1: \documentclass[aps,prl,superscriptaddress,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
2:
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4:
5: \newcommand{\tfrac}[2]{{\textstyle{\frac{#1}{#2}}}}
6: \def\msb{$\overline{\rm MS} $ }
7: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
8: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
9: \def\ba{\begin{eqnarray}}
10: \def\ea{\end{eqnarray}}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Charm and Bottom Quark Masses from Perturbative QCD}
15:
16: \author{R. Boughezal}
17:
18: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik,
19: Universit\"at W\"urzburg, \\ Am Hubland, D-97074 W\"urzburg,
20: Germany}
21:
22: \author{M. Czakon}
23:
24: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik,
25: Universit\"at W\"urzburg, \\ Am Hubland, D-97074 W\"urzburg,
26: Germany}
27:
28: \affiliation{Department of Field Theory and Particle Physics,
29: Institute of Physics, \\ University of Silesia, Uniwersytecka 4,
30: PL-40007 Katowice, Poland}
31:
32: \author{T. Schutzmeier}
33:
34: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik,
35: Universit\"at W\"urzburg, \\ Am Hubland, D-97074 W\"urzburg,
36: Germany}
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39:
40: Using a new result for the first moment of the hadronic production cross
41: section at order ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^3)$, and new data on the $J/\psi$
42: and $\psi'$ resonances for the charm quark, we determine the \msb masses of the charm and
43: bottom quarks to be $\overline{m}_c(\overline{m}_c) = 1.295 \pm 0.015$
44: GeV and $\overline{m}_b(\overline{m}_b) = 4.205 \pm 0.058$ GeV.
45: We assume that the continuum contribution to the sum rules is
46: adequately described by pQCD. While
47: we observe a large reduction of the perturbative error, the shifts
48: induced by the theoretical input are very small. The main change in
49: the central value of $m_c$ is related to the experimental data. On the
50: other hand, the value of $m_b$ is not changed by our calculation to
51: the assumed precision.
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \pacs{12.38.-t, 14.65.Dw, 14.65.Fy}
55:
56: \maketitle
57:
58: The strong coupling constant, $\alpha_s$, and quark masses are the
59: only input parameters of the QCD lagrangian. Since at high energy
60: masses become essentially negligible, $\alpha_s$ can be determined
61: separately to a good precision. On the other hand, the determination
62: of the masses is a much more cumbersome problem, where the details of
63: the interaction can hardly be overcome. It is, therefore, not
64: surprising that it has attracted a lot of attention. Particularly
65: interesting are the charm and bottom quarks, where results can be
66: derived from lattice, see {\it e.g.} \cite{Dougall:2005ev}, or from
67: different types of sum rules, see {\it e.g.}
68: \cite{Penarrocha:2001ig,Eidemuller:2000rc,Hoang:2004wh}. In this
69: Letter, we shall follow the approach of \cite{Kuhn:2001dm}, which
70: requires, as input on the theoretical side, moments of the hadronic
71: cross section. The first moment at ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^3)$ constitutes
72: our main new result \footnote{During the preparation of the present
73: publication, Ref.~\cite{Chetyrkin:2006xg} appeared, which also
74: contains the first moment of the hadronic cross section. We find
75: perfect agreement between the two results.}, which we use, together
76: with new resonance data for $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$
77: \cite{Eidelman:2004wy}, to derive the most up to date values of
78: $\overline{m}_c(\overline{m}_c)$ and $\overline{m}_b(\overline{m}_b)$
79: in the \msb scheme.
80:
81: The use of QCD sum rules for the determination of the charm quark mass
82: has originally been proposed in a series of papers gathered in
83: \cite{Novikov:1977dq}. The same approach has subsequently been applied
84: to the bottom quark \cite{Reinders:1984sr}. A specific feature of
85: these early studies has been the use of higher moments of the hadronic
86: cross section. The advantages of the lower moments have been studied
87: in \cite{Shifman:1978bx}, and used at order ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^2)$ in
88: \cite{Kuhn:2001dm} and subsequently in
89: \cite{Corcella:2002uu,Hoang:2004xm}. The latter analysis was based on
90: the calculation of three-loop moments from \cite{Chetyrkin:1995ii} and
91: the data of the cross section scan around the charm threshold given in
92: \cite{Bai:2001ct}. An important conclusion of \cite{Kuhn:2001dm} is
93: that the first moment is best suited for the analysis, since it has
94: the weakest dependence on the nonperturbative effects and details of
95: the threshold region, leading naturally to the smallest error.
96:
97: Starting from ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^3)$, the perturbative cross section
98: receives contributions from diagrams with a massless threshold,
99: Fig.~\ref{singlet}. Fortunately, gauge invariance restrictions on the
100: photon-three-gluon vertex allow such diagrams only at ${\cal
101: O}((q^2/m^2)^4 \log(q^2/m^2))$
102: \cite{Groote:2001py,Portoles:2002rt}. Since we will use the first
103: moment exclusively, we can safely neglect them in our analysis and
104: restrict the calculation to diagrams where a single heavy quark line
105: connects both electromagnetic current vertices.
106: \begin{figure}
107: \epsfig{file=singlet.eps,width=8cm}
108: \caption{\label{singlet} Singlet diagrams with a three-gluon cut.}
109: \end{figure}
110:
111: Let us now remind a few definitions. The hadronic ratio is given by
112: \be R(s) = \frac{\sigma(e^+ e^- \rightarrow {\rm had.})}{\sigma(e^+
113: e^- \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-)}, \ee where $\sigma(e^+ e^- \rightarrow
114: \mu^+ \mu^-) = 4\pi\alpha^2/3s$. It can be related to the
115: current-current correlator through \be R(s) = 12 \pi {\rm Im} \Pi(q^2
116: = s+i\epsilon), \ee where \be (-q^2g_{\mu\nu}+q_\mu q_\nu) \Pi(q^2) =
117: i \int dx e^{iqx} \langle 0 | T j_\mu(x) j_\nu(0)| 0 \rangle. \ee For
118: a given heavy quark of mass $m$, the contribution to the correlator
119: can be expanded as \be
120: \label{moments}
121: \Pi_h(q^2) = Q_h^2 \frac{3}{16\pi^2} \sum_{n>0} \overline{C}_n z^n,
122: \;\;\;\;
123: z=\frac{q^2}{4m^2(\mu)}.
124: \ee
125: We perform all our calculations in the \msb scheme, and expand the
126: $\overline{C}_n$ coefficients in the strong coupling as
127: \be
128: \overline{C}_n = \sum_{k \ge 0}
129: \left(\frac{\alpha_s(\mu)}{\pi}\right)^k
130: \overline{C}_n^{(k)}\left(\log\left( \frac{m^2(\mu)}{\mu^2}\right)\right) .
131: \ee
132:
133: The coefficients of the expansion in the strong coupling constant are
134: known exactly up to two-loops
135: and all moments can be derived from a generating formula
136: \cite{Broadhurst:1993mw,barbieri}. The first eight moments of the
137: three-loop result have been given in \cite{Chetyrkin:1995ii}. Our new
138: result is the four-loop correction to the first moment, {\it i.e.} the
139: coefficient $\overline{C}_1^{(3)}$. We have obtained it by a direct
140: Taylor expansion to second order in $q^2$ of the photon self-energy,
141: followed by a reduction of the resulting four-loop single scale
142: tadpoles using an approach inspired by the Laporta algorithm
143: \cite{Laporta:2001dd}, see also \cite{Czakon:2004bu}. We have kept a single power of the linear gauge
144: parameter in the 0th moment (value of $\Pi(0)$) to check for gauge
145: invariance, but neglected it in the 1st moment to spare unnecessary
146: computational complexity.
147:
148:
149: The purely bosonic contribution to $\overline{\rm C}_1^{(3)}$ is given by
150: \begin{widetext}
151: \ba
152: &+& C_F^3 \, \biggl( \tfrac{45577758023909}{56435097600} - \tfrac{454}{2835} \, N_5 + \tfrac{173}{1080} \, N_4 +
153: \tfrac{1078129}{3628800} \, N_3 + \tfrac{79}{1920} \, N_2 - \tfrac{8881}{604800} \, N_1 - \tfrac{3546972523}{4702924800} \, \pi^2
154: + \tfrac{1533371173}{653184000} \, \pi^4 \nonumber \\ &&+ \tfrac{24802703}{342921600} \, \pi^6
155: + \tfrac{8192}{45} \, a_5 - \tfrac{252157}{4050} \, a_4 + \tfrac{79}{3360} \, \zeta_7 - \tfrac{5193373091}{27216000} \, \zeta_5
156: + \tfrac{79}{7200} \, \zeta_5 \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{75721242853}{195955200} \, \zeta_3 - \tfrac{95128427}{48988800} \, \zeta_3 \,
157: \pi^2 \nonumber \\ && + \tfrac{79}{21600} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^4 - \tfrac{10306609}{4082400} \, \zeta_3^2 + \tfrac{4352}{2025} \, l_2 \, \pi^4
158: + \tfrac{252157}{97200} \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{1024}{405} \, l_2^3 \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{252157}{97200} \, l_2^4 -
159: \tfrac{1024}{675} \, l_2^5 - \tfrac{6142460327}{22394880} \, l_m - \tfrac{173}{270} \, l_m \, N_3 \nonumber \\ && - \tfrac{79}{480} \, l_m \, N_1
160: + \tfrac{12907273}{1866240} \, l_m \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{215987}{777600} \, l_m \, \pi^4 + \tfrac{79}{45360} \, l_m \,
161: \pi^6 - \tfrac{16384}{135} \, l_m \, a_4 + \tfrac{1962691}{32400} \, l_m \, \zeta_5 + \tfrac{6307081}{155520} \, l_m \, \zeta_3 \nonumber \\
162: && + \tfrac{36163}{58320} \, l_m \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{79}{540} \, l_m \, \zeta_3^2 + \tfrac{2048}{405} \, l_m \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 -
163: \tfrac{2048}{405} \, l_m \, l_2^4 - \tfrac{103}{90} \, l_m^2 + \tfrac{3}{5} \, l_m^3 \biggr)
164: \nonumber \\
165: &+& C_F^2 \, C_A \, \biggl( - \tfrac{4622898495103}{5374771200} + \tfrac{227}{945} \, N_5 - \tfrac{103}{288} \, N_4 -
166: \tfrac{916241}{14515200} \, N_3 - \tfrac{87}{1280} \, N_2 - \tfrac{71941}{403200} \, N_1 + \tfrac{487467767}{3135283200} \, \pi^2
167: - \tfrac{3579168251}{1306368000} \, \pi^4 \nonumber \\ &&- \tfrac{36666499}{228614400} \,
168: \pi^6 - \tfrac{224}{15} \, a_5 - \tfrac{313387}{16200} \, a_4 - \tfrac{87}{2240} \, \zeta_7 + \tfrac{10395883727}{54432000} \, \zeta_5
169: - \tfrac{29}{1600} \, \zeta_5 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{40758646507}{130636800} \, \zeta_3 + \tfrac{463655219}{97977600} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2 \nonumber \\
170: &&- \tfrac{29}{4800} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^4 + \tfrac{15591581}{2721600} \, \zeta_3^2 - \tfrac{119}{675} \,
171: l_2 \, \pi^4 + \tfrac{313387}{388800} \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{28}{135} \, l_2^3 \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{313387}{388800} \,
172: l_2^4 + \tfrac{28}{225} \, l_2^5 + \tfrac{4315007269}{4976640} \, l_m + \tfrac{103}{72} \, l_m \, N_3 \nonumber \\ &&+ \tfrac{87}{320} \, l_m
173: \, N_1 - \tfrac{5492587}{414720} \, l_m \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{1313957}{518400} \, l_m \, \pi^4 - \tfrac{29}{10080} \, l_m \,
174: \pi^6 + \tfrac{448}{45} \, l_m \, a_4 - \tfrac{2928779}{21600} \, l_m \, \zeta_5 - \tfrac{32483549}{103680} \, l_m \, \zeta_3 \nonumber \\ &&-
175: \tfrac{61259}{38880} \, l_m \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{29}{120} \, l_m \, \zeta_3^2 - \tfrac{56}{135} \, l_m \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{56}{135} \, l_m \, l_2^4
176: + \tfrac{259}{108} \, l_m^2 - \tfrac{11}{10} \, l_m^3 \biggr)
177: \nonumber \\
178: &+& C_F \, C_A^2 \, \biggl( \tfrac{25490069288387}{112870195200} - \tfrac{227}{2835} \, N_5 + \tfrac{1199}{8640} \, N_4
179: - \tfrac{413339}{9676800} \, N_3 + \tfrac{91}{3840} \, N_2 + \tfrac{3511}{37800} \, N_1 + \tfrac{1042284611}{9405849600} \, \pi^2
180: + \tfrac{361381739}{1306368000} \, \pi^4 \nonumber \\ &&+ \tfrac{42598397}{685843200} \, \pi^6
181: - \tfrac{1712}{45} \, a_5 + \tfrac{272567}{10800} \, a_4 + \tfrac{13}{960} \, \zeta_7 - \tfrac{613974553}{9072000} \, \zeta_5 +
182: \tfrac{91}{14400} \, \zeta_5 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{277861513}{195955200} \, \zeta_3 - \tfrac{15355283}{8164800} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2
183: + \tfrac{91}{43200} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^4 \nonumber \\ &&- \tfrac{18234067}{8164800} \, \zeta_3^2 - \tfrac{1819}{4050} \, l_2 \, \pi^4 -
184: \tfrac{272567}{259200} \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{214}{405} \, l_2^3 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{272567}{259200} \, l_2^4 +
185: \tfrac{214}{675} \, l_2^5 - \tfrac{15657616211}{44789760} \, l_m - \tfrac{1199}{2160} \, l_m \, N_3 - \tfrac{91}{960} \, l_m \,
186: N_1 \nonumber \\ &&+ \tfrac{3652601}{746496} \, l_m \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{2078929}{1555200} \, l_m \, \pi^4 + \tfrac{13}{12960} \, l_m \,
187: \pi^6 + \tfrac{3424}{135} \, l_m \, a_4 + \tfrac{3411823}{64800} \, l_m \, \zeta_5 + \tfrac{42077383}{311040} \, l_m \, \zeta_3
188: + \tfrac{73807}{116640} \, l_m \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2 \nonumber \\ &&+ \tfrac{91}{1080} \, l_m \, \zeta_3^2 - \tfrac{428}{405} \, l_m \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2
189: + \tfrac{428}{405} \, l_m \, l_2^4 - \tfrac{13597}{14580} \, l_m^2 + \tfrac{121}{270} \, l_m^3 \biggr),
190: \ea
191: \end{widetext}
192: where $C_F$ and $C_A$ are Casimir operators of the fundamental
193: and adjoint representations respectively. In the case of the SU(N)
194: group $C_F = (N^2-1)/2N$ and $C_A = N$. Furthermore, $l_m =
195: \log(m^2(\mu)/\mu^2)$, $l_2 = \log 2$, $\zeta_i$ are Riemann
196: zeta numbers, and $a_i = {\rm Li}_i(1/2)$ with ${\rm Li}_i(x)$
197: the polylogarithm function. The numerical constants $N_i$ are
198: defined by the $\epsilon$ expansion of the vacuum integrals given in
199: Fig.~\ref{masters}, with the understanding that the integration
200: measure per loop is $e^{\epsilon \gamma_E}/i\pi^{2-\epsilon}\int d^d k$
201: \ba
202: \label{num}
203: N_1 &=& + 2369.669517745751, \nonumber \\
204: N_2 &=& + 9090.208679977050, \nonumber \\
205: N_3 &=& - 764.0948373358558, \nonumber \\
206: N_4 &=& - 4647.352454831194, \nonumber \\
207: N_5 &=& - 1.808879546208335.
208: \ea
209: \begin{figure}
210: \epsfig{file=masters.eps,width=8cm}
211: \caption{\label{masters} Definition of the numerical constants $N_i$
212: from the $\epsilon$ expansion of vacuum integrals.}
213: \end{figure}
214: The above numbers have been obtained by changing the normalization of the
215: high precision results of \cite{Schroder:2005va}. In fact, we took the
216: values of all the master integrals needed from there \footnote{Note
217: that there is a misprint in Eq. 6.38 of \cite{Schroder:2005va}, the
218: term $+\pi^4/20\; \epsilon^4$ should read $-\pi^4/20\; \epsilon^4$ (the
219: original source of this result, \cite{Laporta:2002pg}, is
220: correct). Similarly, the term $+36\; \zeta_3\; \epsilon^5$ in Eq. 6.40,
221: should read $-36\; \zeta_3\; \epsilon^5$.}. Relations between the
222: numbers in Eq.~(\ref{num}) discovered in \cite{Chetyrkin:2006dh} have
223: not been used in our analysis. We checked, however, the values of all
224: integrals up to six lines with the help of Mellin-Barnes integral
225: representations and the package \cite{Czakon:2005rk}.
226:
227: The single fermion loop contribution to $\overline{\rm C}_1^{(3)}$
228: with $n_l$ massless quark species is given by
229: \begin{widetext}
230: \ba
231: &+& C_F^2 \, T_F \, \biggl( - \tfrac{155640216647897}{526727577600} + \tfrac{30661}{322560} \, N_1 -
232: \tfrac{391510309}{179159040} \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{288518747}{174182400} \, \pi^4 - \tfrac{30661}{30481920} \,
233: \pi^6 + \tfrac{127252}{945} \, a_4 + \tfrac{30661}{89600} \, \zeta_5 \nonumber \\ &&+ \tfrac{318864713617}{1828915200} \, \zeta_3 +
234: \tfrac{30661}{161280} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{30661}{362880} \, \zeta_3^2 - \tfrac{31813}{5670} \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 +
235: \tfrac{31813}{5670} \, l_2^4 - \tfrac{228583}{19440} \, l_m + \tfrac{139087}{12960} \, l_m \, \zeta_3 - \tfrac{22}{135} \, l_m^2
236: + \tfrac{2}{5} \, l_m^3 \biggr)
237: \nonumber \\
238: &+& C_F^2 \, T_F \, n_l \, \biggl( \tfrac{1080947}{19440} + \tfrac{4793}{103680} \, N_3 - \tfrac{52723}{233280} \, \pi^2 +
239: \tfrac{117811}{194400} \, \pi^4 - \tfrac{4793}{270} \, a_4 - \tfrac{857947}{194400} \, \zeta_5 - \tfrac{25009261}{466560}
240: \, \zeta_3 - \tfrac{4793}{69984} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{4793}{6480} \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 \nonumber \\ &&- \tfrac{4793}{6480} \, l_2^4 -
241: \tfrac{19801}{2160} \, l_m + \tfrac{120817}{12960} \, l_m \, \zeta_3 - \tfrac{22}{135} \, l_m^2 + \tfrac{2}{5} \, l_m^3 \biggr)
242: \nonumber \\
243: &+& C_F \, C_A \, T_F \, \biggl( - \tfrac{11189587381799}{429185433600} + \tfrac{65}{2592} \, N_3 + \tfrac{11339}{645120} \, N_1
244: - \tfrac{188717291}{358318080} \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{6364753}{69672960} \, \pi^4 - \tfrac{11339}{60963840} \, \pi^6
245: + \tfrac{8194}{945} \, a_4 + \tfrac{1724977}{43545600} \, \zeta_5 \nonumber \\ &&+ \tfrac{360428176373}{40236134400} \, \zeta_3
246: - \tfrac{156623}{78382080} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2 - \tfrac{11339}{725760} \, \zeta_3^2 - \tfrac{4097}{11340} \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2
247: + \tfrac{4097}{11340} \, l_2^4 - \tfrac{775451}{349920} \, l_m - \tfrac{7013}{25920} \, l_m \,
248: \zeta_3 + \tfrac{1051}{3645} \, l_m^2 - \tfrac{44}{135} \, l_m^3 \biggr)
249: \nonumber \\
250: &+& C_F \, C_A \, T_F \, n_l \, \biggl( - \tfrac{31394101}{1049760} - \tfrac{4793}{207360} \, N_3 + \tfrac{52723}{466560} \,
251: \pi^2 - \tfrac{26483}{388800} \, \pi^4 + \tfrac{4793}{540} \, a_4 + \tfrac{857947}{388800} \, \zeta_5 + \tfrac{7792237}{933120} \, \zeta_3
252: + \tfrac{4793}{139968} \, \zeta_3 \, \pi^2 \nonumber \\ &&- \tfrac{4793}{12960} \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{4793}{12960} \,
253: l_2^4 - \tfrac{627893}{116640} \, l_m + \tfrac{4183}{2880} \, l_m \, \zeta_3 + \tfrac{1051}{3645} \, l_m^2 - \tfrac{44}{135} \,
254: l_m^3 \biggr),
255: \ea
256: \end{widetext}
257: where $T_F$ is the trace of the fundamental representation, which we
258: take to have the standard value $T_F = 1/2$. Our result does not
259: depend on the number of heavy quark species of mass $m$. It should be
260: understood, however, that all terms without $n_l$ come from the heavy
261: quark loops.
262:
263: The double fermion loop contribution to $\overline{\rm C}_1^{(3)}$ has
264: been published before in \cite{Chetyrkin:2004fq}. We found complete
265: agreement with that result, and reproduce it here only for completeness
266: \begin{widetext}
267: \ba
268: && C_F \, T_F^2 \, \biggl( \tfrac{163868}{98415} - \tfrac{3287}{2430} \, \zeta_3 - \tfrac{14483}{21870} \, l_m + \tfrac{203}{324} \, l_m
269: \, \zeta_3 + \tfrac{236}{3645} \, l_m^2 + \tfrac{8}{135} \, l_m^3 \biggr)
270: + C_F \, T_F^2 \, n_l \, \biggl( - \tfrac{782857}{65610} - \tfrac{29}{2592} \, N_3 + \tfrac{319}{5832} \, \pi^2 \nonumber \\ &&- \tfrac{319}{4860} \, \pi^4
271: + \tfrac{116}{27} \, a_4 + \tfrac{5191}{4860} \, \zeta_5 + \tfrac{340313}{58320} \, \zeta_3 + \tfrac{145}{8748} \, \zeta_3 \,
272: \pi^2 - \tfrac{29}{162} \, l_2^2 \, \pi^2 + \tfrac{29}{162} \, l_2^4 - \tfrac{3779}{21870} \, l_m + \tfrac{203}{324} \, l_m \, \zeta_3
273: + \tfrac{472}{3645} \, l_m^2 + \tfrac{16}{135} \, l_m^3 \biggr)
274: \nonumber \\
275: &&+ C_F \, T_F^2 \, n_l^2 \, \biggl( \tfrac{42173}{32805} - \tfrac{112}{135} \, \zeta_3 + \tfrac{1784}{3645} \, l_m + \tfrac{236}{3645} \,
276: l_m^2 + \tfrac{8}{135} \, l_m^3 \biggr).
277: \ea
278: \end{widetext}
279:
280: Substituting the color factors and the numerical values of the
281: constants, our complete result can be cast in the following form
282: \ba
283: &&1.87882 - 2.79472 \,n_l + 0.0961014 \,n_l^2 \\ &&+
284: 18.4050 \,l_m - 5.26881 \,n_l \,l_m +
285: 0.163146 \,n_l^2 \,l_m \nonumber \\ && - 0.660174 \,l_m^2 +
286: 0.474989 \,n_l \,l_m^2 +
287: 0.0215821 \,n_l^2 \,l_m^2 \nonumber\\ && +
288: 0.656790 \,l_m^3 - 0.256790 \,n_l \,l_m^3 +
289: 0.0197531 \,n_l^2 \,l_m^3. \nonumber
290: \ea
291:
292: In order to determine the mass of a given quark from our perturbative
293: result we shall use the moments of the hadronic cross section
294: defined by
295: \be
296: \label{exp}
297: M_n = \int \frac{ds}{s^{n+1}} R(s).
298: \ee
299: With the help of a dispersion relation, this can be translated into
300: \be
301: M_n = \frac{12 \pi^2}{n!}\left(\frac{d}{dq^2}\right)^n \Pi_h(q^2)\; \big|_{q^2=0}.
302: \ee
303: If one compares the above with Eq.~(\ref{moments}), then the mass is
304: finally given by
305: \be
306: m(\mu) = \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{9}{4}Q_h^2 \;\frac{\overline{C}_n}{M_n^{\rm exp}}\right)^{1/(2n)}.
307: \ee
308: As explained at the beginning, we are only interested in the first
309: moment. The experimental value, Eq.~(\ref{exp}), is made out of three constituents, the
310: resonances, the threshold region and the continuum. We note that tiny
311: changes in the central value of $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ \cite{Bethke:2004uy}
312: entering trough the perturbative result used for the continuum
313: have no impact on the final moments. We observe the same with respect
314: to parts of the five-loop result \cite{Baikov:2004ku}. Therefore,
315: apart from the resonance data for $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$
316: \cite{Eidelman:2004wy}, we adopt the moments from
317: \cite{Kuhn:2001dm}. Note that an alternative set of experimental
318: moments that would lead to a larger error estimate can be found in
319: \cite{Corcella:2002uu,Hoang:2004xm}. After correction for the
320: resonances, we have
321: \ba
322: \left(M^{\rm exp}_1\right)_{\rm charm} &=& 0.2087 \pm 0.0042, \\
323: \left(M^{\rm exp}_1\right)_{\rm bottom} &=& 0.004456 \pm 0.000121.
324: \ea
325: Similarly to \cite{Kuhn:2001dm}, we first determine the mass of the
326: charm quark at 3~GeV, and then run it down to
327: $\overline{m}_c(\overline{m}_c)$. For consistency reasons the running
328: is performed with three-loop accuracy, {\it i.e.} to ${\cal
329: O}(\alpha_s^3)$. We use the package \cite{Chetyrkin:2000yt} and
330: obtain
331: \be
332: \overline{m}_c(\overline{m}_c) = 1.295 \pm 0.009_{\alpha_s} \pm
333: 0.0003_{\mu} \pm 0.012_{\rm exp.}\; {\rm GeV}.
334: \ee
335: The subscripts denote the various sources of the error (variation of
336: $\alpha_s$ within error bars, variation of $\mu$ in the range $3 \pm
337: 1$ GeV and variation of the first moment). The combined error given
338: in the abstract is obtained by adding the errors in squares. We note
339: that the four-loop result gives a shift of -2~MeV whereas the new
340: resonance data -10~MeV. Finally, we observe an almost threefold reduction of
341: the perturbative error.
342:
343: Performing a similar analysis for the b-quark, where the calculation
344: is first done at 10~GeV and then the mass is run down to
345: $\overline{m}_b(\overline{m}_b)$, we obtain
346: \be
347: \overline{m}_b(\overline{m}_b) = 4.205 \pm 0.010_{\alpha_s} \pm
348: 0.002_{\mu} \pm 0.057_{\rm exp.} \; {\rm GeV}.
349: \ee
350: The only change in the error determination with respect to the case of
351: the c-quark is connected to the
352: variation of $\mu$ in the range $10 \pm 5$ GeV. We note, that our
353: result is exactly the same as that of the three-loop analysis in
354: \cite{Kuhn:2001dm}, apart from a reduction of the perturbative error
355: by almost an order of magnitude. We would observe a shift of the
356: central value, if the caculation were performed starting from low
357: values of $\mu$ close to 5~GeV. This is contained in our error
358: estimate from the variation of $\mu$.
359: As a final remark, let us mention that there is some discussion on the resonance
360: contribution of $\Upsilon(4S)$ and $\Upsilon(5S)$
361: \cite{Corcella:2002uu}. Adopting the values suggested by the latter paper, we
362: observe a small shift of a few MeV in the central value, well within
363: our error estimate.
364:
365: The authors would like to thank J. K\"uhn for an interesting
366: discussion on quark masses and sum rules. Parts of the presented
367: calculations were performed on the DESY Zeuthen Grid Engine computer cluster.
368: This work was supported by the Sofja Kovalevskaja Award of the
369: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation sponsored by the German Federal
370: Ministry of Education and Research.
371:
372: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
373:
374: \bibitem{Dougall:2005ev}
375: A.~Dougall, C.~M.~Maynard and C.~McNeile,
376: %``The effect of sea quarks on the mass of the charm quark from lattice QCD,''
377: JHEP {\bf 0601}, 171 (2006);
378: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0508033].
379: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0508033;%%
380: C.~McNeile, C.~Michael and G.~Thompson [UKQCD Collaboration],
381: %``An unquenched lattice QCD calculation of the mass of the bottom quark,''
382: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 600}, 77 (2004).
383: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0408025].
384: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0408025;%%
385:
386: \bibitem{Penarrocha:2001ig}
387: J.~Penarrocha and K.~Schilcher,
388: %``QCD duality and the mass of the charm quark,''
389: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 515}, 291 (2001);
390: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0105222].
391: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105222;%%
392: J.~Bordes, J.~Penarrocha and K.~Schilcher,
393: %``Bottom quark mass and QCD duality,''
394: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 562}, 81 (2003).
395: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0212083].
396: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212083;%%
397:
398: \bibitem{Eidemuller:2000rc}
399: M.~Eidemuller and M.~Jamin,
400: %``Charm quark mass from QCD sum rules for the charmonium system,''
401: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 498}, 203 (2001).
402: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0010334].
403: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010334;%%
404:
405: \bibitem{Hoang:2004wh}
406: A.~H.~Hoang,
407: %``Summing logs of the velocity in NRQCD and top threshold physics,''
408: arXiv:hep-ph/0412160.
409: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412160;%%
410:
411: \bibitem{Kuhn:2001dm}
412: J.~H.~K\"uhn and M.~Steinhauser,
413: %``Determination of alpha(s) and heavy quark masses from recent measurements of
414: %R(s),''
415: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 619}, 588 (2001)
416: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 640}, 415 (2002)].
417: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0109084].
418: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109084;%%
419:
420: \bibitem{Corcella:2002uu}
421: G.~Corcella and A.~H.~Hoang,
422: %``Uncertainties in the MS-bar bottom quark mass from relativistic sum
423: %rules,''
424: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 554} (2003) 133.
425: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0212297].
426: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212297;%%
427:
428: \bibitem{Hoang:2004xm}
429: A.~H.~Hoang and M.~Jamin,
430: %``MS-bar charm mass from charmonium sum rules with contour improvement,''
431: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 594} (2004) 127.
432: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0403083].
433: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403083;%%
434:
435: \bibitem{Chetyrkin:2006xg}
436: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, J.~H.~K\"uhn and C.~Sturm,
437: %``Four-loop moments of the heavy quark vacuum polarization function in
438: %perturbative QCD,''
439: arXiv:hep-ph/0604234.
440: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0604234;%%
441:
442: \bibitem{Eidelman:2004wy}
443: S.~Eidelman {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
444: %``Review of particle physics,''
445: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 592}, 1 (2004).
446: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B592,1;%%
447:
448: \bibitem{Novikov:1977dq}
449: V.~A.~Novikov, L.~B.~Okun, M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein, M.~B.~Voloshin and V.~I.~Zakharov,
450: %``Charmonium And Gluons: Basic Experimental Facts And Theoretical
451: %Introduction,''
452: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 41}, 1 (1978).
453: %%CITATION = PRPLC,41,1;%%
454:
455: \bibitem{Reinders:1984sr}
456: L.~J.~Reinders, H.~Rubinstein and S.~Yazaki,
457: %``Hadron Properties From QCD Sum Rules,''
458: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 127}, 1 (1985).
459: %%CITATION = PRPLC,127,1;%%
460:
461: \bibitem{Shifman:1978bx}
462: M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein and V.~I.~Zakharov,
463: %``QCD And Resonance Physics. Sum Rules,''
464: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 147}, 385 (1979);
465: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,385;%%
466: %M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein and V.~I.~Zakharov,
467: %``QCD And Resonance Physics: Applications,''
468: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 147}, 448 (1979).
469: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,448;%%
470:
471: \bibitem{Chetyrkin:1995ii}
472: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, J.~H.~K\"uhn and M.~Steinhauser,
473: %``Heavy Quark Vacuum Polarisation to Three Loops,''
474: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 371}, 93 (1996);
475: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9511430].
476: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9511430;%%
477: %``Heavy quark current correlators to O(alpha(s)**2),''
478: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 505}, 40 (1997).
479: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9705254].
480: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705254;%%
481:
482: \bibitem{Bai:2001ct}
483: J.~Z.~Bai {\it et al.} [BES Collaboration],
484: %``Measurements of the cross section for e+ e $\to$ hadrons at center-of-mass
485: %energies from 2-GeV to 5-GeV,''
486: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 101802 (2002)
487: [arXiv:hep-ex/0102003].
488: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0102003;%%
489:
490: \bibitem{Groote:2001py}
491: %.~Groote and A.~A.~Pivovarov,
492: %``Low-energy gluon contributions to the vacuum polarization of heavy quarks,''
493: JETP Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 221 (2002)
494: [Pisma Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 75}, 267 (2002)];
495: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0103047].
496: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103047;%%
497: %S.~Groote and A.~A.~Pivovarov,
498: %``Heavy quark induced effective action for gauge fields in the SU(N(c)) x U(1)
499: %model and the low-energy structure of heavy quark current correlators,''
500: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21}, 133 (2001).
501: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0103313].
502: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103313;%%
503:
504: \bibitem{Portoles:2002rt}
505: J.~Portoles and P.~D.~Ruiz-Femenia,
506: %``New contributions to heavy quark sum rules,''
507: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 24}, 439 (2002).
508: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0202114].
509: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202114;%%
510:
511: \bibitem{Broadhurst:1993mw}
512: D.~J.~Broadhurst, J.~Fleischer and O.~V.~Tarasov,
513: %``Two loop two point functions with masses: Asymptotic expansions and Taylor
514: %series, in any dimension,''
515: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 60}, 287 (1993)
516: [arXiv:hep-ph/9304303].
517: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9304303;%%
518:
519: \bibitem{barbieri}
520: R.~Barbieri and E.~Remiddi, Nuovo Cim.{\bf 13A}, 99 (1973).
521:
522: %\cite{Laporta:2001dd}
523: \bibitem{Laporta:2001dd}
524: S.~Laporta,
525: %``High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference
526: %equations,''
527: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 15}, 5087 (2000)
528: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0102033].
529: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102033;%%
530:
531: \bibitem{Czakon:2004bu}
532: M.~Czakon,
533: %``The four-loop QCD beta-function and anomalous dimensions,''
534: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 710}, 485 (2005).
535: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0411261].
536: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411261;%%
537:
538: \bibitem{Schroder:2005va}
539: Y.~Schroder and A.~Vuorinen,
540: %``High-precision epsilon expansions of single-mass-scale four-loop vacuum
541: %bubbles,''
542: JHEP {\bf 0506}, 051 (2005).
543: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0503209].
544: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503209;%%
545:
546: \bibitem{Laporta:2002pg}
547: S.~Laporta,
548: %``High-precision epsilon expansions of massive four-loop vacuum bubbles,''
549: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 549}, 115 (2002);
550: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0210336].
551: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210336;%%
552: S.~Laporta and E.~Remiddi,
553: %``The analytical value of the electron (g-2) at order alpha~3 in QED,''
554: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 379}, 283 (1996).
555: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9602417].
556: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602417;%%
557:
558: \bibitem{Chetyrkin:2006dh}
559: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, M.~Faisst, C.~Sturm and M.~Tentyukov,
560: %``e-finite basis of master integrals for the integration-by-parts method,''
561: arXiv:hep-ph/0601165.
562: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0601165;%%
563:
564: \bibitem{Czakon:2005rk}
565: M.~Czakon,
566: %``Automatized analytic continuation of Mellin-Barnes integrals,''
567: arXiv:hep-ph/0511200.
568: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0511200;%%
569:
570: \bibitem{Chetyrkin:2004fq}
571: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, J.~H.~K\"uhn, P.~Mastrolia and C.~Sturm,
572: %``Heavy-quark vacuum polarization: First two moments of the O(alpha(s)**3
573: %n(f)**2) contribution,''
574: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 40}, 361 (2005).
575: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0412055].
576: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412055;%%
577:
578: \bibitem{Bethke:2004uy}
579: S.~Bethke,
580: %``alpha(s) at Zinnowitz 2004,''
581: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 135}, 345 (2004)
582: [arXiv:hep-ex/0407021].
583: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0407021;%%
584:
585: \bibitem{Baikov:2004ku}
586: P.~A.~Baikov, K.~G.~Chetyrkin and J.~H.~K\"uhn,
587: %``Vacuum polarization in pQCD: First complete O(alpha(s)**4) result,''
588: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 135}, 243 (2004).
589: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,135,243;%%
590:
591: \bibitem{Chetyrkin:2000yt}
592: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, J.~H.~K\"uhn and M.~Steinhauser,
593: %``RunDec: A Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong
594: %coupling and quark masses,''
595: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 133}, 43 (2000).
596: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0004189].
597: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004189;%%
598:
599: \end{thebibliography}
600:
601: \end{document}
602: