1: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2:
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6:
7:
8: \begin{document}
9: \newcommand{\gdhi}{\ooalign{\hfil/\hfil\crcr$\partial$}}
10:
11: \def\Sp{\mathop{\mathrm{Sp}}\nolimits}
12: \def\sgn{\mathop{\mathrm{sgn}}\nolimits}
13: \def\erfc{\mathop{\mathrm{erfc}}\nolimits}
14: \def\tr{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}\nolimits}
15: \def\as{\mathop{\mathrm{as}}\nolimits}
16: \def\val{\mathop{\mathrm{val}}\nolimits}
17:
18: \title{Nuclear matter in the chiral quark soliton model with vector mesons}
19: % Force line breaks with \\
20:
21: \author{S.Nagai$^{1}$}
22: \email{j6206701@ed.noda.tus.ac.jp}
23: \author{N.Sawado$^{1}$}
24: \email{sawado@ph.noda.tus.ac.jp}
25: \author{N.Shiiki$^{1},^{2}$}
26: \email{norikoshiiki@mail.goo.ne.jp}
27: \affiliation{$^{1}$Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology,
28: Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan\\
29: $^{2}$Department of Management, Atomi University, Niiza, Saitama
30: 352-8501, Japan
31: }
32: \date{\today}
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35: We study the nuclear matter solution in the chiral quark soliton model
36: coupled to $\rho$ and $\omega$ vector mesons based on the Wigner-Seitz
37: approximation. It is shown that the vector mesons stabilize the soliton
38: at high-density region. As a result, the saturation property and
39: incompressibility are significantly improved.
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \pacs{12.39.Fe, 12.39.Ki, 21.65.+f, 24.85.+p}
43:
44: \maketitle
45:
46: \section{\label{sec:level1}Introduction\protect\\ }
47: The idea of investigating dense nuclear matter in the topological
48: soliton models has been developed over decades.
49: It was first applied for the nuclear matter system with
50: the skyrmion centered cubic (CC) crystal by Klebanov~\cite{klebanov85}.
51: This configuration was studied further by W\"ust, Brown and Jackson
52: to estimate the baryon density and discuss the phase transition
53: between nuclear matter and quark matter~\cite{wust87}.
54: Goldhabor and Manton found a new configuration, body-centered cubic (BCC)
55: of half-skyrmions in a higher density regime~\cite{manton87}.
56: The face centered cubic (FCC) and BCC lattice were studied by Castillejo
57: {\it et al.}~\cite{castillejo89}
58: and the phase transitions between those configurations were
59: investigated by Kugler and Shtrikman~\cite{kugler89}.
60: Recently, the idea of using crystallized skyrmions to study
61: nuclear matter was revived by Park, Min, Rho and Vento
62: with the introduction of the Atiyah-Manton multi-soliton ansatz
63: in a unit cell~\cite{park02}.
64:
65: The soliton model incorporating quark degrees of freedom into each soliton
66: was also considered in 80's.
67: Achtzehnter, Scheid and Wilets investigated the Friedberg-Lee
68: soliton bag model with a simple cubic lattice~\cite{achtzehnter85}.
69: Due to the periodicity of the background potential, the solution of
70: the Dirac equation has the form of the Bloch waves,
71: $\psi_{\bm k}({\bm r})=e^{i\bm{k}\cdot\bm{r}}\phi_{\bm k}({\bm r})$
72: where $\phi_{\bm k}$ satisfies the same periodic boundary condition
73: as the background potential.
74:
75: The Wigner-Seitz approximation was used for the analysis of the
76: crystal soliton model with quarks. In this ansatz, a single soliton is placed
77: on the center of a spherical unit cell.
78: Then the lowest energy level (``bottom'' of the band) for the valence quarks becomes
79: s-state. The appropriate boundary conditions at the cell
80: boundary should be imposed on the quark wave functions
81: as well as the chiral fields. This simple treatment sheds
82: light on the nucleon structure in nuclear medium. Soliton
83: matter within this approximation have been extensively
84: studied by using various nucleon models such as the
85: the chiral quark-meson type model
86: ~\cite{banerjee85,glendenning86,hahn87,weber98},
87: Friedberg-Lee soliton bag model~\cite{reinhardt85,weber98,birse88,barnea00},
88: the Skyrme model~\cite{Kutschera84}.
89: The non-zero dispersion of the lowest band \cite{weber98}
90: and the quark-meson coupling \cite{barnea00} were also examined within this
91: approximation.
92:
93: The chiral quark soliton model (CQSM) can be interpreted as the soliton bag model
94: including not only valence quarks but also the vacuum sea quark polarization
95: effects explicitly~\cite{diakonov88,reinhardt88,meissner89,wakamatsu91}. The model provides
96: correct observables of a nucleon such as mass, electromagnetic
97: value, spin carried by quarks, parton distributions
98: and octet, decuplet $SU(3)$ baryon spectra~\cite{christov96,alkofer96}.
99: Amore and De Pace studied nuclear matter in the CQSM using the Wigner-Seitz
100: approximation and observed the nuclear saturation~\cite{amore00}.
101: They examined the soliton solutions with three different boundary
102: conditions imposed on the quark wave function. However the obtained
103: saturation density was lower than the experimental value. They thus
104: concluded that such discrepancy is originated in the approximate
105: treatment~\cite{adjali92} of the sea quark contribution.
106:
107: In Ref.\cite{nagai06}, we studied the nuclear matter in CQSM and
108: observed splitting of the nucleon-$\Delta$ spectra.
109: The vacuum polarization was treated exactly and a relatively shallow saturation
110: was obtained.
111: However for the value of the constituent quark mass $M$ reproducing the octet
112: and decuplet baryon spectra, the soliton breaks even at low densities.
113:
114: In this paper, we construct the matter soliton solutions including $\pi, \sigma, \rho$ and $\omega$.
115: The role of $\rho, \omega$ is to produce the short range effects of the nuclear force
116: and stabilize the solution at high densities.
117: It is straightforward to include the $\rho$ meson in the CQSM,
118: but the $\omega$ meson requires some technique since the Hamiltonian is no longer
119: real. To overcome this difficulty, we apply two different methods proposed for the free nucleon
120: system~\cite{Goeke, Alkofer} and compare the obtained results.
121:
122: This paper is organized as follows. In the following section, we present the basic
123: formulation of CQSM with vector mesons.
124: Two distinct formulations for solving the non-Hermitian eigenvalue problem are reviewed
125: in Sec.\ref{sec:level3}.
126: In Sec.\ref{sec:level4}, we show how various cutoff parameters and coupling constants are
127: determined within the chiral perturbation regime.
128: In Sec.\ref{sec:level5}, the extension of the model to the nuclear matter within the Wigner-Seitz approximation
129: is presented. The numerical results are shown in Sec.\ref{sec:level6}.
130: Sec.\ref{sec:level7} is devoted to summary and conclusions.
131:
132:
133:
134: \section{\label{sec:level2}The chiral quark soliton model with ${\rm \rho,\omega}$ mesons \protect\\ }
135: The CQSM was originally derived from the instanton
136: liquid model of the QCD vacuum and incorporates the non-perturbative
137: feature of the low-energy QCD, spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking (SCSB).
138: The semibosonized version of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model also inspires the CQSM model
139: with the SCSB. In these description, the Euclidean vacuum functional
140: with vector mesons can be defined as~\cite{Goeke,Alkofer}
141: \begin{eqnarray}
142: {\cal Z} &=& \int {\cal D}\pi{\cal D}V{\cal D}\psi{\cal D}\psi^{\dagger}\nonumber\\
143: &\times& \exp \left[ \int d^{4}x \, \bar{\psi}\left(i\!\!\not\!\partial+\not\!V
144: - MU^{\gamma_{5}}\right) \psi \right] \label{vacuum_functional}
145: \end{eqnarray}
146: where $V_\mu=\sum^3_{a=0}V_\mu^a\tau^a/2$ ($\tau^0=\bm{1}$)
147: are vector gauge fields for the vector mesons.
148: The SU(2) matrix
149: \begin{eqnarray}
150: U^{\gamma_{5}}= \frac{1+\gamma_{5}}{2} U + \frac{1-\gamma_{5}}{2} U^{\dagger}
151: \end{eqnarray}
152: with
153: \begin{eqnarray}
154: U=\exp \left( i \bm{\tau} \cdot \bm{\phi}/f_{\pi} \right)
155: =\frac{1}{f_\pi}(\sigma+i\bm{\tau}\cdot\bm{\pi})\,,
156: \end{eqnarray}
157: describes the chiral fields. $\sigma$ and $\pi$ represent scalar sigma meson and
158: pseudoscalar pion fields respectively. $\psi$ denotes quark fields and $M$ is the
159: dynamical quark mass. $f_{\pi} $ is the pion decay constant and experimentally
160: $f_{\pi} \sim 93 {\rm MeV}$.
161: Since our concern is the tree-level pions and one-loop quarks according
162: to the Hartree mean field approach, the kinetic term of the pion fields which
163: gives a contribution to higher loops can be neglected.
164: Due to the interaction between the valence quarks and the Dirac sea,
165: soliton solutions appear as bound states of quarks in the background of self-consistent
166: mean chiral field. $N_{c}$ valence quarks fill the each bound state to form a baryon.
167: The baryon number is thus identified with the number of bound states filled by
168: the valence quarks \cite{kahana84}.
169: The $B=1$ soliton solution with only chiral fields has been studied in detail at classical and
170: quantum level in Refs.~\cite{diakonov88,reinhardt88,meissner89,
171: christov96,alkofer96,wakamatsu91}.
172:
173: Integrating over the quark fields in Eq.(\ref{vacuum_functional}),
174: we can obtain the effective action $S_{\rm eff}$ for the mesons
175: \begin{eqnarray}
176: S_{{\rm eff}}&=&S_{F}+S_{m},\\
177: S_{F}&=&-iN_{c}{\rm lndet}\left(i\!\!\not\!\partial
178: +\not\!V- MU^{\gamma_{5}}\right)\label{effective_action1},\\
179: S_{m}&=&\int d^4x\left(\frac{1}{4g}{\rm tr}(V_\mu V^\mu)\right),\label{effective_action2}
180: \end{eqnarray}
181: where $S_m$ is the term derived from the semibosonized version of NJL action~\cite{Alkofer}.
182: $S_F$ can be divided into real and imaginary parts:
183: \begin{eqnarray}
184: &&S_F=S_R+S_I,\\
185: &&S_R=\frac{1}{2}{\rm Tr}\log(D\hspace{-.55em}/^\dagger D\hspace{-.55em}/),\label{actionr}\\
186: &&S_I=\frac{1}{2}{\rm Tr}\log((D\hspace{-.55em}/^\dagger)^{-1} D\hspace{-.55em}/)
187: \end{eqnarray}
188: where $iD\hspace{-.55em}/ = i\!\!\not\!\partial+\not\!V- MU^{\gamma_5}$ is the modified
189: Dirac operator.
190: After performing the Wick rotation for the Dirac operator, $i.e.$ $x_0=-ix_4$ and $V_0=-iV_4$,
191: we can obtain the one-quark Hamiltonian $H$ with vector fields
192: \begin{eqnarray}
193: i\beta D\hspace{-.55em}/ &=&-\partial_\tau - H,\label{dirac_operator}\\
194: H&=&{\bm{\alpha}\!\cdot\!{\bm P}}+iV_4+{\bm{\alpha}\!\cdot\!{\bm V}}+
195: \beta MU^{\gamma_{5}}\,\,. \label{hamiltonian}
196: \end{eqnarray}
197: Here $\tau$ denotes the Euclidean time.
198: Note that as $\tau,V_4$ is supposed to be Hermitian in Euclidean space,
199: $H$ is now non-Hermitian.
200:
201: To obtain the $B=1$ soliton solution, let us impose the hedgehog ansatz on the chiral field
202: \begin{eqnarray}
203: U(\bm{r})&=&\exp(i F(r) \hat{\bm{r}}\cdot \bm{\tau})\nonumber\\
204: &=&\cos F(r)+i\hat{\bm{r}}\cdot \bm{\tau}\sin F(r).\label{chiral_fields_hedgehog}
205: \end{eqnarray}
206: The only possible ansatz for the isoscalar-vector field $\omega_{\mu}$
207: realizing zero grandspin is the one whose spatial components vanish ($\omega_i=0$),
208: \begin{eqnarray}
209: V_\mu^0&=&\omega_\mu=\omega(r)\delta_{\mu4}.
210: \end{eqnarray}
211: Parity invariance requires the isoscalar-axialvector meson field $V_4$ to vanish
212: in the static limit. Note that $V_\mu^0$ corresponds to the physical $\omega$ meson.
213: For the isovector and vector meson fields let us impose the spherically symmetric ansatz
214: \begin{eqnarray}
215: V_\mu&=&-\frac{1}{2}i\rho^a_\mu \tau^a\,,\nonumber\\
216: \rho^a_0&=&0,\,\,\rho^a_i=-\epsilon^{aik}\hat{r}^k G(r)
217: \end{eqnarray}
218: where the indices $a$,$i$ and $k$ run from 1 to 3.
219: $V_i^a$ corresponds to the physical $\rho$ meson.
220: The boundary conditions of $F(r)$ for the $B=1$ soliton solution are given by
221: \begin{eqnarray}
222: F(0)&=&-\pi\,,~~F(\infty)=0\,. \label{boundary_condition_f}
223: \end{eqnarray}
224: Regularity requires the following boundary conditions for $\omega$ and G,
225: \begin{eqnarray}
226: \omega^\prime(0)&=&0,\,\,\omega(\infty)=0\nonumber\,,\\
227: G(0)&=&0,\,\,G(\infty)=0.\label{boundary_condition_wg}
228: \end{eqnarray}
229: Substituting these ansatz into Eq.(\ref{hamiltonian}),
230: one obtains the effective Hamiltonian
231: \begin{eqnarray}
232: H=\mbox{\boldmath $ \alpha\cdot p$}+i\omega(r)
233: +\frac{1}{2}(\mbox{\boldmath $ \alpha$}\times\hat{{\bm r}})\cdot\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}G(r)\nonumber\\
234: +\beta M(\cos{F(r)}+i\gamma_5\mbox{\boldmath $ \tau\cdot \hat{r}$}\sin{F(r)}).
235: \label{hamiltonian_hedgehog}
236: \end{eqnarray}
237: As stated above, $H$ is non-Hermitian since the real function of $\omega(r)$ makes
238: $H$ complex-valued.
239: The eigenvalue problem of $H$ is solved using the method developed by
240: Kahana-Ripka (\cite{kahana84}, see also Sec.\ref{sec:level5}).
241:
242: Once the eigenvalue of $H$, $\epsilon_\mu$, is obtained,
243: the eigenvalues $\lambda_{n,\mu}$ of the operator $\partial_\tau+H$ (\ref{dirac_operator})
244: are determined by
245: \begin{eqnarray}
246: \lambda_{n,\mu}=-i\Omega_n+\epsilon_\mu=-i\Omega_n+\epsilon_\mu^R+i\epsilon_\mu^I\label{lambda}
247: \end{eqnarray}
248: where $i\Omega_n=i(2n+1)\pi/T$ with $(n=0, \pm 1,\pm 2, ..)$
249: and $\epsilon_\mu^R, \epsilon_\mu^I$ are the real and imaginary part of
250: eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian (\ref{hamiltonian_hedgehog}).
251: The quark determinant is expressed in terms of the eigenvalues $\lambda_{n,\mu}$ as
252: \begin{eqnarray}
253: S_R=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\mu,n}\log(\lambda_{n,\mu}\lambda_{n,\mu}^*),
254: \ S_I=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\mu,n}\log\left(\frac{\lambda_{n,\mu}}{\lambda_{n,\mu}^*}\right).
255: \end{eqnarray}
256: Since the real part $S_R$ diverges as log $p^2$ for large momenta $p$,
257: we apply the proper time regularization~\cite{Alkofer}.
258: The real part of the sea quark energy from can be derived from
259: ${\rm e}^{S_R}\sim {\rm e}^{-E_{\rm vac}^RT}$ as
260: \begin{eqnarray}
261: E_{\rm vac}^R=\frac{N_c}{4 \sqrt{\mathstrut \pi}}\sum_\mu |\epsilon_\mu^R|
262: \Gamma\left(-\frac{1}{2},\left(\frac{\epsilon_\mu^R}{\Lambda}\right)^2\right).
263: \end{eqnarray}
264: Similarly the imaginary part of the sea quark energy is derived from
265: ${\rm e}^{S_I}\sim {\rm e}^{-iE_{\rm vac}^IT}$ as
266: \begin{eqnarray}
267: E_{\rm vac}^I=N_c\sum_\mu\epsilon_\mu^I{\rm sign}(\epsilon_\mu^R){\cal N}_\mu.
268: \end{eqnarray}
269: where
270: \begin{eqnarray}
271: {\cal N_\mu}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{\mathstrut 4\pi}}\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2},
272: \left(\frac{\epsilon_\mu^R}{\Lambda}\right)^2\right).
273: \end{eqnarray}
274: The static energy for the vector mesons is given by
275: \begin{eqnarray}
276: E_{m}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4g_1}\int d^3xG(r)^2+\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4g_2}
277: \int d^3x\omega(r)^2\label{meson_term}\,.
278: \end{eqnarray}
279: where $g_1$ and $g_2$ are coupling constants determined in the
280: subsequent section.
281: The total energy $E_{\rm tot}$ is defined by the sum of these energies plus
282: (three times of) valence quark energy (see Sec.\ref{sec:level3}).
283: Field equations for the meson fields can be obtained by demanding
284: that the total energy be stationary
285: with respect to variation of the profile function,
286: \begin{eqnarray}
287: \frac{\delta E_{\rm tot}}{\delta \phi}=0 \label{variation_profile}
288: \end{eqnarray}
289: where $\phi$ denotes any of the meson profile $F,G$ or $\omega$,
290: which produces
291: \begin{eqnarray}
292: S(r)\sin{F(r)}=P(r)\cos{F(r)},\nonumber
293: \end{eqnarray}
294: \begin{eqnarray}
295: S(r)&=&N_c{\rm tr}\int\frac{d\Omega}{4\pi}\gamma_0
296: \rho(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $x$}),\nonumber\\
297: P(r)&=&N_c{\rm tr}\int\frac{d\Omega}{4\pi}
298: \left(i\gamma_0\gamma_5\mbox{\boldmath $\hat{r}$}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$})\right)
299: \rho(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\nonumber\\
300: G(r)&=& - g_1 N_c{\rm tr}\int\frac{d\Omega}{4\pi}
301: \left((\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}\times\mbox{\boldmath $\hat{r}$})\cdot\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}\right)
302: \rho(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\nonumber\\
303: w(r)&=& g_2 N_c{\rm tr}\int\frac{d\Omega}{4\pi}
304: b(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\label{eq}
305: \end{eqnarray}
306: where $\rho(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})$,
307: $b(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})$
308: are the quark scalar density and the quark number density respectively.
309: Their specific forms are presented in the next section.
310:
311:
312:
313: \section{\label{sec:level3}The eigenvalue problem for the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian }
314:
315: In order to solve the eigenvalue problem with the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, let us
316: first introduce the left and right eigenstate
317: \begin{eqnarray}
318: H\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle&=&\epsilon_\mu\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle~,\nonumber\\
319: \langle\tilde{\Psi}_\mu\hspace{-1mm}\mid H&=&\epsilon_\mu\langle\tilde{\Psi}_\mu\hspace{-1mm}\mid\,,
320: \ \ \ i.e.\ \ H^\dagger\mid\hspace{-1mm}\tilde{\Psi}_\mu\rangle=\epsilon_\mu^*\mid\hspace{-1mm}
321: \tilde{\Psi}_\mu\rangle
322: \label{lreigen}
323: \end{eqnarray}
324: with the normalization condition $\langle\tilde{\Psi}_\nu\hspace{-1mm}\mid\hspace{-1mm}
325: \Psi_\mu\rangle=\delta_{\mu\nu}$.
326: For convenience we separate the Hamiltonian into Hermitian and non-Hermitian part
327: \begin{eqnarray}
328: H=H_\Theta+i\omega\,
329: \end{eqnarray}
330: where $H_\Theta$ is the Hermitian part.
331: The fact that $H_\Theta$ and $\omega$ are both Hermitian implies
332: $\mid\hspace{-1mm}\tilde{\Psi}_\mu\rangle=\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^*\rangle$.
333: There are two distinct ways \cite{Goeke,Alkofer}
334: to extract the physical spectra from the eigenequations (\ref{lreigen}).
335:
336: In Ref.\cite{Goeke}, the Wick rotation from Euclidean to Minkowski space has been
337: performed to the Hamiltonian.
338: Since the time component of the vector fields becomes $\omega_4\to i\omega_0$
339: the eigen equations are reduced to
340: \begin{eqnarray}
341: H\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle=\epsilon_\mu\mid\hspace{-1mm}
342: \Psi_\mu\rangle\to H^{(+)}\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle^{(+)}
343: =\epsilon_\mu^+\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle^{(+)},\nonumber\\
344: H^\dagger\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle=\epsilon_\mu^*\mid
345: \hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle\to H^{(-)}\mid\hspace{-1mm}
346: \Psi_\mu\rangle^{(-)}=\epsilon_\mu^-\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle^{(-)}.
347: \end{eqnarray}
348: Defining
349: \begin{eqnarray}
350: \epsilon_\mu^R=\frac{1}{2}(\epsilon_\mu^++\epsilon_\mu^-),\,\,
351: \epsilon_\mu^I=\frac{1}{2}(\epsilon_\mu^+-\epsilon_\mu^-), \label{}
352: \end{eqnarray}
353: one can write the valence quark energy as
354: \begin{eqnarray}
355: E_{\rm val}=N_cn_{\nu}\epsilon^R_{\rm val}
356: \end{eqnarray}
357: where $n_\nu$ is the valence quark occupation number.
358: Then the total energy is given by
359: \begin{eqnarray}
360: E_{\rm tot}[F,\omega,G]=E_{\rm val}+E_{\rm vac}^R+E_{\rm vac}^I+E_m. \label{total_geoke}
361: \end{eqnarray}
362: By substituting (\ref{total_geoke}) into Eq.(\ref{variation_profile}),
363: we obtain the equation of motion (\ref{eq}) where the quark scalar density and
364: the quark number density are given by
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: \rho(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
367: &=&F^+\bar{\psi}\psi^++F^-\bar{\psi}^-\psi^-\nonumber\\
368: b(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
369: &=&F^+\bar{\psi}\psi^+-F^-\bar{\psi}^-\psi^- ,
370: \end{eqnarray}
371: \begin{eqnarray}
372: F^+&=&\left(n_\mu-\frac{1}{4}\sum_\mu{\rm sign}(\epsilon_\mu^R)
373: (1-2{\mathcal N}_\mu)\right) \label{},\nonumber\\
374: F^-&=&\left(\frac{1}{4}\sum_\mu{\rm sign}(\epsilon_\mu^R)
375: (1+2{\mathcal N}_\mu)\right) \label{}.
376: \end{eqnarray}
377: Unfortunately, this simple method do not produce solutions for the predicted value of the $\omega$
378: meson coupling constant $g_\omega$ required in the chiral perturbation analysis.
379: In Fig. \ref{fig:Fig1}, we show the total energy of the soliton as a function of $g_\omega$.
380: As can be seen, the soliton survives only up to $g_\omega\sim3.8$ whereas
381: the chiral perturbation analysis predicts the value around $g_\omega\sim 4.6$.
382:
383: \begin{figure}
384: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig1.EPS}
385: \caption{\label{fig:Fig1} The total energy as a function of $g_\omega$
386: in the formalisms of Refs.\cite{Goeke} and \cite{Alkofer}.
387: In the formalism of Ref.\cite{Goeke}, the solution does not exist for $g_\omega \gtrsim 3.8$.
388: $g_\omega\sim 4.6$ is predicted in the chiral perturbation analysis (see Sec.5).}
389: \end{figure}
390:
391: \begin{figure}
392: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig2.EPS}
393: \caption{\label{fig:Fig2} The binding energy in the formalisms of Refs.\cite{Goeke} and \cite{Alkofer},
394: where $g_\omega$=2.7 is used for the former and $g_\omega\sim4.6$ for the latter.}
395: \end{figure}
396:
397:
398: In the second method, Eq.~(\ref{lreigen}) is solved directly.
399: Then the real and imaginary part of the one particle energy eigenvalue are derived as \cite{Alkofer}.
400: \begin{eqnarray}
401: \epsilon_\mu^R&=&\frac{1}{2}(\langle\Psi_\mu^*\mid H\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle
402: +\langle\Psi_\mu\mid H\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^*\rangle)\nonumber\\
403: &=&\langle\Psi_\mu^R\mid H_\Theta\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^R\rangle-\langle\Psi_\mu^I\mid
404: H_\Theta\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^I\rangle\nonumber\\
405: &-&\langle\Psi_\mu^I\mid \omega\mid\hspace{-1mm}
406: \Psi_\mu^R\rangle-\langle\Psi_\mu^R\mid \omega\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^I\rangle,\nonumber\\
407: \epsilon_\mu^I&=&\frac{1}{2}(\langle\Psi_\mu^*\mid H\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle
408: -\langle\Psi_\mu\mid H\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^*\rangle)\nonumber\\
409: &=&\langle\Psi_\mu^R\mid \omega\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^R\rangle-\langle\Psi_\mu^I\mid
410: \omega\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^I\rangle\nonumber\\
411: &+&\langle\Psi_\mu^I\mid H_\Theta\mid\hspace{-1mm}
412: \Psi_\mu^R\rangle+\langle\Psi_\mu^R\mid H_\Theta\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^I\rangle
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: where we employed the decomposition
415: $\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu\rangle=\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^R\rangle+i\mid\hspace{-1mm}\Psi_\mu^I\rangle$
416: and $\langle\Psi_\mu^*\mid=\langle\Psi_\mu^R\mid+i\langle\Psi_\mu^I\mid$.
417: The valence quark energy is given by the same form as in the first method
418: \begin{eqnarray}
419: E_{\rm val}^{R}=N_c\sum_\nu n_\nu |\epsilon_\nu^R|,\,
420: E_{\rm val}^{I}=N_c\sum_\nu n_\nu {\rm sign}(\epsilon_\nu^R)|\epsilon_\nu^I| \label{}.
421: \end{eqnarray}
422: The total energy in Euclidean space is
423: \begin{eqnarray}
424: E_{\rm tot}[F,\omega,G]=E_{\rm val}^R+E_{\rm vac}^R+i(E_{\rm val}^I+E_{\rm vac}^I)+E_m.
425: \end{eqnarray}
426: Thereby the total energy in Minkowski space is interpreted as
427: \begin{eqnarray}
428: E_{\rm tot}[F,\omega,G]=E_{\rm val}^R+E_{\rm val}^I+E_{\rm vac}^R+E_{\rm vac}^I+E_m.
429: \end{eqnarray}
430: The equation of motion takes the form in (\ref{eq}) with the replacement of $\rho(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},
431: \mbox{\boldmath $y$})$ and $\rho(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})$ by
432: \begin{eqnarray}
433: \rho(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})=
434: \rho_R^{\rm val}+\rho_I^{\rm val}+\rho_R^{\rm vac}+\rho_i^{\rm vac},
435: \end{eqnarray}
436: \begin{eqnarray}
437: &&\rho_R^{\rm val}(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
438: +\rho_R^{\rm vac}(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})\nonumber\\
439: &&~~=\sum_\nu \left[\psi_\nu^R(\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\bar{\psi}_\nu^R(\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
440: -\psi_\nu^I(\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\bar{\psi}_\nu^I(\mbox{\boldmath $y$})\right](n_\nu +f_\nu^R),\nonumber\\
441: &&\rho_I^{\rm val}(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
442: +\rho_I^{\rm vac}(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})\nonumber\\
443: &&~~=\sum_\nu \left[\psi_\nu^R(\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\bar{\psi}_\nu^I(\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
444: +\psi_\nu^I(\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\bar{\psi}_\nu^R(\mbox{\boldmath $y$})\right](n_\nu +f_\nu^I),\nonumber \\
445: \label{}
446: \end{eqnarray}
447: \begin{eqnarray}
448: b(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})=b_R^{\rm val}+b_I^{\rm val}+b_R^{\rm vac}+b_i^{\rm vac},
449: \end{eqnarray}
450: \begin{eqnarray}
451: &&b_R^{\rm val}(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
452: +b_R^{\rm vac}(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})\nonumber\\
453: &&~~=\sum_\nu \left[\psi_\nu^R(\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\psi_\nu^{R\dagger}(\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
454: -\psi_\nu^I(\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\psi_\nu^{I\dagger}(\mbox{\boldmath $y$})\right](n_\nu +f_\nu^I),\nonumber\\
455: &&b_I^{\rm val}(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
456: +b_I^{\rm vac}(\mbox{\boldmath $x$},\mbox{\boldmath $y$})\nonumber\\
457: &&~~= - \sum_\nu \left[\psi_\nu^R(\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\psi_\nu^{I\dagger}(\mbox{\boldmath $y$})
458: +\psi_\nu^I(\mbox{\boldmath $x$})\bar{\psi}_\nu^{R\dagger}(\mbox{\boldmath $y$})\right](n_\nu +f_\nu^R),\nonumber\\
459: \label{}
460: \end{eqnarray}
461: where $f_R$ and $f_I$ are the imaginary part of the reguralized action written by
462: \begin{eqnarray*}
463: f_\nu^R&=&{\rm sign}(\epsilon_\nu^R){\mathcal N}_\nu+\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}(\epsilon_\nu^I/\Lambda)
464: \exp(-(\epsilon_\nu^R/\Lambda)^2),\nonumber\\
465: f_\nu^I&=&{\rm sign}(\epsilon_\nu^R){\mathcal N}_\nu .
466: \end{eqnarray*}
467:
468: \begin{figure}
469: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig3.EPS}
470: \caption{\label{fig:Fig3} The profile functions of the chiral fields
471: for $R$=0.75,1,1.5,2fm and the free ($R\to\infty$) solution.}
472: \end{figure}
473:
474: \section{\label{sec:level4}The coupling constants of the vector mesons \protect}
475: In this section, we derive the coupling constants for the vector mesons.
476: Expanding the real part of the effective action~(\ref{actionr}) up to second order
477: in the heat-kernel expansion~\cite{ebert86}, one obtains
478: \begin{eqnarray}
479: &&S_f^{R(2)}=\frac{N_c}{16\pi^2}\int d^4x\Gamma \left(0,\left(\frac{M}{\Lambda}\right)^2\right)\nonumber\\
480: &&\times{\rm tr}\left(M^2\partial_\mu U\partial^\mu U^\dagger
481: +\frac{1}{3}F_{\mu \nu}^k F^{\mu \nu}_k
482: +\frac{1}{3}F_{\mu \nu}^0 F^{\mu \nu}_0\right),~~\label{expand_s}
483: \end{eqnarray}
484: where
485: \begin{eqnarray}
486: F_{\mu \nu}^k&=&\partial_\mu V^k_\nu-\partial_\nu V^k_\mu +[V_\mu^k , V_\nu^k],\nonumber\\
487: F_{\mu \nu}^0&=&\partial_\mu V^0_\nu-\partial_\nu V^0_\mu +[V_\mu^0 , V_\nu^0].\nonumber
488: \label{}
489: \end{eqnarray}
490: We renormarize the vector meson fields
491: $V_\mu^k =-ig_\rho \tilde{V}_\mu^k,\ V_\mu^0 =-ig_\omega \tilde{V}_\mu^0$
492: for later convenience.
493: Then the total Lagrangian is given by
494: \begin{eqnarray}
495: L^{R(2)}&=&\frac{N_c}{16\pi^2}\Gamma \left(0,\left(\frac{M}{\Lambda}\right)^2\right)
496: {\rm tr} \biggl[ M^2\partial_\mu U\partial^\mu U^\dagger \nonumber\\
497: &+&\frac{g_\rho^2}{3}F_{\mu \nu}^k F^{\mu \nu}_k
498: +\frac{g_\omega^2}{3}F_{\mu \nu}^0 F^{\mu \nu}_0\biggl] \nonumber\\
499: &+&\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{g_\rho^2}{4g_1}\right)(\tilde{V}^k)^2
500: +\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{g_\omega^2}{4g_2}\right)(\tilde{V}^0)^2 \label{expand_lag}
501: \end{eqnarray}
502: where
503: \begin{eqnarray}
504: \tilde{F}_{\mu \nu}^k&=&\partial_\mu \tilde{V}^k_\nu-\partial_\nu \tilde{V}^k_\mu
505: +g_\rho[\tilde{V}_\mu^k , \tilde{V}_\nu^k],\nonumber\\
506: \tilde{F}_{\mu \nu}^0&=&\partial_\mu \tilde{V}^0_\nu-\partial_\nu \tilde{V}^0_\mu
507: +g_\omega[\tilde{V}_\mu^0 , \tilde{V}_\nu^0] \label{}.
508: \end{eqnarray}
509: Comparing Eq.~(\ref{expand_lag}) with the massive Yang-Mills Lagrangian,
510: the following relations for the parameters are obtained,
511: \begin{eqnarray}
512: f_\pi^2&=&\frac{N_c M^2}{4\pi^2}\Gamma \left(0,\left(\frac{M}{\Lambda}\right)^2\right),\\
513: g_\rho^2&=&\frac{6M^2}{f_\pi^2},\ g_\omega^2=\frac{6M^2}{4f_\pi^2},\\
514: M_\rho^2&=&\frac{g_\rho^2}{4g_1},\ M_\omega^2=\frac{g_\omega^2}{4g_2}. \label{}
515: \end{eqnarray}
516: The experimental values are
517: $f_\pi$=93MeV, $M$=350MeV, $M_\rho$=770MeV, $M_\omega$=783MeV,
518: and hence
519: \begin{eqnarray}
520: &&\Lambda=649{\rm MeV},~g_1=1.39,~g_2=0.34,\nonumber \\
521: &&\hspace{1cm}g_\rho=9.22,~g_\omega=4.61.
522: \end{eqnarray}
523: As a reference, let us note that in Ref.~\cite{saito94},
524: \begin{eqnarray}
525: g_\rho=8.32\,,~g_\omega=4.41
526: \end{eqnarray}
527: are adopted for the MIT bag model.
528:
529: \begin{figure}[t]
530: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig4.EPS}
531: \caption{\label{fig:Fig4} The profile functions of $\rho$ meson
532: for $R$=0.75,1,1.5,2fm and the free ($R\to\infty$) solution.}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535: \section{\label{sec:level5}The nuclear matter formulation}
536: In this section we describe the numerical method of eigenproblem of the
537: Hamiltonian~(\ref{hamiltonian_hedgehog}). The Hamiltonian with hedgehog
538: ansatz commutes with the parity and the grandspin operator given by
539: \begin{eqnarray*}
540: \bm{K}=\bm{j}+\bm{\tau}/2=\bm{l}+\bm{\sigma}/2+\bm{\tau}/2,
541: \end{eqnarray*}
542: where $\bm{j},\bm{l}$ are respectively total angular momentum and orbital angular momentum.
543: Accordingly, the angular basis can be written as
544: \begin{eqnarray}
545: |(lj)KM\rangle= \sum_{j_3\tau_3}C^{KM}_{jj_3\frac{1}{2}\tau_3}
546: \Bigl(\sum_{m\sigma_3}C^{jj_3}_{lm\frac{1}{2}\sigma_3}
547: |lm \rangle |\frac{1}{2}\sigma_3 \rangle \Bigr) |\frac{1}{2} \tau_3 \rangle\,.\nonumber\\
548: \end{eqnarray}
549: For $B=1$ solution, following states are possible
550: \begin{eqnarray}
551: &&|0\rangle =|(K~K+\frac{1}{2})KM \rangle\,, \nonumber \\
552: &&|1\rangle =|(K~K-\frac{1}{2})KM \rangle\,, \nonumber \\
553: &&|2\rangle =|(K+1 K+\frac{1}{2})KM\rangle\,, \nonumber \\
554: &&|3\rangle =|(K-1 K-\frac{1}{2})KM\rangle\,. \nonumber
555: \end{eqnarray}
556: With this angular basis, the normalized eigenstates of the free Hamiltonian
557: in a spherical box with radius $R$ can be constructed as follows:
558: \begin{eqnarray}
559: &&u^{(a)}_{KM}=
560: N_k\left(
561: \begin{array}{c}
562: i\omega^{+}_{\epsilon_k}j_{K}(kr)|0\rangle \\
563: \omega^{-}_{\epsilon_k}j_{K+1}(kr)|2\rangle
564: \end{array}
565: \right), \nonumber \\
566: &&u^{(b)}_{KM}=
567: N_k\left(
568: \begin{array}{c}
569: i\omega^{+}_{\epsilon_k}j_{K}(kr)|1\rangle \\
570: -\omega^{-}_{\epsilon_k}j_{K-1}(kr)|3\rangle
571: \end{array}
572: \right), \nonumber \\
573: &&v^{(a)}_{KM}=
574: N_k\left(
575: \begin{array}{c}
576: i\omega^{+}_{\epsilon_k}j_{K+1}(kr)|2\rangle \\
577: -\omega^{-}_{\epsilon_k} j_{K}(kr)|0\rangle
578: \end{array}
579: \right), \nonumber \\
580: &&v^{(b)}_{KM}=
581: N_k\left(
582: \begin{array}{c}
583: i\omega^{+}_{\epsilon_k}j_{K-1}(kr)|3\rangle \\
584: \omega^{-}_{\epsilon_k} j_{K}(kr)|1\rangle
585: \end{array}
586: \right),
587: \label{kahana_ripka}
588: \end{eqnarray}
589: with
590: \begin{eqnarray}
591: N_k=\biggl[\frac{1}{2}R^3
592: \Bigl(j_{K+1}(kR)\Bigr)^2\biggr]^{-1/2}
593: \end{eqnarray}
594: and $\omega^{+}_{\epsilon_k>0},\omega^{-}_{\epsilon_k<0}={\rm sgn}(\epsilon_k),
595: \omega^{-}_{\epsilon_k>0},\omega^{+}_{\epsilon_k<0}=k/(\epsilon_k+M)$.
596: The $u$ and $v$ correspond to the {\it ``natural''}
597: and {\it ``unnatural''} components of the basis
598: which stand for parity $(-1)^{K}$ and $(-1)^{K+1}$ respectively.
599: The momenta are discretized by the boundary conditions $j_K(k_i R)=0$.
600: The orthogonality of the basis is then satisfied by
601: \begin{eqnarray}
602: &&\int^R_0 dr r^2 j_K(k_i r)j_K(k_j r) \nonumber \\
603: &&=\int^R_0 dr r^2 j_{K\pm 1}(k_i r)j_{K\pm 1}(k_j r) \nonumber \\
604: &&=\delta_{ij}\frac{R^3}{2} [j_{K\pm 1}(k_i R)]^2 \, .
605: \label{orthogonality}
606: \end{eqnarray}
607:
608: \begin{figure}[t]
609: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig5.EPS}
610: \caption{\label{fig:Fig5} The profile functions of $\omega$ meson
611: for $R$=0.75,1,1.5,2fm and the free ($R\to\infty$) solution.}
612: \end{figure}
613:
614: Let us examine the boundary conditions for the Dirac and chiral fields
615: to construct the nuclear matter solution in the Wigner-Seitz approximation.
616: When the background chiral fields are periodic with lattice vector $\bm{a}$,
617: the quark fields would be replaced by Bloch wave functions as
618: $\psi(\bm{r}+\bm{a})=e^{i\bm{k}\cdot \bm{a}}\psi(\bm{r})$.
619: In the Wigner-Seitz approximation, however, the soliton is put on the
620: center of the spherical unit cell with the radius $R$ ($a=2R$)
621: and the dispersion $\bm{k}$ is assumed to be zero.
622: Then, $R$ is related to the baryon density through the relation
623: \begin{eqnarray}
624: \rho_{\rm B} = \frac{3}{4\pi R^3}.\label{R_density}
625: \end{eqnarray}
626: For the Dirac eigenstates, modification in the basis is needed.
627: For odd number of $K$, the boundary condition is same as the free case with
628: \begin{eqnarray}
629: j_K(k_i R)=0\,.
630: \end{eqnarray}
631: For even $K$, the following conditions must be satisfied
632: \begin{eqnarray}
633: j_{K+1}(k^{(a)}_i R)=0,~~{\rm for}~~ u^{(a)}_{KM},v^{(a)}_{KM}\,,\nonumber \\
634: j_{K-1}(k^{(b)}_i R)=0,~~{\rm for}~~ u^{(b)}_{KM},v^{(b)}_{KM}\,.
635: \label{mboundary}
636: \end{eqnarray}
637: From the conditions (\ref{mboundary}) together with the equations of motion (\ref{eq}),
638: we find the following boundary conditions for the profile function $F(r)$
639: \begin{eqnarray}
640: \left.
641: \begin{array}{c}
642: ~\sigma'(0)=\sigma'(R)=0\\
643: \pi(0)=\pi(R)=0
644: \end{array}
645: \right\} \Rightarrow
646: F(0)=-\pi, F(R)=0\,, \label{boundary_f}
647: \end{eqnarray}
648: which guarantees the periodicity and the unit topological
649: charge inside the cell. Also, for vector meson profiles
650: $\omega(r), G(r)$ we find the conditions
651: instead of Eq.(\ref{boundary_condition_wg})
652: \begin{eqnarray}
653: \omega^\prime(0)&=&0,\,\,\omega^\prime(R)=0, \\
654: G(0)&=&0,\,\, G(R)=0. \label{boundary_g}
655: \end{eqnarray}
656: We solve (\ref{eq}) selfconsistently
657: with boundary conditions (\ref{mboundary})-(\ref{boundary_g}) for varying $R$,
658: from infinity (isolate the soliton) to origin (infinite density matter).
659:
660: \begin{figure}[t]
661: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig6.EPS}
662: \caption{\label{fig:Fig6} The ``upper'' $u(r)$ and the ``lower'' $w(r)$
663: positive component of valence quark wave functions for various cell
664: radius $R$ with the boundary condition $w(R)=0$.}
665: \end{figure}
666:
667: \section{\label{sec:level6}The numerical results\protect\\ }
668: Since the equations of motion for mesons (\ref{eq}) and
669: the Dirac equations for quarks (\ref{lreigen}) are highly non-linear,
670: we solve these equations numerically by selfconsistent analysis.
671: Using trial profiles for $\pi, \rho$ and $\omega$ mesons which satisfy
672: the appropriate boundary conditions, we solve the Dirac equation (\ref{lreigen}).
673: From Eq.(\ref{eq}), the profile functions $F(r)$, $G(r)$ and $\omega(r)$
674: are uniquely determined by using the eigenstates of Eq.(\ref{lreigen}).
675: The new profiles produce new eigenstates.
676: These procedures are repeated until selfconsistency is attained.
677: We chose he quark mass $M=350$MeV which is mostly used and turned out to be
678: the best choice for obtaining the various experimental observables \cite{christov96,alkofer96}.
679: We performed the computation from $R$=5 (infinity) upto the value where the soliton
680: solution breaks.
681: The most dense solution is obtained for $R$=0.5fm which corresponds to the density
682: $\rho$=1.91${\rm fm}^{-3}\sim 11\rho_N$.
683: Note that $\rho_N$=0.17${\rm fm}^{-3}$ is the standard saturation density.
684:
685: \begin{figure}[t]
686: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig7.EPS}
687: \caption{\label{fig:Fig7} The negative component of valence quark wave functions.
688: The label is as same as Fig. \ref{fig:Fig6}.}
689: \end{figure}
690:
691: In Fig.~\ref{fig:Fig2}, the binding energies computed in the two methods are shown.
692: In the first method, the binding energy is too large, and the solutions disappear at
693: relatively lower densities. Therefore, we focus our attention to the numerical results
694: obtained in the second formalism hereafter.
695:
696: Fig.~\ref{fig:Fig3} shows the self-consistent profile functions for free ($R\to \infty$) and
697: for the various values of the cell radius $R$.
698: Figs.~\ref{fig:Fig4}, \ref{fig:Fig5} show meson profile functions
699: of $G(r),\omega(r)$ respectively. Fig. \ref{fig:Fig6} shows the real part of the
700: quark wave functions.
701: Nonvanishing values of the upper component at the cell boundary $u(R)$
702: come from the zero-mode elements in the basis.
703: The imaginary part of the quark wave functions derived in the second formulation
704: is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:Fig7}.
705:
706: In Fig. \ref{fig:Fig8}, we present the results of the
707: total energy of the soliton as a function of $R$, for various values
708: of the meson couplings. For only the pion coupling, the saturation can not be observed
709: and the soliton disappears at very low density.
710: Adding the $\rho$ meson, the soliton survives at higher density,
711: but no saturation is observed.
712: In the case of $\pi-\omega$, the total energy is enhanced and the soliton disappears
713: at low density. The behavior is similar to the case of the pion coupling only.
714: The saturation can be observed only when all the meson couplings are incorporated.
715: The saturation point is at $R$=1.0fm corresponding to the density $\rho=0.24{\rm fm}^{-3}$ and
716: the binding energy 53MeV.
717: The density is very close to the experimental value for nuclear matter which is $R$=1.1fm
718: corresponding to the density $\rho=0.17{\rm fm}^{-3}$.
719: The binding energy is deeper compared to its empirical value, 16MeV.
720: In Fig. \ref{fig:Fig9} we show the binding energy for varying the constituent quark mass,
721: which is the only free parameter in our model.
722: The soliton survives for the constituent quark mass in the range 300MeV $\leq M \leq$ 440MeV.
723: As $M$ increases, the saturation point moves to the lower density and
724: the binding energy becomes shallower.
725: For $M$=350MeV, the solution reaches to the highest density.
726:
727: Let us estimate the nuclear incompressibility since it gives an important information for
728: the saturation property of the matter.
729: In Ref. \cite{barnea00}, the authors studied the soliton matter in the Friedberg-Lee model
730: with quark-meson coupling using the Wigner-Seitz approximation.
731: They estimated the incompressibility $K$ with the formula
732: \begin{eqnarray}
733: K=R^2\frac{d^2 E_{\rm B}}{dR^2}
734: \end{eqnarray}
735: and obtained $K\sim1170$MeV. The experiment predicts $K$=100-500MeV and generally $K\sim200$MeV.
736: In our previous analysis \cite{nagai06} with only $\pi$ mesons, we obtained $K\sim400$MeV.
737: Our new result predicts $K\sim270$MeV.
738: \begin{figure}[t]
739: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig8.EPS}
740: \caption{\label{fig:Fig8} The total energy of soliton for the various combinations of
741: the mesons.}
742: \end{figure}
743:
744: \section{\label{sec:level7}Summary\protect\\ }
745: In this paper we studied the nuclear matter solutions in the chiral quark soliton model.
746: We adopted Wigner-Seitz approximation and investigated the saturation property of the matter solutions.
747: To improve the qualitative behavior at the saturation point, we introduced the $\rho, \omega$ mesons
748: in the model. The $\rho$ meson can be incorporated in a straightforward manner. On the other hand,
749: Incorporating the $\omega$ meson makes the Hamiltonian complex-valued and requires some technique.
750: We tested two distinct formulations proposed in Refs.\cite{Goeke,Alkofer} to solve the non-Hermitian
751: eigenvalue problem.
752: It turned out that the latter method produces the better behavior of solutions especially at
753: high-density region.
754: We performed the chiral perturbation analysis to determine the meson properties, i.e.,
755: the coupling constants and the cutoff parameter.
756: We found that stable nuclear matter solutions exist when $\pi,\rho,\omega$ mesons are included
757: with $330\le M \le 420$[MeV].
758:
759: \begin{figure}[t]
760: \includegraphics[height=7cm, width=9cm]{Fig9.EPS}
761: \caption{\label{fig:Fig9} The total energy varying the constituent quark mass $M$.}
762: \end{figure}
763:
764: From Fig. \ref{fig:Fig8}, one can speculate that the attractive
765: property of the $\rho$ meson makes the total energy smaller and allows the solution
766: to survive at the high density regime. The repulsive property of the $\omega$ meson
767: makes the total energy larger and creates a short range (high density) core.
768: Thus, the model having both effects can produce a stable nuclear matter.
769:
770: \begin{table}[t]
771: \caption{\label{value_varing_M}We present the $\rho$, $\omega$ coupling constant $g_\rho$, $g_\omega$,
772: the total energy of the free nucleon $E_{\rm tot}^{\rm free}$ (its the experimental value is 939MeV),
773: the binding energy $E_{\rm B}$ (16MeV), the saturation density $\rho_s$ (0.17${\rm fm}^{-3}$)
774: and the incompressibility $K$ (210$\pm$30MeV)
775: for the constituent quark mass $M$=350, 375, 400MeV.}
776: \begin{ruledtabular}
777: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
778: $M[{\rm MeV}]$ & $g_\rho$ & $g_\omega$ & $E_{\rm tot}^{\rm free}[{\rm MeV}]$
779: & $E_{\rm B}[{\rm MeV}]$ & $\rho_s[{\rm fm}^{-3}]$ & $K$[MeV] \\ \hline
780: 350 & 9.22 & 4.61 & 1095 & 53 & 0.24 & 271 \\
781: 375 & 9.88 & 4.94 & 1070 & 36 & 0.13 & 242 \\
782: 400 & 10.54 & 5.27 & 1044 & 29 & 0.11 & 274 \\
783: \end{tabular}
784: \end{ruledtabular}
785: \end{table}
786:
787: Although our formulation realizes a improved nuclear saturation property, the binding energy
788: is still large.
789: Throughout the calculation, we set the constituent quark mass $M$=350MeV, in which the
790: solution survives at highest density.
791: By varying the value of $M$ in a few ten MeV, the saturation property should be
792: improved (see Fig. \ref{fig:Fig9}).
793: TABLE \ref{value_varing_M} shows the computed saturation properties for $M$=350, 375, 400MeV.
794: $M$=375MeV seems to be the best choice, but the binding energy is
795: still large. Another attempt to improve the binding energy may be to introduce heavier mesons,
796: like axial vector meson $a_1$ ($\pi, \sigma, \rho, \omega$ and $a_1$ are the mesons which do not
797: vanish for hedgehogs \cite{Goeke}).
798: It is known that $a_1$ meson has attractive property like $\rho$ meson and then it would make the
799: matter softer. Taking account the Fermi motion would also make the saturation energy shallower.
800:
801:
802: \begin{center}
803: {\bf Acknowledgements}
804: \end{center}
805: We are grateful to Kouichi Saito for fruitful discussions and comments.
806:
807: \begin{thebibliography}{qq} \bibitem{klebanov85}
808: Igor Klebanov, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 262}, 133 (1985). \bibitem{wust87} E. W\"ust, B. E. Brown and A. D. Jackson,
809: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 468}, 450 (1987). \bibitem{manton87} Alfred S. Goldhaber and N. S. Manton,
810: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 19}, 231 (1987). \bibitem{castillejo89} L. Castillejo, P. S. Jones, A. D. Jackson,
811: J. J. M. Verbaarschot and A. Jackson,
812: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 501}, 450 (1987).
813: \bibitem{kugler89}
814: M. Kugler and S. Shtrikman,
815: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 40}, 3421 (1989). \bibitem{park02} Byung-Yoon Park, Dong-Pil Min, Mannque Rho and Vincente Vento, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 707}, 381 (2002). \bibitem{achtzehnter85} Joachim Achtzehnter, Werner Scheid and Lawrence Wilets,
816: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 32}, 2414 (1985). \bibitem{banerjee85}
817: B. Banerjee, N. K. Glendenning and V. Soni,
818: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 155}, 213 (1985).
819: \bibitem{glendenning86}
820: N. K. Glendenning and B. Banerjee,
821: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 34}, 1072 (1986).
822: \bibitem{hahn87}
823: Detlev Hahn and Norman K. Glendenning,
824: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 36}, 1181 (1987).
825: \bibitem{weber98}
826: Urban Weber and Judith A. McGovern,
827: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 57}, 3376 (1998).
828: \bibitem{reinhardt85}
829: H. Reinhardt, B. V. Dang, and H. Schulz,
830: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 159}, 161 (1985).
831: \bibitem{birse88}
832: M. C. Birse, J. J. Rehr and L. Wilets,
833: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 38}, 359 (1988).
834: \bibitem{barnea00}
835: Nir Barnea, Timothy S. Walhout,
836: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 677}, 367 (2000). \bibitem{Kutschera84} M. Kutschera, C. J. Pethick and D. G. Ravenhall,
837: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 53}, 1041 (1984).
838: \bibitem{diakonov88}
839: D. I. Diakonov, V. Yu. Petrov, and P. V. Pobylitsa,
840: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 306}, 809 (1988).
841: \bibitem{reinhardt88}
842: H. Reinhardt and R. W\"unsch , Phys. Lett. B {\bf 215}, 577 (1988).
843: \bibitem{meissner89}
844: Th. Meissner, F. Gr\"ummer, and K. Goeke,
845: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 227}, 296 (1989).
846: \bibitem{wakamatsu91}
847: M. Wakamatsu and H. Yoshiki, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 524}, 561 (1991).
848: \bibitem{christov96}
849: Chr.\ V.\ Christov, A.\ Blotz, H.-C.Kim, P.\ Pobylitsa, T.\ Watabe, Th.\ Meissner,
850: E.\ Ruiz Arriola, K.\ Goeke, Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 37}, 91 (1996).
851: \bibitem{alkofer96}
852: R.\ Alkofer, H.\ Reinhardt and H.\ Weigel, Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 265}, 139 (1996)
853: \bibitem{amore00}
854: P. Amore and A. De Pace,
855: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 61}, 055201 (2000).
856: \bibitem{adjali92}
857: I. Adjali, I. J. Aitchison, and J. A. Zuk,
858: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 537}, 457 (1992).
859: \bibitem{nagai06}
860: S.Nagai, N.Sawado and N.Shiiki,
861: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 632}, 644 (2006).
862: \bibitem{Goeke}
863: C. Sch\"uren, F. D\"oring,
864: E.\ Ruiz Arriola, K.\ Goeke, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 565}, 687 (1993).
865: \bibitem{Alkofer}
866: R.\ Alkofer, H.\ Reinhardt and H.\ Weigel, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 570}, 445 (1994)
867: \bibitem{kahana84}
868: S. Kahana and G. Ripka, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 429}, 462 (1984).
869: \bibitem{ebert86} D.\ Ebert, H.\ Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 271}, 188 (1986).
870: \bibitem{saito94}
871: K.Saito and A.W.Thomas, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 327}, 9 (1994).
872: \end{thebibliography}
873: \end{document}
874:
875:
876:
877: