1:
2: \documentclass[12pt,cite,epsf,epsfig]{article}
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5:
6:
7:
8:
9: \renewcommand{\today}{}
10: \setlength\textwidth{6 in} \setlength\topmargin{-1 cm}
11: \setlength\textheight{9 in} \addtolength\evensidemargin{-1 cm}
12: \addtolength\oddsidemargin{-1 cm} \font\tenrm=cmr12
13: \setlength{\parindent}{0pt} \setlength{\parskip}{6pt}
14:
15:
16:
17:
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \author{S. DEV\thanks{dev5703@yahoo.com} and
22: SANJEEV KUMAR\thanks{sanjeev3kumar@yahoo.co.in}}
23: \title{Neutrino Parameter Space for a Vanishing $ee$ Element in the Neutrino
24: Mass Matrix}
25: \date{Department of Physics, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla 171005, INDIA}
26: \maketitle
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: The consequences of a texture zero at the $ee$ entry of neutrino
30: mass matrix in the flavor basis, which also implies a vanishing
31: effective Majorana mass for neutrinoless double beta decay, have
32: been studied for Majorana neutrinos. The neutrino parameter space
33: under this condition has been constrained in the light of all
34: available neutrino data including the CHOOZ bound on $s_{13}^{2}$.
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: One of the fundamental goals of neutrino physics is to determine
38: the neutrino mass matrix given by
39: \begin{equation}
40: (m_{\nu})_{\alpha
41: \beta}=(Um_{\nu}^{diag}U^{T})_{\alpha\beta};\hspace{10pt}
42: \alpha,\beta=e,\mu,\tau
43: \end{equation}
44: for Majorana neutrinos where $m_{\nu}^{diag}=\{m_1,m_2,m_3\}$.
45: Since $m_{\nu}$ is a symmetric matrix, it is specified by nine
46: physical parameters viz. the three neutrino masses ($m_1$, $m_2$,
47: $ m_3$), three mixing angles ($\theta _{12}$, $\theta _{23}$,
48: $\theta_{13}$), the Dirac-type CP-violating phase ($\delta $), and
49: two Majorana-type CP-violating phases ($\alpha $, $\beta $). Out
50: of these nine parameters, only the first six have been constrained
51: to a reasonable degree of precision but the Dirac-type
52: CP-violating phase and the two Majorana-type CP-violating phases
53: remain unconstrained at present. While the Dirac-type CP-violating
54: phase is expected to be constrained from the study of CP-violation
55: in long baseline neutrino oscillations, the two Majorana-type
56: CP-violating phases can, hopefully, be constrained from
57: neutrinoless double $\beta$ decay ($0\nu\beta\beta$).
58:
59: The rate for $0\nu\beta\beta$ decay is proportional to the
60: effective mass defined as
61: \begin{equation}
62: \left|m_{ee}\right|=\left|\sum_{i} m_i U_{ei} \right|^2
63: \end{equation}
64: which, in fact, is the magnitude of the first element of the
65: neutrino mass matrix in the charged lepton flavor basis. Thus, the
66: $0\nu\beta\beta$ \cite{1} decay provides us an unique opportunity
67: to probe directly one of the elements of the neutrino mass matrix.
68: The non-observation of $0\nu\beta\beta$ decay constrains the
69: effective mass $|m_{ee}|$ to be close to zero. The possibility
70: $m_{ee}=0$ has been examined in the literature \cite{2,3,4,5,6,7}
71: earlier under certain special conditions. However, a general study
72: of the neutrino parameter space for $m_{ee}=0$ with the full
73: interplay of the Majorana phases is still lacking.
74:
75: In the present work, we examine the consequences of the vanishing
76: effective Majorana mass for the neutrino parameter space. A study
77: of this condition has important implications for the texture
78: specific phenomenological neutrino mass matrices. In particular,
79: the phenomenological conclusions obtained from the condition of
80: vanishing effective Majorana mass will be valid for all texture
81: zero schemes in the charged lepton basis in which the first
82: element is zero.
83:
84: The neutrino mixing matrix i.e. the PMNS matrix $U$ can be
85: parameterized in terms of three mixing angles ($\theta _{12}$,
86: $\theta _{23}$, $\theta _{13}$), the Dirac CP-violating phase
87: ($\delta $), and the two Majorana CP-violating phases ($\alpha $,
88: $\beta $) in the following manner \cite{8}:
89: \begin{equation}
90: U=\left(
91: \begin{array}{ccc}
92: c_{12}c_{13} & s_{12}c_{13} & s_{13}e^{-i\delta } \\
93: -s_{12}c_{23}-c_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta } &
94: c_{12}c_{23}-s_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta } & s_{23}c_{13} \\
95: s_{12}s_{23}-c_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta } &
96: -c_{12}s_{23}-s_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta } & c_{23}c_{13}
97: \end{array}
98: \right) \left(
99: \begin{array}{ccc}
100: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
101: 0 & e^{i\alpha } & 0 \\
102: 0 & 0 & e^{i\left( \beta +\delta \right) }
103: \end{array}
104: \right)
105: \end{equation}
106: where $c_{ij}=\cos \theta _{ij}$ and $s_{ij}=\sin \theta _{ij}$.
107: This parameterization has the advantage that the Dirac
108: CP-violating phase $\delta$ is formally absent in the expression
109: of the effective Majorana mass $m_{ee}$ probed in $0\nu \beta
110: \beta $ decays. The neutrino mass matrix is a complex symmetric
111: matrix described by nine parameters as discussed above. For the
112: above parameterisation, the effective Majorana mass is given by
113: \begin{equation}
114: m_{ee}=c_{13}^{2}c_{12}^{2}m_{1}+c_{13}^{2}s_{12}^{2}m_{2}e^{2i\alpha
115: }+s_{13}^{2}m_{3}e^{2i\beta }.
116: \end{equation}
117: The current experimental bound on the effective Majorana mass is
118: \cite{9,10}
119: \begin{equation}
120: \left| m_{ee}\right| \leq 0.35\zeta eV
121: \end{equation}
122: where the uncertainty in the calculation of the nuclear matrix
123: element of $0\nu \beta \beta $ is contained in the factor $\zeta
124: =O(1)$. The element $m_{ee}$ of neutrino mass matrix depends on
125: seven (out of a total of nine) parameters viz. $m_{1}$, $m_{2}$,
126: $m_{3}$, $\theta _{12}$, $\theta _{13}$, $\alpha $ and $\beta $.
127: The mixing angle $\theta _{12}$ is known from the solar and
128: KamLAND neutrino data. The masses $m_{2}$ and $m_{3}$ can be
129: calculated from the two mass-squared differences $\Delta
130: m_{12}^{2}$ and $\Delta m_{23}^{2}$ which has been measured
131: experimentally in the solar and atmospheric neutrino experiments.
132: For normal hierarchy (NH), $ m_{1}$ is the lightest neutrino mass
133: and the masses $m_2$ and $m_3$ can be expressed in terms of $m_1$
134: in the following way
135: \begin{equation}
136: m_{2}=\sqrt{m_{1}^{2}+\Delta m_{12}^{2}}
137: \end{equation}
138: and
139: \begin{equation}
140: m_{3}=\sqrt{m_{2}^{2}+\Delta m_{23}^{2}}.
141: \end{equation}
142: For inverted hierarchy (IH), $m_{3}$ is the lightest neutrino mass
143: and the other two masses are given by
144: \begin{equation}
145: m_{1}=\sqrt{m_{3}^{2}-\Delta m_{23}^{2}}
146: \end{equation}
147: and
148: \begin{equation}
149: m_{2}=\sqrt{m_{1}^{2}+\Delta m_{12}^{2}}.
150: \end{equation}
151: Thus, two neutrino masses are known from the solar and atmospheric
152: mass-squared differences viz. $\Delta m^2_{12}$ and $\Delta
153: m^2_{23}$ in terms of the lightest neutrino mass $m_1$ for NH and
154: $m_3$ for IH.
155:
156: The best fit, 1 and 3 sigma values of the oscillation parameters
157: are \cite {11}:
158: \begin{eqnarray}
159: \Delta m_{12}^{2} &=&7.9_{-0.3,0.8}^{+0.3,1.0}\times
160: 10^{-5}eV^{2}, \nonumber \\ s_{12}^{2}
161: &=&0.31_{-0.03,0.07}^{+0.02,0.09}, \nonumber \\ \Delta m_{23}^{2}
162: &=&\pm 2.2_{-0.27,0.8}^{+0.37,1.1}\times 10^{-3}eV^{2}, \nonumber
163: \\ s_{23}^{2} &=&0.50_{-0.05,0.16}^{+0.06,0.18}, \nonumber \\
164: s_{13}^{2} &<&0.012(0.046).
165: \end{eqnarray}
166: The best-fit value of $s^2_{13}$ is zero. The positive and
167: negative signs of $\Delta m^2$ correspond to the normal and
168: inverted hierarchy, respectively.
169:
170: Thus, the element $m_{ee}$ is now a function of four unknown
171: parameters viz. the mixing angle $\theta _{13} $ and the two
172: Majorana CP-violating phases ($\alpha $, $\beta $) and the
173: lightest neutrino mass ($m_{1}$ for NH and $m_{3}$ for IH). The
174: study of the element $m_{ee}$ is, therefore, important in order to
175: decode information about these unknown parameters.
176:
177: For $s^2_{13}=0$, the effective Majorana mass $m_{ee}$ is given by
178: \begin{equation}
179: m_{ee}=c^2_{12}m_1+s^2_{12}m_2 e^{2i \alpha}
180: \end{equation}
181: which vanishes if
182: \begin{equation}
183: \alpha=\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right) \pi
184: \end{equation}
185: and
186: \begin{equation}
187: \frac{m_1}{m_2}=\frac{s^2_{12}}{c^2_{12}}.
188: \end{equation}
189: Substituting the value of $m_2$ from Eq. (6) or Eq. (9) in Eq.
190: (13), we obtain
191: \begin{equation}
192: m_1= s^2_{12}\sqrt{\frac{\Delta m^2_{12}}{\cos 2 \theta_{12}}}
193: \end{equation}
194: both for normal and inverted hierarchies. Thus, there exists a
195: point on the ($\alpha,m_1$) plane at which $m_{ee}$ vanishes for
196: $s_{13}^2=0$ for both the hierarchies which is a consequence of
197: the fact that the effective Majorana mass $m_{ee}$ is independent
198: of $m_3$ and, hence, independent of the hierarchy for
199: $s_{13}^2=0$. This case has been examined earlier \cite{2}.
200:
201: Now we examine the consequences of a vanishing effective Majorana
202: mass for non-zero $s_{13}^2$. The element $m_{ee}$ depends on the
203: four parameters viz. the lightest neutrino mass ($m_{1}$ for NH
204: and $m_{3}$ for IH), the mixing angle $\theta _{13}$ and the two
205: Majorana CP-violating phases $\alpha $ and $\beta $. Now, we
206: demand that $m_{ee}=0$ which requires that both the real and
207: imaginary parts of $m_{ee}$ vanish which yields two conditions on
208: the neutrino parameter space viz.
209: \begin{equation}
210: Re(m_{ee})=c_{13}^{2}c_{12}^{2}m_{1}+c_{13}^{2}s_{12}^{2}m_{2}
211: \cos 2\alpha +s_{13}^{2}m_{3} \cos 2\beta=0
212: \end{equation}
213: and
214: \begin{equation}
215: Im(m_{ee})=c_{13}^{2}s_{12}^{2}m_{2} \sin2\alpha
216: +s_{13}^{2}m_{3}\sin2\beta=0
217: \end{equation}
218: so that we can express any two variables in terms of the remaining
219: two variables. In fact, the condition $m_{ee}=0$ is more
220: restrictive than the actual measurement of this element from
221: $0\nu\beta\beta$ decay which yields only one constraint on the
222: above four-dimensional neutrino parameter space. In the following,
223: we express $\beta$ and $s_{13}$ in terms of $ m_{1}$ and $\alpha$
224: to examine the neutrino parameter space allowed by the condition
225: $m_{ee}=0$ on the ($\alpha ,m_{1}$) plane. We have, already,
226: obtained a point on the ($\alpha ,m_{1}$) plane corresponding to
227: $s_{13}^2=0$ and arbitrary values of $\beta$ [cf. Eqs. (12,14)].
228: Next, we examine the whole region for $m_{ee}=0$ about this point
229: on the ($\alpha,m_{1}$) plane for different values of $\beta$ and
230: for $s_{13}^2$ within the CHOOZ bound.
231:
232: From Eqs. (15) and (16), we obtain
233: \begin{equation}
234: s_{13}^{2}=\frac{{m_{1}c_{12}^{2}+m_{2}s_{12}^{2}\cos 2\alpha
235: }}{{m_{1}c_{12}^{2}+m_{2}s_{12}^{2}\cos 2\alpha }-{m_{3}\cos
236: 2\beta}}
237: \end{equation}
238: and
239: \begin{equation}
240: s_{13}^{2}=\frac{{m_{2}s_{12}^{2}\sin 2\alpha
241: }}{{m_{2}s_{12}^{2}\sin 2\alpha }-{m_{3}\sin 2\beta }}
242: \end{equation}
243: respectively.
244:
245: From Eqs. (17) and (18), one can obtain the mass ratios
246: \begin{equation}
247: \frac{m_{1}}{m_{2}}=\frac{s_{12}^{2}\sin 2\left( \alpha -\beta \right)}{%
248: c_{12}^{2}\sin 2\beta }
249: \end{equation}
250: and
251: \begin{equation}
252: \frac{m_{2}}{m_{3}}=-\frac{s_{13}^{2}\sin 2\beta }{c_{13}^{2}s_{12}^{2}\sin
253: 2\alpha }.
254: \end{equation}
255: For $m_{ee}=0$ to hold, Eqs. (17) and (18) must hold
256: simultaneously which implies
257: \begin{equation}
258: \sin 2\beta =\pm \frac{s_{12}^{2}m_{2}}{M}\sin 2\alpha
259: \end{equation}
260: where
261: \begin{equation}
262: M=\sqrt{%
263: m_{1}^{2}c_{12}^{4}+m_{2}^{2}s_{12}^{4}+2m_{1}m_{2}s_{12}^{2}c_{12}^{2}\cos
264: 2\alpha }.
265: \end{equation}
266: and $s_{13}$ is given by
267: \begin{equation}
268: s_{13}^{2}=\frac{M}{M\mp m_{3}}.
269: \end{equation}
270: where $\mp$ signs in front of $m_{3}$ correspond to the two signs
271: of $\sin 2\beta $ in Eq. (21), respectively. The physical
272: requirement $s_{13}^{2}<1$ implies that $m_{ee}=0$ if
273: \begin{equation}
274: \sin 2\beta =-\frac{s_{12}^{2}m_{2}}{M}\sin 2\alpha,
275: \end{equation}
276: and
277: \begin{equation}
278: s_{13}^{2}=\frac{M}{M+m_{3}}.
279: \end{equation}
280: It is interesting to note that $\beta$ becomes indeterminate when
281: $m_1/m_2=s_{12}^2/c_{12}^2$ and $\alpha=(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi$ for
282: $s_{13}^2=0$ since $M=0$ at this point. This is consistent with
283: our earlier result that $m_{ee}$ can vanish for arbitrary values
284: of $\beta$ when $s_{13}^2=0$.
285:
286: Substituting the value of $\beta $ from Eq. (24) in Eq. (20), we
287: obtain
288: \begin{equation}
289: m_3=\frac{c^2_{13} M}{s_{13}^2}.
290: \end{equation}
291: Note that R.H.S. of Eq. (26) becomes indeterminate at the point
292: $m_1/m_2=s_{12}^2/c_{12}^2$ for $s_{13}^2=0$ since $M=0$ at this
293: point which is consistent with our earlier remark that $m_{ee}$
294: can vanish for $s_{13}^2=0$ irrespective of the values of $m_3$.
295: One can solve Eq. (26) for $\alpha$ to obtain
296: \begin{equation}
297: \cos 2\alpha =\frac{
298: m_{3}^{2}s_{13}^{4}-c_{13}^{4}(m_{1}^{2}c_{12}^{4}+m_{2}^{2}s_{12}^{4})}{
299: 2m_{1}m_{2}s_{12}^{2}c_{12}^{2}c_{13}^{4}}
300: \end{equation}
301: which corresponds to
302: \begin{equation}
303: \cos 2\beta =-\frac{
304: m_{3}^{2}s_{13}^{4}+c_{13}^{4}(m_{2}^{2}s_{12}^{4}-m_{1}^{2}c_{12}^{4})}{
305: 2m_{2}m_{3}s_{12}^{2}s_{13}^{2}c_{13}^{2}}.
306: \end{equation}
307:
308:
309:
310: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
311: \begin{figure}[tb]
312: \begin{center}
313: %\vskip -2.5cm
314: \rotatebox{0}{\epsfig{file=fig1.eps, width=9.0cm, height=9.0cm}}
315: \end{center}
316: \caption{The contours of constant $\sin 2\beta $ on
317: ($\alpha,m_{1}$) plane as demanded by $m_{ee} =0$. The central
318: vertical line is for $\sin 2\beta =0$. Immediately right (left) to
319: it is the line $\sin 2\beta =\frac{1}{2}(-\frac{1}{2})$ followed
320: by the line for $\sin 2\beta
321: =\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}(-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})$.}
322: \end{figure}
323: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
324:
325: Eqs. (24) and (25) can be used to examine the allowed
326: ($\alpha,m_1$) parameter space for $m_{ee}=0$. Note that $\sin 2
327: \alpha$ and $\sin 2 \beta$ should have opposite signs. A natural
328: choice is to take $\alpha$ centered around $90^o$ (corresponding
329: to $n=0$ in Eq. (12)) and $\beta$ centered around $0^o$. With this
330: particular choice, $\beta$ should lie in the fourth quadrant (i.e.
331: $\beta<0^o$), if $\alpha$ lies in the first quadrant (i.e. $
332: \alpha<90^o$) and $\beta$ should lie in the first quadrant (i.e.
333: $\beta>0^o$), if $\alpha$ lies in the second quadrant (i.e. $
334: \alpha>90^o$). In other words, $\alpha$ should be ahead of $\beta$
335: by one quadrant. This is apparent in Fig. 1 where we have plotted
336: the contours of constant $\beta$ on the ($\alpha,m_1$) plane. The
337: central vertical line corresponds to $\alpha=90^o$ and
338: $\beta=0^o$. The left half of the plot corresponds to $\alpha
339: <90^{o}$ and $\beta <0^o$ whereas the right half of the plot corresponds to
340: $\alpha>90^{o}$ and $\beta>0^o$. All the curves corresponding to
341: different values of $\beta$ intersect at a certain point on the
342: central vertical line. This point has been obtained earlier while
343: discussing the $s_{13}^2=0$ case. At this point, $m_{ee}=0$
344: irrespective of the value of $\beta$. For $\alpha=90^o$, Eq. (25)
345: gives
346: \begin{equation}
347: s_{13}^{2}=\frac{\left|m_{2}s_{12}^{2}-m_{1}c_{12}^{2}\right|}{\left|
348: m_{2}s_{12}^{2}-m_{1}c_{12}^{2}\right|+m_{3}}.
349: \end{equation}
350: For $m_1=s^2_{12}\sqrt{\small{\frac{\Delta m_{12}^2}{ \cos 2
351: \theta_{12}}}}$ [cf. Eq. (14)], $s^2_{13}$ becomes zero for which
352: arbitrary values of $\beta$ are allowed. This is the point through
353: which all the curves corresponding to different values of $\beta$
354: pass in Fig. 1. Different points on the ($\alpha,m_1$) plane
355: correspond to different values of $s_{13}^2$. However, the CHOOZ
356: bound allows only a limited region on the ($\alpha ,m_{1}$) plane,
357: so we shall constrain the ($\alpha,m_{1}$) parameter space in the
358: light of the CHOOZ bound. However, the Majorana CP-violating phase
359: $\beta$ can not be constrained. Since, M is bounded from above
360: ($\alpha =0^o$) and from below ($\alpha =90^o$) [cf. Eq. (22)],
361: $s_{13}^{2}$ is, also, bounded from above and below, i.e.
362: \begin{equation}
363: \frac{\left|m_{2}s_{12}^{2}-m_{1}c_{12}^{2}\right|}
364: {\left|m_{2}s_{12}^{2}-m_{1}c_{12}^{2}\right|+m_{3}}
365: <s_{13}^{2}<\frac{m_{1}c_{12}^{2}+m_{2}s_{12}^{2}}{%
366: m_{1}c_{12}^{2}+m_{2}s_{12}^{2}+m_{3}}.
367: \end{equation}
368: Thus, the region allowed by $m_{ee} =0$ on the
369: ($m_{1},s_{13}^{2}$) plane will be bounded by the two limiting
370: values of $s_{13}^{2}$ corresponding to $\alpha=0^{o}$ and
371: $90^{o}$. As $m_{1}\rightarrow 0$, $s_{13}^2$ becomes independent
372: of $\alpha$ and is given by
373: \begin{equation}
374: s_{13}^{2}=\frac{\sqrt{\Delta m^2_{12}} s_{12}^{2}}{\sqrt{\Delta
375: m^2_{12}} s_{12}^{2}+\sqrt{\Delta m^2_{23}}}.
376: \end{equation}
377: This situation has been depicted in Fig. 2 where the upper and
378: lower bounds on $s_{13}^2$ [cf. Eq. (30)] have been plotted as
379: functions of $m_{1}$. The upper ($\alpha=0^o$) and lower
380: ($\alpha=90^o$) curves come closer as $m_{1}\rightarrow 0$ and,
381: eventually, merge for [cf. Eq. (31)]
382: \begin{equation}
383: s^2_{13}=0.055^{+0.010,0.033}_{-0.009,0.024}.
384: \end{equation}
385: The central value of $s^2_{13}$ for $m_1=0$ given above is above
386: the CHOOZ bound but is consistent with the CHOOZ bound at about
387: 2.3 $\sigma$. Therefore, a vanishing $m_{ee}$ element is
388: disallowed at 2.3 $\sigma$ C.L. for $m_{1}=0$ contrary to the
389: results reported in Ref. [3] where the special case $m_1=m_{ee}=0$
390: has also been examined and it has been found to be consistent with
391: the neutrino oscillation data. However, our results are consistent
392: with the recent results reported by Chauhan et al. \cite{4} who
393: conclude that the CHOOZ bound is violated when $m_1=m_{ee}=0$ in
394: vanishing determinant neutrino mass matrix scenarios where $m_1=0$
395: is a natural choice. As $m_1$ increases, the lower curve
396: (corresponding to $ \alpha=90^o$) dips to its minimum value
397: $s_{13}^2=0$ for $m_1=s^2_{12}\sqrt{\small{\frac{\Delta m_{12}^2}{
398: \cos 2 \theta_{12}}}}=0.045 eV$ [cf. Eq. (14)]. At this point,
399: $m_{ee}=0$ irrespective of the value of $\beta$. With further
400: increases in $m_{1}$, $s_{13}^2$ increases and, eventually,
401: becomes larger than the CHOOZ bound. Thus, there exists a range of
402: $m_{1}$ centered around 0.0045 eV and a corresponding range for
403: $\alpha$ around $90^o$, for which the condition $m_{ee}=0$ and the
404: CHOOZ bound hold simultaneously. Consequently, the condition
405: $m_{ee}=0$ combined with the CHOOZ bound yields both an upper and
406: a lower bound on $m_1$. With further increase in $m_{1}$, we
407: approach the quasi-degenerate (QD) region for normal neutrino mass
408: ordering. For a certain value of $m_{1}$ ($\simeq 10^{-2}eV$ for
409: the central values of neutrino oscillation parameters given in Eq.
410: (10)), the value of $s_{13}^{2}$ becomes larger than the CHOOZ
411: bound. Thus, a vanishing $m_{ee}$ element is not allowed in QD
412: hierarchy with normal ordering of neutrino masses and, therefore,
413: a texture zero at the $ ee$ entry in the neutrino mass matrix in
414: the flavor basis can not accommodate a QD mass spectrum and small
415: $\theta _{13}$ simultaneously. When $m_1$ becomes very large as
416: compared to $\sqrt{\Delta m^2_{23}}$, Eq. (30) becomes
417: \begin{equation}
418: \frac{\left|s_{12}^{2}-c_{12}^{2}\right|}{\left|s_{12}^{2}-c_{12}^{2}\right|+1}
419: <s_{13}^{2}<\frac{1}{2}.
420: \end{equation}
421: The upper ($\alpha =0^{o}$) and lower ($\alpha =90^{o}$) curves in
422: Fig. 2 approach the upper and lower bounds on $s_{13}^{2}$ given
423: above asymptotically with $m_{1}$.
424:
425: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
426: \begin{figure}[tb]
427: \begin{center}
428: %\vskip -2.5cm
429: \rotatebox{0}{\epsfig{file=fig2.eps, width=9.0cm, height=9.0cm}}
430: \end{center}
431: \caption{The ($s_{13}^2,m_{1}$) parameter space allowed by $
432: m_{ee} =0$ for $0^o<\alpha<90^o$. The upper solid line corresponds
433: to $\alpha=0^o$ and the lower solid line corresponds to
434: $\alpha=90^o$. We have also shown the 1 $\sigma$ and 3 $\sigma$
435: CHOOZ bounds as dotted lines.}
436: \end{figure}
437: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
438:
439: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
440: \begin{figure}[tb]
441: \begin{center}
442: %\vskip -2.5cm
443: \rotatebox{0}{\epsfig{file=fig3.eps, width=9.0cm, height=9.0cm}}
444: \end{center}
445: \caption{The parameter space on ($\alpha -m_{1}$) plane
446: constrained by $\left| m_{ee}\right| =0$ and the CHOOZ bound. The
447: regions in the increasing order of lighting correspond to 1
448: $\sigma$, 2 $\sigma$ and 3 $\sigma$ bounds on $s^2_{13}$}.
449: \end{figure}
450: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
451:
452:
453: \begin{table}[b]
454: \begin{center}
455: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
456: \hline C.L. & $m_1$ & $\alpha$ \\ \hline 1
457: $\sigma$&$0.0029-0.0063 eV$ & $83.9^o-96.1^o$ \\ 2
458: $\sigma$&$0.0011-0.0093 eV$ & $71.2^o-108.8^o$ \\ 3
459: $\sigma$&$0-0.0129eV$ & $33.7^o-146.3^o$
460: \\ \hline
461: \end{tabular}
462: \end{center}
463: \caption{ The allowed values of $m_1$ and $\alpha$ for $m_{ee}=0$
464: from the neutrino oscillation data at various confidence levels.}
465: \end{table}
466:
467: In Fig. 3, the contours for 1 $\sigma$, 2 $\sigma$ and 3 $\sigma$
468: values of $s^2_{13}$ allowed by the CHOOZ bound have been plotted
469: on the ($\alpha,m_{1}$) plane. The allowed range of $m_1$ in Fig.
470: 3 is essentially the same as in Fig. 2. The values of $\alpha$
471: which give $m_{ee}=0$ are centered around $\alpha=90^o$ and the
472: ($\alpha,m_{1}$) parameter space becomes smaller with the decrease
473: in the upper bound on $s^2_{13}$. At two standard deviations, the
474: allowed range of $\alpha$ is $75^o-105^o$ approximately and the
475: best fit point on the ($\alpha,m_{1}$) plane is approximately
476: $(90^o,0.0045eV)$. The exact value of $m_1$ for which $m_{ee}$
477: vanishes is given by Eq. (14) and this happens for $s_{13}=0$ and
478: $\alpha=90^o$.
479:
480: While plotting Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, we used the central values of
481: the neutrino oscillation parameters. Now, we incorporate the
482: experimental errors in these parameters in the numerical analysis
483: to fix the allowed ranges of $m_{1}$ and $\alpha$. The results of
484: this analysis have been summarized in Table 1. The allowed ranges
485: for $m_1$ and $\alpha$ shown in Fig. 3, however, come from the 1
486: $\sigma$, 2 $\sigma$ and 3 $\sigma$ ranges for $s^2_{13}$ and
487: central values for the other oscillation parameters and,
488: therefore, are more restrictive as compared to the ranges given in
489: Table 1.
490:
491: Thus, the effective Majorana mass can be zero in normal hierarchy
492: if $m_1$ and $\alpha$ lie within the ranges shown in Table 1. The
493: inter-relationship between the hierarchy of the neutrino mass
494: spectrum and the resulting texture structure of the neutrino mass
495: matrix is apparent from this analysis. The mass matrices with a
496: texture zero at the $ee$ entry naturally lead to a mass spectrum
497: with normal hierarchy and small mixing angle $\theta_{13}$.
498:
499:
500:
501:
502:
503: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
504: \begin{figure}[tb]
505: \begin{center}
506: %\vskip -2.5cm
507: \rotatebox{0}{\epsfig{file=fig4.eps, width=9.0cm, height=9.0cm}}
508: \end{center}
509: \caption{The parameter space allowed on ($s^2_{13}-m_{1}$) plane
510: by $\left| m_{ee}\right| =0$ for $0^o<\alpha<90^o$ for the
511: inverted hierarchy. The upper solid line corresponds to
512: $\alpha=0^o$ and the lower solid line corresponds to
513: $\alpha=90^o$. We have also shown the CHOOZ 1 $\sigma$ and 3
514: $\sigma$ bounds as dotted lines.}
515: \end{figure}
516: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
517:
518: Finally, we examine the case of inverted hierarchy where the
519: lightest neutrino mass is $m_3$. It is clear from Eq. (25) that
520: $s_{13}^2=1$ for $m_3=0$. As $m_3$ increases, $s_{13}^2$ decreases
521: and attains its minimum value asymptotically. This feature is
522: apparent from Fig. 4 where $s_{13}$ has been plotted as a function
523: of $m_3$ for inverted hierarchy. For $m_{3}$ very large, we obtain
524: \begin{equation}
525: \frac{\left|s_{12}^{2}-c_{12}^{2}\right|}{\left|s_{12}^{2}-c_{12}^{2}\right|+1}
526: <s_{13}^{2}<\frac{1}{2}.
527: \end{equation}
528: from Eq. (30). The lower and upper bounds on $s_{13}^2$ given
529: above correspond to the asymptotic values of the upper
530: ($\alpha=0^0$) and lower ($\alpha=90^o$) curves in Fig. 4
531: respectively. It is easily seen that the CHOOZ bound is much below
532: the values of $s_{13}^2$ required for vanishing $m_{ee}$ in
533: inverted hierarchy as well as in quasi-degenerate hierarchy with
534: the inverted ordering of neutrino masses. Therefore, neutrino mass
535: matrices with a texture zero at the $ee$ entry cannot yield a mass
536: spectrum with inverted hierarchy and small $\theta_{13}$
537: simultaneously. This happens because the first mass eigenvalue
538: will be smaller than the second and third eigenvalues if the $ee$
539: element of the mass matrix is zero unless a very large 1-3
540: rotation is effected to make it larger than the third mass
541: eigenvalue.
542:
543:
544:
545: In conclusion, the consequences of a vanishing effective Majorana
546: mass have been examined in detail. It has been concluded that the
547: effective Majorana mass can be zero only for normal hierarchy for
548: certain ranges of values of $m_1$ and $\alpha$. The Majorana phase
549: $\beta$ is left unconstrained but it should be one quadrant behind
550: $\alpha$. It is found that effective Majorana mass is not allowed
551: to vanish at 2.3 $\sigma$ C.L. when $m_1=0$ in normal hierarchy.
552: Mass matrices with a texture zero at the $ee$ entry naturally lead
553: to a normal ordered neutrino mass spectrum and small
554: $\theta_{13}$. However, a neutrino mass spectrum with inverted or
555: even quasi-degenerate hierarchies is not allowed by the condition
556: of a vanishing effective Majorana mass in the light of the current
557: neutrino data.
558:
559:
560:
561:
562: \bigskip
563:
564: \textit{\Large{Acknowledgements}}
565:
566: The research work of S. D. is supported by the Board of Research
567: in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), Department of Atomic Energy,
568: Government of India \textit{vide} Grant No. 2004/ 37/ 23/ BRNS/
569: 399. S. K. acknowledges the financial support provided by Council
570: for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of
571: India.
572:
573: \newpage
574:
575: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
576: \bibitem{1} H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, \textit{Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.}
577: \textbf{145}, 219 (2005).
578:
579: \bibitem{2} Manfred Lindner, Alexander Merle and Werner
580: Rodejohann, \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 73}, 053005 (2006).
581:
582: \bibitem{3} Zhi-zhong Xing, \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 68}, 053002
583: (2003).
584:
585: \bibitem{4} Bhag C. Chouhan, Joao Pulido and Marco Picariello,
586: \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 73}, 053003 (2006).
587:
588: \bibitem{5} Sandhya Choubey and Werner Rodejohann, [arXiv:hep-ph/0506102 v2].
589:
590: \bibitem{6} S. K. Kang and C. S. Kim, \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D
591: 63}, 113010 (2001).
592:
593: \bibitem{7} G. C. Branco \textit{ et al}, \textit{Phys. Lett.}
594: \textbf{B 562}, 265 (2003).
595:
596: \bibitem{8} G. L. Fogli \textit{ et al}, [arXiv:hep-ph/0506083 v1].
597:
598: \bibitem{9} H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus \textit{ et al},
599: \textit{Eur. Phys. J. } \textbf{A 12}, 147 (2001).
600:
601: \bibitem{10}C. E. Aalseth \textit{ et al} [IGEX Collab.],
602: \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 65}, 092007 (2002).
603:
604: \bibitem{11}M. Maltony, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tortola and J. W. F.
605: Valle,\textit{ New J. Phys.} \textbf{6}, 122 (2004).
606: \end{thebibliography}
607:
608: \end{document}
609: