1: %\voffset +5mm
2: \documentclass[prd,aps,nofootinbib,preprintnumbers,showpacs,showkeys]
3: {revtex4}
4: %nofootinbib,
5: \usepackage{graphicx,epsf,amsfonts,amssymb,amsbsy}
6: \newcommand{\cn}{\mathop{\rm cn}\nolimits}
7: \newcommand{\tr}{\mathop{\rm tr}\nolimits}
8: \newcommand{\sn}{\mathop{\rm sn}\nolimits}
9: \newcommand{\Tr}{\mathop{\rm Tr}\nolimits}
10: \newcommand{\diag}{\mathop{\rm diag}\nolimits}
11: \newcommand{\e}{\mathop{\rm e}\nolimits}
12: \newcommand{\ts}{\textstyle}
13: \newcommand{\ds}{\displaystyle}
14: \newcommand{\ints}{\int\limits}
15: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber\\}
16: \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}
17: \newcommand{\vev}[1]{\langle#1\rangle}
18: %\arraycolsep=1.8pt
19: \newcommand{\Det}{\mathop{\rm Det}\nolimits}
20: \preprint{Preprint HU-EP-06/15}
21: \begin{document}
22: \large
23: \title{ \bf Quark and pion condensation in a chromomagnetic
24: background field}
25: \author{
26: D.~Ebert$^{1}$, K.~G.~Klimenko$^{2}$, V.~Ch.~Zhukovsky$^{3}$, and
27: A.~M.~Fedotov$^{3}$}
28: \affiliation{$^{1}$ Institut f\"ur Physik,
29: Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, 12489 Berlin, Germany}
30: \affiliation{$^{2}$ Institute
31: of High Energy Physics, 142281, Protvino, Moscow Region, Russia}
32: \affiliation{$^{3}$ Faculty of
33: Physics, Department of Theoretical Physics, Moscow State University,
34: 119899, Moscow, Russia}
35: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
36: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
37: \begin{abstract}
38: The general features of quark and pion condensation in dense quark matter with
39: flavor asymmetry have been considered at finite temperature in the presence of a
40: chromomagnetic background field modelling the gluon condensate. In
41: particular, pion condensation in the case of a constant abelian
42: chromomagnetic field and zero temperature has been studied both
43: analytically and numerically. Under the influence
44: of the chromomagnetic background field the effective potential of the
45: system is found to have a global minimum for a finite pion condensate even for small values
46: of the effective quark coupling constant. In the strong field limit,
47: an effective dimensional reduction has been found to take place.
48:
49: \end{abstract}
50: \pacs{11.30.Qc, 12.39.-x, 21.65.+f}
51:
52: \keywords{Nambu -- Jona-Lasinio model; pion condensation; external
53: chromomagnetic fields}
54:
55: \maketitle
56: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
57: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}
58: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
59: \setcounter{page}{1}
60: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
61: \section{ Introduction}
62:
63:
64: It is well-known that effective field theories with four-fermion
65: interaction
66: (the so-called Nambu -- Jona-Lasinio (NJL) models), which incorporate
67: the phenomenon of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, are quite useful in
68: describing low-energy hadronic processes (see
69: e.g. \cite{7,kunihiro} and references therein).
70: Since the NJL model displays the same symmetries as QCD,
71: it can be successfully used for simulating some of the QCD ground
72: state properties under the influence of external conditions such as
73: temperature, baryonic chemical potential, or even curved
74: space-time etc. \cite{kunihiro,buballa,odin,klev,klim} In particular,
75: the role of the NJL approach significantly increases, when
76: numerical lattice calculations are not admissible in QCD, like at nonzero
77: baryon density and in the
78: presence of external gauge fields \cite{kl,ekvv}.
79: In this way, it was observed in the framework of a (2+1)-dimensional
80: NJL model that an
81: arbitrary small external magnetic field induces the spontaneous
82: chiral symmetry breaking (CSB)
83: even at arbitrary weak interaction between fermions \cite{2}. Later,
84: it was shown that this phenomenon
85: (the so called magnetic catalysis effect) displays a universal
86: character
87: and can be explained basing on the dimensional
88: reduction mechanism \cite{gus,incera} (for a modern status of the
89: magnetic catalysis effect and its applications in
90: different branches of physics, see the reviews \cite{gus2}).
91:
92: As an effective theory for low energy QCD, the NJL model does
93: not contain any dynamical gluon fields. However, such a nonperturbative
94: feature of the real QCD vacuum, as the nonzero gluon condensate
95: $\vev{F^a_{\mu\nu}F^{a\mu\nu}}$ can be mimicked by external chromomagnetic fields.
96: In particular, for a
97: QCD-motivated NJL model with gluon condensate (i.e. in the
98: presence of an external chromomagnetic field) and finite
99: temperature, it was shown that a weak gluon condensate plays a
100: stabilizing role for the behavior of the constituent quark mass,
101: the quark condensate, meson masses and coupling constants for
102: varying temperature \cite{8}. Then, in a series of papers,
103: devoted to the NJL model with the gluon condensate, it was
104: shown that an external chromomagnetic field, similar to the ordinary
105: magnetic field,
106: serves as a catalyzing factor in the fermion mass generation
107: and dynamical breaking of chiral symmetry as well \cite{klim2}.
108: The basis for this phenomenon is also the effective reduction of the
109: space dimensionality in the presence of strong external
110: chromomagnetic
111: fields, and this does not depend on the particular form of the field
112: configurations \cite {zheb}.
113:
114: At present time, it is well-established (see, e.g.,
115: \cite{saito}) that the gluon condensate is a very slowly decreasing
116: function of the baryon density (baryon chemical potential). So in
117: cold
118: quark matter, it is a nonzero quantity even at sufficiently large
119: baryon densities, which are expected to exist inside the neutron star
120: cores. Evidently, the
121: consideration of the gluon condensate may change significantly the
122: generally
123: accepted picture of physical processes in the baryon matter. For
124: instance, according to the modern point of view, the
125: color superconducting (CSC) phenomenon can be realized in neutron
126: star cores (see the reviews \cite{buballa}). However, according to
127: \cite{agas}, the critical parameters of this phase transition
128: strongly depend on the value of the gluon condensate (in this
129: case, only its chromomagnetic component survives).
130: Moreover, it turns out that even for a rather weak quark coupling,
131: different
132: external chromomagnetic field configurations induce the CSC
133: phenomenon \cite{ebklim}. Quite recently it was found that some
134: combinations of external chromomagnetic and ordinary magnetic
135: fields can penetrate into a bulk of the CSC medium and modify its
136: ground
137: state, producing a new type of color superconductivity
138: \cite{ferrer}. Finally, note that in the dense quark matter,
139: a superstrong magnetic field is originated due to the presence of the
140: gluon
141: condensate \cite{iwazaki}. In conclusion, we see that there exist
142: several new physical effects that are intrinsically connected with
143: the gluon condensate (external chromomagnetic fields).
144:
145: In the present paper, we study the influence of an external
146: chromomagnetic field on the pion condensation phenomenon. This phase
147: transition can
148: also occur in the dense baryon matter, although isotopic
149: asymmetry, with different densities of up and down quarks, is
150: needed for this process to take place. This type of quark matter was
151: already
152: investigated in the framework of NJL type of models, both with and
153: without pion condensation
154: \cite{bub,bed,barducci,zhuang,dekgk}. The main purpose of the present
155: paper is to investigate, in the framework of a NJL model, the
156: behavior of the quark and pion condensation in the presence of an
157: external chromomagnetic field, modelling the gluon
158: condensate. In particular, we will show that, even for a weak coupling
159: of quarks, the pion condensation effect is
160: induced by an external chromomagnetic field and is related
161: to an effective dimensional reduction.
162: The latter effect leads to a nonanalytic logarithmic dependence of
163: the quark and pion condensates on the field strength in the strong
164: field limit.
165:
166: \section{ Quark and pion condensates in external fields}
167:
168: For a system, composed of two flavored quarks, there exists the relation
169: $n_Q=n_{I_3}+n_B/2$ between the electric charge density $n_Q$, the
170: baryon charge density $n_B$ and the density
171: $n_{I_3}=\frac 12\bar q\tau_3q$ of the third isospin component
172: $I_3=\tau_3/2$.
173: Since these quantities are linearly dependent, we will study in the
174: following the isotopic asymmetry (which means
175: that different species of quarks have different densities)
176: in dense quark matter
177: with a nonzero baryon chemical potential $\mu_B$.
178: In this case, the chemical potentials
179: $\mu_B$ and $\mu_I$ (where $\mu_I$ is the isospin chemical potential)
180: are independent parameters. Note that in another
181: possible case, i.e., $\mu_B\ne 0$, $\mu_Q\ne 0$
182: (the last quantity is the electric charge chemical potential),
183: they are no more independent, but related through the electric
184: charge neutrality condition $n_Q=0$, if one assumes that quarks are in a
185: weak-equilibrium with electrons, and the whole system is electrically
186: neutral. We restrict ourselves here to the
187: first possibility, i.e. suppose that $\mu_B$ and $\mu_I$ are
188: independent quantities. In our investigations we also suppose that
189: $\mu_B$ is a rather small quantity. In this case, as well as at
190: sufficiently high flavor asymmetry, the color superconductivity
191: effects may
192: be neglected in favour of the normal quark matter or pion
193: superfluidity effects (see the recent discussions in
194: \cite{bed,zhuang}).
195:
196: \subsection{ General definitions}
197:
198: Let us consider a NJL model of flavored and colored quarks $q_{i\alpha}\,
199: (i=1,\dots,N_f,\,\alpha=1,\dots,N_c)$ with $N_f=2, N_c=3$ as numbers
200: of flavors and colors, respectively
201: (for convenience, corresponding indices are
202: sometimes suppressed in what follows),
203: moving in an external chromomagnetic field.
204: The underlying quark Lagrangian
205: is chosen to contain four-quark interaction terms
206: responsible for spontaneous breaking of chiral
207: and flavor symmetries. Hence, two types of condensates might
208: characterize the
209: ground state of the model: the quark
210: condensate $\vev{\bar qq}$ (spontaneous breaking of chiral
211: symmetry), and the pion condensate $\vev{\bar q \gamma_5\tau_1 q}$
212: (spontaneous breaking of parity and isotopic symmetry). In particular,
213: we consider a Lagrangian which describes dense quark matter
214: with an isotopical asymmetry, and we neglect diquark interactions
215: and
216: hence the possible formation
217: of a diquark condensate. Upon performing
218: the usual
219: bosonization procedure \cite{EbPerv}, \cite {7}
220: and introducing meson fields $\sigma,\,\vec{\pi}$, the four-quark
221: terms are replaced by
222: Yukawa interactions of quarks with these fields, and the Lagrangian
223: takes the following form
224: (our notations refer to four--dimensional Euclidean space with
225: $it=x_4$~\footnote{
226: We consider $\gamma-$matrices in the $4-$dimensional Euclidean space
227: with the metric tensor $g_{\mu\nu}=\diag (-1, -1, -1, -1)$, and the
228: relation between the Euclidean and Minkowski time
229: $x_{(E)}^0=ix_{(M)}^0
230: $: $ \gamma_{(E)}^0=i\gamma_{(M)}^0, \,
231: \gamma_{(E)}^k=\gamma_{(M)}^k.$ In what follows we denote the
232: Euclidean Dirac matrices as $\gamma_{\mu}$, suppressing the subscript
233: $(E).$ They have the following basic properties $\gamma_{\mu}^+= -
234: \gamma_{\mu},\,\{ \gamma_{\mu},\gamma_{\nu}\}=- 2\delta_{\mu\nu}.$
235: The charge conjugation operation for Dirac spinors is defined as $
236: \psi_c(x)\quad =\quad C\left(\psi(x)^+\right)^t $ with $
237: C\gamma_{\mu}^tC^{-1}=-\gamma_{\mu}.$ We choose the standard
238: representation for the Dirac matrices (see \cite{Rho}). The
239: $\gamma_5$
240: has the following properties:
241: $\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma_5\}=0,\quad\gamma_5^+=\gamma_5^t=\gamma_5.$
242: Hence, one finds for the charge-conjugation matrix:
243: $C=\gamma^0\gamma^2,\quad C^+=C^{-1}=C^t=-C.$}):
244: \begin{eqnarray}
245: {\cal L} &=&-\bar q(i\gamma_\nu\nabla_\nu
246: +i\mu\gamma_0+\sigma+m +i\gamma^5\vec
247: \tau\vec\pi+i\mu'\tau_3\gamma^0)q-\frac{1}{4G}(\sigma^2+\vec \pi^2).
248: \label{1}
249: \end{eqnarray}
250: Here $\mu=(\mu_u + \mu_d)/2$ is the chemical
251: potential averaged over flavors
252: \footnote{It is equal to one third of the baryon chemical potential:
253: $\mu=\mu_B/3$.
254: Since the generator $I_3$ of the third component of isospin is equal
255: to $\tau_3/2$, the quantity $\mu'$ in (\ref{1}) is half
256: the isospin chemical potential, $\mu'=\mu_I/2$.}, $\mu'=(\mu_u
257: -\mu_d)/2$ is their difference, and $G$ is the
258: (positive) four-quark coupling constant.
259: Furthermore,
260: $\nabla _\mu
261: =\partial_{\mu}-igA_{\mu}^a\lambda_a/2$ is the covariant
262: derivative of quark fields in the background field $F_{\mu
263: \nu }^a=\partial _\mu A_\nu ^a-\partial _\nu A_\mu ^a+gf_{abc}A_\mu
264: ^bA_\nu ^c$ determined by the potentials $A_\mu ^a\left(
265: a=1,...,8\right)$, and
266: $\lambda_a/2$ are the generators of the
267: color $SU_c(3)$ group. Finally, $\vec \tau\equiv (\tau^{1},
268: \tau^{2},\tau^3)$ are Pauli
269: matrices in the flavor space.
270:
271: Evidently, the Lagrangian (\ref{1}) with nonvanishing current quark
272: masses, $m\ne 0$, is invariant under the baryon
273: $ U_B(1)$ symmetry and the parity transformation P. Moreover,
274: without the $\mu'$-term, it
275: is also invariant under the isospin $SU_I(2)$ group which is
276: reduced to
277: $U_{I_3}(1)$ at $\mu'\ne 0$. At $m=0$ and $\mu'\ne 0$ the
278: symmetry group of the initial model is
279: $U_B(1)\times U_{I_3L}(1)\times U_{I_3R}(1)\times P$ (here the
280: subscripts $L,R$ mean that the corresponding group acts only on
281: the left, right handed spinors, respectively). It is very convenient
282: to present
283: this symmetry as $U_B(1)\times U_{I_3}(1)\times U_{AI_3}(1)\times
284: P$, where $U_{I_3}(1)$ is the isospin subgroup and
285: $ U_{AI_3}(1)$ is the axial isospin subgroup. Quarks are
286: tranformed
287: under
288: these
289: groups in the following ways $q\to\exp
290: (i\alpha\tau_3) q$ and $q\to\exp (i\alpha\gamma^5\tau_3) q$,
291: respectively. In the
292: case of
293: $m= 0$
294: the
295: phase structure of the model (\ref{1}) is defined by the competition
296: of only two condensates. One of them is the quark condensate
297: $\vev{\bar qq}$, and the other is the pion condensate $\vev{\bar q
298: \gamma_5\tau_1 q}$. If the ground state of the model is characterized
299: by $\vev{\bar qq}\ne 0$ and $\vev{\bar q \gamma_5\tau_1 q}= 0$, then
300: the axial symmetry $ U_{AI_3}(1)$
301: of the model is spontaneously broken down, but isospin symmetry $
302: U_{I_3}(1)$ and parity P remain intact. However, if $\vev{\bar q
303: \gamma_5\tau_1 q}\ne 0$ and $\vev{\bar qq}= 0$,
304: then only parity P and the isospin symmetry are spontaneously
305: broken
306: down and the pion condensed phase is realized in the model. As a
307: consequence, in the last case we have $\vev{\bar q \tau_3 q}\ne 0$,
308: i.e., a nonzero difference in densities of up and down quarks arises
309: (isotopic asymmetry of the ground state). Generally speaking, the
310: inverse is not true, i.e., if there is an isotopic asymmetry of quark
311: matter, this does not necessarily mean that pion condensation
312: phenomenon does occur.
313:
314: In order to investigate the possible
315: generation of quark and pion condensates in the framework of the
316: initial model
317: (\ref{1}), let us introduce the partition function $Z$ of the
318: system
319: \begin{equation}
320: Z =\exp W_{E}\,\,=\,\,\int dqd\bar{q}d\sigma d\pi_i \exp
321: \left[\int d^4x{\cal L}\right]
322: \label{2}
323: \end{equation}
324: with $W_{E}$ being the Euclidean effective action.
325: Here, the meson fields can be decomposed as follows
326: \[
327: \sigma=\sigma^{(0)}+\delta \sigma,\,\,\,\vec \pi=\vec
328: \pi^{(0)}+\delta \vec \pi,
329: \]
330: where $\sigma^{(0)}$ and $\vec \pi^{(0)}$ are the condensate
331: fields, which are
332: determined by the minimum of the effective action,
333: \[
334: {\delta\log Z\over \delta\sigma^{(0)}}=-\vev{\bar q q+{1\over
335: 2G}(\sigma^{(0)}+\delta \sigma)}=0,
336: \]
337: \[
338: {\delta\log Z\over \delta\vec\pi^{(0)}}=-\vev{\bar q i\gamma_5\vec
339: \tau
340: %%%%%%%\vec \pi
341: q+{1\over 2G}(\vec\pi^{(0)}+\delta \vec\pi)}=0.
342: \]
343: Notice that the above expectation values are expressed through
344: functional integrals over the quark and meson fields, where the
345: latter are calculated
346: by using the saddle point approximation
347: (in what follows, we shall denote these mean
348: values again by $\sigma$ and $\vec\pi$, respectively). Thus,
349: instead of
350: Eq. (\ref{2}), we shall deal with the following functional
351: integral over fermion fields:
352: \begin{equation}
353: Z =\exp W_{E}\,\,=\,\,\int dqd\bar{q} \exp
354: \left[\int d^4x{\cal L}\right],
355: \label{2_}
356: \end{equation}
357: where now $\sigma$ and $\vec\pi$ in the Lagrangian (\ref {1}) are
358: understood as constant
359: condensates.
360: In the mean field approximation, where field fluctuations
361: $\delta \sigma$ and $\delta \vec \pi$ are neglected, they are given by
362: the following gap equations
363: \begin{eqnarray}
364: -\frac {1}{2G}\sigma=\vev{\bar{q} q},\,\,\,\,
365: -\frac {1}{2G}\vec\pi=\vev{i\bar{q}\vec \tau\gamma_5 q}.
366: \label{delta1}
367: \end{eqnarray}
368: Assume that the only
369: nonvanishing components of the background gauge field potential are
370: for $a=1,2,3$, while others are equal to zero,
371: %%%%%%%%%%%
372: \footnote{Of course, if the external constant homogeneous gauge field
373: fills the whole space, then the color as well as the rotational
374: symmetries of the system are broken. This might be considered as an
375: artifact, since in reality there exist both color and rotational
376: invariance (we ignore the color superconductivity effects). In our
377: case, in order to deal with a physically acceptable ground state,
378: i.e. without color symmetry breaking, one can interpret it as a
379: space split
380: into an infinite number of domains with macroscopic extension. Inside
381: each such domain there exist a homogeneous background
382: chromomagnetic field, which generates a nonzero gluon condensate
383: $\vev{F^a_{\mu\nu}F^{a\mu\nu}}$. Moreover, the direction of the gauge
384: field varies from domain to domain, so the averaging over all domains
385: results in a zero background chromomagnetic field. Therefore, color
386: as
387: well as rotational symmetries are not broken. Strictly speaking, our
388: following calculations refer to some given macroscopic domain. The
389: obtained results turn out to depend on color and rotational invariant
390: quantities only, and are independent of the particular domain.}
391: %%%%%%%%%%
392: \[A_{\mu}^a\ne
393: 0,\,{\rm when}\,\,a=1,2,3,\,\,{\rm and}\,\, A_{\mu}^a=0,\,{\rm
394: when}\,\,a=4,\dots,8.\]
395: This implies
396: that only quarks of two colors $\alpha =1,2$ do interact with the
397: background field $A_{\mu}^a$.
398: %, corresponding to the residual $SU_c(2)$
399: %symmetry group of the vacuum. In this case,
400: As a result,
401: the integration over quark degrees of freedom in the partition
402: function (\ref{2_}) is greatly simplified, and we have
403: \begin{equation}
404: Z=\Det_{(1)}(i\gamma\partial+{\cal M})
405: \cdot\Det_{(2)}(i\gamma\nabla+{\cal M}),
406: \label{intermediate}
407: \end{equation}
408: where ${\cal M}=m+\sigma
409: +i\gamma^5\vec\pi\vec\tau+i\mu\gamma_0+i\mu'\tau_3\gamma^0$, and
410: indices (1) and (2) mean that determinants are calculated in the
411: one-dimensional (with color $\alpha=3$) and in the
412: two-dimensional (with colors $\alpha=1,2$) subspaces of the color
413: group, respectively.
414: Assume now that the background field is constant and homogeneous,
415: $F_{\mu\nu}^a=const$. Then the Dirac equations
416: \[
417: \left(i\gamma \partial + {\cal M}\right)\psi=0 ,
418: ~~~~~~~~\left(i\gamma \nabla + {\cal M}\right)\psi=0
419: \]
420: have stationary
421: solutions with the energy spectrum $\varepsilon$
422: for quarks of flavor $i$ and color $\alpha=1,2,3$ with quantum
423: numbers $k$
424: moving in the constant background field $F_{\mu\nu}^{a} (a=1,2,3)$.
425: In this case, we arrive at the following Euclidean effective
426: action: \begin{equation}
427: W_E=\tau\int \frac{dp_4}{2\pi
428: }\sum_{\lambda,\alpha,k,\kappa}\log
429: \left[p_4^2+(\varepsilon-\kappa\mu)^2\right] - (\tau
430: L^3){\sigma^2+\vec \pi^2\over 4G}.
431: \label{3}
432: \end{equation}
433: Here, $\tau$ is the imaginary time interval, the sum is over the
434: signs $\lambda=\pm 1$ of the
435: chemical potential $\mu'$, the signs $\kappa=\pm1$ of the
436: chemical potential $\mu$, corresponding
437: to charge conjugate contributions of
438: quarks, color indices $\alpha=1,2,3,$ and also over quantum numbers
439: $k$ of quarks, with $\alpha=3$ for free quarks
440: %%%%(not
441: %%%%interacting with the color $SU_c(2)$ field)
442: and the spectrum
443: \begin{equation}
444: \eps=\varepsilon_{\vec p, \lambda}=\sqrt{\Big
445: (\sqrt{(\sigma+m)^2+\vec p^2
446: +\pi_3^2}+\lambda\mu'\Big )^2+\pi_1^2+\pi_2^2},\quad (\lambda=\pm 1),
447: \end{equation}
448: and with $\alpha=1,2$ for quarks with the spectrum
449: \begin{eqnarray}
450: \eps=\varepsilon_{k, \lambda}=\sqrt{\Big
451: (\sqrt{(\sigma+m)^2+{\Pi}_k^2
452: +\pi_3^2}+\lambda\mu'\Big )^2+\pi_1^2+\pi_2^2}, \quad (\lambda=\pm 1),
453: \label{45}
454: \end{eqnarray}
455: moving in the background color field
456: $F_{\mu\nu}^a\,(a=1,2,3)$. In the above formula, ${\Pi}_k^2$ stands
457: for
458: the eigenvalues of the squared Dirac operator $-(\vec\gamma\vec
459: \nabla)^2$
460: with $\vec \nabla=\vec \partial - ig\vec A^a \lambda_a/2$.
461:
462: In the case of finite temperature $T= 1/
463: \beta >0$, the thermodynamic potential $\Omega=-W_E/(\beta L^{3})$
464: is obtained after substituting $p_4\rightarrow \frac{2\pi
465: }\beta (l+\frac 12), l=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,...$,
466: \begin{eqnarray}
467: \Omega&=&-\frac 1{\beta L^{3}}\sum_{\lambda,\kappa}\sum_{k,\alpha}
468: \sum^{l=+\infty}_{l=-
469: \infty}\log\left[\left(\frac{2\pi(l+1/2)}{\beta
470: }\right)^2+(\eps-\kappa\mu)^2\right]+\frac{\sigma^2+\vec{\pi}^2}{4G}
471: + C, \label{450}
472: \end{eqnarray}
473: where we introduced a subtraction constant $C$ in such a way that at $
474: \sigma=\vec{\pi}=0$ we have
475: $ \Omega=0 $.
476: Next, let us consider the proper time representation
477: \begin{equation}
478: \Omega = \frac 1{\beta
479: L^{3}}\sum_{\lambda,\kappa}\sum_{k,\alpha}\sum^{l=+\infty}_{l=-
480: \infty}
481: \ints^{\infty}_{1/\Lambda_s^2}\frac{ds}s
482: \exp\biggl[-s\left(\frac{2\pi(l+1/2)}{\beta}\right)^2
483: -s(\eps-\kappa\mu)^2\biggr]+\frac{\sigma^2+\vec{\pi}^2}{4G} + C,
484: \label{mu}
485: \end{equation}
486: where $\Lambda_s $ is an ultraviolet cutoff ($\Lambda_s \gg
487: \sigma,\,|\vec\pi|$).
488: The
489: temperature dependent contribution can be further transformed with
490: the help of the formula
491: \begin{equation}
492: \label{eq19}
493: \sum _{l=-\infty }^{+\infty }\exp [-s(2\pi l/\beta +x)^2]=\frac
494: {\beta }
495: {2 \sqrt{\pi s}}[1+2\sum _{l=1}^{\infty }\exp (-\frac{\beta
496: ^2l^2}{4s})
497: \cos (x\beta l)],
498: \end{equation}
499: where in our case $x={\pi\over\beta}$. Then, calculating the
500: quark condensate
501: \begin{equation} \langle \bar{q}q\rangle =
502: \frac{\ds\int\,d\bar qdq ~~ \bar{q}q \exp\left[\ds\int\,d^4x {\cal
503: L} \right]} {\ds\int\,d\bar{q}dq \exp \left[\ds\int\,d^4x {\cal
504: L} \right]},
505: %=-\frac{1}{ Z}\frac{\partial Z_q}{\partial
506: %\sigma}=\frac {\partial \Omega}{\partial \sigma},
507: \label{5}
508: \end{equation}
509: and combining the result of (\ref{5}) and (\ref{delta1}), we obtain
510: the following gap equation:
511: \begin{equation} \frac
512: {\sigma}{G} =
513: \frac{\sigma+m}{L^{3}\sqrt{\pi}}\sum_{\lambda,\kappa}\sum_{k,\alpha}
514: \ints^{\infty}_{1/\Lambda_s^2}
515: \frac{\ds
516: ds}{\sqrt{s}}\left[1+2\sum^{\infty}_{l=1}(-1)^l
517: \e^{\ts-\frac{\beta^2l^2}{4s}}\right]\e^{\ts-s(\eps-\kappa\mu)^2}
518: \frac {(\eps -
519: \kappa\mu)\sqrt{\varepsilon^2-\pi_1^2-\pi_2^2}}{\eps(\sqrt{
520: \varepsilon^2-\pi_1^2-\pi_2^2}-\lambda\mu')}.
521: \label{6}
522: \end{equation}
523: Here, the first term in the square brackets describes the $T=0$
524: contribution (it corresponds to the result of integration over $p_4$
525: in the initial equation (\ref{3})), while the second term is the
526: finite temperature
527: contribution, $T\ne 0$.
528: The $\vec\pi$-condensate
529: can be obtained in a similar way. For $\pi_{3}$ we have
530: \begin{equation}
531: \frac {\pi_{3}}{G}\,=\,
532: \frac{\pi_{3}}{L^{3}\sqrt{\pi}}\sum_{\lambda,\kappa}\sum_{k,\alpha}
533: \ints^{\infty}_{1/\Lambda_s^2}
534: \frac{\ds
535: ds}{\sqrt{s}}\left[1+2\sum^{\infty}_{l=1}(-1)^l
536: \e^{\ts-\frac{\beta^2l^2}{4s}}\right]\e^{\ts-s(\eps-\kappa\mu)^2}
537: \frac {(\eps -
538: \kappa\mu)\sqrt{\varepsilon^2-\pi_1^2-\pi_2^2}}{\eps(\sqrt{
539: \varepsilon^2-\pi_1^2-\pi_2^2}-\lambda\mu')}.
540: \label{qq}
541: \end{equation}
542: By comparing this expression with that for $\sigma$, we conclude that
543: for nonvanishing quark mass $m\ne 0$ this condensate vanishes,
544: $\pi_3=0$. For
545: $\pi_1$ (putting $\pi_2=0$ by consideration of the symmetry of the
546: problem) we have
547: \begin{equation}
548: \frac
549: {\pi_1}{G}\,=\,\frac{\pi_1}{L^{3}\sqrt{\pi}}\sum_{\lambda,\kappa}\sum
550: _{k,\alpha}\ints^{\infty}_{1/\Lambda_s^2}
551: \frac{\ds
552: ds}{\sqrt{s}}\left[1+2\sum^{\infty}_{l=1}(-1)^l
553: \e^{\ts-\frac{\beta^2l^2}{4s}}\right]\frac {(\eps -
554: \kappa\mu)}{\eps}\e^{\ts-s(\eps-\kappa\mu)^2}.\label{qqq}
555: \end{equation}
556: It follows from (\ref{6}) and (\ref{qqq}) that at $m=0$ and $\mu'\ne
557: 0$ there exist only two different
558: solutions of this system of gap equations
559: (except for the trivial one with $\sigma = \pi_1 =0$), i.e., a)
560: $\sigma =0, \pi_1 \ne 0$ and b) $\sigma \ne 0, \pi_1=0$. Thus we
561: have to find out which of these
562: solutions provide the global minimum of the
563: thermodynamic potential (\ref{450}) with $\mu'\ne 0$.
564:
565: In the limit of a vanishing external
566: field ($F_{\mu \nu }^a=0$), with $\pi_3=0,\,\,\pi_2=0$, we have for
567: the
568: particle spectrum
569: \begin{equation}
570: \varepsilon_{\vec p, \lambda}=\sqrt{\Big (\sqrt{(\sigma+m)^2+\vec p^2
571: }+\lambda\mu'\Big )^2+\pi_1^2},
572: \label{free}
573: \end{equation}
574: and for the sum over quantum states
575: $$
576: \frac {1}{
577: L^3}\sum_{k,\alpha,\kappa,\lambda}\,=\,12\sum_{\lambda}\int\frac{d^3p
578: }{(2\pi)^3}
579: $$
580: for 3 color states ($\alpha=1,2,3$), 2 spin states, and 2 values of
581: $\kappa=\pm 1$.
582: Considering now the case of vanishing temperature $T=0$, we shall
583: omit the cutoff in the lower
584: limit, $1/\Lambda_s^2\to 0$, and replace it by the corresponding
585: cutoff in the
586: momentum integration $\vec {p}^2\le \Lambda_p^2$. It can be
587: easily seen that
588: the two cutoff parameters $\Lambda_p$ and $\Lambda_s$ are related as
589: $\Lambda_s^2=2\Lambda_p^2$. Indeed, integration in (\ref{3}) gives:
590: $$
591: -\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int dp_4\ints_{\vec p^2<\Lambda_p^2}d^3p\log(\varepsilon^2+p_4^2)=
592: %d^4p\ints_0^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}\exp(-s\eps^2-s
593: % p_4^2)=
594: -\frac{1}{8\pi^2}\Lambda_p^4 + O(\Lambda_p^2)
595: $$
596: with the momentum cutoff $\vec {p}^2\le \Lambda_p^2$, and integration
597: in (\ref{mu}) gives
598: $$
599: \frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int
600: d^4p\ints_{1/\Lambda_s^2}^{\infty}\frac{dz}{z}\exp(-iz\eps^2-iz
601: p_4^2)=-\frac{1}{32\pi^2}\Lambda_s^4+ O(\Lambda_s^2)
602: $$
603: with the proper time cutoff $z\ge \frac{1}{\Lambda_s^2}$. In what
604: follows, we shall denote the $\Lambda_p^2$ cutoff by $\Lambda^2$,
605: and we
606: shall use it throughout, substituting $\Lambda_s^2=2\Lambda^2$. Now,
607: we can perform the proper-time integration
608: in (\ref{qqq}) with the help of the formula
609: \begin{equation}
610: \sum_{\kappa=\pm 1}\ints^{\infty}_{0}\frac{\ds ds}{\sqrt{s}}\frac
611: {(\eps -
612: \kappa\mu)}{\eps}\e^{\ts-s(\eps-\kappa\mu)^2}=\left(\frac{\eps-\mu}{|
613: \eps-\mu|}+1\right)\frac{\sqrt{
614: \pi}}{2\eps}=\sqrt{\pi}\frac{\theta(\eps-\mu)}{\eps}.
615: \end{equation}
616: As a result, one obtains for the quark and pion condensates in the
617: vanishing
618: color field background the formulas coinciding with the result of
619: \cite{dekgk},
620: \begin{eqnarray}
621: &&\frac{\sigma}{2G}=6(\sigma+m)\sum_{\lambda}\ints_{\vec {p}^2\le
622: \Lambda^2}\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}
623: \frac{\theta (\varepsilon-\mu)}{\varepsilon}
624: \frac{\sqrt{(\sigma+m)^2+\vec p^2}
625: +\lambda\mu'}{\sqrt{(\sigma+m)^2+\vec p^2}},
626: \label{50}\\
627: &&\frac{\pi_1}{2G}=6\pi_1\sum_{\lambda}\ints_{\vec {p}^2\le
628: \Lambda^2}\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}
629: \frac{\theta (\varepsilon-\mu)}{\varepsilon}.
630: \label{51}
631: \end{eqnarray}
632: In what follows, we shall analyze
633: the special case of a constant Abelian chromomagnetic field
634: \begin{eqnarray}
635: A_\mu ^a&=&\delta^a_3\delta_{\mu2}x_1H.
636: \label{13}
637: \end{eqnarray}
638: The spectrum $\Pi_k^2$\,\, of the Dirac operator\,\, $-(\vec
639: \gamma\vec \nabla)^2$ has then six branches, two of which correspond
640: to quarks that
641: do not interact with the chromomagnetic field ($\alpha=3$)
642: \begin{eqnarray}
643: {\Pi}_{1,2}^2={\vec p}^2,
644: \label{9}
645: \end{eqnarray}
646: and the other four correspond to two color degrees of
647: freedom of quarks with ``charges'' $\pm g/2$
648: interacting with the external field. The ${\Pi}_k^2$ spectrum of
649: quarks is now given by ($\alpha=1,2$)
650: \begin{eqnarray}
651: {\Pi}_{3,4,5,6}^2\,=\,gH(n+\frac12+
652: \frac{\zeta}2)+p^2_3,
653: \label{14}
654: \end{eqnarray}
655: where $\zeta =\pm 1$ is the spin projection on the external field
656: direction, $p_3$ is the longitudinal component of the quark momentum
657: ($-\infty <p_3<\infty $),
658: \begin{eqnarray}
659: p_{\perp}^2=gH(n+\frac12)
660: \label{15}
661: \end{eqnarray}
662: is the transversal component squared of the quark momentum, and
663: $n=0,1,2,...$
664: is the Landau quantum number.
665:
666: The form of the spectrum
667: is essential for the quark and pion condensate formation. Using the
668: above
669: expressions for energy spectra, we shall next study the quark and
670: pion
671: condensates in the strong field limit.
672:
673: \subsection{ Asymptotic estimates for strong fields}
674:
675: In this section, we consider the special cases of the above
676: configurations of background fields in the strong field
677: limit. Our goal is
678: here to demonstrate that the field is a catalyzing agent for
679: dynamical symmetry breaking, leading to a possible creation of
680: corresponding condensates. The
681: %%%%%%
682: external
683: %%%%%
684: fields are assumed
685: to be strong as compared to the values of
686: %%%%%%%
687: quark $\vev{\bar qq}$ and pion $\vev{\bar q \gamma_5\tau_1 q}$
688: %%%%%%%%%
689: condensates that may be
690: rather small. In this sense, even the expected values of fields
691: simulating the presence of a gluon condensate, which we take to be of
692: the order of $gH=0.4-0.6\,\, {\rm
693: GeV}^2$, may be considered as strong
694: %%%%%%%%
695: (these values of the external chromomagnetic field $gH$ correspond to
696: the QCD gluon condensate at zero temperature and zero baryon density
697: \cite{nar}).
698: %%%%%%%%%%
699: As for the other parameters, we may take their values as in
700: \cite{dekgk,zhuang}, i.e., $\Lambda=0.65$ GeV,
701: $G=5.01$ GeV$^{-2}$.
702:
703: Consider now the special choice of parameters:
704: $\mu\,=\pi_2\,=\,\pi_3\,=\,m\,=\,0.$ In this simple massless case,
705: though with $\pi_1\,\ne\, 0,\,\,\sigma\,\ne\, 0,\,\,\mu'\,\ne\, 0, $
706: the thermodynamic potential (\ref{mu}) takes the form
707: \begin{equation}
708: \Omega = \frac 1{2\sqrt {\pi}
709: L^{3}}\sum_{\lambda,\kappa}\sum_{k,\alpha}
710: \ints^{\infty}_{1\over 2\Lambda^2}\frac{ds}{s^{\frac 3 2}}
711: \left[1+2\sum^{\infty}_{l=1}(-1)^l
712: \e^{\ts-\frac{\beta^2l^2}{4s}}\right]\e^{\ts
713: -s\eps^2}+\frac{\sigma^2+\pi_1^2}{4G} + C.
714: \label{muu}
715: \end{equation}
716:
717: Next, consider the zero temperature case, $T=0$. Then the second
718: term in the square bracket in the above expression vanishes and we are
719: left
720: with the first term equal to unity. The above equation describes
721: the effective potential $V_{\rm eff}=\Omega|_{T=0}$
722: \begin{equation}
723: V_{\rm eff}(\sigma, \pi_1) = \frac 1{2\sqrt {\pi}
724: }\ints^{\infty}_{1\over 2\Lambda^2}\frac{ds}{s^{\frac 3 2}}
725: \Big[
726: 4\sum_{\lambda}\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}
727: \e^{\ts-s\varepsilon_{\vec p,
728: \lambda}^2}\,+\,\frac {1}
729: {L^{3}}\sum_{\kappa}\sum_{k,\lambda,\alpha=1,2}\e^{\ts-s\varepsilon
730: _{k,\lambda}^2}\Big]+\frac{\sigma^2+\pi_1^2}{4G} + C.
731: \label{muuu}
732: \end{equation}
733: The first term in the square bracket stands for quarks with
734: $\alpha=3$, when we have
735: \begin{equation}
736: \varepsilon_{\vec p, \lambda}^2=
737: (\sqrt{\sigma^2+{\vec p}^2}+\lambda\mu' )^2+\pi_1^2,
738: \end{equation}
739: and 4 stands for two values of $\kappa=\pm 1$ and two values of spin
740: projection $\zeta=\pm 1$. The second term stands for quarks with
741: $\alpha=1,2$, where we have
742: \begin{equation}
743: \varepsilon_{k,\lambda}^2=(\sqrt{\sigma^2+\Pi_k^2}+\lambda\mu'
744: )^2+\pi_1^2.
745: \end{equation}
746:
747: Let us first consider the symmetric case, when the chemical potentials
748: for the $u$-quark and the $d$-quark are equal,
749: $\mu'=(\mu_u-\mu_d)/2=0$. Then, the energy of the free quark with
750: $\alpha=3$ becomes
751: \[\varepsilon_{\vec p, \lambda}^2={\vec
752: p}^2+\sigma^2+\pi_1^2={\vec p}^2+\sigma_1^2,\]
753: where $\sigma_1^2=\sigma^2+\pi_1^2$.
754:
755: Consider now the case, when the Abelian-like background
756: field is strong enough, $gH=O(\Lambda^2)$, but
757: $gH<2\Lambda^2$.
758: The momentum squared $\Pi_k^2$ is given by (\ref{14}), and summation
759: over quark quantum numbers in the chromomagnetic field gives
760: \begin{equation}
761: \frac {1}
762: {L^{3}}\sum_{\lambda}\sum_{k,\alpha}=2\frac{gH}{4\pi}\sum_{\lambda}
763: \sum_{n=0}
764: ^{\infty}(2-\delta_{n0})\int\frac{dp_3}{2\pi}.
765: \label{degenerate}
766: \end{equation}
767: Now, the momentum integral in the first term in (\ref{muuu})
768: gives
769: \[
770: \int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\e^{\ts-s\varepsilon_{\vec p,
771: \lambda}^2}=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{8\pi^2}\frac{\e^{\ts-s\sigma_1^2}}{s^{3
772: /2}}.
773: \]
774: In the second term in (\ref{muuu}) for quarks with $\alpha=1,2$, due
775: to
776: the strong field condition, we take only the contribution of the
777: term with $n=0$ in the sum over Landau quantum numbers, while
778: the contribution of large quantum numbers is described similar to the
779: contribution of the free
780: quark term, and thus we must take the free term three
781: times. As a result, after integration in the second term over the
782: $p_3$-component of the quark momentum we have
783: \[
784: V_{\rm
785: eff}(\sigma_1)=\frac{1}{4\pi^2}\left[\ints_{1\over
786: 2\Lambda^2}^{\infty}ds\e^{\ts-
787: s\sigma_1^2}\frac{3}{s^3}+
788: \ints_{1\over
789: gH}^{\infty}ds\e^{\ts-s\sigma_1^2}\frac{gH}{2s^2}\right]+
790: \frac{\sigma_1^2}{4G}+C.
791: \]
792: The cutoff momentum $\Lambda$ as well as the background field $gH$
793: are large $\Lambda\gg\sigma_1,\,\,gH\gg\sigma_1^2$ and, hence we can
794: approximately integrate over $s$ in the first and the second terms
795: according to the following formulas:
796: \begin{equation}
797: \ints_{x_{\rm min}}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{x^3}\e^{\ts-x}={1\over2x_{\rm
798: min}^2}-{1\over x_{\rm min}}-{1\over2}\log x_{\rm min}+{\rm
799: const},\,\,\,\mbox{where}\,\,x_{\rm
800: min}={\sigma_1^2\over 2\Lambda^2}\ll 1,
801: \label{lambda}
802: \end{equation}
803: \begin{equation}
804: \ints_{x_{\rm min}}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{x^2}\e^{\ts-x}={1\over x_{\rm
805: min}}+\log x_{\rm min}+{\rm const}, \,\,\,\mbox{where}\,\, x_{\rm
806: min}={\sigma_1^2\over gH}\ll 1.
807: \label{gH}
808: \end{equation}
809: As a result we find the effective potential
810: \begin{equation}
811: V_{\rm
812: eff}
813: (\sigma_1)=\frac{1}{4\pi^2}\Bigl\{3\sigma_1^4\left[{1\over2}\left({
814: 2 \Lambda^2\over\sigma_1^2}\right)^2
815: -{2\Lambda^2\over\sigma_1^2}+{1\over2}\log
816: {2\Lambda^2\over\sigma_1^2}+C_1\right]+{gH\sigma_1^2\over2}\left({
817: gH\over\sigma_1^2}+\log{\sigma_1^2\over
818: gH}+C_2\right) \Bigr\}+{\sigma_1^2\over 4G}+C,\label{kl}
819: \end{equation}
820: where $C_1,\,\,C_2$ are certain numerical constants.
821: Now, let us find the minimum $\sigma_0$ of the thermodynamic
822: potential (\ref{kl}). Then, the minimum $\sigma_0$ is described by the
823: solution of the equation, where we neglect the terms that do not contain large
824: parameters $\Lambda^2$ or $gH\log(gH/\sigma_0^2)$,
825: \[
826: {\partial V_{\rm eff}\over\partial \sigma_1^2} |_{\sigma_1=\sigma_0}=
827: {1\over4\pi^2}\left[-6\Lambda^2-3\sigma_0^2\log
828: {\sigma_0^2\over 2\Lambda^2}+{gH\over 2}\log{\sigma_0^2\over
829: gH}\right]+{1\over 4G}=0.
830: \]
831: Within the approximation of strong background field
832: \begin{equation}
833: gH\log(gH/\sigma_0^2)\gg\sigma_0^2\log(2\Lambda^2/\sigma_0^2),
834: \label{strong}
835: \end{equation}
836: the above equation simplifies to the following form:
837: \begin{equation}
838: 1={6G\Lambda^2\over \pi^2}+G{gH\over 2\pi^2}\log{gH\over\sigma_0^2}
839: \label{cutoff}
840: \end{equation}
841: with the solution
842: \begin{equation}
843: \sigma_0=\sqrt{\frac{gH}{2\pi}}\exp\left(-\frac{2\pi^2(1-\tilde
844: g)}{GgH}\right),
845: \label{piv1}
846: \end{equation}
847: where the effective coupling constant,
848: \begin{equation}
849: \tilde g =\frac {6G\Lambda^2}{\pi^2},
850: \label{tg}
851: \end{equation}
852: can be arbitrary small $\tilde g <1$, contrary to the zero magnetic
853: field case $H=0$, when it should be $\tilde g >1$ in order that the
854: nontrivial solution for $\sigma_0$ exists.
855: This is a very interesting result. Indeed, we see that at $\mu'=0$ and
856: arbitrary
857: small attraction between quarks ($\tilde g <1$) the external
858: chromomagnetic field catalyzes the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking
859: and quarks acquire a nonzero mass.
860: %%%%%
861: which is equal to $\sigma_0$ (\ref{piv1}).
862: %%%%%%%%%%
863: In contrast, if $H=0$ and $\tilde g <1$, the quarks remain massless
864: and symmetry is unbroken.
865: After removing the cutoff with the use of (\ref{cutoff}), the
866: effective potential (\ref{kl}) takes the form
867: \begin{equation}
868: V_{\rm eff}(\sigma_1)={gH\sigma_1^2\over 8\pi^2}\left(\log
869: {\sigma_1^2\over
870: \sigma_0^2}-1\right),
871: \label{eff}
872: \end{equation}
873: which is just the effective potential of the two-dimensional
874: Gross-Neveu model (see, e.g., \cite{bieten}).
875: This result shows that the chromomagnetic catalysis effect is
876: accompanied by the effective reduction of the space-time
877: dimensionality.
878:
879: Next, consider the case of flavor asymmetric quark matter with
880: $\mu'\ne 0$.
881: %%%%%%%
882: For simplicity, $\mu$ is taken to be zero as before.
883: %%%%%%%%%
884: In this case (recall that $m=0$), there are two nontrivial
885: solutions of the gap equations (\ref{6}) and (\ref{qqq}) (see the
886: remark after (\ref{qqq})), which are the points on the $\sigma$- or
887: $\pi_1$-axes. So, in order to find the global minimum point, it is
888: sufficient (and very convenient) to reduce the investigation of
889: the effective potential $V_{\rm eff}(\sigma, \pi_1)$ (\ref{muuu}) as
890: a function of two variables
891: $\sigma$ and $\pi_1$ to two particular cases. First, we
892: shall study $V_{\rm eff}$ as a function of $\pi_1$ only with
893: $\sigma=0,\,\,\pi_1\ne 0$, then as a function of
894: $\sigma$ with $\sigma \ne 0,\,\,\pi_1=0$.
895: %%%%%%%%%
896: When comparing these two particular cases, one can obtain the
897: genuine global minimum point of the effective potential $V_{\rm
898: eff}(\sigma, \pi_1)$.
899: %%%%%%%%%
900: To simplify our calculation, we assume that $\mu'$ and $gH$ are
901: large, $\mu'^2=O(\Lambda^2)$ and $gH=O(\Lambda^2)$.
902:
903:
904: {\bf a) The case $\sigma=0,\,\,\pi_1\ne 0$.}
905:
906: In this case the first term in (\ref{muuu}),
907: \begin{equation}
908: V_{\rm eff}^{(1)}(\pi_1) = \frac 1{2\sqrt {\pi}
909: }\ints^{\infty}_{1\over 2\Lambda^2}\frac{ds}{s^{\frac 3 2}}
910: \Big[
911: 4\sum_{\lambda}\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}
912: \e^{\ts-s\varepsilon_{\vec p,
913: \lambda}^2}\,\Big]
914: \end{equation}
915: can be expressed through the following approximation of the integral
916: (with $s\mu'^2\gg 1$):
917: \begin{equation}
918: \sum_{\lambda}\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}
919: \e^{\ts-s\varepsilon_{\vec p,
920: \lambda}^2}={\sqrt{\pi}\e^{\ts-s\pi_1^2}\over4\pi^2}\left(2\mu'^2
921: +{1\over 2s}\right){1\over\sqrt{s}}.
922: \label{approx}
923: \end{equation}
924: Integration over $s$ should be approximately performed separately for
925: the first and second terms in (\ref{approx}) with different lower
926: limits
927: \[
928: V_{\rm eff}^{(1)}(\pi_1)={1\over
929: 4
930: \pi^2}\left(4\ints^{\infty}_{1\over\mu'^2}\frac{ds\mu'^2}{s^{2}}\e^{\
931: ts-s
932: \pi_1^2}+3\ints^{\infty}_{1\over 2\Lambda^2}\frac{ds}{s^{3}}\e^{\ts-s
933: \pi_1^2}\right).
934: \]
935: Here, we also added the contribution of quarks with $\alpha=1,2$ with
936: high Landau quantum numbers $n\gg 1$.
937:
938: In the second term in (\ref{muuu}),
939: \[
940: V_{\rm eff}^{(2)}(\pi_1) = \frac 1{2\sqrt {\pi}
941: }\ints^{\infty}_{1/\Lambda_s^2}\frac{ds}{s^{\frac 3 2}}
942: \frac {1}
943: {L^{3}}\sum_{\kappa}\sum_{k,\lambda,\alpha=1,2}\e^{\ts-s
944: \varepsilon_{k,\lambda}^2},
945: \]
946: with $gH=O(\Lambda^2)$ and $\mu'=O(\Lambda)$, but $gH < \mu'^2 <
947: 2\Lambda^2$, we should
948: estimate the contribution of the two main terms, $n=0$ and $n=1$, in
949: the sum over $n$.
950: The $n=0$
951: contribution is expressed through the integral
952: \begin{equation}
953: \sum_{\lambda}\int\frac{dp_3}{(2\pi)}\exp[-s(\pi_1^2+(|p_3|+\lambda
954: \mu')^2)]={1\over\pi}\e^{\ts-s\pi_1^2}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{s}},
955: \label{easy}
956: \end{equation}
957: and summation over the remaining quantum numbers is made according to
958: (\ref{degenerate}) with $n=0$. For the $n=1$ term, we have a
959: new expression with integration of the following exponential term:
960: \begin{equation}
961: \sum_{\lambda}\int\frac{dp_3}{(2\pi)}
962: \exp[-s(\pi_1^2+(\sqrt{gH+p_3^2}+\lambda\mu')^2)].
963: \label{expo}
964: \end{equation}
965: In order to estimate the $n=1$ contribution, we write $p_3=\bar p_3
966: +\psi$, where $\psi$ is a small deviation of $p_3$ from the minimum
967: of
968: the exponential quantity $\sqrt{\bar p_3^2+gH}=\mu'$ for
969: $\lambda=-1$. Then the integral in (\ref{expo}) for $n=1$ is
970: estimated as
971: \begin{equation}
972: \sum_{\lambda}\int \frac{d\psi}{2\pi}\exp[-s \frac
973: {\mu'^2-gH}{\mu'^2}\psi^2]\,=\,{1\over\pi}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{s}}\,\,
974: \frac{\mu'}{\sqrt{\mu'^2-gH}}.
975: \label{n1}
976: \end{equation}
977: Recall that this estimation is justified under the above assumption,
978: i.e., $gH=O(\Lambda^2)$ and $\mu'=O(\Lambda)$, but $gH < \mu'^2 <
979: 2\Lambda^2$.
980: % $gH<\mu'^2$,
981: %while both $gH$ and $\mu'^2$ are much greater than $\pi_1^2$, and
982: %of the order of $\Lambda_s$, but $gH,\mu'^2<\Lambda_s^2$.
983: Finally,
984: summing up the $n=0$ and $n=1$ contributions (\ref{easy}) and
985: (\ref{n1}), we find
986: \[
987: V_{\rm eff}^{(2)}(\pi_1)={gH\over 8\pi^2}\left(1+{2\mu'\over \sqrt
988: {\mu'^2-gH}}\right)\ints^{\infty}_{1\over
989: gH}\frac{ds}{s^{2}}\e^{-s
990: \pi_1^2}.\]
991: In the second term in the above bracket, we took into
992: account that the state with $n=1$ is two-fold degenerate in the
993: spin variable. Summing up all the contributions, and taking into
994: account the integrals (\ref{lambda}) and (\ref{gH}), we have
995: %\begin{equation}
996: \[
997: V_{\rm eff}(\pi_1)={1\over 4\pi^2}\Bigl\{{3\pi_1^4\over
998: 2}\left[({2\Lambda^2\over
999: \pi_1^2})^2-2{2\Lambda^2\over \pi_1^2}-\log {\pi_1^2\over
1000: 2\Lambda^2}+C_1\right]
1001: +\left[4\mu'^4+{(gH)^2\over2}\left(1+{\mu'\over
1002: \sqrt{\mu'^2-gH}}\right)\right]+\]
1003: %\end{equation}
1004: \begin{equation}
1005: +4\mu'^2\pi_1^2\left(\log {\pi_1^2\over \mu'^2}+
1006: C_2\right)+{gH\pi_1^2\over2}\left(1+{\mu'\over\sqrt{\mu'^2-gH}}
1007: \right)\left(\log {\pi_1^2\over gH}+
1008: C_3\right)\Bigr\}+{\pi_1^2\over 4G}+ C.
1009: \label{effpot}
1010: \end{equation}
1011: The minimum point $\pi_0$ of this function obeys the following
1012: stationarity equation $\partial V_{\rm eff}/\partial
1013: \pi_1^2|_{\pi_1=\pi_0}=0$, which gives
1014: \begin{equation}
1015: 1={6G\Lambda^2\over \pi^2}-{4\mu'^2G\over \pi^2}\log {\pi_0^2\over
1016: \mu'^2}-{gH\over
1017: 2\pi^2}G\left(1+{\mu'\over\sqrt{\mu'^2-gH}}\right)\log {\pi_0^2\over
1018: gH},
1019: \label{eqv}
1020: \end{equation}
1021: where the approximation of strong
1022: background field,
1023: $gH\log(gH/\pi_1^2)\gg\pi_1^2\log(2\Lambda^2/\pi_1^2),$ has been
1024: used,
1025: similar to (\ref{strong}).
1026: After substituting the above equation into (\ref{effpot}), the
1027: effective
1028: potential takes the form
1029: \begin{equation}
1030: V_{\rm eff}(\pi_1^2)={\pi_1^2\over 4\pi^2}\left[4\mu'^2+{gH\over
1031: 2}\left(1+{\mu'\over
1032: \sqrt{\mu'^2-gH}}\right)\right]\left(\log{\pi_1^2\over
1033: \pi_0^2}-1\right),
1034: \label{effpoto}
1035: \end{equation}
1036: which again, like (\ref{eff}), resembles the effective potential in
1037: the two-dimensional Gross
1038: -- Neveu model \cite{bieten}. Note also that the minimum $\pi_0$ of
1039: the function (\ref{effpot}), under our assumption of a strong color
1040: background field, exists even for weak coupling of quarks, i.e., at
1041: $\tilde g <1$, while with zero background field, it can exist only if
1042: $\tilde g >1$.
1043: Next, let us study the behaviour of the effective potential
1044: (\ref{muuu}) as a function of $\sigma$, when $\pi_1=0$.
1045:
1046: {\bf b) The case $\sigma\ne 0, \pi_1=0$.}
1047:
1048: Here again we use the above assumption $gH=O(\Lambda^2)$ and
1049: $\mu'=O(\Lambda)$, but $gH < \mu'^2 < 2\Lambda^2$.
1050: The term in the effective potential with $\alpha=3$ is determined by
1051: the expression
1052: \begin{equation}
1053: V_{\rm eff}^{(1)} = \frac 1{2\sqrt {\pi}
1054: }\ints^{\infty}_{1/\Lambda_s^2}\frac{ds}{s^{\frac 3 2}}
1055: \Big[
1056: 4\sum_{\lambda}\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}
1057: \e^{\ts-s\varepsilon_{\vec p,
1058: \lambda}^2}\,\Big],
1059: \end{equation}
1060: where $\varepsilon_{\vec p,
1061: \lambda}=\sqrt {\sigma^2+{\vec p}^2}+\lambda \mu'$. The main
1062: contribution to the integral over $p$, for large $\mu'$, is given
1063: by large $p$ near ${\overline p}=\sqrt{\mu'^2-\sigma^2}.$ Then the
1064: lower limit
1065: in the integral over $s$ should be taken as ${1\over
1066: \mu'^2-\sigma^2}$, and
1067: we obtain, with $p={\overline p}+\psi$,
1068: \begin{equation}
1069: V_{\rm eff}^{(1)}={\bar p^2\over \pi^{5/2}}\ints_{1\over
1070: \mu'^2-\sigma^2}^{\infty}{ds\over s^{3/2}}\int d\psi \e^{\ts
1071: -s(\psi\bar
1072: p/\mu')^2}={\bar p \mu'\over\pi^2}\ints_{1\over
1073: \mu'^2-\sigma^2}^{\infty}{ds\over
1074: s^2}={1\over \pi^2}\mu'(\mu'^2-\sigma^2)^{3\over 2}.
1075: \end{equation}
1076:
1077: Then, the first term, where the contribution of quarks with $\alpha
1078: =1,2,3$ in the region of very large values of $s \gg {1\over \mu'^2},
1079: {1\over gH}$ is also added, is estimated as
1080: \begin{equation}
1081: V_{\rm eff 1}(\sigma)= {1\over \pi^2}(\mu'^2-\sigma
1082: ^2)^{3\over2}\mu'+{3\sigma^4\over 8\pi^2}\left[\left({2\Lambda^2\over
1083: \sigma^2}\right)^2-4{\Lambda^2\over \sigma^2}-\log {\sigma^2\over
1084: 2 \Lambda^2}+C_1\right].
1085: \label{eff1}
1086: \end{equation}
1087: Consider now the contribution of the term with $\alpha =1,2$ in the
1088: region of comparatively small values of $s$ close to the threshold $1/gH$,
1089: \begin{equation}
1090: V_{\rm eff 2}={1\over 4
1091: \sqrt{\pi}}\ints^{\infty}_{1/gH}\frac{ds}{s^{\frac 3
1092: 2}}\sum_{\lambda}{2gH\over 4\pi}\sum _n
1093: (2-\delta_{n0})\int{dp_3\over
1094: 2\pi}\exp[-s(\sqrt{\sigma^2+p_3^2+gHn}+\lambda\mu')^2].
1095: \end{equation}
1096: Since we
1097: assume that $\mu'^2$ and $gH$ are of the same order of magnitude and
1098: large, $\mu'^2=O(\Lambda^2)\,\,gH=O(\Lambda^2)$, two terms, $n=0$ and
1099: $n=1$, will make the main
1100: contribution to the sum over $n$. The $n=0$ term is determined by the
1101: integral, approximately equal to
1102: \[
1103: \int {dp_3\over
1104: 2\pi}\exp[-s(\sqrt{\sigma^2+p_3^2}-\mu')^2]\approx {\mu'\over 2
1105: \sqrt{
1106: \pi s}\sqrt{\mu'^2-\sigma^2}}.
1107: \]
1108: The $n=1$ term gives
1109: \[
1110: 2\sum_{\lambda}\int {dp_3\over
1111: 2\pi}\exp[-s(\sqrt{\sigma^2+p_3^2+gH}+\lambda\mu')^2]\approx
1112: {\mu'\over \sqrt{
1113: \pi s}\sqrt{\mu'^2-\sigma^2-gH}},
1114: \]
1115: where we had introduced a factor two due to the two-fold degeneracy of
1116: the $n=1$ Landau level in the spin variable. The above two terms with
1117: $n=0$ and
1118: $n=1$ should be summed up to give
1119: \[
1120: V_{\rm eff 2}(\sigma)={gH\mu'\over 8\pi^2}\left({1\over \sqrt{\mu'^2
1121: -\sigma^2}}\ints_{1\over \mu'^2-\sigma^2}^{\infty} {ds\over
1122: s^2}+{2\over
1123: \sqrt{\mu'^2-gH-\sigma^2}}\ints_{1\over
1124: \mu'^2-\sigma^2-gH}^{\infty} {ds\over s^2}\right)
1125: \]
1126: \begin{equation}
1127: ={gH \mu'\over 8\pi^2}\left(\sqrt{\mu'^2-\sigma^2}+2\sqrt{
1128: \mu'^2-gH-\sigma^2}\right).
1129: \label{n01}
1130: \end{equation}
1131: The effective potential after summing the contributions $V_{\rm eff 1}$
1132: and $V_{\rm eff 2}$ is finally estimated as follows:
1133: \[
1134: V_{\rm eff}(\sigma)={\mu'\over \pi^2}(\mu'^2-\sigma^2)^{3\over
1135: 2}+{3\sigma^4\over
1136: 8\pi^2}\left[\left({2\Lambda^2\over\sigma^2}\right)^2-4{\Lambda^2
1137: \over
1138: \sigma^2}-\log {\sigma^2\over
1139: 2\Lambda^2}+C_1\right]
1140: \]
1141: \begin{equation}
1142: +{gH \mu'\over 8\pi^2}\left(\sqrt{\mu'^2-\sigma^2}+2\sqrt{
1143: \mu'^2-gH-\sigma^2}\right)+{\sigma^2\over 4 G}+C.
1144: \label{efftotal}
1145: \end{equation}
1146: Next, we have to find the minimum point $\sigma_0$ of this effective
1147: potential, i.e. to solve the stationarity equation $\partial V_{\rm
1148: eff}/\partial \sigma^2=0$, which gives for $\sigma_0$ the equation
1149: \[
1150: %{\partial V_{\rm eff}\over \partial \sigma^2}=
1151: -{3\mu'^2\over
1152: 2 \pi^2}-{3\Lambda^2\over 2\pi^2}-{3\sigma_0^2\over 4\pi^2}\log
1153: {\sigma_0^2\over2\Lambda^2}-{gH\over 16\pi^2}
1154: \left(1+{2\mu'\over \sqrt{\mu'^2-gH}}\right)+{1\over
1155: 4G}+O(\sigma^2)=0.
1156: \]
1157: It is seen that, contrary to the case with the pion condensate, there
1158: are no
1159: large terms like $gH\log (gH/\sigma^2)$ in the above equation, and
1160: hence, for large terms with $\Lambda_s$, it has a nontrivial solution
1161: $\sigma_0\ne 0$ only if $\tilde g >1$, which is the same condition
1162: as for the zero field case (see, e.g., \cite{zhuang}),
1163: %Then with small $\mu'$ we have (at $T=0$):
1164: \begin{equation}
1165: \sigma_0=\sqrt{\tilde C
1166: \Lambda}\exp\left(-\frac{\Lambda^2}{\sigma_0^2}(1-\frac
1167: {1} {\tilde g})\right),
1168: \label{pivii}
1169: \end{equation}
1170: where $\tilde C$ is a certain numerical constant of order unity.
1171:
1172: %%%%%
1173: Comparing the results of the particular
1174: considerations {\bf a)} and {\bf b)},
1175: %Now
1176: the following preliminary conclusions can be made.
1177: %%%%%%%%
1178: It is clear that at very small values of the
1179: coupling constant $G$, i.e. at $\tilde g < 1$, and for $\mu'>0$,
1180: both the isotopic and the chiral symmetry of the model
1181: (\ref{1}) are not broken down at $H=0$, and quarks are massless
1182: particles (recall, we consider only the case with zero current
1183: quark mass). However,
1184: if an external chromomagnetic field $H$ is
1185: %%%%%%%%
1186: present %considered
1187: %%%%%%%
1188: (and it is rather
1189: strong in our analytical consideration), then the effective
1190: potential (\ref{muuu}) of the system acquires a nontrivial global
1191: minimum point which lies on the $\pi_1$-axis and has the form
1192: $(\sigma=0,\pi_1=\pi_0\ne 0)$, where $\pi_0$ is the solution of the
1193: stationarity equation (\ref{eqv}). This means that in this case a
1194: nonzero pion condensate $\vev{\bar q \gamma_5\tau_1 q}=-\pi_0/2G$ is
1195: generated by an external chromomagnetic field (chromomagnetic
1196: catalysis
1197: of the pion condensation), and the isotopic symmetry $ U_{I_3}(1)$
1198: of the model is spontaneously broken
1199: down (see the text after (\ref{1})). Moreover, since the expression
1200: for the effective potential in
1201: this case resembles the effective potential in the 2-dimensional
1202: Gross -- Neveu model, one can say that this effect, similar to the
1203: magnetic catalysis phenomenon, is provided by the dimensional
1204: reduction mechanism.
1205:
1206: Let us present
1207: some numerical calculations in the next section, in order to support this conclusion.
1208:
1209: \section{Numerical results}
1210:
1211: Consider first the case of a zero external field $F_{\mu\nu}=0$, and
1212: flavor symmetric medium $\mu'=0$. Moreover, the temperature and bare
1213: quark mass $m$ are taken
1214: to be zero throughout the present section. The numerical analysis of the
1215: behavior of the effective potential (\ref{muuu}),
1216: which is just the thermodynamic potential $\Omega$
1217: %%% !!!!
1218: for $T=0$,
1219: %in the case of $T=0$,
1220: %%%
1221: was performed for the value of
1222: the coupling constant $G=5.01$ GeV$^{-2}$, taken from
1223: \cite{dekgk,zhuang}, and for the quark chemical
1224: potential $\mu=0$
1225: %and $\mu=0.1$ GeV
1226: (see Fig. \ref{fig:U2}).
1227: % and Fig.
1228: %\ref{fig:U1}, respectively).
1229: In this case the quark energy
1230: spectrum is
1231: symmetric with respect to $\sigma$ and $\pi_1$, i.e. the function
1232: $V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$ depends only on the single
1233: variable $\sqrt{\sigma^2+\pi_1^2}$. Hence we draw the
1234: effective potential as a function of only one variable, e.g.,
1235: $\sigma$. In this figure, the picture on the left corresponds to
1236: the value of the cutoff parameter $\Lambda =0.165$ GeV (in this case
1237: $\tilde g=0.08$), whereas the
1238: right picture corresponds to $\Lambda =0.65$ GeV ($\tilde g=1.29$). The
1239: figure demonstrates the general feature of the effective
1240: potential at $\mu'=0$ and $gH=0$. Namely, if the effective coupling
1241: constant $\tilde g$ is sufficiently small, $\tilde g<1$, then the
1242: global minimum
1243: point of the effective potential is at the origin, and the chiral
1244: symmetry is not broken
1245: %%%%%%%
1246: (left picture).
1247: %%%%
1248: However, if $\tilde g>1$, the effective potential has a nontrivial
1249: global minimum, and the chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken
1250: down
1251: %%%%%
1252: (right picture).
1253: %%%%
1254: The dependence of $V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$ on the two
1255: variables
1256: $\sigma$ and $\pi_1$ ($\tilde g=1.29$) is depicted in Fig.
1257: \ref{fig:U3c} for $\mu=0$. The picture is evidently
1258: symmetric, as it should be in this flavor symmetric case.
1259:
1260: %%%% new paragraph (abzatz)!!Since before we have discussed
1261: %%%% the \mu'=0 case !!!!
1262: It is also necessary to note that if $\tilde g>1$, then at $gH=0$ and
1263: $\mu'>0$ a nonzero pion condensate appears in the model (\ref{1})
1264: \cite{dekgk,zhuang}. (In this case, the isotopic symmetry $U_{I_3}(1)$
1265: is broken down).
1266: However, if $\tilde g<1$, then at $gH=0$ and arbitrary values of
1267: $\mu'$, including zero, the symmetry of
1268: the NJL model (\ref{1}) remains intact.
1269:
1270: Now, in order to present numerical arguments in favour of the
1271: chromomagnetic catalysis of pion
1272: condensation, we will
1273: study the effective potential $V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1274: (\ref{muuu})
1275: %at $\tilde g<1$ and
1276: at $\mu'>0$
1277: %(in this case, as was
1278: %mentioned
1279: %above, the pion condensation is absent at $gH=0$)
1280: and suppose that
1281: $gH~=~0.5$~ GeV$^2$ (this value of $gH$ mimicks the nonzero QCD gluon
1282: condensate \cite{nar}). Since the current quark mass $m$ is equal to
1283: zero, the nontrivial stationary points of the function (\ref{muuu})
1284: lie either on the $\sigma$ or on $\pi_1$ axis (see the remark following
1285: formula (\ref{qqq})). Thus, in order to find the global
1286: minimum point of the effective potential (\ref{muuu}), it is
1287: enough to consider the behavior of $V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$ along
1288: the coordinate $\sigma$ and $\pi_1$-axis only. The corresponding
1289: curves are presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:U4a} for $\mu'~=~0.15$~ GeV,
1290: and physical values of $G=5.01$ GeV$^{-2}$ and $\Lambda =0.65$ GeV (in this case $\tilde
1291: g=1.29$).
1292: %and $\tilde
1293: %g=0.64$ (in this case $G=2.49$ GeV$^{-2}$ if $\Lambda =0.65$ GeV).
1294: They demonstrate that, although a nontrivial stationary
1295: point
1296: of the thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}$ at $T=0$
1297: does exist on the $\sigma$-axis in a chromomagnetic
1298: field $gH$ (and this is just a saddle point in this
1299: case),
1300: the value of the effective potential at the other stationary point,
1301: $\sigma =0,\pi_1=\pi_0\ne 0$, is slightly deeper. Our calculations
1302: indicate that with growing $\mu'$
1303: the difference between the minima of the curves for $V_{\rm
1304: eff}(\pi_1)$
1305: and $V_{\rm eff}(\sigma)$ increases, and the very minima get
1306: deeper. The comparison of the results obtained with the known results at
1307: zero background field, demonstrated that the background field deepens
1308: the minimum for the pion condensate. Moreover, we formally considered
1309: the interesting case of a smaller value of $\Lambda$, corresponding to
1310: $\tilde g<1$. The calculated effective potential then has a minimum at a
1311: nontrivial value of $\pi_0$ for weak coupling of quarks for $\tilde
1312: g<1$, as well.
1313: The corresponding
1314: curves are presented in Figs. \ref{fig:U5b}, \ref{fig:U5a} for
1315: different values of $\mu'=0.1$ GeV, $\mu'=0.15$ GeV, respectively,
1316: and $G=5.01$ GeV$^{-2}$ and $\Lambda =0.46$ GeV (in this case $\tilde
1317: g=0.64$).
1318: %It is clear that the calculated effective potential has a minimum at a
1319: %nontrivial value of $\pi_0$ for weak coupling of quarks for $\tilde
1320: %g<1$, as well.
1321: \footnote{In contrast with the numerical results, in our analytical
1322: investigations (see the previous section), the stationary point of
1323: the
1324: effective potential was not observed on the $\sigma$-axis at $\tilde
1325: g<1$. This fact can be explained due to a different domain
1326: for the variable $\mu'$ used in these cases. Indeed, it was supposed
1327: in section II.B that $\mu'=O(\Lambda)$, whereas for the numerical
1328: consideration, we used $\mu'\ll\Lambda$.}
1329: Thus, only at this
1330: point,
1331: %%%% the point of the 2-dim plane has two coordinates!!!
1332: $\sigma =0$, $\pi_1=\pi_0\ne 0$, the global minimum of the
1333: thermodynamic potential (\ref{muuu})
1334: is observed, and the nonzero pion condensate $\vev{\bar q
1335: \gamma_5\tau_1 q}=-\pi_0/2G$ is generated by the external
1336: chromomagnetic field in the model.
1337: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1338: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{1new2.eps}
1339: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{2new2.eps}
1340: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,0)$ at
1341: $T=0$, $\mu'=0$, $\mu=0$ and $G=5.01$ GeV$^{-2}$ as a function of
1342: $\sigma$ (in GeV-units) for $\Lambda=0.165$ GeV -- left picture,
1343: and $\Lambda=0.65$ GeV -- right picture.}
1344: \label{fig:U2}
1345: \end{figure}
1346:
1347: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1348: \includegraphics[width=300pt]{3new3.eps}
1349: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1350: at
1351: $T=0,\,\, gH=0,\,\, \mu'=0$ as a function of
1352: $\sigma,\,\,\pi_1$ for $\Lambda_p=0.65, \mu=0$. }
1353: \label{fig:U3c}
1354: \end{figure}
1355: % \begin{figure}[htbp]
1356: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{1new1.eps}
1357: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{2new1.eps}
1358: %\caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,0)$ at
1359: %$T=0$, $\mu'=0$, $\mu=0.1$ GeV and $G=5.01$ GeV$^{-2}$ as a function
1360: %of
1361: % $\sigma$ (in GeV-units) for $\Lambda=0.165$ GeV -- left picture,
1362: % and $\Lambda=0.65$ GeV -- right picture.}
1363: %\label{fig:U1}
1364: %\end{figure}
1365: % \begin{figure}[htbp]
1366: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{6new5.eps}
1367: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{7new5.eps}
1368: %\caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1369: %at
1370: % $T=0,\mu=0$, $gH=0.5$ GeV$^2$, $\Lambda=0.65$ GeV, $\tilde
1371: % g=1.29$, $\mu'=0.1$ GeV as a function
1372: % of $\sigma$ (in GeV-units) at $\pi_1=0$ -- left picture, and
1373: % of $\pi_1$ (in GeV) at $\sigma=0$ -- right picture. }
1374: %\label{fig:U4b}
1375: %\end{figure}
1376:
1377: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1378: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{6new4.eps}
1379: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{7new4.eps}
1380: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1381: at
1382: $T=0,\mu=0$, $gH=0.5$ GeV$^2$, $\Lambda=0.65$ GeV, $\tilde
1383: g=1.29$, $\mu'=0.15$ GeV as a function
1384: of $\sigma$ (in GeV-units) at $\pi_1=0$ -- left picture, and
1385: of $\pi_1$ (in GeV) at $\sigma=0$ -- right picture. }
1386: \label{fig:U4a}
1387: \end{figure}
1388:
1389: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1390: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{6new2.eps}
1391: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{7new2.eps}
1392: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1393: at
1394: $T=0,\mu=0$, $gH=0.5$ GeV$^2$, $\Lambda=0.46$ GeV, $\tilde
1395: g=0.64$, $\mu'=0.1$ GeV as a function
1396: of $\sigma$ (in GeV-units) at $\pi_1=0$ -- left picture, and
1397: of $\pi_1$ (in GeV) at $\sigma=0$ -- right picture. }
1398: \label{fig:U5b}
1399: \end{figure}
1400:
1401: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1402: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{6new1.eps}
1403: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{7new1.eps}
1404: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1405: at $T=0,\mu=0$, $gH=0.5$ GeV$^2$, $\Lambda=0.46$ GeV, $\tilde
1406: g=0.64$, $\mu'=0.15$ GeV as a function
1407: of $\sigma$ (in GeV-units) at $\pi_1=0$ -- left picture, and
1408: of $\pi_1$ (in GeV) at $\sigma=0$ -- right picture.}
1409: \label{fig:U5a}
1410: \end{figure}
1411:
1412:
1413:
1414:
1415:
1416: % \begin{figure}[htbp]
1417: %\includegraphics[width=300pt]{3new1.eps}
1418: %\caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1419: %at
1420: % $T=0,\,\, gH=0,\,\, \mu'=0$ as a function of
1421: % $\sigma,\,\,\pi_1$ for $\Lambda_p=0.65, \mu=0.15$. }
1422: %\label{fig:U3a}
1423: %\end{figure}
1424:
1425: %\begin{figure}[htbp]
1426: %\includegraphics[width=300pt]{3new2.eps}
1427: %\caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1428: %at
1429: % $T=0,\,\, gH=0,\,\, \mu'=0$ as a function of
1430: % $\sigma,\,\,\pi_1$ for $\Lambda_p=0.65, \mu=0.1$. }
1431: %\label{fig:U3b}
1432: %\end{figure}
1433:
1434:
1435:
1436: % \begin{figure}[htbp]
1437: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{4.eps}
1438: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{5.eps}
1439: %\caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1440: %at
1441: % $T=0, gH=0.5$ for $\Lambda_p=1.0, \tilde g=1.5$ as a function of
1442: % $\sigma\,\,(\pi_1=0)-$ left picture, and
1443: % $ of $\pi_1\,\,(\sigma=0)-$right picture.}
1444: %\label{fig:U3}
1445: %\end{figure}
1446: % \begin{figure}[htbp]
1447: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{6new3.eps}
1448: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{7new3.eps}
1449: %\caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1450: %at
1451: % $T=0, gH=0.5$, $\Lambda_p=0.65, \tilde g=0.64$, $\mu'=0.05$ as
1452: %a
1453: % function
1454: % of $\sigma\,\,(\pi_1=0)-$ left picture, and
1455: % of $\pi_1\,\,(\sigma=0)-$right picture }
1456: %%for $\Lambda_p=0.65, \tilde
1457: % g=0.64$.}
1458: %\label{fig:U4c}
1459: %\end{figure}
1460:
1461:
1462: % \begin{figure}[htbp]
1463: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{8.eps}
1464: %\includegraphics[width=200pt]{9.eps}
1465: %\caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1466: %at
1467: % $T=0, gH=0.5$ for $\Lambda_p=5, \tilde g=38$ as a function of
1468: % $\sigma\,\,(\pi_1=0)-$ left picture, and
1469: % of $\pi_1\,\,(\sigma=0)-$right picture.}
1470: %\label{fig:U5}
1471: %\end{figure}
1472:
1473:
1474: \section{Conclusions}
1475:
1476: We considered, in the framework of an NJL model, the effects of quark
1477: and pion condensation in dense quark matter
1478: with and without flavor asymmetry under the influence of an external
1479: chromomagnetic field modelling the gluon condensate
1480: %%%%%%%%
1481: $\vev{F^a_{\mu\nu}F^{a\mu\nu}}$.
1482: The general conclusion is that the presence of the chromomagnetic
1483: field catalyses
1484: the effect of quark or pion condensation, depending on the values of
1485: the chemical potential $\mu'$. Indeed,
1486: when there is
1487: no chromomagnetic field, no condensation of quarks or pions takes
1488: place at low values of the effective
1489: coupling
1490: %%%%
1491: (\ref{tg})
1492: %%%%%
1493: of quarks $\tilde g<1$. However, when the chromomagnetic
1494: background field is present, the pion (at $\mu'>0$) or quark
1495: condesation (see the case $\mu'=0$ of Section II) take
1496: place even for small values of $\tilde g<1$ (recall that in our
1497: consideration the current quark mass $m$ was taken to be zero).
1498: If $\tilde g>1$, the role of the external chromomagnetic field $H$ is
1499: to enhance the effect of
1500: pion condensation that appeares in the model at $\mu'>0$ already at
1501: $H=0$.
1502: For further investigations, it would be interesting to study
1503: the influence of an external
1504: chromomagnetic field (the gluon condensate) on the pion condensation
1505: phenomenon at nonzero current quark mass $m$
1506: %%%%%%%%
1507: as well as to consider the chromomagnetic catalysis effect with
1508: another
1509: combinations of a background field, different from (\ref{13}).
1510:
1511:
1512:
1513:
1514: \section{Acknowledgements}
1515:
1516: One of the authors
1517: (V.Ch.Zh.) gratefully acknowledges the hospitality of
1518: Prof. M.~Mueller-Preussker and his colleagues at the particle theory
1519: group of the Humboldt University extended to him during his stay
1520: there.
1521: This work was partially supported by the Deutsche
1522: Forschungsgemeinschaft under contract DFG 436 RUS 113/477/4 and RFBR
1523: grant No. 05-02-16699.
1524:
1525: %\section*{References}
1526:
1527: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1528:
1529: \bibitem{7}
1530: D. Ebert and M.K. Volkov, Yad. Fiz. {\bf 36}, 1265 (1982);
1531: Z. Phys. {\bf C 16}, 205 (1983);
1532: D. Ebert and H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 271}, 188 (1986);
1533: D. Ebert, H. Reinhardt and M.K. Volkov, Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf
1534: 33}, 1 (1994).
1535:
1536: \bibitem{kunihiro}
1537: T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. {\bf 247}, 221 (1994).
1538:
1539: \bibitem{odin}
1540: T. Inagaki, T. Muta and S.D. Odintsov,
1541: Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. {\bf 127}, 93 (1997).
1542:
1543: \bibitem{buballa}
1544: M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. {\bf 407}, 205 (2005); G. Nardulli, Riv. Nuovo
1545: Cim. {\bf 25N3}, 1 (2002).
1546:
1547: \bibitem{klev}
1548: V. Bernard, U.-G. Meissner and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 36}, 819
1549: (1987); M.~Asakawa and K.~Yazaki. Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 504},668 (1989);
1550: %D. Ebert, Yu.L. Kalinovsky, L. M\"unchow and M.K. Volkov, Int. J.
1551: %Mod. Phys. {\bf A 8}, 1295 (1993);
1552: J. H\"ufner, S.P. Klevansky and P.
1553: Zhuang, Ann. Phys. {\bf 234}, 225 (1994).
1554:
1555: \bibitem{klim}
1556: A.S. Vshivtsev, V.Ch. Zhukovsky and K.G. Klimenko,
1557: JETP Lett. {\bf 64}, 338 (1996);
1558: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701288;%%
1559: JETP {\bf 84}, 1047 (1997);
1560: %%CITATION = JTPHE,84,1047;%%
1561: A.S. Vshivtsev, M.A. Vdovichenko and K.G. Klimenko,
1562: JETP {\bf 87}, 229 (1998).
1563: %%CITATION = JTPHE,87,229;%%
1564:
1565: \bibitem{kl}
1566: S.P. Klevansky and R.H. Lemmer, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 39}, 3478 (1989);
1567: H. Suganuma and T. Tatsumi, Ann.of Phys.{\bf 208}, 470 (1991);
1568: T. Inagaki, S.D. Odintsov and Yu.I. Shil'nov,
1569: Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A 14}, 481 (1999);
1570: E. Gorbar, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 491}, 305 (2000).
1571:
1572: \bibitem{ekvv}
1573: M.A. Vdovichenko, A.S. Vshivtsev and K.G. Klimenko,
1574: Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 63}, 470 (2000);
1575: %%CITATION = PANUE,63,470;%%
1576: D. Ebert et al, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 61}, 025005 (2000);
1577: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905253;%%
1578: Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 64}, 336 (2001);
1579: %%CITATION = PANUE,64,336;%%
1580: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 728}, 203 (2003).
1581: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0305149;%%
1582:
1583: \bibitem{2}
1584: K.G. Klimenko, Teor. Mat. Fiz. {\bf 89}, 211 (1991);
1585: %%CITATION = TMPHA,89,1161;%%
1586: {\bf 90}, 3 (1992);
1587: %%CITATION = TMPHA,90,1;%%
1588: Z. Phys. {\bf C 54}, 323 (1992);
1589: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C54,323;%%
1590: V.P. Gusynin, V.A. Miransky and I.A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1591: {\bf 73}, 3499 (1994); A.S. Vshivtsev, K.G. Klimenko and B.V.
1592: Magnitsky, JETP Lett. {\bf 62}, 283 (1995).
1593: %%CITATION = JTPLA,62,283;%%
1594:
1595: \bibitem{gus}
1596: V.P. Gusynin, V.A. Miransky and I.A. Shovkovy, Phys.Rev. {\bf D 52},
1597: 4747 (1996); Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 563}, 361 (1999); Phys. Lett.
1598: {\bf B 349}, 477 (1995);
1599: G.W. Semenoff, I.A. Shovkovy and L.C.R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. {\bf
1600: D 60}, 105024 (1999).
1601:
1602: \bibitem{incera}
1603: E.~J.~Ferrer and V.~de la Incera, Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf 14}, 3963
1604: (1999);
1605: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810473;%%
1606: V.C. Zhukovsky et al, JETP Lett. {\bf 73}, 121 (2001);
1607: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0012256;%%
1608: E.J. Ferrer, V.P. Gusynin and V. de la Incera, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf B
1609: 33}, 397 (2003);
1610: %%CITATION = COND-MAT 0203217;%%
1611: E. Elizalde, E.J. Ferrer, and V. de la Incera,
1612: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 68}, 096004 (2003);
1613: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209324;%%
1614: C.N. Leung and S.-Y. Wang, hep-ph/0510066;
1615: C.G. Beneventano and E.M. Santangelo, hep-th/0511166.
1616: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0511166;%%
1617:
1618: \bibitem{gus2}
1619: V.A. Miransky, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl.
1620: {\bf 123}, 49 (1996); A.S. Vshivtsev et al,
1621: %V.Ch. Zhukovsky, K.G. Klimenko and B.V. Magnitsky,
1622: Phys. Part. Nucl. {\bf 29}, 523 (1998);
1623: %%CITATION = PPNUE,29,523;%%
1624: V.P. Gusynin, Ukrainian J. Phys. {\bf 45}, 603 (2000); V. de la
1625: Incera, hep-ph/0009303.
1626: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009303;%%
1627:
1628: \bibitem{8}
1629: D. Ebert and M.K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 272}, 86 (1991);
1630: D. Ebert, Yu.L. Kalinovsky and M.K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 301},
1631: 231 (1993).
1632:
1633: \bibitem{klim2}
1634: K.G. Klimenko, B.V. Magnitsky and A.S. Vshivtsev, Nuovo Cim. {\bf A
1635: 107}, 439 (1994);
1636: %%CITATION = NUCIA,A107,439;%%
1637: Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 57}, 2171 (1994);
1638: %%CITATION = PANUE,57,2171;%%
1639: Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 101}, 1436 (1994);
1640: %%CITATION = TMPHA,101,1436;%%
1641: I.A. Shovkovy and V.M. Turkowski, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 367}, 213
1642: (1996).
1643:
1644: \bibitem{zheb}
1645: D. Ebert and V.Ch. Zhukovsky, Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A 12}, 2567
1646: (1997).
1647:
1648: \bibitem{saito}
1649: K. Saito, K. Tsushima and A.W. Thomas, Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A 13},
1650: 769 (1998).
1651:
1652: \bibitem{agas}
1653: N.O. Agasian, B.O. Kerbikov and V.I. Shevchenko,
1654: Phys. Rept. {\bf 320}, 131 (1999);
1655: D. Ebert et al,
1656: %V.V. Khudyakov, Ch. Zhukovsky, and K.G. Klimenko,
1657: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 65} (2002) 054024;
1658: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106110;%%
1659: A. Iwazaki et al, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 71}, 034014 (2005);
1660: D. Ebert, V.Ch. Zhukovsky and O.V. Tarasov, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 72},
1661: 096007 (2005).
1662:
1663: \bibitem{ebklim}
1664: V.Ch. Zhukovsky et al, JETP Lett. {\bf 74} (2001) 523;
1665: %%CITATION = JTPLA,74,523;%%
1666: hep-ph/0108185;
1667: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108185;%%
1668: D.~Ebert, K.G.~Klimenko and H.~Toki,
1669: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 64} (2001) 014038;
1670: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011273;%%
1671: D. Ebert et al, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 106}, 835 (2001).
1672: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0106049;%%
1673:
1674: \bibitem{ferrer}
1675: E.~J.~Ferrer, V.~de la Incera, and C. Manuel, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf
1676: 95}, 152002 (2005);
1677: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503162;%%
1678: hep-ph/0603233.
1679: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0603233;%%
1680:
1681: \bibitem{iwazaki}
1682: A. Iwazaki, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 72}, 114003 (2005).
1683:
1684: \bibitem{bub}
1685: D. Toublan and J.B. Kogut, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 564}, 212
1686: (2003); M. Buballa and M. Oertel, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 703}, 770
1687: (2002);
1688: S. Lawley, W. Bentz and A.W. Thomas, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 632}, 495
1689: (2006).
1690: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0504020;%%
1691:
1692: \bibitem{bed}
1693: P.F. Bedaque, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 697}, 569 (2002); H.J. Warringa, D.
1694: Boer and J.O. Andersen, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 72},
1695: 014015 (2005).
1696:
1697: \bibitem{barducci}
1698: A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni, G. Pettini, and L. Ravagli,
1699: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 564}, 217 (2003); Phys. Rev. {\bf D 69},
1700: 096004 (2004).
1701:
1702: \bibitem{zhuang}
1703: L. He and P. Zhuang, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 615}, 93 (2005);
1704: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501024;%%
1705: L. He, M. Jin, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. {\bf D 71},
1706: 116001 (2005);
1707: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503272;%%
1708: hep-ph/0503249;
1709: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503249;%%
1710: hep-ph/0604224.
1711: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0604224;%%
1712:
1713: \bibitem{dekgk} D.~Ebert and K.G.~Klimenko, J. Phys. {\bf G 32}, 599
1714: (2006);
1715: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507007;%%
1716: Eur. Phys. J. C 02527-5 (2006).
1717: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0510222;%%
1718:
1719: \bibitem{EbPerv}
1720: D.~Ebert and V. N.~Pervushin, Teor. Mat. Fiz. {\bf 36}, 313 (1978);
1721: D.~Ebert, Yu.L.~Kalinovsky, L.~M\"unchow and M.K.~Volkov, Int. J.
1722: Mod. Phys. {\bf A 8}, 1295 (1993).
1723:
1724: \bibitem{Rho}
1725: K. Langfeld and M. Rho, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 660}, 475 (1999).
1726:
1727: \bibitem{nar}
1728: S. Narison, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 387}, 162 (1996); M. D'Elia, A. Di
1729: Giacomo and E. Meggiolaro, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 408}, 315 (1997).
1730:
1731: \bibitem{bieten}
1732: M.A. Vdovichenko and A.K. Klimenko, JETP Lett.
1733: {\bf 68}, 460 (1998);
1734: %%CITATION = JTPLA,68,460;%%
1735: W. Bietenholz, A. Gfeller, and U.-J. Wiese, JHEP {\bf 10}, 018
1736: (2003).
1737:
1738:
1739: \end{thebibliography}
1740: \end{document}
1741:
1742:
1743: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1744: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{pi_1.eps}
1745: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{sigma_1.eps}
1746: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}$ at $T=0$ as a
1747: function of
1748: $\pi_1(\sigma=0)-$ left picture, and of $\sigma(\pi_1=0)-$right
1749: picture($\Lambda_p=1.0, \tilde g=1.5$).}
1750: \label{fig:U2}
1751: \end{figure}
1752:
1753: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1754: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{pi_2.eps}
1755: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{sigma_2.eps}
1756: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}$ at $T=0$ as a
1757: function of
1758: $\pi_1(\sigma=0)-$ left picture, and of $\sigma(\pi_1=0)-$right
1759: picture ($\Lambda_p=0.81, \tilde g=1$).}
1760: \label{fig:U1}
1761: \end{figure}
1762:
1763: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1764: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{pi.eps}
1765: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{sigma.eps}
1766: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}$ at $T=0$ as a
1767: function of
1768: $\pi_1(\sigma=0)-$ left picture, and of $\sigma(\pi_1=0)-$right
1769: picture ($\Lambda_p=0.65, \tilde g=0.64$).}
1770: \label{fig:U11}
1771: \end{figure}
1772: V_{\rm eff}=-{3\sigma^4\over 4\pi^2}\left(\log{\sigma^2\over
1773: \Lambda_s^2}-{1\over 2}\right)+{3\sigma^2\sigma_0^2\over
1774: 2\pi^2}\log {\sigma_0^2\over \Lambda_s^2}+
1775: \end{equation}
1776: \[
1777: +{(gH)^2\over
1778: 8\pi^2}\left({4\mu'\over\sqrt{\mu'^2-gH-\sigma^2}}-{4\mu'\over\sqrt
1779: {\mu'^2-gH}}\right)-\sigma^2{4\mu'(gH)^2\over
1780: 8\pi^2 2(\mu'^2-gH-\sigma_0^2)^{3/2}}.
1781: \]
1782:
1783: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1784: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{6new3.eps}
1785: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{7new3.eps}
1786: \caption{Thermodynamic potential $\Omega=V_{\rm eff}(\sigma,\pi_1)$
1787: at
1788: $T=0, gH=0.5$, $\Lambda_p=0.65, \tilde g=0.64$, $\mu'=0.05$ as a
1789: function
1790: of $\sigma\,\,(\pi_1=0)-$ left picture, and
1791: of $\pi_1\,\,(\sigma=0)-$right picture }
1792: %for $\Lambda_p=0.65, \tilde
1793: % g=0.64$.}
1794: \label{fig:U4c}
1795: \end{figure}
1796:
1797: