the QCD model.}
667: \label{udstring}
668: \end{figure}%
669: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
670: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
671: %%%%%us string %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
672: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
673: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
674: \begin{figure}
675: \begin{center}
676: \includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{usstring.eps}
677: \end{center}
678: \caption{Profiles of a $u\bar s$ string, where $\bar{z}=zM_{KK}$ and $\bar{U}=u/U_{KK}$
679: in the QCD-like model.}
680: \label{usstring}
681: \end{figure}
682: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
683: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
684: %%%%%ub string %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
685: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
686: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
687: \begin{figure}
688: \begin{center}
689: \includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{ubstring.eps}
690: \end{center}
691: \caption{Profiles of a $u\bar b$ string, where $\bar{z}=zM_{KK}$ and $\bar{U}=u/U_{KK}$ in the
692: QCD like model.}
693: \label{ubstring}
694: \end{figure}%
695: Next, in the case of the $({u \bar s})$ string,
696: the shape is quite different from that of the $({u \bar d})$ string.
697: The calculated result for the string profile in the
698: $(z,u)$ plane
699: is shown in Fig.~{\ref{usstring}}. We see that at
700: large separations, the string has almost the same
701: shape as the $({u \bar d})$ string.
702: However, if $r$ becomes smaller than the critical length
703: $r_c(u\bar s)=0.9217\ {\rm GeV}^{-1} $ , it
704: directly connects the two branes without passing through the
705: region $u \le U_1$.
706: This tendency is more prominent in the shape of the $u \bar b$ string,
707: as depicted in Fig.~{\ref{ubstring}}. In this case, the critical
708: length is $r_c(u\bar b)=1.427\ {\rm GeV}^{-1}$.
709: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
710: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
711: %%%%%table of critical length %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
712: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
713: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
714: \begin{table}[htb]
715: %\begin{wraptable}{l}{\halftext}
716: \caption{the values of $r_c$ for $u\bar d$, $u\bar s$ and $u\bar b$ strings. }
717: \label{ufromm}
718: \begin{center}
719: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|p{1cm}|} \hline\hline
720: string &$u\bar d$ &$u\bar s$ &$u\bar c$ &$u\bar b$ \\ \hline
721: $r_c$ (in GeV$^{-1}$ ) &0 &0.9217& 1.352 &1.427 \\ \hline
722: $r_c M_{KK}$ &0 &0.710& 1.041 &1.099 \\ \hline
723: \end{tabular}
724: \end{center}
725: %\end{wraptable}
726: \end{table}
727: In order to derive physical meaning from our results, we
728: study the potential between a quark and an anti-quark connected by a string in the next section.
729:
730: \section{The potential between a quark and an antiquark}
731: The string potential at a finite distance $r=Z_2-Z_1$ is defined as
732: \begin{equation}
733: V(r)= \frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'} \int^{U_2}_{U_1} \sqrt{
734: f(u) \left(f(u)dz^2+g(u)du^2\right)}-m_1-m_2.
735: \label{potential}
736: \end{equation}
737: We have seen that the critical length $r_c$ becomes larger for strings
738: connecting the
739: $u$ quark of the first brane to the heavier anti-quark.
740: Table 2 lists the critical lengths for various mesons.
741: The existence of this critical length is a characteristic feature
742: of a string connecting different flavors, and
743: it is also very important to determine the quantitative features of the
744: interaction between a quark and an anti-quark.
745:
746: When we plot the potential $V=V(r)$ between a $u$-quark and a $\bar{q_i}$-quark as a
747: function of $r$, we need to connect the short distant part, $r \le r_c$, and the long distant
748: part, $r \ge r_c$.
749: Thus, we can study the behavior of the potential by considering three regions for the distance, $r$:
750: \begin{enumerate}
751: \item Region 1 : Long distance region ($\quad r >> r_c $) \\
752: From Eq.~(\ref{potential}), it is easily seen that the potential
753: converges to a single straight line, $ V(r)$.
754: This iplies that, for the large separation case (region 1) the potential is universal,
755: and it is almost independent of the flavors of the quark and antiquark;
756: \begin{equation}
757: V(r) \rightarrow \ \frac{ f(U_{KK})}{2\pi\alpha'}\ r\,+C .
758: \label{potrinf}
759: \end{equation}
760: Here we have an almost $r$ independent constant term $C$,
761: which comes from the difference between the real
762: string energy and that calculated using an approximate in rectangular string,
763: \begin{equation}
764: C \rightarrow_{r_c << r}E(r)-V({\rm basic\ rectangular}) \, ,
765: \end{equation}
766: where $C$ is almost independent of the quark and anti-quark flavors.
767: This constant comes from the
768: difference between the energy calculated from an exactly rectangular string
769: around the point ($Z_2$, $U_{KK}$ ) and that of the
770: real, smooth meson shape,
771: which is almost independent of the flavors, because
772: the difference exists only in the region near the point
773: ($Z_2$, $U_{KK}$ ).
774:
775: \item Region 2: Intermediate region ($\quad r \sim r_c,$) \\
776: The critical distance $r_{c}$, which separates the short
777: and long distant parts of a potenntial, can be
778: characterized as an inflection point for the potential $V(r)$,i.e.
779: \begin{equation}
780: \frac{d^2V(r)}{dr^2}\Biggr| _{r=r_{c}}=0.
781: \end{equation}
782: The reason for this is as follows.
783: From the above discussion, we understand that the derivative $u'(z)$ at the
784: position of the u-quark endpoint in the short distance case and
785: that in the long distance case have opposite signs,
786: since a string in the former case is rising up from the position of the
787: u-quark endpoint to that of the anti-quark endpoint,
788: but in the latter case it goes down from the u-quark endpoint.
789: Therefore, $u'(z)$ at the position of u-quark vanishes at the critical distance $r_{c}$.
790: From Eqs.~(\ref{eq:mesonshape}) and (\ref{mesonEnergy}), we have
791: \begin{equation}
792: \frac{dE}{dr}=\frac{dE}{du} u'
793: =\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\, \frac{f^2}{f_0^2},
794: \end{equation}
795: from which we obtain
796: \begin{equation}
797: \frac{d^2E}{dr^2}=\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha'}\, \frac{2f}{f_0^2}\,
798: \frac{df}{du}\, u'
799: \end{equation}
800: Then, we can easily understand that the sign of $\frac{d^2E}{dr^2}$ is
801: determined by the sign of $u'(z)$. Therefore, $r_{c}$ becomes an inflection point
802: for the potential $V(r)$, because $\frac{d^2E}{dr^2}=0$ at $r=r_{c}$, and
803: is positive for $r \le r_{c}$ and negative
804: for $r \ge r_{c}$.
805: We have no such inflection point for mesons connecting branes of
806: the same flavor. The appearance of the inflection point is a
807: characteristic feature of mesons connecting branes of different flavors.
808: Note that the critical length depends on the flavor of the meson;
809: in the case of the $u\bar d$ meson, $r_c=0$, while $r_c=0.9217\, {\rm GeV}^{-1}$
810: for $u\bar s$, and it becomes larger for mesons with heavier flavors.
811: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
812: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
813: %%%%%potential for all the strings %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
814: %%%%%%%
815: %%%%%%%%%?=?????????????????????
816: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
817: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
818: \begin{figure}
819: \begin{center}
820: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{potential.eps}
821: \end{center}
822: \caption{The string potential as a function of $r=Z\ {\rm GeV}^{-1}$ for the strings
823: $u\bar d$( the upper curve), $u\bar s$ ( the middle curve) and $u\bar b$ ( the lower curve).}
824: \label{potential}
825: \end{figure}%
826: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
827: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
828: \begin{figure}
829: \begin{center}
830: \includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{cpotential.eps}
831: \end{center}
832: \caption{The final form of the potential for a quark-antiquak
833: pair obtained by taking account of the perturbative QCD effects added to the
834: potential of the string connecting $q_{1}$ and $\bar q_{2}$
835: in the QCD-like model.}
836: \label{totpotential}
837: \end{figure}
838: \item Region 3: Short distance region ($\quad r << r_c, $) \\
839: In the limit $r\rightarrow 0$, the string shape becomes
840: almost a straight line connecting the lighter quark $q_1$ to the heavier quark $q_2$,
841: and there, the total energy of the meson becomes $m_2-m_1$.
842: Subtracting the rest masses, the potential becomes
843: \begin{equation}
844: V(r) \rightarrow (m_2-m_1)-(m_1+m_2)=-2m_1,\quad m_1 \le m_2 \, .
845: \label{potrzero}
846: \end{equation}
847: \end{enumerate}
848: It is noted that in our string theory, eventhough it is called QCD-like,
849: we cannot precisely take into account the short distance effects. Consequently,
850: perturbative QCD effects resulting from one-gluon exchange would
851: contribute as additional effects.
852: The dual gravity theory
853: that we study here is effective in accounting for long distance non-perturbative
854: effects of QCD, but it is ineffective in acconting for short distance perturbative effects
855: of QCD. To implement the latter effects in the present framework,
856: we have to estimate the higher-order effects.
857: Here, we employ more convinient way to include such perturbative effects
858: by taking account of the
859: perturbative QCD results directly,
860: as QCD is effective in the short distance region.
861: The first order perturbative QCD potential is
862: a sort of Coulomb potential, which is known to be expressed as
863: \begin{equation}
864: V_{\rm perturbative\ QCD}=-\frac{4\, \alpha_{\rm QCD}}{3r}, \quad
865: \alpha_{\rm QCD}=0.33,
866: \label{pertqcdpot}
867: \end{equation}
868: which also is independent of the flavors of the quark and anti-quark.
869:
870: Therefore, a potential between the quark and anti-quark that is applicable to the short
871: distance region as well as the long distance region may consist of the sum of
872: the classical potential of the QCD-like string theory $V(r)$, which we have studied
873: in this paper, and the one-gluon exchange potential $V_{\rm perturbative\ QCD}$ of
874: QCD. We call their sum the \lq\lq improved potential":
875: \begin{equation}
876: V(r)_{\rm improved} = V(r) + V_{\rm perturbative\ QCD}\, .
877: \label{improved}
878: \end{equation}
879: By including such perturbative effects of QCD, the short distance behavior of the potential
880: $V(r)$ of Eq.(49) may be improved to some extent.
881: Figure~\ref{totpotential} displays the calculated result for the improved potentials
882: with different flavors.
883: \footnote{
884: If we take account of the spin dependent color-magnet interaction, they are, of course, flavor dependent. Such an interaction modifies the potential only in the very short range region
885: ($\sim \delta(r)$), but we here consider the spin-independent potential by removing such spin-dependent
886: effects.
887: }
888:
889:
890: Although the behavior of the potential converges to a common value, $-2m_1$,
891: in the limit $r\,\rightarrow \, 0$ (region 3),
892: and also it converges to a single linear potential line in the large separation limit (region 1),
893: the shape of the potential does depend on the flavors around the critical length, $r_c$ (region 2).
894: It is interesting that the potential between the $u$ and $\bar q_j$ at relatively small
895: distances becomes more attractive for the case as of $m_i$ increases.
896:
897:
898: From this picture, we can conclude that the flavor dependence of the potential can be
899: found for the improved potentials around the critical region.
900: It is noted that the non-perturbative effects can be included in our string picture
901: realizing a linear potential which can be directly derived from
902: this QCD-like model.
903:
904: \section{Conclusion}
905: In the picture presented here, the origin of generation is attributed to the flavor branes.
906: The flavor branes are separately positioned perpendicularly to the direction
907: of the extra dimension $u$, which causes quite different energies
908: for the meson strings, depending on the flavors.
909:
910: Based on the above picture, we have explored general formulations of
911: the QCD-like string model and
912: have obtained classical solutions of meson strings.
913: In this QCD-like model, it is automatical that
914: the quark-antiquark potential is universal and independent of their flavors.
915: This is consistent with the experimental data of meson spectroscopy in the
916: large separation limit.
917: If the separation between a quark-antiquark pair decreases, however,
918: their interaction becomes flavor dependent.
919: As the most characteristic feature of our model, we have found that
920: this attractive interaction becomes stronger as the distance
921: between the branes of the quark and anti-quark increases
922: depending on the difference of their flavors, especially in the middle
923: region around critical
924: separation, $r \sim r_c$.
925: If the endpoints of a string are on the same brane, there is
926: no critical distance $r_c$. We believe that our flavor dependent potential
927: may be observed in flavored mesons whose endpoints lie on different branes.
928: In order to check this result, we need information concerning the
929: quark-antiquark potential in the case that their endpoints lie on different flavored
930: branes.
931: We hope that detailed analysis of hadron spectroscopy, especially
932: for hadrons including different flavors, will clear
933: whether or not our prediction is consistent with realistic QCD systems
934: \cite{quiggrosner,cornellpot,stringmeson}.
935:
936: The general formulae which we have used in this paper are
937: also applicable to more complicated shapes
938: of hadron strings,
939: because the differential equation
940: Eq.~(\ref{eq:mesonshape}) is also applicable to various types of
941: hadron strings, baryon strings, and more complicated web-like exotic hadronic strings
942: possesing junctions. One
943: example of such hadrons is
944: the pentaquarks that we have investigated in Ref.\cite{BKST}.
945: \footnote{Actually the observation of pentaquarks motivated us to formulate this picture of
946: flavor branes.
947: It is found that experiments on multi-quark states have not yet been confirmed
948: with the exception of $\Theta^{+}$, which was first observed in Spring 8\cite{sp8}.
949: Even though, we expect
950: that quark-systems may have much variety of exotic hadrons
951: to yield multi-quark systems
952: including pentaquarks in addition to ordinary mesons and baryons.}
953: In this respect, the string picture may suggest the new concept that
954: ``color and flavor are located at the
955: endpoints of a string,
956: but the spin, on the other hand, may be distributed over a whole string".
957:
958: If our interpretation of flavor in terms of flavor branes has
959: some importance, our picture of the origin of flavor may give new
960: insight into hadron physics. Then multi-quark states including quarks of 2nd or 3rd
961: generations may be packed in a more compact way; that is,
962: if the distance between a quark and an anti-quark with different flavors
963: becomes shorter than the critical length $r_c$, their interaction
964: may become stronger, in which case, the density of the multi-quark system would be higher.
965: Then, a variety of high density nuclear matters arise when different flavors are
966: included. Such behavior may be realized as a kind of crystal connecting quarks
967: by junctions and strings\cite{crystal}.
968: This may be an indication of the existence of hadron states including strangeness with
969: high density and it might be related to the recent observation of so-called
970: $\bar K$ nucleon clusters, which have high nucleon density
971: at the center,
972: specifically
973: 4-9 times higher than normal nuclear
974: density ( $\rho =0.17\ fm^{-1}$)\cite{akaishiyamazaki}.
975: Finally, our interpretation of flavors may not be irrelevant to the more
976: speculative conjecture of the existence of a pasta phase of high density
977: matter, appearing in the initial stage of supernova explosions\cite{sato}.
978:
979: Many problems are left to be solved. First, we ignored the effects of spin, and therefore,
980: we cannot say definitely which meson, i.e., a pseudoscalar meson or a vector meson,
981: corresponds to the string we
982: have studied.
983: Also the hyperfine interaction and parity should be taken into account in the string picture of hadrons.
984: Recently, studies of low energy QCD based on the AdS/CFT correspondence
985: have been carried out many researchers; a holographic dual of QCD with massless
986: flavors has been intensively studied by T.~Sakai and S.~Sugimoto\cite{SS}, who have elucidated
987: the mechanism of chiral symmetry breakdown within this framework
988: and also derived the Chern-Simons term, which accouts for
989: baryon states as skyrmions.
990: An interesting fact is that the model they studied is closely related to the hidden local symmetry
991: approach\cite{BKM}.
992: Although the model beautifully expresses
993: the mechanism of chiral symmetry breaking and the spin structure of the system,
994: the flavor structure with non-vanishing quark masses is
995: not well implemented.
996: In this sense, our model may be a complimentary approach.
997: We hope a full understanding of non-perturbative QCD
998: and the insight of the origin of flavor can be gained in near future.
999:
1000: %--------------------------------
1001: %
1002: % acknowledgements
1003: %
1004: %--------------------------------
1005: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1006: The authors are grateful to T.~Kugo for his kind and patient help
1007: and Y.~Imamura, S.~Sugimoto and T.~Sakai
1008: for useful discussions
1009: on string theories, especially on the AdS/CFT correspondence.
1010: Also, we express our thanks to the partcipants at the international
1011: symposium `` Flavor Physics and its Origin",
1012: held at Ochanomizu University in December, 2005, for valuable comments.
1013:
1014: M. B. and A. S. are partially supported by Grants-in-Aid for
1015: Scientific Research (No.17540238)
1016: from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
1017:
1018:
1019:
1020: %--------------------------------
1021: %
1022: % bibliography
1023: %
1024: %--------------------------------
1025: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1026: \bibitem{BKST}
1027: M.~Bando, T.~Kugo, A.~Sugamoto and Y.~Terunuma, Prog. Theor. Phys.. {\bf 2} (2004), 231; hep-ph/0410225.
1028: \bibitem{S}
1029: A. Sugamoto, talk given at 2nd international symposium on {\it ``New Developments of Integrated Sciences"} held at Ochanomizu U. on March 16 (2004); hep-ph/0404019.
1030: %\bibitem{KK}
1031: %A. Karch and E. Katz, J.High Energy Phys. {\bf 06} (2002), 043; hep-th/0205236.
1032:
1033: \bibitem{N=0a}
1034: E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 2} (1998), 505; hep-th/9803131;
1035: J.High Energy Phys. 07 (1998), 006; hep-th/9805112.
1036:
1037: D. J. Gross and H. Ooguri, Phys. Rev. {\bf D58} (1998), 106002; hep-th/9805129.
1038:
1039: M. Kurczenski {\it et al.}, J.High Energy Phys. {\bf 05} (2004), 041; hep-th/0311270;
1040:
1041: \bibitem{M}
1042: J. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 2} (1998), 231; hep-th/9711200.
1043:
1044: J. Babington, J. Erdmenger, N. J. Evans, Z. Guralnik, and I. Kirsch Phys. Rev. {\bf D69} (2004), 066007; hep-th/0306018.
1045:
1046: M. Kurczenski {\it et al.},J.High Energy Phys. {\bf 07} (2003), 049; hep-th/0304032.
1047: \bibitem{Reggeslopehara}
1048: S. Eidelman {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 592}, (2004), 1; Review of particle properties.
1049: \bibitem{quiggrosner}
1050: C. Quigg and J.L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. {\bf D23} (1981), 2625.
1051: \bibitem{cornellpot}
1052: E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J. Kogut, K.D. Lane and T.M. Yan,
1053: Phys. Rev. Letters {\bf 34} (1975), 369.
1054:
1055: %
1056: %\bibitem{G}
1057: %M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Lett. {\bf 8} (1964), 118.
1058: %
1059: \bibitem{stringmeson}
1060: H. Boschi-Filho, Nelson R.F. Braga and C.N. Ferreira,
1061: hep-th/0512295.
1062: \bibitem{sp8}
1063: T. Nakano {\it et al.} (LEPS collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}
1064: (2003), 012002.
1065: \bibitem{akaishiyamazaki}
1066: Y. Akaishi, A. Dote and T. Yamazaki, nucl-th/0501040v1 17 Jan 2005.
1067: \bibitem{crystal}
1068: Y. Igarashi, M, Imachi, T. Matsuoka, K. Ninomiya, S. Otsuki, S. Sawada and F. Toyoda, Suppliment of the Prog. THeor. Pysics, No. 63, 1978, P149.
1069: \bibitem{sato}
1070: G. Watanabe, T. Maruyama, K. Sato, K. Yasuoka and T. Ebisuzaki,
1071: Phys. Rev. Letters, 94, 031101(2005).
1072:
1073: \bibitem{SS}
1074: T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, hep-th/0412141.
1075: \bibitem{BKM}
1076: M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rep. {\bf 164} (1988), 217.
1077: \bibitem{talavera}
1078: Angel Paredes and Pere Talavera, Nucl.Phys.B713:438-464,2005
1079: e-Print Archive: hep-th/0412260: also see
1080: M. Kruczenski, L A. P. Zayas, J. Sonnenschein and D. Vaman, .JHEP 0506:046,2005,
1081: e-Print Archive: hep-th/0410035, for the flavor dependece
1082: of Regge trajectories for mesons in the holographic dual of large-N(c) QCD (although
1083: some parts, especially the part deriving the linear potential, include mistakes).
1084:
1085:
1086: \end{thebibliography}
1087: Note added: After submitting this paper we recieved a letter informing us
1088: that the paper titled
1089: `` Multiflavor excited mesons from the fifth dimension".\cite{talavera} has already
1090: proposed a methos to analyse meson strings very clearly,
1091: and it investigates meson strings in detail
1092: on the basis of Mardacena metric, i.e., in the SUSY case.
1093: The authors of that paper focus mainly on spinning mesons and intensively investigated
1094: Regge trajectories.
1095: Contrastly we investigated the quark-antiquark potential
1096: in the realistic case with SUSY breaking ( the
1097: Witten metric) in detail.
1098: We have found that the shape of potential differs on
1099: their flavors only in the middle region
1100: and that the shape of the potentials is almost independent of their flavors
1101: in the large separation limit. We found that the existence of the critical length is especially
1102: important.
1103: It would be intersting to compare their results in the SUSY case with
1104: our realistic results and to understand how
1105: the flavor branes play
1106: essential roles in flavor physics from QCD-like string models
1107: in which
1108: the origin of generation comes from the existence of flavor branes.
1109:
1110:
1111:
1112: \end{document}
1113:
1114: \bibitem{cornellpot}
1115:
1116:
1117: