1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% ws-procs9x6.tex : 20-9-2004
3: %% Text file for Proceedings Trim Size [9in x 6in] written in Latex2E.
4: %% The content, structure, format and layout of this style file is the
5: %% property of World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
6: %% Copyright 1995, 2002 by World Scientific Publishing Co.
7: %% All rights are reserved.
8: %%
9: %% Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in
10: %% Text Area: 7.35in (include runningheads) x 4.5in
11: %% Main Text is 10/13pt
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13:
14: %% Use \tbl{...} command for table caption i.e. to fit table width.
15: %% Use \caption{...} command for figure caption.
16: %\documentclass[draft]{ws-procs9x6}
17: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}
18:
19: \usepackage{epsfig}
20: \newcommand{\agt}{\,\rlap{\lower 3.5 pt \hbox{$\mathchar \sim$}} \raise 1pt
21: \hbox {$>$}\,}
22: \newcommand{\alt}{\,\rlap{\lower 3.5 pt \hbox{$\mathchar \sim$}} \raise 1pt
23: \hbox {$<$}\,}
24:
25: \begin{document}
26:
27: \title{Inclusive hadron electroproduction at HERA at NLO with and without
28: transverse-momentum constraint}
29:
30: \author{B. A. Kniehl}
31:
32: \address{II.~Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at Hamburg,\\
33: Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761 Hamburg, Germany\\
34: E-mail: kniehl@desy.de}
35:
36: \maketitle
37:
38: \abstracts{We study single-hadron inclusive electroproduction in $ep$
39: scattering at DESY HERA at next-to-leading order in the parton model of
40: quantum chromodynamics endowed with non-perturbative fragmentation functions.
41: Specifically, we consider charged-hadron production, with unspecified
42: transverse momentum $p_T$, in the Breit frame and $D^{*\pm}$ production as
43: a function of $p_T$, and perform comparisons with recent data from the H1
44: Collaboration.}
45:
46: \section{Introduction}
47: \label{sec:one}
48:
49: In the framework of the parton model of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the
50: inclusive production of single hadrons is described by means of fragmentation
51: functions (FFs) $D_a^h(x,\mu)$.
52: At leading order (LO), the value of $D_a^h(x,\mu)$ corresponds to the
53: probability for the parton $a$ produced at short distance $1/\mu$ to form a
54: jet that includes the hadron $h$ carrying the fraction $x$ of the longitudinal
55: momentum of $a$.
56: Analogously, incoming hadrons and resolved photons are represented by
57: (non-perturbative) parton density functions (PDFs) $F_{a/h}(x,\mu)$.
58: Unfortunately, it is not yet possible to calculate the FFs from first
59: principles, in particular for hadrons with masses smaller than or comparable
60: to the asymptotic scale parameter $\Lambda$.
61: However, given their $x$ dependence at some energy scale $\mu$, the evolution
62: with $\mu$ may be computed perturbatively in QCD using the time-like
63: Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) equations.
64: Moreover, the factorisation theorem guarantees that the $D_a^h(x,\mu)$
65: functions are independent of the process in which they have been determined
66: and represent a universal property of $h$.
67: This entitles us to transfer information on how $a$ hadronises to $h$ in a
68: well-defined quantitative way from $e^+e^-$ annihilation, where the
69: measurements are usually most precise, to other kinds of experiments, such as
70: photo-, lepto-, and hadroproduction.
71: Recently, light-hadron FFs with complete quark flavour separation were
72: determined\cite{akk} through a global fit to $e^+e^-$ data from LEP, PEP, and
73: SLC thereby improving previous analyses.\cite{kkp,k}
74:
75: In the following, we extend our previous report\cite{dis05} on the
76: electroproduction, through deep-inelastic scattering (DIS), of $\pi^0$ mesons
77: and charged hadrons with finite transverse momentum $p_T^\star$ in the
78: $\gamma^\star p$ c.m.\ frame at next-to-leading order (NLO)\cite{kkm} by
79: discussing charged hadrons with unspecified values of $p_T^\star$, including
80: $p_T^\star=0$, and $D^{*\pm}$ mesons with $p_T^\star>0$.
81:
82: \section{Analytic Results}
83: \label{sec:two}
84:
85: At LO, inclusive hadron electroproduction proceeds through the Feynman diagram
86: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:fig1}(a), so that $p_T^\star=0$.
87: At NLO,\cite{gra} virtual and real corrections, indicated in
88: Figs.~\ref{fig:fig1}(b) and (c), respectively, contribute.
89: In the latter case, $p_T^\star$ is integrated over.
90: The NLO cross section is conveniently evaluated with the {\tt FORTRAN} program
91: {\tt CYCLOPS}.\cite{gra}
92:
93: \begin{figure}[ht]
94: \begin{center}
95: \begin{tabular}{cc}
96: \parbox{0.45\textwidth}{\epsfig{file=lo.ps,width=0.45\textwidth,%
97: %bbllx=14pt,bblly=14pt,bburx=263pt,bbury=203pt}} &
98: bbllx=53pt,bblly=26pt,bburx=221pt,bbury=173pt,clip=}} &
99: \parbox{0.45\textwidth}{%
100: \caption{(a) Parton-model representation of $l+p\to l^\prime+h+X$, with PDFs
101: ($f$) and FFs ($D$), and Feynman diagrams for (b) virtual and (c) real NLO
102: corrections.
103: \label{fig:fig1}}}
104: \\
105: (a) & \\
106: \parbox{0.45\textwidth}{\epsfig{file=virt.ps,width=0.45\textwidth,%
107: %bbllx=14pt,bblly=14pt,bburx=475pt,bbury=171pt}} &
108: bbllx=47pt,bblly=24pt,bburx=444pt,bbury=144pt,clip=}} &
109: \parbox{0.45\textwidth}{\epsfig{file=real.ps,width=0.45\textwidth,%
110: %bbllx=14pt,bblly=14pt,bburx=417pt,bbury=209pt}} \\
111: bbllx=26pt,bblly=22pt,bburx=401pt,bbury=198pt,clip=}} \\
112: (b) & (c)
113: \end{tabular}
114: \end{center}
115: \end{figure}
116:
117: The NLO analysis for the case that $p_T^\star>0$ already at LO involves one
118: more external parton leg and may be found in Refs.~\refcite{kkm,aur}.
119:
120: \section{Numerical Results}
121: \label{sec:three}
122:
123: \subsection{Charged Hadrons in the Breit Frame}
124:
125: H1\cite{h1} and ZEUS\cite{zeus} measured the normalised $Q$ distribution
126: $(1/\sigma_{\rm DIS})d\sigma/dQ$ of charged hadrons in bins of
127: $x_p=2p^{\rm Breit}/Q$, where $Q^2=-q^2$ is the virtuality of $\gamma^\star$
128: and $p^{\rm Breit}$ is the projection of the three-momentum of $h$ onto the
129: flight direction of $\gamma^\star$ in the Breit frame.
130: In this frame, $\gamma^\star$ is completely space-like, with four-momentum
131: $q^\mu=(0,0,0,-Q)$.
132: This frame provides a clear separation of current and remnant jets and is
133: especially appropriate for comparisons with inclusive hadron production by
134: $e^+e^-$ annihilation.
135:
136: \begin{figure}[ht]
137: \begin{center}
138: \hspace*{2cm}
139: \begin{tabular}{cc}
140: \parbox{0.44\textwidth}{\hspace*{-2cm}
141: %\epsfig{file=xpplotnloscale.ps,width=0.44\textwidth,%
142: %bbllx=65,bblly=29,bburx=569,bbury=744,angle=270}} &
143: \epsfig{file=xpnlo_scale.ps,width=0.44\textwidth,%
144: bbllx=2,bblly=25,bburx=563,bbury=729,angle=270}} &
145: (a) \\
146: \parbox{0.44\textwidth}{\hspace*{-2cm}
147: %\epsfig{file=xpplotnlopdf.ps,width=0.44\textwidth,%
148: %bbllx=65,bblly=29,bburx=569,bbury=744,angle=270}} &
149: \epsfig{file=xpnlo_mrst.ps,width=0.44\textwidth,%
150: bbllx=2,bblly=25,bburx=563,bbury=729,angle=270}} &
151: (b) \\
152: \parbox{0.44\textwidth}{\hspace*{-2cm}
153: %\epsfig{file=xpplotnlo.ps,width=0.44\textwidth,%
154: %bbllx=65,bblly=29,bburx=569,bbury=744,angle=270}} &
155: \epsfig{file=xpnlo_ff2.ps,width=0.44\textwidth,%
156: bbllx=2,bblly=25,bburx=563,bbury=729,angle=270}} &
157: (c)
158: \end{tabular}
159: \end{center}
160: \caption{The normalised $Q$ distribution $(1/\sigma_{\rm DIS})d\sigma/dQ$ of
161: charged hadrons measured by H1\protect\cite{h1} in bins of $x_p$ is compared
162: with our NLO predictions estimating the theoretical uncertainties from the
163: freedom of choice of (a) unphysical scales, (b) PDFs, and (c) FFs.
164: \label{fig:fig2}}
165: \end{figure}
166:
167: In Fig.~\ref{fig:fig2}(a), preliminary H1 data\cite{h1} are compared with NLO
168: predictions evaluated with CTEQ6.1M\cite{cteq} proton PDFs and AKK\cite{akk}
169: FFs; the renormalisation ($r$) and initial-state ($i$) and final-state ($f$)
170: factorisation scales are taken to be $\mu_r=\mu_i=\mu_r=\xi Q$, where $\xi$ is
171: varied between 1/2 and 2 about its default value 1 to estimate the
172: unphysical-scale uncertainty.
173: The PDF and FF uncertainties are assessed in Figs.~\ref{fig:fig2}(b) and (c)
174: by switching to the MRST2004\cite{mrst} PDFs and to the KKP\cite{kkp} and
175: K\cite{k} FFs, respectively.
176:
177: \subsection{$D^{*\pm}$ Mesons}
178:
179: Among other things, H1\cite{h1d} measured the $p_T^\star$ distribution
180: $d\sigma/dp_T^\star$ of $D^{*\pm}$ mesons in the DIS range $2<Q^2<100$~GeV$^2$
181: and $0.05<y<0.7$ with the acceptance cuts $p_T>1.5$~GeV and $|\eta|<1.5$ in
182: the laboratory frame, where $y$ is the relative lepton energy loss in the
183: proton rest frame and $\eta$ is the $D^{*\pm}$ pseudorapidity.
184:
185: \begin{figure}[ht]
186: \begin{center}
187: \parbox{0.5\textwidth}{\epsfig{file=pt.eps,width=0.5\textwidth,%
188: bbllx=-2,bblly=-7,bburx=363,bbury=263,clip=}}
189: \end{center}
190: \caption{The $p_T^\star$ distribution $d\sigma/dp_T^\star$ (in nb/GeV) of
191: $D^{*\pm}$ mesons measured by H1\protect\cite{h1d} is compared with our LO and
192: NLO predictions.
193: \label{fig:fig3}}
194: \end{figure}
195:
196: In Fig.~\ref{fig:fig3}, H1 data\cite{h1d} are compared with LO and NLO
197: predictions evaluated with CTEQ6\cite{cteq} proton PDFs, BKK\cite{bkk} FFs,
198: and $\mu_r^2=\mu_i^2=\mu_r^2=\xi\left[Q^2+\left(p_T^\star\right)^2\right]/2$
199: for $\xi=1$.
200: The theoretical uncertainty at NLO is estimated by varying $\xi$ between 1/2
201: and 2 about its default value 1.
202:
203: \section{Conclusions}
204: \label{sec:four}
205:
206: We compared H1 data on the electroproduction of charged hadrons\cite{h1} in
207: the Breit frame and of $D^{*\pm}$ mesons\cite{h1d} with $p_T^\star>0$ with
208: up-to-date NLO predictions.
209: In the first case, we found reasonable agreement, except for the region of
210: $Q\alt30$~GeV and $x_p\agt0.5$, where the FFs are generally less well
211: constrained by $e^+e^-$ data.
212: In the second case, we found good agreement for $p_T^\star\agt1.25$~GeV.
213: This nicely supports the scaling violations in the FFs encoded via the DGLAP
214: evolution as well as their universality predicted by the factorisation
215: theorem.
216:
217: \section*{Acknowledgements}
218:
219: The author thanks G. Kramer, M. Maniatis, and C. E. Sandoval Usme for their
220: collaboration in the work presented here.
221: This work was supported in part by BMBF Grant No.\ 05~HT4GUA/4.
222:
223: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
224:
225: \bibitem{akk} S. Albino, B. A. Kniehl and G. Kramer,
226: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.}\ {\bf B725}, 181 (2005);
227: {\bf B734}, 50 (2006).
228:
229: \bibitem{kkp} B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer and B. P\"otter,
230: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.}\ {\bf B582}, 514 (2000);
231: {\bf B597}, 337 (2001);
232: {\it Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.}\ {\bf85}, 5288 (2000).
233:
234: \bibitem{k} S. Kretzer,
235: {\it Phys.\ Rev.}\ {\bf D62}, 054001 (2000).
236:
237: \bibitem{dis05} B. A. Kniehl,
238: {\it AIP Conf.\ Proc.}\ {\bf792}, 755 (2005).
239:
240: \bibitem{kkm} B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer and M. Maniatis,
241: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.}\ {\bf B711}, 345 (2005); {\bf B720}, 231(E) (2005).
242:
243: \bibitem{gra} D. Graudenz,
244: {\it Phys.\ Lett.}\ {\bf B406}, 178 (1997).
245:
246: \bibitem{aur} P. Aurenche, R. Basu, M. Fontannaz and R. M. Godbole,
247: {\it Eur.\ Phys.\ J.} {\bf C34}, 277 (2004);
248: {\bf C42}, 43 (2005);
249: A. Daleo, D. de Florian and R. Sassot,
250: {\it Phys.\ Rev.}\ {\bf D71}, 034013 (2005).
251:
252: \bibitem{h1} H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff {\it et al.},
253: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.}\ {\bf B504}, 3 (1997);
254: D. Traynor, in these proceedings.
255:
256: \bibitem{zeus} ZEUS Collaboration, J. Breitweg {\it et al.},
257: {\it Eur.\ Phys.\ J.} {\bf C11}, 251 (1997).
258:
259: \bibitem{cteq} CTEQ Collaboration, D. Stump {\it et al.},
260: {\it JHEP} {\bf0310}, 046 (2003).
261:
262: \bibitem{mrst} A. D. Martin, R. G. Roberts, W. J. Stirling and R. S. Thorne,
263: {\it Phys.\ Lett.}\ {\bf B604}, 61 (2004).
264:
265: \bibitem{h1d} H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff {\it et al.},
266: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.}\ {\bf B545}, 21 (1999).
267:
268: \bibitem{bkk} J. Binnewies, B. A. Kniehl and G. Kramer,
269: {\it Phys.\ Rev.}\ {\bf D58}, 014014 (1998);
270: B. A. Kniehl and G. Kramer,
271: {\it Phys.\ Rev.}\ {\bf D71}, 094013 (2005);
272: {\bf D74}, 037502 (2006).
273:
274: \end{thebibliography}
275:
276: \end{document}
277: