1: \documentclass[aps,showpacs,nofootinbib,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
2:
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}
5:
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: \def\slashchar#1{\setbox0=\hbox{$#1$}
8: \dimen0=\wd0 \setbox1=\hbox{/} \dimen1=\wd1
9: \ifdim\dimen0>\dimen1 \rlap{\hbox to \dimen0{\hfil/\hfil}} #1
10: \else \rlap{\hbox to \dimen1{\hfil$#1$\hfil}} / \fi}
11: % Puts a slash through a character
12: \def\tstrut{\vrule height2.5ex depth0pt width0pt} % used in tables
13: \def\jtstrut{\vrule height5ex depth0pt width0pt} % used in tables
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: \unitlength=1mm
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: \def\esp{\kern 9mm} %Manolo Valverde defined (pslatex)
18: %------------------------------------------------------
19:
20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
21: % %
22: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
23: % %
24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25: \begin{document}
26: % \eqsec % uncomment this line to get equations numbered by (sec.num)
27: \title{Charged and Neutral Current Neutrino Induced Nucleon Emission
28: Reactions} %
29: % you can use '\\' to break lines
30: \author{J. Nieves}
31: \affiliation{Departamento de F\'{\i}sica At\'omica, Molecular y Nuclear,
32: Universidad de Granada,
33: Granada 18071, Spain}
34: \author{M. Valverde}
35: \affiliation{Departamento de F\'{\i}sica At\'omica, Molecular y Nuclear,
36: Universidad de Granada,
37: Granada 18071, Spain}
38: \author{M.J. Vicente Vacas}
39: \affiliation{Departamento de F\'\i sica Te\'orica and IFIC,
40: Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC\\ Institutos de Investigaci\'on
41: de Paterna, Aptdo. 22085, E-46071 Valencia, Spain }
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44: \rule{0ex}{3ex} By means of a Monte Carlo cascade method, to account
45: for the rescattering of the outgoing nucleon, we study the charged and
46: neutral current inclusive one nucleon knockout reactions off nuclei
47: induced by neutrinos. The nucleon emission process studied
48: here is a clear signal for neutral--current neutrino driven reactions, and
49: can be used in the analysis of future neutrino experiments.
50:
51: \end{abstract}
52: \pacs{25.30.Pt,13.15.+g, 24.10.Cn,21.60.Jz}
53:
54: \maketitle
55:
56: \section{Introduction and Theoretical Framework}
57:
58: Recently an interest in neutrino scattering off nuclei has raised
59: because of its implications in the experiments on neutrino
60: oscillations based on large Cerenkov detectors. The presence of
61: neutrinos, being chargeless particles, can only be inferred by
62: detecting the secondary particles they create when colliding and
63: interacting with matter. Nuclei are often used as neutrino detectors,
64: thus a trustable interpretation of neutrino oscillation data heavily
65: relies on detailed and quantitative knowledge of the features of the
66: neutrino-nucleus interaction~\cite{RCNN}. For instance, in the case of
67: neutrino processes driven by the electroweak Neutral Current (NC), the
68: energy spectrum and angular distribution of the ejected nucleons are
69: the unique observables. Besides, the study of these distributions
70: might also help to improve on our knowledge of the quark and gluon
71: substructure of the nucleon, and in particular on the amount of
72: nucleon spin carried by strange quarks~\cite{finese}.
73:
74: At intermediate energies, above the nuclear giant resonance and below
75: the $\Delta(1232)$ regions, neutrino--nucleus interactions have been
76: studied within several approaches. Several different Fermi gas,
77: Random Phase Approximation (RPA) and shell model based
78: calculations have been developed during the last 15
79: years~\cite{Garvey:1992qp}--\cite{Gr04} to compute neutrino or
80: antineutrino induced single--nucleon emission cross sections. Most of
81: the calculations use the plane wave and distorted wave impulse
82: approximations (PWIA and DWIA, respectively), including or not
83: relativistic effects. The PWIA constitutes a poor approximation,
84: since it neglects all types of interactions between the ejected
85: nucleon and the residual nuclear system. The DWIA describes the
86: ejected nucleon as a solution of the Dirac or Schr\"odinger equation
87: with an optical potential obtained by fitting elastic proton--nucleus
88: scattering data. The imaginary part accounts for the absorption into
89: unobserved channels. This scheme is incorrect to study nucleon
90: emission processes where the state of the final nucleus is totally
91: unobserved, and thus all final nuclear configurations, either in the
92: discrete or on the continuum, contribute. The distortion of the
93: nucleon wave function by a complex optical potential removes all
94: events where the nucleons collide with other nucleons. Thus, in DWIA
95: calculations, the nucleons that interact are lost when in the
96: physical process they simply come off the nucleus with a different
97: energy, angle, and maybe charge, and they should definitely be taken
98: into account. A clear example which illustrates the deficiencies of
99: the DWIA models is the neutron emission process: $(\nu_l, l^-
100: n)$. Within the impulse approximation neutrinos only interact via
101: Charged Current (CC) interactions with neutrons and would emit
102: protons, and therefore the DWIA will predict zero cross sections for
103: CC one neutron knock-out reactions. However, the primary protons
104: interact strongly with the medium and collide with other nucleons
105: which are also ejected. As a consequence there is a reduction of the
106: flux of high energy protons but a large number of secondary nucleons,
107: many of them neutrons, of lower energies appear.
108:
109:
110: In this talk, we present results for the QE $(\nu_l,\nu_l N)$,
111: $(\nu_l,l^- N)$, $({\bar \nu}_l,{\bar \nu}_l N)$ and $({\bar
112: \nu}_l,l^+ N)$ reactions in nuclei. We use a Monte Carlo (MC)
113: simulation method to account for the rescattering of the outgoing
114: nucleon. The first step is the gauge boson ($W^{\pm}$ and $Z^0$ )
115: absorption in the nucleus, we take this reaction
116: probability\footnote{It is given by the inclusive QE cross sections
117: $d^2\sigma /d\Omega^{\prime} dE^{\prime}$ ($\Omega^{\prime}$,
118: $E^{\prime}$ are the solid angle and energy of the outgoing lepton,
119: for a fixed incoming neutrino or antineutrino Laboratory (LAB)
120: energy. We also compute differential cross sections with respect to
121: $d^3r$. Thus, we also know the point of the nucleus where the gauge
122: boson was absorbed, and we can start from there our MC propagation of
123: the ejected nucleon} from the microscopical many body framework
124: developed in Refs.~\cite{NAV05,NVV06} for CC and NC induced
125: reactions. Starting from a Local Fermi Gas (LFG) picture of the
126: nucleus, which automatically accounts for Pauli blocking, several
127: nuclear effects are taken into account in that scheme: {\it i)} a
128: correct energy balance, using the experimental $Q-$values, is
129: enforced, {\it ii)} Coulomb distortion of the charged leptons is
130: implemented by using the so called ``modified effective momentum
131: approximation'', {\it iii)} medium polarization (RPA), including
132: $\Delta-$hole degrees of freedom and explicit pion and rho exchanges
133: in the vector--isovector channel of the effective nucleon--nucleon
134: force, and Short Range Correlation (SRC) effects are computed, and
135: finally {\it iv)} the nucleon propagators are dressed in the nuclear
136: medium, which amounts to work with a LFG of interacting nucleons and
137: it also accounts for reaction mechanisms where the gauge boson,
138: $W^\pm$ or $Z^0$, is absorbed by two nucleons. This model is a
139: natural extension of previous studies on electron~\cite{GNO97},
140: photon~\cite{CO92} and pion~\cite{OTW82,pion} dynamics in nuclei and
141: predicts QE neutrino--nucleus (differential and integrated) cross
142: sections with an accuracy of about 10-15\%, at intermediate
143: energies~\cite{VAN06,picap}.
144:
145: After the absorption of the gauge boson, we follow the path of the
146: ejected nucleon through its way out of the nucleus using a MC simulation
147: method to account for the secondary collisions. Details on the MC
148: simulation can be found in \cite{NVV06}. This MC method was
149: designed for single and multiple nucleon and pion emission reactions
150: induced by pions~\cite{pion1,VicenteVacas:1993bk} and has been
151: successfully employed to describe inclusive $(\gamma, \pi)$, $(\gamma,
152: N)$, $(\gamma, NN)$,..., $(\gamma, N\pi)$,...~\cite{CO92bis,COV94},
153: $(e, e^\prime \pi)$, $(e, e^\prime N)$, $(e, e^\prime NN)$,..., $(e,
154: e^\prime N\pi)$,...~\cite{GNO97bis} reactions in nuclei or the neutron
155: and proton spectra from the decay of $\Lambda$
156: hypernuclei~\cite{Ramos:1996ik}. Thus, we are using a quite robust and
157: well tested MC simulator.
158:
159: \section{Results and Concluding Remarks}
160:
161: The nucleon spectra produced by CC processes induced by muon neutrinos
162: and antineutrinos of 500 MeV are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:res4} for
163: argon. Of course neutrinos only interact via CC with neutrons and
164: would emit protons, but these primary protons interact strongly with
165: the medium and collide with other nucleons which
166: %
167: \begin{figure}[tbh]
168: \begin{center}
169: \includegraphics[scale=0.7, bb=50 350 540 790]{fig6.ps}
170: \caption{ Charged current $^{40}Ar(\nu_{\mu},\mu^-+N)$ (upper panels) and
171: $^{40}Ar(\bar{\nu}_{\mu},\mu^++N)$ (lower panels) cross sections as a function
172: of the kinetic energy of the final nucleon for an incoming neutrino or
173: antineutrino energy of 500 MeV. Left and right panels correspond to
174: the emission of protons and neutrons respectively. The dashed histogram
175: shows results without nucleon rescattering and the solid one the full model.
176: }\label{fig:res4}
177: \end{center}
178: \end{figure}
179: %
180: are also ejected. As a consequence there is a reduction of the flux of high
181: energy protons but a large number of secondary nucleons, many of them neutrons,
182: of lower energies appear. Our cascade model does not
183: include the collisions of nucleons with kinetic energies below 30 MeV. Thus,
184: the results at those low energies are not meaningful and are shown for
185: illustrative purposes only in Fig.\ref{fig:res4}.
186:
187: The flux reduction due to the quasielastic NN interaction can be easily
188: accommodated in optical potential calculations. However in those calculations
189: the nucleons that interact are lost when in the physical process they simply
190: come off the nucleus with a different energy and angle, and may be charge, and
191: they must be taken into account.
192:
193: The energy distributions of nucleons emitted after a NC interaction are shown
194: in Figs.~\ref{fig:res5} and \ref{fig:res5b}. In Fig.~\ref{fig:res5}, we show
195: the results for $^{40}$Ar at two different energies. In both cases we find the
196: large effect of the rescattering of the nucleons.
197: %
198: \begin{figure}[tbh]
199: \begin{center}
200: \includegraphics[scale=0.7, bb= 50 350 540 790]{fig7.ps}
201: \caption{ Neutral current
202: $^{40}Ar(\nu,\nu+N)$ at 500 MeV (upper panels) and 150 MeV (lower
203: panels) cross sections as a function of the kinetic energy of the
204: final nucleon. Left and right panels correspond to the emission of
205: protons and neutrons respectively. The dashed histogram shows results
206: without rescattering and the solid one the full model.
207: }\label{fig:res5}
208: \end{center}
209: \end{figure}
210: %
211: For 500 MeV neutrinos the rescattering of the outgoing nucleon
212: produces a depletion of the higher energies side of the spectrum, but
213: the scattered nucleons clearly enhance the low energies region. For
214: lower neutrino energies, most of the nucleons coming from nucleon
215: nucleon collisions would show up at energies below the 30 MeV cut.
216:
217: As expected, the rescattering effect is smaller in lighter nuclei as
218: can be seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:res5b} for oxygen. In all cases the final
219: spectra of protons and neutrons are very similar.
220: %
221: \begin{figure}[tbh]
222: \begin{center}
223: \includegraphics[scale=0.7, bb= 50 350 540 790]{fig8.ps}
224: \caption{ Same as Fig.\ref{fig:res5} for oxygen.}
225: \label{fig:res5b}
226: \end{center}
227: \end{figure}
228: %
229:
230: The ratio of proton to neutron QE cross section could be very
231: sensitive to the strange quark axial form factor of the nucleon, and
232: thus to the $g^s_A$ parameter~\cite{Garvey:1992qp,Horowitz:1993rj,Alberico98,
233: vanderVentel:2003km}. The sensitivity to the collisions of the final
234: nucleons is larger for both heavier nuclei and for larger energies of
235: the neutrinos. In Fig.~\ref{fig:res11}, one can clearly appreciate
236: the importance of the secondary nucleons at the low energies side of
237: the spectrum.
238: %
239: \begin{figure}[tbh]
240: \begin{center}
241: %\centerline{\includegraphics[height=8.0cm,angle=-90]{ar150.ps}
242: %\includegraphics[height=8.0cm,angle=-90]{ar500.ps}}
243: \includegraphics[scale=0.7, bb= 50 560 540 790]{fig14.ps}
244: \caption{ Ratio of $d\sigma/dE$ for protons over that for
245: neutrons for $E_\nu=150$ MeV and $E_\nu=500$ MeV in the reaction
246: $\nu+^{40}Ar\to \nu'+N+X$ as a function of the nucleon kinetic energy.
247: Dashed histogram: without nucleon rescattering.
248: Solid histogram: full model.}
249: \label{fig:res11}
250: \end{center}
251: \end{figure}
252: %
253:
254: \begin{acknowledgments}
255: This work was supported by DGI and FEDER funds, contracts
256: BFM2005-00810 and BFM2003-00856, by the EU Integrated Infrastructure
257: Initiative Hadron Physics Project contract RII3-CT-2004-506078 and by
258: the Junta de Andaluc\'\i a (FQM-225).
259: \end{acknowledgments}
260: %=============================
261:
262: \begin{thebibliography}{expo99}
263:
264: %=============================
265:
266:
267:
268: \bibitem{RCNN} Proceedings of the RCCN International Workshop On
269: Sub-dominant Oscillation Effects in Atmospheric Neutrino
270: Experiments Kashiwa, 2004, Eds. T. Kajita and K. Okumura,
271: Universal Academy Press, Inc.\ Tokyo, Japan
272:
273: \bibitem{finese}
274: FINeSSe Collaboration, L. Bugel {\it et al.}, ``A
275: proposal for a near detector experiment on the booster neutrino
276: beamline: FINeSSE: Fermilab Intense Neutrino Scattering Scintillator
277: Experiment'', hep-ex/0402007; S.~F.~Pate,
278: %``Don't forget to measure Delta(s),''
279: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A {\bf 24S2} (2005) 67
280:
281: \bibitem{Garvey:1992qp}
282: G.~T.~Garvey, S.~Krewald, E.~Kolbe and K.~Langanke,
283: %``Strange quark contributions to neutrino induced quasielastic scattering,''
284: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 289} (1992) 249; G.~Garvey, E.~Kolbe, K.~Langanke
285: and S.~Krewald,
286: %``Role of strange quarks in quasielastic neutrino scattering,''
287: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 48} (1993) 1919.
288:
289:
290:
291: \bibitem{Horowitz:1993rj}
292: C.~J.~Horowitz, H.~C.~Kim, D.~P.~Murdock and S.~Pollock,
293: %``Neutrino nucleus quasifree neutral current reactions and the nucleon strange
294: %quark content,''
295: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 48} (1993) 3078.
296:
297:
298:
299: \bibitem{Mi95} S.L. Mintz and M. Pourkaviani, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A594}
300: (1995) 346.
301:
302:
303: \bibitem{Alberico98} W.M. Alberico, M.B. Barbaro, S.M. Bilenky,
304: J.A. Caballero, C. Giunti, C. Maieron, E. Moya de Guerra, and
305: J.M. Ud\'\i as, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A623} (1997) 471; Phys. Lett. {\bf
306: B438} (1998) 9; Nucl. Phys. {\bf A651} (1999) 277.
307:
308:
309:
310:
311: \bibitem{Vol00} C. Volpe, N. Auerbach, G. Colo, T. Suzuki and N. Van
312: Giai, Phys. Rev. {\bf
313: C62} (2000) 015501
314:
315: \bibitem{Bl01} C. Bleve, G. Co', I. De Mitri, P. Bernardini,
316: G. Mancarella, D. Martello and A. Surdo,
317: Astr. Part. Phys. {\bf 16} (2001) 145.
318:
319: \bibitem{Ma03} C. Maieron, M.C. Martinez, J.A. Caballero and
320: J.M. Udias, Phys. Rev. {\bf C68} (2003) 048501.
321:
322:
323: \bibitem{MGP03} A. Meucci, C. Giusti and F.D. Pacati, Nucl.Phys.
324: {\bf A739}, 277 (2004); A. Meucci, C. Giusti and F.D. Pacati, Nucl.\
325: Phys.\ A {\bf 744} (2004) 307
326:
327:
328: \bibitem{vanderVentel:2003km}
329: B.~I.~S.~van der Ventel and J.~Piekarewicz,
330: %``Quasielastic neutrino nucleus scattering,''
331: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 69} (2004) 035501
332:
333:
334: \bibitem{janprl} N.~Jachowicz, K.~Vantournhout
335: J.~Ryckebusch and K. Heyde, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93} (2004) 082501.
336:
337: \bibitem{Martinez:2005xe} M.~C.~Martinez, P.~Lava, N.~Jachowicz,
338: J.~Ryckebusch, K.~Vantournhout and J.~M.~Udias, Phys. Rev. {\bf C73}
339: (2006) 024607.
340: %``Relativistic models for quasi-elastic neutrino scattering,''
341:
342:
343: \bibitem{Gr04} K. M. Graczyk and J.T. Sobczyk, Eur. Phys. Jour. {\bf
344: C31} (2003) 177; C. Juszczak, J.A. Nowak and J.T. Sobczyk,
345: Eur. Phys. Jour. {\bf C39} (2005) 195.
346:
347:
348:
349: \bibitem{NAV05} J.~Nieves, J.~E.~Amaro and M.~Valverde,
350: Phys.\ Rev. {\bf C70}, 055503 (2004)
351: [Erratum-ibid. {\bf C72}, 019902 (2005)]
352:
353: \bibitem{NVV06} J.~Nieves, M.~Valverde and M.J. Vicente Vacas,
354: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 73} 025504 (2006).
355:
356:
357:
358: \bibitem{GNO97} A. Gil, J. Nieves and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A627} (1997)
359: 543.
360:
361: \bibitem{CO92} R.C. Carrasco and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A536}
362: (1992) 445.
363:
364: \bibitem{OTW82} E. Oset, H. Toki and W. Weise, Phys. Rep. {\bf 83} (1982) 281.
365:
366: \bibitem{pion} J. Nieves, E. Oset, C. Garc\'\i a-Recio,
367: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A554} (1993) 509; {\it ibidem} Nucl. Phys. {\bf A554}
368: (1993) 554; J. Nieves and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. {\bf C47} (1993) 1478;
369: E. Oset, P. Fern\'andez de C\'ordoba, J. Nieves, A. Ramos and
370: L.L. Salcedo, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. {\bf 117} (1994) 461;
371: C. Albertus, J.E. Amaro and J. Nieves, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89}
372: (2002) 032501; {\it ibidem} Phys. Rev. {\bf C67} (2003) 034604.
373:
374: \bibitem{VAN06} M. Valverde, J.E. Amaro and J. Nieves, {\it
375: hep-ph/0604042}, Phys. Lett. {\bf B} in print.
376:
377:
378: \bibitem{picap} J.E. Amaro, A.M. Lallena and J. Nieves,
379: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A623} (1997) 529; J.E. Amaro, C. Maieron, J. Nieves
380: and M. Valverde, {\em Eur. Phys. Jour.} {\bf A24} (2005) 343.
381:
382:
383:
384: \bibitem{pion1} L.L. Salcedo, E. Oset, M.J. Vicente Vacas and
385: C. Garc\'\i a Recio, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A484} (1988) 557.
386:
387: \bibitem{VicenteVacas:1993bk}
388: M.~J.~Vicente Vacas and E.~Oset,
389: %``Pion absorption in-medium and heavy nuclei,''
390: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 568} (1994) 855.
391:
392:
393: \bibitem{CO92bis} R.C. Carrasco, E. Oset and L.L. Salcedo,
394: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A541} (1992) 585.
395:
396: \bibitem{COV94} R.C. Carrasco, M.J. Vicente Vacas and E. Oset,
397: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A570} (1994) 701.
398:
399: \bibitem{GNO97bis} A. Gil, J. Nieves and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. {\bf
400: A627} (1997) 599.
401:
402:
403: \bibitem{Ramos:1996ik}
404: A.~Ramos, M.~J.~Vicente Vacas and E.~Oset,
405: %``Neutron and proton spectra from the decay of Lambda hypernuclei,''
406: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf C55} (1997) 735
407: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf C66} (2002) 039903].
408:
409:
410: \end{thebibliography}
411:
412:
413:
414:
415: \end{document}
416:
417: