1: \documentclass{appolb}
2: %\usepackage{epsfig}
3: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.13cm}{~\shortstack{$<$ \\[-0.07cm] $\sim$}}~}
4: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.13cm}{~\shortstack{$>$ \\[-0.07cm] $\sim$}}~}
5: \newcommand{\dx}{\mbox{\rm d}}
6: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}
7: \newcommand{\lra}{\longrightarrow}
8: \newcommand{\ee}{e^+e^-}
9: \newcommand{\gam}{\gamma \gamma}
10: \newcommand{\tb}{\tan \beta}
11: \newcommand{\s}{\smallskip}
12: \newcommand{\nn}{\noindent}
13: \newcommand{\non}{\nonumber}
14: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{eqnarray}}
15: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{eqnarray}}
16: \newcommand{\mchi}{{m_{\chi_1^0}}}
17: \newcommand{\lsp}{{\chi_1^0}}
18: %
19: \usepackage{graphics,cite,amssymb,epsfig,float,psfrag,rotating}
20: \usepackage[usenames,dvips]{color}
21: %
22:
23: % epsfig package included for placing EPS figures in the text
24: %------------------------------------------------------
25:
26: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
27: % %
28: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
29: % %
30: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31: \begin{document}
32: % \eqsec % uncomment this line to get equations numbered by (sec.num)
33: \title{Tests of the Higgs properties at the next colliders%
34: \thanks{Presented at PLC2005 Warsaw and Kazimierz Lectures,
35: 5/09--08/09 2005.}%
36: % you can use '\\' to break lines
37: }
38: \author{Abdelhak DJOUADI
39: \address{LPT, Universit\'e Paris--Sud, F--91405 Orsay, France}
40: %\and
41: %the Name(s) of other Author(s)
42: %\address{and their affiliation}
43: }
44: \maketitle
45: \begin{abstract}
46: We discuss the tests of the fundamental properties of the Standard Model
47: Higgs boson that can be performed in the next round of experiments.
48: \end{abstract}
49: \PACS{ 12.15.-y, 12.60.Fr, 14.80.Bn, 13.66.Jn}
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52:
53: The search for Higgs bosons is the primary mission of present and future
54: high--energy colliders. Detailed theoretical and experimental studies performed
55: in the last few years, have shown that the single neutral Higgs boson that is
56: predicted in the Standard Model (SM) \cite{Revue} could be discovered at the
57: upgraded Tevatron, if it is relatively light and if enough integrated luminosity
58: is collected \cite{Tevatron,Houches} and can be detected at the LHC
59: \cite{Houches,LHC} over its entire mass range 115 GeV $\lsim M_H \lsim 1$ TeV
60: in many redundant channels.
61:
62: Should we then declare that we have done our homework and wait peacefully for
63: the LHC to start operation? Well, discovering the Higgs boson is not the entire
64: story, and another goal, just as important, would be to probe the electroweak
65: symmetry breaking mechanism in all its facets. Once the Higgs boson is found,
66: the next step would therefore be to perform very high precision measurements to
67: explore all its fundamental properties. To achieve this goal in great detail,
68: one needs to measure all possible cross sections and decay branching ratios of
69: the Higgs bosons to derive their masses, their total decay widths, their
70: couplings to the other particles and their self--couplings, their spin--parity
71: quantum numbers, etc. This needs very precise theoretical predictions and
72: more involved theoretical and experimental studies. In particular, all possible
73: production and decay channels of the Higgs particles, not only the dominant and
74: widely studied ones allowing for clear discovery, should be investigated. This
75: also requires complementary detailed studies at future $\ee$ linear colliders,
76: where the clean environment and the expected high luminosity allow for very
77: high precision measurements \cite{e+e-,Tesla}.
78:
79: In this talk, I summarize the studies of the Higgs profile that can be
80: performed at the LHC and ILC. Most of the material presented here relies on the
81: detailed discussion given in Refs.~\cite{Revue} to which we refer for details.
82:
83:
84: \section{Higgs production and tests at the LHC}
85:
86: \nn The production mechanisms for the SM Higgs boson at hadron colliders are
87: \vspace*{-5mm}
88: \begin{eqnarray}
89: \begin{array}{lccl}
90: (a) & \ \ {\rm gluon~gluon~fusion} & \ \ gg \ \ \ra & H \nonumber \\
91: (b) & \ \ {\rm association~with}~W/Z & \ \ q\bar{q} \ \ \ra & V + H \nonumber\\
92: (c) & \ \ WW/ZZ~{\rm fusion} & \ \ VV \ \ra & H \nonumber \\
93: (d) & \ \ {\rm association~with~}Q\bar{Q} & gg,q\bar{q}\ra & Q\bar{Q}+H
94: \nonumber
95: \end{array}
96: \end{eqnarray}
97: \vspace*{-4mm}
98:
99:
100: The cross sections are shown in Fig.~1 for the LHC with $\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV. Let
101: us briefly discuss the main features of each channel at the LHC [for the
102: various Higgs decay modes; see Ref.~\cite{Decays} for details]:
103:
104: \begin{figure}[!h]
105: \begin{center}
106: \vspace*{-.6cm}
107: \psfig{figure=pp-H-LHC.ps,width=9cm}
108: \end{center}
109: \vspace*{-8.cm}
110: \caption[]{The Higgs boson production cross sections at the LHC in the
111: dominant mechanisms as functions of $M_H$; from Ref.~\cite{Revue}.}
112: \vspace*{-2mm}
113: \end{figure}
114:
115: {\bf a)} The dominant process, up to masses $M_H \lsim 700$ GeV, is by far the
116: $gg$ fusion mechanism. The most promising signals are $H \to \gamma \gamma
117: (WW^*)$ in the mass range below 130 GeV (arround 160 GeV); for larger masses
118: it is $H \ra Z Z^{(*)} \ra 4 \ell^\pm$, with $\ell=e,\mu$, which from $M_H \gsim
119: 500$ GeV can be complemented by $H \to ZZ \to \nu\bar{\nu} \ell^+ \ell^-$ and
120: $H \to WW \to \nu \ell jj$. The higher order QCD corrections should be taken
121: into account since they lead to an increase of the cross sections by a factor
122: of $\sim 2$; see Ref.~\cite{Revue} for a review.
123:
124: {\bf b)} The $WW/ZZ$ fusion mechanism has the second largest cross section [a
125: few picobarns for $M_H \lsim 250$ GeV] and rather small backgrounds [comparable
126: to the signal] allowing precision measurements, one can use forward--jet
127: tagging, mini--jet veto for low luminosity, and one can trigger on the central
128: Higgs decay products \cite{Dieter}. It has been shown that at least the decay $H
129: \to \tau^+ \tau^-$ as well as $H \to \gamma \gamma , WW^*$ can be detected and
130: could allow for Higgs coupling measurements \cite{Houches,Dieter}.
131:
132: {\bf c)} The associated production with gauge bosons, with $H \to b\bar{b}$ is
133: the most relevant mechanism at the Tevatron \cite{Tevatron} but at the LHC,
134: this process [also with the decays $H \to \gamma \gamma$] is challenging
135: and needs a large luminosity.
136:
137: {\bf d)} Finally, Higgs boson production in association with top quarks, with $H
138: \to \gamma \gamma$ or $b\bar{b}$, could be observed at the LHC with sufficient
139: luminosity and would allow the measurement of the important top Yukawa coupling.
140:
141:
142: Let us now turn to the measurements that can be performed at the LHC. We will
143: mostly rely on the summaries given in Refs.~\cite{Revue,Houches,Dieter,LHC-LC}.
144: In most cases, a large, ${\cal O} (200)$ fb$^{-1}$, integrated
145: luminosity is assumed.
146:
147: $\bullet$ The Higgs boson mass can be measured with a very good accuracy. For
148: $M_H \lsim 400$ GeV, where $\Gamma_H$ is not too large, a precision of
149: $\Delta M_H/M_H \sim 0.1$\% can be achieved in $H \to ZZ^{(*)} \to 4\ell^\pm$.
150: In the ``low--mass" range, a slight improvement can be obtained by considering
151: $H \to \gamma \gamma$. For $M_H \gsim 400$ GeV, the precision starts to
152: deteriorate because of the smaller rates. However, a precision of the order of
153: 1\% can still be obtained up to $M_H\sim 800$ GeV if theoretical errors, such
154: as width effects, are not taken into account.
155:
156: $\bullet$ Using the same process, $H \to ZZ^{(*)} \to 4\ell^\pm$, the total
157: Higgs width can be measured for masses above $M_H \gsim 200$ GeV, when it is
158: large enough. While the precision is very poor near this mass value [a factor
159: of 2], it improves to reach the level of $\sim 5$\% around $M_H \sim 400$
160: GeV. Here again, the theoretical errors are not taken into account.
161:
162: $\bullet$ The Higgs boson spin can be measured by looking at angular
163: correlations between the fermions in the final states in $H \to VV \to 4f$.
164: However the cross sections are rather small and the environment
165: too difficult. Only the measurement of the decay planes of the two $Z$ bosons
166: decaying into four leptons seems promising. The Higgs CP properties and the
167: structure of the $HVV$ coupling can be also determined in the fusion process,
168: $qq \to qqH$, by looking at the azimuthal dependence of the two outgoing
169: forward tagging jets. The analysis is independent of the Higgs mass and decay
170: modes but might be difficult because of background problems.
171:
172: $\bullet$ The direct measurement of the Higgs couplings to gauge bosons and
173: fermions is possible, but with rather poor accuracy. This is due to the limited
174: statistics, the large backgrounds, and the theoretical uncertainties from the
175: parton densities and the higher--order radiative corrections. To reduce some
176: uncertainties, it is more interesting to measure ratios of cross sections where
177: the normalization cancels out. The cross sections times branching ratios
178: which can be measured in various channels at the LHC are shown in the left-hand
179: side of Fig.~2 for Higgs masses below 200 GeV \cite{Dieter}. A statistical
180: precision of the order of 10 to 20\% can be achieved in some channels, while the
181: vector boson fusion process, $pp \to H qq \to W W qq$, leads to accuracies of
182: the order of a few percent. Under some assumptions, these $\sigma \times {\rm
183: BR}$ can be translated into Higgs partial widths in the various decay channels
184: $\Gamma_X \equiv \Gamma( H\to XX)$ \cite{Dieter}, which are proportional to the
185: square of the Higgs couplings, $g_{HXX}^2$. The expected accuracies, at the
186: level of 10 to 30\%, are shown in the right--hand side of Fig.~2. One can
187: indirectly measure the total Higgs width $\Gamma$, and thus derive the absolute
188: values of the partial widths $\Gamma_X$, by making additional assumptions,
189: besides $g_{HWW}/g_{HZZ}$ universality
190:
191: \begin{figure}[!h]
192: \vspace*{-2mm}
193: \begin{center}
194: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm,angle=90]{LHC-meas-ratio.ps} \hspace*{1cm}
195: \includegraphics[width=7.0cm,angle=90]{LHC-meas-Gammai.ps}
196: \end{center}
197: \vspace*{-.5cm}
198: \caption[]{Relative accuracy expected at the LHC with a luminosity of
199: 200 fb$^{-1}$ for various ratios of Higgs partial widths (left) and
200: indirect determination of partial and total widths $\tilde\Gamma_i$ and
201: $\Gamma$ (right); from Ref.~\cite{Dieter}.}
202: \vspace*{-.2cm}
203: \end{figure}
204:
205: $\bullet$ The trilinear Higgs boson self--coupling $\lambda_{HHH}$ is too
206: difficult to be measured at the LHC because of the smallness of the $gg\to HH$
207: [and a fortiori the $VV \to HH$ and $qq \to HHV$] cross sections and the very
208: large backgrounds; see Ref.~\cite{Revue,LHC-LC} for a recent work and
209: references.
210:
211: Note that some of the measurements discussed previously would greatly benefit
212: from an increase of the LHC luminosity (SLHC) or from an increase of the energy
213: (VLHC); see Ref.~\cite{SLHC+VLHC} for details.
214:
215:
216: \section{Higgs production and tests at the ILC}
217:
218: At $\ee$ linear colliders operating in the 300--1000 GeV energy range, the main
219: production mechanisms for SM--like Higgs particles are
220: \begin{eqnarray}
221: \begin{array}{lccl}
222: (a) & \ \ {\rm Higgs\!-\!strahlung \ process} & \ \ \ee & \ra (Z) \ra Z+H \non \\
223: (b) & \ \ WW \ {\rm fusion \ process} & \ \ \ee & \ra \bar{\nu} \ \nu \ (WW)
224: \ra \bar{\nu} \ \nu \ + H \non \\
225: (c) & \ \ ZZ \ {\rm fusion \ process} & \ \ \ee & \ra e^+ e^- (ZZ) \ra
226: e^+ e^- + H \non \\
227: (d) & \ \ {\rm radiation~off~tops} & \ \ \ee & \ra (\gamma,Z) \ra t\bar{t}+H
228: \non \\
229: (e) & \ \ {\rm double~Higgs\!-\!strahlung} & \ \ \ee & \ra (Z) \ra Z+HH
230: \non
231: \end{array}
232: \end{eqnarray}
233:
234: The Higgs--strahlung cross section scales as $1/s$ and therefore dominates at
235: low energies, while the $WW$ fusion mechanism has a cross section that rises
236: like $\log(s/M_H^2)$ and dominates at high energies. At $\sqrt{s} \sim 500$ GeV,
237: the two processes have approximately the same cross sections, ${\cal O}
238: (100~{\rm fb})$ for the interesting range 100 GeV $\lsim M_H \lsim$ 200 GeV, as
239: shown in Fig.~3.With $ {\cal L} \sim 500$ fb$^{-1}$, as it was expected e.g.\ in
240: the TESLA design \cite{Tesla}, approximately 25.000 events per year can be
241: collected in each channel for a $M_H \sim 150$ GeV. This sample is more than
242: sufficient to discover the Higgs boson and to study its properties in detail.
243: Higgs masses of the order of 80\% of the c.m. energy can be probed, which means
244: that a 800 GeV collider can cover almost the entire mass range in the SM, $M_H
245: \lsim 650$ GeV. The subleading processes (c)--(e) have orders of magnitude
246: smaller rates but they are very important for precision tests of the Higgs
247: properties as discussed below.
248:
249: \begin{figure}[h]
250: \vspace{-1.1cm}
251: \begin{center}
252: \hspace{-1.5cm}
253: \includegraphics[width=13.cm]{ee-HSM.eps}
254: \end{center}
255: \vspace{-11.4cm}
256: \caption[]{Production cross sections of the SM Higgs boson in $e^+ e^-$
257: collisions in the main and subdominant processes at $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV (left)
258: and 1 TeV (right) \cite{Revue}.}
259: \vspace{-.2cm}
260: \end{figure}
261:
262:
263:
264: The determination of the Higgs properties can be done in great detail in the
265: clean environment of the ILC \cite{e+e-,Tesla}. In the following, relying on
266: analyses done for TESLA \cite{Tesla} [where the references for the original
267: studies can be found], we summarize the measurements in the case of the SM
268: Higgs.
269:
270: $\bullet$ The measurement of the recoil $f\bar{f}$ mass in the strahlung
271: process, $\ee \ra ZH\ra H f\bar{f}$ allows a very good determination of $M_H$:
272: at $\sqrt{s}=350$ GeV with ${\cal L}= 500$ fb$^{-1}$, a precision of $ \Delta
273: M_H \sim 50$ MeV can be reached for $M_H \sim 120$ GeV. Accuracies $\Delta M_H
274: \sim 80$ MeV can also be reached for $M_H=150$ and 180 GeV when the Higgs decays
275: mostly into gauge bosons.
276:
277: $\bullet$ The angular distribution of the $Z/H$ in the strahlung process,
278: $\propto \sin^2\theta$ at high energy, characterizes the production of a
279: $J^P=0^+$ particle. The Higgs spin--parity quantum numbers can also be checked
280: by looking at correlations in the production $\ee \ra HZ \ra 4f$ or decay $H \ra
281: WW^* \ra 4f$ processes, as well as in the channel $H \ra \tau^+ \tau^-$ for $M_H
282: \lsim 140$ GeV. An unambiguous test of the Higgs CP nature can be made by
283: analyzing the spin--correlation in $H \to \tau^+ \tau^¯$ and possibly in the
284: process $\ee \ra t \bar{t}H$ [or at laser photon colliders in the loop--induced
285: process $\gamma \gamma \ra H$].
286:
287: $\bullet$ The Higgs couplings to $ZZ/WW$ bosons [which are predicted to be
288: proportional to the masses] can be directly determined by measuring the
289: production cross sections in the $\ee \ra H \ell^+ \ell^-$ and $H\nu \bar{\nu}$
290: processes. A precision less than $\sim$ 3\% at $\sqrt{s}\sim 500$ GeV with
291: ${\cal L}= 500$ fb$^{-1}$ can be achieved. This leads to an accuracy of $\lsim$
292: 1.5\% on the $HVV$ couplings.
293:
294: $\bullet$ The measurement of the Higgs branching ratios (BRs) is of utmost
295: importance. For $M_H \lsim 130$ GeV a large variety of ratios can be measured:
296: the $b\bar{b}, c\bar{c}$ and $\tau^+ \tau^-$ BRs allow us to derive the
297: relative Higgs--fermion couplings and to check the prediction that they are
298: proportional to the masses. BR$(gg)$ is sensitive to the $t\bar{t}H$ coupling
299: and to new strongly interacting particles. BR$(WW)$ allows an indirect
300: measurement of the $HWW$ coupling, while BR($\gamma \gamma$) is also important
301: since it is sensitive to new particles. Measurements at the level of a few
302: percent for most of the BRs at $M_H \sim 130$ GeV can be made [except for
303: $\gamma \gamma$ and $ZZ^*$ where the errors are of ${\cal O}(20\%)$].
304:
305: $\bullet$ The Higgs coupling to top quarks, which is the largest coupling in the
306: SM, is directly accessible in the $\ee \ra t\bar{t}H$ process, although the
307: rates are low [see Fig.~3]. For $M_H \lsim 130$ GeV, $g_{Htt}$ can
308: be measured with a precision of less than 5\% at $\sqrt{s}\sim 800$ GeV with
309: $ {\cal L} \sim 1$ ab$^{-1}$.
310:
311: $\bullet$ The total width of the Higgs boson, for masses less than $\sim 200$
312: GeV, is so small that it cannot be resolved experimentally. However, the
313: measurement of BR($H \ra WW$) allows an indirect determination of $\Gamma_H$,
314: since the $HWW$ coupling can be determined from the measurement of the Higgs
315: cross section in the $WW$ fusion process. [$\Gamma_{\rm tot}$ can
316: also be derived by measuring the $\gamma \gamma \to H$ cross section at a
317: $\gamma\gamma$ collider or BR($H \to \gamma \gamma)$ in $\ee$].
318:
319: $\bullet$ Finally, the measurement of the trilinear Higgs self--coupling, which
320: is the first non--trivial test of the Higgs potential, is accessible in the
321: double Higgs production processes $\ee \ra ZHH$ [and in the $\ee \ra \nu
322: \bar{\nu}HH$ process at high energies]. Despite its smallness [see Fig.~3], the
323: cross section can be determined with an accuracy of the order of 20\% at a 500
324: GeV collider if a high luminosity, ${\cal L} \sim 1$ ab$^{-1}$, is
325: available.
326:
327: An illustration of the experimental accuracies that can be achieved in the
328: determination of the mass, CP--nature, total decay width and the various
329: couplings of the Higgs boson for $M_H=120$ and 140 GeV is shown in Tab.1 for
330: $\sqrt{s}=350$ GeV [for $M_H$ and the CP nature] and $500$ GeV [for
331: $\Gamma_{\rm tot}$ and all couplings except for $g_{Htt}$] and for $\int {\cal
332: L}=500$ fb$^{-1}$ [except for $g_{Htt}$ where $\sqrt{s}=1$ TeV and $\int {\cal
333: L}=1$ ab$^{-1}$ are assumed].
334:
335:
336: \begin{table}[htbp]
337: \vspace*{-4mm}
338: \begin{center}
339: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
340: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}\hline
341: $M_H$ (GeV) & $\Delta M_H$ & $\Delta {\rm CP}$ & $\Gamma_{\rm tot}$ \\ \hline
342: $120$ & $\pm 0.033$ & $\pm 3.8$ & $\pm 6.1$\\ \hline
343: $140$ & $\pm 0.05$ & $-$ & $\pm 4.5$\\ \hline
344: \end{tabular}
345: %
346: \vspace*{2mm}
347: %
348: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
349: $M_H$ (GeV) & $g_{HWW}$ & $g_{HZZ}$ & $g_{Htt}$ & $g_{Hbb}$ & $g_{Hcc}$ &
350: $g_{H\tau \tau}$ & $g_{HHH}$ \\ \hline
351: %
352: $120$ & $\pm 1.2$ & $\pm 1.2$ & $\pm 3.0$ & $\pm 2.2$
353: & $\pm 3.7$ & $\pm 3.3$ & $\pm 17$ \\ \hline
354: $140$ & $\pm 2.0$ & $\pm 1.3$ & $\pm 6.1$ & $\pm 2.2$ & $\pm 10$ & $\pm 4.8$ &
355: $\pm 23$ \\ \hline
356: \end{tabular}
357: \vspace*{-2mm}
358: \end{center}
359: \vspace*{-2mm}
360: \caption{Relative accuracies (in \%) on the Higgs boson mass, its CP mixture and
361: total width (top) and on its couplings (bottom) obtained at TESLA with
362: $\sqrt{s}=350,500$ GeV and $\int {\cal L}=500$ fb$^{-1}$ (except for top);
363: Ref.~\cite{Tesla}. }
364: \vspace*{-2mm}
365: \end{table}
366:
367:
368:
369: \section{Conclusions}
370:
371:
372:
373: The detection of a Higgs particle is possible at the upgraded Tevatron for $M_H
374: \lsim 130$ GeV and is not a problem at the LHC where even much heavier Higgs
375: bosons can be probed. Relatively light Higgs bosons can also be found at future
376: $\ee$ colliders with c.m.\,energies $\sqrt{s} \gsim 350$ GeV; the signals are
377: very clear, and the expected high luminosity allows a thorough investigation of
378: their fundamental properties. Some of this discussion can of course be
379: extended to the the lightest Higgs particle of the minimal SUSY extension of the
380: SM (MSSM), which is expected to have a mass smaller than 140 GeV; see
381: Ref.~\cite{Mh}. In fact, a very important issue once Higgs particles are
382: found, will be to probe in all its facets the electroweak symmetry breaking
383: mechanism. In many aspects, the searches and tests at future $\ee$ colliders
384: are complementary to those that will be performed at the LHC. An example can be
385: given in the context of the MSSM.
386:
387:
388: \begin{figure}[ht!]
389: \vspace*{-.2cm}
390: \begin{center}
391: %\begin{tabular}{c c}
392: \epsfig{file=Tesla-fig2502.eps,width=0.5\linewidth}
393: %\hspace*{-2mm}&\hspace*{-2mm}
394: %\epsfig{file=figure13b.eps,width=0.5\linewidth} \\
395: %\end{tabular}
396: \vspace*{-.3cm}
397: \caption{Higgs boson coupling determinations at TESLA for $M_H=120$ GeV with
398: 500~fb$^{-1}$ of data, the $1\sigma$ LHC constraint and the expected
399: deviations in the MSSM for various $M_A$ ranges are also shown; from Ref.~\cite{Tesla}. }
400: \end{center}
401: \label{fig:hfitter}
402: \vspace*{-.8cm}
403: \end{figure}
404:
405: In constrained scenarios, such as the minimal supergravity model, the heavier
406: $H,A$ and $H^\pm$ bosons tend to have masses of the order of several hundred GeV
407: and therefore will escape detection at both the LHC and linear collider. In this
408: parameter range, the $h$ boson couplings to fermions and gauge bosons will be
409: almost SM--like and, because of the relatively poor accuracy of the measurements
410: at the LHC, it would be difficult to resolve between the SM and MSSM (or
411: extended) scenarios. At the ILC, the Higgs couplings can be measured with a
412: great accuracy, allowing a distinction between the SM and the MSSM Higgs boson
413: to be made close to the decoupling limit, i.e. for pseudoscalar boson masses,
414: which are not accessible at the LHC. This is exemplified in Fig.~4, where the
415: accuracy in the determination of the Higgs couplings to $t\bar{t}$ and $WW$
416: states are displayed at LHC and ILC, together with the predicted values in the
417: MSSM for different values of $M_A$. At the ILC, the two scenarios can be
418: distinguished for pseudoscalar Higgs masses up to 1 TeV and, thus, beyond the
419: LHC reach.\s
420:
421:
422: {\bf Acknowledgements:} I thank the organizers of the conference, in particular
423: Maria Krawczyk, for the invitation and for the nice atmosphere.\vspace*{-2mm}
424:
425:
426: \begin{thebibliography}{199}
427:
428: \bibitem{Revue} For recent reviews on the Higgs sector in the SM and MSSM and a
429: complete set of references, see: A. Djouadi, hep-ph/0503172 and hep-ph/0503173.
430:
431: \bibitem{Tevatron} M. Carena et al., hep-ph/0010338.
432:
433: \bibitem{Houches} Procs. of Les Houches, A. Djouadi et al., hep-ph/0002258;
434: D. Cavalli et al., hep-ph/0203056; K. Assamagan et al., hep-ph/0406152.
435:
436: \bibitem{LHC} CMS TR, CERN/LHCC/94-38; ATLAS TDR, CERN/LHCC/99-15;
437: G. Branson et al. (CMS and ATLAS), Eur. Phys. J. direct C4 (2002) N1;
438: V. B\"usher and K. Jakobs, hep-ph/0504099.
439:
440: \bibitem{e+e-} E. Accomando, Phys. Rept. 299 (1998) 1; American LC WG,
441: hep-ex/0106057; ACFA LC Higgs WG, hep-ph/0301172.
442:
443: \bibitem{Tesla} TESLA Technical Design Report, Part III, hep-ph/0106315. For
444: updates see, K. Desch et al., hep-ph/0311092, T. Barklow, hep-ph/0312268;
445: J.-C. Brient, Note LC-PHSM-2002-03; S. Kanemura, hep-ph/0410133.
446:
447: \bibitem{Decays} A. Djouadi et al., Z. Phys. C70 (1996) 427; Z. Phys. C70 (1996)
448: 435; Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56.
449:
450: \bibitem{Dieter} D. Zeppenfeld et al., Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 013009; M.
451: D\"uhrssen et al. Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 113009; M. D\"uhrssen, ATLAS Note
452: PHYS-2003-030.
453:
454: \bibitem{LHC-LC} G. Weiglein et al. (LHC--LC Study Group),
455: hep-ph/0410364.
456:
457:
458: \bibitem{SLHC+VLHC} F. Gianotti et al., hep-ph/0204087; U. Baur et al.,
459: hep-ph/0201227.
460:
461: \bibitem{Mh} For recent discussions, see
462: G.~Degrassi et al., Eur. Phys. J. C28 (2003) 133;
463: B. Allanach et al., JHEP 0409 (2004) 044.
464:
465:
466: \end{thebibliography}
467: \end{document}
468:
469: