1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: \documentstyle[12pt,a41,epsfig,cite,portland,rotating]{article}

5: \newcommand{\COM}{C\!\!\!\!\mbox{\small I}}

6: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}

7: \newcommand{\la}{\leftarrow}

8: \newcommand{\E}{\rm E}

9: \newcommand{\A}{\mbox{\wedge}}

10: \newcommand{\Li}{\mbox{Li}}

11: \newcommand{\SN}{\mbox{S}}

12: \newcommand{\Sf}{\mbox{S}_{1,2}}

13: \newcommand{\M}{\mbox{\rm\bf M}}

14: \newcommand{\N}{\mbox{\rm\bf N}}

15: \newcommand{\Mvec}{\mbox{\rm\bf M}}

16: \newcommand{\Nvec}{\mbox{\rm\bf N}}

17: \newcommand{\tra}{\mbox{Li}_{4}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}

18: \newcommand{\que}{\stackrel{\rm ?}{=}}

19: \newcommand{\Df}{\stackrel{\tiny\rm Def}{=}}

20: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

21: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

22: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

23: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

24: \newcommand{\ab}{\overline{\alpha}_s}

25: \newcommand{\gmat}{\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}}

26: \newcommand{\gap}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

27: \newcommand{\lap}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

28: \newcommand{\fem}{$f_2^{em}$}

29: \newcommand{\lam}{$\Lambda$}

30: \newcommand{\qsq}{$Q^2$}

31: \newcommand{\alsq}{$\alpha_s(Q^2)$}

32: \newcommand{\dals}{$\delta \alpha_s$}

33: \newcommand{\pbinv}{pb^{-1}}

34: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm}{$\, \stackrel{<}{{\scriptstyle

35: \sim}}\, $}}

36: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm}{$\, \stackrel{>}{{\scriptstyle

37: \sim}}\, $}}

38: %\newcommand{\gsim}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

39: %\newcommand{\lsim}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

40: \newcommand{\EM}{{\rm E-}}

41: \newcommand{\dfeq}{\stackrel{\scriptsize =}{\scriptsize df}}

42: \newcommand{\als}{\alpha_s}

43: \newcommand{\aqu}{\langle Q^2 \rangle}

44: \newcommand\pB{[\mbox{pb}]}

45: \newcommand\MSbar{$\overline{\mbox{MS}}$}

46: \newcommand\order{{\cal O}}

47: \newcommand\mat{{\cal M}}

48: \newcommand\ds{\displaystyle}

49: \newcommand\MeV{\,\mbox{MeV}}

50: \newcommand\GeV{\,\mbox{GeV}}

51: \newcommand\TeV{\,\mbox{TeV}}

52: \newcommand\secu{\,\mbox{sec}}

53: \newcommand\kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}

54: \newcommand\MT{Morfin and Tung}

55: \newcommand\CALL{{\cal L}}

56: \newcommand\KG{\kappa_G}

57: \newcommand\KA{\kappa_A}

58: \newcommand\LG{\lambda_G}

59: \newcommand\LA{\lambda_A}

60: \newcommand\PD{\not p}

61: \newcommand\MP{M^2_{\Phi}}

62: %\newcommand\B{\beta}

63: \newcommand\XL{\log \left| \frac{1 + \B}{1 - \B} \right |}

64: \newcommand\SM{\frac{\hat{s}}{M_{\Phi}^2}}

65: \newcommand\SMM{\frac{\hat{s}^2}{M_{\Phi}^4}}

66: \newcommand\SMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^3}{M_{\Phi}^6}}

67: \newcommand\SMMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^4}{M_{\Phi}^8}}

68: \newcommand\BC{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

69: \newcommand\CB{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

70: \newcommand\CBB{\beta^4 \cos^4 \theta}

71: \newcommand\CBBB{\beta^6 \cos^6 \theta}

72: \newcommand\CBBBB{\beta^8 \cos^8 \theta}

73: \newcommand\SH{\hat{s}}

74: \newcommand\uh{\hat{u}}

75: \newcommand\thh{\hat{t}}

76: \newcommand\sh{\hat{s}}

77: \newcommand\ea{\varepsilon_1}

78: \newcommand\eb{\varepsilon_2}

79: \newcommand\Ea{\epsilon_1}

80: \newcommand\Eb{\epsilon_2}

81: \newcommand\ch{{\rm{ch}}}

82: \newcommand\shh{{\rm{sh}}}

83: \newcommand\thhh{{\rm{th}}}

84: \newcommand\st{\sin^2 \theta}

85: \newcommand\BR{\left(1 - \CB \right)}

86: \newcommand\ka{\kappa_1}

87: \newcommand\kb{\kappa_2}

88: \newcommand\kap{\kappa_1'}

89: \newcommand\kbp{\kappa_2'}

90: \newcommand\xx{\tilde{x}}

91: \newcommand\AAA{\alpha_1}

92: \newcommand\AB{\alpha_2}

93: \newcommand\ONE{\mbox{\boldmath $1$}}

94: \newcommand\evec{\mbox{\boldmath $e$}}

95: \newcommand\Lvec{\mbox{\boldmath $L$}}

96: \newcommand\Rvec{\mbox{\boldmath $R$}}

97: \newcommand\Kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $K$}}

98: \newcommand\Pvec{\mbox{\boldmath $P$}}

99: \newcommand\Uvec{\mbox{\boldmath $U$}}

100: \newcommand\Vvec{\mbox{\boldmath $V$}}

101: \newcommand\GAM{\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}}

102: \newcommand\bx{\overline{x}}

103: \newcommand\by{\overline{y}}

104: \newcommand\FFA{\mbox{$\widetilde{F}^a$}}

105: \newcommand{\CLra}{{C_{L,q}^{N(1)}\over C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}}

106: \newcommand{\bCLra}{{\bar C_{L,q}^{N(1)}\over \bar C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}}

107: \newcommand{\CLrb}{{C_{L,q}^{N(2)} \over C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}}

108: \newcommand{\CLrc}{{C_{L,g}^{N(2)} \over C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}}

109: \newcommand{\Gqqa}{\gamma_{qq}^{N(0)}}

110: \newcommand{\Gqga}{\gamma_{qg}^{N(0)}}

111: \newcommand{\Ggqa}{\gamma_{gq}^{N(0)}}

112: \newcommand{\Ggga}{\gamma_{gg}^{N(0)}}

113: \newcommand{\Gqqb}{\gamma_{qq}^{N(1)}}

114: \newcommand{\Gqgb}{\gamma_{qg}^{N(1)}}

115: \newcommand{\Ggqb}{\gamma_{gq}^{N(1)}}

116: \newcommand{\Gggb}{\gamma_{gg}^{N(1)}}

117: \newcommand{\CLqa}{C_{L,q}^{N(1)}}

118: \newcommand{\CLga}{C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}

119: \newcommand{\CLqb}{C_{L,q}^{N(2)}}

120: \newcommand{\CLgb}{C_{L,g}^{N(2)}}

121: \newcommand{\Cq}{C_{2,q}^{N(1)}}

122: \newcommand{\Cg}{C_{2,g}^{N(1)}}

123: \newcommand{\bb}{{\beta_1 \over \beta_0}}

124: \newcommand{\ZqqNT}{Z_{qq}^{(T)N(1)}}

125: \newcommand{\ZqgNT}{Z_{qg}^{(T)N(1)}}

126: \newcommand{\ZgqNT}{Z_{gq}^{(T)N(1)}}

127: \newcommand{\ZggNT}{Z_{gg}^{(T)N(1)}}

128: \newcommand{\ZqqT}{Z_{qq}^{(T)(1)}}

129: \newcommand{\ZqgT}{Z_{qg}^{(T)(1)}}

130: \newcommand{\ZgqT}{Z_{gq}^{(T)(1)}}

131: \newcommand{\ZggT}{Z_{gg}^{(T)(1)}}

132: \newcommand{\dZqqNT}{\Delta Z_{qq}^{(T)N(1)}}

133: \newcommand{\dZqgNT}{\Delta Z_{qg}^{(T)N(1)}}

134: \newcommand{\dZgqNT}{\Delta Z_{gq}^{(T)N(1)}}

135: \newcommand{\dZggNT}{\Delta Z_{gg}^{(T)N(1)}}

136: \newcommand{\dZqqT}{\Delta Z_{qq}^{(T)(1)}}

137: \newcommand{\dZqgT}{\Delta Z_{qg}^{(T)(1)}}

138: \newcommand{\dZgqT}{\Delta Z_{gq}^{(T)(1)}}

139: %\newcommand{\bb}{\beta}

140: \newcommand{\tx}{\textrm}

141: %%

142: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

143: %

144: \newcounter{lin}

145: \newcommand{\lin}{\addtocounter{lin}{1}\thelin}

146: %

147: % graphics path should be adapted

148: \graphicspath{{./},

149: 	      {./figures/}}

150: %

151: 

152: \begin{document}

153: \begin{titlepage}

154: 

155: \begin{flushleft}

156: DESY 05--012 \hfill {\tt hep-ph/0607200} \\

157: SFB-CPP-06/33 \\

158: %\today \\

159: \end{flushleft}

160: 

161: \vspace{3cm}

162: \noindent

163: \begin{center}

164: {\LARGE\bf Non--Singlet QCD Analysis of Deep Inelastic} \\

165: \vspace*{2mm}

166: \noindent

167: {\LARGE \bf World Data at \boldmath $O(\alpha_s^3)$ }

168: \end{center}

169: \begin{center}

170: 

171: \vspace{2.0cm}

172: {\large Johannes Bl\"umlein$^a$, Helmut B\"ottcher$^{a,b}$, and Alberto 

173: Guffanti$^a$\footnote{Present address: School of Physics,

174: University of Edinburgh (SUPA)

175: King's Buildings,

176: Mayfield Road,

177: Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, United Kingdom

178: }}

179: 

180: \vspace{1.5cm}

181: {\it 

182: $^a$Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron, DESY}\\

183: 

184: \vspace{3mm}

185: {\it  Platanenallee 6, D--15738 Zeuthen, Germany}\\

186: 

187: \vspace{5mm}

188: {\it 

189: $^b$Institut f\"ur Physik, Humboldt--Universit\"at, Newtonstra\ss{}e. 15, D--12489 

190: Berlin} \\

191: %%\today

192: \vspace{3cm}

193: \end{center}

194: \begin{abstract}

195: \noindent

196: A non--singlet QCD analysis of the structure function $F_2(x,q^2)$ in LO, NLO, NNLO and 

197: N$^3$LO is performed based on the world data for charged lepton scattering. We 

198: determine the valence quark parton densities and present their parameterization 

199: and that of the correlated errors in a wide range of $x$ and $Q^2$. In the analysis we 

200: determined the QCD--scale $\Lambda_{\rm QCD, N_f = 4}^{\overline{\rm MS}} = 265 \pm 27 

201: \MeV~~{\rm (NLO)},~~226 \pm 25 \MeV ~~{\rm (NNLO)},~~234 \pm 26 \MeV~~{\rm (N^3LO)}$, 

202: with a remainder uncertainty of $\pm 2\MeV$ for the yet unknown 4--loop anomalous dimension,

203: corresponding to $\alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.1148 \pm 0.0019~~{\rm NLO},~~0.1134 {\tiny{\begin{array}{c} 

204: +0.0019 \\ -0.0021 \end{array}}}~~{\rm NNLO},~~0.1141 {\tiny{\begin{array}{c} +0.0020 \\ 

205: -0.0022 \end{array}}}~~{\rm N^3LO}$. A comparison is performed to other determinations

206: of the QCD scale and $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ in deeply inelastic scattering. The higher twist 

207: contributions of $F_2^p(x,Q^2)$ and $F_2^d(x,Q^2)$ are extracted in the large $x$ region,

208: subtracting the twist--2 contributions obtained in the NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO analysis.

209: \end{abstract}

210: 

211: \end{titlepage}

212: 

213: \newpage

214: \sloppy

215: 

216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

217: %	Introduction

218: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

219: \section{Introduction}

220: \label{sec:introduction}

221: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

222: 

223: \vspace{1mm}\noindent

224: Deeply inelastic scattering (DIS) at large 4--momentum transfer $Q^2  = - q^2$ 

225: offers the possibility to probe the partonic sub--structure of the nucleon.

226: The light--cone expansion \cite{LC} allows to describe the forward Compton

227: amplitude in terms of the twist--expansion. For the twist--2 contributions

228: the factorization theorems hold and the calculation of the scaling 

229: violations of the parton distribution functions and structure functions 

230: is possible within the framework of perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics 

231: (QCD). In the present paper we determine the flavor non--singlet parton 

232: distribution functions $xu_v(x,Q^2)$ and $xd_v(x,Q^2)$ using the available 

233: $e(\mu) p$ and  $e(\mu) d$ world data \cite{BCDMS,SLAC,NMC,H1,ZEUS} up to  

234: the next-to-next-to leading (NNLO) and next-to-next-to-next to leading 

235: order level (N$^3$LO). This is possible due to the advent of the 3--loop 

236: non--singlet anomalous dimensions \cite{Moch:2004pa} and 3--loop Wilson 

237: coefficients \cite{Vermaseren:2005qc}\footnote{Moments of the 3--loop 

238: anomalous dimension and Wilson coefficients were calculated in \cite{MOM}.}, 

239: as well as first informations on the 4--loop non--singlet anomalous 

240: dimension, with its second moment \cite{BC}. The QCD analysis of the world 

241: non--singlet data has the advantage to deal with a restricted set of parton 

242: distribution functions, to which the virtual photon couples directly and 

243: which do therefore contribute already at leading order. The analysis is, 

244: furthermore, free of assumptions on the gluon distribution function which 

245: stabilizes the systematics since  a lower number of parameters describing the 

246: parton distributions has to be measured and the analysis is free of the 

247: correlation between the  QCD scale $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ and the gluon density. 

248: Also due to the particular behaviour of the 

249: flavor non--singlet parton densities in the smaller Bjorken--$x$ region 

250: in comparison to the sea--quark and gluon densities a separate non--singlet 

251: analysis is in order to better understand systematics effects present in 

252: combined non--singlet and singlet analyses.

253: 

254: Previous 3--loop QCD analyses were mainly performed as combined singlet 

255: and non--singlet analyses \cite{MRST03,A02}\footnote{A recent update of 

256: the latter analysis has been given in \cite{Alekhin:2006zm} very recently.}, 

257: partly based on preliminary, approximative expression of the 3--loop 

258: splitting functions. 

259: Other analyses were carried out for fixed moments only in the singlet 

260: \cite{SY,KAT} and non-singlet case analyzing neutrino data 

261: \cite{SY}\footnote{For earlier results see \cite{SYS}.}. First 

262: results of our non--singlet analysis were published in \cite{BBG04}. Very 

263: recently a 3--loop non--singlet analysis was also carried out in 

264: Ref.~\cite{Gluck:2006yz}. There are numerous NLO analyses, among them 

265: \cite{BCDMS,H1,ZEUS,CTEQ_P}, which we will use in comparisons below. 

266: Another recent NLO parameterization \cite{Pumplin:2005rh} fixes $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$

267: and presents a series of ten parton distribution sets associated to equidistant

268: values of the strong coupling constant in the range  

269: $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)~\epsilon~[0.110,~0.128]$.

270: 

271: The non-singlet analysis will provide us with the distribution functions

272: $xu_v(x,Q^2)$ and $xd_v(x,Q^2)$ with correlated errors. From these 

273: distributions we may form Mellin--moments which can be compared to 

274: lattice--simulations of these quantities. The lattice calculations have to 

275: be performed at as low as possible pion masses due to a potential 

276: non--linear behaviour on $m_{\pi}$ in the small mass region and  

277: non--perturbative renormalization has to be used. Precision results of these 

278: simulations with $N_f =2$ dynamical quarks are expected soon. The comparison 

279: of the Mellin moments obtained in a 3(4)--loop QCD analysis of the non--singlet 

280: World Data at the one side and lattice simulations on the other side

281: will lead to new important tests of Quantum Chromodynamics.

282: 

283: The paper is organized as follows. In Section~2 we briefly summarize 

284: the basic formalism. The data analysis and calculation of errors is 

285: outlined in Section~3. Different corrections such as the account for 

286: a finite sea quark difference $x (\overline{d} - \overline{u})(x,Q^2)$, 

287: heavy quark contributions, target mass and deuteron wave function corrections 

288: are dealt with in  Section~4. The fit results for the non--singlet parton 

289: distribution functions, their correlated errors and evolution are presented 

290: in Section~5, where also comparisons to other analyses are made. In Section~6 the 

291: results on $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ and $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ in NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO are 

292: given and compared to other NLO and NNLO results. In Section~7 we present

293: our results on the higher twist contributions in the large $x$ region for

294: the structure functions $F_2^p(x,Q^2)$ and $F_2^d(x,Q^2)$ and 

295: Section 8 contains the conclusions.

296: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

297: %	Formalism

298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

299: \section{Basic Formalism}

300: \label{sec:formalism}

301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

302: 

303: \vspace{1mm}\noindent

304: We choose the following parameterization for the valence quark densities

305: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

306: {\small

307: \begin{eqnarray}

308: \label{equ:param}

309: x v_i(x,Q^2) = A_i x^{a_i}(1-x)^{b_i} (1 + \rho_i \sqrt{x} + \gamma_i x)~,

310: \end{eqnarray}

311: }

312: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

313: 

314: \noindent

315: with $v_i = u_v, d_v,~i=u,d$. Three valence--projections are considered.

316: In the region $x \leq 0.3$ for the difference of the proton and deuteron 

317: data we use

318: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

319: \begin{eqnarray}

320: f^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2) = \frac{1}{3}\left[ x(u + \overline{u})(x,Q^2) - 

321: x(d + \overline{d})(x,Q^2)\right]~.

322: \end{eqnarray}

323: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

324: The combinations of parton densities in the valence region $x > 0.3$ for 

325: $F_2^{p,d}(x,Q^2)$ are

326: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

327: \begin{eqnarray}

328: f^v_p(x,Q^2) &=& \frac{5}{18}\left[ x(u - \overline{u})(x,Q^2) + 

329: x(d - \overline{d})(x,Q^2)\right] 

330: + \frac{1}{6}\left[ x(u - \overline{u})(x,Q^2) 

331: - x(d - \overline{d})(x,Q^2)\right]  

332: \nonumber\\ 

333: \\

334: f^v_d(x,Q^2) &=& \frac{5}{18}\left[ x(u - \overline{u})(x,Q^2) + 

335: x(d - \overline{d})(x,Q^2)\right]~. 

336: \end{eqnarray}

337: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

338: The evolution equations are solved in Mellin-$N$ space and the Mellin 

339: transforms of the above distributions are denoted by $f^{\rm NS}(N,Q^2),

340: f^v_{p,d}(N,Q^2)$, respectively. The non--singlet structure functions  

341: are given by

342: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

343: \begin{eqnarray}

344: F_k(N,Q^2) = \left[1 + a_s(Q^2) C_1(N) + a_s^2(Q^2) C_2(N) + 

345: a_s^3(Q^2) C_3(N)\right]

346:              f_k(N,Q^2)

347: \end{eqnarray}

348: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

349: for the three cases above. Here $a_s(Q^2) = \alpha_s(Q^2)/(4\pi)$ denotes

350: the strong coupling constant and $C_i(N)(Q^2)$ are the non--singlet

351: Wilson coefficients in $O(a_s^i)$ \cite{FP,NS2,Vermaseren:2005qc}. 

352: For the representation of the Wilson coefficients we used

353: those given in \cite{vanNeerven:1999ca,Vermaseren:2005qc} which are based 

354: on numerical fits. For the 2--loop Wilson coefficients and 3--loop anomalous 

355: dimensions compact analytic representations are also available, based on the 

356: reduction of the respective harmonic sums to 5 (14) basic functions

357: \cite{BK1, ANCONT, JB1, BM1, BM2}.\footnote{Similar representations were  

358: derived for the 2--loop Wilson coefficients for the unpolarized and 

359: polarized Drell--Yan process and scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs--boson 

360: production at hadron colliders in the heavy mass limit as well as for the

361: hadron fragmentation functions in $e^+e^-$ annihilation \cite{BR1,BR2}.} 

362: 

363: 

364: The solution of the non--singlet evolution equation for the parton 

365: densities to 4--loop order reads

366: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

367: \begin{eqnarray}

368: F_k(N,Q^2) &=& F_k(N,Q_0^2) 

369: \left(\frac{a}{a_0}\right)^{-\hat{P}_0(N)/{\beta_0}}

370: \Biggl\{1 - \frac{1}{\beta_0} (a - a_0) \left[\hat{P}_1^+(N)

371: - \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} \hat{P}_0 \right] \nonumber\\ 

372: & & - \frac{1}{2 \beta_0}\left(a^2 - a_0^2\right) \left[\hat{P}_2^+(N) 

373: - \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} \hat{P}_1^+ + \left( \frac{\beta_1^2}{\beta_0^2}

374: - \frac{\beta_2}{\beta_0} \right) \hat{P}_0(N)   \right]

375: \nonumber\\ & &

376: + \frac{1}{2 \beta_0^2} \left(a - a_0\right)^2 \left(\hat{P}_1^+(N)

377: - \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} \hat{P}_0 \right)^2

378: \nonumber\\ & &

379: %---

380: - \frac{1}{3 \beta_0} \left(a^3 - a_0^3\right)

381: \Biggl[\hat{P}_3^+(N)

382: - \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} \hat{P}_2^+(N)  

383: + \left(\frac{\beta_1^2}{\beta_0^2} - 

384: \frac{\beta_2}{\beta_0}\right) \hat{P}_1^+(N)

385: \nonumber\\ & & 

386: +\left(\frac{\beta_1^3}{\beta_0^3} -2 \frac{\beta_1 \beta_2}{\beta_0^2} + 

387: \frac{\beta_3}{\beta_0} \right) \hat{P}_0(N)  \Biggr] 

388: \nonumber\\ & &

389: +

390: \frac{1}{2 \beta_0^2} \left(a-a_0\right)\left(a_0^2 - a^2\right)

391: \left(\hat{P}_1^+(N)-\frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} \hat{P}_0(N) \right) 

392: \nonumber\\ & & \times

393: \left[\hat{P}_2(N) - \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} \hat{P}_1(N) - 

394: \left(\frac{\beta_1^2}{\beta_0^2} 

395: - \frac{\beta_2}{\beta_0} \right) \hat{P}_0(N) 

396:  \right]

397: \nonumber\\ & &

398: - \frac{1}{6 \beta_0^3} \left(a-a_0\right)^3 

399: \left(\hat{P}_1^+(N)-\frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} \hat{P}_0(N)  

400: \right)^3 \Bigg\}~.

401: \end{eqnarray}

402: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

403: Here, $\hat{P}_k$ denote the Mellin transforms of the $(k+1)$--loop splitting 

404: functions.

405: 

406: The strong coupling constant obeys the evolution equation 

407: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

408: \begin{eqnarray}

409: \label{eqAS}

410: \frac{da_s(Q^2)}{d \ln Q^2} = - \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \beta_k 

411: a_s^{k+2}(Q^2)~.

412: \end{eqnarray}

413: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

414: Eq.~(\ref{eqAS}) is solved in the $\overline{\rm MS}$--scheme applying 

415: the matching of flavor thresholds at $Q^2 = m_c^2$ and $Q^2 = m_b^2$ with

416: $m_c = 1.5 \GeV$ and $m_b = 4.5 \GeV$ as described in \cite{CHET,SB}.

417: The convention for the $\overline{\rm MS}$--scheme introduced in \cite{BAR}

418: is extended in this way. To be capable to compare with other measurements

419: of $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ we adopt this prescription.

420: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

421: \section{Data Analysis and Error Calculation}

422: \label{sec:data}

423: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

424: 

425: \vspace{1mm}

426: \noindent

427: For the non--singlet QCD analysis presented in the present paper  

428: structure function data measured in charged lepton proton and  deuteron 

429: deep inelastic scattering are used. The experiments contributing to

430: the statistics are BCDMS~\cite{BCDMS}, SLAC~\cite{SLAC}, NMC~\cite{NMC}, 

431: H1~\cite{H1}, and ZEUS~\cite{ZEUS}. The BCDMS data were recalculated 

432: replacing $R_{QCD}$ by $R_{1998}$ \cite{R1998}. The SLAC data come from a 

433: re-analysis of the data from the experiments E49, E61, E87, and E89. All 

434: deuteron data were corrected for Fermi motion and off-shell

435: effects~\cite{MT}. We form three data samples~: $F_2^p(x,Q^2)$, 

436: $F_2^d(x,Q^2)$ in the valence quark region $x \geq 0.3$ and $F_2^{NS} = 2

437: (F_2^p - F_2^d)$ in the region $x < 0.3$. In the valence quark region we 

438: approximate the parton distribution functions by pure valence quarks. 

439: Only data with $Q^2 > 4~\GeV^2$ were included in the analysis and a cut in the hadronic mass 

440: of $W^2 > 12.5~\GeV^2$ was applied in order to widely eliminate  higher 

441: twist effects from the data samples. After these cuts we are left with 762 

442: data points, 322 for $F_2^p$, 232 for $F_2^d$, and 208 for $F_2^{NS}$. The 

443: BCDMS data have been used with an additional cut of $y_{\mu} > 0.3$ in 

444: order to exclude a region with significant correlated systematic

445: errors, cf. also~\cite{H1}. In case of $e(\mu)N$ deep inelastic scattering 

446: experiments measuring the 

447: kinematic variables either only form the lepton or the outgoing 

448: jet--kinematics the systematics of the respective measurement becomes 

449: worse at low values of $y$ (lepton measurement) or high values of $y$ (jet 

450: measurement). These effects were studied in Ref.~\cite{JBMK} and give rise

451: to the $y$--cut mentioned for the BCDMS-data.

452: A cut of $Q^2 > 8~{\rm \GeV^2}$ was imposed on the

453: NMC data. These cuts reduce the total number of data points available

454: for the analysis from 762 to 551. 

455: 

456: The data sets used contain both statistical and systematic errors which in 

457: turn, for some data sets, split into uncorrelated and correlated ones. 

458: There are several procedures proposed to treat the experimental errors 

459: and the determination of uncertainties from parton distributions~\cite{dPDF}.  

460: Here we decided to use the simplest procedure by adding the statistical 

461: and systematic errors, uncorrelated and correlated ones, in quadrature 

462: when using the data sets in the fit. However, we allowed for a relative 

463: normalization shift $N_i$ between the different data sets within the normalization 

464: uncertainties $\Delta N_i$ quoted by the experiments or assumed accordingly. These 

465: normalization shifts were fitted once and then kept fixed. The number of 

466: data points, their $x$ and $Q^2$ range, and the normalization shifts 

467: determined are summarized in Table~1. 

468: 

469: The normalization shift for each data set enters as an additional term in 

470: the $\chi^2$--expression which then reads

471: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

472: \begin{equation}

473: \chi^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{n^{exp}} \left [ 

474:          \frac {(N_i - 1)^2}

475:                {(\Delta N_i)^2} + 

476:          \sum_{j=1}^{n^{data}} 

477:          \frac {(N_i F_{2,j}^{data} - F_{2,j}^{theor})^2}

478:                {(N_i\Delta F_{2,j}^{data})^2} 

479:          \right ],

480: \end{equation}

481: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

482: 

483: \noindent

484: where the sums run over all data sets and in each data set over all data 

485: points. The minimization of the $\chi^2$ value above to determine the best 

486: parameterization of the unpolarized parton distributions is done using the 

487: program {\tt MINUIT} \cite{MINUIT}. Only fits giving a positive definite

488: covariance matrix at the end have been accepted in order to be able to 

489: calculate the fully correlated $1\sigma$ error bands.

490: 

491: \vspace{2mm}

492: \noindent

493: The  $1\sigma$ error for the parton density $f_q$ as

494: given by Gaussian error propagation is

495: 

496: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

497: \beq

498: \sigma( f_q(x))^2 =  \sum_{i,j=1}^{n_p} 

499:                 \left( \frac{\partial f_q}{\partial p_i}

500:                 \frac{\partial f_q}{\partial p_j} \right)

501:                 \tx{cov}(p_i,p_j)~, 

502: \eeq

503: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

504: 

505: \noindent

506: where the sum runs over all fitted parameters. The functions $\partial f_q /

507: \partial p_i$ are the derivatives of $f_q$ w.r.t. the fit parameter $p_i$,

508: and $\tx{cov}(p_i,p_j)$ are the elements of the covariance matrix. 

509: The derivatives $\partial f_q / \partial p_i$ can be calculated analytically 

510: at the input scale $Q_0^2$. Their values at $Q^2$ are given by evolution 

511: which in our case is performed in {Mellin--$N$} space. The evolution 

512: formalism in {Mellin--$N$} space is such that the input and the evolution 

513: parts factorize which leads to a straightforward analytic error calculation. The 

514: derivatives evolved in {Mellin--$N$} space are transformed back to 

515: $x$--space and can then be used according to the formula above together 

516: with the elements of a positive definite covariance matrix determined at 

517: the input scale $Q_0^2$ by the QCD fit to the data. 

518: 

519: Let us discuss the derivatives in {Mellin--$N$} space a bit further.

520: The {Mellin--$N$} moment for complex values of $N$ calculated at the

521: input scale $Q_0^2$ for the parton density parameterized as in 

522: Eq.~(\ref{equ:param}) is given by 

523: 

524: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

525: \bea

526: \Mvec[f(x,a,b,\rho,\gamma)](N) & = & A \left[B(a+N+1,b+1) + \rho

527: B(a+N-1/2,b+1) \right. \nonumber \\  

528:                                &   & + \left. \gamma B(a+N,b+1)\right],

529: \eea

530: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

531: 

532: \noindent

533: with the normalization constant

534: 

535: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

536: \beq

537: A = \frac{C}{\left[B(a,b+1) + \rho B(a+1/2,b+1) + \gamma 

538: B(a+1,b+1)\right]}~.

539: \eeq

540: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

541: 

542: \noindent

543: Here $C$ is the respective number of valence quarks, i.e. $C_{u_v} =

544: 2$ and $C_{d_v} = 1$, and $B(a,b) = \Gamma(a)\Gamma(b)/\Gamma(a+b)$

545: denotes the Euler Beta--function for complex arguments.

546: 

547: The general form of the derivative of the Mellin moment

548: $\Mvec$ w.r.t. the parameter $p$ is given by  

549: 

550: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

551: \beq

552: \frac {\partial {\Mvec}[f(x,p)](N)}{\partial p} = A

553: \frac {\partial \overline {\Mvec}} {\partial p} + 

554: \overline {\Mvec} \frac {\partial A}{\partial p},

555: \eeq

556: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

557: 

558: \noindent

559: with $\overline {\Mvec} = {\Mvec} / A$. In the present analysis only

560: the parameters $a$ and $b$ have been fitted for both the $u_v$ and the

561: $d_v$ parton distribution while the other parameters involved are kept

562: fixed after a first minimization since their errors turned out to be rather large 

563: compared to the central values. For the parton densities

564: $u_v(x,Q_0^2)$ and $d_v(x,Q_0^2)$ the derivatives w.r.t. parameter $a$ are: 

565: 

566: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

567: \bea

568: \frac {\partial{\overline{\Mvec}}}{\partial a} & = & \bigl\{ 

569: [\Psi(a-1+N) - \Psi(a+N+b)] + \gamma\frac{a-1+N}{a+N+b} (\Psi(a+N) -

570: \bigr. \nonumber \\ 

571:   & & \Psi(a+N+b+1)) \bigr\} B(a-1+N,b+1) + \rho

572: [\Psi\left(a-\frac{1}{2}+N\right) - \nonumber \\  

573:   & & \Psi\left(a+\frac{1}{2}+N+b\right)] 

574: B\left(a-\frac{1}{2}+N,b+1\right)\;

575: \eea

576: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

577: 

578: \noindent

579: and

580: 

581: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

582: \bea

583: \hspace*{-6.0cm}

584: \frac {\partial A}{\partial a} & = & - A Z_a / X_a = - C Z_a / X_a^2\;,  

585: \eea

586: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

587: 

588: \noindent

589: where

590: 

591: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

592: \bea

593: Z_a  & = & [\Psi(a) - \Psi(a+b+1)] B(a,b+1) + \rho 

594: \left[\Psi\left(a+\frac{1}{2}\right) -

595: \Psi\left(a+\frac{1}{2}+b+1\right)\right] \nonumber \\ 

596: & & B(a+\frac{1}{2},b+1) + \gamma [\Psi(a+1) - \Psi(a+1+b+1)]

597: B(a+1,b+1)\;, 

598: \eea

599: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

600: 

601: \noindent

602: and

603: 

604: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

605: \bea

606: \hspace*{-3.50cm}

607: X_a & = & B(a,b+1) + \rho B\left(a+\frac{1}{2},b+1\right) + \gamma 

608: B(a+1,b+1).

609: \eea

610: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

611: 

612: \noindent

613: For the derivatives of $u_v(x,Q_0^2)$ and $d_v(x,Q_0^2)$ w.r.t. parameter $b$

614: one obtains:   

615: 

616: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

617: \bea

618: \frac {\partial{\overline{\Mvec}}}{\partial b} & = & \bigl\{ 

619: [\Psi(b+1) - \Psi(a+N+b)] + \gamma\frac{a-1+N}{a+N+b} (\Psi(b+1) -

620: \bigr. \nonumber \\ 

621:   & & \Psi(a+N+b+1)) \bigr\} B(a-1+N,b+1) + \rho

622: \left[\Psi(b+1) - \nonumber \right.\\  

623:   & & \left. \Psi\left(a+\frac{1}{2}+N+b\right)\right] 

624: B\left(a-\frac{1}{2}+N,b+1\right)\;

625: \eea

626: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

627: 

628: \noindent

629: and

630: 

631: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

632: \bea

633: \hspace*{-6.0cm}

634: \frac {\partial A}{\partial b} & = & - A Z_b / X_b = - C Z_b / X_b^2\;,  

635: \eea

636: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

637: 

638: \noindent

639: where

640: 

641: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

642: \bea

643: Z_b  & = & [\Psi(b+1) - \Psi(a+b+1)] B(a,b+1) + \rho [\Psi(b+1) -

644: \Psi(a+\frac{1}{2}+b+1)] \nonumber \\ 

645: & & B(a+\frac{1}{2},b+1) + \gamma [\Psi(b+1) - \Psi(a+1+b+1)]

646: B(a+1,b+1)\;, 

647: \eea

648: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

649: 

650: \noindent

651: and

652: 

653: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

654: \bea

655: \hspace*{-3.50cm}

656: X_b & = & B(a,b+1) + \rho B(a+\frac{1}{2},b+1) + \gamma B(a+1,b+1).

657: \eea

658: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

659: 

660: \noindent

661: Here $\Psi(z) = d \ln \Gamma(z)/dz$ is Euler's $\Psi$--function.

662: To obtain the gradients

663: for the error calculation of the structure functions $F_2^p$, $F_2^d$,

664: and $F_2^{\rm NS}$ the relevant gradients of the parton distribution functions 

665: in Mellin space have to be multiplied with the

666: corresponding Wilson coefficients.

667: 

668: This yields the errors as far as the QCD parameter $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ is

669: fixed and regarded uncorrelated. The error calculation for a

670: variable $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ is done numerically due to the non--linear 

671: relation and required iterative treatment in the calculation of

672: $\alpha_s(Q^2,\Lambda_{\rm QCD})$. The respective gradients are given

673: by performing the evolution for $\Lambda \pm \delta$, with $\delta

674: \ll \Lambda$, and calculating

675: 

676: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

677: \beq

678: \frac {\partial f(x,Q^2,\Lambda)}{\partial \Lambda} \simeq 

679:        \frac {f(x,Q^2,\Lambda + \delta)-f(x,Q^2,\Lambda -

680: \delta)}{2\delta}  

681: \eeq

682: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

683: 

684: 

685: \noindent

686: using typical values for $\delta \lsim  10~\MeV$ in the present analysis.

687: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

688: %	Corrections

689: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

690: \section{Corrections}

691: \label{sec:corrections}

692: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

693: 

694: \vspace{1mm}\noindent

695: To have the possibility to include deuteron data into the analysis 

696: deuteron wave function corrections both for Fermi motion and 

697: off-shell effects~\cite{MT} have to be carried out. These corrections 

698: are performed  during the fit.

699: 

700: Since we analyze charged lepton--nucleon scattering the non--singlet 

701: structure functions require the distribution $x(\overline{d} - 

702: \overline{u})(x,Q^2)$ as an input, which cannot easily be extracted in the 

703: DIS analysis, but can be determined from Drell--Yan data \cite{E866}. We

704: refer to a parameterization in \cite{MRST02} at $Q^2 = 1 \GeV^2$ which has 

705: been evolved to $Q_0^2 = 4 \GeV^2$. An illustration is given in Figure~1, 

706: containing also the older parton parameterization \cite{A02} which has 

707: been updated recently \cite{Alekhin:2006zm}. 

708: 

709: Part of the data is situated at low values of $Q^2$ and large values of $x$

710: which have to be corrected for target mass effects, cf. \cite{GP76}. The 

711: respective numerical effects are discussed below, see Figures~5, 6 and 8.

712: 

713: Beginning with $O(\alpha_s^2)$ the non--singlet structure functions 

714: receive heavy flavor contributions due to the Compton--process

715: $\gamma^* + q(\overline{q}) \rightarrow q(\overline{q}) + g^* \rightarrow 

716: Q\overline{Q}$ and 

717: $\gamma^* + g^* \rightarrow Q\overline{Q}$, where the off--shell gluon is 

718: emitted from a light quark or anti--quark line in lowest order, 

719: \cite{HF1}. As the present analysis is carried out in Mellin space one 

720: needs accurate and fast representations for the heavy flavor contributions, which were

721: derived in Ref.~\cite{Alekhin:2003ev} 

722: for all available heavy flavor Wilson coefficients. 

723: We accounted for these contributions in the present analysis.

724: The numerical effects 

725: of these contributions for the case of $c\overline{c}$ production are 

726: shown in Figures~2, 3 and 4 for the proton and 

727: deuteron valence regions $x \geq 0.3$ and for $F_2^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2)$ at 

728: $x \leq 0.3$ for a wide region in $Q^2$. The respective arrows mark the 

729: lowest data point in the analysis. Except of the very high $Q^2$ region, 

730: $Q^2 \simeq 10000 \GeV^2$, where the relative contribution amounts to 

731: $O(0.4\%)$ the typical corrections are (far) below 1 per mille and are 

732: therefore widely negligible. The present analysis would require  

733: the $O(\alpha_s^3)$ heavy flavor corrections for $F_2^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2)$ as well, 

734: which were not yet calculated.\footnote{At $O(\alpha_s^3)$ only the corrections for

735: $F_L(x,Q^2)$ in the region $Q^2 \gg m_Q^2$ are known, 

736: cf. \cite{HF2,HF3}.} From the $O(\alpha_s^2)$ results we do not expect 

737: large additional effects in the non--singlet case, however. The 

738: $b\overline{b}$--contributions are even smaller.

739: 

740: Universal small-$x$ contribution to the evolution kernel for deep--inelastic 

741: scattering were derived in \cite{Kirschner:1983di}

742:  in leading order. Resumming these

743: effects with renormalization group techniques yields contributions on the

744: level of 1--2\% and less depending on the size of the subleading terms

745: \cite{BV}, which are important. Like in the flavor singlet case \cite{BV1} 

746: the sub-, subsub-leading 

747: contributions, etc. turn out to be of quite similar size, however, with alternating sign,

748: as the respective next term. This is easily verified expanding the available fixed oder 

749: results in consecutive powers in Mellin $1/N^k$, cf. also \cite{Moch:2004pa}.

750: Hence, these effects do not affect the present analysis. 

751: 

752: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

753: %	Fit Results

754: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

755: \section{Fit Results}

756: \label{sec:fitres}

757: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

758: 

759: \vspace{1mm}\noindent

760: The flavor non--singlet analysis relies on the three complementary data sets:

761: the structure functions $F_2^{p,d}(x,Q^2)$ in the valence--quark region 

762: $x \geq 0.3$ and the combination of these structure functions

763: $F_2^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2) = 2 [F_2^p(x,Q^2) - F_2^d(x,Q^2)]$~. To isolate the twist--2 

764: contributions to the deep--inelastic structure functions

765: $F_{2}^{p,d}(x,Q^2)$ cut--studies in $Q^2$ and $W^2$ were performed. It turns out, that

766: power corrections are widely absent in the kinematic region

767: $Q^2 \geq 4 \GeV^2, W^2 > 12.5 \GeV^2$~.

768: We therefore choose these cuts for the whole data set to perform a twist--2 non--singlet

769: QCD analysis. 

770: We further unfold the target mass corrections \cite{GP76} for all data.

771: 

772: In Figure~5 the proton data for $F_2(x,Q^2)$ are shown in the valence quark region 

773: $x \geq 0.3$ indicating the above cuts by an arrow. The solid lines correspond to the 

774: NNLO QCD fit and the dashed lines correspond to the NNLO QCD fit adding target mass 

775: corrections. We extrapolate these fits to the region $12.5 \GeV^2 \geq W^2

776: \geq 4 \GeV^2$. There, at higher values of $x$ a clear gap between the data and 

777: the QCD fit is seen. Figure~6 shows the corresponding results for the deuteron data. 

778: In the kinematic region $x \leq 0.3$ the above $W^2$ cut is ineffective. Figure~7 

779: shows the result of the NNLO fit for this region. The effect of target mass corrections 

780: in the latter kinematic domain is shown in Figure~8, which turns out to 

781: be rather small.

782: 

783: In Table~2 we summarize the fit results for the parameters of the parton densities

784: $xu_v(x,Q^2_0)$, $xd_v(x,Q^2_0)$ and $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4}$ in the

785: $\overline{\rm MS}$--scheme in NLO, NNLO, and N$^3$LO. The value of $\chi^2/ndf$ 

786: at the minimum improves from 0.89 at NLO to 0.84 at N$^3$LO. In all the fits 

787: the covariance matrix is positive definite. As an example we show the covariance matrix 

788: of the NNLO fit in Table~3.   

789: 

790: Figure~9 illustrates our fit results for $xu_v(x,Q^2_0)$, $xd_v(x,Q^2_0)$ at

791: $Q_0^2 = 4 \GeV^2$ at NNLO with correlated errors (left figures). 

792: We compare to the results of \cite{MRST04} and a very recent analysis 

793: \cite{Alekhin:2006zm}. While there is very good agreement in the case of $xu_v(x,Q^2_0)$ some differences

794: at the $1\sigma$ level are visible for $xd_v(x,Q^2_0)$.

795: We also compare our results to some NLO analyses \cite{CTEQ_P,H1,GRV98} 

796: (right figures). The spread here turns out to be somewhat larger than in the

797: NNLO case. Note that the analyses we compare to are combined non-singlet/

798: singlet analyses and already different assumptions on the sea quark distributions

799: may cause deviations for the non--singlet distributions in the range of 

800: smaller values of $x$.

801: 

802: In Figure~10 (right figures) we show the convergence of our analysis

803: from LO to N$^3$LO, which demonstrates perturbative stability for the parton distribution 

804: functions.  

805: The lines rise in the large $x$ region and drop slightly for low values of $x$.

806: The shifts from NNLO to N$^3$LO are far within the present error bands.

807: 

808: Another way to compare the NNLO fit results consists in forming moments

809: of the distributions $u_v(x,Q^2), d_v(x,Q^2),$ and $u_v(x,Q^2)- d_v(x,Q^2)$.

810: These moments may be directly compared with the results of lattice simulations

811: at low pion masses using dynamical quarks in the near future.

812: In Table~4 we present the lowest non--trivial moments of these distributions

813: at $Q^2 = Q_0^2$ in N$^3$LO and NNLO and compare to the respective moments

814: obtained for the parameterizations \cite{MRST04,A02,Alekhin:2006zm}. 

815: The recent parameterization \cite{Alekhin:2006zm} comes somewhat closer 

816: to our present parameterization then an earlier one \cite{A02} due to an improvement

817: in the $x(\overline{d}(x,Q^2)-\overline{u}(x,Q^2))$ distribution and taking into account

818: off--shell effects in the target mass corrections \cite{PC}.

819: The errors of

820: the moments for \cite{Alekhin:2006zm} are slightly smaller than those in the

821: present analysis. There are still some  deviations, in particular for $d_v(x,Q^2)$, 

822: but most of the values get very close.  

823: 

824: In Figures~11 and 12 we show the evolution of the valence quark densities

825: $xu_v(x,Q^2)$ and $xd_v(x,Q^2)$ from $Q^2 = 1 \GeV^2$ to $Q^2 = 10^4 \GeV^2$

826: in the region $x~\epsilon~[10^{-3}, 1]$ at NNLO with correlated errors. 

827: To compute the respective error bands error propagation has to be performed

828: through the evolution equations. We also compare to other NNLO analyses 

829: \cite{MRST04, A02}. With rising values of $Q^2$ the distributions flatten 

830: at large values of $x$ and rise at low values. Numerically fast parameterizations 

831: of the distributions  $xu_v(x,Q^2)$ and $xd_v(x,Q^2)$ and their errors in the region

832: $Q^2 = [1,10^6] \GeV^2,~~x~\epsilon~[10^{-9},1]$ are performed and

833: are available from the authors on request.

834: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

835: %	alphas & lambda

836: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

837: \section{\boldmath \bf $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ and $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$}

838: \label{sec:alplam}

839: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

840: 

841: \vspace{1mm}\noindent

842: The QCD analysis is performed in NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO. The QCD scale 

843: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4}$ is determined together with  the 

844: parameters of the parton distributions with correlated errors. As an 

845: example the correlation matrix elements of the NNLO analysis are shown in 

846: Table~3.

847: 

848: In spite of the unknown 4--loop anomalous dimensions one may wonder whether 

849: any statement can be made on the non--singlet parton distributions and 

850: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ at the 4--loop level. The 3--loop Wilson coefficients

851: are known \cite{Vermaseren:2005qc} and the question arises, which effect 

852: has the 4--loop anomalous dimension if compared to the Wilson coefficient. 

853: The gross behaviour of the 4--loop anomalous dimension may be 

854: Pad\'{e}--approximated and we will allow a $\pm$ 100\% error for it in the 

855: analysis. After the present analysis was finished, the 2nd moment of the 

856: 4--loop anomalous dimension was calculated in \cite{BC} 

857: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

858: \begin{eqnarray}

859: \gamma_2 &=& 

860: \gamma_2^{(0)} a_s

861: +\gamma_2^{(1)} a_s^2

862: +\gamma_2^{(2)} a_s^3

863: +\gamma_2^{(3)} a_s^4 \nonumber\\ &=&

864: \frac{32}{9} a_s + \frac{9440}{243} a_s^2 

865: + \left[\frac{3936832}{6561} - \frac{10240}{81} \zeta_3\right] a_s^3 

866: \nonumber\\ & &

867: +\left[\frac{1680283336}{1777147} - \frac{24873952}{6561} \zeta_3

868: + \frac{5120}{3} \zeta_4 - \frac{56969}{243} \zeta_5\right] a_s^4

869: \end{eqnarray}

870: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

871: and can be compared to the Pad\'{e}--approximant

872: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

873: \begin{eqnarray}

874: \gamma_n^{\rm Pade} &=& \frac{{\gamma_n^{(2)}}^2}{\gamma_n^{(1)}}~.

875: \end{eqnarray}

876: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

877: For the second moment we found a deviation of about 20\% only in the 

878: $O(a_s^4)$ term, which is far inside our uncertainty margins in the 

879: non--singlet case. The variation in $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ varying the 4--loop 

880: anomalous dimension between zero and twice the value of the Pad\'{e}--approximant 

881: amounts to $\pm 2 \MeV$. Thus $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ at $O(a_s^4)$ accuracy is 

882: widely determined by the 3--loop Wilson coefficient and the behaviour of $a_s(Q^2)$ 

883: to 4--loop order.

884: 

885: Table~5 summarizes our fit results comparing  $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4}$ 

886: and $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ for  the NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO analysis.

887: The NNLO value of $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4}$ is found to be smaller 

888: than the NLO value, while the N$^3$LO value comes out somewhat higher

889: than the NNLO value at about the same experimental error. The pattern

890: of central values from NLO to N$^3$LO shows the convergence of the 

891: analysis, which is illustrated by the decreasing difference of these values. 

892: This measure of convergence is more significant than 

893: varying the scales of the problem, which is less well defined since the 

894: range of variations is arbitrary.  

895: 

896: We compare the results of the present analysis to results obtained in 

897: the literature at  NLO and NNLO in Table~6. Most of the NLO values for 

898: $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ shown were determined in combined singlet- and 

899: non--singlet analyses, partly including jet--data in $\overline{p} p$ 

900: scattering. Not in all analyses the correlation matrices for the parameters of

901: the fit were presented. The NLO values for $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ are larger than 

902: those at NNLO as several analyses, which performed both fits, show. The 

903: difference of both values, however, is not always the same, most likely 

904: due to the type of analysis being performed (singlet and non-singlet, 

905: non-singlet only, etc.), in which also partly different data sets are analyzed.

906: 

907: As outlined above  we perform kinematic cuts in the present analysis to 

908: eliminate as widely as possible higher twist effects. In this way a

909: significant part of the SLAC data is cut away due to the requirement of a 

910: minimal value $W^2 = 12.5 \GeV^2$. Other analyses, cf. 

911: \cite{A02,Gluck:2006yz}, 

912: fit {\sf phenomenological models} for the higher twist contributions. In a 

913: precision determination of $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ we do not follow this way since a 

914: thorough description of these contributions in terms of the light-cone 

915: expansion, including the description of the 4--, 6-- etc. parton 

916: correlation functions, the corresponding Wilson coefficients and anomalous 

917: dimensions, is not known yet, but would be required. 

918: 

919: A significant part of the data in the non--singlet case is due to the 

920: BCDMS measurements

921: \cite{BCDMS}. These data have repeatedly being criticized to deliver a too 

922: small value for $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$, respectively $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$. Let us 

923: therefore revisit associated analyses. The NLO BCDMS--fit was confirmed

924: in \cite{KRI2} both in the singlet and a separate non--singlet analysis 

925: with practically the same value for 

926: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}}$,

927: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

928: \begin{eqnarray}

929: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}} = 198 \pm 20 \MeV~;~~

930: \alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.1096 \footnotesize{\begin{array}{c} +0.0016 \\ 

931: -0.0018 \end{array}}~.

932: \end{eqnarray}

933: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

934: In a re-analysis of the BCDMS data \cite{KRI3} using somewhat less severe 

935: $y$ cuts than applied in the present paper the corresponding value  

936: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

937: \begin{eqnarray}

938: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}} = 257 \pm 40 \MeV,

939: \end{eqnarray}

940: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

941: was found, which is numerically in accordance with our result. However, in

942: \cite{KRI3} the flavor threshold matching in $\alpha_s(\mu^2)$ was 

943: performed at the rather high scales $4 m_Q^2,~~m_c^2 = 9 \GeV^2, m_b^2 = 

944: 80 \GeV^2$. Usually the convention is to match at $m_c$ and $m_b$. 

945: Therefore, the results of \cite{KRI3} cannot be compared to other 

946: analyses directly. We preformed the NLO analysis with these

947: matching conditions and obtained

948: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

949: \begin{eqnarray}

950: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}} = 254 \pm 26 \MeV;

951: ~~\alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.1127 \footnotesize{\begin{array}{c} +0.0018 \\

952: -0.0019 \end{array}}

953: \end{eqnarray}

954: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

955: and do not confirm the rather high values of $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ reported in 

956: \cite{KRI3}.

957: 

958: Non--singlet QCD analyses were also performed for neutrino data. In 

959: \cite{KAT} the CCFR iron data on $xF_3(x,Q^2)$ \cite{Seligman:1997mc} 

960: were analyzed in NLO and 

961: NNLO using fixed moments. Likewise a NNLO analysis was performed in 

962: \cite{SY}. Iron data suffer form the EMC effect, Fermi motion and other 

963: nuclear effects, as re-scattering,  for which the QCD scaling violations  

964: are not known in detail. In \cite{KAT} rather large values for

965: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}}$ 

966: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

967: \begin{eqnarray}

968: \Lambda_{\rm QCD,NLO}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}} = 371 \pm 72 \MeV\\

969: \Lambda_{\rm QCD,NNLO}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}} = 316 \pm 51 \MeV

970: \end{eqnarray}

971: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

972: are obtained, which are  higher than the values obtained in the 

973: analyses based on $F_2^{p,d}(x,Q^2)$ data, still showing the pattern that

974: the NNLO value is lower than the NLO value.

975: In a quite similar analysis in Ref. \cite{SY} on the other hand, values close 

976: to the results of the present analysis are obtained,

977: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

978: \begin{eqnarray}

979: \Lambda_{\rm QCD,NLO}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}}  &=& 281 \pm 57 \MeV\\

980: \Lambda_{\rm QCD,NNLO}^{\rm N_f =4,\overline{\rm MS}} &=& 255 \pm 55 \MeV~.

981: \end{eqnarray}

982: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

983: 

984: In Figure~13 we compare the results of different NLO and NNLO QCD 

985: unpolarized and polarized DIS analyses for $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ with the 

986: results obtained in the present paper and the world average for

987: $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ 

988: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

989: \begin{eqnarray}

990: \alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.1189 \pm 0.0010~, 

991: \end{eqnarray}

992: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

993: which has been determined in \cite{Bethke:2006ac} recently.

994: In most of the cases the central values lay below the world average.

995: Yet most of the NLO results are 1$\sigma$ compatible with the world 

996: average and an increasing number of NNLO results departs to lower

997: values. In the case of polarized deep inelastic scattering at present

998: only NLO analyses are performed with larger errors than in the 

999: unpolarized case, which is due the current experimental errors of the 

1000: polarization asymmetries.  

1001: 

1002: We finally would like to mention results on 

1003: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =2,\overline{\rm MS}}$ from lattice 

1004: calculations with two dynamical quark flavors 

1005: \cite{DellaMorte:2004bc,Gockeler:2005rv}

1006: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1007: \begin{eqnarray}

1008: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =2,\overline{\rm MS}} &=& 245 \pm 16 {\rm 

1009: (stat.)} \pm 16 {\rm (syst.)} \MeV\\

1010: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f =2,\overline{\rm MS}} &=& 261 \pm 17 {\rm 

1011: (stat.)} \pm 26 {\rm (syst.)} \MeV~.

1012: \end{eqnarray}

1013: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1014: These values are very close to the $N_f = 0$ lattice results with rather small 

1015: errors. It will be interesting to see which values will be obtained for 

1016: four dynamical quark flavors in the future.

1017: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1018: %	higher twist

1019: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1020: \section{Higher Twist}

1021: \label{sec:ht}

1022: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1023: 

1024: \vspace{1mm}\noindent

1025: The cuts applied in $Q^2$ and $W^2$, $Q^2 \geq 4 \GeV^2$ and $W^2 \geq 

1026: 12.5 \GeV^2$ in the standard analysis do widely eliminate higher twist 

1027: effects from the data sample. Still the region for deep--inelastic 

1028: scattering ranges to lower values of $W^2 \geq 4 \GeV^2$ keeping the cut

1029: in $Q^2$. The data in the kinematic region 

1030: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1031: \begin{eqnarray}

1032: \label{eqHT}

1033: Q^2 \geq 4 \GeV^2,~~~~~~4 \leq W^2 \leq 12.5 \GeV^2 

1034: \end{eqnarray}

1035: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1036: may thus be used to yield information on power corrections in 

1037: $F_2^p(x,Q^2)$ and $F_2^d(x,Q^2)$. For this purpose we extrapolate the QCD 

1038: fit results obtained for $W^2 \geq 12.5 \GeV^2$ to the region (\ref{eqHT})

1039: and form the difference between data and theory, applying target mass 

1040: corrections in addition. The empirical higher twist coefficient

1041: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1042: \begin{eqnarray}

1043: \label{eqHTC}

1044: F_2^{\rm exp}(x,Q^2) = O_{\rm TMC}[F_2^{\rm tw2}(x,Q^2)] \cdot

1045: \left( 1 + \frac{C_{\rm HT}(x,Q^2)}{Q^2[\GeV^2]}\right)

1046: \end{eqnarray}

1047: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1048: is extracted. Here the operation $O_{\rm TMC}[...]$ denotes taking the 

1049: target mass corrections of the twist--2 contributions to the 

1050: respective structure function. The coefficients $C_{\rm HT}(x,Q^2)$ are

1051: determined in bins of $x$ and $Q^2$ and are then averaged over $Q^2$. The extracted

1052: distributions for $C_{\rm HT}(x)$ are depicted in Figures~14 and 15

1053: for the non--singlet case considering scattering off the proton and 

1054: the deuteron target, respectively. The coefficient $C_{\rm HT}(x)$ grows 

1055: towards large $x$. We find a similar pattern if compared to the early 

1056: NLO analysis \cite{VM92}. Comparing the extractions for the case of 

1057: calculating $F_2^{\rm tw2}(x,Q^2)$ in NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO a gradual 

1058: reduction of $C_{\rm HT}(x)$ is obtained, i.e. higher twist extractions 

1059: describing the twist--2 contributions by low order in perturbation theory 

1060: only lead to incorrect results. As seen from Figures~14, 15 $C_{\rm HT}(x)$ 

1061: is widely independent of the target comparing the results for deeply 

1062: inelastic scattering off protons and deuterons, after nuclear wave function 

1063: corrections were performed. Beyond $x \simeq 0.9$ the errors for 

1064: $C_{\rm HT}(x)$ become very large.

1065: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1066: %	conclusions

1067: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1068: \section{Conclusions}

1069: \label{sec:concl}

1070: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1071: 

1072: \vspace{1mm}\noindent

1073: We performed a  twist--2 QCD analysis of the non--singlet world data up to

1074: NNLO and N$^3$LO and determined the valence quark densities $xu_v(x,Q^2)$

1075: and $xd_v(x,Q^2)$ with correlated errors in the $\overline{\rm MS}$--scheme

1076: using conservative kinematic cuts for the data.

1077: Parameterizations of these parton distribution functions and their errors 

1078: were derived in a wide range of $x$ and $Q^2$  as fit results at 

1079: LO, NLO, NNLO, and N$^3$LO. In the analysis the QCD scale $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f = 4}$ 

1080: and the strong coupling constant $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$, were determined up

1081: to N$^3$LO. The effect of the 4--loop anomalous dimension, if compared 

1082: to the 3--loop Wilson coefficient and the 4--loop effects in $\alpha_s(\mu^2)$   

1083: turn out to be rather weak. The corresponding estimates, based on a Pad\'{e}-approximation

1084: compare very well with the recently calculated second moment of the 4--loop

1085: anomalous dimension. The assumption of a $\pm 100\%$ error on the Pad\'{e}-approximant

1086: results into a marginal shift of $\pm 2 \MeV$ in $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f = 4}$

1087: only. The convergence of the central values for $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f = 4}$

1088: and $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ from NLO to N$^3$LO shows the stability of the analysis

1089: and provides some measure of remaining higher order effects.

1090: Moments for the valence quark distributions with correlated errors at NNLO

1091: and N$^3$LO were calculated for comparisons with upcoming lattice simulations.

1092: Higher twist effects both in $F_2^p$ and $F_2^d$ are extracted extrapolating

1093: the twist--2 results to the region $W^2 \leq 12.5 \GeV^2$. These contributions

1094: are found to be widely target independent and decrease with rising order

1095: in the coupling constant for the twist--2 contributions.  

1096: 

1097: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1098: % Acknowledgements

1099: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1100: %\newpage

1101: 

1102: \vspace{3mm}\noindent

1103: {\bf Acknowledgment}.~This work was supported in part by DFG

1104: Sonderforschungsbereich Transregio 9, Computergest\"utzte Theoretische Physik. 

1105: We thank J. Stirling for the kind permission to show Figure~1 and for discussions.

1106: We would like to thank E.~Reya and S. Alekhin  for communicating their recent 

1107: results  to us. We would like to thank E.~Christy, R.~Ent, M.~Gl\"uck, 

1108: K.~Jansen, C.~Keppel, M.~Klein, W.~Melnitchouk, S.~Moch, G.~Schierholz, R.~Sommer, 

1109: A.W.~Thomas and U.~Wolff for discussions and DESY for support of this project. 

1110: 

1111: \vspace{2mm}

1112: \noindent

1113: \newpage

1114: 

1115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1116: %	Tables

1117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1118: \section{Tables}

1119: \label{sec:tab}

1120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1121: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1123: %

1124: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

1125: %

1126: \normalsize

1127: \begin{center}

1128: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|r|r|r|r|}

1129: \hline \hline

1130: Experiment  & $x$ & $Q^2,~\GeV^2$ & $F_2^p$ & $F_2^p~cuts$ & $F_2^p~HT$ & Norm  \\

1131: \hline \hline

1132: BCDMS (100)   & 0.35 -- 0.75 &  11.75 --  75.00  &  51 &  21 &  10 &

1133: 1.005 \\  

1134: BCDMS (120)   & 0.35 -- 0.75 &  13.25 --  75.00  &  59 &  32 &   4 &

1135: 0.998 \\

1136: BCDMS (200)   & 0.35 -- 0.75 &  32.50 -- 137.50  &  50 &  28 &   0 &

1137: 0.998 \\

1138: BCDMS (280)   & 0.35 -- 0.75 &  43.00 -- 230.00  &  49 &  26 &   0 &

1139: 0.998 \\

1140: NMC (comb)    & 0.35 -- 0.50 &   7.00 --  65.00  &  15 &  14 &   6 &

1141: 1.000 \\

1142: SLAC (comb)   & 0.30 -- 0.62 &   7.30 --  21.39  &  57 &  57 & 259 &

1143: 1.013 \\

1144: H1 (hQ2)      & 0.40 -- 0.65 &    200 --  30000  &  26 &  26 &   0 &

1145: 1.020 \\

1146: ZEUS (hQ2)    & 0.40 -- 0.65 &    650 --  30000  &  15 &  15 &   0 &

1147: 1.007 \\

1148: \hline

1149: $proton$      &              &                   & 322 & 227 & 279 &  \\

1150: \hline \hline

1151: Experiment  & $x$ & $Q^2, \GeV^2$ & $F_2^d$ & $F_2^d~cuts$ & $F_2^d~~HT$ & Norm  \\

1152: \hline \hline

1153: BCDMS (120)   & 0.35 -- 0.75 & 13.25 --  99.00  &  59 &  32 &   4 & 1.001 \\

1154: BCDMS (200)   & 0.35 -- 0.75 & 32.50 -- 137.50  &  50 &  28 &   0 & 0.998 \\

1155: BCDMS (280)   & 0.35 -- 0.75 & 43.00 -- 230.00  &  49 &  26 &   0 & 1.003 \\

1156: NMC (comb)    & 0.35 -- 0.50 &  7.00 --  65.00  &  15 &  14 &   6 & 1.000 \\

1157: SLAC (comb)   & 0.30 -- 0.62 & 10.00 --  21.40  &  59 &  59 & 268 & 0.990 \\

1158: \hline

1159: $deuteron$    &              &                  & 232 & 159 & 278 & \\

1160: \hline \hline

1161: Experiment  & $x$ & $Q^2, \GeV^2$ & $F_2^{NS}$ & $F_2^{NS}~(cuts)$ & $F_2^{NS}~~HT$

1162: & Norm  \\

1163: \hline \hline

1164: BCDMS (120)  & 0.070 -- 0.275 &  8.75 --  43.00  &  36 &  30 &   0 &  0.983 \\

1165: BCDMS (200)  & 0.070 -- 0.275 & 17.00 --  75.00  &  29 &  28 &   0 &  0.999 \\

1166: BCDMS (280)  & 0.100 -- 0.275 & 32.50 -- 115.50  &  27 &  26 &   0 &  0.997 \\

1167: NMC (comb)   & 0.013 -- 0.275 &  4.50 --  65.00  &  88 &  53 &   0 &  1.000 \\

1168: SLAC (comb)  & 0.153 -- 0.293 &  4.18 --   5.50  &  28 &  28 &   1 &  0.994 \\

1169: \hline

1170: $non-singlet$ &               &                  & 208 & 165 &   1 & \\

1171: \hline \hline

1172: $total$       &               &                  & 762 & 551 & 558 & \\  

1173: \hline \hline

1174: \end{tabular}

1175: \end{center}

1176: \normalsize

1177: %

1178: \vspace{2mm}

1179: \noindent

1180: %\caption{\label{table:data}Number of data points for the non--singlet

1181: %QCD analysis 

1182: {\sf Table~1: Number of data points for the non--singlet QCD analysis

1183: with their $x$ and $Q^2$ ranges. In the first column are given (in

1184: parentheses) the beam momentum in GeV of the the respective data set (number), a flag 

1185: whether the data come from a combined analysis of all beam momenta (comb) 

1186: or whether the data are taken at high momentum transfer (hQ2). The fourth column

1187: ($F_2$) contains the number of data points according to the cuts: $Q^2

1188: > 4~{\GeV^2}$, $W^2 > 12.5~{ \GeV^2}$, $x > 0.3$ for $F_2^p$ and

1189: $F_2^d$ and $x < 0.3$ for $F_2^{NS}$. The reduction of the number of

1190: data points by the additional cuts on the BCDMS data ($y > 0.3$) and

1191: on the NMC data ($Q^2 > 8~{ \GeV^2}$) are given in the 5th column

1192: ($F_2~cuts$). The 6th column ($F_2~HT$) contains the number of data

1193: points in the range $4~{\GeV^2} < W^2 < 12.5~{\GeV^2}$ used to

1194: fit the higher twist coefficients $C_{HT}(x)$ for the proton and

1195: deuteron data. In the last column the normalization shifts (see text)

1196: are listed. 

1197: %

1198: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.0}

1199: %

1200: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1202: %

1203: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

1204: %

1205: \normalsize

1206: \begin{center}

1207: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}

1208: \hline \hline 

1209:            &             & NLO  & NNLO & N$^3$LO \\

1210: \hline

1211: $u_v$      & $a$         &  0.274 $\pm$ 0.027 &  0.291 $\pm$ 0.008 & 

1212:  0.298 $\pm$ 0.008 \\

1213:            & $b$         &  3.909 $\pm$ 0.040 &  4.013 $\pm$ 0.037 & 

1214:  4.032 $\pm$ 0.037 \\

1215:            & $\rho  $    &  6.003             &  6.227             & 

1216:  6.042             \\

1217:            & $\gamma$    & 35.089             & 35.629             & 

1218: 35.492             \\

1219: \hline

1220: $d_v$      & $a$         &  0.461 $\pm$ 0.030 &  0.488 $\pm$ 0.033 & 

1221:  0.500 $\pm$ 0.034 \\

1222:            & $b$         &  5.683 $\pm$ 0.228 &  5.878 $\pm$ 0.239 & 

1223:  5.921 $\pm$ 0.243 \\

1224:            & $\rho  $    & --3.699             & --3.639             & 

1225: --3.618             \\

1226:            & $\gamma$    & 16.491             & 16.445             & 

1227: 16.414             \\

1228: \hline

1229: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f=4}$, MeV} & 265 $\pm$ 27 & 

1230: 226 $\pm$ 25 & 234 $\pm$ 26 \\

1231: \hline \hline

1232: \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\chi^2 / ndf$} & 484/546 = 0.89 & 472/546 = 0.86 & 

1233: 461/546 = 0.84 \\

1234: \hline \hline            

1235: \end{tabular}

1236: \end{center}

1237: \normalsize

1238: %

1239: \vspace{2mm}

1240: \noindent

1241: {\sf Table~2: Parameter values of the NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO non--singlet

1242: QCD fit at $Q_0^2 = 4~\GeV^2$. The values without error have been fixed

1243: after a first minimization since the data do not constrain these

1244: parameters well enough (see text).}   

1245: %

1246: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.0}

1247: 

1248: \vspace{4cm}

1249: %

1250: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1251: %

1252: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}

1253: %

1254: \normalsize

1255: \begin{center}

1256: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|}

1257: \hline \hline

1258:  NNLO & $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f=4}$ & $a_{u_v}$ & $b_{u_v}$ & $a_{d_v}$ & $b_{d_v}$ \\

1259: \hline \hline

1260:  $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ & {\bf 6.45E-4} &  &  &  &  \\

1261: \hline

1262:  $a_{u_v}$        &  9.03E-5 & {\bf 5.75E-5} &  &  &  \\

1263: \hline

1264:  $b_{u_v}$        & -3.37E-4 &  1.55E-4 & {\bf 1.40E-3} &  & \\

1265: \hline

1266:  $a_{d_v}$        &  1.92E-4 & -8.97E-6 & -4.69E-4 & {\bf 1.07E-3} & \\ 

1267: \hline

1268:  $b_{d_v}$        &  9.19E-4 &  5.82E-5 & -3.30E-3 & 7.21E-3 & {\bf 5.72E-2} \\ 

1269: \hline

1270: \hline

1271: \end{tabular} 

1272: \end{center}

1273: \normalsize

1274: %

1275: \vspace{2mm}

1276: \noindent

1277: \begin{center}

1278: {\sf Table~3: The covariance matrix of the NNLO non--singlet QCD fit at

1279: $Q_0^2 = 4~\GeV^2$.}   

1280: \end{center}

1281: %

1282: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.0}

1283: \vspace{5mm}

1284: 

1285: \newpage

1286: %

1287: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1288: %

1289: 

1290: \vspace*{6cm}

1291: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

1292: %

1293: \normalsize

1294: \begin{center}

1295: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

1296: \hline \hline 

1297:  $f$ & $n$ & N$^3$LO & NNLO & MRST04 & A02 & A06 \\

1298: \hline \hline

1299: $u_v$ & 2 & 0.3006 $\pm$ 0.0031 & 0.2986 $\pm$ 0.0029 & 0.285 & 0.304 & 0.2947\\

1300: %------

1301:       & 3 & 0.0877 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 0.0871 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 0.082 & 0.087 & 0.0843 \\ 

1302: %------

1303:       & 4 & 0.0335 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.0333 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.032 & 0.033 & 0.0319 \\

1304: %------

1305: \hline

1306: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1307: $d_v$ & 2 & 0.1252 $\pm$ 0.0027 & 0.1239 $\pm$ 0.0026 & 0.115 & 0.120 & 0.1129\\

1308: %------

1309:       & 3 & 0.0318 $\pm$ 0.0009 & 0.0315 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.028 & 0.028 & 0.0275\\ 

1310: %------

1311:       & 4 & 0.0106 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.0105 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.009 & 0.010 & 0.0092\\

1312: %------

1313: \hline

1314: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1315: $u_v-d_v$ & 2 & 0.1754 $\pm$ 0.0041 & 0.1747 $\pm$ 0.0039 & 0.171 & 0.184 & 0.182\\ 

1316: %------

1317:           & 3 & 0.0559 $\pm$ 0.0015 & 0.0556 $\pm$ 0.0014 & 0.055 & 0.059 & 0.057\\ 

1318: %------

1319:           & 4 & 0.0229 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.0228 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.022 & 0.024 & 0.023\\

1320: %------

1321: \hline \hline

1322: \end{tabular}

1323: \end{center}

1324: \normalsize

1325: %

1326: \vspace{2mm}

1327: \noindent

1328: {\sf Table~4: Comparison of low order moments at $Q_0^2 =

1329: 4~\GeV^2$ from our non--singlet N$^3$LO and NNLO QCD analyses with

1330: the NNLO analyses MRST04~\cite{MRST04}, A02~\cite{A02} and A06~\cite{Alekhin:2006zm}

1331: derived from global analyses, resp. combined singlet/non-singlet fits.}      

1332: %

1333: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}

1334: %

1335: 

1336: \newpage

1337: %

1338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1339: %

1340: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

1341: %

1342: \normalsize

1343: \begin{center}

1344: \begin{tabular}{|c|c||c|}

1345: \hline

1346: \hline 

1347:    & $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f=4}$, MeV & $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ \\

1348: \hline

1349:  NLO  &  265 $\pm$ 27 & 0.1148 $\begin{array}{c} +0.0019 \\ -0.0019

1350: \end{array}$ (expt) \\ 

1351:  NNLO &  226 $\pm$ 25 & 0.1134 $\begin{array}{c} +0.0019 \\ -0.0021

1352: \end{array}$ (expt) \\ 

1353:  N$^3$LO &  234 $\pm$ 26 & 0.1141 $\begin{array}{c} +0.0020 \\ -0.0022

1354: \end{array}$ (expt) \\ 

1355: \hline

1356: \hline

1357: \end{tabular}

1358: \end{center}

1359: \normalsize

1360: %

1361: \vspace{2mm}

1362: \noindent

1363: \begin{center}

1364: {\sf Table~5: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\rm N_f=4}$ and $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ at NLO, NNLO

1365: and N$^3$LO.}   

1366: \end{center}

1367: %

1368: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.00}

1369: %

1370: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1371: %

1372: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.1}

1373: %

1374: \normalsize

1375: \begin{center}

1376: \begin{tabular}{|l|llll|c|}

1377: \hline \hline

1378:                   & $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ & $\quad$expt & $\quad$theory &

1379: $\quad$model & Ref. \\ 

1380: \hline

1381: \hline

1382: {\bf  NLO } & & & & & \\

1383: \hline

1384:  CTEQ6  & 0.1165 & $\pm$0.0065 &             &             & \cite{CTEQ_P} \\

1385:  MRST03 & 0.1165 & $\pm$0.0020 & $\pm$0.0030 &             & \cite{MRST03} 

1386: \\

1387:  A02    & 0.1171 & $\pm$0.0015 & $\pm$0.0033 &             & \cite{A02} \\

1388:  ZEUS   & 0.1166 & $\pm$0.0049 &             & $\pm$0.0018 & \cite{ZEUS_Ch} \\

1389:  H1     & 0.1150 & $\pm$0.0017 & $\pm$0.0050 & \hspace*{-0.50cm}

1390: \footnotesize{$\begin{array}{c} +0.0009 \\ -0.0005 \end{array}$} &

1391: \cite{H1} \\   

1392:  BCDMS  & 0.110  & $\pm$0.006 &             &             & \cite{BCDMS} \\  

1393: GRS  &  0.112  &  &            &             &  \cite{Gluck:2006yz}             

1394: \\

1395: BBG  &  0.1148  & $\pm$ 0.0019 &            &             &              

1396: \\

1397: \hline

1398:  BB (pol)     & 0.113 & $\pm$0.004 & \hspace*{-0.50cm}

1399: \footnotesize{$\begin{array}{c} +0.009 \\ -0.006 \end{array}$} & & \cite{BB02}

1400: \\   

1401: \hline

1402: \hline

1403: {\bf  NNLO} & & & & & \\

1404: \hline

1405:  MRST03       & 0.1153 & $\pm$0.0020 & $\pm$0.0030 & & \cite{MRST03} \\

1406:  A02          & 0.1143 & $\pm$0.0014 & $\pm$0.0009 & & \cite{A02} \\

1407:  SY01(ep)     & 0.1166 & $\pm$0.0013 &             & & \cite{SY} \\

1408:  SY01($\nu$N) & 0.1153 & $\pm$0.0063 &             & & \cite{SY} \\

1409: GRS  & 0.111 &  &            &             &       \cite{Gluck:2006yz}       

1410: \\

1411: A06  &  0.1128 & $\pm$ 0.0015 &            &             & \cite{Alekhin:2006zm}            

1412: \\

1413: BBG  &  0.1134  & 

1414: \footnotesize{$\begin{array}{c} +0.0019 \\ -0.0021 \end{array}$} 

1415: & & &\\

1416: \hline

1417: \hline

1418: {\bf  N$^3$LO} & & & & & \\

1419: \hline

1420: BBG  &  0.1141  & 

1421: \footnotesize{$\begin{array}{c} +0.0020 \\ -0.0022 \end{array}$}  

1422: &            &             &\\              

1423: \hline \hline

1424: \end{tabular}

1425: \end{center}

1426: \normalsize

1427: %

1428: \vspace{2mm}

1429: \noindent

1430: \begin{center}

1431: {\sf Table~6: Comparison of $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ values from NLO, NNLO, and N$^3$LO

1432: QCD analyses.}   

1433: \end{center}

1434: %

1435: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.00}

1436: 

1437: 

1438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1439: %	Figures

1440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1441: \newpage

1442: \section{Figures}

1443: \label{sec:fig}

1444: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1445: 

1446: 

1447: \vspace{2cm}

1448: %Figure~1:~

1449: \begin{figure}[htb]

1450: \begin{center}

1451: %\includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{ubdb_e866bis_MRST.eps} 

1452: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{stirling2.eps} 

1453: \end{center}

1454: \caption{\label{fig:dbmub}

1455: The MRST parameterization of $(\bar{d} - \bar{u})$~\cite{MRST02}

1456: describing the E866 data~\cite{E866}. Here also compared with a

1457: parameterization given in~\cite{A02}.[Courtesy by J. Stirling.]}

1458: \end{figure}

1459: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1460: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1461: \newpage

1462: 

1463: \vspace*{3cm}

1464: %Figure~2:~

1465: \begin{figure}[htb]

1466: \begin{center}

1467: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=16.0cm]{F2_hq_nnlo_F2p.eps} 

1468: \end{center}

1469: \caption{\label{fig:hq1}

1470: Relative size of the NLO contribution due to $c\overline{c}$--production for $m_c = 1.5 \GeV$ for

1471: $F_2^p(x,Q^2)$ in the valence quark region.}

1472: \end{figure}

1473: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1474: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1475: \newpage

1476: 

1477: \vspace*{3cm}

1478: %Figure~3:~

1479: \begin{figure}[htb]

1480: \begin{center}

1481: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=16.0cm]{F2_hq_nnlo_F2d.eps} 

1482: \end{center}

1483: \caption{\label{fig:hq2}

1484: Relative size of the NLO contribution due to $c\overline{c}$--production for $m_c = 1.5 \GeV$ for

1485: $F_2^d(x,Q^2)$ in the valence quark region.}

1486: \end{figure}

1487: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1488: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1489: \newpage

1490: 

1491: \vspace*{2cm}

1492: %Figure~4:~

1493: \vfill

1494: \begin{figure}[htb]

1495: \begin{center}

1496: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=16.0cm]{F2_hq_nnlo_F2ns.eps} 

1497: \end{center}

1498: \caption{\label{fig:hq3}

1499: Relative size of the NLO contribution due to $c\overline{c}$--production for $m_c = 1.5 \GeV$ for

1500: $F_2^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2)= 2 [F_2^p(x,Q^2) - F_2^d(x,Q^2)]$ in the region $0.01 \leq x \leq 0.3$.}

1501: \end{figure}

1502: \vfill

1503: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1504: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1505: \newpage

1506: %Figure~5:~

1507: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=F2pnsQ2_TMC_HT_nnlo.eps,width=15cm}}

1508: %\vspace{2mm}

1509: %\noindent     

1510: %\small   

1511: \begin{figure}

1512: \begin{center}

1513: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{F2pnsQ2_TMC_HT_nnlo.eps} 

1514: \end{center}

1515: {\sf

1516: \caption{\label{fig:f2p_TMC_HT}

1517: The structure function $F_2^p$ as function of $Q^2$ in intervals of

1518: $x$. Shown are the pure QCD fit in NNLO (solid line) and the

1519: contributions from target mass corrections TMC (dashed line) and

1520: higher twist HT (dashed--dotted line). The arrows indicate the

1521: regions with $W^2 > 12.5~{\GeV^2}$. The shaded areas represent the

1522: fully correlated $1\sigma$ statistical error bands.}} 

1523: \end{figure}

1524: %\normalsize

1525: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1526: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1527: \newpage

1528: %Figure~6:~

1529: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=F2dnsQ2_TMC_HT_nnlo.eps,width=15cm}}

1530: %\vspace{2mm}

1531: %\noindent     

1532: %\small   

1533: \begin{figure}

1534: \begin{center}

1535: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{F2dnsQ2_TMC_HT_nnlo.eps} 

1536: \end{center}

1537: {\sf

1538: \caption{\label{fig:f2d_TMC_HT}

1539: The structure function $F_2^d$ as function of $Q^2$ in intervals of

1540: $x$. Shown are the pure QCD fit in NNLO (solid line) and the

1541: contributions from target mass corrections TMC (dashed line) and

1542: higher twist HT (dashed--dotted line). The arrows indicate the

1543: regions with $W^2 > 12.5~{\GeV^2}$. The shaded areas represent the

1544: fully correlated $1\sigma$ statistical error bands.}} 

1545: \end{figure}

1546: %\normalsize

1547: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1548: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1549: \newpage

1550: %Figure~7:~

1551: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=F2nsvsQ2_nnlo.eps,width=15cm}}

1552: %\vspace{2mm}

1553: %\noindent     

1554: %\small   

1555: \begin{figure}

1556: \begin{center}

1557: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{F2nsvsQ2_nnlo.eps} 

1558: \end{center}

1559: {\sf

1560: \caption{\label{fig:f2ns}

1561: The structure function $F_2^{\rm NS}$ as function of $Q^2$ in intervals of

1562: $x$. Shown is the pure QCD fit in NNLO (solid lines) with its fully

1563: correlated $1\sigma$ statistical error band (shaded areas).}}  

1564: \end{figure}

1565: %\normalsize

1566: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1567: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1568: \newpage

1569: %Figure~8:~

1570: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=F2nstmcQ2_nnlo.eps,width=15cm}}

1571: %\vspace{2mm}

1572: %\noindent     

1573: %\small   

1574: %Figure~7:~

1575: \begin{figure}

1576: \begin{center}

1577: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{F2nstmcQ2_nnlo.eps} 

1578: \end{center}

1579: {\sf

1580: \caption{\label{fig:f2ns_TMC}

1581: The structure function $F_2^{\rm NS}$ as function of $Q^2$ in intervals of

1582: $x$ without data points. Shown are the pure QCD fit in NNLO (solid

1583: lines) with its fully correlated $1\sigma$ statistical error band

1584: (shaded areas) and the contribution from target mass corrections TMC

1585: (dashed line).}}  

1586: \end{figure}

1587: \normalsize

1588: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1589: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1590: \newpage

1591: %Figure~9:~

1592: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=pdf_comp_nnlo.eps,width=15cm}}

1593: %\vspace{2mm}

1594: %\noindent     

1595: %\small   

1596: %Figure~2:~

1597: \begin{figure}

1598: \begin{center}

1599: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{pdf_comp_nnlo.eps} 

1600: \end{center}

1601: {\sf

1602: \caption{\label{fig:pdf_comp1}

1603: The parton densities $xu_v$ and $xd_v$ at the input scale $Q_0^2 =

1604: 4.0~{\rm{\GeV^2}}$ (solid line) compared to results obtained from NNLO

1605: analyses by MRST (dashed--dotted line)~\cite{MRST04} and A06

1606: (dashed line)~\cite{Alekhin:2006zm} (left panels) and from NLO analyses by CTEQ6

1607: (dashed--dotted line)~\cite{CTEQ_P}, GRV (dashed line)~\cite{GRV98}

1608: and H1 (long dashed line)~\cite{H1} (right panels). The shaded areas

1609: represent the fully correlated $1\sigma$ statistical error bands.}}

1610: \end{figure}

1611: %\normalsize

1612: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1613: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1614: \newpage

1615: %Figure~10:~

1616: \begin{figure}

1617: \begin{center}

1618: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{pdf_comp_n3lo.eps} 

1619: \end{center}

1620: {\sf

1621: \caption{%\label{fig:pdf_comp2}

1622: Left panels: The parton densities $xu_v$ and $xd_v$ at the input scale

1623: $Q_0^2 = 4.0~\GeV^2$ (solid line) compared to results obtained

1624: from NNLO analyses by MRST (dashed--dotted line)~\cite{MRST04} and

1625: A06 (dashed line)~\cite{Alekhin:2006zm}. The shaded areas represent the fully

1626: correlated $1\sigma$ statistical error bands. 

1627: Right panels: Comparison of the same parton densities at different

1628: orders in QCD as resulting from the present analysis.

1629: }}

1630: \end{figure}

1631: %\normalsize

1632: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1633: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1634: \newpage

1635: %Figure~11:~

1636: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=pdf_evol_nnlo_uv.eps,width=15cm}}

1637: %\vspace{2mm}

1638: %\noindent     

1639: %\small   

1640: %Figure~4:~

1641: \begin{figure}

1642: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{pdf_evol_F2_nnlo_uv.eps} 

1643: \begin{center}

1644: \end{center}

1645: {\sf

1646: \caption{\label{fig:pdf_uv}

1647: The parton density $xu_v$ at NNLO evolved up to $Q^2 = 10,000~{ \GeV^2}$

1648: (solid lines) compared to results obtained by MRST (dashed--dotted

1649: line)~\cite{MRST04} and 

1650: A02 (dashed line)~\cite{A02}. The shaded

1651: areas represent the fully correlated $1\sigma$ statistical error

1652: bands.}}

1653: \end{figure} 

1654: %\normalsize

1655: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1657: \newpage

1658: %Figure~12:~

1659: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=pdf_evol_nnlo_dv.eps,width=15cm}}

1660: %\vspace{2mm}

1661: %\noindent     

1662: %\small   

1663: %Figure~5:~

1664: \begin{figure}

1665: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{pdf_evol_F2_nnlo_dv.eps} 

1666: \begin{center}

1667: \end{center}

1668: {\sf

1669: \caption{\label{fig:pdf_dv}

1670: The parton density $xd_v$ at NNLO evolved up to $Q^2 = 10,000~{\GeV^2}$

1671: (solid lines) compared to results obtained by MRST (dashed--dotted

1672: line)~\cite{MRST04} and A02 (dashed line)~\cite{A02}. The shaded

1673: areas represent the fully correlated $1\sigma$ statistical error

1674: bands.}}

1675: \end{figure} 

1676: %\normalsize

1677: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1678: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1679: \newpage

1680: %Figure~13:~

1681: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=HTCOEF_1_p.eps,width=15cm}}

1682: %\vspace{2mm}

1683: %\noindent     

1684: %\small   

1685: \begin{figure}

1686: \begin{center}

1687: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{alphas.eps} 

1688: \end{center}

1689: {\sf

1690: \caption{\label{fig:alps}

1691: Comparison of different NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO measurements of the strong 

1692: coupling constant $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ in unpolarized and polarized deeply inealstic 

1693: scattering. 

1694: CTEQ6 \cite{CTEQ_P}, MRST03 \cite{MRST03}, A02 \cite{A02},  ZEUS \cite{ZEUS_Ch}, 

1695: H1 \cite{H1}, BCDMS \cite{BCDMS}, BBG: present analysis, 

1696: SY01 \cite{SY}, 

1697: A06 \cite{Alekhin:2006zm},

1698: BB \cite{BB02}, 

1699: SMC \cite{SMC}, ABFR \cite{ABFR}.}}

1700: \end{figure}

1701: \normalsize

1702: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1703: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1704: \newpage

1705: %Figure~14:~

1706: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=HTCOEF_1_p.eps,width=15cm}}

1707: %\vspace{2mm}

1708: %\noindent     

1709: %\small   

1710: \begin{figure}

1711: \begin{center}

1712: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{HTCOEF_1_p.eps} 

1713: \end{center}

1714: {\sf

1715: \caption{\label{fig:HT_p}

1716: The higher twist coefficient $C_{HT}(x)$ for the proton data as

1717: function of $x$ treating the twist--2 contributions in NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO.}}

1718: \end{figure}

1719: \normalsize

1720: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1721: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1722: \newpage

1723: %Figure~15:~

1724: %\mbox{\epsfig{file=HTCOEF_1_d.eps,width=15cm}}

1725: %\vspace{2mm}

1726: %\noindent     

1727: %\small   

1728: \begin{figure}

1729: \begin{center}

1730: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=15.0cm]{HTCOEF_1_d.eps} 

1731: \end{center}

1732: {\sf

1733: \caption{\label{fig:HT_d}

1734: The higher twist coefficient $C_{HT}(x)$ for the deuteron data as

1735: function of $x$ treating the twist--2 contributions in NLO, NNLO and N$^3$LO.}}

1736: \end{figure}

1737: \normalsize

1738: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1739: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1740: %	Bibliography

1741: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1742: \clearpage

1743: \portrait

1744: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1745: %

1746: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1747: %

1748: %[1]

1749: \bibitem{LC}

1750: K.G.~Wilson, Phys. Rev. {\bf 179} (1969) 1699;\\

1751: R.A.~Brandt and G.~Preparata, Fortschr. Phys. {\bf 18} (1970)

1752: 249;\\

1753: W.~Zimmermann, {\sf Lect. on Elementary Particle Physics and

1754: Quantum

1755: Field Theory}, Brandeis Summer Inst., Vol.~1,

1756: (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1970),~p. 395;\\

1757: Y.~Frishman, Ann. Phys. {\bf 66} (1971) 373.

1758: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1759: %

1760: %[2]

1761: \bibitem{BCDMS}

1762: %\cite{Benvenuti:1989fm}

1763: %\bibit{\it et al.}em{Benvenuti:1989fm}

1764: A.C.~Benvenuti {\it et al.} [BCDMS Collaboration],

1765: %``A High Statistics Measurement Of The Deuteron Structure Functions F2 (X,

1766: %Q**2) And R From Deep Inelastic Muon Scattering At High Q**2,''

1767: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 237} (1990) 592;

1768: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B237,592;%%

1769: \\

1770: A.C.~Benvenuti {\it et al.} [BCDMS Collaboration], Phys. Lett. {\bf B223} (1989) 485;

1771: Phys. Lett. {\bf B237} (1990) 592.

1772: \\

1773: %\cite{Benvenuti:1989gs}

1774: %\bibitem{Benvenuti:1989gs}

1775: A.C.~Benvenuti {\it et al.} [BCDMS Collaboration],

1776: %``A Comparison Of The Structure Functions F2 Of The Proton And The Neutron From

1777: %Deep Inelastic Muon Scattering At High Q**2,''

1778: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 237} (1990) 599.

1779: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B237,599;%%

1780: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1781: %

1782: %[3]

1783: \bibitem{SLAC}

1784: %\cite{Whitlow:1991uw}

1785: %%\bibitem{Whitlow:1991uw}

1786: L.~W.~Whitlow, E.~M.~Riordan, S.~Dasu, S.~Rock and A.~Bodek, %

1787: % ``Precise measurements of the proton and deuteron structure functions from a

1788: %global analysis of the SLAC deep inelastic electron scattering

1789: %cross-sections,''

1790: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 282} (1992). %

1791: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B282,475;%%

1792: %---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

1793: %

1794: %[4] 

1795: \bibitem{NMC}

1796: %\cite{Arneodo:1996qe}

1797: %\bibitem{Arneodo:1996qe}

1798: M.~Arneodo {\it et al.}  [New Muon Collaboration],

1799: %``Measurement of the proton and deuteron structure functions, F2(p) and  F2(d),

1800: %and of the ratio sigma(L)/sigma(T),''

1801: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 483} (1997) 3

1802: [arXiv:hep-ph/9610231].

1803: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610231;%%

1804: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1805: %

1806: %[5]

1807: \bibitem{H1}

1808: %\cite{Adloff:2000qk}

1809: %\bibitem{Adloff:2000qk}

1810: C.~Adloff {\it et al.}  [H1 Collaboration],

1811: %``Deep-inelastic inclusive e p scattering at low x and a determination of

1812: %alpha(s),''

1813: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21} (2001) 33

1814: [arXiv:hep-ex/0012053];\\

1815: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0012053;%%

1816: %\cite{Adloff:2003uh}

1817: %\bibitem{Adloff:2003uh}

1818: C.~Adloff {\it et al.}  [H1 Collaboration],

1819: %``Measurement and QCD analysis of neutral and charged current cross  sections

1820: %at HERA,''

1821: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 30} (2003) 1

1822: [arXiv:hep-ex/0304003].

1823: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0304003;%%

1824: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1825: %

1826: %[6]

1827: \bibitem{ZEUS}

1828: %\cite{Breitweg:1998dz}

1829: %\bibitem{Breitweg:1998dz}

1830: J.~Breitweg {\it et al.}  [ZEUS Collaboration],

1831: %``ZEUS results on the measurement and phenomenology of F2 at low x and  low

1832: %Q**2,''

1833: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 7} (1999) 609

1834: [arXiv:hep-ex/9809005];\\

1835: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9809005;%%

1836: %\cite{Chekanov:2001qu}

1837: %\bibitem{Chekanov:2001qu}

1838: S.~Chekanov {\it et al.}  [ZEUS Collaboration],

1839: %``Measurement of the neutral current cross section and F2 structure  function

1840: %for deep inelastic e+ p scattering at HERA,''

1841: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21} (2001) 443

1842: [arXiv:hep-ex/0105090].

1843: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0105090;%%

1844: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1845: %

1846: %[7]

1847: %\cite{Moch:2004pa}

1848: \bibitem{Moch:2004pa}

1849: S.~Moch, J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren and A.~Vogt,

1850: %``The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The non-singlet case,''

1851: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 688} (2004) 101

1852: [arXiv:hep-ph/0403192].

1853: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403192;%%

1854: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1855: %

1856: %[8]

1857: %\cite{Vermaseren:2005qc}

1858: \bibitem{Vermaseren:2005qc}

1859: J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren, A.~Vogt and S.~Moch,

1860: %``The third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon

1861: %exchange,''

1862: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 724} (2005) 3

1863: [arXiv:hep-ph/0504242].

1864: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504242;%%

1865: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1866: %

1867: %[9]

1868: \bibitem{MOM}

1869: %\cite{Larin:1993vu}

1870: %\bibitem{Larin:1993vu}

1871: S.~A.~Larin, T.~van Ritbergen and J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,

1872: %``The Next next-to-leading QCD approximation for nonsinglet moments of deep

1873: %inelastic structure functions,''

1874: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 427} (1994) 41;\\

1875: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B427,41;%%

1876: %\cite{Larin:1996wd}

1877: %\bibitem{Larin:1996wd}

1878: S.~A.~Larin, P.~Nogueira, T.~van Ritbergen and J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,

1879: %``The 3-loop QCD calculation of the moments of deep inelastic  structure

1880: %functions,''

1881: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 492} (1997) 338

1882: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605317];\\

1883: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605317;%%

1884: %\cite{Retey:2000nq}

1885: %\bibitem{Retey:2000nq}

1886: A.~Retey and J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,

1887: %``Some higher moments of deep inelastic structure functions at  next-to-next-to

1888: %leading order of perturbative QCD,''

1889: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 604} (2001) 281

1890: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007294];\\

1891: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007294;%%

1892: %\cite{Blumlein:2004xt}

1893: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2004xt}

1894: J.~Bl\"umlein and J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,

1895: %``The 16th moment of the non-singlet structure functions F2(x,Q**2) and

1896: %F(L)(x,Q**2) to O(alpha(s)**3),''

1897: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 606} (2005) 130

1898: [arXiv:hep-ph/0411111].

1899: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411111;%%

1900: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1901: %

1902: %[10]

1903: \bibitem{BC}

1904: P.A. Baikov and K.G. Chetyrkin, in: Proceeedings of {\sf Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory, 2006},

1905: Eisenach, April, 2006, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B} (Proc. Suppl.) to appear.

1906: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1907: %

1908: %[11]

1909: \bibitem{MRST03}

1910: %\cite{Martin:2003tt}

1911: %\bibitem{Martin:2003tt}

1912: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,

1913: %``MRST partons and uncertainties,''

1914: arXiv:hep-ph/0307262.

1915: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307262;%%

1916: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1917: %

1918: %[12]

1919: %\cite{Alekhin:2002fv}

1920: \bibitem{A02}

1921: %\bibitem{Alekhin:2002fv}

1922: S.~Alekhin,

1923: %``Parton distributions from deep-inelastic scattering data,''

1924: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 014002

1925: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211096].

1926: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211096;%%

1927: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1928: %

1929: %[13]

1930: %\cite{Alekhin:2006zm}

1931: \bibitem{Alekhin:2006zm}

1932: S.~Alekhin, K.~Melnikov and F.~Petriello,

1933: %``Fixed target Drell-Yan data and NNLO QCD fits of parton distribution

1934: %functions,''

1935: arXiv:hep-ph/0606237 and private communication.

1936: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0606237;%%

1937: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1938: %

1939: %[14]

1940: \bibitem{SY}

1941: %\cite{Santiago:2001mh}

1942: %\bibitem{Santiago:2001mh}

1943: J.~Santiago and F.~J.~Yndurain,

1944: %``Improved calculation of F2 in electroproduction and xF3 in neutrino

1945: %scattering to NNLO and determination of alpha(s),''

1946: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 611} (2001) 447

1947: [arXiv:hep-ph/0102247].

1948: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102247;%%

1949: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1950: %

1951: %[15]

1952: \bibitem{KAT}

1953: %\cite{Kataev:2002rj}

1954: %\bibitem{Kataev:2002rj}

1955: A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,

1956: %``N**3LO fits to xF3 data: alpha(s) vs 1/Q**2 contributions,''

1957: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 116} (2003) 105

1958: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211151];\\

1959: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211151;%%

1960: %\newpage

1961: %\cite{Kataev:2001kk}

1962: %\bibitem{Kataev:2001kk}

1963: A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,

1964: %``Fixation of theoretical ambiguities in the improved fits to the xF3  CCFR

1965: %data at the next-to-next-to-leading order and beyond,''

1966: Phys.\ Part.\ Nucl.\  {\bf 34} (2003) 20

1967: [Fiz.\ Elem.\ Chast.\ Atom.\ Yadra {\bf 34} (2003) 43]

1968: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106221].

1969: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106221;%%

1970: %---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

1971: %

1972: %[16]

1973: \bibitem{SYS}

1974: %\cite{Santiago:1999pr}

1975: %\bibitem{Santiago:1999pr}

1976: J.~Santiago and F.~J.~Yndurain,

1977: %``Calculation of electroproduction to NNLO and precision determination of

1978: %alpha(s),''

1979: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 563} (1999) 45

1980: [arXiv:hep-ph/9904344].

1981: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904344;%%

1982: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1983: % 

1984: %[17] 

1985: \bibitem{BBG04}

1986: %\cite{Blumlein:2004ip}

1987: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2004ip}

1988: J.~Bl\"umlein, H.~B\"ottcher and A.~Guffanti,

1989: %``Non-singlet QCD analysis of the structure function F2 in 3-loops,''

1990: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 135} (2004) 152

1991: [arXiv:hep-ph/0407089];

1992: %\cite{Blumlein:2006ws}

1993: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2006ws}

1994: %J.~Blumlein, H.~Bottcher and A.~Guffanti,

1995: %``NNLO analysis of unpolarized DIS structure functions,''

1996: arXiv:hep-ph/0606309.

1997: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0606309;%%

1998: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

1999: %

2000: %[18]

2001: %\cite{Gluck:2006yz}

2002: \bibitem{Gluck:2006yz}

2003: M.~Gl\"uck, E.~Reya and C.~Schuck,

2004: %``Non-singlet QCD analysis of F2(x,Q**2) up to NNLO,''

2005: arXiv:hep-ph/0604116.

2006: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0604116;%%

2007: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2008: %

2009: %[19]

2010: \bibitem{CTEQ_P}

2011: %\cite{Pumplin:2002vw}

2012: %\bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}

2013: J.~Pumplin, D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,

2014: %``New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global  QCD

2015: %analysis,''

2016: JHEP {\bf 0207} (2002) 012

2017: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201195].

2018: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201195;%%

2019: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2020: %

2021: %[20]

2022: %\cite{Pumplin:2005rh}

2023: \bibitem{Pumplin:2005rh}

2024: J.~Pumplin, A.~Belyaev, J.~Huston, D.~Stump and W.~K.~Tung,

2025: %``Parton distributions and the strong coupling: CTEQ6AB PDFs,''

2026: JHEP {\bf 0602} (2006) 032

2027: [arXiv:hep-ph/0512167].

2028: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512167;%%

2029: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2030: %

2031: %[21]

2032: \bibitem{FP}

2033: %\cite{Furmanski:1981cw}

2034: %\bibitem{Furmanski:1981cw}

2035: W.~Furmanski and R.~Petronzio,

2036: %``Lepton - Hadron Processes Beyond Leading Order In Quantum Chromodynamics,''

2037: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 11} (1982) 293.

2038: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C11,293;%%

2039: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2040: %

2041: %[22]

2042: \bibitem{NS2}

2043: %\cite{vanNeerven:1991nn}

2044: %\bibitem{vanNeerven:1991nn}

2045: W.~L.~van Neerven and E.~B.~Zijlstra,

2046: %``Order alpha-s**2 contributions to the deep inelastic Wilson coefficient,''

2047: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 272} (1991) 127;\\

2048: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B272,127;%%

2049: %\cite{Zijlstra:1992qd}

2050: %\bibitem{Zijlstra:1992qd}

2051: E.~B.~Zijlstra and W.~L.~van Neerven,

2052: %``Order alpha-s**2 QCD corrections to the deep inelastic proton structure

2053: %functions F2 and F(L),''

2054: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 383} (1992) 525.

2055: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B383,525;%%

2056: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2057: %

2058: %[23]

2059: %\cite{vanNeerven:1999ca}

2060: \bibitem{vanNeerven:1999ca}

2061: W.~L.~van Neerven and A.~Vogt,

2062: %``NNLO evolution of deep-inelastic structure functions: The non-singlet

2063: %case,''

2064: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 568} (2000) 263

2065: [arXiv:hep-ph/9907472].

2066: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907472;%%

2067: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2068: %

2069: %[24]

2070: \bibitem{BK1}

2071: %\cite{Blumlein:1998if}

2072: %\bibitem{Blumlein:1998if}

2073: J.~Bl\"umlein and S.~Kurth,

2074: %``Harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to two-loop order,''

2075: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 014018

2076: [arXiv:hep-ph/9810241].

2077: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810241;%%

2078: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2079: %

2080: %[25]

2081: \bibitem{ANCONT}

2082: %\cite{Blumlein:2000hw}

2083: %bibitem{Blumlein:2000hw}

2084: J.~Bl\"umlein,

2085: %``Analytic continuation of Mellin transforms up to two-loop order,''

2086: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\  {\bf 133} (2000) 76

2087: [arXiv:hep-ph/0003100].

2088: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003100;%%

2089: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2090: %

2091: %[26]

2092: \bibitem{JB1}

2093: %\cite{Blumlein:2004bb}

2094: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2004bb}

2095: J.~Bl\"umlein,

2096: %``Mathematical structure of anomalous dimensions and QCD Wilson  coefficients

2097: %in higher order,''

2098: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 135} (2004) 225

2099: [arXiv:hep-ph/0407044].

2100: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407044;%%

2101: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2102: %

2103: %[27]

2104: \bibitem{BM1}

2105: J. Bl\"umlein  and S. Moch, to appear.

2106: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2107: %

2108: %[28]

2109: \bibitem{BM2}

2110: %\cite{Blumlein:2005jg}

2111: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2005jg}

2112: J.~Bl\"umlein and S.~O.~Moch,

2113: %``Analytic continuation of the harmonic sums for the 3-loop anomalous

2114: %dimensions,''

2115: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 614} (2005) 53

2116: [arXiv:hep-ph/0503188].

2117: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0503188;%%

2118: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2119: %

2120: %[29]

2121: \bibitem{BR1}

2122: %\cite{Blumlein:2005im}

2123: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2005im}

2124: J.~Bl\"umlein and V.~Ravindran,

2125: %``Mellin moments of the next-to-next-to leading order coefficient  functions

2126: %for the Drell-Yan process and hadronic Higgs-boson  production,''

2127: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 716} (2005) 128

2128: [arXiv:hep-ph/0501178].

2129: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501178;%%

2130: %---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

2131: % 

2132: %[30] 

2133: \bibitem{BR2}

2134: %\cite{Blumlein:2006rr}

2135: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2006rr}

2136: J.~Bl\"umlein and V.~Ravindran,

2137: %``O(alpha(s)**2) timelike Wilson coefficients for parton-fragmentation

2138: %functions in Mellin space,''

2139: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 749} (2006) 1

2140: [arXiv:hep-ph/0604019].

2141: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0604019;%%

2142: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2143: %

2144: %[31]

2145: \bibitem{CHET}

2146: %\cite{Chetyrkin:1997sg}

2147: %\bibitem{Chetyrkin:1997sg}

2148: K.~G.~Chetyrkin, B.~A.~Kniehl and M.~Steinhauser,

2149: %``Strong coupling constant with flavour thresholds at four loops in the  MS-bar

2150: %scheme,''

2151: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 79} (1997) 2184

2152: [arXiv:hep-ph/9706430].

2153: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706430;%%

2154: %---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

2155: % 

2156: [32] 

2157: \bibitem{SB}

2158: %\cite{Bethke:2000ai}

2159: %\bibitem{Bethke:2000ai}

2160: S.~Bethke,

2161: %``Determination of the QCD coupling alpha(s),''

2162: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 26} (2000) R27 [arXiv:hep-ex/0004021].

2163: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0004021;%%

2164: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2165: %

2166: %[33]

2167: \bibitem{BAR}

2168: %\cite{Bardeen:1978yd}

2169: %\bibitem{Bardeen:1978yd}

2170: W.~A.~Bardeen, A.~J.~Buras, D.~W.~Duke and T.~Muta,

2171: %``Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond The Leading Order In Asymptotically Free

2172: %Gauge Theories,''

2173: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 18} (1978) 3998.

2174: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D18,3998;%%

2175: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2176: %

2177: %[34]

2178: \bibitem{R1998}

2179: %\cite{Abe:1998ym}

2180: %\bibitem{Abe:1998ym}

2181: K.~Abe {\it et al.}  [E143 Collaboration],

2182: %``Measurements of R = sigma(L)/sigma(T) for 0.03 < x < 0.1 and fit to  world

2183: %data,''

2184: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 452} (1999) 194

2185: [arXiv:hep-ex/9808028].

2186: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9808028;%%

2187: %---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

2188: % 

2189: %[35] 

2190: \bibitem{MT}

2191: %\cite{Melnitchouk:1995am}

2192: %\bibitem{Melnitchouk:1995am}

2193: W.~Melnitchouk and A.~W.~Thomas,

2194: %``Q**2 dependence of nuclear shadowing,''

2195: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 52} (1995) 3373

2196: [arXiv:hep-ph/9508311].

2197: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9508311;%%

2198: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2199: % 

2200: %[36] 

2201: \bibitem{JBMK}

2202: J. Bl\"umlein and M. Klein, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics 

2203: Research, (NIM), {\bf A329} (1993) 112.

2204: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2205: %

2206: %[37]

2207: \bibitem{dPDF}

2208: C.Pascaud and E.Zomer, preprint LAL-95-05;\\ 

2209: %\cite{Botje:1999dj}

2210: %\bibitem{Botje:1999dj}

2211: M.~Botje,

2212: %``A QCD analysis of HERA and fixed target structure function data,''

2213: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 14} (2000) 285

2214: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912439];

2215: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912439;%%

2216: %\cite{Botje:2001fx}

2217: %\bibitem{Botje:2001fx}

2218: M.~Botje,

2219: %``Error estimates on parton density distributions,''

2220: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 28} (2002) 779

2221: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110123;

2222: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110123;%%

2223: \\

2224: %\cite{Stump:2001gu}

2225: %\bibitem{Stump:2001gu}

2226: D.~Stump {\it et al.},

2227: %``Uncertainties of predictions from parton distribution functions. I:  The

2228: %Lagrange multiplier method,''

2229: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 014012

2230: [arXiv:hep-ph/0101051];

2231: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101051;%%

2232: \\

2233: %\cite{Pumplin:2001ct}

2234: %\bibitem{Pumplin:2001ct}

2235: J.~Pumplin {\it et al.},

2236: %``Uncertainties of predictions from parton distribution functions. II:  The

2237: %Hessian method,''

2238: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 014013

2239: [arXiv:hep-ph/0101032];

2240: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101032;%%

2241: \\

2242: %\cite{Martin:2003sk}

2243: %\bibitem{Martin:2003sk}

2244: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,

2245: %``Uncertainties of predictions from parton distributions. II: Theoretical

2246: %errors,''

2247: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 35} (2004) 325;

2248: [arXiv:hep-ph/0308087].

2249: \\

2250: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308087;%%

2251: %\cite{Martin:2002aw}

2252: %\bibitem{Martin:2002aw}

2253: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,

2254: %``Uncertainties of predictions from parton distributions. I: Experimental

2255: %errors. ((T)),''

2256: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 28} (2003) 455

2257: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211080].

2258: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211080;%%

2259: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2260: %

2261: %[38]

2262: \bibitem{MINUIT}

2263: F.~James, CERN Program Library, Long Writeup D506 (MINUIT).

2264: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2265: %

2266: %[39]

2267: \bibitem{E866}

2268: %\cite{Towell:2001nh}

2269: %\bibitem{Towell:2001nh}

2270: R.~S.~Towell {\it et al.}  [FNAL E866/NuSea Collaboration],

2271: %``Improved measurement of the anti-d/anti-u asymmetry in the nucleon sea,''

2272: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 052002

2273: [arXiv:hep-ex/0103030].

2274: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0103030;%%

2275: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2276: %

2277: %[40]

2278: \bibitem{MRST02}

2279: %\cite{Martin:2001es}

2280: %\bibitem{Martin:2001es}

2281: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,

2282: %``MRST2001: Partons and alpha(s) from precise deep inelastic scattering  and

2283: %Tevatron jet data,''

2284: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23} (2002) 73

2285: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110215].

2286: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2287: %

2288: %[41]

2289: \bibitem{GP76}

2290: %\cite{Georgi:1976ve}

2291: %\bibitem{Georgi:1976ve}

2292: H.~Georgi and H.~D.~Politzer,

2293: %``Freedom At Moderate Energies: Masses In Color Dynamics,''

2294: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 14} (1976) 1829.

2295: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D14,1829;%%

2296: %%---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

2297: %

2298: %[42]

2299: \bibitem{HF1}

2300: E. Laenen, S. Riemersma, J. Smith, and W.L. van Neerven, Nucl. Phys. {\bf

2301: B392} (1993) 162, 229;\\

2302: S. Riemersma, J. Smith, and W.L. van Neerven,

2303: Phys. Lett. {\bf B347} (1995) 143;\\

2304: M. Buza, Y. Matiounine, J. Smith, R.L. Migneron and W.L. van Neerven,

2305: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B472} (1996) 611.

2306: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2307: %

2308: %[43]

2309: %\cite{Alekhin:2003ev}

2310: \bibitem{Alekhin:2003ev}

2311: S.~I.~Alekhin and J.~Bl\"umlein,

2312: %``Mellin representation for the heavy flavor contributions to deep  inelastic

2313: %structure functions,''

2314: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 594} (2004) 299

2315: [arXiv:hep-ph/0404034].

2316: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404034;%%

2317: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2318: %

2319: %[44]

2320: \bibitem{HF2}

2321: J. Bl\"umlein, A. De Freitas, S. Klein, S. Moch and W.L. van Neerven, to appear.

2322: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2323: %

2324: %[45]

2325: \bibitem{HF3}

2326: %\cite{Blumlein:2006kc}

2327: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2006kc}

2328: J.~Blumlein,

2329: %``O(alpha(s)**3) contributions to F(L)(Q anti-Q)(x, Q**2) for large

2330: %virtualities,''

2331: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 157} (2006) 2.

2332: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,157,2;%%

2333: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2334: %

2335: %[45]

2336: %\cite{Kirschner:1983di}

2337: \bibitem{Kirschner:1983di}

2338: R.~Kirschner and L.~N.~Lipatov,

2339: %``Double Logarithmic Asymptotics And Regge Singularities Of Quark Amplitudes

2340: %With Flavor Exchange,''

2341: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 213} (1983) 122.

2342: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B213,122;%%

2343: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2344: %

2345: %[46]

2346: \bibitem{BV}

2347: %\cite{Blumlein:1995jp}

2348: %\bibitem{Blumlein:1995jp}

2349: J.~Bl\"umlein and A.~Vogt,

2350: %``On the Behaviour of Non--Singlet Structure Functions at Small $x$,''

2351: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 370} (1996) 149

2352: [arXiv:hep-ph/9510410];

2353: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9510410;%%

2354: %\cite{Blumlein:1996dd}

2355: %\bibitem{Blumlein:1996dd}

2356: %J.~Blumlein and A.~Vogt,

2357: %``On the Resummation of $\alpha \ln~2 x$ Terms for Non-Singlet Structure

2358: %Functions in QED and QCD,''

2359: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 27} (1996) 1309

2360: [arXiv:hep-ph/9603450].

2361: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9603450;%%

2362: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2363: %

2364: %[47]

2365: \bibitem{BV1}

2366: %\cite{Blumlein:1997em}

2367: %\bibitem{Blumlein:1997em}

2368: J.~Bl\"umlein and A.~Vogt,

2369: %``The evolution of unpolarized singlet structure functions at small x,''

2370: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58} (1998) 014020

2371: [arXiv:hep-ph/9712546];

2372: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712546;%%

2373: \\

2374: %\cite{Blumlein:1996aw}

2375: %\bibitem{Blumlein:1996aw}

2376: J.~Bl\"umlein, S.~Riemersma and A.~Vogt,

2377: %``The evolution of unpolarized and polarized structure functions at  small-x,''

2378: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 51C} (1996) 30

2379: [arXiv:hep-ph/9608470];

2380: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9608470;%%

2381: \\

2382: %\cite{Blumlein:1998pp}

2383: %\bibitem{Blumlein:1998pp}

2384: J.~Bl\"umlein, V.~Ravindran, W.~L.~van Neerven and A.~Vogt,

2385: %``The unpolarized gluon anomalous dimension at small x,''

2386: arXiv:hep-ph/9806368.

2387: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806368;%%

2388: %\cite{Ball:1998be}

2389: %\bibitem{Ball:1998be}

2390: R.~D.~Ball and S.~Forte,

2391: %``Corrections at small x,''

2392: arXiv:hep-ph/9805315;\\

2393: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805315;%%

2394: %\cite{Blumlein:1999ev}

2395: %\bibitem{Blumlein:1999ev}

2396: J.~Bl\"umlein,

2397: %``QCD evolution of structure functions at small x,''

2398: arXiv:hep-ph/9909449.

2399: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9909449;%%

2400: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2401: %

2402: %[48]

2403: \bibitem{MRST04}

2404: %\cite{Martin:2004ir}

2405: %\bibitem{Martin:2004ir}

2406: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,

2407: %``Physical gluons and high-E(T) jets,''

2408: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 604} (2004) 61

2409: [arXiv:hep-ph/0410230].

2410: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410230;%%

2411: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2412: %

2413: %[49]

2414: \bibitem{GRV98}

2415: %\cite{Gluck:1998xa}

2416: %\bibitem{Gluck:1998xa}

2417: M.~Gl\"uck, E.~Reya and A.~Vogt,

2418: %``Dynamical parton distributions revisited,''

2419: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 5} (1998) 461

2420: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806404].

2421: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806404;%%

2422: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2423: % 

2424: %[63] 

2425: \bibitem{PC}

2426: S. Alekhin, private communication.

2427: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2428: %

2429: %[50]

2430: \bibitem{KRI2}

2431: V.G Krivokhizhin et al., Z. Phys. {\bf C48} (1990) 347.

2432: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2433: %

2434: %[51]

2435: \bibitem{KRI3}

2436: V.G Krivokhizhin and A.V. Kotikov, Physics of Atomic Nuclei,

2437: {\bf 11} (2005) 1935.

2438: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2439: %

2440: %[53]

2441: %\cite{Seligman:1997mc}

2442: \bibitem{Seligman:1997mc}

2443: W.~G.~Seligman {\it et al.},

2444: %``Improved determination of alpha(s) from neutrino nucleon scattering,''

2445: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 79} (1997) 1213.

2446: %%CITATION = PRLTA,79,1213;%%

2447: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2448: %

2449: %[54]

2450: %\cite{Bethke:2006ac}

2451: \bibitem{Bethke:2006ac}

2452: S.~Bethke,

2453: %``Experimental tests of asymptotic freedom,''

2454: arXiv:hep-ex/0606035.

2455: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0606035;%%

2456: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2457: %

2458: %[55]

2459: \bibitem{ZEUS_Ch}

2460: %\cite{Chekanov:2002pv}

2461: %\bibitem{Chekanov:2002pv}

2462: S.~Chekanov {\it et al.}  [ZEUS Collaboration],

2463: %``A ZEUS next-to-leading-order QCD analysis of data on deep inelastic

2464: %scattering,''

2465: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003) 012007

2466: [arXiv:hep-ex/0208023].

2467: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0208023;%%

2468: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2469: %

2470: %[56]

2471: \bibitem{Thorne:2006zu}

2472: R.~S.~Thorne, A.~D.~Martin and W.~J.~Stirling,

2473: %``MRST Parton Distributions -- status 2006,''

2474: arXiv:hep-ph/0606244.

2475: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0606244;%%

2476: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2477: %

2478: %[57]

2479: \bibitem{BB02}

2480: %\cite{Blumlein:2002be}

2481: %\bibitem{Blumlein:2002be}

2482: J.~Bl\"umlein and H.~B\"ottcher,

2483: %``QCD analysis of polarized deep inelastic scattering data and parton

2484: %distributions,''

2485: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 636} (2002) 225

2486: [arXiv:hep-ph/0203155].

2487: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203155;%%

2488: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2489: %

2490: %[58]

2491: \bibitem{SMC}

2492: %\cite{Adeva:1998vw}

2493: %\bibitem{Adeva:1998vw}

2494: B.~Adeva {\it et al.}  [Spin Muon Collaboration],

2495: %``A next-to-leading order QCD analysis of the spin structure function g1,''

2496: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58} (1998) 112002.

2497: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D58,112002;%%

2498: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2499: %

2500: %[59]

2501: \bibitem{ABFR}

2502: %\cite{Altarelli:1996nm}

2503: %\bibitem{Altarelli:1996nm}

2504: G.~Altarelli, R.~D.~Ball, S.~Forte and G.~Ridolfi,

2505: %``Determination of the Bjorken sum and strong coupling from polarized

2506: %structure functions,''

2507: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 496} (1997) 337

2508: [arXiv:hep-ph/9701289].

2509: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701289;%%

2510: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2511: %

2512: %[60]

2513: %\cite{DellaMorte:2004bc}

2514: \bibitem{DellaMorte:2004bc}

2515: M.~Della Morte, R.~Frezzotti, J.~Heitger, J.~Rolf, R.~Sommer and U.~Wolff

2516:                   [ALPHA Collaboration],

2517: %``Computation of the strong coupling in QCD with two dynamical 

2518: flavours,''

2519: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 713} (2005) 378

2520: [arXiv:hep-lat/0411025].

2521: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0411025;%%

2522: %\cite{Gockeler:2005rv}

2523: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2524: %

2525: %[61]

2526: \bibitem{Gockeler:2005rv}

2527: M.~G\"ockeler, R.~Horsley, A.~C.~Irving, D.~Pleiter, P.~E.~L.~Rakow, 

2528: G.~Schierholz and H.~Stuben,

2529: %``A determination of the Lambda parameter from full lattice QCD,''

2530: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73} (2006) 014513

2531: [arXiv:hep-ph/0502212].

2532: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502212;%%

2533: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2534: % 

2535: %[62] 

2536: \bibitem{VM92}

2537: %\cite{Virchaux:1991jc}

2538: %\bibitem{Virchaux:1991jc}

2539: M.~Virchaux and A.~Milsztajn,

2540: %``A Measurement of alpha-s and higher twists from a QCD analysis of high

2541: %statistics F-2 data on hydrogen and deuterium targets,''

2542: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 274} (1992) 221.

2543: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B274,221;%%

2544: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2545: \end{thebibliography}

2546: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2547: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2548: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2549: \end{document}

2550: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2551: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2552: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2553: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2554: