1: \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \pagestyle{plain} \topmargin=-0.8in \hoffset=-1.0cm \voffset=1cm
4: \textwidth=160mm \textheight=220mm
5: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: \title{Little Higgs models and single top production \\
9: at the LHC}
10: \author{Chong-Xing Yue, Li Zhou, Shuo Yang\\
11: {\small Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian
12: 116029, China
13: \thanks{E-mail:cxyue@lnnu.edu.cn}}\\}
14: \date{\today}
15: \maketitle
16: \begin{abstract}
17: \hspace{5mm}We investigate the corrections of the littlest Higgs(LH)
18: model and the $SU(3)$ simple group model to single top production
19: at the CERN Large Hardon Collider(LHC). We find that the new gauge
20: bosons $W_{H}^{\pm}$ predicted by the LH model can generate
21: significant contributions to single top production via the s-channel
22: process. The correction terms for the tree-level $Wqq'$ couplings
23: coming from the $SU(3)$ simple group model can give large
24: contributions to the cross sections of the t-channel single top
25: production process. We expect that the effects of the LH model and
26: the $SU(3)$ simple group model on single top production can be
27: detected at the LHC experiments.
28: \end {abstract}
29:
30: \vspace{0.8cm}
31:
32:
33: \newpage
34: \section*{1. Introduction}
35:
36: \hspace{5mm}The top quark, with a mass of the order of the
37: electroweak scale $m_{t}=172.7\pm2.9GeV$[1] is the heaviest particle
38: yet discovered and might be the first place in which the new physics
39: effects could be appeared. The properties of the top quark could
40: reveal information regarding flavor physics, electroweak symmetry
41: breaking(EWSB) mechanism, as well as new physics beyond the standard
42: model(SM)[2]. Hadron colliders, such as the Tevatron and the CERN
43: Large Hadron Collider(LHC), can be seen as top quark factories. One
44: of the primary goals for the Tevatron and the LHC is to determine
45: the top quark properties and see whether any hint of non-SM effects
46: may be visible. Thus, studying the top quark production at hadron
47: colliders is of great interest. It can help the collider experiments
48: to probe EWSB mechanism and test the new physics beyond the SM.
49:
50: In the context of the SM, top quark can be produced singly via
51: electroweak interactions involving the $Wtb$ vertex. There are
52: three production processes which are distinguished by the
53: virtuality $Q^{2}$ of the electroweak gauge boson
54: $W(Q^{2}=-p^{2}$, where $p$ is the four-momentum of the gauge
55: boson $W)$[2]. The first process is the so-called $W$-gluon
56: fusion, or t-channel process, which is the dominant process
57: involving a space-like $W$ boson($p^{2}<0$) both at the Tevatron
58: and the LHC. If a $b$ quark distribution function is introduced
59: into the calculation, the leading order process for the $W$-gluon
60: fusion channel is the t-channel process $q+b\rightarrow q'+t$
61: including $\overline{q}'+b\rightarrow \overline{q}+t$[3]. The
62: second process is the s-channel process
63: $q+\overline{q}'\rightarrow t+\overline{b}$ mediated by a
64: time-like $W$ boson ($p^{2}>(m_{t}+m_{b})^{2}$). Single top quark
65: can also be produced in association with a real $W$
66: boson($p^{2}\approx M_{W}^{2}$). The cross section for the $tW$
67: associated production process is negligible at the Tevatron, but
68: of considerable size at the LHC, where the production cross
69: section is larger than that of the s-channel process.
70:
71: At the leading order, the production cross sections for all of three
72: processes are proportional to the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa(CKM)
73: matrix element $|V_{tb}|^{2}$. Thus, measuring the cross section of
74: single top production generally provides a direct probe of
75: $|V_{tb}|$, the effective $Wtb$ vertex, further the strength and
76: handedness of the top charged-current couplings. This fact has
77: already motivated large number of dedicated experimental and
78: theoretical studies. Since the cross section of single top
79: production is smaller than that of the $t\overline{t}$ production
80: and the final state signals suffer from large background, the
81: observation of the single top events is even more challenging than
82: $t\overline{t}$. It is expected that increased luminosity and
83: improved methods of analysis will eventually achieve detection of
84: single top events. So far, there are not single top events to be
85: observed. The cross sections of single top production for the s-
86: and t-channels might be observed at the Tevatron Run II with a small
87: data sample of only a few $fb^{-1}$. However, the LHC can precisely
88: measure single top production, the CKM matrix element $V_{tb}$ could
89: be measured down to less than one percent error at the ATLAS
90: detector[4].
91:
92: The three processes for single top production can be affected by new
93: physics beyond the SM in two ways. One way proceeds via the
94: modification of the SM couplings between the known particles, such
95: as $Wtb$ and $Wqq'(q, q'= u, d, c, s)$ couplings, and other way
96: involves the effects of new particles that couple to the top quark.
97: Certainly, these two classifications can be seen to overlap in the
98: limit, in which the extra particles are heavy and decouple from the
99: low energy description. The SM couplings between the ordinary
100: particles take well defined and calculable values in the SM, any
101: deviation from these values would indicate the presence of new
102: physics. Thus, single top production at hadron colliders might be
103: sensitive to certain effects of new physics and studying the non-SM
104: effects on single top production is very interesting and needed.
105:
106: To address EWSB and the hierarchy problem in the SM, many
107: alternative new physics models, such as supersymmetry, extra
108: dimensions, topcolor, and the recently little Higgs models, have
109: been proposed over the past three decades. Of particular interest to
110: us is the little Higgs models[5]. In this kind of models, the Higgs
111: particle is a pseudo-Goldstone boson of a global symmetry which is
112: spontaneously broken at some high scales. EWSB is induced by
113: radiative corrections leading to a Coleman-Weinberg type of
114: potential. Quadratic divergence cancellations of radiative
115: corrections to the Higgs boson mass are due to contributions from
116: new particles with the same spin as the SM particles. Some of these
117: new particles can generate characteristic signatures at the present
118: and future collider experiments[6,7]. The aim of this paper is to
119: study the effects of the little Higgs models on single top
120: production and see whether the corrections of the little Higgs
121: models to the cross section of single top production can be detected
122: at the LHC.
123:
124: The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In the next section,
125: we shall briefly summarize some coupling expressions in the little
126: Higgs models, which are related to single top production. The
127: contributions of the correction terms for the tree-level $Wtb$ and
128: $Wqq'$ couplings to single top production at the LHC are calculated
129: in section 3. In section 4, we discuss the corrections of the new
130: charged gauge bosons, such as $W_{H}^{\pm}$ and $X^{-}$, predicted
131: by the little Higgs models, to single top production at the LHC. Our
132: conclusions and discussions are given in section 5.
133:
134: \section*{2. The relevant couplings}
135:
136: \hspace{5mm}There are several variations of the little Higgs models,
137: which differ in the assumed higher symmetry and in the
138: representations of the scalar multiplets. According the structure of
139: the extended electroweak gauge group, the little Higgs models can be
140: generally divided into two classes[6,8]: product group models, in
141: which the SM $SU(2)_{L}$ is embedded in a product gauge group, and
142: simple group models, in which it is embedded in a larger simple
143: group. The littlest Higgs model(LH)[9] and the $SU(3)$ simple group
144: model[8,10] are the simplest examples of the product group models
145: and the simple group models, respectively. To predigestion our
146: calculation, we will discuss single top production at the LHC in the
147: context of these two simplest models.
148:
149: The LH model[9] consists of a nonlinear $\sigma$ model with a
150: global $SU(5)$ symmetry and a locally gauged symmetry
151: $[SU(2)\times U(1)]^{2}$. The global $SU(5)$ symmetry is broken
152: down to its subgroup $SO(5)$ at a scale $f\sim\Lambda_{s}/4\pi\sim
153: TeV$, which results in 14 Goldstone bosons(GB's). Four of these
154: GB's are eaten by the gauge bosons($W_{H}^{\pm}, Z_{H}, B_{H}$),
155: resulting from the breaking of $[SU(2)\times U(1)]^{2}$, giving
156: them mass. The Higgs boson remains as a light pseudo-Goldstone
157: boson, and other GB's give mass to the SM gauge bosons and form a
158: Higgs field triplet. The gauge and Yukawa couplings radiative
159: generate a Higgs potential and trigger EWSB. In the LH model, the
160: couplings constants of the SM gauge boson $W$ and the new gauge
161: boson $W_{H}$ to ordinary particles, which are related to our
162: calculation, can be written as[11]:
163: \begin{eqnarray}
164: g_{L}^{Wtb}&=&\frac{ie}{\sqrt{2}S_{W}}[1-\frac{v^{2}}{2f^{2}}(x_{L}^{2}+c^{2}(c^{2}-s^{2}))]
165: ,\hspace{12mm}g_{R}^{Wtb}=0;\\
166: g_{L}^{Wqq'}&=&\frac{ie}{\sqrt{2}S_{W}}[1-\frac{v^{2}}{2f^{2}}c^{2}(c^{2}-s^{2})],\hspace{23mm}g_{R}^{Wqq'}=0;\\
167: g_{L}^{W_{H}tb}&=&g_{L}^{W_{H}qq'}=\frac{ie}{\sqrt{2}S_{W}}\frac{c}{s},\hspace{38mm}g_{R}^{W_{H}tb}=g_{R}^{W_{H}qq'}=0.
168: \end{eqnarray}
169: Where $\nu\approx246GeV$ is the electroweak scale and
170: $S_{W}=\sin\theta_{W}$, $\theta_{W}$ is the Weinberg angle.
171: $c(s=\sqrt{1-c^{2}})$ is the mixing parameter between $SU(2)_{1}$
172: and $SU(2)_{2}$ gauge bosons and the mixing parameter
173: $x_{L}=\lambda_{1}^{2}/(\lambda_{1}^{2}+\lambda_{2}^{2})$ comes
174: from the mixing between the SM top quark $t$ and the vector-like
175: top quark $T$, in which $\lambda_{1}$ and $\lambda_{2}$ are the
176: Yukawa coupling parameters. The $SU(2)$ doublet quarks $(q,q')$
177: represent $(u,d)$ or $(c,s)$. In above equations, we have assumed
178: $V_{tb}\approx V_{ud}\approx V_{cs}\approx1$.
179:
180: The $SU(3)$ simple group model[8,10] consists of two $\sigma$
181: model with a global symmetry $[SU(3)\times U(1)]^{2}$ and a gauge
182: symmetry $SU(3)\times U(1)_{X}$. The global symmetry is
183: spontaneously broken down to its subgroup $[SU(2)\times U(1)]^{2}$
184: by two vacuum condensates $<\Phi_{1,2}>=(0,0,f_{1,2})$, where
185: $f_{1}\sim f_{2}\sim1TeV$. At the same time, the gauge symmetry is
186: broken down to the SM gauge group $SU(2)\times U(1)$ and the
187: global symmetry is broken explicitly down to its diagonal subgroup
188: $SU(3)\times U(1)$ by the gauge interactions. This breaking
189: scenario gives rise to an $SU(2)_{L}$ doublet gauge bosons
190: $(Y^{0},X^{-})$ and a new neutral gauge boson $Z'$. Due to the
191: gauged $SU(3)$ symmetry in the $SU(3)$ simple group model, all of
192: the SM fermion representations have to be extended to transform as
193: fundamental (or antifundamental) representations of $SU(3)$, which
194: demands the existence of new heavy fermions in all three
195: generations. The fermion sector of the $SU(3)$ simple group model
196: can be constructed in two ways: universal and anomaly free, which
197: might induce the different signatures at the high energy collider
198: experiments. However, the coupling forms of the gauge bosons $W$
199: and $X$ to the SM quarks can be unitive written as[6]:
200: \begin{eqnarray}
201: g_{L}^{Wtb}&=&\frac{ie}{\sqrt{2}S_{W}}(1-\frac{1}{2}\delta_{t}^{2}),\hspace{24mm}g_{R}^{Wtb}=0;\\
202: g_{L}^{Wqq'}&=&\frac{ie}{\sqrt{2}S_{W}}(1-\frac{1}{2}\delta_{\nu}^{2}),\hspace{23mm}g_{R}^{Wqq'}=0;\\
203: g_{L}^{Xtb}&=&\frac{ie}{\sqrt{2}S_{W}}\delta_{t},\hspace{40mm}g_{R}^{Xtb}=0;\\
204: g_{L}^{Xqq'}&=&\frac{ie}{\sqrt{2}S_{W}}\delta_{\nu},\hspace{38mm}g_{R}^{Xqq'}=0
205: \end{eqnarray}
206: with
207: \begin{equation}
208: \delta_{t}=\frac{\nu}{\sqrt{2}f}t_{\beta}\frac{x_{\lambda}^{2}-1}{x_{\lambda}^{2}+t_{\beta}^{2}},
209: \hspace{30mm}\delta_{\nu}=-\frac{\nu}{2f t_{\beta}}.
210: \end{equation}
211: Where $f=\sqrt{f_{1}^{2}+f_{2}^{2}}$,
212: $t_{\beta}=\tan\beta=f_{2}/f_{1}$, and
213: $x_{\lambda}=\lambda_{1}/\lambda_{2}$.
214:
215: Using these Feynmen rules, we will estimate the contributions of the
216: LH model and the $SU(3)$ simple group model to single top production
217: at the LHC in the following sections.
218:
219: \section*{3. The contributions of the correction terms
220: to single \hspace*{1.0cm}top production }
221:
222: \hspace{5mm}For the t-channel process $q+b\rightarrow q'+t$, at
223: the leading order, there is only one diagram with $W$ exchange in
224: the t-channel. In the context of the little Higgs models, the
225: corresponding scattering amplitude can be written as :
226: \begin{equation}
227: M_{i}^{t}=\frac{2\pi\alpha_{e}(1+\delta g_{Li}^{Wtb})(1+\delta
228: g_{Li}^{Wqq'})}{S_{W}^{2}(\hat{t}-m_{W}^{2})}[\overline{u}(q')\gamma^{\mu}P_{L}u(q)]
229: [\overline{u}(t)\gamma_{\mu}P_{L}u(b)],
230: \end{equation}
231: where $\hat{t}=(P_{b}-P_{t})^{2}$, $P_{L}=(1-\gamma^{5})/2$ is the
232: left-handed prosection operator. $i=$1 and 2 represent the LH
233: model and the $SU(3)$ simple group model, respectively. $\delta
234: g_{Li}^{Wtb}$ and $\delta g_{Li}^{Wqq'}$ are the correction terms
235: for the $Wtb$ and $Wqq'$ couplings induced by these two little
236: Higgs models, which have been given in Eqs.(1,2,4,5).
237:
238: In the context of the little Higgs models, the scattering amplitude
239: of the s-channel process $q+\overline{q}'\rightarrow t+\overline{b}$
240: can be written as:
241: \begin{eqnarray}
242: M_{i}^{s}=\frac{2\pi\alpha_{e}(1+\delta g_{Li}^{Wtb})(1+\delta
243: g_{Li}^{Wqq'})}{S_{W}^{2}(\hat{s}-m_{W}^{2})}[\overline{\nu}(\overline{q}')\gamma^{\mu}P_{L}u(q)]
244: [\overline{u}(t)\gamma_{\mu}P_{L}\nu(\overline{b})],
245: \end{eqnarray}
246: where $\hat{s}=(P_{q}+P_{\overline{q}'})^{2}$ and $\sqrt{\hat{s}}$
247: is the center-of-mass energy of the subprocess
248: $q+\overline{q}'\rightarrow t+\overline{b}$.
249:
250: At the leading order, the production of single top quark in
251: association with a $W$ boson is given via the processes mediated
252: by the s-channel $b$ quark exchange and the u-channel top quark
253: exchange. In the little Higgs models, the tree-level coupling of
254: the gluon to a pair of fermions is same as that in the SM, thus
255: the scattering amplitude of this process can be written as:
256: \begin{equation}
257: M^{tW}_{i}=\frac{eg_{s}(1+\delta
258: g_{Li}^{Wtb})}{\sqrt{2}S_{W}}\overline{u}(t)[\frac{\not\varepsilon_{2}
259: P_{L}(\not P_{g}+\not
260: P_{b}+m_{b})\not\varepsilon_{1}}{\hat{s}'-m_{b}^{2}}+\frac{\not\varepsilon_{1}
261: (\not P_{t}-\not
262: P_{g}+m_{t})\not\varepsilon_{2}P_{L}}{\hat{u}-m_{t}^{2}}]u(b),
263: \end{equation}
264: where $\hat{s}'=(P_{g}+P_{b})^{2}=(P_{W}+P_{t})^{2}$,
265: $\hat{u}=(P_{t}-P_{g})^{2}=(P_{b}-P_{W})^{2}$.
266:
267: After calculating the cross sections $\hat{\sigma_{i}}(\hat{s})$ for
268: the t-channel, s-channel, and $tW$ associated production processes,
269: the total cross section $\sigma_{i}(S)$ for each process of single
270: top production at the LHC can be obtained by convoluting $
271: \hat{\sigma}_{ijl}(\hat{s})[\hat{\sigma}_{i}(\hat{s})=\sum\limits_{j,l}
272: \hat{\sigma_{ijl}}(\hat{s})]$ with the parton distribution
273: functions(PDF's):
274: \begin{equation}
275: \sigma_{i}(S)=\sum_{j,l}\int_{0}^{1}dx_{1}\int_{0}^{1}dx_{2}f_{j}(x_{j},\mu_{f}^{2})
276: f_{l}(x_{l},\mu_{f}^{2})\hat{\sigma_{jl}}(\hat{s}),
277: \end{equation}
278: where $j$ and $l$ are the possible combination of incoming gluon,
279: quark, antiquark. $f(x,\mu_{f}^{2})$ is the PDF evaluated at the
280: factorization scale $\mu_{f}$. Through out this paper, we neglect
281: all quark masses with the exception of $m_{t}$, use CTEQ6L PDF with
282: $\mu_{f}=m_{t}$[12], and take the center-of-mass energy
283: $\sqrt{S}=14TeV$ for the process $pp\rightarrow t+X$ at the LHC.
284:
285:
286: To obtain numerical results, we need to specify the relevant SM
287: parameters. These parameters are $m_{t}$=172.7GeV[1],
288: $\alpha(m_{Z})$=1/128.8, $\alpha_{s}$=0.118, $S_{W}^{2}$=0.2315, and
289: $m_{W}$=80.425\\GeV[13]. Except for these SM input parameters, the
290: contributions of the LH model and the $SU(3)$ simple group model to
291: single top quark production are dependent on the free parameters
292: ($f$, $x_{L}$, $c$) and ($f$, $x_{\lambda}$, $t_{\beta}$),
293: respectively. Considering the constraints of the electroweak
294: precision data on these free parameters, we will assume $f\geq1TeV$,
295: $0.4\leq x_{L}\leq 0.6$ and $0<c\leq 0.5$ for the LH model[14] and
296: $f\geq 1TeV$, $x_{\lambda}>1$, and $t_{\beta}>1$ for the $SU(3)$
297: simple group model[6,8,10], in our numerical estimation.
298:
299:
300: The relative corrections of the LH model and the $SU(3)$ simple
301: group model to the cross section $\sigma_{i}$ of single top
302: production at the LHC are shown in Fig.1 and Fig.2, respectively.
303: In these figures, we have taken
304: $\Delta\sigma_{i}=\sigma_{i}-\sigma^{SM}_{i}$, $f=1.0TeV$ and three
305: values of the mixing parameters $x_{L}$ and $x_{\lambda}$. From
306: these figures, we can see that the contributions of the $SU(3)$
307: simple group model to single top production are larger than those of
308: the LH model. For the LH model, the absolute values of the relative
309: correction $\Delta\sigma_{i}/\sigma_{i}^{SM}$ are smaller than $2\%$
310: in most of the parameter space preferred by the electroweak
311: precision data. The $SU(3)$ simple group model has negative
312: contributions to single top production at the LHC. For $f=1TeV$,
313: $x_{\lambda}\geq3$, and $1\leq t_{\beta}\leq5$, the absolute values
314: of the relative correction $\Delta\sigma_{i}/\sigma^{SM}_{i}$ for
315: the t-channel, s-channel, and $tW$ associated production processes
316: are in the ranges of $4.3\%\sim10.8\%$, $3.1\%\sim7.5\%$, and
317: $2\%\sim10.6\%$, respectively.
318:
319:
320: \begin{figure}[htb] \vspace{-0.5cm}
321: \begin{center}
322: \epsfig{file=fig1a.eps,width=220pt,height=205pt}
323: \hspace{0cm}\vspace{-0.25cm}
324: \epsfig{file=fig1b.eps,width=220pt,height=207pt} \hspace{-0.5cm}
325: \hspace{10cm}\vspace{-1cm}
326: \epsfig{file=fig1c.eps,width=220pt,height=200pt} \vspace{+0.2cm}
327: \caption{The relative correction $\Delta\sigma_{i}/\sigma^{SM}_{i}$ as a function
328: of the mixing parameter $c$ for \hspace*{1.8cm}$f=$1.0TeV and different values of the mixing
329: parameter $x_{L}$.} \label{ee}
330: \end{center}
331: \end{figure}
332:
333:
334: \begin{figure}[htb] \vspace{-0.5cm}
335: \begin{center}
336: \epsfig{file=fig2a.eps,width=220pt,height=205pt}
337: \hspace{0cm}\vspace{-0.25cm}
338: \epsfig{file=fig2b.eps,width=220pt,height=207pt} \hspace{-0.5cm}
339: \hspace{10cm}\vspace{-1cm}
340: \epsfig{file=fig2c.eps,width=220pt,height=200pt} \vspace{0.2cm}
341: \caption{The relative correction $\Delta\sigma_{i}/\sigma^{SM}_{i}$ as a function
342: of the free parameter
343: $t_{\beta}$ for \hspace*{1.9cm}$f=$1.0TeV and different values of the mixing
344: parameter $x_{\lambda}$.} \label{ee}
345: \end{center}
346: \end{figure}
347:
348:
349: In the context of the SM, the production cross sections at hadron
350: colliders for the t-channel and s-channel single top production
351: processes have been calculated at the next leading order(NLO)[15,2].
352: The values of $\sigma_{t}^{SM}(t)[\sigma_{t}^{SM}(\overline{t})]$
353: and $\sigma_{s}^{SM}(t)[\sigma_{s}^{SM}(\overline{t})]$ at the LHC
354: are given as $(156\pm8)pb[(91\pm5)pb]$ and
355: $(6.6\pm0.6)pb[(4.1\pm0.4)pb]$, respectively. A NLO calculation of
356: the $tW$ associated production cross section at the LHC has been
357: recently given in Ref.[16]. The large backgrounds of the signature
358: from single top production come from W$+$jets and $t\overline{t}$
359: production. Despite the relatively large expected rate and $D0$ has
360: developed several advanced multivariate techniques to discriminate
361: single top production from backgrounds[17], single top production
362: has not been discovered yet. For all of three processes for single
363: top production, the production cross section of the t-channel
364: process can be mostly precise measured at the LHC, which is expected
365: to be measured to $2\%$ accuracy[4]. Thus, at least we can say that,
366: in most of the parameter space, the effects of the $SU(3)$ simple
367: group model on the t-channel single top production process might be
368: detected at the LHC.
369:
370: \begin{figure}[htb] \vspace{0.5cm}
371: \begin{center}
372: \epsfig{file=fig3.eps,width=270pt,height=250pt} \vspace{-1.0cm}
373: \caption{The relative correction $\Delta\sigma_{i}/\sigma^{SM}_{i}$ as a function of
374: the scale parameter $f$ for $t_{\beta}$=3 \hspace*{1.8cm}and $x_{\lambda}$=3.}
375: \label{ee}
376: \end{center}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379:
380: In general, the contributions of the little Higgs models to
381: observables are proportional to the factor $1/f^{2}$. To see the $f$
382: dependence of the corrections of the $SU(3)$ simple group model to
383: single top production, we plot the relative correction
384: $\Delta\sigma_{i}/\sigma_{i}^{SM}$ as a function of the scale
385: parameter $f$ for $t_{\beta}=3$ and $x_{\lambda}=3$ in Fig.3, in
386: which the solid line, dotted line, and dashed line represent the
387: s-channel, t-channel, and $ tW $ associated production processes,
388: respectively. One can see from Fig.3 that the value of the relative
389: correction $\Delta\sigma_{i}/\sigma_{i}^{SM}$ gets close to zero as
390: $f$ increasing. Thus, the contributions of the $SU(3)$ simple group
391: model to single top production decouple for large value of the scale
392: parameter $f$. However, for $t_{\beta}>3$, $x_{\lambda}>3$, and
393: $1TeV<f\leq2.5TeV$, the absolute value of the relative correction
394: $\Delta\sigma_{t}/\sigma_{t}^{SM}$ is larger than $2\%$, which might
395: be detected at the LHC.
396:
397:
398: \section*{4. The contributions of the new gauge bosons $W_{H}$ and
399: \hspace*{0.5cm} $X$ to single top production}
400:
401: \hspace{5mm}Some of the new particles, such as new charged gauge
402: boson $W'$ and scalar boson $\Phi$, can couple the top quark to one
403: of the lighter SM particles and thus can generate contributions to
404: single top production at tree-level or at one-loop. The one-loop
405: contributions are generally too small to be observed at hadron
406: colliders[18]. From Eqs.(3,6,7), we can see that the new charged
407: gauge bosons $W_{H}^{\pm}$ and $X^{-}$ have contributions to the
408: t-channel and s-channel processes for single top production.
409: However, since these new gauge bosons must have space-like momentum
410: in the t-channel process $q+b\rightarrow q'+t$, their contributions
411: to the production cross section of the t-channel process are
412: suppressed by the factor $1/M_{W_{H}}^{2}(M_{X}^{2})$[19]. The
413: masses $M_{W_{H}}$ and $M_{X}$ are at the order of TeV. Thus, the
414: contributions of these heavy gauge bosons to the t-channel process
415: are very small, which can be neglected. For the s-channel process
416: $q+\overline{q}'\rightarrow t+\overline{b}$, the new charged gauge
417: boson $W'$ might generate significant contributions to its
418: production cross section because of the possibility of $W'$ resonant
419: production[19,20]. So, in this section, we will only consider that
420: the contributions of the new gauge bosons $W^{-}_{H}$ and $X^{-}$ to
421: the s-channel process $\overline{q}+q'\rightarrow \overline{t}+b$.
422: Certainly, our numerical results are easily transferred to those of
423: the new charged gauge boson $W^{+}_{H}$ for the process
424: $q+\overline{q}'\rightarrow t+\overline{b}$ by replacing
425: $\overline{b}$ as $b$ and $t$ as $\overline{t}$.
426:
427: The center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{S}$ of the LHC is large enough to
428: produce the heavy gauge bosons $W_{H}^{-}$ or $X^{-}$ on shell, thus
429: these heavy gauge bosons might produce significant contributions to
430: the s-channel process $\overline{q}+q'\rightarrow \overline{t}+b$.
431: The corresponding scattering amplitude including the SM gauge boson
432: $W$ can be written as:
433: \begin{equation}
434: M_{i}=\frac{2\pi\alpha_{e}}{S_{W}^{2}}[\frac{1}{\hat{s}-m_{W}^{2}}+
435: \frac{AB}{\hat{s}-M_{i}^{2}+iM_{i}\Gamma_{i}}]
436: [\overline{u}(\overline{q})\gamma^{\mu}P_{L}\nu(q')]
437: [\overline{u}(b)\gamma_{\mu}P_{L}\nu(\overline{t})],
438: \end{equation}
439: where $i$ represents the gauge boson $W_{H}^{-}$ or $X^{-}$. For the
440: gauge boson $W_{H}^{-}$, $A=B=c/s$, and for the gauge boson $X^{-}$,
441: $A=\delta_{t}$ and $B=\delta_{\nu}$. The expression of the total
442: decay width $\Gamma_{W_{H}}$ has been given in Ref.[21]. If the
443: decay of the gauge boson $X^{-}$ to one SM fermion and one TeV-scale
444: fermion partner is kinematically forbidden, then it can decay to
445: pairs of SM fermions through their mixing with the TeV-scale fermion
446: partners, which is independent of the fermion embedding[6]. For the
447: gauge boson $X^{-}$, the possible decay modes are $\overline{t}b$,
448: $\overline{u}d$, $\overline{c}s$, and $l\nu_{l}$, in which $l$
449: presents all three generation leptons $e$, $\mu$, and $\tau$. The
450: total decay width $\Gamma_{X^{-}}$ can be written as[6]:
451: \begin{equation}
452: \Gamma_{X^{-}}=\frac{\alpha
453: M_{X}}{4S_{W}^{2}}(\delta_{t}^{2}+5\delta_{\nu}^{2}).
454: \end{equation}
455:
456:
457: The new gauge bosons predicted by the little Higgs models get their
458: masses from the $f$ condensate, which breaks the extended gauge
459: symmetry. At the leading order, the masses of the new charged gauge
460: bosons $W_{H}^{\pm}$ and $X^{-}$ can be written as[5,6,7]:
461: \begin{eqnarray}
462: M_{W_{H}}&=&\frac{gf}{2sc}\approx 0.65f\cdot\frac{c}{s},\\
463: M_{X}&=&\frac{gf}{\sqrt{2}}\approx 0.46f.
464: \end{eqnarray}
465:
466: \begin{figure}[htb] \vspace{-1cm}
467: \begin{center}
468: \epsfig{file=fig4.eps,width=270pt,height=250pt} \vspace{-1.0cm}
469: \caption{The relative correction parameter $R_{W}$ as a function of
470: $M_{W_{H}}$ for three values of \hspace*{2.0cm}the mixing parameter $c$.}
471: \label{ee}
472: \end{center}
473: \end{figure}
474:
475:
476: For the LH model, if we assume that the free parameters $f$ and $c$
477: are in the ranges of $1\sim3TeV$ and $0\sim0.5$, then we have
478: $M_{W_{H}}\geq1.12TeV$. While the mass of the gauge boson $X^{-}$
479: predicted by the $SU(3)$ simple group model is larger than $920GeV$
480: even for $f\geq2TeV$. As numerical estimation, we will simple assume
481: $1TeV\leq M_{W_{H}}\leq3TeV$ and $1TeV\leq M_{X}\leq3TeV$.
482:
483:
484: \begin{figure}[htb]
485: \vspace{-0.5cm}
486: \begin{center}
487: \epsfig{file=fig5.eps,width=270pt,height=250pt} \vspace{-1.0cm}
488: \caption{The relative correction parameter $R_{X}$ as a function of
489: $M_{X}$ for $t_{\beta}=3$ and \hspace*{2.0cm}three values of the mixing parameter $x_{\lambda}$.}
490: \label{ee}
491: \end{center}
492: \end{figure}
493:
494: In Fig.4 and Fig.5, we plot the relative correction parameters
495: $R_{W}=\Delta\sigma_{s}^{W}/\sigma_{s}^{SM}$ and
496: $R_{X}=\Delta\sigma_{s}^{X}/\sigma_{s}^{SM}$ as functions of the
497: gauge boson masses $M_{W_{H}}$ and $M_{X}$ for $t_{\beta}=3$ and
498: three values of the mixing parameters $c$ and $x_{\lambda}$,
499: respectively. In these figures, we have assumed
500: $\Delta\sigma_{s}^{W}=\sigma_{s}(W+W_{H})-\sigma_{s}(W)$ and
501: $\Delta\sigma_{s}^{X}=\sigma_{s}(W+X)-\sigma_{s}(W)$. From these
502: figures, we can see that the value of $R_{W}$ is significantly
503: larger than that of $R_{X}$. This is because, compared to the gauge
504: boson $W_{H}^{-}$, the contributions of the gauge boson $X^{-}$ to
505: the s-channel process $\overline{q}+q'\rightarrow \overline{t}+b$
506: are suppressed by the factor $\nu^{2}/f^{2}$. For $0.3\leq c\leq
507: 0.6$ and $1TeV \leq M_{W_{H}}\leq 2TeV$, the value of the relative
508: correction parameter $R_{W}$ is in the range of $ 1.5\%\leq
509: R_{W}\leq 90\% $. Even for $M_{W_{H}}\geq2.0TeV(f \sim 2TeV)$, the
510: value of the relative correction parameter $R_{W}$ can reach
511: $6.3\%$. Thus, the effects of the new gauge boson $W_{H}$ to the
512: s-channel process for single top production might be detected at the
513: LHC.
514:
515:
516: \section*{5. Conclusions and discussions}
517:
518: \hspace{5mm}The electroweak production of single top quark at hadron
519: colliders is an important prediction of the SM which proceeds
520: through three distinct subprocesses. These subprocesses are
521: classified by the virtuality of the electroweak gauge boson $W$
522: involved: t-channel($p^{2}<0$), s-channel($p^{2}>0$), and associated
523: $tW$($p^{2}=m_{W}^{2}$) production. Each process has rather distinct
524: event kinematics, and thus are potentially observable separately
525: from each other[2]. All of these processes are sensitive to
526: modification of the $Wtb$ coupling and the s-channel process is
527: rather sensitive to some heavy charged particles. Thus, studying
528: single top production at the LHC can help to text the SM and further
529: to probe new physics beyond the SM.
530:
531: To solve the so-called hierarchy or fine-tuning problem of the SM,
532: the little Higgs theory was proposed as a kind of models to EWSB
533: accomplished by a naturally light Higgs boson. All of the little
534: Higgs models predict the existence of the new heavy gauge bosons and
535: generate corrections to the SM tree-level $Wqq'$ couplings. Thus,
536: the little Higgs models have effects on single top production at
537: hadron colliders.
538:
539: Little Higgs models can be generally divided in two classes: product
540: group models and simple group models. The LH model and the $SU(3)$
541: simple group model are the simplest examples of the two class
542: models, respectively. In this paper, we have investigated single top
543: production at the LHC in the context of the LH model and the $SU(3)$
544: simple group model. We find that these two simplest little Higgs
545: models generate contributions to single top production at hadron
546: colliders via two ways: correcting the SM tree-level $Wqq'$
547: couplings and new charged gauge boson exchange. For the LH model,
548: the contributions mainly come from the s-channel $W_{H}$ exchange.
549: For $0.3\leq c\leq 0.6$ and $1TeV \leq M_{W_{H}}\leq 2TeV$, the
550: relative correction of the new gauge boson $W_{H}$ to the production
551: cross section of the s-channel process at the LHC with
552: $\sqrt{S}$=14TeV is in the range of $ 1.5\%\leq R_{W}\leq 90\% $.
553: For the $SU(3)$ simple group model, the contributions of the new
554: gauge boson $X$ to the s-channel single top production process is
555: very small. However, in most of the parameter space, the correction
556: terms to the tree-level $Wtb$ and $Wqq'$ couplings can generate
557: significant corrections to all production cross sections of the
558: three processes for single top production at the LHC.
559:
560: It is well known that precise electroweak data provide strong
561: constraints on any extensions of the SM. Most of the little Higgs
562: models are severed constrained by the precise electroweak data, with
563: the exception of the littlest Higgs model with T parity, in which a
564: low scale parameter $f$ is allowed. However variations in the model
565: can give rise to very different constraints. For example, for the LH
566: model, if the SM fermions are charged under $U(1)_{1}\times
567: U(1)_{2}$, the constraints become relaxed. The scale parameter
568: $f=1\sim2TeV$ is allowed for the mixing parameter $c$, $c'$, and
569: $x_{L}$ in the ranges of $0\sim0.5$, $0.62\sim0.73$, and
570: $0.3\sim0.6$, respectively[6,14]. In this case, the mass of the new
571: charged gauge boson $W_{H}$ is allowed in the range of
572: $1TeV\sim3TeV$. Thus, as numerical estimation, we have simply
573: assumed the scale parameter $f\geq1TeV$. Certainly, the effects of
574: the little Higgs models on single top production decrease as $f$
575: increasing, as shown in Fig.3. However, our numerical results shown
576: that, even for $f\geq2TeV$, the relative correction of the $SU(3)$
577: simple group model to the cross section for the t-channel single top
578: production process can reach $-9\%$. Even we assume that the mass of
579: the new charged gauge boson $W_{H}$ predicted by the LH model is
580: larger than $2TeV$, it can also make the cross section of the
581: s-channel single top production process enhance about $6\%$. So we
582: expect that the effects of the $SU(3)$ simple group model on the
583: t-channel process for single top production and the contributions of
584: the new charged gauge bosons $W_{H}^{\pm}$ predicted the LH model to
585: the s-channel process can be detected at the LHC experiments.
586:
587:
588:
589: \vspace{0.5cm} \noindent{\bf Acknowledgments}
590:
591: This work was supported in part by Program for New Century
592: Excellent Talents in University(NCET-04-0290), the National
593: Natural Science Foundation of China under the Grants No.10475037.
594:
595: \vspace{2.0cm}
596:
597:
598: \newpage
599:
600: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
601: \bibitem{1}
602: CDF Collaboration, D0 Collaboration, and Tevatron Electroweak
603: Working Group, {\em Combination of CDF and D0 results on the top-quark
604: mass}, {\em hep-ex}/{\bf0507091}
605: \bibitem{2}
606: M. Beneke et al., {\em Top quark physics}, {\em
607: hep-ph}/{\bf0003033};
608: D. Chakraborty, J. Konigsberg and D. Rainwater, {\em Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.} {\bf53}(2003)301;
609: W. Wagner, {\em Rept. Prog. Phys.} {\bf68}(2005)2409.
610: \bibitem{3}
611: Z. Sullivan, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf70}(2004)114012; J. Campbell,
612: R. K. Ellis and F. Tramontano, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf70}(2004)094012; Chuan-Ren Chen, F. Larios, C. -P.
613: Yuan, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf631}(2005)126.
614: \bibitem{4}
615: J. Parsons, {\em Top Quark Physics at the LHC I}, talk presented
616: at the Top Quark Symposium, April {\bf 7-8, 2005,} Michigan
617: Centor for Theoretical Physics, University of Michiyan, Ann
618: Arbor.
619: \bibitem{5}
620: For recent review see: M.Schmaltz and D.Tucker-Smith, {\em Ann. Rev. Nucl. Parti. Sci.}{\bf
621: 55}(2005)229.
622: \bibitem{6}
623: T. Han, H. E. Logan, and L. T. Wang, {\em JHEP} {\bf 0601}(2006)099.
624: \bibitem{7}
625: M. Perelstein, {\it hep-ph}/{\bf 0512128}.
626: \bibitem{8}
627: D. E. Kaplan and M. Schmaltz, {\em JHEP} {\bf0310}(2003)039.
628:
629: \bibitem{9}
630: N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, E. Katz, A. E. Nelson, {\em JHEP}
631: {\bf 0207}(2002)034.
632: \bibitem{10}
633: M. Schmaltz, {\em JHEP} {\bf0408}(2004)056.
634: \bibitem{11}
635: T. Han, H. E. Logan, B. McElrath and L. T. Wang, {\em Phys. Rev.
636: D}{\bf 67}(2003)095004.
637: \bibitem{12}
638: J. Pumplin et al., {\em JHEP}
639: {\bf 0207}(2002)012; D. Stump et al., {\em JHEP}
640: {\bf 0310}(2003)046.
641: \bibitem{13}
642: S. Eidelman et al[Particle Data Gruop], {\it Phys. Lett. B}{\bf
643: 592}(2004)1.
644: \bibitem{14}
645: R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, M. Oertel, {\bf JHEP 0402}(2004)032;
646: Mu-Chun Chen and S. Dawson, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf70}(2004)015003;
647: Chong-Xing Yue and Wei Wang, {\it Nucl. Phys. B}{\bf
648: 683}(2004)48; W. Kilian and J. Reuter, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
649: 70}(2004)015004; A. Deandrea, {\it hep-ph}/{\bf0405120};
650: J. L. Hewett, F. J. Petriello and T. G. Rizzo, {\em JHEP} {\bf
651: 0310}(2003)062. C. Csaki, J.Hubisz, G. D. Kribs, P. Meade, and J.
652: Terning, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 67}(2003)115002;
653: C. Csaki et al., {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 68}(2003)035009. T. Gregoire,
654: D. R. Smith and J. G. Wacker, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
655: 69}(2004)115008; Mu-Chun Chen, {\em Mod. Phys. Lett.
656: A}{\bf21}(2006)621.
657: \bibitem{15}B. W. Harris et al., {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf66}(2002)054024.
658: \bibitem{16}J. Campbell and F. Tramontano, {\it Nucl. Phys.
659: B}{\bf726}(2005)109; M. Beccaria, F. M. Renard, C. Verzegnassi, {\it
660: Phys. Rev. D}{\bf71}(2005)033005; M. Beccaria, G. Macorini, F. M.
661: Renard and C. Verzegnassi, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf73}(2006)093001.
662: \bibitem{17}V. M. Abazov et al.[D0 Collaboration], {\it Phys. Lett.
663: B}{\bf622}(2005)265.
664: \bibitem{18}
665: C.-S. Li, R. Oakes, J.-M. Yang and H.-Y. Zhou, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
666: 57}(1998)2009; S. Bar-Shalom, D. Atwood, and A. Soni, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 57}(1998)1495.
667: \bibitem{19}
668: Tim Tait and C.-P. Yuan, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
669: 63}(2000)014018.
670: \bibitem{20}
671: Z. Sullivan, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 66}(2002)075011.
672: \bibitem{21}
673: H. E. Logan, {\it hep-ph}/{\bf 0307340}; Chong-Xing Yue, Feng
674: Zhang, and Wei Wang, {\it Chin. Phys. Lett.} {\bf
675: 22}(2005)1083.
676: \end{thebibliography}
677: \null
678:
679:
680:
681:
682:
683: \end{document}
684: