1: %====================================================================%
2: % SPROCL.TEX 27-Feb-1995 %
3: % This latex file rewritten from various sources for use in the %
4: % preparation of the standard proceedings Volume, latest version %
5: % by Susan Hezlet with acknowledgments to Lukas Nellen. %
6: % Some changes are due to David Cassel. %
7: %====================================================================%
8:
9: \documentstyle[sprocl,epsfig]{article}
10:
11: %\input{psfig}
12: \bibliographystyle{unsrt} % for BibTeX - sorted numerical labels by order of
13: % first citation.
14:
15: % A useful Journal macro
16: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}
17:
18: % Some useful journal names
19: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}
20: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
21: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}
22: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}
23: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.} B}
24: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}
25: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}
26: \def\EPJ{{\em Eur. Phys. J.} C }
27: % Some other macros used in the sample text
28: \def\st{\scriptstyle}
29: \def\sst{\scriptscriptstyle}
30: \def\mco{\multicolumn}
31: \def\epp{\epsilon^{\prime}}
32: \def\vep{\varepsilon}
33: \def\ra{\rightarrow}
34: \def\ppg{\pi^+\pi^-\gamma}
35: \def\vp{{\bf p}}
36: \def\ko{K^0}
37: \def\kb{\bar{K^0}}
38: \def\al{\alpha}
39: \def\ab{\bar{\alpha}}
40: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
41: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
42: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
43: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
44: \def\CPbar{\hbox{{\rm CP}\hskip-1.80em{/}}}%temp replacement due to no font
45: \newcommand{\alfa}{\mbox{$\alpha$}}
46: \newcommand{\av}[1]{\mbox{$ \langle #1 \rangle $}}
47: \newcommand{\bha}{\mbox{$Bhabha$}}
48: \newcommand{\aabha}{\mbox{\tt SAMBHA}}
49: \newcommand{\BHLUMI}{\mbox{\tt BHLUMI}}
50: \newcommand{\QQ}{\mbox{$q^2$}}
51: \newcommand{\Da}{\mbox{$\Delta\alfa$}}
52: \newcommand{\mzz}{\mbox{$m_Z^2$}}
53: \newcommand{\eein}[1]{\mbox{$\ee \rightarrow #1 $}}
54: %\newcommand{\ee}{$e^+e^-}}
55: \newcommand{\proc}[2]{\mbox{$ #1 \rightarrow #2 $}}
56: \newcommand{\dd}{{\mathrm d}}
57: \newcommand{\vecc}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
58:
59:
60: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
61: % %
62: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
63: % %
64: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
65:
66: \begin{document}
67:
68: \title{MEASURING THE RUNNING OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC COUPLING ALPHA IN SMALL ANGLE BHABHA SCATTERING~\footnote{Work done in collaboration with A.Arbuzov, D.Haidt, C. Matteuzzi and M. Paganoni}}
69:
70: \author{ LUCA TRENTADUE \footnote{On leave of absence from Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\'a di Parma, 43100, Parma, Italy}}
71: \address{Department of Physics, CERN Theory Division, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland\\and\\INFN, Gruppo Collegato di Parma, I-43100 Parma, Italy}
72:
73:
74: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
75: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary %
76: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
77:
78: \maketitle\abstracts{We propose a method to determine the running of $\alpha_{QED}$
79: from the measurement of small-angle Bhabha scattering. The method is suited to high statistics experiments at $e^{+} e^{-}$ colliders, which are equipped with luminometers in the appropriate angular region. We present a new simulation code predicting small-angle Bhabha scattering. A detailed description of this idea can be found in ref.[1]}
80:
81:
82:
83: %***********************************************************************
84: \section{Introduction}
85: %*******************************************************************
86: The electroweak Standard Model $SU(2)\otimes U(1)$ contains Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) as a constitutive
87: part. The running of the electromagnetic
88: coupling \alfa\ is determined by the theory as
89: %
90: \begin{equation}
91: \alfa(\QQ) = \frac{\alfa(0)}{1-\Da(\QQ)}, \label{eq:Da}
92: \end{equation}
93: %
94: where \alfa(0)\,=\,$\alpha_0$ is the Sommerfeld
95: fine structure constant, which has been measured to
96: a precision of 3.7$\times$10$^{-9}$\ \cite{pdg00}; $\Delta\alpha(q^2)$
97: positive arises from loop contributions to
98: the photon propagator. The numerical prediction of electro\-weak observables
99: involves the know\-ledge of \alfa(\QQ), usually for \QQ \,$\neq$\, 0. For
100: instance, the know\-ledge of \alfa(\mzz) is relevant
101: to the evaluation of quantities
102: measured by the LEP experiments. This is achieved by evolving \alfa\ from
103: \QQ\,=\,0\ up to the $Z$-mass scale \QQ\, =\, \mzz.
104: The evolution expressed by the quantity \Da\ receives contributions from
105: leptons, hadrons and the gauge bosons. The hadronic contribution to the
106: vacuum polarization, which
107: cannot be calculated from first principles, is estimated with the help of a
108: dispersion integral and evaluated \cite{fj} by using total cross section
109: measurements of $e^+e^-\rightarrow$ hadrons at low energies. Therefore, any evolved
110: value \alfa(\QQ)\, particularly for $|q^2|>4m_{\pi}^2$,
111: is affected by uncertainties
112: originating from hadronic contributions.
113: The uncertainty on $\alfa(\mzz)^{-1}$ induced by these
114: data is as small as $\pm$0.09 \cite{fj}; nevertheless it turned out
115: \cite{hhm} that this
116: limits the accurate prediction of electroweak quantities within the
117: Standard Model, parti\-cularly for the prediction of the Higgs mass.
118:
119: While waiting for improved measurements from BEPC, VEPP-4M and DAFNE as input
120: to the dispersion integral, intense efforts are
121: made to improve on estimating the hadronic shift $\Da_{had}$,
122: as for instance \cite{fj99}-\cite{pp}, and to find alternative ways of measuring
123: \alfa\ itself. Attempts have been made to measure \alfa(\QQ) directly, using
124: data at various energies, such as measuring the ratio
125: of $e^+e^-\gamma$/$e^+e^-$ \cite{topaz} or more directly the angular
126: distribution of Bhabha scattering \cite{L3}.
127: In this article the running of \alfa\ is studied using small-angle Bhabha
128: scattering. This process provides unique information on the QED coupling
129: constant \alfa\ at low {\it space-like} momentum transfer $t=-|\QQ|$, where
130: %
131: \begin{equation}
132: t = -\frac{1}{2}\ s\ (1-\cos\theta) \label{eq:t}
133: \end{equation}
134: %
135: is related to the total invariant energy $\sqrt{s}$ and to the scattering
136: angle $\theta$ of the final-state electron. The small-angle region
137: has the virtue of giving access to values of \alfa($t$)\ without being affected
138: by weak contributions. The cross section can be theoretically calculated
139: with a precision at the per mille level. It is dominated by the photonic
140: $t$ channel exchange and the non-QED contributions have been
141: computed~\cite{luca} and are of the order of 10$^{-4}$;
142: in particular, contributions from boxes with two weak bosons are
143: safely negligible.
144:
145: In general, the Bhabha cross section is computed from the entire set of
146: gauge-invariant amplitudes in both the $s$ and $t$ channels. Consequently, two invariant
147: scales $s$ and $t$ govern the process. The different amplitudes are functions of both
148: $s$ and $t$ and also the QED coupling $\alpha$ appears as $\alpha(s)$ resp. $\alpha(t)$
149: \cite{brodsky}. However, the restriction of Bhabha scattering to the kinematic regime of
150: small angles results in a considerable simplification, since
151: the $s$ channel then gives only a negligible contribution, as is quantitatively
152: demonstrated~\cite{lavoro}. Thus, the measurement of the angular distribution
153: allows us indeed to verify directly the running of the coupling $\alpha(t)$.
154: For the actual calculations, $\theta\gg m_e/E_{beam}$ and
155: $E_{beam}\gg m_e$ must be satisfied.
156: Obviously, in order to mani\-fest the running, the experimental precision must be ad\-equate.
157: This idea can be realized by high-statistics experiments at $e^+e^-$ colliders
158: equipped with finely segmented luminometers, in particular by
159: the LEP experiments, given their large event samples, by SLC and future Li\-near
160: Colliders. The relevant luminometers
161: cover the $t$-range from a few GeV$^2$ to order 100 GeV$^2$.
162: The analysis
163: follows closely the procedure adopted in the luminosity measurement, which
164: is described in detail~\cite{LEP_report}, and
165: elaborates on the additional aspect related to the measurement of a
166: differential quantity. To this
167: aim the luminosity detector must have a sufficiently large angular acceptance
168: and adequate fine segmentation. The variable $t$ (eq.~\ref{eq:t}) is
169: reconstructed on an event-by-event basis.
170: The cross section for the process $e^+e^- \rightarrow e^+e^-$ can be conveniently decomposed
171: into three factors~:
172: %
173: \begin{equation}
174: \frac{\dd \sigma}{\dd t} = \frac{\dd \sigma^0}{\dd t}
175: \left(\frac{\alpha(t)}{\alpha(0)}\right)^2
176: (1+\Delta r(t)) \label{eq:meth}.
177: \end{equation}
178: %
179: All three factors are predicted to a precision of 0.1\% or better.
180: The first factor on the right-hand side refers to the effective Bhabha Born cross section,
181: including soft and virtual photons~\cite{luca},
182: which is precisely known, and accounts for the strongest dependence on $t$.
183: The vacuum-polarization effect in the leading photon $t$ channel exchange
184: is incorporated in the running of $\alpha$ and gives rise to the squared factor in
185: eq.~\ref{eq:meth}.
186: %The second factor contains the information on the running
187: %of $\alpha$ and this is the quantity to be extracted.
188: The third factor, $\Delta r(t)$,
189: collects all the remaining real (in particular collinear) and virtual radiative effects
190: not incorporated in the running of $\alpha$.
191: The experimental data after correction for detector effects have to be compared
192: with eq.~\ref{eq:meth}. The $t$ dependence is rather steep,
193: thus migration effects may need attention.
194:
195: This goal is achieved by using a newly developed program based on the already existing
196: semianalytical code {\tt NLLBHA} \cite{luca,nllbha}. A complete bibliography of this
197: code called \aabha\ is given in ref.[1].
198: It is convenient to confront the fully corrected measured cross section
199: with the Bhabha cross section, including radiative corrections in the factorized
200: form given by eq.~\ref{eq:meth}.
201: The physical cross section is infrared safe \cite{luca}.
202: This decomposition is neither unique nor dictated by a compelling physical reason;
203: rather it allows the separation of the different sources of $t$ dependence in
204: a transparent way without introducing any additional theoretical uncertainty.
205: The va\-rious factors as well as the relative accuracy of the QED corrections ( see for example refs [15]-[16] )
206: and the MonteCarlo tool to implement them are discussed in ref.[1].
207: \section{Conclusions}
208: A novel approach to access directly and to measure the running of
209: $\alpha$ in the space-like region
210: is proposed. It consists in analy\-sing small-angle Bhabha scattering.
211: Depending on the particular angular detector coverage and on the energy of the
212: beams, it allows a sizeable range of the $t$ variable to be covered.
213: The feasibility of the method has been put in evidence by the use of a new
214: tool, \aabha\ , to calculate the small-angle Bhabha differential cross section with
215: a theoretical accuracy of better than 0.1\%.
216: The information obtained in the $t$ channel can be compared with the existing
217: results of the $s$ channel measurements. This represents a complementary approach,
218: which is direct, transparent and based only on QED interactions and furthermore
219: free of some of the drawbacks inherent in the $s$ channel methods.
220: The method outlined can be readily applied to the experiments at LEP and SLC.
221: It can also be exploited by future $e^+e^-$ colliders as well as by existing lower
222: energy machines. As an example the $q^2$ values $[GeV^2]$
223: as the $E_{Center\; of\; Mass }$ energy varies between 0 and $10^3\;GeV$ within a range of acceptance for the emitted radiation between the angles from 1.8 to 7.2 degrees range between 0 and $4\cdot 10^3 \;GeV^2$.
224:
225: An extremely precise measurement of the loop contributions to the QED running coupling $\Delta\alpha(t)$
226: for small values of $t$ may be envisaged with a dedicated luminometer
227: even at low machine energies.
228:
229: \section*{References}
230: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
231: %\newpage
232: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
233: \bibitem{lavoro}A.~B.~Arbuzov, D.~Haidt, C.~Matteuzzi, M.~Paganoni and L.~Trentadue,
234: %``The running of the electromagnetic coupling alpha in small-angle Bhabha
235: %scattering,''
236: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 34}, 267 (2004)
237: [arXiv:hep-ph/0402211].
238: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402211;%%
239:
240:
241: \bibitem{pdg00}
242: D.E. Groom et al.: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C15} (2000) 1
243:
244: %2
245: \bibitem{fj}
246: S. Eidelman and F. Jegerlehner: Z. Phys. {\bf C67} (1995) 602
247:
248: %3
249: \bibitem{hhm}
250: K. Hagiwara, D. Haidt, S. Matsumoto and C.S. Kim:
251: Z. Phys. {\bf C64} (1994) 559;\\ (ibidem){\bf C68} (1995) 353;\\
252: K. Hagiwara, D. Haidt and S. Matsumoto:
253: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C2} (1998) 95
254: %4
255: \bibitem{fj99}
256: F. Jegerlehner: %DESY 99-07 (January 1999) and hep-ph/9901386
257: % hep-ph/0104304
258: hep-ph/0308117 % update
259: %5
260: \bibitem{dav}
261: M. Davier and A. H\"ocker: Phys. Lett. {\bf B435} (1998) 427;\\
262: M.~Davier, S.~Eidelman, A.~H\"ocker and Z.~Zhang: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C27} (2003) 497
263:
264: %6
265: \bibitem{kb}
266: D. Karlen and H. Burkhardt: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C22} (2001) 39; hep-ex/0105065 (2001)
267:
268: %6bis new
269: \bibitem{pp}
270: A.A.~Pankov and N.~Paver, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C29} (2003) 313
271:
272: %7
273: \bibitem{topaz}
274: TOPAZ Collaboration, I. Levine et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78} (1997) 424
275:
276: %8
277: \bibitem{L3}
278: L3 Collaboration, M. Acciarri et al.: Phys. Lett. {\bf B476} (2000) 48
279:
280: %9
281: \bibitem{luca}
282: A.B. Arbuzov, V.S. Fadin, E.A. Kuraev, L.N. Lipatov, N.P. Merenkov and
283: L. Trentadue, {\it Small-angle electron-positron scattering with
284: a per mille accuracy}, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B485} (1997) 457.
285:
286: \bibitem{brodsky}
287: S.J.~Brodsky, G.P.~Lepage and P.B.Mackenzie: Phys. Rev. {\bf D28} (1983) 228
288:
289: %22
290: \bibitem{LEP_report}
291: LEP Working Group (Convenors S. Jadach and O. Nicrosini): Event Generators \\ for Bhabha scattering, CERN Report 96-01, p. 229
292:
293: %12
294: \bibitem{nllbha}
295: CERN Report 96-01: NLLBHA short write-up
296:
297: %18
298: \bibitem{Kuraev}
299: E.A. Kuraev and V.S. Fadin: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 41} (1985) 466.
300:
301: %19
302: \bibitem{Nicrosini}
303: O. Nicrosini and L. Trentadue: Phys. Lett. {\bf B196} (1987) 551;
304: Z.\ Phys.\ {\bf C39} (1988) 479
305:
306:
307: %11
308: %\bibitem{stic}
309: %DELPHI Collaboration : P. Abreu et al. : Nuclear Instruments and Methods
310: % in Physics Research {\bf A378} (1996) 57
311: %------------
312: %10
313: %\bibitem{fadin}
314: %V. Fadin et al.: Phys. Atom. Nucl. {\bf 56} (1993) 1537
315:
316:
317:
318: \end{thebibliography}
319:
320: \end{document}
321: