1: %% LyX 1.3 created this file.  For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.

2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.

3: \documentclass[twocolumn,english]{article}

4: \usepackage{bookman}

5: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

6: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}

7: \usepackage{graphicx}

8: 

9: \makeatletter

10: 

11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.

12: %% Bold symbol macro for standard LaTeX users

13: \newcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}

14: 

15: 

16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.

17: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{0.999}

18: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.001}

19: 

20: \usepackage{babel}

21: \makeatother

22: \begin{document}

23: \begin{minipage}[c]{1.0\textwidth}%

24: \begin{center}\textbf{\Large Relating RHIC and SPS Heavy Ion Data}\end{center}{\Large \par}

25: 

26: \noindent \begin{center}\textbf{\large Klaus WERNER }\end{center}{\large \par}

27: 

28: \noindent \begin{center}\textit{SUBATECH, Université de Nantes --

29: IN2P3/CNRS-- EMN,  Nantes, France}\emph{}\\

30: \emph{werner@subatech.in2p3.fr}\end{center}

31: 

32: Abstract: We have demonstrated recently that RHIC heavy ion data concerning

33: particle production at small and intermediate transverse momenta become

34: very transparent, if one realizes that there are two sources of particles

35: production: the corona -- due to the interactions of the peripheral

36: nucleons of either nucleus, and the core -- representing the high

37: density central zone. We extend our analysis to SPS heavy ion data.

38: Again, we find that the nontrivial centrality dependence of particle

39: production (being stronger than at RHIC) is simply due to an increasing

40: corona contribution with decreasing centrality. The core contribution

41: shows no centrality dependence (concerning particle ratios), and can

42: be described in exactly the same way as at RHIC, with one exception:

43: there is somewhat less collective radial flow at SPS compared to RHIC.

44: Apart of this (and a trivial volume effect), the core portions produced

45: in different colliding systems at different energies (RHIC, SPS) look

46: the same.\end{minipage}%

47: 

48: \bigskip{}

49: 

50: One of the spectacular results from SPS heavy ion research is the

51: very strong enhancement of strange (in particular multi-strange) baryons

52: compared to proton-proton scattering. Although this goes qualitatively

53: into the right direction, having in mind the production of a quark-gluon-plasma

54: \cite{rafelski}, a quantitative understanding is still lacking.

55: 

56: We do not really claim to explain these data, we simply want to stress

57: that they show an almost trivial behavior, if one takes into account

58: the {}``corona effect'': the peripheral nucleons of either nucleus

59: essentially perform independent pp or pA-like interactions, with a

60: very different particle production compared to the high density central

61: part. For certain observables, this {}``background'' contribution

62: completely spoils the {}``signal'', and to properly interpret the

63: data, we need to subtract this background.

64: 

65: In order to get quantitative results, we employ exactly the same method

66: as described recently \cite{corona} for analyzing RHIC heavy ion

67: data: we use EPOS \cite{epos}, which has proven to work very well

68: for pp and dAu collisions at RHIC and for pp scattering at SPS. \textbf{}EPOS

69: is a parton model, 

70: 

71: ~\vspace*{7.8cm}

72: 

73: \noindent so in case of a nuclear collision there are many binary

74: interactions, creating partons, which then hadronize employing a phenomenological

75: procedure called string fragmentation. Here, we modify the procedure:

76: we have a look at the situation at an early proper time $\tau_{0}$,

77: long before the hadrons are formed: we distinguish between string

78: segments in dense areas (more than $\rho_{0}$ segments per unit proper

79: volume), from those in low density areas. We refer to high density

80: areas as core, and to low density areas as corona. In order to make

81: a quantitative statement, we adopt the following strategy: the low

82: density part will be treated using the usual EPOS particle production

83: which has proven to be very successful in pp and dAu scattering (the

84: peripheral interactions are essentially pp or pA scatterings). For

85: the high density part, we simply try to parameterize particle production,

86: in the most simple way possible. To do so, we consider the core contributions

87: sepatately in different longitudinal segments. Connected core regions

88: in a given segment are considered to be clusters, whose energy and

89: flavor content are complete determined by the corresponding string

90: segments. Clusters are then considered to be collectively expanding.

91: We assume that the clusters hadronize at some given energy density

92: $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{hadr}}$, having acquired at that moment a collective

93: radial flow, with a linear radial rapidity profile from inside to

94: outside, characterized by the maximal radial rapidity $y_{\mathrm{rad}}$.

95: In addition, we impose an azimuthal asymmetry proportional to the

96: initial space eccentricity. Hadronization then occurs according to

97: covariant phase space. For more details and parameters see \cite{corona}.

98: 

99: \textbf{So we employ exactly the same procedure as we did for RHIC,

100: with even the same parameters -- up to two exceptions, concerning

101: the parameters $\tau_{0}$ and $y_{\mathrm{rad}}$.} Whereas at RHIC

102: the final results are insensitive to variations of $\tau_{0}$ (in

103: the range 1-2fm), this is no longer the case at SPS, the reason being

104: the finite reaction time $\tau_{\mathrm{rea}}$ (time it takes for

105: the two nuclei to pass through each other), which is somewhat more

106: than a fermi. So we use $\tau_{0}=\tau_{\mathrm{rea}}$ , representing

107: the minimum possible value. \textbf{Since we have smaller initial

108: core densities at SPS compared to RHIC, we also expect a smaller radial

109: flow, so we take the freedom to use $y_{\mathrm{rad}}$ as a free

110: parameter, fixed by comparing to SPS data (the only free parameter

111: when going from RHIC to SPS!). We actually use $y_{\mathrm{rad}}=0.60$

112: at SPS, instead of $0.83$ at RHIC.}

113: 

114: In the following, we will discuss results for PbPb collisions at 158

115: GeV. In fig. \ref{cap:core-pp}, we compare the core contribution

116: corresponding to a central (0-5\%) PbPb collision (which means purely

117: statistical hadronization, with flow) with pp scattering. We plot

118: $m_{t}$ spectra of pions, kaons, protons, and lambdas, the nuclear

119: spectra are divided by the number of binary collisions (according

120: to Glauber). Apart of the shape differences, the most striking feature

121: is the fact that the yields for the different pp contributions are

122: much wider spread than the core contributions, even more than at RHIC.

123: In pp (string fragmentation), lambdas (and even more the multi-strange

124: baryons) are very much suppressed compared to pion production, and

125: this suppression is even stronger at SPS compared to RHIC (since the

126: string masses are smaller).%

127: \begin{figure}[tb]

128: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

129:   scale=0.3,

130:   angle=270]{z-sel-3.ps}\end{center}

131: \vspace{-1.5cm}

132: 

133: 

134: \caption{Invariant yields $1/2\pi m_{t}\, dn/dydm_{t}$ of pions (red), kaons

135: (blue), protons (green), and lambdas (yellow), for the core contribution

136: corresponding of a central (0-5\%) PbPb collision (full lines) and

137: proton-proton scattering (dashed). The PbPb spectra are divided by

138: the number of collisions. \label{cap:core-pp}}

139: \end{figure}

140: In fig. \ref{cap:all-pp}, we compare the full contribution (core

141: and corona) of a central (0-5\%) PbPb collision and proton-proton

142: scattering . The PbPb pion line crosses the pp line at large $p_{t}$,

143: which is due to the fact that the core contains particles from pA

144: like collisions, where we have a {}``Cronin-enhancement'' due to

145: parton ladder splitting, discussed in detail in \cite{epos}, which

146: has been introduced in order to understand dAu scattering at RHIC.%

147: \begin{figure}[tb]

148: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

149:   scale=0.3,

150:   angle=270]{z-sel-4.ps}\end{center}

151: \vspace{-1.5cm}

152: 

153: 

154: \caption{Invariant yields $1/2\pi m_{t}\, dn/dydm_{t}$ of pions (red), kaons

155: (blue), protons (green), and lambdas (yellow), for the full contribution

156: (core + corona) of a central (0-5\%) PbPb collision (full lines) and

157: proton-proton scattering (dashed). The PbPb spectra are divided by

158: the number of collisions.\label{cap:all-pp}}

159: \end{figure}

160: In fig. \ref{cap:core-corona}, we plot the relative contribution

161: of the core (relative to the complete spectrum, core + corona) as

162: a function of $m_{t}-m$, for different particle species.%

163: \begin{figure}[tb]

164: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

165:   scale=0.3,

166:   angle=270]{z-sel-1.ps}\end{center}

167: \vspace{-2cm}

168: 

169: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

170:   scale=0.3,

171:   angle=270]{z-sel-2.ps}\end{center}

172: \vspace{-1.5cm}

173: 

174: 

175: \caption{The relative contribution of the core (core/(core+corona)) as a function

176: of the transverse mass for different centralities (0-5\%: red, 40-50\%:

177: blue. Upper figure: pions (full) and kaons (dashed). Lower figure:

178: protons (full) and lambdas (dashed).\label{cap:core-corona}}

179: \end{figure}

180: For central collisions, the core contribution dominates largely (around

181: 90\%), whereas for semi-central collisions (40-50\%) the core contribution

182: decreases, giving more and more space for the corona part. The precise

183: $m_{t}$ dependence of the relative weight of core versus corona depends

184: on the particle type.

185: 

186: We are now going to study SPS PbPb data (158 GeV). In fig. \ref{cap:centrality},

187: we plot the centrality dependence of the particle yield per participant

188: (per unit of rapidity), for different particle species, the data \cite{na49centr,na57centr}

189: together with the full calculation (upper diagram), and the full calculation

190: compared to the core contribution (lower diagram). %

191: \begin{figure}[tb]

192: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

193:   scale=0.3,

194:   angle=270]{z-sel-5.ps}\end{center}

195: \vspace{-2cm}

196: 

197: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

198:   scale=0.3,

199:   angle=270]{z-sel-6.ps}\end{center}

200: \vspace{-1.5cm}

201: 

202: 

203: \caption{\underbar{Upper diagram}: Particle yields per participant in PbPb

204: scattering at 158 GeV as a function of the number of participants,

205: for (from top to bottom): $\pi^{-}$, $K^{+}$, $K^{-}$, $K_{s}$,

206: $\Lambda$, $\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi$, $\bar{\Xi}$, $\Omega$, $\bar{\Omega}$.

207: We show data (points) \cite{na57centr} together with the full calculation

208: (core + corona, full line). The three upper-most curves refer to $4\pi$results,

209: all others to central rapidities. The leftmost points are pp calculations

210: (colored points) and pp or pBe data (black symbols).\label{cap:centrality}

211: \underbar{Lower diagram}: full calculations, same as in upper plot

212: (full lines) compared to the core contributions (dotted).}

213: \end{figure}

214: The complete calculation follows quite closely the data. Whereas central

215: collisions are clearly core dominated, the core contributes less and

216: less with decreasing centrality. In fig. \ref{cap:ratios}, we consider

217: the corresponding particle ratios, as a function of centrality, for

218: the core contributions. We show the ratios of different particles,

219: with respect to $\pi^{-}$or $K_{s}$. The rations are practically

220: flat, apart of some decrease for very small participant numbers.%

221: \begin{figure}[tb]

222: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

223:   scale=0.3,

224:   angle=270]{z-sel-7.ps}\end{center}

225: \vspace{-1.5cm}

226: 

227: 

228: \caption{Particle ratios as a function of centrality, from top to bottom:

229: $K^{+}/\pi^{-}$, $K^{-}/\pi^{-}$, $\Lambda/K_{s}\,\times$0.1 ,

230: $\bar{\Lambda}/K_{s}\:\times$0.1, $\Xi/K_{s}\:\times$0.1, $\bar{\Xi}/K_{s}\:\times$0.1,

231: $\Omega/K_{s}\:\times$0.1, $\bar{\Omega}/K_{s}\:\times$0.1. The

232: full lines are the calculations for the core contribution alone, the

233: dashed lines are horizontal lines, just to guide the eye. \label{cap:ratios}}

234: \end{figure}

235: 

236: 

237: \textbf{So our first important conclusion: after subtracting the {}``corona

238: background'', the interesting part, the core contribution, shows

239: an extremely simple behavior: there is no centrality dependence, the

240: systems are simply changing in size. The participant number is certainly

241: not a good measure of the volume of the core part, this is why the

242: overall multiplicities per participant decrease with decreasing centrality.

243: This is the same conclusion as in \cite{corona} for AuAu at RHIC.

244: And not only the SPS core contribution is as simple as the RHIC one,

245: it is even parameterized with the same parameters, apart of somewhat

246: more flow at RHIC!}

247: 

248: What makes the measured centrality dependence look complicated is

249: the mix of core and corona, depending on the particle species. Actually

250: the $\Omega$ are the simplest, since here the corona contribution

251: is negligible. Here, all the participants which contribute to the

252: corona (being more and more frequent with decreasing centrality) do

253: not contribute at all to the $\Omega$ production. This is why the

254: yields drop so strongly at small participant numbers. This also reflects

255: the fact that the core volume is not proportional to the number of

256: participants.

257: 

258: To demonstrate consistency, we check in the following $m_{t}$ spectra

259: for different hadron species, for PbPb collisions at 158 GeV, see

260: figs. \ref{cap:kas} and \ref{cap:xim}.%

261: \begin{figure}[tb]

262: \vspace{-1.2cm}

263: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

264:   scale=0.3,

265:   angle=270]{z-sel-8.ps}\end{center}

266: 

267: \vspace{-2.5cm}

268: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

269:   scale=0.3,

270:   angle=270]{z-sel-9.ps}\end{center}

271: \vspace{-2.5cm}

272: 

273: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

274:   scale=0.3,

275:   angle=270]{z-sel-10.ps}\end{center}

276: \vspace{-1.5cm}

277: 

278: 

279: \caption{Transverse mass spectra of $K_{s}$ (upper plot), $\Lambda$ (middle),

280: $\bar{\Lambda}$ (lower) in PbPb scattering at different centralities.

281: From top to bottom: 0-5\%, 5-11\%, 11-23\%, 23-40\%, 40-53\%. Lines

282: are full calculations, points are data \cite{na57mt}. The different

283: curves are displaced by factors of 10.\label{cap:kas}}\vspace{-0.3cm}

284: 

285: \end{figure}

286: The calculations represent the full contribution, core plus corona,

287: whose relative%

288: \begin{figure}[tb]

289: \vspace{-1.2cm}

290: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

291:   scale=0.3,

292:   angle=270]{z-sel-11.ps}\end{center}

293: 

294: \vspace{-2.5cm}

295: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

296:   scale=0.3,

297:   angle=270]{z-sel-12.ps}\end{center}

298: \vspace{-2.5cm}

299: 

300: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

301:   scale=0.3,

302:   angle=270]{z-sel-13.ps}\end{center}

303: \vspace{-1.5cm}

304: 

305: 

306: \caption{Transverse mass spectra of $\Xi$ (upper plot), $\bar{\Xi}$ (middle),

307: $\Omega+\bar{\Omega}$ (lower) in PbPb scattering at different centralities.

308: From top to bottom: 0-5\%, 5-11\%, 11-23\%, 23-40\%, 40-53\%. Lines

309: are full calculations, points are data \cite{na57mt}. The different

310: curves are displaced by factors of 10.\label{cap:xim}}\vspace{-0.3cm}

311: 

312: \end{figure}

313:  contributions (at least for kaons and lambdas) can be obtained from

314: fig. \ref{cap:core-corona}. So it is actually a non-trivial superposition

315: of these two contributions, hiding the shape of the interesting part,

316: the core.

317: 

318: It should be noted that NA49 \cite{na49lda} reports much less lambda

319: production at central rapidity than NA57, and correspondingly our

320: calculation of $dn/dy(y=0)$ (being close to the NA57 values) is about

321: 40\% above the NA49 results (whereas the transverse mass spectra almost

322: agree!). 

323: 

324: In fig. \ref{cap:cc}, we show rapidity and transverse mass spectra

325: of different hadron species for central CC and SiSi at 158 GeV. Again

326: we just show the full calculations (core plus corona) together with

327: the data, and we find a similar good agreement than in case of PbPb

328: (using the same parameters!), with the exception of the $\phi$ transverse

329: momentum spectrum, which is somewhat harder in the calculations. Concerning

330: the relative weights of core and corona, CC and SiSi is very similar

331: to peripheral PbPb, in the sense that the corona is relatively more

332: important than in central PbPb (the surface effect is bigger in small

333: nuclei than in big ones). 

334: 

335: %

336: \begin{figure}[tb]

337: \vspace{-1.2cm}

338: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

339:   scale=0.3,

340:   angle=270]{z-sel-14.ps}\end{center}

341: 

342: \vspace{-2.5cm}

343: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

344:   scale=0.3,

345:   angle=270]{z-sel-15.ps}\end{center}

346: \vspace{-2.5cm}

347: 

348: \begin{center}\includegraphics[%

349:   scale=0.3,

350:   angle=270]{z-sel-16.ps}\end{center}

351: \vspace{-1.5cm}

352: 

353: 

354: \caption{Rapidity spectra of identified hadrons in central SiSi (upper, left)

355: and central CC (upper right) and transverse mass spectra in central

356: CC (middle) and central SiSi (bottom). In each figure, from top to

357: bottom: $\pi^{+}$, $\pi^{-}$, $K^{+}$, $K^{-}$, $\Lambda$, $\phi$.

358: Lines are full calculations, points are data. \label{cap:cc}}\vspace{-0.3cm}

359: 

360: \end{figure}

361: 

362: 

363: To summarize: we have discussed the influence of the corona contribution

364: (occurring in the periphery of nuclear collisions) in PbPb, SiSi,

365: and CC collisions at the SPS. We provide a realistic treatment of

366: the corona, by using a model which works excellently for pp and pA.

367: We can provide a parametrization of the core, such that the complete

368: calculation (core + corona) provides a good fit of the observed particle

369: spectra in heavy ion collisions at the SPS. Our core results represent

370: to some extent {}``background corrected results'', removing the

371: undesired corona contributions from the spectra. \textbf{The core

372: shows an extremely simple centrality and species dependence: actually

373: there is no centrality dependence, all particle ratios are constant.

374: In other words, the cores in all these different systems (CC, SiSi,

375: PbPb at different centralities) are all identical, apart of a trivial

376: volume difference. Even more remarkable: the SPS results (concerning

377: core) are identical to the RHIC results, with one exception: there

378: is 30\% more radial flow at RHIC. So what really makes the experimental

379: results complicated is the non-trivial admixture of corona contribution

380: to the core.}

381: 

382: All the results concerning SPS in this paper have been obtained with

383: exactly the same procedure (and same parameters) as in a previous

384: study of RHIC results \cite{corona}, with just one exception: the

385: radial flow parameter. All the centrality and system size dependence

386: is purely determined by geometry.

387: 

388: \begin{thebibliography}{1}

389: \bibitem{rafelski}J. Rafelski, B. Mueller, Phys.Rev.Lett. 48 (1982) 1066.

390: \bibitem{corona}K. Werner, hep-ph/0603064

391: \bibitem{epos}K. Werner, Fuming Liu, Tanguy Pierog, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.

392: 31 (2005) S985-S988.

393: \bibitem{na49centr}NA49 Collaboration, J. Bachler et al., Nucl. Phys. A 661 (1999) 45.

394: \bibitem{na57centr}NA57 Collaboration, F. Antinori, et al., J.Phys. G32 (2006) 427-442.

395: \bibitem{na57mt}NA57 Collaboration, F Antinori, et al., J.Phys. G30 (2004) 823-840.

396: \bibitem{na49cc}NA49 Collaboration, C. Alt et al., Phys.Rev.Lett.94:052301,2005

397: \bibitem{na49lda}NA49 Collaboration, T. Anticic et al., Phys.Rev.Lett.93\_022302,2004\end{thebibliography}

398: 

399: \end{document}

400: