1: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[12pt]{article}
3: \documentclass[showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,latexsym,times}
5: \usepackage{citesort}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
7: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
8: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
9: \begin{document}
10: \preprint{ASC-LMU 03/06}
11:
12: \title{Grand Unification in the $SO(10)$ Model}
13: \author{Alp Deniz \"Ozer and Harald Fritzsch }
14: \affiliation{Arnold Sommerfeld Center, University of Munich
15: Theresienstr.37, DE-80333 M\"unchen }
16:
17:
18:
19: \date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
20: % but any date may be explicitly specified
21:
22:
23: \begin{abstract}
24: Extrapolating the coupling strengths to very high energies, one
25: finds that they do not converge to a single coupling constant, as
26: expected in the simplest gauge theory of Grand Unification, the
27: $SU(5)$ theory.
28:
29: We find that the coupling constants do converge, provided that two
30: new intermediate energy scales are introduced, the energies where
31: the group $SU(4)$, containing the color group, and the
32: right-isospin gauge group are spontaneously broken down.
33:
34:
35:
36:
37:
38: \end{abstract}
39:
40: \pacs{11.15.Ex,11.10.Gh} % PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
41: % Classification Scheme.
42: \keywords{Coupling unification, SO(10) GUT} %Use showkeys class option if keyword
43: %display desired
44:
45:
46: \maketitle
47:
48: \subsection{Introduction}
49:
50:
51: The Standard Model describes the electromagnetic, weak and strong
52: gauge interactions and is based on the group $G_{sm} \equiv
53: SU(3)_C \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$
54: ~\cite{Salam:1964ry,Weinberg:1967tq,Salam:1968rm,Glashow:1961tr,Fritzsch:2002jv,Fritzsch:1973pi,Weinberg:1973un,Glashow:1970gm,'tHooft:1972fi}.
55: Due to vacuum polarization effects the coupling strengths of the
56: three gauge interactions depend on the momenta of the
57: interaction~\cite{Aitchison}. The renormalization group formalism
58: gives rise to the so-called running coupling
59: constants~\cite{Georgi:1974yf}. Consequently, the coupling
60: constants are functions of the energy $Q$. At a few GeV, the
61: strengths of the weak and electromagnetic interactions are equal
62: to $\alpha_W \cong 1/30$ and $\alpha \cong 1/137$, whereas the
63: strong interaction strength varies in the range $2-100$ GeV as
64: $\alpha_s \approx 0.15 - 0.1 $~\cite{groom:2000}. These three
65: coupling strengths differ from each other in value. However the
66: weak and the electromagnetic gauge interactions become gradually
67: comparable at the Fermi energy scale $\approx 246$ GeV. As the
68: electroweak gauge symmetry $ SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$ is
69: spontaneously broken
70: down~\cite{Goldstone:1961eq,Goldstone:1962es,Higgs:1964pj,Higgs:1964ia,Higgs:1966ev}
71: at $(\sqrt{2} \, G_F)^{-1/2} \approx 246 $ GeV through a Higgs
72: doublet whose electrically neutral component acquires a non-zero
73: vacuum expectation value, the electrically neutral gauge fields
74: undergo a mixing so that the resulting massless gauge field
75: couples to the electromagnetic current. Thereby the
76: electromagnetic and the weak coupling strengths become related
77: through a mixing angle~\cite{Weinberg:1971nd}. We have
78: \begin{equation}
79: \sqrt{\alpha} = \sqrt{\alpha_W} \sin \theta_W = \sqrt{\alpha_Y} \cos
80: \theta_W
81: \end{equation}
82: Hence the mixing angle describes a {\it partial unification} of the
83: two distinct interactions~\cite{Weinberg:1979pi}.
84: %\begin{figure}[t]
85: %\begin{center}
86: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{sm}
87: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{sm_with_H}
88: %\end{center}
89: %\caption{Running of the coupling strengths without contribution of
90: %Higgs scalars (on the left) and with contribution of one Higgs
91: %doublet (on the right).} \label{sm-running}
92: %\end{figure}
93: The non-Abelian nature of the weak and the strong interactions give
94: rise to self interactions among the gauge
95: fields~\cite{Politzer:1973fx,Gross:1973id,Politzer:1974fr} in which
96: the self-coupling vertices cause an {\it anti-screening} effect.
97: The couplings strengths decrease with increasing $Q$. In
98: the contrary, the coupling strength of an Abelian interaction
99: increases with increasing energy. One finds
100: \begin{equation}\label{ren}
101: \frac{1}{g^{2}_i(\mu)} = \frac{1}{g^{2}_{i}(Q)} + 2b_i \ln
102: \frac{Q}{\mu} + \text{higher orders}
103: \end{equation}
104: where $g_i(\mu)$ and $g_i(Q)$ are the measured strength of $g_i$ at
105: the energy scale $\mu$ and $Q$ respectively. Formally the
106: renormalization of any of the gauge coupling $g_i$ depends on the
107: dimension of the unitary gauge group to which the coupling is
108: assigned. This property is contained in the $b_i$ functions which
109: get contributions from gauge bosons, fermion loops and scalar
110: bosons~\cite{Jones:1974mm}. If only the gauge bosons and fermion
111: loop contributions to vacuum polarization are taken into account one
112: obtains
113: \begin{equation}
114: b_N =\frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \left[ -\frac{11}{3}N + \frac{4}{3}n_g\right]
115: \end{equation}
116: where $N > 1$ is related with $SU(N)$ and $n_g = 3$ indicates the
117: number of fermion generations. Using the equations given above,
118: the values of $\alpha , \alpha_W , \alpha_Y$ at the {\it Fermi
119: scale} can be extrapolated towards higher energy scales. They
120: converge with increasing energy $Q$ and get very close in the
121: energy interval $10^{13}$ GeV to $10^{17}$ GeV. But a common
122: intersection of the three coupling strengths does not occur.
123: However the convergence of the coupling strengths suggests a
124: unification in which all gauge interactions posses the same
125: strength at some characteristic energy scale.
126:
127: One possibility is to embed $G_{SM}$ into a gauge group that has a
128: single gauge coupling. The simplest possible choice would be the
129: $SU(5)$~\cite{Georgi:1974sy,Georgi:1974my} which has the same rank
130: as $G_{sm}$. Besides the gluons, the $W$, $Z$ and $\gamma$ there
131: are lepto-quark gauge bosons in the theory. (they can transform
132: quarks into leptons). Consequently they can mediate nucleon
133: decay~\cite{Gell-Mann:1976pg,Machacek:1979tx}, giving rise to
134: physics beyond the standard model~\cite{Weinberg:1979sa}. We
135: denote them with $Y_\alpha,Y^\prime_\alpha$, where $\alpha$
136: denotes $SU(3)$-color. Their charges are shown in Table.
137: \ref{qnbosons}. The lifetime of the proton to decay into a $\pi^0
138: \, e^+$ can be estimated as
139: \begin{equation}
140: \tau_p \propto \frac{M^4_G}{\alpha^2_G m^5_p}
141: \end{equation}
142: where $m_p$ is the proton mass, $M_G$ is the lepto-quark gauge
143: boson mass and $\alpha_G$ is the coupling strength at
144: $M_G$~\cite{Goldman:1979ij,Ross:1980gh}. The proton life time is
145: sensitive to the gauge boson masses that mediate the decay
146: process~\cite{Ross:1980gh}\cite{Goldman:1980ah}\cite{Goldhaber:1980dn}\cite{Langacker:1992qb}.
147: A grand unification mass scale should not lie lower than $M_G \sim
148: 10^{15}$ GeV. Immediately after the spontaneous breakdown of the
149: $SU(5)$ symmetry at $M_G$ through a singlet, the residual symmetry
150: group will be equal to that of the Standard Model gauge group. By
151: construction, the relative gauge couplings of the residual gauge
152: symmetry are equal at this energy scale. But as we run them down,
153: they depart from their known values at the Fermi scale.
154: Consequently they can not reproduce the experimental numbers. A
155: contribution of a Higgs doublet has also no considerable
156: influence. Thus no convergence takes place.
157:
158: This problem disappears, however, if at energies above $1$ TeV
159: supersymmetry appears. In this case the coupling constants do
160: converge at the energy about $10^{16}$ GeV. In such a theory a new
161: energy scale arises, the energy where supersymmetry is realized.
162:
163: In the {\it minimal} $SU(5)$ theory wherein the Higgs sector can
164: be adjusted to exhibit coupling unification, the grand unification
165: mass scale roughly takes place at $3.1 \times 10^{14\pm 0.3}$ GeV
166: which is relatively low~\cite{kounnas}. Consequently the {\it
167: minimal} $SU(5)$ theory predicts the proton to decay in $2 \times
168: 10^{29\pm 1.7}$ years~\cite{kounnas} which is faster than the
169: recently measured lower bound~\cite{groom:2000} and therefore the
170: theory is in serious trouble~\cite{Langacker:1980js}.
171:
172: We shall investigate here a further possibility of coupling
173: unification by embedding $G_{sm}$ into the $SO(10)$ gauge
174: group~\cite{Fritzsch:1974nn}.
175:
176:
177:
178:
179:
180: \subsection{$SO(10)$ gauge interactions}
181:
182:
183: The Lagrangian of the massless spinor field describing the $SO(10)$
184: gauge interactions can be stated as
185: \begin{equation}\label{spinor-L}
186: \begin{split}
187: \mathcal{L } & = \bar{\Psi} \ i \ \gamma^{\mu} \ D_{\mu} \ \Psi
188: - \frac{1}{4} \, {F^{\mu \nu}}^{\ ab} {F_{\mu \nu}}^{ab} \\ & =
189: \underbrace{\bar{\Psi} \ i \ \gamma^{\mu} \
190: \partial_{\mu} \Psi }_{\text{K.E. of $\Psi$
191: }}- \ \underbrace{\frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} \ \bar{\Psi} \, \left( \,
192: W_{\mu} \cdot \Sigma \, \right) \, \Psi}_{\text{Interactions}} -
193: \underbrace{\frac{1}{4} \, {F^{\mu \nu}} \cdot {F_{\mu
194: \nu}}}_{\text{K.E. of W's}}
195: \end{split}
196: \end{equation}
197: where $\Psi$ is the family spinor
198: that contains the fermions of a single generation and $D_\mu$ is
199: the gauge covariant derivative~\cite{ozer}. It is defined as
200: \begin{equation}\label{cov-der}
201: D_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} + i \ \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} \ W_{\mu} \cdot
202: \Sigma
203: \end{equation}
204: Here $W^{ab}_\mu$ are real valued $N (N-1) /2$ vector gauge fields
205: with $a,b=1,\dots,N$; $N=10$, $\Sigma_{ab}$ are the representation
206: matrices and $g$ is the single coupling strength. The above inner
207: product implies a sum over the group indices $ab$. Furthermore
208: $D_\mu$ is a matrix in the space of group indices, and $\Sigma_{ab}
209: = -\Sigma_{ba}$. The number of independent physical gauge fields is
210: determined by the degrees of freedom possessed by the unification
211: gauge group.
212:
213: For $SO(10)$, we have 45 gauge fields. The second term
214: appearing in the covariant derivative is usually known as the gauge
215: term matrix. The physical content of the gauge term matrix can be
216: highlighted by using an explicit matrix representation of the
217: $\Sigma$'s. Several examples are given in ref.~\cite{ozer}.
218: Since the $\Sigma$'s transform the family spinor like $\Psi_{a}
219: \rightarrow \left({ e^{-i \ \Sigma \cdot \omega} } \right)_{ab}
220: \Psi_{b}$ $=$ $U_{ab} \ \Psi_{b}$, one should consider the unitary
221: (or spinorial) representation of $SO(10)$. The $\Sigma_{ab}$ basis
222: of the spinorial $SO(10)$ representation can be generated through a
223: $\Gamma$ basis which satisfies the {\it Clifford
224: Algebra}~\cite{Bauer:1952}. We have
225: \begin{equation}
226: \Sigma_{ab}=\frac{i}{4}[\Gamma_{a},\Gamma_{b}] \ \ , \ \ \ \{
227: \Gamma_{a} , \Gamma_{b} \} = 2 \ \delta_{a b} \ 1\hspace{-2.3mm}1
228: \end{equation}
229: Here curly brackets denote anticommutation. $1\hspace{-2.3mm}1$ is
230: a unit matrix with size $32 \times 32$. The $\Sigma$'s satisfy the
231: {\it Lie Algebra of } $SO(10)$. We have
232: \begin{equation}
233: {[\Sigma_{ab} ,\Sigma_{cd} ] = \, i \left( \, \delta_{ad} \
234: \Sigma_{bc} + \delta_{bc} \ \Sigma_{ad} -\delta_{ac} \ \Sigma_{bd}
235: -\delta_{bd} \ \Sigma_{ac} \,\right)}
236: \end{equation}
237: It follows that a maximal sub-group of $SO(10)$ is the $SO(6) \times SO(4)$ where
238: $SO(6)$ is spanned by the indices $a,b = (1,\dots,6) $ and $SO(4)$
239: is spanned by the indices $a,b = (7,\dots,10) $. $SO(4)$ is
240: isomorphic to $SU(2) \times SU(2)$ which defines two mutually commuting
241: isospin-triplet gauge fields. These are the $W^{0,\pm}_L$ and $W^{0,\pm}_R$ fields
242: which couple to left- and right-handed currents respectively.
243:
244: $SO(6)$ is isomorphic to $SU(4)$ and contains $SU(3)_c \times
245: U(1)_{B-L}$ as a subgroup which defines the $8$ Gluons $G_i$ and a
246: singlet $X_{B-L}$ field. In the coset $SU(4)/SU(3)_c$, we have a
247: sextet field which decomposes with respect to the $U(1)_{B-L}$ group
248: into two charge conjugated color triplets $3$ and $\bar{3}$. These
249: are the $X_\alpha$ lepto-quark fields where $\alpha = (r,g,b) $
250: denotes $SU(3)$-color~\cite{Pati:1974yy,Pati:1977jh}. On the other
251: side the coset $SO(10) / SO(6) \times SO(4)$ contains $24$
252: leptoquark gauge fields denoted with $A_\alpha,
253: A^\prime_\alpha,Y_\alpha,Y^\prime_\alpha$ which decompose into a
254: bi-doublet sextet. All these $45$ gauge fields and their various
255: charges are summarized in Table.~\ref{qnbosons}.
256:
257:
258:
259:
260:
261:
262:
263:
264:
265: \begin{table}[htb]
266: \begin{center}
267: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccc}
268: \hline \hline
269: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
270: & $Q$ &$B-L$ &$I_{3R}$&$I_{3L}$&$Y $ & \ \ & & $Q$ &$B-L$ &$I_{3R}$&$I_{3L}$&$Y $ \\
271: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
272: \hline
273: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
274: $G_i$ &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 & \ \ &$W^{+}_{L}$&+1 &0 &0 &+1 &0 \\
275: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
276: $X_{B-L}$ &0 &0 &0 &0 &0 & \ \ &$W^{0}_{L}$&0 &0 &0 &0 &0 \\
277: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
278: $X_{\alpha}$ &2/3&4/3&0 &0 &2/3 & \ \ &$W^{-}_{L}$&-1 &0 &0 &-1 &0 \\
279: \vspace{-1mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
280: $A_{\alpha}$ & 2/3&-2/3&+1/2 &+1/2 &1/3 & \ \ &$W^{+}_{R}$&+1 &0 &+1 &0 &+1 \\
281: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
282: $A^\prime_{\alpha}$&-1/3&-2/3&+1/2 &-1/2 &1/3 & \ \ &$W^{0}_{R}$&0 &0 &0 &0 &0 \\
283: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
284: $Y_{\alpha}$ &-1/3&-2/3&-1/2 &+1/2 &-5/3 & \ \ &$W^{-}_{R}$&-1 &0 &-1 &0 &-1 \\
285: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&&&&&& \\
286: $Y^\prime_{\alpha}$&-4/3&-2/3&-1/2 &-1/2 &-5/3 & \ \ &&&&&& \\
287: \hline \hline
288: \end{tabular}
289: \caption[The 45 gauge bosons mediating $SO(10)$ gauge
290: interactions]{Charges of the 45 Gauge Bosons}\label{qnbosons}
291: \end{center}
292: \end{table}
293: In contrast to the electroweak theory, it is a rather
294: sophisticated task to illustrate the content of the $SO(10)$
295: gauge term through a matrix. The gauge term reads
296: \begin{equation}
297: \begin{split}
298: +i \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} W_{ab} \hspace{1mm} \Sigma_{ab}
299: % & = +i \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} (V \cdot U + W_L \cdot L + W_R \cdot R +\mathbb{V}\cdot S )\\
300: & = + i\, g \, \sqrt{2} \, \left\{ G \cdot U_{G} + \left( \ X \cdot U_{X} + h.c.
301: \right)+
302: + \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \frac{X_{B-L}}{\sqrt{2}} \, \frac{U_{B-L}}{2}
303: + W^{\pm}_L L_{\pm}+ \frac{W^{3}_L}{\sqrt{2}} L_{3} \right. \\
304: & \left. + W^{\pm}_R R_{\pm} + \frac{W^{3}_R}{\sqrt{2}} R_{3}+(D_{A} \cdot A+D_{A^\prime}
305: \cdot A^\prime+D_{Y} \cdot Y +D_{Y^\prime} \cdot Y^\prime + h.c. ) \right\} \\
306: & = +i \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} \left[
307: \begin{array}{cc}
308: \Lambda_{11} & \Lambda_{12} \\
309: \Lambda_{21} & \Lambda_{22} \\
310: \end{array}\right] \\
311: \end{split}
312: \end{equation}
313: The generators multiplying the (neutral) singlet fields,
314: $W^3_L,W^3_R$ and $X_{B-L}$ add up to the electric-charge
315: eigenvalue operator $Q $ = $L_3+R_3$ $+U_{B-L}/2$ where $L_3$ and
316: $R_3$ are the left and right-isospin eigenvalue operators and
317: $U_{B-L}$ is the $B-L$ eigenvalue operator. The entries
318: $\Lambda_{11},\Lambda_{12},\Lambda_{21}$ and $\Lambda_{22}$ are
319: matrices each of size $16 \times 16$. They explicitly depend on
320: the $\Gamma$ basis as studied in~\cite{ozer}. The interaction term
321: given in eq.~(\ref{spinor-L}) generates the currents coupling to
322: the fermions in the family spinor $\Psi$. We have
323: \begin{equation}
324: \begin{split}
325: +i \frac{g}{\sqrt{2}} \bar{\Psi} \gamma_{\mu}
326: \Sigma \cdot {W^{\mu}}
327: \Psi & = + i \, g \, \sqrt{2} \, \left\{ \left( J^{A}_{\mu} \cdot {A^{ \mu}} +J^{A^\prime}_{\mu} \cdot {A^{ \prime \mu}} +
328: J^{Y}_{\mu} \cdot {Y^{ \mu}}+J^{Y^\prime}_{\mu} \cdot {Y^{ \prime \mu}} + h.c.
329: \right)+
330: \right. \\
331: &
332: \left( J^{X}_{\mu } \cdot {X^{ \mu}} + h.c. \right)
333: + J^{\mu }_{B-L} \frac{X_{\mu \, B-L}}{\sqrt{2}}
334: + J_G \cdot G
335: + \left. J^{\pm}_R W^{\pm}_R
336: + J^{3}_R \frac{W^{3}_R}{\sqrt{2}} + J^{\pm}_L W^{\pm}_L
337: + J^{3}_L \frac{W^{3}_L}{\sqrt{2}} \right\} \\
338: \end{split}
339: \end{equation}
340: The currents $J^{A}_{\mu}, J^{A^\prime}_{\mu} $ etc. and the
341: gauge fields are given in the flavor basis. Depending on the
342: content of the Higgs sector, the gauge fields and thereby the
343: currents can undergo some complex mixing. A detailed analysis of
344: these mixing angles and phases which are possible sources of
345: $CP$-violation will not be studied in this paper.
346:
347:
348:
349:
350:
351: \subsection{Renormalization of $\alpha$'s in $SO(10)$}
352:
353: At energies above the Grand Unification energy mass scale $M_G$
354: there is a single coupling constant $g$. The relative
355: coupling strengths $g_i$ assigned to the various subgroups of
356: $SO(10)$ are equal in value at the grand unification mass scale
357: $M_G$ whose value is subject to further determination. We define
358: \begin{equation}\label{strengths}
359: \begin{split}
360: g & = \underbrace{\frac{g_L}{C_L}}_{g_1}=
361: \underbrace{\frac{g_R}{C_R}}_{g_2}
362: = \underbrace{\frac{g_{B-L}}{C_{B-L}}}_{g_3}= \underbrace{\frac{g_Y}{C_Y}}_{g_4}
363: = \underbrace{\frac{\sqrt{4 \pi
364: \alpha_s}}{C_s}}_{g_5} = \underbrace{\frac{\sqrt{4 \pi
365: \alpha_{s^\prime}}}{C_{s^\prime}}}_{g_6}= \underbrace{\frac{e}{C_Q }}_{g_7}
366: \end{split}
367: \end{equation}
368: where $C$ are the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients. These coefficients
369: take the values $C_L=C_R=1$, $C_{B-L}=\sqrt{3/2}$,
370: $C_{Q}=\sqrt{3/8}$, $C_Y=\sqrt{3/5}$. They can be found by
371: rescaling the diagonal generators so that they become eigenvalue
372: operators and produce charge quantization~\cite{ozer}. At $M_G$
373: the symmetry breaks down to $SU(4)_C \times SU(2)_L \times
374: SU(2)_R$. The corresponding coupling strengths are donated by
375: $\alpha_{s^\prime},g_L$ and $g_R$. At $M_C$ the symmetry breaks
376: down to $SU(3)_C \times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R \times U(1)_{B-L}$.
377: Finally at the energy $M_R$ the symmetry is broken down to
378: $SU(3)_C \times SU(2)_L \times SU(1)_Y$. The final breakdown to
379: $SU(3)_C \times U(1)_{Q}$ is similar to the symmetry breaking in
380: the standard model. These intermediate mass scales and symmetries
381: are illustrated in Fig.~(\ref{descents}).
382: \begin{figure}[htb]
383: \begin{eqnarray*}
384: \begin{array}{ccc}
385: & SO(10) & \\
386: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
387: & \downarrow & \\
388: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
389: & SU(4)_{c} \times SU(2)_{L} \times SU(2)_{R} & \\
390: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
391: & \downarrow & \\
392: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
393: & SU(3)_{c} \times U(1)_{B-L} \times SU(2)_{L} \times SU(2)_{R} & \\
394: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
395: & \downarrow & \\
396: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
397: & SU(3)_{c} \times SU(2)_{L} \times U(1)_{Y} & \\
398: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
399: & \downarrow & \\
400: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
401: & SU(3)_{c} \times U(1)_{Q} & \\
402: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
403: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
404: \end{array}
405: \begin{array}{ccc}
406: & M_G & \\
407: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
408: & \downarrow & \\
409: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
410: & M_C & \\
411: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
412: & \downarrow & \\
413: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
414: & M_R & \\
415: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
416: & \downarrow & \\
417: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
418: & M_F & \\
419: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
420: & \downarrow & \\
421: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
422: & \text{no further SSB} & \\
423: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
424: \vspace{-3mm} & & \\
425: \end{array}
426: \end{eqnarray*}
427: \caption[Backbone of symmetry descents in $SO(10)$]{
428: Descents in $SO(10)$ are on the left hand side and corresponding
429: intermediate mass scales are on the right hand side.
430: }\label{descents}
431: \end{figure}
432: \noindent The evolution of the coupling strengths are given as
433: follows:
434: \begin{eqnarray}
435: U(1)_Y \ ; \frac{1}{g^2_4 (M_F)} & = & \frac{1}{g^2(M_G)} + 2 (\frac{2}{5} b_4 +
436: \frac{3}{5} b^R_2) \ln(\frac{M_G}{M_C}) + 2 (\frac{2}{5} b^C_1 +
437: \frac{3}{5} b^R_2)\ln(\frac{M_C}{M_R})+ 2 b_1
438: \ln(\frac{M_R}{M_F}) \nonumber \\
439: SU(2)_L \ ; \frac{1}{g^2_1(M_F)} & = & \frac{1}{g^2(M_G)} + 2 b^L_2 \ln(\frac{M_G}{M_F}) \nonumber \\
440: SU(3)_C \ ; \frac{1}{g^2_5(M_F)} & = & \frac{1}{g^2(M_G)} + 2 b_4 \ln(\frac{M_G}{M_C}) + 2 b_3 \ln(\frac{M_C}{M_F})\\
441: U(1)_Q \ ; \frac{3}{8}\frac{1}{e^2(Q)} & = & \frac{3}{8}\frac{1}{e^2(M_G)}
442: + 2 ( \frac{2}{8}b_4 + \frac{3}{8}b^R_2
443: + \frac{3}{8}b^L_2 ) \ln(\frac{M_G}{M_C})
444: \nonumber \\ & & + 2 ( \frac{2}{8}b^C_1 + \frac{3}{8}b^R_2
445: + \frac{3}{8}b^L_2 ) \ln(\frac{M_C}{M_R})
446: + 2(\frac{5}{8} b_1 + \frac{3}{8} b_2) \ln(\frac{M_R}{M_F})
447: + 2 b^{em}_1 \ln(\frac{M_F}{Q})\nonumber
448: \end{eqnarray}
449: where the $g_i$ and $b_i$ are defined as follows:
450: \begin{equation}\label{beta_all}
451: \begin{tabular}{llrcl}
452: %\hline
453: % & & & & \\
454: $U(1)_Q \ \ , $ & $ b^{em}_1 \ \ , $ & $ e(Q) $ & = & $ C_Q \, g_{7}(Q) = \sqrt{4\pi \alpha(Q)} $ \\
455: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
456: $SU(4)_C \ \ , $ & $ b_4 \ \ , $ & $ \alpha_{s^\prime}(Q) $ & = & $ \frac{g^{2}_6(Q)}{4\pi} $ \\
457: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
458: %\hline
459: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
460: $SU(3)_C \ \ , $ & $ b_3 \ \ , $ & $ \alpha_{s}(Q) $ & = & $ \frac{g^{2}_5(Q)}{4\pi} $ \\
461: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
462: $U(1)_Y \ \ , $ & $ b_1 \ \ , $ & $ g_{Y}(Q) $ & = & $ C_Y \, g_{4}(Q) $ \\
463: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
464: %\hline
465: %\end{tabular}
466: %\end{equation}
467: %\begin{equation}
468: %\begin{tabular}{lcrcl}
469: %\hline
470: \vspace{-3mm} & & & \\
471: $U(1)_{B-L} \ \ , $ & $ b^c_1 \ \ , $ & $ g_{B-L}(Q) $ & = & $ C_{B-L} \, g_{3}(Q) $ \\
472: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
473: %\hline
474: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
475: $SU(2)_R \ \ , $ & $ b^R_2 \ \ , $ & $ g_R(Q) $ & = & $ C_R \, g_{2}(Q) $ \\
476: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
477: %\hline
478: \vspace{-3mm} & & & & \\
479: $SU(2)_L \ \ , $ & $ b^L_2 \ \ , $ & $ g_L(Q) $ & = & $ C_L \, g_{1}(Q) $ \\
480: % & & & & \\
481: %\hline
482: \end{tabular}
483: \end{equation}
484: Note that in general we have $M_F < M_R < M_C < M_G$. From the
485: above equations the unknown scales $M_G$, $M_C$ and $M_R$ can be
486: found. A possibility is to use the the combination ;
487: $C_Y^{-2}/g^2_4+1/g^2_1-(C_Y^{-2}+1)/g^2_5$. It is free of the
488: unknown $g$ and the first two terms in this combination equal to
489: $1/e^2$. It yields;
490: \begin{equation}\label{1}
491: \frac{1}{e^2}-\frac{8}{3}\frac{1}{g^2_5} = \mathcal{A} \ln(\frac{M_G}{M_C})+\mathcal{B} \ln(\frac{M_C}{M_R})+ \mathcal{C} \ln(\frac{M_R}{M_F}) \\
492: \end{equation}
493: where the constants come out as
494: \begin{equation}\label{coef1}
495: \begin{split}
496: \mathcal{A} & = 2 (b^L_2 - 2 b_4 + b^R_2) \\
497: \mathcal{B} & = 2 (\frac{2}{3} b^C_1 + b^R_2- \frac{8}{3} b_3 + b^L_2 ) \\
498: \mathcal{C} & = 2 (\frac{5}{3} b_1 - \frac{8}{3}b_3 + b^L_2) \\
499: \end{split}
500: \end{equation}
501: There are three unknowns in eq.~(\ref{1}), namely the scales $M_G$,
502: $M_C$ and $M_R$. Further relations are required. Another possibility
503: comes from the weak mixing angle contained by the combination
504: $C^{-2}_Y/g^2_4-C^{-2}_Y/g^2_1$. We have
505: \begin{equation}
506: \frac{C^{-2}_Y}{g^2_4}-\frac{C^{-2}_Y}{g^2_1}=
507: \frac{1}{e^2}-(1+C^{-2}_Y)\frac{\sin^2\theta}{e^2}
508: \end{equation}
509: Using the expressions for $g_4$ and $g_1$ and some reorganization
510: of the terms yield
511: \begin{equation}\label{2}
512: \sin^2\theta =\frac{3}{8}- \frac{5 }{8} e^2\left(\mathcal{ D} \ln(\frac{M_G}{M_C})+ \mathcal{E }\ln(\frac{M_C}{M_R})+ \mathcal{F } \ln(\frac{M_R}{M_F}) \right)
513: \end{equation}
514: The constants $\mathcal{D}$, $\mathcal{E}$ and $\mathcal{F}$ in
515: terms of the beta functions are found as
516: \begin{equation}\label{coef2}
517: \begin{split}
518: \mathcal{D} & = 2 (\frac{2}{5} b_4 +
519: \frac{3}{5} b^R_2 - b^L_2 ) \\
520: \mathcal{E} & = 2(\frac{2}{5} b^C_1 + \frac{3}{5} b^R_2 - b^L_2) \\
521: \mathcal{F} & = 2 (b_1- b^L_2) \\
522: \end{split}
523: \end{equation}
524: We have three unknown scales $M_G $, $M_C$ and $M_R$ in each of
525: the statements above. We make the assumption that $M_G$ and $M_C$
526: are close so that $\ln \frac{M_G}{M_C} \gtrsim 0$. In terms of
527: this ratio, the eqs.~(\ref{1}) and~(\ref{2}) can be solved among
528: themselves for the three unknown scales (for details see Appendix
529: A).
530:
531:
532:
533: \subsection{Mass Scales in $SO(10)$}
534: \label{m-scales}
535:
536: Let us estimate the scales without any contribution of Higgs
537: scalars using eq.~(\ref{scales}). These values are summarized in
538: Table~\ref{ims}. It is found that $M_G$ rests between $10^{16}-
539: 10^{17}$ GeV and $M_R$ between $10^{10}-10^{11}$ GeV for various
540: values of $\ln(M_G/M_C)$ and acceptable input values of the
541: electroweak parameters at $ M_F=(\sqrt{2} \, G_F)^{-1/2} \cong
542: 246.22$ GeV where especially $\alpha_s^{-1}(M_F)=10$. For smaller
543: values of $\alpha_s^{-1}$, the $SO(10)$ model is no more
544: physically viable, because $M_G$ moves inescapably towards the
545: Planck scale. The various values of $\alpha(M_G)$ are also given
546: in Table.~\ref{ims} for the respective values of the intermediate
547: mass scales where the fine structure constant $\alpha$ at $M_G$ is
548: obtained as
549: \begin{equation}
550: \begin{split}
551: \frac{3}{8} \frac{(4 \pi)^{-1}}{\alpha(Q)}
552: & = \frac{3}{8} \frac{(4 \pi)^{-1}}{{\alpha}(M_G)}
553: + 2 ( \frac{2}{8}b_4 + \frac{3}{8}b^R_2 + \frac{3}{8}b^L_2 )
554: \ln(\frac{M_G}{M_C})
555: + 2 ( \frac{2}{8}b^C_1 + \frac{3}{8}b^R_2 + \frac{3}{8}b^L_2 ) \ln(\frac{M_C}{M_R})
556: \\ & + 2 (\frac{5}{8} b_1
557: + \frac{3}{8} b_2) \ln(\frac{M_R}{M_F}) + 2 b^{em}_1 \ln(\frac{M_F}{Q}) \ \ \
558: \end{split}
559: \end{equation}
560: This expression can be solved for $\alpha(M_G)$ at $Q=M_F$. If we
561: compare the values of $\alpha^{-1}$ at $M_G$ and $M_F$, given in the
562: last six rows in Table.~\ref{ims}, it is observed that they are
563: very close. This does not happen in the effective $SU(3)_C \times
564: SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$ running of $\alpha^{-1}$. The difference is
565: caused by the existence of the $U(1)_{B-L} \times SU(2)_{R}$
566: symmetries above the $M_R$ scale. The beta functions $b^{em}_1$
567: in the interval $Q > M_R$ becomes negative. The
568: running of $\alpha,\alpha_W,\alpha_s,\alpha_Y$ are
569: sketched in Fig.~\ref{alpha}. As seen in
570: the figure $\alpha^{-1}$ reaches a minimum value of approximately
571: $117$ at the mass scale $M_R$, beyond this scale the electromagnetic
572: interactions become gradually weaker again.
573: \begin{table}[htb]
574: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
575: \hline \hline
576: \vspace{-1mm}&&&&&&&& \\
577: $\ln \frac{M_G}{M_C}$ &$\alpha^{-1}_s(M_F)$ & $M_G$ & $M_C$ & $M_R$ & $\alpha^{-1}(M_G)$ & $\sin^2\theta_W(M_F)$ & $\alpha^{-1}(M_F)$ & $\alpha^{-1}_G$ \\
578: \vspace{-1mm} &&&&&&&& \\
579: \hline
580: \vspace{-1mm} &&&&&&&& \\
581: % $\ln1$ & 7 & $1.70 \times 10^{19}$ & $1.70 \times 10^{19}$ & $2.45 \times 10^{9}$ & 133.8 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 50.2 \\
582: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
583: % $\ln2$ & 7 & $8.57 \times 10^{18}$ & $4.28 \times 10^{18}$ & $9.79 \times 10^{9}$ & 132.9 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 49.8 \\
584: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
585: % $\ln3$ & 7 & $5.71 \times 10^{18}$ & $1.91 \times 10^{18}$ & $2.20 \times 10^{10}$ & 132.3 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 49.6 \\
586: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
587: % % \hline
588: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
589: % $\ln1$ & 8 & $3.09 \times 10^{18}$ & $3.09 \times 10^{18}$ & $7.67 \times 10^{9}$ & 131.5 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 49.3 \\
590: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
591: % $\ln2$ & 8 & $1.54 \times 10^{18}$ & $7.73 \times 10^{17}$ & $3.07 \times 10^{10}$ & 130.4 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 48.9 \\
592: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
593: % $\ln3$ & 8 & $1.03 \times 10^{18}$ & $3.43 \times 10^{17}$ & $6.91 \times 10^{10}$ & 129.9 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 48.7 \\
594: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
595: % \hline
596: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
597: $\ln1$ & 9 & $5.56 \times 10^{17}$ & $5.56 \times 10^{17}$ & $2.40 \times 10^{10}$ & 129.0 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 48.4 \\
598: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
599: $\ln2$ & 9 & $2.78 \times 10^{17}$ & $1.39 \times 10^{17}$ & $9.62 \times 10^{10}$ & 128.1 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 48.0 \\
600: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
601: $\ln3$ & 9 & $1.85 \times 10^{17}$ & $6.16 \times 10^{16}$ & $2.16 \times 10^{11}$ & 127.5 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 47.8 \\
602: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
603: % \hline
604: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
605: $\ln1$ & 10 & $1.00 \times 10^{17}$ & $1.00 \times 10^{17}$ & $7.54 \times 10^{10}$ & 126.6 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 47.5 \\
606: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
607: $\ln2$ & 10 & $5.02 \times 10^{16}$ & $2.50 \times 10^{16}$ & $3.02 \times 10^{11}$ & 125.6 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 47.1 \\
608: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
609: $\ln3$ & 10 & $3.34 \times 10^{16}$ & $1.12 \times 10^{16}$ & $6.78 \times 10^{11}$ & 125.1 & $0.2315$ & 128 & 46.9 \\
610: \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
611: %\hline
612: % \vspace{-2mm}&&&&&&&& \\
613: %$\ln1$ & 10 & $6.74 \times 10^{16}$ & $6.74 \times 10^{16}$ & $7.07 \times 10^{10}$ & 125.4 & $0.2315$ & 127 & 47.0 \\
614: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
615: %$\ln2$ & 10 & $3.37 \times 10^{16}$ & $1.68 \times 10^{16}$ & $2.83 \times 10^{11}$ & 124.1 & $0.2315$ & 127 & 46.6 \\
616: % \vspace{-2mm} &&&&&&&& \\
617: %$\ln3$ & 10 & $2.24 \times 10^{16}$ & $7.49 \times 10^{15}$ & $6.37 \times 10^{11}$ & 123.9 & $0.2315$ & 127 & 46.4 \\
618: \hline \hline
619: \end{tabular}
620: \caption[Grand unification and intermediate mass scales in
621: $SO(10)$] {Grand unification and intermediate mass scales without
622: contribution of any Higgs scalars. $\alpha_G=g^2/4\pi$ is the
623: coupling strength at the grand unification mass scale $M_G$.}
624: \label{ims}
625: \end{table}
626: \begin{figure}[h]
627: \begin{center}
628: \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{so-ten}
629: \caption[The evolution of $1/\alpha(Q)$ with respect to $\ln
630: Q$.]{The evolution of $\alpha_s$, $\alpha_w$, $\alpha$, $\alpha_Y$,
631: with respect to $\ln Q$ where Q is in GeV.}\label{alpha}
632: \end{center}
633: \end{figure}
634: \subsection{Results and Discussion}
635: In this paper we have studied coupling unification in the
636: $SO(10)$-Theory. Unlike the $SU(5)$ theory this theory shows a
637: convergence of the coupling constants, if we adjust them at low
638: energies to the observed values. We have found that the coupling
639: constants do converge, provided that two new intermediate energy
640: scales are introduced, the energies where the 4-color gauge group
641: and the right-isospin gauge group are spontaneously broken down.
642: However two new energy scales have been introduced, the energy
643: where leptons and quarks start to become separated and $SU(4)$ is
644: broken down to the QCD gauge group, and the energy, where the
645: righthanded isospin is broken. The first energy scale, denoted by
646: $M_C$, is very close to $M_G$ and might be identical to $M_G$. The
647: second energy scale $M_R$ is around $10^{10-11}$ GeV. Similar
648: conclusions have also been reached in ref.~\cite{Lavoura:1993su}.
649:
650: Testing the theory is very difficult. To observe the righthanded
651: $W$-bosons seems not possible, since the energy is too high.
652: However the $W$-bosons could result from a complex mixing among
653: the $W_L$ and $W_R$ gauge bosons, wherein the $W_R$ component is
654: extremely suppressed. In this case there will also be a heavier
655: $W^\prime$-boson, wherein the $W_L$ component is suppressed. A
656: tiny mixing angle in the $W_L$-$W_R$ sector that could be detected
657: by precision experiments would immediately indicate a left-right
658: symmetric gauge sector. Similarly in an $SO(10)$-theory there will
659: be an extra neutral $Z^\prime$-boson, coupling to neutral currents
660: as investigated in ref.~\cite{ozer}. As a result we should expect
661: small deviations in the vector and axial-vector couplings of the
662: $Z$-boson which originate from the $SU(4)$ and $SU(2)_R$ gauge
663: fields. Another possibility seems to us to look for the proton
664: decay, which is expected around $10^{31-33}$ years.
665:
666:
667: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
668: \bibliography{main}
669:
670:
671: \appendix
672:
673: \section{}
674: \noindent We have
675: \begin{equation}\label{scales}
676: \begin{split}
677: M_R & = M_F \exp \left[ \Delta_1 - \frac{\mathcal{ B}}{\mathcal{E} \mathcal{C} - \mathcal{F} \mathcal{B} } \frac{1}{e^2} \left(\frac{3}{5} - \frac{8}{5}\sin^2\theta \right) + \frac{ \mathcal{E} }{ \mathcal{E} \mathcal{C}-\mathcal{F} \mathcal{B } } \left( \frac{1}{e^2}-\frac{8}{3}\frac{1}{g^2_5} \right) \right] \\
678: M_C & = M_F \exp\left[ \Delta_2+ \frac{\mathcal{ C} - \mathcal{B} }{ \mathcal{E }\mathcal{C }- \mathcal{F }\mathcal{B } } \frac{1}{e^2} \left(\frac{3}{5} - \frac{8}{5}\sin^2\theta \right) + \frac{ \mathcal{E }- \mathcal{F} }{\mathcal{E }\mathcal{C} -\mathcal{F} \mathcal{B } } \left(\frac{1}{e^2}-\frac{8}{3}\frac{1}{g^2_5} \right) \right]\\
679: M_G & = M_F \exp \left[ \Delta_3 +\frac{\mathcal{ C} - \mathcal{B} }{ \mathcal{E} \mathcal{C} - \mathcal{F} \mathcal{B}} \frac{1}{e^2} \left(\frac{3}{5} - \frac{8}{5}\sin^2\theta \right) + \frac{ \mathcal{E}- \mathcal{F } }{ \mathcal{E} \mathcal{C }-\mathcal{F} \mathcal{B} } \left(\frac{1}{e^2}-\frac{8}{3}\frac{1}{g^2_5}\right)\right] \\
680: \end{split}
681: \end{equation}
682: The $\Delta$'s appearing in these equations are composed of beta
683: functions and the ratio $\ln \frac{M_G}{M_C}$. They are
684: explicitly found as
685: \begin{equation}
686: \begin{split}
687: \Delta_1 & = \frac{\mathcal{D} \mathcal{B} - \mathcal{E} \mathcal{A} }{ \mathcal{ E} \mathcal{C}-\mathcal{F} \mathcal{B} } \ln \frac{M_G}{M_C}\\
688: \Delta_2 & = -\frac{ \mathcal{A} (\mathcal{E}-\mathcal{F}) + \mathcal{D }( \mathcal{C}-\mathcal{B})} {\mathcal{E }\mathcal{C} - \mathcal{F} \mathcal{B } } \ln \frac{M_G}{M_C} \\
689: \Delta_3 & = \left(1 - \frac{ \mathcal{A} (\mathcal{E}-\mathcal{F}) + \mathcal{D }(\mathcal{C} - \mathcal{B})} {\mathcal{E} \mathcal{C} - \mathcal{F }\mathcal{B} }\right) \ln \frac{M_G}{M_C} \\
690: \end{split}
691: \end{equation}
692: The ratio is chosen by definition positive. If we substitute the
693: values of the beta functions, we find that
694: \begin{equation}
695: \Delta_1 \geqslant 0 ,\ \ \ \ \ \ \Delta_2 \leqslant 0,\ \ \ \ \ \ \Delta_3 \leqslant 0
696: \end{equation}
697: %where Higgs scalar contributions are completely neglected in the
698: %beta functions given in eqs.~(\ref{coef1}) and~(\ref{coef2}). If
699: %%the ratio is allowed to increase for a fixed value of $M_F$, than
700: %$M_G$ decreases and $M_R$ increases.
701:
702: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
703:
704:
705:
706: \end{document}
707: