1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \usepackage[section]{placeins}
5: \setlength{\textwidth}{17.2 true cm}
6: \setlength{\textheight}{22 true cm}
7: \setlength{\topmargin}{-1.5 true cm}
8: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.5 true cm}
9: \def\tozero#1{\mathrel{\mathop{\sim}\limits_{\scriptscriptstyle
10: {#1\rightarrow0 }}}}
11: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
12: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
13: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
14: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
15: \def\ms{\overline{\rm MS}}
16: \def\as{\alpha_s}
17: \def\az{\alpha_0}
18: \relax
19: \def\abs#1{\left|#1\right|}
20: \def\zalpha{Z^{(\as)}(\as(\mu^2),\epsilon)}
21: \def\zalphaQ{Z^{(\as)}(\as(Q^2),\epsilon)}
22: \def\zc{Z^{(C)}(N,\as(\mu^2),\epsilon)}
23: \def\m{{\cal M}}
24: \def\eg{{\it e.g.}}
25: \def\ie{{\it i.e.}}
26: \def\MS{\hbox{$\overline{\rm MS}$}}
27: \def \hepph #1 {{\tt hep-ph/#1}}
28: \def \hepex #1 {{\tt hep-ex/#1}}
29: \def\theequation{\arabic{equation}}
30: \newenvironment{comment}[1]{}{}
31: \newcommand{\sect}[1]{\setcounter{equation}{0}\section{#1}}
32: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
33: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
34: \newcommand\sss{\scriptscriptstyle}
35: \renewcommand\topfraction{1} % Max. Fraz. di pagina per float in t
36: \renewcommand\bottomfraction{1} % Max. Fraz. di pagina per float in b
37: \renewcommand\textfraction{0} % Min. Fraz. di pagina per testo
38: \setcounter{topnumber}{5} % Max # float in position t
39: \setcounter{bottomnumber}{5} % Max # float in position b
40: \setcounter{totalnumber}{5} % Max # float in same page
41: \setcounter{dbltopnumber}{2} % Max # large float
42: \newsavebox\tmpfig
43: \newcommand\settmpfig[1]{\sbox{\tmpfig}{\mbox{\ref{#1}}}}
44: %
45: %\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
46:
47: \begin{document}
48:
49: \pagestyle{empty}
50:
51: \begin{flushright}
52:
53: {\tt hep-ph/0609073}\\IFUM-873/FT\\
54: \end{flushright}
55:
56: \begin{center}
57: \vspace*{0.5cm}
58: {\Large \bf Threshold resummation of Drell-Yan rapidity distributions
59: } \\
60: \vspace*{1.5cm}
61: Paolo Bolzoni \\
62: \vspace{0.6cm} {\it
63: Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Milano and
64: INFN, Sezione di Milano,\\
65: Via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano, Italy}\\
66: \vspace*{1.5cm}
67: {\bf Abstract}
68: \end{center}
69:
70: \noindent
71:
72: We present a derivation of the threshold resummation formula for the
73: Drell-Yan rapidity distribution. Our argument is valid for all values of
74: rapidity and to all orders in perturbative QCD and can be applied to all Drell-Yan processes in a universal way, i.e. both for
75: the production of a virtual photon $\gamma^{*}$ and the production of a vector boson $W^{\pm}$, $Z^{0}$. We
76: show that for the fixed-target
77: experiment E866/NuSea used in current parton fits, the NLL resummation corrections are comparable to NLO fixed-order
78: corrections and are crucial to obtain agreement with the data.
79: \vspace*{1cm}
80:
81: \vfill
82: \noindent
83:
84: \begin{flushleft} September 2006 \end{flushleft}
85: \eject
86:
87: \setcounter{page}{1} \pagestyle{plain}
88:
89:
90: In perturbative QCD, it is well known that, when one approaches to the boundary of the phase space,
91: the cross section receives logarithmically-enhanced contributions at all
92: orders. These large terms have been resummed a long time ago for the classes of inclusive hadronic processes
93: of the type of deep-inelastic and Drell-Yan \cite{s,ct} to
94: next-to-leading-logarithmic order (NLL). More recently, the next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic (NNLL)
95: accuracy has been reached \cite{v}. Threshold resummation of inclusive
96: processes can affect significantly cross sections and the extraction of parton densities \cite{mc1,mc2}.
97: For the case of small transverse momentum distributions in Drell-Yan processes,
98: it has been shown that resummation is necessary to reproduce the correct behavior of the cross section \cite{css}.
99:
100:
101: The differential rapidity Drell-Yan cross section is used for the extraction of the ratio
102: $\bar{d}/\bar{u}$ of parton densities. The accurate knowledge of these functions is
103: needed to study Higgs boson production and the asymmetry $W^{\pm}$.
104: The resummation of Drell-Yan rapidity distributions
105: was first considered in 1992 \cite{ls}. At that time, it was suggested a
106: resummation formula for the case of zero rapidity. Very recently, thanks to the analysis of the full NLO calculation of the Drell-Yan
107: rapidity distribution, it has been shown \cite{mv}, that the result given in \cite{ls} is valid at NLL
108: for all rapidities.
109:
110:
111: In this Letter, we will give a simple proof of an all-order
112: resummation formula valid for all values of rapidity. To do this,
113: we will use the technique of the double Fourier-Mellin moments
114: developed in \cite{sv}. In particular, we will show that the
115: resummation can be reduced to that of the rapidity-integrated
116: process, which is given in terms of a dimensionless universal
117: function for both DY and $W^{\pm}$ and $Z^{0}$ production, and has
118: been largely studied \cite{s,ct} even to all logarithmic orders
119: \cite{fr}. Finally, we implement numerically the resummation
120: formula and give predictions of the full rapidity-dependent NLL
121: Drell-Yan cross section for the case of the fixed-target
122: E866/NuSea experiment. We find that resummation at the NLL level
123: is necessary and that its agreement with the experimental data is
124: better than the NNLO calculation \cite{admp}.
125:
126:
127:
128: We consider the general Drell-Yan process in which the collisions of two hadrons ($H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$)
129: produce a virtual photon $\gamma^{*}$ (or an on-shell vector boson $V$) and any collection of
130: hadrons (X):
131: \bea
132: H_{1}(P_{1})+H_{2}(P_{2})\rightarrow \gamma^{*}(V)(Q) +X(K).
133: \eea
134: In particular, we are interested in the differential cross section $\frac{d\sigma}{dQ^{2}dY}(x,Q^{2},Y)$,
135: where $Q^{2}$ is the invariant mass of the photon or of the vector boson, $x$ is defined as usual as the
136: fraction of invariant mass that the hadrons transfer to the photon (or to the vector boson) and $Y$ is the rapidity of
137: $\gamma^{*}$ ($V$) in the hadronic center-of-mass:
138: \bea\label{rap}
139: x\equiv\frac{Q^{2}}{S},\quad S=(P_{1}+P_{2})^{2}, \quad Y\equiv\frac{1}{2}\ln\left(\frac{E+p_{z}}{E-p_{z}}\right),
140: \eea
141: where $E$ and $p_{z}$ are the energy and the momentum along the collisional axis of $\gamma^{*}(V)$ respectively.
142: At the partonic level, a parton 1(2) in the hadron $H_{1}$ ($H_{2}$) carries a longitudinal momentum $p_{1}=x_{1}P_{1}$ ($p_{2}=x_{2}P_{2}$).
143: Thus, the rapidity in the partonic center-of-mass ($y$) is obtained performing a boost of $Y$ between the two frames:
144: \bea\label{yY}
145: y=Y-\frac{1}{2}\ln\left(\frac{x_{1}}{x_{2}}\right).
146: \eea
147:
148:
149: In order to understand the kinematic configurations in terms of rapidity, it is convenient to define a new
150: variable $u$,
151: \bea\label{u}
152: u\equiv\frac{Q\cdot p_{1}}{Q\cdot p_{2}}=e^{-2y}=\frac{x_{1}}{x_{2}}e^{-2Y}.
153: \eea
154: which can assume all the values in the closed interval,
155: \bea\label{boundary}
156: z\leq u\leq \frac{1}{z},
157: \eea
158: with
159: \bea\label{z}
160: z=\frac{Q^{2}}{2p_{1}\cdot p_{2}}=\frac{Q^{2}}{(p_{1}+p_{2})^{2}}=\frac{x}{x_{1}x_{2}}.
161: \eea
162: The upper and lower bounds in eq.(\ref{boundary}) are reached when the extra radiation is emitted collinear to the incoming
163: parton 1 and 2 respectively.
164: Eqs.(\ref{yY},\ref{u}) allow us to rewrite the relation in eq.(\ref{boundary}) as a relation for the upper and lower bounds of the partonic
165: center-of-mass rapidity:
166: \bea\label{boundy}
167: \frac{1}{2}\ln z\leq y\leq \frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{1}{z}.
168: \eea
169: Substituting eqs.(\ref{u}, \ref{z}) into the two
170: conditions $u\geq z$ and $u\leq 1/z$, we obtain the lower
171: kinematic bound for $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$:
172: \bea
173: x_{1}\geq \sqrt{x}e^{Y}\equiv x_{1}^{0}, \quad x_{2}\geq \sqrt{x}e^{-Y}\equiv x_{2}^{0}
174: \eea
175: and the obvious requirement $x_{1(2)}^{0}\leq 1$ implies that the hadronic rapidity has a lower
176: and an upper bound:
177: \bea\label{boundY}
178: \frac{1}{2}\ln x\leq Y\leq \frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{1}{x}.
179: \eea
180: The variable $z$ in eq.(\ref{z}) can be viewed as the fraction of invariant mass that the incoming partons transfer to $\gamma^{*}(V)$.
181: and, hence, the threshold limit is reached when $z$ approaches to $1$.
182:
183:
184: According to the standard factorization of collinear singularities of perturbative QCD, the expression for the hadronic differential
185: cross section in rapidity has the form,
186: \bea\label{hadrcs}
187: \frac{d\sigma}{dQ^{2}dY}=\sum_{i,j}\int_{x_{1}^{0}}^{1}dx_{1}\int_{x_{2}^{0}}^{1}
188: dx_{2}F^{H_{1}}_{i}(x_{1},\mu^{2})F^{H_{2}}_{j}(x_{2},\mu^{2})
189: \frac{d\hat{\sigma}_{ij}}{dQ^{2}dy}\left(x_{1},x_{2},\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y\right),
190: \eea
191: where $y$ depends on $Y$, $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$ according to eq.(\ref{yY}).
192: The sum runs over all possible partonic subprocesses, $F^{(1)}_{i}$ ,$F^{(2)}_{j}$ are respectively the parton densities of the hadron
193: $H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$, $\mu$ is the factorization scale (chosen equal to renormalization scale for simplicity) and
194: $d\hat{\sigma}_{ij}/(dQ^{2}dy)$ is the partonic cross section.
195: In the threshold limit the gluon-quark channels are
196: suppressed by powers of $(1-z)$ \cite{fr} and, so, in order to study resummation, we will consider only the quark-anti-quark contributions of the sum in eq.(\ref{hadrcs}).
197: These last terms are related to the same dimensionless coefficient function
198: $C(z,Q^{2}/\mu^{2},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y)$ through the relations
199: \bea\label{photondy}
200: x_{1}x_{2}\frac{d\hat{\sigma}^{\gamma^{*}}_{q\bar{q}'}}{dQ^{2}dy}\left(x_{1},x_{2},\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y\right)=\frac{4\pi\alpha^{2}c_{q\bar{q}'}}{9Q^{2}S}
201: C\left(z,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y\right),
202: \eea
203: for the virtual photon vertex and
204: \bea\label{Vprod}
205: x_{1}x_{2}\frac{d\hat{\sigma}^{V}_{q\bar{q}'}}{dQ^{2}dy}\left(x_{1},x_{2},\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y\right)=
206: \frac{\pi G_{F}Q^{2}\sqrt{2}c_{q\bar{q}'}}{3S}\delta(Q^{2}-M^{2}_{V})
207: C\left(z,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y\right),
208: \eea
209: for the real vector boson vertex.
210: Here $G_{F}$ is the Fermi constant, $M_{V}$ is the mass of the produced vector boson. The coefficients $c_{q\bar{q}'}$ are given by:
211: \begin{eqnarray}
212: c_{q\bar{q}'}&=&Q_{q}^{2}\delta_{q\bar{q}}\quad\textrm{for $\gamma^{*}$},\label{gamma}\\
213: c_{q\bar{q}'}&=&|V_{qq'}|^{2}\quad \textrm{for $W^{\pm}$},\label{W}\\
214: c_{q\bar{q}'}&=&4[(g_{v}^{q})^{2}+(g_{a}^{q})^{2}]\delta_{q\bar{q}} \quad\textrm{for $Z^{0}$},\label{Z}
215: \end{eqnarray}
216: where $Q_{q}^{2}$ is the square charge of the quark $q$, $V_{qq'}$ are the CKM mixing factors for the quark flavors $q,q'$ and
217: \begin{eqnarray}
218: g_{v}^{q}&=&\frac{1}{2}-\frac{4}{3}\sin^{2}\theta_{W},\quad g_{a}^{q}=\frac{1}{2}\quad\textrm{for an up-type quark},\\
219: g_{v}^{q}&=&-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{2}{3}\sin^{2}\theta_{W},\quad g_{a}^{q}=-\frac{1}{2}\quad\textrm{for a down-type quark},\label{gv}
220: \end{eqnarray}
221: with $\theta_{W}$ the Weinberg weak mixing angle.
222: Thus, we are left with a dimensionless cross section of the form:
223: \bea\label{universal}
224: \sigma(x,Q^{2},Y)\equiv \int_{x_{1}^{0}}^{1}\frac{dx_{1}}{x_{1}}\int_{x_{2}^{0}}^{1}\frac{dx_{2}}{x_{2}}F_{1}^{H_{1}}(x_{1},\mu^{2})
225: F_{2}^{H_{2}}(x_{2},\mu^{2})C\left(z,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y\right),
226: \eea
227: where $F_{1}$ and $F_{2}$ are quark or anti-quark parton densities in the hadron $H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$ respectively. This shows the universality of resummation in
228: Drell-Yan processes in the sense that only the quantity defined in eq.(\ref{universal}) has to be resummed.
229:
230:
231: We shall now show that the resummed expression of eq.(\ref{universal}) is obtained by simply replacing
232: the coefficient function $C(z,Q^{2}/\mu^{2},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y)$ with its integral over y, resummed to the desired
233: logarithmic accuracy. To show this, we recall that resummation is usually performed in the space of the variable $N$, which is the Mellin
234: conjugate of $x$, since Mellin transformation turns convolution products into ordinary products. In the case of the rapidity
235: distribution, however, this is not sufficient.
236: In fact, we see that the Mellin transform with respect to $x$,
237: \bea\label{mellintrans}
238: \sigma(N,Q^{2},Y)\equiv \int_{0}^{1}dxx^{N-1}\sigma(x,Q^{2},Y),
239: \eea
240: does not diagonalize the double integral in eq.(\ref{universal}), because the partonic center-of-mass rapidity $y$ depends on $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$ through eq.(\ref{yY}).
241: The ordinary product in Mellin space can be recovered performing the Mellin transform with respect to $x$ of the Fourier transform with respect to $Y$.
242: Using eqs.(\ref{boundY},\ref{boundy}) and the fact that the coefficient function must be symmetric in $y$, we find
243: \begin{eqnarray}\label{fact}
244: \sigma(N,Q^{2},M)&\equiv&\int_{0}^{1}dxx^{N-1}\int_{\log\sqrt{x}}^{\log1/\sqrt{x}}dYe^{iMY}\sigma(x,Q^{2},Y)\\
245: &=&F_{1}^{H_{1}}(N+iM/2,\mu^{2})F_{2}^{H_{2}}(N-iM/2,\mu^{2})C\left(N,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),M\right),
246: \end{eqnarray}
247: where
248: \begin{eqnarray}
249: F_{i}^{H_{i}}(N\pm iM/2,\mu^{2})&=&\int_{0}^{1}dxx^{N-1\pm iM/2}F_{i}^{H_{i}}(x,\mu^{2}),\label{mmpdf}\\
250: C\left(N,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),M\right)&=&2\int_{0}^{1}dzz^{N-1}\int_{0}^{\log1/\sqrt{z}}dy\cos(My)
251: C\left(z,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}),y\right)\label{mfcoefffunc2}.\label{coefftrans}
252: \end{eqnarray}
253:
254:
255: The dependence on $M$, the Fourier conjugate of the rapidity $y$, originates from the parton
256: densities, that depend on $N\pm iM/2$, and from the factor of $\cos(My)$ in the integrand of eq.(\ref{mfcoefffunc2}).
257: This last dependence, however, is irrelevant in the large-$N$ limit. Indeed, one can expand $\cos(My)$ in powers of $y$,
258: \bea
259: \cos(My)=1-\frac{M^{2}y^{2}}{2}+\emph{O}(M^{4}y^{4}).\label{expansion}
260: \eea
261: and observe that the first term of this expansion leads to a convergent integral (the rapidity-integrated cross section), while
262: the following terms are suppressed by powers of $(1-z)$, since the upper integration bound is
263: \bea
264: \ln\frac{1}{\sqrt{z}}=\frac{1}{2}(1-z)+\emph{O}((1-z)^2).
265: \eea
266: Hence, up to terms suppressed
267: by factors $1/N$, eq.(\ref{mfcoefffunc2}) is equal to the Mellin transform of the rapidity-integrated Drell-Yan coefficient function that we call
268: $C_{I}(N,Q^{2}/\mu^{2},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2}))$.
269: This completes our proof. We get
270: \bea\label{rescrosssec}
271: \sigma^{res}(N,Q^{2},M)=F_{1}^{H_{1}}(N+iM/2,\mu^{2})F_{2}^{H_{2}}(N-iM/2,\mu^{2})C_{I}^{res}\left(N,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})\right).
272: \eea
273:
274:
275: This is the main theoretical result of our Letter: it shows that,
276: near threshold, the Mellin-Fourier transform of the coefficient
277: function does not depend on the Fourier moments and that this is
278: valid to all orders of QCD perturbation theory. Furthermore this
279: result remains valid for all values of hadronic center-of-mass
280: rapidity, because we have introduced a suitable integral transform
281: over rapidity. The resummed rapidity-integrated Drell-Yan
282: coefficient function to NLL is well known \cite{s,ct} and, using
283: the notation of \cite{fr}, it is given in a compact form (in the
284: $\overline{MS}$ scheme) by \bea\label{rescoeff}
285: C_{I}^{res}\left(N,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})\right)=\exp\left\{-\int_{1}^{N^{2}}\frac{dn}{n}
286: \left[\int_{n\mu^{2}}^{Q^{2}}\frac{dk^{2}}{k^{2}}\left(A_{1}\alpha_{s}(\frac{k^{2}}{n})+A_{2}\alpha_{s}^{2}(\frac{k^{2}}{n})\right)+B_{1}\alpha_{s}(\frac{Q^{2}}{n})\right]\right\},
287: \eea where \bea\label{coeff} A_{1}=\frac{C_{F}}{\pi},\quad
288: A_{2}=\frac{C_{F}}{2\pi^{2}}\left[C_{A}\left(\frac{67}{18}-\frac{\pi^{2}}{6}\right)-\frac{5}{9}N_{f}\right],\quad
289: B_{1}=-\frac{\gamma_{E}A_{1}}{2\pi} \eea with $C_{F}=4/3$,
290: $C_{A}=3$, $N_{f}$ the number of flavors and with the Euler gamma
291: $\gamma_{E}=0.5772\dots$ . The use of only the first coefficient
292: $A_{1}$ allows us to resum all the LL contributions
293: $\alpha_{s}^{k}\log^{k+1}(N)$ while the use of all the three
294: coefficients in eq.(\ref{coeff}) enable us to add also the NLL
295: terms $\alpha_{s}^{k}\log^{k}(N)$.
296:
297:
298: A NLL expression of the rapidity distribution is obtained by taking the inverse Mellin and Fourier transform of $\sigma^{res}(N,Q^{2},M)$. This procedure requires
299: the use of some specific prescription \cite{cmnt,lsn,frru} in order to overcome the problem of the Landau singularity in $\alpha_{s}(Q^{2}/N^{2})$.
300: Here, we adopt the ``Minimal Prescription'' proposed in \cite{cmnt}, which is simply obtained choosing the integration contour of the inverse Mellin transform in such a way
301: that all the poles
302: of the integrand are to the left, except the Landau pole. Furthermore,
303: in order to improve numerical convergence and to avoid the singularities of the parton densities of eq.(\ref{rescrosssec}) which are computed out of the real axis,
304: we perform the $N$-integral along a path $\Gamma$ given by:
305: \begin{eqnarray}
306: \Gamma&=&\Gamma_{1}+\Gamma_{2}+\Gamma_{3}\\
307: \Gamma_{1}(t)&=&C_{MP}-i\frac{M}{2}+t(1+i),\quad t\in (-\infty,0)\\
308: \Gamma_{2}(s)&=&C_{MP}+is\frac{M}{2},\quad s\in (-1,1)\\
309: \Gamma_{3}(t)&=&C_{MP}+i\frac{M}{2}-t(1-i),\quad t\in (0,+\infty)
310: \end{eqnarray}
311: where $C_{MP}$ is a positive number below the Landau pole of $\alpha_{s}(Q^{2}/N^{2})$.
312: Performing the changes of variable $M=-\ln m$ and $t=-\ln s$, the double inverse transform over the curve $\Gamma$ becomes:
313: \bea\label{trasff}
314: \sigma^{res}(x,Q^{2},Y)=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{dm}{m}\cos(-Y\ln m)\sigma^{res}(x,Q^{2},-\log m),
315: \eea
316: where $\sigma^{res}(x,Q^{2},M)$ is given by
317: \begin{eqnarray}\label{trasfm}
318: &&\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\sigma^{res}(x,Q^{2},M)=\\
319: &&\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{1}\frac{ds}{s}\Re\bigg[x^{-C_{MP}-\ln s+i(M/2+1)}\sigma^{res}(C_{MP}+\ln s-i(M/2+1),Q^{2},M)(1-i)\nonumber\\
320: &&+\frac{sM}{2}x^{-C_{MP}-isM/2}\sigma^{res}(C_{MP}+isM/2, Q^{2},M)\bigg].\nonumber
321: \end{eqnarray}
322:
323:
324: Eqs.(\ref{trasff},\ref{trasfm}) are the expressions that we use to
325: evaluate numerically the resummed dimensionless cross section in the variables $x$ and $Y$. The explicit expression of eq.(\ref{rescoeff}) is easily obtained performing the integrals
326: and is given by
327: \bea\label{explform}
328: C_{I}^{res}\left(N,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})\right)=\exp\{\ln N g_{1}(\lambda)+g_{2}(\lambda)\},
329: \eea
330: where
331: \begin{eqnarray}
332: g_{1}(\lambda)&=&\frac{A_{1}}{\beta_{0}\lambda}[2\lambda+(1-2\lambda)\log(1-2\lambda)]\label{g1}\\
333: g_{2}(\lambda)&=&-\frac{2A_{1}\gamma_{E}}{\beta_{0}}\log(1-2\lambda)+\frac{A_{1}\beta_{1}}{\beta_{0}^{3}}[2\lambda+\log(1-2\lambda)+\frac{1}{2}\log^{2}(1-2\lambda)]\nonumber\\
334: &&-\frac{A_{2}}{\beta_{0}^{2}}[2\lambda+\log(1-2\lambda)]+\log\left(\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}}\right)\frac{A_{1}}{\beta_{0}}\log(1-2\lambda)\label{g2}
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: and
337: \bea
338: \lambda=\beta_{0}\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})\ln N,\quad\beta_{0}=\frac{1}{4\pi}\left(11-\frac{2}{3}N_{f}\right),\quad\beta_{1}=\frac{1}{16\pi^{2}}\left(102-\frac{38}{3}N_{f}\right)
339: \label{betacoeff}.
340: \eea
341: Here, we choose the factorization scale equal to the renormalization scale for simplicity. To study the dependence on the renormalization scale one has simply to express
342: $\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})$ in terms of it. Furthermore, we need the analytic continuations to the whole complex plane of the Mellin-transformed parton densities that appear
343: in eq.(\ref{rescrosssec}). In order to overcome this problem, we have to evolve up a partonic fit taken at a certain scale solving
344: the DGLAP evolution equations in Mellin space \cite{grv}. The LO and NLO expressions of the
345: splitting functions are reported in \cite{fkl} and their analytic continuations are given in \cite{gly} and \cite{bk}.
346:
347:
348: Finally, we want to obtain a NLO determination of the cross section improved with NLL resummation. In order to do this, we must keep the resummed dimensionless part of the cross
349: section eq.(\ref{trasff}), multiply it by the correct dimensional prefactors looking eqs.(\ref{photondy}-\ref{gv}), add the full NLO cross section and subtract the
350: double-counted logarithmic enhanced contributions. This matching has to be done in the $x$ and $Y$ spaces, because we are not able to calculate the
351: Mellin-Fourier moments of the full NLO cross section analytically. Thus, we have
352: \bea\label{matching}
353: \frac{d\sigma}{dQ^{2}dY}=\frac{d\sigma^{FO}}{dQ^{2}dY}+\frac{d\sigma^{res}}{dQ^{2}dY}-\left[\frac{d\sigma^{res}}{dQ^{2}dY}\right]_{\alpha_{s}=0}-
354: \alpha_{s}\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha_{s}}\left(\frac{d\sigma^{res}}{dQ^{2}dY}\right)\right]_{\alpha_{s}=0}.
355: \eea
356: The first term is the full NLO cross section reported in \cite{mv,g,smrs,aem}, which includes even the quark-gluon channel. The
357: third and the fourth terms in eq.(\ref{matching}) are obtained in the same way as the second one, but with the substitutions
358: \begin{eqnarray}
359: C_{I}^{res}\left(N,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})\right)&\rightarrow& 1,\\
360: C_{I}^{res}\left(N,\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}},\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})\right)&\rightarrow& \alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})
361: 2A_{1}\left\{\ln^{2}N+\ln N\left[2\gamma_{E}-\log\left(\frac{Q^{2}}{\mu^{2}}\right)\right]\right\}\label{matchtrm},
362: \end{eqnarray}
363: respectively.
364: The terms that appear in eq.(\ref{matchtrm}) are exactly the $\emph{O}(\alpha_{s})$ logarithmic enhanced contributions in the $\overline{MS}$ scheme.
365:
366:
367: We note that the final expression eq.(\ref{matching}) is relevant even when the variable $x$ is not large. In fact, the cross section can get the dominant
368: contributions from the integral in eq.(\ref{universal}) for values of $z$ eq.(\ref{z}) that are near the threshold even when $x$ is not close to one, because
369: of the strong
370: suppression of parton densities $F_{i}(x_{i},\mu^{2})$ when $x_{i}$ are large.
371:
372:
373: To show the importance of this resummation, we have calculated the Drell-Yan rapidity distribution for
374: proton-proton collisions at the Fermilab fixed-target experiment E866/NuSea \cite{w}. The center-of-mass energy has been fixed at $\sqrt{S}=38.76\, \textrm{GeV}$ and the
375: invariant mass of the virtual photon $\gamma^{*}$ has been chosen to be $Q^{2}=64\, \textrm{GeV}^{2}$ in analogy with \cite{admp}. Clearly the
376: contribution of the virtual $Z^{0}$ can be neglected, because its mass is much bigger than $Q^{2}$. In this case $x=0.04260$ and the upper and lower bound of the
377: hadronic rapidity $Y$ eq.(\ref{boundY}) are given by $\pm 1.57795$. We have evolved up the MRST 2001 parton distributions (taken at $\mu^{2}=1\,\textrm{GeV}^{2}$)
378: as in \cite{admp}, where the NNLO calculation is performed. However, results obtained using more modern parton sets should not be very different.
379: The LO parton set is given in \cite{mrst2} with $\alpha_{s}^{LO}(m_{Z})=0.130$ and the NLO set is given in \cite{mrst} with $\alpha_{s}^{NLO}(m_{Z})=0.119$.
380: The evolution of parton densities at the scale $\mu^{2}$ has been performed in the variable
381: flavor number scheme. The quarks has been considered massless and, at the scale of the transition of the flavor number ($N_{f}\rightarrow N_{f}+1$), the new flavor is generated
382: dynamically. The resummation formula eq.(\ref{rescrosssec}) together with eqs.(\ref{explform}-\ref{betacoeff}) has been used with the number of flavors $N_{f}=4$.
383:
384: \begin{figure}
385: \begin{center}
386: \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{lollnlof}
387: \caption{\footnotesize{Y-dependence of $d^{2}\sigma/(dQ^{2}dY)$ in units of
388: $\textrm{pb}/\textrm{GeV}^2$. The curves are, from top to bottom, the NLO result (red band), the LO+LL
389: resummation (blue band) and the LO (black band). The bands are obtained varying
390: the factorization scale between $\mu^{2}= 2Q^{2}$ and $\mu^{2}=1/2 Q^{2}$.}}
391: \label{LOLLNLO}
392: \end{center}
393: \end{figure}
394:
395:
396:
397: \begin{figure}
398: \begin{center}
399: \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{lonllnlof}
400: \caption{\footnotesize{Y-dependence of $d^{2}\sigma/(dQ^{2}dY)$ in units of
401: $\textrm{pb}/\textrm{GeV}^2$. The curves are, from top to bottom, the NLO result (red band),
402: the NLO+NLL resummation (green band)
403: and the LO (black band). The bands are obtained as in figure \ref{LOLLNLO}.}}\label{LONLONLL}
404: \end{center}
405: \end{figure}
406:
407:
408:
409: \begin{figure}
410: \begin{center}
411: \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{nllnlodtf}
412: \caption{\footnotesize{Y dependence of $d^{2}\sigma/(dQ^{2}dY)$ in units of
413: $\textrm{pb}/\textrm{GeV}^2$. The curves are, from top to bottom, the NLO result (red band) and the NLO+NLL resummation
414: (green band) together with the E866/NuSea data. The bands are obtained as in figure \ref{LOLLNLO}.}}
415: \label{NLONLLDT}
416: \end{center}
417: \end{figure}
418:
419:
420: In figure \ref{LOLLNLO}, we plot the rapidity-dependence of the cross section at LO, NLO and LO improved with LL resummation. The effect of LL resummation
421: is small compared to the effect of the full NLO correction. We see that, at leading order, the impact of the resummation is negligible in comparison to the NLO
422: fixed-order correction. This means that the NLL resummation is necessary.
423:
424:
425: The LO, the NLO and its NLL improvement cross sections are shown in figure \ref{LONLONLL}.
426: The effect of the NLL resummation in the central rapidity region is almost as large as
427: the NLO correction, but it reduces the cross section instead of enhancing it for not large values of rapidity.
428: Going from the LO result to the NLO with NLL resummation,
429: we note a reduction of the dependence on the
430: factorization scale i.e. a reduction of the theoretical error. It is interesting to observe that logarithmically enhanced
431: and constant terms account for more than 80\% of the NLO contribution for all relevant rapidities. Therefore, they have the same sign. Nevertheless a
432: suppression arises due to the shift in the complex plane of the dominant contribution of the resummed exponent. This suppression starts at order $\emph{O}(\alpha_{s}^{2})$.
433:
434:
435: In figure \ref{NLONLLDT}, we report the experimental data of \cite{w} converted to the $Y$ variable, together with our NLO and NLL resummed predictions. The agreement
436: with data is good and a great improvement for not large rapidity is obtained with respect to the NLO calculation.
437: We note also that the NLL resummation gives better result than the NNLO calculation performed in \cite{admp}. The NNLO prediction has a worse agreement
438: with data than the NLO one for not large values of rapidity.
439: This result suggests that, for the case of rapidity distributions, NLL resummation is more important than high-fixed-order calculation
440: and that it can be so even at higher center-of-mass energies.
441:
442:
443: To summarize, we have proved a resumation formula for the Drell-Yan rapidity distributions to all logarithmic accuracy and valid for all values of rapidity. Isolating a
444: universal dimensionless coefficient function,
445: which is exactly that ones of the Drell-Yan rapidity-integrated, we have shown a general procedure to obtain resummed results to NLL for the rapidity distributions of a virtual
446: photon $\gamma^{*}$ or of a real vector boson $W^{\pm},Z^{0}$. Furthermore, we have outlined a general method to
447: calculate numerical predictions and analyzed the impact of resummation for the fixed-target experiment E866/NuSea. This
448: shows that NLL resummation has an important effects on predictions of differential rapidity cross sections giving an agreement
449: with data that is better than NNLO full calculations.
450: \\\\
451: \textbf{Acknowledgements}
452: \\
453:
454: I want to thank S.~Forte and G.~Ridolfi for suggesting this problem; A.~Vicini for useful discussions about numerical calculations;
455: G.~Cerati, B.M.~Mognetti, S.~Montesano and A.~Zelioli for their concern about my programming difficulties.
456:
457: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
458: \baselineskip14pt
459: \bibitem{s}G.~Sterman,
460: %``SUMMATION OF LARGE CORRECTIONS TO SHORT DISTANCE HADRONIC CROSS-SECTIONS,''
461: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 281} (1987) 310.
462: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B281,310;%%
463: \bibitem{ct} S.~Catani and L.~Trentadue,
464: %``Resummation Of The QCD Perturbative Series For Hard Processes,''
465: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 327} (1989) 323
466: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B327,323;%%
467: %``Comment on QCD exponentiation at large x,''
468: ; Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 353} (1991) 183.
469: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B353,183;%%
470: \bibitem{v} A.~Vogt,
471: %``Next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic threshold resummation for
472: %deep-inelastic scattering and the Drell-Yan process,''
473: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 497} (2001) 228
474: [arXiv:hep-ph/0010146].
475: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010146;%%
476: %\cite{Corcella:2005us}
477: \bibitem{mc1}
478: G.~Corcella and L.~Magnea,
479: %``Soft-gluon resummation effects on parton distributions,''
480: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72} (2005) 074017
481: [arXiv:hep-ph/0506278].
482: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0506278;%%
483: %\cite{Corcella:2005ig}
484: \bibitem{mc2}
485: G.~Corcella and L.~Magnea,
486: %``Impact of large-x resummation on parton distribution functions,''
487: AIP Conf.\ Proc.\ {\bf 792} (2005) 303
488: [arXiv:hep-ph/0507042].
489: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507042;%%
490: %\cite{Collins:1984kg}
491: \bibitem{css}
492: J.~C.~Collins, D.~E.~Soper and G.~Sterman,
493: % ``Transverse Momentum Distribution In Drell-Yan Pair And W And Z Boson
494: %Production,''
495: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 250} (1985) 199.
496: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B250,199;%%
497: \bibitem{ls} E.~Laenen and G.~Sterman,
498: %``Resummation for Drell-Yan differential distributions,''
499: FERMILAB-CONF-92-359-T
500: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=fermilab-conf-92-359-t}{SPIRES entry}
501: {\it Presented at Particles \& Fields 92: 7th Meeting of the Division of Particles Fields of the APS (DPF 92) (NOTE: Dates changed from Oct 13-
502: 17), Batavia, IL, 10-14 Nov 1992}
503: \bibitem{mv} A.~Mukherjee and W.~Vogelsang,
504: %``Threshold resummation for W-boson production at RHIC,''
505: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73} (2006) 074005
506: [arXiv:hep-ph/0601162].
507: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0601162;%%
508: \bibitem{sv} G.~Sterman and W.~Vogelsang,
509: %``Threshold resummation and rapidity dependence,''
510: JHEP {\bf 0102} (2001) 016
511: [arXiv:hep-ph/0011289].
512: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011289;%%
513: \bibitem{fr} S.~Forte and G.~Ridolfi,
514: %``Renormalization group approach to soft gluon resummation,''
515: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 650} (2003) 229
516: [arXiv:hep-ph/0209154].
517: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209154;%%
518: \bibitem{admp} C.~Anastasiou, L.~J.~Dixon, K.~Melnikov and F.~Petriello,
519: %``Dilepton rapidity distribution in the Drell-Yan process at NNLO in QCD,''
520: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91} (2003) 182002
521: [arXiv:hep-ph/0306192].
522: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306192;%%
523: \bibitem{cmnt} S.~Catani, M.~L.~Mangano, P.~Nason and L.~Trentadue,
524: %``The Resummation of Soft Gluon in Hadronic Collisions,''
525: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 478} (1996) 273
526: [arXiv:hep-ph/9604351].
527: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604351;%%
528: \bibitem{lsn}
529: E.~Laenen, J.~Smith and W.~L.~van Neerven,
530: % ``All order resummation of soft gluon contributions to heavy quark production
531: %in hadron hadron collisions,''
532: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 369} (1992) 543.
533: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B369,543;%%
534: \bibitem{frru} S.~Forte, G.~Ridolfi, J.~Rojo and M.~Ubiali,
535: %``Borel resummation of soft gluon radiation and higher twists,''
536: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 635} (2006) 313
537: [arXiv:hep-ph/0601048].
538: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0601048;%%
539: \bibitem{grv} M.~Gluck, E.~Reya and A.~Vogt,
540: %``Radiatively Generated Parton Distributions For High-Energy Collisions,''
541: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 48} (1990) 471.
542: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C48,471;%%
543: \bibitem{fkl} E.~G.~Floratos, C.~Kounnas and R.~Lacaze,
544: %``Higher Order QCD Effects In Inclusive Annihilation And Deep Inelastic
545: %Scattering,''
546: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 192} (1981) 417.
547: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B192,417;%%
548: \bibitem{gly} A.~Gonzalez-Arroyo, C.~Lopez and F.~J.~Yndurain,
549: %``Second Order Contributions To The Structure Functions In Deep Inelastic
550: %Scattering. I. Theoretical Calculations,''
551: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 153} (1979) 161.
552: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B153,161;%%
553: \bibitem{bk} J.~Blumlein and S.~Kurth,
554: %``Harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to two-loop order,''
555: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 014018
556: [arXiv:hep-ph/9810241].
557: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810241;%%
558: \bibitem{g} T.~Gehrmann,
559: %``QCD corrections to double and single spin asymmetries in vector boson
560: %production at polarized hadron colliders,''
561: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 534} (1998) 21
562: [arXiv:hep-ph/9710508].
563: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9710508;%%
564: \bibitem{smrs} P.~J.~Sutton, A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts and W.~J.~Stirling,
565: %``Parton distributions for the pion extracted from Drell-Yan and prompt
566: %photon experiments,''
567: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 45} (1992) 2349.
568: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D45,2349;%%
569: \bibitem{aem} G.~Altarelli, R.~K.~Ellis and G.~Martinelli,
570: %``Large Perturbative Corrections To The Drell-Yan Process In QCD,''
571: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 157} (1979) 461.
572: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B157,461;%%
573: \bibitem{w} J.~C.~Webb {\it et al.} [NuSea Collaboration],
574: %``Absolute Drell-Yan dimuon cross sections in 800-GeV/c p p and p d
575: %collisions,''
576: arXiv:hep-ex/0302019.
577: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0302019;%%
578: \bibitem{mrst2} A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,
579: %``NNLO global parton analysis,''
580: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 531} (2002) 216
581: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201127].
582: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201127;%%
583: \bibitem{mrst} A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,
584: % ``MRST2001: Partons and alpha(s) from precise deep inelastic scattering and
585: %Tevatron jet data,''
586: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23} (2002) 73
587: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110215].
588: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110215;%%
589: \end{thebibliography}
590: \end{document}
591: