1: \documentclass[aps,amsmath,amssymb,twocolumn,showpacs,footinbib]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{amssymb}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6: \title{Meissner screening mass
7: in two-flavor quark matter at nonzero temperature }
8: \author{O. Kiriyama}
9: \email{kiriyama@th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de}
10: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
11: J.W.\ Goethe-Universit\"at, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany}
12:
13: \begin{abstract}
14: We calculate the Meissner screening mass of gluons 4--7 in two-flavor
15: quark matter at nonzero temperature. To this end,
16: we study the effective potential of the 2SC/g2SC phases
17: including a vector condensate $\langle gA_z^6 \rangle$ and
18: calculate the Meissner mass from the potential curvature
19: with respect to $\langle gA_z^6 \rangle$.
20: We find that the Meissner mass becomes real
21: at the critical temperature which is about
22: the half of the chemical potential mismatch.
23: The phase diagram of the neutral two-flavor color superconductor
24: is presented in the plane of temperature and coupling strength.
25: We indicate the unstable region for gluons 4--7 on the phase diagram.
26: \end{abstract}
27: \date{\today}
28: \pacs{12.38.-t, 11.30.Qc, 26.60.+c}
29: \maketitle
30:
31: During the last decade, significant advances have been made
32: in our understandings of color superconductivity.
33: The studies of QCD-motivated effective theories
34: has revealed a rich phase structure of neutral quark matter \cite{CSC}.
35: However, the question which phase is realized in nature
36: is still inconclusive because of a chromomagnetic instability
37: \cite{Huang2004,Casalbuoni2004,Alford2005,Fukushima2005}.
38: (For recent discussions on this issue,
39: see also Refs. \cite{Giannakis2004,Huang2005,Hong2005,Gorbar2005,Gorbar2005b,Iida2006,
40: Fukush2006,GHMS2006,Hashimoto2006,KRS2006,Giannakis2006}.)
41:
42: In the two-flavor case (and at zero temperature),
43: while the 8th gluon has a tachyonic Meissner mass
44: in the region $\Delta/\delta\mu < 1$
45: ($\Delta$ is a diquark gap and $\delta\mu$ denotes the chemical
46: potential mismatch between up and down quarks),
47: the more severe instability related to gluons 4--7 emerges
48: in the region $\Delta/\delta\mu < \sqrt{2}$
49: (i.e. not only in the g2SC phase but also in the 2SC phase) \cite{Huang2004}.
50:
51: At nonzero temperature, the instability is expected
52: to be weakened by thermal effects \cite{Alford2005,Fukushima2005}.
53: In this work, we calculate
54: the Meissner screening mass of gluons 4--7 in two-flavor quark matter
55: at nonzero temperature that has not been addressed so far.
56: The results are useful for the phase diagram of QCD
57: and compact star phenomenology.
58:
59: To study the Meissner screening mass of gluons 4--7,
60: we use a gauged Nambu--Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model
61: with massless up and down quarks:
62: \begin{eqnarray}
63: {\cal L}&=&\bar{\psi}(iD\hspace{-7pt}/+\hat{\mu}\gamma^0)\psi
64: +G_D\left(\bar{\psi}i\gamma_5\varepsilon\epsilon^bC\bar{\psi}^T\right)
65: \left(\psi^TCi\gamma_5\varepsilon\epsilon^b\psi\right)\nonumber\\
66: &&-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{a}F^{a\mu\nu},
67: \end{eqnarray}
68: where the quark field $\psi$ carries flavor ($i,j=1,\ldots N_f$
69: with $N_f=2$) and color ($\alpha,\beta=1,\ldots N_c$ with $N_c=3$)
70: indices, $C$ is the charge conjugation matrix;
71: $(\varepsilon)^{ik}=\varepsilon^{ik}$ and
72: $(\epsilon^b)^{\alpha\beta}=\epsilon^{b\alpha\beta}$
73: are the antisymmetric tensors in flavor and color spaces,
74: respectively. The covariant derivative and the field-strength tensor
75: are defined as
76: \begin{subequations}
77: \begin{eqnarray}
78: D_{\mu} &=& \partial_{\mu}-igA_{\mu}^{a}T^{a},\\
79: F_{\mu\nu}^{a} &=& \partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}^{a}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}^{a}
80: +gf^{abc}A_{\mu}^{b}A_{\nu}^{c}.
81: \end{eqnarray}
82: \end{subequations}
83: In order to evaluate loop diagrams we use a three-momentum cutoff
84: $\Lambda=653.3$ MeV. This specific choice does not affect
85: the qualitative features of the present analysis.
86:
87: In NJL-type models, one has to impose the neutrality conditions
88: by adjusting the values of
89: an electron chemical potential $\mu_e$
90: and a color chemical potential $\mu_8$ \cite{BubSho}.
91: We neglect the color chemical potential $\mu_8$ throughout
92: because it is suppressed in the 2SC/g2SC phases, $\mu_8\ll\Delta$.
93: Then, the elements of the diagonal matrix of
94: quark chemical potentials $\hat{\mu}$
95: in $\beta$-equilibrated neutral quark matter are given by
96: $\mu_{u}=\bar{\mu}-\delta\mu$ and $\mu_{d}=\bar{\mu}+\delta\mu$
97: with $\bar{\mu}=\mu-\delta\mu/3$ and $\delta\mu=\mu_e/2$.
98:
99: In Nambu-Gor'kov space, the inverse full quark propagator
100: $S^{-1}(p)$ is written as
101: \begin{eqnarray}
102: S^{-1}(p)=\left(
103: \begin{array}{cc}
104: (S_0^+)^{-1} & \Phi^- \\
105: \Phi^+ & (S_0^-)^{-1}
106: \end{array}
107: \right),
108: \end{eqnarray}
109: with
110: \begin{subequations}
111: \begin{eqnarray}
112: &&(S_0^+)^{-1}=\gamma^{\mu}p_{\mu}+(\bar{\mu}-\delta\mu\tau^3)\gamma^0
113: +g\gamma^{\mu}A_{\mu}^{a}T^{a},\\
114: &&(S_0^-)^{-1}=\gamma^{\mu}p_{\mu}-(\bar{\mu}-\delta\mu\tau^3)\gamma^0
115: -g\gamma^{\mu}A_{\mu}^{a}T^{aT},
116: \end{eqnarray}
117: \end{subequations}
118: and
119: \begin{eqnarray}
120: \Phi^- = -i\varepsilon\epsilon^b\gamma_5\Delta~,\qquad
121: \Phi^+ = -i\varepsilon\epsilon^b\gamma_5\Delta.
122: \end{eqnarray}
123: Here $\tau^3=\mbox{diag}(1,-1)$ is a matrix in flavor space.
124: We have chosen the diquark condensate to point
125: in the third direction in color space.
126: In this work we are interested
127: in the Meissner screening mass of gluons 4--7,
128: so it is sufficient to study the case of
129: the nonvanishing vector condensate
130: $B\equiv\langle gA_z^6 \rangle \neq 0$ \cite{Gorbar2005}.
131:
132: In the one-loop approximation, the effective potential
133: of two-flavor quark matter with electrons at finite temperature $T$ is given by
134: \begin{eqnarray}
135: V(\Delta,B,\delta\mu,\mu,T)&=&-\frac{1}{12\pi^2}
136: \left(\mu_e^4+2\pi^2T^2\mu_e^2+\frac{7\pi^4}{15}T^4\right)\nonumber\\
137: &&+\frac{\Delta^2}{4G_D}
138: -\frac{T}{2}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}
139: \int^{\Lambda}\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\nonumber\\
140: &&\times\ln\mbox{Det}S^{-1}(i\omega_n,\vec{p}),
141: \label{eqn:omega}
142: \end{eqnarray}
143: where $\omega_n=(2n+1)\pi T$ are
144: the Matsubara frequencies ($n=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,\dots$).
145:
146: Let us look at the Meissner screening mass
147: derived from the effective potential (\ref{eqn:omega}).
148: Although the potential curvature reproduce the correct
149: hard-dense-loop (HDL) result
150: for the Meissner mass squared at zero temperature \cite{Gorbar2005,KRS2006},
151: \begin{eqnarray}
152: &&\frac{\partial^2 V(\Delta,B,\delta\mu,\mu,0)}
153: {\partial B^2}\bigg{|}_{B=0}\nonumber\\
154: &&=\frac{\bar{\mu}^2}{6\pi^2}
155: \Bigg[1-\frac{2\delta\mu^2}{\Delta^2}
156: +2\frac{\delta\mu\sqrt{\delta\mu^2-\Delta^2}}{\Delta^2}
157: \theta(\delta\mu-\Delta)\Bigg],\label{eqn:mm}
158: \end{eqnarray}
159: this is not the case for the Meissner mass squared
160: calculated directly from Eq. (\ref{eqn:omega}).
161: [Note that terms of order ${\cal O}(\bar{\mu}^2/\Lambda^2)$
162: and ${\cal O}(\Delta^2/\bar{\mu}^2)$
163: have been neglected in Eq. (\ref{eqn:mm}).]
164: The potential curvature suffers
165: from ultraviolet divergences $\propto\Lambda^2$
166: and therefore we have to subtract them.
167:
168: At zero temperature the subtraction term is given by
169: \begin{eqnarray}
170: \frac{\partial^2 V(0,B,0,0,0)}
171: {\partial B^2}\bigg{|}_{B=0}=-\frac{\Lambda^2}{3\pi^2}.\label{eqn:cz}
172: \end{eqnarray}
173: At nonzero temperature, since we use a finite cutoff,
174: the subtraction term should depend on temperature. Indeed one finds
175: \begin{eqnarray}
176: &&\frac{\partial^2 V(0,B,\delta\mu,\mu,T)}
177: {\partial B^2}\bigg{|}_{B=0}\nonumber\\
178: &&=\frac{\Lambda^2}{12\pi^2}\sum_{e1,e2,e3=\pm}
179: e_1 N_F(e_1\Lambda+e_2\bar{\mu}+e_3\delta\mu),\label{eqn:ct}
180: \end{eqnarray}
181: where $N_F(x)=1/(e^{x/T}+1)$,
182: otherwise the Meissner mass in the normal phase
183: assumes an unphysical positive value.
184: Note that, in the case of $T \to 0$,
185: Eq. (\ref{eqn:ct}) is in exact agreement with Eq. (\ref{eqn:cz}).
186: It should be also noted that the temperature dependence
187: in Eq. (\ref{eqn:ct}) is made redundant
188: when $\Lambda \gg T$.
189: Thus, the temperature dependence of Eq. (\ref{eqn:ct})
190: is a cutoff artifact indeed.
191: %
192: % Fig. 1
193: %
194: \begin{figure}
195: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{figure1}
196: \caption{The Meissner mass squared
197: [divided by $\bar{\mu}^2/(6\pi^2)$]
198: as a function of $\Delta/\delta\mu$ for
199: $T=0$ MeV (solid), $T=10$ MeV (dotted) $T=20$ MeV (dashed),
200: $T=30$ MeV (dot-dashed) $T=40$ MeV (short-dashed).
201: We used $\bar{\mu}=500~{\rm MeV}$ and $\delta\mu=80~{\rm MeV}$.}
202: \label{Figure1}
203: \end{figure}
204:
205: Figure \ref{Figure1} shows the Meissner mass squared,
206: \begin{eqnarray}
207: m_M^2 &=& \frac{\partial^2}{\partial B^2}
208: \big[V(\Delta,B,\delta\mu,\mu,T)\nonumber\\
209: &&\qquad-V(0,B,\delta\mu,\mu,T)\big]\bigg{|}_{B=0},\label{eqn:MM6}
210: \end{eqnarray}
211: as a function of $\Delta/\delta\mu$ for several temperatures.
212: The results are plotted for $\bar{\mu}=500$ MeV and
213: $\delta\mu=80$ MeV. Note that we have solved neither the gap equation
214: nor the neutrality condition, thus $\Delta/\delta\mu$
215: in Fig. \ref{Figure1} are temperature independent parameters.
216:
217: At $T=0$, we see the manifestation
218: of the chromomagnetic instability at all values below
219: $\Delta/\delta\mu=\sqrt{2}$.
220: (Since our model parameters do not correspond to the HDL limit,
221: strictly speaking, the actual critical value of $\Delta/\delta\mu$
222: is somewhat smaller than $\sqrt{2}$.)
223: As $T$ is increased, due to thermal smoothing effects,
224: the Meissner mass squared tends to approach its value in the normal phase.
225: However, its temperature dependence
226: at fixed $\Delta/\delta\mu$ shows a non-monotonic behavior.
227: This is analogous to the result for a charged condensate
228: reported in Ref. \cite{Alford2005}.
229:
230: The Meissner mass squared at small
231: but nonzero values of $\Delta/\delta\mu$ remains
232: negative at higher temperatures.
233: At $T^{\star} \simeq \delta\mu/2 \simeq 40$ MeV,
234: the imaginary Meissner mass
235: completely disappears for all values of $\Delta/\delta\mu$
236: \footnote{We have examined the robustness
237: of the relation $T^{\star} \simeq \delta\mu/2$
238: varying our model parameters and confirmed that it works well
239: as far as $\bar{\mu}$ is not too small.}.
240: As $T$ is further increased,
241: the Meissner mass squared at nonzero values of $\Delta/\delta\mu$
242: begins to become small and approaches zero.
243: (Note that, due to the normalization (\ref{eqn:MM6}),
244: $m_M^2$ in the normal phase, $\Delta/\delta\mu=0$, is always zero.)
245:
246: %
247: % Fig. 2
248: %
249: \begin{figure*}
250: \includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{figure2}
251: \caption{Left: The phase diagram of neutral two-flavor color superconductor
252: as a function of $T$ and $\Delta_0$.
253: The solid (dashed) line denotes the critical line of
254: the phase transition between the normal quark phase and the g2SC phase
255: (the g2SC phase and the 2SC phase). The results are plotted for $\mu=400$ MeV.
256: Right: The same as the left panel, but the unstable region for
257: gluons 4--7 is enclosed by the thick solid line.}
258: \label{Figure2}
259: \end{figure*}
260: %
261: % Fig. 3
262: %
263: \begin{figure}
264: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{figure3}
265: \caption{The Meissner mass squared [divided by $\bar{\mu}^2/(6\pi^2)$]
266: as a function of $\Delta_0$ for
267: $T=0$ MeV (solid) and $T=10$ MeV (dotted).
268: The results are plotted for $\mu=400$ MeV. At $T=0$ MeV, the curve
269: has a kink at the onset of the g2SC phase.}
270: \label{Figure3}
271: \end{figure}
272: In order to investigate the implications of our analysis
273: for the phase structures of QCD,
274: we solved the gap equation and the neutrality condition:
275: \begin{subequations}
276: \label{eqn:ceq}
277: \begin{eqnarray}
278: &&\frac{\partial V(\Delta,0,\delta\mu,\mu,T)}{\partial \Delta}=0,\\
279: &&\frac{\partial V(\Delta,0,\delta\mu,\mu,T)}{\partial \mu_e}=0.
280: \end{eqnarray}
281: \end{subequations}
282: The phase diagram of the neutral 2SC/g2SC matter is displayed
283: in Fig. \ref{Figure2} as a function of of $T$ and $\Delta_0$.
284: Here, $\Delta_0$ is the value of the 2SC gap at $\delta\mu=0$
285: and at $T=0$.
286: The result is plotted for $\mu=400$ MeV,
287: which should be relevant to the interior of compact stars.
288: The solid (dashed) line denotes the critical line of
289: the phase transition between the normal quark phase and the g2SC phase
290: (the g2SC phase and the 2SC phase).
291: At $T=0$, the g2SC phase exists in the window
292: \begin{eqnarray}
293: 92~{\rm MeV} < \Delta_0 < 134~{\rm MeV},
294: \end{eqnarray}
295: and the 2SC window is given by
296: \begin{eqnarray}
297: \Delta_0 > 134~{\rm MeV}.
298: \end{eqnarray}
299: These results agree with those obtained by using an approximation
300: for the effective potential \cite{Gorbar2005b,KRS2006}.
301: As we will see below,
302: the phase diagram in the left panel of Fig. \ref{Figure2}
303: is qualitatively consistent with those presented
304: in the literature \cite{Shovkovy2003,phased}.
305:
306: In the weak coupling regime, $77~{\rm MeV}<\Delta_0<92~{\rm MeV}$,
307: the chemical potential mismatch is too large
308: for these couplings for diquark pairing
309: and the system is in the normal quark (NQ) phase at $T=0$.
310: At $T>0$, the mismatch of the Fermi surfaces is thermally smeared
311: and, then, it opens the possibility of finding the g2SC phase.
312: In the intermediate coupling regime,
313: $92~{\rm MeV}<\Delta_0<134~{\rm MeV}$,
314: we find the g2SC phase even at $T=0$.
315: For relatively strong couplings,
316: $110~{\rm MeV}<\Delta_0<134~{\rm MeV}$,
317: the g2SC phase at low temperature is replaced by the 2SC phase
318: at intermediate temperature.
319: At higher temperature, the 2SC phase is replaced by the g2SC phase again.
320: It is known that this unusual behavior happens
321: in the intermediately coupled
322: two-flavor color superconductor \cite{Shovkovy2003}.
323: For strong coupling, $\Delta_0>134~{\rm MeV}$,
324: the gap $\Delta$ increases and the 2SC phase is favored at $T=0$.
325: At higher temperatures, however, $\Delta$ is decreased by thermal effects
326: and the g2SC phase becomes possible.
327:
328: Let us now take into account the chromomagnetic instability.
329: Combining Eq. (\ref{eqn:ceq}) with the Meissner mass squared (\ref{eqn:MM6}),
330: we calculated the Meissner mass squared
331: and mapped out the unstable region for gluons 4--7
332: on the $T$-$\Delta_0$ phase diagram.
333: The region enclosed by the solid thick line in the right panel
334: of Fig. \ref{Figure2} corresponds to the region
335: where gluons 4--7 have a negative Meissner mass squared.
336: In this region, the gluonic phase is energetically more favored than the 2SC/g2SC phases
337: and resolves the instability.
338: (In this paper, we refer to the phase where $B \neq 0$ as the gluonic phase.
339: Strictly speaking, the reduced symmetry of the 2SC/g2SC phases with $B \neq 0$
340: does not exclude additional gluonic condensates \cite{Gorbar2005}.)
341:
342: At $T=0$, we find the manifestation of the instability
343: in the region $92~{\rm MeV}<\Delta_0<162~{\rm MeV}$
344: (see Fig. \ref{Figure3})
345: \footnote{The upper boundary of
346: this unstable region, $\Delta_0=162~{\rm MeV}$, is
347: lower than that quoted in Refs. \cite{Gorbar2005b,KRS2006}.
348: As mentioned earlier, the fact that
349: our parameters do not correspond to the HDL limit yields the difference.
350: To find the unstable window we directly calculated
351: the Meissner mass squared
352: and the resulting critical value of $\Delta/\delta\mu$ is
353: much smaller than the HDL value $\sqrt{2}$.}.
354: For extremely strong couplings, $\Delta_0 \agt 162$ MeV,
355: the 2SC phase is free from the instability
356: not only at $T=0$ but also at $T>0$.
357: On the other hand, the whole g2SC phase
358: and the part of the 2SC phase
359: suffer from the instability at low temperatures.
360: At $T \simeq 20$ MeV,
361: the phase transition from the gluonic phase to the 2SC/g2SC phases
362: occurs and the unstable region disappears.
363: (The order of the phase transition is most probably second-order \cite{IP}.)
364: As is clear from the right panel of Fig. \ref{Figure2},
365: in the g2SC window, the critical temperature for the gluonic $\to$ g2SC
366: reaches about half that for the g2SC $\to$ NQ transition.
367: As a consequence,
368: most of the g2SC phase should be replaced by the gluonic phase.
369: In addition, it is very likely that the g2SC phase
370: is also unstable for the 8th gluon at $T \ge 0$ \cite{Alford2005}.
371: (Our preliminary study shows that, for intermediate couplings,
372: the unstable region for the 8th gluon
373: survives for temperatures of order of 10 MeV \cite{IP}.)
374: Thus, the g2SC phase suffers from the severe instability related
375: to gluons 4--7 and 8.
376: It should be emphasized, however, that the stable g2SC phase
377: is not excluded from the phase diagram.
378: Even if we take account of the instability for the 8th gluon,
379: we still find the stable g2SC phase
380: in high-temperature regions of the phase diagram \cite{IP},
381: though the gapless structure is not so important at nonzero temperature.
382:
383: In this paper, we studied the Meissner mass squared
384: in the 2SC/g2SC phases at nonzero temperature.
385: It was found that the negative Meissner
386: mass squared for gluons 4--7 completely
387: disappears at the temperature $T^{\star}\simeq\delta\mu/2$.
388: We also investigated the $T$-$\Delta_0$ phase diagram
389: and mapped out the unstable region for gluons 4--7 on the phase diagram.
390: We did not vary the quark chemical potential $\mu$,
391: so we could not map out unstable regions explicitly
392: on the $T$-$\mu$ phase diagram.
393: However, the result is an indication that wide regions
394: of the g2SC phase on the phase diagram
395: suffer from the instability.
396:
397: Resolving the chromomagnetic instability
398: is the most pressing task
399: in the study of the phase diagram of color super conductor.
400: It is , therefore, interesting to reconsider
401: the $T$-$\mu$ phase diagram of QCD,
402: taking into account a LOFF state
403: with realistic crystal structures \cite{ABR,Rajagopal2006},
404: a colored crystalline phase \cite{Fukushima2005},
405: a phase with a vector condensate \cite{Huang2005,Hong2005}
406: and gluonic condensates \cite{Gorbar2005}.
407: Such a study would have important implications
408: for the physics of compact stars
409:
410: \begin{acknowledgments}
411: The author would like to thank Igor Shovkovy for fruitful discussions
412: and Dirk Rischke for comments on the manuscript.
413: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).
414:
415: {\it Note added.}
416: After finishing this work, I learned that an overlapping study
417: was recently done by L. He, M. Jin, and P. Zhuang \cite{He}.
418: \end{acknowledgments}
419:
420: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
421: \bibitem{CSC}
422: K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, in
423: {\it At the Frontier of Particle Physics/Handbook of QCD},
424: edited by M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapole, 2001);
425: M. G. Alford, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 51}, 131 (2001);
426: D. K. Hong, Acta. Phys. Pol. B {\bf 32}, 1253 (2001);
427: S. Reddy, Acta. Phys. Pol. B {\bf 33}, 4101 (2002);
428: D. H. Rischke, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 52}, 197 (2004);
429: M. Buballa, Phys. Rept. {\bf 407}, 205 (2005);
430: M. Huang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E {\bf 14}, 675 (2005);
431: I. A. Shovkovy, Found. Phys. {\bf 35}, 1309 (2005).
432:
433: \bibitem{Huang2004}
434: M. Huang and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 051501(R) (2004);
435: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 094030 (2004).
436:
437: \bibitem{Casalbuoni2004}
438: R. Casalbuoni, R. Gatto, M. Mannarelli, G. Nardulli, and M. Ruggieri,
439: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 605}, 362 (2005); {\bf 615}, 297(E) (2005).
440:
441: \bibitem{Alford2005}
442: M. Alford and Q. H. Wang, J. Phys. G {\bf 31}, 719 (2005).
443:
444: \bibitem{Fukushima2005}
445: K. Fukushima, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 074002 (2005).
446:
447: \bibitem{Giannakis2004}
448: I. Giannakis and H. C. Ren,
449: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 611}, 137 (2005);
450: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B723}, 255 (2005);
451: I. Giannakis, D. f. Hou, and H. C. Ren,
452: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 631}, 16 (2005).
453:
454: \bibitem{Huang2005}
455: M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 73}, 045007 (2006).
456:
457: \bibitem{Hong2005}
458: D. K. Hong, hep-ph/0506097.
459:
460: \bibitem{Gorbar2005}
461: E. V. Gorbar, M. Hashimoto, and V. A. Miransky,
462: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 632}, 305 (2006).
463:
464: \bibitem{Gorbar2005b}
465: E. V. Gorbar, M. Hashimoto, and V. A. Miransky,
466: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 96}, 022005 (2006).
467:
468: \bibitem{Iida2006}
469: K. Iida and K. Fukushima, hep-ph/0603179.
470:
471: \bibitem{Fukush2006}
472: K. Fukushima, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 73}, 094016 (2006).
473:
474: \bibitem{GHMS2006}E. V. Gorbar, M. Hashimoto, and V. A. Miransky,
475: and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 73}, 111502(R) (2006).
476:
477: \bibitem{Hashimoto2006}M. Hashimoto, hep-ph/0605323.
478:
479: \bibitem{KRS2006}O. Kiriyama, D. H. Rischke, and I. A. Shovkovy,
480: hep-ph/0606030.
481:
482: \bibitem{Giannakis2006}I. Giannakis, D. Hou, M. Huang, and H. c. Ren,
483: hep-ph/0606178.
484:
485: \bibitem{BubSho}
486: M. Buballa and I. A. Shovkovy,
487: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 097501 (2005).
488:
489: \bibitem{Shovkovy2003}
490: I. Shovkovy and M. Huang, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 564}, 205 (2003);
491: M. Huang and I. Shovkovy, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A729}, 835 (2003).
492:
493: \bibitem{phased}
494: S. B. R\"uster, V. Werth, M. Buballa, I. A. Shovkovy, and D. H. Rischke,
495: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 034004 (2005);
496: D. Blaschke, S. Fredriksson, H. Grigorian, A. M. \"Ozta\c{s}, and F. Sandin,
497: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 72}, 065020 (2005);
498: H. Abuki and T. Kunihiro, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A768}, 118 (2006).
499:
500: \bibitem{IP}O. Kiriyama, in preparation.
501:
502: \bibitem{ABR}
503: M. Alford, J. A. Bowers, and K. Rajagopal,
504: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63}, 074016 (2001);
505: J. A. Bowers and K. Rajagopal,
506: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66}, 065002 (2002).
507:
508: \bibitem{Rajagopal2006}
509: K. Rajagopal and R. Sharma, hep-ph/0605316.
510:
511: \bibitem{He}Lianyi He (private communication).
512:
513: \end{thebibliography}
514:
515: \end{document}
516: