1: \documentclass[aps,prd,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[aps,prd,preprint,showpacs,superscriptaddress,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{bm}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8:
9: \title{Probing low-$\bm{x}$ QCD with cosmic neutrinos at the
10: Pierre Auger Observatory}
11:
12: \author{Luis A.~Anchordoqui}
13: \affiliation{Department of Physics,
14: Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA}
15: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
16: P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA}
17: \author{Amanda M. Cooper-Sarkar}
18: \affiliation{Particle Physics, Denys Wilkinson Laboratory,
19: University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK}
20: \author{Dan Hooper}
21: \affiliation{Particle Astrophysics Center,
22: Fermilab, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA}
23: \author{Subir Sarkar}
24: \affiliation{Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics,
25: University of Oxford, 1 Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3NP, UK}
26:
27: \date{\today}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30: The sources of the observed ultra-high energy cosmic rays must also
31: generate ultra-high energy neutrinos. Deep inelastic scattering of
32: these neutrinos with nucleons on Earth probe center-of-mass energies
33: $\sqrt{s} \sim 100$~TeV, well beyond those attainable at terrestrial
34: colliders. By comparing the rates for two classes of observable
35: events, any departure from the benchmark (unscreened perturbative QCD)
36: neutrino-nucleon cross-section can be constrained. Using the projected
37: sensitivity of the Pierre Auger Observatory to quasi-horizontal
38: showers and Earth-skimming tau neutrinos, we show that a `Super-Auger'
39: detector can thus provide an unique probe of strong interaction
40: dynamics.
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: \pacs{95.85.Ry, 13.15.+g, 12.38.-t, 24.85.+p}
44:
45:
46: %12.38.-t Quantum chromodynamics ... ... ...Quarks, gluons, and QCD in
47: %nuclei and nuclear processes, see 24.85.+p
48: %13.15.+g Neutrino interactions
49: %95.85.Ry Neutrino, muon, pion, and other elementary particles; cosmic
50: %rays
51:
52: \maketitle
53:
54: A new window on the Universe is expected to open soon through the
55: observation of ultra-high energy cosmic neutrinos by detectors such as
56: the Pierre Auger Observatory~\cite{Abraham:2004dt} and
57: IceCube~\cite{Achterberg:2006md}. The study of their interactions in
58: the Earth's atmosphere and crust is particularly interesting as this
59: provides a probe of QCD in the kinematic region of very small values
60: of Bjorken-$x$: $x <10^{-3}$, where conventional calculations done in
61: the DGLAP framework become inadequate.
62:
63: The surprising discovery at HERA that the gluon distribution function
64: rises sharply with decreasing $x$ for high virtuality of the exchanged
65: gauge boson $Q^2$, implies a strong increase in the neutrino-nucleon
66: total cross-section. This would however violate unitarity (the
67: Froissart bound) if continued indefinitely, hence there {\em must} be
68: a departure from this behavior at very low values of~$x$.
69:
70: Various possibilities have been entertained in this context (see
71: e.g.,~\cite{Reno:2004cx} for a recent review) which predict a slower
72: rise of the cross-section than the usual DGLAP evolution based
73: calculation~\cite{Gandhi:1998ri} commonly adopted for estimating the
74: effective aperture of detectors, e.g. of Auger, which is sensitive to
75: neutrinos of energy $\agt 10^8$~GeV~\cite{Capelle:1998zz}. Thus, a
76: measurement of the neutrino-nucleon cross-section at such energies,
77: even if relatively crude, would nonetheless be of great interest. For
78: example one can directly test models where saturation effects cause
79: the gluon distribution function to freeze or even {\em decrease} with
80: $x$ below some threshold, $x \alt 10^{-5}$. The former implies a
81: $\nu-N$ cross-section which stays about a factor of 2 below the
82: standard expectation for $E_\nu \sim 10^8 - 10^{10}$~GeV, where Auger
83: is most sensitive. In the latter case the cross-section remains
84: sensibly constant with increasing energy above $\sim 10^9$~GeV, so has
85: a value 10 times below the usual expectation at the upper end of this
86: range.
87:
88: One might wonder how such a measurement can be done given the large
89: uncertainties in the expected fluxes of (the yet to be detected!)
90: cosmic neutrinos. The opportunity arises because of the discovery that
91: the muon and tau neutrinos are maximally mixed. Hence cosmic neutrino
92: beams, generally expected to be $\nu_\mu$'s and $\nu_e$'s from the
93: decays of pions, kaons and perhaps heavy flavours, will necessarily
94: contain a substantial component of $\nu_\tau$'s by the time they reach
95: Earth~\cite{Learned:1994wg}. It has been
96: noted~\cite{Fargion:2000iz,Bertou:2001vm,Feng:2001ue} that
97: Earth-skimming $\nu_\tau$'s will generate {\em upward} going air
98: showers when they interact in the crust. By contrast neutrinos of all
99: flavours will generate deeply penetrating quasi-horizontal air showers
100: which are distinctive in having an electromagnetic component unlike
101: hadron-initiated air showers at such large
102: inclinations~\cite{Zas:2005zz}. The crucial
103: observation~\cite{Kusenko:2001gj} is that while the rate of
104: quasi-horizontal $\nu$-showers is proportional to the $\nu-N$
105: cross-section, the rate of detectable Earth-skimming $\nu_\tau$'s is
106: not. This is because of several effects which come into play in the
107: latter case. For example, a decrease in the cross-section will
108: increase the number of $\tau$'s produced in a region close enough to
109: Earth's surface that are likely to escape. However, the resulting
110: $\tau$'s emerge preferentially at angles outside the acceptance
111: typical of surface arrays. Consequently, the number of detected
112: $\tau$'s is relatively independent of the cross-section. All in all,
113: the {\em ratio} of the two classes of events provides a measure of the
114: absolute $\nu-N$ cross-section, even when there are large
115: uncertainties in the incoming cosmic flux.
116:
117: For example although the (so far unknown) sources of the observed
118: ultra-high energy cosmic rays {\em must} also be sources of ultra-high
119: energy neutrinos, it is difficult to calculate the expected neutrino
120: flux in terms of the observed cosmic ray flux, given our ignorance of
121: the opacity of the sources. The usual benchmark here is the so-called
122: (all flavours) Waxman-Bahcall flux~\cite{Waxman:1998yy}
123: \begin{equation}
124: \phi^\nu_{\rm WB} \simeq 4 \times 10^{-8}
125: \left(E_\nu/\mathrm{GeV}\right)^2
126: \mathrm{GeV}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\,\mathrm{sr}^{-1},
127: \label{wb}
128: \end{equation}
129: for $10^3 \lesssim E_\nu/\mathrm{GeV} \lesssim 10^{11}$, derived
130: assuming that the sources are `transparent' and that 60\% of the proton
131: energy is converted to pions. We will use this flux to estimate the
132: event rates for various models of the neutrino scattering cross-section.
133:
134: The cross-section for charged current (CC) $\nu-N$ scattering
135: is~\cite{Cooper-Sarkar:1997jk}
136: \begin{equation}
137: \sigma_{\rm pQCD} =\int_0^1 \mathrm{d}x \int_0^{xs} \mathrm{d}Q^2
138: {\mathrm{d}^2 \sigma^{\nu N} \over \mathrm{d}x \mathrm{d}Q^2}\, ,
139: \end{equation}
140: where
141: \begin{eqnarray}
142: {\mathrm{d}^2\sigma^{\nu N} \over \mathrm{d}x \mathrm{d}Q^2} & = &
143: {G_\mathrm{F}^2 \over 2\pi x}
144: \bigg({m^2_W \over Q^2 + m^2_W}\bigg)^2
145: \bigg[Y_+\, F_2 (x, Q^2) \nonumber \\
146: & - & y\, F_{\rm L}(x, Q^2) + Y_-\, xF_3(x, Q^2)\bigg]
147: \end{eqnarray}
148: is the differential cross-section given in terms of the structure
149: functions $F_2,$ $F_{\rm L}$ and $xF_3$, and $Y_+ = 1 + (1-y)^2$, $Y_-
150: = 1 - (1-y)^2$ with $y = Q^2/sx$ ($s = 2 E_\nu m_N$ is the
151: center-of-mass (c.m.) energy, $G_{\rm F}$ is the Fermi constant and
152: $m_W$ is the $W$-boson mass). For simplicity, we are considering only
153: CC interactions, as neutral current (NC) interactions are
154: subdominant. At leading order (LO) in perturbative QCD, the structure
155: functions are given in terms of parton distributions as $F_2 = \sum_i
156: x [q_i(x,Q^2) + \bar{q}_i(x, Q^2)],$ $xF_3 = \sum_i x [q_i(x, Q^2) +
157: \bar{q}_i(x, Q^2)]$ and $F_{\rm L} = 0$. However at NLO these
158: relationships involve further QCD-calculable coefficient functions and
159: contributions from $F_{\rm L}$ can no longer be neglected. Parton
160: distribution functions (PDFs) are determined in fits to deep inelastic
161: scattering (DIS) data by the following procedure. The parton
162: distribution functions are parameterised at some initial scale $Q_0
163: \sim 1$~GeV and then evolved, using the next-to-leading order (NLO)
164: DGLAP equations, to higher values of $Q^2$; they are then convoluted
165: with QCD-calculable coefficient functions to give NLO predictions for
166: the structure functions, which are then fitted to the DIS
167: data~\cite{Cooper-Sarkar:1997jk}. Such fits have been made by several
168: different groups~\cite{Martin:2001es,Pumplin:2002vw,Chekanov:2002pv};
169: recent analyses have included estimates of the uncertainties on the
170: PDFs coming from experimental uncertainties.
171:
172: As $Q^2$ increases, the parton distribution functions (particularly of
173: the gluon) grow due to QCD evolution, so that the neutrino
174: cross-section will also grow until the propagator cuts off the growth
175: at $Q^2 \sim m_W^2$. Hence the typical $x$ value probed is $x \sim
176: m_W^2/ 2 m_N E_\nu$~\cite{Frichter:1994mx}. For neutrino energies
177: $E_\nu \sim 10^8 - 10^{10}$~GeV this translates into small $x$ values
178: of $10^{-4} - 10^{-6}$ at $Q^2 \sim 10^4$~GeV$^2.$ HERA measurements
179: do extend down to $x \sim 10^{-6},$ but only at $Q^2 < 0.1$~GeV$^2$,
180: while for $Q^2 \sim m_W^2$ the LHC will probe $5\times 10^{-4} < x <
181: 5\times 10^{-2}$. To probe down to the same kinematic region as Auger
182: would require a hadron collider with c.m. energy exceeding $10^3$~TeV.
183:
184: At small $x$ and high $Q^2$ the $\nu-N$ cross-section is dominated by
185: sea quarks produced by gluon splitting $g \to q \bar q.$ In this
186: kinematic region, the parametrisation of the gluon momentum distribution is
187: approximately: $xg(x,Q_0^2) \propto x^{-\lambda}$ for $x \ll 1$,
188: where $\lambda \simeq 0.3-0.4$. The resulting CC $\nu-N$ cross-section
189: was originally calculated at leading order using 1996 parton distribution
190: functions and parametrised as: $\sigma_\mathrm{unscr}^\mathrm{LO} =
191: 5.53 \, (E_\nu/\mathrm{GeV})^{0.363}~{\rm pb}$ for $10^7 \leq E_\nu
192: \leq 10^{12}$~GeV~\cite{Gandhi:1998ri}. This is the benchmark {\em
193: unscreened} cross-section widely used to evaluate sensitivities of
194: ultra-high energy cosmic neutrino detectors. We show this in
195: Fig.~\ref{fig:sigma} along with our updated calculation using a
196: modern PDF analysis \cite{Chekanov:2002pv} which included the final
197: data from the first phase of HERA running (1993--2000); this data is
198: {\em essential} to obtain information on the PDFs at low-$x$. Our NLO
199: analysis includes corrections for heavy flavours, and, most
200: importantly, a full treatment of experimental uncertainties
201: which were not considered in~\cite{Gandhi:1998ri}.
202: We also show in Fig.~\ref{fig:sigma} a simple power-law fit to our
203: improved CC $\nu-N$ cross-section:
204: \begin{equation}
205: \sigma_\mathrm{unscr}^\mathrm{NLO} =
206: 6.04 \pm 0.40 \, (E_\nu/\mathrm{GeV})^{0.358 \pm 0.005}~\mathrm{pb}\ ,
207: \label{nlo}
208: \end{equation}
209: for $10^7 \leq E_\nu \leq 10^{12}$~GeV. (The tabulated cross-section
210: and other details are provided elsewhere \cite{mandy}.)
211:
212: However, when $x$ is small two further considerations are relevant.
213: First, when $x$ is sufficiently small that $\alpha_\mathrm{s}\,\ln
214: (1/x) \sim 1$, it is also necessary to resum these large logarithms,
215: using the BFKL formalism. Second, the gluon density at small-$x$ is
216: very high and both the DGLAP and the BFKL formalisms neglect
217: non-linear screening effects due to gluon recombination. Such effects
218: would tame the rise of the gluon distribution function at small $x$
219: and may even lead to saturation. An efficient way of modelling this is
220: the color dipole framework in which DIS at low $x$ is viewed as the
221: interaction of the $q \bar q$ dipole to which the gauge bosons
222: fluctuate. An unified BFKL/DGLAP calculation supplemented by screening
223: effects, as well as nuclear shadowing (following the calculation in
224: \cite{CastroPena:2000sx} for $A = 12$), predicts a decrease of the
225: cross-section $\sigma_\mathrm{scr}^{\rm KK}$ by a factor of
226: $\sim 1.2-2$ in the relevant energy range~\cite{Kutak:2003bd}. An
227: alternative recent approach uses the colour glass condensate
228: formalism~\cite{Iancu:2003xm}; this predicts a similar suppression
229: when a dipole model~\cite{Kharzeev:2004yx} which fits data from RHIC is
230: used~\cite{Henley:2005ms}. The predicted cross-section
231: $\sigma_\mathrm{scr}^\mathrm{HJ}$ is even lower if a different dipole
232: model developed to fit the HERA data~\cite{Bartels:2002cj} is used and
233: the gluon distribution is assumed (more speculatively) to {\em
234: decrease} for $x < 10^{-5}$~\cite{Henley:2005ms}. As seen in
235: Fig.~\ref{fig:sigma} this is a factor of $\sim 2-20$ below the unscreened
236: cross-section in the relevant energy range. Other possibilities for
237: the high energy $\nu-N$ cross-section have been
238: discussed~\cite{Jalilian-Marian:2003wf}; an exciting development
239: formulates DIS using gauge/string duality and provides new insights
240: into low-$x$ dynamics \cite{Polchinski:2001tt}.
241:
242: \begin{figure}
243: \setlength{\epsfxsize}{0.98\hsize}\centerline{\epsfbox{pdfs_f1.eps}}
244: \caption{Predicted cross-sections for neutrino-nucleon scattering at
245: high energies. The line with its $1 \sigma$ error band is
246: the fit (Eq.\protect\ref{nlo}) to our calculated
247: $\sigma_{\rm uns}^{\rm NLO} (E_\nu)$ (points with error bars).
248: For comparison we show $\sigma_{\rm uns}^{\rm LO} (E_\nu)$ (dotted line)
249: \protect\cite{Gandhi:1998ri}, $\sigma_{\rm scr}^{\rm KK} (E_\nu)$ (dashed
250: line) \protect\cite{Kutak:2003bd}, and $\sigma_{\rm scr}^{\rm HJ} (E_\nu)$
251: (dot-dashed line) \protect\cite{Henley:2005ms}.}
252: \label{fig:sigma}
253: \end{figure}
254:
255: The Pierre Auger Observatory is the largest cosmic ray detector in the
256: world~\cite{Abraham:2004dt} and when complete will occupy two sites
257: --- one in the Southern and one in the Northern
258: hemisphere. Construction of Auger South on a plateau in Western
259: Argentina is well advanced and it is operating in hybrid mode
260: employing fluorescence detectors overlooking a $\sim 3000$ km$^2$
261: ground array of water \v{C}erenkov detectors. In addition to studying
262: the highest energy cosmic rays, Auger is also capable of observing
263: ultra-high energy cosmic neutrinos
264: \cite{Capelle:1998zz,Bertou:2001vm}.
265:
266: \begin{table}
267: \caption{Neutrino events per year at Auger for different models of the
268: $\nu - N$ cross-section, adopting two benchmark cosmic fluxes and
269: shower energy threshold of $10^8 (10^9)$~GeV.}
270:
271: \begin{tabular}{|c@{}|c|c@{}|c|c|}
272: \hline
273: \hline
274: Model~ & \multicolumn{2}{@{}c}{Waxman-Bahcall} & \multicolumn{2}{@{}c|}{Cosmogenic} \\
275: \hline
276: \cline{1-3} \cline{4-5}
277: &~~${\cal N}_\mathrm{QH}$~~&~~${\cal N}_\mathrm{ES}$~~&~~${\cal N}_\mathrm{QH}$~~&~~${\cal N}_\mathrm{ES}$~~ \\
278: \hline
279: \hline
280: $\sigma_\mathrm{unscr}^{\rm LO}$ & 0.15\phantom{0}~(0.092)~& 3.0~(0.62)~~& 0.061~(0.039)~& 1.2~(0.35)~\\
281: \hline
282: $\sigma_\mathrm{unscr}^{\rm NLO}$ & 0.14\phantom{0}~(0.080)~& 3.0~(0.61)~~& 0.057~(0.036) & 1.2~(0.34)~\\
283: \hline
284: $\sigma_\mathrm{scr}^{\rm KK}$ & 0.10\phantom{0}~(0.057)~& 2.7~(0.54)~~& 0.042~(0.027) & 1.1~(0.31)~\\
285: \hline
286: $\sigma_\mathrm{scr}^{\rm HJ}$ & 0.048~(0.022)~& 1.8~(0.32)~~& 0.018~(0.010) & 0.7~(0.18)~\\
287: \hline
288: \hline
289: \end{tabular}
290: \label{table}
291: \end{table}
292:
293: Given an isotropic flux of neutrinos $\phi^\nu (E_\nu)$, the rate of
294: quasi-horizontal (QH) showers expected to be observed at Auger is
295: proportional to the $\nu-N$ cross-section:
296: \begin{equation}
297: {\cal N}_{\rm QH} \propto \int \mathrm{d}E_{\rm sh} \,\,\sigma_{\nu N} (E_\nu)
298: \,\, A_{\rm QH} (E_{\rm sh}, \theta_{\rm z}) \,\, \phi^\nu (E_\nu)\, .
299: \end{equation}
300: Here $A_{\rm QH}(E_{\rm sh}, \theta_{\rm z})$ is the Auger acceptance,
301: which depends on the zenith angle $\theta_{\rm
302: z}$~\cite{Anchordoqui:2005ey}, and $E_{\rm sh} = y E_\nu$ for $\nu_\mu$
303: and $\nu_\tau$, whereas $E_{\rm sh} = E_\nu$ for $\nu_e$. The
304: expected event rate for the WB flux (Eq.\ref{wb}) is given in
305: Table~\ref{table}.
306:
307: The situation is different for showers initiated by $\tau$'s created
308: by CC interactions of Earth-skimming (ES) $\nu_\tau$'s. To a first
309: approximation the number of such events is
310: \begin{equation}
311: {\cal N}_\mathrm{ES} \propto \int \mathrm{d}E_\mathrm{sh}\
312: \mathrm{d}\cos\theta\ \mathrm{d}\phi\ P(\theta, \phi) A_\mathrm{ES}
313: (E_\mathrm{sh}, \theta) \phi^\nu (E_\nu)\ ,
314: \end{equation}
315: where
316: \begin{equation}
317: P (\theta, \phi) = \int_0^\ell \frac{\mathrm{d}z}{l_\nu^\mathrm{CC}}
318: \mathrm{e}^{-z/l_\nu^\mathrm{tot}}\ \Theta \left[z - (\ell - l_\tau) \right]
319: \label{P}
320: \end{equation}
321: is the probability for a $\nu_\tau$ with incident nadir angle $\theta$
322: and azimuthal angle $\phi$ to emerge as a detectable $\tau$. Here
323: $l_\tau \sim 10$~km is the typical $\tau$ path
324: length~\cite{Feng:2001ue}, $\ell = 2 R_{\oplus} \cos\theta$ is the
325: chord length of the intersection of the neutrino trajectory with the
326: Earth (of radius $R_{\oplus} \approx 6371$~km), $l_\nu^\mathrm{CC}$
327: and $l_\nu^\mathrm{tot}$ are the CC and total neutrino mean free
328: paths, respectively, and $A_\mathrm{ES} (E_\mathrm{sh}, \theta)$ is
329: the experimental acceptance which has a strong dependence on the
330: angle, since the surface detector array can only see events within a
331: few degrees of the horizon~\cite{Zas:2005zz}. In fact, the analytic
332: expression above is an oversimplification; it does not allow for
333: $\tau$ regeneration in the Earth and the $\tau$ path length is not
334: really a step-function. To take such details into account, we have
335: carried out a simple Monte Carlo simulation assuming the NC
336: cross-section to be 40\% of the CC cross-section for all models. The
337: resulting ES event rates are given in Table~\ref{table} --- we find
338: good agreement with results from a sophisticated Monte
339: Carlo that models the environment of Auger and its acceptance
340: accurately \cite{markus}.
341:
342: \begin{figure}
343: \setlength{\epsfxsize}{0.98\hsize}\centerline{\epsfbox{pdfs_f2.eps}}
344: \caption{The expected number of Earth-skimming and quasi-horizontal
345: neutrino events above $10^8$~GeV for different models of the $\nu-N$
346: cross-section; for each model, one of the lines assumes the cosmogenic
347: spectrum and the other line the Waxman-Bahcall spectrum. We show as
348: squares and stars respectively, the corresponding hypothetical
349: measurements (with $1 \sigma$ statistical errors) that could be made
350: in 10~yr with an Auger-like detector scaled up to 10000 square miles.}
351: \label{fig:sensitivity}
352: \end{figure}
353:
354: To evaluate the sensitivity to the assumed spectral index we also
355: consider the ``guaranteed'' cosmogenic neutrino flux which has a
356: peaked distribution in the energy range of
357: interest~\cite{Engel:2001hd}. As shown in Table~\ref{table}, if we
358: consider events with $E_{\rm sh}^{\rm th} > 10^8$~GeV, the change in
359: the spectrum produces a variation in the ratio ${\cal N}_{\rm
360: QH}/{\cal N}_{\rm ES}$ of less than 5\%. We have also verified that a
361: more steeply falling flux $\propto E^{-2.54}$ (with the same $E_{\rm
362: sh}^{\rm th}$) causes a change in ${\cal N}_{\rm QH}/{\cal N}_{\rm
363: ES}$ by about 10\% (e.g, for $\sigma_\mathrm{unscr}^{\rm NLO}$, ${\cal
364: N}_{\rm QH} = 0.69~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ and $ {\cal N}_{\rm ES}= 12~{\rm
365: yr}^{-1}$). Such a flux is expected~\cite{Ahlers:2005sn} if
366: extragalactic cosmic rays from `transparent' sources begin dominating
367: the observed spectrum at $10^{9.6}$~GeV \cite{Bergman:2004bk} rather
368: than at $\sim 10^{10.5}$~GeV as is usually assumed (see Fig.~5
369: in~\cite{Anchordoqui:2005ey} for a comparison of these fluxes). Thus
370: we conclude that the ratio ${\cal N}_{\rm QH}/{\cal N}_{\rm ES}$
371: provides a {\em robust} estimate of the $\nu-N$
372: cross-section~\cite{fluorescence}.
373:
374: Now we discuss the precision with which such a measurement can be
375: made. In Fig.~\ref{fig:sensitivity} we show the numbers of QH and ES
376: events expected for different cross-section predictions and flux
377: expectations. The data points are hypothetical measurements made over
378: 10 years with a proposed `Super Auger' array of area 10000 square
379: miles (25600 km$^2$). Note that by observing just a dozen QH events,
380: we can begin to distinguish between the theoretical models, however
381: from Table~\ref{table} we see that the number of events for the WB
382: flux is an order of magnitude smaller in Auger even after 10
383: years. Hence we are led to entertain the idea of scaling up the array
384: by an order of magnitude, perhaps by using radio detection methods
385: \cite{jim}. Another possibility is to use satellite-borne
386: fluorescence detectors such as EUSO and OWL which may attain the
387: required order of magnitude increase in sensitivity
388: \cite{Palomares-Ruiz:2005xw}.
389:
390: The cosmic neutrino flux can be much higher than the conservative
391: benchmark values we have adopted above. Data from
392: HiRes~\cite{Bergman:2004bk} suggest that it may
393: be~\cite{Ahlers:2005sn} just below the current experimental bound from
394: AMANDA-B10~\cite{Ackermann:2005sb}. The expected event rates in Auger
395: itself would then be high enough to test for any suppression of the
396: UHE $\nu-N$ cross-section. Since the spectrum in this case is softer
397: than the WB flux, IceCube~\cite{Achterberg:2006md}, with its lower
398: energy threshold, should test this model very soon. Indeed IceCube has
399: the sensitivity to see the benchmark WB flux within a few years. Thus
400: there is an emerging synergy between large cosmic ray arrays and
401: cosmic neutrino detectors which will soon establish if there is a
402: realistic possibility for exploring fundamental physics using Nature's
403: own high energy beams. Given that there is no conceivable terrestrial
404: accelerator which can attain such energies, we believe that the
405: construction of Super Auger should be considered seriously; the
406: detection techniques are well developed and the resources required are
407: no larger than for a contemporary collider experiment.
408:
409: \smallskip
410: \noindent
411: LAA is partially supported by NSF Grant No. PHY-0457004. DH is
412: supported by the DOE and by NASA Grant NAG5-10842. SS acknowledges a
413: PPARC Senior Research Fellowship (PPA/C506205/1). We wish to thank Jim
414: Cronin and Alan Watson for discussions and encouragement.
415:
416:
417: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
418:
419: \bibitem{Abraham:2004dt}
420: J.~Abraham {\it et al.} [Pierre Auger Collaboration],
421: %``Properties and performance of the prototype instrument
422: %for the Pierre Auger Observatory,''
423: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 523}, 50 (2004).
424: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A523,50;%%
425:
426: \bibitem{Achterberg:2006md}
427: A.~Achterberg {\it et al.} [IceCube Collaboration],
428: %``First year performance of the IceCube neutrino telescope,''
429: arXiv:astro-ph/0604450.
430: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0604450;%%
431:
432: \bibitem{Reno:2004cx}
433: M.~H.~Reno,
434: %``High energy neutrino cross-sections,''
435: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 143}, 407 (2005).
436: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0410109].
437: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410109;%%
438:
439: \bibitem{Gandhi:1998ri}
440: R.~Gandhi, C.~Quigg, M.~H.~Reno and I.~Sarcevic,
441: %``Neutrino interactions at ultrahigh energies,''
442: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 093009 (1998).
443: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9807264].
444: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807264;%%
445:
446: \bibitem{Capelle:1998zz}
447: K.~S.~Capelle, J.~W.~Cronin, G.~Parente and E.~Zas,
448: %``On the detection of ultra high energy neutrinos with the Auger
449: %Observatory,''
450: Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 8}, 321 (1998).
451: %[arXiv:astro-ph/9801313].
452: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9801313;%%
453:
454: \bibitem{Learned:1994wg}
455: J.~Learned and S.~Pakvasa,
456: %``Detecting tau-neutrino oscillations at PeV energies,''
457: Astropart. Phys. {\bf 3}, 267 (1995).
458: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9405296].
459: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405296;%%
460:
461: \bibitem{Fargion:2000iz}
462: D.~Fargion,
463: %``Discovering ultra high energy neutrinos by horizontal and upward tau
464: %air-showers: First evidences in terrestrial gamma flashes,''
465: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 570}, 909 (2002).
466: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0002453];
467: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0002453;%%
468:
469: \bibitem{Bertou:2001vm}
470: X.~Bertou, P.~Billoir, O.~Deligny, C.~Lachaud and A.~Letessier-Selvon,
471: %``Tau neutrinos in the Auger observatory: A new window to UHECR sources,''
472: Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 17}, 183 (2002).
473: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0104452];
474: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0104452;%%
475:
476: \bibitem{Feng:2001ue}
477: J.~L.~Feng, P.~Fisher, F.~Wilczek and T.~M.~Yu,
478: %``Observability of earth-skimming ultra-high energy neutrinos,''
479: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 161102 (2002).
480: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0105067].
481: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105067;%%
482:
483: \bibitem{Zas:2005zz}
484: E.~Zas,
485: %``Neutrino detection with inclined air showers,''
486: New J.\ Phys.\ {\bf 7}, 130 (2005).
487: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0504610].
488: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0504610;%%
489:
490: \bibitem{Kusenko:2001gj}
491: A.~Kusenko and T.~J.~Weiler,
492: %``Neutrino cross-sections at high energies and the future observations of
493: %ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays,''
494: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 161101 (2002);
495: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0106071];
496: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106071;%%
497: %\bibitem{Anchordoqui:2001cg}
498: L.~A.~Anchordoqui, J.~L.~Feng, H.~Goldberg and A.~D.~Shapere,
499: % ``Black holes from cosmic rays: Probes of extra dimensions and new
500: % limits on TeV-scale gravity,''
501: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 124027 (2002).
502: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0112247];
503: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112247;%%
504:
505: \bibitem{Waxman:1998yy}
506: E.~Waxman and J.~N.~Bahcall,
507: %``High energy neutrinos from astrophysical sources: An upper bound,''
508: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 023002 (1999).
509: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9807282].
510: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807282;%%
511:
512: \bibitem{Cooper-Sarkar:1997jk}
513: %A.~M.~Cooper-Sarkar, R.~Devenish and A.~De Roeck,
514: %``Structure functions of the nucleon and their interpretation,''
515: %Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 13}, 3385 (1998);
516: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9712301];
517: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712301;%%
518: R. Devenish and A.M. Cooper-Sarkar,
519: {\em Deep Inelastic Scattering}
520: (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
521:
522: \bibitem{Martin:2001es}
523: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,
524: %``MRST2001: Partons and alpha(s) from precise deep inelastic scattering and
525: %Tevatron jet data,''
526: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23}, 73 (2002).
527: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0110215].
528: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110215;%%
529:
530: \bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}
531: J.~Pumplin, %{\em et al.},
532: D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,
533: %``New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD
534: %analysis,''
535: JHEP {\bf 0207}, 012 (2002).
536: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0201195];
537: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201195;%%
538:
539: \bibitem{Chekanov:2002pv}
540: S.~Chekanov {\it et al.} [ZEUS Collaboration],
541: %``A ZEUS next-to-leading-order QCD analysis of data on deep inelastic
542: %scattering,''
543: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 012007 (2003).
544: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0208023].
545: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0208023;%%
546:
547: \bibitem{Frichter:1994mx}
548: G.~M.~Frichter, D.~W.~McKay and J.~P.~Ralston,
549: %``Prediction on the ultrahigh energy neutrino
550: %nucleon cross-section from new structure function data at small x,''
551: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 1508 (1995).
552: %[Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 77}, 4107 (1996)].
553: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9409433].
554: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9409433;%%
555:
556: \bibitem{mandy}
557: http://www-pnp.physics.ox.ac.uk/$\sim$cooper/neutrino.html
558:
559: \bibitem{CastroPena:2000sx}
560: J.~A.~Castro Pena, G.~Parente and E.~Zas,
561: %``Nuclear effects on the UHE neutrino nucleon deep inelastic scattering
562: %cross-section,''
563: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 507}, 231 (2001).
564: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0011309].
565: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011309;%%
566:
567: \bibitem{Kutak:2003bd}
568: K.~Kutak and J.~Kwiecinski,
569: %``Screening effects in the ultrahigh energy neutrino interactions,''
570: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 29}, 521 (2003).
571: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0303209].
572: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303209;%%
573:
574: \bibitem{Iancu:2003xm}
575: E.~Iancu and R.~Venugopalan,
576: %``The color glass condensate and high energy scattering in QCD,''
577: in {\em ``Quark Gluon Plasma''}, Vol.~3, p.~249
578: %Eds. R.C. Hwa and X.N.Wang
579: (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).
580: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0303204].
581: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303204;%%
582:
583: \bibitem{Kharzeev:2004yx}
584: D.~Kharzeev, Y.~V.~Kovchegov and K.~Tuchin,
585: %``Nuclear modification factor in d + Au collisions: Onset of suppression in
586: %the color glass condensate,''
587: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 599}, 23 (2004).
588: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0405045].
589: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405045;%%
590:
591: \bibitem{Henley:2005ms}
592: E.~M.~Henley and J.~Jalilian-Marian,
593: %``Ultra-high energy neutrino nucleon scattering and parton distributions at
594: %small x,''
595: arXiv:hep-ph/0512220.
596: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512220;%%
597:
598: \bibitem{Bartels:2002cj}
599: J.~Bartels, K.~Golec-Biernat and H.~Kowalski,
600: %``A modification of the saturation model: DGLAP evolution,''
601: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 014001 (2002).
602: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0203258].
603: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203258;%%
604:
605: \bibitem{Jalilian-Marian:2003wf}
606: J.~Jalilian-Marian,
607: %``Enhancement and suppression of the neutrino nucleon total
608: %cross-section at ultra-high energies,''
609: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 054005 (2003)
610: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 70}, 079903 (2004)];
611: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0301238].
612: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301238;%%
613: %\bibitem{Machado:2003bs}
614: M.~V.~T.~Machado,
615: %``Ultrahigh energy neutrinos and non-linear QCD dynamics,''
616: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 053008 (2004);
617: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0311281];
618: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311281;%%
619: %\bibitem{Fiore:2005wf}
620: R.~Fiore, L.~L.~Jenkovszky, A.~V.~Kotikov, F.~Paccanoni and A.~Papa,
621: %``Asymptotic neutrino nucleon cross section and saturation effects,''
622: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 053012 (2006).
623: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0512259];
624: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512259;%%
625:
626: \bibitem{Polchinski:2001tt}
627: J.~Polchinski and M.~J.~Strassler,
628: %``Hard scattering and gauge/string duality,''
629: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 031601 (2002);
630: %[arXiv:hep-th/0109174];
631: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0109174;%%
632: %\bibitem{Polchinski:2002jw}
633: %J.~Polchinski and M.~J.~Strassler,
634: %``Deep inelastic scattering and gauge/string duality,''
635: JHEP {\bf 0305}, 012 (2003).
636: %[arXiv:hep-th/0209211];
637: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0209211;%%
638: %\bibitem{Brower:2006ea}
639: %R.~C.~Brower, J.~Polchinski, M.~J.~Strassler and C.~I.~Tan,
640: %``The pomeron and gauge / string duality,''
641: %arXiv:hep-th/0603115.
642: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0603115;%%
643:
644: \bibitem{Anchordoqui:2005ey}
645: L.~Anchordoqui, T.~Han, D.~Hooper and S.~Sarkar,
646: %``Exotic neutrino interactions at the Pierre Auger observatory,''
647: Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 25}, 14 (2006).
648: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0508312].
649: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0508312;%%
650:
651: \bibitem{markus}
652: M.~Roth, private communication.
653:
654: \bibitem{Engel:2001hd}
655: R.~Engel, D.~Seckel and T.~Stanev,
656: %``Neutrinos from propagation of ultra-high energy protons,''
657: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 093010 (2001).
658: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0101216].
659: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0101216;%%
660:
661: \bibitem{Ahlers:2005sn}
662: M.~Ahlers {\em et al.},
663: %L.~A.~Anchordoqui, H.~Goldberg, F.~Halzen, A.~Ringwald
664: %and T.J.~Weiler,
665: %``Neutrinos as a diagnostic of cosmic ray galactic / extra-galactic
666: %transition,''
667: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 023001 (2005).
668: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0503229].
669: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0503229;%%
670:
671: \bibitem{Bergman:2004bk}
672: D.~R.~Bergman [HiRes Collaboration],
673: %``Fitting the HiRes Spectra and Monocular Composition,''
674: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 136}, 40 (2004).
675: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0407244].
676: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0407244;%%
677:
678: \bibitem{fluorescence}
679: Fluorescence detection provides roughly uniform coverage in angle and
680: is equally sensitive to any chord length in the Earth, hence the expected
681: ES event rates are nearly {\em independent} of the cross-section. Combining
682: this with QH events measured by a ground array should thus provide a more
683: powerful `hybrid mode' analysis tool.
684: %;to quantify this will require a careful evaluation of the acceptance.
685:
686: \bibitem{jim}
687: J. Cronin, private communication.
688:
689: \bibitem{Palomares-Ruiz:2005xw}
690: S.~Palomares-Ruiz, A.~Irimia and T.~J.~Weiler,
691: %``Acceptances for space-based and ground-based fluorescence detectors, and
692: %inference of the neutrino nucleon cross-section above 10**19-eV,''
693: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 083003 (2006).
694: %[arXiv:astro-ph/0512231].
695: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0512231;%%
696:
697: \bibitem{Ackermann:2005sb}
698: M.~Ackermann {\it et al.},
699: %``Flux limits on ultra high energy neutrinos with AMANDA-B10,''
700: Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 22}, 339 (2005).
701: %%CITATION = APHYE,22,339;%%
702:
703: \end{thebibliography}
704:
705: \end{document}
706:
707:
708:
709:
710:
711:
712:
713:
714:
715:
716: