1: %\documentstyle[epsfig]{slides}
2: \documentclass{article}
3: \usepackage{epsfig,latexsym,graphics}
4: \oddsidemargin 5pt \evensidemargin 5pt \topmargin -.5cm \textwidth 16cm
5: \textheight 22cm
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%MACROS%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: \def\circa#1{\,\raise.3ex\hbox{$#1$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\,}
8: \newcommand{\ov}{{\cal O}} \newcommand{\f}{{\phi}}
9: \newcommand{\Ttot}{{\bf T}} \newcommand{\psl}{p\hspace{-4.2pt}{\scriptstyle/}}
10: \newcommand{\qsl}{q\hspace{-4.9pt}{\scriptstyle /}}
11: \newcommand{\ksl}{k\hspace{-4.9pt}{\scriptstyle /}}
12: \newcommand \bra {\langle}
13: \newcommand \ket {\rangle} \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
14: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}} \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{displaymath}}
15: \newcommand{\een}{\end{displaymath}} \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
16: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}} \newcommand{\ban}{\begin{eqnarray*}}
17: \newcommand{\ean}{\end{eqnarray*}} \newcommand{\cro}{\dagger}
18: \newcommand{\tr}{{\rm Tr}} \newcommand{\de}{\partial}
19: \newcommand{\fvet}{\bar{\f}} \newcommand{\pvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $p$}}
20: \newcommand{\gvet}{\bar{\gamma}} \newcommand{\tvet}{\bar{\tau}}
21: \newcommand{\GeV}{\,{\rm GeV}} \newcommand{\TeV}{\,{\rm TeV}}
22: \newcommand{\MeV}{\,{\rm MeV}} \newcommand{\Pl}{p\hspace{-4.2pt}{\scriptstyle/}}
23: \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon} \newcommand{\ft}{{\tilde{f}}}
24: \newcommand{\Phivet}{\mbox{\boldmath $\Phi$}}
25: \newcommand{\kt}{\mbox{$k$}_{\perp }}\newcommand{\pt}{\mbox{$p$}_{\perp }}
26: \newcommand\as{\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}}
27: \newcommand\gs{g_{\mathrm{S}}}
28: \def\eeeq{\end{eqnarray}}
29: \def\cm{{\cal M}}
30: % \sopra{A}{B} sovrappone A e B
31: \newcommand{\g}{\gamma} \newcommand{\kvet}{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}
32: \newcommand{\xv}{{\bf x}} \newcommand{\pv}{{\bf p}} \newcommand{\Qtot}{{\rm\bf
33: Q}}
34: \newcommand{\Ytot}{{\rm\bf Y}} \newcommand{\vet}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
35: \newcommand{\kp}{\mbox{$k$}_{\perp }}
36: \newcommand{\qp}{\mbox{\boldmath
37: $q$}_{\perp }}
38: \newcommand{\sopra}[2]{\settowidth{\www}{#1}#1\hspace{-\www}#2
39: \settowidth{\www}{#2}\hspace{-\www}\settowidth{\www}{#1}\hspace{\www}}
40: \newcommand{\effe}[1]
41: {\mathop{{\vspace{3pt}\cal F}}\limits^{}_{\hskip-1mm \scriptscriptstyle #1}}
42: \newcommand{\esse}[1]
43: {\mathop{{\vspace{3pt}\cal S}}\limits^{}_{\hskip-1mm \scriptscriptstyle #1}}
44: \newcommand{\vi}[1]
45: {\mathop{{\vspace{3pt}\cal V}}\limits^{}_{\hskip-1mm \scriptscriptstyle #1}}
46: \newcommand{\ff}[2]{\mathop{{\vspace{3pt}f}}\limits^{}_{\hskip-1mm
47: \scriptscriptstyle #1}{\hskip-1mm \scriptstyle #2}}
48:
49: \newcommand{\ef}[2]
50: {\mathop{{\vspace{3pt} f }}\limits^{#1}_{\hskip-1mm \scriptscriptstyle #2}}
51:
52: \newcommand{\F}[2]
53: {\mathop{{\vspace{3pt}\cal F}}\limits^{#1}_{\hskip-1mm \scriptscriptstyle #2}}
54: \newcommand{\der}{-\frac{\de}{\de t}}
55: \newcommand{\overlap}[1]
56: {\mathop{{\vspace{3pt}\cal O}}\limits^{}_{\scriptscriptstyle #1}}
57: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}} \newcommand{\mix}{{\cal\amalg}}
58:
59: \def\lra{\leftrightarrow}
60: \def\Ph{{\hat P}}
61: \def\hs{\hspace{.1mm}}
62: \def\naive{na\"{\i}ve}
63: \newcommand\M[2]{|{\cal{M}}^{#1}_{#2}|^2}
64: %\newcommand\as{\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}}
65: %\newcommand\gs{g_{\mathrm{S}}}
66: \newcommand\eij{e^{-i \lambda_{ij} \pi}}
67: \newcommand\eiq{e^{-i \lambda_{iq} \pi}}
68: \newcommand\ejq{e^{-i \lambda_{jq} \pi}}
69: \newcommand\smfrac[2]{{\textstyle\frac{#1}{#2}}}
70: \def\hf{\smfrac{1}{2}}
71: %\newcommand\f[2]{\frac{#1}{#2}}
72: \def\ep{\epsilon}
73: %\newcommand\vep{{\large \varepsilon}}
74: \newcommand\vep{\varepsilon}
75: \def\ktil{\widetilde k}
76: \def\qtil{\widetilde q}
77: %\def\ee{$e^+e^-$}
78: %\def\beq{\begin{equation}}
79: %\def\eeq{\end{equation}}
80: \def\beeq{\begin{eqnarray}}
81: \def\eeeq{\end{eqnarray}}
82: \def\cm{{\cal M}}
83: \def\pb{{\bar p}}
84: \def\bom#1{{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}}
85: \def\to{\rightarrow}
86: \def\kper{k_{\perp}}
87: \def\LO{leading order}
88: \def\NLO{next-to-leading order}
89: \def\kt{k_\perp}
90: \newcommand{\la}{\langle}
91: \newcommand{\ra}{\rangle}
92: \def\vspaceinarray{\nonumber ~&~&~\\}
93: \def\nn{\nonumber}
94: \def\arrowlimit#1{\mathrel{\mathop{\longrightarrow}\limits_{#1}}}
95: \def\s#1#2{s_{#1#2}}
96: \def\AP{Altarelli--Parisi }
97: \def\ID{1 \kern -.45 em 1}
98: \def\bom#1{{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}}
99:
100:
101:
102:
103:
104:
105:
106: \begin{document}
107:
108:
109:
110: \vspace{1.cm}
111:
112:
113: {\centering
114:
115: {\Large\bf The Importance of Weak Boson Emission at LHC}
116:
117: \vspace{1.cm}
118:
119:
120: {\bf \large Paolo Ciafaloni}
121:
122: {\it INFN - Sezione di Lecce, \\Via per Arnesano, I-73100 Lecce, Italy \\
123: E-mail: paolo.ciafaloni@le.infn.it}
124: \vspace{0.4cm}
125:
126: {\bf \large Denis Comelli}
127:
128: {\it INFN - Sezione di Ferrara, \\Via Saragat 1, I-43100 Ferrara, Italy\\
129: E-mail: comelli@fe.infn.it}
130:
131:
132: }
133:
134: \vspace{0.3cm}
135:
136: \begin{abstract}
137: We point out that gauge bosons emissions should be
138: carefully estimated when considering LHC observables, since real $Ws$ and $Zs$
139: contributions can dramatically change cross sections with respect to tree
140: level values.
141: Here we consider observables
142: that are fully inclusive
143: respect to soft gauge boson emission
144: and where a certain number of nonabelian
145: isospin charges in initial and/or final states are detected.
146: We set up a general formalism to evaluate leading, all order resummed
147: electroweak corrections and we consider the phenomenologically relevant
148: case of third family quark production at the LHC. In the case of $b\bar{t}$
149: production we find that, due to the interplay between strong and weak
150: interactions, the production cross section
151: can become an order of magnitude bigger than the tree level value.
152: \end{abstract}
153:
154:
155: \section{Introduction}
156: It is by now well established that one loop electroweak corrections are not
157: sufficient to keep under control Standard Model predictions at the TeV
158: scale. The reason for this is the sharp growth with energy of these kind of
159: corrections, that reach the 10 \% level at 1 TeV. More in detail, this
160: growth is related to the infrared structure of the theory, so that one loop
161: contributions are proportional to $\log^2\frac{s}{M_{W,Z}^2}$, the gauge bosons
162: masses $M_{W,Z}$ acting as infrared regulators \cite{IR}.
163: In order to cope with the
164: expected precision of hadronic (LHC) and leptonic (ILC)
165: colliders, fixed-order
166: one and two loop corrections \cite{fixedSuda} and resummation of leading
167: effects \cite{resumSuda} have been
168: considered by various groups in the last few years.
169: Broadly speaking, two kinds of observables have been considered. In first
170: place the exclusive observables where only virtual electroweak effects need to be
171: considered \cite{fixedSuda,resumSuda}.
172: In second place, observables including $W,Z,\gamma$ emissions
173: have been considered \cite{EWBN}. A prototype of these kind of observables is $e^+
174: e^-\to hadrons$: the two final jets are detected, while any other object in
175: the final state is summed over, including the final decay products of $Ws$
176: and $Zs$ \cite{EWBN}. In this case, the collider provides two initial nonabelian
177: charges, and due to this fact the outcome is surprising: even though fully
178: inclusive, the cross section is sensitive to the infrared cutoff $M_W$ and
179: affected by big $\log^2\frac{s}{M_{W}^2}$ terms. This effect, baptized
180: ``Bloch-Nordsieck violation'', has been shown to occur only in broken gauge
181: theories, including the abelian case \cite{abelian}. Recently,
182: electroweak evolution equations, which are the analogous of QCD DGLAP
183: equations, have been derived \cite{col}.
184:
185: The aim of this work is to considered another class of observables, which
186: we might call ``partially inclusive''. That is, gauge boson radiation in
187: is still summed over, however we retain the possibility to observe
188: nonabelian charges in both the initial and/or final states.
189: The cross sections we consider are, generally speaking, identified by 4
190: hard partons, 2 in the initial and 2 in the final state. However in order
191: to compute the leading logs related to virtual and real $W,Z,\gamma$
192: emission we can reduce to 2 or 3 relevant legs. Suppose for instance that
193: the flavor of leg 4 is undetected (see fig.1) This could be the case if we
194: consider leg 4 to be a final jet and we do not isolate the jet's
195: flavor. Then, by unitarity, since we are summing over real and virtual
196: corrections \cite{EWBN}, we need only to consider the electroweak
197: corrections related to legs 1,2,3. This is showed in fig. 1 where the
198: overlap matrix with the remaining three legs is depicted.
199:
200:
201:
202: \begin{figure}
203: \centering
204: \includegraphics[width=16cm]{PIfff.eps}
205: \caption{Diagrammatic Isospin description of the overlap matrix
206: with three isospin charged legs and one inclusive final state.}
207: \end{figure}
208:
209:
210:
211: \section{General formalism}
212: Our starting point, as in previous works, is the SU(2) isospin structure of
213: the overlap matrix, defined in
214: terms of the S-matrix as follows \cite{EWBN} ($\alpha_i,\beta_i$
215: are the isospin indices):
216: \be
217: \bra \beta_1\beta_2\dots \beta_n|S^\cro S|\alpha_1\alpha_2\dots \alpha_n\ket
218: =\ov_{\beta_1\alpha_1,\beta_2\alpha_2,\dots\beta_n\alpha_n}
219: \ee
220: and the observable cross sections are related to the above
221: definition by:
222: \be
223: d\sigma_{\alpha_1\alpha_2\dots\alpha_n}=\ov_{\alpha_1\alpha_1,
224: \alpha_2\alpha_2,\dots\alpha_n\alpha_n}
225: \ee
226: Notice that we use a ``generalized S matrix'' formalism, such that all the
227: states over which we are inclusive appear on the left of S and all the
228: detected nonabelian charges $1,2...n$ appear on the right. So for instance
229: a detected final (outgoing) antiquark is seen as an initial (ingoing)
230: quark state.
231: Namely, for the case $n=2$ this means that we describe
232: cross sections with two electroweak charges in the initial
233: states or systems with one charged particle in the initial and one in
234: the final state,
235: or the case of two final charges.
236:
237: The SU(2) generators $t^a, a=1,2,3\quad i=1,2,\dots n$ act on the overlap
238: matrix as follows
239: \be
240: (t^a_i \ov)_{\beta_1\alpha_1,\dots\beta_n\alpha_n}=
241: \sum_{\delta_i}t^a_{\alpha_i\delta_i}
242: \ov_{\beta_1\alpha_1,\dots\beta_i\delta_i,\dots\beta_n\alpha_n}
243: \qquad
244: (t'^a_i \ov)_{\beta_1\alpha_1,\dots\beta_n\alpha_n}=
245: \sum_{\gamma_i}t^a_{\beta_i\gamma_i}
246: \ov_{\beta_1\alpha_1,\dots\gamma_i\alpha_i,\dots\beta_n\alpha_n}
247: \ee
248: where the generators $t^a$ depend on the representation of the considered
249: $i-th$ particle.
250:
251:
252: It is convenient to define the isospin generator referred
253: to a single leg $i$ as $T_i\equiv t_i+t'_i$ \cite{EWBN}.
254: Since we consider energy scales of the order of 1 TeV and beyond, we take all particles to
255: be massless.
256: In other words we work in the high energy limit in which the $SU(2)\otimes U(1)$
257: symmetry is recovered; then the overlap matrix is invariant under a symmetry
258: transformation:
259: \be\label{sym} {T}_{tot}^a\equiv\sum_i { T}_i^a\qquad
260: \exp[\alpha^a { T}^a_{tot}]\ov=
261: \exp[\bom{\alpha}\cdot \bom{ T}_{tot}]\ov=\ov\quad
262: \Rightarrow \quad \bom{T}_{tot}\ov=0
263: \ee
264: This property allows to write the overlap matrix as a sum of projectors with
265: definite isospin properties and gives various relations between the apriori
266: independent cross sections (see next sections).
267:
268: The dressing of the hard overlap matrix $\ov^H$ to obtain the evolved one
269: $\ov$ through exchange of virtual and real soft $W$ quanta
270: is described by the external line insertion of the eikonal current:
271: \begin{equation}
272: \label{eikcur}
273: {\bom J}^{\mu }(k)=g_w\;\sum_{i=1}^{n} {\bom T}_i\,
274: \frac{p_{i}^{\mu}}{p_i\cdot k} \;,
275: \end{equation}
276: $k$ being the momentum of the emitted soft gauge boson, $p_i$ the i-th
277: leg momentum and $g_w$ the SU(2) gauge coupling.
278: Notice that the part of the current
279: proportional to $g'$ is absent altogether because of the cancellation
280: of the abelian components for inclusive observables \cite{EWBN}.
281:
282:
283: By squaring the eikonal current one obtains,
284: in the limit where all invariants are of the same order $2p_i\cdot p_j\approx s$,
285: the
286: insertion operator:
287: \be
288: I(k)=g_w^2\frac{p_1p_2}{(kp_1)(kp_2)}\sum_{i< j}^n\bom{T}_i\cdot\bom{T}_j
289: \ee
290:
291: The resummed expression for the overlap matrix is finally given by the
292: following expression involving the insertion operator:
293: \be\label{res}
294: \ov(s)=\exp[L_W \sum_{i< j}^n\bom{T}_i\cdot\bom{T}_j]\ov^H
295: \ee
296: where we have defined the eikonal radiation factor for $W$ exchange:
297: \be
298: L_W(s)=\frac{g_w^2}{2}\int_M^E\frac{d^3\bom{k}}{2\omega_k(2\pi)^3}
299: \frac{2p_1p_2}{(kp_1)(kp_2)}=\frac{\alpha_w}{4\pi}\log^2\frac{s}{M^2},
300: \quad\alpha_w=\frac{g_w^2}{4\pi}
301: \ee
302:
303: It is useful to rewrite (\ref{res}) by using
304: \be
305: \sum_{i<j}^n\bom{T}_i\cdot\bom{T}_j=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^n
306: \bom{T}_i\cdot(\bom{T}_{tot}-\bom{T}_i)
307: =-\frac{1}{2}\sum_i \bom{T}_i^2
308: \ee
309: where we used $\bom{T}_{tot}\ov=0$, so that
310: \be\label{dress}
311: \ov(s)=\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}L_W \sum_{i=1}^n\bom{T}_i^2\right]\ov^H
312: \ee
313: %that show the single particle property´s of the inclusive emission.
314: %We can specialize such an equation to various cases depending on the
315: %number of external hard partons charged under SU(2).
316: Eqn. (\ref{dress}) shows the single particle property of inclusive
317: emission, i.e. the fact that corrections are calculated by considering an
318: exponential factor for each leg in a definite total isospin state. In the
319: following we systematically adopt the procedure of writing the overlap
320: matrix as a sum of projectors on total isospin eigenstates and then applying
321: (\ref{dress}) to obtain the ``EW BN'' corrected overlap matrix.
322: The hard overlap matrix is therefore first decomposed as follows:
323: \be\label{expansion}
324: \ov^H=\sum_{t_1,t_2\dots t_n} O^H_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}{\cal{P}}_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}
325: \ee
326: where $\ov,{\cal{P}}_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}$ are operators acting on the $n$
327: external legs indices, and $O_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}$ are the coefficients of
328: the expansion. The projectors satisfy, by definition:
329: \be\label{prop}
330: \bom{T}_j{\cal{P}}_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}=t_j{\cal{P}}_{t_1t_2\dots
331: t_n},j=1\dots n
332: \qquad
333: \bom{T}_{tot}{\cal{P}}_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}=0
334: \ee
335: Then we apply (\ref{dress}) in order to obtain the all order resummed
336: values. Due to property (\ref{prop}) this is particularly simple, since it
337: amounts to the substitution:
338: \be\label{subs}
339: O^H_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}\to O_{t_1t_2\dots
340: t_n}(s)=\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}L_W(s)
341: \sum_{i=1}^n t_i(t_i+1)\right]O^H_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}
342: \ee
343: In next section we give the explicit form of the projection operators for
344: the cases of two and three external legs.
345:
346: To end with, we want to compare the above describe ``BN EW'' corrections
347: with ``Sudakov EW'' corrections,
348: i.e. EW corrections given only by the virtual
349: contributions without weak bosons emissions. The latter depend on how the
350: observable is defined, namely on which cutoff is decided on real photon
351: emission: a certain degree of inclusiveness on photons is
352: mandatory in order to render the observable infrared finite. For
353: definiteness and in order to compare with the BN corrections, we choose for
354: the photon a cutoff of the order of the weak scale; the result is an
355: effective SU(2) $\otimes$ U(1) theory with all gauge bosons at a common
356: mass $M_W\approx M_Z$ \cite{resumSuda}.
357: In this limit Sudakov corrections are in fact rather simple: the resummed cross section
358: is obtained from the hard one by multiplying each external leg by an
359: exponential factor:
360: \be\label{suda}
361: \sigma^{Sud}(s)=\exp [-L_W(s) \sum_i(t_i(t_i+1)+y_i^2\tan^2\theta_W )]\sigma_H
362: \ee
363: where $\theta_W$ is
364: the Weinberg angle, $t_i$ is the i-th leg isospin and $y_i$ its hypercharge
365: \cite{resumSuda}.
366: Despite the similarities between (\ref{subs}) and (\ref{suda}), the
367: inclusive (BN) and exclusive (Sudakov) case are of course very different and give rise to
368: significantly different patterns of radiative corrections. Namely:
369: \begin{itemize}
370: \item
371: in (\ref{suda}) $t_i$ is the external leg isospin (e.g., $\frac{1}{2}$ for
372: a fermion) while in (\ref{subs}) $t_i$ is obtained by
373: composing two single-leg isospins (see fig. 1)
374: \item
375: no correction proportional to $y^2$ is present in the ``BN'' inclusive
376: case, since contributions proportional to the U(1) coupling $g_y$ cancel
377: out \cite{EWBN}.
378: \item
379: There is a factor 2 of difference in the argument of the exponential
380: (compare (\ref{suda}), (\ref{subs})).
381: \item
382: while Sudakov corrections always depress the tree level cross section,
383: BN ones can be negative or positive (see
384: section 4).
385: \end{itemize}
386:
387:
388:
389: \section{The case of two and three external legs}
390: In this section we give the explicit forms of the projectors in the case of
391: two and three external legs. This allows to calculate the EW BN
392: corrections by simply inserting the appropriate values of the hard cross
393: sections, as we explain in next section. Of course not all of the possible
394: values of $t_1,t_2\dots t_n$ appearing in (\ref{expansion}) are allowed. In
395: fact the total isospin must be $0$ due to isospin invariance, so
396: for instance in the case of two legs there is no ${\cal{P}}_{10}$ term,
397: since no isospin invariant can be constructed from an isospin 0 and an
398: isospin 1 objects. In the following we present tables with the allowed
399: values for $t_1\dots t_n$. The coefficients $O_{t_1t_2\dots t_n}$ are also
400: called ``form factors'' since they are $s$-dependent and
401: receive the exponential factor (\ref{subs}). Here we limit ourselves to
402: fermions, antifermions and transverse gauge bosons in the external
403: legs. Therefore in the following by ``boson'' we always mean ``transversely
404: polarized (weak) gauge boson''.
405:
406: We now consider the ``two external legs'' case. Notice that by this we do
407: not mean that only two external particles are present. Rather, we mean a
408: process with an arbitrary number of external particles, but in which
409: only two non abelian weak charges are detected. Therefore, the process $gg\to
410: q\bar{q}$ belongs to this category since gluons do not carry weak charges;
411: also the process $e^+e^-\to jets+X$ falls in this case since this process
412: is fully inclusive in the final state: no weak charge is singled out. The
413: case of two initial external charged legs has been widely discussed
414: from various point of view:
415: in \cite{EWBN} the BN violation was put in evidence and more refined
416: studies were done in \cite{col} including the next to leading
417: corrections.
418: Here we extend the same procedure to processes with
419: {\it two external charged legs} irrespective of their position of
420: initial or final states.
421:
422: The possible values for the isospin of the two external legs labeled by
423: $t_1,t_2$ are given by (f.f.=form factors):
424:
425: \vspace{.3cm}
426:
427: \noindent\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c| |c|c|c| |c|c|c|}
428: \hline
429: fermion & fermion & Number of f.f. & fermion & boson &
430: Number of f.f. & boson & boson &Number of f.f. \\
431: \hline
432: $t_1=0$ & $t_2=0$& & $t_1=0$ &$ t_2=0$ & & $t_1=0$ &$ t_2=0$ & \\
433: $t_1=1$ & $t_2=1$& 2 & $t_1=1$ & $t_2=1$ & 2 & $t_1=1$ &$ t_2=1$& 3\\
434: $$ & $$& & $$ & $$ & & $t_1=2$ &$ t_2=2$&\\
435: \hline
436: \end{tabular}
437:
438: \vspace{.3cm}
439:
440: The explicit form of the projection operators is given below for the
441: relevant case of fermions and (transverse) gauge bosons:
442:
443: \begin{itemize}
444: \item two external fermions
445: \ba
446: \ov(\alpha_1,\beta_1;\alpha_2,\beta_2)
447: =O_{00}\;\delta_{\alpha_1\beta_1}\delta_{\alpha_2\beta_2}
448: +O_{11}\;t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}t^a_{\alpha_2\beta_2}
449: \label{2f}\ea
450: \item one fermion and one external gauge boson
451: \ba
452: \ov(\alpha_1,\beta_1;a_2,b_2)
453: =O_{00}\;\delta_{\alpha_1\beta_1}\delta_{a_2b_2}
454: +O_{11}\;t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}T^a_{a_2b_2}
455: \ea
456: \item two external gauge bosons
457: \ba
458: \ov(a_1,b_1;a_2,b_2)
459: =O_{00}\;\delta_{a_1b_1}\delta_{a_2b_2}
460: +O_{11}\;T^a_{a_1b_1}T^a_{a_2b_2}+
461: O_{22}\;{\cal{P}}_2(a_1b_1;a_2b_2)
462: \ea
463: \end{itemize}
464: where $t^a(T^a)$ are the SU(2) generators in the fundamental (adjoint)
465: representation and
466: the isospin 2 projector is defined by:
467: \be
468: {\cal{P}}_2(a_1,b_1;a_2,b_2)=\frac{1}{4}\left[\{T^c,T^d\}_{b_1a_1}
469: \{T^c,T^d\}_{b_2a_2}-\frac{16}{3}\delta _{b_1a_1}\delta_{b_2a_2}\right]
470: \ee
471: The case with three external particles charged under $SU(2)$ is more
472: complicated because the product of three isospins generates many
473: invariant with definite total isopin.
474: As shown in the table below
475: in order to describe a system with three external fermion in the
476: fundamental representation five gauge invariant form
477: factors are needed; a system with two fundamental fermions and one boson
478: (in the adjoint representation ) needs six form factors and for a system
479: with one fermion plus two bosons we have to write nine form factors.
480:
481:
482:
483: \vspace{0.3cm}
484:
485:
486: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c||c|c|c|c|}
487: \hline
488: fermion & fermion & fermion &Number of f.f.
489: &fermion & fermion & boson & Number of f.f.
490: \\ \hline
491: $t_1=0$ &$ t_2=0$ &$ t_3=0$& &$t_1=0$ & $t_2=0$ &$ t_3=0$&\\
492: $t_1=1$ &$ t_2=0$ &$ t_3=1$&$5$ &$t_1=1$ &$ t_2=0$ &$ t_3=1$&$6$\\
493: $t_1=0$ & $t_2=1$ &$ t_3=1$& &$t_1=0$ &$ t_2=1$ &$ t_3=1$&\\
494: $t_1=1$ &$ t_2=1$ & $t_3=0,1$&&$t_1=$1 &$ t_2=1$ &$ t_3=0,1,$2 &\\
495: \hline
496: \end{tabular}
497:
498: \vspace{0.1cm}
499:
500: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
501: \hline
502: fermion & boson & boson & Number of f.f.
503: \\\hline
504: $t_1=0$ &$ t_2=0$ &$ t_3=0$&\\
505: $t_1=$1 &$ t_2=0$ & $t_3=1$&\\
506: $t_1=0$ & $t_2=1$ &$ t_3=1$& $9$\\
507: $t_1=$1 &$ t_2=1$ &$ t_3=0,1,$2 &\\
508: $t_1=0$ &$ t_2=2$ &$ t_3=2$&\\
509: $t_1=1$ &$ t_2=2$ &$ t_3=1,$2 &\\
510: \hline
511: \end{tabular}
512:
513: \vspace{0.2cm}
514:
515: For the case with three bosons there are 15 form factors.
516: The form factors are gauge invariant combinations of
517: physical cross sections (that correspond to the diagonal elements of
518: the overlap matrix).
519: Reversing the problem, any physical cross section is a combination of
520: form factors.
521: It is interesting to note that the form factors
522: $\ov_{ijk...}$ whose sum $i+j+k+...=$ {\it odd number } do not
523: contribute to physical cross sections.
524: In practice this means that the degrees of freedom of the overlap
525: matrix projected on the physical space of the cross sections are
526: diminished.
527: In the above examples, with three external particles the form factors
528: $\ov_{111}$ and $\ov_{122}$ are unphysical. The final result is that, at the level of
529: physical cross sections, the system with
530: three fermions has 4 degrees of freedom: once we know 4 cross sections any
531: other one is fixed as a combination of these ones.
532: The system of two fermions and one boson has 5 degrees of freedom and
533: finally the one fermion and two bosons only 7.
534:
535: The isospin decomposition of the overlap matrix in
536: the various cases is given below.
537: Fermionic and antifermionic legs are treated on equal grounds, so
538: for instance the case of one antifermionic and two fermionic legs belongs
539: to the ``3 fermionic legs'' case.
540: \begin{itemize}
541: \item 3 fermionic legs
542: \ba\label{3f}
543: \ov(\alpha_1,\beta_1;\alpha_2,\beta_2;\alpha_3,\beta_3)
544: &=&O_{000}\; \delta_{\alpha_1\beta_1}\delta_{\alpha_2\beta_2}\delta_{\alpha_3\beta_3}
545: +O_{101}\; t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}\delta_{\alpha_2\beta_2}t^a_{\alpha_3\beta_3}+
546: O_{111}\; f_{abc}t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}t^b_{\alpha_2\beta_2}t^c_{\alpha_3\beta_3}
547: \nn\\
548: &+&
549: O_{011}\; \delta_{\alpha_1\beta_1}t^a_{\alpha_2\beta_2}t^a_{\alpha_3\beta_3}
550: +O_{110}\; t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}t^a_{\alpha_2\beta_2}\delta_{\alpha_3\beta_3}
551: \ea
552: \item 2 fermionic, 1 bosonic
553: \ba
554: \ov(\alpha_1,\beta_1;\alpha_2,\beta_2;a_3,b_3)
555: &=&O_{000}\; \delta_{\alpha_1\beta_1}\delta_{\alpha_2\beta_2}\delta_{a_3b_3}
556: +O_{101}\; t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}\delta_{\alpha_2\beta_2}T^a_{a_3b_3}
557: +O_{011}\; \delta_{\alpha_1\beta_1}t^a_{\alpha_2\beta_2}T^a_{a_3b_3}\nn\\
558: &+&O_{110}\; t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}t^a_{\alpha_2\beta_2}\delta_{a_3b_3}
559: +O_{112}\; t^a_{\alpha1\beta1}t^b_{\alpha2\beta2}
560: {\cal{P}}_2(a,b;a_3,b_3)\nn\\
561: &+& O_{111}\; f_{abc}t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}t^b_{\alpha_2\beta_2}T^c_{a_3b_3}
562: \label{2f1b}
563: \ea
564: \item 1 fermionic, 2 bosonic
565: \ba
566: \ov&=&
567: O_{000}\; \delta_{\alpha_1\beta_1}\delta_{a_2b_2}\delta_{a_3b_3}+
568: O_{022}\; \delta_{\alpha_1\beta_1}{\cal{P}}_2(a_2,b_2;a_3,b_3)+
569: O_{101}\; \delta_{a_2b_2}t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}T^a_{a_3b_3}\nn\\
570: &+&O_{110}\; \delta_{a_3b_3}t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}T^a_{a_2b_2}+
571: O_{111}\; f_{abc}t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}T^b_{a_2b_2}T^c_{a_3b_3}
572: +O_{112}\; t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}T^b_{a_2b_2}{\cal{P}}_2(a,b;a_3,b_3)\nn\\
573: &+&O_{121}\; t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}T^b_{a_3b_3}{\cal{P}}_2(a,b;a_2,b_2)
574: +O_{121}\; t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1}T^b_{a_3b_3}{\cal{P}}_2(a,b;a_2,b_2)
575: \nn\\
576: &+& O_{122}\; f_{abc}t^a_{\alpha_1\beta_1} {\cal{P}}_2(b,d;a_2,b_2){\cal{P}}_2(c,d;a_3,b_3)
577: \label{1f2b}
578: \ea
579: \end{itemize}
580:
581: The SU(2) symmetry encoded into eqns. (\ref{3f}-\ref{1f2b}) gives various
582: relations between the {\sl apriori} independent overlap matrix elements,
583: and therefore between the various cross sections.
584: For instance in the case
585: of (\ref{3f}) the overlap has $2^6=64$ values in principle; however there
586: are only 4 independent projectors, and therefore only 4 independent values.
587: The most general relation is the
588: following: let us give the index assignments:
589: \be
590: 1=\nu,2=e \;\mbox{ for fermions }\qquad
591: 1=W^+,2=W^-,3=W^3\mbox{ for gauge bosons }
592: \ee
593: then we have $\sigma_{abc}=\sigma_{a'b'c'}$ where the set $a'b'c'$ is
594: obtained from $abc$ by the exchange $1\leftrightarrow 2,3\leftrightarrow
595: 3$. So $\sigma_{112}=\sigma_{221},\sigma_{331}=\sigma_{332}$ and so on. It
596: is easy to realize that the described exchange corresponds to a unitary
597: transformation with the matrix $i\sigma_2$.
598: The dressing of the overlap matrix, i.e. resumming leading electroweak
599: double logs at all orders, is done by applying eq. (\ref{dress}).
600: The above formula will be useful in order to evaluate the BN corrections to
601: the high energy cross section for third family
602: quarks at LHC.
603:
604: \section{Third generation quarks production at LHC}
605:
606: In this section we will apply some of the above formulas
607: for LHC cross sections partially inclusive over soft $W$ and $Z$ emission.
608: The idea is to analyze the third family (top and bottom) quark
609: production at LHC for very large momentum transfer.
610: In order to give an idea of the size of the corrections we will
611: also compute the resummed Sudakov corrections at leading order.
612: In such a
613: way we can compare processes without any emission
614: of $W$ and processes with the same hard final states but with the
615: possibility to emit soft $W$ bosons.
616:
617:
618:
619: As is well known we can write the heavy quark production mechanism at LHC
620: as a convolution of the luminosity functions $L_{ij}$ for the
621: partons $p_i$ and $p_j$ times the partonic cross sections \cite{web}:
622: \be\label{sigma}
623: \frac{d \sigma_{PP\rightarrow Q\bar Q}}{d\hat{s}}=\frac{1}{s}\sum_{i,j}
624: L_{ij}(\hat{s})
625: d\sigma_{p_ip_j\rightarrow Q\bar Q}(\hat{s})\qquad
626: L_{ij}(\hat{s})=\int_\frac{\hat{s}}{s}^1\frac{dx}{x}
627: f_{p_i}(x)f_{p_j}(\frac{\hat{s}}{sx})
628: \ee
629: where $f_{p_i}(x)$ is the distribution of parton $i$ inside the proton,
630: $\sqrt{\hat{s}}$ is the partonic c.m. energy and $\sqrt{s}=14$
631: TeV the hadronic one.
632: For each channel we will decompose the hard partonic cross sections in
633: isospin defined form factors whose EW BN corrections can be directly
634: computed with eq. (\ref{subs}).
635:
636: At this point analyzing the luminosity functions of the sea quarks
637: of the proton we can obtain a quite reasonable simplification for
638: the evaluation of the BN corrections to the $q \bar q$ cross section of
639: eq. (\ref{sigma}):
640: the proton sea is approximately an isospin singlet.
641: In other word the amount of anti up quark inside a proton is almost
642: the same of the antiquark down and so on for the other
643: sea families.
644: This statement, from the SU(2) point of view,
645: implies automatically that, with a reasonable
646: approximation, the sea quarks of a proton is a flavour singlet state.
647: To corroborate our statement we show in fig.\ref{structurefunctions})
648: the $x$ dependence of
649: structure functions of the anti-up and anti-down quarks and of the
650: remaining sea quarks at fixed energy. This implies that the partonic
651: process $q\bar{q}\to Q\bar{Q}$ is, with a good approximation, a three leg process and not a
652: four legs one, since the $\bar{q}$ leg is summed over SU(2) quantum
653: numbers, and therefore receives no inclusive EW corrections (see also fig. 1).
654: % and the ratios of the luminosities for
655: %$L_{u\bar d}/L_{u\bar u}$ and $L_{d\bar u}/L_{d\bar d}$
656: % for varying partonic energy $\sqrt{ \hat s}$ .
657:
658: \begin{figure}
659: \centering
660: \includegraphics[height=50mm] {StructFunct2.eps}
661: \includegraphics[height=45mm] {StructFunct1.eps}
662: % \includegraphics[height=45mm] {ub.eps}
663: \caption{\label{structurefunctions}
664: Parton distributions for the sea of the proton at $Q=4000 GeV$ as a
665: function of $x$, the fraction of momentum carried by the parton.
666: Left: $s=\bar{s},c=\bar{c},b=\bar{b}$. Right: $\bar{u},\bar{d}$. }
667: \end{figure}
668:
669:
670: Let us now turn to the expression for tree level (hard) partonic cross
671: section $q\bar{q}\to Q\bar{Q}$, where $ q (Q)$ is a
672: light (heavy) quark, and we sum over the initial antiquark isospin.
673: Our notation is
674: %$Q_1=t,Q_2=b$.
675: $\alpha_1=1,2$ for up and for down type initial quarks,
676: $\alpha_{2}=1,2$ for $t,\,b$ final states
677: and
678: $\alpha_{3}=1,2$ for $\bar t,\,\bar b$ antifermion final states.
679: The SU(3)$\otimes$SU(2)$\otimes$U(1) couplings are given respectively by
680: $g_s,g_w,g_y$.
681: In the massless limit chirality is conserved, so we can label the cross
682: sections with the chirality of the initial and final fermions: the
683: chiralities of corresponding antifermions are unambiguously fixed.
684: The overlap matrix receives various contributions from $s$-channel exchange of
685: electroweak gauge bosons and gluons\footnote{We do not consider here t-channel
686: contributions from initial sea heavy quarks like $b\bar{t}\to b\bar{t}$,
687: a process initiated by the excitations of bottom and top quarks from the
688: gluon sea. However for a full consistent calculation
689: a careful evaluation of these kind of processes has to be included.}:
690: \ba \label{qbq1}
691: \frac{d\sigma^H_{LL}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3)}{d\cos\theta}&
692: =&%\frac{(1+\cos\theta)^2}{8\pi s}
693: \frac{\hat{u}^2}{8\pi \hat s^3}
694: \left[(g^{4}_y\,y_{L\alpha_1}^2\,y_{L\alpha_2}^2+
695: 2\,g^{2}_y\,g_w^2\,y_{L\alpha_1}\,y_{L\alpha_2}\,t^3_{\alpha_1\alpha_1} \,
696: t^3_{\alpha_2\alpha_3})\,\delta_{\alpha_2\alpha_3}\right.\\
697: &&\left.\nonumber
698: +g_w^4\,t^c_{\alpha_3\alpha_2}(t^ct^d)_{\alpha_1\alpha_1}t^d_{\alpha_2\alpha_3}
699: +\frac{2}{9} g_s^4 \delta_{\alpha_2\alpha_3} \right]\label{LL}\\
700: \frac{d\sigma^H_{LR}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3)}{d\cos\theta}\label{qbq2}
701: & =&%\frac{(1-\cos\theta)^2}{8\pi s}
702: \frac{\hat{t}^2}{8\pi \hat s^3}
703: \left[g^{4}_y\,y_{L\alpha_1}^2 \,y_{R{\alpha_2}}^2
704: +\frac{2}{9} g_s^4 \right] \delta_{\alpha_2\alpha_3}
705: \\
706: \frac{d\sigma^H_{RL}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3)}{d\cos\theta}\label{qbq3}
707: & =&%\frac{(1-\cos\theta)^2}{8\pi s}
708: \frac{\hat{t}^2}{8\pi \hat s^3}
709: \left[g^{4}_y\,y_{R\alpha_1}^2 \,y_{L{\alpha_2}}^2 +
710: \frac{2}{9} g_s^4\right]\delta_{\alpha_2\alpha_3}
711: \\
712: \frac{d\sigma^H_{RR}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3)}{d\cos\theta}\label{qbq4}
713: & =&%\frac{(1+\cos\theta)^2}{8\pi s}
714: \frac{\hat{u}^2}{8\pi \hat s^3}
715: \left[g^{4}_y\,y_{R\alpha_1}^2 \,y_{R{\alpha_2}}^2 +
716: \frac{2}{9} g_s^4 \right]\,\delta_{\alpha_2\alpha_3}
717: \ea
718: where $\hat t=-\hat s /2(1-\cos\theta)$ and $\hat u=-\hat s
719: /2(1+\cos\theta)$ are the Mandelstam variables in the partonic c.m. frame.
720: Notice the absence of $g_s^2 g_w^2$ and $g_s^2 g_y^2$ terms since electroweak and strong amplitudes
721: do not interfere due to the color structure.
722: The values of the corresponding hard overlap matrix elements in the LL
723: channel can be
724: obtained by equating the general form (\ref{3f}) to the values of the hard
725: cross sections (\ref{qbq1}, \ref{qbq2}, \ref{qbq3},\ref{qbq4}). Namely, from
726: $\ov^H_{LL}(\alpha_1,\alpha_1;\alpha_2,\alpha_2;\alpha_3,\alpha_3)
727: =\frac{d\sigma^H_{LL}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3)}{d\cos\theta}$ and
728: defining $\alpha_i=\frac{g_i^2}{4\pi}$ one obtains:
729: \be\label{prima}
730: O^H_{000}=\frac{2\,\pi \hat{u}^2}{9 \hat{s}^3}
731: (\alpha_s^2+\frac{27}{32}\alpha_w^2+\frac{1}{288}\alpha_y^2)
732: \qquad
733: O^H_{110}=\frac{\pi \hat{u}^2}{8 \hat{s}^3}(\alpha_w^2+\frac{1}{9}\alpha_w\,\alpha_y)
734: \ee
735: \be
736: O^H_{011}=\frac{8\,\pi \hat{u}^2}{9 \hat{s}^3}(\alpha_s^2-\frac{9}{32}\alpha_w^2+\frac{1}{288}\alpha_y^2)
737: \qquad
738: O^H_{101}=-\frac{\pi \hat{u}^2}{2 \hat{s}^3}(\alpha_w^2-\frac{1}{9}\alpha_w\,\alpha_y)
739: \ee
740: The same procedure allows to find the values for the RL channel (in
741: this case we have two different overlaps: one for the initial $u_R$
742: and one for $d_R$, distinguished by the hypercharge contribution):
743: \be\label{ultima}
744: O^H_{00}=\frac{2\,\pi \hat{t}^2}{9 \hat{s}^3}
745: (\alpha_s^2 +\frac{1}{8}\alpha_y^2\,y_{R}^2)
746: \qquad
747: O^H_{11}=\frac{8\,\pi \hat{t}^2}{9 \hat{s}^3}(\alpha_s^2 +\frac{1}{8}\alpha_y^2\,y_{R}^2)
748: \ee
749: The dressed overlap matrix
750: can be now obtained by using the values for the hard overlap matrix of
751: eqs. (\ref{prima}-\ref{ultima}) and applying the rule of
752: eq.(\ref{subs}). So for instance
753: \be
754: O_{101}(s)=O^H_{101}\exp[-2L_W]=-\frac{\pi \hat{u}^2}{8 \hat{s}^3}(\alpha_w^2-4 \,\,y_L^2\,\alpha_w\,\alpha_y)
755: \exp[-2L_W]
756: \ee
757: and so on. On the other hand, the $LR,RR$ channels do not receive BN EW corrections.
758:
759:
760: The gluon gluon hard cross section ($g g\to Q\bar{Q}$)
761: can be decomposed giving the chirality of the final states:
762: \be
763: \frac{ d\sigma^H
764: }{d \cos \theta}=
765: \frac{ d\sigma^H_{R}
766: }{d \cos \theta}+
767: \frac{ d\sigma^H_{L}
768: }{d \cos \theta}\quad ;\quad
769: \frac{ d\sigma^H_{L}
770: }{d \cos \theta}=\frac{ d\sigma^H_{R}
771: }{d \cos \theta}
772: \ee
773:
774: It is clear that the contributions coming from initial gluons,
775: from the point of view of $SU(2)$, are
776: two-charged-leg final states only when left handed heavy quarks
777: are produced, while the overlap of the
778: process $gg\rightarrow Q_{R}\bar Q_R$ is singlet under $SU(2)$ decomposition.
779: The isospin structure of the process $gg\rightarrow Q_{L}\bar Q_L$ is given by
780: \be
781: \frac{ d\sigma_L^H(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)}{d \cos \theta} =
782: \frac{\pi \alpha_S^2}{4 \hat s} \left(
783: \frac{\hat t^2+\hat u^2}{6 \hat t \hat u}-
784: \frac{3 \left(\hat t^2+\hat u^2\right)}{8 \hat s^2}
785: \right) \;\delta_{\alpha_1\alpha_2}
786: \ee
787: corresponding to an overlap $\ov^H_{}$ given by the coefficients
788: \ba \label{ovgg}
789: O^H_{00}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{ d\sigma^H_{L}%(\alpha_1\alpha_2)
790: }{d \cos \theta}
791: \quad \quad \quad
792: O^H_{11}= 2\,\frac{ d\sigma^H_{L}%(\alpha_1\alpha_2)
793: }{d \cos \theta}
794: \ea
795:
796: The evolved overlap matrix and the respective dressed cross sections
797: with the all order resummed virtual and real EW
798: corrections, can now be obtained by using eqn.(\ref{dress},\ref{subs}) applied to
799: all the hard overlap form factors. An important feature of such a channel is the fact that, being a
800: mixture of s and t-channels, its angular dependence is different
801: from the $q \bar q$ s-channel cross section.
802: This fact is important not only for $t\bar{t},b\bar{b}$
803: production but mainly for $t\bar{b},b\bar{t}$ production, where the tree level
804: $\alpha_W^2$ cross section proceeds only through s-channel annihilation. The outcome is
805: that the BN corrected
806: angular distribution is different from the tree level one (fig. \ref{angtot}).
807:
808: Finally, in fig. \ref{numerics} we plot the differential cross section for the
809: process $PP\to b\bar{t}+X$ for the BN and Sudakov cases.
810:
811: We can obtain a rather simple formula for the BN corrections if we
812: evaluate the hard cross section in the limit $g_y,g_w\to 0$; this is a
813: reasonable approximation since the contributions proportional to $g_s$
814: are the bulk of the
815: hard cross sections.
816: It is easy to check that in this case the same correction is obtained for the
817: $q\bar q$ and $gg$ channels, allowing the
818: factorization of the BN corrections with
819: respect the hard QCD cross section:
820: \ba\label{simple1}
821: \frac{ d\sigma^{BN}_{}(PP\rightarrow t\bar t)}{d \cos \theta}\approx
822: \frac{ d\sigma^{BN}_{}(PP\rightarrow b\bar b)}{d \cos \theta} \approx\frac{
823: d\sigma^H_{QCD}(PP\rightarrow t\bar t)}{d \cos \theta}\;
824: \frac{1}{4}(3+\exp[-2\,L_W(\hat s)])\\\label{simple2}
825: \frac{ d\sigma^{BN}_{}(PP\rightarrow t\bar b)}{d \cos \theta} \approx
826: \frac{ d\sigma^{BN}_{}(PP\rightarrow b\bar t)}{d \cos \theta} \approx\frac{
827: d\sigma^H_{QCD}(PP\rightarrow t\bar t)}{d \cos \theta}\;
828: \frac{1}{4}(1-\exp[-2\,L_W(\hat s)])
829: \ea
830:
831: Let us now comment on our final results for the cross sections
832: $PP\to Q\bar{Q}+X$ where $Q\bar{Q}=t\bar{t},t\bar{b},b\bar{t},b\bar{b}$, summarized in
833: figs. \ref{tt12}, \ref{angtot}.
834: We recall again that we consider two kinds of
835: observables:
836: \ba
837: ``Sudakov''&:(PP\to \mbox{tagged final state}+X )\mbox{ with }
838: W,Z\notin X \nonumber
839: \\ \nonumber
840: ``BN''&:(PP\to \mbox{tagged final state} +X) \mbox{ with } W,Z\in X
841: \ea
842:
843: Sudakov corrections always depress the tree level cross section \cite{tt}, while in
844: BN case the sign of the corrections can be positive or negative.
845: The results for resummed BN and Sudakov corrections to
846: $t \bar t$ hadronic cross section are
847: shown in fig. \ref{tt12}.
848: Both corrections are negative in size and more pronounced in the
849: Sudakov case.
850: The $b\bar{b}$ case has a very similar behavior: in fact, in the limit $\alpha_Y\to 0$
851: the $t\bar{t}$ and $b\bar{b}$ partonic cross sections are equal; the same holds in the
852: $t\bar{b}$, $b\bar{t}$ case.
853: Notice however that the $t\bar{b}$
854: and $b\bar{t}$ {\sl hadronic} cross sections are very different,
855: due to the different luminosities involved. For instance at
856: tree level the hadronic cross section for $t\bar{b}$ depends on
857: $L_{u\bar{d}}$ while the one for $b\bar{t}$ depends on $L_{d\bar{u}}$,
858: which is smaller.
859:
860: In the the $b\bar{t}$, $t\bar{b}$ channels the BN corrections instead {\sl
861: enhance} the cross sections. From
862: fig. \ref{angtot} we see that the BN enhancement
863: is dramatic: the cross section including
864: gauge bosons emission is more than one order of magnitude bigger than the exclusive
865: (Sudakov) one. This is due to an interesting interplay
866: between strong and weak interactions. In fact in these channels, while the
867: tree level cross sections are proportional to $\alpha_w^2$, when
868: considering BN corrections they receive big contribution from the strong
869: $O(\alpha_s^2)$ channel.
870: Moreover, the tree
871: level and the BN cross sections have different angular behavior
872: (see fig. \ref{angtot}).
873:
874: For
875: heavy quark production the leading tree level (with no $W$ emission) cross sections
876: are of order $O(\alpha_S^2)$ when diagonal in isospin
877: ($\sigma^H_{pp\rightarrow t\bar t },\;\sigma^H_{pp\rightarrow b\bar b } $),
878: while the two isospin changing one $\sigma^H_{pp\rightarrow b\bar t},
879: \;\sigma^H_{pp\rightarrow t\bar b}$
880: are $O(\alpha_W^2)$. We can summarize the pattern for the leading tree level and one
881: loop EW
882: corrected cross sections as follows:
883: \vspace{0.2cm}
884:
885: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|}
886: \hline
887: Cross sections & Isospin Structure & Tree Level ($X=0$) & BN corrections\\
888: \hline
889: & $\delta_{ij}$ & $ \alpha_s^2$ &
890: $\alpha_s^2\alpha_w\,log^2\hat{s}$\\
891: $pp\rightarrow Q_i\bar{Q}_j +X$ & & & \\
892: & $i\neq j$ & $\alpha_w^2 $& $\alpha_s^2
893: \alpha_w\,log^2\hat{s}$\\
894: \hline
895: \end{tabular}
896:
897: \vspace{0.2cm}
898: Finally, we expect analogous results for other observables in which nonabelian legs are
899: detected, such as single top
900: production.
901:
902: \vspace{.2cm}
903:
904: In this work the CTEQ5M parton distributions \cite{cteq5} have been used.
905: \section{Conclusions}
906:
907: The main point of this paper is that emission of real gauge bosons should
908: be carefully examined when considering LHC observables.
909: As we have seen, including it or
910: not may result in cross sections differing by an order of magnitude.
911:
912:
913: As explained in the text, a number of simplifications have been made: we consider the
914: proton sea to be an isospin singlet, only resummed double logs are computed and so
915: on. Therefore our main results in formulae (\ref{simple1},\ref{simple2})
916: and figs 3,4 have to be taken as first
917: order estimates. However first, more detailed calculations are feasible and not too hard
918: and second, we think that the outcome is already clear at this preliminary level: by
919: considering observables that are inclusive,
920: rather than exclusive, of weak bosons emissions, the pattern of radiative electroweak
921: corrections changes significantly. In some cases the cross sections that one wants to
922: measure are {\sl drammaticaly enhanced} (fig.4), and also differential cross sections
923: such as the angular distribution are {\sl significantly different} (fig. 4).
924:
925: While
926: we reckon that it is not entirely clear what can, and will, be measured at the
927: LHC with respect to ``soft'' final Ws and Zs emission, we think that it is worthwhile
928: opening the physics case.
929: \vspace{0.3cm}
930:
931: {\bf Acknowledgments}
932: We thank M. Ciafaloni for useful theoretical discussions and M. Grazzini for
933: help on QCD Structure Functions.
934: D.C. acknowledges Cern Theory Division where he started this work.
935:
936:
937: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% JOURNALS {no}{year}{page} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
938:
939: \def\np#1#2#3{{\sl Nucl.~Phys.\/}~{\bf B#1} {(#2) #3}} \def\spj#1#2#3{{\sl
940: Sov.~Phys.~JETP\/}~{\bf #1} {(#2) #3}} \def\plb#1#2#3{{\sl Phys.~Lett.\/}~{\bf
941: B#1} {(#2) #3}} \def\pl#1#2#3{{\sl Phys.~Lett.\/}~{\bf #1} {(#2) #3}}
942: \def\prd#1#2#3{{\sl Phys.~Rev.\/}~{\bf D#1} {(#2) #3}} \def\pr#1#2#3{{\sl
943: Phys.~Rep.\/}~{\bf #1} {(#2) #3}} \def\epjc#1#2#3{{\sl Eur.~Phys.~J.\/}~{\bf
944: C#1} {(#2) #3}} \def\ijmp#1#2#3{{\sl Int.~J.~Mod.~Phys.\/}~{\bf A#1} {(#2) #3}}
945: \def\ptps#1#2#3{{\sl Prog.~Theor.~Phys.~Suppl.\/}~{\bf #1} {(#2) #3}}
946: \def\npps#1#2#3{{\sl Nucl.~Phys.~Proc.~Suppl.\/}~{\bf #1} {(#2) #3}}
947: \def\sjnp#1#2#3{{\sl Sov.~J.~Nucl.~Phys.\/}~{\bf #1} {(#2) #3}}
948: \def\hepph#1{{\sl hep--ph}/{#1}}
949: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
950:
951: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
952:
953: \bibitem{IR}
954:
955: P.~Ciafaloni and D.~Comelli,
956: %``Sudakov enhancement of electroweak corrections,''
957: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 446} (1999) 278.
958: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809321;%%
959:
960: \bibitem{fixedSuda}
961: E. Accomando, A. Denner and S. Pozzorini,
962: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65} 073003 (2002);S.~Dittmaier and M.~Kramer,
963: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to W-boson production at hadron
964: %colliders,''
965: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 073007 (2002);
966: U.~Baur, O.~Brein, W.~Hollik, C.~Schappacher and D.~Wackeroth,
967: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to neutral-current Drell-Yan processes
968: %at hadron colliders,''
969: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 033007 (2002);
970: E. Maina, S. Moretti, M.R. Nolten and D.A. Ross,
971: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 570} 205 (2003);
972: M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,
973: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 113004 (2004),
974: %``Special features of heavy quark-antiquark pair production ratios at LHC,''
975: hep-ph/0405036 and Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 033005;
976: U.~Baur and D.~Wackeroth,
977: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to p (anti-)p $\to$ W+- $\to$ l+- nu
978: %beyond the pole approximation,''
979: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 073015 (2004);
980: J.~H.~Kuhn, A.~Kulesza, S.~Pozzorini and M.~Schulze,
981: %``Logarithmic electroweak corrections
982: %to hadronic Z + 1 jet production at large
983: %transverse momentum,''
984: %hep-ph/0408308
985: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 609}, 277 (2005);
986: E.~Accomando, A.~Denner and A.~Kaiser,
987: %``Logarithmic electroweak corrections to gauge-boson pair production at the
988: %LHC,''
989: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 706} 325 (2005);
990: E.~Accomando and A.~Kaiser,
991: % ``Electroweak corrections and anomalous triple gauge-boson couplings in W W
992: %and W Z production at the LHC,''
993: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73} (2006) 093006;
994: %hep-ph/0409247.
995: E.~Accomando, A.~Denner and C.~Meier,
996: %``Electroweak corrections to W gamma and Z gamma production at the LHC,''
997: arXiv:hep-ph/0509234;
998: W.~Hollik {\it et al.},
999: %``Electroweak physics,''
1000: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 35} 2533 (2004) ;
1001: S.~Moretti, M.~R.~Nolten and D.~A.~Ross,
1002: %``Weak corrections and high E(T) jets at Tevatron,''
1003: arXiv:hep-ph/0503152; arXiv:hep-ph/0509254; arXiv:hep-ph/0603083;
1004: M.~Beccaria, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli, F.~M.~Renard, C.~Verzegnassi,
1005: %``Logarithmic expansion of electroweak corrections to four-fermion processes in the TeV region,''
1006: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} 073005 (2000) ;
1007: %M.~Beccaria, P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,
1008: %``The role of the top mass in b production at future lepton colliders,''
1009: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} 011301 (2000);
1010: M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard, C.~Verzegnassi,
1011: %``Logarithmic SUSY electroweak effects on four-fermion processes at TeV energies,''
1012: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} 095010 (2001) ;
1013: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,
1014: %``Top quark production at future lepton colliders in the asymptotic regime,''
1015: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} 053013 (2001) ;
1016: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,
1017: %``The role of universal and non universal Sudakov logarithms in four
1018: %fermion processes at TeV energies: The one-loop approximation revisited,''
1019: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 073008 (2001);
1020: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 663}, 394 (2003);
1021: M.~Beccaria, S.~Prelovsek, F.~M.~Renard, C.~Verzegnassi,
1022: %``Top quark production at TeV energies as a potential SUSY detector,''
1023: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 053016 (2001);
1024: M.~Beccaria, M.~Melles, F.~M.~Renard, C.~Verzegnassi,
1025: %``SUSY scalar production in the electroweak Sudakov regime of lepton colliders,''
1026: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} 093007 (2002) ;
1027: M.~Beccaria, M.~Melles, F.~M.~Renard, S.~Trimarchi, C.~Verzegnassi,
1028: %``Sudakov expansions at one loop and beyond for charged scalar and
1029: % fermion pair production in SUSY models at future
1030: %linear colliders,''
1031: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 18}, 5069 (2003);
1032: M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard, S.~Trimarchi, C.~Verzegnassi,
1033: %``Charged Higgs production in the 1-TeV domain as a probe of supersymmetric models,''
1034: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} 035014 (2003) ;
1035: %M.~Beccaria, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,
1036: %``Reliability of a high energy one-loop expansion of e+ e- $\to$ W+ W- in the SM and in the MSSM,''
1037: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 663}, 394 (2003);
1038: A.~Denner and S.~Pozzorini,
1039: %``One-loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections. I: Results,''
1040: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 18}, 461 (2001) and
1041: Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 21}, 63 (2001);
1042: S.~Pozzorini,
1043: %``Electroweak Radiative Corrections At High Energies,''
1044: arXiv:hep-ph/0201077;
1045: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201077;%%;
1046: %\bibitem{twoloop}
1047: ~Hori, H.~Kawamura, J.~Kodaira,
1048: %``Electroweak Sudakov at two loop level,''
1049: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 491} 275 (2000) ;
1050: W.~Beenakker, A.~Werthenbach,
1051: %``New insights into the perturbative structure of electroweak Sudakov logarithms: Breakdown of conventional exponentiation,''
1052: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 489}, 148 (2000);
1053: A.~Denner and S.~Pozzorini,
1054: %``One-loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections. I:
1055: %Results,''
1056: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 18} 461 (2001) and
1057: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21} 63 (2001);
1058: W.~Beenakker and A.~Werthenbach,
1059: %``Electroweak two-loop Sudakov logarithms for on-shell fermions and bosons,''
1060: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 630} 3 (2002);
1061: A.~Denner, M.~Melles, S.~Pozzorini,
1062: %``Two-loop electroweak angular-dependent logarithms at high energies,''
1063: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 662}, 299 (2003);
1064: U.~Aglietti, R.~Bonciani,
1065: %``Master integrals with one massive propagator for the two-loop electroweak form factor,''
1066: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 668}, 3 (2003) and Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 698}, 277 (2004) ;
1067: ~Feucht, J.~H.~Kuhn and S.~Moch,
1068: %``Fermionic and scalar corrections for the Abelian
1069: % form factor at two loops,''
1070: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 561}, 111 (2003);
1071: B.~Feucht, J.~H.~Kuhn, A.~A.~Penin and V.~A.~Smirnov,
1072: %``Two-loop Sudakov form factor in a theory with mass gap,''
1073: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 93} 101802 (2004);
1074: A.~Denner and S.~Pozzorini,
1075: %``An algorithm for the high-energy expansion of multi-loop diagrams to
1076: %next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy,''
1077: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 717}, 48 (2005);
1078: S.~Pozzorini,
1079: %``Next-to-leading mass singularities in two-loop electroweak singlet form
1080: %factors,''
1081: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 692}, 135 (2004);
1082: B.~Jantzen, J.~H.~Kuhn, A.~A.~Penin and V.~A.~Smirnov,
1083: %``Two-loop electroweak logarithms,''
1084: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72} (2005) 051301;
1085: J.~H.~Kuhn, A.~Kulesza, S.~Pozzorini and M.~Schulze,
1086: %``One-loop weak corrections to hadronic production of Z bosons at large
1087: %transverse momenta,''
1088: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 727} (2005) 368 and arXiv:hep-ph/0508253;
1089: B.~Jantzen, J.~H.~Kuhn, A.~A.~Penin and V.~A.~Smirnov,
1090: %``Two-loop electroweak logarithms in four-fermion processes at high energy,''
1091: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 731} (2005) 188;
1092: B.~Jantzen and V.~A.~Smirnov,
1093: %``The two-loop vector form factor in the Sudakov limit,''
1094: arXiv:hep-ph/0603133.
1095:
1096:
1097: \bibitem{resumSuda}
1098: V.~S.~Fadin, L.~N.~Lipatov, A.~D.~Martin and M.~Melles,
1099: %``Resummation of double logarithms in electroweak high energy processes,''
1100: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} 094002 (2000);
1101: P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli,
1102: %``Electroweak Sudakov form factors and nonfactorizable soft QED effects at NLC energies,''
1103: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 476} 49 (2000);
1104: M.~Melles,
1105: %``Subleading Sudakov logarithms in electroweak high energy processes to all orders,''
1106: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 034003 (2001);
1107: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 014011 (2001);
1108: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 054003 (2001);
1109: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 24}, 193 (2002);
1110: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 375}, 219 (2003);
1111: %\bibitem{NLL}
1112: J.~H.~Kuhn, A.~A.~Penin and V.~A.~Smirnov,
1113: %``Summing up subleading Sudakov logarithms,''
1114: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17}, 97 (2000);
1115: J.~H.~Kuhn, S.~Moch, A.~A.~Penin, V.~A.~Smirnov,
1116: %``Next-to-next-to-leading logarithms in four-fermion electroweak processes at high energy,''
1117: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 616}, 286 (2001)
1118: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 648}, 455 (2003)].
1119:
1120: \bibitem{EWBN} M.~Ciafaloni, P.~Ciafaloni and D.~Comelli, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\
1121: {\bf 84}, 4810 (2000);
1122: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 501}, 216 (2001);
1123: Nucl.Phys. B 589 359 (2000);
1124: %``Enhanced electroweak corrections to inclusive boson fusion processes at the
1125: %TeV scale,''
1126: Nucl.Phys. {\bf B613 }, 382
1127: (2001);
1128: %\bibitem{transverse}
1129: P.~Ciafaloni, D.~Comelli and A.~Vergine, JHEP {\bf 0407}, 039 (2004).
1130: %``Sudakov electroweak effects in transversely polarized beams,''
1131: %arXiv:hep-ph/0311260.
1132:
1133: \bibitem{abelian}M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni and
1134: D. Comelli, Phys. Rev.Lett {\bf 87 }, 211802 (2001).
1135:
1136: %\bibitem{strong}
1137: %M.~Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli,
1138: % Nucl.Phys. B 589 359 (2000).
1139:
1140:
1141:
1142:
1143: \bibitem{col}
1144: %``Towards collinear evolution equations in electroweak theory,''
1145: %Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 102001 (2002)
1146: P. Ciafaloni, M. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli,
1147: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 88}, 102001 (2002);
1148: P.~Ciafaloni and D.~Comelli,
1149: %``Electroweak evolution equations,''
1150: JHEP {\bf 0511} (2005) 022.
1151:
1152:
1153:
1154: \bibitem{web}
1155: ``QCD and Collider Physics''
1156: (Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology)
1157: by R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling, B. R. Webber, T. Ericson (Series Editor), P. Y. Landshoff (Series Editor).
1158:
1159:
1160:
1161: \bibitem{tt}
1162: M.~Beccaria, S.~Bentvelsen, M.~Cobal, F.~M.~Renard and C.~Verzegnassi,
1163: %``Special supersymmetric features of large invariant mass unpolarized and
1164: %polarized top antitop production at LHC,''
1165: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 073003;
1166: S.~Moretti, M.~R.~Nolten and D.~A.~Ross,
1167: %``Weak corrections to gluon-induced top-antitop hadro-production,''
1168: arXiv:hep-ph/0603083.
1169:
1170: \bibitem{cteq5}
1171: H.~L.~Lai {\it et al.} [CTEQ Collaboration],
1172: %``Global {QCD} analysis of parton structure of the nucleon: CTEQ5 parton
1173: %distributions,''
1174: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 12} (2000) 375.
1175: \end{thebibliography}
1176: \begin{figure}
1177: \centering
1178: \includegraphics[width=15cm] {tt1.eps}
1179: \includegraphics[width=15cm] {tt2.eps}
1180: \caption{\label{tt12}
1181: Sudakov and BN electroweak corrections at Leading Log order for the
1182: process $PP\rightarrow t\bar t$ (similar results hold for
1183: $PP\rightarrow b\bar b$) in the massless limit. Top: effects of radiative corrections on
1184: $\frac{d^2\sigma}{d\hat{s}d\cos\theta}$ at $\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}$, $\hat{s}$ being the
1185: partonic c.m. energy (which is also the $t \bar{t}$ invariant mass) and
1186: $\theta$ the partonic reference frame scattering angle. Bottom: the same for $
1187: \frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{s}}$, integrated over $\theta$ for $\pt>400$ GeV.
1188: }
1189: \end{figure}
1190: \begin{figure}
1191: \centering
1192: \includegraphics[width=15cm] {ang.eps}
1193: \includegraphics[width=15cm] {tot.eps}
1194: \caption{\label{angtot}
1195: Top: angular dependence at fixed energy ($\sqrt{\hat
1196: s}=2000$ GeV in the partonic frame) of the LL BN cross
1197: section (red dashed line) and of the Sudakov one for $t\bar{b}$ production (blue
1198: continuous line).
1199: Bottom: $\sqrt{\hat s}$ dependence of the ratio of BN
1200: and Sudakov cross sections for $p_{\perp}\geq 400$ GeV. Dashed (red) line for
1201: $b\bar{t}$, continuous (blue) line for $t\bar{b}$.
1202: }
1203: \end{figure}
1204: \begin{figure}
1205: \centering
1206: \includegraphics[width=15cm] {absolute.eps}
1207: \caption{\label{numerics}
1208: The differential cross section for $b\bar{t}$ production,
1209: $\frac{d\sigma}{d\hat{s}}$ in $\frac{pb}{GeV^2}$, integrated over $\theta$ for $\pt>400$ GeV.
1210: Dashed (red) line is for the fully inclusive LL BN case, while
1211: continuous (blue) line for the exclusive Sudakov case.
1212: }
1213: \end{figure}
1214: \end{document}