1: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % afb2.tex
3: %
4: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: %
6: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: %
8: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
9: %
10: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: %
12: % for graphics and figures
13: %
14: \usepackage{graphicx}
15: \usepackage{epsfig}
16: \usepackage{subfigure}
17: \usepackage{psfrag}
18: %
19: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20: %
21: % for mathematics
22: %
23: \usepackage{amssymb}
24: \usepackage{amsfonts}
25: \usepackage{amsmath}
26: \usepackage{bbold}
27: %
28: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29: %
30: % layout
31: %
32: \unitlength=1mm
33: %
34: \topmargin -0.9truecm
35: \textheight 23truecm
36: \textwidth 17truecm
37: \evensidemargin -1.0truecm
38: \oddsidemargin -0.5truecm
39: %
40: \allowdisplaybreaks[1]
41: %
42: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
43: %
44: % Neue Kommandos
45: %
46: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
47: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
48: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
49: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
50: \newcommand{\bfig}{\begin{figure}}
51: \newcommand{\efig}{\end{figure}}
52: \newcommand{\bc}{\begin{center}}
53: \newcommand{\ec}{\end{center}}
54: \newcommand{\bd}{\begin{displaymath}}
55: \newcommand{\ed}{\end{displaymath}}
56: \newcommand{\noi}{\noindent}
57: \newcommand{\afb}{A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}}
58: \newcommand{\as}{\alpha_s}
59: \newcommand{\ord}{\mathcal{O}}
60: \newcommand{\Qb}{\overline{Q}}
61: \newcommand{\sasij}[2]{\sigma_{A,S}^{(#1,#2)}}
62: \newcommand{\sas}{\sigma_{A,S}}
63: \newcommand{\sia}{\sigma_A}
64: \newcommand{\sis}{\sigma_S}
65: \newcommand{\siaij}[2]{\sigma_A^{(#1,#2)}}
66: \newcommand{\sisij}[2]{\sigma_S^{(#1,#2)}}
67: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
68: \newcommand{\tr}{\mbox{Tr}}
69: \newcommand{\gfac}{\gamma_5^{\mbox{{\scriptsize ac}}}}
70: \newcommand{\gfla}{\gamma_5^{\mbox{{\scriptsize la}}}}
71: \newcommand{\veg}{v_e^\gamma}
72: \newcommand{\vqg}{v_Q^\gamma}
73: \newcommand{\vez}{v_e^Z}
74: \newcommand{\vqz}{v_Q^Z}
75: \newcommand{\aez}{a_e^Z}
76: \newcommand{\aqz}{a_Q^Z}
77: \renewcommand{\Re}{\mathrm{Re}\;\!}
78: \renewcommand{\Im}{\mathrm{Im}\;\!}
79: \newcommand{\aas}{\left(\frac{\alpha_s}{2\pi}\right)}
80: \newcommand{\hv}{{\hat v}}
81: \newcommand{\ha}{{\hat a}}
82: %
83: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
84: %
85: %
86: \begin{document}
87:
88: %
89: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
90: %
91: %
92: \begin{titlepage}
93:
94: \nopagebreak
95: {\flushright{
96: \begin{minipage}{5cm}
97: PITHA 06/02 \\
98: IFIC/06-09\\
99: ZU-TH 08/06 \\
100: UCLA/06/TEP/07\\
101: \end{minipage} }
102: }
103: %\vspace*{-1.5cm}
104: \vskip 1.5cm
105: \begin{center}
106: {\Large \bf Two-Parton Contribution to the Heavy-Quark\\
107: \vspace*{2mm}
108: Forward-Backward Asymmetry in NNLO QCD}
109: \vskip 1.2cm
110: {\large W.~Bernreuther$\rm \, ^{a }$},
111: {\large R.~Bonciani$\rm \, ^{b }$},
112: {\large T.~Gehrmann$\rm \, ^{c }$},
113: {\large R. Heinesch $\rm \, ^{a,\, }$\footnote{present address:
114: Framatome ANP GmbH, D-63067 Offenbach, Germany}}, \\[2mm]
115: {\large T.~Leineweber$\rm \, ^{a, \, }$\footnote{present address: Framatome
116: ANP GmbH,
117: D-91050 Erlangen, Germany}} ,
118: {\large P. Mastrolia$\rm \, ^{c, \, d}$}
119: % \\[2mm]
120: and {\large E.~Remiddi$\rm \, ^{e}$}
121: %
122: \vskip .6cm
123: {\it $\rm ^a$ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, RWTH Aachen,
124: D-52056 Aachen, Germany}
125: \vskip .2cm
126: {\it $\rm ^b$ Departament de F\'{\i}sica Te\`orica, IFIC, CSIC -- Universitat de
127: Val\`encia,\\ E-46071 Val\`encia,
128: Spain}
129: \vskip .2cm
130: {\it $\rm ^c$ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
131: Universit\"at Z\"urich, CH-8057 Z\"urich, Switzerland}
132: \vskip .2cm
133: {\it $\rm ^d$ Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA,
134: Los Angeles, CA 90090-1547, USA}
135: \vskip .2cm
136: {\it $\rm ^e$ Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universit\`a di Bologna, and
137: INFN, Sezione di Bologna, \\ I-40126 Bologna, Italy}
138: \end{center}
139: \vskip .4cm
140:
141:
142: \begin{abstract}
143: Forward-backward asymmetries, $A_{FB}^Q$, are important observables for the
144: determination of the neutral-current couplings of heavy quarks
145: in inclusive heavy quark production, $e^+ e^- \to \gamma^*, Z^* \to Q
146: +X$. In view of the measurement perspectives on $A_{FB}^Q$
147: at a future linear collider, precise predictions of $A_{FB}^Q$ are required
148: for massive quarks. We compute the
149: contribution of the $Q \bar Q$ final state to $A_{FB}^Q$
150: to order $\as^2$ in the QCD coupling. We
151: provide general formulae, and we show that this contribution to
152: $A_{FB}^Q$ is infrared-finite. We evaluate these two-parton
153: contributions for $b$ and $c$ quarks on and near the $Z$ resonance, and for
154: $t$ quarks above threshold. Moreover, near the
155: $t \bar t$ threshold we obtain, by expanding in the
156: heavy-quark velocity $\beta$, an expression for
157: $A_{FB}^{t \bar t}$ to order $\as^2$ and NNLL in $\beta$.
158: This quantity is equal, to this order in $\beta$,
159: to the complete forward-backward asymmetry $A_{FB}^t$.
160: \vskip .3cm
161: \flushright{
162: \begin{minipage}{12.3cm}
163: {\it Key words}: Electroweak measurements, Forward-backward asymmetry,
164: \hspace*{18.5mm} Heavy quarks, Precision calculations, QCD corrections. \\
165: {\it PACS}: 12.38.Bx, 13.66.Jn, 14.65.Dw, 14.65.Fy, 14.65.Ha
166: \end{minipage} }
167: \end{abstract}
168: \vfill
169: \end{titlepage}
170:
171: %
172: %
173: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
174: %
175: % Introduction
176: %
177: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
178: %
179: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
180:
181: \section{Introduction \label{Intro}}
182:
183: Forward-backward asymmetries in the production
184: of fermions in high-energy $e^+ e^-$ collisons are known to be precision
185: obervables for the determination of the respective fermionic
186: neutral current couplings. Specifically the forward-backward asymmetry
187: $A_{FB}^b$
188: of $b$ quarks, which was measured at the $Z$ resonance with an accuracy of 1.7 percent,
189: led to a determination of the effective weak mixing angle
190: $\sin^2 \theta_{W,eff}$ of the Standard Model with a relative precision
191: of about 1 per mille \cite{:2004qh,Abbaneo:1998xt} -- notwithstanding the apparent
192: discrepancy between this measurement and the determination of $\sin^2
193: \theta_{W,eff}$ with similar precision from the left-right asymmetry
194: measured by the SLD collaboration. (For a comprehensive overview, see
195: \cite{:2004qh}.)
196:
197: At a future linear $e^+ e^-$ collider \cite{tesla}, precision
198: determinations of electroweak parameters will again involve forward-backward asymmetries.
199: When such a collider will be operated at the $Z$ peak, accuracies of
200: about 0.1 percent may be reached for these observables
201: \cite{Hawkings:1999ac,Erler:2000jg}.
202: Moreover, the top quark asymmetry $A_{FB}^t$ will be experimentally
203: accessible -- a crucial tool for
204: the determination of the hitherto unexplored neutral
205: current couplings of this quark.
206:
207: The theoretical understanding of these observables, in
208: particular those involving the heavy quarks $Q=t,b,c$, must eventually match these
209: projected accuracies. The present theoretical description of
210: $A_{FB}^b$ and $A_{FB}^c$ includes the fully massive next-to-leading
211: order (NLO) electroweak \cite{Bohm:1989pb,Bardin:1999yd,Freitas:2004mn}
212: and fully massive NLO QCD \cite{Jersak:1981sp,Arbuzov,Djouadi} corrections. The
213: next-to-next-to-leading
214: order (NNLO) QCD corrections, i.e., the contributions of $\as^2$ to these
215: asymmetries, were calculated so far only in the limit of massless
216: quarks $Q$ \cite{Altarelli,vanNeerven,seymour}. To be precise,
217: the forward-backward asymmetry of
218: {\it massless} quarks is not computable in QCD perturbation theory, as was
219: pointed out in \cite{seymour}. It is
220: affected in the limit $m_Q \to 0$ by logarithmic final state
221: divergences $\sim \ln m_Q$ resulting from the contribution of
222: the $Q{\bar Q}Q{\bar Q}$ final state. (These terms are associated with
223: the non-pertubative $Q$ fragmentation function.) These logarithmically
224: enhanced terms were taken into account in Ref. \cite{seymour}, which is
225: the most complete calculation of $A_{FB}^b$
226: within QCD to date, done both with respect to the
227: quark and the thrust axis.
228:
229: In view of the future
230: perspectives for the $b$- and $t$-quark asymmetries
231: at a linear collider, a computation of the order $\as^2$ contributions to
232: $A_{FB}^Q$ for massive quarks $Q$ is clearly desirable.
233: The NNLO QCD corrections
234: involve three classes of contributions: (1) the two-loop corrections
235: to the decay of a vector boson into a
236: heavy quark-antiquark pair; (2) the one-loop corrected matrix elements for
237: the decay of a vector boson into a heavy quark-antiquark pair plus a gluon;
238: (3) the tree level matrix elements for
239: the decay of a vector boson into four partons, at least two of which being
240: the heavy quark-antiquark pair.
241:
242: In the limit of massless external quarks $Q$ the $Q \bar Q$
243: contributions to $A_{FB}^Q$ vanish up to a non-universal correction
244: of order $\as^2$ due to quark triangle diagrams \cite{Altarelli}. This
245: is no longer the case for $m_Q \neq 0$.
246: In this paper we determine class (1), i.e., the order
247: $\as^2$ $Q \bar Q$ contributions to $A_{FB}^Q$, for arbitrary quark mass $m_Q$ and
248: center-of-mass (c.m.) energy $\sqrt{s}$. For this purpose we use
249: our recent results on the two-loop vector and axial vector vertex
250: functions for massive quarks \cite{us1,us2,us3}
251: which determine the amplitude of $e^+e^-\to \gamma^*, Z^* \to Q {\bar
252: Q}$ to order $\as^2$ and to lowest order in the electroweak couplings.
253: The contributions (1) from the two-parton final state, and (2) plus
254: (3), i.e., those from the three- and four-parton final states, are separately
255: infrared-finite, as will be discussed below. The latter can be
256: obtained along the lines of the calculations
257: of three-jet production involving heavy quarks
258: \cite{Bernreuther:1997jn,Rodrigo:1997gy,Nason:1997tz}. The
259: parity-violating part of $d\sigma(3\, jet)$ at order $\as^2$, which is
260: a necessary ingredient here, was computed in \cite{Bernreuther:2000zx}.
261: However, a full computation of $A_{FB}^{3+4 \, parton}$ has not yet
262: been done for massive quarks.
263:
264:
265: The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we set up the formulae
266: for determining $A_{FB}^Q$, off and at the $Z$ resonance, to order
267: $\as^2$ in terms of the symmetric and antisymmetric cross sections for
268: inclusive production of quarks $Q$. In particular we express the $Q \bar
269: Q$ contribution to $A_{FB}^Q$ by the one- and two-loop heavy-quark vector and
270: axial vector form factors that determine the amplitude corresponding to
271: the $Q \bar Q$ final state. Moreover, we show that these
272: contributions to the respective
273: forward-backward asymmetry, which we denote by
274: $A_{FB}^{Q\bar Q}$, are infrared-finite. In Section 3 we present the NNLO
275: $Q \bar Q$ cross section and the forward-backward asymmetry
276: in the energy region $\alpha_s \ll \beta \ll 1$, where
277: $\beta$ denotes the heavy-quark velocity.
278: This result
279: is applicable, for instance, to $t$ quarks in the vicinity
280: of the $t \bar t$ threshold.
281: In Section 4 we
282: evaluate $A_{FB}^{Q\bar Q}$ for $b$ and $c$ quarks at the $Z$
283: resonance, and in the case of $t$ quarks for c. m. energies above the $t\bar t$
284: threshold till 1 TeV. We conclude in Section 5.
285:
286: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
287: %
288: % Kapitel 2
289: %
290: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
291: %
292: \section{The Forward-Backward Asymmetry to Order $\alpha_s^2$}
293:
294: In this paper we consider the production of a heavy
295: quark-antiquark pair in $e^+ e^-$ collisions,
296: \begin{align}
297: e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma^*(q),\,Z^*(q) \rightarrow Q\bar{Q} +
298: X\label{eeQQX} \, ,
299: \end{align}
300: where $Q=c,b,t$, to lowest order in the electroweak couplings
301: and to second order in
302: the QCD coupling $\alpha_s$. To this order the
303: following final states contribute to the cross section of
304: inclusive $Q \bar Q$ production,
305: Eq.~(\ref{eeQQX}):
306: the two-parton $Q \bar Q$ state (at Born level, to order $\alpha_s$,
307: and to order $\alpha_s^2$), the three-parton state $Q {\bar Q} g$ (to
308: order $\alpha_s$ and to order $\alpha_s^2$)
309: and the four-parton states $Q{\bar Q}gg$, $Q{\bar Q} q \bar q$, and
310: $Q{\bar Q}Q{\bar Q}$ (to order $\alpha_s^2$).
311:
312: The forward-backward asymmetry\footnote{We drop the superscript $Q$ in
313: the following for ease of notation.} $\afb$ for a heavy quark $Q$ is
314: commonly defined as the number of quarks $Q$ observed in the forward hemisphere
315: minus the number of quarks $Q$ in the backward hemisphere, divided by
316: the total number of observed quarks $Q$.
317: The axis that defines the forward direction must be
318: infrared- and collinear-safe in order that $\afb$ is computable
319: in perturbation theory. Common choices are the direction of flight of
320: $Q$ or the thrust axis direction. The forward-backward asymmetry can
321: also be expressed in terms of the cross section for inclusive
322: production of quarks $Q$.
323: We have:
324: %
325: \begin{align}
326: \afb = \frac{\sia}{\sis}\label{defafb},
327: \end{align}
328: %
329: with the antisymmetric and symmetric cross sections $\sigma_A$ and
330: $\sigma_S = \sigma$ defined by
331: %
332: \begin{align}
333: \sia = & \int_0^1\frac{d\sigma}{d\cos\vartheta} d\cos\vartheta - \int_{-1}^0\frac{d\sigma}{d\cos\vartheta} d\cos\vartheta\label{defsia},\\
334: \sis = & \int_{-1}^1\frac{d\sigma}{d\cos\vartheta} d\cos\vartheta \, .
335: \label{defsis}
336: \end{align}
337: %
338: Here $\vartheta$ is the angle between the incoming electron and the
339: direction defining the forward hemisphere (in the $e^+ e^-$ center-of-mass
340: frame). When choosing the momentum direction of $Q$ or the
341: thrust axis, the $Q \bar Q$ contribution to $\afb$, which we compute in
342: this paper, is of course the same. In the following $\vartheta = \angle(e^-,Q)$.
343:
344: In analogy to its experimental measurement, $\afb$ may be computed by
345: determining the contributions from the final-state jets which, to order
346: $\as^2$, are those of
347: the two-, three-, and four-jet states. These contributions
348: are separately infrared-finite, and $\afb$ would not depend on the jet
349: clustering algorithm employed when no phase space cuts are applied.
350: Such a calculation would require a jet calculus for massive
351: quarks
352: at NNLO in $\as$ which is, however, not available. (For massless
353: quarks a NNLO subtraction method was recently developed
354: \cite{Gehrmann-DeRidder:2005cm}, cf. also references therein.)
355: Yet, $\afb$ belongs to the class of observables that can be computed
356: at the level of unresolved partons. The two-parton and the three- plus
357: four-parton contributions to the second-order forward-backward
358: asymmetry are separately infrared (IR) finite,
359: cf. \cite{Altarelli,seymour}
360: and Section 2.2 below. This basic result will be exploited in the following.
361:
362: To order $\alpha_s^2$ the symmetric and antisymmetric cross sections
363: receive the following contributions from unresolved partons:
364: %
365: \begin{align}\label{sasbeitraege}
366: \sigma_{A,S} = \sigma_{A,S}^{(2,0)} +\sigma_{A,S}^{(2,1)} + \sigma_{A,S}^{(2,2)} + \sigma_{A,S}^{(3,1)} + \sigma_{A,S}^{(3,2
367: )} + \sigma_{A,S}^{(4,2)} + \ord(\as^3) \, ,
368: \end{align}
369: %
370: where the first number in the superscripts $(i,j)$ denotes the
371: number of partons in the respective
372: final state and the second one the order of
373: $\alpha_s$. Inserting (\ref{sasbeitraege}) into (\ref{defafb}) we get
374: for $\afb$ to second order in $\as$:
375: %
376: \begin{align}\label{afbgesamt}
377: \afb(\as^2) = \frac{\sigma_{A}^{(2,0)} +\sigma_{A}^{(2,1)} + \sigma_{A}^{(2,2)} + \sigma_{A}^{(3,1)} + \sigma_{A}^{(3,2)} +
378: \sigma_{A}^{(4,2)}}{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0)} +\sigma_{S}^{(2,1)} + \sigma_{S}^{(2,2)} + \sigma_{S}^{(3,1)} + \sigma_{S}^{(3,2)} +
379: \sigma_{S}^{(4,2)}} \, .
380: \end{align}
381: %
382: Taylor expansion of~\eqref{afbgesamt} with respect to $\as$ leads to
383: %
384: \begin{align}\label{afbent}
385: \afb(\as^2) =&
386: A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}\;\left[1\;+\;A_{1} \;+\;
387: A_{2}\right] \, ,
388: \end{align}
389: %
390: where $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}$ is
391: the forward-backward asymmetry at Born level, and $A_{1}$ and $A_{2}$
392: are the $\ord(\as)$ and $\ord(\as^2)$
393: contributions normalized to $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}$.
394: %
395: \begin{align}
396: %
397: A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0} =& \frac{\sia^{(2,0)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}} \, ,\label{afb0}\\
398: %
399: A_{1} =& \frac{\sia^{(2,1)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}} \;-\;
400: \frac{\sis^{(2,1)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}} \;+\; \frac{\sia^{(3,1)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}} \;-\;
401: \frac{\sis^{(3,1)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}} \, ,\label{afb1}\\
402: %
403: A_{2} =& \frac{\sia^{(2,2)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}} \;-\;
404: \frac{\sis^{(2,2)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}}
405: + \frac{\sia^{(3,2)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}} \;-\;
406: \frac{\sis^{(3,2)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}} \;+\;
407: \frac{\sia^{(4,2)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}} \;-\;
408: \frac{\sis^{(4,2)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}}\nonumber\\
409: -&\frac{\sis^{(2,1)}+\sis^{(3,1)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}} \;\Bigg[\;\frac{\sia^{(2,1)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}} \;-\;
410: \frac{\sis^{(2,1)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}} \;+\;
411: \frac{\sia^{(3,1)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}} \;-\;
412: \frac{\sis^{(3,1)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}}\;\Bigg] \, .\label{afb2}
413: %
414: \end{align}
415: %
416: \subsection{The $Q \bar Q$ Contribution}
417:
418: It is convenient to rewrite Eq. (\ref{afbent}) as follows:
419: %
420: \be
421: \afb(\as^2) =
422: A^{(2p)}_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}} \;+\;
423: A^{(3p)}_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}} \;+\; A^{(4p)}_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}} \, ,
424: \label{afp234}
425: \ee
426: where the superscript $(np)$ labels the number of partons $n$ in the final
427: state. Collecting the two-parton term from
428: Eqs.~\eqref{afb0},~\eqref{afb1},
429: and~\eqref{afb2} we get:
430: \be
431: A^{(2p)}_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}} = A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}\;
432: \left[1 \; + \; A^{(2p)}_1 +
433: A^{(2p)}_2 \right ] \, ,
434: \label{afb2pp}
435: \ee
436: with
437: %
438: \begin{align}
439: %
440: A_{1}^{(2p)} =& \frac{\sia^{(2,1)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}}\;-\;\frac{\sis^{(2,1)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}},\label{afb12p}\\
441: %
442: A_{2}^{(2p)} =& A_{2,2} - A_{2,1}, \label{afb22p}
443: \end{align}
444: where
445: \begin{align}
446: A_{2,2} =& \frac{\sia^{(2,2)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}} \;-\;
447: \frac{\sis^{(2,2)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}}, \label{afb2loop} \\
448: A_{2,1} = & \frac{\sis^{(2,1)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}} \; A_{1}^{(2p)}\, .
449: \label{afb21loop}
450: %
451: \end{align}
452: %
453: The remaining terms in Eqs.~\eqref{afb1},~\eqref{afb2} contribute to
454: $A^{(3p)}$ and $A^{(4p)}$.
455:
456: As already stated above,
457: both the two-parton and the three- plus four-parton contributions $A^{(2p)}$
458: and $A^{(3p)}+ A^{(4p)}$, respectively, are infrared (IR)
459: finite, i.e., free of soft and collinear singularites. We shall
460: show this explicitly for $A^{(2p)}$ at the end of this section.
461:
462: Next we express $A^{(2p)}_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}$ in terms of the $VQ \bar
463: Q$ vertex form factors $(V=\gamma,Z)$ which determine the amplitude
464: of the reaction $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \gamma^*,\,Z^* \rightarrow Q\bar{Q}$
465: to lowest order in the electroweak couplings and to any order in the
466: QCD coupling; see Fig.~1.
467: %
468: \begin{figure}[ht]
469: \begin{center}
470: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps, width=8cm, height=4cm}
471: \end{center}
472: \caption{\label{skanal} The amplitude $e^+ e^- \to Q {\bar Q}$ in QCD.}
473: \end{figure}
474: %
475: In this case the $VQ \bar Q$ vertex $\Gamma^{\mu,V}_Q$ depends,
476: for on-shell external quarks, on four form factors:
477: \bea
478: i\, \Gamma^{\mu,V}_Q &=& v_Q^V \left (F_{1}(s) \gamma^\mu +
479: \frac{i}{2m_Q}F_{2}(s)\sigma^{\mu \nu} q_\nu \right)
480: \nn \\ && + a_Q^V \left(G_{1}(s) \gamma^\mu \gamma_5 +
481: \frac{1}{2m_Q}G_{2}(s) \gamma_5\, q^\mu \right) \, ,\label{decomp}
482: \eea
483: where
484: $s=q^2$, $\sigma^{\mu \nu} = \frac{i}{2}\left[\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu
485: \right]$, $m_Q$ denotes the on-shell mass of $Q$, and, for $f=e, Q$,
486: \begin{align}
487: v_f^Z =& \,\frac{e}{2 s_W
488: c_W}\,\left(T^3_f- 2s^2_W \, e_f\right) \, , \nn\\
489: a_f^Z =& \,\frac{e}{2 s_W c_W} \,\left(-T^3_f\right) \, , \nn\\
490: v_f^\gamma =& \,e \,e_f\, , \quad a_f^\gamma = 0 \, .
491: \label{vakoppl}
492: \end{align}
493: Here $e_f$ and $T^3_f$ denote the charge of $f$ in units of the
494: positron charge $e$ and
495: its weak isospin, respectively, and $s_W\,(c_W)$ are the sine
496: (cosine) of the weak mixing angle
497: $\theta_W$. The
498: functions $F_i$ and $G_i$ denote renormalized form factors; the
499: renormalization scheme will be specified below. Instead of
500: using the Dirac form factor $F_1$ we express in the following
501: the (anti)symmetric cross
502: section in terms of
503: \begin{align}
504: \tilde{F}_1(s) = F_1(s) + F_2(s) \, .
505: \end{align}
506: Neclecting the electron
507: mass we find for the two-parton contributions to $\sigma_{A,S}$:
508: \begin{align}
509: \sia^{(2p)} = &\frac{N_c}{8\pi}\,\frac{s}{D_Z} \, \beta^2 \, \aez \aqz \Bigg\{\left[\vez\vqz + \frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{m_Z^
510: 2}{s}\right)\,\veg\vqg\right]\left(\tilde{F}_1^* G_1 + \tilde{F}_1 G_1^*\right) \nn\\
511: & + i \frac{m_Z \Gamma_Z}{2 s}\vqg \veg \left(\tilde{F}_1 G_1^* -
512: \tilde{F}_1^* G_1\right) \Bigg\}\, ,\label{siaff}
513: \end{align}
514: \begin{align}
515: \sis^{(2p)} = &
516: \frac{N_c}{24\pi} \,\frac{1}{s}\,\beta\,\left(\veg\vqg \right)^2 \; \mathcal{W} + \frac{N_c}{12\pi} \,\frac{s}{D_Z} \,\beta
517: \,\left(1-\frac{m_Z^2}{s}\right)\,\veg\vqg\vez\vqz \; \mathcal{W} \nn\\
518: %
519: + & \frac{N_c}{24\pi} \,\frac{s}{D_Z}\, \beta\,
520: \left[\left(\aez\right)^2 + \left(\vez\right)^2\right]\;
521: \Big[\left(\vqz\right)^2 \; \mathcal{W} \; +
522: 2\beta^2\left(\aqz\right)^2 \left(G_1 G_1^*\right)\Big]\, , \label{sisff}
523: \end{align}
524: %
525: where
526: %
527: \begin{align}
528: \mathcal{W} = (3-\beta^2)\,\left(\tilde{F}_1
529: \tilde{F}_1^*\right)+\beta^2 \left(\tilde{F}_1 F_2^* + \tilde{F}_1^*
530: F_2\right) + \frac{\beta^4}{1-\beta^2}\left(F_2 F_2^*\right)\, ,\nn
531: \end{align}
532: %
533: $D_Z = [(s-m_Z^2)^2 + m_Z^2 \Gamma_Z^2]$ with $m_Z,$ $\Gamma_Z$ being
534: the mass and width of the $Z$ boson,
535: $\beta = \sqrt{1-\frac{4m_Q^2}{s}}$ the heavy quark velocity, and
536: $N_c=3$ the number of colors. Because we have put $m_e=0$
537: the form factor $G_2$ does not contribute to
538: Eqs.~(\ref{siaff}),~(\ref{sisff}).
539: %
540: The last term in~\eqref{siaff}, which contains $\Gamma_Z$, is of higher order in the
541: electroweak couplings as compared with the first term. We will neglect
542: that term in the following.\\
543: Expanding the form factors in
544: Eqs.~(\ref{siaff}),~(\ref{sisff}) in powers of $\as$:
545: %
546: \begin{alignat}{3}
547: %
548: \tilde{F}_1 = & 1 \;+\; &\aas \;\tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)} &+ \aas^2 \;\tilde{F}_1^{(2\ell)} & \;+\; \ord\left(\as^3\right), \label{f1ent}\\
549: %
550: F_2 = && \aas \;F_{2}^{(1\ell)} &+ \aas^2 \;F_{2}^{(2\ell)} &\;+\; \ord\left(\as^3\right), \label{f2ent}\\
551: %
552: G_1 = & 1 \;+\; &\aas \;G_{1}^{(1\ell)} &+ \aas^2 \;G_{1}^{(2\ell)} &\;+\; \ord\left(\as^3\right), \label{g1ent}
553: %
554: \end{alignat}
555: %
556: leads to the expansions of the two-parton contributions as exhibited
557: in~\eqref{sasbeitraege}, i.e.,
558: \begin{align}
559: \sigma_{A,S}^{(2p)} = & \, \sigma_{A,S}^{(2,0)} +\sigma_{A,S}^{(2,1)} +
560: \sigma_{A,S}^{(2,2)}. \label{sas22p}
561: \end{align}
562: The contributions to $\sigma_{S}^{(2p)}$ can be further decomposed as follows:
563: \begin{alignat}{3}
564: \sis^{(2,0)} = & \;\sis^{(2,0,\gamma)} &&+ \sis^{(2,0,Z)} &&+\sis^{(2,0,\gamma Z)},\\
565: \sis^{(2,1)} = & \;\sis^{(2,0,\gamma)} \sis^{(2,1,\gamma)} &&+ \sis^{(2,0,Z)} \sis^{(2,1,Z)} &&+ \sis^{(2,0,\gamma Z)} \sis^
566: {(2,1,\gamma Z)},\\
567: \sis^{(2,2)} = & \;\sis^{(2,0,\gamma)} \sis^{(2,2,\gamma)} &&+ \sis^{(2,0,Z)} \sis^{(2,2,Z)} &&+ \sis^{(2,0,\gamma Z)} \sis^{(2,2,\gamma Z)},
568: \label{s2loops}
569: \end{alignat}
570: %
571: where the superscripts $\gamma$, $Z$, and $\gamma Z$
572: label the pure photon and $Z$ contributions, and the
573: $\gamma-Z$ interference terms, respectively. These terms are given by
574:
575: \begin{align}
576: %
577: \sis^{(2,0,\gamma)} = & \frac{N_c}{24\pi} \,\frac{1}{s}\,\beta\,\left(\veg\vqg \right)^2 (3-\beta^2),\label{ss20g}\\
578: %
579: \sis^{(2,1,\gamma)} = & \aas \Big\{2 \Re \tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)} + \frac{2\beta^2}{3-\beta^2} \Re F_2^{(1\ell)}\Big\},\label{ss21gff}\\
580: %
581: \sis^{(2,2,\gamma)} = & \aas^2 \Big\{\frac{2\beta^2}{3-\beta^2}\Big[ \Re F_2^{(2\ell)} + \Re \tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)} \Re F_2^{(1\ell)} + \pi^2\, \Im \tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)}\Im F_2^{(1\ell)}\Big]\nn\\
582: & + \frac{\beta^4}{(3-\beta^2)(1-\beta^2)}\Big[ (\Re F_2^{(1\ell)})^2 + \pi^2\, (\Im F_2^{(1\ell)})^2 \Big]\nn\\
583: & + (\Re \tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)})^2 + \pi^2\, (\Im \tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)})^2 + 2 \Re \tilde{F}_1^{(2\ell)}\Big\},\label{ss22gff}\\
584: %
585: \sis^{(2,0,Z)} = & \frac{N_c}{24\pi} \,\frac{s}{D_Z}\, \beta\,
586: \left[\left(\aez\right)^2 + \left(\vez\right)^2\right]\;\left[2\left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2 + \left(\vqz\right)^2 (3-\beta^2)\right],\label{ss20z}\\
587: %
588: \sis^{(2,1,Z)} = & \frac{ \left(\vqz\right)^2 (3-\beta^2)\; \sis^{(2,1,\gamma)} + 4 \aas \left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2 \Re G_1^{(1\ell)} }{2\left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2 + (3-\beta^2)\left(\vqz\right)^2},\label{ss21zff}\\
589: %
590: \sis^{(2,2,Z)} = & \frac{1}{2\left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2 + (3-\beta^2)\left(\vqz\right)^2} \Big\{ \left(\vqz\right)^2 (3-\beta^2)\; \sis^{(2,2,\gamma)}\nn\\
591: & + 4 \aas^2 \left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2 \Re G_1^{(2\ell)} + 2 \aas^2
592: \left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2\Big[(\Re G_1^{(1\ell)})^2 + \pi^2\,(\Im
593: G_1^{(1\ell)})^2 \Big] \Big\},\label{ss22zff}\\
594: %
595: \sis^{(2,0,\gamma Z)} = & \frac{N_c}{12\pi} \,\frac{s}{D_Z} \,\beta
596: \,\left(1-\frac{m_Z^2}{s}\right)\,\veg\vqg\vez\vqz \;(3-\beta^2),\label{ss20gz}\\
597: %
598: \sis^{(2,1,\gamma Z)} = & \sis^{(2,1,\gamma)},\label{ss21gzff}\\
599: %
600: \sis^{(2,2,\gamma Z)} = & \sis^{(2,2,\gamma)}, \label{ss22gzff}
601: %
602: \end{align}
603: %
604: where the convention $F_a = \Re F_a + i\pi \Im F_a$,
605: $G_a = \Re G_a + i\pi \Im G_a$
606: $(a=1,2)$ is used; i.e., a factor $\pi$ is taken out of the imaginary part.
607: The antisymmetric cross section is given by:
608: %
609: \begin{align}
610: %
611: \sia^{(2,0)} = &\; \frac{N_c}{4\pi}\,\frac{s}{D_Z} \, \beta^2 \, \aez \aqz \left[\vez\vqz + \frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{m_Z^2}{
612: s}\right)\,\veg\vqg\right], \label{sa20ff}\\
613: %
614: \sia^{(2,1)} = &\; \sia^{(2,0)}\; \aas \; \left[\Re \tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)} + \Re G_1^{(1\ell)}\right],\label{sa21ff}\\
615: %
616: \sia^{(2,2)} = &\; \sia^{(2,0)} \; \aas^2 \; \left[\Re \tilde{F}_1^{(2\ell)} + \Re G_1^{(2\ell)} + \Re \tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)}\Re G_1^{(1\ell)}
617: + \pi^2 \Im \tilde{F}_1^{(1\ell)} \Im G_1^{(1\ell)} \right].\label{sa22ff}
618: %
619: \end{align}
620: %
621: %
622: With these formuale the $Q \bar Q$
623: contribution~\eqref{afb2pp} to the forward-backward asymmetry is
624: expressed in terms of the one- and two-loop
625: form factors Eqs.~\eqref{f1ent}~-~\eqref{g1ent}.
626:
627: The second order term in the expansion~\eqref{g1ent}
628: of the axial vector form factor, $G_1^{(2\ell)}$, receives so-called
629: type A and type B
630: contributions. Type A contributions are those where the $Z$ boson
631: couples directly to the external quark $Q$~\cite{us2},
632: while the triangle diagram
633: contributions, summed over the quark isodoublets of
634: the three generations, are called type B~\cite{us3}.
635: (In the terminology of~\cite{seymour} these correspond to universal and
636: non-universal corrections, respectively.)
637: Among Eqs.~\eqref{ss20g} -~\eqref{sa22ff} only $\sis^{(2,2,Z)}$ and $\sia^{(2,2)}$ depend on
638: $G_1^{(2\ell)}$. With $G_1^{(2\ell)}= G_1^{(2\ell,A)}+
639: G_1^{(2\ell,B)}$
640: we separate in these terms the type A and B contributions:
641: %
642: \begin{align}
643: \sis^{(2,2,Z)} = \sis^{(2,2,Z,A)} + \sis^{(2,2,Z,B)}
644: \end{align}
645: %
646: with
647: %
648: \begin{align}
649: \sis^{(2,2,Z,A)} = \; \sis^{(2,2,Z)}(G_1^{(2\ell)} \rightarrow G_1^{(2\ell,A)}),\\
650: \sis^{(2,2,Z,B)} = \; \aas^2\, \frac{\;4\,\left(\aqz\right)^2\,\beta^2\,
651: \Re\,G_1^{(2\ell,B)}}{2\left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2 +
652: (3-\beta^2)\left(\vqz\right)^2} \; , \label{ss22zb}
653: \end{align}
654: and
655: \begin{align}
656: \sia^{(2,2)} = \sia^{(2,2,A)} + \sia^{(2,2,B)}
657: \end{align}
658: %
659: with
660: %
661: \begin{align}
662: \sia^{(2,2,A)} = \; \sia^{(2,2)}(G_1^{(2\ell)} \rightarrow G_1^{(2\ell,A)}),\\
663: \sia^{(2,2,B)} = \; \aas^2\, \sia^{(2,0)}\;\Re\,G_1^{(2\ell,B)}. \label{sa22zb}
664: \end{align}
665: %
666: Thus (\ref{afb22p}) can be written:
667: \be
668: A^{(2p)}_{2} = A^{(2p,A)}_{2} +
669: A^{(2p,B)}_{2} \, ,
670: \label{af2psep}
671: \ee
672: where $A^{(2p,A)}_{2}$ is obtained from (\ref{afb22p})
673: by the substitution $G_1^{(2\ell)} \rightarrow G_1^{(2\ell,A)}$
674: in~\eqref{afb22p}, respectively in ~\eqref{afb2loop}, and
675: \begin{align}
676: A_{2}^{(2p,B)} =& \frac{\sia^{(2,2,B)}}{\sia^{(2,0)}}
677: \;-\; \frac{\sis^{(2,0,Z)}\,\sis^{(2,2,Z,B)}}{\sis^{(2,0)}} \; .\label{afb22zb}
678: \end{align}
679: %
680: If one evaluates, in the case of $b \bar b$ and $c \bar c$ final
681: states, Eq.~(\ref{afb22zb}) exactly at the $Z$ resonance and neglects
682: the contributions from photon exchange, then:
683: \begin{align}
684: A_{2}^{(2p,B)}(s=m_Z^2) =\; \aas^2 \; \Re G_1^{(2\ell,B)} \;\left[\frac{(3-\beta^2)\left(\vqz\right)^2- 2\left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2}{(3-\beta^2)\left(\vqz\right)^2 + 2\left(\aqz\right)^2 \beta^2 }\right]\label{afb22zb1}.
685: \end{align}
686: The type B contribution~(\ref{afb22zb}) to the forward-backward
687: asymmetry is ultraviolet- and infrared-finite~\cite{us3}.
688:
689: \subsection{Infrared-Finiteness of $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(2p)}$}
690:
691: The renormalized vector and axial vector form factors~\eqref{decomp} were computed in \cite{us1,us2,us3}
692: to order $\as^2$ within QCD with $N_f$ massless and one massive
693: quark $Q$, in a renormalization scheme, which is appropriate
694: for the case at hand: the wavefunction and the mass of $Q$ are
695: defined in the on-shell scheme while $\as$ is defined in
696: the ${\overline{\rm MS}}$ scheme. The renormalized
697: form factors still contain IR divergences which are
698: regulated by dimensional regularization in $D=4-2\epsilon$ dimensions.
699: At one loop, $F_1^{(1\ell)}$
700: and $G_1^{(1\ell)}$ contain $1/\epsilon$ poles due to soft virtual
701: gluons. At two loops, the dominant IR singularities of $F_1^{(2\ell)}$
702: and $G_1^{(2\ell, A)}$ are of order $1/\epsilon^2$ due to soft and
703: collinear massless partons, while $F_2^{(2\ell)}$ has
704: only $1/\epsilon$ poles. However, when inserting the
705: renormalized form factors into the formulae for the order $\as$ and
706: $\as^2$ contributions to $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(2p)}$ the IR
707: singularities cancel and we obtain a finite result. This is well-known
708: for $A_{1}^{(2p)}$, c.f. \cite{Djouadi}.
709:
710: This cancellation of infrared poles can be seen in a straightforward
711: manner if one takes into account the universal structure of the
712: infrared poles in the form factors, which can be expressed in terms of
713: one-loop and two-loop infrared singularity operators for a massive
714: quark-antiquark pair, ${\boldmath I}^{(1)}_{Q\bar Q}(s,\mu=m_Q,\epsilon)$ and
715: ${\boldmath I}^{(2)}_{Q\bar Q}(s,\mu= m_Q,\epsilon)$, where $\mu$ is
716: the renormalization scale, as:
717: \begin{eqnarray}
718: {\cal P}oles \; \left( F_1^{(1\ell)} \right) &=& {\boldmath I}^{(1)}_{Q\bar Q}
719: F_1^{(0 \ell)} \;,
720: \nonumber \\
721: {\cal P}oles \; \left( F_2^{(1\ell)}\right) &=& 0\;, \nonumber \\
722: {\cal P}oles \; \left( G_1^{(1\ell)}\right) &=& {\boldmath I}^{(1)}_{Q\bar Q} G_1^{(0
723: \ell)}\; ,\\
724: {\cal P}oles \; \left(F_1^{(2\ell)}\right) &=& {\boldmath I}^{(2)}_{Q\bar Q} F_1^{(0\ell)}
725: +{\boldmath I}^{(1)}_{Q\bar Q} F_1^{(1\ell)} \; ,\nonumber \\
726: {\cal P}oles \; \left(F_2^{(2\ell)}\right) &=& {\boldmath I}^{(1)}_{Q\bar Q} F_2^{(1\ell)} \;,
727: \nonumber \\
728: {\cal P}oles \; \left(G_1^{(2\ell)}\right) &=& {\boldmath I}^{(2)}_{Q\bar Q} G_1^{(0\ell)}\; +{\boldmath I}^{(1)}_{Q\bar Q} G_1^{(1\ell)} \; .
729: \end{eqnarray}
730: This factorization of the infrared poles is a well-known feature of
731: massless multi-loop amplitudes, where it can be derived from
732: exponentiation~\cite{Catani:1998bh,Sterman:2002qn}.
733: In massive QED, the same behaviour
734: was observed long ago~\cite{Yennie:1961ad}. To the best of our knowledge,
735: infrared factorization in massive QCD was established up to now only at
736: the one-loop level~\cite{Catani:2000ef}; the above pole structure of the
737: form factors suggests that it holds at higher orders as well. Expressions
738: for ${\boldmath I}^{(1,2)}_{Q\bar Q}$ can be read off from the explicit
739: pole structure of the form
740: factors~\cite{us1,us2}.
741: Exploiting that
742: \begin{displaymath}
743: F_1^{(0\ell)} = G_1^{(0\ell)} = 1\;,
744: \end{displaymath}
745: one finds immediately that the two-parton contribution (\ref{afb22p})
746: to the
747: forward-backward asymmetry is infrared finite. However,
748: it should be kept in mind that the two terms in (\ref{afb22p}) are not separately finite.
749:
750: Let us illustrate how this
751: cancellation occurs in $A_{2}^{(2p)}$ by considering this expression at
752: the $Z$ resonance, i.e., by taking into account only $Z$ exchange
753: contributions and neglecting the photon and
754: $\gamma-Z$ interference terms. When inserting the
755: form factors into Eq.~\eqref{afb2loop}, all the leading $1/\epsilon^2$
756: singularities cancel, but a subleading divergence remains:
757: \begin{eqnarray}
758: A_{2,2} &=& -\, \left(\frac{\as}{2\pi}\right)^2 \; C_F^2 \; \frac{1}{\epsilon}
759: \; 4 y \; \frac{ 2 ({a_Q^Z})^2 (1-y)^2 - 3 ({v_Q^Z})^2
760: (1+y)^2}{[({a_Q^Z})^2 (1-y)^2 +
761: ({v_Q^Z})^2 (1+y)^2 + 2 ({v_Q^Z})^2 y ]\;(1-y^2)^2} \nonumber\\
762: && \times \;[(1+y^2)\; \ln^2(y)\; + \; (1-y^2) \; \ln(y)]
763: \; + \; A_{2,2}^{finite} \,
764: \label{twolsing}
765: \end{eqnarray}
766: where $y = ({1-\beta})/({1+\beta})$ and $C_F=(N_c^2-1)/(2N_c)$.
767: This subleading singularity proportional to $C_F^2$ results from the
768: real parts of the one-loop form factors, $F_1^{(1\ell)}$
769: and $G_1^{(1\ell)}$, and from the contribution of a set of
770: abelian-type two-loop diagrams (gluon ladder diagram and gluon
771: vertex diagrams with quark self-energy insertions) to the real parts
772: of the two-loop
773: vector and type A axial vector form factors. The
774: singularity~\eqref{twolsing}
775: is removed by the second term in~\eqref{afb22p}. While
776: \be
777: A_{1}^{(2p)}
778: = \frac{\as}{2\pi} \; C_F \; \ln(y) \; 2 y \; \frac{ 2 ({a_Q^Z})^2
779: (1-y)^2 -
780: 3 ({v_Q^Z})^2 (1+y)^2}{[({a_Q^Z})^2 (1-y)^2 +
781: ({v_Q^Z})^2 (1+y)^2 + 2 ({v_Q^Z})^2 y ]\;(1-y^2)}
782: \ee
783: is finite, the first term in~\eqref{afb21loop} contains a singularity,
784: \be
785: \frac{\sigma_S^{(2,1)}}{\sigma_S^{(2,0)}} =
786: - \, \frac{\as}{2\pi}\; C_F \; \frac{1}{\epsilon}\:
787: \frac{2(1-y^2 +(1+y)^2 \ln(y))}{1-y^2} \, + \, {\rm finite}\; {\rm terms} \, ,
788: \ee
789: and thus the singular part of $A_{2,1}$ cancels
790: the singularity in~\eqref{twolsing}. This cancellation pattern remains
791: also away from the $Z$ resonance.
792: %%
793: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
794: %
795: % Kapitel 3
796: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
797:
798: \section{Cross Section and $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}$ near Threshold}
799:
800: In this section we analyze the cross section and
801: $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(2p)}$ for $e^+ e^- \to \gamma^*, Z^* \to Q
802: {\bar Q}$ near the production threshold. Close to threshold, where the
803: quark velocity $\beta$ is small, the fixed order perturbative
804: expansion in $\alpha_s$ of these and other quantities breaks down due
805: to Coulomb singularities, which must be resummed. In addition,
806: large logarithms in $\beta$ appear, which may be summed using the
807: renormalization group \cite{Beneke:1999qg,Hoang:2001mm}
808: applied in the framework of
809: nonrelativistic effective field theory methods. However, in the energy region where
810: $\alpha_s \ll \beta \ll 1$, threshold expansions of observables, i.e.,
811: expansions in $\beta$ to fixed order in $\alpha_s$ are expected
812: to yield reliable results. In this region we derive compact formulae
813: for the symmetric and antisymmetric $Q \bar Q$ cross sections at NNLO.
814: These expressions should be useful, especially in the case of
815: top-quark pair production, for comparison of continuum results
816: with results obtained directly at threshold.
817:
818: \subsection{The $Q \bar Q$ cross section}
819: We start with Eqs. (\ref{sas22p}) - (\ref{s2loops}) where the $Q \bar
820: Q$ cross section at NNLO, $\sigma_{NNLO}=\sigma_S^{(2p)}$, is expressed
821: in terms of the $\gamma,$ $Z$, and $\gamma-Z$ exchange contributions.
822: Using these formulae we may write
823: \bea
824: \sigma_{NNLO} & = &
825: \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)} \Biggl\{ 1 + \frac{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,Z)} +
826: \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma Z)}}{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)}}
827: + \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,\gamma)} \Biggl[ 1 +
828: \frac{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,Z)} \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,Z)}
829: + \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma Z)} \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,\gamma Z)}}{
830: \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)} \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,\gamma)}} \Biggr] \nn\\
831: & & \hspace{1.3cm} + \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,\gamma)} \Biggl[ 1
832: + \frac{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,Z)} \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,Z)}
833: + \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma Z)} \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,\gamma Z)}}{
834: \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)} \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,\gamma)}} \Biggr] \Biggl\} \,.
835: \eea
836: Denoting
837: \be
838: \Delta^{(0,Ax)} = \frac{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,Z)} +
839: \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma Z)}}{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)}}
840: \ee
841: and recalling Eqs. (\ref{ss21gzff}), (\ref{ss22gzff})
842: we get
843: \bea
844: \sigma_{NNLO} & = &
845: \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)} \Biggl\{ 1 + \Delta^{(0,Ax)}
846: + \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,\gamma)} \Bigl[ 1 +
847: \Delta^{(0,Ax)} \Bigr] +
848: \frac{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,Z)}}{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)}} \Bigl(
849: \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,Z)} - \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,\gamma)} \Bigr) \nn\\
850: & & \hspace{1.3cm} + \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,\gamma)} \Bigl[ 1 +
851: \Delta^{(0,Ax)} \Bigr] +
852: \frac{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,Z)}}{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)}} \Bigl(
853: \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,Z)} - \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,\gamma)} \Bigr) \Biggl\} \, .
854: \label{final}
855: \eea
856: Putting
857: \bea
858: \frac{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,Z)}}{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)}} \Bigl(
859: \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,Z)} - \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,\gamma)} \Bigr)
860: &=& C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right) {\Delta}^{(1,Ax)} \, ,
861: \label{DE1} \\
862: \frac{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,Z)}}{\sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)}} \Bigl(
863: \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,Z)} - \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,\gamma)} \Bigr)
864: &=& C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right)^2 \Delta^{(2,Ax)} \, ,
865: \label{DE2}
866: \eea
867: the NNLO cross section reads:
868: \bea
869: \sigma_{NNLO} & = &
870: \sigma_{S}^{(2,0,\gamma)} \Biggl\{ 1 + \Delta^{(0,Ax)}
871: + \sigma_{S}^{(2,1,\gamma)} \Bigl[ 1 +
872: \Delta^{(0,Ax)} \Bigr] + C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right)
873: {\Delta}^{(1,Ax)} \nn\\
874: & & \hspace{3.5cm} + \sigma_{S}^{(2,2,\gamma)} \Bigl[ 1 +
875: \Delta^{(0,Ax)} \Bigr] +
876: C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right)^2 \Delta^{(2,Ax)} \Biggl\} \,.
877: \label{finb}
878: \eea
879: We now expand the expression in the curly brackets of
880: Eq. (\ref{finb}) up to and including terms of order $\beta^0$. Using
881: the threshold expansions \cite{us1,us2,us3} of the one- and two-loop
882: vector and axial vector form factors and putting the renormalization
883: scale $\mu= m_Q$ we obtain
884: \bea
885: \sigma_{NNLO} & = &
886: \sigma^{(2,0,\gamma)}_S \Bigl\{ 1 + \Delta^{(0,Ax)}
887: + C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right) \Delta^{(1,Ve)} \bigl( 1
888: + \Delta^{(0,Ax)} \bigr) + C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right)
889: {\Delta}^{(1,Ax)}
890: \nn\\
891: & &
892: + C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right)^2 \Delta^{(2,Ve)}
893: \bigl( 1 + \Delta^{(0,Ax)} \bigr)
894: + C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right)^2
895: \Delta^{(2 ,Ax)} \Bigr\} \, .
896: \label{CS}
897: \eea
898: The Born cross section $\sigma^{(2,0,\gamma)}_S$ is given in Eq.~(\ref{ss20g}).
899: We get for the terms $\Delta^{(1,Ve)}$ and $\Delta^{(2,Ve)}$
900: which arise from
901: the one- and two-loop photon-exchange contributions, respectively:
902: \bea
903: \Delta^{(1,Ve)} & = & \frac{6 \zeta(2)}{\beta} - 8
904: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta \right) \, ,
905: \label{1L} \\
906: \Delta^{(2,Ve)} & = & C_F \Delta^{(2,Ve)}_{A} + C_A \Delta^{(2,Ve)}_{NA}
907: + N_f T_R \Delta^{(2,Ve)}_{L} + T_R \Delta^{(2,Ve)}_{H} \, ,
908: \eea
909: with
910: \bea
911: \Delta^{(2,Ve)}_{A} & = & \frac{12 \zeta^{2}(2)}{\beta^2}
912: - \frac{48 \zeta(2)}{\beta} + 24 \zeta^{2}(2)
913: - 4 \zeta(2) \Bigl( \frac{35}{3} - 8 \ln{2}
914: + 4 \ln{\beta} \Bigr)
915: - 4 \zeta(3) + 39
916: \nn\\
917: & &
918: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta \right) \, ,
919: \label{SS} \\
920: \Delta^{(2,Ve)}_{NA} & = & \frac{4 \zeta(2)}{\beta} \Bigl(
921: \frac{31}{12} - \frac{11}{2} \ln{(2 \beta)} \Bigr)
922: + 4 \zeta(2) \Bigl( \frac{179}{12} - 16 \ln{2}
923: - 6 \ln{\beta} \Bigr)
924: - 26 \zeta(3) - \frac{151}{9}
925: \nn\\
926: & &
927: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta \right)\, , \\
928: \Delta^{(2,Ve)}_{L} & = & \frac{4 \zeta(2)}{\beta} \Bigl( 2 \ln{(2 \beta)}
929: - \frac{5}{3} \Bigr) + \frac{44}{9}
930: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta \right)\, , \\
931: \Delta^{(2,Ve)}_{H} & = & - \frac{32}{3} \zeta(2) + \frac{176}{9}
932: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta^2 \right)
933: \, .
934: \eea
935: In the equations above, $\zeta(2)=\pi^2/6$, $C_A=N_c$, $T_R=1/2$, and
936: $N_f$ is the number of light quarks, which we take to be massless. For the
937: threshold expansions of the terms $\Delta^{(i,Ax)}$ $(i=0,1,2)$, involving
938: $Z$ boson exchange, we find:
939: \bea
940: \Delta^{(0,Ax)} & = & \frac{s^2}{D_Z} \Biggl\{
941: \frac{\left(\aez\right)^2 + \left(\vez\right)^2}{
942: \left(\veg \vqg \right)^2} \Biggl[ 2 \left(\aqz\right)^2
943: \frac{\beta^2}{3-\beta^2} + \left(\vqz\right)^2 \Biggr]
944: + 2 \left(1-\frac{m_Z^2}{s}\right) \frac{\vez \vqz}{\veg \vqg} \Biggr\} \, ,
945: \label{Z0} \\
946: \Delta^{(1,Ax)} & = & {\mathcal O} \left( \beta^2 \right) ,
947: \label{Z1} \\
948: \Delta^{(2,Ax)} & = &
949: \frac{64 \zeta(2) m_Q^4 (a_Q^Z)^2 \left[ (v_e^Z)^2 + (a_e^Z)^2 \right]}{
950: ( v_Q^{\gamma} v_e^{\gamma} )^2 (4m_Q^2 - m_Z^2)^2} C_F
951: + {\mathcal O}(\beta) \, ,
952: \label{Z2}
953: \eea
954: where $\hv_f$, $\ha_f$ are defined in Eq. (\ref{vakoppl}).
955: While the multiplicative factor $\Delta^{(0,Ax)}$
956: is given in exact form, the higher order terms are expanded to the
957: appropriate order in $\beta$ such that the NNLO cross section
958: (\ref{CS}) is obtained to
959: next-to-next-to-leading
960: logarithmic order (NNLL) in $\beta$.
961: \noindent
962: We observe:\\
963: (i) To NNLL in $\beta$ the NNLO cross section is infrared-finite, i.e., the $Q \bar Q$ cross section
964: is equal to the total production cross section to this order. This is due to the fact that
965: close to threshold, real gluon emission is suppressed by a velocity factor with respect to the
966: $Q \bar Q$ final state. The two-loop triangle diagrams, studied in \cite{us3},
967: do not contribute to the cross section to this order in $\beta$.\\
968: (ii) In the expansions of $\Delta^{(1,Ve)}$ and $\Delta^{(2,Ve)}$
969: IR divergences appear at ${\mathcal O}(\beta)$ and ${\mathcal
970: O}(\beta^2)$, respectively.
971: In the expansions of $\Delta^{(1,Ax)}$ and $\Delta^{(2,Ax)}$ such
972: divergences show up to order $\beta^4$ and $\beta^3$, respectively. \\
973: (iii) The threshold cross section $\sigma_{NNLO}$ was calculated to
974: NNLL in
975: $\beta$ in the above energy region, for pure vector exchange, previously in
976: \cite{Czarnecki:1997vz} (see also \cite{Hoang:1997sj}).
977: Putting the axial vector couplings to zero in the above expressions and
978: comparing with \cite{Czarnecki:1997vz} we find agreement.\\
979: (iv) The first and second-order $Z$-boson exchange terms
980: $\Delta^{(1,Ax)}$ and $\Delta^{(2,Ax)}$, involving the axial
981: vector coupling $\ha_Q$, are of order $\beta^2$ and $\beta^0$,
982: respectively. $\Delta^{(2,Ax)}$ is thus relevant for an analysis
983: aiming at NNLO accuracy at threshold (counting $\alpha_s \sim
984: \beta$). The analytic result for the axial-vector contribution at
985: ${\mathcal O}(\alpha_s^2)$, which can be obtained to all orders in
986: $\beta$ from \cite{us2,us3}, has not been given before in the literature.
987: The term $\Delta^{(2,Ax)}$ is small compared to $\Delta^{(2,Ve)}$,
988: see Fig.~\ref{thr}.
989:
990: %
991: \begin{figure}[ht]
992: \begin{center}
993: \epsfig{file=THR_2.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
994: \end{center}
995: \caption{\label{thr} The terms $\Delta^{(2,Ve)}$ (dotted line), $\Delta^{(0,Ax)}$ (dashed
996: line) and $\Delta^{(2,Ax)}$ (solid line), expanded to
997: order $\beta^0$, as functions of $\beta$, for the case of $t \bar t$
998: production, using $m_t$=172.7 GeV. $\beta=0.2$ ($\beta=0.5$)
999: corresponds to a center-of-mass energy of about 357 GeV (404 GeV).}
1000: \end{figure}
1001: %
1002: Nevertheless, at a
1003: high luminosity linear collider with polarized $e^-$ and $e^+$ beams one may
1004: eventually be able to disentangle the vector and axial-vector induced
1005: contributions to the $t \bar t$ cross section. A numerical calculation
1006: of axial vector contributions in the context of Lippmann-Schwinger
1007: equations was performed in \cite{AX}, and the axial-vector
1008: contribution to the
1009: threshold cross section at next-to-next-to-leading
1010: logarithmic order was determined in \cite{Hoang:2001mm} by a
1011: combination
1012: of numerical and analytical calculations.
1013: \par
1014: For completeness we mention that a summation of all terms
1015: of the form $\as^n/\beta^n$ should be performed
1016: when the region of small heavy-quark
1017: velocities $\beta \sim \as$ is approached. The result of the
1018: resummation of these leading terms (and of part
1019: of the subleading terms) is the well-known Sommerfeld-Sakharov factor (see, for
1020: instance \cite{Czarnecki:1997vz}). Subleading terms may be
1021: resummed by the renormalization group \cite{Hoang:2001mm} in the
1022: context of effective field theory methods.
1023: In this paper we are not concerned with these summation methods, as we
1024: consider only the region $\beta \gg \as$.
1025:
1026: \subsection{Antisymmetric cross cection and $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}$}
1027:
1028: Next we perform the threshold expansion of the second-order
1029: antisymmetric cross section $\sigma^{(A)}_{NNLO}= \sigma^{(2p)}_{A}$ ,
1030: given in Eqs. (\ref{sas22p}) and (\ref{sa20ff}) - (\ref{sa22ff}), in
1031: the same manner as was done above for $\sigma_{NNLO}$, using the results
1032: of \cite{us1,us2,us3}. We obtain to NNLL in $\beta$:
1033: \be
1034: \sigma^{(A)}_{NNLO} = \sigma^{(2,0)}_A \Bigl\{ 1
1035: + C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right) \Delta^{(A,1)}
1036: + C_{F} \left( \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2 \pi} \right)^2 \, \Delta^{(A,2)}
1037: \Bigr\} \, ,
1038: \label{CSA}
1039: \ee
1040: where $\sigma^{(2,0)}_A$ is given in Eq.~(\ref{sa20ff}) and
1041: \bea
1042: \Delta^{(A,1)} & = & \frac{6 \zeta(2)}{\beta} - 6
1043: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta \right) \, , \nn \\
1044: \Delta^{(A,2)} & = & C_F \Delta^{(A,2)}_{A} + C_A \Delta^{(A,2)}_{NA}
1045: + N_f T_R \Delta^{(A,2)}_{L} + T_R \big( \Delta^{(A,2)}_{H}
1046: + \Delta^{(A,2)}_{tr} \big) \, ,
1047: \label{deldec}
1048: \eea
1049: with
1050: \bea
1051: \Delta^{(A,2)}_{A} & = &
1052: \frac{12 \zeta^{2}(2)}{\beta^2}
1053: - \frac{36 \zeta(2)}{\beta}
1054: + 24 \zeta^{2}(2)
1055: - 4 \zeta(2) \Bigl( \frac{25}{6}
1056: - \frac{25}{4} \ln{2}
1057: + \frac{9}{2} \ln{\beta} \Bigr)
1058: - \frac{35}{4} \zeta(3)
1059: + \frac{70}{3}
1060: \nn\\
1061: & &
1062: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta \right) \, , \\
1063: \Delta^{(A,2)}_{NA} & = & \frac{4 \zeta(2)}{\beta} \Bigl(
1064: \frac{16}{3}
1065: - \frac{11}{2} \ln{(2 \beta)} \Bigr)
1066: + 4 \zeta(2) \Bigl( \frac{67}{6}
1067: - \frac{25}{2} \ln{2}
1068: - 4 \ln{\beta} \Bigr)
1069: - \frac{35}{2} \zeta(3)
1070: - 14
1071: \nn\\
1072: & &
1073: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta \right)\, , \\
1074: \Delta^{(A,2)}_{L} & = & \frac{4 \zeta(2)}{\beta} \Bigl( 2 \ln{(2
1075: \beta)}
1076: - \frac{8}{3} \Bigr) + 4
1077: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta \right)\, , \\
1078: \Delta^{(A,2)}_{H} & = & - \frac{32}{3} \zeta(2) + \frac{56}{3}
1079: + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta^2 \right) \, .
1080: \label{aaapm}
1081: \eea
1082: The term $\Delta^{(A,2)}_{tr}$ in Eq.~(\ref{deldec}) is the contribution of the
1083: triangle diagrams computed in \cite{us3}. It is infrared- and
1084: ultraviolet-finite.
1085: In the case of $t \bar t$
1086: production it is given by
1087: \be
1088: \Delta^{(A,2)}_{tr} = \zeta(2) \left( 16 \ln{2} - \frac{23}{3} \right)
1089: - 8 \ln{2} + \frac{8}{3} \ln^2{2} + {\mathcal O} \left( \beta^2 \right) \, .
1090: \label{anpm}
1091: \ee
1092: Notice that the the second-order antisymmetric $Q \bar Q$ cross section
1093: (\ref{CSA}) is infrared-finite to NNLL in $\beta$ and is equal to the
1094: total antisymmetric cross section in this order.
1095: The terms $\Delta^{(A,1)}$ and $\Delta^{(A,2)}$ become
1096: infrared-divergent to order $\beta^2$ and $\beta$, respectively.
1097:
1098: Finally, the second-order forward-backward asymmetry is given
1099: near threshold by
1100: \be
1101: A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(Q \bar Q)} =
1102: A_{FB,0} \, C_{FB},
1103: \label{AFBthr}
1104: \ee
1105: where $C_{FB}$ is the ratio of the curly bracket in
1106: Eqs.~(\ref{CSA}) and of the curly bracket in
1107: (\ref{CS}) divided by $(1+\Delta^{(0,Ax)})$.
1108: To NNLL in $\beta$ it is equal to
1109: the complete forward-backward asymmetry $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{Q}$.
1110: \par
1111: In Fig.~\ref{AFBthres} we have plotted the forward-backward asymmetry
1112: Eq.~(\ref{AFBthr}) to order $\as^2$ for $t\bar t$ production above threshold
1113: in the range $0.2\leq \beta\leq 0.5$, where
1114: $C_{FB}$ is the ratio of two expressions expanded to NNLL in $\beta$. The top mass and the other
1115: parameters were chosen as given in Eq.~(\ref{input}) below.
1116: A comparison with the exact second order
1117: asymmetry $A_{\text{\small FB}}^{(t\bar t)}$ will be made in Section 4.2.
1118:
1119: %
1120: \begin{figure}[ht]
1121: \begin{center}
1122: \epsfig{file=AFB1.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1123: \end{center}
1124: \caption{\label{AFBthres} The forward-backward
1125: asymmetry $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t \bar t)}$ to NNLL above the
1126: $t \bar t$ threshold in the range $0.2\leq \beta\leq 0.5$ for $\mu =m_t$.}
1127: \end{figure}
1128: %
1129:
1130: %
1131: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1132: %
1133: % Numerical Results
1134: %
1135: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1136: %
1137: \section{Numerical Results}
1138:
1139: In this section we compute the $Q\bar Q$ contributions to $\afb$ to
1140: order $\as^2$ using the results of Section 2
1141: and the analytic results for the one- and two-loop vector and
1142: type A and B axial vector form factors given in
1143: \cite{us1,us2,us3}.
1144: The numerical evaluation of the harmonic polylogarithms that
1145: appear in these expressions were made using the code of \cite{Polylog3}.
1146: For $b$ and $c$ quarks the above formulae
1147: are evaluated at and in the vicinity of the
1148: $Z$ resonance and for $t$ quarks between $2m_t<\sqrt{s}\leq 1$ TeV.
1149: The quark masses, whose values we use are given below, are defined
1150: in the on-shell scheme while $\as$ is the QCD coupling in the
1151: $\overline{\rm{MS}}$ scheme. When calculating $\afb^{(Q\bar Q)}$
1152: for $b$ and $c$ quarks around the $Z$ resonance, $\as$ is defined with
1153: respect to the effective $N_f=5$ flavor theory; that is, the top quark
1154: contribution to the gluon self-energy that enters the vector and
1155: type A axial vector form factors to order $\as^2$ is absent. The
1156: forward-backward asymmetry
1157: for top quarks is computed in the six-flavor theory with the
1158: corresponding six-flavor QCD
1159: coupling determined from the five-flavor coupling at the matching point $\mu=m_t$.
1160: We use the following input values \cite{:2004qh}:
1161: \bea
1162: m_c= 1.5 \, {\rm GeV}, \quad m_b= 5 \, {\rm GeV},\quad m_t= 172.7 \pm
1163: 2.9 \, {\rm GeV}, \nn \\
1164: m_Z =91.1875 \, {\rm GeV}, \quad \Gamma_Z=2.4952\, {\rm GeV}, \nn \\
1165: \sin^2\theta_W=0.23153, \quad \as^{N_f=5}(m_Z)= 0.1187 \,.
1166: \label{input}
1167: \eea
1168: The value of mass of the top quark is the recent CDF and D0
1169: average \cite{unknown:2005cc}.
1170: For $b$ and $c$ quarks the type B axial vector contributions are
1171: evaluated with the central value of $m_t$ given in~\eqref{input}.
1172: \par
1173: In the following we denote $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(Q\bar Q)}$
1174: evaluated to order
1175: $\as$ and $\as^2$, respectively, by:
1176: %
1177: \begin{align}
1178: A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(Q\bar Q)}(\as) = & \; A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}^{(Q\bar Q)} \left(1 + A_{1}^{(Q\bar Q)}\right),\nn\\
1179: %
1180: A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(Q\bar Q)}(\as^2) = & \; A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}^{(Q\bar Q)} \left(1 + A_{1}^{(Q\bar Q)} + A_{2}^{(Q\bar Q,A)} + A_{2}^{(Q\bar Q,B)}\right).\nn
1181: \end{align}
1182: %
1183: \subsection{$A_{\text{\small FB}}^{(Q\bar Q)}$ for $b$ and $c$ quarks at and in the vicinity of $\sqrt{s}=m_Z$}
1184:
1185: Let us first consider the $b$ quark asymmetry. As it is to be computed for
1186: $\sqrt{s} \simeq m_Z$ we can safely neglect the masses of the $u, $d, $s,$ and $c$ quarks
1187: which contribute to the second order
1188: form factors. (As already
1189: mentioned above, the $t$ quark contribution to the gluon self-energy
1190: is decoupled.) \\
1191: The type B axial vector form factor $G_1^{(2\ell,B)}$
1192: is non-zero due to the large mass
1193: splitting between $t$ and $b$ quarks, and to very
1194: good approximation one may neglect in these triangle diagram contributions
1195: the mass of the $b$ quark. Therefore we use
1196: \be
1197: G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s)=G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s,m_b=0,m_b=0) -
1198: G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s,m_t,m_b=0) \,,
1199: \label{triangelb}
1200: \ee
1201: when evaluating Eq.~\eqref{afb22zb}, respectivley~\eqref{afb22zb1}, for
1202: the $b$ quark. The functions on the right-hand side of~\eqref{triangelb},
1203: whose second and third argument denotes the mass of the quark in the loop
1204: and the mass of the external quark, respectively, are given in
1205: \cite{Kniehl:1989qu,us3}.
1206: (We use the notation of \cite{us3}.)
1207: Putting $\beta=1$ in Eq.~\eqref{afb22zb1}, our result for
1208: $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(2p,B)}(s=m_Z^2)$ agrees with that of \cite{Altarelli}. \\
1209: Table~\ref{tb:afbz} contains the values for the lowest order forward-backward asymmetry at the
1210: $Z$ resonance, together with the $b \bar b$ contributions to first and second order
1211: in $\as$ for three choices of the renormalization
1212: scale $\mu$. The photon and $\gamma-Z$ interference contributions, which are (on the
1213: $Z$ resonance) of higher order in the electroweak
1214: couplings, are not taken into account. Table~\ref{tb:afbz} shows that the QCD corrections are dominated
1215: by the type B contributions: they are about three times as large as the order $\as$ and about nine times
1216: as large as the order $\as^2$ corrections. This is due to the fact that
1217: we are close to the
1218: chiral limit,
1219: as $m_b/m_Z \ll 1$.
1220: In this limit the order $\as$ vector and axial vector
1221: form factors $F_1^{(1\ell)},$ $G_1^{(1\ell)},$
1222: and the order $\as^2$
1223: vector and type A axial vector form factors $F_1^{(2\ell)},$
1224: $G_1^{(2\ell, A)}$ become equal while the chirality-flipping
1225: form factors vanish. In this limit $A_{1}^{(Q\bar Q)}$ and
1226: $A_{2}^{(Q{\bar Q}, A)}$ vanish, too, as an inspection of the above formulae
1227: shows.
1228: Thus the QCD corrections
1229: are dominated by the type B contribution.
1230: As it turns out, it amounts to
1231: a correction of the lowest order asymmetry by only about one per mille.
1232: \par
1233: In Fig.~\ref{fig:2b} the first and second order QCD corrections $A_{1}^{(b\bar b)}$,
1234: $A_{2}^{(b\bar b,A)}$, and $A_{2}^{(b\bar b,B)}$, evaluated for
1235: $\mu = m_Z$, are shown between 88 GeV $<\sqrt{s}<$ 95 GeV. Here the
1236: contributions from photon exchange are included. Again the QCD corrections are dominated by the
1237: type B triangle diagram contributions. Varying the
1238: renormalization scale in the range $m_Z/2 \leq \mu \leq 2 m_Z$ changes these
1239: numbers only by a small amount.
1240:
1241: \begin{table}
1242: %
1243: \centering
1244: %
1245: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
1246: & $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}^{(b\bar{b})}$ & $A_{1}^{(b\bar{b})}$ & $A_{2}^{(b\bar{b},A)}$ & $A_{2}^{(b\bar{b},B)}$ & $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(b\bar{b})}(\as)$ & $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(b\bar{b})}(\as^2)$ \\ \hline\hline
1247: $\mu=\frac{m_Z}{2}$ & 0.103128 & -0.000365 & -0.000084 & 0.001147 & 0.103090 & 0.103200 \\\hline
1248: $\mu=m_Z$ & 0.103128 & -0.000326 & -0.000100 & 0.000919 & 0.103094 & 0.103179 \\\hline
1249: $\mu= 2 m_Z $ & 0.103128 & -0.000295 & -0.000109 & 0.000753 & 0.103097 & 0.103164 \\\hline
1250: \end{tabular}
1251: \caption{\label{tb:afbz} The $b \bar b$ contributions to $\afb$ for bottom quarks at $\sqrt{s}=m_Z$.}
1252: \end{table}
1253:
1254: Next we consider the $c$ quark asymmetry for $\sqrt{s}\simeq m_Z$. To very good approximation we can neglect
1255: the masses of the $c$ and $b$ quarks in their contribution to the gluon self-energy.
1256: Here the type B axial vector form factor $G_1^{(2\ell,B)}$ is again
1257: determined by the large mass splitting between $t$ and $b$ quarks. In view of the convention adopted
1258: in Eq.~\eqref{decomp}, where the neutral current couplings of the
1259: external quark are factored out,
1260: we use now
1261: \be
1262: G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s)= G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s,m_t,m_c=0) - G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s,m_b=0,m_c=0)
1263: \label{triangelc}
1264: \ee
1265: when applying Eq.~\eqref{afb22zb}, respectively~\eqref{afb22zb1}, to the
1266: $c$ quark. Again we put $\beta=1$ in these
1267: equations. Eq.~\eqref{triangelc}
1268: is equal in magnitude but opposite in sign to Eq.~\eqref{triangelb}. \\
1269: Table~\ref{tc:afbz} contains the values for the lowest order $c$ quark forward-backward asymmetry at the
1270: $Z$ resonance -- without the $\gamma$ and $\gamma-Z$ contributions --,
1271: together with the $c \bar c$ contributions
1272: to first and second order
1273: in $\as$ for three choices of the renormalization
1274: scale $\mu$. The QCD corrections are dominated
1275: again by the type B term, which in this case is about two per mille
1276: of the leading order asymmetry. The increase by a factor of about two
1277: as compared to the $b$ quark results from the fact that
1278: $|v_c^Z|<|v_b^Z|$, c.f. Eq.~\eqref{afb22zb1}.
1279:
1280: In Fig.~\ref{fig:2c} the first and second order QCD corrections $A_{1}^{(c\bar c)}$,
1281: $A_{2}^{(c\bar c,A)}$, and $A_{2}^{(c\bar c,B)}$, evaluated for
1282: $\mu = m_Z$, are shown between 88 GeV $<\sqrt{s}<$ 95 GeV,
1283: including the contributions from photon exchange. For $c$ quarks,
1284: too,
1285: the QCD corrections are dominated by the
1286: type B triangle diagram contributions.
1287:
1288: %
1289: \begin{table}
1290: %
1291: \centering
1292: %
1293: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
1294: & $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}^{(c\bar{c})}$ & $A_{1}^{(c\bar{c})}$ & $A_{2}^{(c\bar{c},A)}$ & $A_{2}^{(c\bar{c},B)}$ & $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(c\bar{c})}(\as)$ & $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(c\bar{c})}(\as^2)$ \\ \hline\hline
1295: $\mu=\frac{m_Z}{2}$ & 0.073592 & -0.000170 & -0.000060 & -0.002418 & 0.073580 & 0.073397 \\\hline
1296: $\mu=m_Z$ & 0.073592 & -0.000152 & -0.000063 & -0.001938 & 0.073581 & 0.073434 \\\hline
1297: $\mu= 2 m_Z $ & 0.073592 & -0.000138 & -0.000064 & -0.001586 & 0.073582 & 0.073460 \\\hline
1298: \end{tabular}
1299: \caption{\label{tc:afbz} The $c \bar c$ contributions to $\afb$ for charm quarks at $\sqrt{s}=m_Z$.}
1300: \end{table}
1301:
1302:
1303: %
1304: \begin{figure}[ht]
1305: \begin{center}
1306: \epsfig{file=fig2b.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1307: \end{center}
1308: \caption{First and second order QCD corrections $A_{1}^{(b\bar b)}$
1309: (dashed), $A_{2}^{(b\bar b,A)}$ (dotted), and $A_{2}^{(b\bar b,B)}$
1310: (solid) for $\mu = m_Z$ in the vicinity of the $Z$ resonance.}\label{fig:2b}
1311: \end{figure}
1312:
1313: \begin{figure}[]
1314: \begin{center}
1315: \epsfig{file=fig2c.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1316: \end{center}
1317: \caption{First and second order QCD corrections $A_{1}^{(c\bar c)}$
1318: (dashed), $A_{2}^{(c\bar c,A)}$ (dotted), and $A_{2}^{(c\bar c,B)}$
1319: (solid) for $\mu = m_Z$ in the vicinity of the $Z$ resonance.}\label{fig:2c}
1320: \end{figure}
1321:
1322: \begin{figure}[]
1323: \begin{center}
1324: \epsfig{file=fig2bc.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1325: \end{center}
1326: \caption{$A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(b\bar b)}(\as^2)$ (solid)
1327: and $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(c\bar c)}(\as^2)$ (dashed)
1328: for $\mu = m_Z$ in the vicinity of the $Z$ resonance.}\label{fig:2bc}
1329: \end{figure}
1330: %
1331: %
1332: %
1333: In Fig.~\ref{fig:2bc} the $b \bar b$ and $c\bar c$ forward-backward
1334: asymmetries
1335: to order $\as^2$, $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(b\bar{b})}(\as^2)$ and $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(c\bar{c})}(\as^2)$
1336: are displayed between 88 GeV $<\sqrt{s}<$ 95 GeV, using $\mu =m_Z$.
1337: Figs.~\ref{fig:2b},~\ref{fig:2c} show that the order $\as^2$ asymmetry is
1338: increased, in the case of $b$ quarks, by about one per mille and
1339: decreased, in the case of $c$ quarks, by about two per mille of the
1340: respective lowest order asymmetry in the whole energy
1341: range considered. Varying the
1342: renormalization scale in the range $m_Z/2 \leq \mu \leq 2 m_Z$ changes
1343: the asymmetries shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:2bc} only by a very small
1344: amount.
1345: \par
1346: The complete forward-backward asymmetry to order $\as^2$ for $b$ and
1347: $c$ quarks at and in the vicinity of
1348: the $Z$ resonance is dominated by the respective three- and four-parton contributions. A complete computation
1349: of these terms to order $\as^2$ has not yet been done for $m_b, m_c
1350: \neq 0$. Nevertheless, we expect that the respective results of
1351: \cite{seymour}, which were obtained in the
1352: massless limit, will not change dramatically.
1353:
1354: \subsection{$A_{\text{\small FB}}^{(t\bar t)}$ for top quarks above threshold}
1355:
1356: Finally we compute the $t \bar t$ contributions to the
1357: forward-backward asymmetry in the reaction $e^+ e^-\to t {\bar t}X$,
1358: sufficiently far away from the pair production threshold in order that
1359: perturbation theory in $\as$ is applicable. That is, the following
1360: results apply to events with $t$ and $\bar t$ velocities $\beta \gg
1361: \as$. As already stated above, $\as$ is defined in the
1362: six flavor QCD, with all quarks but the top quark taken to be
1363: massless. The value of $\as(\mu=m_t)$ is determined from the input
1364: value~\eqref{input}, and values of $\as$ at other energy scales
1365: are obtained by two-loop
1366: renormalization group evolution. Most of the results below are
1367: presented for three values of the top quark mass: the present central
1368: and 1 s.d. upper and lower values 172.7 GeV, 175.6 GeV, and 169.8 GeV,
1369: respectively.
1370: The type B contribution to $A_{{\small FB}}^{(t\bar t)}$, Eq.~\eqref{afb22zb},
1371: is computed with the two-loop
1372: axial vector form factor
1373: \be
1374: G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s)= G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s,m_t,m_t) -
1375: G_1^{(2\ell,B)}(s,m_b=0,m_t) \, .
1376: \label{triangelt}
1377: \ee
1378: which is given in \cite{us3}.
1379: %
1380: %
1381: \begin{figure}[]
1382: \begin{center}
1383: \epsfig{file=figt0.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1384: \end{center}
1385: \caption{Leading order asymmetry $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}^{(t\bar t)}$
1386: for three values of the top quark mass.}\label{fig:t0}
1387: \end{figure}
1388:
1389: \begin{figure}[]
1390: \begin{center}
1391: \epsfig{file=figt1ren.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1392: \end{center}
1393: \caption{Order $\as$ correction $A_{1}^{(t \bar t)}$
1394: for three values of the renormalization scale $\mu$, using
1395: $m_t=172.7$ GeV.}\label{fig:t1ren}
1396: \end{figure}
1397:
1398: \begin{figure}[]
1399: \begin{center}
1400: \epsfig{file=figt1mass.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1401: \end{center}
1402: \caption{Order $\as$ correction $A_{1}^{(t\bar t)}$
1403: for three values of the top quark mass, using $\mu=\sqrt{s}$.}
1404: \label{fig:t1mass}
1405: \end{figure}
1406:
1407: \begin{figure}[]
1408: \begin{center}
1409: \epsfig{file=figt2aren.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1410: \end{center}
1411: \caption{Order $\as^2$ correction $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,A)}$
1412: for three values of the renormalization scale $\mu$, using
1413: $m_t=172.7$ GeV.}\label{fig:t2aren}
1414: \end{figure}
1415:
1416: \begin{figure}[]
1417: \begin{center}
1418: \epsfig{file=figt2amass.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1419: \end{center}
1420: \caption{Order $\as^2$ correction $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,A)}$
1421: for three values of the top quark mass, using $\mu=\sqrt{s}$.}
1422: \label{fig:t2amass}
1423: \end{figure}
1424:
1425: \begin{figure}[]
1426: \begin{center}
1427: \epsfig{file=figt2bren.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1428: \end{center}
1429: \caption{Order $\as^2$ correction $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,B)}$
1430: for three values of the renormalization scale $\mu$, using
1431: $m_t=172.7$ GeV.}\label{fig:t2bren}
1432: \end{figure}
1433:
1434: \begin{figure}[]
1435: \begin{center}
1436: \epsfig{file=figt2bmass.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1437: \end{center}
1438: \caption{Order $\as^2$ correction $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,B)}$
1439: for three values of the top quark mass, using $\mu=\sqrt{s}$.}
1440: \label{fig:t2bmass}
1441: \end{figure}
1442:
1443: \begin{figure}[]
1444: \begin{center}
1445: \epsfig{file=figtg2ren.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1446: \end{center}
1447: \caption{Forward-backward asymmetry $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t\bar t)}(\as^2)$
1448: for three values of the renormalization scale $\mu$, using
1449: $m_t=172.7$ GeV.}\label{fig:tg2ren}
1450: \end{figure}
1451:
1452:
1453: \begin{figure}[]
1454: \begin{center}
1455: \epsfig{file=figtg2mass.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1456: \end{center}
1457: \caption{Forward-backward asymmetry $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t\bar t)}(\as^2)$
1458: for three values of the top quark mass, using $\mu=\sqrt{s}$.}
1459: \label{fig:tg2mass}
1460: \end{figure}
1461:
1462: \begin{figure}[]
1463: \begin{center}
1464: \epsfig{file=figtg012.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1465: \end{center}
1466: \caption{Forward-backward asymmetry to lowest, first and second order
1467: in $\as$ using $m_t=172.7$ GeV and
1468: $\mu=\sqrt{s}$. $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}^{(t\bar t)}$ (dashed),
1469: $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t\bar t)}(\as)$ (dotted),
1470: $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t\bar t)}(\as^2)$ (solid).}
1471: \label{fig:tg012}
1472: \end{figure}
1473: %
1474: In the following we consider the energy range 360 GeV $\leq \sqrt{s}
1475: \leq$ 1 TeV. In Fig.~\ref{fig:t0}
1476: the leading order asymmetry $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}},0}^{(t\bar t)}$
1477: is shown for three values of the top quark mass.
1478: In Figs.~\ref{fig:t1ren} and~\ref{fig:t1mass} the
1479: order $\as$ correction $A_{1}^{(t\bar t)}$ is displayed
1480: for three values of the renormalization scale $\mu$ and fixed top
1481: quark mass, and for three values of $m_t$ and fixed $\mu$,
1482: respectively. The anologous cases are shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:t2aren}
1483: and~\ref{fig:t2amass} for the
1484: order $\as^2$ correction $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,A)}$. The
1485: triangle diagram contributions $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,B)}$
1486: are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:t2bren} and
1487: Fig.~\ref{fig:t2bmass} for three values of $\mu$ and $m_t$, respectively.
1488: From these figures we conclude that the two-parton QCD corrections to the
1489: lowest order asymmetry are moderate to small for $\sqrt{s}\geq$ 400 GeV.
1490: At $\sqrt{s} =$ 400 GeV, $A_{1}^{(t\bar t)}$ is about 3.3 percent
1491: while $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,A)}$ is about 2.4 percent.
1492: As expected, the relative
1493: importance of the order $\as^2$ corrections increases as the centre-of-mass
1494: energy approaches the threshold region: for $\sqrt{s}\simeq$ 360
1495: GeV, $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,A)}$ is larger than $A_{1}^{(t\bar t)}$,
1496: signaling that perturbation theory in $\as$ is no longer applicable.
1497: Contrary to the case of $b$ and $c$ quarks at the
1498: $Z$ resonance the two-loop type B contributions are two orders
1499: of magnitude smaller than $A_{2}^{(t\bar t,A)}$.
1500: \par
1501: Figs.~\ref{fig:tg2ren} and~\ref{fig:tg2mass} show the
1502: forward-backward asymmetry $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t\bar t)}(\as^2)$
1503: for three values of the renormalization scale and three values of the
1504: top quark mass, respectively. The dependence of the second order
1505: asymmetry on $\mu$ is small: changing $\mu$ from $\sqrt{s}/2$ to
1506: $2\sqrt{s}$ changes $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t\bar t)}(\as^2)$, for
1507: fixed $m_t$, only by about 1 percent at $\sqrt{s}\gtrsim$ 360 GeV, and
1508: this dependence on $\mu$ decreases with increasing c. m. energy.
1509: \par
1510: In Fig.~\ref{fig:tg012} the $t \bar t$ asymmetry is displayed
1511: to lowest, first, and second order in $\as$.
1512: This figure shows that for c. m. energies sufficiently away from
1513: threshold the QCD corrections are under control.
1514:
1515: Finally, a comparison is made in Fig.~\ref{fig:trex}
1516: between the exact second order forward-backward asymmetry
1517: $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t\bar t)}(\as^2)$ as given in
1518: Fig.~\ref{fig:tg012} and the values obtained from the near-threshold
1519: NNLL formula Eq.~(\ref{AFBthr}). For $\sqrt{s} \lesssim$ 360 GeV
1520: corresponding to $\beta \lesssim 0.3$ the deviation of the NNLL from
1521: the respective exact
1522: value is less than 5 percent.
1523: %
1524: \begin{figure}[ht]
1525: \begin{center}
1526: \epsfig{file=AFBbis1.eps, width=12cm, height=8cm}
1527: \end{center}
1528: \caption{The second order forward-backward asymmetry $A_{\mbox{\tiny{FB}}}^{(t\bar t)}(\as^2)$
1529: near threshold: exact values (dashed) as given in
1530: Fig.~\ref{fig:tg012} and the values obtained from the near-threshold
1531: formula Eq.~(\ref{AFBthr}) (solid), using $\mu=m_t=172.7$ GeV.}
1532: \label{fig:trex}
1533: \end{figure}
1534: %
1535: %
1536: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1537: %
1538: % Conclusions
1539: %
1540: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1541: %
1542: \section{Summary and Outlook}
1543:
1544: Future experiments on heavy-quark production
1545: at a planned linear $e^+ e^-$ collider aim at very precise
1546: measurements of the neutral-current couplings of these quarks.
1547: An important observable for this purposes is the forward-backward asymmetry $A_{FB}^Q$
1548: in inclusive heavy quark production, $e^+ e^- \to \gamma^*, Z^* \to Q +X$. The projected
1549: accuracies with which $A_{FB}^Q$ can be measured in future $b$ or $t$
1550: quark production requires also the precise determination of these observables
1551: within the Standard Model. In particular, a computation of the order
1552: $\as^2$ QCD contributions to $A_{FB}^Q$ for massive quarks is
1553: mandatory.
1554:
1555: In view of these perspectives we have calculated
1556: the contribution of the $Q \bar Q$ final state to $A_{FB}^Q$ in NNLO
1557: QCD. As discussed above, and explicitly shown for the $Q \bar Q$
1558: final state, the contributions of the two-parton and of the
1559: three- plus four-parton states to the second-order
1560: forward-backward asymmetry are separately infrared-finite.
1561: We have provided formulae for the symmetric and antisymmetric $Q \bar
1562: Q$ cross sections $\sigma_S$ and $\sigma_A$ which yield $A_{FB}^{(Q \bar Q)}$.
1563: These formulae hold for any center-of-mass energy.
1564: Specifically, in the energy region near threshold where the quark
1565: velocity $\beta$ satisfies $\alpha_s \ll \beta \ll 1$, we have
1566: expanded the order $\as$ and $\as^2$ QCD corrections
1567: to $\sigma_S$ and $\sigma_A$ to NNLL in $\beta$. To this order in
1568: $\beta$ the $Q \bar Q$ cross sections are equal
1569: to the corresponding total cross sections. Therefore, an (analytic)
1570: expression is obtained for
1571: the forward-backward asymmetry $A_{FB}^Q$ to order $\as^2$ and order
1572: $\beta$ near threshold.
1573:
1574: Moreover, we have computed
1575: the two-parton forward-backward asymmetry $A_{FB}^{(Q \bar Q)}$
1576: for $b$ and $c$ quarks on and near the $Z$-boson resonance and for $t$ quarks
1577: for center-of-mass energies $\sqrt s$ above threshold to 1 TeV. The two-parton
1578: asymmetry is determined by the heavy-quark vector and axial vector form factors.
1579: To order $\as^2$ the axial vector form factors receive besides type A
1580: (universal) corrections also triangle diagram contributions resulting
1581: from the large mass splitting between $t$ and $b$ quarks. These
1582: triangle diagram terms dominate, for $\sqrt s \sim m_Z$, the QCD corrections from the $Q \bar
1583: Q$ final state to
1584: $A_{FB}^b$ and $A_{FB}^c$. This is due to the
1585: fact that here one is close to the chiral limit. However, the
1586: complete order $\as^2$ QCD corrections
1587: to these asymmetries are dominated by the contributions from the
1588: three- and four-parton final states, which were calculated so far
1589: only for massless quarks \cite{seymour}.
1590: For top quarks the triangle diagram contributions to $A_{FB}^t$
1591: are negligible compared to the type A corrections. These corrections from the $t \bar t$ final state
1592: to the lowest order aymmetry are
1593: moderate for large $\sqrt s$ and increase in size towards
1594: threshold. The order $\as^2$ corrections are important, as the analysis
1595: in Section 4.2 shows.
1596:
1597: We plan to determine in the near future also the contribution of the
1598: three- and four parton-final states to the order $\as^2$
1599: forward-backward asymmetry for massive quarks.
1600:
1601:
1602:
1603:
1604: %
1605: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1606: %
1607: % Acknowledgments
1608: %
1609: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1610: %
1611: \section*{Acknowledgment}
1612: %
1613: This work was supported
1614: by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG),
1615: SFB/TR9, by DFG-Graduiertenkolleg RWTH Aachen,
1616: by the Swiss
1617: National Science Foundation (SNF) under contract 200020-109162,
1618: by the European Union under the
1619: contract HPRN-CT2002-00311 (EURIDICE),
1620: by a European Commission Marie Curie Fellowship under
1621: contract number MEIF-CT-2006-024178,
1622: by MCYT (Spain) under Grant FPA2004-00996, by Generalitat Valenciana (Grants
1623: GRUPOS03/013 and GV05/015), and by the USA DoE under
1624: the grant DE-FG03-91ER40662, Task J.
1625: %
1626: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1627: %
1628: % Bibliography
1629: %
1630: % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1631: %
1632: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1633: \def \np #1#2#3{{\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1634: \def \nptwoth #1#2#3{{\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf #1} (20#2) #3}
1635: \def \prep #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Rep.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1636: \def \pl #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1637: \def \pltwoth #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf #1} (20#2) #3}
1638: \def \plold #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B#1} (19#2) #3}
1639: \def \prl #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1640: \def \prltwoth #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf #1} (20#2) #3}
1641: \def \pr #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1642: \def \prd #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D#1} (19#2) #3}
1643: \def \prdtwoth #1#2#3{{\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D#1} (20#2) #3}
1644: \def \zeit #1#2#3{{\it Z. Phys.} {\bf C#1} (19#2) #3}
1645: \def \cmp #1#2#3{{\it Comm. Math. Phys.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1646: \def \ibid #1#2#3{{\it ibid.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1647: \def \nc #1#2#3{{\it Nuovo Cim.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1648: \def \acta #1#2#3{{\it Acta Phys. Polon.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1649: \def \tmp #1#2#3{{\it Theor. Math. Phys.} {\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
1650: \def \comp #1#2#3{{\it Comput. Phys. Commun.} {\bf #1} (20#2) #3}
1651: \def \hepph #1 {{\tt hep-ph/#1}}
1652: \def \hepex #1 {{\tt hep-ex/#1}}
1653: \def \mathph #1 {{\tt math-ph/#1}}
1654: \parskip 0pt
1655: \itemsep=0pt
1656:
1657:
1658:
1659: %%%%%%%%%%%%%% FB-Asym %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1660: \bibitem{:2004qh}
1661: [LEP and SLD Collaborations],
1662: ``Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance,''
1663: \hepex{0509008}.
1664: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0509008;%%
1665:
1666: %\cite{Abbaneo:1998xt}
1667: \bibitem{Abbaneo:1998xt}
1668: D.~Abbaneo {\it et al.} [LEP Heavy Flavor Working Group],
1669: %``QCD corrections to the forward-backward asymmetries of c and b quarks at
1670: %the Z pole,''
1671: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 4} (1998) 185. \\
1672: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C4,185;%%
1673: % \bibitem{LEPHF}
1674: LEP/SLD heavy flavour working group, ``Final Input Parameters
1675: for the LEP/SLD Heavy Flavour Analyses'', LEPHF/2001-01;
1676: {\tt http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/LEPEWWG/heavy/}
1677:
1678: \bibitem{tesla}
1679: J.~A.~Aguilar-Saavedra {\it et al.} [ECFA/DESY LC Physics Working Group
1680: Collaboration], ``TESLA Technical Design Report Part III: Physics at an
1681: $e^+e^-$ Linear Collider'', DESY-report 2001-011 (\hepph{0106315}).
1682: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106315;%%
1683:
1684:
1685:
1686: %\cite{Hawkings:1999ac}
1687: \bibitem{Hawkings:1999ac}
1688: R.~Hawkings and K.~M\"onig,
1689: %``Electroweak and CP violation physics at a linear collider Z-factory,''
1690: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ direct C {\bf 1} (1999) 8
1691: [\hepex{9910022}].
1692: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9910022;%%
1693:
1694: %\cite{Erler:2000jg}
1695: \bibitem{Erler:2000jg}
1696: J.~Erler, S.~Heinemeyer, W.~Hollik, G.~Weiglein and P.~M.~Zerwas,
1697: %``Physics impact of GigaZ,''
1698: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 486} (2000) 125
1699: [\hepph{0005024}].
1700: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005024;%%
1701:
1702:
1703: %\cite{Bohm:1989pb}
1704: \bibitem{Bohm:1989pb}
1705: M.~B\"ohm {\it et al.},
1706: ``Forward - Backward Asymmetries,''
1707: in: CERN Yellow Report ``$Z$ Physics at LEP 1'',
1708: CERN 89-08 (1989), G. Altarelli et al. (eds.).
1709:
1710:
1711: %\cite{Bardin:1999yd}
1712: \bibitem{Bardin:1999yd}
1713: D.~Y.~Bardin, P.~Christova, M.~Jack, L.~Kalinovskaya, A.~Olchevski,
1714: S.~Riemann and T.~Riemann,
1715: %``ZFITTER v.6.21: A semi-analytical program for fermion pair production in
1716: %e+ e- annihilation,''
1717: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 133} (2001) 229
1718: [\hepph{9908433}].
1719: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908433;%%
1720:
1721:
1722: %\cite{Freitas:2004mn}
1723: \bibitem{Freitas:2004mn}
1724: A.~Freitas and K.~M\"onig,
1725: %``Corrections to quark asymmetries at LEP,''
1726: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 40} (2005) 493
1727: [\hepph{0411304}].
1728: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411304;%%
1729:
1730:
1731: \bibitem{Jersak:1981sp}
1732: J.~Jersak, E.~Laermann and P.~M.~Zerwas,
1733: %``Electroweak Production Of Heavy Quarks In E+ E- Annihilation,''
1734: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 25} (1982) 1218
1735: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 36} (1987) 310].
1736: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,1218;%%
1737:
1738:
1739: \bibitem{Arbuzov}
1740: B.~Arbuzov, D.~Y.~Bardin and A.~Leike,
1741: {\it Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.} A {\bf 7} (1992) 2029
1742: [Erratum-ibid.\ A {\bf 9} (1994) 1515].
1743: %%CITATION = MPLAE,A7,2029;%%
1744:
1745: \bibitem{Djouadi}
1746: A.~Djouadi, B.~Lampe and P.~M.~Zerwas, {\it Z. Phys.} {\bf C67} (1995) 123
1747: [\hepph{9411386}].
1748: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411386;%%
1749:
1750:
1751: \bibitem{Altarelli}
1752: G. Altarelli and B. Lampe, \np{B391}{93}{3}.
1753: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B391,3;%%
1754:
1755: \bibitem{vanNeerven}
1756: V. Ravindran and W. L. van Neerven, \pl{B445}{98}{214}.
1757: [\hepph{9809411}].
1758: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809411;%%
1759:
1760: \bibitem{seymour}
1761: S. Catani and M.H. Seymour,
1762: {\it JHEP} {\bf 07} (1999) 023 [\hepph{9905424}].
1763: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905424;%%
1764:
1765:
1766: %\cite{Bernreuther:1997jn}
1767: \bibitem{Bernreuther:1997jn}
1768: W.~Bernreuther, A.~Brandenburg and P.~Uwer,
1769: %``Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to three-jet cross sections with
1770: %massive quarks,''
1771: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79} (1997) 189
1772: [\hepph{9703305}]; \;
1773: A.~Brandenburg and P.~Uwer, \np{B515}{98}{279} [\hepph{9708350}].
1774: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9708350;%%
1775:
1776: %\cite{Rodrigo:1997gy}
1777: \bibitem{Rodrigo:1997gy}
1778: G.~Rodrigo, A.~Santamaria and M.~S.~Bilenky,
1779: %``Do the quark masses run? Extracting m-bar(b)(m(Z)) from LEP data,''
1780: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79} (1997) 193
1781: [\hepph{9703358}]; \;
1782: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9703358;%%
1783: \np{B554}{99}{257} [\hepph{9905276}].
1784: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905276;%%
1785:
1786: %\cite{Nason:1997tz}
1787: \bibitem{Nason:1997tz}
1788: P.~Nason and C.~Oleari,
1789: %``Next-to-leading-order corrections to momentum correlations in Z0 $\to$ b
1790: %anti-b,''
1791: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 407} (1997) 57 [\hepph{9705295}]; \;
1792: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705295;%%
1793: \np{B521}{98}{237}, [\hepph{9709360}].
1794: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709360;%%
1795:
1796: \bibitem{Bernreuther:2000zx}
1797: W.~Bernreuther, A.~Brandenburg and P.~Uwer, \hepph{0008291}.
1798: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008291;%%
1799:
1800:
1801:
1802:
1803: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1804:
1805: \bibitem{Gehrmann-DeRidder:2005cm}
1806: A.~Gehrmann-De Ridder, T.~Gehrmann and E.~W.~N.~Glover,
1807: %``Antenna subtraction at NNLO,''
1808: JHEP {\bf 0509} (2005) 056
1809: [\hepph{0505111}].
1810: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505111;%%
1811:
1812: %
1813: %%%%%%%%%%%%%% two-loop %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1814:
1815:
1816: \bibitem{us1}
1817: W.~Bernreuther, R.~Bonciani, T.~Gehrmann, R.~Heinesch, T.~Leineweber, P.~Mastrolia and E.~Remiddi,
1818: %``Two-loop QCD corrections to the heavy quark form factors: The vector
1819: %contributions,''
1820: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 706}, 245 (2005)
1821: [\hepph{0406046}].
1822: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406046;%%
1823: %
1824: \bibitem{us2}
1825: W.~Bernreuther, R.~Bonciani, T.~Gehrmann, R.~Heinesch, T.~Leineweber, P.~Mastrolia and E.~Remiddi,
1826: %``Two-loop QCD corrections to the heavy quark form factors: Axial vector
1827: %contributions,''
1828: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 712} (2005) 229
1829: [\hepph{0412259}].
1830: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412259;%%
1831: %
1832: \bibitem{us3}
1833: W.~Bernreuther, R.~Bonciani, T.~Gehrmann, R.~Heinesch, T.~Leineweber and E.~Remiddi,
1834: %``Two-loop QCD corrections to the heavy quark form factors: Anomaly
1835: %contributions,''
1836: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 723} (2005) 91
1837: [\hepph{0504190}].
1838: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504190;%%
1839:
1840:
1841: \bibitem{Catani:1998bh}
1842: S.~Catani,
1843: %``The singular behaviour of {QCD} amplitudes at two-loop order,''
1844: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 427} (1998) 161
1845: [\hepph{9802439}].
1846: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802439;%%
1847:
1848: %\cite{Sterman:2002qn}
1849: \bibitem{Sterman:2002qn}
1850: G.~Sterman and M.~E.~Tejeda-Yeomans,
1851: %``Multi-loop amplitudes and resummation,''
1852: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 552} (2003) 48
1853: [\hepph{0210130}].
1854: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210130;%%
1855:
1856: %\cite{Yennie:1961ad}
1857: \bibitem{Yennie:1961ad}
1858: D.~R.~Yennie, S.~C.~Frautschi and H.~Suura,
1859: %``The Infrared Divergence Phenomena And High-Energy Processes,''
1860: Annals Phys.\ {\bf 13} (1961) 379.
1861: %%CITATION = APNYA,13,379;%%
1862:
1863: %\cite{Catani:2000ef}
1864: \bibitem{Catani:2000ef}
1865: S.~Catani, S.~Dittmaier and Z.~Trocsanyi,
1866: %``One-loop singular behaviour of QCD and SUSY QCD amplitudes with massive
1867: %partons,''
1868: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 500} (2001) 149
1869: [\hepph{0011222}].
1870: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011222;%%
1871:
1872: %\cite{Beneke:1999qg}
1873: \bibitem{Beneke:1999qg}
1874: M.~Beneke, A.~Signer and V.~A.~Smirnov,
1875: %``Top quark production near threshold and the top quark mass,''
1876: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 454} (1999) 137
1877: [\hepph{9903260}].
1878: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903260;%%
1879:
1880: %\cite{Hoang:2001mm}
1881: \bibitem{Hoang:2001mm}
1882: A.~H.~Hoang, A.~V.~Manohar, I.~W.~Stewart and T.~Teubner,
1883: %``The threshold t anti-t cross section at NNLL order,''
1884: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 014014
1885: [\hepph{0107144}].
1886: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107144;%%
1887:
1888:
1889: \bibitem{Czarnecki:1997vz}
1890: A.~Czarnecki and K.~Melnikov,
1891: %``Two-loop QCD corrections to the heavy quark pair production cross section
1892: %in e+ e- annihilation near the threshold,''
1893: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 80} (1998) 2531
1894: [\hepph{9712222}].
1895: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712222;%%
1896:
1897: \bibitem{Hoang:1997sj}
1898: A.~H.~Hoang,
1899: %``Two-loop corrections to the electromagnetic vertex for energies close to
1900: %threshold,''
1901: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56} (1997) 7276
1902: [\hepph{9703404}].
1903: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9703404;%%
1904:
1905:
1906:
1907: \bibitem{AX}
1908: J.~H.~K\"uhn and T.~Teubner,
1909: %``Axial contributions at the top threshold,''
1910: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 9} (1999) 221 [\hepph{9903322}].
1911: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903322;%%
1912:
1913:
1914:
1915: %\cite{unknown:2005cc}
1916: \bibitem{unknown:2005cc}
1917: The Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, J.F. Arguin et al.,
1918: ``Combination of CDF and D0 results on the top-quark mass,''
1919: {\tt hep-ex/0507091}.
1920: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0507091;%%
1921:
1922:
1923: %
1924: %\cite{Kniehl:1989qu}
1925: \bibitem{Kniehl:1989qu}
1926: B.~A.~Kniehl and J.~H.~K\"uhn,
1927: %``QCD Corrections To The Z Decay Rate,''
1928: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 329}, 547 (1990).
1929: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B329,547;%%
1930: %
1931: %
1932: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Harm-Polylog %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1933:
1934: \bibitem{Polylog3}
1935: T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi,
1936: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 141} (2001) 296
1937: [\hepph{0107173}]; \;
1938: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107173;%%
1939: D.~Ma\^{i}tre, Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 174} (2006) 222
1940: [{\tt hep-ph/0507152}].
1941:
1942:
1943:
1944: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1945:
1946: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1947:
1948: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1949: %
1950: \end{thebibliography}
1951: %
1952: %
1953: \end{document}
1954: