1: \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}

2: 

3: 

4: \newcommand{\ppbar}{p^{\!\!\!\!\!\textsuperscript{\tiny{(--)}}}\!\!}

5: \newcommand{\ptmiss}{{p\!\!\!\!\! \not \,\,\,\,}_t}

6: \providecommand{\openone}{\leavevmode\hbox{\small1\kern-3.8pt\normalsize1}}

7: 

8: \usepackage{amssymb,graphicx}

9: \usepackage{epsfig}

10: \usepackage{cite}

11: 

12: \renewcommand{\labelenumi}{(\theenumi)}

13: \renewcommand{\theenumi}{\roman{enumi}}

14: 

15: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{1}

16: \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{1}

17: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0}

18: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}

19: \parskip=1.0ex

20: \setcounter{topnumber}{10}

21: \setcounter{bottomnumber}{10}

22: \setcounter{totalnumber}{10}

23: 

24: \textwidth=15.5cm

25: \textheight=23cm

26: \oddsidemargin=0.2cm

27: \evensidemargin=0.2cm

28: \topmargin=-1cm

29: 

30: \begin{document}

31: 

32: \begin{center}

33: \begin{Large}

34: {\bf Neutrino physics at large colliders}

35: 

36: \end{Large}

37: 

38: \vspace{0.5cm}

39: F. del Aguila$^1$, J. A. Aguilar--Saavedra$^1$, R. Pittau$^2$  \\[0.2cm] 

40: {\it $^1$ Departamento de Física Teórica y del Cosmos and CAFPE, \\

41: Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain} \\[0.1cm]

42: {\it $^2$ Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica, Universit\`a di Torino, 

43: and INFN \\ Sezione di Torino, Italy} 

44: \end{center}

45: 

46: 

47: \begin{abstract}

48: Large colliders are not sensitive to light neutrino masses and character, but 

49: they can produce new heavy neutrinos, allowing also for the determination

50: of their Dirac or Majorana nature. We review

51: the discovery limits at the next generation of large colliders.

52: \end{abstract}

53: 

54: 

55: 

56: 

57: 

58: \section{Introduction}

59: \label{Introduction}

60: 

61: 

62: Future colliders will probe Nature up to TeV scales with high precision,

63: discovering new heavy particles  with sizeable couplings or setting stringent

64: limits  on their existence. Thus, we expect that the Higgs will be copiously

65: produced at the LHC, as may also be the lightest superpartners

66: \cite{atlas,cms}. At any rate, these facilities will be a window to any new

67: physics near the electroweak scale which couples to the Standard Model (SM). 

68: This could be the case, for example, of new heavy neutrinos. In the following

69: we review what can be learned about them at the next generation of large

70: colliders. 

71: 

72: SM extensions with heavy neutrinos at the TeV scale or below usually include new

73: interactions and extra matter. If the latter are also in this mass range, they

74: give new signals and further contributions to heavy neutrino production

75: processes. We neglect them here, assuming that they do not affect the

76: significance of the specific processes discussed. (In this sense the resulting

77: limits are conservative, because we do not consider other possible effects

78: eventually larger.) Hence, all the additional parameters involved in

79: heavy neutrino production at colliders are the heavy neutrino

80: masses and their mixings with SM fermions. Let $N$ be the lightest heavy

81: neutrino, which can be of Dirac (D) or Majorana (M) nature. In the former case

82: two  extra bispinors $N_{L,R}$ are added and lepton number is conserved, whereas

83: in the latter the SM is enlarged with only one bispinor satisfying

84: $(N_L)^c \equiv C \bar N_L^T = N_R$, and thus lepton number is violated

85: \cite{MP,BLS}. It should be stressed that: 

86: 

87: %\newpage

88: \begin{itemize}

89: \item The effects of light neutrino masses at large colliders are suppressed by

90: factors $\sim m_\nu / \sqrt{s}$, and they can be completely neglected. Hence, we

91: can assume without loss of  generality that the SM neutrinos are strictly

92: massless, and lepton number is preserved in the light sector. In other words, 

93: it does not matter in this context whether the light neutrinos are of Dirac or

94: Majorana nature \cite{Bilenky}.\footnote{In definite models with extra

95: interactions and matter content light neutrino masses and mixing parameters may

96: be related to the new sectors and, through them, to collider observables (see

97: for examples Refs. \cite{porod1,porod2}). Then, the latter

98: can give indirect information about the former, which are otherwise

99: unmeasurable at high energies.}

100: \item The heavy Dirac neutrino case is a particular limit of two heavy Majorana

101: neutrinos, when both are degenerate and their mixings with the SM leptons are

102: lepton number conserving (LNC). On the other hand, one extra heavy Majorana 

103: neutrino corresponds to the limit in which the second Majorana neutrino is much

104: heavier. 

105: \end{itemize}

106: 

107: In both situations, the relevant additional terms of the Lagrangian are the

108: heavy neutrino mass term 

109: \begin{eqnarray}

110: \mathcal{L}_\mathrm{mass} & = & - m_N \bar N_L N_R  + \mathrm{H.c.} \,,

111:   \quad \quad ~~\, (\mathrm{D})  \nonumber \\ 

112: \mathcal{L}_\mathrm{mass} & = & - \frac{1}{2} \, m_N \bar N_L N_R +

113:  \mathrm{H.c.}  \,, \quad \quad (\mathrm{M}) 

114: \label{ec:massterm} 

115: \end{eqnarray}

116: (with $N_{L,R} = P_{L,R} N$), and its interactions

117: with

118: the light fermions \cite{clic}. The charged current vertex with a

119: charged lepton $\ell$ reads 

120: \begin{equation}

121: \mathcal{L}_W = - \frac{g}{\sqrt 2}  \left( \bar \ell \gamma^\mu V_{\ell N}

122: P_L N \; W_\mu + \bar N \gamma^\mu V_{\ell N}^* P_L \ell \; W_\mu^\dagger

123: \right) \,.

124: \label{ec:lNW} 

125: \end{equation}

126: The neutral current gauge couplings with a light neutrino $\nu_\ell$ are

127: \begin{equation}

128: \mathcal{L}_Z = - \frac{g}{2 c_W}  \left( \bar \nu_\ell \gamma^\mu

129: V_{\ell N} P_L N + \bar N \gamma^\mu V_{\ell N}^* P_L \nu_\ell \right)

130: Z_\mu \,,

131: \label{ec:nNZ}

132: \end{equation}

133: and the scalar interactions

134: \begin{equation}

135: \mathcal{L}_H = - \frac{g \, m_N}{2 M_W} \, \left( \bar \nu_\ell \, V_{\ell N}

136: P_R N + \bar N \, V_{\ell N}^* P_L \nu_\ell \right) H \,.

137: \label{ec:nNH}

138: \end{equation}

139: Thus, all the necessary parameters for the evaluation of the $N$ production

140: cross

141: sections are its mass $m_N$ and its couplings to the different lepton flavours 

142: $V_{\ell N}$, $\ell = e, \mu, \tau$. The main difference between a heavy Dirac

143: or Majorana neutrino is the non-zero lepton number violating (LNV) propagator

144: for two $N$ fields $ \langle N N \rangle$ in the Majorana case, besides the

145: common LNC one $\langle N\bar N \rangle$ \cite{Denner}.

146: Dirac and Majorana heavy neutrinos have the same couplings but

147: for the Majorana case the second term in Eqs.~(\ref{ec:nNZ}) and 

148: (\ref{ec:nNH}) can be rewritten using the condition  $N = N^c$,

149: giving\footnote{This also assumes that $\nu=\nu^c$, otherwise both fields $\nu$

150: and $\nu^c$ would appear. As it has been emphasised, results are independent of

151: this assumption.} 

152: \begin{eqnarray}

153: \mathcal{L}_Z & = & - \frac{g}{2 c_W} \, \bar \nu_\ell \gamma^\mu \left(  

154: V_{\ell N} P_L - V_{\ell N}^* P_R \right) N \; Z_\mu \,, \quad \quad

155: \mathrm{(M)} \nonumber \\

156: \mathcal{L}_H & = & - \frac{g \, m_N}{2 M_W} \, \bar \nu_\ell \left( V_{\ell N}

157:  P_R + V_{\ell N}^* P_L \right) N \; H \,. \quad \quad \quad

158: \mathrm{(M)}

159: \label{ec:nNZHm}

160: \end{eqnarray}

161: For equal values of the couplings, production cross sections are equal in

162: general for a Dirac and Majorana heavy neutrino, as we will explicitly see

163: in section \ref{sec:5} (in some processes, this requires summing $N$ and

164: $\bar N$ production for Dirac neutrinos). 

165: For the analysis of the different heavy neutrino signals it is necessary to

166: know its decay modes as well. $N$ can decay in the channels $N \to W^+ \ell^-$ 

167: (if $N$ is a Majorana fermion $N \to W^- \ell^+ $ is also allowed), 

168: $N \to Z \nu_\ell$ and $N \to H \nu_\ell$. 

169: The partial widths for these decays are \cite{clic,GZ1,Pil3}

170: \begin{eqnarray}

171: \Gamma(N \to W^+ \ell^-) & = &  \Gamma(N \to W^- \ell^+) \nonumber \\

172: & = & \frac{g^2}{64 \pi} |V_{\ell N}|^2

173: \frac{m_N^3}{M_W^2} \left( 1- \frac{M_W^2}{m_N^2} \right) 

174: \left( 1 + \frac{M_W^2}{m_N^2} - 2 \frac{M_W^4}{m_N^4} \right) \,, \nonumber

175: \\[0.1cm]

176: \Gamma_D(N \to Z \nu_\ell) & = &  \frac{g^2}{128 \pi c_W^2} |V_{\ell N}|^2

177: \frac{m_N^3}{M_Z^2} \left( 1- \frac{M_Z^2}{m_N^2} \right) 

178: \left( 1 + \frac{M_Z^2}{m_N^2} - 2 \frac{M_Z^4}{m_N^4} \right) \,, \nonumber

179: \\[0.2cm]

180: \Gamma_M(N \to Z \nu_\ell) & = & 2 \, \Gamma_D(N \to Z \nu_\ell) \,, \nonumber

181: \\

182: \Gamma_D(N \to H \nu_\ell) & = &  \frac{g^2}{128 \pi} |V_{\ell N}|^2

183: \frac{m_N^3}{M_W^2} \left( 1- \frac{M_H^2}{m_N^2} \right)^2 \,, \nonumber

184: \\[0.2cm]

185: \Gamma_M(N \to H \nu_\ell) & = & 2 \, \Gamma_D(N \to H \nu_\ell) \,,

186: \label{ec:widths}

187: \end{eqnarray}

188: with $\Gamma_D$ and $\Gamma_M$ standing for the widths of a Dirac and Majorana

189: neutrino. The factors of two in the partial widths of $N \to Z \nu_\ell$,

190: $N \to H \nu_\ell$ for a Majorana neutrino are the consequence of the extra

191: $V_{\ell N}^*$ couplings in Eqs.~(\ref{ec:nNZHm}) resulting from the Majorana

192: condition, and which are not present for a Dirac neutrino. From

193: Eqs.~(\ref{ec:widths}) it follows that for equal values of the mixing angles

194: $V_{\ell N}$ the width of a heavy Majorana neutrino is twice as large as for a

195: Dirac neutrino.

196: Another straightforward consequence of the previous expressions is that 

197: the partial widths for $W$, $Z$ and Higgs decays are in the ratios 

198: $2 \, : \, 1 \, : \, 1$ (assuming $m_N \gg M_W, M_Z, M_H $). 

199: 

200: The reader mainly interested in the reach of the different experiments 

201: can go directly to section \ref{sec:5}, where we

202: review the results for heavy neutrino production at future colliders. In

203: next section we discuss the motivation for having heavy neutrinos at

204: the electroweak scale, and in section \ref{sec:3} we provide more 

205: details on the neutrino mass matrices we are interested in, 

206: for easier comparison with other analyses. 

207: Present indirect constraints on heavy neutrino mixing are summarised in

208: section \ref{sec:4}. Section \ref{sec:6} is devoted to our conclusions.

209: 

210: 

211: 

212: 

213: \section{Motivation}

214: \label{sec:2}

215: 

216: 

217: New fermions are present in many extensions of the SM. If their masses are well

218: above the electroweak scale they must be vector-like, that is, with their

219: left- and right-handed parts transforming in the same represetation of the SM

220: gauge group.  This guarantees that their mass terms preserve the electroweak

221: gauge symmetry,\footnote{In particular, fermions transforming trivially under

222: the SM group can have Majorana nature. In this case particles and antiparticles

223: coincide, and their (Majorana) masses violate fermion number.}

224: but by the same token the natural size of their masses is of the order of the

225: largest mass scale allowed by the symmetries of the model \cite{thooft}.

226: In grand unified

227: theories this is usually the grand unified  scale, near the Planck mass. 

228: This is for example the case of Majorana right-handed neutrinos

229: \cite{seesaw1,seesaw2,seesaw3,seesaw4}.

230: However, in

231: the presence of extra symmetries these vector-like masses can be much smaller

232: \cite{ramond,paco,LL}, and exotic fermions can also manifest at lower

233: energies (for reviews see Refs.~\cite{frampton,hewett}).

234: 

235: This scenario has become more interesting lately because the possible existence

236: of low extra dimensions near the TeV scale \cite{extra1,extra2}, with SM

237: fermions in the bulk, implies infinite towers of vector-like fermions, known as

238: Kaluza-Klein modes \cite{torre1,torre2,torre3},

239: whose lightest states could be also

240: eventually observable \cite{jose,gustavo}. 

241: Fermions in five dimensions have both chiralities and, although the zero modes

242: can be chiral in appropriate backgrounds, the Kaluza-Klein modes are in general

243: Dirac particles. If neutral, they can have Majorana mass terms as well

244: \cite{a31,a32}.

245: Moreover, as an alternative to supersymmetry at the TeV scale, SM extensions

246: with a larger global symmetry have  been proposed to cancel the undesired

247: large quantum corrections to the Higgs mass \cite{LH1,LH2,LH3}.

248: In these models the SM

249: Higgs is a pseudo-Goldstone  boson, what justifies their name of Little Higgs

250: models.  They are characterised by a new scale near the TeV and include

251: extra matter

252: content to realise the larger symmetry. In this context the existence of new

253: fermions near the  electroweak scale is not a possibility but a

254: requirement. In general they mix with the SM fermions and can be 

255: eventually produced at large colliders \cite{coll1,coll2,coll3}.

256: In particular, if the model includes extra neutrinos transforming as singlets

257: under the SM group, it seems natural that they have TeV masses and relatively

258: large mixings with the SM fermions.

259: For example, in the {\em simplest} Little Higgs models \cite{schmaltz},

260: the matter

261: content belongs to $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ multiplets, and the SM lepton doublets must

262: be enlarged with one extra neutrino $N'_{\ell L}$ per family. When a combination

263: of Higgs triplets acquires a large vacuum expectation value (VEV) $f$ of few

264: TeV, reducing

265: the $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ symmetry down to $\mathrm{SU}(2)_L$, the extra neutrinos

266: can get a large Dirac mass of the order of the new scale, provided the model

267: also includes the necessary right-handed neutrinos transforming as

268: $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ singlets \cite{padilla}. This mechanism provides a natural way

269: of giving masses to the SM neutrinos while explaining

270: the absence of exotic fermions below the electroweak scale. In this framework

271: the mixing between the light leptons and the heavy neutrinos is of order

272: $v/\sqrt 2 f$, with $v=246$ GeV the electroweak VEV.

273:   If this is the case, it is

274: precisely the non-observation  of these fermions at future colliders what will

275: set very  stringent limits on the model.

276: 

277: Besides their appearance in specific models, 

278: heavy Majorana neutrinos are introduced in seesaw models

279: \cite{seesaw1,seesaw2,seesaw3,seesaw4}. They

280: give contributions to light neutrino masses $m_\nu$ of the order

281: $Y^2 v^2  / 2 m_N$, where $Y$ is a Yukawa coupling.

282: In the minimal seesaw realisations

283: this is the only source for

284: light neutrino masses, and the Yukawas are assumed of order unity without any

285: particular symmetry. Therefore,

286: having $m_\nu \sim Y^2 v^2 / 2 m_N$ requires heavy masses $m_N \sim 10^{13}$ GeV

287: to reproduce the observed light neutrino spectrum. Additionally, the light-heavy

288: mixing is predicted to be $V_{\ell N} \sim \sqrt{m_\nu / m_N}$.

289: These ultra-heavy particles are unobservable, and thus the seesaw mechanism

290: is not directly testable. Nevertheless, non-minimal

291: seesaw models can be built, with $m_N \sim 1$ TeV or smaller, if some 

292: approximate flavour

293: symmetry suppresses the $\sim  Y^2 v^2 / 2 m_N$ contribution from seesaw

294: \cite{buch2,ing,gluzatev}.

295: Moreover, the light-heavy mixing can be decoupled from the mass ratio

296: $\sqrt{m_\nu / m_N}$ \cite{bernabeu}. In this situation, the heavy states could

297: be observable in future collider experiments.

298: 

299: In addition to providing a mechanism for neutrino mass generation,

300: heavy neutrino decays can give a succesful leptogenesis. A beautiful feature of

301: the minimal seesaw

302: is that the same heavy neutrino scale $m_N \sim 10^{13}$ GeV which reproduces

303: light neutrino masses predicts a lepton asymmetry large enough to account for

304: the observed baryon asymmetry through $B+L$ violating sphaleron interactions 

305: \cite{lepto1,lepto2}.

306: The heavy neutrino scale can be lowered to the TeV, if two neutrinos are

307: nearly degenerate and the CP asymmetry is resonantly enhanced

308: \cite{qd1,qd2,qd3}, or for other SM extensions \cite{tev1,tev2,RH}.

309: It seems to be a general property that the heavy neutrino

310: needed to generate the CP asymmetry must couple very weakly to the SM

311: fields, and then it cannot be produced at existing or planned

312: colliders through the usual mechanisms.

313: But this does not preclude the existence of other heavy neutrinos with larger

314: couplings which, although not participating actively in leptogenesis, may 

315: be observable at colliders. In the example of Refs.~\cite{tau,tau2}, with 3

316: heavy

317: neutrinos with masses $m_{N_i} \sim 250$ GeV, the observed light neutrino

318: spectrum is reproduced and a baryon excess is generated through a $\tau$ lepton

319: asymmetry.

320: The heavy neutrino $N_1$ actively involved in $\tau$ leptogenesis couples very

321: weakly to the SM leptons, $V_{\ell N_1} \sim 10^{-6}$, and cannot be produced

322: at existing or planned colliders. The other two heavy neutrinos $N_{2,3}$ 

323: form a quasi-Dirac neutrino $N$ mainly coupling to the first two families,

324: $V_{eN}, V_{\mu N} \sim 10^{-2}$, and with a small mixing with the third one,

325: $V_{\tau N} \sim 10^{-6}$, to avoid

326: washing-out the $\tau$ lepton asymmetry.

327: This heavy state could be observable at $e^+ e^-$ colliders.

328: 

329: 

330: 

331: 

332: 

333: 

334: \section{Beyond the Neutrino Standard Model}

335: \label{sec:3}

336: 

337: 

338: In this section we consider a SM extension with heavy neutrino singlets,

339: deriving their interactions with the light leptons \cite{valle}. The general

340: situation is that $n$ additional singlets $N'_{iL}$ ($i=1, ..., n$),

341: which can be taken to be left-handed, are introduced.\footnote{In

342: the case of light Dirac neutrinos we must introduce 3 additional

343: $\mathrm{SU}(2)_L$ singlet fields to allow for Dirac neutrino masses. However,

344: as it has already been emphasised, light neutrino masses are not relevant at

345: large colliders, so these fermions can be considered massless and their

346: right-handed parts ignored. Any other more general scenario can be brought into

347: this form in this limit. In particular, this is consistent with whatever

348: specific model of neutrino masses one may advocate. Here we do not make any

349: attempt to accommodate them, neither claim that the heavy neutrino masses and

350: mixings we consider are natural in any given model of neutrino mass generation

351: one can think of. But heavy neutrinos can be introduced, as long as they 

352: fulfill the experimental constraints discussed in the next section and can

353: reproduce the 

354: pattern of neutrino masses and mixings implied by neutrino oscillations.}

355: We will assume $n = 3$ for definiteness and easier comparison with 

356: the heavy neutrino production analysis we are interested in,

357: but the formalism is general for any number of singlets. 

358: The neutrino weak isospin $T_3=1/2$ eigenstates

359: $\nu'_{iL}$ are the same as in the SM, and the extended mass term reads

360: \begin{eqnarray}

361: \mathcal{L}_\mathrm{mass} & = & - \frac{1}{2} \,

362: \left(\bar \nu'_L \; \bar N'_{L} \right)

363: \left( \! \begin{array}{cc}

364: M_L & \frac{v}{\sqrt 2} Y \\ 

365: \frac{v}{\sqrt 2} Y^T & M_R 

366: \end{array} \! \right) \,

367: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c} \nu'_R \\ N'_{R} 

368: \end{array} \!\! \right)

369: \; + \mathrm{H.c.} \,,

370: \label{massterm}

371: \end{eqnarray}

372: where 

373: $\nu'_{iR} \equiv (\nu'_{iL})^c$, $N'_{jR} \equiv (N'_{jL})^c$, and the blocks

374: $M_L$, $Y$ and $M_R$ stand for $3 \times 3$ matrices. $M_L$ is a lepton number

375: violating mass matrix for the light neutrinos, $Y$ stands for the Yukawa

376: interactions and $M_R$, which can be assumed diagonal, real and positive

377: without loss of generality, corresponds to bare masses which also violate

378: lepton number. The mass eigenstates are obtained diagonalising 

379: the complete $6\times 6$ mass matrix $\mathcal{M}$ with the  

380: unitary transformation $\mathcal{U}_L$,

381: \begin{equation}

382: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c} \nu_L \\ N_L \end{array} \!\! \right) =

383: \mathcal{U}_L^\dagger

384: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c} \nu'_L \\ N'_L \end{array} \!\! \right) \,,

385: \quad \quad 

386: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c} \nu_R \\ N_R \end{array} \!\! \right) =

387: \mathcal{U}_L^T

388: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c} \nu'_R \\ N'_R \end{array} \!\! \right) \,,

389: \label{ec:U}

390: \end{equation}

391: with $\mathcal{U}_L^\dagger 

392: \mathcal{M} \, \mathcal{U}_L^* = \mathcal{M}_\mathrm{diag}$.

393: The weak interaction Lagrangian in the weak eigenstate basis is

394: \begin{eqnarray}

395: \mathcal{L}_W & = & - \frac{g}{\sqrt 2} \, \bar l'_L \gamma^\mu \nu'_L

396: W_\mu + \mathrm{H.c.} \,, \nonumber \\

397: \mathcal{L}_Z & = 

398: & - \frac{g}{2 c_W} \, \bar \nu'_L \gamma^\mu \nu'_L Z_\mu 

399: \,, \nonumber \\

400: \mathcal{L}_H & = & - \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} \; \bar \nu'_L Y N'_R \, H  

401: + \mathrm{H.c.} \, ,\end{eqnarray}

402: with $l'_{iL}$ the charged lepton weak eigenstates. Using Eqs.~(\ref{ec:U}),

403: these terms read in the mass eigenstate basis

404: \begin{eqnarray}

405: \mathcal{L}_W & = & - \frac{g}{\sqrt 2} \, \bar l_L \gamma^\mu \; 

406: U_l^\dagger U_L

407: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c} \nu_L \\ N_L \end{array} \!\! \right) 

408: W_\mu + \mathrm{H.c.} \,, \nonumber \\

409: \mathcal{L}_Z & = & - \frac{g}{2 c_W} 

410: \left(\bar \nu_L \; \bar N_L \right)

411: \gamma^\mu \; U_L^\dagger U_L

412: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c} \nu_L \\ N_L \end{array} \!\! \right)

413: Z_\mu \,, \nonumber \\

414: \mathcal{L}_H & = & - \frac {1}{\sqrt 2}  \left(\bar \nu_L \; \bar N_L \right)

415: U_L^\dagger Y U_L^{'*}

416: \left( \!\! \begin{array}{c} \nu_R \\ N_R \end{array} \!\! \right)

417:  \, H  + \mathrm{H.c.}  \, ,

418: \label{ec:wzh}

419: \end{eqnarray}

420: where the $3 \times 6$ matrices $U_L$ and $U'_L$ 

421: are the upper and lower blocks of $\mathcal{U}_L$, 

422: \begin{equation}

423: \mathcal{U}_L = \left( \! \begin{array}{c} U_L \\ U'_L \end{array} \! \right)

424: \; , 

425: \label{mixingm}

426: \end{equation}

427: and $U_l$ is a $3 \times 3$ unitary matrix resulting from the 

428: diagonalisation of the charged lepton mass matrix.

429: In the weak basis where the latter is diagonal 

430: $U_l$ is the identity, so we can assume without loss of generality   

431: that the extended $3 \times 6$ Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (MNS) matrix

432: \cite{PMNS1,PMNS2}

433: \begin{equation}

434: V \equiv U_l^\dagger U_L

435: \end{equation}

436: equals $U_L$. Hence, from

437: Eqs.~(\ref{ec:wzh}) we see that this matrix completely fixes the couplings 

438: of light leptons to heavy neutrinos, including their scalar 

439: interactions, although in this case the couplings are also proportional to the

440: heavy neutrino masses $m_{N_i}$. The charged current matrix can be further

441: decomposed into $3 \times 3$ blocks for convenience,

442: \begin{equation}

443: V = \left( V^{(\nu)} ~ V^{(N)} \right) \,,

444: \end{equation}

445: where $V^{(\nu)}$ and $V^{(N)}$ mix the charged leptons with light and heavy

446: neutrinos, respectively.

447: Its approximate form can be obtained

448: observing that the $3 \times 3$ blocks of the mass matrix $\mathcal{M}$ exhibit

449: a strong hierarchy $M_L \ll v Y \ll M_R$, where here $M_L$, $Y$ and $M_R$

450: stand for generic values of their entries.

451: Then, to first order in small ratios,

452: \begin{eqnarray}

453: \mathcal{U}_L & = &

454: \left( \! \begin{array}{c} U_L \\ U'_L \end{array} \! \right)

455: \simeq 

456: \left( \! \begin{array}{cc}

457: \openone & V^{(N)} \\ 

458: - V^{(N)\dagger} & \openone 

459: \end{array} \! \right) \,,

460: \label{mixingDa}

461: \end{eqnarray}

462: where $V^{(N)}$ has matrix elements 

463: \begin{eqnarray}

464: V_{\ell N_i} = \frac{v}{\sqrt 2}\frac{Y_{\ell i}}{M_i} \,,

465: \label{mixing}

466: \end{eqnarray}

467: being $M_i$, $i=1,\dots,3$ the eigenvalues of the diagonal matrix $M_R$.

468: Heavy neutrino masses are $m_{N_i} \simeq M_i$. Their couplings $V_{\ell N_i}$

469: are very small and it makes sense to keep only the first order terms.

470: (Experimental data constrain these quantities to be $O(10^{-2})$ at most,

471: see next section.)

472: $V^{(\nu)}$ is unitary up to small corrections $O(V_{\ell N_i}^2)$ and

473: has been taken as the $3 \times 3$ identity matrix,

474: because light neutrino masses can be safely neglected at high energies. 

475: The interactions for heavy Majorana neutrinos presented in the introduction

476: can be easily obtained substituting the expressions

477: for $\mathcal{U}_L$ and $V$ into Eqs. (\ref{ec:wzh}).

478: We note that while the charged current interaction has the form shown in

479: Eq.~(\ref{ec:lNW}) by definition, the neutral current and Higgs terms

480: correspond to the leading term for small $V^{(N)}$.

481: In the general case of three heavy Majorana neutrinos the vertices in

482: Eqs. (\ref{ec:lNW})--(\ref{ec:nNH}) correspond to any of them.

483: 

484: For a heavy Dirac neutrino the interactions are the same but some redefinitions

485: are necessary. In this case there are two degenerate eigenstates, say

486: $N_1$ and $N_2$, and their Yukawa couplings (the first two columns) are

487: proportional,

488: \begin{equation}

489: m_{N_2} = m_{N_1} \,, \quad  Y_{\ell 2} = i Y_{\ell 1} \,.

490: \label{Dirac}

491: \end{equation}

492: From the latter equality, $V_{\ell N_2} = i V_{\ell N_1}$.

493: These conditions realise the lepton number symmetry $L$ inherent to this case.

494: Defining

495: \begin{eqnarray}

496: N_L & \equiv & \frac{1}{\sqrt 2} (N_{1L} + i N_{2L}) \,, \nonumber \\

497: (N_R)^c & \equiv & \frac{1}{\sqrt 2} (N_{1L} - i N_{2L}) \,,

498: \end{eqnarray}

499: it is easily found that $N_L$ couples to the charged leptons with

500: \begin{equation}

501: V_{\ell N} = \sqrt 2 V_{\ell N_1} \,,

502: \end{equation}

503: while $(N_R)^c$ decouples. 

504: Lepton numbers $L=1$, $L=-1$ can be assigned to $N_L$, $(N_R)^c$, respectively.

505: Rewriting the Majorana mass term for $N_1$ and $N_2$

506: \begin{equation}

507: \mathcal{L}_\mathrm{mass} = - \frac{m_{N_1}}{2} \left (\bar N_{1L} (N_{1L})^c +

508: \bar N_{2L} (N_{2L})^c \right) + \mathrm{H.c.}

509: \end{equation}

510: gives the usual LNC mass term of a Dirac neutrino with

511: mass $m_N \equiv m_{N_1}$ in Eq.~(\ref{ec:massterm}),

512: \begin{equation}

513: \mathcal{L}_\mathrm{mass} = - m_N \bar N_L N_R

514: + \mathrm{H.c.}

515: \end{equation}

516: 

517: 

518: 

519: 

520: 

521: 

522: 

523: 

524: \section{Experimental constraints}

525: \label{sec:4}

526: 

527: 

528: The mixing of neutrinos heavier than the $Z$ boson with charged leptons 

529: is limited by two sets of processes 

530: \cite{LL,pil1,nardi,pil2,bernabeu,kagan,illana}:

531: ({\em i\/}) $\pi \to \ell \nu$, $Z \to \nu \bar \nu$ and other tree-level

532: processes involving light neutrinos in the final state; ({\em ii\/})

533: $\mu \to e \gamma$, $Z \to \ell^+ \ell^{'-}$ and other lepton flavour violating

534: (LFV) processes to which heavy neutrinos can contribute at one loop level.

535: These imits are independent of the Dirac or Majorana nature of the

536: neutrinos, and constrain the quantities

537: \begin{equation}

538: \Omega_{\ell \ell'} \equiv \delta_{\ell \ell'} - \sum_{i=1}^3 

539: V_{\ell \nu_i} V_{\ell' \nu_i}^* =  

540: \sum_{i=1}^3 V_{\ell N_i} V_{\ell' N_i}^* \,,

541: \label{ec:omega}

542: \end{equation}

543: where the equality is a consequence of the unitarity of 

544: $\mathcal{U}_L$. A global fit to the

545: processes in the first group gives the bounds \cite{kagan}

546: \begin{equation}

547: \Omega_{ee} \leq 0.0054 \,, \quad \Omega_{\mu \mu} \leq 0.0096 \,, \quad

548: \Omega_{\tau \tau} \leq 0.016 \,,

549: \label{eps1}

550: \end{equation}

551: with a 90\% confidence level (CL). In the limit of heavy neutrino masses 

552: in the TeV range, LFV processes in the second group require \cite{bernabeu}

553: \begin{equation}

554: |\Omega_{e \mu}| \leq 0.0001 \,, \quad |\Omega_{e \tau}| \leq 0.01 \,, \quad

555: |\Omega_{\mu \tau}| \leq 0.01 \,.

556: \label{eps2}

557: \end{equation}

558: The bounds in Eqs.~(\ref{eps1}) are model-independent to a large extent, and

559: independent of heavy neutrino masses as well. They imply that the mixing of the

560: heavy eigenstates with the charged leptons is very small, 

561: $\sum_i |V_{\ell N_i}|^2 \leq 0.0054$, 0.0096, 0.016 for $\ell = e,\mu,\tau$, 

562: respectively. 

563: On the other hand, in general the bounds in Eqs.~(\ref{eps2}) do not directly 

564: constrain the products $V_{\ell N_i} V_{\ell' N_i}^*$, but their sums,

565: and cancellations might occur between two or more terms 

566: and also with other new physics contributions. 

567: These cancellations may be more or less natural, but in any case

568: such possibility makes the limits in Eqs.~(\ref{eps2}) relatively

569: weak if more than one heavy neutrino exists \cite{plb,GZ1}. 

570: When discussing the future 

571: collider limits in next section we will take into account only the bounds 

572: in Eqs.~(\ref{eps1}), eventually using those in Eqs.~(\ref{eps2}) for

573: comparison.

574: 

575: Specific neutrino mass models must reproduce the observed light neutrino

576: spectrum.

577: In the block-diagonal basis defined by Eq.~(\ref{mixingDa})

578: the neutrino mass matrix in Eq.~(\ref{massterm})

579: reads (neglecting small corrections) 

580: \begin{eqnarray}

581: \mathcal{U}_L^\dagger \, \mathcal{M} \, \mathcal{U}_L^* & \simeq & 

582: \left( \! \begin{array}{cc}

583: M_L - \frac{v^2}{2}Y M_R^{-1} Y^T & 0 \\ 

584: 0 & M_R 

585: \end{array} \! \right) \,. 

586: \end{eqnarray}

587: The light neutrino masses and mixings result from the diagonalisation of the

588: light neutrino $3 \times 3$ mass matrix

589: \begin{equation}

590: M_\nu \simeq M_L - \frac{v^2}{2}Y M_R^{-1} Y^T \,.

591: \end{equation}

592: The first term $M_L$ vanishes unless a Higgs triplet is included in the theory,

593: in which case it must be justified why its matrix elements are small.

594: For $V_{\ell N} \sim 0.01$ and $m_N \sim 1$ TeV, the typical size of the second

595: term is $0.1$ GeV, 8 orders of magnitude larger than the light neutrino mass

596: scale $m_\nu \sim 1$ eV. Then, one has to arrange either (i) some supression

597: mechanism, or (ii) a fine-tuned

598: cancellation with $M_L$. In any of these cases one expects that some

599: symmetry is at work. A particular example of the former appears when two

600: degenerate Majorana neutrinos form a (quasi) Dirac neutrino. In such case,

601: their contributions cancel due to the conditions in Eqs.~(\ref{Dirac}).

602: (If all heavy neutrinos are Dirac particles the light neutrinos can be also

603: Dirac fermions, what requires the addition of three extra SM singlets.)

604: This possibility has been explored in definite models \cite{ing,tau,tau2}.

605: Indeed, if we write

606: \begin{equation}

607: Y = Y^{(0)} + \varepsilon Y^{(1)} \,,

608: \end{equation}

609: with $\varepsilon$ small and $Y^{(0)}$ taking the form

610: \begin{equation}

611: Y^{(0)} =

612: \left( \! \begin{array}{ccc}

613: y_1 & y_2 & y_3 \\ 

614: \alpha y_1 & \alpha y_2 & \alpha y_3 \\ 

615: \beta y_1 & \beta y_2 & \beta y_3  

616: \end{array} \! \right) \,, 

617: \end{equation}

618: where

619: \begin{equation}

620: \frac{y_1^2}{M_1} + \frac{y_2^2}{M_2} + \frac{y_3^2}{M_3} =0 \,,

621: \end{equation}

622: the term $Y^{(0)} M_R^{-1} Y^{(0)T}$ identically vanishes, and the light

623: neutrino mass matrix reduces to

624: \begin{equation}

625: M_\nu \simeq \varepsilon \left( Y^{(0)} M_R^{-1} Y^{(1)T}

626: + Y^{(1)} M_R^{-1} Y^{(0)T} \right) + O(\varepsilon^2) \,.

627: \end{equation} 

628: In this case it is also possible to cancel the contributions 

629: to neutrinoless double $\beta$ decay as well, which otherwise would 

630: require in general much heavier neutrino masses $m_{N_i} \geq 1$ TeV

631: \cite{M,nless}. Moreover, this framework can accommodate

632: leptogenesis by making $\beta \ll \alpha$ \cite{tau,tau2}.

633: At any rate, constructing models where this structure and the size of $\alpha$,

634: $\beta$ result from symmetries with a natural breaking

635: does not seem straightforward.  

636: 

637: 

638: 

639: 

640: 

641: 

642: 

643: 

644: \section{Heavy neutrino signals at large colliders}

645: \label{sec:5}

646: 

647: 

648: Heavy neutrino signals can conserve or violate lepton number. In the LNC case 

649: final state angular distributions must be used in order to determine the Dirac

650: or Majorana nature of the heavy neutrino. On the contrary, LNV signals

651: certify its Majorana character. (Although lepton number can

652: be violated by light Majorana neutrino masses, they have no relevance at large

653: colliders because their effects are suppressed

654: by powers of  $m_\nu /\sqrt s$.) 

655: Lepton flavour is also conserved within the SM in the limit of vanishing

656: neutrino masses. This makes LFV signals interesting

657: as well. 

658: SM backgrounds to LNV or LFV processes involve the production of extra

659: neutrinos in the final state (this is because both lepton number and flavour are

660: preserved

661: within the minimal SM, in the limit of vanishing light neutrino masses).

662: Then, in addition to being higher order processes, they can be

663: greatly reduced in general requiring the absence of significant missing energy.

664: Consequently, SM backgrounds to these kind of signals are much smaller than for

665: the ones conserving lepton number and flavour.

666: This usually translates in more stringent constraints 

667: on heavy Majorana neutrinos, and justifies concentrating on LNV processes in

668: some cases. For each accelerator

669: it is convenient to classify the possible signals according to their 

670: LNC and lepton flavour conserving (LFC) character in order to address the

671: discovery potential  in each case. 

672: 

673: We review the estimates for heavy neutrino production at $e^-p$,

674: $p \ppbar$, $e^+e^-$, and $e^-\gamma$ colliders in turn, 

675: restricting ourselves to masses $m_N > M_Z$. Since final state

676: neutrinos are undetected, the observation of LNV signals requires a change 

677: of two units in the charge of the leptons involved. This makes $e^-p$ and

678: $e^- \gamma$, a priori, more adequate to search for Majorana neutrinos, because

679: the initial state has a single charged lepton. The most significant processes

680: are $e^- p \to N j$ \cite{buch1,buch2,ing} and 

681: $e^- \gamma \to N W^-$ \cite{pila}.

682: For $p \ppbar$ collisions the most interesting process is

683: $q \bar q' \to \ell^+ N$ (and its charge conjugate).

684: We extend the

685: analysis in Refs.~\cite{Han,otherpp1,otherpp2} to Dirac neutrinos,

686: for which backgrounds

687: are much larger. Finally, the neutral character

688: of the initial state in $e^+e^-$ colliders makes this machine equally sensitive

689: to Dirac and Majorana neutrinos in the process

690: $e^+ e^- \to N \nu$ \cite{clic}.

691: 

692: It is also important to realise that discovering a heavy neutrino seems to

693: require its on-shell production.

694: This is so because its mixing with the SM particles is

695: rather small, what makes necessary the pole enhancement factor

696: to observe the heavy neutrino signal over the background.

697: Additionally, the production of an on-shell heavy neutrino allows to

698: reconstruct its mass and reduce the backgrounds further.

699: 

700: 

701: 

702: 

703: 

704: \subsection{$e^- p$ scattering}

705: 

706: 

707: Heavy neutrinos can be produced in the processes $e^- q \to N q'$,

708: $e^- \bar q' \to N \bar q$, being $q=u,c$, $q'=d,s$. 

709: These processes take place with $t$ channel exchange,

710: and hence their cross section, equal for Dirac and Majorana $N$, is not

711: suppressed for large $m_N$ by $s$-channel propagators. On the

712: other hand, $N$ is produced through its mixing with the electron $V_{eN}$,

713: and heavy neutrinos mixing significantly with the muon or tau but with $V_{eN}

714: \simeq 0$ are not observable. Depending on the mixing and character of $N$, we

715: can have the following signals:

716: \begin{enumerate}

717: \item For Dirac $N$ coupling only to the electron, the decay $N \to e^- W^+$

718: gives an SM-like final state $e^- W^+ j$ with a huge background.

719: \item For Dirac $N$ coupling also with the muon or tau, the decays

720: $N \to \mu^- / \tau^- \, W^+$ give clean LFV signals

721: $e^- p \to \mu^- / \tau^- \, W^+ j$.

722: \item For Majorana $N$, apart from the previous modes we have

723: $N \to \ell^+ W^-$, yielding a clean LNV signal $e^- p \to \ell^+ W^- j$,

724: as depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:ep}.

725: \end{enumerate}

726: 

727: \begin{figure}[htb]

728: \begin{center}

729: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/ep1.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}}

730: \end{center}

731: \caption{Feynman diagram for the LNV process $e^- q \to \ell^+ W^- q'$. An

732: additional process $e^- \bar q' \to N \bar q$, obtained interchanging the quark

733: lines, contributes to $e^- p \to \ell^+ W^- j$ as well.}

734: \label{fig:ep}

735: \end{figure}

736: 

737: The $W^\pm$ bosons in the final state can be taken to decay hadronically, what,

738: in addition to the larger branching ratio, avoids the complication of additional

739: final state leptons which may hide the non-conservation of lepton number

740: and/or flavour.

741: The LNV signal $e^- p \to e^+ jjj$ of a heavy Majorana neutrino has been

742: studied in the literature \cite{buch1,buch2,ing}. 

743: At the centre of mass (CM) energy $\sqrt s = 314$ GeV available at HERA

744: heavy neutrino

745: production cross sections are very small, due to the suppression of the parton

746: density functions (PDFs) at high $x$. We have rescaled the limits obtained in

747: Ref.~\cite{ing}, saturating the improved upper bound $|V_{eN}|^2 \leq 0.0054$.

748: For a luminosity of 200 pb$^{-1}$,

749: assuming no backgrounds and a perfect detection efficiency, HERA could give $2

750: \sigma$ evidence (conventionally taken as 3 signal events in the absence of

751: background) for a 100 GeV

752: neutrino coupling only to the electron. This sensitivity is similar to the one

753: achieved at LEP \cite{l3}.

754: 

755: A hypothetical $\mathrm{LEP} \otimes \mathrm{LHC}$ $ep$ machine, with

756: $\sqrt s = 1.3$ TeV and a

757: luminosity of 2 fb$^{-1}$ per year, could extend the LHC sensitivity for heavy

758: Majorana neutrinos. Taking as statistical criterion for

759: $5 \sigma$ discovery the observation of 10 signal events, this significance

760: would be achieved for heavy neutrino masses up to $\sim 550$ GeV, doubling the

761: LHC reach (see next subsection).

762: If no signal is found, the bounds $|V_{eN}| \lesssim 0.02$ at 90\% CL could be

763: set for

764: $m_N \simeq 300$ GeV, and useful constraints would be obtained up to $m_N \sim

765: 700$ GeV.

766: 

767: 

768: 

769: \subsection{$p \ppbar$ collisions}

770: 

771: 

772: Hadron colliders can produce heavy neutrinos in association with a charged

773: lepton in $q \bar q' \to \ell^+ N$, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:pp1}

774: (plus its charge conjugate $\bar q q' \to \ell^- N$).

775: This process is relevant for moderate $N$ masses. It is

776: mediated by $s$-channel $W$ exchange, and then

777: for large $m_N$ it is suppressed not only by PDFs but also by the

778: $W$ propagator

779: (in contrast to $ep \to Nj$ scattering previously discussed). However,

780: one important advantage compared to other colliders is that $\ell^+ N$

781: production at LHC

782: does not require a sizeable coupling to the electron, as it can be observed from

783: Fig.~\ref{fig:pp1}. It can lead to the

784: following signals:

785: \begin{enumerate}

786: \item For a Dirac $N$ mixing with only one lepton flavour, the decay

787: $N \to \ell^- W^+$ yields a $\ell^+ \ell^- W^+$ final state, with a huge

788: SM background.

789: 

790: \item For a Dirac $N$ coupled to more than one charged lepton we can also have

791: $N \to \ell^{'-} W^+$ with $\ell' \neq \ell$, giving the LFV signal

792: $\ell^+ \ell^{'-} W^+$ shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:pp1} (a), which has much

793: smaller backgrounds.

794: 

795: \item For a Majorana $N$, in addition to LNC signals we have LNV ones arising

796: from the decay $N \to \ell^{(')+} W^-$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:pp1} (b), which have

797: small backgrounds too.

798: \end{enumerate}

799: 

800: \begin{figure}[htb]

801: \begin{center}

802: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

803: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/pp1a.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} & \quad \quad &

804: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/pp1b.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} \\[1mm]

805: (a) & & (b)

806: \end{tabular}

807: \end{center}

808: \caption{Feynman diagrams for the process $q \bar q' \to \ell^+ N$, followed by

809: LNC decay $N \to \ell^{(')-} W^+$ (a) and LNV decay $N \to \ell^{(')+ }W^-$ (b).

810: Additional diagrams with off-shell $N$ contributing to the same final state are

811: not shown. For the charge conjugate processes the diagrams are analogous.}

812: \label{fig:pp1}

813: \end{figure}

814: 

815: The charge conjugate process $\bar q q' \to \ell^- N$ yields the charge

816: conjugate final states. For the same values of the couplings,

817: cross sections for on-shell $N$ production are the same for heavy Dirac and

818: Majorana neutrinos (for the latter, additional diagrams with off-shell $N$ can

819: mediate

820: the final states considered, but their contribution is very small). Therefore,

821: since a Majorana $N$ has LNV decays as well as LNC ones, the relation

822: \begin{equation}

823: \sigma_\mathrm{D} \, (p \ppbar \to \ell^\pm \ell^{(') \mp} W^\pm) \simeq

824: 2 \sigma_\mathrm{M} \, (p \ppbar \to \ell^\pm \ell^{(')\mp} W^\pm) \simeq 

825: 2 \sigma_\mathrm{M} \, (p \ppbar \to \ell^\pm \ell^{(')\pm} W^\mp) 

826: \end{equation}

827: holds, although

828: $\sigma_\mathrm{M} \, (pp \to \ell^+ \ell^{(')+} W^-)

829: \neq \sigma_\mathrm{M} \, (pp \to \ell^- \ell^{(')-} W^+)$ in $pp$

830: collisions due to the different PDFs involved.

831: 

832: Apart from angular distributions, the obvious difference between the

833: processes (i)--(iii) above is the SM background, huge for the first

834: case and small for the other two.

835: In order to estimate the LHC discovery potential

836: we have implemented in ALPGEN \cite{ALPGEN} the relevant vertices presented in

837: section \ref{Introduction}, finding results consistent with previous 

838: analyses for Majorana neutrinos \cite{Han}. 

839: We will present a detailed study of signals and backgrounds 

840: with a proper simulation of the experimental detection elsewhere.

841: For our numerical estimates we assume a heavy neutrino $N$ coupling only

842: to muons and saturating the present limit $|V_{\mu N}|^2 \leq 0.0096$,

843: which yields $\mu^\pm \mu^\mp W^\pm$ final states and, provided $N$ is a

844: Majorana fermion, $\mu^\pm \mu^\pm W^\mp$ as well.

845: This is the most interesting situation for LHC, where it can outperform

846: other planned $e^+ e^-$ and $e^- \gamma$ colliders, as it will be shown later.

847: The analysis if $N$ couples

848: only to the electron is completely analogous, while if it couples to the tau

849: the decays and tagging efficiency of this lepton must be considered in the

850: analysis.

851: We select $W^\pm$ hadronic decays, and fix the Higgs mass $M_H = 120$ GeV.

852: The processes considered are 

853: \begin{eqnarray}

854: p \ppbar & \to & \mu^+ \mu^- j j \,, \quad \quad {\rm (LNC)} \nonumber \\

855: p \ppbar & \to & \mu^\pm \mu^\pm j j  \,. \quad \quad {\rm (LNV)}

856: \label{eq:proc1}

857: \end{eqnarray}

858: Among the most relevant SM backgrounds we select as example

859: \begin{equation}

860: p \ppbar \to  Z/\gamma^* jj \to \mu^+ \mu^- jj

861: \end{equation}

862: in the LNC case, and

863: \begin{eqnarray}

864: p \ppbar \to W^\pm W^\pm W^\mp \to \mu^\pm \mu^\pm jj~+~{\rm missing~energy}

865: \end{eqnarray}

866: in the LNV one, computing them with ALPGEN. 

867: In the former case (LNC) the background is huge. For instance,

868: the signal cross section without cuts for

869: $p \ppbar \rightarrow \mu^\pm N \rightarrow \mu^\pm \mu^\mp W^\pm 

870: \rightarrow \mu^\pm \mu^\mp jj$ at LHC is 86 fb for $m_N= 100$ GeV, 

871: while the $Zjj$ background is around 400 times larger.

872: The cuts adopted to simulate the detector coverage and particle / jet isolation

873: are

874: \begin{eqnarray}

875: & p_t^\mu > 20 \; {\rm GeV} \,, & p_t^j > 30 \; {\rm GeV} \,, \nonumber \\

876: & |\eta _{\mu,j}| < 2.5 \,, & \Delta R_{jj, j\mu, \mu\mu} > 0.4 \,,

877: \label{cuts}

878: \end{eqnarray}

879: with $p_t$ the transverse momentum, $\eta$ the pseudorapidity and $\Delta R$ the

880: lego-plot distance, in standard notation. Besides these minimal

881: ``pre-selection'' criteria we impose cuts on various final state invariant

882: masses $M$ to suppress backgrounds. In the LNC case we require

883: \begin{eqnarray}

884: & 60 \; {\rm GeV} < M_{jj} < 100 \; {\rm GeV} \,,  \nonumber \\

885: &  40 \; {\rm GeV} < M_{\mu\mu} < 70 \; {\rm GeV}  \;\;\;\; {\rm or} \;\;\;\; 

886:  M_{\mu\mu} > 110 \; {\rm GeV} \,,

887: \label{cutb}

888: \end{eqnarray}

889: in order to reconstruct the $W$ boson from $N$ decay and reduce the

890: $Z / \gamma^*$ contributions. In the LNV case we ask

891: \begin{eqnarray}

892: & 60 \; {\rm GeV} < M_{jj} < 100 \; {\rm GeV} \,,  \nonumber \\

893: & \ptmiss < 20 \; {\rm GeV} \,, 

894: \label{cutbb}

895: \end{eqnarray}

896: so as to reconstruct the $W$ boson and take advantage  of the fact that the

897: signal has no significant missing momentum $\ptmiss$. Moreover, as the

898: observation of a

899: heavy neutrino requires its mass reconstruction, we also impose in both cases

900: \begin{eqnarray}

901:  0.9 \; m_N < M_{jj\mu} < 1.1 \; m_N \,,  

902: \label{cutr}

903: \end{eqnarray}

904: for at least one of the two $\mu$ assignments. The corresponding cross sections

905: are given in Tables \ref{tab:lhc} and \ref{tab:tev} for LHC and Tevatron,

906: respectively. For the LNC signal the heavy neutrino is assumed to have Dirac

907: nature

908: (for a Majorana neutrino this cross section would be roughly one half).

909: We have concentrated on the mass region $m_N > M_Z$ where the

910: signal cross section gets smaller (the case $m_N < m_Z$ has been also

911: considered for  $p \ppbar \to \, \mu^\pm \mu^\pm j j$ in Ref. \cite{Han}).

912: As we stressed at the beginning of this subsection, cross sections are

913: suppressed for larger $m_N$ values. We observe for example that changing

914: $m_N= 100$ GeV to $m_N= 500$ GeV implies a signal reduction of almost 2 orders

915: of magnitude at LHC. 

916: 

917: %

918: \begin{table}[htb]

919: \begin{center}

920: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}

921: $m_N$ & $\begin{array}{c} \mu^+ \mu^- jj \\ {\rm signal} \end{array}$ 

922: & $\begin{array}{c} Zjj \\ {\rm background} \end{array}$ 

923: & $\begin{array}{c} \mu^\pm \mu^\pm jj \\ {\rm signal} \end{array}$

924: & $\begin{array}{c} W^\pm W^\pm W^\mp \\ {\rm background} \end{array}$ \\

925: \hline

926: 100  & 2.6  & 43  & 2.0  & 0.0012 \\

927: 200  & 0.83  & 91  & 0.48  & 0.0044 \\

928: 300  & 0.29  & 44  & 0.16  & 0.0023 \\

929: 400  & 0.13  & 22  & 0.068 & 0.0012 \\

930: 500  & 0.066 & 11  & 0.034 & 0.0007

931: \end{tabular}

932: \caption{Signal and background cross sections (in fb) 

933: as a function of the heavy neutrino mass (in GeV) at LHC ($\sqrt{s}= 14$ TeV) 

934: for the cuts given in the text.}

935: \label{tab:lhc} 

936: \end{center}

937: \end{table}

938: %

939: \begin{table}[htb]

940: \begin{center}

941: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}

942: $m_N$ & $\begin{array}{c} \mu^+ \mu^- jj \\ {\rm signal} \end{array}$ 

943: & $\begin{array}{c} Zjj \\ {\rm background} \end{array}$ 

944: & $\begin{array}{c} \mu^\pm \mu^\pm jj \\ {\rm signal} \end{array}$

945: & $\begin{array}{c} W^\pm W^\pm W^\mp \\ {\rm background} \end{array}$ \\

946: \hline

947: 100  & 0.51   & 2.9 & 0.40   & 0.0001 \\

948: 200  & 0.12   & 4.9 & 0.071  & 0.0004 \\

949: 300  & 0.025  & 1.7 & 0.014  & 0.0001 \\

950: 400  & 0.0060 & 0.68 & 0.0032 & 0.00005 \\

951: 500  & 0.0015 & 0.24 & 0.0008 & 0.00001 \\

952: \end{tabular}

953: \caption{ The same as in Table \ref{tab:lhc} but at Tevatron 

954: ($\sqrt{s}= 1.96$ TeV).}   

955: \label{tab:tev}

956: \end{center}

957: \end{table} 

958: %

959: 

960: Tevatron does not seem to have a chance to observe a new heavy 

961: neutrino in this mass range with a luminosity of 2 fb$^{-1}$. For LHC,

962: although the comparison between the first two columns of Table~\ref{tab:lhc}

963: seems to indicate that it may be difficult to observe a Dirac heavy neutrino,

964: one could still carefully refine the cut selection to

965: improve the signal to background significance. In this way neutrino masses

966: $\sim 100$ GeV might be observable. 

967: The LNV process clearly offers better prospects to detect a heavy Majorana 

968: neutrino. In this case one expects to discover with $5 \sigma$ significance (10

969: signal events without background) a Majorana neutrino coupling only to the muon

970: with a mass up to $350$ GeV in this channel, 

971: assuming a luminosity of 100 fb$^{-1}$. This result is in agreement with

972: previous ones \cite{Han}.

973: Conversely, if no signal is observed present bounds on the mixing angles are

974: improved. For instance, for $m_N = 200$ GeV we would obtain the 90\% CL upper

975: limit

976: $|V_{\mu N}| \leq 0.022$, improving the present bound by a factor of four.

977: (This limit is obtained assuming no observed events, what yields an upper

978: limit of 2.44 for the signal in the absence of background \cite{fc}.)

979: Obviously, further backgrounds must be taken into account and a realistic

980: detector simulation performed, especially regarding the background suppression

981: with the requirement $\ptmiss < 20$ GeV, which seems more delicate.

982: On the other hand, the kinematical cuts used to enhance the signal significance

983: can still be improved.

984: 

985: For a heavy Majorana neutrino simultaneously coupling to the electron and muon 

986: the results (summing all relevant signals) are expected to be similar, since

987: the backgrounds involving

988: electrons and muons have the same size. In case that $N$ couples significantly

989: to the tau lepton, results will be worse because decays involving taus are

990: more difficult to tag.

991: An interesting possibility is that of a heavy Dirac neutrino coupling to more

992: than one charged lepton. In this case, LFV signals as described in point (ii)

993: above have much smaller SM backgrounds than LFC ones discussed here, and 

994: better limits could be obtained.

995: 

996: 

997: 

998: 

999: 

1000: \subsection{$e^+ e^-$ annihilation}

1001: 

1002: 

1003: The process $e^+ e^- \to N \nu$ can produce heavy neutrinos which couple to

1004: the electron, for masses up to nearly the kinematical limit imposed by

1005: CM energy \cite{zerwas,GZ2,djouadi,GZ4}.

1006: In the Dirac case both the neutrino $N$ and antineutrino $\bar N$

1007: are produced (with equal cross sections), and a Majorana $N$ is produced with a

1008: cross section two times larger. The subsequent decays $N \to \ell^- W^+$,

1009: $\bar N \to \ell^+ W^-$ for a Dirac neutrino and $N \to \ell^- W^+$,

1010: $N \to \ell^+ W^-$ for a Majorana one yield $\ell^\pm W^\mp$ final states,

1011: with total cross

1012: sections $\sigma (e^+ e^- \to \ell^- W^+ \nu) = 

1013: \sigma (e^+ e^- \to \ell^+ W^- \nu)$. Additionally, these two cross sections are

1014: almost independent of the Dirac or Majorana nature of the produced neutrino.

1015: The diagrams for $e^+ e^- \to \ell^- W^+ \nu$ mediated by on-shell $N$ exchange

1016: are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ee1}.\footnote{If $N$ does not couple to the electron

1017: it can still be produced through the diagram (c), but this contribution is very

1018: suppressed by the $s$-channel $Z$ propagator, and does not lead to an observable

1019: signal \cite{plb}.} 

1020: The SM background is given by

1021: $e^+ e^- \to \ell^- W^+ \nu$, including resonant $W^+ W^-$ production and 

1022: several other Feynman diagrams, which dominate at high energies. We observe that

1023: the only indication of lepton number violation

1024: in diagram \ref{fig:ee1} (b) is the helicity of the final state neutrino, which

1025: remains undetected. Therefore, there is no advantage for LNV processes in what

1026: respects to background reduction, and limits obtained are the same for Dirac and

1027: Majorana fermions.

1028: 

1029: 

1030: \begin{figure}[htb]

1031: \begin{center}

1032: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}

1033: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/ee1a.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} & \quad &

1034: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/ee1b.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} & \quad &

1035: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/ee1c.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} \\

1036: (a) & & (b) & & (c)

1037: \end{tabular}

1038: \end{center}

1039: \caption{Feynman diagrams for the process $e^+ e^- \to \ell^- W^+ \nu$

1040: involving on-shell Majorana $N$ exchange. Diagram (b) is only present if $N$ is

1041: a Majorana fermion.

1042: Additional diagrams with off-shell $N$ are not shown.}

1043: \label{fig:ee1}

1044: \end{figure}

1045: 

1046: 

1047: We consider $e^+ e^-$ annihilation at a CM energy of 500 GeV, as proposed for an

1048: international linear collider (ILC) and 3 TeV, as might be the case of a future

1049: compact linear collider (CLIC), examining their discovery potential for heavy

1050: neutrinos \cite{clic}. Since they are produced through its mixing with the

1051: electron, two cases are worth discussing for this process: (a) $N$ only couples

1052: to the

1053: electron; (b) $N$ also mixes with the muon or tau lepton. $W$ hadronic decays

1054: are selected, and the luminosities for ILC and CLIC are of 345 fb$^{-1}$ and

1055: 1000 fb$^{-1}$, respectively, corresponding to one year of running. Beam

1056: polarisations $P_{e^+} = 0.6$, $P_{e^-} =

1057: -0.8$ are also used. The discovery potential for both machines is

1058: summarised in Fig.~\ref{fig:mass-coup}. (Notice that the mass range in the

1059: second plot has been enlarged with respect to Ref.~\cite{clic}.)

1060: 

1061: 

1062: \begin{figure}[htb]

1063: \begin{center}

1064: \begin{tabular}{cc}

1065: \epsfig{file=Figs/mass-coup-ILC.eps,height=5cm,clip=} & 

1066: \epsfig{file=Figs/mass-coup.eps,height=5cm,clip=} \\

1067: (a) & (b)

1068: \end{tabular}

1069: \caption{Dependence of the discovery and upper limits on

1070: $V_{eN}$ on the heavy neutrino mass, for ILC (a) and CLIC (b). Both plots

1071: assume mixing only with the electron.}

1072: \label{fig:mass-coup}

1073: \end{center}

1074: \end{figure}

1075: 

1076: For ILC the sensitivity is nearly the same for masses between 100 and 400 GeV,

1077: because the reduction of the background at larger transverse

1078: momenta makes up for the

1079: decrease in signal cross sections for larger $m_N$. A heavy neutrino with a

1080: coupling $|V_{eN}| \geq 0.01$ could be discovered with $5 \sigma$ significance,

1081: and if no signal is seen the limit $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.006$ could be set

1082: at 90\% CL, improving

1083: the eventual LHC bounds by a factor of 4. CLIC would be able to explore $N$

1084: masses in the TeV range, as it can be observed in Fig.~\ref{fig:mass-coup} (b),

1085: and provide very stringent limits $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.001-0.002$ for

1086: $m_N = 400-1000$ GeV.

1087: These estimates have been obtained at the partonic level and with a simple

1088: simulation of the detector resolution. Therefore, it is expected that with a

1089: detailed simulation the results will be a little worse.

1090: We also remark that the Dirac or Majorana nature of a 

1091: heavy neutrino eventually discovered could be unambiguously established with

1092: the analysis of its opening angle distribution \cite{clic}.

1093: 

1094: For heavy neutrinos mixing also with the muon or the tau, additional signals

1095: $\mu^\pm W^\mp \nu$ or $\tau^\pm W^\mp \nu$ are present.

1096: The discovery potential for ILC in this case is shown in

1097: Fig.~\ref{fig:limits-ILC}, considering mixing either with the muon (a)

1098: or with the $\tau$ (b). In the first case the combined limits do not depend on

1099: the mixing with the muon, essentially due to the fact that backgrounds involving

1100: electrons and muons have the same size. In the second case the limits are worse

1101: for larger $|V_{\tau N}|$ because in this situation the heavy neutrino has a

1102: larger branching fraction to $\tau^\pm W^\mp$,

1103: and $\tau$ detection is experimentally more difficult.

1104: We have also included the constraints from low-energy LFV processes for

1105: comparison, which are relevant only for $N$ coupling simultaneously

1106: to $e$ and $\mu$.

1107: The direct limit from $N$ production complements the indirect ones

1108: for small $|V_{\mu N}|$.

1109: 

1110: 

1111: \begin{figure}[htb]

1112: \begin{center}

1113: \begin{tabular}{cc}

1114: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-em-ILC.eps,height=5.2cm,clip=} &

1115: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-et-ILC.eps,height=5.2cm,clip=} \\

1116: (a) & (b)

1117: \end{tabular}

1118: \caption{Combined limits obtained at ILC on: $V_{eN}$ and $V_{\mu N}$, for

1119: $V_{\tau N} = 0$ (a); $V_{eN}$ and $V_{\tau N}$, for $V_{\mu N} = 0$ (b). The

1120: red areas represent the 90\% CL limits if no signal is observed. The white areas

1121: extend up to present bounds $V_{eN} \leq 0.073$, $V_{\mu N} \leq 0.098$,

1122: $V_{\tau N} \leq 0.13$, and correspond to the region where a combined

1123: statistical significance of $5\sigma$ or larger is achieved. The indirect limit

1124: from $\mu - e$ LFV processes is also shown. We take $m_N = 300$ GeV.}

1125: \label{fig:limits-ILC}

1126: \end{center}

1127: \end{figure}

1128: 

1129: \begin{figure}[htb]

1130: \begin{center}

1131: \begin{tabular}{cc}

1132: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-em.eps,height=5.2cm,clip=} &

1133: \epsfig{file=Figs/bound-et.eps,height=5.2cm,clip=} \\

1134: (a) & (b)

1135: \end{tabular}

1136: \caption{The same as in Fig.~\ref{fig:limits-ILC} but for CLIC,

1137: taking $m_N = 1500$ GeV.}

1138: \label{fig:limits}

1139: \end{center}

1140: \end{figure}

1141: 

1142: 

1143: 

1144: At CLIC energies the behaviour is completely different. Since backgrounds

1145: involving muons or taus are much smaller \cite{clic}, mixing with a second

1146: charged lepton increases the observability of the heavy neutrino.

1147: The combined limits are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:limits}, for mixing with the muon

1148: (a) or the tau (b). In the first case the limits are greatly improved for

1149: $|V_{\mu N}| \gtrsim 0.005$, while in the second case the effect is partially

1150: compensated

1151: by the worse detection of $\tau$ leptons. We also point out that the direct

1152: limit eventually obtained from $N$ production is far better than the indirect

1153: one from present

1154: low-energy LFV processes, and would remain competitive with future

1155: improvements of the upper bounds on $\mathrm{Br}(\mu \to e \gamma)$ \cite{MEG}

1156: and $\mu - e$ conversion in nuclei \cite{MECO}.

1157: 

1158: 

1159: 

1160: A heavy neutrino $N$ with $V_{eN} \simeq 0$ can still be produced in $e^+ e^-$

1161: annihilation through

1162: the higher-order process $e^+ e^- \to \ell^- N W^+$ (and its charge conjugate).

1163: Its cross section is much smaller than

1164: for $e^+ e^- \to N \nu$, however. Depending on the nature and mixing of $N$,

1165: we can have the following final states:

1166: \begin{enumerate}

1167: \item For Dirac $N$ coupling only to the muon or tau, $N \to \ell^+ W^-$

1168: ($\ell=\mu,\tau$) gives an SM-like $\ell^+ \ell^- W^+ W^-$ signal 

1169: with a large background.

1170: \item A Dirac $N$ coupling to $\mu$ and $\tau$ also yields the LFV

1171: final state $\mu^\pm \tau^\mp W^+ W^-$, for which the background is much

1172: smaller.

1173: \item For a Majorana $N$, the decay $N \to \ell^- W^+$ leads to a LNV signal

1174: $\ell^- \ell^- W^+ W^+$, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ee2}. SM background is very

1175: small as well in this case.

1176: \end{enumerate}

1177: 

1178: 

1179: \begin{figure}[htb]

1180: \begin{center}

1181: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}

1182: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/ee2a.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} & \quad &

1183: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/ee2b.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} & \quad &

1184: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/ee2c.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}}

1185: \end{tabular}

1186: \end{center}

1187: \caption{Feynman diagrams for the process $e^+ e^- \to \ell^- \ell^- W^+ W^+$

1188: involving on-shell Majorana $N$ exchange.

1189: Additional diagrams with off-shell $N$ are not shown.}

1190: \label{fig:ee2}

1191: \end{figure}

1192: 

1193: 

1194: We have estimated the ILC discovery potential in the latter case (iii),

1195: for $m_N = 200$ GeV, $V_{eN} = V_{\tau N} = 0$, $|V_{\mu N}|^2 = 0.0096$.

1196: Assuming perfect

1197: detection efficiency, 8 $\mu^\pm \mu^\pm jjjj$ events could be obtained within

1198: one year of running. The SM background is given by $e^+ e^- \to W^- W^- W^+ W^-

1199: \to \mu^\pm \mu^\pm \nu \nu jjjj$, and

1200: it is assumed that it can be reduced to negligible levels 

1201: (what must be confirmed with a detailed simulation)

1202: requiring the absence

1203: of significant missing momentum and the reconstruction of the $N$ invariant

1204: mass. Hence, the heavy neutrino could be clearly observed but with a

1205: significance smaller than $5 \sigma$. If no signal is found, the limit 

1206: $|V_{\mu N}| \leq 0.055$ could be set at 90\% CL, a factor of two lower than the

1207: one obtained at LHC.

1208: 

1209: 

1210: 

1211: 

1212: \subsection{$e^- \gamma$ collisions}

1213: 

1214: 

1215: A proposed option for ILC is to have $e^- \gamma$ collisions at CM energies

1216: of several hundreds of GeV.

1217: From the point of view of heavy neutrino physics, this would be a very

1218: interesting

1219: possibility, complementing the capabilities of $e^+ e^-$

1220: annihilation. Heavy neutrinos can be produced in the process $e^- \gamma \to N

1221: W^-$. The cross section is the same for Dirac and Majorana $N$, but 

1222: depending on its character and mixing with the charged leptons we

1223: can have the following final states:

1224: \begin{enumerate}

1225: \item For a Dirac $N$ coupling only to the electron, $N \to e^- W^+$ gives a

1226: SM-like signal $e^- \gamma \to e^- W^+ W^-$ with a large background.

1227: \item For a Dirac $N$ coupling also to the muon or tau, we can have 

1228: $N \to \mu^- / \tau^- W^+$. The resulting LFV signals $e^- \gamma \to 

1229: \mu^- / \tau^- W^+ W^-$ are not present in the SM, hence their backgrounds are

1230: small.  

1231: \item For a Majorana $N$, apart from these final states we have

1232: $N \to \ell^+ W^-$, giving a clean LNV signal $e^- \gamma \to \ell^+ W^- W^-$,

1233: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:eg1}.

1234: \end{enumerate}

1235: 

1236: 

1237: \begin{figure}[htb]

1238: \begin{center}

1239: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

1240: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/eg1a.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} & \quad \quad &

1241: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/eg1b.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}}

1242: \end{tabular}

1243: \end{center}

1244: \caption{Feynman diagrams for the LNV process $e^- \gamma \to \ell^+ W^- W^-$.

1245: Additional diagrams with off-shell $N$ are not shown.}

1246: \label{fig:eg1}

1247: \end{figure}

1248: 

1249: The $W$ bosons can be taken to decay hadronically, what in addition to the

1250: larger branching ratio avoids the complication of additional final state

1251: leptons. SM backgrounds to the LFV and LNV signals involve additional final

1252: state neutrinos, and they can be reduced by requiring the absence of

1253: significant missing

1254: transverse momentum. This is however a delicate issue and requires detailed

1255: simulations to confirm the parton-level expectations.

1256: 

1257: The process (iii), for a Majorana $N$ coupling mainly with the electron,

1258: has been studied in Ref.~\cite{pila}. The SM background is given by

1259: $e^- \gamma \to W^+ W^- W^- \nu_e \to e^+ \nu_e W^- W^- \nu_e$.

1260: For a CM energy of 500 GeV and a luminosity of 100 fb$^{-1}$,

1261: $5 \sigma$ evidence (taking as criterion the production of 10 signal

1262: events) for a 200 GeV Majorana neutrino could be achieved

1263: for mixings $|V_{eN}| \geq 0.0046$. Conversely, if no signal is observed the

1264: bound $|V_{eN}| \leq 2.3 \times 10^{-3}$ can be set at 90\% CL.

1265: These limits assume that SM background can be

1266: essentially eliminated without affecting the signals, what may be too

1267: optimistic. Thus $e^- \gamma$ collisions improve

1268: the ILC limit by a factor of two for $m_N$ around this value. For heavier $N$

1269: the production cross section decreases quickly, and for $m_N =

1270: 400$ GeV the limits for $e^+ e^-$ and $e^- \gamma$ collisions are similar.

1271: On the other hand, limits for heavy Dirac neutrinos are much better at ILC.

1272: 

1273: As in $e^+ e^-$ annihilation, heavy neutrinos which do not couple

1274: to the electron can be produced in a sub-leading process, in this case

1275: $e^- \gamma \to N \ell^- \nu$, $\ell = \mu,\tau$. The following final states

1276: are possible:

1277: \begin{enumerate}

1278: \item For Dirac $N$ coupling only to $\ell = \mu$ or $\ell = \tau$,

1279: $N \to \ell^+ W^-$ gives a signal $\ell^+ \ell^- W^- \nu$ which has a large SM

1280:  background

1281: \item A Dirac $N$ coupling to both can give a LFV signal $\mu^\pm \tau^\mp W^-

1282: \nu$ which is easier to detect

1283: \item For a Majorana $N$, the decay $N \to \ell^- W^+$ leads to a LNV signal

1284: $\ell^- \ell^- W^+ \nu$, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:eg2}. SM background is very

1285: small in this case.

1286: \end{enumerate}

1287: 

1288: \begin{figure}[htb]

1289: \begin{center}

1290: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}

1291: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/eg2a.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} & \quad &

1292: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/eg2b.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}} & \quad &

1293: \mbox{\epsfig{file=Diags/eg2c.eps,height=2.5cm,clip=}}

1294: \end{tabular}

1295: \end{center}

1296: \caption{Feynman diagrams for the process

1297: $e^- \gamma \to \ell^- \ell^- W^+ \nu$ involving on-shell Majorana $N$ exchange.

1298: Additional diagrams with off-shell $N$ are not shown.}

1299: \label{fig:eg2}

1300: \end{figure}

1301: 

1302: The third case has been studied in Ref.~\cite{pila}. Assuming that the

1303: background can be essentially eliminated with kinematical cuts (a fact which

1304: must be confirmed with a detailed simulation), a 200 GeV neutrino coupling only

1305: to the muon can be discovered at $5 \sigma$ level for $|V_{\mu N}| \geq 0.09$.

1306: If no signal is observed, the bound $|V_{\mu N}| \leq 0.045$ can be set. These

1307: figures improve slightly the ones from $e^+ e^-$ annihilation at 500

1308: GeV, shown in the previous subsection, but are still a factor of two

1309: worse than the ones achievable at LHC.

1310: 

1311: 

1312: 

1313: \section{Conclusions}

1314: \label{sec:6}

1315: 

1316: 

1317: At present, neutrinos are known to be massive. The minimal SM extension

1318: necessary to account for this experimental fact includes three

1319: ultra-heavy eigenstates with masses of the order of $10^{13}$ GeV, which 

1320: lead to light neutrino masses via the seesaw mechanism.

1321: These states are directly unobservable. Moreover, at low energies the 

1322: number of parameters in the neutrino sector (when heavy states are integrated

1323: out) is smaller than at the high scale, and this minimal seesaw mechanism

1324: is untestable (for a discussion see Ref.~\cite{sd}).

1325: This has given extra motivation for models lowering to the TeV the scale of new

1326: physics which originates light neutrino masses. (Other possibility to obtain

1327: predictive models is to introduce extra symmetries.)

1328: The new heavy neutrinos appearing at this scale could be

1329: directly observed in future colliders, provided their mixing with the charged

1330: leptons is $O(10^{-2})$ or larger.

1331: With a completely different motivation in mind, extra-dimensional and Little

1332: Higgs models are also proposed, in the first case aiming to reduce the huge

1333: hierarchy

1334: between the electroweak and Planck scales, and in the second to cancel large

1335: corrections to the Higgs boson mass.

1336: Both classes of models can have new heavy neutrinos in their additional

1337: particle spectrum, light enough to be observable.

1338: 

1339: Independently of their origin, the mixing of heavy neutrinos is constrained by

1340: low-energy data, including lepton universality, LFV processes and

1341: neutrinoless double $\beta$ decay. Additionally, their seesaw-like contributions to

1342: light neutrino masses must be kept under control.

1343: Model-independent bounds from universality

1344: restrict their mixing with a given charged lepton, while LFV

1345: processes constrain the simultaneous mixing to more

1346: than one charged lepton. Neutrinoless double $\beta$ decay imposes a strong

1347: constraint on $V_{e N}$ if only one heavy Majorana neutrino $N$ is introduced,

1348: but when more than

1349: one exist cancellations are possible, including the natural case in which two

1350: (nearly) degenerate Majorana neutrinos with opposite CP parities form a (quasi)

1351: Dirac fermion. This is a general property: heavy (quasi) Dirac neutrinos

1352: at the TeV scale or below are less

1353: constrained and can reproduce light neutrino masses with less fine tuning.

1354: 

1355: 

1356: 

1357: 

1358: We have reviewed the potential of various colliders to discover heavy neutrinos.

1359: Their relative sensitivities strongly depend on the mass, mixing

1360: and character of $N$. Some general statements can be made, however:

1361: \begin{enumerate}

1362: \item Lepton colliders have a better discovery potential for heavy neutrinos

1363: with a significant coupling to the electron. They can be produced, up

1364: to high masses, via $t$-channel diagrams.

1365: 

1366: 

1367: \item LHC has the best discovery potential for a heavy Majorana neutrino with

1368: $V_{eN} = 0$. The sensitivity of $e^- \gamma$ and $e^+ e^-$ colliders is

1369: similar in this situation, but a factor of two smaller.

1370: 

1371: \item Neutrinos which couple to more than one charged lepton are easier to

1372: detect, because: (a) LFV backgrounds are smaller in all

1373: cases; (b) in $e^+ e^-$, $e^- p$ and $e^- \gamma$ collisions backgrounds

1374: involving $\mu$ or $\tau$ leptons are also smaller.

1375: However, the better observability

1376: at lepton colliders does not translate into better bounds on $V_{\mu N}$ or

1377: $V_{\tau N}$. Production cross sections are independent of these

1378: couplings and, when $V_{\mu N}$ or $V_{\tau N}$ are sufficiently large

1379: so that $\mu$ or $\tau$ final states dominate, decay branching

1380: ratios are independent as well. This fact can be clearly observed

1381: in Figs. \ref{fig:limits-ILC}, \ref{fig:limits}.

1382: 

1383: \item Dirac neutrinos are best studied in $e^+ e^-$ collisions, where they are

1384: copiously produced and the environment is sufficiently clean.

1385: \end{enumerate}

1386: 

1387: \begin{table}[h*]

1388: \begin{center}

1389: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}

1390: & & & Majorana & & & & Dirac \\[1mm]

1391: & ~ & Low & Intermediate & Large & ~~ & Low & Intermediate & Large \\

1392: \hline

1393: $e$ & & \begin{tabular}{c} $e^- \gamma$ \\ CLIC \\ ILC \\ $\mathrm{LEP} \otimes

1394: \mathrm{LHC}$ \\ LHC \end{tabular} &

1395: \begin{tabular}{c} CLIC \\ $\mathrm{LEP} \otimes \mathrm{LHC}$ \end{tabular} &

1396: CLIC

1397: & & \begin{tabular}{c} CLIC \\ ILC \\ LHC \end{tabular} & CLIC & CLIC \\

1398: \hline

1399: $\mu$ & &\begin{tabular}{c}  LHC \\ $e^- \gamma$ \\ ILC \end{tabular} &

1400:  -- & --

1401: & & LHC & -- & -- \\

1402: \hline

1403: $e,\mu$ & & \begin{tabular}{c} $e^- \gamma$ \\ CLIC \\ ILC \\

1404:   $\mathrm{LEP} \otimes \mathrm{LHC}$  \\ LHC \end{tabular} &

1405: \begin{tabular}{c} CLIC \\ $\mathrm{LEP} \otimes \mathrm{LHC}$ \end{tabular} &

1406: CLIC

1407: & & \begin{tabular}{c} CLIC \\ ILC \\ LHC \end{tabular} &

1408: CLIC & CLIC \\

1409: \end{tabular}

1410: \caption{Summary of the relative discovery potential for heavy

1411: Majorana and Dirac neutrinos, in the low ($100-400$ GeV), intermediate

1412: ($400-1000$ GeV) and large ($1-2.5$ TeV) mass regions, and coupling to $e$,

1413: $\mu$ or both. In each cell, better to worse discovery potentials are ordered

1414: from top to bottom. Dashes are shown when there is no significant sensitivity.

1415: Results for mixing with the $\tau$ are analogous than for the muon.}

1416: \label{tab:summ}   

1417: \end{center}

1418: \end{table}

1419: 

1420: Table~\ref{tab:summ} summarises the relative sensitivities of the different

1421: colliders studied. It is useful to consider three approximate mass ranges for

1422: heavy neutrinos: ``low'', from 100 to 400 GeV, ``intermediate'' from 400 GeV to

1423: 1 TeV and ``large'', from 1 to 2.5 TeV, which is close to the maximum

1424: $m_N$ which can be probed at CLIC (see Fig.~\ref{fig:mass-coup}). It is also

1425: convenient to take several limits

1426: for the mixing of $N$: when it only couples to the electron, muon or tau, and

1427: when it couples significantly to the electron and either muon or tau lepton.

1428: In this latter case, we assume a significant coupling to the electron but with

1429: decays dominated by muon / tau final states. We observe that for heavy Dirac

1430: neutrinos, which naturally appear in some Little Higgs and extra-dimensional

1431: models, $e^+ e^-$ collisions at CLIC and ILC provide the best limits.

1432: 

1433: 

1434: \begin{table}[h*]

1435: \begin{center}

1436: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

1437: & & Majorana  \\[1mm]

1438: & Low & Intermediate & Large  \\

1439: \hline

1440: $e$ & $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.003-0.002$ &

1441:       $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.002$ &

1442:       $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.002-0.01$  \\[3mm]

1443: %\mr

1444: $\mu$ & $|V_{\mu N}| \leq 0.022-0.1$ & -- & -- \\[3mm]

1445: %\mr

1446: $\tau$ & $|V_{\tau N}| \lesssim 0.045-0.2$ & -- & -- \\[4mm]

1447: %\mr

1448: $e,\mu$ & \begin{tabular}{c} $|V_{eN}| \lesssim 0.003-0.002$ \\

1449:    $|V_{\mu N}| \lesssim 0.022-0.1$ \end{tabular} & 

1450:    $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.001$ &

1451:    $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.001-0.005$ \\[4mm]

1452: %\mr

1453: $e,\tau$ & \begin{tabular}{c} $|V_{eN}| \lesssim 0.006-0.004$ \\ 

1454:            $|V_{\tau N}| \lesssim 0.045-0.2$  \end{tabular} & 

1455:            $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.002$ &

1456:            $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.002-0.01$ \\[6mm]

1457: %\hline

1458: & & Dirac \\[1mm]

1459: & Low & Intermediate & Large \\

1460: \hline

1461: $e$ & $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.01-0.002$ &

1462:       $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.002$ &

1463:       $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.002-0.01$ \\[3mm]

1464: %\mr

1465: $\mu$ & ? & -- & -- \\[3mm]

1466: %\mr

1467: $\tau$ & ? & -- & -- \\[3mm]

1468: %\mr

1469: $e,\mu$ & $|V_{eN}| \lesssim 0.01-0.002$ &

1470:           $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.001$ &

1471:           $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.001-0.005$ \\[3mm]

1472: %\mr

1473: $e,\tau$ & $|V_{eN}| \lesssim 0.02-0.004$ &

1474:            $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.002$ &

1475:            $|V_{eN}| \leq 0.002-0.01$ \\[1mm]

1476: \end{tabular}

1477: \caption{Estimated 90\% CL upper bounds on the mixing of

1478: heavy Majorana and Dirac neutrinos which couple to the charged leptons in the

1479: left column, for the low ($100-400$ GeV), intermediate

1480: ($400-1000$ GeV) and large ($1-2.5$ TeV) mass regions.

1481: Dashes are shown when there is no significant sensitivity.}

1482: \label{tab:summ2}

1483: \end{center}

1484: \end{table}

1485: 

1486: 

1487: We collect in Table~\ref{tab:summ2} the approximate 90\% CL bounds expected if

1488: no heavy neutrino signal is found at any of the colliders discussed. They have

1489: been obtained from the various limits and plots presented in section

1490: \ref{sec:5}. Limits on $V_{\mu N}$ and $V_{\tau N}$ originate from $N$

1491: production at LHC, and so they are relevant only for low $m_N$ values. They are 

1492: shown for the Majorana case. Limits for a Dirac neutrino are not still

1493: available nor can be safely estimated with present analyses. 

1494: $5 \sigma$ discovery limits can be obtained from the figures presented by

1495: multiplying by a factor $\sim 1.7-2$.

1496: 

1497: 

1498: To conclude, we stress the importance of searches for heavy neutrinos at future

1499: colliders. Light neutrino masses are at present the only piece of evidence for

1500: physics beyond the SM, but their source is (and may remain forever)

1501: unknown. A possible discovery in this direction would clarify the situation,

1502: confirming and discarding possible scenarios for neutrino mass generation and

1503: possibly leptogenesis.

1504: 

1505: 

1506: \vspace{1cm}

1507: %\newpage

1508: \noindent

1509: {\Large \bf Acknowledgements}

1510: 

1511: \vspace{0.4cm} \noindent

1512: This review summarises and extends work presented at

1513: ``CP Violation and the Flavour Puzzle'', Symposium in Honour of Gustavo C.

1514: Branco, GustavoFest 2005, Lisbon, Portugal, July 19--20, 2005;

1515: XIX International Conference of Theoretical Physics ``Matter to the Deepest'',

1516: Ustro\'n, Poland, September 8--14, 2005;

1517: Corfu Summer Institute on Elementary Particle Physics, CORFU2005, Corfu, Greece,

1518: September 4-26, 2005;

1519: Euro GDR SUSY 2005 meeting, 2--5 November 2005, Barcelona, Spain; and

1520: Third ECFA ILC Workshop, 14--17 November 2005, Vienna, Austria.

1521: This work has been supported by MEC project FPA 2003-09298-C02-01,

1522: Junta de Andaluc{\'\i}a projects FQM 101 and FQM 437 and

1523: MIUR under contract 2004021808\_009.

1524: J.A.A.-S. acknowledges support by a MEC Ram\'on y Cajal contract.

1525: 

1526: 

1527: %\newpage

1528: 

1529: 

1530: 

1531: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1532: 

1533: 

1534: \bibitem{atlas}

1535: ATLAS collaboration, 

1536: {\em ATLAS detector and physics performance technical design report},

1537: CERN-LHCC-99-15

1538: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1539: 

1540: \bibitem{cms}

1541: CMS collaboration,

1542: {\em The Compact Muon Solenoid technical proposal}, CERN-LHCC-94-38

1543: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1544: 

1545: \bibitem{MP}

1546: R.N. Mohapatra and P.B. Pal,

1547: {\it Massive neutrinos in physics and astrophysics: second edition}

1548: World Sci. Lect. Notes Phys. {\bf 72} (2004) 1

1549: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1550: 

1551: \bibitem{BLS}

1552: G.C. Branco, L. Lavoura and J.P. Silva, 

1553: {\it CP Violation}, 

1554: Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1999)

1555: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1556: 

1557: \bibitem{Bilenky}

1558: S. M. Bilenky,

1559: {\em Neutrino Majorana},

1560: {\tt hep-ph/0605172}

1561: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0605172;%%

1562: 

1563: \bibitem{porod1}

1564: W.~Porod, M.~Hirsch, J.~Romao and J.~W.~F.~Valle,

1565: {\em Testing neutrino mixing at future collider experiments}

1566: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 115004

1567: {\tt [hep-ph/0011248]}

1568: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011248;%%

1569: 

1570: \bibitem{porod2}

1571: M.~Hirsch and W.~Porod,

1572: {\em Neutrino properties and the decay of the lightest supersymmetric particle},

1573: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 115007

1574: {\tt [hep-ph/0307364]}

1575: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307364;%%

1576: 

1577: \bibitem{clic}

1578: F. del Aguila and J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,

1579: {\em $\ell W \nu$ production at CLIC: A window to TeV scale non-decoupled

1580: neutrinos},

1581: JHEP {\bf 0505} (2005) 026

1582: {\tt [hep-ph/0503026]}

1583: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503026;%%

1584: 

1585: \bibitem{Denner}

1586: A. Denner, H. Eck, O. Hahn and J. Kublbeck,

1587: {\em Feynman rules for fermion number violating interactions},

1588: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 387} (1992) 467

1589: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B387,467;%%

1590: 

1591: \bibitem{GZ1}

1592: J. Gluza and M. Zralek,

1593: {\em Heavy neutrinos production and decay in future $e^+ e^-$ colliders},

1594: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 55} (1997) 7030

1595: {\tt [hep-ph/9612227]}

1596: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612227;%%

1597: 

1598: \bibitem{Pil3}

1599: A. Pilaftsis,

1600: {\em Radiatively induced neutrino masses and large Higgs neutrino couplings in

1601: the standard model with Majorana fields},

1602: Z. Phys. C {\bf 55} (1992) 275

1603: {\tt [hep-ph/9901206]}

1604: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9901206;%%

1605: 

1606: 

1607: 

1608: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%   seccion 2

1609: 

1610: 

1611: 

1612: \bibitem{thooft}

1613: G. 't Hooft G,

1614: {\em Naturalness, Chiral Symmetry, And Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking},

1615: in {\em Dynamical gauge symmetry breaking. A collection of Reprints}

1616: edited by E. Farhi and R. Jackiw, World Scientific, Singapore (1982)

1617: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1618: 

1619: \bibitem{seesaw1}

1620: P. Minkowski, 

1621: {\em $\mu \to e \gamma$ At A Rate Of One Out Of 1-Billion Muon Decays?},

1622: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 67} (1977) 421

1623: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B67,421;%%

1624: 

1625: \bibitem{seesaw2}

1626: M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky,

1627: {\em Complex Spinors And Unified Theories},

1628: in {\it Supergravity}, p. 315, edited by F. Nieuwenhuizen and D. Friedman,

1629: North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979

1630: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1631: 

1632: \bibitem{seesaw3}

1633: T. Yanagida, 

1634: {\em Horizontal Gauge Symmetry And Masses Of Neutrinos},

1635: Proceedings of the {\it Workshop on

1636: Unified Theories and Baryon Number of the Universe},

1637: edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto, KEK, Japan 1979

1638: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1639: 

1640: \bibitem{seesaw4}

1641: R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,

1642: {\em Neutrino Mass And Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation}

1643: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 44} (1980) 912 

1644: %%CITATION = PRLTA,44,912;%%

1645: 

1646: \bibitem{ramond}

1647: M. J. Bowick and P. Ramond,

1648: {\em Calculable Masses In Grand Unified Theories},

1649: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 103} (1981) 338

1650: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B103,338;%%

1651: 

1652: \bibitem{paco}

1653: F. del Aguila and M. J. Bowick,

1654: {\em The Possibility Of New Fermions With $\Delta I = 0$ Mass},

1655: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 224} (1983) 107

1656: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B224,107;%%

1657: 

1658: \bibitem{LL}

1659: P. Langacker and D. London,

1660: {\em Lepton Number Violation And Massless Nonorthogonal Neutrinos},

1661: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 38} (1988) 907

1662: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D38,907;%%

1663: 

1664: \bibitem{frampton}

1665: P. H. Frampton, P. Q. Hung and M. Sher,

1666: {\em Quarks and leptons beyond the third generation},

1667: Phys. Rept. {\bf 330} (2000) 263

1668: {\tt [hep-ph/9903387]}

1669: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903387;%%

1670: 

1671: \bibitem{hewett}

1672: J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo

1673: {\em Low-Energy Phenomenology Of Superstring Inspired $E(6)$ Models},

1674: Phys. Rept. {\bf 183} (1989) 193

1675: %%CITATION = PRPLC,183,193;%%

1676: 

1677: \bibitem{extra1}

1678: N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali,

1679: {\em The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter},

1680: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 429} (1998) 263

1681: {\tt [hep-ph/9803315]}

1682: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803315;%%

1683:   

1684: \bibitem{extra2}

1685: I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali,

1686: {\em New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV},

1687: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 436} (1998) 257

1688: {\tt [hep-ph/9804398]}

1689: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804398;%%  

1690: 

1691: \bibitem{torre1}

1692: N. Arkani-Hamed and M. Schmaltz,

1693: {\em Hierarchies without symmetries from extra dimensions},

1694: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61} (2000) 033005

1695: {\tt [hep-ph/9903417]}

1696: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903417;%%

1697:   

1698: \bibitem{torre2}

1699: E. A. Mirabelli and M. Schmaltz,

1700: {\em Yukawa hierarchies from split fermions in extra dimensions},

1701: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61} (2000) 113011

1702: {\tt [hep-ph/9912265]}

1703: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912265;%%

1704: 

1705: \bibitem{torre3}

1706: A. Delgado, A. Pomarol and M. Quiros,

1707: {\em Electroweak and flavor physics in extensions of the standard model with

1708: large extra dimensions},

1709: JHEP {\bf 0001} (2000) 030

1710: {\tt hep-ph/9911252]}

1711: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911252;%%

1712: 

1713: \bibitem{jose}

1714: F. del Aguila and J. Santiago,

1715: {\em Signals from extra dimensions decoupled from the compactification scale},

1716: JHEP {\bf 0203} (2002) 010

1717: {\tt [hep-ph/0111047]}

1718: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111047;%%

1719: 

1720: \bibitem{gustavo}

1721: G. C. Branco, D. Delepine, B. Nobre and J. Santiago,

1722: {\em Extra dimensions, isosinglet charged leptons and neutrino factories},

1723: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 657} (2003) 355

1724: {\tt [hep-ph/0209263]}

1725: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209263;%%

1726: 

1727: \bibitem{a31}

1728: K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas and T. Gherghetta,

1729: {\em Light neutrinos without heavy mass scales: A higher-dimensional seesaw

1730: mechanism},

1731: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 557} (1999) 25

1732: {\tt [hep-ph/9811428]}

1733: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811428;%%

1734: 

1735: \bibitem{a32}

1736: A. Lukas, P. Ramond, A. Romanino and G. G. Ross,

1737: {\em Neutrino masses and mixing in brane-world theories},

1738: JHEP {\bf 0104} (2001) 010

1739: {\tt [hep-ph/0011295]}

1740: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011295;%%

1741: 

1742: \bibitem{LH1}

1743: H. Georgi and A. Pais,

1744: {\em Calculability And Naturalness In Gauge Theories},

1745: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 10} (1974) 539

1746: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D10,539;%%

1747: 

1748: \bibitem{LH2}

1749: H. Georgi and A. Pais,

1750: {\em Vacuum Symmetry And The Pseudogoldstone Phenomenon},

1751: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 12} (1975) 508

1752: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D12,508;%%

1753: 

1754: \bibitem{LH3}

1755: N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi,

1756: {\em Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction},

1757: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 513} (2001) 232

1758: {\tt [hep-ph/0105239]}

1759: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105239;%%

1760: 

1761: \bibitem{coll1}

1762: J. L. Hewett, F. J. Petriello and T. G. Rizzo,

1763: {\em Constraining the littlest Higgs},

1764: JHEP {\bf 0310} (2003) 062

1765: {\tt [hep-ph/0211218]}

1766: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211218;%%

1767: 

1768: \bibitem{coll2}

1769: G. Burdman, M. Perelstein and A. Pierce,

1770: {\em Collider tests of the little Higgs model},

1771: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90} (2003) 241802

1772: [Erratum-ibid.  {\bf 92} (2004) 049903]

1773: {\tt [hep-ph/0212228]}

1774: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212228;%%

1775: 

1776: \bibitem{coll3}

1777: For a recent review see

1778: M. Perelstein,

1779: {\em Little Higgs models and their phenomenology},

1780: {\tt hep-ph/0512128}

1781: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512128;%%

1782: 

1783: \bibitem{schmaltz}

1784: M. Schmaltz,

1785: {\em The simplest little Higgs},

1786: JHEP {\bf 0408} (2004) 056

1787: {\tt [hep-ph/0407143]}

1788: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407143;%%

1789: 

1790: \bibitem{padilla}

1791: F. del Aguila, M. Masip and J. L. Padilla,

1792: {\em A little Higgs model of neutrino masses},

1793: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 627} (2005) 131

1794: {\tt [hep-ph/0506063]}

1795: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0506063;%%

1796: 

1797: \bibitem{buch2}

1798: W. Buchmuller and C. Greub,

1799: {\em Heavy Majorana neutrinos in Electron -- Positron and Electron -- Proton

1800: collisions},

1801: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 363} (1991) 345

1802: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B363,345;%%

1803: 

1804: \bibitem{ing}

1805: G. Ingelman and J. Rathsman,

1806: {\em Heavy Majorana neutrinos at e p colliders},

1807: Z. Phys. C {\bf 60} (1993) 243

1808: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C60,243;%%

1809: 

1810: \bibitem{gluzatev}

1811: J. Gluza,

1812: {\em On teraelectronvolt Majorana neutrinos},

1813: Acta Phys. Polon. B {\bf 33} (2002) 1735

1814: {\tt [hep-ph/0201002]}

1815: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201002;%%

1816: 

1817: \bibitem{bernabeu}

1818: D. Tommasini, G. Barenboim, J. Bernabeu and C. Jarlskog,

1819: {\em Nondecoupling of heavy neutrinos and lepton flavor violation},

1820: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 444} (1995) 451

1821: {\tt [hep-ph/9503228]}

1822: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9503228;%%

1823: 

1824: \bibitem{lepto1}

1825: M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida,

1826: {\em Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,}

1827: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 174} (1986) 45

1828: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B174,45;%%

1829: 

1830: \bibitem{lepto2}

1831: For a recent review see

1832: W. Buchm\"uller, P. Di Bari and M. Pl\"umacher,

1833: {\em Leptogenesis for pedestrians},

1834: Annals Phys. {\bf 315} (2005) 305

1835: {\tt [hep-ph/0401240]}

1836: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0401240;%%

1837: 

1838: \bibitem{qd1}

1839: A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood,

1840: {\em Resonant leptogenesis},

1841: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 692} (2004) 303

1842: {\tt [hep-ph/0309342]}

1843: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309342;%%

1844: 

1845: \bibitem{qd2}

1846: T. Hambye, J. March-Russell and S. M. West,

1847: {\em TeV scale resonant leptogenesis from supersymmetry breaking},

1848: JHEP {\bf 0407} (2004) 070

1849: {\tt [hep-ph/0403183]}

1850: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403183;%%

1851: 

1852: \bibitem{qd3}

1853: R. Gonzalez Felipe, F. R. Joaquim and B. M. Nobre,

1854: {\em Radiatively induced leptogenesis in a minimal seesaw model},

1855: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70} (2004) 085009

1856: {\tt [hep-ph/0311029]}

1857: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311029;%%

1858: 

1859: \bibitem{tev1}

1860: L. Boubekeur, T. Hambye and G. Senjanovic,

1861: {\em Low-scale leptogenesis and soft supersymmetry breaking},

1862: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93} (2004) 111601

1863: {\tt [hep-ph/0404038]}

1864: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404038;%%

1865: 

1866: \bibitem{tev2}

1867: A. Abada, H. Aissaoui and M. Losada,

1868: {\em A model for leptogenesis at the TeV scale},

1869: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 728} (2005) 55

1870: {\tt [hep-ph/0409343]}

1871: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409343;%%

1872: 

1873: \bibitem{RH}

1874: M. Frigerio, T. Hambye and E. Ma,

1875: {\em Right-handed sector leptogenesis},

1876: {\tt hep-ph/0603123}

1877: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0603123;%%

1878: 

1879: \bibitem{tau}

1880: A.~Pilaftsis,

1881: {\em Resonant tau leptogenesis with observable lepton number violation},

1882: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 95} (2005) 081602

1883: {\tt [hep-ph/0408103]}

1884: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408103;%%

1885: 

1886: \bibitem{tau2}

1887: A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood,

1888: {\em Electroweak-scale resonant leptogenesis},

1889: Phys.Rev. D {\bf 72} (2005) 113001

1890: {\tt [hep-ph/0506107]}

1891: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0506107;%%

1892: 

1893: 

1894: 

1895: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%   seccion 3

1896: 

1897: 

1898: 

1899: \bibitem{valle}

1900: J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle,

1901: {\em Neutrino Masses In SU(2) X U(1) Theories},

1902: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 22} (1980) 2227

1903: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,2227;%%

1904: 

1905: \bibitem{PMNS1}

1906: B. Pontecorvo,

1907: {\em Mesonium And Antimesonium},

1908: Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 6} (1957) 429

1909: [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.  {\bf 33} (1957) 549]

1910: %%CITATION = SPHJA,6,429;%%

1911: 

1912: \bibitem{PMNS2}

1913: Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata,

1914: {\em Remarks On The Unified Model Of Elementary Particles},

1915: Prog. Theor. Phys.  {\bf 28} (1962) 870

1916: %%CITATION = PTPKA,28,870;%%

1917: 

1918: 

1919: 

1920: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%   seccion 4

1921: 

1922: 

1923: 

1924: \bibitem{pil1}

1925: J. G. Korner, A. Pilaftsis and K. Schilcher,

1926: {\em Leptonic flavor changing Z0 decays in $SU(2) \times U(1)$ theories with

1927: right-handed neutrinos},

1928: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 300} (1993) 381

1929: {\tt [hep-ph/9301290]}

1930: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9301290;%%

1931: 

1932: \bibitem{nardi}

1933: E. Nardi, E. Roulet and D. Tommasini,

1934: {\em Limits on neutrino mixing with new heavy particles},

1935: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 327} (1994) 319

1936: {\tt [hep-ph/9402224]}

1937: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9402224;%%

1938: 

1939: \bibitem{pil2}

1940: A. Ilakovac and A. Pilaftsis,

1941: {\em Flavor violating charged lepton decays in seesaw-type models},

1942: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 437} (1995) 491

1943: {\tt [hep-ph/9403398]}

1944: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403398;%%

1945: 

1946: \bibitem{kagan}

1947: S. Bergmann and A. Kagan,

1948: {\em Z-induced FCNCs and their effects on neutrino oscillations},

1949: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 538} (1999) 368

1950: {\tt [hep-ph/9803305]}

1951: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803305;%%

1952: 

1953: \bibitem{illana}

1954: J. I. Illana and T. Riemann,

1955: {\em Charged lepton flavour violation from massive neutrinos in $Z$ decays},

1956: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63} (2001) 053004

1957: {\tt [hep-ph/0010193]}

1958: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010193;%%

1959: 

1960: \bibitem{plb}

1961: F. del Aguila, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Mart\'{\i}nez de la Ossa and

1962: D. Meloni,

1963: {\em Flavour and polarisation in heavy neutrino production at $e^+ e^-$

1964: colliders},

1965: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 613} (2005) 170

1966: {\tt [hep-ph/0502189]}

1967: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502189;%%

1968: 

1969: \bibitem{M}

1970: R. N. Mohapatra,

1971: {\em Particle physics implications of neutrinoless double beta decay},

1972: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 77} (1999) 376

1973: {\tt [hep-ph/9808284]}

1974: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808284;%%

1975: 

1976: \bibitem{nless}

1977: For a recent review see

1978: C. Aalseth {\it et al.},

1979: {\em Neutrinoless double beta decay and direct searches for neutrino mass},

1980: {\tt hep-ph/0412300}

1981: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412300;%%

1982: 

1983: 

1984: 

1985: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%   seccion 5

1986: 

1987: \bibitem{buch1}

1988: W. Buchmuller and C. Greub,

1989: {\em Electroproduction Of Majorana Neutrinos},

1990: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 256} (1991) 465

1991: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B256,465;%%

1992: 

1993: 

1994: \bibitem{pila}

1995: S. Bray, J. S. Lee and A. Pilaftsis,

1996: {\em Heavy Majorana neutrino production at $e^- \gamma$ colliders},

1997: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 628} (2005) 250

1998: {\tt [hep-ph/0508077]}

1999: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0508077;%%

2000: 

2001: \bibitem{Han}

2002: T. Han and B. Zhang,

2003: {\em Signatures for Majorana neutrinos at hadron colliders},

2004: {\tt hep-ph/0604064}

2005: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0604064;%%

2006: 

2007: \bibitem{otherpp1}

2008: F. M. L. Almeida, Y. A. Coutinho, J. A. Martins Simoes, P. P. Queiroz Filho and

2009: C. M. Porto,

2010: {\em Same-sign dileptons as a signature for heavy Majorana neutrinos in hadron

2011: hadron collisions},

2012: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 400} (1997) 331

2013: {\tt [hep-ph/9703441]}

2014: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9703441;%%

2015: 

2016: \bibitem{otherpp2}

2017: A. Ali, A. V. Borisov and N. B. Zamorin,

2018: {\em Majorana neutrinos and same-sign dilepton production at LHC and in  rare

2019: meson decays},

2020: Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 21} (2001) 123

2021: {\tt [hep-ph/0104123]}

2022: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104123;%%

2023: 

2024: \bibitem{l3}

2025: P. Achard {\it et al.}  [L3 Collaboration],

2026: {\em Search for heavy isosinglet neutrino in $e^+ e^-$ annihilation at LEP},

2027: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 517} (2001) 67

2028: {\tt [hep-ex/0107014]}

2029: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107014;%%

2030: 

2031: \bibitem{ALPGEN}

2032: M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau and A. D. Polosa,

2033: {\em ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic collisions,

2034: JHEP} {\bf 0307} (2003) 001 {\tt [hep-ph/0206293]};

2035: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206293;%%

2036: See also {\tt http://mlm.home.cern.ch/m/mlm/www/alpgen/}

2037: 

2038: \bibitem{fc}

2039: G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins,

2040: {\em A Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small

2041: signals},

2042: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57} (1998) 3873

2043: {\tt [physics/9711021]}

2044: %%CITATION = PHYS-ICS 9711021;%%

2045: 

2046: \bibitem{zerwas}

2047: F. del Aguila, E. Laermann and P. M. Zerwas,

2048: {\em Exotic $E(6)$ Particles In $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation},

2049: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 297} (1988) 1

2050: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B297,1;%%

2051: 

2052: \bibitem{GZ2}

2053: J. Gluza and M. Zralek,

2054: {\em Neutrino production in $e^+ e^-$ collisions in a left-right symmetric

2055: model},

2056: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 48} (1993) 5093

2057: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D48,5093;%%

2058: 

2059: \bibitem{djouadi}

2060: G. Azuelos and A. Djouadi,

2061: {\em New fermions at $e^+ e^-$ colliders. 2. Signals and backgrounds},

2062: Z. Phys. C {\bf 63} (1994) 327

2063: {\tt [hep-ph/9308340]}

2064: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9308340;%%

2065: 

2066: \bibitem{GZ4}

2067: J. Gluza, J. Maalampi, M. Raidal and M. Zralek,

2068: {\em Heavy neutrino mixing and single production at linear collider},

2069: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 407} (1997) 45

2070: {\tt [hep-ph/9703215]}

2071: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9703215;%%

2072: 

2073: \bibitem{MEG}

2074: T. Mori,

2075: {\em Status and future of $\mu \to e \gamma$: The PSI experiment},

2076: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 111} (2002) 194;

2077: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,111,194;%%

2078: see also

2079: {\small \tt http://meg.web.psi.ch/}

2080: 

2081: \bibitem{MECO}

2082: M. Hebert [MECO Collaboration],

2083: {\em Searching for muon to electron conversion below the $10^{-16}$ level}

2084: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 721} (2003) 461;

2085: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A721,461;%%

2086: see also {\small \tt http://meco.ps.uci.edu/}

2087: 

2088: \bibitem{sd}

2089: S. Davidson,

2090: {\em Parametrizations of the seesaw, or, can the seesaw be tested?},

2091: in {\em Seesaw mechanism} Proceedings, International Conference,

2092: SEESAW25, Paris, France, June 10-11, 2004

2093: {\tt [hep-ph/0409339]}

2094: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409339;%%

2095: 

2096: 

2097: 

2098: 

2099: \end{thebibliography}

2100: 

2101: \end{document}

2102: 

2103: